What Are The Steps Of The Scientific Method?
Julia Simkus
Editor at Simply Psychology
BA (Hons) Psychology, Princeton University
Julia Simkus is a graduate of Princeton University with a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology. She is currently studying for a Master's Degree in Counseling for Mental Health and Wellness in September 2023. Julia's research has been published in peer reviewed journals.
Learn about our Editorial Process
Saul McLeod, PhD
Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester
Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc
Associate Editor for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education
Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.
On This Page:
Science is not just knowledge. It is also a method for obtaining knowledge. Scientific understanding is organized into theories.
The scientific method is a step-by-step process used by researchers and scientists to determine if there is a relationship between two or more variables. Psychologists use this method to conduct psychological research, gather data, process information, and describe behaviors.
It involves careful observation, asking questions, formulating hypotheses, experimental testing, and refining hypotheses based on experimental findings.
![](http://sektorel.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
How it is Used
The scientific method can be applied broadly in science across many different fields, such as chemistry, physics, geology, and psychology. In a typical application of this process, a researcher will develop a hypothesis, test this hypothesis, and then modify the hypothesis based on the outcomes of the experiment.
The process is then repeated with the modified hypothesis until the results align with the observed phenomena. Detailed steps of the scientific method are described below.
Keep in mind that the scientific method does not have to follow this fixed sequence of steps; rather, these steps represent a set of general principles or guidelines.
7 Steps of the Scientific Method
Psychology uses an empirical approach.
Empiricism (founded by John Locke) states that the only source of knowledge comes through our senses – e.g., sight, hearing, touch, etc.
Empirical evidence does not rely on argument or belief. Thus, empiricism is the view that all knowledge is based on or may come from direct observation and experience.
The empiricist approach of gaining knowledge through experience quickly became the scientific approach and greatly influenced the development of physics and chemistry in the 17th and 18th centuries.
![What Are The Steps Of The Scientific Method? 1 Steps of the Scientific Method](https://www.simplypsychology.org/wp-content/uploads/scientific-method.jpg)
Step 1: Make an Observation (Theory Construction)
Every researcher starts at the very beginning. Before diving in and exploring something, one must first determine what they will study – it seems simple enough!
By making observations, researchers can establish an area of interest. Once this topic of study has been chosen, a researcher should review existing literature to gain insight into what has already been tested and determine what questions remain unanswered.
This assessment will provide helpful information about what has already been comprehended about the specific topic and what questions remain, and if one can go and answer them.
Specifically, a literature review might implicate examining a substantial amount of documented material from academic journals to books dating back decades. The most appropriate information gathered by the researcher will be shown in the introduction section or abstract of the published study results.
The background material and knowledge will help the researcher with the first significant step in conducting a psychology study, which is formulating a research question.
This is the inductive phase of the scientific process. Observations yield information that is used to formulate theories as explanations. A theory is a well-developed set of ideas that propose an explanation for observed phenomena.
Inductive reasoning moves from specific premises to a general conclusion. It starts with observations of phenomena in the natural world and derives a general law.
Step 2: Ask a Question
Once a researcher has made observations and conducted background research, the next step is to ask a scientific question. A scientific question must be defined, testable, and measurable.
A useful approach to develop a scientific question is: “What is the effect of…?” or “How does X affect Y?”
To answer an experimental question, a researcher must identify two variables: the independent and dependent variables.
The independent variable is the variable manipulated (the cause), and the dependent variable is the variable being measured (the effect).
An example of a research question could be, “Is handwriting or typing more effective for retaining information?” Answering the research question and proposing a relationship between the two variables is discussed in the next step.
Step 3: Form a Hypothesis (Make Predictions)
A hypothesis is an educated guess about the relationship between two or more variables. A hypothesis is an attempt to answer your research question based on prior observation and background research. Theories tend to be too complex to be tested all at once; instead, researchers create hypotheses to test specific aspects of a theory.
For example, a researcher might ask about the connection between sleep and educational performance. Do students who get less sleep perform worse on tests at school?
It is crucial to think about different questions one might have about a particular topic to formulate a reasonable hypothesis. It would help if one also considered how one could investigate the causalities.
It is important that the hypothesis is both testable against reality and falsifiable. This means that it can be tested through an experiment and can be proven wrong.
The falsification principle, proposed by Karl Popper , is a way of demarcating science from non-science. It suggests that for a theory to be considered scientific, it must be able to be tested and conceivably proven false.
To test a hypothesis, we first assume that there is no difference between the populations from which the samples were taken. This is known as the null hypothesis and predicts that the independent variable will not influence the dependent variable.
Examples of “if…then…” Hypotheses:
- If one gets less than 6 hours of sleep, then one will do worse on tests than if one obtains more rest.
- If one drinks lots of water before going to bed, one will have to use the bathroom often at night.
- If one practices exercising and lighting weights, then one’s body will begin to build muscle.
The research hypothesis is often called the alternative hypothesis and predicts what change(s) will occur in the dependent variable when the independent variable is manipulated.
It states that the results are not due to chance and that they are significant in terms of supporting the theory being investigated.
Although one could state and write a scientific hypothesis in many ways, hypotheses are usually built like “if…then…” statements.
Step 4: Run an Experiment (Gather Data)
The next step in the scientific method is to test your hypothesis and collect data. A researcher will design an experiment to test the hypothesis and gather data that will either support or refute the hypothesis.
The exact research methods used to examine a hypothesis depend on what is being studied. A psychologist might utilize two primary forms of research, experimental research, and descriptive research.
The scientific method is objective in that researchers do not let preconceived ideas or biases influence the collection of data and is systematic in that experiments are conducted in a logical way.
Experimental Research
Experimental research is used to investigate cause-and-effect associations between two or more variables. This type of research systematically controls an independent variable and measures its effect on a specified dependent variable.
Experimental research involves manipulating an independent variable and measuring the effect(s) on the dependent variable. Repeating the experiment multiple times is important to confirm that your results are accurate and consistent.
One of the significant advantages of this method is that it permits researchers to determine if changes in one variable cause shifts in each other.
While experiments in psychology typically have many moving parts (and can be relatively complex), an easy investigation is rather fundamental. Still, it does allow researchers to specify cause-and-effect associations between variables.
Most simple experiments use a control group, which involves those who do not receive the treatment, and an experimental group, which involves those who do receive the treatment.
An example of experimental research would be when a pharmaceutical company wants to test a new drug. They give one group a placebo (control group) and the other the actual pill (experimental group).
Descriptive Research
Descriptive research is generally used when it is challenging or even impossible to control the variables in question. Examples of descriptive analysis include naturalistic observation, case studies , and correlation studies .
One example of descriptive research includes phone surveys that marketers often use. While they typically do not allow researchers to identify cause and effect, correlational studies are quite common in psychology research. They make it possible to spot associations between distinct variables and measure the solidity of those relationships.
Step 5: Analyze the Data and Draw Conclusions
Once a researcher has designed and done the investigation and collected sufficient data, it is time to inspect this gathered information and judge what has been found. Researchers can summarize the data, interpret the results, and draw conclusions based on this evidence using analyses and statistics.
Upon completion of the experiment, you can collect your measurements and analyze the data using statistics. Based on the outcomes, you will either reject or confirm your hypothesis.
Analyze the Data
So, how does a researcher determine what the results of their study mean? Statistical analysis can either support or refute a researcher’s hypothesis and can also be used to determine if the conclusions are statistically significant.
When outcomes are said to be “statistically significant,” it is improbable that these results are due to luck or chance. Based on these observations, investigators must then determine what the results mean.
An experiment will support a hypothesis in some circumstances, but sometimes it fails to be truthful in other cases.
What occurs if the developments of a psychology investigation do not endorse the researcher’s hypothesis? It does mean that the study was worthless. Simply because the findings fail to defend the researcher’s hypothesis does not mean that the examination is not helpful or instructive.
This kind of research plays a vital role in supporting scientists in developing unexplored questions and hypotheses to investigate in the future. After decisions have been made, the next step is to communicate the results with the rest of the scientific community.
This is an integral part of the process because it contributes to the general knowledge base and can assist other scientists in finding new research routes to explore.
If the hypothesis is not supported, a researcher should acknowledge the experiment’s results, formulate a new hypothesis, and develop a new experiment.
We must avoid any reference to results proving a theory as this implies 100% certainty, and there is always a chance that evidence may exist that could refute a theory.
Draw Conclusions and Interpret the Data
When the empirical observations disagree with the hypothesis, a number of possibilities must be considered. It might be that the theory is incorrect, in which case it needs altering, so it fully explains the data.
Alternatively, it might be that the hypothesis was poorly derived from the original theory, in which case the scientists were expecting the wrong thing to happen.
It might also be that the research was poorly conducted, or used an inappropriate method, or there were factors in play that the researchers did not consider. This will begin the process of the scientific method again.
If the hypothesis is supported, the researcher can find more evidence to support their hypothesis or look for counter-evidence to strengthen their hypothesis further.
In either scenario, the researcher should share their results with the greater scientific community.
Step 6: Share Your Results
One of the final stages of the research cycle involves the publication of the research. Once the report is written, the researcher(s) may submit the work for publication in an appropriate journal.
Usually, this is done by writing up a study description and publishing the article in a professional or academic journal. The studies and conclusions of psychological work can be seen in peer-reviewed journals such as Developmental Psychology , Psychological Bulletin, the Journal of Social Psychology, and numerous others.
Scientists should report their findings by writing up a description of their study and any subsequent findings. This enables other researchers to build upon the present research or replicate the results.
As outlined by the American Psychological Association (APA), there is a typical structure of a journal article that follows a specified format. In these articles, researchers:
- Supply a brief narrative and background on previous research
- Give their hypothesis
- Specify who participated in the study and how they were chosen
- Provide operational definitions for each variable
- Explain the measures and methods used to collect data
- Describe how the data collected was interpreted
- Discuss what the outcomes mean
A detailed record of psychological studies and all scientific studies is vital to clearly explain the steps and procedures used throughout the study. So that other researchers can try this experiment too and replicate the results.
The editorial process utilized by academic and professional journals guarantees that each submitted article undergoes a thorough peer review to help assure that the study is scientifically sound. Once published, the investigation becomes another piece of the current puzzle of our knowledge “base” on that subject.
This last step is important because all results, whether they supported or did not support the hypothesis, can contribute to the scientific community. Publication of empirical observations leads to more ideas that are tested against the real world, and so on. In this sense, the scientific process is circular.
The editorial process utilized by academic and professional journals guarantees that each submitted article undergoes a thorough peer review to help assure that the study is scientifically sound.
Once published, the investigation becomes another piece of the current puzzle of our knowledge “base” on that subject.
By replicating studies, psychologists can reduce errors, validate theories, and gain a stronger understanding of a particular topic.
Step 7: Repeat the Scientific Method (Iteration)
Now, if one’s hypothesis turns out to be accurate, find more evidence or find counter-evidence. If one’s hypothesis is false, create a new hypothesis or try again.
One may wish to revise their first hypothesis to make a more niche experiment to design or a different specific question to test.
The amazingness of the scientific method is that it is a comprehensive and straightforward process that scientists, and everyone, can utilize over and over again.
So, draw conclusions and repeat because the scientific method is never-ending, and no result is ever considered perfect.
The scientific method is a process of:
- Making an observation.
- Forming a hypothesis.
- Making a prediction.
- Experimenting to test the hypothesis.
The procedure of repeating the scientific method is crucial to science and all fields of human knowledge.
Further Information
- Karl Popper – Falsification
- Thomas – Kuhn Paradigm Shift
- Positivism in Sociology: Definition, Theory & Examples
- Is Psychology a Science?
- Psychology as a Science (PDF)
List the 6 steps of the scientific methods in order
- Make an observation (theory construction)
- Ask a question. A scientific question must be defined, testable, and measurable.
- Form a hypothesis (make predictions)
- Run an experiment to test the hypothesis (gather data)
- Analyze the data and draw conclusions
- Share your results so that other researchers can make new hypotheses
What is the first step of the scientific method?
The first step of the scientific method is making an observation. This involves noticing and describing a phenomenon or group of phenomena that one finds interesting and wishes to explain.
Observations can occur in a natural setting or within the confines of a laboratory. The key point is that the observation provides the initial question or problem that the rest of the scientific method seeks to answer or solve.
What is the scientific method?
The scientific method is a step-by-step process that investigators can follow to determine if there is a causal connection between two or more variables.
Psychologists and other scientists regularly suggest motivations for human behavior. On a more casual level, people judge other people’s intentions, incentives, and actions daily.
While our standard assessments of human behavior are subjective and anecdotal, researchers use the scientific method to study psychology objectively and systematically.
All utilize a scientific method to study distinct aspects of people’s thinking and behavior. This process allows scientists to analyze and understand various psychological phenomena, but it also provides investigators and others a way to disseminate and debate the results of their studies.
The outcomes of these studies are often noted in popular media, which leads numerous to think about how or why researchers came to the findings they did.
Why Use the Six Steps of the Scientific Method
The goal of scientists is to understand better the world that surrounds us. Scientific research is the most critical tool for navigating and learning about our complex world.
Without it, we would be compelled to rely solely on intuition, other people’s power, and luck. We can eliminate our preconceived concepts and superstitions through methodical scientific research and gain an objective sense of ourselves and our world.
All psychological studies aim to explain, predict, and even control or impact mental behaviors or processes. So, psychologists use and repeat the scientific method (and its six steps) to perform and record essential psychological research.
So, psychologists focus on understanding behavior and the cognitive (mental) and physiological (body) processes underlying behavior.
In the real world, people use to understand the behavior of others, such as intuition and personal experience. The hallmark of scientific research is evidence to support a claim.
Scientific knowledge is empirical, meaning it is grounded in objective, tangible evidence that can be observed repeatedly, regardless of who is watching.
The scientific method is crucial because it minimizes the impact of bias or prejudice on the experimenter. Regardless of how hard one tries, even the best-intentioned scientists can’t escape discrimination. can’t
It stems from personal opinions and cultural beliefs, meaning any mortal filters data based on one’s experience. Sadly, this “filtering” process can cause a scientist to favor one outcome over another.
For an everyday person trying to solve a minor issue at home or work, succumbing to these biases is not such a big deal; in fact, most times, it is important.
But in the scientific community, where results must be inspected and reproduced, bias or discrimination must be avoided.
When to Use the Six Steps of the Scientific Method ?
One can use the scientific method anytime, anywhere! From the smallest conundrum to solving global problems, it is a process that can be applied to any science and any investigation.
Even if you are not considered a “scientist,” you will be surprised to know that people of all disciplines use it for all kinds of dilemmas.
Try to catch yourself next time you come by a question and see how you subconsciously or consciously use the scientific method.
![What Are The Steps Of The Scientific Method? 2 Print Friendly, PDF & Email](https://www.simplypsychology.org/wp-content/uploads/three-icons-with-text-light-blue.jpg)
- Bipolar Disorder
- Therapy Center
- When To See a Therapist
- Types of Therapy
- Best Online Therapy
- Best Couples Therapy
- Managing Stress
- Sleep and Dreaming
- Understanding Emotions
- Self-Improvement
- Healthy Relationships
- Student Resources
- Personality Types
- Sweepstakes
- Guided Meditations
- Verywell Mind Insights
- 2024 Verywell Mind 25
- Mental Health in the Classroom
- Editorial Process
- Meet Our Review Board
- Crisis Support
How to Write a Great Hypothesis
Hypothesis Definition, Format, Examples, and Tips
Verywell / Alex Dos Diaz
- The Scientific Method
Hypothesis Format
Falsifiability of a hypothesis.
- Operationalization
Hypothesis Types
Hypotheses examples.
- Collecting Data
A hypothesis is a tentative statement about the relationship between two or more variables. It is a specific, testable prediction about what you expect to happen in a study. It is a preliminary answer to your question that helps guide the research process.
Consider a study designed to examine the relationship between sleep deprivation and test performance. The hypothesis might be: "This study is designed to assess the hypothesis that sleep-deprived people will perform worse on a test than individuals who are not sleep-deprived."
At a Glance
A hypothesis is crucial to scientific research because it offers a clear direction for what the researchers are looking to find. This allows them to design experiments to test their predictions and add to our scientific knowledge about the world. This article explores how a hypothesis is used in psychology research, how to write a good hypothesis, and the different types of hypotheses you might use.
The Hypothesis in the Scientific Method
In the scientific method , whether it involves research in psychology, biology, or some other area, a hypothesis represents what the researchers think will happen in an experiment. The scientific method involves the following steps:
- Forming a question
- Performing background research
- Creating a hypothesis
- Designing an experiment
- Collecting data
- Analyzing the results
- Drawing conclusions
- Communicating the results
The hypothesis is a prediction, but it involves more than a guess. Most of the time, the hypothesis begins with a question which is then explored through background research. At this point, researchers then begin to develop a testable hypothesis.
Unless you are creating an exploratory study, your hypothesis should always explain what you expect to happen.
In a study exploring the effects of a particular drug, the hypothesis might be that researchers expect the drug to have some type of effect on the symptoms of a specific illness. In psychology, the hypothesis might focus on how a certain aspect of the environment might influence a particular behavior.
Remember, a hypothesis does not have to be correct. While the hypothesis predicts what the researchers expect to see, the goal of the research is to determine whether this guess is right or wrong. When conducting an experiment, researchers might explore numerous factors to determine which ones might contribute to the ultimate outcome.
In many cases, researchers may find that the results of an experiment do not support the original hypothesis. When writing up these results, the researchers might suggest other options that should be explored in future studies.
