Rubric Best Practices, Examples, and Templates
How to get started, best practices, moodle how-to guides.
Workshop Links:
- Workshop Recording (Spring 2024)
- Workshop Registration
A rubric is a scoring tool that identifies the different criteria relevant to an assignment, assessment, or learning outcome and states the possible levels of achievement in a specific, clear, and objective way. Use rubrics to assess project-based student work including essays, group projects, creative endeavors, and oral presentations.
Rubrics can help instructors communicate expectations to students and assess student work fairly, consistently and efficiently. Rubrics can provide students with informative feedback on their strengths and weaknesses so that they can reflect on their performance and work on areas that need improvement.
Step 1: Analyze the assignment
The first step in the rubric creation process is to analyze the assignment or assessment for which you are creating a rubric. To do this, consider the following questions:
- What is the purpose of the assignment and your feedback? What do you want students to demonstrate through the completion of this assignment (i.e. what are the learning objectives measured by it)? Is it a summative assessment, or will students use the feedback to create an improved product?
- Does the assignment break down into different or smaller tasks? Are these tasks equally important as the main assignment?
- What would an “excellent” assignment look like? An “acceptable” assignment? One that still needs major work?
- How detailed do you want the feedback you give students to be? Do you want/need to give them a grade?
Step 2: Decide what kind of rubric you will use
Holistic rubrics.
Grade | Description |
---|---|
A | |
B | |
C |
A holistic rubric includes all the criteria (such as clarity, organization, mechanics, etc.) to be considered together and included in a single evaluation. With a holistic rubric, the rater or grader assigns a single score based on an overall judgment of the student’s work, using descriptions of each performance level to assign the score.
Advantages of holistic rubrics:
- Can p lace an emphasis on what learners can demonstrate rather than what they cannot
- Save grader time by minimizing the number of evaluations to be made for each student
- Can be used consistently across raters, provided they have all been trained
Disadvantages of holistic rubrics:
- Provide less specific feedback than analytic/descriptive rubrics
- Can be difficult to choose a score when a student’s work is at varying levels across the criteria
- Any weighting of c riteria cannot be indicated in the rubric
Analytic/Descriptive Rubrics
Criterion | Highest level | Next highest level | 3rd highest level |
---|---|---|---|
1 | description | description | description |
2 | description | description | description |
2 | description | description | description |
An analytic or descriptive rubric often takes the form of a table with the criteria listed in the left column and with levels of performance listed across the top row. Each cell contains a description of what the specified criterion looks like at a given level of performance. Each of the criteria is scored individually.
Advantages of analytic rubrics:
- Provide detailed feedback on areas of strength or weakness
- Each criterion can be weighted to reflect its relative importance
Disadvantages of analytic rubrics:
- More time-consuming to create and use than a holistic rubric
- May not be used consistently across raters unless the cells are well defined
- May result in giving less personalized feedback
Single-Point Rubrics
Not yet met | Description of proficient | Meets or exceeds |
---|---|---|
Criterion 1 at B level | ||
Criterion 2 at B level | ||
Criterion 3 at B level |
A single-point rubric is breaks down the components of an assignment into different criteria, but instead of describing different levels of performance, only the “proficient” level is described. Feedback space is provided for instructors to give individualized comments to help students improve and/or show where they excelled beyond the proficiency descriptors.
Advantages of single-point rubrics:
- Easier to create than an analytic/descriptive rubric
- Perhaps more likely that students will read the descriptors
- Areas of concern and excellence are open-ended
- May removes a focus on the grade/points
- May increase student creativity in project-based assignments
Disadvantage of single point rubrics: Requires more work for instructors writing feedback
Step 3 (Optional): Look for templates and examples.
You might Google, “Rubric for persuasive essay at the college level” and see if there are any publicly available examples to start from. Ask your colleagues if they have used a rubric for a similar assignment. Some examples are also available at the end of this article. These rubrics can be a great starting point for you, but consider steps 3, 4, and 5 below to ensure that the rubric matches your assignment description, learning objectives and expectations.
Step 4: Define the assignment criteria
Make a list of the knowledge and skills are you measuring with the assignment/assessment Refer to your stated learning objectives, the assignment instructions, past examples of student work, etc. for help.
