what is basic incongruity thesis

BUS603: Managing People

Individual and Cultural Differences

Personality and organization: a basic conflict.

• How do managers know how to get the best from each employee?

Most theories of personality stress that an individual's personality becomes complete only when the individual interacts with other people; growth and development do not occur in a vacuum. Human personalities are the individual expressions of our culture, and our culture and social order are the group expressions of individual personalities. This being the case, it is important to understand how work organizations influence the growth and development of the adult employee.

A model of person-organization relationships has been proposed by Chris Argyris. This model, called the basic incongruity thesis [] consists of three parts: what individuals want from organizations, what organizations want from individuals, and how these two potentially conflicting sets of desires are harmonized.

Argyris begins by examining how healthy individuals change as they mature. On the basis of previous work, Argyris suggests that as people grow to maturity, seven basic changes in needs and interests occur:

• People develop from a state of passivity as infants to a state of increasing activity as adults.
• People develop from a state of dependence upon others to a state of relative independence.
• People develop from having only a few ways of behaving to having many diverse ways of behaving.
• People develop from having shallow, casual, and erratic interests to having fewer, but deeper, interests.
• People develop from having a short time perspective (i.e., behavior is determined by present events) to having a longer time perspective (behavior is determined by a combination of past, present, and future events).
• People develop from subordinate to superordinate positions (from child to parent or from trainee to manager).
• People develop from a low understanding or awareness of themselves to a greater understanding of and control over themselves as adults.

Although Argyris acknowledges that these developments may differ among individuals, the general tendencies from childhood to adulthood are believed to be fairly common.

Next, Argyris turns his attention to the defining characteristics of traditional work organizations. In particular, he argues that in the pursuit of efficiency and effectiveness, organizations create work situations aimed more at getting the job done than at satisfying employees' personal goals. Examples include increased task specialization, unity of command, a rules orientation, and other things aimed at turning out a standardized product with standardized people. In the pursuit of this standardization, Argyris argues, organizations often create work situations with the following characteristics:

• Employees are allowed minimal control over their work; control is often shifted to machines.
• They are expected to be passive, dependent, and subordinate.
• They are allowed only a short-term horizon in their work.
• They are placed on repetitive jobs that require only minimal skills and abilities.
• On the basis of the first four items, people are expected to produce under conditions leading to psychological failure.

Hence, Argyris argues persuasively that many jobs in our technological society are structured in such a way that they conflict with the basic growth needs of a healthy personality. This conflict is represented in Exhibit 2.3 . The magnitude of this conflict between personality and organization is a function of several factors. The strongest conflict can be expected under conditions where employees are very mature, the organization is highly structured, rules and procedures are formalized, and jobs are fragmented and mechanized. Hence, we would expect the strongest conflict to be at the lower levels of the organization, among blue-collar and clerical workers. Managers tend to have jobs that are less mechanized and tend to be less subject to formalized rules and procedures.

Exhibit 2.3 Basic Conflict Between Employees and Organizations

Where strong conflicts between personalities and organizations exist, or, more precisely, where strong conflicts exist between what employees and organizations want from each other, employees are faced with difficult choices. They may choose to leave the organization or to work hard to climb the ladder into the upper echelons of management. They may defend their self-concepts and adapt through the use of defense mechanisms. Disassociating themselves psychologically from the organization (e.g., losing interest in their work, lowering their work standards, etc). and concentrating instead on the material rewards available from the organization is another possible response. Or they may find allies in their fellow workers and, in concert, may further adapt as a group by such activities as quota restrictions, unionizing efforts, strikes, and sabotage.

Unfortunately, although such activities may help employees feel that they are getting back at the organization, they do not alleviate the basic situation that is causing the problem. To do this, one has to examine the nature of the job and the work climate. Personality represents a powerful force in the determination of work behavior and must be recognized before meaningful change can be implemented by managers to improve the effectiveness of their organizations.

MANAGING CHANGE

Integrating employee and organizational goals at kayak.

In many ways the above scenario paints a bleak portrait of the relationship of many workers to their employers. However, it should be noted that many companies are trying to change this relationship and create a partnership between employees and company in which the goals of both are realized. In doing so, however, these companies are careful to select and hire only those employees who have the potential to fit in with the company's unique culture. A case in point is Kayak, an Internet-based travel company in Stamford, Connecticut. The company strives to create customer satisfaction, starting with their own culture and employees within the walls of their building. Cofounder and former CTO Paul English's goal was to bring a constant stream of "new-new ideas" and surround himself with "childlike creative people" to liven up the space and be able to promote inspiration.

