• 0 Shopping Cart £ 0.00 -->

Internet Geography

Geography Revision

Revision materials to support you in preparing for your GCSE Geography exams. 

GCSE | AQA |  The Challenge of Natural Hazards | Case Study – HIC Earthquake

  • What is a natural hazard?
  • Types of Natural Hazards
  • Hazard Risk
  • Plate Tectonics
  • Why do tectonic plates move?
  • The global distribution of volcanoes and earthquakes
  • Destructive plate margins
  • Conservative plate margins
  • Constructive plate margins

Causes of earthquakes

  • Measuring Earthquakes

What are the effects of earthquakes?

  • Responses to Earthquakes

Case Study – HIC Earthquake

  • Case Study – LIC Earthquake
  • Why do people live in tectonically active areas?
  • Managing Tectonic Hazards
  • Global Atmospheric Circulation

Revision Notes

Measuring earthquakes

Responses to earthquakes

Case Study – LIC/NEE Earthquake

Interactive Revision

  • On 24 August 2016, a magnitude 6.2 earthquake hit central Italy near Norcia.
  • The earthquake’s epicentre was shallow, at a depth of 5.1 km.
  • It was the strongest quake in Italy since the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, which killed over 300 people.
  • The Amatrice earthquake was felt over 100 miles away, including in Rome.
  • Amatrice, the town closest to the epicentre, suffered significant social, economic, and environmental impacts.
  • Italy’s seismic activity is due to its location on the Eurasian and African plate collision border, creating multiple fault lines.
  • Two major fault lines, north-south and east-west, contribute to the country’s geological instability.
  • The Apennines are stretching northwest at about 3 mm per year, causing pressure buildup along faults, leading to earthquakes when released.

Primary Effects

The  primary effects  of the Amatrice earthquake include:

  • Two hundred ninety-nine people died, 400 were injured, and 4454 were homeless.
  • 293 historic buildings were damaged or destroyed, including the Basilica of San Francesco in Amatrice
  • Over half the buildings in Amatrice were damaged or destroyed. Despite their reinforcements, 80 per cent of the buildings in the old town were affected.
  • Although the government allocated €1 billion for building improvements since the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, many properties did not meet seismic building standards. The uptake of the funding had been low.
  • Despite being restored in 2012, the school in Amatrice collapsed, indicating substandard building practices.

Secondary Effects

The secondary effects of the Amatrice earthquake include:

  • Landslides blocked roads, making access to the area difficult.
  • Local residents suffered psychological damage.
  • Individuals were reported to have been involved in looting.
  • Unsafe buildings led to the town centre being cordoned off. This had a negative impact on  tourism .
  • Ninety per cent of barns and stalls for sheep, goats, and cattle in the affected area were destroyed, alongside the mechanical milking systems. As a result, farmers struggled to milk by hand, leaving their cattle at risk of mastitis, an udder-tissue disease. Farmers struggled to make a living in the aftermath of the earthquake.
  • The earthquake resulted in an estimated $11 billion in economic losses.

Immediate Responses

  • Ten thousand homeless people were accommodated in 58 tent camps.
  • Sports halls were converted to provide shelter, and hotels on the Adriatic coasts were used to home people temporarily.
  • Many rescue workers arrived within an hour of the earthquake. Five thousand soldiers, alpine guides, and the Italian Red Cross were involved in searching for survivors, providing food and water, and supplying tents. Seventy dog teams and twelve helicopters were involved in the rescue effort.
  • Six of the Vatican’s 37 firefighters have travelled to Amatrice to help civil  protection  workers look for survivors.
  • A temporary hospital was set up, and patients at Amazatrice Hospital, severely damaged during the earthquake, were transferred to a nearby hospital in Rieti.
  • Appeals were made by the national blood donation service to ensure demand was met.
  • Facebook activated safety check features so local people could inform family and friends they were safe.
  • Locals removed passwords from Wi-Fi at the Italian Red Cross’s request so rescue teams could communicate more effectively.
  • The Italian Government announced a €50 million emergency response. Taxes for residents were cancelled, and reconstruction work began immediately.

