- Generating Ideas
- Drafting and Revision
- Sources and Evidence
- Style and Grammar
- Specific to Creative Arts
- Specific to Humanities
- Specific to Sciences
- Specific to Social Sciences
- CVs, Résumés and Cover Letters
- Graduate School Applications
- Other Resources
- Hiatt Career Center
- University Writing Center
- Classroom Materials
- Course and Assignment Design
- UWP Instructor Resources
- Writing Intensive Requirement
- Criteria and Learning Goals
- Course Application for Instructors
- What to Know about UWS
- Teaching Resources for WI
- FAQ for Instructors
- FAQ for Students
- Journals on Writing Research and Pedagogy
- University Writing Program
- Degree Programs
- Graduate Programs
- Brandeis Online
- Summer Programs
- Undergraduate Admissions
- Graduate Admissions
- Financial Aid
- Summer School
- Centers and Institutes
- Funding Resources
- Housing/Community Living
- Clubs and Organizations
- Community Service
- Brandeis Arts Engagement
- Rose Art Museum
- Our Jewish Roots
- Mission and Diversity Statements
- Administration
- Faculty & Staff
- Alumni & Friends
- Parents & Families
- Campus Calendar
- Directories
- New Students
- Shuttle Schedules
- Support at Brandeis
![](http://sektorel.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Writing Resources
Grading rubric for an essay in a literature class.
The A Essay makes an interesting, complex—even surprising—argument and is thoroughly well-executed. It both engages the text closely and sheds light on relevant contexts (historical, theoretical, or critical).
- Thesis and Motive . The major claim of the essay is complex, insightful, and unexpected. The thesis responds to a true question, tension or problem. It is stated clearly at the outset and evolves throughout the paper. The introduction has a clear motive that outlines the stakes of the argument and demonstrates a meaningful context for the author’s claims. Ideally demonstrates familiarity with current critical conversation on relevant issues.
- Evidence & Analysis . The best available evidence is introduced not only to support but also to challenge and complicate the claims and stakes of the essay. It is often drawn from unexpected places, and its nuances are insightfully explored. The argument is sufficiently complex to require an explanation of how the evidence supports the essay’s claims, and evidence, drawn both from close reading and from contextual research, is used to develop new claims.
- Structure . Ideas develop over the course of the essay so that the foundations established early on push the argument toward a more complex conclusion. The possibility of other ways of approaching the material is explored, and the validity of other arguments about the material is discussed.
Style . The writing is clear and concise, yet sophisticated, demonstrating sentence variety and appropriate vocabulary. The essay is a pleasure to read.
Revision . The essay does not simply address the comments of the instructor and peer reviewers, but altogether transforms its ideas or use of evidence from the draft. It is meticulously proofread.
The high B Essay falls into two categories: 1. aims at making an engaging, complex argument but is hindered by a few local problems with structure, analysis, or style (e.g. wide-ranging but not deep; contextual but not textual); 2. has a simpler argument that is thoroughly well-executed (e.g. close reading is present but contexts are lacking, or alternative viewpoints are not engaged).
Thesis & Motive . Either the major claim is clear, arguable, and complex but misses opportunities for nuance or subtlety, or else it set out to explore an ambitious idea whose complexity leads to minor errors in articulation. The introduction suggests some context or stakes for the argument but does not offer strong motivation, or a convincing motive is gestured at but remains implicit. There is limited or no engagement with current scholarship
Evidence & Analysis . All claims are supported with evidence that is integral to the development of the argument, but the link between claim and evidence may be at times unconvincing, unnuanced, or insufficiently explained. The analysis demonstrates several moments of keen insight but also includes arguments that lack subtlety or are insufficiently explained elsewhere in the essay. Only one possible way of approaching the material is fully explored; other perspectives receive limited attention.
Structure . The argument follows a clear logical arc, but small gaps, digressions, or a lack of transitional language interrupt the flow of ideas in a few places.
Style . The writing is mostly clear but may contain a few confusing sentences or mechanical problems. It is mostly engaging.
Revision . The essay has mostly resolved the major concerns of the reviewers, though a few minor issues remain. It has clearly been proofread.
The B Essay addresses the assignment and demonstrates effort to produce a complex argument. However, the essay is hindered by either a lack of nuance in the thesis or by structural, analytical, or stylistic problems in the execution of its ideas.