Helpful strategies for defining grading criteria:
- Collaborate with co-instructors, teaching assistants, and other colleagues
- Brainstorm and discuss with students
- Can they be observed and measured?
- Are they important and essential?
- Are they distinct from other criteria?
- Are they phrased in precise, unambiguous language?
- Revise the criteria as needed
- Consider whether some are more important than others, and how you will weight them.
Step 5: Design the rating scale
Most ratings scales include between 3 and 5 levels. Consider the following questions when designing your rating scale:
- Given what students are able to demonstrate in this assignment/assessment, what are the possible levels of achievement?
- How many levels would you like to include (more levels means more detailed descriptions)
- Will you use numbers and/or descriptive labels for each level of performance? (for example 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 and/or Exceeds expectations, Accomplished, Proficient, Developing, Beginning, etc.)
- Don’t use too many columns, and recognize that some criteria can have more columns that others . The rubric needs to be comprehensible and organized. Pick the right amount of columns so that the criteria flow logically and naturally across levels.
Step 6: Write descriptions for each level of the rating scale
Artificial Intelligence tools like Chat GPT have proven to be useful tools for creating a rubric. You will want to engineer your prompt that you provide the AI assistant to ensure you get what you want. For example, you might provide the assignment description, the criteria you feel are important, and the number of levels of performance you want in your prompt. Use the results as a starting point, and adjust the descriptions as needed.
Building a rubric from scratch
For a single-point rubric , describe what would be considered “proficient,” i.e. B-level work, and provide that description. You might also include suggestions for students outside of the actual rubric about how they might surpass proficient-level work.
For analytic and holistic rubrics , c reate statements of expected performance at each level of the rubric.
- Consider what descriptor is appropriate for each criteria, e.g., presence vs absence, complete vs incomplete, many vs none, major vs minor, consistent vs inconsistent, always vs never. If you have an indicator described in one level, it will need to be described in each level.
- You might start with the top/exemplary level. What does it look like when a student has achieved excellence for each/every criterion? Then, look at the “bottom” level. What does it look like when a student has not achieved the learning goals in any way? Then, complete the in-between levels.
- For an analytic rubric , do this for each particular criterion of the rubric so that every cell in the table is filled. These descriptions help students understand your expectations and their performance in regard to those expectations.
Well-written descriptions:
- Describe observable and measurable behavior
- Use parallel language across the scale
- Indicate the degree to which the standards are met
Step 7: Create your rubric
Create your rubric in a table or spreadsheet in Word, Google Docs, Sheets, etc., and then transfer it by typing it into Moodle. You can also use online tools to create the rubric, but you will still have to type the criteria, indicators, levels, etc., into Moodle. Rubric creators: Rubistar , iRubric
Step 8: Pilot-test your rubric
Prior to implementing your rubric on a live course, obtain feedback from:
- Teacher assistants
Try out your new rubric on a sample of student work. After you pilot-test your rubric, analyze the results to consider its effectiveness and revise accordingly.
- Limit the rubric to a single page for reading and grading ease
- Use parallel language . Use similar language and syntax/wording from column to column. Make sure that the rubric can be easily read from left to right or vice versa.
- Use student-friendly language . Make sure the language is learning-level appropriate. If you use academic language or concepts, you will need to teach those concepts.
- Share and discuss the rubric with your students . Students should understand that the rubric is there to help them learn, reflect, and self-assess. If students use a rubric, they will understand the expectations and their relevance to learning.
- Consider scalability and reusability of rubrics. Create rubric templates that you can alter as needed for multiple assignments.
- Maximize the descriptiveness of your language. Avoid words like “good” and “excellent.” For example, instead of saying, “uses excellent sources,” you might describe what makes a resource excellent so that students will know. You might also consider reducing the reliance on quantity, such as a number of allowable misspelled words. Focus instead, for example, on how distracting any spelling errors are.