Long-term Responses 

  • Students were educated in neighbouring schools, while 12 classrooms were constructed in prefabricated buildings in Amatrice.
  • Six months following the earthquake, the government promised to move people from temporary camps into wooden houses.
  • The cost of rebuilding was reduced by tax incentives, allowing 65 per cent of total renovation costs to be used as tax breaks.
  • Villages were rebuilt, with the building of the same character through a €42 million government initiative called ‘Italian Homes’.
  • A year on, 2.4 million tons of debris and rubble remained in the areas affected by the earthquake.
  • At 3:34 am on 27 February 2010, an 8.8 magnitude earthquake struck off the coast of central Chile.
  • The earthquake happened at a destructive plate margin , where the Nazca Plate subducts the South American plate.
  • A series of smaller aftershocks followed it.
  • Tsunami warnings were issued due to waves travelling from the epicentre across the Pacific Ocean at speeds of about 800 km/h.
  • Around 500 people died, and 12,000 people were injured. Over 800,000 people were affected.
  • Two hundred twenty thousand homes, 4500 schools, 56 hospitals, and 53 ports were destroyed.
  • Santiago Airport and the Port of Talahuanao were severely damaged.
  • The earthquake disrupted power, water supplies and communications across Chile.
  • The cost of the earthquake is estimated to be US$30 billion.
  • Tsunami waves devastated several coastal towns.
  • The  tsunami  struck several Pacific countries; however, warnings prevented a loss of life.
  • A fire at a Santiago chemical plant led to the local area being evacuated.
  • Landslides destroyed up to 1500 km of roads, cutting off remote communities for days.
  • Emergency services responded quickly.
  • International support provided field hospitals, satellite phones and floating bridges.
  • Within 24 hours, the north-south highway was temporarily repaired, allowing aid to be transported from Santiago to areas affected by the earthquake.
  • Within ten days, 90% of homes had restored power and water.
  • US$60 million was raised after a national appeal, which funded 30,000 small emergency shelters.
  • Chile’s government launched a housing reconstruction plan just one month after the earthquake to help nearly 200,000 families.
  • Chile’s strong economy reduced the need for foreign aid to fund rebuilding.
  • The recovery took over four years.

Christchurch

  • The earthquake struck New Zealand’s South Island, 10km west of Christchurch, at 12:51 pm on 22nd February 2011, lasting just 10 seconds.
  • It measured 6.3 on the Richter Scale and had a shallow depth of 4.99 km.
  • The quake occurred along a conservative margin between the Pacific and Australasian plates.

The  primary effects  included:

  • Christchurch, New Zealand’s second city, experienced extensive damage
  • 185 people were killed
  • 3129 people were injured
  • 6800 people received minor injuries
  • 100,000 properties were damaged, and the earthquake demolished 10,000
  • $28 billion of damage was caused
  • water and sewage pipes were damaged
  • the cathedral spire collapsed
  • liquefaction  destroyed many roads and buildings
  • 2200 people had to live in temporary housing

The  secondary effects  included:

  • five Rugby World Cup matches were cancelled
  • schools were closed for two weeks
  • 1/5 of the population migrated from the city
  • many businesses were closed for a long time
  • two large aftershocks struck Christchurch less than four months after the city was devastated
  • Economists have suggested that it will take 50 to 100 years for New Zealand’s economy to recover
  • 80% of respondents to a post-event survey stated that their lives had changed significantly since the earthquake

The  immediate responses  included:

  • around $6-7 million of aid was provided
  • International aid was provided
  • The Red Cross and other charities supplied aid workers
  • rescue crews from all over the world, including the UK, USA, Taiwan and Australia, provided support
  • more than 300 Australian police officers flew into Christchurch three days after the earthquake. They were sworn in with New Zealand policing powers and worked alongside New Zealand officers, enforcing law and order and reassuring the people of Christchurch
  • 30,000 residents were provided with chemical toilets

The long-term responses included:

  • the construction of around 10,000 affordable homes
  • water and sewage were restored by August 2011
  • the New Zealand government provided temporary housing
  • Many NGOs provided support, including Save the Children
  • Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority was created to organise the rebuilding of the region. It had special powers to change planning  laws and regulations.
  • A 9.0 magnitude earthquake struck off Japan’s northeast coast, 250 miles from Tokyo, at a depth of 20 miles on March 11, 2011, at 2:46 pm local time.
  • Occurred 250 miles off the northeast coast of Honshu, Japan’s main island.
  • The earthquake resulted from the subduction of the Pacific Plate beneath the Eurasian Plate, a destructive plate margin.
  • Built-up friction over time led to a massive ‘megathrust’ earthquake.
  • Energy release was 600 million times the energy of the Hiroshima nuclear bomb.
  • Post-earthquake studies found a thin, slippery clay layer in the subduction zone , which allowed a significant plate displacement of 164 feet and contributed to the massive earthquake and tsunami.
  • The combination of the earthquake’s shallow depth and high magnitude generated a devastating tsunami.
  • 15,894 people died, and 26,152 were injured.
  • 130,927 displaced, with 2,562 missing.
  • 332,395 buildings, 2,126 roads, 56 bridges, and 26 railways damaged or destroyed.
  • 300 hospitals damaged, 11 destroyed.
  • Over 4.4 million households in northeast Japan were without electricity.
  • Significant disruptions to Japan’s transport network.
  • Coastal land subsidence by over 50 cm in some areas.
  • Due to tectonic shifts, North East Japan moved 2.4 m closer to North America.
  • Pacific plate slipped westwards by 20 to 40 m.
  • Seabed near the epicentre shifted by 24 m; off Miyagi province by 3 m.
  • Earthquake altered Earth’s axis by 10 to 25 cm, shortening the day by 1.8 microseconds.
  • Liquefaction damaged 1,046 buildings in Tokyo’s reclaimed land areas.
  • The earthquake cost was estimated at US$235 billion, making it the most expensive natural disaster in history.
  • Tsunami waves up to 40m high caused widespread devastation, killing thousands and causing damage and pollution up to 6 miles inland; only 58% heeded tsunami warnings.
  • Fukushima nuclear power station experienced a meltdown in seven reactors; radiation levels spiked to over eight times the norm.
  • Transport networks in rural areas were severely disrupted; the tsunami destroyed major roads and railways and derailed trains.
  • The ‘Japan Move Forward Committee’ suggested young adults and teenagers could aid in rebuilding efforts.
  • Coastal changes included a 250-mile stretch of coastline dropping by 0.6m, allowing the tsunami to travel further inland.
  • The Japan Meteorological Agency issued tsunami warnings three minutes after the earthquake.
  • Scientists had been able to predict where the tsunami would hit after the earthquake using modelling and forecasting technology so that responses could be directed to the appropriate areas.
  • Rescue workers and around 100,000 members of the Japan Self-Defence Force were dispatched to help with search and rescue operations within hours of the tsunami hitting the coast.
  • Although many search and rescue teams focused on recovering bodies washing up on shore following the tsunami, some people were rescued from under the rubble with the help of sniffer dogs.
  • The government declared a 20 km  evacuation  zone around the Fukushima nuclear power plant to reduce the threat of radiation exposure to local residents.
  • Japan received international help from the US military, and search and rescue teams were sent from New Zealand, India, South Korea, China and Australia.
  • Access to the affected areas was restricted because many were covered in debris and mud following the tsunami, so it wasn’t easy to provide immediate support in some areas.
  • Hundreds of thousands of people who had lost their homes were evacuated to temporary shelters in schools and other public buildings or relocated to other areas.
  • Many evacuees came from the  exclusion zone  surrounding the Fukushima nuclear power plant. After the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear meltdown, those in the area had their radiation levels checked, and their health monitored to ensure they did not receive dangerous exposure to radiation. Many evacuated from the area around the nuclear power plant were given iodine tablets to reduce the risk of radiation poisoning.
  • One month post-disaster, Japan established the Reconstruction Policy Council for National Recovery, focusing on tsunami-resilient communities.
  • The government allocated 23 trillion yen for a ten-year recovery plan, introducing ‘Special Zones for Reconstruction’ to attract investments in Tohoku.
  • Coastal protection policies involving seawalls and breakwaters were adopted to withstand tsunamis with a 150-year recurrence interval.
  • Enacted ‘Act on the Development of Tsunami-resilient Communities’ prioritizing human life and promoting infrastructure and defence measures against major tsunamis.
  • Post-earthquake, Japan faced economic challenges, with the disaster impacting stock market values and raising concerns about economic recovery.
  • Infrastructure repair included 375 km of the Tohoku Expressway and Sendai Airport runway, with significant efforts from the Japanese Defence Force and the US Army.
  • Reconstruction efforts also focused on restoring energy, water supply, and telecommunications infrastructure, achieving significant restoration rates by November 2011.