In many cases, researchers might draw a hypothesis from a specific theory or build on previous research. For example, prior research has shown that stress can impact the immune system. So a researcher might hypothesize: "People with high-stress levels will be more likely to contract a common cold after being exposed to the virus than people who have low-stress levels."
In other instances, researchers might look at commonly held beliefs or folk wisdom. "Birds of a feather flock together" is one example of folk adage that a psychologist might try to investigate. The researcher might pose a specific hypothesis that "People tend to select romantic partners who are similar to them in interests and educational level."
Elements of a Good Hypothesis
So how do you write a good hypothesis? When trying to come up with a hypothesis for your research or experiments, ask yourself the following questions:
- Is your hypothesis based on your research on a topic?
- Can your hypothesis be tested?
- Does your hypothesis include independent and dependent variables?
Before you come up with a specific hypothesis, spend some time doing background research. Once you have completed a literature review, start thinking about potential questions you still have. Pay attention to the discussion section in the journal articles you read . Many authors will suggest questions that still need to be explored.
How to Formulate a Good Hypothesis
To form a hypothesis, you should take these steps:
- Collect as many observations about a topic or problem as you can.
- Evaluate these observations and look for possible causes of the problem.
- Create a list of possible explanations that you might want to explore.
- After you have developed some possible hypotheses, think of ways that you could confirm or disprove each hypothesis through experimentation. This is known as falsifiability.
In the scientific method , falsifiability is an important part of any valid hypothesis. In order to test a claim scientifically, it must be possible that the claim could be proven false.
Students sometimes confuse the idea of falsifiability with the idea that it means that something is false, which is not the case. What falsifiability means is that if something was false, then it is possible to demonstrate that it is false.
One of the hallmarks of pseudoscience is that it makes claims that cannot be refuted or proven false.
The Importance of Operational Definitions
A variable is a factor or element that can be changed and manipulated in ways that are observable and measurable. However, the researcher must also define how the variable will be manipulated and measured in the study.
Operational definitions are specific definitions for all relevant factors in a study. This process helps make vague or ambiguous concepts detailed and measurable.
For example, a researcher might operationally define the variable " test anxiety " as the results of a self-report measure of anxiety experienced during an exam. A "study habits" variable might be defined by the amount of studying that actually occurs as measured by time.
These precise descriptions are important because many things can be measured in various ways. Clearly defining these variables and how they are measured helps ensure that other researchers can replicate your results.
Replicability
One of the basic principles of any type of scientific research is that the results must be replicable.
Replication means repeating an experiment in the same way to produce the same results. By clearly detailing the specifics of how the variables were measured and manipulated, other researchers can better understand the results and repeat the study if needed.
Some variables are more difficult than others to define. For example, how would you operationally define a variable such as aggression ? For obvious ethical reasons, researchers cannot create a situation in which a person behaves aggressively toward others.
To measure this variable, the researcher must devise a measurement that assesses aggressive behavior without harming others. The researcher might utilize a simulated task to measure aggressiveness in this situation.
Hypothesis Checklist
- Does your hypothesis focus on something that you can actually test?
- Does your hypothesis include both an independent and dependent variable?
- Can you manipulate the variables?
- Can your hypothesis be tested without violating ethical standards?
The hypothesis you use will depend on what you are investigating and hoping to find. Some of the main types of hypotheses that you might use include:
- Simple hypothesis : This type of hypothesis suggests there is a relationship between one independent variable and one dependent variable.
- Complex hypothesis : This type suggests a relationship between three or more variables, such as two independent and dependent variables.
- Null hypothesis : This hypothesis suggests no relationship exists between two or more variables.
- Alternative hypothesis : This hypothesis states the opposite of the null hypothesis.
- Statistical hypothesis : This hypothesis uses statistical analysis to evaluate a representative population sample and then generalizes the findings to the larger group.
- Logical hypothesis : This hypothesis assumes a relationship between variables without collecting data or evidence.
A hypothesis often follows a basic format of "If {this happens} then {this will happen}." One way to structure your hypothesis is to describe what will happen to the dependent variable if you change the independent variable .
The basic format might be: "If {these changes are made to a certain independent variable}, then we will observe {a change in a specific dependent variable}."
A few examples of simple hypotheses:
- "Students who eat breakfast will perform better on a math exam than students who do not eat breakfast."
- "Students who experience test anxiety before an English exam will get lower scores than students who do not experience test anxiety."
- "Motorists who talk on the phone while driving will be more likely to make errors on a driving course than those who do not talk on the phone."
- "Children who receive a new reading intervention will have higher reading scores than students who do not receive the intervention."
Examples of a complex hypothesis include:
- "People with high-sugar diets and sedentary activity levels are more likely to develop depression."
- "Younger people who are regularly exposed to green, outdoor areas have better subjective well-being than older adults who have limited exposure to green spaces."
Examples of a null hypothesis include:
- "There is no difference in anxiety levels between people who take St. John's wort supplements and those who do not."
- "There is no difference in scores on a memory recall task between children and adults."
- "There is no difference in aggression levels between children who play first-person shooter games and those who do not."
Examples of an alternative hypothesis:
- "People who take St. John's wort supplements will have less anxiety than those who do not."
- "Adults will perform better on a memory task than children."
- "Children who play first-person shooter games will show higher levels of aggression than children who do not."
Collecting Data on Your Hypothesis
Once a researcher has formed a testable hypothesis, the next step is to select a research design and start collecting data. The research method depends largely on exactly what they are studying. There are two basic types of research methods: descriptive research and experimental research.
Descriptive Research Methods
Descriptive research such as case studies , naturalistic observations , and surveys are often used when conducting an experiment is difficult or impossible. These methods are best used to describe different aspects of a behavior or psychological phenomenon.
Once a researcher has collected data using descriptive methods, a correlational study can examine how the variables are related. This research method might be used to investigate a hypothesis that is difficult to test experimentally.
Experimental Research Methods
Experimental methods are used to demonstrate causal relationships between variables. In an experiment, the researcher systematically manipulates a variable of interest (known as the independent variable) and measures the effect on another variable (known as the dependent variable).
Unlike correlational studies, which can only be used to determine if there is a relationship between two variables, experimental methods can be used to determine the actual nature of the relationship—whether changes in one variable actually cause another to change.
The hypothesis is a critical part of any scientific exploration. It represents what researchers expect to find in a study or experiment. In situations where the hypothesis is unsupported by the research, the research still has value. Such research helps us better understand how different aspects of the natural world relate to one another. It also helps us develop new hypotheses that can then be tested in the future.
Thompson WH, Skau S. On the scope of scientific hypotheses . R Soc Open Sci . 2023;10(8):230607. doi:10.1098/rsos.230607
Taran S, Adhikari NKJ, Fan E. Falsifiability in medicine: what clinicians can learn from Karl Popper [published correction appears in Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jun 17;:]. Intensive Care Med . 2021;47(9):1054-1056. doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06432-z
Eyler AA. Research Methods for Public Health . 1st ed. Springer Publishing Company; 2020. doi:10.1891/9780826182067.0004
Nosek BA, Errington TM. What is replication ? PLoS Biol . 2020;18(3):e3000691. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691
Aggarwal R, Ranganathan P. Study designs: Part 2 - Descriptive studies . Perspect Clin Res . 2019;10(1):34-36. doi:10.4103/picr.PICR_154_18
Nevid J. Psychology: Concepts and Applications. Wadworth, 2013.
By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."
![what comes after making a hypothesis science made simple logo](https://www.sciencemadesimple.com/images/flask-70.jpg)
The Scientific Method by Science Made Simple
Understanding and using the scientific method.
The Scientific Method is a process used to design and perform experiments. It's important to minimize experimental errors and bias, and increase confidence in the accuracy of your results.
In the previous sections, we talked about how to pick a good topic and specific question to investigate. Now we will discuss how to carry out your investigation.
Steps of the Scientific Method
- Observation/Research
- Experimentation
Now that you have settled on the question you want to ask, it's time to use the Scientific Method to design an experiment to answer that question.
If your experiment isn't designed well, you may not get the correct answer. You may not even get any definitive answer at all!
The Scientific Method is a logical and rational order of steps by which scientists come to conclusions about the world around them. The Scientific Method helps to organize thoughts and procedures so that scientists can be confident in the answers they find.
OBSERVATION is first step, so that you know how you want to go about your research.
HYPOTHESIS is the answer you think you'll find.
PREDICTION is your specific belief about the scientific idea: If my hypothesis is true, then I predict we will discover this.
EXPERIMENT is the tool that you invent to answer the question, and
CONCLUSION is the answer that the experiment gives.
Don't worry, it isn't that complicated. Let's take a closer look at each one of these steps. Then you can understand the tools scientists use for their science experiments, and use them for your own.
OBSERVATION
This step could also be called "research." It is the first stage in understanding the problem.
After you decide on topic, and narrow it down to a specific question, you will need to research everything that you can find about it. You can collect information from your own experiences, books, the internet, or even smaller "unofficial" experiments.
Let's continue the example of a science fair idea about tomatoes in the garden. You like to garden, and notice that some tomatoes are bigger than others and wonder why.
Because of this personal experience and an interest in the problem, you decide to learn more about what makes plants grow.
For this stage of the Scientific Method, it's important to use as many sources as you can find. The more information you have on your science fair topic, the better the design of your experiment is going to be, and the better your science fair project is going to be overall.
Also try to get information from your teachers or librarians, or professionals who know something about your science fair project. They can help to guide you to a solid experimental setup.
The next stage of the Scientific Method is known as the "hypothesis." This word basically means "a possible solution to a problem, based on knowledge and research."
The hypothesis is a simple statement that defines what you think the outcome of your experiment will be.
All of the first stage of the Scientific Method -- the observation, or research stage -- is designed to help you express a problem in a single question ("Does the amount of sunlight in a garden affect tomato size?") and propose an answer to the question based on what you know. The experiment that you will design is done to test the hypothesis.
Using the example of the tomato experiment, here is an example of a hypothesis:
TOPIC: "Does the amount of sunlight a tomato plant receives affect the size of the tomatoes?"
HYPOTHESIS: "I believe that the more sunlight a tomato plant receives, the larger the tomatoes will grow.
This hypothesis is based on:
(1) Tomato plants need sunshine to make food through photosynthesis, and logically, more sun means more food, and;
(2) Through informal, exploratory observations of plants in a garden, those with more sunlight appear to grow bigger.
The hypothesis is your general statement of how you think the scientific phenomenon in question works.
Your prediction lets you get specific -- how will you demonstrate that your hypothesis is true? The experiment that you will design is done to test the prediction.
An important thing to remember during this stage of the scientific method is that once you develop a hypothesis and a prediction, you shouldn't change it, even if the results of your experiment show that you were wrong.
An incorrect prediction does NOT mean that you "failed." It just means that the experiment brought some new facts to light that maybe you hadn't thought about before.
Continuing our tomato plant example, a good prediction would be: Increasing the amount of sunlight tomato plants in my experiment receive will cause an increase in their size compared to identical plants that received the same care but less light.
This is the part of the scientific method that tests your hypothesis. An experiment is a tool that you design to find out if your ideas about your topic are right or wrong.
It is absolutely necessary to design a science fair experiment that will accurately test your hypothesis. The experiment is the most important part of the scientific method. It's the logical process that lets scientists learn about the world.
On the next page, we'll discuss the ways that you can go about designing a science fair experiment idea.
The final step in the scientific method is the conclusion. This is a summary of the experiment's results, and how those results match up to your hypothesis.
You have two options for your conclusions: based on your results, either:
(1) YOU CAN REJECT the hypothesis, or
(2) YOU CAN NOT REJECT the hypothesis.
This is an important point!
You can not PROVE the hypothesis with a single experiment, because there is a chance that you made an error somewhere along the way.
What you can say is that your results SUPPORT the original hypothesis.
If your original hypothesis didn't match up with the final results of your experiment, don't change the hypothesis.
Instead, try to explain what might have been wrong with your original hypothesis. What information were you missing when you made your prediction? What are the possible reasons the hypothesis and experimental results didn't match up?
Remember, a science fair experiment isn't a failure simply because does not agree with your hypothesis. No one will take points off if your prediction wasn't accurate. Many important scientific discoveries were made as a result of experiments gone wrong!
A science fair experiment is only a failure if its design is flawed. A flawed experiment is one that (1) doesn't keep its variables under control, and (2) doesn't sufficiently answer the question that you asked of it.
Search This Site:
Science Fairs
- Introduction
- Project Ideas
- Types of Projects
- Pick a Topic
- Scientific Method
- Design Your Experiment
- Present Your Project
- What Judges Want
- Parent Info
Recommended *
- Sample Science Projects - botany, ecology, microbiology, nutrition
* This site contains affiliate links to carefully chosen, high quality products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
- Terms of Service
Copyright © 2006 - 2023, Science Made Simple, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
The science fair projects & ideas, science articles and all other material on this website are covered by copyright laws and may not be reproduced without permission.
![what comes after making a hypothesis PrepScholar](https://www.prepscholar.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/PrepScholar-Logo-Colored.png)
Choose Your Test
- Search Blogs By Category
- College Admissions
- AP and IB Exams
- GPA and Coursework
What Is a Hypothesis and How Do I Write One?
![what comes after making a hypothesis author image](https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/360031/author_ashley.png)
General Education
![what comes after making a hypothesis body-glowing-question-mark](https://blog.prepscholar.com/hs-fs/hubfs/body-glowing-question-mark.jpg?width=550&name=body-glowing-question-mark.jpg)
Think about something strange and unexplainable in your life. Maybe you get a headache right before it rains, or maybe you think your favorite sports team wins when you wear a certain color. If you wanted to see whether these are just coincidences or scientific fact, you would form a hypothesis, then create an experiment to see whether that hypothesis is true or not.
But what is a hypothesis, anyway? If you’re not sure about what a hypothesis is--or how to test for one!--you’re in the right place. This article will teach you everything you need to know about hypotheses, including:
- Defining the term “hypothesis”
- Providing hypothesis examples
- Giving you tips for how to write your own hypothesis
So let’s get started!
![what comes after making a hypothesis body-picture-ask-sign](https://blog.prepscholar.com/hs-fs/hubfs/body-picture-ask-sign.jpg?width=450&name=body-picture-ask-sign.jpg)
What Is a Hypothesis?
Merriam Webster defines a hypothesis as “an assumption or concession made for the sake of argument.” In other words, a hypothesis is an educated guess . Scientists make a reasonable assumption--or a hypothesis--then design an experiment to test whether it’s true or not. Keep in mind that in science, a hypothesis should be testable. You have to be able to design an experiment that tests your hypothesis in order for it to be valid.
As you could assume from that statement, it’s easy to make a bad hypothesis. But when you’re holding an experiment, it’s even more important that your guesses be good...after all, you’re spending time (and maybe money!) to figure out more about your observation. That’s why we refer to a hypothesis as an educated guess--good hypotheses are based on existing data and research to make them as sound as possible.
Hypotheses are one part of what’s called the scientific method . Every (good) experiment or study is based in the scientific method. The scientific method gives order and structure to experiments and ensures that interference from scientists or outside influences does not skew the results. It’s important that you understand the concepts of the scientific method before holding your own experiment. Though it may vary among scientists, the scientific method is generally made up of six steps (in order):
- Observation
- Asking questions
- Forming a hypothesis
- Analyze the data
- Communicate your results
You’ll notice that the hypothesis comes pretty early on when conducting an experiment. That’s because experiments work best when they’re trying to answer one specific question. And you can’t conduct an experiment until you know what you’re trying to prove!
Independent and Dependent Variables
After doing your research, you’re ready for another important step in forming your hypothesis: identifying variables. Variables are basically any factor that could influence the outcome of your experiment . Variables have to be measurable and related to the topic being studied.
There are two types of variables: independent variables and dependent variables. I ndependent variables remain constant . For example, age is an independent variable; it will stay the same, and researchers can look at different ages to see if it has an effect on the dependent variable.
Speaking of dependent variables... dependent variables are subject to the influence of the independent variable , meaning that they are not constant. Let’s say you want to test whether a person’s age affects how much sleep they need. In that case, the independent variable is age (like we mentioned above), and the dependent variable is how much sleep a person gets.
Variables will be crucial in writing your hypothesis. You need to be able to identify which variable is which, as both the independent and dependent variables will be written into your hypothesis. For instance, in a study about exercise, the independent variable might be the speed at which the respondents walk for thirty minutes, and the dependent variable would be their heart rate. In your study and in your hypothesis, you’re trying to understand the relationship between the two variables.
Elements of a Good Hypothesis
The best hypotheses start by asking the right questions . For instance, if you’ve observed that the grass is greener when it rains twice a week, you could ask what kind of grass it is, what elevation it’s at, and if the grass across the street responds to rain in the same way. Any of these questions could become the backbone of experiments to test why the grass gets greener when it rains fairly frequently.
As you’re asking more questions about your first observation, make sure you’re also making more observations . If it doesn’t rain for two weeks and the grass still looks green, that’s an important observation that could influence your hypothesis. You'll continue observing all throughout your experiment, but until the hypothesis is finalized, every observation should be noted.
Finally, you should consult secondary research before writing your hypothesis . Secondary research is comprised of results found and published by other people. You can usually find this information online or at your library. Additionally, m ake sure the research you find is credible and related to your topic. If you’re studying the correlation between rain and grass growth, it would help you to research rain patterns over the past twenty years for your county, published by a local agricultural association. You should also research the types of grass common in your area, the type of grass in your lawn, and whether anyone else has conducted experiments about your hypothesis. Also be sure you’re checking the quality of your research . Research done by a middle school student about what minerals can be found in rainwater would be less useful than an article published by a local university.
