analysis of a quantitative research paper

To display these descriptive statistics in a paper, one might create a table like Table 2. Note that for discrete variables, we use the value label in the table, not the value.

If we were then to discuss our descriptive statistics in a quantitative paper, we might write something like this (note that we do not need to repeat every single detail from the table, as readers can peruse the table themselves):

This analysis relies on four variables from the 2021 General Social Survey: occupational prestige score, age, highest degree earned, and whether the respondent was born in the United States. Descriptive statistics for all four variables are shown in Table 2. The median occupational prestige score is 47, with a range from 16 to 80. 50% of respondents had occupational prestige scores scores between 35 and 59. The median age of respondents is 53, with a range from 18 to 89. 50% of respondents are between ages 37 and 66. Both variables have little skew. Highest degree earned ranges from less than high school to a graduate degree; the median respondent has earned an associate’s degree, while the modal response (given by 39.8% of the respondents) is a high school degree. 88.8% of respondents were born in the United States.

Crosstabulation

When presenting the results of a crosstabulation, we simplify the table so that it highlights the most important information—the column percentages—and include the significance and association below the table. Consider the SPSS output below.

Table 4 shows how a table suitable for include in a paper might look if created from the SPSS output in Table 3. Note that we use asterisks to indicate the significance level of the results: * means p < 0.05; ** means p < 0.01; *** means p < 0.001; and no stars mean p > 0.05 (and thus that the result is not significant). Also note than N is the abbreviation for the number of respondents.

If we were going to discuss the results of this crosstabulation in a quantitative research paper, the discussion might look like this:

A crosstabulation of respondent’s class identification and their highest degree earned, with class identification as the independent variable, is significant, with a Spearman correlation of 0.419, as shown in Table 4. Among lower class and working class respondents, more than 50% had earned a high school degree. Less than 20% of poor respondents and less than 40% of working-class respondents had earned more than a high school degree. In contrast, the majority of middle class and upper class respondents had earned at least a bachelor’s degree. In fact, 50% of upper class respondents had earned a graduate degree.

Correlation

When presenting a correlating matrix, one of the most important things to note is that we only present half the table so as not to include duplicated results. Think of the line through the table where empty cells exist to represent the correlation between a variable and itself, and include only the triangle of data either above or below that line of cells. Consider the output in Table 5.

Table 6 shows what the contents of Table 5 might look like when a table is constructed in a fashion suitable for publication.

If we were to discuss the results of this bivariate correlation analysis in a quantitative paper, the discussion might look like this:

Bivariate correlations were run among variables measuring age, occupational prestige, the highest year of school respondents completed, and family income in constant 1986 dollars, as shown in Table 6. Correlations between age and highest year of school completed and between age and family income are not significant. All other correlations are positive and significant at the p<0.001 level. The correlation between age and occupational prestige is weak; the correlations between income and occupational prestige and between income and educational attainment are moderate, and the correlation between education and occupational prestige is strong.

To present the results of a regression, we create one table that includes all of the key information from the multiple tables of SPSS output. This includes the R 2 and significance of the regression, either the B or the beta values (different analysts have different preferences here) for each variable, and the standard error and significance of each variable. Consider the SPSS output in Table 7.

The regression output in shown in Table 7 contains a lot of information. We do not include all of this information when making tables suitable for publication. As can be seen in Table 8, we include the Beta (or the B), the standard error, and the significance asterisk for each variable; the R 2 and significance for the overall regression; the degrees of freedom (which tells readers the sample size or N); and the constant; along with the key to p/significance values.

If we were to discuss the results of this regression in a quantitative paper, the results might look like this:

Table 8 shows the results of a regression in which age, occupational prestige, and highest year of school completed are the independent variables and family income is the dependent variable. The regression results are significant, and all of the independent variables taken together explain 15.6% of the variance in family income. Age is not a significant predictor of income, while occupational prestige and educational attainment are. Educational attainment has a larger effect on family income than does occupational prestige. For every year of additional education attained, family income goes up on average by $3,988.545; for every one-unit increase in occupational prestige score, family income goes up on average by $522.887. [1]

• Choose two discrete variables and three continuous variables from a dataset of your choice. Produce appropriate descriptive statistics on all five of the variables and create a table of the results suitable for inclusion in a paper.
• Using the two discrete variables you have chosen, produce an appropriate crosstabulation, with significance and measure of association. Create a table of the results suitable for inclusion in a paper.
• Using the three continuous variables you have chosen, produce a correlation matrix. Create a table of the results suitable for inclusion in a paper.
• Using the three continuous variables you have chosen, produce a multivariate linear regression. Create a table of the results suitable for inclusion in a paper.
• Write a methods section describing the dataset, analytical methods, and variables you utilized in questions 1, 2, 3, and 4 and explaining the results of your descriptive analysis.
• Write a findings section explaining the results of the analyses you performed in questions 2, 3, and 4.
• Note that the actual numberical increase comes from the B values, which are shown in the SPSS output in Table 7 but not in the reformatted Table 8. ↵

Social Data Analysis Copyright © 2021 by Mikaila Mariel Lemonik Arthur is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Quantitative Data Analysis 101

The lingo, methods and techniques, explained simply.

By: Derek Jansen (MBA)  and Kerryn Warren (PhD) | December 2020

Quantitative data analysis is one of those things that often strikes fear in students. It’s totally understandable – quantitative analysis is a complex topic, full of daunting lingo , like medians, modes, correlation and regression. Suddenly we’re all wishing we’d paid a little more attention in math class…

The good news is that while quantitative data analysis is a mammoth topic, gaining a working understanding of the basics isn’t that hard , even for those of us who avoid numbers and math . In this post, we’ll break quantitative analysis down into simple , bite-sized chunks so you can approach your research with confidence.

Overview: Quantitative Data Analysis 101

• What (exactly) is quantitative data analysis?
• When to use quantitative analysis
• How quantitative analysis works

The two “branches” of quantitative analysis

• Descriptive statistics 101
• Inferential statistics 101
• How to choose the right quantitative methods
• Recap & summary

What is quantitative data analysis?

Despite being a mouthful, quantitative data analysis simply means analysing data that is numbers-based – or data that can be easily “converted” into numbers without losing any meaning.

For example, category-based variables like gender, ethnicity, or native language could all be “converted” into numbers without losing meaning – for example, English could equal 1, French 2, etc.

This contrasts against qualitative data analysis, where the focus is on words, phrases and expressions that can’t be reduced to numbers. If you’re interested in learning about qualitative analysis, check out our post and video here .

What is quantitative analysis used for?

Quantitative analysis is generally used for three purposes.

• Firstly, it’s used to measure differences between groups . For example, the popularity of different clothing colours or brands.
• Secondly, it’s used to assess relationships between variables . For example, the relationship between weather temperature and voter turnout.
• And third, it’s used to test hypotheses in a scientifically rigorous way. For example, a hypothesis about the impact of a certain vaccine.

Again, this contrasts with qualitative analysis , which can be used to analyse people’s perceptions and feelings about an event or situation. In other words, things that can’t be reduced to numbers.

How does quantitative analysis work?

Well, since quantitative data analysis is all about analysing numbers , it’s no surprise that it involves statistics . Statistical analysis methods form the engine that powers quantitative analysis, and these methods can vary from pretty basic calculations (for example, averages and medians) to more sophisticated analyses (for example, correlations and regressions).

Sounds like gibberish? Don’t worry. We’ll explain all of that in this post. Importantly, you don’t need to be a statistician or math wiz to pull off a good quantitative analysis. We’ll break down all the technical mumbo jumbo in this post.

Need a helping hand?

As I mentioned, quantitative analysis is powered by statistical analysis methods . There are two main “branches” of statistical methods that are used – descriptive statistics and inferential statistics . In your research, you might only use descriptive statistics, or you might use a mix of both , depending on what you’re trying to figure out. In other words, depending on your research questions, aims and objectives . I’ll explain how to choose your methods later.

So, what are descriptive and inferential statistics?

Well, before I can explain that, we need to take a quick detour to explain some lingo. To understand the difference between these two branches of statistics, you need to understand two important words. These words are population and sample .

First up, population . In statistics, the population is the entire group of people (or animals or organisations or whatever) that you’re interested in researching. For example, if you were interested in researching Tesla owners in the US, then the population would be all Tesla owners in the US.

However, it’s extremely unlikely that you’re going to be able to interview or survey every single Tesla owner in the US. Realistically, you’ll likely only get access to a few hundred, or maybe a few thousand owners using an online survey. This smaller group of accessible people whose data you actually collect is called your sample .

So, to recap – the population is the entire group of people you’re interested in, and the sample is the subset of the population that you can actually get access to. In other words, the population is the full chocolate cake , whereas the sample is a slice of that cake.

So, why is this sample-population thing important?

Well, descriptive statistics focus on describing the sample , while inferential statistics aim to make predictions about the population, based on the findings within the sample. In other words, we use one group of statistical methods – descriptive statistics – to investigate the slice of cake, and another group of methods – inferential statistics – to draw conclusions about the entire cake. There I go with the cake analogy again…

With that out the way, let’s take a closer look at each of these branches in more detail.

Branch 1: Descriptive Statistics

Descriptive statistics serve a simple but critically important role in your research – to describe your data set – hence the name. In other words, they help you understand the details of your sample . Unlike inferential statistics (which we’ll get to soon), descriptive statistics don’t aim to make inferences or predictions about the entire population – they’re purely interested in the details of your specific sample .

When you’re writing up your analysis, descriptive statistics are the first set of stats you’ll cover, before moving on to inferential statistics. But, that said, depending on your research objectives and research questions , they may be the only type of statistics you use. We’ll explore that a little later.

So, what kind of statistics are usually covered in this section?

Some common statistical tests used in this branch include the following:

• Mean – this is simply the mathematical average of a range of numbers.
• Median – this is the midpoint in a range of numbers when the numbers are arranged in numerical order. If the data set makes up an odd number, then the median is the number right in the middle of the set. If the data set makes up an even number, then the median is the midpoint between the two middle numbers.
• Mode – this is simply the most commonly occurring number in the data set.
• In cases where most of the numbers are quite close to the average, the standard deviation will be relatively low.
• Conversely, in cases where the numbers are scattered all over the place, the standard deviation will be relatively high.
• Skewness . As the name suggests, skewness indicates how symmetrical a range of numbers is. In other words, do they tend to cluster into a smooth bell curve shape in the middle of the graph, or do they skew to the left or right?

Feeling a bit confused? Let’s look at a practical example using a small data set.

On the left-hand side is the data set. This details the bodyweight of a sample of 10 people. On the right-hand side, we have the descriptive statistics. Let’s take a look at each of them.

First, we can see that the mean weight is 72.4 kilograms. In other words, the average weight across the sample is 72.4 kilograms. Straightforward.