L’Aquila

  • A 6.3 magnitude earthquake hit L’Aquila, central Italy, on 6 April 2009, resulting in 309 fatalities.
  • The main shock occurred at 3.32 am, causing extensive damage to the 13th-century city, situated approximately 60 miles northeast of Rome.
  • This event was Italy’s most severe earthquake since the 1980 Irpinia earthquake.
  • The earthquake’s cause was normal faulting on the northwest-southeast-trending Paganica Fault, influenced by extensional tectonic forces from the Tyrrhenian Basin’s opening.
  • L’Aquila experienced several thousand foreshocks and aftershocks since December 2008, with over thirty exceeding a 3.5 Richter magnitude.
  • The L’Aquila earthquake damaged or collapsed 3,000 to 11,000 buildings, injuring around 1,500 people, and made approximately 40,000 homeless.
  • Twenty children were among the 309 fatalities, and around 40,000 individuals were displaced, with 10,000 housed in coastal hotels.
  • The European Union estimated the earthquake’s total damage to be US$1.1 billion.
  • Historic buildings sustained severe damage, leading to widespread abandonment. Streets were blocked by fallen masonry, and a significant aftershock damaged the local hospital.
  • The Basilica of Saint Bernardino, a major Renaissance church, and its campanile were severely damaged.
  • Modern structures, including the earthquake-proof wing of L’Aquila Hospital, also suffered extensive damage, leading to its closure.
  • Displaced persons found temporary shelter in tented camps and hotels along the coast.
  • Aftershocks from the L’Aquila earthquake triggered landslides and rockfalls, damaging homes and transportation infrastructure.
  • A burst main water supply pipeline near Paganio caused a landslide and mudflow.
  • Student enrollment at L’Aquila University declined post-earthquake.
  • The scarcity of housing led to increased house prices and rents.
  • Much of the city’s central business district was cordoned off due to unsafe buildings, resulting in some areas remaining as ‘red zones’.
  • These ‘red zones’ have negatively impacted business, tourism , and income in the area.
  • Hotels sheltered 10,000 people; 40,000 tents were distributed to the homeless.
  • Some train carriages were repurposed as shelters.
  • Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi offered his homes for temporary shelters.
  • Italian Red Cross, supported by dog units and ambulances, searched for survivors and set up a temporary hospital.
  • The Red Cross distributed water, meals, tents, and blankets; the British Red Cross raised £171,000.
  • Mortgages, Sky TV, gas, and electricity bills were suspended.
  • Italian Post Office provided free mobile calls, raised donations, and offered free delivery for small businesses.
  • L’Aquila declared a state of emergency, facilitating international aid from the EU and USA.
  • EU granted US$552.9 million from its Solidarity Fund for rebuilding efforts.
  • Disasters Emergency Committee (DEC) did not provide aid, deeming Italy capable with its resources and EU support.
  • A torch-lit procession and Catholic mass are held on the anniversary for remembrance.
  • Residents were exempt from taxes in 2010.
  • Students received free public transport , discounts on educational equipment, and an exemption from university fees for three years.
  • Home reconstruction took years; historical centres may take 15 years to rebuild.
  • Six scientists and one government official were initially convicted of manslaughter for not predicting the earthquake, sentenced to six years in prison, and fined millions in damages.
  • In November 2014, the convictions of the six scientists were overturned by Italian courts.

