essay on nuclear weapons good or bad

Essay on Nuclear Weapons Good Or Bad

Students are often asked to write an essay on Nuclear Weapons Good Or Bad in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Nuclear Weapons Good Or Bad

What are nuclear weapons.

Nuclear weapons are powerful bombs. They can destroy whole cities and kill many people at once. When they explode, they also make dangerous radiation that can harm people and nature for many years.

Why Some Think Nuclear Weapons Are Good

Some people say nuclear weapons keep peace. Countries with them might prevent wars because they are afraid of the big damage these weapons can cause.

The Bad Side of Nuclear Weapons

Others think nuclear weapons are bad. They can cause too much destruction and suffering. Accidents or wrong decisions could lead to terrible explosions.

It’s hard to say if nuclear weapons are good or bad. They can stop wars but also cause huge problems. It’s important to think carefully about how we use them.

250 Words Essay on Nuclear Weapons Good Or Bad

Nuclear weapons are very powerful bombs. They can destroy whole cities and kill many people at once. They use energy from splitting atoms, tiny particles that make up everything. When atoms split, they release a lot of power.

Why Some People Think Nuclear Weapons Are Good

Some people say nuclear weapons are good because they keep countries from fighting. They think if a country has these bombs, others will be afraid to attack it. This is called deterrence. It’s like two people who don’t fight because they both are strong.

Why Nuclear Weapons Are Bad

Nuclear weapons can cause a lot of harm. If they are used, many people can die, and the land can become unsafe for a long time. They can also make the air, water, and soil very dangerous. This is bad for people, animals, and plants.

The Risk of Accidents

There is also the risk that nuclear weapons can go off by accident. This can happen if there is a mistake or a problem with the bomb. If an accident happens, it can be as bad as if the bomb was used on purpose.

Nuclear weapons are very strong and can stop wars, but they are also very dangerous. They can kill many people and hurt the Earth. It is important to think carefully about whether they are good or bad. Most people agree that a world without nuclear weapons would be safer for everyone.

500 Words Essay on Nuclear Weapons Good Or Bad

Introduction to nuclear weapons.

Nuclear weapons are very powerful bombs. They can destroy whole cities and kill many people at once. Some countries have these weapons. People argue if having them is good or bad. This essay talks about why some think they are good and why others think they are bad.

Why Some People Say Nuclear Weapons Are Good

Some say nuclear weapons are good because they keep peace. This idea is called “deterrence.” It means that if a country has nuclear weapons, other countries will not want to fight with it. This is because they are afraid of the big damage that nuclear weapons can cause. So, in a way, nuclear weapons can stop wars before they start.

Another reason is protection. Countries with nuclear weapons feel strong and safe. They believe that no other country will attack them because they can fight back with their powerful bombs.

Why Others Believe Nuclear Weapons Are Bad

On the other side, many people think nuclear weapons are very bad. They are dangerous because they can kill lots of people and ruin the environment. If a nuclear bomb goes off, it can hurt the air, water, and land for many years. This can make people sick and it is bad for animals and plants too.

Another problem is accidents. Sometimes, mistakes happen. If a mistake happens with a nuclear weapon, it could be a huge disaster. People worry that a small mistake could lead to a big explosion.

Also, nuclear weapons cost a lot of money. Countries spend billions to make and keep these weapons. Some people say this money should be used for better things like schools, hospitals, and helping poor people.

The Risk of More Countries Getting Nuclear Weapons

There is also a worry about more countries getting nuclear weapons. If more countries have them, there might be a higher chance of a nuclear war. This is scary because a nuclear war could hurt the whole world.

Efforts to Control Nuclear Weapons

Because of these dangers, there are efforts to control nuclear weapons. Some agreements between countries try to stop more countries from getting these weapons. There are also talks about reducing the number of nuclear weapons in the world.

In conclusion, nuclear weapons are a big topic of debate. They can be seen as good because they might keep peace and protect countries. But they are also seen as bad because they are very dangerous, can cause accidents, harm the environment, and cost a lot of money. Many people and countries are trying to find ways to deal with these powerful weapons safely. It is important to think carefully about nuclear weapons because they affect everyone on our planet.

