writing a research paper meme

Summer is here, and so is the sale. Get a yearly plan with up to 65% off today! 🌴🌞

• Form Builder
• Survey Maker
• AI Form Generator
• AI Survey Tool
• AI Quiz Maker
• Store Builder
• WordPress Plugin

HubSpot CRM

Google Sheets

Google Analytics

Microsoft Excel

• Popular Forms
• Job Application Form Template
• Rental Application Form Template
• Hotel Accommodation Form Template
• Online Registration Form Template
• Employment Application Form Template
• Application Forms
• Booking Forms
• Consent Forms
• Contact Forms
• Donation Forms
• Customer Satisfaction Surveys
• Employee Satisfaction Surveys
• Evaluation Surveys
• Feedback Surveys
• Market Research Surveys
• Personality Quiz Template
• Geography Quiz Template
• Math Quiz Template
• Science Quiz Template
• Vocabulary Quiz Template

Try without registration Quick Start

Read engaging stories, how-to guides, learn about forms.app features.

Inspirational ready-to-use templates for getting started fast and powerful.

Spot-on guides on how to use forms.app and make the most out of it.

See the technical measures we take and learn how we keep your data safe and secure.

• Integrations
• Help Center
• Sign In Sign Up Free
• 40+ Hilarious research memes that will make you smile

Şeyma Beyazçiçek

Researches are part of our lives, especially if you are a forever learner. While doing research, we have been through similar difficulties or experienced the same feelings. In order to show these common points, internet memes come to our aid!

In this blog, you will see excellent any kind of material, such as UX research memes, clinical research memes, psychology research memes, and research paper memes. If you want to take a break and enjoy your time, you should definitely take a look at our 40 hilarious Research memes that will make you laugh :  

• 1. Tip of the iceberg

#1 Research meme - Source: Facebook - High Impact PhD

In the background of each research, there are nights, days, weeks, and even months spent time and effort for the research. So, the paper itself is just a little concrete form of all the effort and work. 

2. There is no destination!

#2 Research meme - Source: Make a meme

Researches are like living. There is no destination, but it is a journey! As you read and see, you will realize the limitless world of knowledge. 

3. But it sounds cool, isn’t it?

#3 Research meme - Source: Quick meme

When we need to do research, the first thing to do is to google it, right? We seem to have no better option as the first step in our era. 

4. Don’t want to check🫣

#4 Research meme - Source: Ah See it

Before submitting the paper, reading it might feel like it is not good enough. If you do not want to feel like that, all you need to do is submit it without the last check. 🤗

• 5. Memes matter🤨

#5 Research meme - Source: Reddit

When it comes to doing Research about anything not related to the Research topic, everything seems to be worth reading and learning. Especially if it is a meme!

6. They are always one step ahead!

#6 Research meme - Source: Facebook- High Impact PhD Memes

It is undeniable that applied research with sensational findings always gathers more attention and funding. Basic research is always doomed to lose spotlights. 😏

7. Vs the reality

#7 Research meme - Source: Pinterest

When you tell people that you are doing psych research, everybody imagines something different. However, the reality is completely different from their picture. But calm down; at least we know that you are drowning among the papers.

8. Don’t want to be THAT person

#8 Research meme - Source: Illinois

If you are the person who made somebody do psych Research or made them into psychology, you should definitely question yourself and your actions. 👀 

9. None can say the opposite!

#9 Research meme - Source: Giphy

If one has never done any research, s/he can assume that you begin a research, develop, and finish it. Nevertheless, of course, the process is way much more complicated than that! 

• 10. Welcome to the Research-lover club🫶

#10 Research meme - Source: Imgflip

If you are into research, any topic will be a duty for you. A new phone? A holiday plan? A trip abroad? Considered it done because the necessary research is done!

11. Me trying not to be a square

#11 Research meme - Source: Facebook- High Impact PhD Memes 

When you attempt to try a new research method for the first time, you might feel the anxiety of not knowing what you are doing. But as you do, it gets better, we promise. 

12. That’s the only smart thing to do 😎

#12 Research meme - Source: Meme-arsenal

Before making an important decision, no matter what, you should definitely do your research because it is how cool people act! 

13. UX Research is everything!

#13 Research meme - Source: Playbook UX

If you are a UX designer, you can share this meme with confidence. The picture given above summarizes the importance of UX research very well. 

14. Watch me, then 😈

#14 Research meme - Source: Pinterest

Yes, probably it is not a paper that can be written the night before; we know that. But if there is no other option left, it is possible turning into a writing machine. ⌨️

• 15. It is a serious job🧐

#15 Research meme - Source: Memes

While doing research, the most significant part is to collect data related to your topic in your most serious mood. It is essential but hard to keep this mood for a long time. 

16. Am I just perfect or bad at self-feedback?

#16 Research meme - Source: Tumblr

It seems like it is easier to find somebody else’s errors or criticize it. But when it comes to ours, our mistakes come suddenly invisible. Science needs to explain this!

17. I want to break free🎶

#17 Research meme - Source: McGill

While working on our research papers, we know that you do not completely feel free and work as you wish. Practicum supervisors are like a limit for research. 

18. Above the clouds☁️

#18 Research meme - Source: Imgflip

While doing the research, there is always a crowd of tabs that we cannot dare close. But, when we complete the research, it is the most satisfying feeling to close all the tabs finally.

19. So am I…

#19 Research meme - Source: Make a meme

This process is challenging both physically and psychologically, for sure. So, finishing a research paper might feel like someone who survived a battle scene. 

• 20. Look, I am famous!

#20 Research meme - Source: Twitter-High Impact PhD Memes

It is a really really satisfactory feeling to see your work online! Also, reading your work from someone else’s perspective is quite fun. 

21. It is hard to keep your energy stable 📉

#21 Research meme - Source: Meme-arsenal

At the beginning of the semester, we have big energy and motivation to start our paper. However, at the end of the semester, it is hard to feel the same enthusiasm and energy.  

22. Why would they?😭

#22 Research meme

Yes, we know that the question is optional, but still, it hurts us… When the respondents skip the question, we feel the rejection of the bone. 💔

23. So, what a medical researcher does?

#23 Research meme - Source: Mosio

When you tell people that you are a medical researcher, everybody might assume or imagine your work differently. This meme given above is a good illustration of the situation. 

24. The hardest part is done 👍

#24 Research meme - Source: Quick meme

Sometimes, it is hard to understand the topic or instructions of the research. When you understand it, it gets easier. However, when you complete your research and realize that you did wrong from the beginning, it is like a nightmare!

• 25. No kid, just no.

#25 Research meme - Source: Memes happen

Yes, Wikipedia is also a source of information. But when the data is taken as copy and paste, it is an unacceptable mistake that a professional never ever does!

26. It is worthy ✨

#26 Research Meme

Looking at your final work and being able to be proud of the paper feels like a real victory! Is the paper good? Yes. Am I okay? Doesn’t matter. 🤝

27. Hard to tell🤔

#27 Research meme - Source: Make a meme

Both quantitive research and qualitative research have pros. But it is like a dilemma to make a decision between these two. 

28. But I googled it 😏

#28 Research meme - Source: Quick meme

Yes, it is not possible to do our research in libraries. Instead, we google our questions and topics. Still, it is research, isn’t it?😇

29. Do not confuse me, please🙏

#29 Research meme - Source: Twitter - Iopsyche Memes

Sometimes, our research does not give us what we want. However, we can turn these opposite ideas into the next work. Looking on the bright side is our job! 

• 30. Which one are you?

#30 Research meme - Source: 9GAG

If you want to be the muscled dog, take your job seriously. Otherwise, you will be the weak dog if you do not work like a professional! 

31. 🥁Drum rolls🥁

#31 Research meme - Source: Memes happen

Imagine that you have already prepared the 15 pages of your research, and your PI tells you to start over. The pain🤡

32. It is time to be serious

#32 Research meme - Source: Cheezburger

Yes, the research is important. There should not be any spelling errors. But memes never allow spelling eros. Check it once, twice, three times, four times, five times….

33. That critical decision

#33 Research meme - Source: Meme-arsenal

It is essential to read the important papers related to the topic. But when it takes too much time and delays the time of starting your own research, it might feel anxious.😶

34. Let’s calm down

#34 Research meme - Source: Joey deVilla

One cannot deny that Google is a source of information today. But still, simply scrolling through pages on Google does not give you a good research paper. 

• 35. Let your confidence speak!

#35 Research meme - Source: Giphy

When you are well-equipped for a topic that you have done your research before, and you witness that someone is talking totally wrong about it, you can let your self-confidence speak!

36. A product without UX Research?!

#36 Research meme - Source: Twitter - Doug Collins

The importance of UX research can be fully understood when a product is launched without UX research. 

37. Let’s make it spicy🪩

#37 Research meme - Source: LinkedIn

If your cries for help are ignored, all you need to do is to name the docs in a fun way, just like the example given above. 😊

38. The moment of confusion

#38 Research meme - Source: Memes

When you think about too much of your research, it starts to seem wrong and correct at the same time. So, not to feel burn-out, avoid thinking about too much. 

39. Social media and research?

#39 Research meme - Source: Ah See It 

Digital culture has changed many things. When we witness someone on social media mention their research, it does not sound reassuring, right? 

• 40. It is what it is

#40 Research meme - Source: Make a meme

I have not slept, and I have not eaten properly lately. I am also not socializing in these last days. But it does not matter because I finished my research. 👍 

In this post, we have collected funny research paper memes, UX research memes, funny clinical research memes, or research memes in gif forms to make you smile. Memes are an excellent form of common feelings, and if these memes were able to help you have a great time, we are even happier than you! 

Şeyma is a content writer at forms.app. She loves art and traveling. She is passionate about reading and writing. Şeyma has expertise in surveys, survey questions, giveaways, statistics, and online forms.

• Form Features
• Data Collection

Table of Contents

Related posts.

What is RAPID decision making model: Definition & examples

Fatih Serdar Çıtak

Announcing forms.app Profile: Bring your links & forms together

5 consent form examples that will save your day

27 Hilarious Peer Review Memes for Academics and Researchers 🤓🔬

Welcome to our latest blog post! If you’re part of the academic or research community, you know that the peer review process, while essential, can be a rollercoaster of emotions. That’s why we’ve compiled a collection of 27 side-splitting peer review memes that perfectly capture the ups, downs, and quirky moments of academic life . From the endless cycle of revisions to the mysterious vanishing reviewer, these memes offer a light-hearted look at the challenges and idiosyncrasies we all face in the world of research. So, take a break from your scholarly endeavors, and let’s dive into some academic humor that’s sure to bring a smile to your face! 📚😂

Top 27 Hilarious Peer Review Memes:

“Finding a Minor Error” : A scientist triumphantly holding a magnifying glass over a stack of research papers, with the caption: “When you spot a minor error in a well-written paper .”

“Reviewer 2 Strikes Again” : A trio of superheroes labeled “Reviewer 1,” “Reviewer 3,” and a villain labeled “Reviewer 2,” with the caption: “The never-ending battle in peer review.”

“Endless Revisions” : A researcher sitting at a computer , surrounded by piles of crumpled paper and coffee cups , with a calendar showing months passing by. Caption: “Just one more revision they said.”

“The Waiting Game” : A skeleton sitting at a computer with an inbox still waiting for peer review feedback, captioned: “Still waiting for the reviewers’ comments.”

“The Optimistic Author” : An author submitting a paper with stars in their eyes , dreaming of acceptance. Next panel shows them receiving revision requests, with a caption: “Reality hits hard.”

“Citation Overload” : An overstuffed sandwich with each layer labeled as a different citation, captioned: “When reviewers ask for more citations.”

“Lost in Translation” : A researcher looking confused at a screen showing review comments that are vague and contradictory, captioned: “Trying to decipher reviewer feedback.”

“Data Juggling” : A scientist juggling multiple charts and graphs, with the caption: “When reviewers ask for additional data analysis.”

“The Perfect Match” : Two researchers finding each other on a dating app, only to realize they are reviewer and author of a contentious paper, captioned: “When your peer review is too close to home.”

“The Methodology Maze” : An image of a researcher looking perplexed at a complex maze, with each turn labeled with different research methods. Caption: “Navigating the methodology section as per reviewer’s suggestions.”