New Zealand 2016

  • A magnitude-7.8 earthquake hit New Zealand’s South Island on November 14th, 2016, at 00.02 am, resulting in at least two fatalities.
  • The quake was felt up to 120 miles away, including in Wellington, the capital on the North Island.
  • A tsunami warning was issued two hours post-quake, advising people on the eastern coast to move inland or higher ground.
  • Two people died.
  • Fifty people were injured.
  • Sixty people needed emergency housing.
  • Over 190km of roads and 200km of railway lines were destroyed
  • Twenty thousand buildings were damaged or destroyed.
  • Water, sewerage & power supplies were cut off.
  • Total damage is estimated at US $8.5 billion.
  • One hundred thousand landslides blocked roads and railways.
  • A landslide blocked the Clarence River, causing flooding. Ten farms were evacuated.
  • The earthquake triggered a tsunami of 5m, leaving debris up to 250 metres inland.
  • A tsunami warning was issued, and residents were told to reach higher ground.
  • Hundreds were housed in emergency shelters.
  • Two hundred vulnerable people were evacuated by helicopter.
  • Power was restored within hours. International warships were sent to Kaikoura with food, medicine and portable toilets.
  • Temporary water supplies were set up.
  • Other countries sent food and medicine.
  • $5.3 million from the District Council for repairs and rebuilding.
  • Road and rail routes reopened within two years.
  • A relief fund was set up to provide basic supplies.
  • By March 2017, a permanent water main had been laid in Kaikoura. the new pipe was designed to move with any future earthquakes so it wouldn’t break

Case study – LIC/NEE earthquake

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Please Support Internet Geography

If you've found the resources on this site useful please consider making a secure donation via PayPal to support the development of the site. The site is self-funded and your support is really appreciated.

Search Internet Geography

Home

Latest Blog Entries

How can Internet Geography Plus help with mock exam preparation

Pin It on Pinterest

  • Click to share
  • Print Friendly

japan tsunami 2011 case study gcse

Skip to content

Get Revising

Join get revising, already a member.

Ai Tutor Bot Advert

Tsunami case study- Japan 2011

  • Natural hazards
  • Created by: katiebrocklehurst251
  • Created on: 01-11-14 13:31
  • 15,845 people were killed
  • Liquefaction damaged over a thousand buildings
  • 3,375 people went missing
  • the ground sunk by 0.6m
  • 5,894 people were injured
  • Japan moved 2.4m east
  • 128,479 buildings were destroyed
  • Within 2 days all debris was cleared
  • Identify key areas for aid
  • 11 military aircraft responded within 30 minutes
  • Temporary shelters were set up for 452,000 people
  • Maximum height of 59m
  • travelled 10km inland
  • Nuclear power plant went into meltdown
  • Shipping and travel disrupted
  • Huge economic impact
  • 11th March 2011 14:46pm
  • Release of energy along the subduction zone between the Pacific and Eurasian plates
  • By November 2001 96% of electricity was repaired and 98% of water
  • By 29th March the airport was reusable
  • It cost £190 million
  • By 24th March half the expressway was repaired
  • Magnitude 9.0

No comments have yet been made

Similar Geography resources:

Geography Revision 3.0 / 5 based on 2 ratings

restless earth 0.0 / 5

Case study: Japan tsunami 2011: Completed 5.0 / 5 based on 1 rating

learning checklist 4.0 / 5 based on 1 rating

case study- the Tohoku Tsunami, japan 5.0 / 5 based on 1 rating

Geography Case Study - Restless Earth 4.5 / 5 based on 2 ratings

The Restless Earth 4.0 / 5 based on 1 rating

Revision page on Earthquake 0.0 / 5

Earthquakes 2.0 / 5 based on 1 rating

Restless Earth Case Studies 0.0 / 5

japan tsunami 2011 case study gcse

A Level Geography

Case Study: How does Japan live with earthquakes?

Japan lies within one of the most tectonically active zones in the world. It experiences over 400 earthquakes every day. The majority of these are not felt by humans and are only detected by instruments. Japan has been hit by a number of high-intensity earthquakes in the past. Since 2000 there are have been 16000 fatalities as the result of tectonic activity.

Japan is located on the Pacific Ring of Fire, where the North American, Pacific, Eurasian and Philippine plates come together. Northern Japan is on top of the western tip of the North American plate. Southern Japan sits mostly above the Eurasian plate. This leads to the formation of volcanoes such as Mount Unzen and Mount Fuji. Movements along these plate boundaries also present the risk of tsunamis to the island nation. The Pacific Coastal zone, on the east coast of Japan, is particularly vulnerable as it is very densely populated.

The 2011 Japan Earthquake: Tōhoku

Japan experienced one of its largest seismic events on March 11 2011. A magnitude 9.0 earthquake occurred 70km off the coast of the northern island of Honshu where the Pacific and North American plate meet. It is the largest recorded earthquake to hit Japan and is in the top five in the world since records began in 1900. The earthquake lasted for six minutes.