That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.

If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:

• Essay on Human Nature
• Essay on Human Rights Protection
• Essay on Nuclear Power Boon Or Bane

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Happy studying!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

17 Advantages and Disadvantages of Nuclear Weapons

Nuclear weapons are explosive devices that create a destructive force due to the fission or fusion reactions it creates upon detonation. There are several names for this technology, including atom bombs, nukes, a-bombs, and nuclear warheads, but it all works to describe the same technology.

There have only been two times when nuclear weapons were deployed in war. Both of the incidents were initiated by the United States against Japan near the end of World War II. On August 6, 1945, the Army Air Forces detonated a fission bomb that was nicknamed Little Boy over the city of Hiroshima. Three days later, the implosion-type Fat Man was detonated over the city of Nagasaki. These two incidents caused injuries that resulted in the deaths of over 200,000 civilians and military personnel, along with several Americans and Allied troops in the area.

Since these two wartime incidents, there have been over 2,000 detonations of nuclear weapons for demonstration and testing purposes. Despite this high number, only a few countries possess these weapons or are suspected of seeking them. South Africa is the only country on the planet to have independently developed this technology and then renounced and dismantled what they created.

List of the Advantages of Nuclear Weapons

1. It reinforces the idea of nationalism from a border-based perspective. The reality of human existence is that people tend to go toward the areas of the planet where the most resources are available. This pattern of behavior dates all of the way back to the Roman Empire and Ancient Egypt. When governments take action to defend their borders, then they are creating a method of organization that allows for the effective distribution of needed items to their citizens and the world beyond.

Even though a borderless world seems like it could be an excellent idea, borders create an environment where cooperation between cultures becomes a requirement for survival. It forces us to develop an approach that seeks diplomacy first instead of launching missiles whenever someone does something that isn’t liked.

2. Nuclear weapons do serve as a deterrent to a global conflict. One of the primary reasons why there hasn’t been another global war since the 1940s is because of the presence of nuclear weapons. Only a handful of countries possess or share this technology with others, and most nations that do have access to this technology have fewer than 100 weapons. The destructive capabilities in the hands of the military were put on full display over Japan at the end of World War II, and no one wants to go through something like that again. The threat of being over-powered or having mutually-assured destruction is enough to prevent the world’s superpowers from escalating a conflict to the point that a military confrontation becomes necessary.

3. This technology creates a bargaining chip for countries that need it. Israel is believed to be in possession of nuclear weapons, but their government does not officially report this status. North Korea has independently developed this technology since then end of the Korean War, giving it a seat at the negotiation table to the point that President Donald Trump has visited with the leadership of the country on multiple occasions. The threat of devastation from this tech is so great that it forces other nations to listen to what the other has to say. Since there is a desire to avoid the outcomes of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it is not unusual for concessions to be made to those with the greatest power.

4. Nuclear weapons reduce the threat to a country’s military forces. Today’s nuclear weapons have the ability to fly over 1,000 miles to strike a target with precision. Even the nations with “subpar” technology in this area, such as North Korea, can fly their missiles are enough to impact the sovereignty of another nation. The Skyfall project in Russia presents the idea of equipping a small nuclear reactor to a missile so that it can operate almost indefinitely. Because the deployment of these weapons can occur remotely, there is less of a threat of casualties or loss if an order comes through to launch. It’s not like the 1940s when bombers carried the weapons with an entire flight crew.

5. Governments can position nuclear weapons to a variety of launch locations. Portable launch vehicles make it possible to locate nuclear weapons at almost any point on land. Government installations allow for underground storage and launch capabilities at numerous development sites across their country. Naval tech, including submarines, can support this firepower as well.

Nuclear weapons provide just as much flexibility as their conventional counterparts with this support technology. One can even drop them from a bomber as they did in the 1940s if that is preferred or issue a remote command. This versatility is a definite advantage when considering the overall scope of what this tech can do.

