Title
Date
Identifying Number or Brief Description
Care to rate this template?
Your rating will help others.
Thanks for your rate!
Create an ip assignment with everyone who’s worked on your product or idea without a formal contract in place. , make sure you have an ip assignment with everyone who has worked on your product or idea without a formal contract in place - this ensures your company owns their contribution, and not them..
When you first start building your business, there is often a lot of people working on your product and other intellectual property. These might be potential co-founders or team members, advisors, or even contractors that you hire (for example contractors for your website).
The IP that they create, even if it’s clearly for your business, doesn’t necessarily belong to you unless you have an IP assignment in place. There are many examples of founders not having their IP protected, causing an expensive dispute that can make you all but uninvestable.
An IP assignment ensures that any work they do for the benefit of your company, even if it was before your company was officially incorporated, belongs to your company. There is sometimes payment as part of this, which normally is either a nominal figure or what was initially agreed e.g. the contractor price for your website.
Ideally, you should make sure you have an IP assignment in place with everyone who has worked on your product, even if you don’t consider their contribution to be material to avoid any potential disputes in the future.
An often-asked question in relation to IP Assignments is whether or not the Moral Rights clause can be removed and what it means if it is. The two main moral rights are 'attribution' (the right to be named as the author' and 'integrity' (the right to control certain changes in the work). So what does it mean if you remove the moral rights clause? Well, it means you'll have to assign authorship of the design to the agency and you'll need to be very careful when you make changes to the design. You will also need to be careful in which context you use the design. As such, it is recommended that you leave them in to avoid any potential disagreements.
Step 1: Agreements > Click create IP Assignment
Transferring intellectual property (IP) rights requires a thorough understanding of the legal considerations and contractual obligations involved. IP transfer agreements outline the terms and conditions of IP rights transfer, addressing tax implications, regulatory frameworks, and ownership provisions. Assigning IP rights involves the transfer of ownership and associated responsibilities, while licensing IP allows the owner to retain ownership while granting permission to use IP assets. Confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements protect sensitive IP assets, and effective dispute resolution mechanisms and remedies are essential for protecting IP rights. Understanding these complexities is essential for a seamless transfer of IP rights; exploring the intricacies of IP contracts can reveal further insights.
Table of Contents
Understanding IP Transfer Agreements
An intellectual property (IP) transfer agreement is a legally binding contract that outlines the terms and conditions under which ownership of IP rights, such as patents, trademarks, copyrights, or trade secrets, are transferred from one party to another. This agreement is vital in facilitating a smooth transfer of IP rights, as it addresses key aspects of the transfer, including tax implications and regulatory frameworks.
Tax implications are a critical consideration in IP transfer agreements, as the transfer of IP rights can have significant tax consequences for both the assignor and assignee. The agreement should outline the tax obligations of each party, including any withholding taxes, value-added taxes, or other levies. Additionally, the agreement should specify how any tax disputes will be resolved.
The regulatory framework governing IP transfer agreements varies by jurisdiction, and the agreement should comply with relevant laws and regulations. The agreement should address issues such as antitrust laws, competition laws, and data protection regulations, to guarantee that the transfer of IP rights is compliant with applicable laws and regulations.
In facilitating a seamless transfer of IP rights, a comprehensive agreement is essential. It is vital that the agreement safeguards the interests of both parties, providing clarity on tax implications and regulatory requirements.
In IP contracts, key provisions play a vital part in defining the terms and conditions of intellectual property transfer. Two vital provisions that require careful consideration are ownership provisions and IP assignment clauses. These clauses determine the rights and obligations of the contracting parties, facilitating a smooth transfer of intellectual property rights.
Ownership provisions in intellectual property contracts explicitly define the rights and interests of each party involved, thereby preventing potential disputes and providing clarity on IP ownership and usage. These provisions are vital in establishing the scope of ownership, facilitating IP inventorship, and determining the value of intellectual assets. In the context of IP contracts, ownership provisions outline the rights and obligations of each party, protecting the interests of all stakeholders. This includes defining the ownership structure, specifying the rights to use, modify, and distribute the IP, and establishing the procedures for resolving disputes. Accurate asset valuation is also critical in ownership provisions, as it enables parties to determine the financial value of the IP and negotiate fair compensation. By clearly outlining the ownership provisions, parties can avoid costly disputes and guarantee a smooth transfer of intellectual property rights.
IP assignment clauses, a crucial component of intellectual property contracts, explicitly outline the terms and conditions governing the transfer of IP rights from one party to another. These clauses provide a clear understanding of the transferred IP rights, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets . A well-drafted IP assignment clause should address key aspects, such as the scope of transferred rights, exclusivity, and territorial limitations.
To provide thorough IP safeguards, assignment clauses should also specify the duration of the transfer, whether it is perpetual or for a fixed term. Additionally, the clause should outline the procedures for valuation and payment of asset valuations, which is critical in determining the compensation for the transferred IP rights. It is imperative to carefully draft IP assignment clauses to avoid ambiguity and guarantee that the parties' intentions are clearly reflected in the contract. By doing so, parties can mitigate potential disputes and facilitate a smooth transfer of IP rights.
A pivotal step in the transfer of intellectual property is the assignment of IP rights and obligations, which involves the transfer of ownership and associated responsibilities from one party to another. This process requires careful consideration of the IP valuation, as it directly impacts the transaction's financial aspects. A thorough understanding of the patent strategy is also imperative, as it determines the scope of protection and potential royalties.
When assigning IP rights, it is imperative to identify the specific rights being transferred, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. The assignment agreement should clearly outline the scope of the transfer, including the specific IP assets, geographic territories, and duration of the assignment. Additionally, the parties must address the obligations accompanying the assignment, such as warranties, indemnities, and confidentiality agreements.
A well-structured assignment agreement guarantees a seamless transfer of IP rights and obligations, minimizing potential disputes and liabilities. By carefully steering the complexities of IP valuation and patent strategy, parties can confirm a successful transfer that aligns with their business objectives.
In contrast to assigning intellectual property rights, licensing IP allows the owner to retain ownership while granting permission to use the IP assets, presenting a distinct set of risks and rewards that require careful consideration. Licensing IP can provide a lucrative revenue stream through royalty rates, which can be negotiated based on the type of license, territory, and duration. However, it also exposes the licensor to potential risks, such as the licensee's misuse of the IP, unauthorized sublicensing, or failure to meet contractual obligations.
To mitigate these risks, licensors should consider obtaining IP insurance to protect against potential losses. Additionally, licensors must verify that the licensing agreement clearly outlines the terms and conditions, including the scope of the license, territorial restrictions, and royalties. By carefully structuring the licensing agreement, licensors can optimize the rewards while minimizing the risks associated with licensing their IP.
When disclosing confidential information to a potential licensee or partner, a robust confidentiality and non-disclosure agreement (NDA) is vital to protect sensitive intellectual property assets. This is particularly important when sharing trade secrets, which are valuable and sensitive information that can make or break a business. A well-drafted NDA guarantees that the recipient of confidential information understands their obligations to maintain secrecy and prevent unauthorized use or disclosure.
In the event of a data breach, a thorough NDA can provide legal recourse for the owner of the intellectual property. It is necessary to specify the scope of confidential information, the duration of the agreement, and the consequences of breaching the agreement. Additionally, the NDA should outline the procedures for handling and returning confidential information, as well as the protocol for reporting and addressing potential data breaches. By including these provisions, intellectual property owners can better safeguard their trade secrets and minimize the risk of unauthorized disclosure. A robust NDA is a vital tool in protecting intellectual property assets and maintaining a competitive edge in the market.