“Infinite Edits Loop” : A flowchart looping endlessly between “Submit Revision” and “Receive More Edits”. Caption: “The never-ending cycle of peer review.”

“Reviewer’s Crystal Ball” : A mystic crystal ball with the words “Future Studies” inside it. Caption: “When reviewers expect you to predict and address future research outcomes.”

“The Jargon Jungle” : A researcher hacking through a dense jungle, where each plant is labeled with complex scientific jargon. Caption: “Trying to simplify language as suggested by reviewers.”

“Expectation vs. Reality: Results Section” : Two panels; the first showing a neat, straightforward graph (Expectation), and the second showing a messy, complicated graph (Reality). Caption: “What reviewers expect vs. what you have.”

“The Ghost Reviewer” : A ghost hovering over a computer, ignoring the email reminders. Caption: “The mysterious case of the disappearing reviewer.”

“Conference Call Confusion” : A group of confused researchers on a video call, with speech bubbles of contradictory comments. Caption: “When every reviewer has a different opinion.”

“The Lengthy Literature Review” : A researcher buried under a mountain of books and papers. Caption: “When reviewers ask for a ‘brief’ literature review update.”

“Graphs Galore” : A researcher surrounded by an overwhelming number of graphs and charts, looking bewildered. Caption: “When one reviewer asks for more data visualization.”

“The Keyword Conundrum” : A researcher looking at a thesaurus with a confused expression, surrounded by a cloud of keywords. Caption: “When reviewers suggest using ‘more specific’ keywords.”

“Revision Rollercoaster” : A rollercoaster ride with highs labeled “Acceptance” and lows labeled “Major Revisions.” Caption: “The emotional rollercoaster of manuscript revisions.”

“The Citation Detective” : A detective with a magnifying glass inspecting a citation, with the caption: “When reviewers question every single reference.”

“Reviewer Roulette” : A roulette wheel with sections labeled as different reviewer personalities (e.g., “The Nitpicker,” “The Over-Enthusiast,” “The Ghost”). Caption: “Spinning the wheel to see what kind of reviewer you’ll get this time .”

“Conference Deadline Panic” : A researcher frantically typing on a laptop with a calendar showing a looming conference date . Caption: “Trying to incorporate last-minute review comments before the conference deadline.”

“The Abstract Abyss” : A researcher staring into a swirling vortex labeled “Abstract.” Caption: “When you have to summarize years of work in 250 words.”

“Data Dive” : An image of a diver surrounded by a sea of data points and graphs. Caption: “Exploring the depths of data analysis after reviewer feedback.”

“The Overzealous Editor” : A cartoon of an editor with a giant red pen , crossing out huge sections of a manuscript. Caption: “When the editor gets a little too enthusiastic with revisions.”

“Peer Review Poker” : Researchers sitting around a poker table, holding cards with different sections of a manuscript. Caption: “Bluffing your way through the peer review process.”

And there you have it – 27 hilariously relatable peer review memes that every academic and researcher will understand and appreciate. Whether you’ve faced the enigmatic Reviewer 2, endured the endless revisions, or navigated the complex maze of methodology, these memes are a humorous reminder that you’re not alone in this journey. Share these with your colleagues to spread some laughter in your lab or library . Remember, a little humor goes a long way in making the rigorous journey of research a bit more enjoyable. Stay tuned for more academic insights and light-hearted content! 🌟📉

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

77 Funny Book Writing Memes for Authors and Writers

Hey, writers. It’s good to see you here instead of hard at work on your current writing project. Of course, we know that it’s important to have some downtime and to have a bit of a laugh, which is why we’ve collected these 77 fun memes that do a rather good job of poking fun at the truth of what it is to be a writer. Have fun checking them out. You might just see a bit of yourself in them.

“Why Can’t You Just Get Your Book Published?”

Just tell a publisher to publish the book…. You beautiful genius, why didn’t we writers think of that?

Writers When They’re Determined to Do Anything

Why finish a book when there are so many other important things to do, like, well, anything except finish? After all, the crevices in the keyboard don’t clean themselves, do they?

Getting Those Thoughts Down on Paper

It always feels like the best characters are trapped inside our big brains, but we aren’t quite smart enough to help them get out and on the page.

How I Tell a Story

Does this sound familiar? It’s not our fault. What some may see as scatterbrained, we can tell ourselves, is simply a mad genius at work.

When You Find a Typo in a Published Book

Ah, yes, the dichotomy of typos. It feels so good when you find a typo in someone else’s published book, but so bad when you see one in your own.

Red Pill or Blue Pill?

Overcomplicating things and spending hours creating the perfect Spotify playlist for a story that will never see the light of day hits close to home, doesn’t it?

Respond to Bad Reviews

All publicity’s good publicity, right? While bad reviews aren’t going to do you any favors, lashing out against a reviewer will hurt your brand… no matter how good it might feel.

Picking Between Past and Present Tenses

Few things make writers tenser than talking about tenses.

I Just Hope I Find It Along the Way

This is how a lot of great stories start . It’s also how a lot of manifestos tend to start, so be careful.

Rewriting the Beginning 50 Times

The middle is where many writers fear to tread. Surely, if you just tweak the beginning another one or fifty times, the middle will be easier.

Who’s Been Keeping Me From Writing

Writing isn’t easy, but it’s a lot harder when your biggest obstacle to getting things done is the weirdo staring back at you from the mirror.

The World Right Now

The real world can be a bummer. It’s no wonder writers spend so much time in their own heads. It’s often the best place to be.

Writing vs. Editing the First Draft

It appears you even threw the kitchen sink into the first draft. Sounds good now, but just wait until you have to edit.

Two Kinds of People 

Want to make a writer curse like Yosemite Sam and fight like a Spartan? Go ahead and dogear the pages in their favorite books.

Most Difficult Things About Writing

Admit it. We’ve all gone down the rabbit hole of character names for hours and days on end, searching for that perfect name with meaning, history, and gravitas. And then we wind up using Jack or Kate because it’s easier to type.

The Present Tense

With this type of tense problem, it might just be easier to give up and learn a completely new skill. Maybe basketweaving.

“Your Parents Are Dead”

Seriously, how many characters have one or more dead parents to give them “character”? In literature and pop culture, from Bambi to Batman, parents have it rough.

My First Draft

Your brain is a wonderful, powerful tool, but that first draft always comes out like a child’s first finger painting. It’s messy, it might be a dog or a dinosaur, but it can be turned into something special. Probably.

When Someone Finds Your First Draft 

The only thing worse than cringing when reading your first draft is finding out that someone else has seen your first draft.

“I Trusted You”

Just keep telling yourself that it’s only a fictional death. Tell your therapist and your tissue box the same thing.

Being a Good Writer

And here you are… reading these memes and telling yourself that it’s still “writing work” because you are “getting ready”.

A Day in the Life of a Writer

Hey, this is rather accurate, except we’re missing the parts about feeling like an imposter and wondering whether that new show you want to stream is out yet.

Genius Level of an Author

Even worse is the location where you tend to have those great ideas. We all know that it’s usually in the bathroom.

I Think I Did a Pretty Good Job

If only we all had this kind of confidence in ourselves as writers! Honestly, though, don’t write reviews for yourself… the Internet will find you and make sure you know how wrong you are.

I Wonder if…

Well, this is a great way to start a horror story . Now what happens when they start trying to get in touch with you?

How I Feel When I Write a Plot Twist

Oh, that plot twist feels so great when you come up with it… until you realize that you confused twist with a trope.

Trying to Work Out if the Plot Ties Together

Plot seems easy, but we all know it’s not. It’s like doing long division in your head while walking barefoot across a floor filled with Legos.

The List of Books That I’ve Actually Finished Writing

Yeah… but at least you have a list.

Writing in the Middle of the Night

Honestly, there’s not much of a difference between vampires and writers, except that vampires tend to be more organized and better dressers.

I Will Find You

It’s not a lack of ideas that plagues most writers. It’s the lack of a pen and paper to write them down while on the toilet.

Brace Yourself and Kill the Character 

Yes, kill the character, but make sure you wear gloves and bury the body deep.

I Have No Memory of This Place

This is where you convince yourself that you never really liked the story, so you can start that new idea.

If we’re being honest, most of us are actually some combination of the first and the sixth image here. I mean, we sometimes look at a sheet of paper.

When You Write Something Really Dark 

And then you start to worry about the authorities checking your online search history.

Me Listening to Music While Writing

We all know that we have those ideal “theme songs” for everything we write. Don’t pretend you’re any different.

The Reality of My Writing

With a little massaging and edits even this could work… or not.

When People Try to Read Your Unfinished Writing

This is when it’s time to start poking at some eyes and smacking hands.

New Project vs. Unfinished Projects

There’s nothing sweeter than the kernel of a new idea. Until you’ve actually thought about it and played around a bit. Then there’s that next new idea.

My Creativity

Creativity is like the friend who tries to hype you up to do something dangerous and then just leaves you standing alone in the middle of the restaurant in your underwear.

20 More Words for a Paper 

And here’s why writing toward word counts can be a problem. I mean, “here is”.

Writers have more excuses than a kid who wants to get out of gym class on dodgeball day.

Finding Your First Typo in Your Published Book

If you’ve ever wanted to know what it feels like to have your heart drop into a bucket of ice water and embarrassment, here it is.

I Wrote a Novel in Second Person

To be honest, the writer deserves to be there. Second person for a novel is an abomination.

How to Be Successful

“Here’s what you need, kid. You need a little luck, a little talent, and a couple of those plot things from Jersey Jim down on 52nd Street. Yeah, that’s how you do it.”

A Famous Writer

You would probably be better off with a career in just about anything else aside from venomous snake wrangler. And even then…

Time to Get to Work

So, this is what it’s like when people feel called out about something. Not cool, Padme. Not cool.

A Serial Killer’s Google Search History

Seriously, if there’s a serial killer in the city and the authorities started looking at search histories, writers are screwed.

The Main Villain

This is a little like turning a raging wolf into a tiny lap dog wearing a jaunty hat. It doesn’t always work, and it can take away some of the allure and mystery from your original Big Bad.

A Character With Living Parents

Well, that’s impossible. Characters don’t have living parents. Time to pack it up and become a full-time blueberry farmer.

A Total Emotional Hellscape

Sure, it makes us sad. Yet, we continue to do it. We writers are sadistic gods of our created worlds, and we like the power.

Writers After Killing Your Favorite Character 

Writers have a heart. Honest. We just keep ours in a little jar in the cabinet.

When You Write 200 Years of World History 

Worldbuilding is nature’s way to keep the population of fantasy writers in check.

Adverbs Everywhere

Think of adverbs as characters you don’t like. Kill them with impunity and smile while doing it.

Story Idea vs. First Draft

At least you recognize that the first draft is a little goofy… some writers just press submit.

It’s Called an Oughtobiography

Instead of reading this clever meme, you “ought to be” writing.

Delete Charakter

When you have a character that doesn’t fit… just pluck them out of the story like aliens beaming up a farmer in Indiana. Find another story for them.

Manuscript Evolution

I’d like to say that it gets easier with time, but I don’t like to lie.

All the Random Subplots Without Cohesion

Don’t worry. No one will notice. Honest. Wait, I don’t like to lie.

When I Finally Write the End

Honestly, there’s no better feeling. So, to get that good feeling faster, start your books backwards.

Something Useless and Unpractical

It’s a good feeling. All that worldbuilding is great. You aren’t getting any further on your story, but hey, you do you.

Where Does It Hurt

Everyone says technology is the way of the future. This happens too often, and everyone starts looking for stone tablets and chisels.

When Only 10 People Read Your Book

It’s not the size of your audience that counts, it’s the journey. You’ll grow stronger, and maybe some fresh “eyes” to see where you can do better.

I’m Going to Become a Writer

This is disturbingly accurate. Of course, it would’ve been nice if the guidance counselor had actually told me this. At least then, I could’ve made an informed decision.

Alright… “Chapter 1”

You laugh, but how many would-be writers are slowly decaying in front of the blank page right now. Not so funny now is it?

At the Third and Last Act of Editing 

Editing has to be some sort of karmic retribution we’re all suffering because of the transgressions of some writer from the past, right?