6. Nuclear weapons helped us to create new technologies in other sectors. Even though the destructive power of nuclear weapons is well known, the concepts of fission and fusion have helped us to develop a variety of technologies over the year in several different industries. Approximately 10% of the electricity the world uses every year comes from nuclear reactors. Medical practices that use nuclear techniques can help to diagnose and treat diseases when conventional options may not be available or useful. We use nuclear engines on naval craft, and we are exploring this option for space travel as well.

Many people around the world are using the power of nuclear technology to read this content right now. The idea of using it as a weapon may be incomprehensible, but it at least allows us to do good things for the human race too.

7. The reliability of nuclear weapons is one of its greatest attributes. Nuclear fission can operate for up to three years without disruption, which is why it is such a useful option for power generation. When we use the refinement processes with nuclear weapons, this advantage presents itself as well. You can install a missile on a delivery platform, and then have it ready to launch for years on standby mode with a minimum amount of maintenance. It is a technology that increases the readiness factor of a government and its protective capacity while still reducing the threat of war because of the principles of mutually assured destruction.

List of the Disadvantages of Nuclear Weapons

1. There will always be moral and ethical debates about the use of nuclear weapons. We can point to the two cities in Japan that experienced a direct detonation to speak to this advantage. The mass loss of civilian life from nuclear weapons would go far beyond what any mass shooter in the United States would create.

We must also look at the more than 2,000 test explosions that researchers generated in their quest to develop this technology. The primary human-made contribution to the exposure of the world’s population to radiation has come from testing these weapons in the atmosphere from 145-1980. Each test resulted in the unrestrained release into the environment of radioactive materials that dispersed and deposited everywhere on the planet.

2. Nuclear weapon detonations are directly connected to cancer development. Ionizing radiation is a scientifically-proven carcinogen in humans. It is directly linked to most forms of leukemia, thyroid cancer, and cancers in the breast and lungs. The time that can elapse between the exposure to the radiation and the development of a malignancy can be anywhere between 10-40 years. When we look at the degrees of exposure that scientists thought were tolerable in the 1950s, it is clear to see that they were unsafe – and that position is now backed by international recognition of what nuclear weapons can cause.

3. There are direct costs attributed to a government’s nuclear weapons program. The United States spends about $35 billion every year to build, upgrade, operate, and maintain the nuclear weapons stockpile it owns. Figures from Russia where there are a similar number of weapons are about equal. Even third-party estimates of the expense to maintain an entire portfolio of these explosive devices place the expense at $25 billion or higher. That means we could take the money that we spend on these destructive devices, switch it to food development, and cure global hunger overnight with that amount of money.

The figures in this disadvantage don’t include the potential medical costs of over 2.7 million people who may develop cancer over the years because of the atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons.

4. Nuclear weapons devastate the environment. The United States tested a massive hydrogen bomb on Bikini Atoll in 1954. It’s more than 65 years later, but this location in the Marshall Islands chain is still not livable. Some of the exiled families say that they are too fearful ever to go back. The U.S. government declared that it was safe to resettle some residents in the 1970s, but they were removed in 1978 after officials discovered that the foods grown on the island contained high levels of radiation. The Nuclear Claims Tribunal has awarded more than $2 billion in land damage and personal injury claims over the years, but it has stopped paying since its compensation fund is entirely exhausted.

There was a total of 67 tests conducted on the Marshall Islands, with the last one occurring in 1958. A 2012 report from the United Nations found that the conditions there are still not livable. This devastation means that the land around a test site or detonation event remains unusable unless there is a targeted and expensive cleanup effort that takes place.

5. The use of nuclear weapons creates a significant threat of terrorism. The Nuclear Threat Initiative works to create a better world from Washington, D.C. by working to prevent terrorism with these harmful weapons. The number of countries that are storing the dangerous materials that could lead to atomic weaponization has decreased from 52 in 1992 to a little over 30 today. Terrorist organizations now have easier access to the materials and knowledge needed to build these weapons as well. Some have even declared their intent to seek the necessary materials to create mass destruction.

If we have nuclear weapons, then we will always have the threat of loss that terrorism could provide. In February 2003 in Tennessee, the final testing of a new saltless uranium processing method created a small explosion and fire. Several incidents that date to the 1940s involve missiles exploding, bombs being accidentally dropped, and similar incidents where it would be possible for a terrorist organization to get their hands on this material if they were to act quickly enough.