A map to show the location of the 2011 Japan Earthquake

A map to show the location of the 2011 Japan Earthquake

The earthquake had a significant impact on the area. The force of the megathrust earthquake caused the island of Honshu to move east 2.4m. Parts of the Japanese coastline dr[[ed by 60cm. The seabed close to the focus of the earthquake rose by 7m and moved westwards between 40-50m. In addition to this, the earthquake shifted the Earth 10-15cm on its axis.

The earthquake triggered a tsunami which reached heights of 40m when it reached the coast. The tsunami wave reached 10km inland in some places.

What were the social impacts of the Japanese earthquake in 2011?

The tsunami in 2011 claimed the lives of 15,853 people and injured 6023. The majority of the victims were over the age of 60 (66%). 90% of the deaths was caused by drowning. The remaining 10% died as the result of being crushed in buildings or being burnt. 3282 people were reported missing, presumed dead.

Disposing of dead bodies proved to be very challenging because of the destruction to crematoriums, morgues and the power infrastructure. As the result of this many bodies were buried in mass graves to reduce the risk of disease spreading.

Many people were displaced as the result of the tsunami. According to Save the Children 100,000 children were separated from their families. The main reason for this was that children were at school when the earthquake struck. In one elementary school, 74 of 108 students and 10 out of 13 staff lost their lives.

More than 333000 people had to live in temporary accommodation. National Police Agency of Japan figures shows almost 300,000 buildings were destroyed and a further one million damaged, either by the quake, tsunami or resulting fires. Almost 4,000 roads, 78 bridges and 29 railways were also affected. Reconstruction is still taking place today. Some communities have had to be relocated from their original settlements.

What were the economic impacts of the Japanese earthquake in 2011?

The estimated cost of the earthquake, including reconstruction, is £181 billion. Japanese authorities estimate 25 million tonnes of debris were generated in the three worst-affected prefectures (counties). This is significantly more than the amount of debris created during the 2010 Haiti earthquake. 47,700 buildings were destroyed and 143,300 were damaged. 230,000 vehicles were destroyed or damaged. Four ports were destroyed and a further 11 were affected in the northeast of Japan.

There was a significant impact on power supplies in Japan. 4.4 million households and businesses lost electricity. 11 nuclear reactors were shut down when the earthquake occurred. The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant was decommissioned because all six of its reactors were severely damaged. Seawater disabled the plant’s cooling systems which caused the reactor cores to meltdown, leading to the release of radioactivity. Radioactive material continues to be released by the plant and vegetation and soil within the 30km evacuation zone is contaminated. Power cuts continued for several weeks after the earthquake and tsunami. Often, these lasted between 3-4 hours at a time. The earthquake also had a negative impact on the oil industry as two refineries were set on fire during the earthquake.

Transport was also negatively affected by the earthquake. Twenty-three train stations were swept away and others experienced damage. Many road bridges were damaged or destroyed.

Agriculture was affected as salt water contaminated soil and made it impossible to grow crops.

The stock market crashed and had a negative impact on companies such as Sony and Toyota as the cost of the earthquake was realised.  Production was reduced due to power cuts and assembly of goods, such as cars overseas, were affected by the disruption in the supply of parts from Japan.

What were the political impacts of the Japanese earthquake in 2011?

Government debt was increased when it injects billions of yen into the economy. This was at a time when the government were attempting to reduce the national debt.

Several years before the disaster warnings had been made about the poor defences that existed at nuclear power plants in the event of a tsunami. A number of executives at the Fukushima power plant resigned in the aftermath of the disaster. A movement against nuclear power, which Japan heavily relies on, developed following the tsunami.

The disaster at Fukushima added political weight in European countries were anti-nuclear bodies used the event to reinforce their arguments against nuclear power.