![what comes after making a hypothesis body-pencil-notebook-writing](https://blog.prepscholar.com/hs-fs/hubfs/body-pencil-notebook-writing.jpg?width=450&name=body-pencil-notebook-writing.jpg)
Writing Your Hypothesis
Once you’ve considered all of the factors above, you’re ready to start writing your hypothesis. Hypotheses usually take a certain form when they’re written out in a research report.
When you boil down your hypothesis statement, you are writing down your best guess and not the question at hand . This means that your statement should be written as if it is fact already, even though you are simply testing it.
The reason for this is that, after you have completed your study, you'll either accept or reject your if-then or your null hypothesis. All hypothesis testing examples should be measurable and able to be confirmed or denied. You cannot confirm a question, only a statement!
In fact, you come up with hypothesis examples all the time! For instance, when you guess on the outcome of a basketball game, you don’t say, “Will the Miami Heat beat the Boston Celtics?” but instead, “I think the Miami Heat will beat the Boston Celtics.” You state it as if it is already true, even if it turns out you’re wrong. You do the same thing when writing your hypothesis.
Additionally, keep in mind that hypotheses can range from very specific to very broad. These hypotheses can be specific, but if your hypothesis testing examples involve a broad range of causes and effects, your hypothesis can also be broad.
![what comes after making a hypothesis body-hand-number-two](https://blog.prepscholar.com/hs-fs/hubfs/body-hand-number-two.jpg?width=400&name=body-hand-number-two.jpg)
The Two Types of Hypotheses
Now that you understand what goes into a hypothesis, it’s time to look more closely at the two most common types of hypothesis: the if-then hypothesis and the null hypothesis.
#1: If-Then Hypotheses
First of all, if-then hypotheses typically follow this formula:
If ____ happens, then ____ will happen.
The goal of this type of hypothesis is to test the causal relationship between the independent and dependent variable. It’s fairly simple, and each hypothesis can vary in how detailed it can be. We create if-then hypotheses all the time with our daily predictions. Here are some examples of hypotheses that use an if-then structure from daily life:
- If I get enough sleep, I’ll be able to get more work done tomorrow.
- If the bus is on time, I can make it to my friend’s birthday party.
- If I study every night this week, I’ll get a better grade on my exam.
In each of these situations, you’re making a guess on how an independent variable (sleep, time, or studying) will affect a dependent variable (the amount of work you can do, making it to a party on time, or getting better grades).
You may still be asking, “What is an example of a hypothesis used in scientific research?” Take one of the hypothesis examples from a real-world study on whether using technology before bed affects children’s sleep patterns. The hypothesis read s:
“We hypothesized that increased hours of tablet- and phone-based screen time at bedtime would be inversely correlated with sleep quality and child attention.”
It might not look like it, but this is an if-then statement. The researchers basically said, “If children have more screen usage at bedtime, then their quality of sleep and attention will be worse.” The sleep quality and attention are the dependent variables and the screen usage is the independent variable. (Usually, the independent variable comes after the “if” and the dependent variable comes after the “then,” as it is the independent variable that affects the dependent variable.) This is an excellent example of how flexible hypothesis statements can be, as long as the general idea of “if-then” and the independent and dependent variables are present.
#2: Null Hypotheses
Your if-then hypothesis is not the only one needed to complete a successful experiment, however. You also need a null hypothesis to test it against. In its most basic form, the null hypothesis is the opposite of your if-then hypothesis . When you write your null hypothesis, you are writing a hypothesis that suggests that your guess is not true, and that the independent and dependent variables have no relationship .
One null hypothesis for the cell phone and sleep study from the last section might say:
“If children have more screen usage at bedtime, their quality of sleep and attention will not be worse.”
In this case, this is a null hypothesis because it’s asking the opposite of the original thesis!
Conversely, if your if-then hypothesis suggests that your two variables have no relationship, then your null hypothesis would suggest that there is one. So, pretend that there is a study that is asking the question, “Does the amount of followers on Instagram influence how long people spend on the app?” The independent variable is the amount of followers, and the dependent variable is the time spent. But if you, as the researcher, don’t think there is a relationship between the number of followers and time spent, you might write an if-then hypothesis that reads:
“If people have many followers on Instagram, they will not spend more time on the app than people who have less.”
In this case, the if-then suggests there isn’t a relationship between the variables. In that case, one of the null hypothesis examples might say:
“If people have many followers on Instagram, they will spend more time on the app than people who have less.”
You then test both the if-then and the null hypothesis to gauge if there is a relationship between the variables, and if so, how much of a relationship.
![what comes after making a hypothesis feature_tips](https://blog.prepscholar.com/hs-fs/hubfs/feature_tips.png?width=375&name=feature_tips.png)
4 Tips to Write the Best Hypothesis
If you’re going to take the time to hold an experiment, whether in school or by yourself, you’re also going to want to take the time to make sure your hypothesis is a good one. The best hypotheses have four major elements in common: plausibility, defined concepts, observability, and general explanation.
#1: Plausibility
At first glance, this quality of a hypothesis might seem obvious. When your hypothesis is plausible, that means it’s possible given what we know about science and general common sense. However, improbable hypotheses are more common than you might think.
Imagine you’re studying weight gain and television watching habits. If you hypothesize that people who watch more than twenty hours of television a week will gain two hundred pounds or more over the course of a year, this might be improbable (though it’s potentially possible). Consequently, c ommon sense can tell us the results of the study before the study even begins.
Improbable hypotheses generally go against science, as well. Take this hypothesis example:
“If a person smokes one cigarette a day, then they will have lungs just as healthy as the average person’s.”
This hypothesis is obviously untrue, as studies have shown again and again that cigarettes negatively affect lung health. You must be careful that your hypotheses do not reflect your own personal opinion more than they do scientifically-supported findings. This plausibility points to the necessity of research before the hypothesis is written to make sure that your hypothesis has not already been disproven.
#2: Defined Concepts
The more advanced you are in your studies, the more likely that the terms you’re using in your hypothesis are specific to a limited set of knowledge. One of the hypothesis testing examples might include the readability of printed text in newspapers, where you might use words like “kerning” and “x-height.” Unless your readers have a background in graphic design, it’s likely that they won’t know what you mean by these terms. Thus, it’s important to either write what they mean in the hypothesis itself or in the report before the hypothesis.
Here’s what we mean. Which of the following sentences makes more sense to the common person?
If the kerning is greater than average, more words will be read per minute.
If the space between letters is greater than average, more words will be read per minute.
For people reading your report that are not experts in typography, simply adding a few more words will be helpful in clarifying exactly what the experiment is all about. It’s always a good idea to make your research and findings as accessible as possible.
![what comes after making a hypothesis body-blue-eye](https://blog.prepscholar.com/hs-fs/hubfs/body-blue-eye.jpg?width=450&name=body-blue-eye.jpg)
Good hypotheses ensure that you can observe the results.
#3: Observability
In order to measure the truth or falsity of your hypothesis, you must be able to see your variables and the way they interact. For instance, if your hypothesis is that the flight patterns of satellites affect the strength of certain television signals, yet you don’t have a telescope to view the satellites or a television to monitor the signal strength, you cannot properly observe your hypothesis and thus cannot continue your study.
Some variables may seem easy to observe, but if you do not have a system of measurement in place, you cannot observe your hypothesis properly. Here’s an example: if you’re experimenting on the effect of healthy food on overall happiness, but you don’t have a way to monitor and measure what “overall happiness” means, your results will not reflect the truth. Monitoring how often someone smiles for a whole day is not reasonably observable, but having the participants state how happy they feel on a scale of one to ten is more observable.
In writing your hypothesis, always keep in mind how you'll execute the experiment.
#4: Generalizability
Perhaps you’d like to study what color your best friend wears the most often by observing and documenting the colors she wears each day of the week. This might be fun information for her and you to know, but beyond you two, there aren’t many people who could benefit from this experiment. When you start an experiment, you should note how generalizable your findings may be if they are confirmed. Generalizability is basically how common a particular phenomenon is to other people’s everyday life.
Let’s say you’re asking a question about the health benefits of eating an apple for one day only, you need to realize that the experiment may be too specific to be helpful. It does not help to explain a phenomenon that many people experience. If you find yourself with too specific of a hypothesis, go back to asking the big question: what is it that you want to know, and what do you think will happen between your two variables?
![what comes after making a hypothesis body-experiment-chemistry](https://blog.prepscholar.com/hs-fs/hubfs/body-experiment-chemistry.jpg?width=450&name=body-experiment-chemistry.jpg)
Hypothesis Testing Examples
We know it can be hard to write a good hypothesis unless you’ve seen some good hypothesis examples. We’ve included four hypothesis examples based on some made-up experiments. Use these as templates or launch pads for coming up with your own hypotheses.
Experiment #1: Students Studying Outside (Writing a Hypothesis)
You are a student at PrepScholar University. When you walk around campus, you notice that, when the temperature is above 60 degrees, more students study in the quad. You want to know when your fellow students are more likely to study outside. With this information, how do you make the best hypothesis possible?
You must remember to make additional observations and do secondary research before writing your hypothesis. In doing so, you notice that no one studies outside when it’s 75 degrees and raining, so this should be included in your experiment. Also, studies done on the topic beforehand suggested that students are more likely to study in temperatures less than 85 degrees. With this in mind, you feel confident that you can identify your variables and write your hypotheses:
If-then: “If the temperature in Fahrenheit is less than 60 degrees, significantly fewer students will study outside.”
Null: “If the temperature in Fahrenheit is less than 60 degrees, the same number of students will study outside as when it is more than 60 degrees.”
These hypotheses are plausible, as the temperatures are reasonably within the bounds of what is possible. The number of people in the quad is also easily observable. It is also not a phenomenon specific to only one person or at one time, but instead can explain a phenomenon for a broader group of people.
To complete this experiment, you pick the month of October to observe the quad. Every day (except on the days where it’s raining)from 3 to 4 PM, when most classes have released for the day, you observe how many people are on the quad. You measure how many people come and how many leave. You also write down the temperature on the hour.
After writing down all of your observations and putting them on a graph, you find that the most students study on the quad when it is 70 degrees outside, and that the number of students drops a lot once the temperature reaches 60 degrees or below. In this case, your research report would state that you accept or “failed to reject” your first hypothesis with your findings.
Experiment #2: The Cupcake Store (Forming a Simple Experiment)
Let’s say that you work at a bakery. You specialize in cupcakes, and you make only two colors of frosting: yellow and purple. You want to know what kind of customers are more likely to buy what kind of cupcake, so you set up an experiment. Your independent variable is the customer’s gender, and the dependent variable is the color of the frosting. What is an example of a hypothesis that might answer the question of this study?
Here’s what your hypotheses might look like:
If-then: “If customers’ gender is female, then they will buy more yellow cupcakes than purple cupcakes.”
Null: “If customers’ gender is female, then they will be just as likely to buy purple cupcakes as yellow cupcakes.”
This is a pretty simple experiment! It passes the test of plausibility (there could easily be a difference), defined concepts (there’s nothing complicated about cupcakes!), observability (both color and gender can be easily observed), and general explanation ( this would potentially help you make better business decisions ).
![what comes after making a hypothesis body-bird-feeder](https://blog.prepscholar.com/hs-fs/hubfs/body-bird-feeder.jpg?width=450&name=body-bird-feeder.jpg)
Experiment #3: Backyard Bird Feeders (Integrating Multiple Variables and Rejecting the If-Then Hypothesis)
While watching your backyard bird feeder, you realized that different birds come on the days when you change the types of seeds. You decide that you want to see more cardinals in your backyard, so you decide to see what type of food they like the best and set up an experiment.
However, one morning, you notice that, while some cardinals are present, blue jays are eating out of your backyard feeder filled with millet. You decide that, of all of the other birds, you would like to see the blue jays the least. This means you'll have more than one variable in your hypothesis. Your new hypotheses might look like this:
If-then: “If sunflower seeds are placed in the bird feeders, then more cardinals will come than blue jays. If millet is placed in the bird feeders, then more blue jays will come than cardinals.”
Null: “If either sunflower seeds or millet are placed in the bird, equal numbers of cardinals and blue jays will come.”
Through simple observation, you actually find that cardinals come as often as blue jays when sunflower seeds or millet is in the bird feeder. In this case, you would reject your “if-then” hypothesis and “fail to reject” your null hypothesis . You cannot accept your first hypothesis, because it’s clearly not true. Instead you found that there was actually no relation between your different variables. Consequently, you would need to run more experiments with different variables to see if the new variables impact the results.
Experiment #4: In-Class Survey (Including an Alternative Hypothesis)
You’re about to give a speech in one of your classes about the importance of paying attention. You want to take this opportunity to test a hypothesis you’ve had for a while:
If-then: If students sit in the first two rows of the classroom, then they will listen better than students who do not.
Null: If students sit in the first two rows of the classroom, then they will not listen better or worse than students who do not.
You give your speech and then ask your teacher if you can hand out a short survey to the class. On the survey, you’ve included questions about some of the topics you talked about. When you get back the results, you’re surprised to see that not only do the students in the first two rows not pay better attention, but they also scored worse than students in other parts of the classroom! Here, both your if-then and your null hypotheses are not representative of your findings. What do you do?
This is when you reject both your if-then and null hypotheses and instead create an alternative hypothesis . This type of hypothesis is used in the rare circumstance that neither of your hypotheses is able to capture your findings . Now you can use what you’ve learned to draft new hypotheses and test again!
Key Takeaways: Hypothesis Writing
The more comfortable you become with writing hypotheses, the better they will become. The structure of hypotheses is flexible and may need to be changed depending on what topic you are studying. The most important thing to remember is the purpose of your hypothesis and the difference between the if-then and the null . From there, in forming your hypothesis, you should constantly be asking questions, making observations, doing secondary research, and considering your variables. After you have written your hypothesis, be sure to edit it so that it is plausible, clearly defined, observable, and helpful in explaining a general phenomenon.
Writing a hypothesis is something that everyone, from elementary school children competing in a science fair to professional scientists in a lab, needs to know how to do. Hypotheses are vital in experiments and in properly executing the scientific method . When done correctly, hypotheses will set up your studies for success and help you to understand the world a little better, one experiment at a time.
![what comes after making a hypothesis body-whats-next-post-it-note](https://blog.prepscholar.com/hs-fs/hubfs/body-whats-next-post-it-note.jpg?width=250&name=body-whats-next-post-it-note.jpg)
What’s Next?
If you’re studying for the science portion of the ACT, there’s definitely a lot you need to know. We’ve got the tools to help, though! Start by checking out our ultimate study guide for the ACT Science subject test. Once you read through that, be sure to download our recommended ACT Science practice tests , since they’re one of the most foolproof ways to improve your score. (And don’t forget to check out our expert guide book , too.)
If you love science and want to major in a scientific field, you should start preparing in high school . Here are the science classes you should take to set yourself up for success.
If you’re trying to think of science experiments you can do for class (or for a science fair!), here’s a list of 37 awesome science experiments you can do at home
Trending Now
How to Get Into Harvard and the Ivy League
How to Get a Perfect 4.0 GPA
How to Write an Amazing College Essay
What Exactly Are Colleges Looking For?
ACT vs. SAT: Which Test Should You Take?
When should you take the SAT or ACT?
Get Your Free
![what comes after making a hypothesis PrepScholar](https://www.prepscholar.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/PrepScholar-Logo-Colored.png)
Find Your Target SAT Score
Free Complete Official SAT Practice Tests
How to Get a Perfect SAT Score, by an Expert Full Scorer
Score 800 on SAT Math
Score 800 on SAT Reading and Writing
How to Improve Your Low SAT Score
Score 600 on SAT Math
Score 600 on SAT Reading and Writing
Find Your Target ACT Score
Complete Official Free ACT Practice Tests
How to Get a Perfect ACT Score, by a 36 Full Scorer
Get a 36 on ACT English
Get a 36 on ACT Math
Get a 36 on ACT Reading
Get a 36 on ACT Science
How to Improve Your Low ACT Score
Get a 24 on ACT English
Get a 24 on ACT Math
Get a 24 on ACT Reading
Get a 24 on ACT Science
Stay Informed
Get the latest articles and test prep tips!
![what comes after making a hypothesis Follow us on Facebook (icon)](https://360031.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/360031/facebook_logo.png)
Ashley Sufflé Robinson has a Ph.D. in 19th Century English Literature. As a content writer for PrepScholar, Ashley is passionate about giving college-bound students the in-depth information they need to get into the school of their dreams.
Ask a Question Below
Have any questions about this article or other topics? Ask below and we'll reply!
- Research Process
- Manuscript Preparation
- Manuscript Review
- Publication Process
- Publication Recognition
- Language Editing Services
- Translation Services
![what comes after making a hypothesis Elsevier QRcode Wechat](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/themes/authentic/images/wechat-qrcode.jpg)
Step-by-Step Guide: How to Craft a Strong Research Hypothesis
- 4 minute read
- 362.3K views
Table of Contents
A research hypothesis is a concise statement about the expected result of an experiment or project. In many ways, a research hypothesis represents the starting point for a scientific endeavor, as it establishes a tentative assumption that is eventually substantiated or falsified, ultimately improving our certainty about the subject investigated.
To help you with this and ease the process, in this article, we discuss the purpose of research hypotheses and list the most essential qualities of a compelling hypothesis. Let’s find out!
How to Craft a Research Hypothesis
Crafting a research hypothesis begins with a comprehensive literature review to identify a knowledge gap in your field. Once you find a question or problem, come up with a possible answer or explanation, which becomes your hypothesis. Now think about the specific methods of experimentation that can prove or disprove the hypothesis, which ultimately lead to the results of the study.
