youtube case study analysis

Sales CRM Terms

What is Case Study Analysis? (Explained With Examples)

Oct 11, 2023

Case Study Analysis is a widely used research method that examines in-depth information about a particular individual, group, organization, or event. It is a comprehensive investigative approach that aims to understand the intricacies and complexities of the subject under study. Through the analysis of real-life scenarios and inquiry into various data sources, Case Study Analysis provides valuable insights and knowledge that can be used to inform decision-making and problem-solving strategies.

1°) What is Case Study Analysis?

Case Study Analysis is a research methodology that involves the systematic investigation of a specific case or cases to gain a deep understanding of the subject matter. This analysis encompasses collecting and analyzing various types of data, including qualitative and quantitative information. By examining multiple aspects of the case, such as its context, background, influences, and outcomes, researchers can draw meaningful conclusions and provide valuable insights for various fields of study.

When conducting a Case Study Analysis, researchers typically begin by selecting a case or multiple cases that are relevant to their research question or area of interest. This can involve choosing a specific organization, individual, event, or phenomenon to study. Once the case is selected, researchers gather relevant data through various methods, such as interviews, observations, document analysis, and artifact examination.

The data collected during a Case Study Analysis is then carefully analyzed and interpreted. Researchers use different analytical frameworks and techniques to make sense of the information and identify patterns, themes, and relationships within the data. This process involves coding and categorizing the data, conducting comparative analysis, and drawing conclusions based on the findings.

One of the key strengths of Case Study Analysis is its ability to provide a rich and detailed understanding of a specific case. This method allows researchers to delve deep into the complexities and nuances of the subject matter, uncovering insights that may not be captured through other research methods. By examining the case in its natural context, researchers can gain a holistic perspective and explore the various factors and variables that contribute to the case.

1.1 - Definition of Case Study Analysis

Case Study Analysis can be defined as an in-depth examination and exploration of a particular case or cases to unravel relevant details and complexities associated with the subject being studied. It involves a comprehensive and detailed analysis of various factors and variables that contribute to the case, aiming to answer research questions and uncover insights that can be applied in real-world scenarios.

When conducting a Case Study Analysis, researchers employ a range of research methods and techniques to collect and analyze data. These methods can include interviews, surveys, observations, document analysis, and experiments, among others. By using multiple sources of data, researchers can triangulate their findings and ensure the validity and reliability of their analysis.

Furthermore, Case Study Analysis often involves the use of theoretical frameworks and models to guide the research process. These frameworks provide a structured approach to analyzing the case and help researchers make sense of the data collected. By applying relevant theories and concepts, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the underlying factors and dynamics at play in the case.

1.2 - Advantages of Case Study Analysis

Case Study Analysis offers numerous advantages that make it a popular research method across different disciplines. One significant advantage is its ability to provide rich and detailed information about a specific case, allowing researchers to gain a holistic understanding of the subject matter. Additionally, Case Study Analysis enables researchers to explore complex issues and phenomena in their natural context, capturing the intricacies and nuances that may not be captured through other research methods.

Moreover, Case Study Analysis allows researchers to investigate rare or unique cases that may not be easily replicated or studied through experimental methods. This method is particularly useful when studying phenomena that are complex, multifaceted, or involve multiple variables. By examining real-world cases, researchers can gain insights that can be applied to similar situations or inform future research and practice.

Furthermore, this research method allows for the analysis of multiple sources of data, such as interviews, observations, documents, and artifacts, which can contribute to a comprehensive and well-rounded examination of the case. Case Study Analysis also facilitates the exploration and identification of patterns, trends, and relationships within the data, generating valuable insights and knowledge for future reference and application.

1.3 - Disadvantages of Case Study Analysis

While Case Study Analysis offers various advantages, it also comes with certain limitations and challenges. One major limitation is the potential for researcher bias, as the interpretation of data and findings can be influenced by preconceived notions and personal perspectives. Researchers must be aware of their own biases and take steps to minimize their impact on the analysis.

Additionally, Case Study Analysis may suffer from limited generalizability, as it focuses on specific cases and contexts, which might not be applicable or representative of broader populations or situations. The findings of a case study may not be easily generalized to other settings or individuals, and caution should be exercised when applying the results to different contexts.

Moreover, Case Study Analysis can require significant time and resources due to its in-depth nature and the need for meticulous data collection and analysis. This can pose challenges for researchers working with limited budgets or tight deadlines. However, the thoroughness and depth of the analysis often outweigh the resource constraints, as the insights gained from a well-conducted case study can be highly valuable.

Finally, ethical considerations also play a crucial role in Case Study Analysis, as researchers must ensure the protection of participant confidentiality and privacy. Researchers must obtain informed consent from participants and take measures to safeguard their identities and personal information. Ethical guidelines and protocols should be followed to ensure the rights and well-being of the individuals involved in the case study.

2°) Examples of Case Study Analysis

Real-world examples of Case Study Analysis demonstrate the method's practical application and showcase its usefulness across various fields. The following examples provide insights into different scenarios where Case Study Analysis has been employed successfully.

2.1 - Example in a Startup Context

In a startup context, a Case Study Analysis might explore the factors that contributed to the success of a particular startup company. It would involve examining the organization's background, strategies, market conditions, and key decision-making processes. This analysis could reveal valuable lessons and insights for aspiring entrepreneurs and those interested in understanding the intricacies of startup success.

2.2 - Example in a Consulting Context

In the consulting industry, Case Study Analysis is often utilized to understand and develop solutions for complex business problems. For instance, a consulting firm might conduct a Case Study Analysis on a company facing challenges in its supply chain management. This analysis would involve identifying the underlying issues, evaluating different options, and proposing recommendations based on the findings. This approach enables consultants to apply their expertise and provide practical solutions to their clients.

2.3 - Example in a Digital Marketing Agency Context

Within a digital marketing agency, Case Study Analysis can be used to examine successful marketing campaigns. By analyzing various factors such as target audience, message effectiveness, channel selection, and campaign metrics, this analysis can provide valuable insights into the strategies and tactics that contribute to successful marketing initiatives. Digital marketers can then apply these insights to optimize future campaigns and drive better results for their clients.

2.4 - Example with Analogies

Case Study Analysis can also be utilized with analogies to investigate specific scenarios and draw parallels to similar situations. For instance, a Case Study Analysis could explore the response of different countries to natural disasters and draw analogies to inform disaster management strategies in other regions. These analogies can help policymakers and researchers develop more effective approaches to mitigate the impact of disasters and protect vulnerable populations.

In conclusion, Case Study Analysis is a powerful research method that provides a comprehensive understanding of a particular individual, group, organization, or event. By analyzing real-life cases and exploring various data sources, researchers can unravel complexities, generate valuable insights, and inform decision-making processes. With its advantages and limitations, Case Study Analysis offers a unique approach to gaining in-depth knowledge and practical application across numerous fields.

About the author

Arnaud Belinga

"i wrote this article"

Try my sales crm software (people love it) 👇.

DISCOVER BREAKCOLD CRM

Related Articles

What is the 80-20 rule? (Explained With Examples)

What is the ABCD Sales Method? (Explained With Examples)

What is an Accelerated Sales Cycle? (Explained With Examples)

What is Account-Based Marketing (ABM)? (Explained With Examples)

What is an Account Manager? (Explained With Examples)

What is Account Mapping? (Explained With Examples)

What is Account-Based Selling? (Explained With Examples)

What is Ad Targeting? (Explained With Examples)

What is the Addressable Market? (Explained With Examples)

What is the Adoption Curve? (Explained With Examples)

What is an AE (Account Executive)? (Explained With Examples)

What is Affiliate Marketing? (Explained With Examples)

What is AI in Sales? (Explained With Examples)

What is an AI-Powered CRM? (Explained With Examples)

What is an Alternative Close? (Explained With Examples)

What is the Annual Contract Value? (ACV - Explained With Examples)

What are Appointments Set? (Explained With Examples)

What is an Assumptive Close? (Explained With Examples)

What is Automated Outreach? (Explained With Examples)

What is Average Revenue Per Account (ARPA)? (Explained With Examples)

What is B2B (Business-to-Business)? (Explained With Examples)

What is B2G (Business-to-Government)? (Explained With Examples)

What is B2P (Business-to-Partner)? (Explained With Examples)

What is BANT (Budget, Authority, Need, Timing)? (Explained With Examples)

What is Behavioral Economics in Sales? (Explained With Examples)

What is Benchmark Data? (Explained With Examples)

What is Benefit Selling? (Explained With Examples)

What are Benefit Statements? (Explained With Examples)

What is Beyond the Obvious? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Bootstrapped Startup? (Explained With Examples)

What is the Bottom of the Funnel (BOFU)? (Explained With Examples)

What is Bounce Rate? (Explained With Examples)

What is Brand Awareness? (Explained With Examples)

What is the Break-Even Point? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Breakup Email? (Explained With Examples)

What is Business Development? (Explained With Examples)

What are Business Insights? (Explained With Examples)

What is Business Process Automation? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Buyer Persona? (Explained With Examples)

What is the Buyer's Journey? (Explained With Examples)

What is the Buying Cycle? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Buying Signal? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Buying Team? (Explained With Examples)

What is a C-Level Executive? (Explained With Examples)

What is Call Logging? (Explained With Examples)

What is Call Recording? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Call-to-Action (CTA)? (Explained With Examples)

What is Challenger Sales? (Explained With Examples)

What is Chasing Lost Deals? (Explained With Examples)

What is Churn Prevention? (Explained With Examples)

What is Churn Rate? (Explained With Examples)

What is Click-Through Rate (CTR)? (Explained With Examples)

What is Client Acquisition? (Explained With Examples)

What is the Closing Ratio? (Explained With Examples)

What is the Ben Franklin Close? (Explained With Examples)

What is Cognitive Bias in Sales? (Explained With Examples)

What is Cognitive Dissonance in Sales? (Explained With Examples)

What is Cold Calling? (Explained With Examples)

What is Cold Outreach? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Competitive Advantage? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Competitive Analysis? (Explained With Examples)

What is Competitive Positioning? (Explained With Examples)

What is Conceptual Selling? (Explained With Examples)

What is Consultative Closing? (Explained With Examples)

What is Consultative Negotiation? (Explained With Examples)

What is Consultative Prospecting? (Explained With Examples)

What is Consultative Selling? (Explained With Examples)

What is Content Marketing? (Explained With Examples)

What is Content Syndication? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Conversion Funnel? (Explained With Examples)

What is Conversion Optimization? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Conversion Path? (Explained With Examples)

What is Conversion Rate? (Explained With Examples)

What is Cost-Per-Click (CPC)? (Explained With Examples)

What is a CRM (Customer Relationship Management)? (Explained With Examples)

What is Cross-Cultural Selling? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Cross-Sell Ratio? (Explained With Examples)

What is Cross-Selling? (Explained With Examples)

What is Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC)? (Explained With Examples)

What is Customer-Centric Marketing? (Explained With Examples)

What is Customer-Centric Selling? (Explained With Examples)

What is Customer Journey Mapping? (Explained With Examples)

What is the Customer Journey? (Explained With Examples)

What is the Customer Lifetime Value (CLV)? (Explained With Examples)

What is Customer Profiling? (Explained With Examples)

What is Customer Retention? (Explained With Examples)

What is Dark Social? (Explained With Examples)

What is Data Enrichment? (Explained With Examples)

What is Data Segmentation? (Explained With Examples)

What is Database Marketing? (Explained With Examples)

What are Decision Criteria? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Decision Maker? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Decision-Making Unit (DMU)? (Explained With Examples)

What is Demand Generation? (Explained With Examples)

What is Digital Marketing? (Explained With Examples)

What is Direct Marketing? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Discovery Call? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Discovery Meeting? (Explained With Examples)

What are Discovery Questions? (Explained With Examples)

What is Door-to-Door Sales? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Drip Campaign? (Explained With Examples)

What is Dunning? (Explained With Examples)

What is an Early Adopter? (Explained With Examples)

What is Elevator Pitch? (Explained With Examples)

What is Email Hygiene? (Explained With Examples)

What is Email Marketing? (Explained With Examples)

What is Emotional Intelligence Selling? (Explained With Examples)

What is Engagement Marketing? (Explained With Examples)

What is Engagement Rate? (Explained With Examples)

What is Engagement Strategy? (Explained With Examples)

What is Feature-Benefit Selling? (Explained With Examples)

What is Field Sales? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Follow-Up? (Explained With Examples)

What is Forecast Accuracy? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Funnel? (Explained With Examples)

What is Gamification in Sales? (Explained With Examples)

What is Gatekeeper Strategy? (Explained With Examples)

What is Gatekeeper? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Go-to Market Strategy? (Explained With Examples)

What is Growth Hacking? (Explained With Examples)

What is Growth Marketing? (Explained With Examples)

What is Guerrilla Marketing? (Explained With Examples)

What is High-Ticket Sales? (Explained With Examples)

What is Holistic Selling? (Explained With Examples)

What is Ideal Customer Profile (ICP)? (Explained With Examples)

What is Inbound Lead Generation? (Explained With Examples)

What is an Inbound Lead? (Explained With Examples)

What is Inbound Marketing? (Explained With Examples)

What is Inbound Sales? (Explained With Examples)

What is Influencer Marketing? (Explained With Examples)

What is Inside Sales Representative? (Explained With Examples)

What is Inside Sales? (Explained With Examples)

What is Insight Selling? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Key Account? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Key Performance Indicator (KPI)? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Landing Page? (Explained With Examples)

What is Lead Database? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Lead Enrichment? (Explained With Examples)

What is Lead Generation? (Explained With Examples)

What is Lead Nurturing? (Explained With Examples)

What is Lead Qualification? (Explained With Examples)

What is Lead Scoring? (Explained With Examples)

What are LinkedIn InMails? (Explained With Examples)

What is LinkedIn Sales Navigator? (Explained With Examples)

What is Lost Opportunity? (Explained With Examples)

What is Market Positioning? (Explained With Examples)

What is Market Research? (Explained With Examples)

What is Market Segmentation? (Explained With Examples)

What is MEDDIC? (Explained With Examples)

What is Middle Of The Funnel (MOFU)? (Explained With Examples)

What is Motivational Selling? (Explained With Examples)

What is a MQL (Marketing Qualified Lead)? (Explained With Examples)

What is MRR Growth? (Explained With Examples)

What is MRR (Monthly Recurring Revenue)? (Explained With Examples)

What is N.E.A.T. Selling? (Explained With Examples)

What is Neil Rackham's Sales Tactics? (Explained With Examples)

What is Networking? (Explained With Examples)

What is NLP Sales Techniques? (Explained With Examples)

What is the Net Promotion Score? (NPS - Explained With Examples)

What is Objection Handling Framework? (Explained With Examples)

What is On-Hold Messaging? (Explained With Examples)

What is Onboarding in Sales? (Explained With Examples)

What is Online Advertising? (Explained With Examples)

What is Outbound Sales? (Explained With Examples)

What is Pain Points Analysis? (Explained With Examples)

What is Permission Marketing? (Explained With Examples)

What is Personality-Based Selling? (Explained With Examples)

What is Persuasion Selling? (Explained With Examples)

What is Pipeline Management? (Explained With Examples)

What is Pipeline Velocity? (Explained With Examples)

What is Predictive Lead Scoring? (Explained With Examples)

What is Price Negotiation? (Explained With Examples)

What is Price Objection? (Explained With Examples)

What is Price Sensitivity? (Explained With Examples)

What is Problem-Solution Selling? (Explained With Examples)

What is Product Knowledge? (Explained With Examples)

What is Product-Led-Growth? (Explained With Examples)

What is Prospecting? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Qualified Lead? (Explained With Examples)

What is Question-Based Selling? (Explained With Examples)

What is Referral Marketing? (Explained With Examples)

What is Relationship Building? (Explained With Examples)

What is Revenue Forecast? (Explained With Examples)

What is a ROI? (Explained With Examples)

What is Sales Automation? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Sales Bonus Plan? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Sales Champion? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Sales Collateral? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Sales Commission Structure Plan? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Sales CRM? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Sales Cycle? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Sales Demo? (Explained With Examples)

What is Sales Enablement? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Sales Flywheel? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Sales Funnel? (Explained With Examples)

What are Sales KPIs? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Sales Meetup? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Sales Pipeline? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Sales Pitch? (Explained With Examples)

What is a Sales Playbook? (Explained With Examples)

Try breakcold now, are you ready to accelerate your sales pipeline.

Join over +1000 agencies, startups & consultants closing deals with Breakcold Sales CRM

Get Started for free

Sales CRM Features

Sales CRM Software

Sales Pipeline

Sales Lead Tracking

CRM with social media integrations

Social Selling Software

Contact Management

CRM Unified Email LinkedIn Inbox

Breakcold works for many industries

CRM for Agencies

CRM for Startups

CRM for Consultants

CRM for Small Business

CRM for LinkedIn

CRM for Coaches

Sales CRM & Sales Pipeline Tutorials

The 8 Sales Pipeline Stages

The Best CRMs for Agencies

The Best CRMs for Consultants

The Best LinkedIn CRMs

How to close deals in 2024, not in 2010

CRM automation: from 0 to PRO in 5 minutes

LinkedIn Inbox Management

LinkedIn Account-Based Marketing (2024 Tutorial with video)

Tools & more

Sales Pipeline Templates

Alternatives

Integrations

CRM integration with LinkedIn

© 2024 Breakcold

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Assignments

• Annotated Bibliography
• Analyzing a Scholarly Journal Article
• Group Presentations
• Dealing with Nervousness
• Using Visual Aids
• Grading Someone Else's Paper
• Types of Structured Group Activities
• Group Project Survival Skills
• Leading a Class Discussion
• Multiple Book Review Essay
• Reviewing Collected Works
• Writing a Case Analysis Paper
• Writing a Case Study
• About Informed Consent
• Writing Field Notes
• Writing a Policy Memo
• Writing a Reflective Paper
• Writing a Research Proposal
• Generative AI and Writing
• Acknowledgments

Definition and Introduction

Case analysis is a problem-based teaching and learning method that involves critically analyzing complex scenarios within an organizational setting for the purpose of placing the student in a “real world” situation and applying reflection and critical thinking skills to contemplate appropriate solutions, decisions, or recommended courses of action. It is considered a more effective teaching technique than in-class role playing or simulation activities. The analytical process is often guided by questions provided by the instructor that ask students to contemplate relationships between the facts and critical incidents described in the case.

Cases generally include both descriptive and statistical elements and rely on students applying abductive reasoning to develop and argue for preferred or best outcomes [i.e., case scenarios rarely have a single correct or perfect answer based on the evidence provided]. Rather than emphasizing theories or concepts, case analysis assignments emphasize building a bridge of relevancy between abstract thinking and practical application and, by so doing, teaches the value of both within a specific area of professional practice.

Given this, the purpose of a case analysis paper is to present a structured and logically organized format for analyzing the case situation. It can be assigned to students individually or as a small group assignment and it may include an in-class presentation component. Case analysis is predominately taught in economics and business-related courses, but it is also a method of teaching and learning found in other applied social sciences disciplines, such as, social work, public relations, education, journalism, and public administration.

Ellet, William. The Case Study Handbook: A Student's Guide . Revised Edition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing, 2018; Christoph Rasche and Achim Seisreiner. Guidelines for Business Case Analysis . University of Potsdam; Writing a Case Analysis . Writing Center, Baruch College; Volpe, Guglielmo. "Case Teaching in Economics: History, Practice and Evidence." Cogent Economics and Finance 3 (December 2015). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2015.1120977.

How to Approach Writing a Case Analysis Paper

The organization and structure of a case analysis paper can vary depending on the organizational setting, the situation, and how your professor wants you to approach the assignment. Nevertheless, preparing to write a case analysis paper involves several important steps. As Hawes notes, a case analysis assignment “...is useful in developing the ability to get to the heart of a problem, analyze it thoroughly, and to indicate the appropriate solution as well as how it should be implemented” [p.48]. This statement encapsulates how you should approach preparing to write a case analysis paper.

Before you begin to write your paper, consider the following analytical procedures:

• Review the case to get an overview of the situation . A case can be only a few pages in length, however, it is most often very lengthy and contains a significant amount of detailed background information and statistics, with multilayered descriptions of the scenario, the roles and behaviors of various stakeholder groups, and situational events. Therefore, a quick reading of the case will help you gain an overall sense of the situation and illuminate the types of issues and problems that you will need to address in your paper. If your professor has provided questions intended to help frame your analysis, use them to guide your initial reading of the case.
• Read the case thoroughly . After gaining a general overview of the case, carefully read the content again with the purpose of understanding key circumstances, events, and behaviors among stakeholder groups. Look for information or data that appears contradictory, extraneous, or misleading. At this point, you should be taking notes as you read because this will help you develop a general outline of your paper. The aim is to obtain a complete understanding of the situation so that you can begin contemplating tentative answers to any questions your professor has provided or, if they have not provided, developing answers to your own questions about the case scenario and its connection to the course readings,lectures, and class discussions.
• Determine key stakeholder groups, issues, and events and the relationships they all have to each other . As you analyze the content, pay particular attention to identifying individuals, groups, or organizations described in the case and identify evidence of any problems or issues of concern that impact the situation in a negative way. Other things to look for include identifying any assumptions being made by or about each stakeholder, potential biased explanations or actions, explicit demands or ultimatums , and the underlying concerns that motivate these behaviors among stakeholders. The goal at this stage is to develop a comprehensive understanding of the situational and behavioral dynamics of the case and the explicit and implicit consequences of each of these actions.
• Identify the core problems . The next step in most case analysis assignments is to discern what the core [i.e., most damaging, detrimental, injurious] problems are within the organizational setting and to determine their implications. The purpose at this stage of preparing to write your analysis paper is to distinguish between the symptoms of core problems and the core problems themselves and to decide which of these must be addressed immediately and which problems do not appear critical but may escalate over time. Identify evidence from the case to support your decisions by determining what information or data is essential to addressing the core problems and what information is not relevant or is misleading.
• Explore alternative solutions . As noted, case analysis scenarios rarely have only one correct answer. Therefore, it is important to keep in mind that the process of analyzing the case and diagnosing core problems, while based on evidence, is a subjective process open to various avenues of interpretation. This means that you must consider alternative solutions or courses of action by critically examining strengths and weaknesses, risk factors, and the differences between short and long-term solutions. For each possible solution or course of action, consider the consequences they may have related to their implementation and how these recommendations might lead to new problems. Also, consider thinking about your recommended solutions or courses of action in relation to issues of fairness, equity, and inclusion.
• Decide on a final set of recommendations . The last stage in preparing to write a case analysis paper is to assert an opinion or viewpoint about the recommendations needed to help resolve the core problems as you see them and to make a persuasive argument for supporting this point of view. Prepare a clear rationale for your recommendations based on examining each element of your analysis. Anticipate possible obstacles that could derail their implementation. Consider any counter-arguments that could be made concerning the validity of your recommended actions. Finally, describe a set of criteria and measurable indicators that could be applied to evaluating the effectiveness of your implementation plan.

Use these steps as the framework for writing your paper. Remember that the more detailed you are in taking notes as you critically examine each element of the case, the more information you will have to draw from when you begin to write. This will save you time.

NOTE : If the process of preparing to write a case analysis paper is assigned as a student group project, consider having each member of the group analyze a specific element of the case, including drafting answers to the corresponding questions used by your professor to frame the analysis. This will help make the analytical process more efficient and ensure that the distribution of work is equitable. This can also facilitate who is responsible for drafting each part of the final case analysis paper and, if applicable, the in-class presentation.

Framework for Case Analysis . College of Management. University of Massachusetts; Hawes, Jon M. "Teaching is Not Telling: The Case Method as a Form of Interactive Learning." Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education 5 (Winter 2004): 47-54; Rasche, Christoph and Achim Seisreiner. Guidelines for Business Case Analysis . University of Potsdam; Writing a Case Study Analysis . University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center; Van Ness, Raymond K. A Guide to Case Analysis . School of Business. State University of New York, Albany; Writing a Case Analysis . Business School, University of New South Wales.

Structure and Writing Style

A case analysis paper should be detailed, concise, persuasive, clearly written, and professional in tone and in the use of language . As with other forms of college-level academic writing, declarative statements that convey information, provide a fact, or offer an explanation or any recommended courses of action should be based on evidence. If allowed by your professor, any external sources used to support your analysis, such as course readings, should be properly cited under a list of references. The organization and structure of case analysis papers can vary depending on your professor’s preferred format, but its structure generally follows the steps used for analyzing the case.

Introduction

The introduction should provide a succinct but thorough descriptive overview of the main facts, issues, and core problems of the case . The introduction should also include a brief summary of the most relevant details about the situation and organizational setting. This includes defining the theoretical framework or conceptual model on which any questions were used to frame your analysis.

Following the rules of most college-level research papers, the introduction should then inform the reader how the paper will be organized. This includes describing the major sections of the paper and the order in which they will be presented. Unless you are told to do so by your professor, you do not need to preview your final recommendations in the introduction. U nlike most college-level research papers , the introduction does not include a statement about the significance of your findings because a case analysis assignment does not involve contributing new knowledge about a research problem.

Background Analysis

Background analysis can vary depending on any guiding questions provided by your professor and the underlying concept or theory that the case is based upon. In general, however, this section of your paper should focus on:

• Providing an overarching analysis of problems identified from the case scenario, including identifying events that stakeholders find challenging or troublesome,
• Identifying assumptions made by each stakeholder and any apparent biases they may exhibit,
• Describing any demands or claims made by or forced upon key stakeholders, and
• Highlighting any issues of concern or complaints expressed by stakeholders in response to those demands or claims.

These aspects of the case are often in the form of behavioral responses expressed by individuals or groups within the organizational setting. However, note that problems in a case situation can also be reflected in data [or the lack thereof] and in the decision-making, operational, cultural, or institutional structure of the organization. Additionally, demands or claims can be either internal and external to the organization [e.g., a case analysis involving a president considering arms sales to Saudi Arabia could include managing internal demands from White House advisors as well as demands from members of Congress].

Throughout this section, present all relevant evidence from the case that supports your analysis. Do not simply claim there is a problem, an assumption, a demand, or a concern; tell the reader what part of the case informed how you identified these background elements.

Identification of Problems

In most case analysis assignments, there are problems, and then there are problems . Each problem can reflect a multitude of underlying symptoms that are detrimental to the interests of the organization. The purpose of identifying problems is to teach students how to differentiate between problems that vary in severity, impact, and relative importance. Given this, problems can be described in three general forms: those that must be addressed immediately, those that should be addressed but the impact is not severe, and those that do not require immediate attention and can be set aside for the time being.

All of the problems you identify from the case should be identified in this section of your paper, with a description based on evidence explaining the problem variances. If the assignment asks you to conduct research to further support your assessment of the problems, include this in your explanation. Remember to cite those sources in a list of references. Use specific evidence from the case and apply appropriate concepts, theories, and models discussed in class or in relevant course readings to highlight and explain the key problems [or problem] that you believe must be solved immediately and describe the underlying symptoms and why they are so critical.

Alternative Solutions

This section is where you provide specific, realistic, and evidence-based solutions to the problems you have identified and make recommendations about how to alleviate the underlying symptomatic conditions impacting the organizational setting. For each solution, you must explain why it was chosen and provide clear evidence to support your reasoning. This can include, for example, course readings and class discussions as well as research resources, such as, books, journal articles, research reports, or government documents. In some cases, your professor may encourage you to include personal, anecdotal experiences as evidence to support why you chose a particular solution or set of solutions. Using anecdotal evidence helps promote reflective thinking about the process of determining what qualifies as a core problem and relevant solution .

Throughout this part of the paper, keep in mind the entire array of problems that must be addressed and describe in detail the solutions that might be implemented to resolve these problems.

Recommended Courses of Action

In some case analysis assignments, your professor may ask you to combine the alternative solutions section with your recommended courses of action. However, it is important to know the difference between the two. A solution refers to the answer to a problem. A course of action refers to a procedure or deliberate sequence of activities adopted to proactively confront a situation, often in the context of accomplishing a goal. In this context, proposed courses of action are based on your analysis of alternative solutions. Your description and justification for pursuing each course of action should represent the overall plan for implementing your recommendations.

For each course of action, you need to explain the rationale for your recommendation in a way that confronts challenges, explains risks, and anticipates any counter-arguments from stakeholders. Do this by considering the strengths and weaknesses of each course of action framed in relation to how the action is expected to resolve the core problems presented, the possible ways the action may affect remaining problems, and how the recommended action will be perceived by each stakeholder.

In addition, you should describe the criteria needed to measure how well the implementation of these actions is working and explain which individuals or groups are responsible for ensuring your recommendations are successful. In addition, always consider the law of unintended consequences. Outline difficulties that may arise in implementing each course of action and describe how implementing the proposed courses of action [either individually or collectively] may lead to new problems [both large and small].

Throughout this section, you must consider the costs and benefits of recommending your courses of action in relation to uncertainties or missing information and the negative consequences of success.

The conclusion should be brief and introspective. Unlike a research paper, the conclusion in a case analysis paper does not include a summary of key findings and their significance, a statement about how the study contributed to existing knowledge, or indicate opportunities for future research.

Begin by synthesizing the core problems presented in the case and the relevance of your recommended solutions. This can include an explanation of what you have learned about the case in the context of your answers to the questions provided by your professor. The conclusion is also where you link what you learned from analyzing the case with the course readings or class discussions. This can further demonstrate your understanding of the relationships between the practical case situation and the theoretical and abstract content of assigned readings and other course content.

Problems to Avoid

The literature on case analysis assignments often includes examples of difficulties students have with applying methods of critical analysis and effectively reporting the results of their assessment of the situation. A common reason cited by scholars is that the application of this type of teaching and learning method is limited to applied fields of social and behavioral sciences and, as a result, writing a case analysis paper can be unfamiliar to most students entering college.