Effective dispute resolution mechanisms and remedies are vital for intellectual property owners to protect their rights and interests in the event of infringement or misappropriation. In the context of intellectual property transfer agreements, it is imperative to establish clear and effective dispute resolution mechanisms to resolve potential disputes efficiently and cost-effectively. One approach is to include arbitration clauses in the agreement, which can provide a streamlined and binding arbitration process for resolving disputes. Additionally, parties may opt for mediation strategies, such as facilitated negotiations or early neutral evaluations, to resolve disputes amicably and preserve business relationships. It is also vital to specify the applicable law and jurisdiction governing the agreement, facilitating that the parties are aware of the legal framework governing their dispute resolution process. By incorporating these mechanisms, parties can minimize the risk of protracted and costly litigation, safeguarding that their intellectual property rights are protected and their business interests are preserved.
Conducting thorough intellectual property due diligence is a critical component of intellectual property transfer agreements, as it enables parties to identify and assess the risks and liabilities associated with the intellectual property rights being transferred. This process involves a thorough review of the intellectual property portfolio, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. Recommended practices for IP due diligence include conducting IP audits to identify potential issues, such as ownership disputes, invalidity, or infringement risks. Patent landscaping is another vital tool, providing a visual representation of the intellectual property landscape, enabling parties to identify opportunities, threats, and potential zones of conflict. Additionally, due diligence should involve a meticulous review of licensing agreements, contracts, and other legal documents to verify that all necessary permissions and consents have been obtained. By following these recommended practices, parties can confirm that they are adequately prepared for intellectual property transfers and minimize the risk of costly disputes or legal liabilities.
Can ip transfer contracts be verbal or must they be in writing?.
While oral agreements may be enforceable, it is highly recommended to solidify IP transfer contracts in writing to provide written proof, providing clarity and minimizing disputes, as verbal agreements can lead to misunderstandings and ambiguities.
In the event of unauthorized intellectual property rights transfer without the owner's consent, the transferee may incur legal liability for infringement, and the transfer may be deemed invalid, rendering the transaction voidable.
Post-signing alterations to IP contracts are feasible, contingent on incorporating flexible contractual language and outlining explicit amendment procedures, facilitating contract flexibility while maintaining mutual consent and avoiding unilateral modifications.
International IP transfer contracts often encounter jurisdictional complexities, making cross-border enforcement challenging; making vigilant drafting and consideration of applicable laws vital to guarantee flawless execution and protection of intellectual property rights across international borders.
In estate planning, IP transfer contracts can be inherited or passed down as part of a family legacy, guaranteeing continuation of intellectual property rights and obligations, but specific contractual provisions and jurisdictional laws must be considered.
UNLOCK YOUR COPY
Introduction.
In today’s fast-paced and innovation-driven world, intellectual property (IP) is a valuable asset for individuals and businesses alike. IP assignment means when one party, often referred to as the “assignor” or “licensor,” transfers their rights and ownership of intellectual property to another party, known as the “assignee” or “licensee.
When it comes to transferring ownership of IP rights, an IP Assignment Agreement plays a crucial role. This agreement ensures that the transfer of intellectual property is properly documented and is legally binding. In this blog, we will explore the key terms in an Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement.
IP assignment agreements are usually agreements between a business and its employees or any other party that transfers ownership of IP created by the personnel during their employment or engagement with the business. IP can include patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets, or other intangible creations. It is transferred to a company or another individual. This provides a clear record of the title of the intellectual property to whoever the rights of the IP are being transferred. This can also help the creator to keep their intellectual property safe from illegal use, distribution and more.
The agreement ensures that the business retains ownership of any IP created by the employees, even after they leave the business. Even if an employee is not involved in creating IP, it’s advisable to have these agreements in place—you never know where the next great idea might come from, and in any case, it’s easier to get this agreement signed than it is to explain to an investor or acquirer why you didn’t. Without an IP assignment agreement, personnel may be able to claim personal ownership of the IP they created, which can be deadly to a business that relies on IP for its value. So, if it is such an important document, then what are the terms and clauses that are required to make it a foolproof contract?
To Learn Drafting of IP Assignment Agreement and other important agreements, sign up for our Contract Drafting & Negotiation course taught by Top Law Firm Partners. It starts on October 7, 2023.
Mainly the terms need to give information about who is involved in the transfer, what Intellectual Property is being transferred, how much the Intellectual Property Costs, and why the transfer is valid. To elaborate, an IP Assignment Agreement must have the following:-
The scope and objective clause lays down the foundation of the IP assignment agreement. These clauses need to specify the purposes for which the assignee will use the IP. The assignor needs to know and specify the intent of the transfer of the IP. It is crucial to understand that the assignor can only transfer rights that are specified in the scope of the agreement.
A detailed description of the intellectual property being assigned is vital to identify the scope and nature of the IP rights involved. These points have to be in the description clause:
The main clause is the assignment clause which specifies the transfer or conveyance of the ownership of rights over the IP. In this clause, a clear outline of the scope of the ownership and procedure of transfer has to be laid out. The key points to cover in this clause include:
Consideration refers to the compensation or payment exchanges between the parties. In an IP assignment agreement, the consideration may take various forms:
These terms protect both parties by setting forth the assurance and protections related to the intellectual property being assigned:
To protect sensitive information related to intellectual property, it is essential that the assignment agreement has confidentiality and non-disclosure provisions. This section should have:
Determining the governing law and jurisdiction in the event of a dispute is crucial for effective enforcement. These terms should include:
An Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement is a critical legal document for transferring ownership of intellectual property rights. By including the aforementioned clauses one can make it a foolproof contract and protect their rights and make it enforceable whenever anything goes wrong. Further, before signing the agreement one must look out for all the important terms and clauses and make an informed decision.
To Learn Drafting of IP Assignment Agreement and other important agreements, sign up for our Contract Drafting & Negotiation course taught by Top Law Firm Partners. It starts on October 7, 2023.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Jump to section.
ContractsCounsel has assisted 36 clients with intellectual property assignments and maintains a network of 64 intellectual property lawyers available daily. Customers rate lawyers for intellectual property assignment matters 5.0.
Intellectual property assignment is a process in which the ownership of a work product created for an entity by an employee or consultant is transferred to the entity.
Typically, an employee or consultant will sign an agreement that explicitly assigns any intellectual property created during service with the company. For the employee, this is called either a Confidentiality and Inventions Assignment Agreement (CIIAA) or Proprietary Information and Inventions Assignment Agreement (PIIAA).
You should consider 4 of the main kinds of valuable assets under an intellectual property assignment:
These are all considered valuable assets of a company, and knowing how they work and how they’re created can help protect them.
Here is an article to learn more about intellectual property.
A patent is granted by the government and gives the owner of the patent unlimited ability to build, sell or use their invention while at the same time preventing others from doing so.
Typically, patents issued have a 20-year life span, but some expire in 14. After this period, anyone else can copy, build, or sell the invention. Any attempt to circumvent this time allowance would result in a patent infringement .
To receive exclusive rights to build, sell or use your invention, you have to provide details about your invention that would allow someone who is “practiced in the arts” to recreate it. Also, there are four requirements for a patent to be issued:
Additionally, you can file for three different types of patents:
Here is an article to learn more about patents.
A trademark is any word, phrase, symbol, design, or combination that identifies goods or services. The term “trademark” is used for both trademarks and service marks. Still, a service mark is reserved for those services related to the company.
Owning a trademark doesn’t automatically mean you own the words or the phrasing, but rather that you own the rights to how to use that word or phrase concerning specific goods or services. A great example is an online store that tries to use the Nike swoosh mark for their own t-shirts or shoes. This is trademark infringement .