Next, we can see that the median is very similar to the mean (the average). This suggests that this data set has a reasonably symmetrical distribution (in other words, a relatively smooth, centred distribution of weights, clustered towards the centre).

In terms of the mode , there is no mode in this data set. This is because each number is present only once and so there cannot be a “most common number”. If there were two people who were both 65 kilograms, for example, then the mode would be 65.

Next up is the standard deviation . 10.6 indicates that there’s quite a wide spread of numbers. We can see this quite easily by looking at the numbers themselves, which range from 55 to 90, which is quite a stretch from the mean of 72.4.

And lastly, the skewness of -0.2 tells us that the data is very slightly negatively skewed. This makes sense since the mean and the median are slightly different.

As you can see, these descriptive statistics give us some useful insight into the data set. Of course, this is a very small data set (only 10 records), so we can’t read into these statistics too much. Also, keep in mind that this is not a list of all possible descriptive statistics – just the most common ones.

But why do all of these numbers matter?

While these descriptive statistics are all fairly basic, they’re important for a few reasons:

• Firstly, they help you get both a macro and micro-level view of your data. In other words, they help you understand both the big picture and the finer details.
• Secondly, they help you spot potential errors in the data – for example, if an average is way higher than you’d expect, or responses to a question are highly varied, this can act as a warning sign that you need to double-check the data.
• And lastly, these descriptive statistics help inform which inferential statistical techniques you can use, as those techniques depend on the skewness (in other words, the symmetry and normality) of the data.

Simply put, descriptive statistics are really important , even though the statistical techniques used are fairly basic. All too often at Grad Coach, we see students skimming over the descriptives in their eagerness to get to the more exciting inferential methods, and then landing up with some very flawed results.

Don’t be a sucker – give your descriptive statistics the love and attention they deserve!

Branch 2: Inferential Statistics

As I mentioned, while descriptive statistics are all about the details of your specific data set – your sample – inferential statistics aim to make inferences about the population . In other words, you’ll use inferential statistics to make predictions about what you’d expect to find in the full population.

What kind of predictions, you ask? Well, there are two common types of predictions that researchers try to make using inferential stats:

• Firstly, predictions about differences between groups – for example, height differences between children grouped by their favourite meal or gender.
• And secondly, relationships between variables – for example, the relationship between body weight and the number of hours a week a person does yoga.

In other words, inferential statistics (when done correctly), allow you to connect the dots and make predictions about what you expect to see in the real world population, based on what you observe in your sample data. For this reason, inferential statistics are used for hypothesis testing – in other words, to test hypotheses that predict changes or differences.

Of course, when you’re working with inferential statistics, the composition of your sample is really important. In other words, if your sample doesn’t accurately represent the population you’re researching, then your findings won’t necessarily be very useful.

For example, if your population of interest is a mix of 50% male and 50% female , but your sample is 80% male , you can’t make inferences about the population based on your sample, since it’s not representative. This area of statistics is called sampling, but we won’t go down that rabbit hole here (it’s a deep one!) – we’ll save that for another post .

What statistics are usually used in this branch?

There are many, many different statistical analysis methods within the inferential branch and it’d be impossible for us to discuss them all here. So we’ll just take a look at some of the most common inferential statistical methods so that you have a solid starting point.

First up are T-Tests . T-tests compare the means (the averages) of two groups of data to assess whether they’re statistically significantly different. In other words, do they have significantly different means, standard deviations and skewness.

This type of testing is very useful for understanding just how similar or different two groups of data are. For example, you might want to compare the mean blood pressure between two groups of people – one that has taken a new medication and one that hasn’t – to assess whether they are significantly different.

Kicking things up a level, we have ANOVA, which stands for “analysis of variance”. This test is similar to a T-test in that it compares the means of various groups, but ANOVA allows you to analyse multiple groups , not just two groups So it’s basically a t-test on steroids…

Next, we have correlation analysis . This type of analysis assesses the relationship between two variables. In other words, if one variable increases, does the other variable also increase, decrease or stay the same. For example, if the average temperature goes up, do average ice creams sales increase too? We’d expect some sort of relationship between these two variables intuitively , but correlation analysis allows us to measure that relationship scientifically .

Lastly, we have regression analysis – this is quite similar to correlation in that it assesses the relationship between variables, but it goes a step further to understand cause and effect between variables, not just whether they move together. In other words, does the one variable actually cause the other one to move, or do they just happen to move together naturally thanks to another force? Just because two variables correlate doesn’t necessarily mean that one causes the other.

Stats overload…

I hear you. To make this all a little more tangible, let’s take a look at an example of a correlation in action.

Here’s a scatter plot demonstrating the correlation (relationship) between weight and height. Intuitively, we’d expect there to be some relationship between these two variables, which is what we see in this scatter plot. In other words, the results tend to cluster together in a diagonal line from bottom left to top right.

As I mentioned, these are are just a handful of inferential techniques – there are many, many more. Importantly, each statistical method has its own assumptions and limitations .

For example, some methods only work with normally distributed (parametric) data, while other methods are designed specifically for non-parametric data. And that’s exactly why descriptive statistics are so important – they’re the first step to knowing which inferential techniques you can and can’t use.

How to choose the right analysis method

To choose the right statistical methods, you need to think about two important factors :

• The type of quantitative data you have (specifically, level of measurement and the shape of the data). And,
• Your research questions and hypotheses

Let’s take a closer look at each of these.

Factor 1 – Data type

The first thing you need to consider is the type of data you’ve collected (or the type of data you will collect). By data types, I’m referring to the four levels of measurement – namely, nominal, ordinal, interval and ratio. If you’re not familiar with this lingo, check out the video below.

Why does this matter?

Well, because different statistical methods and techniques require different types of data. This is one of the “assumptions” I mentioned earlier – every method has its assumptions regarding the type of data.

For example, some techniques work with categorical data (for example, yes/no type questions, or gender or ethnicity), while others work with continuous numerical data (for example, age, weight or income) – and, of course, some work with multiple data types.

If you try to use a statistical method that doesn’t support the data type you have, your results will be largely meaningless . So, make sure that you have a clear understanding of what types of data you’ve collected (or will collect). Once you have this, you can then check which statistical methods would support your data types here .

If you haven’t collected your data yet, you can work in reverse and look at which statistical method would give you the most useful insights, and then design your data collection strategy to collect the correct data types.

Another important factor to consider is the shape of your data . Specifically, does it have a normal distribution (in other words, is it a bell-shaped curve, centred in the middle) or is it very skewed to the left or the right? Again, different statistical techniques work for different shapes of data – some are designed for symmetrical data while others are designed for skewed data.

This is another reminder of why descriptive statistics are so important – they tell you all about the shape of your data.

Factor 2: Your research questions

The next thing you need to consider is your specific research questions, as well as your hypotheses (if you have some). The nature of your research questions and research hypotheses will heavily influence which statistical methods and techniques you should use.

If you’re just interested in understanding the attributes of your sample (as opposed to the entire population), then descriptive statistics are probably all you need. For example, if you just want to assess the means (averages) and medians (centre points) of variables in a group of people.

On the other hand, if you aim to understand differences between groups or relationships between variables and to infer or predict outcomes in the population, then you’ll likely need both descriptive statistics and inferential statistics.

So, it’s really important to get very clear about your research aims and research questions, as well your hypotheses – before you start looking at which statistical techniques to use.

Never shoehorn a specific statistical technique into your research just because you like it or have some experience with it. Your choice of methods must align with all the factors we’ve covered here.

Time to recap…

You’re still with me? That’s impressive. We’ve covered a lot of ground here, so let’s recap on the key points:

• Quantitative data analysis is all about  analysing number-based data  (which includes categorical and numerical data) using various statistical techniques.
• The two main  branches  of statistics are  descriptive statistics  and  inferential statistics . Descriptives describe your sample, whereas inferentials make predictions about what you’ll find in the population.
• Common  descriptive statistical methods include  mean  (average),  median , standard  deviation  and  skewness .
• Common  inferential statistical methods include  t-tests ,  ANOVA ,  correlation  and  regression  analysis.
• To choose the right statistical methods and techniques, you need to consider the  type of data you’re working with , as well as your  research questions  and hypotheses.

Psst... there’s more!

This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...

77 Comments

Hi, I have read your article. Such a brilliant post you have created.

Thank you for the feedback. Good luck with your quantitative analysis.

Thank you so much.

Thank you so much. I learnt much well. I love your summaries of the concepts. I had love you to explain how to input data using SPSS

Very useful, I have got the concept

Amazing and simple way of breaking down quantitative methods.

This is beautiful….especially for non-statisticians. I have skimmed through but I wish to read again. and please include me in other articles of the same nature when you do post. I am interested. I am sure, I could easily learn from you and get off the fear that I have had in the past. Thank you sincerely.

Send me every new information you might have.

i need every new information

Thank you for the blog. It is quite informative. Dr Peter Nemaenzhe PhD

It is wonderful. l’ve understood some of the concepts in a more compréhensive manner

Your article is so good! However, I am still a bit lost. I am doing a secondary research on Gun control in the US and increase in crime rates and I am not sure which analysis method I should use?

Based on the given learning points, this is inferential analysis, thus, use ‘t-tests, ANOVA, correlation and regression analysis’

Well explained notes. Am an MPH student and currently working on my thesis proposal, this has really helped me understand some of the things I didn’t know.

I like your page..helpful

wonderful i got my concept crystal clear. thankyou!!

This is really helpful , thank you

Thank you so much this helped

Wonderfully explained

thank u so much, it was so informative

THANKYOU, this was very informative and very helpful

This is great GRADACOACH I am not a statistician but I require more of this in my thesis

Include me in your posts.

This is so great and fully useful. I would like to thank you again and again.

Glad to read this article. I’ve read lot of articles but this article is clear on all concepts. Thanks for sharing.

Thank you so much. This is a very good foundation and intro into quantitative data analysis. Appreciate!

You have a very impressive, simple but concise explanation of data analysis for Quantitative Research here. This is a God-send link for me to appreciate research more. Thank you so much!

Avery good presentation followed by the write up. yes you simplified statistics to make sense even to a layman like me. Thank so much keep it up. The presenter did ell too. i would like more of this for Qualitative and exhaust more of the test example like the Anova.

This is a very helpful article, couldn’t have been clearer. Thank you.

Awesome and phenomenal information.Well done

The video with the accompanying article is super helpful to demystify this topic. Very well done. Thank you so much.

thank you so much, your presentation helped me a lot

I don’t know how should I express that ur article is saviour for me 🥺😍

It is well defined information and thanks for sharing. It helps me a lot in understanding the statistical data.

I gain a lot and thanks for sharing brilliant ideas, so wish to be linked on your email update.

Very helpful and clear .Thank you Gradcoach.

Thank for sharing this article, well organized and information presented are very clear.