Example of an analytic rubric for a final paper
Above Average (4) | Sufficient (3) | Developing (2) | Needs improvement (1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(Thesis supported by relevant information and ideas | The central purpose of the student work is clear and supporting ideas always are always well-focused. Details are relevant, enrich the work. | The central purpose of the student work is clear and ideas are almost always focused in a way that supports the thesis. Relevant details illustrate the author’s ideas. | The central purpose of the student work is identified. Ideas are mostly focused in a way that supports the thesis. | The purpose of the student work is not well-defined. A number of central ideas do not support the thesis. Thoughts appear disconnected. |
(Sequencing of elements/ ideas) | Information and ideas are presented in a logical sequence which flows naturally and is engaging to the audience. | Information and ideas are presented in a logical sequence which is followed by the reader with little or no difficulty. | Information and ideas are presented in an order that the audience can mostly follow. | Information and ideas are poorly sequenced. The audience has difficulty following the thread of thought. |
(Correctness of grammar and spelling) | Minimal to no distracting errors in grammar and spelling. | The readability of the work is only slightly interrupted by spelling and/or grammatical errors. | Grammatical and/or spelling errors distract from the work. | The readability of the work is seriously hampered by spelling and/or grammatical errors. |
Example of a holistic rubric for a final paper
Articulating thoughts through written communication— final paper.
- Above Average: The audience is able to easily identify the central message of the work and is engaged by the paper’s clear focus and relevant details. Information is presented logically and naturally. There are minimal to no distracting errors in grammar and spelling.
- Sufficient : The audience is easily able to identify the focus of the student work which is supported by relevant ideas and supporting details. Information is presented in a logical manner that is easily followed. The readability of the work is only slightly interrupted by errors.
- Developing : The audience can identify the central purpose of the student work without little difficulty and supporting ideas are present and clear. The information is presented in an orderly fashion that can be followed with little difficulty. Grammatical and spelling errors distract from the work.
- Needs Improvement : The audience cannot clearly or easily identify the central ideas or purpose of the student work. Information is presented in a disorganized fashion causing the audience to have difficulty following the author’s ideas. The readability of the work is seriously hampered by errors.
Single-Point Rubric
More examples:.
- Single Point Rubric Template ( variation )
- Analytic Rubric Template make a copy to edit
- A Rubric for Rubrics
- Bank of Online Discussion Rubrics in different formats
- Mathematical Presentations Descriptive Rubric
- Math Proof Assessment Rubric
- Kansas State Sample Rubrics
- Design Single Point Rubric
Technology Tools: Rubrics in Moodle
- Moodle Docs: Rubrics
- Moodle Docs: Grading Guide (use for single-point rubrics)
Tools with rubrics (other than Moodle)
- Google Assignments
- Turnitin Assignments: Rubric or Grading Form
Other resources
- DePaul University (n.d.). Rubrics .
- Gonzalez, J. (2014). Know your terms: Holistic, Analytic, and Single-Point Rubrics . Cult of Pedagogy.
- Goodrich, H. (1996). Understanding rubrics . Teaching for Authentic Student Performance, 54 (4), 14-17. Retrieved from
- Miller, A. (2012). Tame the beast: tips for designing and using rubrics.
- Ragupathi, K., Lee, A. (2020). Beyond Fairness and Consistency in Grading: The Role of Rubrics in Higher Education. In: Sanger, C., Gleason, N. (eds) Diversity and Inclusion in Global Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.
Writing Rubrics [Examples, Best Practices, & Free Templates]
Writing rubrics are essential tools for teachers.
Rubrics can improve both teaching and learning. This guide will explain writing rubrics, their benefits, and how to create and use them effectively.
What Is a Writing Rubric?
Table of Contents
A writing rubric is a scoring guide used to evaluate written work.
It lists criteria and describes levels of quality from excellent to poor. Rubrics provide a standardized way to assess writing.
They make expectations clear and grading consistent.
Key Components of a Writing Rubric
- Criteria : Specific aspects of writing being evaluated (e.g., grammar, organization).
- Descriptors : Detailed descriptions of what each level of performance looks like.
- Scoring Levels : Typically, a range (e.g., 1-4 or 1-6) showing levels of mastery.