Enlisted below are some standard formats in which you can formulate a hypothesis¹ :
- A hypothesis can use the if/then format when it seeks to explore the correlation between two variables in a study primarily.
Example: If administered drug X, then patients will experience reduced fatigue from cancer treatment.
- A hypothesis can adopt when X/then Y format when it primarily aims to expose a connection between two variables
Example: When workers spend a significant portion of their waking hours in sedentary work , then they experience a greater frequency of digestive problems.
- A hypothesis can also take the form of a direct statement.
Example: Drug X and drug Y reduce the risk of cognitive decline through the same chemical pathways
What are the Features of an Effective Hypothesis?
Hypotheses in research need to satisfy specific criteria to be considered scientifically rigorous. Here are the most notable qualities of a strong hypothesis:
- Testability: Ensure the hypothesis allows you to work towards observable and testable results.
- Brevity and objectivity: Present your hypothesis as a brief statement and avoid wordiness.
- Clarity and Relevance: The hypothesis should reflect a clear idea of what we know and what we expect to find out about a phenomenon and address the significant knowledge gap relevant to a field of study.
Understanding Null and Alternative Hypotheses in Research
There are two types of hypotheses used commonly in research that aid statistical analyses. These are known as the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis . A null hypothesis is a statement assumed to be factual in the initial phase of the study.
For example, if a researcher is testing the efficacy of a new drug, then the null hypothesis will posit that the drug has no benefits compared to an inactive control or placebo . Suppose the data collected through a drug trial leads a researcher to reject the null hypothesis. In that case, it is considered to substantiate the alternative hypothesis in the above example, that the new drug provides benefits compared to the placebo.
Let’s take a closer look at the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis with two more examples:
Null Hypothesis:
The rate of decline in the number of species in habitat X in the last year is the same as in the last 100 years when controlled for all factors except the recent wildfires.
In the next experiment, the researcher will experimentally reject this null hypothesis in order to confirm the following alternative hypothesis :
The rate of decline in the number of species in habitat X in the last year is different from the rate of decline in the last 100 years when controlled for all factors other than the recent wildfires.
In the pair of null and alternative hypotheses stated above, a statistical comparison of the rate of species decline over a century and the preceding year will help the research experimentally test the null hypothesis, helping to draw scientifically valid conclusions about two factors—wildfires and species decline.
We also recommend that researchers pay attention to contextual echoes and connections when writing research hypotheses. Research hypotheses are often closely linked to the introduction ² , such as the context of the study, and can similarly influence the reader’s judgment of the relevance and validity of the research hypothesis.
Seasoned experts, such as professionals at Elsevier Language Services, guide authors on how to best embed a hypothesis within an article so that it communicates relevance and credibility. Contact us if you want help in ensuring readers find your hypothesis robust and unbiased.
References
- Hypotheses – The University Writing Center. (n.d.). https://writingcenter.tamu.edu/writing-speaking-guides/hypotheses
- Shaping the research question and hypothesis. (n.d.). Students. https://students.unimelb.edu.au/academic-skills/graduate-research-services/writing-thesis-sections-part-2/shaping-the-research-question-and-hypothesis
![what comes after making a hypothesis Systematic Literature Review or Literature Review](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Systematic-Literature-Review-or-Literature-Review-560x420.jpg)
Systematic Literature Review or Literature Review?
![what comes after making a hypothesis Problem Statement](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Picture1-560x420.jpg)
How to Write an Effective Problem Statement for Your Research Paper
You may also like.
![what comes after making a hypothesis Academic paper format](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Academic-paper-format-320x240.jpg)
Submission 101: What format should be used for academic papers?
![what comes after making a hypothesis Being Mindful of Tone and Structure in Artilces](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Being-Mindful-of-Tone-and-Structure-in-Artilces-320x240.jpg)
Page-Turner Articles are More Than Just Good Arguments: Be Mindful of Tone and Structure!
![what comes after making a hypothesis How to Ensure Inclusivity in Your Scientific Writing](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/How-to-Ensure-Inclusivity-in-Your-Scientific-Writing-320x240.jpg)
A Must-see for Researchers! How to Ensure Inclusivity in Your Scientific Writing
![what comes after making a hypothesis impactful introduction section](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/impactful-introduction-section-1-320x240.jpg)
Make Hook, Line, and Sinker: The Art of Crafting Engaging Introductions
![what comes after making a hypothesis Limitations of a Research](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Limitations-of-a-Research-320x240.jpg)
Can Describing Study Limitations Improve the Quality of Your Paper?
![what comes after making a hypothesis Guide to Crafting Impactful Sentences](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Guide-to-Crafting-Impactful-Sentences-320x240.jpg)
A Guide to Crafting Shorter, Impactful Sentences in Academic Writing
![what comes after making a hypothesis Write an Excellent Discussion in Your Manuscript](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Write-an-Excellent-Discussion-in-Your-Manuscript-320x240.png)
6 Steps to Write an Excellent Discussion in Your Manuscript
![what comes after making a hypothesis How to Write Clear Civil Engineering Papers](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/How-to-Write-Clear-Civil-Engineering-Papers-320x240.jpg)
How to Write Clear and Crisp Civil Engineering Papers? Here are 5 Key Tips to Consider
Input your search keywords and press Enter.
Scientific Method Example
Illustration by J.R. Bee. ThoughtCo.
- Cell Biology
- Weather & Climate
- B.A., Biology, Emory University
- A.S., Nursing, Chattahoochee Technical College
The scientific method is a series of steps that scientific investigators follow to answer specific questions about the natural world. Scientists use the scientific method to make observations, formulate hypotheses , and conduct scientific experiments .
A scientific inquiry starts with an observation. Then, the formulation of a question about what has been observed follows. Next, the scientist will proceed through the remaining steps of the scientific method to end at a conclusion.
The six steps of the scientific method are as follows:
Observation
The first step of the scientific method involves making an observation about something that interests you. Taking an interest in your scientific discovery is important, for example, if you are doing a science project , because you will want to work on something that holds your attention. Your observation can be of anything from plant movement to animal behavior, as long as it is something you want to know more about. This step is when you will come up with an idea if you are working on a science project.
Once you have made your observation, you must formulate a question about what you observed. Your question should summarize what it is you are trying to discover or accomplish in your experiment. When stating your question, be as specific as possible. For example, if you are doing a project on plants , you may want to know how plants interact with microbes. Your question could be: Do plant spices inhibit bacterial growth ?
The hypothesis is a key component of the scientific process. A hypothesis is an idea that is suggested as an explanation for a natural event, a particular experience, or a specific condition that can be tested through definable experimentation. It states the purpose of your experiment, the variables used, and the predicted outcome of your experiment. It is important to note that a hypothesis must be testable. That means that you should be able to test your hypothesis through experimentation . Your hypothesis must either be supported or falsified by your experiment. An example of a good hypothesis is: If there is a relation between listening to music and heart rate, then listening to music will cause a person's resting heart rate to either increase or decrease.
Once you have developed a hypothesis, you must design and conduct an experiment that will test it. You should develop a procedure that states clearly how you plan to conduct your experiment. It is important you include and identify a controlled variable or dependent variable in your procedure. Controls allow us to test a single variable in an experiment because they are unchanged. We can then make observations and comparisons between our controls and our independent variables (things that change in the experiment) to develop an accurate conclusion.
The results are where you report what happened in the experiment. That includes detailing all observations and data made during your experiment. Most people find it easier to visualize the data by charting or graphing the information.
Developing a conclusion is the final step of the scientific method. This is where you analyze the results from the experiment and reach a determination about the hypothesis. Did the experiment support or reject your hypothesis? If your hypothesis was supported, great. If not, repeat the experiment or think of ways to improve your procedure.
- Glycolysis Steps
- Biology Prefixes and Suffixes: chrom- or chromo-
- Biology Prefixes and Suffixes: proto-
- 6 Things You Should Know About Biological Evolution
- Biology Prefixes and Suffixes: Aer- or Aero-
- Taxonomy and Organism Classification
- Homeostasis
- Biology Prefixes and Suffixes: diplo-
- The Biology Suffix -lysis
- Biology Prefixes and Suffixes Index
- Biology Prefixes and Suffixes: tel- or telo-
- Parasitism: Definition and Examples
- Biology Prefixes and Suffixes: Erythr- or Erythro-
- Biology Prefixes and Suffixes: ana-
- Biology Prefixes and Suffixes: phago- or phag-
- Biology Prefixes and Suffixes: -phyll or -phyl
Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.
- Knowledge Base
- Methodology
- How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Guide & Examples
How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Guide & Examples
Published on 6 May 2022 by Shona McCombes .
A hypothesis is a statement that can be tested by scientific research. If you want to test a relationship between two or more variables, you need to write hypotheses before you start your experiment or data collection.
Table of contents
What is a hypothesis, developing a hypothesis (with example), hypothesis examples, frequently asked questions about writing hypotheses.
A hypothesis states your predictions about what your research will find. It is a tentative answer to your research question that has not yet been tested. For some research projects, you might have to write several hypotheses that address different aspects of your research question.
A hypothesis is not just a guess – it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations, and statistical analysis of data).
![](http://sektorel.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Variables in hypotheses
Hypotheses propose a relationship between two or more variables . An independent variable is something the researcher changes or controls. A dependent variable is something the researcher observes and measures.
In this example, the independent variable is exposure to the sun – the assumed cause . The dependent variable is the level of happiness – the assumed effect .
Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.
Step 1: ask a question.
Writing a hypothesis begins with a research question that you want to answer. The question should be focused, specific, and researchable within the constraints of your project.
Step 2: Do some preliminary research
Your initial answer to the question should be based on what is already known about the topic. Look for theories and previous studies to help you form educated assumptions about what your research will find.
At this stage, you might construct a conceptual framework to identify which variables you will study and what you think the relationships are between them. Sometimes, you’ll have to operationalise more complex constructs.
Step 3: Formulate your hypothesis
Now you should have some idea of what you expect to find. Write your initial answer to the question in a clear, concise sentence.
Step 4: Refine your hypothesis
You need to make sure your hypothesis is specific and testable. There are various ways of phrasing a hypothesis, but all the terms you use should have clear definitions, and the hypothesis should contain:
- The relevant variables
- The specific group being studied
- The predicted outcome of the experiment or analysis
Step 5: Phrase your hypothesis in three ways
To identify the variables, you can write a simple prediction in if … then form. The first part of the sentence states the independent variable and the second part states the dependent variable.
In academic research, hypotheses are more commonly phrased in terms of correlations or effects, where you directly state the predicted relationship between variables.
If you are comparing two groups, the hypothesis can state what difference you expect to find between them.
Step 6. Write a null hypothesis
If your research involves statistical hypothesis testing , you will also have to write a null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the default position that there is no association between the variables. The null hypothesis is written as H 0 , while the alternative hypothesis is H 1 or H a .
Research question | Hypothesis | Null hypothesis |
---|---|---|
What are the health benefits of eating an apple a day? | Increasing apple consumption in over-60s will result in decreasing frequency of doctor’s visits. | Increasing apple consumption in over-60s will have no effect on frequency of doctor’s visits. |
Which airlines have the most delays? | Low-cost airlines are more likely to have delays than premium airlines. | Low-cost and premium airlines are equally likely to have delays. |
Can flexible work arrangements improve job satisfaction? | Employees who have flexible working hours will report greater job satisfaction than employees who work fixed hours. | There is no relationship between working hour flexibility and job satisfaction. |
How effective is secondary school sex education at reducing teen pregnancies? | Teenagers who received sex education lessons throughout secondary school will have lower rates of unplanned pregnancy than teenagers who did not receive any sex education. | Secondary school sex education has no effect on teen pregnancy rates. |
What effect does daily use of social media have on the attention span of under-16s? | There is a negative correlation between time spent on social media and attention span in under-16s. | There is no relationship between social media use and attention span in under-16s. |
Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics. It is used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses , by calculating how likely it is that a pattern or relationship between variables could have arisen by chance.
A hypothesis is not just a guess. It should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations, and statistical analysis of data).
A research hypothesis is your proposed answer to your research question. The research hypothesis usually includes an explanation (‘ x affects y because …’).
A statistical hypothesis, on the other hand, is a mathematical statement about a population parameter. Statistical hypotheses always come in pairs: the null and alternative hypotheses. In a well-designed study , the statistical hypotheses correspond logically to the research hypothesis.
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.
McCombes, S. (2022, May 06). How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 29 August 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/hypothesis-writing/
Is this article helpful?
Shona McCombes
Other students also liked, operationalisation | a guide with examples, pros & cons, what is a conceptual framework | tips & examples, a quick guide to experimental design | 5 steps & examples.
![what comes after making a hypothesis what comes after making a hypothesis](https://cdn.hswstatic.com/en-us/hsw/img/hsw-avatar-sm.png)
Advertisement
How the Scientific Method Works
- Share Content on Facebook
- Share Content on LinkedIn
- Share Content on Flipboard
- Share Content on Reddit
- Share Content via Email
Scientific Method Steps
As more proof that there is no one way to "do" science, different sources describe the steps of the scientific method in different ways. Some list three steps, some four and some five. Fundamentally, however, they incorporate the same concepts and principles.
For our purposes, we're going to say that there are five key steps in the method.
Step 1: Make Observations
Almost all scientific inquiry begins with an observation that piques curiosity or raises a question. For example, when Charles Darwin (1809-1882) visited the Galapagos Islands (located in the Pacific Ocean, 590 miles (950 kilometers) west of Ecuador, he observed several species of finches , each uniquely adapted to a very specific habitat. In particular, the beaks of the finches were quite variable and seemed to play important roles in how the birds obtained food.
These birds captivated Darwin. He wanted to understand the forces that allowed so many different varieties of finch to coexist successfully in such a small geographic area. His observations caused him to wonder, and his wonderment led him to ask a question that could be tested.
Step 2: Ask Questions
The purpose of the question is to narrow the focus of the inquiry, to identify the problem in specific terms. The question Darwin might have asked after seeing so many different finches was something like this: What caused the diversification of finches on the Galapagos Islands?
Here are some other scientific questions:
- What causes the roots of a plant to grow downward and the stem to grow upward?
- What brand of mouthwash kills the most germs?
- Which car body shape reduces air resistance most effectively?
- What causes coral bleaching?
- Does green tea reduce the effects of oxidation?
- What type of building material absorbs the most sound?
Coming up with scientific questions isn't difficult and doesn't require training as a scientist. If you've ever been curious about something, if you've ever wanted to know what caused something to happen, then you've probably already asked a question that could launch a scientific investigation.
Step 3: Formulate a Hypothesis
The great thing about a question is that it yearns for an answer, and the next step in the scientific method is to suggest a possible answer in the form of a hypothesis . A hypothesis is often defined as an educated guess because it is almost always informed by what you already know about a topic. For example, if you wanted to study the air-resistance problem stated above, you might already have an intuitive sense that a car shaped like a bird would reduce air resistance more effectively than a car shaped like a box. You could use that intuition to help formulate your hypothesis.
Generally, a hypothesis is stated as an "if ... then" statement. In making such a statement, scientists engage in deductive reasoning , which is the opposite of inductive reasoning. Deduction requires movement in logic from the general to the specific. Here's an example: If a car's body profile is related to the amount of air resistance it produces (general statement), then a car designed like the body of a bird will be more aerodynamic and reduce air resistance more than a car designed like a box (specific statement).
Notice that there are two important qualities about a hypothesis expressed as an "if ... then" statement. First, it is testable; an experiment could be set up to test the validity of the statement. Second, it is falsifiable; an experiment could be devised that might reveal that such an idea is not true. If these two qualities are not met, then the question being asked cannot be addressed using the scientific method.
Please copy/paste the following text to properly cite this HowStuffWorks.com article:
![what comes after making a hypothesis Encyclopedia Britannica](https://cdn.britannica.com/mendel/eb-logo/MendelNewThistleLogo.png)
- History & Society
- Science & Tech
- Biographies
- Animals & Nature
- Geography & Travel
- Arts & Culture
- Games & Quizzes
- On This Day
- One Good Fact
- New Articles
- Lifestyles & Social Issues
- Philosophy & Religion
- Politics, Law & Government
- World History
- Health & Medicine
- Browse Biographies
- Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
- Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
- Environment
- Fossils & Geologic Time
- Entertainment & Pop Culture
- Sports & Recreation
- Visual Arts
- Demystified
- Image Galleries
- Infographics
- Top Questions
- Britannica Kids
- Saving Earth
- Space Next 50
- Student Center
![what comes after making a hypothesis experiments disproving spontaneous generation](https://cdn.britannica.com/14/137014-004-9647CF0C/hypothesis-generation-organisms-matter-Louis-Pasteur-experiments-1859.jpg)
- Where was science invented?
- When did science begin?
![what comes after making a hypothesis Blackboard inscribed with scientific formulas and calculations in physics and mathematics](https://cdn.britannica.com/76/194476-131-85FEB7A3/Blackboard-formulas-calculations-mathematics-physics.jpg?w=200&h=200&c=crop)
scientific hypothesis
Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - PubMed Central - On the scope of scientific hypotheses
- LiveScience - What is a scientific hypothesis?
- The Royal Society - Open Science - On the scope of scientific hypotheses
![what comes after making a hypothesis experiments disproving spontaneous generation](https://cdn.britannica.com/14/137014-050-0E3A759B/hypothesis-generation-organisms-matter-Louis-Pasteur-experiments-1859.jpg?w=400&h=300&c=crop)
scientific hypothesis , an idea that proposes a tentative explanation about a phenomenon or a narrow set of phenomena observed in the natural world. The two primary features of a scientific hypothesis are falsifiability and testability, which are reflected in an “If…then” statement summarizing the idea and in the ability to be supported or refuted through observation and experimentation. The notion of the scientific hypothesis as both falsifiable and testable was advanced in the mid-20th century by Austrian-born British philosopher Karl Popper .