Thesis & Motive . Either the major claim is clear and arguable but lacks complexity or else sets out to explore an intriguing idea that has not developed into a specific claim. The introduction either unsuccessfully motivates an unexpected claim or weakly and artificially motivates a claim that does not constitute a significant revision of the status quo . No attention is given to alternative ways to approach the material
Evidence & Analysis . Most ideas are supported with well-chosen evidence that is sometimes explored in an insightful way, although nuances are often neglected. The text is treated as a set of unproblematic statements or observations, rather than grappled with as an aesthetic object. The evidence is often integral to the development of the argument, although there may be gaps in the explanation of how the evidence supports the essay’s claims.
Structure . The argument is interesting and logical, but the structure of the essay is, at times, confusing. The essay’s claims, while complex, are executed in a confusing sequence, or they seem related to the thesis but have a confusing relationship to one another. Transitional language may be present but is unsuccessful or inconsistent. No evidence of engagement with possible alternative ways of approaching material.
Style . The writing is straightforward, mostly clear, and often engaging, but it contains occasional mechanical problems, confusing sentences, or moments of vagueness.
Revision . The essay attempts to address reviewers concerns but only does so in parts of the essay. The changes in the essay are improvements but may not be global changes. There may be a few lapses in proofreading.
The low B Essay demonstrates an effort to address the assignment, but the argument is ultimately too obvious, undeveloped, or obscured by significant structural, analytical, or stylistic problems.
Thesis & Motive . The major claim is logical and would require some evidence to prove, but the stakes are not as high as they should be. The essay’s major claims are somewhat unclear, unspecific or uninteresting. The introduction lacks a clear motive or contains an unspecific or weak motive; it evidences no encounters with any sort of critical interlocutors.
Evidence & Analysis . Evidence is usually relevant, but the essay often does not consider the most important evidence or will present multiple examples to demonstrate the same idea. The essay makes some effort to explore the subtleties of the evidence and may be occasionally insightful, but it rarely uses evidence to complicate the argument and develop new claims.
Structure . The argument mostly makes logical sense, but the structure of the essay is confusing—jumping around, missing transitions, or taking on too many ideas at once. Or, the argument itself may be presented simplistically and repetitively, leading to a predictable structure and unnecessary transitional language.
Style . Though the writing generally makes sense and there may be moments where the diction is appropriate and elegant, it is weak enough in places to obscure the author’s ideas, often as a result of vagueness, verbosity, awkwardness, or a recurrent mechanical problem.
Revision . The essay is either a C paper (or lower) that has been revised to a low B, or it shows no significant revision.
The C Essay has significant problems with argumentation and/or presentation.
Thesis & Motive . The major claim of the essay is weak—vague, simple, or obvious. The essay does not respond to a true question, tension, or problem. The introduction usually has no motive.
Evidence & Analysis . Evidence may be lacking or irrelevant. Instead of using evidence to develop the argument, examples remain undigested and unexplored. The author may simply summarize and simplify evidence, or present it in a confusing or unhelpful way.
Structure . The argument may be too simple and so does not develop over the course of the essay. Or the argument may be incoherent or too broad, without any clear organization or transitions. There is no sense of encounter with other minds and other perspectives to give relevance and engagement to the writing.
Style . The writing is generally confusing, awkward, or too verbose, and probably exhibits numerous mechanical problems. Its diction may be inappropriate.
Revision . The essay did not change significantly from the first draft to the final draft. Either the essay does not adequately address the criticism of peers and instructor, or the author missed opportunities for response.
Not Passing . An essay will not pass if it does not meet the minimum page requirement, does not address the assignment, plagiarizes, or does not meet standards for academic writing or argumentation.