6. The development of nuclear weapons creates hazardous waste. There are more than 14,000 metric tons of nuclear waste managed in the United States because of the presence of nuclear weapons. Washington State, at the Hanford Site, once at five plutonium processors and nine nuclear reactors operating simultaneously to produce over 60,000 weapons for the American arsenal. The hazardous waste from these activities is still in storage there in almost 200 tanks, where the threat of a leak can still create health problems for workers more than 50 years later.

The United States does not have a nuclear waste repository where the materials can be safely stored. That means that local storage takes place, requiring extensive management techniques that can create its own set of problems in the future.

7. Degraded delivery systems can cause a nuclear weapon to fail. The storage time for a nuclear weapon may not cause it to degrade as much as conventional devices, but the delivery systems for them to not contain the same advantages. It is possible for the detonation to fail in a variety of ways because the supportive tech does not have the same lifespan benefits. The American stock of intercontinental ballistic missiles is expected to remain in service until at least the year 2032, while naval-based installations on submarines have an additional decade of protective support. Once those deadlines are reached, then the deterrent power of the tech will not have the same impact that it does today.

8. We create nuclear weapons from non-renewable resources. We typically create nuclear weapons from uranium or plutonium, which are both radioactive elements that we harvest from the planet. A third option, called thorium, can come from the waste of nuclear reactors. If we were to transition all of the energy potentials from these destructive devices to provide an emissions-free result, there would still be the risk of a meltdown or reactor explosion that could adversely impact the planet in a variety of ways.

Since the half-life of the radiation produced by some of these technologies can be as much as 5,000 years, the problems that we create today are going to be an issue for future generations long after anyone who reads this content is forgotten.

9. It requires a specific skill set to develop or maintain nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons have the capability of remote use, but it requires a skilled workforce to pull the trigger on this advantage. Engineers and scientists are necessary to ensure the viability of this technology throughout its lifetime. Military personnel can be trained to launch, operate, or direct the explosives, but they are not typically responsible for the upkeep work that they require. If the people who know how to manage this tech were to disappear for any reason, in any country, then there would be a significant increase in risk for that region and the rest of the world.

10. We are still dealing with the after-effects of nuclear weapons testing. The United States is responsible for over 50% of the total nuclear weapons tests that have taken place since the 1940s. This fact persists even though the American government last tested this technology in 1992. One example from this disadvantage comes from Project Rulison, which was an underground 40-kiloton nuclear test project that took place between the small towns of Rifle and Parachute in Colorado.

This project is unique because the goal was to study the impact of a nuclear weapon for the release of energy resources. The work found that it could liberate high levels of natural gas, but it also contaminated the fuel so that it was unsuitable for heating homes or cooking with it. A bugger zone is still in place around the site.

The issue with mutually-assured destruction is that it always leaves a lingering threat to the general population. If two superpowers decide to trade launches, such as Russia and the United States, then there would be global consequences to that decision. The life of a single human is more valuable than all of the nuclear weapons in stockpiles around the globe right now.

When we look at the advantages and disadvantages of nuclear weapons, the idea of a threat deterrent is not genuine peace. It is a race to create something bigger or more defensive in an arms battle that never seems to end. The use of significant conventional weapons without the threat of radiation exposure and the severe loss of civilian life could accomplish a similar goal.

Nuclear weapons are here to stay as a threat. We might not think about the idea of a missile falling from the sky every day, but history does teach us that we must continue to be vigilant about protecting ourselves and our families from the dangers these weapons create.

16 Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons

How does one keep a society safe at a national level?

In the past, city-states would build walls to protect the population. As technologies advanced, nations rushed to develop deadlier weapons than their enemies so that the threat of loss was greater than the reward of taking territory.

Those technologies have now developed into nuclear weapons. The destructive power of a nuclear weapon is just one threat to consider. The radioactive fallout from such a weapon can cause long-term consequences for a population that was close to the explosion. Radiated soil, weapon debris, and radioactive particles falling from the sky are all threats that must be taken seriously, which means a nation with nuclear weapons provides a great threat to a potential invader.