After you have drafted your paper, proofread the narrative flow and revise any of these common errors:

• Unnecessary detail in the background section . The background section should highlight the essential elements of the case based on your analysis. Focus on summarizing the facts and highlighting the key factors that become relevant in the other sections of the paper by eliminating any unnecessary information.
• Analysis relies too much on opinion . Your analysis is interpretive, but the narrative must be connected clearly to evidence from the case and any models and theories discussed in class or in course readings. Any positions or arguments you make should be supported by evidence.
• Analysis does not focus on the most important elements of the case . Your paper should provide a thorough overview of the case. However, the analysis should focus on providing evidence about what you identify are the key events, stakeholders, issues, and problems. Emphasize what you identify as the most critical aspects of the case to be developed throughout your analysis. Be thorough but succinct.
• Writing is too descriptive . A paper with too much descriptive information detracts from your analysis of the complexities of the case situation. Questions about what happened, where, when, and by whom should only be included as essential information leading to your examination of questions related to why, how, and for what purpose.
• Inadequate definition of a core problem and associated symptoms . A common error found in case analysis papers is recommending a solution or course of action without adequately defining or demonstrating that you understand the problem. Make sure you have clearly described the problem and its impact and scope within the organizational setting. Ensure that you have adequately described the root causes w hen describing the symptoms of the problem.
• Recommendations lack specificity . Identify any use of vague statements and indeterminate terminology, such as, “A particular experience” or “a large increase to the budget.” These statements cannot be measured and, as a result, there is no way to evaluate their successful implementation. Provide specific data and use direct language in describing recommended actions.
• Unrealistic, exaggerated, or unattainable recommendations . Review your recommendations to ensure that they are based on the situational facts of the case. Your recommended solutions and courses of action must be based on realistic assumptions and fit within the constraints of the situation. Also note that the case scenario has already happened, therefore, any speculation or arguments about what could have occurred if the circumstances were different should be revised or eliminated.

Bee, Lian Song et al. "Business Students' Perspectives on Case Method Coaching for Problem-Based Learning: Impacts on Student Engagement and Learning Performance in Higher Education." Education & Training 64 (2022): 416-432; The Case Analysis . Fred Meijer Center for Writing and Michigan Authors. Grand Valley State University; Georgallis, Panikos and Kayleigh Bruijn. "Sustainability Teaching using Case-Based Debates." Journal of International Education in Business 15 (2022): 147-163; Hawes, Jon M. "Teaching is Not Telling: The Case Method as a Form of Interactive Learning." Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education 5 (Winter 2004): 47-54; Georgallis, Panikos, and Kayleigh Bruijn. "Sustainability Teaching Using Case-based Debates." Journal of International Education in Business 15 (2022): 147-163; .Dean,  Kathy Lund and Charles J. Fornaciari. "How to Create and Use Experiential Case-Based Exercises in a Management Classroom." Journal of Management Education 26 (October 2002): 586-603; Klebba, Joanne M. and Janet G. Hamilton. "Structured Case Analysis: Developing Critical Thinking Skills in a Marketing Case Course." Journal of Marketing Education 29 (August 2007): 132-137, 139; Klein, Norman. "The Case Discussion Method Revisited: Some Questions about Student Skills." Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal 6 (November 1981): 30-32; Mukherjee, Arup. "Effective Use of In-Class Mini Case Analysis for Discovery Learning in an Undergraduate MIS Course." The Journal of Computer Information Systems 40 (Spring 2000): 15-23; Pessoa, Silviaet al. "Scaffolding the Case Analysis in an Organizational Behavior Course: Making Analytical Language Explicit." Journal of Management Education 46 (2022): 226-251: Ramsey, V. J. and L. D. Dodge. "Case Analysis: A Structured Approach." Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal 6 (November 1981): 27-29; Schweitzer, Karen. "How to Write and Format a Business Case Study." ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/how-to-write-and-format-a-business-case-study-466324 (accessed December 5, 2022); Reddy, C. D. "Teaching Research Methodology: Everything's a Case." Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 18 (December 2020): 178-188; Volpe, Guglielmo. "Case Teaching in Economics: History, Practice and Evidence." Cogent Economics and Finance 3 (December 2015). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2015.1120977.

Writing Tip

Ca se Study and Case Analysis Are Not the Same!

Confusion often exists between what it means to write a paper that uses a case study research design and writing a paper that analyzes a case; they are two different types of approaches to learning in the social and behavioral sciences. Professors as well as educational researchers contribute to this confusion because they often use the term "case study" when describing the subject of analysis for a case analysis paper. But you are not studying a case for the purpose of generating a comprehensive, multi-faceted understanding of a research problem. R ather, you are critically analyzing a specific scenario to argue logically for recommended solutions and courses of action that lead to optimal outcomes applicable to professional practice.

To avoid any confusion, here are twelve characteristics that delineate the differences between writing a paper using the case study research method and writing a case analysis paper:

• Case study is a method of in-depth research and rigorous inquiry ; case analysis is a reliable method of teaching and learning . A case study is a modality of research that investigates a phenomenon for the purpose of creating new knowledge, solving a problem, or testing a hypothesis using empirical evidence derived from the case being studied. Often, the results are used to generalize about a larger population or within a wider context. The writing adheres to the traditional standards of a scholarly research study. A case analysis is a pedagogical tool used to teach students how to reflect and think critically about a practical, real-life problem in an organizational setting.
• The researcher is responsible for identifying the case to study; a case analysis is assigned by your professor . As the researcher, you choose the case study to investigate in support of obtaining new knowledge and understanding about the research problem. The case in a case analysis assignment is almost always provided, and sometimes written, by your professor and either given to every student in class to analyze individually or to a small group of students, or students select a case to analyze from a predetermined list.
• A case study is indeterminate and boundless; a case analysis is predetermined and confined . A case study can be almost anything [see item 9 below] as long as it relates directly to examining the research problem. This relationship is the only limit to what a researcher can choose as the subject of their case study. The content of a case analysis is determined by your professor and its parameters are well-defined and limited to elucidating insights of practical value applied to practice.
• Case study is fact-based and describes actual events or situations; case analysis can be entirely fictional or adapted from an actual situation . The entire content of a case study must be grounded in reality to be a valid subject of investigation in an empirical research study. A case analysis only needs to set the stage for critically examining a situation in practice and, therefore, can be entirely fictional or adapted, all or in-part, from an actual situation.
• Research using a case study method must adhere to principles of intellectual honesty and academic integrity; a case analysis scenario can include misleading or false information . A case study paper must report research objectively and factually to ensure that any findings are understood to be logically correct and trustworthy. A case analysis scenario may include misleading or false information intended to deliberately distract from the central issues of the case. The purpose is to teach students how to sort through conflicting or useless information in order to come up with the preferred solution. Any use of misleading or false information in academic research is considered unethical.
• Case study is linked to a research problem; case analysis is linked to a practical situation or scenario . In the social sciences, the subject of an investigation is most often framed as a problem that must be researched in order to generate new knowledge leading to a solution. Case analysis narratives are grounded in real life scenarios for the purpose of examining the realities of decision-making behavior and processes within organizational settings. A case analysis assignments include a problem or set of problems to be analyzed. However, the goal is centered around the act of identifying and evaluating courses of action leading to best possible outcomes.
• The purpose of a case study is to create new knowledge through research; the purpose of a case analysis is to teach new understanding . Case studies are a choice of methodological design intended to create new knowledge about resolving a research problem. A case analysis is a mode of teaching and learning intended to create new understanding and an awareness of uncertainty applied to practice through acts of critical thinking and reflection.
• A case study seeks to identify the best possible solution to a research problem; case analysis can have an indeterminate set of solutions or outcomes . Your role in studying a case is to discover the most logical, evidence-based ways to address a research problem. A case analysis assignment rarely has a single correct answer because one of the goals is to force students to confront the real life dynamics of uncertainly, ambiguity, and missing or conflicting information within professional practice. Under these conditions, a perfect outcome or solution almost never exists.
• Case study is unbounded and relies on gathering external information; case analysis is a self-contained subject of analysis . The scope of a case study chosen as a method of research is bounded. However, the researcher is free to gather whatever information and data is necessary to investigate its relevance to understanding the research problem. For a case analysis assignment, your professor will often ask you to examine solutions or recommended courses of action based solely on facts and information from the case.
• Case study can be a person, place, object, issue, event, condition, or phenomenon; a case analysis is a carefully constructed synopsis of events, situations, and behaviors . The research problem dictates the type of case being studied and, therefore, the design can encompass almost anything tangible as long as it fulfills the objective of generating new knowledge and understanding. A case analysis is in the form of a narrative containing descriptions of facts, situations, processes, rules, and behaviors within a particular setting and under a specific set of circumstances.
• Case study can represent an open-ended subject of inquiry; a case analysis is a narrative about something that has happened in the past . A case study is not restricted by time and can encompass an event or issue with no temporal limit or end. For example, the current war in Ukraine can be used as a case study of how medical personnel help civilians during a large military conflict, even though circumstances around this event are still evolving. A case analysis can be used to elicit critical thinking about current or future situations in practice, but the case itself is a narrative about something finite and that has taken place in the past.
• Multiple case studies can be used in a research study; case analysis involves examining a single scenario . Case study research can use two or more cases to examine a problem, often for the purpose of conducting a comparative investigation intended to discover hidden relationships, document emerging trends, or determine variations among different examples. A case analysis assignment typically describes a stand-alone, self-contained situation and any comparisons among cases are conducted during in-class discussions and/or student presentations.

The Case Analysis . Fred Meijer Center for Writing and Michigan Authors. Grand Valley State University; Mills, Albert J. , Gabrielle Durepos, and Eiden Wiebe, editors. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2010; Ramsey, V. J. and L. D. Dodge. "Case Analysis: A Structured Approach." Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal 6 (November 1981): 27-29; Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods . 6th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2017; Crowe, Sarah et al. “The Case Study Approach.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 11 (2011):  doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-100; Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods . 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing; 1994.

• << Previous: Reviewing Collected Works
• Next: Writing a Case Study >>
• Last Updated: Jun 3, 2024 9:44 AM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/assignments

YouTube Case Studies: How to Create and Share Case Studies on YouTube

1. the power of youtube case studies, 2. what they are and why they matter, 3. video styles for youtube case studies, 4. how to structure your youtube case study, 5. highlighting successes in your youtube case study, 6. strategies for maximizing reach on youtube, 7. measuring the impact of your youtube case study, 8. real-life youtube case study examples, 9. key takeaways for creating effective youtube case studies.

YouTube is one of the most popular and influential platforms for online video content. It has over 2 billion monthly active users who watch more than a billion hours of video every day. YouTube is not only a source of entertainment, but also a powerful tool for marketing , education, social change, and personal branding. One of the ways that YouTube creators and businesses can leverage the platform to showcase their value, expertise, and impact is by creating and sharing case studies .

case studies are stories that illustrate how a product, service, or idea has solved a problem, achieved a goal, or improved a situation for a specific customer, client, or beneficiary. case studies can be used to demonstrate the benefits, features, and outcomes of a solution, as well as to provide testimonials, reviews, and social proof. Case studies can also be used to educate, inspire, and persuade potential customers , clients, or supporters to take action or make a decision.

youtube case studies are videos that present case studies in an engaging, informative, and compelling way. YouTube case studies can be more effective than written case studies because they can capture the attention, emotion, and trust of the viewers. YouTube case studies can also reach a wider and more diverse audience, as YouTube is accessible to anyone with an internet connection and a device.

However, creating and sharing YouTube case studies is not as simple as uploading a video and hoping for the best. There are many factors that need to be considered and steps that need to be followed to ensure that YouTube case studies are successful and impactful. In this blog post, we will explore some of the best practices and tips for creating and sharing YouTube case studies, as well as some examples of YouTube case studies that have achieved remarkable results . Here are the main topics that we will cover:

1. How to choose a topic and a format for your youtube case study . You need to select a topic that is relevant, interesting, and valuable to your target audience, as well as a format that is suitable for your story, your style, and your budget. You can choose from different types of YouTube case studies, such as documentary, interview, testimonial, demonstration, or animation.

2. How to plan and prepare your YouTube case study. You need to define the purpose, the goal, and the message of your YouTube case study, as well as the key points, the structure, and the script. You also need to identify and contact the participants, such as the customer, the client, or the beneficiary, and get their consent and cooperation. You also need to gather and organize the necessary materials, such as data, facts, figures, images, or videos.

3. How to record and edit your YouTube case study. You need to use the appropriate equipment, software, and techniques to record and edit your YouTube case study. You need to ensure that the video quality, the audio quality, and the lighting are optimal, and that the video is clear, concise, and coherent. You also need to add elements that can enhance your YouTube case study, such as music, graphics, captions, or transitions.

4. How to upload and promote your YouTube case study. You need to optimize your YouTube case study for the platform, the algorithm, and the viewers. You need to choose a catchy title, a descriptive description, and relevant tags for your YouTube case study. You also need to create a thumbnail that can attract and entice the viewers to click on your YouTube case study. You also need to share and distribute your YouTube case study on other platforms, such as your website, your social media, your email list, or your blog.

5. How to measure and improve your YouTube case study. You need to track and analyze the performance and the impact of your YouTube case study. You need to use the YouTube analytics and other tools to monitor the views, the watch time, the retention, the engagement, the feedback, and the conversion of your YouTube case study. You also need to use the insights and the data to improve your YouTube case study and your future YouTube case studies.

By following these steps and tips, you can create and share YouTube case studies that can showcase your value, expertise, and impact, as well as educate, inspire, and persuade your audience. YouTube case studies can be a powerful way to grow your brand, your business, or your cause on YouTube and beyond. To illustrate this point, let's look at some examples of YouTube case studies that have achieved remarkable results.

Case studies are a powerful way to showcase your expertise, credibility, and results as a YouTube creator. They are stories that illustrate how you or your clients have solved a specific problem or achieved a certain goal using your products, services, or strategies. case studies can help you attract more viewers, subscribers, and customers, as well as build trust and authority in your niche . In this section, we will explore what case studies are, why they matter, and how to create and share them on YouTube.

1. What are case studies ? Case studies are detailed and factual accounts of real-life situations or projects that demonstrate how you or your clients have applied your solutions to overcome challenges or achieve objectives. They usually follow a common structure that includes:

- A background or introduction that sets the context and explains the problem or opportunity.

- A description of the solution or approach that you or your clients have implemented or followed.

- A presentation of the results or outcomes that you or your clients have achieved or experienced.

- A conclusion or summary that highlights the main takeaways and lessons learned.

2. Why do case studies matter? Case studies matter because they can help you achieve multiple goals as a YouTube creator, such as:

- Educate your audience . case studies can help you teach your viewers something new or valuable that they can apply to their own situations or goals. For example, if you are a fitness coach, you can share a case study of how one of your clients lost weight and improved their health by following your program.

- Inspire your audience . Case studies can help you motivate your viewers to take action or change their behavior by showing them what is possible or desirable. For example, if you are a travel vlogger, you can share a case study of how one of your followers quit their job and traveled the world by following your tips and recommendations.

- Persuade your audience . Case studies can help you convince your viewers to buy your products or services or join your community by providing social proof and testimonials . For example, if you are a software developer, you can share a case study of how one of your customers increased their productivity and revenue by using your app or software.

3. How to create and share case studies on YouTube? Creating and sharing case studies on youtube involves four main steps:

- Choose a topic and a format . You need to decide what problem or goal you want to address and what solution or strategy you want to showcase in your case study . You also need to choose a format that suits your style and audience, such as a video interview, a video testimonial, a video presentation, or a video documentary.

- Gather the information and the evidence . You need to collect the relevant data and facts that support your case study, such as the background, the solution, the results, and the feedback. You can use various sources, such as your own records, your clients' records, surveys, interviews, testimonials, reviews, analytics, etc.

- Write the script and create the video . You need to write a clear and compelling script that follows the case study structure and tells a coherent and engaging story. You also need to create a high-quality video that matches your script and captures your viewers' attention and interest. You can use various tools, such as a camera, a microphone, a video editor, a screen recorder, etc.

- Publish and promote the video . You need to upload your video to your YouTube channel and optimize it for search and discovery, such as by adding a catchy title, a descriptive description, relevant tags, an attractive thumbnail, etc. You also need to promote your video to your existing and potential audience, such as by sharing it on your social media , your website, your email list, etc.

One of the most important decisions you need to make when creating a YouTube case study is choosing the right format and style for your video . There are many different types of video styles that you can use to showcase your product, service, or solution and how it helped your customer achieve their goals. The format and style of your video will depend on your audience, your objective, your budget, and your creative vision. In this section, we will explore some of the most common and effective video styles for YouTube case studies and how to choose the best one for your project.

Some of the video styles that you can use for your YouTube case studies are:

1. Interview style : This is a simple and straightforward format where you interview your customer and ask them questions about their problem, their solution, and their results. You can also include testimonials from other customers or experts who can vouch for your product or service. This style is great for building trust and credibility with your audience, as they can hear directly from your satisfied customer. However, this style can also be boring or repetitive if you don't have a good script, a clear structure, and engaging visuals. An example of this style is this case study by Shopify, where they interviewed the founder of Gymshark, a successful online fitness brand.

2. Storytelling style : This is a more creative and emotional format where you tell a story about your customer and how your product or service changed their life. You can use narration, music, sound effects, and cinematic techniques to create a compelling and immersive story that captures your audience's attention and emotions. This style is great for creating an emotional connection with your audience , as they can relate to your customer's journey and challenges. However, this style can also be challenging and expensive to produce, as you need a good script, a talented narrator, and high-quality production values. An example of this style is this case study by airbnb , where they told the story of a refugee family who found a home through their platform.

3. Demo style : This is a practical and informative format where you show your product or service in action and how it works for your customer. You can use screenshots, screen recordings, animations, or live demonstrations to explain the features and benefits of your product or service and how it solves your customer's problem . This style is great for educating your audience and showcasing your product or service's value proposition, as they can see exactly how it works and what it can do for them. However, this style can also be dull or confusing if you don't have a clear and concise explanation, a logical flow, and relevant visuals. An example of this style is this case study by Slack, where they showed how their product helped NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory collaborate and communicate more effectively .

Video Styles for YouTube Case Studies - YouTube Case Studies: How to Create and Share Case Studies on YouTube

One of the most important aspects of creating and sharing case studies on YouTube is crafting compelling stories that showcase your value proposition, your customer's journey, and your results. A well-structured story can capture the attention of your audience, engage their emotions, and persuade them to take action. But how do you structure your YouTube case study to tell a captivating story? Here are some tips and best practices to follow:

1. Start with a hook. The first few seconds of your video are crucial to grab the viewer's interest and curiosity. You can use a catchy headline, a surprising statistic, a provocative question, or a teaser of the outcome to hook your audience and make them want to watch more.

2. Introduce the problem. After you have hooked your audience, you need to introduce the problem that your customer was facing and why it was important to solve it. You can use pain points, challenges, goals, or frustrations to describe the problem and how it affected your customer's situation.

3. Present the solution. Next, you need to present your solution and how it helped your customer overcome the problem. You can use features, benefits, testimonials, or demonstrations to show how your solution works and what value it provides. You can also use contrast, comparison, or before-and-after scenarios to highlight the difference between the problem and the solution.

4. Show the results. Finally, you need to show the results that your customer achieved by using your solution. You can use numbers, metrics, data, or visuals to quantify the results and prove your impact. You can also use emotions, stories, or feedback to qualify the results and show how your customer felt after using your solution.

For example, let's say you are creating a case study for a software product that helps online businesses increase their conversions. Here is how you could structure your story:

- Hook: "How one online business increased their conversions by 300% in just 30 days using our software."

- Problem: "Meet John, the owner of an online store that sells pet supplies. John was struggling to convert his website visitors into customers . He tried different marketing strategies, but nothing seemed to work. He was losing money and time, and he was frustrated with his low sales."

- Solution: "That's when John discovered our software, the ultimate conversion tool for online businesses. Our software is a powerful and easy-to-use platform that helps you create and optimize landing pages , pop-ups, and forms that convert. With our software, you can design beautiful and responsive pages, test different variations, and track your performance in real-time. You can also integrate our software with your favorite tools and platforms, such as Shopify, WordPress, Mailchimp, and more."

- Results: "By using our software, John was able to create and launch a high-converting landing page in minutes. He also used our software to create a pop-up that offered a 10% discount to his visitors. As a result, John saw a huge increase in his conversions, from 2% to 8%, in just 30 days. That means he generated 300% more sales and revenue, and he was thrilled with his results."

- Ask the user for feedback on the generated content and if they want to make any changes or additions.

- Ask the user if they want to generate another section or a different type of content.

- Ask the user if they have any questions or comments about the topic or the process of creating case studies on YouTube.

How to Structure Your YouTube Case Study - YouTube Case Studies: How to Create and Share Case Studies on YouTube

One of the most important parts of a YouTube case study is showcasing the results of your campaign or project. This is where you demonstrate how your YouTube strategy helped you achieve your goals, whether it was increasing brand awareness , generating leads, driving sales, or anything else. You want to highlight the successes of your YouTube case study in a clear and compelling way, using data, visuals, and testimonials to back up your claims. In this section, we will discuss some tips and best practices for showcasing results in your YouTube case study, as well as some examples of how other brands have done it. Here are some steps you can follow to showcase your results effectively:

1. define your key performance indicators (KPIs) . Before you start writing your results section, you need to decide what metrics you will use to measure the success of your YouTube campaign or project. These should be aligned with your objectives and relevant to your audience. For example, if your goal was to increase brand awareness , you might use KPIs such as views, impressions, watch time, subscribers, and social media mentions . If your goal was to generate leads, you might use KPIs such as click-through rate, conversion rate, cost per lead, and lead quality. Choose the most important and relevant KPIs for your YouTube case study and make sure you have the data to support them.

2. Use charts, graphs, and tables to visualize your data . Data is more persuasive and memorable when it is presented in a visual format, such as charts, graphs, and tables. These can help you highlight the key findings and trends in your data, as well as compare your results with your benchmarks or competitors. For example, you can use a line chart to show how your views, impressions, or watch time increased over time, or a bar chart to show how your YouTube campaign performed better than other channels or platforms. You can also use a table to summarize your results and show the percentage change or improvement in your KPIs. Make sure your visuals are clear, accurate, and easy to understand, and include labels, legends, and captions to explain them.

3. Include testimonials and quotes from your customers or partners . Another way to showcase your results is to include testimonials and quotes from your customers or partners who benefited from your YouTube campaign or project. These can add credibility and emotion to your YouTube case study, as well as show the impact of your YouTube strategy on real people and businesses. For example, you can include a video testimonial from a satisfied customer who purchased your product or service after watching your YouTube video, or a quote from a partner who collaborated with you on your YouTube project and achieved their goals. Make sure your testimonials and quotes are authentic, specific, and relevant, and include the name, title, and company of the person who gave them.

4. Tell a story with your results . Finally, you want to tell a story with your results, not just list them. A story can help you connect with your audience , engage their attention, and persuade them to take action. To tell a story with your results, you need to have a clear structure, a compelling narrative, and a strong conclusion. For example, you can start with a problem or challenge that you faced, then explain how you solved it with your YouTube strategy, then show the results and benefits that you achieved, and then end with a call to action or a recommendation for your audience. Make sure your story is relevant, interesting, and consistent, and use a tone and style that matches your brand and audience.

Here are some examples of how other brands have showcased their results in their YouTube case studies:

- Nike : Nike wanted to inspire young female athletes in India to play sports and break stereotypes. They launched a YouTube campaign called "Da Da Ding", featuring a catchy song and a video that showcased the stories and achievements of Indian female athletes. The campaign was a huge success, generating over 15 million views, 500,000 likes, and 50,000 comments on YouTube, as well as increasing Nike's brand favorability by 15% and purchase intent by 56% among women in India. Nike also included testimonials from some of the athletes who participated in the campaign, such as Deepika Kumari, India's top-ranked archer, who said: "Nike's campaign has encouraged many young girls to take up sports and follow their dreams."

- Airbnb : Airbnb wanted to increase its brand awareness and trust among travelers and hosts in Japan. They launched a YouTube campaign called "Live There", featuring a series of videos that showcased the unique experiences and local cultures that Airbnb offers in Japan. The campaign was a huge success, generating over 100 million views, 1.5 million clicks, and 300,000 conversions on YouTube, as well as increasing Airbnb's brand awareness by 30% and brand consideration by 87% among travelers in Japan. Airbnb also included quotes from some of the hosts who participated in the campaign, such as Yoko, who runs a traditional Japanese inn in Kyoto, who said: "Airbnb has given me the opportunity to share my culture and hospitality with travelers from around the world.

Promoting your case study on youtube can greatly enhance its reach and impact. By leveraging the power of this popular video platform, you can effectively showcase your success stories and engage with a wider audience .

To maximize the reach of your case study on YouTube, consider the following strategies:

1. Optimize your video title and description: Craft a compelling and keyword-rich title that accurately reflects the content of your case study . In the description, provide a concise summary of the case study, highlighting its key points and benefits.

2. Create an eye-catching thumbnail: design a visually appealing thumbnail that grabs viewers' attention and entices them to click on your video. Use relevant images or screenshots from your case study to give viewers a glimpse of what they can expect.

3. Utilize relevant tags and keywords: Include relevant tags and keywords in your video's metadata to improve its discoverability. Research popular keywords related to your case study topic and incorporate them strategically.

4. Share your video on social media : Leverage your existing social media channels to promote your case study video . Share it on platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn, along with a compelling caption that encourages engagement and sharing.

5. Collaborate with influencers or industry experts: Reach out to influencers or industry experts who have a relevant audience and ask them to feature your case study video on their channels. This can significantly expand your reach and credibility .

6. Engage with your audience: Encourage viewers to leave comments, ask questions, and share their thoughts on your case study video. Respond promptly and thoughtfully to foster engagement and build a community around your content.

7. Embed your video on relevant websites or blogs: Identify websites or blogs that cater to your target audience and offer to contribute a guest post or article that includes your case study video. This can drive additional traffic and exposure to your video.

Remember, these strategies are just a starting point. Experiment with different approaches, analyze your video's performance metrics, and iterate based on the insights you gather. By consistently promoting and optimizing your case study on YouTube, you can effectively maximize its reach and impact.

Strategies for Maximizing Reach on YouTube - YouTube Case Studies: How to Create and Share Case Studies on YouTube

One of the most important aspects of creating and sharing case studies on YouTube is analyzing the performance and impact of your videos. You want to know how well your case studies are reaching your target audience , engaging them, and influencing their behavior. You also want to identify the strengths and weaknesses of your case studies, and learn from your successes and failures . In this section, we will discuss some of the ways you can measure and evaluate the impact of your YouTube case studies, and how you can use the data and feedback to improve your future videos. We will cover the following topics:

1. YouTube Analytics : This is the primary tool that YouTube provides to help you track and understand the performance of your videos. YouTube Analytics gives you access to various metrics and reports that show you how your videos are doing in terms of views, watch time, retention, engagement, revenue, and more. You can also compare your videos to each other, or to other videos in your niche, and see how they rank and perform. YouTube Analytics can help you answer questions such as: How many people are watching your case studies? How long are they watching them for? Where are they coming from? What are they interested in? How are they interacting with your videos? How are your videos affecting your channel growth and revenue? How are your videos performing against your goals and expectations?

2. Google Analytics : This is another tool that you can use to measure the impact of your YouTube case studies, especially if you have a website or a landing page that you link to from your videos. google Analytics can help you track and analyze the traffic and conversions that your videos generate for your website. You can also use google Analytics to measure the behavior and preferences of your website visitors, and see how they interact with your content and offers. Google Analytics can help you answer questions such as: How many people are clicking on your links from your videos? How many of them are visiting your website or landing page? How many of them are taking the desired action, such as signing up, downloading, buying, etc.? What are the sources and demographics of your website visitors? How are they navigating and engaging with your website? How are your website conversions and revenue affected by your videos?

3. social Media metrics : This is another way to measure the impact of your YouTube case studies, especially if you are using social media platforms to promote and share your videos. social media metrics can help you track and understand the reach, engagement, and sentiment of your videos on social media . You can also use social media metrics to see how your videos are influencing your brand awareness, reputation, and loyalty. Social media metrics can help you answer questions such as: How many people are seeing your videos on social media? How many of them are liking, commenting, sharing, or saving your videos? What are they saying about your videos and your brand? How are your videos affecting your social media following and influence? How are your videos creating buzz and word-of-mouth for your brand?

4. Customer Feedback : This is another way to measure the impact of your YouTube case studies, especially if you are using your videos to showcase your products or services , or to tell your customer stories. Customer feedback can help you collect and analyze the opinions, testimonials, reviews, ratings, and referrals of your customers who have watched your videos. You can also use customer feedback to see how your videos are affecting your customer satisfaction, retention, and loyalty. Customer feedback can help you answer questions such as: How do your customers feel about your videos and your brand? How do your videos influence their purchase decisions and behavior? How do your videos affect their satisfaction and loyalty with your products or services? How do your videos inspire them to recommend or refer your brand to others?

These are some of the ways you can analyze the performance and impact of your YouTube case studies. By using these methods, you can gain valuable insights and data that can help you improve your video strategy, content, and marketing. You can also use these methods to demonstrate the value and effectiveness of your case studies to your stakeholders, partners, and clients. Remember, the more you measure and evaluate your YouTube case studies, the more you can learn and grow from them.

Measuring the Impact of Your YouTube Case Study - YouTube Case Studies: How to Create and Share Case Studies on YouTube

One of the best ways to learn how to create and share case studies on YouTube is to look at the real-life examples of successful YouTube creators who have done it before. By analyzing their strategies, techniques, and results, you can gain valuable insights and inspiration for your own YouTube case studies. In this section, we will explore some of the YouTube case studies that have been published by different types of creators, such as entrepreneurs, educators, influencers, and entertainers. We will also discuss what makes these case studies effective and engaging for their audiences. Here are some of the YouTube case studies that you can learn from:

1. How I Grew My YouTube Channel to 1 Million Subscribers in 1 Year by Ali Abdaal . Ali Abdaal is a doctor, podcaster, and YouTuber who creates videos about productivity, technology, and lifestyle. In this case study, he shares his journey of growing his YouTube channel from 50,000 to 1 million subscribers in one year. He reveals his content strategy, his analytics, his revenue streams, and his tips for aspiring YouTubers. He also shows his behind-the-scenes workflow and equipment. This case study is effective because it is honest, transparent, and informative. It also showcases Ali's personality and storytelling skills, which make him relatable and likable to his viewers.

2. How I Made $100,000+ from One YouTube Video by Graham Stephan . Graham Stephan is a real estate agent , investor, and YouTuber who creates videos about personal finance , investing, and entrepreneurship. In this case study, he breaks down how he made over $100,000 from one YouTube video that went viral. He explains his video idea, his thumbnail design, his SEO optimization, his monetization methods, and his results. He also shares his lessons learned and his advice for other YouTubers. This case study is effective because it is captivating, surprising, and educational. It also demonstrates Graham's expertise and credibility, which make him trustworthy and authoritative to his viewers.