To obtain trademark protection, you must first choose the specific category of goods or services the trademark will cover. This also means the company looking to obtain the trademark must already produce the category of goods/services to be trademarked or have a demonstrative or good faith intent to provide them.
Here is an article to learn more about trademarks.
Copyright infringement is probably one of the most well-known areas of IP protection. Copyrights are obtained to protect original authored works such as:
Things like titles, names, short phrases, slogans, familiar symbols or designs, lettering, coloring, or a list of ingredients or contents, are not considered creative . Still, they are also included as items that can be copyrighted. In general, copyrights can protect the way you convey a message or expression, but not ideas, procedures, systems, concepts, processes, and discoveries.
Companies can have a record of ownership over copyrights, as the law allows for ownership through “ works made for hire ” or works created by an employee within the scope of their employment.
Here is an article to learn more about copyrights.
Businesses have a wide range of confidential information, but not everything is considered a trade secret. Typically, a trade secret refers to information that is not publicly known and involves a reasonable effort to keep it confidential.
It also has to offer some form of economic value to the information holder that would only be beneficial if the information was not known by anyone else. States and even countries have varying laws regarding trade secrets. An excellent way to consider what constitutes trade secrets is to consider what information you wouldn’t want your competitors to get ahold of.
Think about pricing information, marketing strategy, or specific processes used to manufacture your goods.
Here is an article to learn more about trade secrets.
Image via Pexels by Andrea Piacquadio
An enforceable and valid intellectual property assignment needs to have a valid contract. A contract requires:
Now, what is considered valid consideration could vary. Still, generally consideration “must be ‘bargained for’ and not "illusory’” (Restatement (Second) of Contracts, § 77).
In some cases, small monetary considerations, as well as non-monetary considerations, are enough to create a binding contract, as long as there is an exchange of value between parties.
The intellectual property assignment agreement is the document that binds everything together. Companies traditionally use IP agreements to protect their inventions. However, in this arrangement, they are still free to transfer ownership of IP on a case-by-case basis.
It is sometimes called an IP transfer agreement. It ensures that if an employee helps to develop an intangible creation while employed with the company, the company still owns the rights and responsibilities to the creation.
An IP Property Assignment Agreement usually includes the following sections:
Any entity or person can use an intellectual property assignment to protect their original inventions. Still, they can safely transfer ownership of IP when needed.
Some examples of intellectual property assignments include:
Intellectual property assignments are not for the faint of heart. Oftentimes these are multi-layered and complex arrangements that require careful negotiation.
Post a project in ContractsCounsel’s marketplace to receive flat fee bids from lawyers for your project. All lawyers have been vetted by our team and peer-reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.
ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.
Meet some of our intellectual property assignment lawyers.
Benjamin is an attorney specializing in Business, Intellectual Property, Employment and Real Estate.
Corporate Attorney that represents startups, businesses, investors, VC/PE doing business throughout the country. Representing in a range of matters from formation to regulatory compliance to financings to exit. Have a practice that represents both domestic and foreign startups, businesses, and entrepreneurs. Along with VC, Private Equity, and investors.
I am a licensed and active NY and CT Contracts Attorney, with over 20 years of diverse legal and business experience. I specialize in reviewing, drafting and negotiating commercial agreements. My practice focuses on working with small business clients as well as clients from international brokerage firms on acquisitions, especially in the Ecommerce space; drafting, negotiating, reviewing and advising on business agreements; ; breach of contract issues, contract disputes and arbitration. I am licensed to practice in New York and Connecticut, and am a FINRA and NCDS Arbitrator. My experience includes serving as General Counsel to small businesses. This entails reviewing, updating and drafting contracts such as employments agreements, asset purchase agreements, master services agreements, operating agreements and a variety of business and commercial contracts. Additionally, I assist clients with business strategies, contract disputes and arbitration. My diverse experience allows me to give my clients a well-rounded approach to the issues they face. I have been at top AML law firms; a Vice President at an Investment Bank, a Civil Court Arbitrator presiding over cases in contract law, commercial law, a Hearing Officer, presiding over cases and rendering written decisions, and a Judicial Clerk to a Civil Court Judge. It would be a privilege to assist you and your business with my services.
28+ years experience. Licensed in Colorado and New York. Areas of expertise: estate planning, wills and trusts; trademark law; patent law; contracts and licensing; small business organization and counseling.
Experienced real estate, business, and tax practitioner, representing start up and established businesses with formation, contracts, and operational issues.
Meagan Kirchner has nearly a decade of experience in Immigration law. She has significant experience working on H-2B immigration matters. Her practice also focuses on business immigration, particularly representing corporate clients pursuing H, E3, TN, O, and L nonimmigrant classifications, as well as lawful permanent residence (EB-1A, NIW, EB-1C). Meagan has represented clients in a variety of industries including agriculture, hospitality, healthcare, IT, engineering, and finance. Meagan has a Bachelor of Science degree in Business from George Mason University and a Juris Doctor degree from the George Mason University School of Law. She is licensed to practice law in Virginia and is also a member of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA).
In 1991, Barbara Markessinis graduated cum laude from Albany Law School in Albany, New York. Shortly thereafter, Barbara was admitted to practice in New York State and in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. In 1997, Barbara was admitted to practice in Massachusetts and in April of 2009 she was admitted to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. After graduating from law school, Barbara worked in private practice in the Albany, New York area and for Sneeringer, Monahan, Provost & Redgrave Title Agency, Inc. before joining the New York State Division for Youth and the New York State Attorney General's Real Property Bureau as a Senior Attorney. During her tenure with the Division for Youth, Attorney Markessinis found herself in Manhattan Family Court in front of Judge Judy! A career highlight for sure! After admission to the Massachusetts Bar, Barbara returned to private practice in the Berkshires and eventually started her own firm in June of 2006. Attorney Markessinis offers legal services in elder law, estate planning and administration/probate, family law, limited assistance representation (LAR), real estate and landlord tenant disputes. In 2016, after a family member found themselves in need of long term care, Attorney Markessinis’ launched her elder law practice. Through this experience, Attorney Markessinis discovered that the process of selecting a long term care facility and/or caregiver, applying for MassHealth and preserving an applicant’s assets are serious issues faced by many people every day. This area of the law is Barbara’s passion and she offers her legal services to families who find themselves in need of an elder law attorney. Attorney Markessinis is part of the Volunteer Legal Clinic in the Berkshire Probate & Family Court and has provided limited free legal services to patients and families at Moments House cancer support center in Pittsfield. She currently serves as a Hearing Committee Member for the MA Board of Bar Overseers and is a member of the Berkshire County and Massachusetts Bar Associations, Berkshire County Estate Planning Council (BCEPC). Attorney Markessinis is also the host of WUPE Talks Law. She also serves on the Town of Hancock Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning Board.
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
ContractsCounsel User
Location: new hampshire, turnaround: a week, service: contract review, doc type: ip assignment agreement, page count: 8, number of bids: 5, bid range: $350 - $1,200, agreement of using copyrighted material draft, location: florida, turnaround: less than a week, service: drafting, number of bids: 7, bid range: $350 - $650, want to speak to someone.
Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!
You may be starting or acquiring a company. Then you need the Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement (IP) to transfer intellectual property. These include innovation patents, source code, and customer lists.
In a technology business, what the investor finances is often the IP assets .
Your products and services depend on certain critical IP assets. Then an investor will undertake due diligence. It will help him to understand your right to use such assets.
In this post, we will tell you why an IP assignment agreement is required. So, we will also list out the steps to draw such an agreement.