VERY INTERESTING AND SUPPORTIVE TO NEW RESEARCHERS LIKE ME. AT LEAST SOME BASICS ABOUT QUANTITATIVE.

An outstanding, well explained and helpful article. This will help me so much with my data analysis for my research project. Thank you!

wow this has just simplified everything i was scared of how i am gonna analyse my data but thanks to you i will be able to do so

simple and constant direction to research. thanks

This is helpful

Great writing!! Comprehensive and very helpful.

Do you provide any assistance for other steps of research methodology like making research problem testing hypothesis report and thesis writing?

Thank you so much for such useful article!

Amazing article. So nicely explained. Wow

Very insightfull. Thanks

I am doing a quality improvement project to determine if the implementation of a protocol will change prescribing habits. Would this be a t-test?

The is a very helpful blog, however, I’m still not sure how to analyze my data collected. I’m doing a research on “Free Education at the University of Guyana”

tnx. fruitful blog!

So I am writing exams and would like to know how do establish which method of data analysis to use from the below research questions: I am a bit lost as to how I determine the data analysis method from the research questions.

Do female employees report higher job satisfaction than male employees with similar job descriptions across the South African telecommunications sector? – I though that maybe Chi Square could be used here. – Is there a gender difference in talented employees’ actual turnover decisions across the South African telecommunications sector? T-tests or Correlation in this one. – Is there a gender difference in the cost of actual turnover decisions across the South African telecommunications sector? T-tests or Correlation in this one. – What practical recommendations can be made to the management of South African telecommunications companies on leveraging gender to mitigate employee turnover decisions?

Your assistance will be appreciated if I could get a response as early as possible tomorrow

This was quite helpful. Thank you so much.

wow I got a lot from this article, thank you very much, keep it up

Thanks for yhe guidance. Can you send me this guidance on my email? To enable offline reading?

Thank you very much, this service is very helpful.

Every novice researcher needs to read this article as it puts things so clear and easy to follow. Its been very helpful.

Wonderful!!!! you explained everything in a way that anyone can learn. Thank you!!

I really enjoyed reading though this. Very easy to follow. Thank you

Many thanks for your useful lecture, I would be really appreciated if you could possibly share with me the PPT of presentation related to Data type?

Thank you very much for sharing, I got much from this article

This is a very informative write-up. Kindly include me in your latest posts.

Very interesting mostly for social scientists

Thank you so much, very helpfull

You’re welcome 🙂

woow, its great, its very informative and well understood because of your way of writing like teaching in front of me in simple languages.

I have been struggling to understand a lot of these concepts. Thank you for the informative piece which is written with outstanding clarity.

very informative article. Easy to understand

Beautiful read, much needed.

Always greet intro and summary. I learn so much from GradCoach

Quite informative. Simple and clear summary.

I thoroughly enjoyed reading your informative and inspiring piece. Your profound insights into this topic truly provide a better understanding of its complexity. I agree with the points you raised, especially when you delved into the specifics of the article. In my opinion, that aspect is often overlooked and deserves further attention.

Absolutely!!! Thank you

Thank you very much for this post. It made me to understand how to do my data analysis.

its nice work and excellent job ,you have made my work easier

Wow! So explicit. Well done.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• J Korean Med Sci
• v.37(16); 2022 Apr 25

A Practical Guide to Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research Questions and Hypotheses in Scholarly Articles

Edward barroga.

1 Department of General Education, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke’s International University, Tokyo, Japan.

Glafera Janet Matanguihan

2 Department of Biological Sciences, Messiah University, Mechanicsburg, PA, USA.

The development of research questions and the subsequent hypotheses are prerequisites to defining the main research purpose and specific objectives of a study. Consequently, these objectives determine the study design and research outcome. The development of research questions is a process based on knowledge of current trends, cutting-edge studies, and technological advances in the research field. Excellent research questions are focused and require a comprehensive literature search and in-depth understanding of the problem being investigated. Initially, research questions may be written as descriptive questions which could be developed into inferential questions. These questions must be specific and concise to provide a clear foundation for developing hypotheses. Hypotheses are more formal predictions about the research outcomes. These specify the possible results that may or may not be expected regarding the relationship between groups. Thus, research questions and hypotheses clarify the main purpose and specific objectives of the study, which in turn dictate the design of the study, its direction, and outcome. Studies developed from good research questions and hypotheses will have trustworthy outcomes with wide-ranging social and health implications.

INTRODUCTION

Scientific research is usually initiated by posing evidenced-based research questions which are then explicitly restated as hypotheses. 1 , 2 The hypotheses provide directions to guide the study, solutions, explanations, and expected results. 3 , 4 Both research questions and hypotheses are essentially formulated based on conventional theories and real-world processes, which allow the inception of novel studies and the ethical testing of ideas. 5 , 6

It is crucial to have knowledge of both quantitative and qualitative research 2 as both types of research involve writing research questions and hypotheses. 7 However, these crucial elements of research are sometimes overlooked; if not overlooked, then framed without the forethought and meticulous attention it needs. Planning and careful consideration are needed when developing quantitative or qualitative research, particularly when conceptualizing research questions and hypotheses. 4

There is a continuing need to support researchers in the creation of innovative research questions and hypotheses, as well as for journal articles that carefully review these elements. 1 When research questions and hypotheses are not carefully thought of, unethical studies and poor outcomes usually ensue. Carefully formulated research questions and hypotheses define well-founded objectives, which in turn determine the appropriate design, course, and outcome of the study. This article then aims to discuss in detail the various aspects of crafting research questions and hypotheses, with the goal of guiding researchers as they develop their own. Examples from the authors and peer-reviewed scientific articles in the healthcare field are provided to illustrate key points.

DEFINITIONS AND RELATIONSHIP OF RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES

A research question is what a study aims to answer after data analysis and interpretation. The answer is written in length in the discussion section of the paper. Thus, the research question gives a preview of the different parts and variables of the study meant to address the problem posed in the research question. 1 An excellent research question clarifies the research writing while facilitating understanding of the research topic, objective, scope, and limitations of the study. 5

On the other hand, a research hypothesis is an educated statement of an expected outcome. This statement is based on background research and current knowledge. 8 , 9 The research hypothesis makes a specific prediction about a new phenomenon 10 or a formal statement on the expected relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable. 3 , 11 It provides a tentative answer to the research question to be tested or explored. 4

Hypotheses employ reasoning to predict a theory-based outcome. 10 These can also be developed from theories by focusing on components of theories that have not yet been observed. 10 The validity of hypotheses is often based on the testability of the prediction made in a reproducible experiment. 8

Conversely, hypotheses can also be rephrased as research questions. Several hypotheses based on existing theories and knowledge may be needed to answer a research question. Developing ethical research questions and hypotheses creates a research design that has logical relationships among variables. These relationships serve as a solid foundation for the conduct of the study. 4 , 11 Haphazardly constructed research questions can result in poorly formulated hypotheses and improper study designs, leading to unreliable results. Thus, the formulations of relevant research questions and verifiable hypotheses are crucial when beginning research. 12

CHARACTERISTICS OF GOOD RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES

Excellent research questions are specific and focused. These integrate collective data and observations to confirm or refute the subsequent hypotheses. Well-constructed hypotheses are based on previous reports and verify the research context. These are realistic, in-depth, sufficiently complex, and reproducible. More importantly, these hypotheses can be addressed and tested. 13

There are several characteristics of well-developed hypotheses. Good hypotheses are 1) empirically testable 7 , 10 , 11 , 13 ; 2) backed by preliminary evidence 9 ; 3) testable by ethical research 7 , 9 ; 4) based on original ideas 9 ; 5) have evidenced-based logical reasoning 10 ; and 6) can be predicted. 11 Good hypotheses can infer ethical and positive implications, indicating the presence of a relationship or effect relevant to the research theme. 7 , 11 These are initially developed from a general theory and branch into specific hypotheses by deductive reasoning. In the absence of a theory to base the hypotheses, inductive reasoning based on specific observations or findings form more general hypotheses. 10

TYPES OF RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES

Research questions and hypotheses are developed according to the type of research, which can be broadly classified into quantitative and qualitative research. We provide a summary of the types of research questions and hypotheses under quantitative and qualitative research categories in Table 1 .

Research questions in quantitative research

In quantitative research, research questions inquire about the relationships among variables being investigated and are usually framed at the start of the study. These are precise and typically linked to the subject population, dependent and independent variables, and research design. 1 Research questions may also attempt to describe the behavior of a population in relation to one or more variables, or describe the characteristics of variables to be measured ( descriptive research questions ). 1 , 5 , 14 These questions may also aim to discover differences between groups within the context of an outcome variable ( comparative research questions ), 1 , 5 , 14 or elucidate trends and interactions among variables ( relationship research questions ). 1 , 5 We provide examples of descriptive, comparative, and relationship research questions in quantitative research in Table 2 .

Hypotheses in quantitative research

In quantitative research, hypotheses predict the expected relationships among variables. 15 Relationships among variables that can be predicted include 1) between a single dependent variable and a single independent variable ( simple hypothesis ) or 2) between two or more independent and dependent variables ( complex hypothesis ). 4 , 11 Hypotheses may also specify the expected direction to be followed and imply an intellectual commitment to a particular outcome ( directional hypothesis ) 4 . On the other hand, hypotheses may not predict the exact direction and are used in the absence of a theory, or when findings contradict previous studies ( non-directional hypothesis ). 4 In addition, hypotheses can 1) define interdependency between variables ( associative hypothesis ), 4 2) propose an effect on the dependent variable from manipulation of the independent variable ( causal hypothesis ), 4 3) state a negative relationship between two variables ( null hypothesis ), 4 , 11 , 15 4) replace the working hypothesis if rejected ( alternative hypothesis ), 15 explain the relationship of phenomena to possibly generate a theory ( working hypothesis ), 11 5) involve quantifiable variables that can be tested statistically ( statistical hypothesis ), 11 6) or express a relationship whose interlinks can be verified logically ( logical hypothesis ). 11 We provide examples of simple, complex, directional, non-directional, associative, causal, null, alternative, working, statistical, and logical hypotheses in quantitative research, as well as the definition of quantitative hypothesis-testing research in Table 3 .