Developed at Brandeis University through a grant from the Davis Educational Foundation
- Resources for Students
- Writing Intensive Instructor Resources
- Research and Pedagogy
Rubric – English Grade 10 Literary Analysis Essay
Criteria / Topics | Scoring Scale | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | |||||
Identification of Theme | Clearly identifies the theme of the novel and provides a thorough explanation with specific examples from the text. | Identifies the theme of the novel and provides an explanation with some examples from the text. | |||
Use of Characters | Effectively analyzes how the author uses characters to illustrate the theme, providing detailed examples and insightful explanations. | Analyzes how the author uses characters to illustrate the theme, providing examples and explanations. | |||
Use of Plot Events | Effectively analyzes how the author uses plot events to illustrate the theme, providing detailed examples and insightful explanations. | Analyzes how the author uses plot events to illustrate the theme, providing examples and explanations. | |||
Use of Literary Devices | Effectively analyzes how the author uses literary devices to illustrate the theme, providing detailed examples and insightful explanations. | Analyzes how the author uses literary devices to illustrate the theme, providing examples and explanations. | |||
Evidence from the Text | Provides ample and specific evidence from the text to support the analysis of the theme, using direct quotes and thorough explanations. | Provides evidence from the text to support the analysis of the theme, using some direct quotes and explanations. |
Privacy Overview
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
- Learn the Alphabet
- Children's Music
- Video Lessons
AI CONVERSATIONS
- AI Homework & Project Helper
- Interview a Historical Figure
- AI Conversation Practice
- AI Book Chat
- AI Country Guide
AI TOOLS FOR STUDENTS
- AI Dictionary
- AI Thesaurus
- AI Sentence Generator
- AI Grammar Correction
- AI Paraphraser
- AI Summarizer
- AI Lyrics Generator
- AI Poem Generator
- AI Ancient Text Translator
- AI Children's Story Generator
- Role-Play Game: Fantasy Quest
- AI Figure of Speech Generators
AI TOOLS FOR TEACHERS
- AI Rubric Generator
- AI Essay Grader
- AI Prompt Optimizer
- AI Lesson Creator
- AI Lesson Plan Creator
- AI Multiple-Choice Quiz Creator
- AI True-False Quiz Creator
- AI Fill-in-the-Blanks Quiz Creator
- AI Book Quiz Creator
- AI Report Card Comments
- AI Comments for English Teachers
- IEP Generator
- AI Homework Helper
Create a Free Account Free Membership
![literature analysis essay rubric working on laptop.png](https://classx.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/working-on-laptop.png)
Create a free account on ClassX to enjoy all the benefits we have to offer.
- Rating Count
- Price (Ascending)
- Price (Descending)
- Most Recent
Literary analysis rubric
Resource type.
![literature analysis essay rubric Preview of One-Pager Text Analysis Project with Rubric - Creative Literary Study Lesson](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbitem/One-Pager-Text-Analysis-Rubric-Engaging-Creative-3748194-1667163333/original-3748194-1.jpg)
One-Pager Text Analysis Project with Rubric - Creative Literary Study Lesson
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/Howes-In-The-Middle-1712424758/4145910.jpg)
Literary Analysis & Argumentative Essay Rubrics {EDITABLE}
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/Mud-And-Ink-Teaching-1700502798/154850.jpg)
The Giver Socratic Seminar packets and rubric literary analysis
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/The-Red-haired-Reader-1714480141/5125711.jpg)
Writing Rubric for Literary Analysis Essays, High School Essay Writing
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/Love-And-Let-Lit-1719330020/4561339.jpg)
Romeo and Juliet Essay 1-Week of Literary Analysis Lesson Plans, Rubric , Etc.
![literature analysis essay rubric Preview of Literary Analysis Writing Rubrics BUNDLE: 6 Editable CCSS "Writer-First" Rubrics](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbitem/Literary-Analysis-Writing-Rubrics-BUNDLE-6-Editable-CCSS-Writer-First-Rubrics-5050834-1574794616/original-5050834-1.jpg)
Literary Analysis Writing Rubrics BUNDLE: 6 Editable CCSS "Writer-First" Rubrics
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/Write-On-With-Miss-G-1699440258/2914615.jpg)
Editable Middle School Literary Analysis Essay Rubrics for 6th 7th and 8th Grade
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/Martina-Cahill-The-Hungry-Teacher-1712053668/1524751.jpg)
Dialectical Journals for Literary Analysis and Non-fiction analysis (w/ rubric )
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/Real-Lessons-For-The-Teenage-Mind-1715681126/9560047.jpg)
Literary Analysis Essay Prompt & Rubric (Theme)
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/Adventures-In-Literature-1704192376/9269156.jpg)
Literary Analysis Essay Outline Rubric Activities Characterization Worksheet PDF
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/Kristin-Menke-Integrated-Ela-Test-Prep-1711709370/9039230.jpg)
Literary Analysis Writing Rubric : Theme Development | EDITABLE | CCSS
![literature analysis essay rubric Preview of Six Traits Literary Analysis Rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbitem/Six-Traits-Literary-Analysis-Rubric-1500873450/original-344604-1.jpg)
Six Traits Literary Analysis Rubric