An IP assignment agreement is a contract.
It transfers the rights to the intellectual property from the creator. The rights go to another entity, such as an acquiring company.
You may (and should) ask your employees to sign the IP agreement. Additionally, this will assign to your company any ideas, work products, or inventions of the business.
Technology assignment agreement.
This assigns your startup any intellectual property before you form the company.
The developer(s) may keep individual intellectual property rights under certain circumstances. Hence, they may even sell the rights to you for equity or cash.
This assigns new company ownership of any relevant intellectual property created by employees.
The agreement includes the founder(s) and employees as signatories. So, they become parties to a confidentiality agreement and an invention assignment agreement.
You should include a couple of critical points in the agreement.
Assignment clause.
This requires employees to assign their inventions to your company. This will ensure you have total ownership of the intellectual property.
This could be narrowed to employee inventions only. It could be broadened to include anything the employee creates.
Therefore, your IP lawye r should include the following assignment clause into the IP agreement :
Your IP lawyer should include the following warranties into the IP agreement:
The Assignor represents and warrants that:
You can get this clause added to the agreement. This is so that the firm can administer the ownership rights without the employee. So, this is regardless of whether the employee is willing and able to assist.
An IP assignment agreement assures investors that the IP has been transferred. It consists of the intellectual property that is required to run the business.
Engage qualified IP counsel at the outset of your company. So, this ensures that you have the freedom to operate your business with your inventions.
Ready to talk, download free ebook here, get a free ebook on avoiding 10 startup blunders to achieve 10x growth, why over 98% of businesses fail , and what those who succeed do differently.
Are you an aspiring entrepreneur looking for the secrets to success? Are you struggling to stay focused and motivated while building your business?
Look no further – this book is packed with the insights, tips, and strategies you need to become a successful entrepreneur. Discover the two most significant driving forces of successful entrepreneurship, examples of the best entrepreneurial leaders, and why focus and tenacity matter more than strategies, business plans, and techniques.
Get ready to take your business to the next level! This book contains the knowledge and insight you need to become a successful entrepreneur.
Don’t miss out on this opportunity to learn the secrets of successful entrepreneurship. Buy this book now and start your journey towards success!
Thanks for choosing to download our sample report today.
**This is a free report and does not approve or guarantee funding**
add to folder:
Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page.
If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here . Go back to the PDF .
IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts Daniel Hoppe-Jänisch1 The world is growing together and keeps getting more complicated every day. Multinational corporations have worldwide operations in a variety of business segments. They employ a large number of employees in a growing number of countries. There are companies that have offices in almost every country of the world nowadays. Managing large numbers of employees in an international context can be a real challenge, particularly when a consistent and uniform handling of employees and their employment contracts is required across the corporation globally. Subtleties of local law also have to be taken into consideration, from statutory requirements regarding working time and vacation to regulatory requirements regarding remuneration, just to name but a few. One important aspect of employment contracts is the assignment of IP rights to the employer. It goes without saying that the employer must be entitled to use the employees’ work product. However, how this can be effected in various jurisdictions is not obvious in many cases. In this article, we touch on only some of the important points in a . Specific IP assignment agreements will need to be assessed on a case-by-case basis. 1 The author would like to thank Ms. Alice Pasch, White & Case Hamburg, Ms. Clara Hainsdorf, White & Case Paris, and Ms. Sarah Taylor and Mr. John Benjamin, White & Case London, for their generous contributions and their review of the article. Also, the author would like to thank Mr. Don Dowling, KL Gates New York, who came up with the idea for this article. Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 2 1. Introduction The complexity of IP assignment clauses becomes clearer if one takes into account that IP rights are mainly territorial rights; legal relationships to these IP rights are therefore mainly shaped by national laws. For these reasons, it will not be possible to use a US standard IP assignment clause for employees in Europe. A number of topics have to be addressed regarding such IP assignment clauses. The following remarks are designed to point out the considerations which employers will need to bear in mind when implementing IP assignment clauses in Germany, UK and France. - The first question which comes to mind is the question of who initially owns the rights in intellectual creations made by employees during the course of their employment and how these rights, if necessary, are assigned to the employer. This includes the question which limitations to such assignments exist and how such limitations could possibly be circumvented. - The second question which is always related to IP assignment clauses is the question of remuneration. This covers in particular whether an additional payment has to be made to employees by way of consideration for the attribution or assignment of IP rights. - The third main question is whether and to what extent the parties to the employment contract are subject to other obligations such as obligations to apply for a registration of IP rights or obligations to support the other party in PTO proceedings. Even though all these questions are pressing, it is difficult to find comprehensive guidelines which address such matters. This stems, inter alia, from the fact that some IP-related statutory provisions have been drafted rather vaguely and are often therefore difficult to interpret. There is partly also a lack of clarifying and/or consistent case law. Further employment law also needs to be considered when Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 3 dealing with IP assignments in employment contracts, in particular since very broad IP clauses can be problematic from an employment law perspective. One also needs to keep in mind that a contractual agreement will be declared invalid if it contravenes the general principle of good faith. 2. Who owns IP rights and how can such rights be assigned to the employer? In the context of an international employment contract, a distinction should be made between patents or rights to inventions and copyrights on the one hand and other intellectual property rights on the other hand. This is due to the specific treatment which inventions and copyright protected works are given in various jurisdictions. The special treatment of copyrights, for instance, is based on the strong manifestation of moral rights in European copyright law. With other IP rights, there are mostly no legal provisions that prohibit an assignment or make a payment of additional compensation mandatory. 2.1 Inventions The term “invention” includes technical inventions within the meaning of Art. 1(2) of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property. It also includes developments which are eligible for protection by patent or utility models. The legal relationship between employer and employee with regards to inventions is strongly influenced by national laws. (a) Germany The basic rule under German law is very similar to US law: An inventor initially owns the invention and the associated rights to it by virtue of the act of creation i.e. as a matter of an inventor’s natural right. This basic rule also applies in connection with employee-made inventions; the employee is the first owner of all rights connected to the invention. Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 4 It is important to note that German law does not share US patent law’s concept of shop rights or hired-to-invent. However, there are provisions under German law that are not so different from these doctrines. The transfer of the rights in employee-made inventions to the employer is most peculiar in Germany. An advance assignment is not possible. Freedom of contract is generally very limited when it comes to inventions made by employees during their employment. The reason for this is that the German Act on Employee Inventions (Arbeitnehmererfindungsgesetz – ArbEG) lays down detailed and mostly mandatory provisions that leave little room for individual agreements. 1) German employee invention law distinguishes between employment-related inventions and free inventions. All inventions which either result from the employee performing his or her duties or are significantly dependent on the company’s experience or works are considered employment-related inventions. Rights to employment-related inventions originally belong to the employee. However, employers are entitled to claim the transfer of these rights to them. 2) German law requires the employee to notify the employer of the created invention in writing. The employer then has the right to claim the invention within a period of four months. Due to some recent changes in the law, the transfer of the invention to the employer takes place automatically unless the employer expressly rejects the invention within this time limit in writing. For employers, this may seem convenient because the employer then does not have to ensure a timely transfer of the invention. However, it should be pointed out that a number of obligations are created as soon as the employee notifies the employer about an Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 5 invention, for example, the employer’s obligation to apply for a patent or utility model. 3) Inventions which are not employment-related inventions are free. This means that the employee may freely decide whether he or she assigns the rights to the employer or not. Nonetheless, the employee has to communicate such inventions to the employer unless the invention obviously cannot be used in the employer’s business. The rationale behind this obligation is to enable the employer to assess whether the invention is an employment-related invention or a free invention. The employee’s freedom to dispose of free inventions is subject to an important restriction: Before the employee exploits the invention elsewhere, he or she is obliged to offer the employer a non-exclusive right of use on reasonable terms, provided the invention can be used in the employer’s business. 