Research questions in qualitative research

Unlike research questions in quantitative research, research questions in qualitative research are usually continuously reviewed and reformulated. The central question and associated subquestions are stated more than the hypotheses. 15 The central question broadly explores a complex set of factors surrounding the central phenomenon, aiming to present the varied perspectives of participants. 15

There are varied goals for which qualitative research questions are developed. These questions can function in several ways, such as to 1) identify and describe existing conditions ( contextual research question s); 2) describe a phenomenon ( descriptive research questions ); 3) assess the effectiveness of existing methods, protocols, theories, or procedures ( evaluation research questions ); 4) examine a phenomenon or analyze the reasons or relationships between subjects or phenomena ( explanatory research questions ); or 5) focus on unknown aspects of a particular topic ( exploratory research questions ). 5 In addition, some qualitative research questions provide new ideas for the development of theories and actions ( generative research questions ) or advance specific ideologies of a position ( ideological research questions ). 1 Other qualitative research questions may build on a body of existing literature and become working guidelines ( ethnographic research questions ). Research questions may also be broadly stated without specific reference to the existing literature or a typology of questions ( phenomenological research questions ), may be directed towards generating a theory of some process ( grounded theory questions ), or may address a description of the case and the emerging themes ( qualitative case study questions ). 15 We provide examples of contextual, descriptive, evaluation, explanatory, exploratory, generative, ideological, ethnographic, phenomenological, grounded theory, and qualitative case study research questions in qualitative research in Table 4 , and the definition of qualitative hypothesis-generating research in Table 5 .

Qualitative studies usually pose at least one central research question and several subquestions starting with How or What . These research questions use exploratory verbs such as explore or describe . These also focus on one central phenomenon of interest, and may mention the participants and research site. 15

Hypotheses in qualitative research

Hypotheses in qualitative research are stated in the form of a clear statement concerning the problem to be investigated. Unlike in quantitative research where hypotheses are usually developed to be tested, qualitative research can lead to both hypothesis-testing and hypothesis-generating outcomes. 2 When studies require both quantitative and qualitative research questions, this suggests an integrative process between both research methods wherein a single mixed-methods research question can be developed. 1

FRAMEWORKS FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES

Research questions followed by hypotheses should be developed before the start of the study. 1 , 12 , 14 It is crucial to develop feasible research questions on a topic that is interesting to both the researcher and the scientific community. This can be achieved by a meticulous review of previous and current studies to establish a novel topic. Specific areas are subsequently focused on to generate ethical research questions. The relevance of the research questions is evaluated in terms of clarity of the resulting data, specificity of the methodology, objectivity of the outcome, depth of the research, and impact of the study. 1 , 5 These aspects constitute the FINER criteria (i.e., Feasible, Interesting, Novel, Ethical, and Relevant). 1 Clarity and effectiveness are achieved if research questions meet the FINER criteria. In addition to the FINER criteria, Ratan et al. described focus, complexity, novelty, feasibility, and measurability for evaluating the effectiveness of research questions. 14

The PICOT and PEO frameworks are also used when developing research questions. 1 The following elements are addressed in these frameworks, PICOT: P-population/patients/problem, I-intervention or indicator being studied, C-comparison group, O-outcome of interest, and T-timeframe of the study; PEO: P-population being studied, E-exposure to preexisting conditions, and O-outcome of interest. 1 Research questions are also considered good if these meet the “FINERMAPS” framework: Feasible, Interesting, Novel, Ethical, Relevant, Manageable, Appropriate, Potential value/publishable, and Systematic. 14

As we indicated earlier, research questions and hypotheses that are not carefully formulated result in unethical studies or poor outcomes. To illustrate this, we provide some examples of ambiguous research question and hypotheses that result in unclear and weak research objectives in quantitative research ( Table 6 ) 16 and qualitative research ( Table 7 ) 17 , and how to transform these ambiguous research question(s) and hypothesis(es) into clear and good statements.

a These statements were composed for comparison and illustrative purposes only.

b These statements are direct quotes from Higashihara and Horiuchi. 16

a This statement is a direct quote from Shimoda et al. 17

The other statements were composed for comparison and illustrative purposes only.

CONSTRUCTING RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES

To construct effective research questions and hypotheses, it is very important to 1) clarify the background and 2) identify the research problem at the outset of the research, within a specific timeframe. 9 Then, 3) review or conduct preliminary research to collect all available knowledge about the possible research questions by studying theories and previous studies. 18 Afterwards, 4) construct research questions to investigate the research problem. Identify variables to be accessed from the research questions 4 and make operational definitions of constructs from the research problem and questions. Thereafter, 5) construct specific deductive or inductive predictions in the form of hypotheses. 4 Finally, 6) state the study aims . This general flow for constructing effective research questions and hypotheses prior to conducting research is shown in Fig. 1 .

Research questions are used more frequently in qualitative research than objectives or hypotheses. 3 These questions seek to discover, understand, explore or describe experiences by asking “What” or “How.” The questions are open-ended to elicit a description rather than to relate variables or compare groups. The questions are continually reviewed, reformulated, and changed during the qualitative study. 3 Research questions are also used more frequently in survey projects than hypotheses in experiments in quantitative research to compare variables and their relationships.

Hypotheses are constructed based on the variables identified and as an if-then statement, following the template, ‘If a specific action is taken, then a certain outcome is expected.’ At this stage, some ideas regarding expectations from the research to be conducted must be drawn. 18 Then, the variables to be manipulated (independent) and influenced (dependent) are defined. 4 Thereafter, the hypothesis is stated and refined, and reproducible data tailored to the hypothesis are identified, collected, and analyzed. 4 The hypotheses must be testable and specific, 18 and should describe the variables and their relationships, the specific group being studied, and the predicted research outcome. 18 Hypotheses construction involves a testable proposition to be deduced from theory, and independent and dependent variables to be separated and measured separately. 3 Therefore, good hypotheses must be based on good research questions constructed at the start of a study or trial. 12

In summary, research questions are constructed after establishing the background of the study. Hypotheses are then developed based on the research questions. Thus, it is crucial to have excellent research questions to generate superior hypotheses. In turn, these would determine the research objectives and the design of the study, and ultimately, the outcome of the research. 12 Algorithms for building research questions and hypotheses are shown in Fig. 2 for quantitative research and in Fig. 3 for qualitative research.

EXAMPLES OF RESEARCH QUESTIONS FROM PUBLISHED ARTICLES

• EXAMPLE 1. Descriptive research question (quantitative research)
• - Presents research variables to be assessed (distinct phenotypes and subphenotypes)
• “BACKGROUND: Since COVID-19 was identified, its clinical and biological heterogeneity has been recognized. Identifying COVID-19 phenotypes might help guide basic, clinical, and translational research efforts.
• RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the clinical spectrum of patients with COVID-19 contain distinct phenotypes and subphenotypes? ” 19
• EXAMPLE 2. Relationship research question (quantitative research)
• - Shows interactions between dependent variable (static postural control) and independent variable (peripheral visual field loss)
• “Background: Integration of visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive sensations contributes to postural control. People with peripheral visual field loss have serious postural instability. However, the directional specificity of postural stability and sensory reweighting caused by gradual peripheral visual field loss remain unclear.
• Research question: What are the effects of peripheral visual field loss on static postural control ?” 20
• EXAMPLE 3. Comparative research question (quantitative research)
• - Clarifies the difference among groups with an outcome variable (patients enrolled in COMPERA with moderate PH or severe PH in COPD) and another group without the outcome variable (patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH))
• “BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) in COPD is a poorly investigated clinical condition.
• RESEARCH QUESTION: Which factors determine the outcome of PH in COPD?
• STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed the characteristics and outcome of patients enrolled in the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) with moderate or severe PH in COPD as defined during the 6th PH World Symposium who received medical therapy for PH and compared them with patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) .” 21
• EXAMPLE 4. Exploratory research question (qualitative research)
• - Explores areas that have not been fully investigated (perspectives of families and children who receive care in clinic-based child obesity treatment) to have a deeper understanding of the research problem
• “Problem: Interventions for children with obesity lead to only modest improvements in BMI and long-term outcomes, and data are limited on the perspectives of families of children with obesity in clinic-based treatment. This scoping review seeks to answer the question: What is known about the perspectives of families and children who receive care in clinic-based child obesity treatment? This review aims to explore the scope of perspectives reported by families of children with obesity who have received individualized outpatient clinic-based obesity treatment.” 22
• EXAMPLE 5. Relationship research question (quantitative research)
• - Defines interactions between dependent variable (use of ankle strategies) and independent variable (changes in muscle tone)
• “Background: To maintain an upright standing posture against external disturbances, the human body mainly employs two types of postural control strategies: “ankle strategy” and “hip strategy.” While it has been reported that the magnitude of the disturbance alters the use of postural control strategies, it has not been elucidated how the level of muscle tone, one of the crucial parameters of bodily function, determines the use of each strategy. We have previously confirmed using forward dynamics simulations of human musculoskeletal models that an increased muscle tone promotes the use of ankle strategies. The objective of the present study was to experimentally evaluate a hypothesis: an increased muscle tone promotes the use of ankle strategies. Research question: Do changes in the muscle tone affect the use of ankle strategies ?” 23

EXAMPLES OF HYPOTHESES IN PUBLISHED ARTICLES

• EXAMPLE 1. Working hypothesis (quantitative research)
• - A hypothesis that is initially accepted for further research to produce a feasible theory
• “As fever may have benefit in shortening the duration of viral illness, it is plausible to hypothesize that the antipyretic efficacy of ibuprofen may be hindering the benefits of a fever response when taken during the early stages of COVID-19 illness .” 24
• “In conclusion, it is plausible to hypothesize that the antipyretic efficacy of ibuprofen may be hindering the benefits of a fever response . The difference in perceived safety of these agents in COVID-19 illness could be related to the more potent efficacy to reduce fever with ibuprofen compared to acetaminophen. Compelling data on the benefit of fever warrant further research and review to determine when to treat or withhold ibuprofen for early stage fever for COVID-19 and other related viral illnesses .” 24
• EXAMPLE 2. Exploratory hypothesis (qualitative research)
• - Explores particular areas deeper to clarify subjective experience and develop a formal hypothesis potentially testable in a future quantitative approach
• “We hypothesized that when thinking about a past experience of help-seeking, a self distancing prompt would cause increased help-seeking intentions and more favorable help-seeking outcome expectations .” 25
• “Conclusion
• Although a priori hypotheses were not supported, further research is warranted as results indicate the potential for using self-distancing approaches to increasing help-seeking among some people with depressive symptomatology.” 25
• EXAMPLE 3. Hypothesis-generating research to establish a framework for hypothesis testing (qualitative research)
• “We hypothesize that compassionate care is beneficial for patients (better outcomes), healthcare systems and payers (lower costs), and healthcare providers (lower burnout). ” 26
• Compassionomics is the branch of knowledge and scientific study of the effects of compassionate healthcare. Our main hypotheses are that compassionate healthcare is beneficial for (1) patients, by improving clinical outcomes, (2) healthcare systems and payers, by supporting financial sustainability, and (3) HCPs, by lowering burnout and promoting resilience and well-being. The purpose of this paper is to establish a scientific framework for testing the hypotheses above . If these hypotheses are confirmed through rigorous research, compassionomics will belong in the science of evidence-based medicine, with major implications for all healthcare domains.” 26
• EXAMPLE 4. Statistical hypothesis (quantitative research)
• - An assumption is made about the relationship among several population characteristics ( gender differences in sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of adults with ADHD ). Validity is tested by statistical experiment or analysis ( chi-square test, Students t-test, and logistic regression analysis)
• “Our research investigated gender differences in sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of adults with ADHD in a Japanese clinical sample. Due to unique Japanese cultural ideals and expectations of women's behavior that are in opposition to ADHD symptoms, we hypothesized that women with ADHD experience more difficulties and present more dysfunctions than men . We tested the following hypotheses: first, women with ADHD have more comorbidities than men with ADHD; second, women with ADHD experience more social hardships than men, such as having less full-time employment and being more likely to be divorced.” 27
• “Statistical Analysis
• ( text omitted ) Between-gender comparisons were made using the chi-squared test for categorical variables and Students t-test for continuous variables…( text omitted ). A logistic regression analysis was performed for employment status, marital status, and comorbidity to evaluate the independent effects of gender on these dependent variables.” 27