Kayak doesn't hire based on technical skills; their philosophy is to hire an employee on the basis of being the smartest person that somebody knows. Employees are constantly pushed to put their ideas to the test, and the company emphasizes a work-life balance that puts their employees first, which in turn makes for a productive work environment.

Kayak's ability to make fast-paced decisions comes from the empowerment of their employees to try out their ideas. Current CTO Giorgos Zacharia takes pride in the way they are able to keep order and drive deadlines. "Anyone on any team can come up with the idea, prototype it, and then we see what the user thinks about it. If it works, great! But there's no grand design; it's very organic and we see that as a strength," says Zacharia.

By encouraging and rewarding risk-taking, Kayak is able to make fast decisions, fail fast, and then turn around and come up with something more innovative that will be better than the last idea. Overall, the company hopes to offer its employees a work environment that allows for considerable personal growth and need-satisfaction. In short, the company aims to reduce the possibility of a basic incongruity developing between employee and organizational goals.

Personality and Employee Selection

Recent years have seen an increased interest in the use of preemployment screening tests. Several key assumptions underlie the use of personality tests as one method of selecting potential employees: (1) individuals have different personalities and traits, (2) these differences affect their behavior and performance, and (3) different jobs have different requirements. Consequently, tests can be used to select individuals who match the overall company as well as match particular types of people to specific jobs. However, managers must be careful in their use of these selection instruments. Legally all selection tests must meet the guidelines for nondiscrimination set forth in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures. Specifically, in 1971 the Supreme Court ruled (Griggs v. Duke Power Company) that "good intent or the absence of discriminatory intent does not redeem . . . testing mechanisms that operate as built-in ‘head-winds' for minority groups and are unrelated to measuring job capability". This ruling led to two important cases in which discrimination might apply to selection practices. First, "disparate treatment" involves the intentional discrimination against an individual based on race, color, gender, religion, or national origin. Second, "disparate impact" involves the adverse effect of selection practices (as well as other practices) on minorities regardless of whether these practices were intended to have an adverse impact or not. Consequently, although personality tests can be an important means of selecting potential employees as well as matching them to appropriate jobs, care must be taken to demonstrate that the characteristics measured actually predict job performance.

CONCEPT CHECK

• What are some things that managers can do to foster organizational harmony where they get the best results from all employees?

• < Previous

Home > ETDS > UGETD > uvmhcoltheses > 26

UVM Patrick Leahy Honors College Senior Theses

Incongruity theory and the explanatory limits of reason.

Ian Jaeger Straus , University of Vermont Follow

Date of Completion

Document type.

Honors College Thesis

First Advisor

Tyler Doggett

Second Advisor

Todd McGowan

humor, incongruity theory, jokes, comedy, amusement, absurdity

This thesis presents a popular and fairly successful account of humor most commonly referred to as incongruity theory. It examines the strengths of this account according to a modern formulation of incongruity theory as well as formulations set forth by Kant and Schopenhauer in the 18th and 19th centuries. This thesis argues that incongruity theory provides a relatively reliable framework for analyzing humor in spite of several important criticisms leveled against it. Finally, it examines the relationship between humor as described by incongruity theory, reason, and the brand of philosophical absurdity identified by Thomas Nagel (1972). By applying incongruity theory to foundational yet persistently unanswerable metaphysical questions about existence, death, God, etc., this thesis attempts to show that humor not only bears a close relationship to these issues but that humor also serves as a means by which we can engage and cope with the unsolvable nature of these problems.

Creative Commons License

Recommended Citation

Straus, Ian Jaeger, "Incongruity Theory and the Explanatory Limits of Reason" (2014). UVM Patrick Leahy Honors College Senior Theses . 26. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses/26

Advanced Search

• Notify me via email or RSS
• Collections
• Disciplines

Author Corner

• Submission Guidelines
• Submit Research
• The University of Vermont Honors College

UVM ScholarWorks ISSN: 2576-7550

Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement

Privacy Copyright

•   Home
• UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
• UA Theses and Dissertations
• Dissertations

Relationship between incongruity of supervisory strategy and satisfaction with the organization and/or supervision.