Example Breakdown
Criteria | 4 (Excellent) | 3 (Good) | 2 (Fair) | 1 (Poor) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Grammar | No errors | Few minor errors | Several errors | Many errors |
Organization | Clear and logical | Mostly clear | Somewhat clear | Not clear |
Content | Thorough and insightful | Good, but not thorough | Basic, lacks insight | Incomplete or off-topic |
Benefits of Using Writing Rubrics
Writing rubrics offer many advantages:
- Clarity : Rubrics clarify expectations for students. They know what is required for each level of performance.
- Consistency : Rubrics standardize grading. This ensures fairness and consistency across different students and assignments.
- Feedback : Rubrics provide detailed feedback. Students understand their strengths and areas for improvement.
- Efficiency : Rubrics streamline the grading process. Teachers can evaluate work more quickly and systematically.
- Self-Assessment : Students can use rubrics to self-assess. This promotes reflection and responsibility for their learning.
Examples of Writing Rubrics
Here are some examples of writing rubrics.
Narrative Writing Rubric
Criteria | 4 (Excellent) | 3 (Good) | 2 (Fair) | 1 (Poor) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Story Elements | Well-developed | Developed, some details | Basic, missing details | Underdeveloped |
Creativity | Highly creative | Creative | Some creativity | Lacks creativity |
Grammar | No errors | Few minor errors | Several errors | Many errors |
Organization | Clear and logical | Mostly clear | Somewhat clear | Not clear |
Language Use | Rich and varied | Varied | Limited | Basic or inappropriate |
Persuasive Writing Rubric
Criteria | 4 (Excellent) | 3 (Good) | 2 (Fair) | 1 (Poor) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Argument | Strong and convincing | Convincing, some gaps | Basic, lacks support | Weak or unsupported |
Evidence | Strong and relevant | Relevant, but not strong | Some relevant, weak | Irrelevant or missing |
Grammar | No errors | Few minor errors | Several errors | Many errors |
Organization | Clear and logical | Mostly clear | Somewhat clear | Not clear |
Language Use | Persuasive and engaging | Engaging | Somewhat engaging | Not engaging |
Best Practices for Creating Writing Rubrics
Let’s look at some best practices for creating useful writing rubrics.
1. Define Clear Criteria
Identify specific aspects of writing to evaluate. Be clear and precise.
The criteria should reflect the key components of the writing task. For example, for a narrative essay, criteria might include plot development, character depth, and use of descriptive language.
Clear criteria help students understand what is expected and allow teachers to provide targeted feedback.
Insider Tip : Collaborate with colleagues to establish consistent criteria across grade levels. This ensures uniformity in expectations and assessments.
2. Use Detailed Descriptors
Describe what each level of performance looks like.
This ensures transparency and clarity. Avoid vague language. Instead of saying “good,” describe what “good” entails. For example, “Few minor grammatical errors that do not impede readability.”
Detailed descriptors help students gauge their performance accurately.
Insider Tip : Use student work samples to illustrate each performance level. This provides concrete examples and helps students visualize expectations.
3. Involve Students
Involve students in the rubric creation process. This increases their understanding and buy-in.
Ask for their input on what they think is important in their writing.
This collaborative approach not only demystifies the grading process but also fosters a sense of ownership and responsibility in students.
Insider Tip : Conduct a workshop where students help create a rubric for an upcoming assignment. This interactive session can clarify doubts and make students more invested in their work.
4. Align with Objectives
Ensure the rubric aligns with learning objectives. This ensures relevance and focus.
If the objective is to enhance persuasive writing skills, the rubric should emphasize argument strength, evidence quality, and persuasive techniques.
Alignment ensures that the assessment directly supports instructional goals.
Insider Tip : Regularly revisit and update rubrics to reflect changes in curriculum and instructional priorities. This keeps the rubrics relevant and effective.
5. Review and Revise
Regularly review and revise rubrics. Ensure they remain accurate and effective.
Solicit feedback from students and colleagues. Continuous improvement of rubrics ensures they remain a valuable tool for both assessment and instruction.
Insider Tip : After using a rubric, take notes on its effectiveness. Were students confused by any criteria? Did the rubric cover all necessary aspects of the assignment? Use these observations to make adjustments.
6. Be Consistent
Use the rubric consistently across all assignments.