If enough nuclear weapons are launched and allowed to detonate, however, then life as we know it on our planet will cease to exist. Any survivors would be forced to endure unthinkable conditions.

Here are the essential pros and cons of nuclear weapons to consider.

The Pros of Nuclear Weapons

1. It is a deterrent for starting a major conflict. Only a handful of nations are armed with nuclear weapons. The US and Russia have the most weapons, but France, China, the United Kingdom, and Pakistan all have more than 100 weapons. The presence of these weapons and their immense destructive capabilities is a major deterrent for starting a major conflict, like the two world wars that are fought in the first half of the 20th century. Even when both nations have nuclear weapons, their mutually assured destruction is enough to cause diplomacy to rule the day.

2. It reinforces national borders. Our society is becoming ever-more global. Because of the internet, communications improvements, and other technological advances, we can talk with anyone, anywhere, with a simple data connection. New transportation technologies are in development that can provide long-distance transportation at speeds which were unthinkable just a generation ago. By reinforcing national borders, a global society of cooperation can be built through negotiation and diplomacy instead of warfare.

3. It changes the power and status of a nation. Countries with nuclear weapons are treated different on the global stage than countries without those weapons. North Korea may only have a dozen or so nuclear weapons at best estimate, but their demands are taken with an extra level of seriousness and scrutiny because they have developed rudimentary nuclear weapon technology. Because there is a desire to avoid such a devastating conflict, most nations with nuclear weapons can generally get what they want on-demand.

4. They can be fired without a direct threat to personnel. The nuclear weapons dropped in Japan were carried by bombers, staffed with a flight crew. Rockets can be fired remotely from stations and intercontinental ballistic technologies can let someone manage the weapon from thousands of miles away. Nuclear weapons do not require a battlefield presence in the same way a conventional weapon may require.

5. Nuclear weapons can be positioned in a variety of locations. Submarines and naval craft can be outfitted with nuclear weapons so that they can be fired from any ocean-based location on the planet. Storage silos, buried underground, can fire ICBM-outfitted nuclear weapons. They can be fired from remote trucks, put into aircraft missiles, or still be dropped by bombers like they were in the 1940s. The versatility of positioning that a nuclear weapon offers is quite profound.

6. They provide the foundations for other technologies. The technologies that have helped to create nuclear weapons have fostered other technologies that have benefited society in many ways. Nuclear power provides a relatively clean source of energy that is used to power hundreds of thousands of homes around the world. Nuclear reactors have been used to build naval vessels. Many types of nuclear-powered propulsion have been proposed for future spacecraft.

7. It is a highly reliable technology. As a power source, nuclear energy can run uninterrupted for more than a year without disruption, even during difficult weather conditions. The refinement of a nuclear weapon is similar to this advantage. Once installed, the delivery platform reliability of the weapon is strong. Even if the warheads are not modernized, the surety of the weapon and its readiness make it a consistent threat that cannot be ignored.

The Cons of Nuclear Weapons

1. They have added development and maintenance costs. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the United States spends an estimated $34.8 billion per year to maintain, operate, and upgrade its nuclear weapons arsenal. Estimates from Nuclear Threat Initiative suggest the figures may be a little lower, but still costing the US up to $25 billion per year. To put that in perspective, an investment into food products at that level would provide up to 75 billion meals for those living in poverty.

2. Detonation has a major ethical impact. Only two cities have ever been directly affected by nuclear weapons in history. Both were in Japan: Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Just two bombs caused the death of over 129,000 people, with many of them being civilians. Acute effects from the bombs may have contributed to the deaths of over 250,000 additional people in the following decades. Even if military complexes are struck with a nuclear weapon, there will be civilian casualties.

3. There are environmental concerns which must be considered with a detonation. Since 1945, the testing of nuclear weapons has caused more than 2,100 detonations that have happened around the globe. Some have occurred underwater, while others have occurred underground. Every detonation creates radiation that, if someone were exposed to it, could create grave consequences. The threat of multiple simultaneous nuclear detonations could create a prolonged winter that would ravage the planet and potentially cause all life to cease.