The formulation and testing of a hypothesis is part of the scientific method , the approach scientists use when attempting to understand and test ideas about natural phenomena. The generation of a hypothesis frequently is described as a creative process and is based on existing scientific knowledge, intuition , or experience. Therefore, although scientific hypotheses commonly are described as educated guesses, they actually are more informed than a guess. In addition, scientists generally strive to develop simple hypotheses, since these are easier to test relative to hypotheses that involve many different variables and potential outcomes. Such complex hypotheses may be developed as scientific models ( see scientific modeling ).
Depending on the results of scientific evaluation, a hypothesis typically is either rejected as false or accepted as true. However, because a hypothesis inherently is falsifiable, even hypotheses supported by scientific evidence and accepted as true are susceptible to rejection later, when new evidence has become available. In some instances, rather than rejecting a hypothesis because it has been falsified by new evidence, scientists simply adapt the existing idea to accommodate the new information. In this sense a hypothesis is never incorrect but only incomplete.
The investigation of scientific hypotheses is an important component in the development of scientific theory . Hence, hypotheses differ fundamentally from theories; whereas the former is a specific tentative explanation and serves as the main tool by which scientists gather data, the latter is a broad general explanation that incorporates data from many different scientific investigations undertaken to explore hypotheses.
Countless hypotheses have been developed and tested throughout the history of science . Several examples include the idea that living organisms develop from nonliving matter, which formed the basis of spontaneous generation , a hypothesis that ultimately was disproved (first in 1668, with the experiments of Italian physician Francesco Redi , and later in 1859, with the experiments of French chemist and microbiologist Louis Pasteur ); the concept proposed in the late 19th century that microorganisms cause certain diseases (now known as germ theory ); and the notion that oceanic crust forms along submarine mountain zones and spreads laterally away from them ( seafloor spreading hypothesis ).
- Affiliate Program
![what comes after making a hypothesis Wordvice](https://pstatic.wordvice.com/wv-us/image/biglogo2.png)
- UNITED STATES
- 台灣 (TAIWAN)
- TÜRKIYE (TURKEY)
- Academic Editing Services
- - Research Paper
- - Journal Manuscript
- - Dissertation
- - College & University Assignments
- Admissions Editing Services
- - Application Essay
- - Personal Statement
- - Recommendation Letter
- - Cover Letter
- - CV/Resume
- Business Editing Services
- - Business Documents
- - Report & Brochure
- - Website & Blog
- Writer Editing Services
- - Script & Screenplay
- Our Editors
- Client Reviews
- Editing & Proofreading Prices
- Wordvice Points
- Partner Discount
- Plagiarism Checker
- APA Citation Generator
- MLA Citation Generator
- Chicago Citation Generator
- Vancouver Citation Generator
- - APA Style
- - MLA Style
- - Chicago Style
- - Vancouver Style
- Writing & Editing Guide
- Academic Resources
- Admissions Resources
How to Write a Research Hypothesis: Good & Bad Examples
What is a research hypothesis?
A research hypothesis is an attempt at explaining a phenomenon or the relationships between phenomena/variables in the real world. Hypotheses are sometimes called “educated guesses”, but they are in fact (or let’s say they should be) based on previous observations, existing theories, scientific evidence, and logic. A research hypothesis is also not a prediction—rather, predictions are ( should be) based on clearly formulated hypotheses. For example, “We tested the hypothesis that KLF2 knockout mice would show deficiencies in heart development” is an assumption or prediction, not a hypothesis.
The research hypothesis at the basis of this prediction is “the product of the KLF2 gene is involved in the development of the cardiovascular system in mice”—and this hypothesis is probably (hopefully) based on a clear observation, such as that mice with low levels of Kruppel-like factor 2 (which KLF2 codes for) seem to have heart problems. From this hypothesis, you can derive the idea that a mouse in which this particular gene does not function cannot develop a normal cardiovascular system, and then make the prediction that we started with.
What is the difference between a hypothesis and a prediction?
You might think that these are very subtle differences, and you will certainly come across many publications that do not contain an actual hypothesis or do not make these distinctions correctly. But considering that the formulation and testing of hypotheses is an integral part of the scientific method, it is good to be aware of the concepts underlying this approach. The two hallmarks of a scientific hypothesis are falsifiability (an evaluation standard that was introduced by the philosopher of science Karl Popper in 1934) and testability —if you cannot use experiments or data to decide whether an idea is true or false, then it is not a hypothesis (or at least a very bad one).
So, in a nutshell, you (1) look at existing evidence/theories, (2) come up with a hypothesis, (3) make a prediction that allows you to (4) design an experiment or data analysis to test it, and (5) come to a conclusion. Of course, not all studies have hypotheses (there is also exploratory or hypothesis-generating research), and you do not necessarily have to state your hypothesis as such in your paper.
But for the sake of understanding the principles of the scientific method, let’s first take a closer look at the different types of hypotheses that research articles refer to and then give you a step-by-step guide for how to formulate a strong hypothesis for your own paper.
Types of Research Hypotheses
Hypotheses can be simple , which means they describe the relationship between one single independent variable (the one you observe variations in or plan to manipulate) and one single dependent variable (the one you expect to be affected by the variations/manipulation). If there are more variables on either side, you are dealing with a complex hypothesis. You can also distinguish hypotheses according to the kind of relationship between the variables you are interested in (e.g., causal or associative ). But apart from these variations, we are usually interested in what is called the “alternative hypothesis” and, in contrast to that, the “null hypothesis”. If you think these two should be listed the other way round, then you are right, logically speaking—the alternative should surely come second. However, since this is the hypothesis we (as researchers) are usually interested in, let’s start from there.
Alternative Hypothesis
If you predict a relationship between two variables in your study, then the research hypothesis that you formulate to describe that relationship is your alternative hypothesis (usually H1 in statistical terms). The goal of your hypothesis testing is thus to demonstrate that there is sufficient evidence that supports the alternative hypothesis, rather than evidence for the possibility that there is no such relationship. The alternative hypothesis is usually the research hypothesis of a study and is based on the literature, previous observations, and widely known theories.
Null Hypothesis
The hypothesis that describes the other possible outcome, that is, that your variables are not related, is the null hypothesis ( H0 ). Based on your findings, you choose between the two hypotheses—usually that means that if your prediction was correct, you reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative. Make sure, however, that you are not getting lost at this step of the thinking process: If your prediction is that there will be no difference or change, then you are trying to find support for the null hypothesis and reject H1.
Directional Hypothesis
While the null hypothesis is obviously “static”, the alternative hypothesis can specify a direction for the observed relationship between variables—for example, that mice with higher expression levels of a certain protein are more active than those with lower levels. This is then called a one-tailed hypothesis.
Another example for a directional one-tailed alternative hypothesis would be that
H1: Attending private classes before important exams has a positive effect on performance.
Your null hypothesis would then be that
H0: Attending private classes before important exams has no/a negative effect on performance.
Nondirectional Hypothesis
A nondirectional hypothesis does not specify the direction of the potentially observed effect, only that there is a relationship between the studied variables—this is called a two-tailed hypothesis. For instance, if you are studying a new drug that has shown some effects on pathways involved in a certain condition (e.g., anxiety) in vitro in the lab, but you can’t say for sure whether it will have the same effects in an animal model or maybe induce other/side effects that you can’t predict and potentially increase anxiety levels instead, you could state the two hypotheses like this:
H1: The only lab-tested drug (somehow) affects anxiety levels in an anxiety mouse model.
You then test this nondirectional alternative hypothesis against the null hypothesis:
H0: The only lab-tested drug has no effect on anxiety levels in an anxiety mouse model.
![what comes after making a hypothesis hypothesis in a research paper](https://ee-blog-cdn.wordvice.com/us/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/28182831/research-paper-hypothesis-1024x465.png)
How to Write a Hypothesis for a Research Paper
Now that we understand the important distinctions between different kinds of research hypotheses, let’s look at a simple process of how to write a hypothesis.
Writing a Hypothesis Step:1
Ask a question, based on earlier research. Research always starts with a question, but one that takes into account what is already known about a topic or phenomenon. For example, if you are interested in whether people who have pets are happier than those who don’t, do a literature search and find out what has already been demonstrated. You will probably realize that yes, there is quite a bit of research that shows a relationship between happiness and owning a pet—and even studies that show that owning a dog is more beneficial than owning a cat ! Let’s say you are so intrigued by this finding that you wonder:
What is it that makes dog owners even happier than cat owners?
Let’s move on to Step 2 and find an answer to that question.
Writing a Hypothesis Step 2:
Formulate a strong hypothesis by answering your own question. Again, you don’t want to make things up, take unicorns into account, or repeat/ignore what has already been done. Looking at the dog-vs-cat papers your literature search returned, you see that most studies are based on self-report questionnaires on personality traits, mental health, and life satisfaction. What you don’t find is any data on actual (mental or physical) health measures, and no experiments. You therefore decide to make a bold claim come up with the carefully thought-through hypothesis that it’s maybe the lifestyle of the dog owners, which includes walking their dog several times per day, engaging in fun and healthy activities such as agility competitions, and taking them on trips, that gives them that extra boost in happiness. You could therefore answer your question in the following way:
Dog owners are happier than cat owners because of the dog-related activities they engage in.
Now you have to verify that your hypothesis fulfills the two requirements we introduced at the beginning of this resource article: falsifiability and testability . If it can’t be wrong and can’t be tested, it’s not a hypothesis. We are lucky, however, because yes, we can test whether owning a dog but not engaging in any of those activities leads to lower levels of happiness or well-being than owning a dog and playing and running around with them or taking them on trips.
Writing a Hypothesis Step 3:
Make your predictions and define your variables. We have verified that we can test our hypothesis, but now we have to define all the relevant variables, design our experiment or data analysis, and make precise predictions. You could, for example, decide to study dog owners (not surprising at this point), let them fill in questionnaires about their lifestyle as well as their life satisfaction (as other studies did), and then compare two groups of active and inactive dog owners. Alternatively, if you want to go beyond the data that earlier studies produced and analyzed and directly manipulate the activity level of your dog owners to study the effect of that manipulation, you could invite them to your lab, select groups of participants with similar lifestyles, make them change their lifestyle (e.g., couch potato dog owners start agility classes, very active ones have to refrain from any fun activities for a certain period of time) and assess their happiness levels before and after the intervention. In both cases, your independent variable would be “ level of engagement in fun activities with dog” and your dependent variable would be happiness or well-being .
Examples of a Good and Bad Hypothesis
Let’s look at a few examples of good and bad hypotheses to get you started.
Good Hypothesis Examples
Working from home improves job satisfaction. | Employees who are allowed to work from home are less likely to quit within 2 years than those who need to come to the office. |
Sleep deprivation affects cognition. | Students who sleep <5 hours/night don’t perform as well on exams as those who sleep >7 hours/night. |
Animals adapt to their environment. | Birds of the same species living on different islands have differently shaped beaks depending on the available food source. |
Social media use causes anxiety. | Do teenagers who refrain from using social media for 4 weeks show improvements in anxiety symptoms? |
Bad Hypothesis Examples
Garlic repels vampires. | Participants who eat garlic daily will not be harmed by vampires. | Nobody gets harmed by vampires— . |
Chocolate is better than vanilla. | No clearly defined variables— . |
Tips for Writing a Research Hypothesis
If you understood the distinction between a hypothesis and a prediction we made at the beginning of this article, then you will have no problem formulating your hypotheses and predictions correctly. To refresh your memory: We have to (1) look at existing evidence, (2) come up with a hypothesis, (3) make a prediction, and (4) design an experiment. For example, you could summarize your dog/happiness study like this:
(1) While research suggests that dog owners are happier than cat owners, there are no reports on what factors drive this difference. (2) We hypothesized that it is the fun activities that many dog owners (but very few cat owners) engage in with their pets that increases their happiness levels. (3) We thus predicted that preventing very active dog owners from engaging in such activities for some time and making very inactive dog owners take up such activities would lead to an increase and decrease in their overall self-ratings of happiness, respectively. (4) To test this, we invited dog owners into our lab, assessed their mental and emotional well-being through questionnaires, and then assigned them to an “active” and an “inactive” group, depending on…
Note that you use “we hypothesize” only for your hypothesis, not for your experimental prediction, and “would” or “if – then” only for your prediction, not your hypothesis. A hypothesis that states that something “would” affect something else sounds as if you don’t have enough confidence to make a clear statement—in which case you can’t expect your readers to believe in your research either. Write in the present tense, don’t use modal verbs that express varying degrees of certainty (such as may, might, or could ), and remember that you are not drawing a conclusion while trying not to exaggerate but making a clear statement that you then, in a way, try to disprove . And if that happens, that is not something to fear but an important part of the scientific process.
Similarly, don’t use “we hypothesize” when you explain the implications of your research or make predictions in the conclusion section of your manuscript, since these are clearly not hypotheses in the true sense of the word. As we said earlier, you will find that many authors of academic articles do not seem to care too much about these rather subtle distinctions, but thinking very clearly about your own research will not only help you write better but also ensure that even that infamous Reviewer 2 will find fewer reasons to nitpick about your manuscript.
Perfect Your Manuscript With Professional Editing
Now that you know how to write a strong research hypothesis for your research paper, you might be interested in our free AI Proofreader , Wordvice AI, which finds and fixes errors in grammar, punctuation, and word choice in academic texts. Or if you are interested in human proofreading , check out our English editing services , including research paper editing and manuscript editing .
On the Wordvice academic resources website , you can also find many more articles and other resources that can help you with writing the other parts of your research paper , with making a research paper outline before you put everything together, or with writing an effective cover letter once you are ready to submit.
![what comes after making a hypothesis Banner](https://d2jv02qf7xgjwx.cloudfront.net/sites/1103/banner/LibraryHeader.png)
Scientific Method: Step 3: HYPOTHESIS
- Step 1: QUESTION
- Step 2: RESEARCH
- Step 3: HYPOTHESIS
- Step 4: EXPERIMENT
- Step 5: DATA
- Step 6: CONCLUSION
Step 3: State your hypothesis
Now it's time to state your hypothesis . The hypothesis is an educated guess as to what will happen during your experiment.
The hypothesis is often written using the words "IF" and "THEN." For example, " If I do not study, then I will fail the test." The "if' and "then" statements reflect your independent and dependent variables .
The hypothesis should relate back to your original question and must be testable .
A word about variables...
Your experiment will include variables to measure and to explain any cause and effect. Below you will find some useful links describing the different types of variables.
- "What are independent and dependent variables" NCES
- [VIDEO] Biology: Independent vs. Dependent Variables (Nucleus Medical Media) Video explaining independent and dependent variables, with examples.
Resource Links
- What is and How to Write a Good Hypothesis in Research? (Elsevier)
- Hypothesis brochure from Penn State/Berks
- << Previous: Step 2: RESEARCH
- Next: Step 4: EXPERIMENT >>
- Last Updated: Aug 26, 2024 10:04 AM
- URL: https://harford.libguides.com/scientific_method
Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
- Knowledge Base
Hypothesis Testing | A Step-by-Step Guide with Easy Examples
Published on November 8, 2019 by Rebecca Bevans . Revised on June 22, 2023.
Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics . It is most often used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses, that arise from theories.
There are 5 main steps in hypothesis testing:
- State your research hypothesis as a null hypothesis and alternate hypothesis (H o ) and (H a or H 1 ).
- Collect data in a way designed to test the hypothesis.
- Perform an appropriate statistical test .
- Decide whether to reject or fail to reject your null hypothesis.
- Present the findings in your results and discussion section.
Though the specific details might vary, the procedure you will use when testing a hypothesis will always follow some version of these steps.
Table of contents
Step 1: state your null and alternate hypothesis, step 2: collect data, step 3: perform a statistical test, step 4: decide whether to reject or fail to reject your null hypothesis, step 5: present your findings, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about hypothesis testing.
After developing your initial research hypothesis (the prediction that you want to investigate), it is important to restate it as a null (H o ) and alternate (H a ) hypothesis so that you can test it mathematically.
The alternate hypothesis is usually your initial hypothesis that predicts a relationship between variables. The null hypothesis is a prediction of no relationship between the variables you are interested in.
- H 0 : Men are, on average, not taller than women. H a : Men are, on average, taller than women.
Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services
Discover proofreading & editing
For a statistical test to be valid , it is important to perform sampling and collect data in a way that is designed to test your hypothesis. If your data are not representative, then you cannot make statistical inferences about the population you are interested in.
There are a variety of statistical tests available, but they are all based on the comparison of within-group variance (how spread out the data is within a category) versus between-group variance (how different the categories are from one another).
If the between-group variance is large enough that there is little or no overlap between groups, then your statistical test will reflect that by showing a low p -value . This means it is unlikely that the differences between these groups came about by chance.
Alternatively, if there is high within-group variance and low between-group variance, then your statistical test will reflect that with a high p -value. This means it is likely that any difference you measure between groups is due to chance.
Your choice of statistical test will be based on the type of variables and the level of measurement of your collected data .
- an estimate of the difference in average height between the two groups.
- a p -value showing how likely you are to see this difference if the null hypothesis of no difference is true.
Based on the outcome of your statistical test, you will have to decide whether to reject or fail to reject your null hypothesis.