EXAMPLES OF HYPOTHESIS AS WRITTEN IN PUBLISHED ARTICLES IN RELATION TO OTHER PARTS

• EXAMPLE 1. Background, hypotheses, and aims are provided
• “Pregnant women need skilled care during pregnancy and childbirth, but that skilled care is often delayed in some countries …( text omitted ). The focused antenatal care (FANC) model of WHO recommends that nurses provide information or counseling to all pregnant women …( text omitted ). Job aids are visual support materials that provide the right kind of information using graphics and words in a simple and yet effective manner. When nurses are not highly trained or have many work details to attend to, these job aids can serve as a content reminder for the nurses and can be used for educating their patients (Jennings, Yebadokpo, Affo, & Agbogbe, 2010) ( text omitted ). Importantly, additional evidence is needed to confirm how job aids can further improve the quality of ANC counseling by health workers in maternal care …( text omitted )” 28
• “ This has led us to hypothesize that the quality of ANC counseling would be better if supported by job aids. Consequently, a better quality of ANC counseling is expected to produce higher levels of awareness concerning the danger signs of pregnancy and a more favorable impression of the caring behavior of nurses .” 28
• “This study aimed to examine the differences in the responses of pregnant women to a job aid-supported intervention during ANC visit in terms of 1) their understanding of the danger signs of pregnancy and 2) their impression of the caring behaviors of nurses to pregnant women in rural Tanzania.” 28
• EXAMPLE 2. Background, hypotheses, and aims are provided
• “We conducted a two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate and compare changes in salivary cortisol and oxytocin levels of first-time pregnant women between experimental and control groups. The women in the experimental group touched and held an infant for 30 min (experimental intervention protocol), whereas those in the control group watched a DVD movie of an infant (control intervention protocol). The primary outcome was salivary cortisol level and the secondary outcome was salivary oxytocin level.” 29
• “ We hypothesize that at 30 min after touching and holding an infant, the salivary cortisol level will significantly decrease and the salivary oxytocin level will increase in the experimental group compared with the control group .” 29
• EXAMPLE 3. Background, aim, and hypothesis are provided
• “In countries where the maternal mortality ratio remains high, antenatal education to increase Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness (BPCR) is considered one of the top priorities [1]. BPCR includes birth plans during the antenatal period, such as the birthplace, birth attendant, transportation, health facility for complications, expenses, and birth materials, as well as family coordination to achieve such birth plans. In Tanzania, although increasing, only about half of all pregnant women attend an antenatal clinic more than four times [4]. Moreover, the information provided during antenatal care (ANC) is insufficient. In the resource-poor settings, antenatal group education is a potential approach because of the limited time for individual counseling at antenatal clinics.” 30
• “This study aimed to evaluate an antenatal group education program among pregnant women and their families with respect to birth-preparedness and maternal and infant outcomes in rural villages of Tanzania.” 30
• “ The study hypothesis was if Tanzanian pregnant women and their families received a family-oriented antenatal group education, they would (1) have a higher level of BPCR, (2) attend antenatal clinic four or more times, (3) give birth in a health facility, (4) have less complications of women at birth, and (5) have less complications and deaths of infants than those who did not receive the education .” 30

Research questions and hypotheses are crucial components to any type of research, whether quantitative or qualitative. These questions should be developed at the very beginning of the study. Excellent research questions lead to superior hypotheses, which, like a compass, set the direction of research, and can often determine the successful conduct of the study. Many research studies have floundered because the development of research questions and subsequent hypotheses was not given the thought and meticulous attention needed. The development of research questions and hypotheses is an iterative process based on extensive knowledge of the literature and insightful grasp of the knowledge gap. Focused, concise, and specific research questions provide a strong foundation for constructing hypotheses which serve as formal predictions about the research outcomes. Research questions and hypotheses are crucial elements of research that should not be overlooked. They should be carefully thought of and constructed when planning research. This avoids unethical studies and poor outcomes by defining well-founded objectives that determine the design, course, and outcome of the study.

Disclosure: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions:

• Conceptualization: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ.
• Methodology: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ.
• Writing - original draft: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ.
• Writing - review & editing: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ.

Quantitative Research Design (JARS–Quant)

The current JARS–Quant standards, released in 2018, expand and revise the types of research methodologies covered in the original JARS, which were published in 2008.

JARS–Quant include guidance for manuscripts that report

• Primary quantitative research
• Experimental designs
• Nonexperimental designs

Special designs

Analytic methods, meta-analyses.

In addition, JARS–Quant now divides hypotheses, analyses, and conclusions into primary, secondary, and exploratory groups. This should enhance the readability and replicability of the research.

Providing the information specified in JARS–Quant should become routine and minimally burdensome, thereby increasing the transparency of reporting in psychological research.

For more information on how the revised standards were created, read Journal Article Reporting Standards for Quantitative Research in Psychology .

General quantitative reporting standards

• Quantitative Design Reporting Standards (JARS-Quant) (PDF, 137KB) Information recommended for inclusion in manuscripts that report new data collections regardless of research design

Experimental and nonexperimental designs

• Experimental Designs (PDF, 109KB) Reporting standards for studies with an experimental manipulation
• Random Assignment (PDF, 101KB) Reporting standards for studies using random assignment
• Nonrandom Assignment (PDF, 92KB) Reporting standards for studies using nonrandom assignment
• Clinical Trials (PDF, 106KB) Reporting standards for studies involving clinical trials
• Nonexperimental Designs (PDF, 103KB) Reporting standards for studies using no experimental manipulation
• Longitudinal Studies (PDF, 103KB) Reporting standards for longitudinal studies
• N -of-1 Studies (PDF, 102KB) Reporting standards for N -of-1 studies
• Replication Studies (PDF, 95KB) Reporting standards for replication studies
• Structural Equation Modeling (PDF, 111KB) Reporting standards for studies using structural equation modeling
• Bayesian Statistics (PDF, 104KB) Reporting standards for studies using Bayesian techniques
• Quantitative Meta-Analysis Reporting Standards (PDF, 116KB) Information recommended for inclusion in manuscripts that report quantitative meta-analyses
• Qualitative design standards
• Mixed methods standards
• Race, Ethnicity, and Culture standards

Return to Journal Article Reporting Standards homepage

Jars resources

• History of APA’s journal article reporting standards
• APA Style JARS supplemental glossary
• Supplemental resource on the ethic of transparency in JARS
• Frequently asked questions
• JARS-Quant Decision Flowchart (PDF, 98KB)
• JARS-Quant Participant Flowchart (PDF, 98KB)

Jars articles

• Jars –Quant article
• Jars –Qual / Mixed article
• Jars – rec executive summary

Questions / feedback

Email an APA Style Expert if you have questions, feedback, or suggestions for modules to be included in future JARS updates.

APA resources

• APA Databases and Electronic Resources
• APA Journals
• Journal Author Resource Center
• Education and Career
• Psychological Science
• Open Science at APA
• How to Review a Manuscript

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Dissertation
• How to Write a Results Section | Tips & Examples

How to Write a Results Section | Tips & Examples

Published on August 30, 2022 by Tegan George . Revised on July 18, 2023.

A results section is where you report the main findings of the data collection and analysis you conducted for your thesis or dissertation . You should report all relevant results concisely and objectively, in a logical order. Don’t include subjective interpretations of why you found these results or what they mean—any evaluation should be saved for the discussion section .

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

How to write a results section, reporting quantitative research results, reporting qualitative research results, results vs. discussion vs. conclusion, checklist: research results, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about results sections.

When conducting research, it’s important to report the results of your study prior to discussing your interpretations of it. This gives your reader a clear idea of exactly what you found and keeps the data itself separate from your subjective analysis.

Here are a few best practices:

• Your results should always be written in the past tense.
• While the length of this section depends on how much data you collected and analyzed, it should be written as concisely as possible.
• Only include results that are directly relevant to answering your research questions . Avoid speculative or interpretative words like “appears” or “implies.”
• If you have other results you’d like to include, consider adding them to an appendix or footnotes.
• Always start out with your broadest results first, and then flow into your more granular (but still relevant) ones. Think of it like a shoe store: first discuss the shoes as a whole, then the sneakers, boots, sandals, etc.

Don't submit your assignments before you do this

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. Free citation check included.

Try for free

If you conducted quantitative research , you’ll likely be working with the results of some sort of statistical analysis .

Your results section should report the results of any statistical tests you used to compare groups or assess relationships between variables . It should also state whether or not each hypothesis was supported.

The most logical way to structure quantitative results is to frame them around your research questions or hypotheses. For each question or hypothesis, share:

• A reminder of the type of analysis you used (e.g., a two-sample t test or simple linear regression ). A more detailed description of your analysis should go in your methodology section.
• A concise summary of each relevant result, both positive and negative. This can include any relevant descriptive statistics (e.g., means and standard deviations ) as well as inferential statistics (e.g., t scores, degrees of freedom , and p values ). Remember, these numbers are often placed in parentheses.
• A brief statement of how each result relates to the question, or whether the hypothesis was supported. You can briefly mention any results that didn’t fit with your expectations and assumptions, but save any speculation on their meaning or consequences for your discussion  and conclusion.

A note on tables and figures

In quantitative research, it’s often helpful to include visual elements such as graphs, charts, and tables , but only if they are directly relevant to your results. Give these elements clear, descriptive titles and labels so that your reader can easily understand what is being shown. If you want to include any other visual elements that are more tangential in nature, consider adding a figure and table list .

As a rule of thumb:

• Tables are used to communicate exact values, giving a concise overview of various results
• Graphs and charts are used to visualize trends and relationships, giving an at-a-glance illustration of key findings

Don’t forget to also mention any tables and figures you used within the text of your results section. Summarize or elaborate on specific aspects you think your reader should know about rather than merely restating the same numbers already shown.