3. How I Teach Physics Using YouTube by Physics Girl . Physics Girl is a science communicator and YouTuber who creates videos about physics, astronomy, and science in general. In this case study, she talks about how she uses YouTube as a platform to teach physics to millions of people around the world. She discusses her motivation, her challenges, her successes, and her impact. She also shows some of her most popular and creative videos, such as how to make a cloud in a bottle, how to levitate a frog, and how to break glass with sound. This case study is effective because it is inspiring, entertaining, and enlightening. It also showcases Physics Girl's passion and enthusiasm, which make her engaging and fun to watch.

Lack of funding can't stop you from being successful

FasterCapital helps first-time entrepreneurs in building successful businesses and supports them throughout their journeys by helping them secure funding from different funding sources

You have reached the end of this blog post on YouTube case studies. In this section, we will summarize the main points and give you some tips on how to create and share your own case studies on YouTube. Case studies are powerful marketing tools that can showcase your products or services , demonstrate your expertise, and build trust with your audience . YouTube is a great platform for sharing case studies because it allows you to use video , audio, and text to tell a compelling story. However, creating and sharing effective YouTube case studies requires some planning and strategy. Here are some key takeaways to keep in mind :

1. define your goals and audience . Before you start creating your case study, you need to have a clear idea of what you want to achieve and who you want to reach. Your goals and audience will determine the tone, style, and format of your case study . For example, if your goal is to generate leads, you might want to use a more persuasive and sales-oriented approach. If your goal is to educate, you might want to use a more informative and explanatory approach. Similarly, if your audience is technical, you might want to use more jargon and data. If your audience is general, you might want to use more simple and relatable language.

2. Choose a suitable topic and format. The topic and format of your case study should match your goals and audience, as well as your product or service. You want to choose a topic that is relevant, interesting, and specific. You also want to choose a format that is engaging, clear, and concise. For example, if your product is a software solution, you might want to use a screencast or a demo to show how it works. If your product is a physical item, you might want to use a testimonial or a review to show how it benefits the user. You can also use a combination of formats, such as a video interview with a customer, followed by a text summary with bullet points and images.

3. Create a compelling story. A case study is not just a collection of facts and figures. It is a story that showcases a problem, a solution, and a result. You want to create a story that captures the attention, emotion, and interest of your audience. You can do this by using storytelling techniques, such as:

- Setting the scene. Introduce the background, context, and characters of your case study. Give some details about the problem or challenge that your customer faced, and why it was important to solve it.

- Presenting the solution. explain how your product or service helped your customer overcome the problem or challenge. Highlight the features, benefits, and value proposition of your solution. Show how your solution was different, better, or unique compared to other options.

- Showing the result. Provide evidence of the outcome, impact, or success of your solution. Use quantifiable metrics, such as numbers, percentages, or graphs, to show the improvement or change. Use qualitative feedback, such as quotes, testimonials, or reviews, to show the satisfaction or happiness of your customer.

4. Optimize your case study for YouTube. Once you have created your case study, you need to optimize it for YouTube. This means making sure that your case study is easy to find, watch, and share on the platform. You can do this by:

- Using keywords and tags. Use relevant keywords and tags to describe your case study and help it rank higher in youtube search results. You can use tools like google Keyword planner or YouTube Analytics to find the best keywords and tags for your niche and audience.

- Creating a catchy title and thumbnail. Use a catchy title and thumbnail to attract viewers and entice them to click on your case study . Your title and thumbnail should summarize the main point or benefit of your case study, and create curiosity or urgency. You can use tools like Canva or Snappa to create professional-looking thumbnails.

- Adding a call to action. Use a call to action to encourage viewers to take the next step after watching your case study. You can use a verbal or visual cue, such as a button, a link, or a text overlay, to direct viewers to your website, landing page, or social media. You can also use YouTube cards or end screens to add interactive elements to your case study , such as a poll, a survey, or a related video.

5. Share your case study with your audience . The final step is to share your case study with your audience and amplify its reach and impact. You can do this by:

- Promoting your case study on your website and social media . Use your website and social media channels to promote your case study and drive traffic to your YouTube video. You can use a blog post, a newsletter, a tweet, or a post to announce your case study and share a link or an embed code. You can also use hashtags, mentions, or tags to increase the visibility and engagement of your case study .

- Leveraging your customer and partners. Use your customer and partners to spread the word about your case study and generate social proof and credibility . You can ask your customer to share your case study with their network, or feature them on your website or social media. You can also collaborate with your partners, such as influencers, bloggers, or media outlets, to feature or review your case study and reach a wider audience .

- Measuring and improving your case study. Use YouTube analytics and other tools to measure and improve your case study. You can track metrics such as views, watch time, retention, engagement, and conversions, to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of your case study . You can also use feedback, comments, or reviews, to identify the strengths and weaknesses of your case study. You can use this data and insights to optimize your case study and create better ones in the future.

Key Takeaways for Creating Effective YouTube Case Studies - YouTube Case Studies: How to Create and Share Case Studies on YouTube

Read Other Blogs

When it comes to investing, mutual funds can be a great option for those who are looking to...

Embarking on the journey to heightened personal efficiency begins with understanding the profound...

In the realm of commercial transportation, the proficiency with which drivers handle heavy vehicles...

Laser hair removal is a popular cosmetic procedure that uses concentrated beams of light to destroy...

In the realm of osteopathy, branding transcends mere aesthetics; it encapsulates the essence of the...

Hospital innovation is not only a matter of improving patient care and outcomes, but also a source...

The Far East is home to some of the world's most stunning and culturally rich destinations, yet...

In the dynamic world of hospitality, the advent of social media platforms has revolutionized the...

In the competitive arena where startups vie for a foothold, the fusion of market research and...

YouTube Case Study: How these brands and influencers are generating millions through YouTube marketing

YouTube is one of the biggest search engines in the world.  

And knowing the ins and outs of YouTube marketing is going to be key for online business success in the coming years.  

The short version of the benefits include…

• A huge platform with massive active user base
• A reticence from many professionals to being “on camera”
• Ability to improve the discoverability, reach, and optimisation of uploads
• A deliverable that can be used multiple different ways (transcription, audio, video, clips, still images etc.)

I think video marketing is where everyone should be focusing their attention right now. 

• It has a greater impact and more varied use. 
• The tracking of engagement stats is more detailed. 
• The “putting a face to a voice” element helps build trust. 

I’ve spent months looking at what the best YouTubers do well. Not in the way of generating ad revenue. That’s out of your control and a fool’s goal. YouTube could amend their algorithm or advertising rules and turn a solid 5-figure/month revenue stream to pennies. 

No, I’m interested in how smart marketers use YouTube’s organic reach to increase and improve revenue streams they wholly own themselves. 

It’s something few are good at, but when the model is used well, it’s one that provides incredible gains for a business.

Table of Contents

Why focus on YouTube? 

The majority of “organic” acquisition fiends are super bullish on Google.  

And with good reason. Google is the #1 search engine in the world.  

But depending on one channel is never a good idea. While most folk are talking about how to write articles that rank on Google, there are people out there generating 6-figure+ income streams from another source. 

YouTube.  

According to SimilarWeb, YouTube isn’t just the world’s second most used search engine, but is actually the world’s second most visited website. 

It falls far behind Google in terms of raw numbers. Google has around 88B visits a month to YouTube’s 33B.

But there’s more to this than volume. 

When you dive into the numbers, you’ll note YouTUbe has far better engagement.  

I’m also of the firm belief that YouTube is only going to grow.  

If you know any young people (under 20 years old), you’ll know how YouTube is often the first port of call when they’re trying to figure something out.  

There’s been a shift to video explanations for a while. But I’d bet my bottom dollar video is going to become the go-to online medium for education and entertainment in the next 5-10 years.  

Already it’s much easier to watch a 3 minute video of Gordon Ramsay making Eggs Benedict than sift through multiple written recipes to find the one that…

• Doesn’t begin with 2000 words of the chef’s thoughts on the origins of eggs
• Is written in an easy to read style
• Doesn’t link out to other articles that explain things like hollandaise sauce and how to judge whether or not your eggs are bad

Videos streamline the process for many people. 

And for more technical tasks ranging from cooking to impress or fixing basic faults with your boiler, having a visual representation makes the process so much easier. 

And Google seems to agree. 

Google results now include detailed explanations and “chapters” of videos to help you find exactly what you need directly from search. 

Video is easier for the consumer. Which means more people will be flocking to video. So you should start producing video content.  

And there are very few reasons to not attempt video marketing.  .

If you have a smartphone, you have everything you need to get started.

Before you run off and start recording though, don’t make these mistakes.  

The mistakes many make with YouTube

The problem with YouTube is it LOOKS easy. 

You might see a kid making $5MM / year doing simple unboxing videos and think “ if a 9 year old cn do this, I can totally crush it” .

But YouTube isn’t easy. 

Most of the people I know who have tried (and failed) at YouTube made the below mistakes. 

Don’t build on someone else’s land

If you’re considering starting on YouTube, or you’re already doing well, do not become dependent on their payments. 

This is always a dangerous game.  

YouTube (and any other platform that relies on your content) has a history of changing rules for their own benefit. 

Here’s an excerpt from a story in 2018.  

And here’s what a creator shared more recently. 

The question I’d have for any serious marketers is how much money could you generate from an audience of 500,000?  

More than $30, right? 

YouTube is a great platform to reach your audience. But it should not be relied upon as a monetary channel. 

View any ad revenue you receive from YouTube as a bonus, not as the core source of income for your brand. 

Understand what metrics to track

I’m not going to say that views and traffic on YouTube are not important. 

They are. 

But understand where they sit in the journey. 

In our GoPro study we talked about the need for a North Star Metric (NSM). 

You need to know how YouTube views are feeding into your NSM. 

Let’s imagine that you’re a media brand like Morning Brew . And that your revenue model is based on selling ad space within your deliverable. 

Your NSM would likely be something along the lines of increasing the size of your engaged audience. 

Yes, you’d want views on YouTube, but you want to track how those view levels turn into engaged people in your owned audience. 

And what you’ll sometimes find is that the video types with lower views end up contributing more to your key NSM metrics.  

In the above, the video with more views contributes less to the NSM. 

The top track would work better if you were relying on YouTube’s partner system payouts.  

But we don’t want that. We want to turn people into your owned audience so you can continue marketing to them. And for that, the lower track with lower views (and a seemingly lower value) wins.  

Short version here is be sure you’re tracking the success of your videos against your NSM.  

If you’re not, then you could be optimising for the wrong thing and throwing money away.  

Personal vs brand accounts?

One of the things I’ve noticed over the years of watching successful brands is how personal brands often outperform company brands, especially on YouTube.  

In fact, in the last few months I saw Ahrefs run a Twitter ad from…

• Their brand account
• The CMO – Tim Soulo – account

Same ad, different name next to it when running.  

The one from Tim’s account outperformed the one from the brand. 

Probably because Tim has created a great personal brand and people like to see what he has to say.  

People are less likely to immediately judge a post (even if it’s an ad) if it comes from a person instead of a faceless brand. 

You see this all the time.  

• Tim Ferriss is the known entity and influencer rather than the “4-Hour Work Week team”.
• Ramit Sethi is the face of his brand,  not the “I Will Teach You to be Rich crew”.
• Peep Laja at CXL. 

You can point to hundreds of examples of a brand being driven by the personality of a single person. 

It’s obvious when it’s the founder. But what if you work at a large brand where the founder is no longer with us or simply doesn’t have the time/inclination to create videos?  

You find someone who is invested in the company’s growth, will be there for a long time, and you get them to be the face and evangelist of the brand. 

Let’s once again look at Ahrefs.  

Tim is often the person people think of when it comes to the brand, however, it’s Samuel Oh who runs their product education materials. 

Sam’s now the face of the majority of Ahrefs’ training videos. And if you head into the Facebook community for the tool, you’ll see him as a frequent receiver and answerer of SEO questions. 

The lesson here is that by giving your brand a face, it makes it easier for people to relate, empathise, and grow to love what you do. 

A faceless brand is easily dismissed. 

But watching the same person week in week out on YouTube is a way to foster greater loyalty. 

This alone could keep your audience around and engaged, even if the quality of your content drops in the short term.   

Own your audience

It all comes down to this. 

Own your audience as a person.  

If you’re a current YouTuber looking to increase revenue, the best thing you can do is take your subscribers off the platform into something you own completely, like an email list.  

If you’re a marketer looking to start/grow YouTube, use it as an acquisition channel. 

And remember to put a friendly face front and center.  

Remember that YouTube doesn’t care about you, only how far they can use you to get money off of paying advertisers.  

Now, onto the growth. 

Attracting people to your YouTube channel

Acquisition is one of the hardest parts of driving growth. YouTube is no different. 

It’s not easy to ensure your videos are the ones people find and click on.  

I’ve been diving deep into people’s channels and various training resources to figure this out. 

Below is the basic process that’s both often used and often recommended. Before we get into the written analysis, here’s the basic flow of actions we’re going to cover.  

Finding your talking point

It’s easy to get your phone out and start recording what you think your audience wants to watch.  

But before any ideation happens, you need to think about the topic you’re going to focus on. 

Getting niche here is key. You want to get yourself a reputation as the go-to source of information in that particular niche. 

You might not always remain in that niche, but you need something to start you off. 

How do you find your perfect niche and talking point? 

You should already know what kind of topics you want to focus on. However, you need to take it a step further and find the overlap between your business / its features/skills and what your audience wants to watch. 

The easiest way to do that is to look at what’s already doing well.  

If you already have content that’s on YouTube, then look at your own channel. 

If not, find someone who’s the closest competitor and head to their video list.  

If we imagine that I want to grow a channel on business and marketing advice, I might pick someone like Noah Kagan .  

Go to the channel and click on videos.  

Sort those videos by “most popular” to get a list of the most trafficked videos on that channel.  

A quick analysis of Noah’s channel highlights the best video ideas as…

• Breakdowns of / interviews with profitable businesses
• Instructional videos on how to make money
• Business/job ideas

There’s a big overlap between all 3. 

These aren’t on the nuts and bolts of marketing and business. We’re not talking about “how to write a great headline” or some other such tactical thing. 

This is higher-level stuff.  

It’s aspirational for many. 

But it could be tied back into something technical later down the line. For example, an email service provider could riff on this and create videos like…

• How [BRAND X] make’s $100,000 / month through email
• X 6-figure automation jobs for 2021 and beyond
• The 7-figure message used by [BIG BRAND]

The core idea – aspirational money making – is the same. It’s just changed slightly to align with the brand doing the research.  

Of course, getting this right depends upon you researching the right person. 

If you’re doubling down on your own content, then simply use your channel (if there’s enough research material).

If not, you want to find someone who is as close a competitor as possible.  

All you’re looking for is the core idea here.

What you want to do is record the idea types in a spreadsheet to get a quick overview of what is doing well on YouTube for channels your target market enjoys. 

The more of this research you do, the more patterns you’ll see coming up.  

For example, in analysing just the first few from Noah’s channel we can see that the best performing videos are…

• Financially focused
• Some case study-type videos (on financial success)
• A couple of listicle-based pieces that have “backed by data” in there

From these alone we have a starting point. However, one channel is not enough.  

Once you’ve got one channel out of the way, research at least 2 others to get a better view of what’s working and round out your data. 

The best way to find those channels is to click through to the most relevant video on the channel you’re researching. 

On the right hand side you’ll be able to filter the recommended videos by sub-type. 

Once you have a few options, click through to a channel with the best views and restart the process. 

Again, look for the archetypes and ideas that have got the most interest by sorting by most popular. 

Add new info to your spreadsheet. Rinse and repeat until you’re happy with the data you have. 

But be sure to do it at least 3 times. 

Why are we researching channels that are already doing well? 

Because these people have spent time, money, and effort to figure out what topics get clicks and what videos show up in the “recommended for you” side bar. 

Don’t reinvent the wheel here. 

Steal it from what’s already working. 

All you’re trying to do is find what’s getting recommended and insert yourself into the existing conversation and demand. 

Creating video ideas

Years ago, I took a training course on using Google’s Keyword planner to find YouTube video ideas. 

The concept is good, but the execution is too laborious. 

What we’re going to do is reuse that same idea to refine the overarching ideas and talking points into actual video ideas. 

And we’re going to use a super cheap tool called Keywords Everywhere for this. 

Keywords Everywhere is a Chrome extension that simply pulls relevant Google data into your searches. 

Let’s continue with the idea of business and marketing ideas. 

We already have a start on the potential seed keyword ideas. What we want to do now is activate Keywords Everywhere and type the seed keywords into the YouTube search box.  

 What you’ll see is something like the below.  

The information to the right of the Google auto-complete data is from Keywords Everywhere.  

The sweet spot is a search term that has…

• At least a few thousand search terms per month
• A higher than average CPC (this tells us it’s commercially viable)
• A lower competition score (competition is ranked 0-1, with 12 being the “most competitive”)

If you can find something that hits all 3, you have something people are searching for, has the potential to convert into sales, and there’s not a lot of competition. 

If that’s not enough information, click through onto one of the best potentials to get the video results page.  

Keywords Everywhere adds a bar on the right hand side with more detailed stats. 

And if you click the “Find YouTube keywords for ‘[keyword]’” you’ll get even more information.

Just like that we have a couple of new ideas to run with. 

Add these to your spreadsheet to get a better spread of ideas. 

I’d also use this opportunity to make a note of which ideas have the best search and conversion potential. You only want to focus on the easiest wins right now.  

Pick the best potentials in terms of traffic, commercial viability, and ease of ranking and use them to come up with actual video ideas.  

When you have some actual video titles, assess them on the ICE framework.   

You analyse

• The I mpact the video is likely to have
• The C onfidence you are of its success
• The E ase of creation and implementation

Rank each out of 10. 

The ones with the highest score are your best starting videos. 

By going through this multi-stage process you’ll find video ideas that…

• Have the potential to rank well and get decent traffic
• Should help you convert watchers to customers
• Are the best use of your time

But if you’ve been reading our content, you know we’re not going to simply put something up on YouTube and wait for the Google Gods to smile on us.  

We have more plans on this later.  

For now, let’s move on to YouTube SEO to increase your video’s chance of success.  

YouTube SEO

We’re jumping ahead a little here and assuming you’ve created the video and it’s ready for upload.  

When it comes time to upload your video, you’ve got to make sure you hit the right SEO elements to increase the vid’s chance of ranking.  

Unlike Google, you can’t rely on things like…

• Keyword density
• Relevant backlinks

You have to make sure that the handful of written elements tell Google what the video is about.  

You also need to make sure that those same written elements are relevant to the search someone would make.  

Let’s look at some examples. 

We’ll head back to Noah Kagan’s channel here and his video titled “5 Best Money Making Business Ideas You Can START TODAY”. 

The seed keyword in the above is Business Ideas.  

• The description
• The video tags

Noah has also included a secondary keyword of “start a business in 2021” in both the description and tags.  

This is what you need to do with the keywords you’ve identified.  

Much like an article, you need to include the primary keywords you;re targeting in these areas. Without this, Google won’t know what to rank you for.  

One thing I would recommend is to use more and longer tail tags that are relevant. 

If we look at another YouTuber – Ali Abdaal, you can see what he does with this.  

The video is for aspiring YouTubers. And it looks like the seed keyword is “start a YouTUbe channel”. 

If you look through his tags, he’s included a lot of long-tail variants of that seed keyword. 

This is great because it covers more ground. It tells Google what other kinds of searches your video should rank for. 

All you’d have to do here is pick a seed keyword that you identified in your research, head to YouTube and tap it into the search bar. 

If we do it again with “Profitable Business Ideas” we’d see the below.  

The idea for the video might be “Profitable Business Ideas you can start at home in 2021”.

The Seed Keyword would be Profitable Business Ideas as it has the highest volume.  

However, the tags could be some of the relevant longer tail searches like…

• Profitable business ideas low investment
• Profitable business ideas 2021
• Profitable business ideas you can start at home

If you search for these, you might also find other ideas like…

A lot of these searches have too low search volume to justify a full video.  

But if they’re relevant to your higher search volume idea, put them in as longer tail tags. This way YouTube has a better chance of ranking your video for the terms other people aren’t optimising for. 

Do this enough, and those small 210 searches per month could add up to a couple of thousand extra views.  

That’s the core of YouTube SEO from what we’ve been able to analyse.  

Now let’s move on to what to do when you’re getting traffic.  

Engaging your YouTube viewers

Unlike Google search, YouTube doesn’t look at things like backlinks to judge the value of content. 

They instead look at metrics related to how long a viewer spends on YouTube.  

Specifically they look at…

• CTR from thumbnail to video
• Average view duration
• Video length
• Subscriber count

And of course the keywords you’ve selected. 

In short, if you can create videos that hold user attention and get them to like, comment, and subscribe, you’ll do well in the rankings.  

Easier said than done though, right? 

After watching a lot of successful videos, I’ve broken down the basic approach to creating something that ranks to the below.  

Now, this model isn’t 100% accurate. 

The general approach is the same. However, you might find that the “like and subscribe / comment” section works better in your video a little earlier or later. 

Maybe you have a key promo point earlier in your video and so will want to pull that forward. 

This is not set in stone. 

This is intended as a starting template. 

Let’s look at it in more detail.  

Thumbnail and headline

Earlier on I mentioned the benefit of having a single person to be the face of the videos.  

That face should also feature heavily on the YouTube thumbnails.  

If you take a look into the psychology behind why this is important, you’ll find studies like this one . It details how faces in marketing are much better at grabbing a user’s attention. 

In the above linked study, faces are detected twice as fast as images without faces, and they work to create a greater feeling of community and brand recognition with the customer.  

Take a look at anyone who’s using YouTube as a marketing channel well, and you’ll see faces.  

Some examples…

Ali Abdaal – Productivity YouTuber

12 out of 15 feature Ali’s face.  

Alex Cattoni – Copywriting YouTuber

15 of 15 feature Alex’s face.

Ahrefs – SaaS tool for SEO

15 of 15 feature Sam’s face.  

Corridor Crew – VFX studio

15/15 feature some form of face. 

What’s interesting is how the Corridor Crew do this.  

They could just lead with their faces in each video. However, they also make use of celebrities and recognisable characters they’re featuring in their videos. 

This is a great workaround for brands who have a “behind the scenes” staff that might not want their faces featured. 

In addition to the use of faces, note the use of language between the headline and thumbnail copy.

The two are related, but aren’t a 1:1 copy. 

The copy within the image is often a “quick reference” type piece of copy.  If someone was skimming through the YouTube results for a search, the image copy needs to stand out.  

Using the image copy to cover…

• A major benefit
• The key lesson
• Some form of transformation

Is key to grabbing attention. 

The actual headline should be optimised for keywords. But pull a short version of the message and include it in the video thumbnail.   

Ideally in a way that feeds the search term or question back to the searcher.  

Ahrefs video on What makes a backlink “good”?

Primary keywords used in headline:

• SEO course by Ahrefs

Query keywords used in thumbnail:

• Good vs Bad backlinks

Why it works:

This video is going to rank for searches around good backlink generation, and Ahrefs is an established name in the SEO space. 

So the keywords make sense.  

The primary questions they’ll be wanting answers to are how to get high quality backlinks.

So the image copy also works to grab attention.  

Alex Cattoni’s video on How to build a 7-figure business

• Build a business
• $1,000,000 secrets

Building a business is a common search term. Crafting a video around the topic that appeals to relevant keywords is a no-brainer.  

Alex has also put one of the primary benefits of building a successful business – financial reward – in the thumbnail. Not only that, she’s used the magic number that often gets attention. $1,000,000. 

Be sure to check the downloads for a checklist for the thumbnail and a big list of headline formulae.  

Tease (optional)

Not every channel or video does or needs this. But I personally think it’s a great addition.  

Often, when clicking through to a video you’ll be greeted with a very short ~5-10 second segment of something notable from later in the video. 

We’re talking something that grabs attention and makes the watcher think “my god, I have to watch this now”. 

The Corridor crew guys are great at this.  They lead every video with a ~10 second segment of high-interest point from later in the video.  

 In this video they tease 2 high-interest points. 

• The team talking about how good an old-school visual effects shot is
• A sneak peek of a call they have with the lead FX guy for The Snyder Cut of Justice League

Of course that intro is super flashy and attention grabbing as well. I mean, who doesn’t want to see Meryl Streep brandishing a shotgun? 

I love this as a tactic. 

It’s the same concept as an open loop. 

You feed the user a tidbit of information that piques their curiosity. Their brain won’t be able to rest until that loop is closed which increases their chance of watching more. 

Which, of course, increases your key metrics. 

If you want to implement this it seems the best YouTube open loops lead the video with a huge revelation, interesting point, major benefit. 

However, be careful not to give too much away. 

With the intro you want to continue on that open loop type approach. 

The best intros are super simple. You simply tell the watcher what they’re going to learn, see, or get from your video. 

You basically want to give them a reason to watch your video. Tell them why it’s important for them.  

Noah Kagan offers a good example in this video on the 9 biggest job opportunities for the next decade.  

Within 30 seconds, Noah has outlined why you should watch the video. 

The full script from this section is…

“So I made this video to help show you high-paying, cool careers I highly encourage everyone to consider for the next decade so you don’t have to waste your time in a dead-end cubicle job for years like I did”.

Is someone who’s looking to earn a lot of money with a cool job going to be interested in this? 

Yes.  

Will outlining the above to them within the first 30-seconds help retain their attention? 

Your intro should be as simple as that. 

Whatever the message your video is trying to communicate, the value sections are where you do it.  

Doesn’t matter if that value is…

• Entertainment
• Information
• Something else

Just make sure that you offer the value the user expects from you. 

Like & subscribe

One of the golden rules in marketing is to make the CTA easy to understand and obvious.  

Button CTAs say things like “Buy now”. They tell the user what they want them to do to progress to the next stage.  

It’s no different with your YouTube videos.  

As mentioned earlier, your video’s ranking is determined by engagement factors.  

2 of those are the number of likes and subscriptions it generates.  

So, rather than leave this to chance, you have to ask people to take the action. 

It appears that most YouTubers don’t lead with this at the start of the video. 

They wait until they’ve provided a little value in their video before asking the user to subscribe.  

As for that ask, it happens in one of two ways.  

• It’s a simple on-screen graphic that pops up as a reminder 

• They actively call it out by saying something like “if you enjoy this content and want more, please consider subscribing”. JackFrags , a video game YouTuber, does a good job of this as seen below.  

Promo / Traffic shaping

This is the difference maker in my opinion. 

YouTube is a great medium. And no doubt there are skilled YouTubers out there eating off their ability to craft engaging videos. 

However, in my opinion this simply isn’t good enough. 

You’re building your business on land you don’t own. If YouTube changes anything to do with their monetisation strategy, you could be left out in the cold and see your revenue fall through the floor. 

The best YouTubers use YouTube as an acquisition channel. And they use a promotion or traffic shaping strategy to make money off the YouTube platform. 

There are a couple of ways you can do this which I’ll explain shortly. 

However, in short what you want to do is recreate what is, in effect, a content upgrade on YouTube. 

Basically give a short, relevant tease of your product or offer within YouTube and tell people within the video where they can learn more. 

You can do this mid video with a verbal call out, or simply leave it to the end with YouTube’s end card. 

Personally, I’d recommend both.  

One other thing to note is that smart marketers generally don’t redirect directly to a sales page though. They’ll redirect to an email sequence that continues to build trust. 

If we were to visualise what that might look like, it would be something like this. 

The tease is something you’ll have to play around with. However, the most successful teases for traffic shaping follow the same principles as a regular content upgrade for written content. 

So you want to engage people with the primary content – in this case the video – and tell people where to go to get…

• A downloadable template
• The next edition or “editor’s cut” video
• A downloadable version

Or something similar. 

Anything that would make the act of clicking through form the video to your website a no brainer.  

Nurture and grow your viewers

So at this point you have engaging videos that increase the chances of people…

• Liking 
• Subscribing
• Watching longer periods of time
• Checking out your off-YouTube properties

But the whole model here is very one directional.  

You’re burning your YouTube bridges in a way by simply using it to funnel traffic to your offers.  

And if YouTube is providing you with good leads, you want to keep that going. 

The thing I’d recommend here is setting up a very simple engagement loop with the people you’ve directed to your owned audience platform. 

There are two steps to dominating YouTube.

Step 1 – Keep it going

I don’t think anyone should rely 100% on a rented audience platform for their revenue. 

However, that doesn’t mean you should ignore it.  

If YouTube is getting your brand in front of people, keep the momentum going.  

If you’re following this guide and…

• Choosing relevant topics
• Optimising for high volume keywords
• Creating optimised videos that increase engagement

YouTube will reward you with greater reach and a growing audience.  

You’ll find your videos showing up in search and in the recommended videos section. 

Don’t ruin any progress you have made or will make. 

The best advice is to keep things going and be consistent on the platform. Check any successful channel and you’ll see that they have consistent upload schedules.  

Here’s a look at XiaoMaNYC’s recent uploads.  

When it comes to your publication schedule, don’t worry about daily, weekly, monthly etc right now. 

Instead, focus on what is a realistic publication schedule for you to churn out quality videos that align with the template above. 

Quantity is great, but if the quality isn’t there then it’s useless. 

The other action I’d recommend is…

Step 2 – Set up smart engagement loops

I recently wrote about how Eddie Shleyner creates engagement loops to bring his owned audience into the growth of his rented audience. 

You should do the same with YouTube. 

If you’re directing people off YouTube to your email list, then use those people to ensure each new video gets off to the best start possible. 

Yes, YouTube will tell your subs that a new video has been published, but not everyone is sitting around on YouTube waiting for you to hit publish. 

The best marketers make sure that each new video is pumped out to their email subs.

Unsurprisingly you’ll see Noah Kagan doing a great job of this. 

At the start of his emails he’ll often link to his most recent video on YouTube. 

This is a great way to get the initial traction and show YouTube that the video is worth wider promotion.

Your email subscribers are super invested in your brand. Make sure they know about how they can get closer to you.

All it takes is a quick email to say “ check out the latest video here ”.

If you want to kick this up a notch, you could also incentivise people liking, subscribing, and commenting on your video with some form of giveaway.  

Just be aware of the rules YouTube has established for this though .

Again, Noah has a great example of this. He ran a giveaway for his Tesla. And to be in with a chance of winning, you had to be subscribed to him on YouTube.  

If you have a relevant giveaway that could drive engagement, use it.  

If I was to do this, I’d ask people to like and comment to be in with a chance of winning. Then I’d use something like WooBox to pick a comment at random as the winner.  