Some Sort of Bullshit Energy

If you use enough fancy high-tech-sounding words and have people with lab coats and clipboards in scenes, no one will notice.

How I Speak vs. How I Write

Writers have two creatures living in us. One is refined, charming, and intelligent. It doesn’t get out much. The other creature is rabid, weird, and always present.

What Gives People Feelings of Power 

It doesn’t seem like it takes much to please a writer. Just finish a chapter… just finish a chapter. Little do people know that’s like milking a cobra.

Villain vs. Mentor Character

Sometimes, we do get attached to the characters. We don’t want to let them go. But our villains have to be villainous. They can’t just shake their fist at the sky.

After a Character Runs Out of Meaning

Of course, for fantasy, urban fantasy, and horror authors, the coffin just ends up adding more character meaning.

Am I Researching or Just Procrastinating

To the untrained eye, it appears as though I’m procrastinating. But am I researching? No, I’m procrastinating!

It’s Free Character Development 

Well, it’s part of humanity, so it can be part of a character. Of course, this often serves as a dark mirror for many writers.

Finishing the Current Chapter

Yes, this is procrastinating, but it’s also writing… so, we should probably come up with another word for it. Procrastin-writing?

Very Little Overlap 

These little circles show the truth. But when you hit that sliver in the middle, it’s like magic.

That Plot Twist

This is like a surprise fart, but one that you and others will enjoy because it doesn’t stink.

The Tone I Wanted to Write the Story in

Honestly, this might say a lot about you and what you have inside. Not that it’s a bad thing.

Killing New Characters, You’re Attached to

Sometimes killing makes us sad, sometimes it makes us happy. If we weren’t writers, we’d be in prison.

How many times did you see yourself in these memes? Let’s be honest. Writers who have been at it for more than a couple of days are sure to find a lot of humor and a lot of truth in the memes. Hope you had fun with them and even more importantly, isn’t it time you got back to that work in progress?

Yves Lummer

As the founder of BookBird, Yves Lummer has pioneered a thriving community for authors, leading more than 100,000 of them towards their dreams of self-publishing. His expertise in book marketing has become a catalyst for multiple best-sellers, establishing his reputation as an influential figure in the publishing world.

Elements of a Story: 8 Story Elements Explained

February 6, 2024

170 Book Puns: Funny Puns & Jokes You’ll Never Forget

February 4, 2024

Side Character: Definition, Examples & Writing Tips

How to Start a Story: 10 Secret Writing Tips

Inciting Incident: Definition, Purpose & Examples

January 23, 2024

Biography vs. Autobiography vs. Memoir: Art of Life Stories

November 22, 2023

Privacy Overview

Get the Access to the Collection of Ultimate Templates, Tools, and Courses to Build Your Own Self-Publishing Empire.

• Interesting
• Scholarships
• UGC-CARE Journals

PhD Memes About Research Life | High Impact PhD memes

ilovephd phd memes

Explore the world of “High Impact PhD Memes,” where humor meets academia. This collection of memes delves into the unique challenges and relatable moments of the PhD journey. From battling writer’s block to celebrating small victories, these memes capture the essence of research life. Join fellow doctoral candidates in sharing a laugh and finding solace in shared experiences. Get ready to dive into the comical side of academia!

Check this impact meme, interesting and funny PhD memes about research life from iLovePhD Memes Facebook Page

This is how I Run my PhD Life with Research Problems and Life Problems

Research Gap Identified

A Night Before Thesis Defense

When My Supervisor Shouts At Me

Position to Read Article in PDF

References and Review Paper

I heard he’s doing PhD in stress management

ILovePhD’s Meme Presented in the Final Thesis Defense

How deadlines chsing me

Motivation During First and Final year of the PhD

Can you Proof Read my Article

Cofee with First Publication Motivate a lot

Ph.D. Couple Goals | We Love PhD

Forget Princess I Want to be a Scientist – PhD Memes

Difference between First and Fifth year in LAB

PhD Scholar after Thesis Defence

Graphical Abstract vs. Abstract – PhD Memes

Welcome to PhD – Memes

When you notice people reading your research work but no one citing it.

Where is the novelty

PhD advisor before and after PhD admission

What if someone had published your idea

Eat and Innovate

Difference between Theory and Practice

Procrastination to write a research paper

Advisor with new project ideas

What I am doing in Life | Why I joined PhD

Show the difference between existing vs proposed work

Before deadline vs after deadline

When your experiment gives outstanding result but you don’t know how

The idea of graduating and having to write my thesis

When scholar says he/she will submit manuscript draft tomorrow, but it’s been 6 months now

When everything is going wring in your life but you’re used to it

Study vs Stress Meme

Lab on Sunday

When you start thinking about your research during dinner

“High Impact PhD Memes” offers a humorous and relatable glimpse into the world of research and academia. These memes resonate with the experiences of doctoral candidates, highlighting the challenges, victories, and moments of camaraderie that define the PhD journey. As we explore this collection, it becomes evident that humor can be a powerful tool for coping with the rigors of research life. So, whether you’re in the midst of your own PhD adventure or simply curious about the world of academia, these memes provide a lighthearted and insightful perspective that brings a smile to your face and a sense of connection to the scholarly community.

• getting a phd memes
• High impact PhD memes
• high impact phd memes twitter
• interstellar phd memes
• latest phd memes
• love phd memes
• md phd memes
• Peer Reviewer
• phd dissertation memes
• phd doctor memes
• phd humor memes
• phd jokes memes
• phd memes facebook
• phd memes funny
• phd memes instagram
• phd memes jokes tamil
• phd memes postdoc
• phd memes reddit
• phd memes tamil
• phd memes twitter
• phd research memes
• phd student memes
• phd student phd memes
• phd supervisor memes
• phd thesis on memes
• phd thesis writing memes

Top 10 UK Universities Welcoming Commonwealth Professional Fellows

10 mind-blowing ai projects transforming medical imaging, 150+ innovative generative ai project ideas: transforming industries and advancing technology, leave a reply cancel reply, most popular, 5 free gptzero alternatives that actually work in 2024: unmask ai content now, download research papers for free: legal and ethical methods, walk-in-interview for junior research fellowships at drdo, dbt-research associateship in biotechnology & life sciences for 2024-25, wise-scope fellowship program: addressing societal challenges, 480 ugc care list of journals – science – 2024, how to complete your phd in 3 years, best for you, 24 best online plagiarism checker free – 2024, what is phd, popular posts, reviewer three: unveiling the world of peer review, how to check scopus indexed journals 2024, popular category.

• POSTDOC 317
• Interesting 258
• Journals 234
• Fellowship 133
• Research Methodology 102
• All Scopus Indexed Journals 92

Mail Subscription

iLovePhD is a research education website to know updated research-related information. It helps researchers to find top journals for publishing research articles and get an easy manual for research tools. The main aim of this website is to help Ph.D. scholars who are working in various domains to get more valuable ideas to carry out their research. Learn the current groundbreaking research activities around the world, love the process of getting a Ph.D.

Contact us: [email protected]

Google News

Copyright © 2024 iLovePhD. All rights reserved

• Artificial intelligence

Scientific Publishing Is a Joke

An XKCD comic—and its many remixes—perfectly captures the absurdity of academic research.

A real scientific advance, like a successful date, needs both preparation and serendipity. As a tired, single medical student, I used to feel lucky when I managed two good dates in a row. But career scientists must continually create this kind of magic. Universities judge their research faculty not so much by the quality of their discoveries as by the number of papers they’ve placed in scholarly journals, and how prestigious those journals happen to be. Scientists joke (and complain) that this relentless pressure to pad their résumés often leads to flawed or unoriginal publications. So when Randall Munroe, the creator of the long-running webcomic XKCD , laid out this problem in a perfect cartoon last week, it captured the attention of scientists—and inspired many to create versions specific to their own disciplines. Together, these became a global, interdisciplinary conversation about the nature of modern research practices.

The cartoon is, like most XKCD comics, a simple back-and-white line drawing with a nerdy punch line. It depicts a taxonomy of the 12 “Types of Scientific Paper,” presented in a grid. “The immune system is at it again,” one paper’s title reads. “My colleague is wrong and I can finally prove it,” declares another. The gag reveals how research literature, when stripped of its jargon, is just as susceptible to repetition, triviality, pandering, and pettiness as other forms of communication. The cartoon’s childlike simplicity, though, seemed to offer cover for scientists to critique and celebrate their work at the same time.

The concept was intuitive—and infinitely remixable. Within a couple of days, the sociologist Kieran Healy had created a version of the grid for his field; its entries included “This seems very weird and bad but it’s perfectly rational when you’re poor,” and “I take a SOCIOLOGICAL approach, unlike SOME people.” Epidemiologists got on board too—“We don’t really have a clue what we’re doing: but here are some models!” Statisticians , perhaps unsurprisingly, also geeked out: “A new robust variance estimator that nobody needs.” (I don’t get it either.) You couldn’t keep the biologists away from the fun (“New microscope!! Yours is now obsolete”), and—in their usual fashion—the science journalists soon followed (“Readers love animals”). A doctoral student cobbled together a website to help users generate their own versions. We reached Peak Meme with the creation of a meta-meme outlining a taxonomy of academic-paper memes. At that point, the writer and internet activist Cory Doctorow lauded the collective project of producing these jokes as “an act of wry, insightful auto-ethnography—self-criticism wrapped in humor that tells a story.”

Put another way: The joke was on target. “The meme hits the right nerve,” says Vinay Prasad, an associate epidemiology professor and a prominent critic of medical research . “Many papers serve no purpose, advance no agenda, may not be correct, make no sense, and are poorly read. But they are required for promotion.” The scholarly literature in many fields is riddled with extraneous work; indeed, I’ve always been intrigued by the idea that this sorry outcome was more or less inevitable, given the incentives at play. Take a bunch of clever, ambitious people and tell them to get as many papers published as possible while still technically passing muster through peer review … and what do you think is going to happen? Of course the system gets gamed: The results from one experiment get sliced up into a dozen papers, statistics are massaged to produce more interesting results, and conclusions become exaggerated . The most prolific authors have found a way to publish more than one scientific paper a week. Those who can’t keep up might hire a paper mill to do (or fake) the work on their behalf.

In medicine, at least, the urgency of COVID-19 only made it easier to publish a lot of articles very quickly. The most prestigious journals— The New England Journal of Medicine , the Journal of the American Medical Association , and The Lancet —have traditionally reserved their limited space for large, expensive clinical trials. During the pandemic, though, they started rapidly accepting reports that described just a handful of patients. More than a few CVs were beefed up along the way. Scientists desperate to stay relevant began to shoehorn COVID-19 into otherwise unrelated research, says Saurabh Jha, an associate radiology professor and a deputy editor of the journal Academic Radiology .

A staggering 200,000 COVID-19 papers have already been published, of which just a tiny proportion will ever be read or put into practice. To be fair, it’s hard to know in advance which data will prove most useful during an unprecedented health crisis. But pandemic publishing has only served to exacerbate some well-established bad habits, Michael Johansen, a family-medicine physician and researcher who has criticized many studies as being of minimal value, told me. “COVID publications appear to be representative of the literature at large: a few really important papers and a whole bunch of stuff that isn’t or shouldn’t be read,” he said. Peer-reviewed results confirming that our vaccines really work, for example, could lead to millions of lives being saved. Data coming out of the United Kingdom’s nationwide RECOVERY trial have provided strong evidence for now-standard treatments such as dexamethasone. But that weird case report? Another modeling study trying to predict the unpredictable? They’re good for a news cycle, maybe, but not for real medical care. And some lousy studies have even undermined the treatment of COVID-19 patients ( hydroxychloroquine has entered the chat).

I should pause here to acknowledge that I’m a hypocrite. “Some thoughts on how everyone else is bad at research” is listed as one of the facetious article types in the original XKCD comic, yet here I am rehashing the same idea, with an internet-culture angle. Unfortunately, because The Atlantic isn’t included in scientific databases, publishing this piece will do nothing to advance my academic career. “Everyone recognizes it’s a hamster-in-a-wheel situation, and we are all hamsters,” says Anirban Maitra, a physician and scientific director at MD Anderson Cancer Center. (He created a version of the “12 Types” meme for my own beloved field: “A random pathology paper with the phrase ‘artificial intelligence’ in the title.”) Maitra has built a successful career by running in the publication wheel—his own bibliography now includes more than 300 publications —but he says he has no idea how to fix the system’s flaws. In fact, none of the scientists I talked with could think of a realistic solution. If science has become a punch line, then we haven’t yet figured out how to get rid of the setup.