4. It provides a major terror threat. The size of a nuclear weapon is relatively small. With terrorism on the rise around the world, the threat of a “dirty bomb” cannot be ignored. A terrorist group with a nuclear weapon could cause immense and immediate damage that could change the path of an entire society. The Patriot Act of 2001 was in response to airplanes being flown into buildings. Imagine would the aftermath of a nuclear explosion could be.

5. Waste from the development of nuclear weapons must be stored somewhere. The challenges of storing nuclear waste are evident at the Hanford Site in Washington State. It was the location of the world’s first plutonium production reactor. Up to 9 nuclear reactors and 5 plutonium processors were operating at once, creating 60,000 weapons for the US nuclear arsenal. Now the radioactive waste is stored in 177 storage tanks. Breaches and leaks are still a very real threat, despite the lack of production that occurs there today.

6. It is a non-renewable resource. Nuclear fuels are plutonium and uranium, which are radioactive metals. This means it is a resource that is non-renewable. Even if the all the nuclear energy from weapons was transitioned into usable energy that wouldn’t produce carbon dioxide, any accident could create a threat to human health that could potentially last for thousands of years. In many ways, nuclear technologies are much like fossil fuels, but with a different threat to the environment.

7. A nuclear weapon can fail because of a degraded delivery system. Even if the nuclear weapon is viable, the delivery system for the weapon may not be viable. Many nuclear weapons are being maintained with delivery systems that have not been modernized. In the US, the current stock of ICBM nuclear weapons is expected to remain in service until 2032. Submarine-based nuclear weapons are expected to remain in service until 2042. Unless delivery systems are upgraded and maintained in the same way as their weapon counterparts, they may not be an effective deterrent.

8. They require a skilled workforce to operate. Although nuclear weapons can be operated from a distance, a skilled workforce is required to make them a useful tool. Scientists, engineers, and operators are critical to the viability of any nuclear weapon. Without a skilled workforce in support, the safety and security of the nuclear weapons becomes doubtful and that doubt can be enough to make the weapons less of a deterrent.

9. Testing must require a detonation at some point. Computer simulations can show the effects of a nuclear weapon and what an expected fallout happens to be. To determine if the technology is viable, however, an actual detonation must take place. Since July 1945, the United States has fired over 1,100 nuclear weapon as part of the testing process. No tests have been conducted, however, since September 1992.

The pros and cons of nuclear weapons show that they can serve as a deterrent and support “positive” technologies. There is just one question that continues to remain unanswered: what will happen if someone finally calls the bluff and attacks a nation with nuclear capabilities? It is the potential answer to that questions which should cause everyone to pause and consider the continued need for these weapons.

Home — Essay Samples — War — Nuclear Weapon — The Dangers and Moral Implications of Nuclear Weapons

The Dangers and Moral Implications of Nuclear Weapons

• Categories: Nuclear Weapon

About this sample

Words: 609 |

Published: Mar 8, 2024

Words: 609 | Page: 1 | 4 min read

Table of contents

The dangers of nuclear weapons, the moral implications of nuclear weapons.

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr. Heisenberg

Verified writer

• Expert in: War

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

2 pages / 830 words

1 pages / 442 words

3 pages / 1376 words

1 pages / 655 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Nuclear Weapon

In order to produce nuclear weapons (nuclear explosion weapons) it is necessary to have plutonium or highly enriched (weapons-grade) uranium. These fissionable materials are not freely available on the international market. They [...]

To what extent has foreign influence by the United States after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki affected Japan economically and politically? Material that can be acquired from this source includes information about the [...]

The Purpose of this topic is to explain the core problem of the Israel and Palestine conflict and with our point of view, give the solution that is acceptable within international relation study. A "two-state solution" to the [...]

World War I had claimed many lives and was a great tragedy; the reason the war had started was because most of the other European countries had great empires consisting of many other countries. However Belgium did not have [...]

A submarine is basically a watercraft that has the ability of independent operation underwater. It is dissimilar to a submersible, which has more limited underwater power or ability. The term most commonly refers to a large, [...]