4) In the context of international IP assignment agreements it is important to note that it is not possible to contractually deviate from the statutory rules to the disadvantage of the employee before a particular invention has been disclosed to the employer. This means that an employment contract cannot contain stipulations which – compared to the statutory provisions of German employee invention law – disadvantage the employee. Therefore, an IP clause will be void if it is designed to have the employee assign all rights in future inventions to their employer, regardless of whether the clause is supposed to apply to free inventions or to employment-related inventions. 5) The German Act on Employee Inventions prohibits all contractual agreements which deviate from the Act in favor of the employer if these agreements are related to future employee inventions. Rights in employee inventions can especially not be pre-assigned in the employment contract. This restriction on contractual freedom cannot be avoided by use of a non-German governing law clause Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 6 because German courts consider the German employee invention law as mandatory. According to Art. 8 (1) Rome-I Regulation a law clause must not result in that mandatory provisions of the national law are derogated. (b) United Kingdom The situation differs significantly from the above in the UK. The UK Patents Act comprises specific regulations for employee inventions. 1) In contrast to German and US law, under UK law the rights in employment-related inventions belong to the employer from the outset. This means that the employer does not need to claim an employment-related invention in order to acquire the associated rights. Thus, an advance assignment clause is not necessary. 2) With respect to non-employment-related inventions, UK law resembles German law in that such inventions belong to the employee and the associated rights cannot be assigned to the employer prior to the invention’s creation. This means that an assignment clause in the employment contract would be unenforceable as far as it concerns non-employment-related inventions in terms of the UK Patents Act. 3) The UK Patents Act does not require the employee to offer the employer a non-employment-related invention. This means that the employer may typically, not force the employee to assign or license the associated rights. However, such an obligation might arise from general employment law considerations, in particular from the employee’s duties of loyalty and confidentiality to the employer. (c) France In France, the statutory provisions contained in Article L.611-7 of the French Intellectual Property Code concerning employee inventions distinguish three types of employee inventions, namely inventions Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 7 under mission, employment-related inventions beyond mission and free inventions. 1) Inventions under mission can be characterized by the act that an employee creates them (i) pursuant to an employment contract which stipulates an inventive mission as the employee’s usual work task; or (ii) while performing research tasks according to the employer’s directions. The rights in inventions under mission automatically vest in the employer so that there is no need for an assignment clause, either in advance of the invention’s creation or subsequent to it. 2) Employment-related inventions beyond mission are inventions which the employee does not create within the scope of his or her inventive mission but still relate to the employer’s business or the employee’s function within the employer’s business, e.g. because they were made by using specific in-house technologies or processes. The rights in employee inventions beyond mission belong to the employee; however, the employer enjoys the right to have them assigned in whole or in part. There is a deadline of four months from the day of notification to claim the invention. 3) All other inventions are free which means that the rights in these inventions remain with the employee. The employer cannot demand their transfer. 4) According to French law, the statutory provisions in relation to employee inventions apply unless the parties agree upon something more favorable to the employee. Therefore, a clause by which the employee assigns to the employer all rights in future employment-related inventions beyond mission or free inventions will not be enforceable. The same applies to clauses by which employees commit themselves to assign the rights as soon as they have created an invention. Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 8 (d) Preliminary result It shows that the assignment of rights to employee-made inventions is particularly difficult in Germany and in France. Even though these jurisdictions provide for sufficient employer’s rights to claim all the inventions needed for their business, an advance assignment is not possible. Where an advance assignment is possible, namely with regards to inventions under mission in France and employment-related inventions in the UK, it is not necessary, because employers automatically obtain the rights in these inventions by law. 2.2 Works protected by copyright The situation differs significantly when it comes to copyright protected works. With respect to inventions, employer and employee are mainly bound by mandatory statutory provisions that leave little to no room for divergent contractual agreements. By contrast in many European jurisdictions it may be possible to establish individual provisions relating to copyrights in the employment contract. Nonetheless, the parties to the employment contract need to be aware of certain statutory rules when drafting copyright-related agreements. Broadly speaking, copyright is an intellectual property right which subsists in artistic, musical, literary and suchlike creations, provided these creations meet certain criteria. First of all, it should be pointed out that the Anglo-American copyright system and the European copyright system differ substantially from each other. The Anglo-American copyright is an economic exploitation right; it grants its holder – as the term suggests – the right to copy, to exploit the creation. Copyright holder and work’s author do not necessarily have to be identical; even though it is usually the author who first owns the copyright in the work, it can be (pre-)assigned to other individuals or legal entities. Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 9 European copyright systems provide for a stronger connection between the copyright and the author of the protected work. This makes sense if one considers that even though the German Urheberrecht or the French droit d’auteur are often translated as copyright, the literal translation is author’s right. It comprises not only proprietary rights but also moral rights. In many European jurisdictions, only the proprietary rights are assignable; in others, copyrights, including the proprietary rights, cannot be assigned at all but authors may only grant others a license to exploit the protected work. Moral rights are usually not assignable and can be waived only to a limited extent. Companies need to bear this in mind when they draft IP clauses. A clause whereby the employee assigns the copyright in future works might not be enforceable in jurisdictions where the assignment of copyright is not possible. Moreover, especially in continental Europe, employment contracts should include waivers of moral rights or, where moral rights cannot be waived, determine restrictions on their exercise as far as the respective law permits this. (a) Germany When employees create a copyright protected work, by nature of their creation, they become the owner of the copyright. The employee cannot transfer the copyright to the employer, because copyright is non-assignable under German law. Moreover, German copyright law does not know the concept of work made for hire, under which the employer is deemed the author of a work that an employee created within the scope of the employment and therefore owns the copyright from the outset. However, the employee can grant the employer various exploitation rights, e.g. the right to reproduce the work or the right to distribute it. Exploitation rights can be granted exclusively or non-exclusively. An Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 10 exclusive exploitation right also excludes the author from using the work. Other than in case of employee inventions, copyright exploitation rights can be granted with regard to future creations. In fact, German courts even assume an implicit grant of certain essential exploitation rights by virtue of the employment contract; naturally, this applies only to such works which employees create within the scope of their employment contract. Nonetheless, employers should seek to obtain an express grant of exploitation rights in their employment contracts. Such an IP clause should not be worded vaguely. Rather the clause should exactly specify to what extent exploitation rights are granted. Ideally, it should name each type of exploitation that is supposed to be covered. Otherwise, only those exploitation rights will be covered which employers need in order to operate their usual business. Especially the right to license or transfer the granted exploitation rights to third parties is not always considered essential in order to conduct the ordinary business activities. Thus, it should be expressly granted in the employment contract. Furthermore, it is important to know that the grant of rights in respect of as yet unknown types of exploitation must be in writing and signed. A special provision exists for employee-made computer programs: If an employee creates software in the execution of his or her duties or according to the employer’s instructions only the employer is entitled to exercise the related proprietary rights. Thus, the employer is granted comprehensive rights with respect to all forms of exploitation by law. There is no need for a contractual agreement. It should be noted that no insightful case law has been established with regards to the question of whether and under which circumstances an employee can validly commit themselves to offer future non-work related creations to his or her employer. An IP clause Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 11 which includes such works is exposed to the risk that a court will hold it invalid or unenforceable. Besides exploitation rights the German copyright includes moral rights. These are the right to determine if, when and how the work shall be published, the right to be recognized as the work’s author and to be or not to be mentioned in publications and the right to prohibit a distortion of the work. Moral rights cannot be waived as such; however, to a certain degree, employees may contractually commit themselves to not exercise them, at least as far as the exercise would hinder the authorized commercial exploitation of the work. Employers could, for instance, not exercise their right to distribute the protected work if employees objected to this by invoking their moral right to determine whether, when and how the work is to be published. (b) United Kingdom The basic rule concerning initial ownership of copyright is the same as in the US: Authors initially own the copyright in their work. In certain scenarios UK copyright law attributes authorship – which entails copyright ownership – to certain individuals or legal entities, e.g. the producer is deemed the author of a sound recording. For employee-made copyright works UK law stipulates an exception to this general rule: Where an employee creates a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work, or a film in the course of the employment, the employer is the first owner of the copyright in the work Therefore, an advance assignment in the employment contract is not necessary. Computer programs count as literary works. This exception provision may not be confused with the work made for hire concept; while under the work made for hire doctrine the employer is considered the author of a work, UK copyright law only refers the copyright in the work to the employer; the employee is nonetheless deemed the author. Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 12 Besides economic exploitation rights, UK copyright law grants the author of a copyright protected work certain moral rights, e.g. the right to be identified as the author in publications of the work. Moral rights are non-assignable. However, employees can waive them in advance by an express statement in the employment contract. Such a waiver must be in writing and signed. Unlike with inventions, there is no statutory rule that prohibits the advance assignment of copyrights in works that employees create outside the scope of their employment. However, courts might consider such an assignment unfair on the employee and therefore declare a corresponding assignment clause void or unenforceable. (c) France With respect to the possible transfer of copyrights, French copyright law provides for very strict provisions compared to other European jurisdictions. Besides, it contains a lot of special regulations concerning certain types of copyright protected works. It parallels German copyright law in that the author of a work is usually the original owner of the connected copyright. There are some exceptions to this general rule, e.g. with respect to collective works and employee-made computer programs. However, there is no exception for other employee-made works such as a work made for hire rule. Further, moral rights are not assignable but can only be waived to a limited extent. However, unlike in German law, the proprietary rights to copyright protected works can actually be assigned to others. In the context of employment contracts it must be noted that the French Intellectual Property Code declares a global assignment of future works void. What is meant by global assignment is not so obvious. It definitely encompasses clauses that are designed to assign to the employer all propriety rights to all future copyright protected works that the employee will create in the course of the employment. Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 13 Consequently, such broadly worded clauses in employment contracts will be void. However, there have been cases where courts, for instance, have upheld assignment clauses when it was possible to individualize the assigned future works. It can be seen from this that the determination of whether a particular assignment clause falls within the scope of the provision highly depends on the deciding court’s interpretation of the provision. Given this uncertainty, assignment clauses that relate to future works are always at risk of being void. It is more secure to have the employee assign the proprietary rights on a case-by-case basis or at least upon creation of the work. French law requires assignment contracts to separately list each of the proprietary rights that is supposed to be covered. Further, it must precisely define the scope and purpose of the authorized exploitation as for its duration and place. Only what is expressly agreed upon will be transferred. General clauses that globally include all rights run the risk of being invalid. (d) Preliminary result With respect to copyright protected works the three jurisdictions provide for quite different regulations. In the UK there is actually no need for an assignment of copyrights to employment-related works, whereas in France, employers cannot permissibly exploit a work unless the employee contractually assigns the proprietary rights to them, which is usually only possible once a work has been created. As regards Germany, one needs to keep in mind that employees cannot assign the copyright to works they create, but only grant their employers exploitation rights. However, unlike in French law, exploitation rights can be granted globally with respect to future employment-related works. In all three jurisdictions authors enjoy certain moral rights, which can be contractually limited to a greater or lesser extent. Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 14 3. Remuneration Another crucial question is whether the employer has to make extra payments for the transfer of rights to employee-made intellectual creations. 3.1 Inventions (a) Germany According to German employee invention law, the employer has to remunerate the employee – beyond the monthly salary – in return for the rights to employee-made inventions. When the employer has obtained the rights to an invention the parties shall individually agree upon a reasonable compensation on the basis of the invention’s economic value. Each party may demand an adjustment if, at a later time, circumstances change which were decisive for determining the amount of compensation. Employees cannot validly waive their right to additional remuneration in the employment contract, because the statutory provisions cannot be modified to the employee’s disadvantage before a particular invention has been communicated to the employer. Moreover, an IP clause that stipulates a certain lump sum as remuneration for the transfer of rights over future inventions is void. Only after the employee has informed the employer of a particular invention the parties may deviate from the statutory rules. However, such individual agreements are void if they are grossly unfair. In what circumstances a contractual provision is considered grossly unfair cannot be answered universally. Neither does the Act on Employee Inventions specify the term, nor is there illuminating case law concerning this matter. A remuneration agreement is or becomes grossly unfair and thus void if the remuneration according to the agreement is considerably lower than the remuneration the employee could claim according to the statutory provisions. As a general rule it can be said that this should be considered if the agreed remuneration is Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 15 below 50% of the remuneration owed under the Act on Employee Inventions. The real problems lie in this determination, where a lot of difficult to evaluate factors have to be taken into account. Despite that, a complete waiver of the right to additional compensation is not grossly unfair per se, provided the employee is entirely aware of the waiver’s consequences. However, since courts do not assume a will to waive rights easily, complete waivers are rather exposed to the risk of being considered as grossly unfair. Many German companies have introduced so-called incentive systems with which they offer the employee inventor a payment of a certain lump sum instead of ongoing (e.g. annual) payments for a particular invention. The offer is usually made when the employee reports the invention. The amount usually depends on the invention’s estimated economic value. While some incentive systems leave it at that, others combine the payment of a lump sum with a waiver of several employee rights, e.g. the above-mentioned right to an adjusted amount of compensation. Even though employees are free to decide to be compensated pursuant to the statutory provisions of the Act on Employee Inventions instead, according to a recent survey, the majority chooses to be remunerated according to their employer’s incentive system. (b) United Kingdom Under UK patent law the employee inventor is entitled to additional compensation in exceptional circumstances only. With regards to inventions which belong to the employer from the outset, a court may – at its discretion – award the employee compensation if a patent has been granted for the invention at issue and the invention is of “outstanding benefit” to the employer. The law does not define the meaning of “outstanding benefit”; the courts demand a greater benefit than one would normally expect to arise from an employee’s work, a benefit which is “more than significant”, “out of the ordinary” or “something special”. Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 16 With respect to free inventions, courts may award compensation if the employee has assigned the rights in the invention or granted an exclusive license to the employer, a patent has been obtained and the consideration the employee received for the assignment or grant is inadequate in relation to the employer’s benefit from the invention. UK courts are rather reluctant to award compensation. This is due to the difficulty of meeting the requirements for a successful remuneration claim, especially the “outstanding benefit”, on the one hand, and proving them on the other hand. To date, only one successful compensation application has been made. Nonetheless, the employee’s right to legally seek compensation cannot be excluded by means of the employment contract. Accordingly, a clause with such content would not be enforceable. (c) France The current legal situation in France is quite similar to the one in Germany. As a rule, the employer has to remunerate employees in return for the rights to their inventions. The employer cannot be released from this obligation by way of the employment contract, because only agreements that favor the employee more than the statutory provisions are permissible. The law expressly and unequivocally states the employee’s entitlement to a “additional compensation” with respect to employee inventions under mission and to a “fair price” with respect to employment-related inventions beyond mission. With respect to “additional compensation”, the French Intellectual Property Code provides that the conditions under which an employee is entitled to additional remuneration shall be determined by provisions in collective bargaining agreements, company agreements and individual employment contracts. In fact, some collective bargaining agreements in France grant employees additional remuneration only if certain requirements are met, e.g. if a patent has been filed or granted, the employer actually exploits the invention and/or the invention is of Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 17 exceptional interest to the company. However, some courts have declared such provisions inapplicable. According to these courts, the French Intellectual Property Code provides that additional remuneration is mandatory in all circumstances; the law merely permitted collective bargaining agreements, company agreements and individual employment contracts to lay down rules for calculating the amount of the compensation. Therefore, companies need to be aware of the fact that a court might declare a clause invalid if it hinges the employee’s entitlement to additional compensation on certain requirements, Contractual provisions that specify methods of calculating the compensation are, however, permissible unless they contradict mandatory terms of collective bargaining agreements. 