While the XKCD comic can be read as critical of the scientific enterprise, part of its viral appeal is that it also conveys the joy that scientists feel in nerding out about their favorite topics. (“Hey, I found a trove of old records! They don’t turn out to be particularly useful, but still, cool!”) Publication metrics have become a sad stand-in for quality in academia, but maybe there’s a lesson in the fact that even a webcomic can arouse so much passion and collaboration across the scientific community. Surely there’s a better way to cultivate knowledge than today’s endless grid of black-and-white papers.

About the Author

More Stories

Does Med School Have a DEI Problem?

Cancer Supertests Are Here

"research paper" Memes & GIFs

Imgflip pro.

• AI creation tools & better GIFs
• Custom 6x6 profile icon and new colors
• Your images are featured instantly in auto-approve-sfw streams
• Your images jump to the top of approval queues

Research Paper

Research Paper | image tagged in gifs,research paper,pulp fiction,writing | made w/ Imgflip video-to-gif maker

Adapting Memes for Qualitative Research

Filed Under: Market Research , Tools & Techniques , Focus Groups , Qualitative Research

Shaili Bhatt

Alum, Online Qualitative Research

When writing a discussion guide, it’s wonderful to be able to tap into resources that already exist in order to craft a well-rounded discussion.

A treasure trove of creative activities to elicit people’s thoughts and feelings beyond a surface level already exist. They are readily available to moderators of all experience levels, so it’s a big research-geek thrill when inspiration sparks for a projective activity with a new angle!

Our online qual team here at C+R enjoys passing around new links, for information or sheer entertainment. Twitter searches, Pinterest, and social publishers like Mashable, BuzzFeed and Reddit are some of our current sources for inspiration. In fact, when I came across the “What I Really Do” storyboard meme in 2012, one of the Top Memes for 2012, with all of its visual glory and bite-size insights, I was very excited!

The sharing fad around this meme, “What I Really Do,” which you probably saw last year, surreptitiously inspired me to transfer the basic visual layout of the meme to adapt it for use in online qualitative research.

This meme consists of a stylish comic montage of people’s thoughts related to the author/participant and his or her occupation, and boils down to a self-aware confession of “what I really do.”

The visuals are compelling connotations of their perceptions when the author spends time to find just the right pictures. The honesty in that last frame is often insightful, and exudes just the right magic that we qualitative researchers like to capture. In short, this new projective gives us a multi-angle lens into consumers’ lives.

The “What I Really Do” meme works well for research in its multi-frame storyboard layout (usually six frames). For a lighter exercise, I like this twist for the meme-theme:

Participants individually select an image for each of the three buckets. As a flexible, thought-provoking format, it’s easy to change out the “What” to a “Where” or “How,” such as, “Where I Vacationed” or “How I Cooked”, even ask about group perceptions–just change the “I” to “We” (like “What We Watched” or “What We Played”) and refer to friend or family connections in the instructions.

The stories and depictions that people generate through these activities are almost always entertaining and insightful for all involved, and early results suggest these activities would float well across a variety of category discussions.  

explore featured Case studies

Collaborative, iterative, immersive, and agile creative…, segmenting dog owners by those seeking quality…, the power of dining missions and live look-ins to deep….

Hey, get our newsletter

Join 5,000+ market research professionals who “emerge smarter” with our insights, what’s new & coming up, smartpulse: our neuroscience tool for assessing experiences, shopper segmentation.

Discover how our Shopper Segmentation can help understand shoppers’ mindsets.

The Impact Bad Actors Have on Sample Quality and Brand Strategies

When:  Wednesday, July 17 | 12:00 p.m. Central Time

Are you confident in the quality of the data driving your brand’s decisions?  Join our Emerge Smarter webinar to explore the critical issue of Sample and Data Quality and its impact on your brand’s success.

Don’t miss this opportunity to see the results of our own Research on Research that illustrates the implications of having “bad actors” in your data set, which can lead your brand to erroneous decisions, including who you target, your messaging, media placement, and distribution channels.

Register Now

Search this site

Meme Talk: A Lesson on Plagiarism, Copyright, & the Scholarly Conversation

This lesson plan introduces scholarship as conversation by asking students to compare the creative process we call “the scholarly conversation” to that involved in the phenomenon of meme communication.

Session Specifics

The lesson plan detailed below is intended for a class in a semester-long face-to-face research and information literacy course with 90-minute sessions. Considering many programs do not have sessions of such length, variations for shorter time frames are offered in the Reflection section. In addition, components of this approach to the “Scholarship as Conversation” and “Information Has Value” frameworks could be adapted to a one-shot instruction session, especially for first-year composition or general education courses.

Instructional Partners

While this lesson plan was conceived as a class taught solo by an information literacy instructor, the approach lends itself well to collaboration with Composition & Rhetoric, Communications faculty, and faculty working in Media fields.

First- and second-semester college students

Curricular Context

This lesson engages students in the “Scholarship as Conversation” framework by introducing them to the complex relationship between academic writing and sources. The lesson exposes students to the “Information Has Value” by encouraging them to think about plagiarism and copyright infringement as real-world contractual matters determined by specific communities of practice, rather than fixed realities. Asked to compare the creative process we call “the scholarly conversation” to that involved in the phenomenon of meme communication, students will gain a better understanding of how writing research papers requires not extracting or copying information from sources, but contributing to an ongoing exchange of ideas, coming up with new takes and iterations – yes, producing new knowledge.

The lesson may fit in at different points in a course dedicated to the research process and information literacy concepts. It could serve to introduce the concept of the scholarly conversation early in the course, for example. However, it would work particularly well after a lesson covering the issue of how to read scholarly articles as the lesson reinforces reading for argument and ideas as opposed to getting caught up in language. It would also work later in a course as an introduction to the task of synthesizing sources.

Why memes? Two reasons:

1) The notion that undergraduate research requires students to assume the role of new knowledge creators is a basic information literacy tenet shared with many other disciplines in a liberal arts community. However, it is easily stated, but much less easily internalized or put into practice. In order to understand their work as part of a scholarly conversation, rather than hear this statement or have the statement explained to them, students need to experience themselves as creators. But, how do we get there? One way is to introduce them to the concepts, tools, frameworks of a discipline or field or debate and to invite them in. This is the work of introductory subject-specific classes and theme-based skills or general education courses. Information literacy instruction can offer another approach: to get students to recognize and leverage the ways in which they already participate in everyday communication akin to the scholarly conversation, focused on social or cultural commentary and bound by similar constraints, conventions, and opportunities for creativity. The world of memes provides the perfect example. Meme communication – a phenomenon so ubiquitous to everyday networked life that we may assume most students are familiar with it whether or not they know what a “meme” is – blurs the line between consumers and producers. Memes work in a way that allows students to see themselves as contributors and creative participants in an ongoing, almost endless, exchange.

2) Media scholars and journalists alike treat the world of memes as practically synonymous with internet communication itself. As Wired ’s guide to memes puts it: “Memes and the internet—they're made for each other. Not because they’re digital visual communication (though of course, they are that), but because they are the product of a hive mind. They are the shorthand of a hyper-connected group thinking in unison” (Watercutter & Ellis, 2018). Memes, then, are closely connected to a way of thinking that arises from and shapes the internet. Educators, librarians among them, have for some time argued that this way of thinking has led to the apparent surge in student plagiarism in digital times and to new, looser or freer attitudes toward intellectual property (Blum, 2008; Murphy, 2016). Memes can be a rich vehicle for discussing the similarities and differences between a thriving everyday form of networked communication – that “hyper-connected group thinking in unison” – and the scholarly conversation, a different form of group thinking shaped by expectations of attribution and documentation.

Learning Outcomes

After this lesson, students will be able to:

Use sources not simply to reproduce or transmit the information they provide, but also to highlight connections between sources and to apply these connections to the new context created by the student’s own work.

Recognize what counts as common knowledge (and, therefore no attribution) as determined by context and audience.

Weigh arguments concerning copyright and fair use.

Conduct successful internet searches for open access and public domain visual materials.

Navigate free meme-generator tools.

Demonstrate familiarity with APA References page citations for online visual materials.

Begin to develop their own stake in how attribution and documentation honor the relationships that sustain the scholarly conversation.

Preparation

Prepare the Google Forms Questionnaire on familiarity with memes.

Select background readings and viewings on copyright, fair use, creative commons, open access (see suggestions below and in the Resources section).

Create handout and/or class slides with definitions of memes from a range of sources; find suggested Meme Definition Sheet here .

Select several meme series to showcase.

Design a few summaries of copyright infringement and ethical cases related to memes; find suggested Meme Cases here .

Write up homework assignment.

Note: See suggestions for each of these elements below

Read and view selected class readings and viewings:

Informational:

View ACRL Scholarly Communications Toolkit, Fair Use (3:15) https://youtu.be/e6vwkuSH1cQ

View Open Access, 101 from SPARC (3:16) https://vimeo.com/6973160

Read “ Duke Scholar Works: Copyright and Plagiarism ” https://scholarworks.duke.edu/copyright-advice/copyright-faq/copyright-and-plagiarism/

For discussion - Open culture vs. Copyright system

Read “ The Online Utopia Doesn’t Exist ” by Jaron Lanier https://www.wired.co.uk/article/the-online-utopia-doesnt-exist

Read “ Interview with Lawrence Lessig ” in WIPO https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2011/01/article_0002.html

Note: Other readings may be selected by the instructor, but the session will work best if the assigned readings relate in some way to the class’s focus on “Scholarship as Conversation” or “Information has Value.”

Respond to Google Form questions on memes

Access to the Internet and a smartboard or projector

Handout, and scrap paper

Chalkboard or whiteboard for discussion notes

Computer and Internet access

Notebook and scrap paper

Session Outline

Explain that are going to use the assigned readings and videos on intellectual property, copyright, and fair use to explore how discussions occur in the world of memes vs. the world of academic writing, specifically paper writing and scholarly writing.

Show graphics depicting class responses to the Google Form questions on memes.

Introduce the phrase “the scholarly conversation” and have students write down and share with the class two words/ideas they associate with it (encourage free word association here).

Present the question for the class: What are the similarities and differences between the way we communicate through memes and the “scholarly conversation” ?

View short video “Joining the (Scholarly) Conversation” (1:15) with the class question in mind.

Brainstorm some initial responses to the question (class “hypothesis”); if the following points aren’t forthcoming, raise them as questions: What about plagiarism? What about citation and documentation?

Make up a chart on a whiteboard, smartboard, or chalkboard with the similarities between scholarly and meme communication on the one side and the differences on the other (you will return to this later).

So, What’s a Meme, Really?

Students write down their own definition of a meme.

In pairs or small groups, share definitions and compare them to the definition assigned to each group from the Meme Definitions Sheet (for the sake of modeling, include the full APA citation along with the in-text as provided on the sheet).

Have each group summarize their assigned definition together and discuss how their own definitions compare to it.

Brief discussion of group conversation in order to establish a working definition of memes – what questions or surprises came up?

How Do Memes Work?

Review together as a class 2 or 3 memes sequences or “image macros” from KnowYour Meme.com asking questions such as:

How does a meme use original images?

What do memes assume about what their audiences know?

What makes a meme successful or ripe for imitation?

How do copies of a meme use the original meme?

Use the discussion to review key background concepts from assigned readings and viewings: such as fair use, copyright, public domain, creative commons, plagiarism.

Memes Misbehaving?

30 minutes total: 10 minutes small group work , 20 minutes group discussion

Students work in pairs or groups of three; each group receives a case study or perspectives index card, either on memes and copyright infringement or memes and political extremism/fake news (find suggestions here and in the Resources section); each group should be ready to explain their case study or perspectives card to the class and present a response or question concerning meme communication and the scholarly conversation.

Student-led discussion of the two topics: memes and copyright infringement or memes and extremism in relation to the comparison between meme discourse and the scholarly conversation.