In most cases you will use the p -value generated by your statistical test to guide your decision. And in most cases, your predetermined level of significance for rejecting the null hypothesis will be 0.05 – that is, when there is a less than 5% chance that you would see these results if the null hypothesis were true.
In some cases, researchers choose a more conservative level of significance, such as 0.01 (1%). This minimizes the risk of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis ( Type I error ).
Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting
Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:
- Academic style
- Vague sentences
- Style consistency
See an example
![what comes after making a hypothesis what comes after making a hypothesis](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/dissertation-proofreading-service.png)
The results of hypothesis testing will be presented in the results and discussion sections of your research paper , dissertation or thesis .
In the results section you should give a brief summary of the data and a summary of the results of your statistical test (for example, the estimated difference between group means and associated p -value). In the discussion , you can discuss whether your initial hypothesis was supported by your results or not.
In the formal language of hypothesis testing, we talk about rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis. You will probably be asked to do this in your statistics assignments.
However, when presenting research results in academic papers we rarely talk this way. Instead, we go back to our alternate hypothesis (in this case, the hypothesis that men are on average taller than women) and state whether the result of our test did or did not support the alternate hypothesis.
If your null hypothesis was rejected, this result is interpreted as “supported the alternate hypothesis.”
These are superficial differences; you can see that they mean the same thing.
You might notice that we don’t say that we reject or fail to reject the alternate hypothesis . This is because hypothesis testing is not designed to prove or disprove anything. It is only designed to test whether a pattern we measure could have arisen spuriously, or by chance.
If we reject the null hypothesis based on our research (i.e., we find that it is unlikely that the pattern arose by chance), then we can say our test lends support to our hypothesis . But if the pattern does not pass our decision rule, meaning that it could have arisen by chance, then we say the test is inconsistent with our hypothesis .
If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
- Normal distribution
- Descriptive statistics
- Measures of central tendency
- Correlation coefficient
Methodology
- Cluster sampling
- Stratified sampling
- Types of interviews
- Cohort study
- Thematic analysis
Research bias
- Implicit bias
- Cognitive bias
- Survivorship bias
- Availability heuristic
- Nonresponse bias
- Regression to the mean
Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics. It is used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses , by calculating how likely it is that a pattern or relationship between variables could have arisen by chance.
A hypothesis states your predictions about what your research will find. It is a tentative answer to your research question that has not yet been tested. For some research projects, you might have to write several hypotheses that address different aspects of your research question.
A hypothesis is not just a guess — it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations and statistical analysis of data).
Null and alternative hypotheses are used in statistical hypothesis testing . The null hypothesis of a test always predicts no effect or no relationship between variables, while the alternative hypothesis states your research prediction of an effect or relationship.
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
Bevans, R. (2023, June 22). Hypothesis Testing | A Step-by-Step Guide with Easy Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved August 30, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/hypothesis-testing/
Is this article helpful?
Rebecca Bevans
Other students also liked, choosing the right statistical test | types & examples, understanding p values | definition and examples, what is your plagiarism score.
- Skip to primary navigation
- Skip to main content
- Skip to primary sidebar
- Skip to footer
![what comes after making a hypothesis](https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2018/01/berkeley_logo_white.png)
Understanding Science
How science REALLY works...
- Understanding Science 101
- Misconceptions
- Testing ideas with evidence is at the heart of the process of science.
- Scientific testing involves figuring out what we would expect to observe if an idea were correct and comparing that expectation to what we actually observe.
Misconception: Science proves ideas.
Misconception: Science can only disprove ideas.
Correction: Science neither proves nor disproves. It accepts or rejects ideas based on supporting and refuting evidence, but may revise those conclusions if warranted by new evidence or perspectives. Read more about it.
Testing scientific ideas
Testing ideas about childbed fever.
As a simple example of how scientific testing works, consider the case of Ignaz Semmelweis, who worked as a doctor on a maternity ward in the 1800s. In his ward, an unusually high percentage of new mothers died of what was then called childbed fever. Semmelweis considered many possible explanations for this high death rate. Two of the many ideas that he considered were (1) that the fever was caused by mothers giving birth lying on their backs (as opposed to on their sides) and (2) that the fever was caused by doctors’ unclean hands (the doctors often performed autopsies immediately before examining women in labor). He tested these ideas by considering what expectations each idea generated. If it were true that childbed fever were caused by giving birth on one’s back, then changing procedures so that women labored on their sides should lead to lower rates of childbed fever. Semmelweis tried changing the position of labor, but the incidence of fever did not decrease; the actual observations did not match the expected results. If, however, childbed fever were caused by doctors’ unclean hands, having doctors wash their hands thoroughly with a strong disinfecting agent before attending to women in labor should lead to lower rates of childbed fever. When Semmelweis tried this, rates of fever plummeted; the actual observations matched the expected results, supporting the second explanation.
Testing in the tropics
Let’s take a look at another, very different, example of scientific testing: investigating the origins of coral atolls in the tropics. Consider the atoll Eniwetok (Anewetak) in the Marshall Islands — an oceanic ring of exposed coral surrounding a central lagoon. From the 1800s up until today, scientists have been trying to learn what supports atoll structures beneath the water’s surface and exactly how atolls form. Coral only grows near the surface of the ocean where light penetrates, so Eniwetok could have formed in several ways:
Hypothesis 2: The coral that makes up Eniwetok might have grown in a ring atop an underwater mountain already near the surface. The key to this hypothesis is the idea that underwater mountains don’t sink; instead the remains of dead sea animals (shells, etc.) accumulate on underwater mountains, potentially assisted by tectonic uplifting. Eventually, the top of the mountain/debris pile would reach the depth at which coral grow, and the atoll would form.
Which is a better explanation for Eniwetok? Did the atoll grow atop a sinking volcano, forming an underwater coral tower, or was the mountain instead built up until it neared the surface where coral were eventually able to grow? Which of these explanations is best supported by the evidence? We can’t perform an experiment to find out. Instead, we must figure out what expectations each hypothesis generates, and then collect data from the world to see whether our observations are a better match with one of the two ideas.
If Eniwetok grew atop an underwater mountain, then we would expect the atoll to be made up of a relatively thin layer of coral on top of limestone or basalt. But if it grew upwards around a subsiding island, then we would expect the atoll to be made up of many hundreds of feet of coral on top of volcanic rock. When geologists drilled into Eniwetok in 1951 as part of a survey preparing for nuclear weapons tests, the drill bored through more than 4000 feet (1219 meters) of coral before hitting volcanic basalt! The actual observation contradicted the underwater mountain explanation and matched the subsiding island explanation, supporting that idea. Of course, many other lines of evidence also shed light on the origins of coral atolls, but the surprising depth of coral on Eniwetok was particularly convincing to many geologists.
- Take a sidetrip
Visit the NOAA website to see an animation of coral atoll formation according to Hypothesis 1.
- Teaching resources
Scientists test hypotheses and theories. They are both scientific explanations for what we observe in the natural world, but theories deal with a much wider range of phenomena than do hypotheses. To learn more about the differences between hypotheses and theories, jump ahead to Science at multiple levels .
- Use our web interactive to help students document and reflect on the process of science.
- Learn strategies for building lessons and activities around the Science Flowchart: Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-12 Grades 13-16
- Find lesson plans for introducing the Science Flowchart to your students in: Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-16
- Get graphics and pdfs of the Science Flowchart to use in your classroom. Translations are available in Spanish, French, Japanese, and Swahili.
Observation beyond our eyes
The logic of scientific arguments
Subscribe to our newsletter
- The science flowchart
- Science stories
- Grade-level teaching guides
- Teaching resource database
- Journaling tool
Stack Exchange Network
Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Q&A for work
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
What comes first a research question or a hypothesis?
I am thinking how to structure a paper on economics. I have some scatter data from online sources, but nothing I collected on my own, say, via a survey.
I am struggling to figure out how to organize my research. Specifically, I am unsure if I need to first have a research question and then a hypothesis. Or if both are even needed, perhaps a research question suffices?
- research-process
3 Answers 3
Since the hypothesis is about how to resolve a research question, the former makes little sense without the latter. So, the question, and why it is important, should come first.
But without a hypothesis you can't really conclude much from a study that uses statistics. Yes, you can give descriptive statistics you derive from the data, but unless they support a given hypothesis (or give evidence against it) they have little scientific value.
And, one normally forms the question and the hypothesis and decide on appropriate statistical test before gathering data. Two reasons for this.
The hypothesis guides the sort of data that must be gathered to settle the question (within statistical bounds). And knowing the hypothesis helps you avoid bias in data collection, leading to misleading results.
However, at the very beginning of some exploration, it may be impossible to formulate a hypothesis and even the research question might be ill formed. In such a situation, a preliminary study might be undertaken to try to figure out what might be going on. Some data analysis might be useful, but it is generally wise to consider such information with a grain or more of salt. Such things can inform your research statement and also lead to the hypothesis to confirm (or not) the results from the prelim.
Perhaps you need to get a good book on research process since the question seems a bit naive. Gathering data, alone, isn't really research. It needs to be directed toward an end.
![what comes after making a hypothesis Buffy's user avatar](https://i.sstatic.net/ibvAV.jpg?s=64)
- Thank you. A follow-up. If my study was more exploratory, would I still need a hypothesis or would a research question be enough? It seems a research question is always needed but hypotheses are more apt for STEM and quantitative research. – StatsScared Commented Aug 7, 2022 at 23:33
- I'll add a bit about preliminary studies. – Buffy Commented Aug 7, 2022 at 23:42
I am unsure if I need to first have a research question and then a hypothesis. Or if both are even needed, perhaps a research question suffices?
I know what you mean by "hypothesis": you suspect something is true and you've set up an experiment that will provide evidence for or against it.
I'm less certain what you mean by "research question," especially since you talk of "doing a study" around the question. I suspect you're thinking about more exploratory or "service-based" research. For example, a new virus has just been observed; I have no idea what it is, so we'll look at it under a microscope and see what we see. Or maybe producing a nice dataset that others can use to study their hypotheses.
Conventions here, and the importance of such work, will vary a lot by field. As you say, STEM generally incentivizes proving important hypotheses, though there are certainly examples of high-impact papers that provide only data or tools. I suspect the situation may be inverted in some humanities fields, where the most important papers will present new evidence (e.g., from fieldwork) and the less important papers will simply provide a new interpretation of long-established evidence.
![what comes after making a hypothesis cag51's user avatar](https://i.sstatic.net/b3dkP.jpg?s=64)
I would first consider your philosophical and research paradigms. For example, if you combine the positivist and quantitative paradigms, the hypothesis may proceed the question. In contrast, if you combine post-structuralism and qualitative, the reverse may be true. In summary, your ontological, epistemological, and methodological, perspectives should provide you the answers you seek.
You must log in to answer this question.
Not the answer you're looking for browse other questions tagged research-process writing ..
- Featured on Meta
- Bringing clarity to status tag usage on meta sites
- Announcing a change to the data-dump process
Hot Network Questions
- Generate vectors with a certain property
- Issues with Python in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
- Could an alien pathogen actually have an effect on us?
- If you switch to a non-orthogonal basis, are vectors that were previously orthogonal still orthogonal?
- Is this actor-critic algorithm correct?
- World Building Knowledgebase - How to write good Military World Building
- How can I use DihedralAngle to get correct result?
- Why is Namibia killing game animals for food rather than allowing more big game hunting?
- What counts as the Earth's mass? At which point would it increase or decrease?
- Explain how π – 1 + 50 + ⅔ × 1000 is PLONK
- Can LLMs be prompted without fine tuning?
- How to perform correlation & regression analysis using both 5-point likert scale and "Yes/No/Maybe" questionnaire?
- Fast way to test if an argument is an integer in LaTeX3?
- What is happening when a TV satellite stops broadcasting during an "eclipse"?
- Who owns code contributed to a license-free repository?
- Are there probabilistic facts of the matter about the universe?
- Which Mosaic law was in the backdrop of ceremonial hand-washing in Mark 7?
- How specific does the GDPR require you to be when providing personal information to the police?
- Took a pic of old school friend in the 80s who is now quite famous and written a huge selling memoir. Pic has ben used in book without permission
- All four children have England birth index page changes
- Doesn't counting hole and electron current lead to double-counting of actual current?
- Word to describe telling yourself that you are not, and will never be, good enough
- Do passengers transiting in YVR (Vancouver) from international to US go through Canadian immigration?
- Would it be Balanced to Give Everyone Warlock Slots for Casting Racial Spells?
- SI SWIMSUIT
- SI SPORTSBOOK
- Top Stories
- Relationships
- Real Estate
Caitlin Clark Make-A-Wish fan tragically passes away after Indiana Fever dream come true
Matthew graham | aug 31, 2024.
![Aug 30, 2024: Indiana Fever guard Caitlin Clark brings the ball up court against the Chicago Sky. Aug 30, 2024: Indiana Fever guard Caitlin Clark brings the ball up court against the Chicago Sky.](https://images2.minutemediacdn.com/image/upload/c_crop,w_4200,h_2362,x_0,y_100/c_fill,w_720,ar_16:9,f_auto,q_auto,g_auto/images/ImagnImages/mmsport/the_athlete_lifestyle_on_si/01j6kb52cw3g58x5zsq4.jpg)
- Indiana Fever
- Las Vegas Aces
Bailey Lux loved the Iowa Hawkeyes women’s basketball team, especially forming a special bond with Caitlin Clark and teammate Kate Martin.
With both Clark and Martin now in the WNBA, playing for different teams, it took a Make-A-Wish dream come true for Lux, 14, to be able to spend the entire day with her hero Caitlin Clark, now a WNBA superstar for the Indiana Fever , and Kate Martin, now on the Las Vegas Aces .
The Fever did an incredible feature to commemorate Lux’s visit with Clark and the Fever before their game against the Aces in Las Vegas in early July.
making wishes come true 🥰 we're thrilled to welcome Make-A-Wish kid Bailey Lux as a member of the team today. Bailey flew from Iowa to Las Vegas for tonight's game, but beforehand we invited her to shootaround where she got her custom jersey and more. pic.twitter.com/zLCLHfjPai — Indiana Fever (@IndianaFever) July 2, 2024
“It’s been truly a spiritual uplifting,” Kraig Lux, Bailey’s dad, told the IndyStar at the time . “She hasn’t stopped smiling. This is just one of those things that makes her incredibly happy, and we have to take advantage of that.”
The 22-year-old Clark also got emotional talking about Bailey after the visit.
“At the end of the day, basketball doesn’t matter,” Clark said. “That poor girl has obviously lost her mom already to cancer, and then is fighting for her own life. For me, this is what she spent her Wish on, how cool is that… Obviously that makes an impact on her, but it does in my life too.”
"This is what she spent her wish on. How cool is that?" Caitlin Clark talks about spending time with Make-A-Wish kid Bailey Lux at shootaround and before tonight's game ❤️ pic.twitter.com/KLoZLNeLlB — Indiana Fever (@IndianaFever) July 3, 2024
Tragically, news broke just around the time the Fever took on the Chicago Sky that Lux had passed away. Lux’s hero, Clark, had a stellar performance that left even the NBA’s X, formerly Twitter, handle and LeBron James in awe.
Caitlin Clark put on a MASTERFUL performance in the @IndianaFever ’s win! 🔥 31 PTS (career high) 🔥 12 AST 🔥 4 REB 🔥 5 3PM 🔥 8-14 FGM This is CC’s 5th game this year with 20+ PTS and 10+ AST, the MOST such games in a single season in WNBA history 👏 pic.twitter.com/pkVp3g6d3B — NBA (@NBA) August 31, 2024
CAITLIN CLARK!!!!! HI HATERS — LeBron James (@KingJames) August 31, 2024
Chloe Peterson, the one who originally reported on Lux’s visit with the former Iowa teammates, broke the devastating news on X.
Avid 14-year-old Hawkeye fan Bailey Lux, who had a rare form of cancer, sadly passed away on Wednesday. Make A Wish, with help from Kate Martin and Caitlin Clark, flew Bailey and her family out to Las Vegas last month for a Fever-Aces game: https://t.co/wOBVIeWlNW — Chloe Peterson (@chloepeterson67) August 30, 2024
And in the most awesome follow-up to this devastating story, Lux’s family is encouraging funeral guests to wear Iowa Hawkeyes gear.
In line with her Iowa fandom, people are encouraged to wear Hawkeye gear to her funeral. Bailey’s obituary: https://t.co/ICr4jKKnqi — Chloe Peterson (@chloepeterson67) August 30, 2024
Bailey Lux is truly an inspiration.
![Matthew Graham Matthew Graham](https://images2.minutemediacdn.com/image/upload/c_fill,w_180,ar_1:1,f_auto,q_auto,g_auto/shape/cover/sport/MattGraham-719b2fd8252b43eb834b245300f68cba.jpg)
MATTHEW GRAHAM
Matthew Graham has over 20 years of media experience and oversees The Athlete Lifestyle On SI. He has had previous leadership roles at NBC Sports, Yahoo, and USA TODAY, where he co-founded For The Win (named Best Mobile Site by Digiday). He has also written for ESPN, Cosmopolitan, US Weekly, People, E! Online, and FHM, covering major sports and entertainment events like the Oscars, the Golden Globes, NBA Finals, Super Bowl, and winning the Yahoo Superstar Award for coverage of the Olympics.
![what comes after making a hypothesis Read the Latest on Page Six](https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/02/button_3_bg-2.png?w=206)
latest in US News
![what comes after making a hypothesis Police officer, mom-of-six killed in crash during high-speed pursuit in Missouri](https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/09/Untitled-2-1.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&w=87)
Mom-of-six police officer killed in high-speed pursuit
![what comes after making a hypothesis Car kills 2 after plowing into Minn. restaurant's patio; driver arrested for criminal vehicular homicide](https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/09/newspress-collage-99ulggw60-1725258947837.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&1725244595&w=87)
Car kills 2 after plowing into Minn. restaurant's patio; driver...