A two-sample t test was used to test the hypothesis that higher social distance from environmental problems would reduce the intent to donate to environmental organizations, with donation intention (recorded as a score from 1 to 10) as the outcome variable and social distance (categorized as either a low or high level of social distance) as the predictor variable.Social distance was found to be positively correlated with donation intention, t (98) = 12.19, p < .001, with the donation intention of the high social distance group 0.28 points higher, on average, than the low social distance group (see figure 1). This contradicts the initial hypothesis that social distance would decrease donation intention, and in fact suggests a small effect in the opposite direction.

Figure 1: Intention to donate to environmental organizations based on social distance from impact of environmental damage.

In qualitative research , your results might not all be directly related to specific hypotheses. In this case, you can structure your results section around key themes or topics that emerged from your analysis of the data.

For each theme, start with general observations about what the data showed. You can mention:

• Recurring points of agreement or disagreement
• Patterns and trends
• Particularly significant snippets from individual responses

Next, clarify and support these points with direct quotations. Be sure to report any relevant demographic information about participants. Further information (such as full transcripts , if appropriate) can be included in an appendix .

When asked about video games as a form of art, the respondents tended to believe that video games themselves are not an art form, but agreed that creativity is involved in their production. The criteria used to identify artistic video games included design, story, music, and creative teams.One respondent (male, 24) noted a difference in creativity between popular video game genres:

“I think that in role-playing games, there’s more attention to character design, to world design, because the whole story is important and more attention is paid to certain game elements […] so that perhaps you do need bigger teams of creative experts than in an average shooter or something.”

Responses suggest that video game consumers consider some types of games to have more artistic potential than others.

Your results section should objectively report your findings, presenting only brief observations in relation to each question, hypothesis, or theme.

It should not  speculate about the meaning of the results or attempt to answer your main research question . Detailed interpretation of your results is more suitable for your discussion section , while synthesis of your results into an overall answer to your main research question is best left for your conclusion .

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

I have completed my data collection and analyzed the results.

I have included all results that are relevant to my research questions.

I have concisely and objectively reported each result, including relevant descriptive statistics and inferential statistics .

I have stated whether each hypothesis was supported or refuted.

I have used tables and figures to illustrate my results where appropriate.

All tables and figures are correctly labelled and referred to in the text.

There is no subjective interpretation or speculation on the meaning of the results.

You've finished writing up your results! Use the other checklists to further improve your thesis.

If you want to know more about AI for academic writing, AI tools, or research bias, make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!

Research bias

• Survivorship bias
• Self-serving bias
• Availability heuristic
• Halo effect
• Hindsight bias
• Deep learning
• Generative AI
• Machine learning
• Reinforcement learning
• Supervised vs. unsupervised learning

 (AI) Tools

• Grammar Checker
• Paraphrasing Tool
• Text Summarizer
• AI Detector
• Plagiarism Checker
• Citation Generator

The results chapter of a thesis or dissertation presents your research results concisely and objectively.

In quantitative research , for each question or hypothesis , state:

• The type of analysis used
• Relevant results in the form of descriptive and inferential statistics
• Whether or not the alternative hypothesis was supported

In qualitative research , for each question or theme, describe:

• Recurring patterns
• Significant or representative individual responses
• Relevant quotations from the data

Don’t interpret or speculate in the results chapter.

Results are usually written in the past tense , because they are describing the outcome of completed actions.

The results chapter or section simply and objectively reports what you found, without speculating on why you found these results. The discussion interprets the meaning of the results, puts them in context, and explains why they matter.

In qualitative research , results and discussion are sometimes combined. But in quantitative research , it’s considered important to separate the objective results from your interpretation of them.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

George, T. (2023, July 18). How to Write a Results Section | Tips & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved August 26, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/results/

Is this article helpful?

Tegan George

Other students also liked, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, how to write a discussion section | tips & examples, how to write a thesis or dissertation conclusion, what is your plagiarism score.

• How it works

Quantitative Research Questionnaire – Types & Examples

Published by Alvin Nicolas at August 20th, 2024 , Revised On August 21, 2024

Research is usually done to provide solutions to an ongoing problem. Wherever the researchers see a gap, they tend to launch research to enhance their knowledge and to provide solutions to the needs of others. If they want to research from a subjective point of view, they consider qualitative research. On the other hand, when they research from an objective point of view, they tend to consider quantitative research.

There’s a fine line between subjectivity and objectivity. Qualitative research, related to subjectivity, assesses individuals’ personal opinions and experiences, while quantitative research, associated with objectivity, collects numerical data to derive results. However, the best medium to collect data in quantitative research is a questionnaire.

Let’s discuss what a quantitative research questionnaire is, its types, methods of writing questions, and types of survey questions. By thoroughly understanding these key essential terms, you can efficiently create a professional and well-organised quantitative research questionnaire.

What is a Quantitative Research Questionnaire?

Quantitative research questionnaires are preferably used during quantitative research. They are a well-structured set of questions designed specifically to gather specific, close-ended participant responses. This allows the researchers to gather numerical data and obtain a deep understanding of a particular event or problem.

As you know, qualitative research questionnaires contain open-ended questions that allow the participants to express themselves freely, while quantitative research questionnaires contain close-ended and specific questions, such as multiple-choice and Likert scales, to assess individuals’ behaviour.

Quantitative research questionnaires are usually used in research in various fields, such as psychology, medicine, chemistry, and economics.

Let’s see how you can write quantitative research questions by going through some examples:

• How much do British people consume fast food per week?
• What is the percentage of students living in hostels in London?

Types of Quantitative Research Questions With Examples

After learning what a quantitative research questionnaire is and what quantitative research questions look like, it’s time to thoroughly discuss the different types of quantitative research questions to explore this topic more.

Dichotomous Questions

Dichotomous questions are those with a margin for only two possible answers. They are usually used when the answers are “Yes/No” or “True/False.” These questions significantly simplify the research process and help collect simple responses.

Example: Have you ever visited Istanbul?

Multiple Choice Questions

Multiple-choice questions have a list of possible answers for the participants to choose from. They help assess people’s general knowledge, and the data gathered by multiple-choice questions can be easily analysed.

Example: Which of the following is the capital of France?

Multiple Answer Questions

Multiple-answer questions are similar to multiple-choice questions. However, there are multiple answers for participants to choose from. They are used when the questions can’t have a single, specific answer.

Example: Which of the following movie genres are your favourite?

Likert Scale Questions

Likert scale questions are used when the preferences and emotions of the participants are measured from one extreme to another. The scales are usually applied to measure likelihood, frequency, satisfaction, and agreement. The Likert scale has only five options to choose from.

Example: How satisfied are you with your job?

Semantic Differential Questions

Similar to Likert scales, semantic differential questions are also used to measure the emotions and attitudes of participants. The only difference is that instead of using extreme options such as strongly agree and strongly disagree, opposites of a particular choice are given to reduce bias.

Example: Please rate the services of our company.

Rank Order Questions

Rank-order questions are usually used to measure the preferences and choices of the participants efficiently. In this, multiple choices are given, and participants are asked to rank them according to their perspective. This helps to create a good participant profile.

Example: Rank the given books according to your interest.

Matrix Questions

Matrix questions are similar to Likert scales. In Likert scales, participants’ responses are measured through separate questions, while in matrix questions, multiple questions are compiled in a single row to simplify the data collection method efficiently.

Example: Rate the following activities that you do in daily life.

How To Write Quantitative Research Questions?

Quantitative research questions allow researchers to gather empirical data to answer their research problems. As we have discussed the different types of quantitative research questions above, it’s time to learn how to write the perfect quantitative research questions for a questionnaire and streamline your research process.

Here are the steps to follow to write quantitative research questions efficiently.

Step 1: Determine the Research Goals

The first step in writing quantitative research questions is to determine your research goals. Determining and confirming your research goals significantly helps you understand what kind of questions you need to create and for what grade. Efficiently determining the research goals also reduces the need for further modifications in the questionnaire.

Step 2: Be Mindful About the Variables

There are two variables in the questions: independent and dependent. It is essential to decide what would be the dependent variable in your questions and what would be the independent. It significantly helps to understand where to emphasise and where not. It also reduces the probability of additional and vague questions.

Step 3: Choose the Right Type of Question

It is also important to determine the right type of questions to add to your questionnaire. Whether you want Likert scales, rank-order questions, or multiple-answer questions, choosing the right type of questions will help you measure individuals’ responses efficiently and accurately.

Step 4: Use Easy and Clear Language

Another thing to keep in mind while writing questions for a quantitative research questionnaire is to use easy and clear language. As you know, quantitative research is done to measure specific and simple responses in empirical form, and using easy and understandable language in questions makes a huge difference.

Step 5: Be Specific About The Topic

Always be mindful and specific about your topic. Avoid writing questions that divert from your topic because they can cause participants to lose interest. Use the basic terms of your selected topic and gradually go deep. Also, remember to align your topic and questions with your research objectives and goals.

Step 6: Appropriately Write Your Questions

When you have considered all the above-discussed things, it’s time to write your questions appropriately. Don’t just haste in writing. Think twice about the result of a question and then consider writing it in the questionnaire. Remember to be precise while writing. Avoid overwriting.

Step 7: Gather Feedback From Peers

When you have finished writing questions, gather feedback from your researcher peers. Write down all the suggestions and feedback given by your peers. Don’t panic over the criticism of your questions. Remember that it’s still time to make necessary changes to the questionnaire before launching your campaign.

Step 8: Refine and Finalise the Questions

After gathering peer feedback, make necessary and appropriate changes to your questions. Be mindful of your research goals and topic. Try to modify your questions according to them. Also, be mindful of the theme and colour scheme of the questionnaire that you decided on. After refining the questions, finalise your questionnaire.

Types of Survey Questionnaires in Quantitative Research

Quantitative research questionnaires have close-ended questions that allow the researchers to measure accurate and specific responses from the participants. They don’t contain open-ended questions like qualitative research, where the response is measured by interviews and focus groups. Good combinations of questions are used in the quantitative research survey .

However, here are the types of surveys in quantitative research:

Descriptive Survey

The descriptive survey is used to obtain information about a particular variable. It is used to associate a quantity and quantify research variables. The questions associated with descriptive surveys mostly start with “What is” and “How much”.

Example: A descriptive survey to measure how much money children spend to buy toys.

Comparative Survey

A comparative survey is used to establish a comparison between one or more dependable variables and two or more comparison groups. This survey aims to form a comparative relation between the variables under study. The structure of the question in a comparative survey is, “What is the difference in [dependable variable] between [two or more groups]?”.

Example: A comparative survey on the difference in political awareness between Eastern and Western citizens.

Relationship-Based Survey

Relationship-based survey is used to understand the relationship or association between two or more independent and dependent variables. Cause and effect between two or more variables is measured in the relationship-based survey. The structure of questions in a relationship-based survey is, “What is the relation [between or among] [independent variable] and [dependable variable]?”.

Example: What is the relationship between education and lifestyle in America?