Return to the class question and chart concerning meme and scholarly communication; ask: What can we add to the chart now? [You might want to add pros & cons section for both meme talk and scholarly conversation as shown in the Resources section]

To prepare students for the homework, ask them to consider the chart the class made together and free write concerning their views on any questions raised during the class on intellectual property, copyright, fair use, plagiarism, the scholarly conversation; if there’s time and desire, have volunteers share their work with the class.

Hands-on Time: Preparation for homework assignment

Review and demo the tools and strategies below, all of which students will need to understand to complete the homework assignment; provide written instructions in the assignment as back-up:

How to use a free meme-generator to craft one’s own meme (suggested site: https://imgflip.com/memegenerator/27596988/Free )

How to navigate the knowyourmeme.com website to get information on a selected meme’s origins and information

How to search for and use open access or public domain visual material through a Google usage rights search and a Creative Commons search

How to write up an APA Reference page citation and an MLA Works Cited citation for an online visual source

Homework Assignment

Review assignment: Students will make a series of three interrelated memes representing the “conversation” between two of the course sources they prepared previously for class and their own position on issues discussed in class. Students will upload each meme as a pdf into the course management assignment page.

Students will also be required to create and upload an APA References page of the class sources and the meme or the visual material they decide to use.

To make their meme sequence, students will have to make a few choices as detailed below.

Select two of the class readings/viewings on copyright, fair use, fake news, meme definition that you prepared for this class (pairings can also just be suggested by the instructor). See grading rubric here .

Option # 1:

Browse the “Popular Memes” tab on the imgflip website and select a meme you think would work well to represent the “conversation” between the class sources you paired.

If you want to use the same image and format from the meme series, go back to the imgflip website and make a meme for each of the class sources you selected and one more meme for your own take. Each meme text should represent each source’s contribution or perspective on the shared topic.

If you do stick with the image from the original meme series, you must also write up a brief explanation of why the concept of “fair use” should protect you from any charge of copyright infringement.

Write up an APA Reference or an MLA Works Cited page of the class sources and of your original meme image (instructor’s choice of citation style).

If you would rather use your own image and start your own meme image macro, do a Creative Commons image search or a Google Image search filtered by usage rights; select an image you feel represents the “conversation” between the class sources you paired and your own position.

Go back to the imgflip website, upload your image, and use it as the basis for your three meme series or meme macro

Write up an APA Reference or an MLA Works Cited page of the class sources and of your open access or public domain image (instructor’s choice of citation style).

Give your memes a Creative Commons license and write a brief note explaining your choice of license.

For an immediate in-class assessment, try in-class minute lists. In the last two minutes of class after the free writing time, direct students to:

Based on their free writing, sum up in a short phrase or question their position on any issue raised in the class discussion and/or the class readings/viewings.

Write down one thing they learned in class that they think will be useful to them in their work.

Write down one question they have concerning anything touched on in class.

(This can be done either on scrap paper or in a prepared response text-box post through the course’s classroom management system).

For more in-depth assessment, the homework assignment will serve as vehicle for students to show their mastery of the concepts discussed regarding engaging with sources in the scholarly conversation and the skills reviewed concerning navigating copyright issues in a digital environment. See the meme talk assignment grading rubric here .

For more long-term assessment, it would be worthwhile to find a way to measure the lesson’s impact on students’ understanding of how to engage with sources in a research project. One of the main points of this lesson is to help students become more comfortable with what we currently call “the scholarly conversation,” that is, the synthesis and analysis of sources. To measure comfort level is difficult in general, but perhaps in this case it could be done through a brief reflection piece added to a longer class project such as a research paper or research presentation.

The reflection activity could be something along the following lines: Identify one moment in your project where you feel you made a good use of your source(s) and one in which you are not particularly happy with how you incorporated source(s). Explain your assessment of your work. Why is one use of sources stronger than the other? The language students chose to use in this assessment and their ability to explain what makes a strong or weak engagement with sources will be evidence of their understanding of the scholarly conversation, hopefully gained partially through this lesson.

Teaching method – The combination of small group and class discussion described in this lesson plan is somewhat less common in information literacy classes, which often focus on alternating demonstrations with skill-building practice time. The teaching method is slow and perhaps not always linear, but particularly in the case of a concept-rich framework such as “Scholarship as Conversation,” it involves students at a deeper level and allows them to direct their own learning to some extent.

Playing with visualizations – Requiring students to dabble in creative image-making may seem questionable in a class on research and information literacy, but the exercise speaks to the common demand that researchers distill their work into several different formats, including visualizations. In addition, the exercise of translating a text into a specific kind of visual has the added benefit of allowing students to practice restating ideas in a different “language” than the source language. In other words, the lesson’s assignment gives student a chance to practice a sort of radical paraphrasing, and so, prepares them for paraphrasing in the traditional sense.

“Teaching Plagiarism” – Of course, the more appropriate and hopefully more accurate phrasing is “teaching how to avoid plagiarism.” Ironically, the potential for student parroting appears to be curiously high, perhaps because the sense of plagiarism as a problem is hard for students to internalize (Power, 2009). For this reason, this lesson plan takes an indirect approach to the discussion of plagiarism, steering students to reflect on source use and to focus on those skills that build up their capacity to get around plagiarism: identifying conversations between sources and paraphrasing.

Lesson variations – Admittedly, this lesson packs a great deal into one session. It could easily be turned into two linked sessions, with the second starting after #3 “How Do Memes Work and including more of an emphasis on visual literacy. For a stand-alone shorter session, it would be quite effective to stop again after point “How Do Memes Work” (#3) and spend more time with each part of the discussion. The shorter version could include identifying the “conversation” in a scholarly article and considering the comparison to “meme talk” in more detail.

Memes & the Framework for Information Literacy – Memes are a fascinating vehicle through which to explore and teach about several of the tenets of Information Literacy. Linked lessons could be developed for example on bias and evaluating sources and the workings of authority.

Additional Instructional Materials

Pre-assigned homework.

Google Form Questionnaire

Video: ACRL Scholarly Communications Toolkit, Fair Use (3:15)

Video: Open Access, 101 (3:16)

Brief reading: “ Duke Scholar Works: Copyright and Plagiarism ”

Magazine article: “ The Online Utopia Doesn’t Exist ” by Jaron Lanier

Interview: “ Interview with Lawrence Lessig ” in WIPO

Class Materials

Video: Joining the (Scholarly) Conversation (1:15) by Clemson Libraries

Meme Definitions Sheet

Meme Case Studies Sheet

Lesson Assessment Assignment

Meme Talk Assignment Grading Rubric

Blum, S. D. (2009). My Word! : Plagiarism and College Culture . Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Retrieved from eBook EBSCO Collection.

Murphy, S. (2016). Plagiarism is dead; long live the retweet: Unpacking an identity crisis in digital content. Hybrid Pedagogy . Retrieved from hybridpedagogy.org/plagiarism-is-dead-long-live-the-retweet/

Power, L. G. (2009). University students' perceptions of plagiarism. Journal of Higher Education , 80(6), 643-662. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete.

Watercuter, A. & Ellis, E. G. (2018, April 1). The Wired guide to memes. Wired . Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/guide-memes/

Get the Reddit app

Looking for the best College & University meme subreddit? Welcome to the best College & University meme comunitty. Here, you can find the best jokes, memes and daily quotes in our group. If you do not want to visit college or university lectures, then this group may be considered as one of the best educational page. If you need writing any paper. We'll help you do any paper writing of assignment, homework, editing, proofreading online before the deadline! Just contact Us.

The Best Research Papers Memes

What's a research paper?

A research paper is an expanded essay that presents your own interpretation or evaluation or argument. In fact, this guide is designed to help you navigate the research voyage, through developing a research question and thesis, doing the research, writing the paper, and correctly documenting your sources.

Research Paper Writing Service is one of the best ⭐professional research paper writing service⭐. Hire guru writers or just simply buy research papers. We'll meet a ⏳ 3 hour deadline!

By continuing, you agree to our User Agreement and acknowledge that you understand the Privacy Policy .

Enter the 6-digit code from your authenticator app

You’ve set up two-factor authentication for this account.

Enter a 6-digit backup code

Create your username and password.

Reddit is anonymous, so your username is what you’ll go by here. Choose wisely—because once you get a name, you can’t change it.

Reset your password

Enter your email address or username and we’ll send you a link to reset your password

Check your inbox

An email with a link to reset your password was sent to the email address associated with your account

Choose a Reddit account to continue

quickmeme: all your memes, gifs & funny pics in one place

• random memes
• upload a funny
• caption a meme

like qm now and laugh more daily!

• also trending:

Start writing a research paper misspell the very first word

3,021 shares

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Twitter
• Share on Google Plus
• Share on Pinterest
• Incompetent Academic

Got My Diploma. 12 Years of studying and no dates. Still a virgin. Wondering if Gynecologist was a good choice for me.

Have six months to write a paper start writing one day before deadline ends, been studiying here for 6 years still have to use a campus map to find my classrooms, friends say they will keep in touch never hear from them again, crams the night before an exam d is for diploma, double majored can't remember anything from class, i hate this school posing for my parents, "mom i'm busy studying tonight" browses facebook for three hours, on to the real world you say i can reddit at work too, popular meme categories.

• All The Things
• Angry School Boy
• Annoying Childhood Friend
• Annoying Facebook Girl
• Anti-Joke Chicken
• Art Student Owl
• Baby Godfather
• Bad Advice Cat
• Batman and Joker
• Bear Grylls
• Bill O Reilly
• Business Cat
• Business Dog
• Butthurt Dweller
• Captain Hindsight
• Chemistry Cat
• College Freshman
• Condescending Fox
• Confucius says
• Courage Wolf
• Crazy Girlfriend Praying Mantis
• Creeper Canine
• Creepy Wonka
• Dating Site Murderer
• Depression Dog
• Downvoting Roman
• Engineering Professor
• Epic Jackie Chan
• Evil Plotting Raccoon
• Fallout new vegas
• Family Tech Support Guy
• First World Problems
• Forever Alone
• Foul Bachelor Frog
• Foul Bachelorette Frog
• Friend Zone Fiona
• Futurama Fry
• Futurama Zoidberg
• Gaming Gopher
• Good Dog Greg
• Good Guy Greg
• Grandma finds the Internet
• Harmless Scout Leader
• Helpful Tyler Durden
• High Expectations Asian Father
• Hipster Ariel
• Hipster Barista
• Hipster Dog
• Hipster Gaston
• Hipster Jesus
• Hipster Kitty
• Harry Potter Meme
• Horrifying Houseguest
• Idiot Nerd Girl
• Imminent Ned
• Inception Meme
• Insanity puppy
• Insanity Wolf
• Jimmy McMillan Rent Too High
• JJ Jameson Meme
• Joseph Ducreux
• Judgmental Bookseller Ostrich
• Karate Kyle
• Lame Pun Coon
• Long-term relationship Lobster
• Misunderstood Spider
• Musically Oblivious 8th Grader
• Oblivious Suburban Mom
• Observational Owl
• Online Diagnosis Octopus
• Optimistic Crab
• Ordinary Muslim Man
• Overly Permissive Hippie Parents
• Paranoid Parrot
• Philosoraptor
• Pickup Line Scientist
• Pickup-Line Panda
• Push it somewhere else Patrick
• Rasta Science Teacher
• Reddit Alien
• Redditors Wife
• Redneck Randal
• Religion Pigeon
• Samuel L Jackson
• Science Major Mouse
• Scumbag Advice God
• Scumbag Brain
• Scumbag girl
• Scumbag Reddit
• Scumbag Redditor
• Scumbag Steve
• Serious fish SpongeBob
• Sexually Oblivious Rhino
• Sheltered College Freshman
• Sheltered Suburban Kid
• Sheltering Suburban Mom
• Skeptical Hippo
• Skinhead John
• Socially awesome kindergartener
• Socially Awkward Penguin
• Success Kid
• Successful Black Man
• Tech Impaired Duck
• The Most Interesting Man In The World
• The Rock Driving Meme
• Torrenting Turtle
• Unhelpful High School Teacher
• Vengeance Dad
• Wrong Lyrics Christina
• Xzibit meme
• Y U No Meme

Laugh more daily

Like us on Facebook?