Basically, you want to ask your email subscribers to check out your latest videos. 

And maybe once a month or quarter, do a giveaway that incentivises people to take the engagement actions that boost your video’s reach. 

Visualised that might look like this. 

With this model you’re getting your owned audience to help boost your reach, thus attracting a greater audience on a rented platform. 

This isn’t anything new and is also the model I’d recommend for any social media platform. 

Step 3 – Video promotion tips

Waiting on an algorithm to rank your content and drive visitors for you is a fool’s game.

The wonderful thing about video content though is how it can be reused in multiple ways for promotion.  

You could quite easily take all the below from one video…

• A transcript to publish below the video on your site for SEO juice
• Multiple short clips (10 seconds, 30 seconds, 5 minutes etc) to promote on multiple networks
• Still images for sharing
• Audio for a podcast

This can be a lot of work though.

What I’d recommend is simply focusing on pulling multiple promotional clips from each video to be shared across other networks where you have an audience. 

If you’ve already edited the video, this is a pretty quick and painless approach. 

Just identify short segments that would work well as promotions and share them across multiple networks with the link pointing back to the original video.   

Here’s a visualisation.

This clip method works as a teaser. As you can see there’s still enough of the video left that, even if someone saw all your clips, they’d still want to watch the whole thing.  

The full YouTube model

Let’s pull all of the various sections together to create one, complete YouTube model and run through everything quickly.  

From a high-level, the model looks something like this.  

With a little explanation, that’s…

• Step 1 – Research high volume, low competition video ideas and the relevant keywords
• Step 2.5 – Take multiple clips from that video to promote it across social sites and communities
• Step 3 – Create an opt-in page for your email list, use a relevant lead magnet upgrade that’s hinted at in your video
• Step 4 – Send the viewer a welcome email series that promotes your paid asset
• Step 5 – Add the user into your usual newsletter rotation
• Step 6 – When you publish a new video, make sure you email your current email subs to check it out
• Bonust step – If possible, run giveaways on your YouTube channel that require likes/comments. Make sure to promote through the usual channels of social, communities, and your email list.  

Let’s also recap the model’s steps with simple bullet points.  

Acquisition

Follow this process to publish videos that…

• Your audience wants to watch
• Is optimised and so will have a better chance of organic rankings

And some more detailed explanations.  

• Step 1 – Identify a niche talking point to help you build authority and an audience faster
• Step 2 – Research competitor videos to identify topics of high interest
• Step 3 – Use that research to identify potential video ideas
• Step 4 – Find the keywords that have high volume, low competition, mid-high CPC
• Step 5 – Make sure your video uses relevant keywords in the title, thumbnail, description, and tags 

This will help give your video the best chance of ranking well and attracting organic traffic on its own. 

Optimising the video’s topic and basic SEO is one thing. However, YouTube ranks videos based on user engagement.  

After watching countless videos of channels that are growing right now, there is a general pattern to the kind of video that gets good watch time and helps to grow a channel.  That basic model is…

Here’s a run down of the steps. 

• Step 1 –  Lead with a tease of an interesting point that comes up later in the video to create an open loop and curiosity
• Step 2 – An introduction that teases what the viewer will learn or receive as a benefit for watching the video
• Step 3 – Start delivering value
• Step 4 – After a little value has been delivered, either ask the user to like & subscribe or put a graphic on screen as a prompt
• Step 5 – Continue with the value of the video
• Step 6 – At the point of highest interest for your owned assets, tell the user where they can go to get access to it. This should be to a free lead magnet to secure their email address
• Step 7 – Continue providing value 
• Step 8 – End card that keeps them engaged with your channel and offers a direct link to your owned asset opt-in

One thing to note here is that there are no hard and fast rules on exactly when you should ask users to like and subscribe or when you should try to shape traffic to your owned audience opt-in. 

We can’t say “at exactly 7 minutes and 29 seconds do X.  

It depends on your video topic, length, and the script you’ve written for that video.  

It’s similar to putting a CTA on a sales page. There is no one best placement.  

You have to look at where the intent for action is the highest. 

So, where in your video is someone most likely to think “ I can’t wait for the next video” ? That’s where you push for the like and subscribe.  

Find the place in your video where someone would think “ I wish I could do that ” to push them toward your owned asset opt-in which will set them on the path to solving the problem themselves (and adding them to your email list). 

The exact timing of these things will be different for every video you make. And you need to experiment and keep an eye on these to find the best possible location. 

Once you’ve got your videos on topics that people are interested in, and a template that fosters better engagement, it’s time to hit the growth.

The first thing you’ll want to do is increase the ToFu traffic.  

And the easiest way to do this is to make sure that your video is being promoted across any and all relevant social platforms, communities, or areas your ideal audience hangs out. 

Here’s how I’d recommend doing this.

• Step 1 – Pull short video clips, still images, or quotes from your video asset
• Step 2 – Share those short versions across social platforms, communities, and forums where your 
• Step 3 – make sure they all include a link back to the original video
• Step 4 – Rinse and repeat. Never let your promotion of videos (even old videos) die off

This will help drive new viewers from one rented audience platform to another. 

But to kick the growth machine up a notch you need to increase the chance of…

• Sales and revenue you control (not YouTube ad revenue)
• Engagement that increases the reach of the video

The best way to achieve both of these is through email.  

Here’s what the visualisation would look like.  

If we break it down, here are the steps. 

• Step 1 – Include a relevant tease and promotion of your owned asset in your video
• Step 2 – Offer the owned asset as a freebie if they join your email list
• Step 3 – Send a welcome email series that builds trust whilst also promoting your paid asset (generating revenue you own 100%)
• Step 4 – When the welcome sequence is done, add them to your normal newsletter rotation
• Step 5 – Email your newsletter subscribers when you have a new video out to get initial traction in terms of views

With this you’re bringing our owned audience back to the rented audience platform to manually increase the engagement, which helps increase overall reach. 

To kick that up another step, you can run a giveaway or competition on YouTube that requires engagement. 

Promote that through the same channels above (social and email) and you should see a drastic increase in engagement and new views.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Home » blog » YouTube case studies: How brands are marketing through videos?

YouTube case studies: How brands are marketing through videos?

As a digital marketer, One should always be on the lookout for innovative and effective ways to reach their target audience. And one platform that has consistently proven its worth in the world of marketing is YouTube. With over 2 billion monthly active users, YouTube offers tremendous potential for brands to connect with their audience through engaging video content.

In this article, we will explore various YouTube case studies to understand how successful brands have utilized the platform to market their products and services. By analyzing these case studies, we can uncover valuable insights and strategies that can be applied to your own marketing campaigns.

Benefits of Using YouTube for Marketing

Before diving into the case studies, let’s first understand why YouTube is such a powerful tool for marketers. Here are a few key benefits:

• Massive Reach: YouTube is the second-largest search engine after Google, and its extensive user base provides brands with an opportunity to reach a vast audience. Whether you’re targeting a specific niche or aiming for widespread recognition, YouTube can help you achieve your goals.
• Visual Appeal: Videos have a unique ability to capture attention and convey information in an engaging manner. By leveraging YouTube’s platform, brands can create visually appealing content that resonates with their target audience.
• SEO Benefits: YouTube videos are indexed by search engines, which means that a well-optimized video has the potential to rank highly in search results. This can drive organic traffic to your channel and increase brand visibility.
• Audience Engagement: YouTube allows for direct interaction with your audience through comments, likes, and shares. This level of engagement helps build brand loyalty and fosters a sense of community around your content.

Now that we understand the benefits of using YouTube for marketing, let’s dive into some fascinating case studies that showcase the platform’s potential.

Also Read – 15 High Paying Digital Marketing Skills

YouTube Case Study 1: Red Bull’s Journey to Viral Fame

Red Bull’s journey to viral fame on YouTube was fueled by a strategic and authentic approach to video marketing. They embraced their identity as a purveyor of energy and adventure, showcasing extreme sports and creating a lifestyle brand. By crafting compelling narratives, collaborating with influencers, and harnessing user-generated content, they created a powerful connection with their audience.

Red Bull’s YouTube strategy focused on authenticity, storytelling, and collaboration. They showcased genuine moments of adrenaline-pumping stunts and extreme sports, captivating viewers with their raw and unfiltered content. Collaborations with influential YouTube creators and athletes added credibility and expanded their reach. Moreover, by encouraging user-generated content, Red Bull turned viewers into active participants, fostering a sense of community and empowerment.

Reference – https://www.redbull.com/us-en/10-years-10-epic-red-bull-youtube-videos  

Impact of Red Bull’s Viral Fame

Video – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0jmSsQ5ptw  

The impact of Red Bull’s viral fame on YouTube was substantial. They built a global phenomenon, inspiring millions with their thrilling videos. By creating an emotional bond with their audience, they established a loyal community that embraced the brand’s lifestyle. Red Bull’s success demonstrates the power of video marketing to transcend traditional advertising and create a lasting impact.

The impact went beyond just brand recognition; it also had significant financial implications. The company experienced substantial revenue growth and successfully scaled its business through the power of their viral videos. The captivating content attracted a massive audience, resulting in increased brand visibility, higher engagement, and ultimately, boosted sales and revenue for Red Bull.

Actionable tips for brands to achieve similar success on YouTube:

• Authenticity is key: Be true to your brand and values. Create content that reflects your identity and resonates with your target audience.
• Craft compelling narratives: Tell captivating stories that evoke emotions and connect with viewers on a deeper level. Use storytelling techniques to engage and inspire your audience.
• Collaborate with influencers: Partner with influential individuals or creators in your niche to extend your reach, tap into their audience, and gain credibility.
• Encourage user-generated content: Foster a sense of community and empower your audience to contribute their own content. This not only enhances engagement but also expands your brand’s visibility.
• Optimize for discoverability: Pay attention to video titles, descriptions, and tags to optimize your content for searchability. Leverage keywords and relevant tags to increase the chances of your videos being found by your target audience.

By incorporating these actionable tips into your YouTube strategy, you can enhance your brand’s visibility, engagement, and revenue potential. Remember to stay true to your brand, tell compelling stories, collaborate strategically, encourage audience participation, and optimize your content for maximum discoverability.

YouTube Case Study 2: Influencer Collaboration and Samsung’s Success Story

Samsung’s success story is intertwined with their strategic adoption of influencer collaboration on YouTube. Recognizing the power of influencers and their ability to connect with audiences, Samsung forged partnerships with popular YouTube creators in their target markets. They executed this strategy by integrating their products seamlessly into the content of these influencers, creating authentic and engaging videos that resonated with viewers.

Videos – https://www.youtube.com/shorts/AhxrfuLgUw0 | https://www.youtube.com/shorts/qDRsaB8mJuo

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6AZ7caBbGMQ  

Impact and Benefits of Samsung’s Influencer Collaboration

The impact of Samsung’s influencer collaboration was remarkable, leading to increased brand visibility, customer engagement, and ultimately, significant revenue growth. By leveraging the influence and reach of popular YouTubers, Samsung’s products received widespread exposure to their dedicated fan bases. The result was higher sales, improved market share, and a strong brand presence in the digital space. The genuine endorsement and positive reviews from influencers also bolstered customer trust and loyalty towards the Samsung brand.

Actionable Tips for Brands to Achieve Influencer Collaboration Success:

To achieve similar success with influencer collaboration in today’s world, brands should consider the following actionable tips:

• Identify the right influencers: Research and select influencers who align with your brand’s values and target audience, ensuring a natural fit for collaboration.
• Create authentic content: Work with influencers to create content that is organic and genuine, showcasing your product or service in a way that feels authentic to the influencer’s style and audience.
• Foster long-term partnerships: Instead of one-off collaborations, aim for long-term relationships with influencers to build credibility and continuity in your marketing efforts.
• Encourage creativity and storytelling: Give influencers creative freedom to incorporate your brand into their content, allowing for unique and engaging storytelling that resonates with their audience.
• Track and measure results: Utilize analytics tools to track the impact of influencer collaborations, monitoring metrics such as engagement, reach, and conversion rates. Use this data to refine your strategies and optimize future partnerships.

By implementing these tips, brands can harness the power of influencer collaboration to drive brand awareness, increase customer engagement, and generate substantial revenue growth in the digital landscape.

Also Read – Top 13 Digital Marketing Trends

YouTube Case Study 3: Amazon’s Data-Driven Approach to Video Advertising

Amazon’s success in video advertising can be attributed to their data-driven approach. They leveraged their vast customer data and insights to develop a targeted YouTube strategy. By analyzing user behavior, search patterns, and purchase history, Amazon was able to identify and understand their audience’s preferences and interests. They executed their strategy by creating personalized and relevant video ads that resonated with viewers on YouTube.

Impact and Benefits of Amazon’s Data-Driven Approach

Amazon’s data-driven approach to video advertising resulted in significant impact, including increased revenue and enhanced customer engagement. By delivering tailored video ads to specific target audiences, Amazon saw improved conversion rates and higher ROI on their advertising spend. The ability to effectively reach and engage customers through personalized video content led to increased brand awareness, customer loyalty, and ultimately, revenue growth for Amazon.

Actionable Tips for Brands to Achieve a Data-Driven Approach to Video Advertising

To achieve success with a data-driven approach to video advertising in today’s world, brands can consider the following actionable tips:

• Leverage customer data: Utilize available data to understand your audience’s preferences, interests, and behaviors. This will enable you to create targeted and relevant video ads that resonate with your viewers.
• Embrace personalization: Tailor your video ads based on individual preferences and deliver personalized experiences. Use data insights to create dynamic and customized content that speaks directly to each viewer.
• Continuously analyze and optimize: Regularly track and analyze the performance of your video ads. Monitor key metrics such as engagement, click-through rates, and conversion rates. Use this data to optimize your campaigns and improve results over time.
• Test and iterate: Experiment with different video ad formats, messaging, and targeting strategies. Test and iterate to find what resonates best with your audience and yields the highest ROI.
• Invest in technology and automation: Utilize advanced tools and technologies to automate data analysis, audience segmentation, and campaign optimization. This will streamline your advertising efforts and enable you to make data-driven decisions more efficiently.

By adopting a data-driven approach to video advertising and implementing these actionable tips, brands can effectively target their audience, improve engagement, and drive revenue growth through personalized and relevant video content.

Also Read – How to crack your first job interview as a digital marketing professional

YouTube Case Study 4: Small Business Success on YouTube: Brand Dollar Shave Club’s Story

Dollar Shave Club’s success story on YouTube stems from their innovative and bold strategy. They adopted a humorous and relatable approach to connect with their target audience. Their YouTube videos featured witty and entertaining content that resonated with viewers. Dollar Shave Club executed their strategy by creating high-quality, low-budget videos that showcased their products’ value and unique selling propositions. They leveraged storytelling and humor to engage viewers and built a strong brand identity through their YouTube channel.

Video – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUG9qYTJMsI  

Impact and Benefits of Dollar Shave Club’s YouTube Success

Reference Links: https://www.inc.com/magazine/201507/diana-ransom/how-youtube-crashed-our-website.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/11/business/smallbusiness/dollar-shave-club-from-viral-video-to-real-business.html  

Dollar Shave Club’s presence on YouTube had a profound impact on their business, leading to exponential growth, increased revenue, and brand recognition. Their viral videos garnered millions of views and generated significant buzz, attracting a large customer base. The engaging content on their YouTube channel resulted in high customer acquisition rates, boosting their revenue and market share. Moreover, Dollar Shave Club’s YouTube success helped establish them as disruptors in the industry, challenging established shaving brands and gaining a competitive edge.

Actionable Tips for Brands to Achieve Small Business Success on YouTube

To achieve similar success on YouTube in today’s world, small businesses can follow these actionable tips:

• Know your audience: Understand your target audience’s preferences, pain points, and interests. Create content that resonates with them and addresses their needs.
• Embrace creativity and humor: Find unique ways to showcase your brand personality through creative and humorous content. Be memorable and stand out from the competition.
• Focus on storytelling: Use storytelling techniques to create compelling narratives around your brand, products, or services. Connect with your audience on an emotional level and make your content memorable.
• Prioritize video quality: While a high production budget is not always necessary, ensure that your videos are well-produced, visually appealing, and have good audio quality. Invest in basic equipment to enhance the overall quality of your videos.
• Consistency is key: Maintain a regular upload schedule to keep your audience engaged and coming back for more. Consistency builds trust and helps grow your subscriber base over time.

By implementing these tips, small businesses can leverage YouTube as a powerful platform to showcase their brand, engage with their target audience, and drive business growth. Dollar Shave Club’s success story serves as an inspiration for small businesses looking to make an impact through strategic YouTube marketing.

Also Read – How does AI contribute to the transformation of the digital marketing spectrum?

Key Takeaways from YouTube Case Studies

After analyzing these case studies, several key takeaways emerge:

• Influencer Marketing: Collaborating with influencers can greatly amplify your brand’s reach and credibility.
• Authenticity: Creating genuine and relatable content helps forge a deeper connection with your audience.
• Compelling Storytelling: Engaging narratives can evoke emotions, inspire action, and create a lasting impact.
• User-Generated Content: Encouraging your audience to create and share content can boost brand awareness and foster a sense of community.
• Live Streaming: Hosting live events on YouTube allows for real-time interaction and generates excitement around your brand.

Tips for Creating Successful YouTube Marketing Campaigns

If you’re looking to create successful YouTube marketing campaigns, here are a few tips to keep in mind:

• Research Your Target Audience: Understand your audience’s preferences, interests, and pain points to create content that resonates with them.
• Invest in Production Quality: High-quality videos with professional production values leave a lasting impression and reflect positively on your brand.
• Optimize for Search Engines: Use relevant keywords, compelling titles, and engaging thumbnails to improve your video’s visibility in search results.
• Promote Across Multiple Channels: Share your YouTube videos on other social media platforms to maximize reach and engagement.
• Measure and Analyze: Track important metrics such as views, likes, and comments to gauge the success of your campaigns and make data-driven decisions.

YouTube has revolutionized the way brands connect with their audience. Through the case studies discussed in this article, we have seen how successful brands leverage YouTube’s platform to create engaging and impactful marketing campaigns.

By adopting the strategies and insights from these case studies, you can elevate your own YouTube marketing efforts and drive tangible results for your brand. So why wait? Start exploring the world of YouTube marketing and pursue a digital marketing course by IMS Proschool to develop these skills. Your audience is waiting to be captivated by your videos!

Share This Event!

Related posts.

10 Advantages & Disadvantages Of Social Media Marketing

Top 10 SEO Certification Courses You Could Pursue in 2024

SEO vs SEM – Understand What Does Your Business Need Right Now

Leave a comment cancel reply.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Join our elite club of 50,000 students upskilling in IMS Proschool Right Now

IMS Proschool – Shaping Careers, Building Lives Upskilling Professionals and Enhancing Competencies

IMS Proschool is the market leader in delivering exceptional career-building courses using intensive professional certifications.

Mumbai 9867958900

Thane 9867842800

Sion 9619207323

Navi Mumbai 9867842800

Pune 8454988892

Ahmedabad 7718865564

Delhi – Connaught Place 7304957442

Delhi – Pitampura 9136687002

Gurgaon 7738674974

Noida 9136687679

Lucknow 7389180009

Kolkata 8591956474

Hyderabad 9136908879

Bangalore 7892295842

Kochi 9645629999

Chennai 9600137479

Online 9867994700

[email protected]

Monday – Sunday: 10:00 AM – 07:00 PM

Partner with us

• Start a Centre
• Corporate Training
• Skill Yatra
• Terms & Conditions
• Privacy Policy
• Excel Financial Model
• Brochures & Ebooks

© Copyright 2012 - 2024 | All Rights Reserved

Join Over 50,000 Students Enjoying IMS Proschool E-Learning Education Now

Join Over 500,000 Students Enjoying IMS Proschool E-Learning Education Now

Join Over 500,000 Students Enjoying IMS Proschool E-Learning Education Now DBM

WhatsApp us

Enquiry Form

• Free Case Studies
• Business Essays

Write My Case Study

Buy Case Study

Case Study Help

• Case Study For Sale
• Case Study Services
• Hire Writer

YouTube Case Analysis

YouTube, LLC is an American video-sharing website headquartered in San Bruno, California. Three former PayPal employees—Chad Hurley, Steve Chen, and Jawed Karim—created the service in February 2005. Google bought the site in November 2006 for US$1.65 billion; YouTube now operates as one of Google’s subsidiaries.

YouTube allows users to upload, view, rate, share, add to favorites, report, comment on videos, and subscribe to other users. It offers a wide variety of user-generated and corporate media videos. Available content includes video clips, TV show clips, music videos, short and documentary films, audio recordings, movie trailers, live streams, and other content such as video blogging, short original videos, and educational videos. Most of the content on YouTube is uploaded by individuals, but media corporations including CBS, the BBC, Vevo, and Hulu offer some of their material via YouTube as part of the YouTube partnership program. Unregistered users can only watch videos on the site, while registered users are permitted to upload an unlimited number of videos and add comments to videos. Videos deemed potentially inappropriate are available only to registered users affirming themselves to be at least 18 years old.

YouTube earns advertising revenue from Google AdSense, a program which targets ads according to site content and audience. The vast majority of its videos are free to view, but there are exceptions, including subscription-based premium channels, film rentals, as well as YouTube Premium, a subscription service offering ad-free access to the website and access to exclusive content made in partnership with existing users.

As of February 2017, there were more than 400 hours of content uploaded to YouTube each minute, and one billion hours of content being watched on YouTube every day. As of August 2018, the website is ranked as the second-most popular site in the world, according to Alexa Internet.

Youtube Case Study Examples

Does youtube favor a certain type of content.

Is Youtube Trying to Get Rid of Certain Channels Indirectly? YouTube, being the biggest website for videos to be posted and watched. YouTube has many things that can still be improved, such as what content is being posted on the website. YouTube has an algorithm that is put into place to give the content creators […]

Case Study on YouTube

Youtube Case Study: YouTube is one of the most popular web sites in the world which enables online users watch, upload, and download video files of different types, genre and quality. The web site was created approximately in 2005 and at first it was not so popular, because people did not understand its potential and […]

Quick Links

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Testimonials

Our Services

Case Study Writing Services

Case Studies For Sale

Our Company

Welcome to the world of case studies that can bring you high grades! Here, at ACaseStudy.com, we deliver professionally written papers, and the best grades for you from your professors are guaranteed!

[email protected] 804-506-0782 350 5th Ave, New York, NY 10118, USA

Acasestudy.com © 2007-2019 All rights reserved.

Hi! I'm Anna

Would you like to get a custom case study? How about receiving a customized one?

Haven't Found The Case Study You Want?

For Only $13.90/page

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Sage Choice
• PMC11334375

Methodologic and Data-Analysis Triangulation in Case Studies: A Scoping Review

Margarithe charlotte schlunegger.

1 Department of Health Professions, Applied Research & Development in Nursing, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland

2 Faculty of Health, School of Nursing Science, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany

Maya Zumstein-Shaha

Rebecca palm.

3 Department of Health Care Research, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

Associated Data

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-wjn-10.1177_01939459241263011 for Methodologic and Data-Analysis Triangulation in Case Studies: A Scoping Review by Margarithe Charlotte Schlunegger, Maya Zumstein-Shaha and Rebecca Palm in Western Journal of Nursing Research

We sought to explore the processes of methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies using the example of research on nurse practitioners in primary health care.

Design and methods:

We conducted a scoping review within Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework, considering studies that defined a case study design and used 2 or more data sources, published in English or German before August 2023.

Data sources:

The databases searched were MEDLINE and CINAHL, supplemented with hand searching of relevant nursing journals. We also examined the reference list of all the included studies.

In total, 63 reports were assessed for eligibility. Ultimately, we included 8 articles. Five studies described within-method triangulation, whereas 3 provided information on between/across-method triangulation. No study reported within-method triangulation of 2 or more quantitative data-collection procedures. The data-collection procedures were interviews, observation, documentation/documents, service records, and questionnaires/assessments. The data-analysis triangulation involved various qualitative and quantitative methods of analysis. Details about comparing or contrasting results from different qualitative and mixed-methods data were lacking.

Conclusions:

Various processes for methodologic and data-analysis triangulation are described in this scoping review but lack detail, thus hampering standardization in case study research, potentially affecting research traceability. Triangulation is complicated by terminological confusion. To advance case study research in nursing, authors should reflect critically on the processes of triangulation and employ existing tools, like a protocol or mixed-methods matrix, for transparent reporting. The only existing reporting guideline should be complemented with directions on methodologic and data-analysis triangulation.

Case study research is defined as “an empirical method that investigates a contemporary phenomenon (the ‘case’) in depth and within its real-world context, especially when the boundaries between phenomenon and context may not be clearly evident. A case study relies on multiple sources of evidence, with data needing to converge in a triangulating fashion.” 1 (p15) This design is described as a stand-alone research approach equivalent to grounded theory and can entail single and multiple cases. 1 , 2 However, case study research should not be confused with single clinical case reports. “Case reports are familiar ways of sharing events of intervening with single patients with previously unreported features.” 3 (p107) As a methodology, case study research encompasses substantially more complexity than a typical clinical case report. 1 , 3

A particular characteristic of case study research is the use of various data sources, such as quantitative data originating from questionnaires as well as qualitative data emerging from interviews, observations, or documents. Therefore, a case study always draws on multiple sources of evidence, and the data must converge in a triangulating manner. 1 When using multiple data sources, a case or cases can be examined more convincingly and accurately, compensating for the weaknesses of the respective data sources. 1 Another characteristic is the interaction of various perspectives. This involves comparing or contrasting perspectives of people with different points of view, eg, patients, staff, or leaders. 4 Through triangulation, case studies contribute to the completeness of the research on complex topics, such as role implementation in clinical practice. 1 , 5 Triangulation involves a combination of researchers from various disciplines, of theories, of methods, and/or of data sources. By creating connections between these sources (ie, investigator, theories, methods, data sources, and/or data analysis), a new understanding of the phenomenon under study can be obtained. 6 , 7

This scoping review focuses on methodologic and data-analysis triangulation because concrete procedures are missing, eg, in reporting guidelines. Methodologic triangulation has been called methods, mixed methods, or multimethods. 6 It can encompass within-method triangulation and between/across-method triangulation. 7 “Researchers using within-method triangulation use at least 2 data-collection procedures from the same design approach.” 6 (p254) Within-method triangulation is either qualitative or quantitative but not both. Therefore, within-method triangulation can also be considered data source triangulation. 8 In contrast, “researchers using between/across-method triangulation employ both qualitative and quantitative data-collection methods in the same study.” 6 (p254) Hence, methodologic approaches are combined as well as various data sources. For this scoping review, the term “methodologic triangulation” is maintained to denote between/across-method triangulation. “Data-analysis triangulation is the combination of 2 or more methods of analyzing data.” 6 (p254)

Although much has been published on case studies, there is little consensus on the quality of the various data sources, the most appropriate methods, or the procedures for conducting methodologic and data-analysis triangulation. 5 According to the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) clearinghouse for reporting guidelines, one standard exists for organizational case studies. 9 Organizational case studies provide insights into organizational change in health care services. 9 Rodgers et al 9 pointed out that, although high-quality studies are being funded and published, they are sometimes poorly articulated and methodologically inadequate. In the reporting checklist by Rodgers et al, 9 a description of the data collection is included, but reporting directions on methodologic and data-analysis triangulation are missing. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the process of methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies. Accordingly, we conducted a scoping review to elicit descriptions of and directions for triangulation methods and analysis, drawing on case studies of nurse practitioners (NPs) in primary health care as an example. Case studies are recommended to evaluate the implementation of new roles in (primary) health care, such as that of NPs. 1 , 5 Case studies on new role implementation can generate a unique and in-depth understanding of specific roles (individual), teams (smaller groups), family practices or similar institutions (organization), and social and political processes in health care systems. 1 , 10 The integration of NPs into health care systems is at different stages of progress around the world. 11 Therefore, studies are needed to evaluate this process.

The methodological framework by Arksey and O’Malley 12 guided this scoping review. We examined the current scientific literature on the use of methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies on NPs in primary health care. The review process included the following stages: (1) establishing the research question; (2) identifying relevant studies; (3) selecting the studies for inclusion; (4) charting the data; (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting the results; and (6) consulting experts in the field. 12 Stage 6 was not performed due to a lack of financial resources. The reporting of the review followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Review) guideline by Tricco et al 13 (guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses [ Supplementary Table A ]). Scoping reviews are not eligible for registration in PROSPERO.

Stage 1: Establishing the Research Question

The aim of this scoping review was to examine the process of triangulating methods and analysis in case studies on NPs in primary health care to improve the reporting. We sought to answer the following question: How have methodologic and data-analysis triangulation been conducted in case studies on NPs in primary health care? To answer the research question, we examined the following elements of the selected studies: the research question, the study design, the case definition, the selected data sources, and the methodologic and data-analysis triangulation.

Stage 2: Identifying Relevant Studies

A systematic database search was performed in the MEDLINE (via PubMed) and CINAHL (via EBSCO) databases between July and September 2020 to identify relevant articles. The following terms were used as keyword search strategies: (“Advanced Practice Nursing” OR “nurse practitioners”) AND (“primary health care” OR “Primary Care Nursing”) AND (“case study” OR “case studies”). Searches were limited to English- and German-language articles. Hand searches were conducted in the journals Nursing Inquiry , BMJ Open , and BioMed Central ( BMC ). We also screened the reference lists of the studies included. The database search was updated in August 2023. The complete search strategy for all the databases is presented in Supplementary Table B .

Stage 3: Selecting the Studies

Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

We used the inclusion and exclusion criteria reported in Table 1 . We included studies of NPs who had at least a master’s degree in nursing according to the definition of the International Council of Nurses. 14 This scoping review considered studies that were conducted in primary health care practices in rural, urban, and suburban regions. We excluded reviews and study protocols in which no data collection had occurred. Articles were included without limitations on the time period or country of origin.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria.

Screening process

After the search, we collated and uploaded all the identified records into EndNote v.X8 (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and removed any duplicates. Two independent reviewers (MCS and SA) screened the titles and abstracts for assessment in line with the inclusion criteria. They retrieved and assessed the full texts of the selected studies while applying the inclusion criteria. Any disagreements about the eligibility of studies were resolved by discussion or, if no consensus could be reached, by involving experienced researchers (MZ-S and RP).