![what comes after making a hypothesis 19-year-old woman killed in NYC moped crash sought to live in the moment: twin sister](https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/09/Untitled-1-21.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&w=87)
19-year-old woman killed in NYC moped crash sought to live in the...
![what comes after making a hypothesis Mom, child, tortoise, and cat rescued 925 miles off Hawaii coast during Hurricane Gilma](https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/09/Coast-guard.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&w=87)
Stranded woman, child, tortoise, and cat rescued 925 miles off...
![what comes after making a hypothesis NJ woman mistakenly arrested, jailed for two weeks can’t sue over error](https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/09/Untitled-1-19.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&w=87)
NJ woman mistakenly arrested, jailed for two weeks can’t sue...
![what comes after making a hypothesis RFK Jr. sues North Carolina elections board to remove him from ballot](https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/09/2024-kennedy-drop-presidential-race-88769176.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&w=87)
RFK Jr. sues North Carolina elections board to remove him from...
![what comes after making a hypothesis Linda Deutsch, AP trial writer who had front row to courtroom history like OJ Simpson and Charles Manson trials, dead at 80](https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/09/newspress-collage-4ivnflp0u-1725247262985.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&1725232941&w=87)
Linda Deutsch, AP trial writer who had front row to courtroom...
![what comes after making a hypothesis 90-year-old Texas vet shot, run over by his own car during fatal carjacking outside retirement home: Houston police](https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/09/90-year-old-veteran-murdered-88771445.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&w=87)
90-year-old Texas vet shot, run over by his own car during fatal...
Breaking news, tiktokers are trying to exploit a chase bank ‘glitch’ — and discovering it comes at a huge cost.
A new TikTok trend has people posting their attempts to exploit a “glitch” in Chase bank ATMs that offers “infinite free money” — but quickly learning that a bank and its money are not so easily parted.
Experts say the “glitch” videos look an awful lot like check fraud — one of the oldest scams in the book.
Videos urging customers at the bank to take advantage of the “glitch” quickly took off online, prompting people to deposit fake checks for large sums of money.
The glitch would credit some of the sham deposits to the customers’ accounts before the checks cleared.
people are currently lined up outside a Chase bank in New York trying to do the new viral glitch to get free money 😭😭 pic.twitter.com/V49JpVu9iq — ryan 🤿 (@scubaryan_) August 31, 2024
One video showed people lined up outside of Chase locations in New York City, allegedly looking to take advantage of the “viral glitch to get free money,” one person wrote on X.
But, Chase quickly fixed the bug, and is now clawing back any money doled out to people who didn’t deserve it.
A spokesperson for Chase Bank told The Post consumers should be skeptical and if something seems too good to be true, it likely is.
“We are aware of this incident, and it has been addressed. Regardless of what you see online, depositing a fraudulent check and withdrawing the funds from your account is fraud, plain and simple,” the spokesperson added.
The people who took advantage of the glitch were soon reporting that their accounts were locked and hit with massive negative balances.
One user posted deductions labeled “ATM deposit error” totaling nearly $40,000.
![what comes after making a hypothesis Chase bank fraud](https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/09/new-tiktok-viral-chase-bank-88729465.jpg)
For a short window when the exploit seemed to work, clueless social media users were exuberant.
Chase customers shared videos of themselves dancing with joy and throwing handfuls of bills into the air right outside of a Chase bank in Yonkers.
One clip shows a joyful bunch cruising with their heads sticking out of a car’s window and their Chase cards in their mouths.
Jim Wang, a financial educator explained the trouble with “Chase bank glitch” mania — and warned those who “took advantage” of the issue will face serious consequences.
@bestwallethacks The Chase “infinite money glitch” is a viral video that went around showing a way to trick Chase ATMs into giving money that wasn’t yours. It involved check fraud and I won’t repeat how the “glitch” worked because it’s illegal and has been fixed. If you ever get mysterious money deposited into your account as a result of a bank error, tell the bank immediately. It’s not your money and when they figure it out, they will want it back. Do not spend it, do not move it, just leave it along and tell the bank. Just because it’s in your account doesn’t make it yours. And don’t believe everything you see on social media. #fraud #chase #scam ♬ original sound – Jim Wang
“So what people discovered over the last few days was that Chase was having problems with their ATMs. They were able to deposit checks and get the balances and were able to withdraw them,” Wang said.
“Chase was pretty on top of it, within a day it was all fixed and the people that were doing this were seeing big holds in their accounts or huge negative balances.”
Wang continued: “In the case of this ‘glitch,’ it was just check fraud. You’re going to get in huge trouble if you do something like this.”
![what comes after making a hypothesis Chase](https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/09/general-view-chase-bank-sign-10743134.jpg?w=1024)
Wang reiterated that if a large amount of money shows up in your bank account as a result of a bank error, customers should tell their bank immediately.
“Just because money appears in your account, doesn’t mean it’s literally yours,” he said. “If you spend it and are forced to pay it back you’re going to have to figure out a way to pay it back.”
Another expert and CEO of the Bloom Institute of Technology Austen Allred also took to social media to debunk the trend.
“So the ‘Chase unlimited money glitch’ that went viral on TikTok was: Writing yourself a giant check, mobile depositing that check, going to an ATM to withdraw cash before the check cleared…Literally just committing check fraud,” he wrote.
Value Hypothesis Fundamentals: A Complete Guide
Last updated on Fri Aug 23 2024
Imagine spending months or even years developing a new feature only to find out it doesn’t resonate with your users, argh! This kind of situation could be any worst Product manager’s nightmare.
There's a way to fix this problem called the Value Hypothesis . This idea helps builders to validate whether the ideas they’re working on are worth pursuing and useful to the people they want to sell to.
This guide will teach you what you need to know about Value Hypothesis and a step-by-step process on how to create a strong one. At the end of this post, you’ll learn how to create a product that satisfies your users.
Are you ready? Let’s get to it!
How a Value Hypothesis Helps Product Managers
Scrutinizing this hypothesis helps you as a developer to come up with a product that your customers like and love to use.
Product managers use the Value Hypothesis as a north star, ensuring focus on client needs and avoiding wasted resources. For more on this, read about the product management process .
Definition and Scope of Value Hypothesis
Let's get into the step-by-step process, but first, we need to understand the basics of the Value Hypothesis:
What Is a Value Hypothesis?
A Value Hypothesis is like a smart guess you can test to see if your product truly solves a problem for your customers. It’s your way of predicting how well your product will address a particular issue for the people you’re trying to help.
You need to know what a Value Hypothesis is, what it covers, and its key parts before you use it. To learn more about finding out what customers need, take a look at our guide on discovering features .
The Value Hypothesis does more than just help with the initial launch, it guides the whole development process. This keeps teams focused on what their users care about helping them choose features that their audience will like.
Critical Components of a Value Hypothesis
![what comes after making a hypothesis Critical Components of a Value Hypothesis](https://images.ctfassets.net/3dt621gm7xgb/5cx2EtGyyYadVBwTWoaFNp/93d01cb8200e347efcfb9b7546c7f275/Critical_Components_of_a_Value_Hypothesis.png)
A strong Value Hypothesis rests on three key components:
Value Proposition: The Value Proposition spells out the main advantage your product gives to customers. It explains the "what" and "why" of your product showing how it eases a particular pain point.
This proposition targets a specific group of consumers. To learn more, check out our guide on roadmapping .
Customer Segmentation: Knowing and grasping your target audience is essential. This involves studying their demographics, needs, behaviors, and problems. By dividing your market, you can shape your value proposition to address the unique needs of each group.
Customer feedback surveys can prove priceless in this process. Find out more about this in our customer feedback surveys guide.
Problem Statement : The Problem Statement defines the exact issue your product aims to fix. It should zero in on a real fixable pain point your target users face. For hands-on applications, see our product launch communication plan .
Here are some key questions to guide you:
What are the primary challenges and obstacles faced by your target users?
What existing solutions are available, and where do they fall short?
What unmet needs or desires does your target audience have?
For a structured approach to prioritizing features based on customer needs, consider using a feature prioritization matrix .
Crafting a Strong Value Hypothesis
![what comes after making a hypothesis Crafting a Strong Value Hypothesis](https://images.ctfassets.net/3dt621gm7xgb/01xiMmNOMIs88NyXDM7jcM/f4f579311b2119301bc554b1030b77f4/Crafting_a_Strong_Value_Hypothesis.png)
Now that we've covered the basics, let's look at how to build a convincing Value Hypothesis. Here's a two-step method, along with value hypothesis templates, to point you in the right direction:
1. Research and Analysis
To start with, you need to carry out market research. By carrying out proper market research, you will have an understanding of existing solutions and identify areas in which customers' needs are yet to be met. This is integral to effective idea tracking .
Next, use customer interviews, surveys, and support data to understand your target audience's problems and what they want. Check out our list of tools for getting customer feedback to help with this.
2. Finding Out What Customers Need
Once you've completed your research, it's crucial to identify your customers' needs. By merging insights from market research with direct user feedback, you can pinpoint the key requirements of your customers.
Here are some key questions to think about:
What are the most significant challenges that your target users encounter daily?
Which current solutions are available to them, and how do these solutions fail to fully address their needs?
What specific pain points are your target users struggling with that aren't being resolved?
Are there any gaps or shortcomings in the existing products or services that your customers use?
What unfulfilled needs or desires does your target audience express that aren't currently met by the market?
To prioritize features based on customer needs in a structured way, think about using a feature prioritization matrix .
Validating the Value Hypothesis
Once you've created your Value Hypothesis with a template, you need to check if it holds up. Here's how you can do this:
MVP Testing
Build a minimum viable product (MVP)—a basic version of your product with essential functions. This lets you test your value proposition with actual users and get feedback without spending too much. To achieve the best outcomes, look into the best practices for customer feedback software .
Prototyping
Build mock-ups to show your product idea. Use these mock-ups to get user input on the user experience and overall value offer.
Metrics for Evaluation
After you've gathered data about your hypothesis, it's time to examine it. Here are some metrics you can use:
User Engagement : Monitor stats like time on the platform, feature use, and return visits to see how much users interact with your MVP or mock-up.
Conversion Rates : Check conversion rates for key actions like sign-ups, buys, or feature adoption. These numbers help you judge if your value offer clicks with users. To learn more, read our article on SaaS growth benchmarks .
Iterative Improvement of Value Hypothesis
The Value Hypothesis framework shines because you can keep making it better. Here's how to fine-tune your hypothesis:
Set up an ongoing system to gather user data as you develop your product.
Look at what users say to spot areas that need work then update your value proposition based on what you learn.
Read about managing product updates to keep your hypotheses current.
Adaptation to Market Changes
The market keeps changing, and your Value Hypothesis should too. Stay up to date on what's happening in your industry and watch how users' habits change. Tweak your value proposition to stay useful and ahead of the competition.
Here are some ways to keep your Value Hypothesis fresh:
Do market research often to keep up with what's happening in your industry and what your competitors are up to.
Keep an eye on what users are saying to spot new problems or things they need but don't have yet.
Try out different value statements and features to see which ones your audience likes best.
To keep your guesses up-to-date, check out our guide on handling product changes .
Common Mistakes to Avoid
While the Value Hypothesis approach is powerful, it's key to steer clear of these common traps:
Avoid Confirmation Bias : People tend to focus on data that backs up their initial guesses. But it's key to look at feedback that goes against your ideas and stay open to different views.
Watch out for Shiny Object Syndrome : Don't let the newest fads sway you unless they solve a main customer problem. Your value proposition should fix actual issues for your users.
Don't Cling to Your First Hypothesis : As the market changes, your value proposition should too. Be ready to shift your hypothesis when new evidence and user feedback comes in.
Don't Mix Up Busywork with Real Progress : Getting user feedback is key, but making sense of it brings real value. Look at the data to find useful insights that can shape your product. To learn more about this, check out our guide on handling customer feedback .
Value Hypothesis: Action Points
To build a product that succeeds, you need to know your target users inside out and understand how you help them. The Value Hypothesis framework gives you a step-by-step way to do this.
If you follow the steps in this guide, you can create a strong value proposition, check if it works, and keep improving it to ensure your product stays useful and important to your customers.
Keep in mind, a good Value Hypothesis changes as your product and market change. When you use data and put customers first, you're on the right track to create a product that works.
Want to put the Value Hypothesis framework into action? Check out our top templates for creating product roadmaps to streamline your process. Think about using featureOS to manage customer feedback. This tool makes it easier to collect, examine, and put user feedback to work.
Announcements
Privacy Policy
Terms of use
Competitor Comparisons
Canny vs Frill
Beamer vs Frill
Hello Next vs Frill
Our Roadmap
© 2024 Frill – Independent & Bootstrapped.
- Skip to main content
- Keyboard shortcuts for audio player
Army says Arlington National Cemetery worker was 'pushed aside' by Trump aides
![what comes after making a hypothesis Quil Lawrence square](https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2018/02/15/quil-lawrence_sq-ffe41571c6c34bb9c5ad6130ea46d3c1fcfb1466.jpeg?s=100&c=85&f=jpeg)
Quil Lawrence
![what comes after making a hypothesis Tom Bowman 2010](https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2012/01/03/tombowman_5_sq-12d0ea6fbe5b814c01259cd961fa528fd292766b.jpg?s=100&c=85&f=jpeg)
Stephen Fowler
TRUMP CAMP ARLINGTON POLITICS
![what comes after making a hypothesis This photo shows many rows of tombstones with American flags planted in front of them for Memorial Day in Section 60 of Arlington National Cemetery, in Arlington, Va., on May 27, 2024.](https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/dims3/default/strip/false/crop/5000x3333+0+0/resize/1100/quality/85/format/jpeg/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F42%2F62%2F387c3ec1496989e102db1d5a98ef%2Fap24148686800107.jpg)
Graves with flags for Memorial Day are seen in Section 60 of Arlington National Cemetery, in Arlington, Va., on May 27. Jacquelyn Martin/AP hide caption
The U.S. Army said an employee at Arlington National Cemetery who tried to "ensure adherence" to rules that prohibit political activities at the cemetery "was abruptly pushed aside," but that the employee decided not to press charges against the Trump campaign staffers who allegedly pushed her.
The statement Thursday comes in response to NPR's reporting on former President Donald Trump's visit to Arlington and an altercation his staff had with a cemetery employee.
"Participants in the August 26th ceremony and the subsequent Section 60 visit were made aware of federal laws, Army regulations and DoD policies, which clearly prohibit political activities on cemetery grounds," the statement said. "An ANC employee who attempted to ensure adherence to these rules was abruptly pushed aside. Consistent with the decorum expected at ANC, this employee acted with professionalism and avoided further disruption. The incident was reported to the JBM-HH police department, but the employee subsequently decided not to press charges. Therefore, the Army considers this matter closed."
The Army, in its statement, called the incident "unfortunate," adding: "it is also unfortunate that the ANC employee and her professionalism has been unfairly attacked."
Because federal law prohibits Army employees from being involved with any political campaign, the staff at the cemetery did not deal directly with the Trump campaign about his visit there. A source familiar with the event said the cemetery staff worked with the staff of Republican Congressman Brian Mast of Florida, who joined Trump at Arlington.
Arlington Cemetery staff dealt directly with Mast’s chief of staff, James Langenderfer, briefing him extensively on the rules, which include no campaign events at the cemetery. They also reiterated that only an official Arlington National Cemetery photographer — and no campaign photographer — could be used at Section 60, the location of the recent American war dead. The source said Langenderfer told them the Trump campaign agreed to these rules.
Fallout continues after Trump campaign incident at Arlington National Cemetary
NPR reached out to Mast’s staff and asked if Langenderfer was briefed and relayed that information to the Trump campaign. They did not address the questions but instead released a statement.
In the statement to NPR, Mast said: "President Trump conducted no politics at Arlington National Cemetery."
The statement comes a day after Trump shared a TikTok video including footage from Arlington National Cemetery that likely violates a federal law against using military cemeteries for campaigning purposes.
NPR reported that Trump campaign staffers had a physical altercation with an Arlington National Cemetery staffer on Monday over the restriction.
It's not the first time Trump has been accused of politicizing the military, but the campaign is seeking to downplay what happened in the aftermath.
![what comes after making a hypothesis This photo shows former President Donald Trump at Arlington National Cemetery on Monday. He's wearing a blue suit and red tie and is standing outdoors on stairs while surrounded by various officials and staffers in suits.](https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/dims3/default/strip/false/crop/683x683+171+0/resize/100/quality/15/format/jpeg/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fa5%2F27%2F4f1bf65d4e0a999565326c690e8d%2Fgettyimages-2168623932.jpg)
Trump campaign staff had altercation with official at Arlington National Cemetery
Trump was at Arlington on Monday to commemorate the third anniversary of an attack in Afghanistan that killed 13 U.S. service members amid the disastrous withdrawal of troops. Trump and other Republicans have blamed President Biden and Vice President Harris for the chaos and loss of life.
The 21-second video posted on Trump's TikTok account shows the former president laying a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier and several snippets of Trump joining Gold Star family members at gravesites of their loved ones in a part of the cemetery known as Section 60 .
"We lost 13 great, great people — what a horrible day it was," Trump says over somber music. “We didn't lose one person in 18 months, and then they took over the disaster, the leaving of Afghanistan.”