• Mailing List
• Search Search

Username or Email Address

Remember Me

How to Conduct Internet Meme Research

This How-to Guide can offer direction for those studying internet memes to better understand memetic content and the relationship between memes and power.

Studying internet memes can teach us about the values and ideologies promoted through social media content, and it can help up better understand the relationship between culture and technology. This How-to Guide can offer direction for those studying internet memes to better understand memetic content and the relationship between memes and power. It presents two qualitative methods for analyzing memes: qualitative content analysis and critical discourse analysis, both of which you can do on your own with a low requirement of resources. This guide explains the merits of each method and lays out ways to approach ethical issues involved in meme research. SAGE Research Methods: Doing Research Online

Sulafa Zidani

As a scholar of digital culture, Sulafa Zidani writes on global creative practices in online civic engagement across geopolitical contexts and languages such as Mandarin, English, Arabic, Hebrew, and French.

Zidani is currently working on a book-length study called Global Meme Elites: How Meme Creators Navigate Transnational Politics on the Multilingual Internet . She has also published on online culture mixing, Arab and Chinese media politics, and critical transnational pedagogy in venues such as: Social Media + Society ; Asian Communication Research ; Media, Culture & Society ; International Journal of Communication , and others. She is the co-editor of the forthcoming anthology, The Intersectional Internet II: Power, Politics and Resistance Online .

Outside of the academy, Zidani is an accomplished public educator. As a facilitator for the Seachange Collective, she has led workshops on antiracism and social justice for organizations such as NowThis, Gimlet Media, The Onion, and The Writers Guild of America. Her public writing on popular culture and politics has appeared in Arabic and Anglophone publications.

Related articles

Tom Levenson on science, religion, and the Thirty Meter Telescope

I’m Shocked! Shocked! to Find There Are Neutrinos Going On Here

Design Justice, A.I., and Escape from the Matrix of Domination

This is How We Play It: What a Mega-LAN Can Teach Us About Games

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Research paper

How to Write a Research Paper | A Beginner's Guide

A research paper is a piece of academic writing that provides analysis, interpretation, and argument based on in-depth independent research.

Research papers are similar to academic essays , but they are usually longer and more detailed assignments, designed to assess not only your writing skills but also your skills in scholarly research. Writing a research paper requires you to demonstrate a strong knowledge of your topic, engage with a variety of sources, and make an original contribution to the debate.

This step-by-step guide takes you through the entire writing process, from understanding your assignment to proofreading your final draft.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

Understand the assignment, choose a research paper topic, conduct preliminary research, develop a thesis statement, create a research paper outline, write a first draft of the research paper, write the introduction, write a compelling body of text, write the conclusion, the second draft, the revision process, research paper checklist, free lecture slides.

Completing a research paper successfully means accomplishing the specific tasks set out for you. Before you start, make sure you thoroughly understanding the assignment task sheet:

• Read it carefully, looking for anything confusing you might need to clarify with your professor.
• Identify the assignment goal, deadline, length specifications, formatting, and submission method.
• Make a bulleted list of the key points, then go back and cross completed items off as you’re writing.

Carefully consider your timeframe and word limit: be realistic, and plan enough time to research, write, and edit.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

There are many ways to generate an idea for a research paper, from brainstorming with pen and paper to talking it through with a fellow student or professor.

You can try free writing, which involves taking a broad topic and writing continuously for two or three minutes to identify absolutely anything relevant that could be interesting.

You can also gain inspiration from other research. The discussion or recommendations sections of research papers often include ideas for other specific topics that require further examination.

Once you have a broad subject area, narrow it down to choose a topic that interests you, m eets the criteria of your assignment, and i s possible to research. Aim for ideas that are both original and specific:

• A paper following the chronology of World War II would not be original or specific enough.
• A paper on the experience of Danish citizens living close to the German border during World War II would be specific and could be original enough.

Note any discussions that seem important to the topic, and try to find an issue that you can focus your paper around. Use a variety of sources , including journals, books, and reliable websites, to ensure you do not miss anything glaring.

Do not only verify the ideas you have in mind, but look for sources that contradict your point of view.

• Is there anything people seem to overlook in the sources you research?
• Are there any heated debates you can address?
• Do you have a unique take on your topic?
• Have there been some recent developments that build on the extant research?

In this stage, you might find it helpful to formulate some research questions to help guide you. To write research questions, try to finish the following sentence: “I want to know how/what/why…”

A thesis statement is a statement of your central argument — it establishes the purpose and position of your paper. If you started with a research question, the thesis statement should answer it. It should also show what evidence and reasoning you’ll use to support that answer.

The thesis statement should be concise, contentious, and coherent. That means it should briefly summarize your argument in a sentence or two, make a claim that requires further evidence or analysis, and make a coherent point that relates to every part of the paper.

You will probably revise and refine the thesis statement as you do more research, but it can serve as a guide throughout the writing process. Every paragraph should aim to support and develop this central claim.

Scribbr Citation Checker New

The AI-powered Citation Checker helps you avoid common mistakes such as:

• Missing commas and periods
• Incorrect usage of “et al.”
• Ampersands (&) in narrative citations
• Missing reference entries

A research paper outline is essentially a list of the key topics, arguments, and evidence you want to include, divided into sections with headings so that you know roughly what the paper will look like before you start writing.

A structure outline can help make the writing process much more efficient, so it’s worth dedicating some time to create one.

Your first draft won’t be perfect — you can polish later on. Your priorities at this stage are as follows:

• Maintaining forward momentum — write now, perfect later.
• Paying attention to clear organization and logical ordering of paragraphs and sentences, which will help when you come to the second draft.
• Expressing your ideas as clearly as possible, so you know what you were trying to say when you come back to the text.

You do not need to start by writing the introduction. Begin where it feels most natural for you — some prefer to finish the most difficult sections first, while others choose to start with the easiest part. If you created an outline, use it as a map while you work.

Do not delete large sections of text. If you begin to dislike something you have written or find it doesn’t quite fit, move it to a different document, but don’t lose it completely — you never know if it might come in useful later.

Paragraph structure

Paragraphs are the basic building blocks of research papers. Each one should focus on a single claim or idea that helps to establish the overall argument or purpose of the paper.

Example paragraph

George Orwell’s 1946 essay “Politics and the English Language” has had an enduring impact on thought about the relationship between politics and language. This impact is particularly obvious in light of the various critical review articles that have recently referenced the essay. For example, consider Mark Falcoff’s 2009 article in The National Review Online, “The Perversion of Language; or, Orwell Revisited,” in which he analyzes several common words (“activist,” “civil-rights leader,” “diversity,” and more). Falcoff’s close analysis of the ambiguity built into political language intentionally mirrors Orwell’s own point-by-point analysis of the political language of his day. Even 63 years after its publication, Orwell’s essay is emulated by contemporary thinkers.

Citing sources

It’s also important to keep track of citations at this stage to avoid accidental plagiarism . Each time you use a source, make sure to take note of where the information came from.

You can use our free citation generators to automatically create citations and save your reference list as you go.

APA Citation Generator MLA Citation Generator

The research paper introduction should address three questions: What, why, and how? After finishing the introduction, the reader should know what the paper is about, why it is worth reading, and how you’ll build your arguments.

What? Be specific about the topic of the paper, introduce the background, and define key terms or concepts.

Why? This is the most important, but also the most difficult, part of the introduction. Try to provide brief answers to the following questions: What new material or insight are you offering? What important issues does your essay help define or answer?

How? To let the reader know what to expect from the rest of the paper, the introduction should include a “map” of what will be discussed, briefly presenting the key elements of the paper in chronological order.

The major struggle faced by most writers is how to organize the information presented in the paper, which is one reason an outline is so useful. However, remember that the outline is only a guide and, when writing, you can be flexible with the order in which the information and arguments are presented.

One way to stay on track is to use your thesis statement and topic sentences . Check:

• topic sentences against the thesis statement;
• topic sentences against each other, for similarities and logical ordering;
• and each sentence against the topic sentence of that paragraph.

Be aware of paragraphs that seem to cover the same things. If two paragraphs discuss something similar, they must approach that topic in different ways. Aim to create smooth transitions between sentences, paragraphs, and sections.

The research paper conclusion is designed to help your reader out of the paper’s argument, giving them a sense of finality.

Trace the course of the paper, emphasizing how it all comes together to prove your thesis statement. Give the paper a sense of finality by making sure the reader understands how you’ve settled the issues raised in the introduction.

You might also discuss the more general consequences of the argument, outline what the paper offers to future students of the topic, and suggest any questions the paper’s argument raises but cannot or does not try to answer.

You should not :

• Offer new arguments or essential information
• Take up any more space than necessary
• Begin with stock phrases that signal you are ending the paper (e.g. “In conclusion”)

There are four main considerations when it comes to the second draft.

• Check how your vision of the paper lines up with the first draft and, more importantly, that your paper still answers the assignment.
• Identify any assumptions that might require (more substantial) justification, keeping your reader’s perspective foremost in mind. Remove these points if you cannot substantiate them further.
• Be open to rearranging your ideas. Check whether any sections feel out of place and whether your ideas could be better organized.
• If you find that old ideas do not fit as well as you anticipated, you should cut them out or condense them. You might also find that new and well-suited ideas occurred to you during the writing of the first draft — now is the time to make them part of the paper.

The goal during the revision and proofreading process is to ensure you have completed all the necessary tasks and that the paper is as well-articulated as possible. You can speed up the proofreading process by using the AI proofreader .

Global concerns

• Confirm that your paper completes every task specified in your assignment sheet.
• Check for logical organization and flow of paragraphs.
• Check paragraphs against the introduction and thesis statement.

Fine-grained details

Check the content of each paragraph, making sure that:

• each sentence helps support the topic sentence.
• no unnecessary or irrelevant information is present.
• all technical terms your audience might not know are identified.

Next, think about sentence structure , grammatical errors, and formatting . Check that you have correctly used transition words and phrases to show the connections between your ideas. Look for typos, cut unnecessary words, and check for consistency in aspects such as heading formatting and spellings .

Finally, you need to make sure your paper is correctly formatted according to the rules of the citation style you are using. For example, you might need to include an MLA heading  or create an APA title page .

Scribbr’s professional editors can help with the revision process with our award-winning proofreading services.

Discover our paper editing service

Checklist: Research paper

I have followed all instructions in the assignment sheet.

My introduction presents my topic in an engaging way and provides necessary background information.

My introduction presents a clear, focused research problem and/or thesis statement .

My paper is logically organized using paragraphs and (if relevant) section headings .

Each paragraph is clearly focused on one central idea, expressed in a clear topic sentence .

Each paragraph is relevant to my research problem or thesis statement.

I have used appropriate transitions  to clarify the connections between sections, paragraphs, and sentences.

My conclusion provides a concise answer to the research question or emphasizes how the thesis has been supported.

My conclusion shows how my research has contributed to knowledge or understanding of my topic.

My conclusion does not present any new points or information essential to my argument.

I have provided an in-text citation every time I refer to ideas or information from a source.

I have included a reference list at the end of my paper, consistently formatted according to a specific citation style .

I have thoroughly revised my paper and addressed any feedback from my professor or supervisor.

I have followed all formatting guidelines (page numbers, headers, spacing, etc.).

You've written a great paper. Make sure it's perfect with the help of a Scribbr editor!

Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint

Is this article helpful?

Other students also liked.

• Writing a Research Paper Introduction | Step-by-Step Guide
• Writing a Research Paper Conclusion | Step-by-Step Guide
• Research Paper Format | APA, MLA, & Chicago Templates

More interesting articles

• Academic Paragraph Structure | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples
• Checklist: Writing a Great Research Paper
• How to Create a Structured Research Paper Outline | Example
• How to Write a Discussion Section | Tips & Examples
• How to Write Recommendations in Research | Examples & Tips
• How to Write Topic Sentences | 4 Steps, Examples & Purpose
• Research Paper Appendix | Example & Templates
• Research Paper Damage Control | Managing a Broken Argument
• What Is a Theoretical Framework? | Guide to Organizing

"I thought AI Proofreading was useless but.."

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

Project 2025 is an effort by the Heritage Foundation, not Donald Trump | Fact check

The claim: Project 2025 is a plan from Trump

A July 5 Facebook post ( direct link , archive link ) includes nine slides describing supposed policy propositions from former President Donald Trump. The slides include an image of Trump along with the title "Project 2025."