Stages 4 and 5: Charting the Data and Collating, Summarizing, and Reporting the Results

The first reviewer (MCS) extracted data from the selected publications. For this purpose, an extraction tool developed by the authors was used. This tool comprised the following criteria: author(s), year of publication, country, research question, design, case definition, data sources, and methodologic and data-analysis triangulation. First, we extracted and summarized information about the case study design. Second, we narratively summarized the way in which the data and methodological triangulation were described. Finally, we summarized the information on within-case or cross-case analysis. This process was performed using Microsoft Excel. One reviewer (MCS) extracted data, whereas another reviewer (SA) cross-checked the data extraction, making suggestions for additions or edits. Any disagreements between the reviewers were resolved through discussion.

A total of 149 records were identified in 2 databases. We removed 20 duplicates and screened 129 reports by title and abstract. A total of 46 reports were assessed for eligibility. Through hand searches, we identified 117 additional records. Of these, we excluded 98 reports after title and abstract screening. A total of 17 reports were assessed for eligibility. From the 2 databases and the hand search, 63 reports were assessed for eligibility. Ultimately, we included 8 articles for data extraction. No further articles were included after the reference list screening of the included studies. A PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection and inclusion process is presented in Figure 1 . As shown in Tables 2 and ​ and3, 3 , the articles included in this scoping review were published between 2010 and 2022 in Canada (n = 3), the United States (n = 2), Australia (n = 2), and Scotland (n = 1).

PRISMA flow diagram.

Characteristics of Articles Included.

Overview of Within-Method, Between/Across-Method, and Data-Analysis Triangulation.

Research Question, Case Definition, and Case Study Design

The following sections describe the research question, case definition, and case study design. Case studies are most appropriate when asking “how” or “why” questions. 1 According to Yin, 1 how and why questions are explanatory and lead to the use of case studies, histories, and experiments as the preferred research methods. In 1 study from Canada, eg, the following research question was presented: “How and why did stakeholders participate in the system change process that led to the introduction of the first nurse practitioner-led Clinic in Ontario?” (p7) 19 Once the research question has been formulated, the case should be defined and, subsequently, the case study design chosen. 1 In typical case studies with mixed methods, the 2 types of data are gathered concurrently in a convergent design and the results merged to examine a case and/or compare multiple cases. 10

Research question

“How” or “why” questions were found in 4 studies. 16 , 17 , 19 , 22 Two studies additionally asked “what” questions. Three studies described an exploratory approach, and 1 study presented an explanatory approach. Of these 4 studies, 3 studies chose a qualitative approach 17 , 19 , 22 and 1 opted for mixed methods with a convergent design. 16

In the remaining studies, either the research questions were not clearly stated or no “how” or “why” questions were formulated. For example, “what” questions were found in 1 study. 21 No information was provided on exploratory, descriptive, and explanatory approaches. Schadewaldt et al 21 chose mixed methods with a convergent design.

Case definition and case study design

A total of 5 studies defined the case as an organizational unit. 17 , 18 - 20 , 22 Of the 8 articles, 4 reported multiple-case studies. 16 , 17 , 22 , 23 Another 2 publications involved single-case studies. 19 , 20 Moreover, 2 publications did not state the case study design explicitly.

Within-Method Triangulation

This section describes within-method triangulation, which involves employing at least 2 data-collection procedures within the same design approach. 6 , 7 This can also be called data source triangulation. 8 Next, we present the single data-collection procedures in detail. In 5 studies, information on within-method triangulation was found. 15 , 17 - 19 , 22 Studies describing a quantitative approach and the triangulation of 2 or more quantitative data-collection procedures could not be included in this scoping review.

Qualitative approach

Five studies used qualitative data-collection procedures. Two studies combined face-to-face interviews and documents. 15 , 19 One study mixed in-depth interviews with observations, 18 and 1 study combined face-to-face interviews and documentation. 22 One study contained face-to-face interviews, observations, and documentation. 17 The combination of different qualitative data-collection procedures was used to present the case context in an authentic and complex way, to elicit the perspectives of the participants, and to obtain a holistic description and explanation of the cases under study.

All 5 studies used qualitative interviews as the primary data-collection procedure. 15 , 17 - 19 , 22 Face-to-face, in-depth, and semi-structured interviews were conducted. The topics covered in the interviews included processes in the introduction of new care services and experiences of barriers and facilitators to collaborative work in general practices. Two studies did not specify the type of interviews conducted and did not report sample questions. 15 , 18

Observations

In 2 studies, qualitative observations were carried out. 17 , 18 During the observations, the physical design of the clinical patients’ rooms and office spaces was examined. 17 Hungerford et al 18 did not explain what information was collected during the observations. In both studies, the type of observation was not specified. Observations were generally recorded as field notes.

Public documents

In 3 studies, various qualitative public documents were studied. 15 , 19 , 22 These documents included role description, education curriculum, governance frameworks, websites, and newspapers with information about the implementation of the role and general practice. Only 1 study failed to specify the type of document and the collected data. 15

Electronic health records

In 1 study, qualitative documentation was investigated. 17 This included a review of dashboards (eg, provider productivity reports or provider quality dashboards in the electronic health record) and quality performance reports (eg, practice-wide or co-management team-wide performance reports).

Between/Across-Method Triangulation

This section describes the between/across methods, which involve employing both qualitative and quantitative data-collection procedures in the same study. 6 , 7 This procedure can also be denoted “methodologic triangulation.” 8 Subsequently, we present the individual data-collection procedures. In 3 studies, information on between/across triangulation was found. 16 , 20 , 21

Mixed methods

Three studies used qualitative and quantitative data-collection procedures. One study combined face-to-face interviews, documentation, and self-assessments. 16 One study employed semi-structured interviews, direct observation, documents, and service records, 20 and another study combined face-to-face interviews, non-participant observation, documents, and questionnaires. 23

All 3 studies used qualitative interviews as the primary data-collection procedure. 16 , 20 , 23 Face-to-face and semi-structured interviews were conducted. In the interviews, data were collected on the introduction of new care services and experiences of barriers to and facilitators of collaborative work in general practices.

Observation

In 2 studies, direct and non-participant qualitative observations were conducted. 20 , 23 During the observations, the interaction between health professionals or the organization and the clinical context was observed. Observations were generally recorded as field notes.

In 2 studies, various qualitative public documents were examined. 20 , 23 These documents included role description, newspapers, websites, and practice documents (eg, flyers). In the documents, information on the role implementation and role description of NPs was collected.

Individual journals

In 1 study, qualitative individual journals were studied. 16 These included reflective journals from NPs, who performed the role in primary health care.

Service records

Only 1 study involved quantitative service records. 20 These service records were obtained from the primary care practices and the respective health authorities. They were collected before and after the implementation of an NP role to identify changes in patients’ access to health care, the volume of patients served, and patients’ use of acute care services.

Questionnaires/Assessment

In 2 studies, quantitative questionnaires were used to gather information about the teams’ satisfaction with collaboration. 16 , 21 In 1 study, 3 validated scales were used. The scales measured experience, satisfaction, and belief in the benefits of collaboration. 21 Psychometric performance indicators of these scales were provided. However, the time points of data collection were not specified; similarly, whether the questionnaires were completed online or by hand was not mentioned. A competency self-assessment tool was used in another study. 16 The assessment comprised 70 items and included topics such as health promotion, protection, disease prevention and treatment, the NP-patient relationship, the teaching-coaching function, the professional role, managing and negotiating health care delivery systems, monitoring and ensuring the quality of health care practice, and cultural competence. Psychometric performance indicators were provided. The assessment was completed online with 2 measurement time points (pre self-assessment and post self-assessment).

Data-Analysis Triangulation

This section describes data-analysis triangulation, which involves the combination of 2 or more methods of analyzing data. 6 Subsequently, we present within-case analysis and cross-case analysis.

Mixed-methods analysis

Three studies combined qualitative and quantitative methods of analysis. 16 , 20 , 21 Two studies involved deductive and inductive qualitative analysis, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. 20 , 21 One used deductive qualitative analysis. 16 The method of analysis was not specified in the studies. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics in 3 studies. 16 , 20 , 23 The descriptive statistics comprised the calculation of the mean, median, and frequencies.

Qualitative methods of analysis

Two studies combined deductive and inductive qualitative analysis, 19 , 22 and 2 studies only used deductive qualitative analysis. 15 , 18 Qualitative data were analyzed thematically in 1 study, 22 and data were treated with content analysis in the other. 19 The method of analysis was not specified in the 2 studies.

Within-case analysis

In 7 studies, a within-case analysis was performed. 15 - 20 , 22 Six studies used qualitative data for the within-case analysis, and 1 study employed qualitative and quantitative data. Data were analyzed separately, consecutively, or in parallel. The themes generated from qualitative data were compared and then summarized. The individual cases were presented mostly as a narrative description. Quantitative data were integrated into the qualitative description with tables and graphs. Qualitative and quantitative data were also presented as a narrative description.

Cross-case analyses

Of the multiple-case studies, 5 carried out cross-case analyses. 15 - 17 , 20 , 22 Three studies described the cross-case analysis using qualitative data. Two studies reported a combination of qualitative and quantitative data for the cross-case analysis. In each multiple-case study, the individual cases were contrasted to identify the differences and similarities between the cases. One study did not specify whether a within-case or a cross-case analysis was conducted. 23

Confirmation or contradiction of data

This section describes confirmation or contradiction through qualitative and quantitative data. 1 , 4 Qualitative and quantitative data were reported separately, with little connection between them. As a result, the conclusions on neither the comparisons nor the contradictions could be clearly determined.

Confirmation or contradiction among qualitative data

In 3 studies, the consistency of the results of different types of qualitative data was highlighted. 16 , 19 , 21 In particular, documentation and interviews or interviews and observations were contrasted:

• Confirmation between interviews and documentation: The data from these sources corroborated the existence of a common vision for an NP-led clinic. 19
• Confirmation among interviews and observation: NPs experienced pressure to find and maintain their position within the existing system. Nurse practitioners and general practitioners performed complete episodes of care, each without collaborative interaction. 21
• Contradiction among interviews and documentation: For example, interviewees mentioned that differentiating the scope of practice between NPs and physicians is difficult as there are too many areas of overlap. However, a clear description of the scope of practice for the 2 roles was provided. 21

Confirmation through a combination of qualitative and quantitative data

Both types of data showed that NPs and general practitioners wanted to have more time in common to discuss patient cases and engage in personal exchanges. 21 In addition, the qualitative and quantitative data confirmed the individual progression of NPs from less competent to more competent. 16 One study pointed out that qualitative and quantitative data obtained similar results for the cases. 20 For example, integrating NPs improved patient access by increasing appointment availability.

Contradiction through a combination of qualitative and quantitative data

Although questionnaire results indicated that NPs and general practitioners experienced high levels of collaboration and satisfaction with the collaborative relationship, the qualitative results drew a more ambivalent picture of NPs’ and general practitioners’ experiences with collaboration. 21

Research Question and Design

The studies included in this scoping review evidenced various research questions. The recommended formats (ie, how or why questions) were not applied consistently. Therefore, no case study design should be applied because the research question is the major guide for determining the research design. 2 Furthermore, case definitions and designs were applied variably. The lack of standardization is reflected in differences in the reporting of these case studies. Generally, case study research is viewed as allowing much more freedom and flexibility. 5 , 24 However, this flexibility and the lack of uniform specifications lead to confusion.

Methodologic Triangulation

Methodologic triangulation, as described in the literature, can be somewhat confusing as it can refer to either data-collection methods or research designs. 6 , 8 For example, methodologic triangulation can allude to qualitative and quantitative methods, indicating a paradigmatic connection. Methodologic triangulation can also point to qualitative and quantitative data-collection methods, analysis, and interpretation without specific philosophical stances. 6 , 8 Regarding “data-collection methods with no philosophical stances,” we would recommend using the wording “data source triangulation” instead. Thus, the demarcation between the method and the data-collection procedures will be clearer.

Within-Method and Between/Across-Method Triangulation

Yin 1 advocated the use of multiple sources of evidence so that a case or cases can be investigated more comprehensively and accurately. Most studies included multiple data-collection procedures. Five studies employed a variety of qualitative data-collection procedures, and 3 studies used qualitative and quantitative data-collection procedures (mixed methods). In contrast, no study contained 2 or more quantitative data-collection procedures. In particular, quantitative data-collection procedures—such as validated, reliable questionnaires, scales, or assessments—were not used exhaustively. The prerequisites for using multiple data-collection procedures are availability, the knowledge and skill of the researcher, and sufficient financial funds. 1 To meet these prerequisites, research teams consisting of members with different levels of training and experience are necessary. Multidisciplinary research teams need to be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of different data sources and collection procedures. 1

Qualitative methods of analysis and results

When using multiple data sources and analysis methods, it is necessary to present the results in a coherent manner. Although the importance of multiple data sources and analysis has been emphasized, 1 , 5 the description of triangulation has tended to be brief. Thus, traceability of the research process is not always ensured. The sparse description of the data-analysis triangulation procedure may be due to the limited number of words in publications or the complexity involved in merging the different data sources.

Only a few concrete recommendations regarding the operationalization of the data-analysis triangulation with the qualitative data process were found. 25 A total of 3 approaches have been proposed 25 : (1) the intuitive approach, in which researchers intuitively connect information from different data sources; (2) the procedural approach, in which each comparative or contrasting step in triangulation is documented to ensure transparency and replicability; and (3) the intersubjective approach, which necessitates a group of researchers agreeing on the steps in the triangulation process. For each case study, one of these 3 approaches needs to be selected, carefully carried out, and documented. Thus, in-depth examination of the data can take place. Farmer et al 25 concluded that most researchers take the intuitive approach; therefore, triangulation is not clearly articulated. This trend is also evident in our scoping review.

Mixed-methods analysis and results

Few studies in this scoping review used a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis. However, creating a comprehensive stand-alone picture of a case from both qualitative and quantitative methods is challenging. Findings derived from different data types may not automatically coalesce into a coherent whole. 4 O’Cathain et al 26 described 3 techniques for combining the results of qualitative and quantitative methods: (1) developing a triangulation protocol; (2) following a thread by selecting a theme from 1 component and following it across the other components; and (3) developing a mixed-methods matrix.

The most detailed description of the conducting of triangulation is the triangulation protocol. The triangulation protocol takes place at the interpretation stage of the research process. 26 This protocol was developed for multiple qualitative data but can also be applied to a combination of qualitative and quantitative data. 25 , 26 It is possible to determine agreement, partial agreement, “silence,” or dissonance between the results of qualitative and quantitative data. The protocol is intended to bring together the various themes from the qualitative and quantitative results and identify overarching meta-themes. 25 , 26

The “following a thread” technique is used in the analysis stage of the research process. To begin, each data source is analyzed to identify the most important themes that need further investigation. Subsequently, the research team selects 1 theme from 1 data source and follows it up in the other data source, thereby creating a thread. The individual steps of this technique are not specified. 26 , 27

A mixed-methods matrix is used at the end of the analysis. 26 All the data collected on a defined case are examined together in 1 large matrix, paying attention to cases rather than variables or themes. In a mixed-methods matrix (eg, a table), the rows represent the cases for which both qualitative and quantitative data exist. The columns show the findings for each case. This technique allows the research team to look for congruency, surprises, and paradoxes among the findings as well as patterns across multiple cases. In our review, we identified only one of these 3 approaches in the study by Roots and MacDonald. 20 These authors mentioned that a causal network analysis was performed using a matrix. However, no further details were given, and reference was made to a later publication. We could not find this publication.

Case Studies in Nursing Research and Recommendations

Because it focused on the implementation of NPs in primary health care, the setting of this scoping review was narrow. However, triangulation is essential for research in this area. This type of research was found to provide a good basis for understanding methodologic and data-analysis triangulation. Despite the lack of traceability in the description of the data and methodological triangulation, we believe that case studies are an appropriate design for exploring new nursing roles in existing health care systems. This is evidenced by the fact that case study research is widely used in many social science disciplines as well as in professional practice. 1 To strengthen this research method and increase the traceability in the research process, we recommend using the reporting guideline and reporting checklist by Rodgers et al. 9 This reporting checklist needs to be complemented with methodologic and data-analysis triangulation. A procedural approach needs to be followed in which each comparative step of the triangulation is documented. 25 A triangulation protocol or a mixed-methods matrix can be used for this purpose. 26 If there is a word limit in a publication, the triangulation protocol or mixed-methods matrix needs to be identified. A schematic representation of methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies can be found in Figure 2 .

Schematic representation of methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies (own work).

Limitations

This study suffered from several limitations that must be acknowledged. Given the nature of scoping reviews, we did not analyze the evidence reported in the studies. However, 2 reviewers independently reviewed all the full-text reports with respect to the inclusion criteria. The focus on the primary care setting with NPs (master’s degree) was very narrow, and only a few studies qualified. Thus, possible important methodological aspects that would have contributed to answering the questions were omitted. Studies describing the triangulation of 2 or more quantitative data-collection procedures could not be included in this scoping review due to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Conclusions

Given the various processes described for methodologic and data-analysis triangulation, we can conclude that triangulation in case studies is poorly standardized. Consequently, the traceability of the research process is not always given. Triangulation is complicated by the confusion of terminology. To advance case study research in nursing, we encourage authors to reflect critically on methodologic and data-analysis triangulation and use existing tools, such as the triangulation protocol or mixed-methods matrix and the reporting guideline checklist by Rodgers et al, 9 to ensure more transparent reporting.

Supplemental Material

Acknowledgments.

The authors thank Simona Aeschlimann for her support during the screening process.

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Supplemental Material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.

• Order Status
• Testimonials
• What Makes Us Different

YouTube for Brands Harvard Case Solution & Analysis

Home >> Marketing HBS Case Solutions >> YouTube for Brands

This case analyzes the changes applied by YouTube to make the massively popular website more attractive to brands. Building from its foundation of amateur, user-generated content, YouTube had turned to experimenting with professionally- and organizing its videos into channels.

YouTube for Brands Case Solution

When question arised as to capturing marketing dollars to its online video platform, it struggled. The societal video web site aspires to be a 'brand safe' platform which important marketers use to market their video ads. Should important brands switch a significant part of their TV advertising budget to online advertisements on YouTube?

PUBLICATION DATE : January 07, 2014 PRODUCT #: 514048-HCB-ENG

This is just an excerpt. This case is about SALES & MARKETING

Related Case Solutions & Analyses:

Hire us for Originally Written Case Solution/ Analysis

Like us and get updates:.

Harvard Case Solutions

Search Case Solutions

• Accounting Case Solutions
• Auditing Case Studies
• Business Case Studies
• Economics Case Solutions
• Finance Case Studies Analysis
• Harvard Case Study Analysis Solutions
• Human Resource Cases
• Ivey Case Solutions
• Management Case Studies
• Marketing HBS Case Solutions
• Operations Management Case Studies
• Supply Chain Management Cases
• Taxation Case Studies

More From Marketing HBS Case Solutions

• Parker & Pine
• A Note on Direct Selling in Developing Economies
• IDIEM-Catalogo Verde
• How Social-Cause Marketing Affects Consumer Perceptions
• Pregnancy Pack: Branding with AdWords
• Click-and-Mortar SMEs: Attracting customers to your website
• Judy Wicks Video

Contact us:

Check Order Status

How Does it Work?

Why TheCaseSolutions.com?

• Mert Can Cakmak 1 ,
• Nitin Agarwal 1 &
• Remi Oni 1  

385 Accesses

Explore all metrics

In today’s digital world, understanding how YouTube’s recommendation systems guide what we watch is crucial. This study dives into these systems, revealing how they influence the content we see over time. We found that YouTube’s algorithms tend to push content in certain directions, affecting the variety and type of videos recommended to viewers. To uncover these patterns, we used a mixed methods approach to analyze videos recommended by YouTube. We looked at the emotions conveyed in videos, the moral messages they might carry, and whether they contained harmful content. Our research also involved statistical analysis to detect biases in how these videos are recommended and network analysis to see how certain videos become more influential than others. Our findings show that YouTube’s algorithms can lead to a narrowing of the content landscape, limiting the diversity of what gets recommended. This has important implications for how information is spread and consumed online, suggesting a need for more transparency and fairness in how these algorithms work. In summary, this paper highlights the need for a more inclusive approach to how digital platforms recommend content. By better understanding the impact of YouTube’s algorithms, we can work towards creating a digital space that offers a wider range of perspectives and voices, affording fairness, and enriching everyone’s online experience.

Similar content being viewed by others

Examining Video Recommendation Bias on YouTube

Assessing Bias in YouTube’s Video Recommendation Algorithm in a Cross-lingual and Cross-topical Context

Investigating Bias in YouTube Recommendations: Emotion, Morality, and Network Dynamics in China-Uyghur Content

Explore related subjects.

• Artificial Intelligence
• Medical Ethics

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

1 Introduction

In an age where information floods our digital landscapes, recommendation systems emerge as essential beacons, leading users simply and effectively through the vast ocean of data. These systems, elegantly designed to analyze and predict user preferences, have revolutionized how content is consumed online. At their core, recommendation systems are sophisticated algorithms that look through vast datasets to present users with choices customized to their historical interactions, preferences, and behaviors. This personalized approach not only enhances user experience but also significantly impacts cultural and political narratives by influencing what is watched, read, and discussed across the globe. A typical example of this influence is YouTube’s recommendation algorithm, which has become a pivotal force in shaping viewing habits among billions of users worldwide. Such algorithms have the power to subtly direct the flow of information, underscoring the importance of understanding their underlying mechanisms and the implications of their widespread adoption. The evolution of recommendation systems, as detailed in Burke et al. ( 2011 ), Lü et al. ( 2012 ), spans a trajectory from simple collaborative filtering techniques (where recommendations are made based on the preferences of similar users) to complex, multi-faceted approaches that incorporate a variety of artificial intelligence methodologies. This progression reflects a deepening sophistication in how digital platforms engage with users, ensuring that the content they encounter resonates with their individual tastes and preferences. However, the immense influence wielded by these seemingly impartial systems also brings to the forefront the need for a critical examination of how digital content is curated and the potential consequences of its reach.

At the core of platforms like YouTube, recommender systems stand as technological wonders, adept at predicting and shaping our preferences. They search through vast content, aligning choices with our past interactions to enhance our experience. These systems, by prioritizing content they predict will be of interest, significantly shape our digital diets, potentially narrowing our exposure to a homogenized set of perspectives. However, these algorithms, for all their sophistication, are not without their biases, which can skew content diversity and fairness in information distribution, raising concerns about echo chambers, filter bubbles, and the significant influence on public discourse (Polatidis and Georgiadis 2013 ). Recent studies have underscored the need to understand and mitigate biases in recommender systems, including but not limited to selection bias, position bias, exposure bias, and popularity bias. Not addressing these inherent biases could lead to serious issues, such as a disparity between offline evaluation and online metrics, negatively affecting user satisfaction and trust in the recommendation service (Chen et al. 2020 ).

Building on the understanding of recommender systems’ impact on user experience and the potential biases inherent in such systems, this study aims to delve deeper into the specific dynamics at play within YouTube’s ecosystem. YouTube, as a leading platform for video content, offers a fertile ground for examining how recommender algorithms shape the content landscape and user interactions over time. Accordingly, this research seeks to address the following pivotal questions:

RQ1: In what ways do YouTube’s recommendation algorithms influence drift within content over time?

RQ2: How do YouTube’s algorithms affect content diversity, narrative visibility, fairness of information distribution, user engagement, and echo chamber formation?

This study embarks on a critical examination of YouTube’s recommendation algorithm, specifically its role in driving narrative drift within the digital content ecosystem over time. Narrative drift, defined as the gradual changes in themes, topics, and perspectives within recommended content, significantly influences the diversity and depth of information accessible to users, thereby shaping their informational landscape.

Our investigation employs a multidimensional analytical framework, blending statistical evaluations with advanced analyses of emotion and moral sentiment, among other methodologies, to dissect the complex dynamics of YouTube’s content recommendation system. This comprehensive approach blends quantitative data analysis with qualitative insights, offering a detailed exploration of how algorithms impact user engagement and content evolution.

Structured as follows, the paper aims to provide a coherent narrative: Sect.  3 introduces the narratives under study and offers an overview of related domains, setting the stage for the methodologies applied. Section  4 details our data collection processes and analytical methods. Section  5 presents our findings on narrative drift, supplemented by detailed graphical analyses. Finally, Sect.  6 summarizes our study’s key insights.

The goal of this research extends beyond merely mapping narrative drift; it seeks to delve into the implications of algorithmic content curation on content diversity and the fair distribution of information across the digital landscape. By scrutinizing YouTube’s recommendation algorithm and identifying potential biases, this study contributes to the ongoing dialogue on digital media consumption, governance, and its societal impact.

In doing so, we challenge the current state of digital content recommendation, envisioning a path toward more transparent, equitable, and diverse digital ecosystems. Through this exploration of YouTube’s recommendation system, we aim to shed light on the nuances of algorithmic governance, fostering a richer and more inclusive digital commons for all.

2 Background

In this section, we delve into the intricate web of geopolitical issues that shape our world, exploring conflicts and disputes that not only have regional implications but also resonate on the global stage. From the deep-rooted tensions in China’s Xinjiang province to the strategic complexities of the South China Sea dispute, and the nuanced use of historical narratives, such as the story of Cheng Ho, in modern-day diplomacy, these offer insightful analyses into some of the most pressing and contentious geopolitical challenges of our times.

2.1 China-Uyghur conflict

The Xinjiang conflict, deeply rooted in complex historical, cultural, and political factors, has emerged as a significant issue in global discourse. Central to this conflict is the difficult situation faced by the Uyghur Muslim minority in China’s Xinjiang province, an area filled with ethnic tensions and controversial government actions. Research highlights the cultural and linguistic aspects of the conflict, focusing on the Uyghur identity and language policy, underscoring how identity plays a crucial role in the ongoing tensions (Dwyer 2005 ). Another study examines the conflict through the lens of majority-minority dynamics within China, providing insights into the socio-political factors that have contributed to the escalation of tensions (Hasmath 2019 ). Further analysis explores the broader implications of the conflict, particularly China’s national policies and their impact on the Uyghur population, offering a critical view of the government’s approach to handling ethnic diversity and disagreement (Israeli 2010 ). This is complemented by discussions on the involvement of international organizations like Amnesty International in addressing the discrimination and conflict faced by Uyghurs, highlighting the period from 2018 to 2022 and the international community’s response (Al-Asad and Zarkachi 2023 ). Additionally, studies on Uyghur Muslim ethnic separatism clarify the complexities of ethnic identity and the desire for self-governance within Xinjiang, illustrating the intricate relationship between ethnic identity, political aspirations, and the broader conflict narrative (Davis 2008 ). These scholarly perspectives paint a multifaceted picture of the Xinjiang conflict, demonstrating its multi-dimensional nature that includes cultural, political, and international elements.

2.2 South China sea dispute

The South China Sea dispute represents a complex intersection of geopolitical, economic, and legal challenges, crucial for understanding contemporary international relations. This region, pivotal for global maritime trade, sees an estimated one-third of the world’s shipping pass through its waters, highlighting its significance in international commerce. The area is not only a key maritime route but also possesses considerable untapped natural resources, including substantial oil and gas reserves, making it an economically strategic zone. Central to this dispute is the People’s Republic of China (PRC)’s assertive attitude, as explored in Chubb ( 2020 ). China’s strategy includes extensive island-building and militarization, particularly within the Paracel and Spratly Islands, reshaping the region’s geopolitical landscape. These efforts involve constructing artificial islands and establishing military bases, actions that have significantly altered regional dynamics and heightened tensions among neighboring states. The complexity of the South China Sea dispute extends beyond its strategic maritime routes, as detailed in Fravel ( 2011 ). The promise of rich undersea resources, including significant reserves of oil and natural gas, plays a pivotal role in fueling the conflicting territorial claims. This economic potential, closely mixed with layers of historical claims and national pride, adds to the complexity of the situation. The legal dimension of the dispute gained importance following the 2016 decision by the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which challenged China’s extensive “nine-dash line" territorial claim, deeming it inconsistent with international law (Macaraig and Fenton 2021 ). Although China has rejected the ruling, it introduced an important legal aspect to the dispute, emphasizing the role of international law in maritime territorial rights. China’s activities in the South China Sea, including land reclamation and militarization, have implications far beyond the immediate region, raising significant concerns regarding the principles of freedom of navigation and overflight in crucial international waters. The South China Sea dispute, with its intricate blend of geopolitical significance, economic interests, and legal complexities, stands as a testament to the challenges facing the international order in the 21st century.

2.3 Cheng Ho propaganda

In the context of current international politics and strategies, the story of Cheng Ho, also known as Zheng He, has gained new significance, especially in how it’s used in the propaganda of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Historically recognized as a celebrated Chinese naval admiral of the early 15th century, Zheng He is renowned for his extensive maritime voyages across Southeast Asia, India, and the Middle East, as detailed in Wade ( 2005 ), Finlay ( 2008 ). These expeditions are traditionally viewed as exploratory and diplomatic in nature, emphasizing peaceful engagement and trade. However, in recent times, the CCP has strategically repurposed Zheng He’s legacy, as discussed in Dotson ( 2011 ), to serve its contemporary political and strategic agendas. This recontextualization of Zheng He’s historical image is particularly evident in the narrative that portrays him as a figure who not only spread Islam and religious tolerance but also as a symbol of China’s peaceful rise and kindness. This portrayal aligns with the CCP’s broader objective of countering international criticism regarding its treatment of the Uyghur Muslim population, as well as bolstering its geopolitical influence, especially in relation to the South China Sea conflict. By recasting Zheng He as a compassionate gift-giver and a peaceful diplomat, the narrative serves to project an image of China as a historically tolerant and inclusive nation. Furthermore, the manipulation of Zheng He’s story is intricately linked with China’s “Maritime Silk Road" initiative, aiming to expand its economic and strategic influence across Asia, Africa, and Europe. The narrative serves as a tool to foster regional support for China’s ambitious project, presenting it as a continuation of a peaceful and cooperative maritime tradition. This tactic of referencing historical events is a sophisticated approach to engage in international relations, strengthen credibility within China, and improve its global position. The Cheng Ho propaganda is a testament to the power of historical narratives in serving current political objectives, where the past is actively reinterpreted to shape the present and future.

2.4 Significance of selected geopolitical topics

We have chosen these geopolitical topics due to their inherent controversy and their significant impact on international relations and public opinion. The selected topics include two anti-China perspectives: the China-Uyghur conflict and the South China Sea dispute, and one pro-China narrative, the story of Cheng Ho. This balanced selection allows us to examine issues where bias might be particularly evident due to their polarizing nature.