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/Christine-Heuner-1659000682/1164971.jpg)
Literary Analysis Paragraph Writing Rubric CCSS
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/Planned-And-Prepped-1707041460/1700931.jpg)
How to Write Literary Analysis Essay - Essay Template & Rubric - AP Prose Essay
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/Three-Heads-Works-1718650273/21515189.jpg)
Literary Analysis Paragraph Writing Checklist Guide & Rubric FREE
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/English-With-Ease-1714075895/248309.jpg)
![](http://sektorel.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Cited Literary Argument & Analysis Essay Rubric w Sophistication Point (AP/CCSS)
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/English-With-Mrs-Lamp-1718593827/11833778.jpg)
Literary Analysis Essay Rubric
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/Megan-And-Meghan-1675774392/23260046.jpg)
Universal Writing Rubric for Essays - Argument, Expository, Literary Analysis
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/Katiedidit-1693511921/8477308.jpg)
Literary Analysis Rubric
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/Steven-Dewitt-1652306187/7451955.jpg)
AP 12 Literary Analysis Paper Evaluation Rubric
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/Lisa-Renard-spicer-1720090714/0274.jpg)
Theme Essay Workshop For Any Literary Work – ELA – Analysis , CCSS Rubric
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/The-Language-Of-Educational-Art-1699355611/11406467.jpg)
The Outsiders Literary Analysis Essay, Organizer, Checklist, and Rubric
![literature analysis essay rubric](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbuserhome/The-Teacher-Trailhead-1708167795/5637597.jpg)
Literary Analysis Essay Prompt & Rubric (Characterization)
- We're hiring
- Help & FAQ
- Privacy policy
- Student privacy
- Terms of service
- Tell us what you think
ChatGPT as an automated essay scoring tool in the writing classrooms: how it compares with human scoring
- Published: 13 July 2024
Cite this article
- Ngoc My Bui 1 &
- Jessie S. Barrot ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8517-4058 1 , 2
180 Accesses
8 Altmetric
Explore all metrics
With the generative artificial intelligence (AI) tool’s remarkable capabilities in understanding and generating meaningful content, intriguing questions have been raised about its potential as an automated essay scoring (AES) system. One such tool is ChatGPT, which is capable of scoring any written work based on predefined criteria. However, limited information is available about the reliability of this tool in scoring the different dimensions of writing quality. Thus, this study examines the relationship between the scores assigned by ChatGPT and a human rater and how consistent ChatGPT-assigned scores are when taken at multiple time points. This study employed a cross-sectional quantitative approach in analyzing 50 argumentative essays from each proficiency level (A2_0, B1_1, B1_2, and B2_0), totaling 200. These essays were rated by ChatGPT and an experienced human rater. Using correlational analysis, the results reveal that ChatGPT’s scoring did not align closely with an experienced human rater (i.e., weak to moderate relationships) and failed to establish consistency after two rounds of scoring (i.e., low intraclass correlation coefficient values). These results were primarily attributed to ChatGPT’s scoring algorithm, training data, model updates, and inherent randomness. Implications for writing assessment and future studies are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save.
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
Similar content being viewed by others
![literature analysis essay rubric literature analysis essay rubric](https://media.springernature.com/w215h120/springer-static/image/art%3Aplaceholder%2Fimages/placeholder-figure-nature.png)
A large-scale comparison of human-written versus ChatGPT-generated essays
![literature analysis essay rubric literature analysis essay rubric](https://media.springernature.com/w215h120/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10639-024-12817-6/MediaObjects/10639_2024_12817_Fig1_HTML.png)
Exploratory study on the potential of ChatGPT as a rater of second language writing
![literature analysis essay rubric literature analysis essay rubric](https://media.springernature.com/w215h120/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1057%2Fs41599-023-02269-7/MediaObjects/41599_2023_2269_Fig1_HTML.png)
ChatGPT-3.5 as writing assistance in students’ essays
Data availability.
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Almusharraf, N., & Alotaibi, H. (2023). An error-analysis study from an EFL writing context: Human and automated essay scoring approaches. Technology Knowledge and Learning, 28 (3), 1015–1031.
Article Google Scholar
An, X., Chai, C. S., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., & Yang, B. (2023). Modeling students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence assisted language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning . https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2246519 . Advance online publication.
Athanassopoulos, S., Manoli, P., Gouvi, M., Lavidas, K., & Komis, V. (2023). The use of ChatGPT as a learning tool to improve foreign language writing in a multilingual and multicultural classroom. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3 (2), 818–824.
Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57 , 100745.
Barrot, J. S. (2024a). Trends in automated writing evaluation systems research for teaching, learning, and assessment: A bibliometric analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 29 (6), 7155–7179.
Barrot, J. S. (2024b). ChatGPT as a language learning tool: An emerging technology report. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29 , 1151–1156.
Beseiso, M., Alzubi, O. A., & Rashaideh, H. (2021). A novel automated essay scoring approach for reliable higher educational assessments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33 , 727–746.
Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. B. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40 (2), 615–622.
Dikli, S., & Bleyle, S. (2014). Automated essay scoring feedback for second language writers: How does it compare to instructor feedback? Assessing Writing, 22 , 1–17.
Gonzalez Torres, A. P., & Sawhney, N. (2023). Role of regulatory sandboxes and MLOps for AI-enabled public sector services. The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, 17 , 297–318.
Guo, K., & Wang, D. (2024). To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT’s potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing. Education and Information Technologies, 29 , 8435–8463.
Han, T., & Sari, E. (2024). An investigation on the use of automated feedback in Turkish EFL students’ writing classes. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37 (4), 961–985.
Higgins, D., & Heilman, M. (2014). Managing what we can measure: Quantifying the susceptibility of automated scoring systems to gaming behavior. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 33 (3), 36–46.
Hussein, M. A., Hassan, H., & Nassef, M. (2019). Automated language essay scoring systems: A literature review. PeerJ Computer Science, 5 , e208.
Ishikawa, S. (2013). The ICNALE and sophisticated contrastive interlanguage analysis of Asian learners of English. Learner Corpus Studies in Asia and the World, 1 , 91–118.
Google Scholar
Javier, D. R. C., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2023). Developing secondary school English language learners’ productive and critical use of ChatGPT. TESOL Journal, (e755), 1–9.
Lee, A. V. Y., Luco, A. C., & Tan, S. C. (2023). A human-centric automated essay scoring and feedback system for the development of ethical reasoning. Educational Technology & Society, 26 (1), 147–159.
Liljequist, D., Elfving, B., & Skavberg Roaldsen, K. (2019). Intraclass correlation–A discussion and demonstration of basic features. PloS One, 14 (7), e0219854.
Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education , 10 (2), 2236469.
Mizumoto, A., & Eguchi, M. (2023). Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2 (2), 100050.
OpenAI (2023). ChatGPT: Optimizing language models for dialogue . Retrieved October 10, 2023, from https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/
Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27 (6), 7893–7925.
Parker, J. L., Becker, K., & Carroca, C. (2023). ChatGPT for automated writing evaluation in scholarly writing instruction. Journal of Nursing Education, 62 (12), 721–727.
Powers, D. E., Escoffery, D. S., & Duchnowski, M. P. (2015). Validating automated essay scoring: A (modest) refinement of the gold standard. Applied Measurement in Education, 28 (2), 130–142.
Ramesh, D., & Sanampudi, S. K. (2022). An automated essay scoring systems: A systematic literature review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55 (3), 2495–2527.
Ramineni, C. (2013). Validating automated essay scoring for online writing placement. Assessing Writing, 18 (1), 40–61.
Ramineni, C., & Williamson, D. M. (2013). Automated essay scoring: Psychometric guidelines and practices. Assessing Writing, 18 (1), 25–39.
Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3 , 121–154.
Schade, M. (2023). How ChatGPT and our language models are developed . Retrieved October 28, 2023, from https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7842364-how-chatgpt-and-our-language-models-are-developed
Schmidt-Fajlik, R. (2023). ChatGPT as a grammar checker for Japanese English language learners: A comparison with Grammarly and ProWritingAid. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 14 (1), 105–119.
Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126 (5), 1763–1768.
Shermis, M. D. (2014). State-of-the-art automated essay scoring: Competition, results, and future directions from a United States demonstration. Assessing Writing, 20 , 53–76.
Shermis, M. D., Koch, C. M., Page, E. B., Keith, T. Z., & Harrington, S. (2002). Trait ratings for automated essay grading. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62 (1), 5–18.
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
Su, Y., Lin, Y., & Lai, C. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms. Assessing Writing, 57 , 100752.
Suppadungsuk, S., Thongprayoon, C., Miao, J., Krisanapan, P., Qureshi, F., Kashani, K., & Cheungpasitporn, W. (2023). Exploring the potential of chatbots in critical care nephrology. Medicines, 10 (10), 58.