“Trump has made his authoritarian intentions quite clear with his Project 2025 plan,” reads the post's caption. 

It received more than 500 shares in four days.

More from the Fact-Check Team: How we pick and research claims | Email newsletter | Facebook page

Our rating: False

Project 2025 is a political playbook created by the Heritage Foundation and dozens of other conservative groups, not Trump, who said he disagrees with elements of the effort. There are, however, numerous people involved in Project 2025 who worked in Trump's first administration.

President decides which policy recommendations to implement

The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank , collaborated with more than 100 conservative groups for Project 2025, also known as the Presidential Transition Project. The result is a more than 900-page playbook with policy recommendations for the next Republican president that reflect the think tank's goal of "(rescuing) the country from the grip of the radical Left."

Trump, however, has sought to publicly distance himself from the effort, as reported by The Washington Post .

“I know nothing about Project 2025,” Trump wrote in a July 5 Truth Social post . “I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal. Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.” 

Trump didn’t specify which Project 2025 proposals he disagrees with in the statement. 

Fact check : No, AP did not report Trump may face 'molestation' charges

Project 2025 said it “does not speak for any candidate or campaign” in a July 5 post on X , formerly Twitter. Its playbook is comprised of suggestions the coalition believes will benefit the "next conservative president."

“But it is ultimately up to that president, who we believe will be President Trump, to decide which recommendations to implement,” the post said. 

That said, Project 2025 does involve numerous Trump allies.

Director Paul Dans , for example, was the chief of staff at the Office of Personnel Management during the Trump administration. Trump advisor Stephen Miller and the Trump campaign's National Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt also appeared in a video supporting the project’s “Presidential Administration Academy."

There is also overlap between Trump's platform and Project 2025's proposals.

The project has called for an end to illegal immigration while Trump has vowed to "carry out the largest domestic deportation operation in American history" and "terminate every open borders policy of the Biden administration ," if re-elected.

Project 2025 also supports shutting down the Department of Education , which Trump pledged to do in a 2023 campaign video .

The Heritage Foundation said in a January 2018 news release that Trump had adopted nearly two-thirds of its policy recommendations within his first year in office.

USA TODAY has debunked an array of claims about Trump, including false assertions that he selected Michael Flynn as his vice president , that a video shows “Trump Force One” buzzing a Washington-area airport after the June presidential debate and that Trump was found guilty in his hush-money trial by a jury stacked with Biden supporters .

The Facebook user who shared the post told USA TODAY it's a "logical inference" that Trump supports the project because of the number of his allies who are involved, even if he has not publicly endorsed the effort.

Our fact-check sources:

• Project 2025, accessed July 8, About Project 2025
• Donald Trump, July 5, Truth Social post
• Project 2025, July 5, X post

Thank you for supporting our journalism. You can subscribe to our print edition, ad-free app or e-newspaper here .

USA TODAY is a verified signatory of the International Fact-Checking Network, which requires a demonstrated commitment to nonpartisanship, fairness and transparency. Our fact-check work is supported in part by a grant from Meta .

Cookies on GOV.UK

We use some essential cookies to make this website work.

We’d like to set additional cookies to understand how you use GOV.UK, remember your settings and improve government services.

We also use cookies set by other sites to help us deliver content from their services.

You have accepted additional cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

You have rejected additional cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

King's Speech 2024: background briefing notes

Read the briefing notes on the announcements made in the 2024 King’s Speech.

The King's Speech 2024: background briefing notes

PDF , 556 KB , 104 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Updates to this page

The attachment on this page has been updated.

First published.

Sign up for emails or print this page

Is this page useful.

• Yes this page is useful
• No this page is not useful

Help us improve GOV.UK

Don’t include personal or financial information like your National Insurance number or credit card details.

To help us improve GOV.UK, we’d like to know more about your visit today. Please fill in this survey (opens in a new tab) .

Who Is AI Replacing? The Impact of Generative AI on Online Freelancing Platforms

31 Pages Posted: 3 Nov 2023 Last revised: 22 Jun 2024

Ozge Demirci

Harvard business school, jonas hannane.

German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin); Technische Universität Berlin (TU Berlin)

Xinrong Zhu

Imperial College Business School

Date Written: October 15, 2023

This paper studies the impact of Generative AI technologies on the demand for online freelancers using a large dataset from a leading global freelancing platform. We identify the types of jobs that are more affected by Generative AI and quantify the magnitude of the heterogeneous impact. Our findings indicate a 21% decrease in the number of job posts for automation-prone jobs related to writing and coding, compared to jobs requiring manual-intensive skills, within eight months after the introduction of Chat-GPT. We show that the reduction in the number of job posts increases competition among freelancers while the remaining automation-prone jobs are of greater complexity and offer higher pay. We also find that the introduction of Image-generating AI technologies led to a 17% decrease in the number of job posts related to image creation. We use Google Trends to show that the more pronounced decline in the demand for freelancers within automation-prone jobs correlates with their higher public awareness of ChatGPT's substitutability.

Keywords: Generative AI, large language models, ChatGPT, digital freelancing platforms JEL No: O33, E24, J21, J24

JEL Classification: O33, E24, J21, J24

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Harvard University Harvard Business School, 25 Harvard Way Boston, MA Boston 02163 United States

German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin) ( email )

Mohrenstraße 58 Berlin, 10117 Germany

Technische Universität Berlin (TU Berlin) ( email )

Straße des 17 Juni 135 Berlin, 10623 Germany

Xinrong Zhu (Contact Author)

Imperial college business school ( email ).

South Kensington Campus Exhibition Road London SW7 2AZ, SW7 2AZ United Kingdom 07778963203 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics, related ejournals, ebusiness & ecommerce ejournal.

Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic

Decision-Making & Management Science eJournal

International political economy: globalization ejournal, decision-making in computational design & technology ejournal.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Perspective
• Published: 15 July 2024

Aquatic deoxygenation as a planetary boundary and key regulator of Earth system stability

• Kevin C. Rose   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1292-9381 1 , 2 ,
• Erica M. Ferrer   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6709-449X 3 , 4 ,
• Stephen R. Carpenter   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8097-8700 5 ,
• Sean A. Crowe   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8071-2144 6 ,
• Sarah C. Donelan   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4066-7884 7 ,
• Véronique C. Garçon   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4041-1379 8 , 9 ,
• Marilaure Grégoire   ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0008-3112-4256 10 ,
• Stephen F. Jane   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2968-359X 11 , 12   nAff16 ,
• Peter R. Leavitt   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9805-9307 13 ,
• Lisa A. Levin   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2858-8622 4 ,
• Andreas Oschlies   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8295-4013 14 &
• Denise Breitburg   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5453-6973 15  

Nature Ecology & Evolution ( 2024 ) Cite this article

1142 Accesses

525 Altmetric

Metrics details

• Biogeochemistry
• Freshwater ecology
• Marine chemistry

Planetary boundaries represent thresholds in major Earth system processes that are sensitive to human activity and control global-scale habitability and stability. These processes are interconnected such that movement of one planetary boundary process can alter the likelihood of crossing other boundaries. Here we argue that the observed deoxygenation of the Earth’s freshwater and marine ecosystems represents an additional planetary boundary process that is critical to the integrity of Earth’s ecological and social systems, and both regulates and responds to ongoing changes in other planetary boundary processes. Research on the rapid and ongoing deoxygenation of Earth’s aquatic habitats indicates that relevant, critical oxygen thresholds are being approached at rates comparable to other planetary boundary processes. Concerted global monitoring, research and policy efforts are needed to address the challenges brought on by rapid deoxygenation, and the expansion of the planetary boundaries framework to include deoxygenation as a boundary helps to focus those efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles

111,21 € per year

only 9,27 € per issue

Buy this article

• Purchase on Springer Link
• Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Sustained increases in atmospheric oxygen and marine productivity in the Neoproterozoic and Palaeozoic eras

Widespread deoxygenation of temperate lakes

Calculating dissolved marine oxygen values based on an enhanced Benthic Foraminifera Oxygen Index

Rockström, J. et al. A safe operation space for humanity. Nature 461 , 472–475 (2009).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347 , 1259855 (2015).

Richardson, K. et al. Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Sci. Adv. 9 , eadh2458 (2023).

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Rockström, J. et al. Safe and just Earth system boundaries. Nature 619 , 102–111 (2023).

Lade, S. J. et al. Human impacts on planetary boundaries amplified by Earth system interactions. Nat. Sustain. 3 , 119–128 (2020).

Article   Google Scholar  

Ferrer, E. Climate–Fishery Interactions in Coastal Ecosystems . Thesis, Scripps Institute of Oceanography, UC San Diego, 6–47 (2023).

Raymond, J. & Segrè, D. The effect of oxygen on biochemical networks and the evolution of complex life. Science 311 , 1764–1767 (2006).

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Fang, J. Animals thrive without oxygen at sea bottom. Nature 464 , 825 (2010).

Scott, A. C. & Glasspool, I. J. The diversification of Paleozoic fire systems and fluctuations in atmospheric oxygen concentration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103 , 10861–10865 (2006).

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Falkowski, P. G. et al. The rise of oxygen over the past 205 million years and the evolution of large placental mammals. Science 309 , 2202–2204 (2005).

Poulsen, C. J., Tabor, C. & White, J. D. Long-term climate forcing by atmospheric oxygen concentrations. Science 348 , 1238–1242 (2015).

Pohl, A. et al. Continental configuration controls ocean oxygenation during the Phanerozoic. Nature 608 , 523–527 (2022).

He, T. et al. Possible links between extreme oxygen perturbations and the Cambrian radiation of animals. Nat. Geosci. 12 , 468–474 (2019).

Kraft, B. et al. Oxygen and nitrogen production by an ammonia-oxidizing archaeon. Science 375 , 97–100 (2022).

Kreling, J. et al. The importance of physical transport and oxygen consumption for the development of a metalimnetic oxygen minimum in a lake. Limnol. Oceanogr. 62 , 348–363 (2017).

Stramma, L. et al. Expansion of oxygen minimum zones may reduce available habitat for tropical pelagic fishes. Nat. Clim. Change 2 , 33–37 (2012).

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Mi, C. et al. The formation of a metalimnetic oxygen minimum exemplifies how ecosystem dynamics shape biogeochemical processes: a modelling study. Water Res. 175 , 115701 (2020).

Smith, K. L., Messié, M., Connolly, T. P. & Huffard, C. L. Decadal time‐series depletion of dissolved oxygen at abyssal depths in the northeast Pacific. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49 , e2022GL101018 (2022).

Diaz, R. J. & Rosenberg, R. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321 , 926–929 (2008).

Jane, S. F. et al. Widespread deoxygenation of temperate lakes. Nature 594 , 66–70 (2021).

Brune, A., Frenzel, P. & Cypionka, H. Life at the oxic–anoxic interface: microbial activities and adaptations. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 24 , 691–710 (2000).

Huang, J. et al. The global oxygen budget and its future projection. Sci. Bull. 63 , 1180–1186 (2018).

Jenny, J. P. et al. Global spread of hypoxia in freshwater ecosystems during the last three centuries is caused by rising local human pressure. Glob. Change Biol. 22 , 1481–1489 (2016).

Schmidtko, S., Stramma, L. & Visbeck, M. Decline in global oceanic oxygen content during the past five decades. Nature 542 , 335–339 (2017).

Breitburg, D. et al. Declining oxygen in the global ocean and coastal waters. Science 359 , eaam7240 (2018).

Limburg, K. E., Breitburg, D., Swaney, D. P. & Jacinto, G. Ocean deoxygenation: a primer. One Earth 2 , 24–29 (2020).

Zhi, W., Kligler, C., Liu, J. & Li, L. Widespread deoxygenation in warming rivers. Nat. Clim. Change 13 , 1105–1113 (2023).

Levin, L. A. Manifestation, drivers, and emergence of open ocean deoxygenation. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 10 , 229–260 (2018).

Ono, T., Watarlabe, Y. W., Tadokoro, K. & Saino, T. Temporal increases of phosphate and apparent oxygen utilization in the subsurface waters of western subarctic Pacific from 1968 to 1998. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28 , 3285–3288 (2001).