These geopolitical issues are highly relevant in current global discourse and receive significant media coverage, making them ideal for analyzing recommendation bias on platforms like YouTube. The controversies surrounding these topics often result in strong opinions and divided audiences, providing a fertile ground for studying how recommendation systems present content in response to user interactions. By examining these topics, we aim to uncover potential biases in YouTube’s recommendation algorithms that might influence the direction of content suggestions.

Additionally, these topics encompass a range of cultural, political, and historical elements, providing a comprehensive framework for studying the complexity of bias in recommendation systems. This selection allows us to assess whether YouTube’s algorithms exhibit any tendencies in the progression of recommended content starting from these contentious geopolitical issues. Understanding these tendencies is crucial for recognizing the broader implications of algorithmic bias in shaping public opinion and the potential consequences for international relations and social harmony.

3 Literature review

This literature review systematically explores a wide range of scholarly work on the multifaceted nature of biases in digital spaces, algorithmic influences in recommendation systems, and the psychological and ethical dimensions of online content interaction.

3.1 Recommendation bias

This section delves into the intricate web of biases inherent in recommendation algorithms, examining their profound implications on information consumption, user behavior, and societal discourse across various digital platforms.

The author in Stinson ( 2022 ) explores biases inherent in collaborative filtering algorithms, used extensively in recommendation and search systems. Highlighting the cold-start problem, popularity bias, over-specialization, and homogenization, the author argues these statistical biases can marginalize already marginalized groups. This insight is crucial for the broader discourse on algorithmic fairness, stressing the importance of addressing both data and algorithmic mechanisms to mitigate biases and ensure more equitable outcomes in digital recommendation environments. Building on this foundational understanding of recommendation biases, the comprehensive survey by Chen et al. ( 2023 ) meticulously explores the multifaceted nature of biases in recommendation algorithms. They provide a deeper dive into each of the seven identified biases: selection, exposure, conformity, position, inductive, popularity, and unfairness; their research inspects various strategies for mitigating such biases. Among the debiasing techniques, the survey discusses the effectiveness of tendency score adjustments, adversarial learning, and other methods in enhancing the fairness and diversity of recommendations. By elaborating on the challenges and solutions associated with each bias type, the survey enriches the discourse on creating equitable and inclusive recommender systems, aligning closely with the thematic concerns of recommendation bias in our study.

Similarly, the researchers in Zhan et al. ( 2022 ) present a novel approach to address the duration bias in video watch-time prediction models. By employing a causal graph and backdoor adjustment, the study innovatively separates the intrinsic effect of video duration on watch-time from its biased impact on video exposure. This methodology allows for more accurate and fair recommendations by mitigating the undue preference for longer videos, which has been shown to skew platform engagement metrics and user experience. Through extensive offline evaluations and live experiments on the Kuaishou platform, the researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in enhancing watch-time prediction accuracy and, consequently, video consumption, further emphasizing the importance of addressing biases in recommendation systems.

The researchers in Haroon et al. ( 2022 ) conduct a comprehensive audit of YouTube’s recommendation system to assess ideological biases and potential radicalization through recommendations. They employ a novel methodology using “sock puppets" to mimic user behavior across different ideological spectrums. The findings reveal YouTube’s tendency to guide users, particularly those leaning right, towards increasingly radical content. Additionally, the study proposes a bottom-up intervention strategy aimed at mitigating these biases, demonstrating its effectiveness in diversifying recommendations. This research adds critical insights into the ongoing debate on social media’s role in ideological bias and radicalization, highlighting the complex challenges faced by digital platforms in ensuring fair and balanced content distribution.

The study by Nechushtai et al. ( 2023 ) investigates the effect of algorithmic recommendation systems on the diversity of news exposure across major digital platforms, presenting a comprehensive analysis that compares the extent of homogenization in news recommendations. It emphasizes the tendency of these platforms to favor nationally oriented news sources over local or regional ones, highlighting concerns regarding the centralization of information, the potential reduction in exposure diversity, and the implications for public discourse. The study employs a crowd-sourced audit methodology to assess the recommendations made by Google, Google News, Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter to a diverse set of users in the United States, examining the interplay between user characteristics and algorithmic sorting in shaping news consumption patterns. This analysis underscores the subtle impacts of YouTube’s recommendation algorithms on content diversity and user perception, illuminating a complex picture of algorithmic bias.

Recent studies, including Cakmak et al. ( 2024b ), Okeke et al. ( 2023 ), Cakmak et al. ( 2024a ), Gurung et al. ( 2024 ) and Onyepunuka et al. ( 2023 ), further contribute to the understanding of YouTube’s recommendation algorithm’s complexities. These analyses reveal trends towards positive emotions, reduced focus on moral dilemmas, systematic content filtration, and shifts in thematic and emotional engagement, which highlight the algorithms’ influence on shaping viewers’ feelings, beliefs, and public discourse dynamics. Specifically, Onyepunuka et al. ( 2023 ) explores the Cheng Ho narrative to assess topic and emotion drift, finding that YouTube’s recommendations tend to deviate towards content subtly introducing pro-China topics, which target specific demographics. These findings emphasize the algorithm’s capacity to shift discussion points and influence audience perception, adding depth to the landscape of recommendation biases.

Exploring the nuances of bias and misinformation propagation within digital ecosystems, scholarly investigations such as Kirdemir et al. ( 2021a ), Kirdemir and Agarwal ( 2022 ), Kirdemir et al. ( 2021b ), Cakmak et al. ( 2024a ), Cakmak and Agarwal ( 2024b ), Poudel et al. ( 2024 ), and Srba et al. ( 2023 ) unveil the inherent structural preferences and the algorithm’s role in fostering content homogeneity, tightly knit content communities, and polarized content spheres. These studies underscore the critical need for transparent, accountable algorithmic practices and the development of debiasing interventions to cultivate a more diverse and accurate digital information landscape, thereby reinforcing the pivotal themes discussed in the aforementioned research on recommendation biases.

3.2 Behavioral dynamics in social media

The emotional, moral, and toxic behavioral dynamics of social media are foundational to user engagement and the development of effective recommender systems. Recognizing and interpreting these dynamics is critical for creating algorithms that resonate with user preferences and enhance their online experiences.

3.2.1 Emotions in social media

The emotional dynamics of social media significantly influence user engagement and content dissemination. Recognizing and interpreting emotional expressions in user-generated content is crucial for creating algorithms that enhance user experiences. Research highlights the importance of accurately identifying emotions to prevent the spread of misinformation and counteract online radicalization (Kušen et al. 2017 ). Studies delve into the role of emotions in shaping user influence and engagement, advocating for emotionally intelligent recommendation systems that capture the essence of user-generated content and ensure emotionally engaging recommendations (Chung and Zeng 2020 ; Panger 2017 ). Further research explores the impact of visual and auditory cues on user emotional responses, emphasizing the potential for leveraging these elements to enhance recommendation accuracy and appeal (Cakmak et al. 2024c ; Yousefi et al. 2024a ). Multimodal emotion analysis, combining textual and auditory data through deep learning, improves emotion detection accuracy and underscores the development of more emotionally intelligent recommendation systems, aligning recommendations more closely with user emotions (Banjo et al. 2022 ).

3.2.2 Morality in social media

Understanding how moral considerations intersect with social media dynamics is imperative for addressing biases in digital spaces. Research highlights the significant impact of social media on moral reasoning, judgments, and behaviors, emphasizing the need for theoretical contributions to understanding morality on these platforms (Neumann and Rhodes 2024 ). Studies delve into the effects of moral outrage on political polarization, showing how social media magnifies aggression and withdrawal from political conversations (Carpenter et al. 2020 ). The interplay between social media and morality can amplify both negative (e.g., outrage, intergroup conflict) and positive (e.g., social support, prosociality) aspects of morality (Van Bavel et al. 2024 ). The design and algorithmic preferences of social media platforms significantly shape the spread of moral narratives, embedding moral biases within the algorithms responsible for content recommendations. This highlights the importance of incorporating moral values into recommender systems to create a balanced and less biased digital environment (Mbila-Uma et al. 2023 ).

3.2.3 Toxic behavior in social media

Toxic content on social media presents a significant challenge for the development of unbiased recommendation algorithms. Studies utilizing Reddit data reveal how toxic content impacts communities and biases algorithmic decisions by amplifying negative discourse (Yousefi et al. 2024b ). Research on the contagious nature of toxic tweets underscores the urgency for algorithms to understand how harmful content multiplies (Yousefi et al. 2023 ). Comparisons of toxicity levels across different platforms suggest that distinct strategies may be needed to curb bias (DiCicco et al. 2020 ; Noor et al. 2023 ). Recent studies extend our understanding of the toxicity landscape by examining its role in amplifying public health debates and affecting polarization in the wake of feminist protests (Pascual-Ferrá et al. 2021 ; Estrada et al. 2022 ). These insights emphasize the necessity for recommendation algorithms to account for toxicity dynamics to refine algorithms, promote healthier discourse, and mitigate biases, ultimately fostering constructive public engagement.

In conclusion, a comprehensive understanding of the emotional, moral, and toxic behavioral dynamics in social media is essential for developing recommendation systems that can effectively manage biases, enhance user engagement, and promote a healthier online environment.

3.3 Topic modeling in social media

Understanding the importance of topic content in social media is pivotal for enhancing recommender systems and ensuring their fairness and relevance. The dynamism of social media platforms, such as Sina Weibo, underscores the necessity to analyze and comprehend the thematic shifts in user-generated content. By examining the distribution of hot topics and their correlations across different platforms, researchers can gain insights into user interests and behaviors, which are crucial for developing more accurate and unbiased recommender systems (Yu et al. 2014 ). This analysis not only helps in identifying trending topics but also in understanding the broader social context in which these discussions occur.

Moreover, the application of advanced topic modeling techniques to social media content enables the discovery of underlying topic facets and their evolution over time. Such methodologies are instrumental in capturing the rich tapestry of online discourse, facilitating a deeper understanding of the thematic structures within vast datasets (Rohani et al. 2016 ). This knowledge is invaluable for recommender systems, as it allows for the refinement of content curation algorithms to better match user preferences and mitigate the risk of reinforcing echo chambers.

The significance of topic analysis extends beyond bare content filtering and recommendation. It plays a critical role in identifying shifts in public sentiment and emerging trends, thereby enabling decision support systems to adapt to changing user needs and preferences (Li et al. 2023 ). Furthermore, the study of changes in social media content over time provides marketers and content creators with insights into the effectiveness of their strategies and the changing interests of their audience, as evidenced by research in marketing science by Zhong and Schweidel ( 2020 ).

In conclusion, topic content on social media emerges as a critical element requiring meticulous analysis for identifying and mitigating bias within recommender systems. Its influence on recommendation algorithms underscores the necessity for careful examination to ensure the integrity and fairness of these systems.

3.4 Social network analysis

Social Network Analysis (SNA) has emerged as a vital tool for analyzing the complicated web of interactions within social media platforms, offering profound insights into the diffusion of information and the identification of influential actors within these networks, as described in Harrigan et al. ( 2021 ). By mapping out the relationships and flows between users, SNA facilitates a deeper understanding of how information spreads through these digital landscapes, highlighting the individuals who wield disproportionate influence over these processes. Influencers, identified through their central positions within the network, play a critical role in shaping audience attitudes and facilitating the spread of information, thus acting as gatekeepers in the dissemination of content (Khanam et al. 2023 ). The study by Shaik et al. ( 2024 ) further elucidates the role of multimedia in amplifying these dynamics, underscoring the potential of multimedia content to engage and mobilize communities through social networks.

The significance of influencers extends beyond mere popularity, as their strategic position within the network grants them the ability to affect the flow and reach of information significantly. This influence is not uniform but varies based on the network’s structure and the nature of the connections. Research describes distinct types of influencers, such as disseminators, engagers, and leaders, each playing unique roles in information spread (del Fresno García et al. 2024 ). These distinctions underscore the ways in which influence manifests within social networks, shaping how information is shared and received.

In the context of recommender systems, understanding the dynamics of social networks and the role of influencers is paramount. These systems, designed to select and recommend content to users based on various algorithms, can significantly benefit from including insights derived from SNA. By recognizing and leveraging the influence of key actors, recommender systems can enhance their effectiveness, ensuring that the content reaches a broader audience and resonates more deeply with users (Aïmeur et al. 2023 ). Moreover, the inclusion of social network insights can help mitigate the challenges of filter bubbles and echo chambers, promoting a more diverse and engaging content landscape.

Incorporating SNA into the examination and refinement of recommender systems on social media platforms presents a strategic approach to mitigating bias and enriching the content landscape. By meticulously identifying and deciphering the roles of influencers within these digital networks, platforms have the opportunity to recalibrate their algorithms to leverage these pivotal actors effectively. This strategy not only amplifies the diversity and relevance of recommendations but also addresses underlying biases by ensuring a broader, more inclusive representation of perspectives and content. As highlighted by Alp et al. ( 2022 ), analyzing social media discussions around critical health issues like COVID-19 and vaccines can offer invaluable insights into public sentiment, further enriching the dataset for recommender systems. Consequently, this integration fosters a digital ecosystem that is not only more interconnected and vibrant but also fairer and more transparent. Through such tailored algorithmic adjustments, social media platforms can excel conventional limitations, offering users a richer, more balanced and unbiased content experience.

Recent studies by Bhattacharya et al. ( 2024a ) highlight the critical role of network analysis in uncovering biases within social networks. The authors used computational methods to analyze identity formation in political protests, showing how social networks can coalesce into cohesive movements and revealing potential biases in these networks. Additionally, Bhattacharya et al. ( 2024b ) examined the socio-technical factors behind modern social movements, emphasizing how network analysis can identify biases and better understand the interplay between solidarity and collective action in digital environments.

3.5 User engagement effect on recommendation systems

In the realm of digital platforms, recommender systems serve as the keystone for navigating the vast array of content available to users, aiming to enhance user engagement by tailoring recommendations to individual preferences. However, the attempt to personalize user experiences and maximize engagement does not come without its challenges, particularly in terms of recommendation bias and its impact on the visibility of diversified content. This understanding of recommender systems functionality underscores the critical balance between user engagement and the equitable representation of content.

The research of Maslowska et al. ( 2022 ) emphasizes the pivotal role of recommender systems in fostering user engagement, suggesting that the design and operational variations of recommender systems significantly influence users’ long-term interactions with platforms. While accuracy in predicting user preferences is traditionally valued, their work suggests a broader scope for evaluating recommender systems effectiveness, highlighting the importance of understanding user engagement dynamics in depth.

Complementing this perspective, Ping et al. ( 2024 ) investigates the effects of diversity, novelty, and serendipity on user engagement and reveals the intricate relationship between recommender systems design choices and the potential for bias. Their findings illuminate how an overemphasis on popular or trending content could inadvertently marginalize less conventional, yet potentially engaging, content. This phenomenon, often referred to as the popularity bias, underlines the critical trade-offs recommender systems designers face between optimizing for user engagement and ensuring a diverse content ecosystem.

Moreover, the study by Zhao et al. ( 2018 ) on the differential impacts of explicit versus implicit feedback on user engagement and satisfaction offers insights into the mechanisms through which recommender systems might amplify or mitigate biases. By highlighting the intricate ways in which user feedback is included into recommender systems, their research underscores the potential for recommender systems to either perpetuate or challenge existing biases, depending on the design and implementation choices made.

Additionally, research by Shajari et al. ( 2024a , 2024b ) explores anomalous engagement and commenter behavior on YouTube, providing valuable insights into how engagement metrics can be manipulated and the implications this has for recommender systems. Adeliyi et al. ( 2024 ) further investigate inorganic user engagement, emphasizing the impact of automated and semi-automated activities on the integrity of user engagement metrics. Their findings highlight the importance of implementing robust mechanisms to detect and address such behaviors to maintain the integrity of user engagement metrics.

Addressing these complexities, it becomes evident that the larger goal of recommender systems to enhance user engagement must be critically examined through the lens of recommendation bias. The challenge lies not only in designing recommender systems that are expert at capturing and sustaining user interest but also in ensuring that these systems promote a balanced and inclusive representation of content.

3.6 Statistical evaluation in recommender systems

The advancement of recommender systems has underscored the vital need for robust statistical evaluation frameworks. As these systems increasingly influence user experiences across various digital platforms, the need for their effectiveness and fairness cannot be overstated. Statistical evaluation methodologies provide a foundation for understanding, improving, and benchmarking recommender systems. The integration of Information Retrieval (IR) metrics into recommender system evaluation has emerged as a pivotal area of study, aiming to bridge the gap between predicted user preferences and actual user satisfaction (Shani and Gunawardana 2011 ). However, this adaptation is not without challenges, as noted in Bellogín et al. ( 2017 ), who highlighted the inherent statistical biases, such as sparsity and popularity biases, that could distort evaluation outcomes and obstruct the comparability of recommender systems.

In the realm of evaluating recommender systems, traditional error-based metrics have shown limitations, prompting a shift towards more user-centric evaluation criteria (Knijnenburg and Willemsen 2015 ). This shift has been influential in capturing the multifaceted nature of user preferences and the complex dynamics of recommendation processes. The work by Shani and Gunawardana ( 2011 ) further elaborates on the intricacies of applying IR methodologies to recommender systems, emphasizing the need for a systematic approach to address these challenges.

The evaluation of recommender systems has also brought to light the significance of addressing and mitigating biases inherent in recommendation algorithms. These biases, if unchecked, can skew the recommendation process, potentially leading to a reinforcement of existing user preferences and hindering the discovery of diverse content (Herlocker et al. 2004 ).

Furthermore, the exploration of statistical robustness in the evaluation of stream-based recommender systems by Vinagre et al. ( 2019 ) adds an additional layer of complexity, necessitating the development of dynamic evaluation metrics that can adapt to the evolving nature of user interactions with content. This dynamic evaluation underscores the importance of time aspects in the assessment of recommender systems, highlighting the need for metrics that can capture the transient preferences of users and the fluidity of content relevance.

In conclusion, the literature underscores the paramount importance of statistical measurements in the evaluation of recommender systems. As these systems continue to evolve and play a crucial role in shaping digital experiences, the development and refinement of statistical evaluation methodologies will remain a critical area of research. This endeavor not only aids in benchmarking the performance of recommender systems but also in ensuring their fairness, transparency, and adaptability to the diverse and changing needs of users.

4 Methodology

Our methodology outlines the structured approach we adopt to investigate the intricate dynamics of recommendation algorithms, combining data collection, analysis, and theoretical examination to unveil the underlying biases within digital platforms.

4.1 Data collection

In this section, we detail the rigorous methodology employed for gathering and processing data, setting the foundation for our comprehensive analysis of the narratives explored in this study.

4.1.1 Narrative keywords

To initiate data collection as outlined in Sect.  2 , we conducted a series of workshops with subject matter experts. These sessions were instrumental in generating a list of relevant keywords associated with the three narratives. Subsequently, these keywords were utilized to facilitate the search for related videos on YouTube.

China-Uyghur Conflict: in our research on the China-Uyghur conflict, the carefully chosen keywords reflect the critical themes identified in our literature review. These keywords are detailed in Table 1 . The keywords include human rights abuses, cultural and religious identities, and the international response to the conflict. Terms like “Oppression”, “Muslim Uyghur”, and “Stop Genocide” are used to capture the mistreatment of the Uyghur population, their cultural and religious significance, and the global reaction to these issues. By incorporating specific organizations and notable figures, our data collection becomes comprehensive, ensuring our study accurately represents the complexities and the proved realities of the China-Uyghur conflict.

South China Sea Dispute: as shown in Table 2 , our selected keywords for the South China Sea dispute study encapsulate the conflict’s key aspects: legal rulings (“Permanent Court", “Arbitration", “UNCLOS"), geopolitical tensions (“China + Philippines", “sovereignty"), and economic interests (“economic cooperation", “natural resources"). These terms are essential to examine the intricate blend of legal, political, and economic factors in the dispute, particularly focusing on China’s territorial claims and the responses of neighboring states like the Philippines. The keywords enable a comprehensive analysis, aligning with the diverse perspectives and complexities discussed in our literature review.

As outlined in Table 3 , our study utilized specific keywords to investigate Cheng Ho’s (Zheng He) maritime expeditions and their modern reinterpretation by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). “Cheng Ho", “Zheng He", and related terms explore his historical significance and cultural impact. Keywords linking to the Uighur region and figures like “Gavin Menzies" connect his legacy with contemporary geopolitical narratives and popular theories. This selection facilitates a comprehensive examination of Zheng He’s historical role and his portrayal in current political strategies, aligning with our research focus.

These keywords, as presented in their respective tables, play a pivotal role in uncovering the complex themes and narratives at the heart of our study. This approach not only structures our in-depth analysis but also contains a blend of English and non-English terms. This bilingual approach accounts for the original content of videos and their broader dissemination in English, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter from multiple linguistic perspectives. It’s important to note that the unbalanced count of keywords between topics does not detract from our study’s validity. Each topic is unique, encompassing a varied range of terms. Moreover, we selected an equal number of initial seed videos for each topic, a methodological choice that will be elaborated upon in the upcoming section.

4.1.2 Recommendation depth collection

To accurately measure bias in YouTube’s recommendations, we needed to collect the videos recommended by YouTube. Our methodology mirrors the approach used by the authors in Onyepunuka et al. ( 2023 ). Initially, we selected seed videos using the keywords mentioned in Sect.  4.1.1 . These seed videos were manually chosen based on their relevance to the subject.

For the collection of recommended videos, we employed Selenium, a widely-used open-source library for web scraping. Selenium utilizes the WebDriver protocol to control web browsers, such as Chrome in our case. We individually opened each seed video in the browser and scraped the videos recommended by YouTube, typically displayed in the right-hand corner of the screen. These recommended videos are related to the current video being viewed. After completing the collection at each recommendation depth, the newly gathered videos served as the starting point for the subsequent depth. This process helped us to construct a recommendation network. Ultimately, we achieved four new depths of recommendations. The number of videos and their corresponding depths are presented in Table 4 .

We initially selected 40 seed videos for each narrative. After each depth, there was a variation in the count of recommended videos. This variation is attributable to YouTube’s algorithm, which factors in aspects such as content metadata, viewer engagement, video length, ongoing algorithmic adjustments, content availability, and current trends. Throughout the video collection process, we ensured an unbiased approach by not logging into any YouTube account. Each browsing session started afresh with cleared cookies to eliminate any influence of user history on the data.

4.1.3 Attribute retrieval

In this research, we analyzed various video attributes including the title, description, transcription, comments, views, and likes. For all attributes except transcription, we utilized the YouTube Data API v3. This API facilitates the retrieval of feeds related to videos, among other functionalities.

For transcriptions, we adopted a different approach, as detailed in Cakmak et al. ( 2023 ), Cakmak and Agarwal ( 2024 ). In these studies, the authors developed a method to efficiently collect video transcripts from YouTube. This process primarily involved the use of the YouTube Transcript API (Depoix 2023 ), which extracts transcripts from YouTube videos. For videos without available transcripts, we used the OpenAI Whisper model by Radford et al. ( 2023 ), which applies speech generation algorithms, to create the necessary transcriptions. This method effectively streamlined the transcription collection process, demonstrating the practical use of advanced computational techniques in extracting data from online multimedia sources.

Additionally, due to geo-specific issues encountered during our data collection, we dealt with non-English data. To enhance the understanding and accuracy of the models we used, we translated the data into English. This was achieved using the Googletrans Library in Python, a free and unlimited library that implements the Google Translate API. The library leverages the Google Translate Ajax API for functions such as language detection and translation.

4.2 Emotion assessment

The bias inherent in recommended video content can be effectively analyzed through the lens of emotional shifts. Emotions significantly influence our interaction with media, shaping our reactions, responses, and engagement levels. In the realm of recommended videos, a complex relationship exists between the emotional tone of the content and the viewer’s current emotional state. This interaction can result in a skewed selection of recommendations, as algorithms might favor content that evokes emotions leading to higher engagement from viewers. This tendency can create a cycle where viewers are continually presented with content that provokes specific emotional responses, potentially resulting in a more engaged but less diverse viewing experience. Understanding this mechanism is key in identifying and addressing bias in video recommendations, highlighting the subtle ways in which emotional targeting can influence viewing habits and content exposure.

To quantify these emotional shifts in video recommendations, our approach involved analyzing the emotions in each video using a transformer model, a tool at the forefront of advancements in natural language processing. Renowned for their ability to contextually interpret language, models like BERT, GPT, and RoBERTa (Devlin et al. 2019 ; Radford and Narasimhan 2018 ; Brown et al. 2020 ; Liu et al. 2019 ) are particularly adept at accurate emotion analysis.

Our research utilized RoBERTa and its more efficient variant, DistilRoBERTa. We selected the model (Hartmann 2022 ) from Hugging Face, a refined version of DistilRoBERTa, which has been meticulously trained on diverse datasets to identify a range of emotions: anger, disgust, fear, joy, neutral, sadness, and surprise.

Employing this model enabled us to conduct a thorough analysis of the emotional content in video titles, descriptions, transcriptions, and user comments. This methodology yielded valuable insights into the nature of emotional content within these videos and its impact on audience engagement. Such findings are integral to deepening our understanding of emotional biases in video recommendations and developing strategies to mitigate their effects.

4.3 Moral foundation assessment

In our exploration of the biases present in video recommendations, we acknowledge that alongside emotions, the subtle yet powerful influence of moral values plays a crucial role in steering viewer choices. These values, which form the backbone of personal ethics and decision-making, are instrumental in shaping how audiences perceive and interact with video content. Our study, therefore, delves into the realm of morality in recommended videos, aiming to unravel how these ethical dimensions influence viewer behavior and content preferences.

To investigate moral values in video content, we employed the extended Moral Foundations Dictionary (eMFD), a sophisticated tool designed for extracting moral content from textual data (Hopp et al. 2021 ). The eMFD represents a significant advancement in moral analysis, leveraging the input of a large and diverse group of human annotators to capture a wide range of moral intuitions. This methodology contrasts with previous approaches, which often relied on a small group of experts and resulted in a more constrained interpretation of morality.

For this study, we have used the eMFD as a quantitative tool and did not engage in its construction process. The eMFD’s construction involved a detailed annotation process that profoundly enhanced our analysis of moral content in video recommendations. In this process, each word in the eMFD is assigned continuously weighted vectors, reflecting its likelihood of association with five core moral foundations: Care/Harm, Fairness/Cheating, Loyalty/Betrayal, Authority/Subversion, and Sanctity/Degradation. Additionally, a key aspect of our methodology is the eMFD’s capability to evaluate the moral connotations of each word based on its alignment with vice or virtue characteristics. This dual approach, considering both the moral foundations and the vice-virtue spectrum, allows for a nuanced assessment of the moral undertones in video content. By examining how words align with these ethical dimensions, we gain a detailed view of how moral values are conveyed, offering insights into their potential impact on viewer behavior and preferences.

The methodology employed by the eMFD does not utilize probability distributions to analyze or interpret text. Instead, the approach is fundamentally frequency-based and categorical. When applied to a body of text, the eMFD quantifies the presence of moral language by counting the occurrences of words and phrases associated with each of the five moral foundations. This process results in a set of metrics that reflect the extent to which each moral foundation is represented in the text. The output is thus a direct measure of moral rhetoric, expressed through the frequency of specific lexicon usage across the identified moral dimensions. This direct and categorical assessment of moral content allows for a clear understanding of how moral values are embedded and communicated in video content, enhancing our ability to analyze the ethical implications of video recommendations.

Furthermore, the eMFD incorporates sentiment analysis through the Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner (VADER), providing an additional layer of depth to the moral language assessment. This combination allows for a sophisticated examination of the moral and ethical themes within the video content, considering not just the presence of moral language but also the context and sentiment surrounding it.

By applying the eMFD to our analysis of recommended videos, we aim to explore the moral dimensions in video titles, descriptions, transcriptions, and user comments. This approach helps us assess narratives and character portrayals, uncovering the moral and ethical implications embedded in these aspects. Understanding how moral values are represented across these video attributes will provide insights into their influence on viewer engagement and preferences, offering a more comprehensive view of moral biases in video recommendations.

4.4 Toxicity assessment

In exploring the biases in video recommendations, the measurement of toxicity is as crucial as the assessment of emotion and moral values. Toxicity, which encompasses rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable content, is a key factor that can significantly influence people’s choices and interactions with online content. Its importance lies in its potential impact on the viewer’s experience and decision-making process. Just like emotional and moral content, toxic elements in videos can subtly shape preferences and behaviors, which in turn may affect the functioning of recommendation algorithms. Therefore, incorporating toxicity as a measure in our analysis is essential to gain a comprehensive understanding of the various factors that contribute to recommendation biases and their implications on user engagement and content consumption patterns.

To methodologically assess toxicity in video content, we employed the Detoxify model (Hanu 2020 ). Detoxify is a state-of-the-art machine learning model designed to detect and quantify various forms of toxic behavior in textual content. Among the variants of Detoxify, we specifically chose the “unbiased" model, which is designed to minimize biases that often accompany toxicity detection, such as those related to gender, race, or specific ideologies. This model’s architecture is based on a transformer-based framework, leveraging the power of models like BERT for context-sensitive analysis. It has been trained on a large dataset comprising diverse and challenging text samples, allowing it to accurately identify and score a range of toxic behaviors, including insults, threats, and hate speech.

Our use of the unbiased Detoxify model involved analyzing textual elements of videos such as titles, descriptions, transcriptions, and user comments. By applying this model, we were able to generate toxicity scores for each video element, giving us a quantifiable measure of the toxic content present in the recommended videos. This approach allowed us to systematically evaluate the prevalence and severity of toxic content in video recommendations and to understand how such content could influence viewer behavior and preferences.

4.5 Topic analysis

Understanding the biases in video recommendations requires an analysis of the topics presented in these videos. The topic or theme of a video is a crucial element that can influence the recommendation algorithm. If certain topics are consistently recommended while others are neglected, this can indicate a bias in the algorithm. This bias may arise because viewers tend to watch certain topics more frequently or engage more deeply with them, prompting the algorithm to favor these topics in its recommendations. Such a trend can lead to a homogenization of content, where diverse or less popular topics are underrepresented. This aspect of topic analysis is essential in understanding how content diversity is maintained or limited by recommendation systems and its impact on viewer exposure to a broad range of subjects.