Vo, Y., Rickels, H., Welch, C., & Dunbar, S. (2023). Human scoring versus automated scoring for English learners in a statewide evidence-based writing assessment. Assessing Writing, 56 , 100719.
Wang, J., & Brown, M. S. (2008). Automated essay scoring versus human scoring: A correlational study. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8 (4), 310–325.
Weigle, S. C. (2013). English language learners and automated scoring of essays: Critical considerations. Assessing Writing, 18 (1), 85–99.
Wilson, J., Chen, D., Sandbank, M. P., & Hebert, M. (2019). Generalizability of automated scores of writing quality in grades 3–5. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111 (4), 619–640. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000311
Yancey, K. P., Laflair, G., Verardi, A., & Burstein, J. (2023). Rating short L2 essays on the CEFR scale with GPT-4. In E. Kochmar, J. Burstein, A. Horbach, R. Laarmann-Quante, N. Madnani, A. Tack, V. Yaneva, Z. Yuan, & T. Zesch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (pp. 576–584). Retrieved November 19, 2023, from https://aclanthology.org/2023.bea-1.49
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16 (1), 1–27.
Download references
This research is funded by the University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
School of Foreign Languages, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Ngoc My Bui & Jessie S. Barrot
College of Education, Arts and Sciences, National University, Manila, Philippines
Jessie S. Barrot
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Jessie S. Barrot .
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval.
The study has undergone appropriate ethics protocol.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was sought from the participants.
Consent for publication
Authors consented the publication. Participants consented to publication as long as confidentiality is observed.
Competing interests
Additional information, publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Bui, N.M., Barrot, J.S. ChatGPT as an automated essay scoring tool in the writing classrooms: how it compares with human scoring. Educ Inf Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12891-w
Download citation
Received : 10 January 2024
Accepted : 28 June 2024
Published : 13 July 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12891-w
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Generative AI
- Automated essay scoring
- Automated writing evaluation
- Argumentative essays
- Find a journal
- Publish with us
- Track your research
![](http://sektorel.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
7 6. Topic sentences are present and make an argument connected to the thesis; however, ideas are obvious and basic. 5. Topic sentences are not linked to the thesis. Topic sentences show misunderstanding or prompt or text. 4 3. Topic sentences not evident. Topic sentences are facts or summaries.
Writing demonstrates basic comprehension of the text but not a critical, analytical understanding of it, as reflected by one or more of the following: lack of focused, developed idea guiding essay; interpretive analysis inconsistent or unsubstantiated; frequent summary of plot details that retell the story; writer restates the content of cited ...
BASIC RUBRIC FOR ASSESSMENT OF ESSAYS ABOUT LITERATURE CRITERIA LEVELS OF MASTERY. Most paragraphs clearly relevant, supporting and explaining thesis. Essay reads coherently and all points are made according to a defined pattern. Paragraphs exceptionally well ordered to provide strong flow and synthesis of individual points.
Literary Analysis Rubric for Dr. K's 500-level Classes. The analysis presents fresh and defensible insights into the work being analyzed. The writer's ethos is one of confidence and competence. The analysis presents defensible insights into the work being analyzed, but may not go much further than the obvious.
AP English Literature Scoring Rubric, Free-Response Question 1-3 | SG 1 Scoring Rubric for Question 1: Poetry Analysis 6 points Reporting Category Scoring Criteria Row A Thesis (0-1 points) 7.B 0 points For any of the following: • There is no defensible thesis. • The intended thesis only restates the prompt.
9th-12th Grade. ALYSIS RUBRICScore432Reading ComprehensionPresents what is stated in and/or what c. n be inferred from the text(s) accurately and in depth.Demonstrates a. omplete understanding of central ideas and information.Presents what is stated in. nd/or what can be inferred from the text(s) accurately.Demonstrates a corr.
Major Literary Analysis Essay - Grading Rubric 20 points lsophisticated and formal. 18-20 pts. anguage errors. 16-17 pts. 14-15 pts. better essays. 12-13 pts. 10-11 pts. Paper is correctly formatted Formatting- MLA including Works Cited 20 points in MLA style including the heading, header, page numbers, titles, citations (punctuated correctly ...
Essay does not include literary analysis or criticism. Essay neglects to evaluate or analyze literary theme(s) or techniques. Essay uses simple but inconsistent literary analysis and criticism. Essay provides basic level evaluation and analysis of literary theme(s) and techniques. Essay provides probing literary analysis and criticism.