Privacy Overview

Pin it on pinterest.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

IMAGES

  1. The 2011 Japanese tsunami GCSE case study

    japan tsunami 2011 case study gcse

  2. KS3 Geography

    japan tsunami 2011 case study gcse

  3. KS3 Geography

    japan tsunami 2011 case study gcse

  4. The 2011 Japanese tsunami GCSE case study by clas3

    japan tsunami 2011 case study gcse

  5. GEOGRAPHY A LEVEL TSUNAMI, EARTHQUAKE AND VOLCANO CASE STUDIES

    japan tsunami 2011 case study gcse

  6. (PDF) Case Study on Japan Earthquake and Tsunami

    japan tsunami 2011 case study gcse

VIDEO

  1. Japan Earthquake And Tsunami Of 2011

  2. japan tsunami 2011

  3. Japan Tsunami 2011 (ไทย)

  4. new video tsunami in Japan

  5. The 2011 tsunami generation off Pacific ocean

  6. Why do Tsunamis Mainly occurs in Japan?

COMMENTS

  1. Case Study

    The 2011 Japan earthquake illustrates the complexity of managing natural disasters in even the most developed and prepared nations. The event prompted further refinements in disaster preparedness and response in Japan and globally, highlighting the need for continuous assessment and adaptation to seismic risks.

  2. Japan Earthquake 2011

    The 2011 Japan earthquake had a devastating impact. This case study explores the cause and effects of the earthquake including a tsunami. ... 2018 Sulawesi Indonesia Earthquake and Tsunami Case Study; Ecosystems. What is an ecosystem? What is a Biome? Humans and the Biosphere; ... AQA GCSE Geography Exam Analysis 2024 22 August 2024 - 10:39 am ...

  3. PDF Hazardous Earth: Earthquakes in Japan and Nepal

    Earthquake in a Developed Country: Tohoku, Japan 2011 On the 11 th March 2011 , a 9.0 magnitude earthquake struck 70km from the coast of Sendai Bay, severely ... Tsunami prediction in Japan is thought to be 80 to 90% accurate at predicting the level of damage ... Case Study Notes - Earthquakes in Japan and Nepal - Edexcel Geography GCSE

  4. japan 2011 tsunami and earthquake case study

    Date: 11th March 2011. Location: North east coast of Japan (250 miles from Tokyo). M.E.D.C. Tsunami Location: Sendai. Magnitude:8.9 and lasted 6 minutes. Aftershocks: at least 124 greater than 5 magnitude. Death toll: 18,000. Economic damage: $250 billion to $309 billion

  5. Tohoku, Japan 2011 (Earthquake Case Study)

    Case Study of the Japan 2011 earthquake in Tohoku.This is the sixth video for the AQA GCSE 9-1 Geography course, and the sixth video of the Challenge of Natu...

  6. Case Study

    Rescue workers and around 100,000 members of the Japan Self-Defence Force were dispatched to help with search and rescue operations within hours of the tsunami hitting the coast. Although many search and rescue teams focused on recovering bodies washing up on shore following the tsunami, some people were rescued from under the rubble with the ...

  7. case study- the Tohoku Tsunami, japan

    CASE STUDY-TOHOKU TSUNAMI, JAPAN 2011Happened=11th march 2011. CAUSES. earthquake measuring 9.0 on the richter scale occured at destructive plate margin where pacific plate is being subducted beneath north american plate. about 100km east of sendai on honshu, japan; sceintists believe: a segment of rock, some 200 km in length slipped suddenly = upwards flick of earths crus t by between 5-10m ...

  8. Tsunami case study- Japan 2011

    A tsunami 60km of the east coast. Maximum height of 59m; travelled 10km inland; Nuclear power plant went into meltdown; Shipping and travel disrupted; Agriculture was devestated. Area produces 3-4% of Japan's rice production. Huge economic impact; 11th March 2011 14:46pm; Cause. Release of energy along the subduction zone between the Pacific ...

  9. Japan 2011 Earthquake Case Study

    Case Study: How does Japan live with earthquakes? ... The 2011 Japan Earthquake: Tōhoku. ... The tsunami in 2011 claimed the lives of 15,853 people and injured 6023. The majority of the victims were over the age of 60 (66%). 90% of the deaths was caused by drowning. The remaining 10% died as the result of being crushed in buildings or being ...

  10. Japanese Tsunami Case Study

    Mauna Loa and Mount Pinatubo Case Study! Japan Tsunami: On March 11, 2011, a huge earthquake terrorised Japan, which also triggered a 23 foot tsunami which wiped out many parts of Tokyo and a small city called Sendai. Japan is located underneath the North American, Pacific, Eurasian and Philippine plates, (however the Philippine plate was not ...