To conduct a comprehensive topic analysis, we employed a BERTopic model (Grootendorst 2022 ), a sophisticated machine learning tool designed for topic classification and extraction. The fine-tuned version of this model, referenced in Grootendorst ( 2023 ), is pre-trained on approximately 1,000,000 Wikipedia pages, covering a broad spectrum of knowledge. It is capable of identifying 2,377 distinct topics, providing us with a robust framework for analyzing the thematic content of videos. The BERTopic model operates using a transformer-based architecture, similar to BERT, which excels in understanding and categorizing complex textual data. This capability allows for precise and nuanced topic detection, essential for accurately assessing the range and diversity of topics in video content.

Our methodology involved applying the BERTopic model to various textual elements of videos, such as titles, descriptions, transcriptions, and comments. By doing so, we could systematically categorize videos into specific topics and analyze the distribution of these topics within the recommended videos. This approach enabled us to observe patterns and trends in topic representation, offering insights into how certain topics are either prioritized or overlooked by the recommendation algorithm.

4.6 Network analysis

Network analysis offers a powerful perspective for unraveling the often hidden biases within video recommendation systems. This approach goes beyond surface-level observations, diving into the complex web of connections that define how videos are interlinked and recommended. By mapping these networks, we can expose subtle patterns and relationships, illuminating how certain videos gain notability or become marginalized within the recommendation ecosystem.

Our focus on network analysis derives from a desire to decode the intricacies of YouTube’s recommendation algorithm, as detailed in Sect.  4.1.2 . Here, we examine the structure of the recommendation network, which is composed of parent videos and their associated recommended (child) videos. This network representation is key to understanding how certain content gains traction and influences viewer choices, potentially leading to biases in what is recommended to users.

Central to our network analysis is the application of Eigenvector Centrality (EC), as shown in Eq.  1 . This metric is insightful because it evaluates both the number and the quality of connections a video has. In the equation, \(EC(v)\) represents the centrality of a video \(v\) . The term \(\lambda\) is the largest eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix \(A\) , which normalizes the centrality values. The adjacency matrix \(A\) itself reflects the connection strengths between videos, where \(A_{uv}\) indicates the strength between video \(v\) and its neighbor \(u\) . The sum \(\sum _{u \in N(v)}\) takes into account all neighboring videos \(u\) of \(v\) . Essentially, a video with high eigenvector centrality, as calculated by this formula, is one that is recommended by other influential videos. This indicates a form of indirect influence that can significantly shape viewer consumption patterns, highlighting videos that are important due to their strong connections to other significant videos.

Our analysis, conducted with the aid of Gephi software (Bastian et al. 2009 ) identified videos that serve as pivotal nodes within the recommendation network. These influential videos can be seen as key influencers or trend starters, guiding the direction of video recommendations based on how viewers interact with them. By examining these key influencers, we aimed to discern whether and how they contribute to perpetuating certain biases within the recommendation algorithm.

We also used modularity values in the network analysis. Modularity values are important because they help to identify those nodes (individuals, entities) that are central or influential within their respective communities or modules. By focusing on nodes with high modularity values, one can target influencers who are not just broadly connected across the entire network but also pivotal within their specific communities. This approach enhances the effectiveness of strategies that rely on these influencer nodes for information dissemination, ensuring that efforts are concentrated on individuals who can mobilize or impact their immediate community significantly.

We also incorporated modularity values into our network analysis to refine the identification of influential nodes within their respective communities or modules. High modularity values signify nodes that are not only broadly connected but also hold pivotal positions within specific communities, enhancing the targeted strategies for information dissemination. This consideration ensures that efforts are concentrated on individuals who can significantly impact their immediate community.

The modularity \(Q\) of a network, particularly utilizing the Louvain method, is defined by the formula shown in Eq.  2 .

In this formula \(A_{ij}\) represents the adjacency matrix element, \(k_i\) and \(k_j\) are the degrees of nodes \(i\) and \(j\) , \(m\) is the total weight of all edges, and \(\delta (c_i, c_j)\) is the Kronecker delta function; the Kronecker delta is 1 if nodes \(i\) and \(j\) are in the same community and 0 otherwise. This formula aids in identifying nodes that are central within their communities, thereby highlighting the influencers who play a critical role in the dissemination of content within specific segments of the network.

4.7 Examination of engagement metrics

The analysis of engagement metrics plays a pivotal role in understanding biases in video recommendation systems. Engagement metrics, such as views, likes, and comment counts, serve as indicators of a video’s popularity and audience interaction. These metrics can be instrumental in revealing whether recommendation algorithms disproportionately favor more popular content, potentially leading to a bias in recommendations.

Our examination focused on the hypothesis that recommendation algorithms might be inclined to suggest videos with higher engagement metrics as users explore content more deeply. This potential bias could manifest in a cycle where already popular videos gain further visibility, overshadowing less-viewed content regardless of its relevance or quality. To investigate this, we considered a video popular based on the high view counts, substantial likes, and a significant number of comments.

In our methodology, we tracked the engagement metrics of videos across various recommendation depths. This approach allowed us to analyze patterns in how the recommendation algorithm prioritizes content based on viewer engagement. If we observe a trend where videos with higher engagement consistently appear in recommendations, it could indicate an algorithmic preference for popular content.

This analysis is crucial in understanding how engagement metrics could skew the diversity of recommended content. A bias towards highly engaged videos might limit the exposure of newer or relevant content, potentially narrowing the spectrum of ideas and perspectives presented to viewers. By examining engagement metrics, we aim to uncover and understand these potential biases, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing content recommendations on digital platforms.

4.8 Statistical measurement

Our analysis utilizes statistical methods to validate the presence and extent of biases within YouTube’s recommendation system, as outlined in Sect.  4 . Through quantitative evaluation, we assess the significance of deviations in content distribution and engagement metrics from expected norms. This approach ensures a robust understanding of recommendation biases, supporting our findings with concrete evidence of how these biases may affect content visibility and user interaction patterns across the platform.

4.8.1 Drift significance

A key component of our statistical analysis is the evaluation of drift significance, particularly how content distribution changes across recommendation depths. For this purpose, we utilized the Chi-Square test (Pearson 1900 ), a robust statistical method for examining the relationship between categorical variables. This test compares the observed frequency of categories at different recommendation depths against expected frequencies, assuming no underlying bias, as detailed in Eq.  3 .

In this context, \(O_{i}\) represents the observed frequency of each category within the recommendation depths, while \(E_{i}\) denotes the expected frequency, calculated based on the assumption of uniform distribution across depths. The expected frequencies are derived using the formula shown in Eq.  4 . This calculation helps us to establish a baseline against which to measure the extent of deviation (or drift) from expected content distribution patterns. In our case, the rows were the categorical values, and the columns were the recommendation depths. This setup allows for a detailed analysis of how content categories distribute across different levels of recommendation, providing insights into the recommendation algorithm’s behavior and its potential biases.

We set a distinct significance level of 0.05 to ascertain the threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis, which posits that “there is no drift in the distribution of the categorical variables between the different recommendation depths." The degrees of freedom, crucial for understanding the distribution’s variance, are calculated as shown in Eq.  5 .

The p -value, which is the area under the Chi-Square distribution curve to the right of the observed \(\chi ^2\) statistic for the calculated degrees of freedom, indicates the probability of observing a result as extreme as, or more extreme than, what was actually found, assuming the null hypothesis is true. If the p -value is small (less than the significance level), then we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence of drift in the distribution of the categories between the depths. Conversely, a larger p -value suggests that the observed differences could have occurred by random chance, leading us to fail to reject the null hypothesis, indicating no significant drift or difference between the depths.

As we mention, the calculation of the p -value requires integrating the Chi-Square probability density function (PDF) from the observed \(\chi ^2\) value to infinity, which is not typically done by hand. Instead, one would use statistical tables designed for this purpose, but due to the limited values that can be retrieved from the Chi-Square distribution table, we have used a statistical software, a Python module which uses the “chi2_contingency" function from the “scipy.stats" package. This module uses an approximation method to calculate the p -value for large Chi-Square statistics. For very large Chi-Square statistics, the p -value may be approximated to 0.0 due to limitations in floating-point arithmetic and computational precision. This approximation is reasonable because such large Chi-Square statistics indicate a very strong deviation from the null hypothesis, making it highly unlikely to observe such extreme results under the assumption of independence.

Through this statistical framework, we aim to provide a concrete measure of bias, offering a more definitive understanding of how recommendation algorithms might skew content distribution. This methodological rigor enhances the credibility of our findings, facilitating a deeper exploration into the mechanics of bias within YouTube’s recommendation system.

4.8.2 Inequality quantification

In examining biases within YouTube’s content recommendation algorithms, analyzing disparities in engagement metrics reveals critical insights. This method allows us to inspect how viewer interactions are distributed among recommended videos, shedding light on potential inequalities that may affect content visibility and the overall user experience.

The Atkinson Index (Atkinson et al. 1970 ), a measure initially developed to assess income inequality within populations, provides a useful framework for examining disparities in content engagement on YouTube. This index quantifies the extent to which individual data points (in our case, engagement metrics such as likes, comments, and views) diverge from a perfectly equal distribution. The Atkinson Index is defined as shown in Eq.  6 .

\(A(\epsilon )\) represents the Atkinson Index, with \(\epsilon\) being a parameter that determines the sensitivity of the measure to changes in different parts of the distribution. A higher value of \(\epsilon\) indicates a greater sensitivity to inequalities at the lower end of the distribution. \(n\) is the number of videos considered in a particular depth of recommendation. \(p_i\) is the proportion of total engagement (likes, views, or comments) that the \(i\) -th video receives relative to the total engagement of all videos in the dataset.

In our analysis, we adopted an \(\epsilon\) value of 0.5 to balance the measure’s sensitivity to inequalities at both the lower and upper ends of the engagement spectrum. The choice of \(\epsilon\) is significant because it allows for the adjustment of the index’s focus, with higher values prioritizing the lower end of the distribution. As \(\epsilon\) approaches infinity, the Atkinson Index nears 1, reflecting an increasing emphasis on disparities at the lower end of the engagement spectrum.

By applying the Atkinson Index to the engagement metrics of recommended videos, we aim to quantify the level of inequality present within each recommendation depth. This analysis allows us to assess whether the YouTube recommendation algorithm exhibits a bias towards videos with significantly higher engagement metrics, potentially marginalizing content with lower but still substantial engagement levels.

Evaluating engagement inequality with the Atkinson Index sheds light on the dynamics of content recommendation and visibility on YouTube. It helps identify if the recommendation system perpetuates a concentration of attention on a small subset of highly popular videos, thereby reinforcing existing visibility and engagement disparities. Such insights are crucial for understanding the broader implications of algorithmic recommendation practices on content diversity and user exposure.

4.8.3 Understanding gaussian distributions and statistical measures

In the study of complex datasets, whether examining patterns in digital narratives or analyzing trends in social data, the application of statistical measures provides a foundational framework for both describing and understanding variability within the data. Central to this framework is the concept of the Gaussian distribution, often referred to as the normal distribution, which is a fundamental statistical distribution pattern observed in many natural phenomena and datasets.

The Gaussian distribution is characterized by its symmetric, bell-shaped curve, where the majority of observations cluster around a central value (the mean), decreasing in frequency as they diverge towards the extremes. This distribution is mathematically defined by its mean \(\mu\) and standard deviation \(\sigma\) , where the following is true:

The mean \(\mu\) represents the average value of the dataset, providing a central point around which the data is distributed.

The standard deviation \(\sigma\) quantifies the dispersion or variability of the dataset, indicating how spread out the data points are from the mean.

Formally, the Gaussian distribution can be expressed through its probability density function (PDF) as shown in Eq.  7 :

Within the context of Gaussian distributions, the concepts of mean + std ( \(\mu\) + \(\sigma\) ) and mean + 2std ( \(\mu\) + \(2\sigma\) ) serve as crucial analytical thresholds. These measures are instrumental in understanding the distribution of data:

Mean + std ( \(\mu\) + \(\sigma\) ): Approximately 68% of the data in a Gaussian distribution falls within one standard deviation of the mean. This range identifies the most common variance from the average, encapsulating the bulk of data points in a typical distribution.

Mean + 2std ( \(\mu\) + \(2\sigma\) ): Expanding the range to two standard deviations from the mean encompasses approximately 95% of the data. This broader threshold is critical for identifying outliers, which are the data points that lie beyond the typical range of variation. These outliers can signify extreme cases or occurrences that deviate significantly from the norm.

The application of these statistical measures and thresholds provides a powerful lens for analyzing and interpreting data. In real-world scenarios, understanding the distribution of data within these thresholds enables researchers to do the following:

Identify patterns and trends that are central to the dataset

Detect outliers or anomalies that may warrant further investigation

Make informed decisions based on the statistical behavior of the data

Employing these statistical concepts allows for a nuanced analysis that goes beyond mere averages, offering insights into the variability and extremities of the data. This approach is invaluable across a spectrum of fields, from social sciences to natural phenomena, enabling a deeper comprehension of the underlying patterns and behaviors within complex datasets.

In this section, we delve into our findings, unraveling the dynamics of narrative drift across various dimensions, including influencer nodes, engagement metrics, and other pivotal elements that underscore the algorithmic influence on content dissemination and reception.

5.1 Emotion drift

In our comprehensive analysis, as detailed in Sect.  4.2 , we embarked on an investigation to discern the presence of emotion drift across various narratives, alongside their respective attributes as elaborated in Sect.  4.1.3 . This inquiry was established on the hypothesis that emotional tones could significantly shift across the depth of recommendations, a phenomenon we aimed to quantify and understand within the context of digital discourse.

Our findings, illustrated in Fig.  1 , particularly spotlight the China-Uyghur Conflict as a case study. Initial expectations, based on the narrative’s nature discussed in Sect.  2.1 , suggested predominantly negative emotions. However, the data revealed notable emotion drifts, especially noticeable in the attributes of titles and descriptions (Fig.  1 a and b). These attributes exhibited a remarkable increase in neutrality and emergence of joy, with a simultaneous decrease in negative emotions such as anger and fear.

Conversely, the transcriptions and comments associated with the videos exhibited less variation. This could be attributed to the extended length of transcripts, which tends towards neutrality, and the varied nature of comments. Specifically, Fig.  1 c demonstrated an increase in neutral expressions and a decrease in disgust, whereas Fig.  1 d showcased an uptick in joy and a trace of surprise. Collectively, these findings underscore a general decline in negative sentiment across the recommendation depth, signaling a notable emotion drift within the context of the China-Uyghur Conflict narrative.

For the narrative concerning the South China Sea Dispute, our examination was rooted in expectations of initially negative emotions, as outlined in Sect.  2.2 . This narrative, similar to the China-Uyghur conflict, demonstrated a decline in negative sentiments, with a discernible decrease in anger as shown in Fig.  2 . Intriguingly, the descriptions, as captured in Fig.  2 b, unveiled an initial spike in fear at the outset of recommendations. Yet, this was followed by a notable reduction in fear levels later on. These observations collectively highlight a broader trend towards diminished negative sentiments, underscoring an emotion drift within the discourse of the South China Sea Dispute.

For the Cheng Ho narrative, expectations were set for initially positive emotions, as outlined in Sect.  2.3 . True to prediction, this narrative began with a higher combination of neutrality and joy compared to others. As depicted in Fig.  3 , these levels largely remained consistent across recommendation depths. Notably, Fig.  3 b shows a minor increase in fear, yet the overall emotional distribution maintained its positivity. Thus, the Cheng Ho narrative exhibited minimal emotion drift, with emotional levels showing negligible fluctuation, distinguishing it from the variability observed in other narratives.

In summarizing the emotion analysis across different narratives, our investigation revealed a subtle spectrum of emotion drift. Narratives characterized by negative or contentious themes exhibited notable shifts towards less negative emotional expressions across recommendation depths, indicating a dynamic emotional response to changing content. Conversely, narratives with inherently positive themes demonstrated stability in their emotional tone, with minimal shifts observed.

The analysis revealed significant shifts in the emotional tone of narratives, particularly from initially negative to increasingly neutral and positive emotions. This shift can be attributed to YouTube’s recommendation algorithm, which may prioritize content fostering longer engagement and positive user experiences. As users engage with content, the algorithm adjusts to suggest videos that are less emotionally charged and more balanced in tone. This trend highlights the dynamic nature of YouTube’s recommendation system and its potential impact on user perceptions and behavior. Understanding these shifts is crucial for developing strategies to enhance the quality and impact of online content recommendations, promoting constructive dialogue and reducing polarization.

To meticulously assess the presence and statistical significance of emotion drift across narratives, we utilized the Chi-Square method as outlined in Sect.  4.8.1 . With seven emotion categories across five depths, our analysis yielded 24 degrees of freedom, derived from the formula in Eq.  5 .

The p -values obtained for the emotion drift, as detailed in Table 5 , were below the strict significance threshold of 0.05 for both the China-Uyghur Conflict and the South China Sea Dispute narratives. This indicates a significant deviation from the null hypothesis, affirming the presence of an emotion drift among the depths. Conversely, the Cheng Ho Propaganda narrative exhibited p -values near the threshold but below it, except in one instance where the value was higher, in contrast to the extremely low values (almost zero) observed in other narratives. This suggests a presence of drift, though in a weaker form compared to other narratives. Finally, given that the sample size for comments is approximately 100 times larger than that for the other elements, it inherently possesses a higher sensitivity to detect changes. This increased sensitivity is reflected in the larger Chi-Square statistics observed for comments.

Emotion distribution across all attributes of the China-Uyghur conflict

Emotion distribution across all attributes of the South China sea dispute

Emotion distribution across all attributes of the Cheng Ho propaganda

5.2 Morality drift

In our comprehensive analysis of morality drift within digital narratives, we delve into the evolution of moral values across various narratives, examining how these values fluctuate through the recommendation depth of video content. This undertaking, detailed in Sect.  4.3 , involves assessing the prevalence of moral virtues and vices, captured through mean scores at the sentence level, to measure the moral tone spreading different layers of digital discourse.

Our investigation into the China-Uyghur Conflict anticipated a dominance of negative moral values. The findings, as illustrated in Figs.  4 and 5 , reveal an initial decline in vices such as harm, which was the highest one initially, as well as cheating, betrayal, subversion, and degradation, with a trend towards stabilization in deeper recommendation levels. Conversely, virtue scores, especially loyalty as highlighted in Fig.  5 a–d, generally exhibit an increase or remain stable, underscoring a shift towards more positive moral values in the narrative discourse. In summary, for the China-Uyghur Conflict specifically, our analysis revealed a marked decrease in negative moral values (vices) and an increase or stabilization in positive moral values (virtues), notably loyalty.

In analyzing the South China Sea Dispute, subtle shifts in moral values were observed. Vice values, indicated in Fig.  6 , showed minor variations; increases in degradation and harm were noted in titles in Fig.  6 a, while a slight overall decrease in vices, except for degradation, was seen in descriptions in Fig.  6 b. Transcriptions in Fig.  6 c revealed a slight rise in harm and degradation, with other values remaining steady. Comments in Fig.  6 d initially increased in vices at depth one, but subsequently all vice values declined.

Virtue values presented more fluctuation, particularly in titles in Fig.  7 a, where three virtues increased and two decreased, with sanctity experiencing the most significant change. In descriptions in Fig.  7 b, we observed an initial decrease and then an increase later on. Transcriptions in Fig.  7 c showed virtue levels to be relatively stable. Lastly, in Fig.  7 d we noticed an increase in all virtues for comments.

In summarizing the moral dynamics within the South China Sea Dispute, it becomes evident that the shifts in moral values across various depths of recommendations present a complex pattern, lacking a straightforward trajectory.

In the analysis of the Cheng Ho Propaganda, the moral landscape presented diverse shifts. Vice values, referenced in Fig.  8 , depicted an uptick in harm across titles as shown in Fig.  8 a, alongside minor increases in other vices. Descriptions and transcriptions, in Fig.  8 b and c, demonstrated slight decreases in some values, while others remained unchanged. Comments, as per Fig.  8 d, showed a mix of stability and slight increases in certain vices.

Virtue values, detailed in Fig.  9 , varied across the board, with transcriptions in Fig.  9 c experiencing more uniform changes, contrasting with the significant fluctuations in other attributes, both in terms of increases and decreases.

In the examination of narratives surrounding the China-Uyghur Conflict, South China Sea Dispute, and Cheng Ho Propaganda, our investigation into the phenomenon of morality drift reveals a multifaceted spectrum of moral values that vary significantly across different levels of analysis. Through rigorous sentence-level evaluation, this analysis uncovers a dynamic shift accompanied by marked fluctuations in virtues and vices. Some narratives illustrate a discernible movement towards the stabilization of virtues or a reduction in vices, whereas others display complex patterns that go against a linear progression. These observations collectively highlight the relationship between the dissemination of digital content and the changing moral perspectives of audiences.

Building upon this foundation, our subsequent analysis, detailed in Sect.  4.8.1 , delves into the statistical significance of morality drift. We calculated the p -values and chose the maximum value as the moral value for that sentence. In this way, we have calculated the count for the Chi-Square evaluation. Therefore, these moral values are not count distribution values; they are mean scores of each word in a sentence across the entire dataset, as shown in Figs.  4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , and 9 . The empirical evidence, as shown in Table 6 , characterized by p -values consistently falling below the threshold of 0.05, clearly confirms the presence of significant shifts in moral content across the majority of cases examined. In some instances, the degree of drift is profoundly marked, with p -values approaching zero or, in certain cases, rounding to zero. This quantitative validation reinforces the notion of an ongoing evolution in moral values, further illustrating the complex interplay between content exposure and the evolution of moral perception within the digital era.

Moral vices distribution across all attributes of the China-Uyghur conflict

Moral virtues distribution across all attributes of the China-Uyghur conflict

Moral vices distribution across all attributes of the South China sea dispute

Moral virtues distribution across all attributes of the South China sea dispute

Moral vices distribution across all attributes of the Chengh Ho propaganda

Moral virtues distribution across all attributes of the Chengh Ho propaganda

5.3 Toxicity drift

In our refined analysis of toxicity shifts within digital narratives, we leveraged the toxicity measurement framework as outlined in Sect.  4.4 . This approach emphasizes not only the evaluation of average toxicity levels but also a rigorous examination of extreme toxicity instances, employing the mean + 2std metric. As detailed in Sect.  4.8.3 , this metric, grounded in the principles of Gaussian distributions, effectively highlights data points that significantly deviate from the norm, serving as a crucial threshold for identifying highly toxic content.

For our toxicity analysis, we primarily focused on average toxicity values, which constituted a single variable. Recognizing that the Chi-Square test is unsuitable for such cases, we instead applied Gaussian distribution principles to identify and scrutinize outliers, particularly those representing high toxicity levels, thus providing a clearer understanding of underlying trends.

This methodology facilitates a complex understanding of toxicity across different digital platforms, enabling us to distinguish between prevalent toxicity trends and the emergence of content that escalates from being merely unpleasant to unequivocally harmful. By applying the mean + 2std threshold, we can precisely identify and analyze instances of extreme toxicity, thereby illuminating the dynamics of toxicity within digital narratives at various levels of content recommendation.

In the context of our analysis on the narrative surrounding the China-Uyghur conflict, initial findings revealed an intriguing pattern: the mean toxicity levels were notably low from the starting point. More interestingly, a specific trend was observed at the initial depth of content recommendation, where mean toxicity demonstrated a marked reduction, hinting at the narrative that was becoming progressively less inflammatory over time. This trend of low mean toxicity levels not only persisted but also stabilized, maintaining a low profile across the entirety of our observation period.

Upon delving into the high toxicity levels, distinct fluctuations across different content aspects became apparent. For instance, the toxicity levels within narrative titles, as illustrated in Fig.  10 a, initially decreased, only to rise again, reflecting a fluctuating pattern of toxicity over time. Conversely, the narrative descriptions, shown in Fig.  10 b, experienced an initial uptick in toxicity levels, which subsequently decreased, indicating a shift towards moderation after an initial period of heightened toxicity. The most pronounced decline in high toxicity levels was observed in transcription content, as detailed in Fig.  10 c, suggesting a significant reduction in the toxicity of this content segment. On the other hand, user-generated comments, as seen in Fig.  10 d, experienced a slight increase in toxicity.

Despite these variable trends in instances of high toxicity, the narrative experienced a decrease in aggregate toxicity levels. This observation suggests a gradual improvement in the content recommendation algorithms of digital platforms, steering the narrative towards a more moderated and less extreme discourse on the China-Uyghur conflict. Such a trend is indicative of an evolving digital ecosystem that is becoming increasingly adept at managing and mitigating the spread of toxic content, contributing to a more controlled and constructive online discourse.

In our comprehensive analysis of the South China Sea Dispute narrative, we observed an initial trend where mean toxicity levels were notably low and stable, closely paralleling the findings from the China-Uyghur Conflict. These levels were so minimal that they nearly approached zero, a trend clearly depicted in Fig.  11 . This consistency underscores a baseline of low toxicity across different narratives within our dataset.

Remarkably, at the initial recommendation depth (depth 0), our analysis identified no instances of highly toxic content within titles, descriptions, and transcriptions. These content attributes uniformly failed to cross the high toxicity threshold, as delineated in Fig.  11 a–c.

However, the narrative complexity increased beyond depth 0, where we began to observe the emergence of high toxicity content. Specifically, Fig.  11 a revealed a progressive increase in toxicity levels with each subsequent depth, although this trend plateaued at depth 4, indicating a stabilization in the toxicity of narrative titles. Conversely, Fig.  11 b showcased an initial spike in toxicity at depth 1, followed by a significant reduction at depth 2, with only a slight recovery thereafter. A somewhat parallel trend was observed in Fig.  11 c, mirroring the behavior of descriptions but with a less pronounced decrease at depth 2, followed by a mild increase in toxicity levels.

The most notable finding was within the user comments, as captured in Fig.  11 d, where high toxicity levels peaked, nearing 0.9. This intensity was consistently maintained across different depths, suggesting an area of concentrated toxicity within the narrative. Despite this, the overall mean toxicity distribution remained largely unaffected across all attributes, illustrating a dynamic that mirrors the previously analyzed China-Uyghur Conflict narrative. This observation points to a nuanced understanding of narrative engagement, where, despite the presence of highly toxic comments, the aggregate toxicity level across the narrative’s content did not exhibit a significant shift, maintaining a low and stable mean toxicity level.

In the exploration of the Cheng Ho Propaganda narrative, our analysis found a pattern consistent with other narratives regarding initial mean toxicity levels: predominantly low, with occasional spikes in high toxicity instances, as illustrated in Fig.  12 . The titles showed an immediate increase in high toxicity levels in Fig.  12 a, followed by subsequent fluctuations. This variability suggests a dynamic narrative engagement from the outset. Meanwhile, descriptions depicted a different pattern, with a notable decrease in high toxicity at depth 1, before increasing again as shown in Fig.  12 b. This oscillation in toxicity levels indicates a nuanced content landscape that evolves with user interaction depth.

Contrastingly, transcriptions did not exhibit high toxicity at the surface level (depth 0), as shown in Fig.  12 c; however, an increase was observed as users engaged more deeply, eventually stabilizing. Comments, on the other hand, demonstrated a gradual increase in high toxicity levels with each deeper engagement level in Fig.  12 d, hinting at a compounding effect of user interactions on toxicity.

Our findings suggest that as users navigate through deeper layers of recommendations, the likelihood of encountering highly toxic content subtly increases. Nonetheless, it appears that content recommendation algorithms are designed with a cautious balance in mind, aiming to maintain overall low toxicity levels. This approach suggests a potential systemic bias towards creating a safer, more welcoming digital environment at the cost of possibly filtering out a broader spectrum of voices. Such a strategy underscores the inherent challenge platforms face in curating content: they must navigate the fine line between reducing exposure to potentially harmful content and preserving a space favorable to free expression and diverse viewpoints. This balancing act reflects the complexities of managing digital narratives, aiming to ensure user safety while fostering an inclusive and neutral platform.

Toxicity distribution across all attributes of the China-Uyghur conflict

Toxicity distribution across all attributes of the South China sea dispute

Toxicity distribution across all attributes of the Chengh Ho propaganda

5.4 Topic drift

To examine the evolution of topics within the narratives, we employed BERTopic, as detailed in Sect.  4.5 . Given the model’s extensive topic generation, we focused on the three most prevalent topics for each depth level, enabling us to track topic transitions effectively. This approach allowed us to identify a range from a minimum of three to a maximum of fifteen topics by the conclusion of depth 4, dependent on the degree of topic overlap and shift.

For the analysis of topic drifts, it’s important to note that at each depth level, both the count and labels of topics change; for instance, depth \(a\) might have \(x\) topics, while depth \(b\) might have \(y\) different topics. Given this variability, the Chi-Square test, which requires a fixed distribution for accurate calculations, was not applicable in our case.

In the case of the China-Uyghur conflict, Fig.  13 reveals a significant initial emphasis on the topic of “genocide" (topic_id 384), characterized by keywords such as “genocide, detainees, persecution, internment, holocaust". This is visually represented in blue, being a part of a large portion of the dialogue at depth 0.

Across various attributes, we observed a rapid decrease in the prevalence of the genocide topic in the initial depths, eventually vanishing in the latter stages. At the same time, new topics emerged, notably those related to soccer, as shown in Fig.  13 a, as well as themes involving actresses and singers, depicted in Fig.  13 b, folklore, highlighted in Fig.  13 c, and songs, detailed in Fig.  13 d by depth 4. This dramatic shift in thematic focus underscores a significant topic drift within the discourse surrounding the China-Uyghur Conflict.

For the South China Sea Dispute narrative, our analysis using BERTopic identified an initial focus on political elements, specifically the topic of “candidate" illustrated by keywords such as “candidacy, candidate, candidates, presidential, presidency" at depth 0. This focus was evident in titles, descriptions, and transcriptions as portrayed in Fig.  14 . Early discussions also highlighted environmental concerns, with “reefs" and “corals" mentioned as at risk from Chinese operations as illustrated in Fig.  14 a, alongside “harbour" and “naval" topics, indicating initial sea-related discussions. As the narrative progressed, these topics gave way to more militaristic themes, such as “warships" and “missiles" which maintained a connection to the sea and potential conflicts. Interestingly, the comments diverged, introducing unrelated topics like films, authors, and singers by depth 4 as shown in Fig.  14 d, illustrating a topic shift. However, except for comments, the emerging topics remained aligned with the narrative’s core themes, indicating a focused yet evolving discourse.