3.2 Works protected by copyright (a) Germany With respect to works that were created within the scope of the employment contract, employees are in general not legally entitled to additional remuneration. Consequently, an IP clause of such contents will usually not evoke legal problems. Only if exploiting the work brings the employer a profit in relation to which the monthly salary is an inadequate reward, the employee may claim to be paid additional compensation. An IP clause whereby the employee waives this right will be void. (b) United Kingdom As German law, UK law does not provide employees with a right to additional compensation in return for the attribution of the copyright in work-related creations to the employer. Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 18 (c) France French copyright law stipulates that the author who assigns proprietary rights has to be remunerated proportional to the assignee’s proceeds of exploiting the work. The law enumerates several cases in which the remuneration can have the form of a lump sum instead of profit-based royalties. However, there is no general exception for employee-made copyright protected works. Consequently, employees are entitled to a proportional share of the proceeds or, in case of one of the enumerated exceptions, a lump sum for the assignment of proprietary rights. Usually, an agreement according to which the employer does not have to remunerate the employee for the assignment of proprietary rights will be void. In addition, courts tend to consider that additional remuneration for copyright, like additional remuneration for inventions, should not be included in the employee salary. (d) Preliminary result Except for the UK, the employer must usually pay the employee an additional compensation for the attribution or assignment of rights to inventions. Normally, employees cannot waive their right to additional remuneration at all; they can definitely not waive it in advance. For the attribution of copyrights (UK), the transfer of proprietary rights (France) or granting exploitation rights (Germany), however, only French law requires an additional payment. Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 19 4. Other rights and obligations Besides the questions of right’s ownership and additional compensation, there are a couple of other issues that should be addressed in the context of IP rights in employment relationships. 4.1 Reporting of intellectual creations Without the information that an intellectual creation has been made the employer cannot know about his or her rights to it. Such a situation can only be avoided if employees have the duty to inform their employer of intellectual creations they have made in the course of their employment. German and French employee invention laws stipulate the employee’s obligation to immediately report a created invention to the employer. This applies to employment-related as well as free inventions, because the employer needs to be able to classify the invention in question. The relevant laws also contain provisions as to the content of the report (circumstances under which the invention was made, description of the invention etc.) and the formalities that have to be complied with. It should come as no surprise that in Germany, the employment contract cannot validly stipulate stricter requirements than the Act on Employee Inventions sets out because agreements that disadvantage the employee are only permissible after a particular invention has been reported to the employer. In the UK, there is no statute that particularly mentions the employee’s obligation to report inventions to the employer. However, such an obligation is naturally implied by the statutory provisions that vest the rights to employment-related inventions in the employer, or by the employment relationship itself. Apart from this, the employment contract may expressly stipulate the employee’s duty to report inventions to the employer. With other intellectual creations there are usually no statutory provisions that stipulate an obligation to report. Such an obligation Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 20 may be laid down by a clause in the employment contract. Otherwise, it will in most cases be implied by virtue of the employment relationship. 4.2 Registration of IP rights As opposed to copyrights, intellectual property rights that serve to protect an invention, most importantly patents need to be registered with the competent authorities in order to come into existence. The right to apply for and be granted a patent is in fact the most valuable right connected to an invention. As a general rule in European jurisdictions, the person or legal entity that holds the rights to an invention is also the one that is entitled to apply for and be granted a registered IP right for the invention at question. In an employment context this means that only the employer has the right to do so when he or she has acquired the rights to an employee-made invention. In this context, German employee invention law contains some peculiarities. As soon as the employee has reported an employment-related invention to the employer, only the employer is entitled to apply for a registration of IP rights in Germany, especially patents and utility models. Thus an employer has the sole right to apply for a registered IP right even before he or she claims the invention and thereby acquire the connected rights. It needs to be noted that this only applies to German IP rights; the right to apply for registered IP protection in other states is only transferred to the employer when he or she claims an invention. The sole right to apply for a registered IP right in Germany is accompanied by the obligation to apply for a domestic patent or utility model. The employer must file the application without undue hesitation. Again, it needs to be pointed out that this obligation arises as soon as the invention is reported to the employer. Depending on the Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 21 particular circumstances, an employer might be obliged to apply for a German patent or utility model even before he or she has decided whether or not to claim the invention. The obligation to apply for a German patent or utility model lapses in three scenarios. Firstly, if the employment-related invention has become free due to the employers rejection of it. In this case all rights connected with the invention belong ultimately to the employee. Secondly, if legitimate interests of the company necessitate the invention to be treated as a trade secret and the employer acknowledges to the employee that the invention is capable of IP protection. Thirdly and most importantly in our context, the obligation to apply for a German patent or utility model ceases if the employee has agreed that no application is to be filed. However, employers cannot be released from the obligation prior to the invention’s disclosure to them. Therefore, a corresponding clause in the employment contract will be void. In practice it is common that employees release their employer from the obligation when they decide to be treated according to their employer’s incentive system instead of according to the statutory provisions of German employee invention law. Only when the employer claims the invention, he or she also become entitled – but not obliged – to apply for a registration of IP rights abroad. However, the employee can permit the employer to do so before claiming the invention. As with most individual agreements concerning employee inventions, this is not possible in the employment contract, but only after the invention has been reported to the employer. In the context of the registration of IP rights abroad the employer is subject to a peculiar obligation: With respect to the countries for which the employer does not desire to obtain registered IP rights, he or she has to release the claimed invention to the employee so that the Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 22 employee can apply for IP protection in these countries. At the employee’s request, the employer has to support the employee in the process of acquiring IP rights abroad. However, the employer can also be released from this obligation, but only after the invention has been reported. Many German companies also include the waiver of this obligation in their incentive system. There are no suchlike obligations laid down in UK and in French employee invention law. This implies that employers may normally freely decide whether or not to apply for a patent. In particular cases, however, French and UK courts might find the employer nevertheless to be obliged to apply for a patent or at least exploit the invention in another way. This is conceivable in cases where the employee’s entitlement to additional remuneration or the amount of the additional remuneration depends on a patent or an actual exploitation of the invention. In Germany, the UK and France there are no legal provisions that speak against clauses in the employment contract obliging the employee to assist the employer in acquiring intellectual property rights for creations that are attributed to the employer. The German Act on Employee Inventions even stipulates that the employee, if requested to do so, has to assist the employer in the application proceedings and has to make the statements that are necessary in order to acquire registered IP rights. 4.3 Confidentiality Where the employer enjoys the rights to an employee-made intellectual creation, it actually goes without saying that the employee must not disclose the creation to third parties or the public. This applies to both parties as long as the final attribution of the rights is still in abeyance. The German Act on Employee Inventions as well as the Act on Unfair Competition and the French Decree on Employees’ Inventions Hoppe-Jänisch, IP Assignment Clauses in International Employment Contracts page 23 expressly state such an obligation to confidentiality as regards inventions. Where there is no explicit statutory provision, the obligation to confidentiality results from the employment relationship itself. There is no need to expressly include it in the employment contract. However, a suchlike clause will not cause validity issues. German competition law, for example, even penalizes the violation of the employee’s obligation to confidentiality. 5. Conclusion and practical advice European IP law, especially employee invention law, permits individual agreements in employment contracts only to a limited extent. Usually, it is not possible, in individual agreements, to deviate from statutory provisions that are designed to protect employees. This applies in particular to remuneration regulations with the consequence that a waiver of statutory remuneration claims is rarely possible. Many issues, particularly in respect of invention’s and copyright’s ownership, are, however, sufficiently regulated by statute. As was shown, the various IP rights are treated quite differently from each another. For IP clauses in employment contracts it follows from this that, first of all, employers should draw a clear distinction between different types of IP rights in their employment contracts. Further, it is advisable to use “staggered” IP clauses in order to absorb the peculiarities of various jurisdictions. Such clauses will in particular be useful to deal with jurisdictions where certain types of assignments or restrictions of remuneration clauses are invalid or unenforceable.