Although the failure of the US in Vietnam can be partially due to the clever strategies of the North Vietnamese armies and the guerrilla tactics that they employed to counter those of Technology employed by the far more advanced [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

IELTS Essay Band 7: Nuclear Threats and Benefits

The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.

The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Task Achievement

The essay provides a balanced view on the benefits and disadvantages of nuclear technology, which is commendable. However, the essay could benefit from more specific examples and evidence to support the claims. The ideas presented could also be further developed, and the connections between the points could be made clearer. Overall, the essay demonstrates a good understanding of the topic, but there is room for improvement in terms of depth and clarity.

• Provide more specific examples and evidence to support the claims.
• Explore more about the potential of nuclear technology in other fields.
• Discuss more about the potential solutions to the hazards posed by nuclear technology.
• Provide more clear connections between the points.
• Explain more about how the benefits of nuclear technology outweigh its disadvantages.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

You have demonstrated a good understanding of grammatical range and accuracy in your essay. Your use of a variety of sentence structures, including complex sentences, is commendable. However, there were a few grammatical errors, including a spelling mistake and a missing article. These errors did not significantly impede the readability or meaning of your essay, but they should be addressed in future essays. I suggest that you proofread your essays carefully to catch and correct these errors.

• Use a wider variety of sentence structures to demonstrate your grammatical range.
• Proofread your essay to catch and correct spelling errors.
• Ensure that you use articles correctly in your sentences.

Coherence and Cohesion

You have written a well-structured essay with a clear argument and good use of evidence. Your ideas are organized logically and your paragraphing is well managed. However, there is room for improvement in your topic sentences and in the clarity of your conclusion. Keep practicing and refining your writing skills.

• The introduction could be improved by providing a brief overview of the points that will be discussed in the essay.
• The body paragraphs could be improved by having a clearer topic sentence at the start of each one.
• The conclusion could be improved by summarizing the main points of the essay more clearly.

Lexical Resource

You have demonstrated a strong command of vocabulary in your essay. Your word choice is precise and you have used a wide range of vocabulary to express your ideas. However, there was one spelling error and one inappropriate word choice. Please pay attention to these details in your future writing. Overall, your lexical resource is impressive.

• Replace 'Empire of Japan' with 'Japan'.
• Correct the spelling of 'beneefited' to 'benefited'.
• Try to use more complex and less common words to further enhance your vocabulary range.

IELTS Mentor "IELTS Preparation & Sample Answer"

• Skip to content
• Jump to main navigation and login

Nav view search

• IELTS Sample

IELTS Writing Task 2/ Essay Topics with sample answer.

Ielts essay sample 36 - the threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace, ielts writing task 2/ ielts essay:, the threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. the benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages..

• IELTS Essay

IELTS Materials

• IELTS Bar Graph
• IELTS Line Graph
• IELTS Table Chart
• IELTS Flow Chart
• IELTS Pie Chart
• IELTS Letter Writing
• Academic Reading

Useful Links

• IELTS Secrets
• Band Score Calculator
• Exam Specific Tips
• Useful Websites
• IELTS Preparation Tips
• Academic Reading Tips
• Academic Writing Tips
• GT Writing Tips
• Listening Tips
• Speaking Tips
• IELTS Grammar Review
• IELTS Vocabulary
• IELTS Cue Cards
• IELTS Life Skills
• Letter Types

• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy
• Copyright Notice
• HTML Sitemap

• Skip to primary navigation
• Skip to main content
• Skip to footer

Science Struck

Weighing in the Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons

This article deals with one of the most polarizing topics of all time: the pros and cons of nuclear weapons. Is there really any use of an atom bomb other than killing millions of innocent civilians? Let's find out...

Like it? Share it!

This article deals with one of the most polarizing topics of all time: the pros and cons of nuclear weapons. Is there really any use of an atom bomb other than killing millions of innocent civilians? Let’s find out…

Till date, nuclear weapons have only been used in the Second World War, by the United States against Japan. The US dropped two nuclear bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in early August 1945, and the world witnessed the power of these weapons. These bombs were responsible for the death of millions of innocent people, and this mass killing finally brought the end to the terrible war. Scientists have long debated on the pros and cons of nuclear bombs; some say it is very essential for a country, but some still see it as a major threat to the human race.