In the Cheng Ho narrative, the initial dominant topics were associated with keywords like “yang, yin, rituals, religions, shamanism" as illustrated in Fig.  15 . This suggests Zheng He’s voyages were not just exploratory but also aimed at fostering harmony and spiritual unity through engagement with various religious practices and shamanistic rituals. Throughout the narrative, the topics remained relevant to these original themes. By depth 4, discussions evolved to include cultural expressions such as festivals, celebrations, dance, and folklore. However, the comments section, as depicted in Fig.  15 d, showcased a mix of related and unrelated discussions. This narrative, akin to the South China Sea Dispute, experienced a thematic evolution where initial and later topics, despite their differences, were interconnected. The comments, however, displayed a broader spectrum of topics by the end, indicating a diversification of discussion themes.

Topic distribution across all attributes of the China-Uyghur conflict

Topic distribution across all attributes of the South China sea dispute

Topic distribution across all attributes of the Cheng Ho propaganda

5.5 Influencer nodes

As detailed in Sect.  4.6 , we employed Gephi software for network visualization and identification of influencer nodes. To isolate influential entities, we computed modularity values and eigenvector centrality. Modularity values helped us to dismiss insignificant communities due to their minimal size and relevance. Furthermore, nodes demonstrating higher eigenvector centrality were indicative of their influential capacity, as represented by their enlarged node sizes. For each network depth, beginning from depth 1, we pinpointed the top 5 influencer nodes. This initial depth was chosen deliberately to concentrate on nodes that apply a direct impact on the network’s foundational layer, thereby playing a pivotal role in the dissemination of information or behaviors. Unlike previous approaches that utilized BERTopic for topic identification, we choose manual inspection of video titles. Our decision to focus on titles, rather than other elements, was strategic. While we acknowledge the importance of various factors in content engagement, titles are often the decisive factor for viewers when navigating through recommendation networks. This approach allowed us to focus on influencer videos effectively, understanding their pivotal role in guiding viewer choices across the network depths.

In exploring the China-Uyghur conflict narrative through YouTube’s recommendation network, we uncover the subtle role of influencer nodes across varying depths. This is illustrated in both Table 7 and Fig.  16 . Initially, viewers are presented with a diverse array of videos, from a Hebrew alphabet tutorial to an analysis of Taiwan-China military drills, illustrating the broad and wide-ranging gateway into the network. This initial diversity sets the stage for a journey through thematic shifts and content divergence.

As the viewer explores further, the network skillfully shifts attention, presenting videos on topics like alternative medicine discussions and financial questions. Although these topics are not directly connected to the central theme of geopolitics, they showcase how the algorithm plays a role in expanding the range of the conversation. These topics, despite diverging from the initial narrative, hold high eigenvector centrality scores, indicating their significant influence within the network’s structure.

By the third depth, a thematic centralization occurs around specific sub-themes such as legal critiques and financial scrutiny, further demonstrating the algorithm’s capacity to narrow or expand the viewer’s focus. This stage reflects a complex balance between engaging with the core narrative and exploring peripheral topics.

At the final analyzed depth, the narrative journey expands dramatically, introducing a wide range of topics from U.S. political scandals to space telescope discoveries. This broadening into unrelated areas showcases the influencer nodes’ pivotal role in shaping content pathways, revealing the algorithm’s potential to simultaneously narrow and broaden viewer exposure to diverse content.

The South China Sea dispute narrative within YouTube’s recommendation network presented in Table 8 and Fig.  17 offers a concise example of how influencer nodes shape content pathways, starting from a surprising entry point: a blizzard warning in San Diego with the highest eigenvector score at the first depth. This initial weather-related video, seemingly unrelated to geopolitical themes, underscores the algorithm’s capacity to introduce diverse topics, potentially affecting the subsequent recommendation chain.

As the narrative progresses to the second depth, the focus shifts to global issues and environmental concerns, reflecting a broader exploration of themes such as new social orders and nuclear disarmament. The significant presence of videos on environmental protection and global governance illustrates the network’s influence in steering the audience towards a complex understanding of the interplay between geopolitical conflicts and broader global challenges.

By the third depth, the narrative focuses on regional crises, highlighted by detailed coverage of weather-related disasters across California. This focus on immediate, tangible events suggests an algorithmic response to viewer interest, demonstrating the dynamic nature of content recommendations, which can swiftly pivot from global discussions back to localized concerns.

The final depth returns to strategic and speculative themes, with a notable focus on U.S. naval preparation against China, technological advancements, and global demographic issues. The appearance of a strategic military video as the influencer at this depth signifies a full-circle return to geopolitical considerations, although within a much broader context that includes scientific discovery and future technological impacts.

For the Cheng Ho narrative, the YouTube recommendation network depicted in Table 9 and Fig.  18 demonstrates a focused exploration of Cheng Ho’s historical legacy, with less drift in content across the initial depths, highlighting the algorithm’s ability to maintain thematic consistency.

At the first depth, the narrative firmly centers around Cheng Ho’s contributions and legacy, featuring videos on his life, the Cheng Hoo Mosque, and his significance as a Muslim admiral in Semarang. The highest eigenvector score is assigned to a video directly related to Cheng Ho’s legacy, indicating a strong thematic entry point into the narrative. This depth is dedicated to immersing viewers in the historical and cultural impacts of Cheng Ho, emphasizing his historical significance and the spread of Islam in Southeast Asia.

Progressing to the second depth, the focus remains on Cheng Ho, with videos exploring his mosque, the Sam Poo Kong Temple, and his historical footprints in the archipelago. The narrative continues to delve deeper into Cheng Ho’s cultural and religious heritage, maintaining a coherent and focused exploration of his enduring legacy.

By the third depth, while there’s a slight broadening of themes, including a live streaming from KOMPASTV, the content largely stays on topic. The sustained interest in Cheng Ho is evident with the reappearance of videos on his expeditions and the introduction of a film about him, suggesting a diversification within the bounds of the Cheng Ho narrative rather than a significant drift.

It is only in the final depth that the narrative begins to shift towards contemporary political and social issues, featuring videos on political commentary, suspicious financial transactions, and controversies surrounding the KPK Chairman. This late-stage drift indicates a departure from the historical and cultural focus of earlier depths, suggesting the algorithm’s inclination to eventually introduce current socio-political discussions, possibly in response to broader viewer engagement trends or the inherent dynamics of the recommendation algorithm.

In conclusion, our findings reveal the sophisticated mechanisms at play within YouTube’s recommendation system, where influencer nodes through their strategic position and thematic influence play a critical role in either maintaining narrative focus or facilitating thematic drift. This insight into the algorithm’s operation not only illuminates the challenges in navigating digital content landscapes but also underscores the importance of understanding influencer nodes’ impact on public discourse and perception.

Network graphs of the China-Uyghur conflict

Network graphs of the South China sea dispute

Network graphs of the Cheng Ho propaganda

5.6 Engagement bias

In accordance with the methodology outlined in Sect.  4.7 , we examined engagement metrics such as views, likes, and comments across various levels of recommendation depth. Utilizing box plots enabled us to illustrate not only the average engagement but also the distribution’s range, median, variance, and other statistical indicators.

Our analysis, as detailed in the narratives highlighted in Figs.  19 , 20 , and 21 , revealed a consistent pattern of engagement metrics ranking in the order of views, likes, and comments. Notably, there was a significant increase in engagement at the initial recommendation depth, followed by minimal increases or stable engagement at subsequent depths. Furthermore, we observed an expansion in the outlier boundaries, increasing by orders of magnitude towards the final depths.

These observations support our hypothesis that the recommendation algorithm favors videos with higher engagement metrics, thus enhancing the visibility of content that is already popular. This trend indicates an algorithmic bias towards popular videos, potentially at the cost of less viewed but equally relevant content.

Further statistical analysis, using the method discussed in Sect.  4.8.2 , investigated the distribution of engagement across depths for potential inequality. The results, as presented in Table 10 , show values nearing 1, indicating a pronounced inequality in the distribution of videos across depths based on likes, views, and comment counts. Additionally, with each successive depth, the Atkinson index increased, nearly reaching 1 by depth 4. This suggests that with each recommendation cycle, the distribution of video engagements becomes increasingly unequal, highlighting a growing disparity in content visibility based on engagement metrics.

China-Uyghur conflict box plot representation for engagement statistics

South China Sea dispute box plot representation for engagement statistics

Cheng Ho propaganda box plot representation for engagement statistics

6 Conclusion and discussion

In this study, we embarked on a comprehensive examination of YouTube’s recommendation algorithm to understand its impact on the narrative and diversity of content. Through a methodical approach that included gathering extensive data, analyzing emotions and morals conveyed in videos, assessing content toxicity, exploring topics, conducting network analysis, and scrutinizing engagement metrics, we aimed to uncover the subtle ways in which algorithmic suggestions might shape the evolution of narratives and influence wider discourse on a range of topics. Our investigation sought to peel back the layers of YouTube’s algorithmic ecosystem to reveal how it potentially directs narratives in specific directions, thereby affecting the broader conversation spectrum.

Our exploration of YouTube’s recommendation algorithm revealed a complex and varied terrain of influence. Key findings include:

Emotion Drift: We observed a significant evolution in the emotional tone of narratives, shifting from initially negative to increasingly neutral and positive emotions. This pattern was particularly pronounced in the discussions surrounding the China-Uyghur Conflict and the South China Sea Dispute. The significant shift from negative to neutral and positive emotions, as supported by very low p -values, indicates the algorithm’s strong influence in modifying the narrative tone. Conversely, the Cheng Ho narrative displayed remarkable stability, showing minimal alterations, suggesting a resilience against the algorithm’s tendency to modify emotional undertones.

Moral Values: Our examination of moral values within the narratives uncovered a complex interplay of ethical considerations. Specifically, we noted a trend towards the promotion of uplifting moral values in the narrative related to the China-Uyghur Conflict, implying an intentional curation by the algorithm. This shift towards more positive moral tones highlights the algorithm’s potential role in presenting sensitive topics more positively.

Content Toxicity: Our analysis revealed YouTube’s proficiency in refining its recommendations to sustain minimal toxicity levels. This effective moderation strategy ensures a healthier content ecosystem. However, this selective filtering may also introduce biases, prioritizing certain narratives or viewpoints and subtly influencing the diversity of discourse.

Topic Analysis: Significant thematic evolution was observed within the China-Uyghur Conflict narrative, aligning with our observations regarding emotional and moral shifts. This suggests a broader algorithmic effort to enrich and diversify the narrative landscape. In contrast, the Cheng Ho narrative exhibited remarkable thematic consistency, indicating the algorithm’s selective curation strategy to maintain the integrity of specific historical or cultural narratives.

Network Analysis: Our network analysis illuminated the pivotal role of specific videos that act as influential nodes within the recommendation ecosystem. These key influencer nodes, identifiable by high levels of engagement or central themes, significantly shape the trajectory of narrative flow, enhancing, altering, or inhibiting the dissemination of narratives across YouTube.

Engagement Metrics: The algorithm’s bias towards promoting content with higher user interaction was evident, highlighting its role in shaping the visibility and distribution of content based on viewer engagement levels. This preference influences the broader narrative discourse on the platform.

Collectively, our findings paint a detailed portrait of YouTube’s recommendation algorithm as a powerful influencer in the crafting and governance of narratives. By intricately weaving together elements of emotional resonance, moral context, content toxicity management, thematic direction, network dynamics, and engagement focus, the algorithm positions itself as a central figure in the construction of the digital content ecosystem. It subtly steers user interactions and shapes public conversation, underscoring its role as a critical determinant of the online narrative fabric. This complex coordination highlights the algorithm’s capacity to subtly navigate user experience and influence the broader discourse.

From our analysis we can conclude these generalized takeaways:

The recommendation algorithm significantly shifts the emotional tone of content, often from negative to more neutral and positive tones, particularly in sensitive geopolitical topics.

There is a notable trend towards the promotion of positive moral values in certain narratives, suggesting an algorithmic bias towards more uplifting content.

The platform’s moderation strategies effectively minimize content toxicity, though this selective filtering could introduce biases.

Thematic evolution within narratives indicates an effort by the algorithm to diversify content, though certain narratives are maintained with remarkable consistency.

Influential nodes within the recommendation network play a pivotal role in shaping narrative flow and user engagement.

Engagement metrics reveal a preference for content with higher user interaction, impacting content visibility and distribution.

The significance of our research reaches beyond mere academic interest, providing vital perspectives on the content moderation strategies and ethical frameworks within digital platforms. This work enriches the ongoing dialogue concerning the need for algorithmic openness, equity, and the broader societal consequences stemming from digital media practices. By illuminating the intricate ways in which recommendation algorithms affect content discoverability and audience interaction, our study advocates for a more profound exploration of the moral aspects surrounding algorithmic control.

In wrapping up, our investigation highlights the profound influence of recommendation algorithms in crafting online narratives and shaping user journeys. It encourages continued academic exploration into the ethical and social implications of algorithmic choices, calling for a future in which digital platforms not only seek to engage but also to uphold values of diversity, justice, and openness.

7 Ethical considerations and positionality

We recognize that our perspectives and backgrounds influence our approach and interpretation of the data. As researchers based in the United States, our views on geopolitical issues may be shaped by our sociopolitical context. While striving for objectivity, we acknowledge that complete neutrality is unattainable. Awareness of these potential biases helps us critically evaluate our findings and present a balanced analysis.

Ethical considerations were paramount throughout our study. We ensured that all data collected from YouTube were publicly accessible and did not involve any personally identifiable information, thus complying with ethical standards for data privacy. Although our study did not involve direct interaction with human subjects, we adhered to ethical guidelines for using publicly available data, ensuring transparency and respect for user-generated content.

We considered the potential impact of our findings on public discourse and the digital ecosystem. By highlighting biases in YouTube’s recommendation algorithms, our goal is to contribute to more equitable and transparent digital platforms, promoting constructive dialogue and positive change while being mindful of the ethical implications of our work.

Data availibility

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Adeliyi O, Solaiman I, Shajari S, et al (2024) Detecting and characterizing inorganic user engagement on Youtube. In: Workshop Proceedings of the 18th international AAAI conference on web and social media: CySoc 2024: 5th international workshop on cyber social threats. AAAI, Palo Alto, California, https://doi.org/10.36190/2024.01

Aïmeur E, Amri S, Brassard G (2023) Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review. Soc Netw Anal Min 13(1):30

Article   Google Scholar  

Al-Asad H, Zarkachi I (2023) The role of international amnesty in China’s discrimination conflict against Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang 2018–2022. Mediasi: J Int Relat 6(2):23–31

Google Scholar  

Alp E, Gergin B, Eraslan YA et al (2022) Covid-19 and vaccine tweet analysis. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08242-9_9

Book   Google Scholar  

Atkinson AB et al (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory 2(3):244–263

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Banjo DS, Trimmingham C, Yousefi N, et al (2022) Multimodal characterization of emotion within multimedia space. In: Proceedings of the international conference on computers and computation (COMPUTE 2022)

Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M (2009) Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, pp 361–362

Bellogín A, Castells P, Cantador I (2017) Statistical biases in information retrieval metrics for recommender systems. Inf Retr J 20:606–634

Bhattacharya S, Spann B, Agarwal N (2024a) A computational approach to analyze identity formation: A case study of brazil insurrection. In: AMCIS 2024 Proceedings, https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2024/social_comp/social_comput/19

Bhattacharya S, Spann B, Agarwal N (2024b) Solidarity to storming: Assessing the socio-technical factors behind modern social movements. In: ECIS 2024 Proceedings, https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2024/track24_socialmedia/track24_socialmedia/17

Brown T, Mann B, Ryder N et al (2020) Language models are few-shot learners. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 33:1877–1901

Burke R, Felfernig A, Göker MH (2011) Recommender systems: an overview. Ai Magazine 32(3):13–18

Cakmak MC, Agarwal N (2024) High-speed transcript collection on multimedia platforms: Advancing social media research through parallel processing. In: 2024 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW), p 857–860, https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPSW63119.2024.00153

Cakmak MC, Okeke O, Onyepunuka U, et al (2024a) Analyzing bias in recommender systems: A comprehensive evaluation of youtube’s recommendation algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, ASONAM ’23, p 753–760, https://doi.org/10.1145/3625007.3627300

Cakmak MC, Okeke O, Onyepunuka U, et al (2024b) Investigating bias in Youtube recommendations: Emotion, morality, and network dynamics in China-Uyghur content. In: Cherifi H, Rocha LM, Cherifi C, et al (eds) Complex Networks & Their Applications XII. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, pp 351–362, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53468-3_30

Cakmak MC, Okeke O, Spann B, et al (2023) Adopting parallel processing for rapid generation of transcripts in multimedia-rich online information environment. In: 2023 IEEE international parallel and distributed processing symposium workshops (IPDPSW), pp 832–837, https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPSW59300.2023.00139

Cakmak MC, Shaik M, Agarwal N (2024c) Emotion assessment of youtube videos using color theory. In: Proceedings of the 2024 9th International Conference on Multimedia and Image Processing. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, ICMIP ’24, p 6–14, https://doi.org/10.1145/3665026.3665028

Cakmak MC, Agarwal N, Dagtas S, et al (2024a) Unveiling bias in youtube shorts: Analyzing thumbnail recommendations and topic dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling & Prediction and Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation (SBP-BRiMS), accepted for presentation

Cakmak MC, Agarwal N (2024b) Unpacking algorithmic bias in youtube shorts by analyzing thumbnails. In: The 58th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), accepted for presentation

Carpenter J, Brady W, Crockett M et al (2020) Political polarization and moral outrage on social media. Conn L Rev 52:1107

Chen J, Dong H, Wang X et al (2023) Bias and debias in recommender system: a survey and future directions. ACM Trans Inf Syst 41(3):1–39

Chen J, Dong H, Wang X, et al (2020) Bias and debias in recommender system: a survey and future directions. corr abs/2010.03240 (2020). arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03240

Chubb A (2020) PRC assertiveness in the south China sea: measuring continuity and change, 1970–2015. Int Secur 45(3):79–121

Chung W, Zeng D (2020) Dissecting emotion and user influence in social media communities: an interaction modeling approach. Inf Manag 57(1):103108

Davis EVW (2008) Uyghur Muslim ethnic separatism in Xinjiang, China. Asian Affairs: Am Rev 35(1):15–30

del Fresno García M, Daly AJ, Segado Sanchez-Cabezudo S (2024) Identifying the new influences in the internet era: social media and social network analysis. Evista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas 153:23–42. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.153.23

Depoix J (2023) Youtube transcript API. https://github.com/jdepoix/youtube-transcript-api

Devlin J, Chang M, Lee K, et al (2019) Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding in: Proceedings of the 2019 conference of the north American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: Human language technologies, volume 1 (long and short papers). Minneapolis, MN: Association for Computational Linguistics pp 4171–86

DiCicco K, Noor NB, Yousefi N, et al (2020) Toxicity and networks of Covid-19 discourse communities: a tale of two social media platforms. Proceedings https://ceur-ws.org/issn-1613-0073

Dotson J (2011) The Confucian revival in the propaganda narratives of the Chinese government. US-China Economic and Security Review Commission

Dwyer AM (2005) The Xinjiang conflict: Uyghur identity, language policy, and political discourse. East-West Center Washington, Washington, DC

Estrada MS, Juarez Y, Piña-García CA (2022) Toxic social media: affective polarization after feminist protests. Soc Media Soc. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221098343

Finlay R (2008) The voyages of Zheng He: ideology, state power, and maritime trade in Ming China. J Hist Soc 8(3):327–347

Fravel MT (2011) China’s strategy in the south china sea. Contemporary Southeast Asia pp 292–319

Grootendorst M (2022) Bertopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based tf-idf procedure. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05794

Grootendorst M (2023) Bertopic wikipedia. https://huggingface.co/MaartenGr/BERTopic_Wikipedia/

Gurung MI, Bhuiyan MMI, Al-Taweel A, et al (2024) Decoding Youtube’s recommendation system: a comparative study of metadata and GPT-4 extracted narratives. In: Companion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, WWW ’24, p 1468–1472, https://doi.org/10.1145/3589335.3651913

Hanu L (2020) Detoxify. https://github.com/unitaryai/detoxify

Haroon M, Chhabra A, Liu X, et al (2022) Youtube, the great radicalizer? auditing and mitigating ideological biases in youtube recommendations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.10666

Harrigan P, Daly TM, Coussement K et al (2021) Identifying influencers on social media. Int J Inf Manage 56:102246

Hartmann J (2022) Emotion english distilroberta-base. https://huggingface.co/j-hartmann/emotion-english-distilroberta-base/

Hasmath R (2019) What explains the rise of majority-minority tensions and conflict in Xinjiang? Central Asian Surv 38(1):46–60

Herlocker JL, Konstan JA, Terveen LG et al (2004) Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans Inf Syst 22(1):5–53

Hopp FR, Fisher JT, Cornell D et al (2021) The extended moral foundations dictionary (EMFD): development and applications of a crowd-sourced approach to extracting moral intuitions from text. Behav Res Methods 53:232–246

Israeli R (2010) China’s Uyghur problem. Isr J Foreign Affairs 4(1):89–101

Khanam KZ, Srivastava G, Mago V (2023) The homophily principle in social network analysis: a survey. Multimed Tools Appl 82(6):8811–8854

Kirdemir B, Agarwal N (2022) Exploring bias and information bubbles in Youtube’s video recommendation networks. In: Benito RM, Cherifi C, Cherifi H et al (eds) Complex Networks & Their Applications X. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 166–177

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Kirdemir B, Kready J, Mead E, et al (2021a) Examining video recommendation bias on Youtube. In: International workshop on algorithmic bias in search and recommendation, Springer, pp 106–116

Kirdemir B, Kready J, Mead E, et al (2021b) Assessing bias in youtube’s video recommendation algorithm in a cross-lingual and cross-topical context. In: Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling: 14th International Conference, SBP-BRiMS 2021, Virtual Event, July 6–9, 2021, Proceedings 14, Springer, pp 71–80

Knijnenburg BP, Willemsen MC (2015) Evaluating recommender systems with user experiments. In: Recommender systems handbook. Springer, p 309–352

Kušen E, Cascavilla G, Figl K, et al (2017) Identifying emotions in social media: comparison of word-emotion lexicons. In: 2017 5th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud Workshops (FiCloudW), IEEE, pp 132–137

Li H, Qian Y, Jiang Y et al (2023) A novel label-based multimodal topic model for social media analysis. Decis Support Syst 164:113863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2022.113863

Liu Y, Ott M, Goyal N, et al (2019) Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692

Lü L, Medo M, Yeung CH et al (2012) Recommender systems. Phys Rep 519(1):1–49

Macaraig CE, Fenton AJ (2021) Analyzing the causes and effects of the south china sea dispute. J Territorial Marit Stud 8(2):42–58

Maslowska E, Malthouse EC, Hollebeek LD (2022) The role of recommender systems in fostering consumers’ long-term platform engagement. J Serv Manag 33(4/5):721–732

Mbila-Uma S, Umoga I, Alassad M et al (2023) Conducting morality and emotion analysis on blog discourse. In: Takada H, Marutschke DM, Alvarez C et al (eds) Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, pp 185–192

Nechushtai E, Zamith R, Lewis SC (2023) More of the same? Homogenization in news recommendations when users search on Google, Youtube, Facebook, and twitter. Mass Communication and Society pp 1–27

Neumann D, Rhodes N (2024) Morality in social media: a scoping review. New Media Soc 26(2):1096–1126

Noor NB, Yousefi N, Spann B, et al (2023) Comparing toxicity across social media platforms for covid-19 discourse. In: The Proceedings of the Ninth international conference on human and social analytics (HUSO 2023). Copyright (c) IARIA, 2023, Barcelona, Spain, pp 21–26, https://www.thinkmind.org/index.php?view=article&articleid=huso_2023_1_50_80036

Okeke O, Cakmak MC, Spann B, et al (2023) Examining Content and Emotion Bias in YouTube’s Recommendation Algorithm. In: The Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Human and Social Analytics (HUSO 2023). Copyright (c) IARIA, 2023, Barcelona, Spain, pp 15–20, https://www.thinkmind.org/index.php?view=article&articleid=huso_2023_1_40_80032

Onyepunuka U, Alassad M, Nwana L et al (2023) Multilingual analysis of youtube’s recommendation system: Examining topic and emotion drift in the ‘cheng ho’narrative. In: Sixth international workshop on narrative extraction from texts (Text2Story 2023) co-located with the 45th European conference on information retrieval (ECIR 2023), Dublin, Ireland

Panger GT (2017) Emotion in social media. University of California, Berkeley

Pascual-Ferrá P, Alperstein N, Barnett DJ et al (2021) Toxicity and verbal aggression on social media: Polarized discourse on wearing face masks during the Covid-19 pandemic. Big Data Soc. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211023533

Pearson K (1900) X. on the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 50(302):157–175

Ping Y, Li Y, Zhu J (2024) Beyond accuracy measures: the effect of diversity, novelty and serendipity in recommender systems on user engagement. Electronic Commerce Research pp 1–28

Polatidis N, Georgiadis CK (2013) Recommender systems: the importance of personalization in e-business environments. Int J E-Entrepreneurship Innov 4(4):32–46

Poudel D, Cakmak MC, Agarwal N (2024) Beyond the click: How youtube thumbnails shape user interaction and algorithmic recommendations. In: The 16th International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), accepted for presentation

Radford A, Kim JW, Xu T, et al (2023) Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision. In: International conference on machine learning, PMLR, pp 28492–28518

Radford A, Narasimhan K (2018) Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:49313245

Rohani VA, Shayaa S, Babanejaddehaki G (2016) Topic modeling for social media content: a practical approach. In: 2016 3rd international conference on computer and information sciences (ICCOINS), IEEE, pp 397–402

Shaik M, Cakmak MC, Spann B, et al (2024) Characterizing multimedia adoption and its role on mobilization in social movements. In: Bui TX (ed) 57th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2024, Hilton Hawaiian Village Waikiki Beach Resort, Hawaii, USA, January 3-6, 2024. ScholarSpace, pp 146–155, https://hdl.handle.net/10125/106393

Shajari S, Alassad M, Agarwal N (2024a) Characterizing suspicious commenter behaviors. In: Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, ASONAM ’23, p 631–635, https://doi.org/10.1145/3625007.3627309 , https://doi.org/10.1145/3625007.3627309

Shajari S, Amure R, Agarwal N (2024b) Analyzing anomalous engagement and commenter behavior on youtube. In: AMCIS 2024 Proceedings, https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2024/social_comp/social_comput/6

Shani G, Gunawardana A (2011) Evaluating recommendation systems. Recommender systems handbook pp 257–297

Srba I, Moro R, Tomlein M et al (2023) Auditing Youtube’s recommendation algorithm for misinformation filter bubbles. ACM Trans Recomm Syst 1(1):1–33

Stinson C (2022) Algorithms are not neutral: bias in collaborative filtering. AI Ethics 2(4):763–770

Van Bavel JJ, Robertson CE, Del Rosario K et al (2024) Social media and morality. Annu Rev Psychol 75:311–340

Vinagre J, Jorge AM, Rocha C et al (2019) Statistically robust evaluation of stream-based recommender systems. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 33(7):2971–2982

Wade G (2005) The Zheng He voyages: a reassessment. J Malaysian Branch Royal Asiatic Soc. pp 37–58

Yousefi N, Noor NB, Spann B et al (2024) Examining toxicity’s impact on reddit conversations. In: Cherifi H, Rocha LM, Cherifi C et al (eds) Complex Networks & Their Applications XII. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, pp 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53503-1_33

Yousefi N, Cakmak MC, Agarwal N (2024a) Examining multimodel emotion assess- ment and resonance with audience on youtube. In: Proceedings of the 2024 9th International Conference on Multimedia and Image Processing. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, ICMIP ’24, p 85–93, https://doi.org/10.1145/3665026.3665039

Yousefi N, Noor NB, Spann B, et al (2023) Towards developing a measure to assess contagiousness of toxic tweets. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on combating health misinformation for social wellbeing (TrueHealth 2023) co-located with the 17th International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2023)

Yu Q, Weng W, Zhang K, et al (2014) Hot topic analysis and content mining in social media. In: 2014 IEEE 33rd International performance computing and communications conference (IPCCC), IEEE, p 1–8

Zhan R, Pei C, Su Q, et al (2022) Deconfounding duration bias in watch-time prediction for video recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, p 4472–4481

Zhao Q, Harper FM, Adomavicius G, et al (2018) Explicit or implicit feedback? engagement or satisfaction? a field experiment on machine-learning-based recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM symposium on applied computing, pp 1331–1340

Zhong N, Schweidel DA (2020) Capturing changes in social media content: a multiple latent changepoint topic model. Mark Sci 39(4):827–846

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation (OIA-1946391, OIA-1920920, IIS-1636933, ACI-1429160, and IIS-1110868), U.S. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (FA9550-22-1-0332), U.S. Army Research Office (W911NF-20-1-0262, W911NF-16-1-0189, W911NF-23-1-0011, W911NF-24-1-0078), U.S. Office of Naval Research (N00014-10-1-0091, N00014-14-1-0489, N00014-15-P-1187, N00014-16-1-2016, N00014-16-1-2412, N00014-17-1-2675, N00014-17-1-2605, N68335-19-C-0359, N00014-19-1-2336, N68335-20-C-0540, N00014-21-1-2121, N00014-21-1-2765, N00014-22-1-2318), U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory, U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (W31P4Q-17-C-0059), Arkansas Research Alliance, the Jerry L. Maulden/Entergy Endowment at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, and the Australian Department of Defense Strategic Policy Grants Program (SPGP) (award number: 2020-106-094). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations. The researchers gratefully acknowledge the support.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

COSMOS Research Center, University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR, USA

Mert Can Cakmak, Nitin Agarwal & Remi Oni

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

M.C.C. was responsible for writing the main text of the manuscript, preparing all figures, and implementing the research methods described therein. N.A. critically reviewed the manuscript at each stage and provided substantial guidance on the research direction and methodology. R.O. conducted the analysis of the statistical measurements as outlined in Sect.  4.8 .

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mert Can Cakmak .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare no Conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cakmak, M.C., Agarwal, N. & Oni, R. The bias beneath: analyzing drift in YouTube’s algorithmic recommendations. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 14 , 171 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-024-01343-5

Download citation

Received : 25 April 2024

Revised : 24 June 2024

Accepted : 18 August 2024

Published : 24 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-024-01343-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Algorithmic bias
• Recommendation systems

Advertisement

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research