Tips for taps *, global antitrust sustainability heatmap (europe) *, the french market: esg gains traction *, a general introduction to public-private partnerships in france *, in review: insolvency law, policy and procedure in france *.
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected] .
Certificate in Employment Law - Live at Your Desk - Learn Live
Practical law uk standard document 0-500-7124 (approx. 29 pages), get full access to this document with a free trial.
Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.
This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.
650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.
83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.
81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.
COMMENTS
Intellectual Property Assignment. For the purposes of this Agreement, the "business of the Company" is defined as the design, manufacture or marketing of recreational and commercial power catamaran boats. In the course of Executive's employment, Executive may develop, conceive, generate, or contribute to, alone and/or jointly with others, tangible and intangible property including ...
An IP assignment agreement is an agreement that designates the ownership of intellectual property. Companies often use IP assignment agreements to secure their inventions and developments but also to transfer ownership of intellectual property as needed. These assignment agreements are used for transferring intangible property like a copyright ...
Drafting Your IP Assignment Agreement. Step 1 - Identify the Parties Involved. Step 2 - Specify the Assigned Intellectual Property. Step 3 - Describe the Transfer of Rights. Step 4 - Detail Compensation and Payment Terms. Step 5 - Include Confidentiality Clauses.
An assignment of intellectual property agreement is a contract that transfers the intellectual property rights (For example, patents, trademarks, industrial designs, or copyrights.) from the creator to another entity. The intellectual property rights holder may transfer all or part of their rights. The transfer of intellectual property rights ...
IP assignment agreements are utilized across a spectrum of industries and scenarios. These agreements are crucial tools for businesses and individuals seeking to define and transfer intellectual property rights. Corporations and businesses. Employment agreement: Companies frequently incorporate IP assignment clauses into their employment ...
IP assignment typically occurs through three major methods: Assignment deed A formal written agreement where the assignor expressly transfers ownership rights to the assignee. Incorporation by reference An agreement refers to another document like an employment agreement , that contains IP assignment clauses .
Ownership clauses are another indispensable component of an intellectual property assignment agreement. These clauses establish the new owner's rights and responsibilities, including the right to use, modify, and license the assigned intellectual property. ... where each co-owner holds an undivided interest in the IP, with corresponding rights ...
When used with employees and consultants, IP assignment and confidentiality clauses are typically bundled into a single contract, often called a "Proprietary Information and Inventions Assignment Agreement" or a "Confidential Information and Inventions Assignment Agreement" (though there are many names that can be used here). ...
IP assignment agreements are contracts between a business and its personnel that transfer ownership of IP created by the personnel during their employment or engagement with the business. IP can ...
The Assignment Clause The main assignment clause which specifies the transfer or conveyance of ownership of rights over the IP is the keystone to an IP Assignment Agreement. If a clear outline of the scope of ownership and the procedure of such transfer is not laid out, then the entire IP Assignment Agreement would collapse.
This clause clarifies that unless the assignor has specifically listed intellectual property in Exhibit A, the assignor is required to both tell the assignee about it and give the assignee full rights to use it. ... An IP assignment agreement is a document that is created when authority over an intellectual property is given from the owner to ...
IP Assignment Clauses . An often-asked question in relation to IP Assignments is whether or not the Moral Rights clause can be removed and what it means if it is. The two main moral rights are 'attribution' (the right to be named as the author' and 'integrity' (the right to control certain changes in the work). ...
A well-drafted IP assignment clause should address key aspects, such as the scope of transferred rights, exclusivity, and territorial limitations. To provide thorough IP safeguards, assignment clauses should also specify the duration of the transfer, whether it is perpetual or for a fixed term. Additionally, the clause should outline the ...
An IP assignment agreement is a legal contract that facilitates the transfer of intellectual property (IP) rights from one party to another. Importantly, it defines specifics such as what IP is being transferred (e.g., patents, trade marks, copyrights). It also ensures that the assignee receives all rights, titles, and interests in the IP.
The scope and objective clause lays down the foundation of the IP assignment agreement. These clauses need to specify the purposes for which the assignee will use the IP. The assignor needs to know and specify the intent of the transfer of the IP. It is crucial to understand that the assignor can only transfer rights that are specified in the ...
The intellectual property assignment agreement is the document that binds everything together. Companies traditionally use IP agreements to protect their inventions. However, in this arrangement, they are still free to transfer ownership of IP on a case-by-case basis. It is sometimes called an IP transfer agreement.
California and Washington, for instance, have statutes limiting the scope of intellectual property assignment clauses to cover only inventions that relate to the employer's business. A company should review the laws of the relevant state that will govern the assignment agreement to ensure it is not overbroad. 5. Make the assignment clause ...
An IP assignment agreement is a contract. It transfers the rights to the intellectual property from the creator. The rights go to another entity, such as an acquiring company. You may (and should) ask your employees to sign the IP agreement. Additionally, this will assign to your company any ideas, work products, or inventions of the business.
IP Assignment Agreement. An intellectual property assignment agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D ("IP Assignment Agreement"), duly executed by the Seller Parties. Sample 1. IP Assignment Agreement. At or prior to Closing, Seller and the Company shall execute and deliver to Parent and Purchaser, the IP Assignment Agreement.
The European IP Helpdesk Your Guide to IP and Contracts CONTENTS Introducing IP and contracts 1. General contract clauses 2. IP contracts 262.1. Assignment agreements 292.2. Licence agreements 352.3. Non-disclosure agreements 392.4. Technology transfer agreements 412.5. R&D agreements 3. Contracts that contain IP clauses 3.1. Joint venture ...
IP Assignments. The Company will record, or cause to be recorded, in the United States Patent and Trademark Office the assignment of Patent # 5474890 by the holder thereof to the Company 's Subsidiary within 90 days of the Closing Date. Sample 1. IP Assignments. It shall be the BUYER 's responsibility to take care, at its own expense, of ...
IP assignment clauses in international employment contracts. White & Case. To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader . If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here ...
The ownership of IP rights in work product an independent consultant or contractor creates under contract with a company can be the subject of heavy negotiation. The company that engages the contractor to produce the work product typically expects to acquire outright ownership of all associated IP rights. The contractor, in turn, may resist transferring its IP rights in the work product in ...
Improve Response Time. 81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time. End of Document. Resource ID -500-7124. We are experiencing technical difficulties. Please contact Technical Support at +44 345 600 9355 for assistance. An agreement for the assignment of intellectual property rights, drafted from the assignee's perspective.