Chap 12: Literature (295-319) Essay does not include criticism. Essay neglects to evaluate or analyze literary theme(s) or techniques. Essay uses simple but inconsistent literary analysis and criticism. Essay provides basic level evaluation and analysis of literary theme(s) and techniques. Essay provides probing literary analysis and criticism ...
Tragedy and the Common Man". Please consult the rubric below in regard to what your. essay/analysis should include. Remember that your essay should be typed, double-spaced and p. inted on 8.5" x 11" paper. The margins should be 1" and the paper should be typed in. 12 point Times New Roman font. This rubric should be printed out and submitt.
demonstrate each of the skills in the Literary Analysis and Interpretation Assessment Rubric (below). This assessment assignment should be one of the following: a research paper, a short form essay, or an essay question on an exam. Glossary 1. Canonical texts: Texts that, however generic or experimental in their inception, are now
Analysis explains how the author uses characters, setting, and plot to develop a theme. in the reader/audienceExp. between thesis and evidence. Explanations apply grade-level standards to literature, such as: Analysis identifies a connection between the theme and the characters, setting, and plot.
Literary Analysis Rubric The Exceptional Essay Excellent, specific thesis that fully responds to the prompt ... Essay is an assortment of rambling generalizations. Provides inaccurate, little, or no evidence to develop thesis and shows no and/or inaccurate understanding of topic Does not use or cite sources
Literary Analysis. Date. AD 180® rBook4-Point Writing RubricUs. this rubric to assess student writing. Record th. Average GoodAn introductory statementidentifies the titl. , author, and text type to be analyzed.A focus/thesis statement makes a Lacks an introductory statement that identifies the titl.
The Literary Analysis Essay Assignment and Rubric. Write an essay about Richard Connell's short story "The Most Dangerous Game.". The essay should explain how and why Connell uses one or more literary elements in his story. (Our literary terms are on notebook pages 37 and 38.) Use the "Different Ways To Write 'The Most Dangerous Game ...
Grading Rubric for an Essay in a Literature Class. The A Essay makes an interesting, complex—even surprising—argument and is thoroughly well-executed. It both engages the text closely and sheds light on relevant contexts (historical, theoretical, or critical). Thesis and Motive.. The major claim of the essay is complex, insightful, and unexpected.
Provides evidence from the text to support the analysis of the theme, using some direct quotes and explanations. Copy the rubric to your clipboard. A rubric for Grade 10 English. The assignment title is "Literary Analysis Essay". Write a well-organized, multi-paragraph response that identifies the theme you believe the author conveys through ...
In case you missed it before: Here is the Rubric for Literary Analysis. This rubric takes care of the following common core standards. Common Core Writing Standard 1. Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence. Common Core Writing Standard 2. Write ...
Literary Analysis Rubric Did I demonstrate and understanding of the assignment by: citing relevant, strong, and thorough evidence from the text that supports my analysis? ... writing a _____ to _____ word essay that identifies the primary theme in _____? (5 points) creating smooth and logical transitions by using words, phrases, and clauses to ...
Literary Analysis Rubric for Dr. K's 500-level Classes Outstanding (A range) Above Average (B range) Competent (C range) Insufficient (D to F ... Essay reflects a solid understanding of the literary perspective applied. The writer is using much of the language and theory behind the
This common core aligned essay pack contains three excellent rubrics: Expository Writing Rubric, Persuasive Writing Rubric and Literary Analysis Essay Rubric. Each rubric is sold separately in my store, but the bundle offers a discount! Each rubric includes a link to Google Drive and can be shared in Google Classroom.
These middle school editable literary analysis essay rubrics for sixth, seventh, and eighth grade were created to assess students' literary analysis essays based on the common core argumentative writing and literary analysis specific standards.Download the preview to see all the rubrics that are included and how they are created and organized ...
Similarity Report and AI Writing guidance: Academic integrity tools: Creating PeerMark assignments guidance: Class and assignment management: Creating and managing QuickMarks, rubrics and grading PeerMark assignments guidance: Grading and feedback: User profile guidance for administrators and instructors: User profile settings
We adopted the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)-aligned writing rubric, which was used by the human rater and ChatGPT (GPT-3.5 version) in assessing the student essays. This rubric has three versions to evaluate different text types, namely narrative, argumentative, and informative. For this study, we adopted the rubric for argumentative ...