Trump has been making this claim about 18 months without military casualties during his administration for years, and it’s not true. The 18-month period from February 2020 to August 2021 saw no combat-related deaths in Afghanistan, with part of that when Biden was in office.
The Trump campaign was not authorized to film or photograph in Section 60, federal law prohibits the use of military cemeteries for campaign events, and two campaign staffers got in a physical and verbal altercation with the Arlington staffer who tried to prevent the filming.
In a statement after NPR's original story, family members present Monday said they invited Trump and gave approval for his photographer and videographer to document an emotional moment of remembrance.
![what comes after making a hypothesis A man places flowers in front of headstones in Section 60, which mark the final resting place of service men and women at Arlington National Cemetery on May 27 in Arlington, Va. Originally known as Decoration Day, Memorial Day began after the Civil War to commemorate soldiers who died in that conflict and now honors all Americans who have sacrificed their lives in all wars.](https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/dims3/default/strip/false/crop/4000x4000+1000+0/resize/100/quality/15/format/jpeg/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F26%2F9f%2F965ebbc9456ebca647f3e3e5c25a%2Fgettyimages-2154428391.jpg)
Arlington National Cemetery’s Section 60 is a focus of controversy. What is the area?
Some of those family members also spoke at the Republican National Convention, bashing Biden and vocally endorsing Trump.
"Joe Biden may have forgotten that our children died, but we have not forgotten — Donald Trump has not forgotten," said Cheryl Juels in Milwaukee at the RNC in July. Juels is the aunt of Sgt. Nicole Gee, one of the 13 U.S. service members killed at Abbey Gate in Afghanistan in 2021.
"Joe Biden owes the men and women that served in Afghanistan a debt of gratitude and an apology. Donald Trump loves this country and will never forget the sacrifice and bravery of our service members," she added. "Join us in putting him back in the White House."
Though the loved ones said they were OK with the cameras present, the families do not have the power to suspend the rules.
The family of Master Sgt. Andrew Marckesano, a Green Beret who died by suicide after serving multiple combat tours and who is buried in Section 60, said according to their conversations with the cemetery, "the Trump campaign staffers did not adhere to the rules that were set in place for this visit."
"We hope that those visiting this sacred site understand that there were real people who sacrificed for our freedom and that they are honored and respected and treated accordingly," they said in a statement.
The Trump campaign responds
In the aftermath of the visit to Arlington, the Trump campaign's response has taken on a tone of nastiness. One spokesman said the cemetery staffer was "clearly suffering from a mental health episode" and promised to release footage of the encounter but has so far declined to do so.
On the campaign trail in Pennsylvania on Wednesday, the Republican vice presidential nominee, Sen. JD Vance of Ohio, said Harris could "go to hell" over the Afghanistan withdrawal and blamed reporters for the campaign's controversy, which he called a "disagreement."
"You guys in the media, you're acting like Donald Trump filmed a TV commercial at a grave site," Vance said. "He was there providing emotional support to a lot of brave Americans who lost loved ones they never should have lost. And there happened to be a camera there, and somebody gave him permission to have that camera there.”
Trump echoed that argument Thursday, doubling down on attacks against Harris and Biden in a clip posted to his campaign's Trump Social account from a campaign event in Michigan.
"She does not respect you, ask the families of the 13 incredible servicemember heroes who died during the surrender of Afghanistan — which was surrendered by Kamala and 'Sleepy Joe' — whether or not Kamala Harris cares about our young people and our military," Trump said.
Meanwhile, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, who attended the Arlington events with Trump, apologized in a social media post for sending a campaign fundraising email with a photo of him and the former president in Section 60 with the family of Staff Sgt. Darin Taylor Hoover.
Cox's official gubernatorial X account posted a photo from the restricted area, and the post is still online.
This is not the first time Trump has been accused of politicizing the military for his personal gain. He has allegedly called dead soldiers " suckers" and "losers ," insulted the late Sen. John McCain for being a prisoner of war and recently stoked controversy for saying civilian Presidential Medal of Freedom recipients are much better than those who received the Medal of Honor — the highest military award in the country, often given posthumously.
Court hears that more women have made complaints against former Seven journalist
By Jamie McKinnell
Topic: Courts and Trials
Robert Ovadia was sacked by Network Seven. ( AAP: Joe Castro )
A barrister representing the Seven network has said 13 more women have come forward with complaints against journalist Robert Ovadia.
Mr Ovadia launched legal action against his former employer after being sacked in late June.
What's next?
The Federal Court judge ordered that the parties attend mediation after a failed Fair Work Commission conciliation attempt.
Thirteen additional women have come forward with complaints against former Seven journalist Robert Ovadia since he was sacked by the network in late June, a Sydney court has heard.
The veteran reporter has launched legal action against his former employer in the Federal Court, after previously denying allegations of inappropriate behaviour.
Mr Ovadia didn't attend court as the case reached its first largely administrative listing before Justice Elizabeth Raper on Thursday morning.
In a statement, he described the claims of 13 additional women coming forward as "baseless" and said that Seven had never provided him with evidence of the allegations "despite repeated requests".
Mr Ovadia said Seven's claims were "just a dirty tactic to try to bully me away from defending myself".
Barrister Andrew Gotting, representing Mr Ovadia, told the judge that his client's letter of termination was effected immediately, citing "serious misconduct".
There was an express statement that he was not entitled to a notice of termination, Mr Gotting said.
Barrister Andrew Gotting said the onus fell upon the employer to establish misconduct. ( ABC News: Keana Naughton )
A minor dispute arose regarding which party should produce its evidence first, and Mr Gotting said in cases where there are allegations of misconduct the onus fell upon the employer to establish the misconduct.
He argued the matter was one of the rare cases where it was appropriate for the respondent to put on its evidence first.
Barrister Vanja Bulut, representing Seven and its new boss Anthony De Ceglie, said two matters were investigated for which Mr Ovadia's employment was terminated.
They included allegations that he sent a number of inappropriate pictures to a producer and sent a photograph of men's genitals to a different colleague.
Barrister Vanja Bulut represented Seven and its boss Anthony De Ceglie. ( ABC News: Keana Naughton )
One of those allegations was recently reported in an episode of the ABC's Four Corners.
The journalist, who spent 23 years with Seven, has previously described allegations of inappropriate behaviour as false and said they would be defended.
On Thursday, Ms Bulut said subsequent to Mr Ovadia's dismissal, 13 more women had come forward with complaints in relation to his conduct.
Mr Ovadia had been "put on notice" of that, she said.
Ms Bulut said that even if Seven and Mr De Ceglie didn't have a basis to summarily terminate the employment, the alleged conduct that had subsequently come to light provided a basis for it.
The court heard the parties attempted conciliation at the Fair Work Commission around six weeks ago, which did not resolve the matter.
Justice Raper has ordered that the parties attend mediation.
- Election 2024
- Entertainment
- Newsletters
- Photography
- AP Buyline Personal Finance
- AP Buyline Shopping
- Press Releases
- Israel-Hamas War
- Russia-Ukraine War
- Global elections
- Asia Pacific
- Latin America
- Middle East
- Election results
- Google trends
- AP & Elections
- U.S. Open Tennis
- Paralympic Games
- College football
- Auto Racing
- Movie reviews
- Book reviews
- Financial Markets
- Business Highlights
- Financial wellness
- Artificial Intelligence
- Social Media
Nvidia stock slips even after earnings top Wall Street estimates and demand for AI chips surges
FILE - Jensen Huang, chief executive officer of Nvidia, speaks at SIGGRAPH 2024, in the Colorado Convention Center on July 29, 2024, in Denver. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski, File)
A sign for a Nvidia office building is shown in Santa Clara, Calif., Wednesday, Aug. 7, 2024. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)
- Copy Link copied
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Nvidia may have exceeded Wall Street estimates as its profit jumped — buffeted by the chipmaking dominance that has cemented Nvidia’s place as the poster child of the artificial intelligence boom — but investors seemed less than impressed.
The company reported a net income of to $16.6 billion. Adjusted for one-time items, net income was $16.95 billion. Revenue rose to $30 billion, up 122% from a year ago and 15% from the previous quarter.
By comparison, S&P 500 companies overall are expected to deliver just 5% growth in revenue for the quarter, according to FactSet. Still, Nvidia shares slipped nearly 4% in after-hours trading.
Ryan Detrick, chief market strategist at Carson Group, said that despite growing revenue “it appears the bar was just set a tad too high this earnings season.”
“Death, taxes, and NVDA beats on earnings are three things you can bank on,” Detrick said. “Here’s the issue. The size of the beat this time was much smaller than we’ve been seeing. Even future guidance was raised, but again not by the tune from previous quarters.”
The company reported second-quarter adjusted earnings per share of 68 cents per share, up from 27 cents a year ago. Nvidia said it expects third quarter revenue to grow to $32.5 billion, plus or minus 2%.
Nvidia has led the artificial intelligence sector to become one of the stock market’s biggest companies , as tech giants continue to spend heavily on the company’s chips and data centers needed to train and operate their AI systems.
“The people who are investing in Nvidia infrastructure are getting returns on it right away,” Jensen Huang, founder and CEO of Nvidia, said on a call with analysts. “It’s the best ROI infrastructure, computing infrastructure investment you can make today.”
Demand for generative AI products that can compose documents, make images and serve as personal assistants has fueled sales of Nvidia’s specialized chips over the last year. In June, Nvidia briefly rose to become the most valuable company in the S&P 500. The company is now worth over $3 trillion .
Nvidia CFO Colette Kress said during the analyst call that the company is planning to increase production of its Blackwell AI chips beginning in the fourth quarter and continuing through fiscal 2026. Kress said Nvidia expects several billion dollars in Blackwell revenue in the fourth quarter, with shipments of its Hopper graphics processor unit, or GPU, expected to increase in the second half of fiscal 2025.
In an interview with Bloomberg Television, Huang said the company will “have a great next year as well.”
Through the year’s first six months, Nvidia’s stock price soared nearly 150%. At that point, it was trading at a little more than 100 times the company’s earnings over the prior 12 months. That’s much more expensive than it’s been historically and than the S&P 500 in general. That’s why analysts warn of a selloff if Wall Street sees any indication that AI demand is waning.
Dan Ives, an analyst with Wedbush Securities, called the earnings part of a “historic, meteoric rise from Nvidia and the godfather of AI, Jensen (Huang).” Investors, Ives added, are picking apart “robust numbers” and trying to find holes in them. Although Nvidia said it estimates about $32.5 billion in revenue in the third fiscal quarter, some analysts expected a slightly higher figure, he said.
“I view it as kind of like splitting hairs,” Ives said. The demand for AI technology is only accelerating, he added, echoing Huang’s previous statements that the world is in the midst of the next industrial revolution.
“This is the most watched earnings — not just in tech, but in the market, in many years,” he said. “Investors will initially overreact to any sort of short-lived weakness. But I believe this actually put more fuel into the tank of the bull market.”
![](http://sektorel.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
A hypothesis is an educated guess about how things work. It is an attempt to answer your question with an explanation that can be tested. A good hypothesis allows you to then make a prediction: "If _____[I do this] _____, then _____[this]_____ will happen." State both your hypothesis and the resulting prediction you will be testing.
Hypothesis Propose a hypothesis. This is a sort of educated guess about what you expect your research to reveal. A hypothesis is a statement used to predict the outcome of an experiment. Usually, a hypothesis is written in terms of cause and effect. Alternatively, it may describe the relationship between two phenomena.
Developing a hypothesis (with example) Step 1. Ask a question. Writing a hypothesis begins with a research question that you want to answer. The question should be focused, specific, and researchable within the constraints of your project. Example: Research question.
The scientific method is a process that includes several steps: First, an observation or question arises about a phenomenon. Then a hypothesis is formulated to explain the phenomenon, which is used to make predictions about other related occurrences or to predict the results of new observations quantitatively. Finally, these predictions are put to the test through experiments or further ...
A hypothesis is a tentative statement about the relationship between two or more variables. It is a specific, testable prediction about what you expect to happen in a study. It is a preliminary answer to your question that helps guide the research process. Consider a study designed to examine the relationship between sleep deprivation and test ...
Understanding and Using The Scientific Method. The Scientific Method is a process used to design and perform experiments. It's important to minimize experimental errors and bias, and increase confidence in the accuracy of your results. In the previous sections, we talked about how to pick a good topic and specific question to investigate.
Merriam Webster defines a hypothesis as "an assumption or concession made for the sake of argument.". In other words, a hypothesis is an educated guess. Scientists make a reasonable assumption--or a hypothesis--then design an experiment to test whether it's true or not.
Here are the most notable qualities of a strong hypothesis: Testability: Ensure the hypothesis allows you to work towards observable and testable results. Brevity and objectivity: Present your hypothesis as a brief statement and avoid wordiness. Clarity and Relevance: The hypothesis should reflect a clear idea of what we know and what we expect ...
This is basically the step that comes after you ask your research question but before you make a prediction about the subject matter. ... It typically takes a statement form, predicting a potential outcome or relationship between variables. Make sure that your hypothesis is focused and answers your research question. For example, a hypothesis ...
Regina Bailey. Updated on August 16, 2024. The scientific method is a series of steps that scientific investigators follow to answer specific questions about the natural world. Scientists use the scientific method to make observations, formulate hypotheses, and conduct scientific experiments . A scientific inquiry starts with an observation.
5 Logical hypothesis. A logical hypothesis suggests a relationship between variables without actual evidence. Claims are instead based on reasoning or deduction, but lack actual data. Examples: An alien raised on Venus would have trouble breathing in Earth's atmosphere. Dinosaurs with sharp, pointed teeth were probably carnivores. 6 Empirical ...
Step 5: Phrase your hypothesis in three ways. To identify the variables, you can write a simple prediction in if … then form. The first part of the sentence states the independent variable and the second part states the dependent variable. If a first-year student starts attending more lectures, then their exam scores will improve.
Step 3: Formulate a Hypothesis. The great thing about a question is that it yearns for an answer, and the next step in the scientific method is to suggest a possible answer in the form of a hypothesis. A hypothesis is often defined as an educated guess because it is almost always informed by what you already know about a topic.
hypothesis. science. scientific hypothesis, an idea that proposes a tentative explanation about a phenomenon or a narrow set of phenomena observed in the natural world. The two primary features of a scientific hypothesis are falsifiability and testability, which are reflected in an "If…then" statement summarizing the idea and in the ...
If you understood the distinction between a hypothesis and a prediction we made at the beginning of this article, then you will have no problem formulating your hypotheses and predictions correctly. To refresh your memory: We have to (1) look at existing evidence, (2) come up with a hypothesis, (3) make a prediction, and (4) design an experiment.
Learning how to write a hypothesis comes down to knowledge and strategy. So where do you start? Learn how to make your hypothesis strong step-by-step here.
The Scientific Method: What Comes After the Hypothesis? To understand the importance of a hypothesis, consider its place in the overall research process known as the scientific method .
4. Formulate your hypothesis. After collecting background information and making a prediction based on your question, plan a statement that lays out your variables, subjects and predicted outcome. Whether you write it as an "if/then" or declarative statement, your hypothesis should include the prediction to be tested.
The hypothesis is an educated guess as to what will happen during your experiment. The hypothesis is often written using the words "IF" and "THEN." For example, "If I do not study, then I will fail the test." The "if' and "then" statements reflect your independent and dependent variables.
Present the findings in your results and discussion section. Though the specific details might vary, the procedure you will use when testing a hypothesis will always follow some version of these steps. Table of contents. Step 1: State your null and alternate hypothesis. Step 2: Collect data. Step 3: Perform a statistical test.
Theory vs. Hypothesis: Basics of the Scientific Method. Written by MasterClass. Last updated: Jun 7, 2021 • 2 min read. Though you may hear the terms "theory" and "hypothesis" used interchangeably, these two scientific terms have drastically different meanings in the world of science.
Hypothesis 2: The coral that makes up Eniwetok might have grown in a ring atop an underwater mountain already near the surface. The key to this hypothesis is the idea that underwater mountains don't sink; instead the remains of dead sea animals (shells, etc.) accumulate on underwater mountains, potentially assisted by tectonic uplifting.
5. Since the hypothesis is about how to resolve a research question, the former makes little sense without the latter. So, the question, and why it is important, should come first. But without a hypothesis you can't really conclude much from a study that uses statistics. Yes, you can give descriptive statistics you derive from the data, but ...
Caitlin Clark Make-A-Wish fan tragically passes away after Indiana Fever dream come true Die-hard Iowa Hawkeyes and Caitlin Clark fan Bailey Lux died battling a rare form of cancer. She was only 14.
A new TikTok trend has people posting their attempts exploit a "glitch" in Chase bank ATMs that offers "infinite free money" — but experts and Chase said the "free money" hack just appears to be ...
A "right to disconnect" rule has come into effect in Australia, offering relief to people who feel forced to take calls or read messages from employers after they finish their day's work. The ...
How a Value Hypothesis Helps Product Managers. Scrutinizing this hypothesis helps you as a developer to come up with a product that your customers like and love to use. Product managers use the Value Hypothesis as a north star, ensuring focus on client needs and avoiding wasted resources. For more on this, read about the product management process.
The statement comes a day after Trump shared a TikTok video including footage from Arlington National Cemetery that likely violates a federal law against using military cemeteries for campaigning ...
Thirteen additional women have come forward with complaints against former Seven journalist Robert Ovadia since he was sacked by the network in late June, a Sydney court has heard.
Nvidia may have exceeded Wall Street estimates as its profit jumped — buffeted by the chipmaking dominance that has cemented Nvidia's place as the poster child of the artificial intelligence boom — but investors seemed less than impressed.