Keeling, R. F., Körtzinger, A. & Gruber, N. Ocean deoxygenation in a warming world. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2 , 199–229 (2010).

Stramma, L., Schmidtko, S., Levin, L. A. & Johnson, G. C. Ocean oxygen minima expansions and their biological impacts. Deep Sea Res. 1 Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 57 , 587–595 (2010).

Grégoire, M. et al. A global ocean oxygen database and atlas for assessing and predicting deoxygenation and ocean health in the open and coastal ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. 8 , 724913 (2021).

Jane, S. F. et al. Longer duration of seasonal stratification contributes to widespread increases in lake hypoxia and anoxia. Glob. Change Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16525 (2022).

Vaquer-Sunyer, R. & Duarte, C. M. Thresholds of hypoxia for marine biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105 , 15452–15457 (2008).

Deutsch, C., Ferrel, A., Seibel, B., Pörtner, H.-O. & Huey, R. B. Climate change tightens a metabolic constraint on marine habitats. Science 348 , 1132–1136 (2015).

Deutsch, C., Penn, J. L. & Seibel, B. Metabolic trait diversity shapes marine biogeography. Nature 585 , 557–562 (2020).

Vaquer-Sunyer, R. & Duarte, C. M. Experimental evaluation of the response of coastal Mediterranean planktonic and benthic metabolism to warming. Estuaries Coasts 36 , 697–707 (2013).

Penn, J. L. & Deutsch, C. Avoiding ocean mass extinction from climate warming. Science 376 , 524–526 (2022).

Mortimer, C. H. The exchange of dissolved substances between mud and water in lakes. Br. Ecol. Soc. 29 , 280–329 (1941).

CAS   Google Scholar  

Wang, S., Jin, X., Bu, Q., Jiao, L. & Wu, F. Effects of dissolved oxygen supply level on phosphorus release from lake sediments. Colloids Surf. A 316 , 245–252 (2008).

Hilt, S., Brothers, S., Jeppesen, E., Veraart, A. J. & Kosten, S. Translating regime shifts in shallow lakes into changes in ecosystem functions and services. BioScience 67 , 928–936 (2017).

Harris, R. M. B. et al. Biological responses to the press and pulse of climate trends and extreme events. Nat. Clim. Change 8 , 579–587 (2018).

O’Reilly, C. M. et al. Rapid and highly variable warming of lake surface waters around the globe. Geophys. Res. Lett . https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066235 (2015).

Johnson, G. C. & Lyman, J. M. Warming trends increasingly dominate global ocean. Nat. Clim. Change 10 , 757–761 (2020).

Frölicher, T. L., Fischer, E. M. & Gruber, N. Marine heatwaves under global warming. Nature 560 , 360–364 (2018).

Woolway, R. I. et al. Lake heatwaves under climate change. Nature 589 , 402–407 (2021).

Oliver, E. C. J. et al. Projected marine heatwaves in the 21st century and the potential for ecological impact. Front. Mar. Sci. 6 , 734 (2019).

Garçon, V. et al. Multidisciplinary observing in the world ocean’s oxygen minimum zone regions: from climate to fish—the VOICE Initiative. Front. Mar. Sci. 6 , 722 (2019).

Wiltse, B., Yerger, E. C. & Laxson, C. L. A reduction in spring mixing due to road salt runoff entering Mirror Lake (Lake Placid, NY). Lake Reserv. Manage. 36 , 109–121 (2020).

Cliff, E., Khatiwala, S. & Schmittner, A. Glacial deep ocean deoxygenation driven by biologically mediated air–sea disequilibrium. Nat. Geosci. 14 , 43–50 (2021).

Polyakov, I. V. et al. Greater role for Atlantic inflows on sea-ice loss in the Eurasian Basin of the Arctic Ocean. Science 356 , 285–291 (2017).

Sharma, S. et al. Widespread loss of lake ice around the Northern Hemisphere in a warming world. Nat. Clim. Change 9 , 227–231 (2019).

Woolway, R. I. et al. Phenological shifts in lake stratification under climate change. Nat. Commun. 12 , 2318 (2021).

Zhou, J., Leavitt, P. R., Zhang, Y. & Qin, B. Anthropogenic eutrophication of shallow lakes: is it occasional? Water Res. 221 , 118728 (2022).

Canadell, J. G. et al. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) Ch. 5 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

Ruvalcaba Baroni, I., Palastanga, V. & Slomp, C. P. Enhanced organic carbon burial in sediments of oxygen minimum zones upon ocean deoxygenation. Front. Mar. Sci. 6 , 839 (2020).

Finlay, K. et al. Decrease in CO 2 efflux from northern hardwater lakes with increasing atmospheric warming. Nature 519 , 215–218 (2015).

Van Cappellen, P. & Ingall, E. D. Redox stabilization of the atmosphere and oceans by phosphorus-limited marine productivity. Science 271 , 493–496 (1996).

Oschlies, A., Brandt, P., Stramma, L. & Schmidtko, S. Drivers and mechanisms of ocean deoxygenation. Nat. Geosci. 11 , 467–473 (2018).

Niemeyer, D., Kemena, T. P., Meissner, K. J. & Oschlies, A. A model study of warming-induced phosphorus–oxygen feedbacks in open-ocean oxygen minimum zones on millennial timescales. Earth Syst. Dyn. 8 , 357–367 (2017).

Landolfi, A., Dietze, H., Koeve, W. & Oschlies, A. Overlooked runaway feedback in the marine nitrogen cycle: the vicious cycle. Biogeosciences 10 , 1351–1363 (2013).

Karstensen, J., Stramma, L. & Visbeck, M. Oxygen minimum zones in the eastern tropical Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Prog. Oceanogr. 77 , 331–350 (2008).

Codispoti, L. A. Interesting times for marine N 2 O. Science 327 , 1339–1340 (2010).

Beman, J. M. et al. Substantial oxygen consumption by aerobic nitrite oxidation in oceanic oxygen minimum zones. Nat. Commun. 12 , 7043 (2021).

Landry, C. A., Steele, S. L., Manning, S. & Cheek, A. O. Long term hypoxia suppresses reproductive capacity in the estuarine fish, Fundulus grandis . Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 148 , 317–323 (2007).

Brander, K. Reduced growth in Baltic Sea cod may be due to mild hypoxia. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 77 , 2003–2005 (2020).

Gallo, N. D. & Levin, L. A. Fish ecology and evolution in the world’s oxygen minimum zones and implications of ocean deoxygenation. Adv. Mar. Biol. 74 , 117–198 (2016).

Verberk, W. C. E. P. et al. Body mass and cell size shape the tolerance of fishes to low oxygen in a temperature‐dependent manner. Glob. Change Biol. 28 , 5695–5707 (2022).

Chapman, L. J. & Hulen, K. G. Implications of hypoxia for the brain size and gill morphometry of mormyrid fishes. J. Zool. 254 , 461–472 (2001).

Kump, L. R., Pavlov, A. & Arthur, M. A. Massive release of hydrogen sulfide to the surface ocean and atmosphere during intervals of oceanic anoxia. Geology 33 , 397–400 (2005).

Stockey, R. G., Pohl, A., Ridgwell, A., Finnegan, S. & Sperling, E. A. Decreasing Phanerozoic extinction intensity as a consequence of Earth surface oxygenation and metazoan ecophysiology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118 , e2101900118 (2021).

Levin, L. A. & Gallo, N. D. in Ocean Deoxygenation: Everyone’s Problem—Causes, Impacts, Consequences and Solutions (eds Laffoley, D. & Baxter, J. M.) 341–361 (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, 2019).

Breitburg, D. L., Hondorp, D. W., Davias, L. A. & Diaz, R. J. Hypoxia, nitrogen, and fisheries: integrating effects across local and global landscapes. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 1 , 329–349 (2009).

Rose, K. A. et al. in Ocean Deoxygenation: Everyone’s Problem—Causes, Impacts, Consequences and Solutions (eds Laffoley, D. & Baxter, J. M.) 519–544 (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, 2019).

Cabré, A., Marinov, I., Bernardello, R. & Bianchi, D. Oxygen minimum zones in the tropical Pacific across CMIP5 models: mean state differences and climate change trends. Biogeosciences 12 , 5429–5454 (2015).

Kwiatkowski, L. et al. Twenty-first century ocean warming, acidification, deoxygenation, and upper-ocean nutrient and primary production decline from CMIP6 model projections. Biogeosciences 17 , 3439–3470 (2020).

Oschlies, A. A committed fourfold increase in ocean oxygen loss. Nat. Commun. 12 , 8 (2021).

Ni, W., Li, M. & Testa, J. M. Discerning effects of warming, sea level rise and nutrient management on long-term hypoxia trends in Chesapeake Bay. Sci. Total Environ. 737 , 139717 (2020).

Levin, L. et al. Deep-sea impacts of climate interventions. Science 379 , 978–981 (2023).

Download references

Acknowledgements

K.C.R. acknowledges support from US National Science Foundation (NSF) grant nos 2048031 and 1754265. E.M.F. acknowledges graduate support from the NSF GRFP (UCSD DGE-2038238), UC San Diego (PPPF) and the Aburto Lab at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, and postdoctoral support from UC Santa Cruz. S.R.C. acknowledges support from the North Temperate Lakes Long-Term Ecological Research programme from the NSF Cooperative Agreement no. DEB-2025982. S.C.D. acknowledges support from NSF grant no. IOS-2345023. V.C.G. and M.G. acknowledge support from the CE2COAST project funded by ANR (FR), BELSPO (BE), FCT (PT), IZM (LV), MI (IE), MIUR (IT), Rannis (IS), IRP MAST (Multiscale Adaptive Strategies) and RCN (NO) through the 2019 ‘Joint Transnational Call on Next Generation Climate Science in Europe for Oceans’ initiated by JPI Climate and JPI Oceans. V.C.G. also acknowledges support from the EU H2020 FutureMares project (Theme LC-CLA-06-2019, grant agreement no. 869300) and the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research (SCOR) Working Group 155, funded by national SCOR committees and a grant to SCOR from the NSF (grant no. OCE-1840868). P.R.L. acknowledges support from the Canada Research Chairs programme and grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. M.G. acknowledges support from the EU H2020 BRIDGE-BS project under grant agreement no. 101000240 and the EU HE NECCTON project under grant agreement no. 101081273. S.F.J. was supported by the Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability. S.F.J. was also partially supported by a Society of Science Postdoctoral Fellowship from the University of Notre Dame. L.A.L. acknowledges support from an NSF AccelNet Program award no. 2114717 via University of Texas subaward no. 308056-0001A and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science Competitive Research Program under award no. NA18NOS4780172. V.C.G., L.A.L., D.B., A.O., S.C. and M.G. acknowledge fruitful discussions around the topic of deoxygenation as a potential planetary boundary, which took place within the Global Ocean Oxygen Network Working Group being supported by IOC UNESCO.

Author information

Stephen F. Jane

Present address: Department of Biology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Biological Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA

Kevin C. Rose

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA

Erica M. Ferrer

Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

Erica M. Ferrer & Lisa A. Levin

Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA

Stephen R. Carpenter

Departments of Microbiology and Immunology and Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Sean A. Crowe

Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, North Dartmouth, MA, USA

Sarah C. Donelan

CNRS—Laboratoire d’Etudes en Géophysique et Océanographie Spatiales, Toulouse, France

Véronique C. Garçon

CNRS - Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France

MAST-FOCUS, Department of Astrophysics, Geophysics and Oceanography, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium

Marilaure Grégoire

Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

Institute of Environmental Change and Society, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

Peter R. Leavitt

GEOMAR Helmholtz-Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany

Andreas Oschlies

Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD, USA

Denise Breitburg

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors (K.C.R., E.M.F., S.R.C., S.C., S.C.D., V.C.G., M.G., S.F.J., P.R.L., L.A.L., A.O. and D.B.) contributed to the writing and editing of this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin C. Rose .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information.

Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks David Karl, Thorsten Blenckner, Katherine Richardson and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Rose, K.C., Ferrer, E.M., Carpenter, S.R. et al. Aquatic deoxygenation as a planetary boundary and key regulator of Earth system stability. Nat Ecol Evol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02448-y

Download citation

Received : 02 June 2023

Accepted : 02 May 2024

Published : 15 July 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02448-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.