Pros and Cons

Advantages and disadvantages of nuclear warheads have been discussed by people from all walks of life. Some people think it as a security measure essential for the country, but some who know and have seen the destruction caused by nuclear bombs despise them.

► These weapons are the ultimate deterrent against any attack, be it from a lesser power or a stronger one. In their multiples, they have the capacity to wipe out entire cities and cripple the enemy’s entire economy. The decision to replace them with new security measures has been a topic of debate for a while now, but no concrete talks have been held. Many peace activists proclaim that the world would be much safer without nuclear bombs, but there is also a possibility that if not nuclear bombs, it would be something else that threatens world peace.

► Currently it is impossible to keep a tab on the number of nuclear bombs in the world, as every country is using the excuse of strategic defense to acquire these destructive weapons. Defense experts also say that it wouldn’t be a wise decision to try to scrap all nuclear weapons, when various hostile states are acquiring them in large number.

► Their usage is considered highly immoral and highly dangerous. When a nuclear experiment is conducted, its aftereffects can be seen decades after the experiment itself. The more the weapons, the more the risks to human life.

► Producing and maintaining a nuclear bomb is pretty expensive, and it takes a large share from the country’s budget―money that could have been put to better use. Hostile countries are more likely to have a war in which they may use nuclear bombs against each other, and the result could prove disastrous for the entire planet.

• A nuclear weapon derives its devastating force from a nuclear fission reaction. So, even a relatively small bomb has the potential to wipe out an entire city.
• In human history, nuclear weapons have only been used twice, both during the closing days of World War II. The first one was dropped on August 6, 1945, on Hiroshima, and the second bomb was dropped three days later, on Nagasaki.
• There are still about 26,000 nuclear weapons in the world.
• Of all the nuclear bombs in the world, 95% belong to the USA and Russia.
• There are currently nine countries in possession of nuclear weapons (US, Russia, India, China, UK, France, Israel, Pakistan, and North Korea).
• The United States enjoys the right to declare any form of military action if it or its allies are under threat by a weapon of mass destruction. The United States also assures that it would not use its nuclear power against a non-nuclear state, unless the state attacked the US or its allies with a nuclear weapon.
• There is up to 2,000,000 kilogram of Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) in global reserve, while it takes just 15 to 24 kilograms to make a nuclear weapon. There are about 27 countries which have enough reserve to make one nuclear bomb, and 12 countries which have the capacity to produce 20 nuclear bombs.
• Nuclear reactors create plutonium, which can also act as bomb material. It takes less than 5 kilograms of plutonium to make a nuclear bomb. There is around 500,000 kg plutonium in global stockpiles.
• The project that led to the formation of the first nuclear bomb was the Manhattan Project. Both Canada and the United Kingdom assisted America with this research.
• The Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty (SORT), which was signed between the US and Russia, required them to lessen their deployed nuclear weapons between 1,700 to 2,200 by December 31, 2012. The day this treaty expired, both the countries could redeploy as many nuclear weapons as they want. However, the weapons which had been taken off ‘deployed’ status were not demolished, but were placed in storage. The US and Russia have sped up their efforts in reducing nuclear warheads from both sides by signing the New START treaty, as a continuation of the SORT treaty. Under the terms of the New START (The St rategic A rms R eduction T reaty), both US and Russia would reduce the number of nuclear missile launchers by half. This treaty is expected to last till 2021, during which both the countries would encourage nuclear disarmament on a global scale. This treaty also includes a provision for inspection and checks, a feature notably absent from SORT.

The total elimination of nuclear weapons seems practically impossible today, but if world leaders make a sincere effort, they might be able to make this planet free from nuclear weapons. Possession of nuclear weapons used to, but now doesn’t, signify that the country is powerful and developed; countries like Germany, Canada, and Australia don’t possess a single nuclear weapon, but are still more influential in the global arena than most nuclear states.

Nuclear power can be used as a clean source of energy. I hope this article on the advantages and disadvantages of nuclear weapons helped you understand the various aspects of this destructive weaponry.

Get Updates Right to Your Inbox

Privacy overview.