Advantages & Disadvantages of Questionnaires in Quantitative Research

Quantitative research questionnaires are an excellent tool to collect data and information about the responses of individuals. Quantitative research comes with various advantages, but along with advantages, it also has its disadvantages. Check the table below to learn about the advantages and disadvantages of a quantitative research questionnaire.

Quantitative Research Questionnaire Example

Here is an example of a quantitative research questionnaire to help you get the idea and create an efficient and well-developed questionnaire for your research:

Warm welcome, and thank you for participating in our survey. Please provide your response to the questions below. Your esteemed response will significantly help us to achieve our research goals and provide effective solutions to society.

17-20 21-24 25-28 29-32 ii) What is your gender? Male Female Other Prefer not to say ii) Have you graduated? Yes No iii) Are you employed? iv) Are you married? Yes No   Part 2: Provide your honest response.  Question 1: I have tried online shopping. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral  Agree Strongly Agree Question 2: I have good experience with online shopping. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Question 3: I have a bad experience with online shopping. Question 4: I received my order on time.  Question 5: I like physical shopping more.  Frequently Asked Questions What is a quantitative research questionnaire. A quantitative research questionnaire is a well-structured set of questions designed specifically to gather specific and close-ended participant responses. What is the difference between qualitative and quantitative research? The difference between qualitative and quantitative research is subjectivity and objectivity. Subjectivity is associated with qualitative research, while objectivity is associated with quantitative research.  What are the advantages of a quantitative research questionnaire? It is quick and efficient. There is less risk of research bias and subjectivity. It is particular and simple. You May Also Like Thematic analysis is commonly used for qualitative data. Researchers give preference to thematic analysis when analysing audio or video transcripts. Disadvantages of primary research – It can be expensive, time-consuming and take a long time to complete if it involves face-to-face contact with customers. What are the different types of research you can use in your dissertation? Here are some guidelines to help you choose a research strategy that would make your research more credible. USEFUL LINKS LEARNING RESOURCES COMPANY DETAILS How It Works DOI: 10.3390/risks12080123 Corpus ID: 271681637 Impact of Audit Fees on Earnings Management and Financial Risk: An Analysis of Corporate Finance Practices A. Daryaei , D. Askarany , Yasin Fattahi Published in Risks 2 August 2024 Business, Economics Figures and Tables from this paper 49 References Is earnings management impacted by audit fees and auditor tenure an analysis of the big four audit firms in the us market, do audit firm and audit costs/fees influence earnings management in swedish municipalities, how audit fees impact earnings management in service companies on the amman stock exchange through audit committee characteristics, abnormal audit fees and audit quality: the importance of considering managerial incentives in tests of earnings management, the relation between auditors' fees for non-audit services and earnings management, determining audit fees: evidence from the egyptian stock market, audit fees and earnings management: differences based on the type of audit, the association between audit fees and reported earnings quality in pre‐ and post‐sarbanes‐oxley regimes, non-audit services and earnings management: u.k. evidence, multilevel optimal managerial incentives and audit fees to limit earnings management practices, related papers. Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers Enhancing SLAM efficiency: a comparative analysis of B-spline surface mapping and grid-based approaches Published: 28 August 2024 Cite this article B. Rajesh Kanna 1 , Shreyas Madhav AV 2 , C. Sweetlin Hemalatha 3 & Manoj Kumar Rajagopal   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2671-2394 4   Environmental mapping serves as a crucial element in Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) algorithms, playing a pivotal role in ensuring the accurate representation necessary for autonomous robot navigation guided by SLAM. Current SLAM systems predominantly rely on grid-based map representations, encountering challenges such as measurement discretization for cell fitting and grid map interpolation for online posture prediction. Splines present a promising alternative, capable of mitigating these issues while maintaining computational efficiency. This paper delves into the efficiency disparities between B-Spline surface mapping and discretized cell-based approaches, such as grid mapping, within indoor environments. B-Spline Online SLAM and FastSLAM, utilizing Rao-Blackwellized Particle Filter (RBPF), are employed to achieve range-based mapping of the unknown 2D environment. The system incorporates deep learning networks in the B-Spline curve estimation process to compute parameterizations and knot vectors. The research implementation utilizes the Intel Research Lab benchmark dataset to conduct a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative analysis of both approaches. The B-Spline surface approach demonstrates significantly superior performance, evidenced by low error metrics, including an average squared translational error of 0.0016 and an average squared rotational error of 1.137. Additionally, comparative analysis with Vision Benchmark Suite demonstrates robustness across different environments, highlighting the effectiveness of B-Spline SLAM for real-world applications. This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access. Access this article Subscribe and save. Get 10 units per month Download Article/Chapter or eBook 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter Cancel anytime Price excludes VAT (USA) Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout. Instant access to the full article PDF. Rent this article via DeepDyve Institutional subscriptions Explore related subjects Artificial Intelligence Data Availability and Access The dataset supporting the findings of this study is derived from the open dataset provided by the Intel Research Lab benchmark and is publicly accessible for research purposes [ 34 , 35 ]. The authors affirm compliance with the dataset’s terms and conditions and emphasize that, due to anonymization and de-identification, individual informed consent is not applicable. Rodrigues RT, Aguiar AP, Pascoal A (2018) A b-spline mapping framework for long-term autonomous operations. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 3204–3209. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2018.8594456 Liu M, Huang S, Dissanayake G, Kodagoda S (2010) Towards a consistent slam algorithm using b-splines to represent environments. In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ International conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 2065–2070. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2010.5649703 Schumaker L (2007) Approximation Power of Splines (Free Knots), 3rd Edition, Cambridge Mathematical Library, Cambridge University Press, pp 268–296. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618994.009 A V SM, Kanna BR (2021) Parallel fpfh slam for aerial vehicles. In: 2021 IEEE Conference on Norbert Wiener in the 21st Century (21CW), pp 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/21CW48944.2021.9532582 Mur-Artal R, Montiel JMM, Tardós JD (2015) Orb-slam: a versatile and accurate monocular slam system. IEEE Trans Rob 31(5):1147–1163. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2015.2463671 Article   Google Scholar   Kohlbrecher S, Meyer J, Graber T, Petersen K, Klingauf U, von Stryk O (2014) Hector open source modules for autonomous mapping and navigation with rescue robots. In: Behnke S, Veloso M, Visser A, Xiong R (eds) RoboCup 2013: Robot World Cup XVII. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 624–631 Chapter   Google Scholar   Engel J, Schöps T, Cremers D (2014) Lsd-slam: large-scale direct monocular slam. In: Fleet D, Pajdla T, Schiele B, Tuytelaars T (eds) Computer vision - ECCV 2014. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 834–849 Filipenko M, Afanasyev IM (2018) Comparison of various slam systems for mobile robot in an indoor environment. 2018 International Conference on Intelligent Systems (IS) 400–407 Xu L, Feng C, Kamat VR, Menassa CC (2019) An occupancy grid mapping enhanced visual slam for real-time locating applications in indoor gps-denied environments. Autom Constr 104:230–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.04.011 Keonyong Lee S-HR, Nam C, Doh NL (2018) A practical 2d/3d slam using directional patterns of an indoor structure. Intel Serv Robotics 11(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-017-0234-9 Rodrigues RT, Tsiogkas N, Aguiar AP, Pascoal A (2020) B-spline surfaces for range-based environment mapping. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 10774–10779. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9341768 Shreyas Madhav AV, Kanna BR, Pavithra LK (2021) Parallel exploitation of 2d lidar simultaneous localization and mapping. In: 2021 5th International conference on computer, communication and signal processing (ICCCSP), pp 204–208. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCSP52374.2021.9465538 Chen L-H, Peng C-C (2019) A robust 2d-slam technology with environmental variation adaptability. IEEE Sens J 19(23):11475–11491. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2019.2931368 Ma J, Wang X, Yijia H, Mei X, Zhao J (2019) Line-based visual slam by junction matching and vanishing point alignment. IEEE Access PP 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2960282 Çatal O, Jansen W, Verbelen T, Dhoedt B, Steckel J (2021) Latentslam: unsupervised multi-sensor representation learning for localization and mapping. arXiv:2105.03265 Grisetti G, Stachniss C, Burgard W (2007) Improved techniques for grid mapping with rao-blackwellized particle filters. IEEE Trans Rob 23:34–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2006.889486 Vázquez-Martín R, Núñez P, Bandera A, Sandoval F (2009) Curvature-based environment description for robot navigation using laser range sensors. Sensors 9(8):5894–5918. https://doi.org/10.3390/s90805894 Caccavale A, Schwager M (2018) Wireframe mapping for resource-constrained robots. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2018.8594057 Burgard W, Brock O, Stachniss C (2008) BS-SLAM: shaping the World, pp 169–176 Manni Ghaffari Jadidi JVM, Dissanayake G (2018) Gaussian processes autonomous mapping and exploration for range-sensing mobile robots. Autonomous Robots 42:273–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-017-9668-3 Li Y, Ruichek Y (2014) Occupancy grid mapping in urban environments from a moving on-board stereo-vision system. Sensors 14(6):10454–10478. https://doi.org/10.3390/s140610454 Shen D, Xu Y, Huang Y (2019) Research on 2d-slam of indoor mobile robot based on laser radar. In: Proceedings of the 2019 4th international conference on automation, control and robotics engineering, association for computing machinery, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351917.3351966 Hempel T, Al-Hamadi A (2022) An online semantic mapping system for extending and enhancing visual slam. Eng Appl Artif Intell 111:104830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.104830 Wen S, Liu X, Wang Z, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Tian W (2022) An improved multi-object classification algorithm for visual slam under dynamic environment. Intel Serv Robot 15:39–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-021-00400-8 Ebadi K, Palieri M, Wood S, Padgett CW, Agha-mohammadi AA (2021) DARE-SLAM: Degeneracy-Aware and Resilient Loop Closing in Perceptually-Degraded Environments. J Intell Robot Syst 102:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-021-01362-w Li R, Wang S, Gu D (2021) Deepslam: a robust monocular slam system with unsupervised deep learning. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 68(4):3577–3587. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2020.2982096 Bescos B, Fácil JM, Civera J, Neira J (2018) Dynaslam: tracking, mapping, and inpainting in dynamic scenes. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 3(4):4076–4083. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2018.2860039 McCormac J, Handa A, Davison A, Leutenegger S (2017) Semanticfusion: dense 3d semantic mapping with convolutional neural networks. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 4628–4635. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989538 Kendall A, Grimes M, Cipolla R (2015) Posenet: a convolutional network for real-time 6-dof camera relocalization. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV), ICCV ’15, IEEE Computer Society, USA, pp 2938–2946. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2015.336 Ban X, Wang H, Chen T, Wang Y, Xiao Y (2021) Monocular visual odometry based on depth and optical flow using deep learning. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 70:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2020.3024011 Günther S, Pazner W, Qi D (2021) Spline parameterization of neural network controls for deep learning. arXiv:2103.00301 Lee J-S, Nam SY, Chung WK (2011) Robust rbpf-slam for indoor mobile robots using sonar sensors in non-static environments. Adv Robot 25(9–10):1227–1248. https://doi.org/10.1163/016918611X574696 Kümmerle R, Steder B, Dornhege C, Ruhnke M, Grisetti G, Stachniss C, Kleiner A (2009) On measuring the accuracy of slam algorithms. Auton Robot 27(4):387–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-009-9155-6 SLAM Benchmarking Datasets — ais.informatik.uni-freiburg.de. http://ais.