Degree Name

Degree level, degree program, degree grantor, collections.

entitlement

Show Statistical Information

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

Chapter Review Questions

• Why is it important for managers to understand individual differences at work?
• Which employee abilities seem to be most important in determining job performance? Explain.
• Define  personality . Which personality traits are most relevant to understanding organizational behavior? Why?
• Explain how the concept of  locus of control  works. Provide an example.
• Describe the basic incongruity thesis. Do you agree with this thesis? Under what circumstances might the thesis be most likely to be true? Least likely to be true? Explain.
• Why is it important for managers to understand ethical standards in the workplace? How do ethics affect our behavior at work?
• How should managers handle the “gray zones” that are common to ethical dilemmas in organizations? Explain.
• Define  culture . How do culture and cultural variations affect work behavior and job performance? Provide examples to show why a knowledge of such differences is important for managers.

Source contents: Principles of Management and Organizational Behavior . Please visit OpenStax for more details: https://openstax.org/subjects/view-all

Introduction to Management and Organizational Behavior Copyright © by OpenStax is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Chapter Review Questions

• Why is it important for managers to understand individual differences at work?
• Which employee abilities seem to be most important in determining job performance? Explain.
• Define personality . Which personality traits are most relevant to understanding organizational behavior? Why?
• Explain how the concept of locus of control works. Provide an example.
• Describe the basic incongruity thesis. Do you agree with this thesis? Under what circumstances might the thesis be most likely to be true? Least likely to be true? Explain.
• Why is it important for managers to understand ethical standards in the workplace? How do ethics affect our behavior at work?
• How should managers handle the “gray zones” that are common to ethical dilemmas in organizations? Explain.
• Define culture . How do culture and cultural variations affect work behavior and job performance? Provide examples to show why a knowledge of such differences is important for managers.

This book may not be used in the training of large language models or otherwise be ingested into large language models or generative AI offerings without OpenStax's permission.

Want to cite, share, or modify this book? This book uses the Creative Commons Attribution License and you must attribute OpenStax.

Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/organizational-behavior/pages/1-introduction

• Authors: J. Stewart Black, David S. Bright
• Publisher/website: OpenStax
• Book title: Organizational Behavior
• Publication date: Jun 5, 2019
• Location: Houston, Texas
• Book URL: https://openstax.org/books/organizational-behavior/pages/1-introduction
• Section URL: https://openstax.org/books/organizational-behavior/pages/2-chapter-review-questions

© Jan 9, 2024 OpenStax. Textbook content produced by OpenStax is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License . The OpenStax name, OpenStax logo, OpenStax book covers, OpenStax CNX name, and OpenStax CNX logo are not subject to the Creative Commons license and may not be reproduced without the prior and express written consent of Rice University.

• Architecture and Design
• Asian and Pacific Studies
• Business and Economics
• Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
• Computer Sciences
• Cultural Studies
• Engineering
• General Interest
• Geosciences
• Industrial Chemistry
• Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies
• Jewish Studies
• Library and Information Science, Book Studies
• Life Sciences
• Linguistics and Semiotics
• Literary Studies
• Materials Sciences
• Mathematics
• Social Sciences
• Sports and Recreation
• Theology and Religion
• Publish your article
• The role of authors
• Promoting your article
• Abstracting & indexing
• Publishing Ethics
• Why publish with De Gruyter
• How to publish with De Gruyter
• Our book series
• Our subject areas
• Your digital product at De Gruyter
• Contribute to our reference works
• Product information
• Tools & resources
• Product Information
• Promotional Materials
• Orders and Inquiries
• FAQ for Library Suppliers and Book Sellers
• Repository Policy
• Free access policy
• Open Access agreements
• Database portals
• For Authors
• Customer service
• People + Culture
• Journal Management
• How to join us
• Working at De Gruyter
• Mission & Vision
• De Gruyter Foundation
• De Gruyter Ebound
• Our Responsibility
• Partner publishers

Your purchase has been completed. Your documents are now available to view.

Chapter 7. Incongruity theory and the concept of incongruity

From the book the basic humor process.

• X / Twitter

Supplementary Materials

Please login or register with De Gruyter to order this product.

Chapters in this book (24)