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/slamevaluation/datasets.php . Accessed 27 Nov 2023 Dwijotomo A, Abdul Rahman MA, Mohammed Ariff MH, Zamzuri H, Wan Azree WMH (2020) Cartographer slam method for optimization with an adaptive multi-distance scan scheduler. Appl Sci 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010347 Xu B, Liu Z, Fu Y, Zhang C (2017) Research of cartographer laser SLAM algorithm. In: Lv Y, Bao W, Chen W, Shi Z, Su J, Fei J, Gong W, Han S, Jin W, Yang J (eds), LiDAR Imaging Detection and Target Recognition 2017, vol. 10605, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, p 1060509. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2292864 Montemerlo M, Thrun S, Koller D, Wegbreit B (2002) Fastslam: a factored solution to the simultaneous localization and mapping problem. In: Eighteenth national conference on artificial intelligence, american association for artificial intelligence, pp 593–598 Download references Acknowledgements The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Rajiv Gandhi National Institute of Youth Development, Sriperumbudur, India, and the Vellore Institute of Technology in Chennai, India, for giving valuable research facilities. The authors also thank Mr. Ganesh, VIT Chennai, and Mr. Sethuraman T V, VIT Chennai for sparing time and sharing their expertise towards the enhancement of this research work. Funded by Seed research grant in engineering management and sciences, VIT Chennai. Photonic disinfection to combat COVID-19 using Indoor unmanned aerial vehicle Author information Authors and affiliations. Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Rajiv Gandhi National Institute of Youth Development, Pennalur, Sriperumbudur, 602105, Tamilnadu, India B. Rajesh Kanna Computer Science, University of California, Davis, Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA Shreyas Madhav AV School of Computer Science & Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Melakottaiyur, Chennai, 600127, Tamilnadu, India C. Sweetlin Hemalatha School of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Melakottaiyur, Chennai, 600127, Tamilnadu, India Manoj Kumar Rajagopal You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar Contributions The collaborative effort of the authors in this study is outlined as follows: Dr. B. Rajesh Kanna played a crucial role in conceptualizing the study, designing and implementing the methodology, and contributed significantly to both the initial drafting and subsequent revisions of the manuscript. Shreyas Madhav AV actively participated in the development of the research design and methodology, played a key role in data analysis and interpretation, made substantial contributions to the manuscript’s writing, and took primary responsibility for data collection and analysis. Dr. C. Sweetlin Hemalatha provided valuable critical feedback during the revision process, contributed to the conceptualization and design of the study, played a substantial role in drafting and revising the manuscript, and offered insightful perspectives during the interpretation of results. Dr. Manoj Kumar Rajagopal contributed to formulating the research question and study design, actively engaged in data analysis and interpretation, and provided critical input during the revision process. Corresponding author Correspondence to Manoj Kumar Rajagopal . Ethics declarations Ethical and informed consent for data used. This manuscript should not be submitted to multiple journals for simultaneous consideration. The submitted work should be original and should not have been published elsewhere in any form or language (partially or in full). The data utilized in this study were sourced from the open dataset provided by the Intel Research Lab benchmark. This dataset is publicly accessible and intended for research purposes. The authors acknowledge and comply with the terms and conditions outlined by the dataset provider. As an open dataset, individual informed consent is not applicable, given that the data is anonymized and de-identified. Competing Interests The author of the manuscript entitled “Enhancing SLAM Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis of B-Spline Surface Mapping and Grid-Based Approaches for Autonomous Robot Navigation” declares (s) that there is no conflict of interest with anyone. Additional information Publisher's note. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Reprints and permissions About this article Kanna, B.R., AV, S.M., Hemalatha, C.S. et al. Enhancing SLAM efficiency: a comparative analysis of B-spline surface mapping and grid-based approaches. Appl Intell (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-024-05776-5 Download citation Accepted : 14 August 2024 Published : 28 August 2024 DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-024-05776-5 Share this article Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative B-spline approximation Deep learning model Environmental mapping Indoor SLAM Mobile robot navigation Find a journal Publish with us Track your research 316 IMAGES Week 12: Quantitative Research Methods 10 Easy Steps: How to Write a Research Article Analysis in 2023 Quantitative Analysis Sample FREE 27+ Research Paper Formats in PDF Sample Of Quantitative Research Paper Chapter 3 Quantitative research paper hypothesis COMMENTS (PDF) Quantitative Analysis: the guide for beginners quantitative (numbers) and qualitative (words or images) data. The combination of. quantitative and qualitative research methods is called mixed methods. For example, first, numerical data are ... (PDF) An Overview of Quantitative Research Methods Quantitative research is a systematic empirical inquiry of observable phenomena through numerical data collection, statistical analysis and mathematical models. What Is Quantitative Research? Quantitative research is the process of collecting and analyzing numerical data. It can be used to find patterns and averages, make predictions, test causal relationships, and generalize results to wider populations. A Really Simple Guide to Quantitative Data Analysis The research uses a quantitative approach, mainly quantitative descriptive. [7] For quantitative descriptive data analysis, it begins by entering data into raw data. Quantitative Methods Definition Quantitative methods emphasize objective measurements and the statistical, mathematical, or numerical analysis of data collected through polls, questionnaires, and surveys, or by manipulating pre-existing statistical data using computational techniques. Quantitative research focuses on gathering numerical data and generalizing it across groups of people or to explain a particular ... The Beginner's Guide to Statistical Analysis The Beginner's Guide to Statistical Analysis | 5 Steps & Examples Statistical analysis means investigating trends, patterns, and relationships using quantitative data. It is an important research tool used by scientists, governments, businesses, and other organizations. Quantitative Research Quantitative Research Quantitative research is a type of research that collects and analyzes numerical data to test hypotheses and answer research questions. This research typically involves a large sample size and uses statistical analysis to make inferences about a population based on the data collected. It often involves the use of surveys, experiments, or other structured data collection ... Introduction to Research Statistical Analysis: An Overview of the Introduction Statistical analysis is necessary for any research project seeking to make quantitative conclusions. The following is a primer for research-based statistical analysis. It is intended to be a high-level overview of appropriate statistical testing, while not diving too deep into any specific methodology. What Is Quantitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines Abstract. In an era of data-driven decision-making, a comprehensive understanding of quantitative research is indispensable. Current guides often provide fragmented insights, failing to offer a holistic view, while more comprehensive sources remain lengthy and less accessible, hindered by physical and proprietary barriers. Data Analysis in Quantitative Research Quantitative data analysis serves as part of an essential process of evidence-making in health and social sciences. It is adopted for any types of research question and design whether it is descriptive, explanatory, or causal. However, compared with qualitative... Writing Quantitative Research Studies Summarizing quantitative data and its effective presentation and discussion can be challenging for students and researchers. This chapter provides a framework for adequately reporting findings from quantitative analysis in a research study for those contemplating to write a research paper. The rationale underpinning the reporting methods to ... 9 Presenting the Results of Quantitative Analysis Mikaila Mariel Lemonik Arthur This chapter provides an overview of how to present the results of quantitative analysis, in particular how to create effective tables for displaying quantitative results and how to write quantitative research papers that effectively communicate the methods used and findings of quantitative analysis. Quantitative Research Quantitative research methods are concerned with the planning, design, and implementation of strategies to collect and analyze data. Descartes, the seventeenth-century philosopher, suggested that how the results are achieved is often more important than the results themselves, as the journey taken along the research path is a journey of discovery. Quantitative Data Analysis 101 Learn the basics of quantitative data analysis, including the most popular analysis methods and techniques, explained simply with examples. A Practical Guide to Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research The development of research questions is a process based on knowledge of current trends, cutting-edge studies, and technological advances in the research field. Excellent research questions are focused and require a comprehensive literature search and in-depth understanding of the problem being investigated. Quantitative Research Design (JARS-Quant) The updated APA Style JARS for Quantitative Research address quantitative studies—studies that rely on measuring variables using a numerical system. Reporting Research Results in APA Style The results section of a quantitative research paper is where you summarize your data and report the findings of any relevant statistical analyses. The APA manual provides rigorous guidelines for what to report in quantitative research papers in the fields of psychology, education, and other social sciences. (PDF) Quantitative Research: A Successful Investigation in Natural and This article presents and analyzes the design of quantitative research. It also discusses the proper use and the components of quantitative research methodology. PDF Step'by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research It is imperative in nursing that care has its foundations in sound research and it is essential that all nurses have the ability to critically appraise research to identify what is best practice. This article is a step-by step-approach to critiquing quantitative research to help nurses demystify the process and decode the terminology. How to Write a Results Section Reporting quantitative research results If you conducted quantitative research, you'll likely be working with the results of some sort of statistical analysis. Your results section should report the results of any statistical tests you used to compare groups or assess relationships between variables. Quantitative Research Questionnaire Types of Survey Questionnaires in Quantitative Research. Quantitative research questionnaires have close-ended questions that allow the researchers to measure accurate and specific responses from the participants. They don't contain open-ended questions like qualitative research, where the response is measured by interviews and focus groups. Impact of Audit Fees on Earnings Management and Financial Risk: An This study employs a robust quantitative ex post facto research design to investigate the complex relationship between audit fees and earnings management. The financial information of 164 firms admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) was used from 2010 to 2019 (pre-COVID period) to achieve the research goal. Analysing data from the Tehran Stock Exchange firms, the study uncovers an ... Quantitative Research Methods: Maximizing Benefits, Addressing Abstract This research paper offers a thorough examination of the benefits and drawbacks of applying quantitative methods to research in a range of academic fields. (PDF) Quantitative Research Methods : A Synopsis Approach Quantitative research, according to Apuke (2017), is "one that works with quantifying and analyzing variables to produce results". It includes the analysis of data using numerical and statistical ... Enhancing SLAM efficiency: a comparative analysis of B ... The system incorporates deep learning networks in the B-Spline curve estimation process to compute parameterizations and knot vectors. The research implementation utilizes the Intel Research Lab benchmark dataset to conduct a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative analysis of both approaches. (PDF) Quantitative Data Analysis Quantitative data analysis is a systematic process of both collecting and evaluating measurable. and verifiable data. It contains a statistical mechanism of assessing or analyzing quantitative ... assignment essay homework phd report resume review speech thesis