This ensures fairness and reliability. Consistency in applying the rubric helps build trust with students and maintains the integrity of the assessment process.
Insider Tip : Develop a grading checklist to accompany the rubric. This can help ensure that all criteria are consistently applied and none are overlooked during the grading process.
7. Provide Examples
Provide examples of each performance level.
This helps students understand expectations. Use annotated examples to show why a particular piece of writing meets a specific level.
This visual and practical demonstration can be more effective than descriptions alone.
Insider Tip : Create a portfolio of exemplar works for different assignments. This can be a valuable resource for both new and experienced teachers to standardize grading.
How to Use Writing Rubrics Effectively
Here is how to use writing rubrics like the pros.
1. Introduce Rubrics Early
Introduce rubrics at the beginning of the assignment.
Explain each criterion and performance level. This upfront clarity helps students understand what is expected and guides their work from the start.
Insider Tip : Conduct a rubric walkthrough session where you discuss each part of the rubric in detail. Allow students to ask questions and provide examples to illustrate each criterion.
2. Use Rubrics as a Teaching Tool
Use rubrics to teach writing skills. Discuss what constitutes good writing and why.
This can be an opportunity to reinforce lessons on grammar, organization, and other writing components.
Insider Tip : Pair the rubric with writing workshops. Use the rubric to critique sample essays and show students how to apply the rubric to improve their own writing.
3. Provide Feedback
Use the rubric to give detailed feedback. Highlight strengths and areas for improvement.
This targeted feedback helps students understand their performance and learn how to improve.
Insider Tip : Instead of just marking scores, add comments next to each criterion on the rubric. This personalized feedback can be more impactful and instructive for students.
4. Encourage Self-Assessment
Encourage students to use rubrics to self-assess.
This promotes reflection and growth. Before submitting their work, ask students to evaluate their own writing against the rubric.
This practice fosters self-awareness and critical thinking.
Insider Tip : Incorporate self-assessment as a mandatory step in the assignment process. Provide a simplified version of the rubric for students to use during self-assessment.
5. Use Rubrics for Peer Assessment
Use rubrics for peer assessment. This allows students to learn from each other.
Peer assessments can provide new perspectives and reinforce learning.
Insider Tip : Conduct a peer assessment workshop. Train students on how to use the rubric to evaluate each other’s work constructively. This can improve the quality of peer feedback.
6. Reflect and Improve
Reflect on the effectiveness of the rubric. Make adjustments as needed for future assignments.
Continuous reflection ensures that rubrics remain relevant and effective tools for assessment and learning.
Insider Tip : After an assignment, hold a debrief session with students to gather their feedback on the rubric. Use their insights to make improvements.
Check out this video about using writing rubrics:
Common Mistakes with Writing Rubrics
Creating and using writing rubrics can be incredibly effective, but there are common mistakes that can undermine their effectiveness.
Here are some pitfalls to avoid:
1. Vague Criteria
Vague criteria can confuse students and lead to inconsistent grading.
Ensure that each criterion is specific and clearly defined. Ambiguous terms like “good” or “satisfactory” should be replaced with concrete descriptions of what those levels of performance look like.
2. Overly Complex Rubrics
While detail is important, overly complex rubrics can be overwhelming for both students and teachers.
Too many criteria and performance levels can complicate the grading process and make it difficult for students to understand what is expected.
Keep rubrics concise and focused on the most important aspects of the assignment.
3. Inconsistent Application
Applying the rubric inconsistently can lead to unfair grading.
Ensure that you apply the rubric in the same way for all students and all assignments. Consistency builds trust and ensures that grades accurately reflect student performance.
4. Ignoring Student Input
Ignoring student input when creating rubrics can result in criteria that do not align with student understanding or priorities.
Involving students in the creation process can enhance their understanding and engagement with the rubric.
5. Failing to Update Rubrics
Rubrics should evolve to reflect changes in instructional goals and student needs.
Failing to update rubrics can result in outdated criteria that no longer align with current teaching objectives.
Regularly review and revise rubrics to keep them relevant and effective.
6. Lack of Examples
Without examples, students may struggle to understand the expectations for each performance level.
Providing annotated examples of work that meets each criterion can help students visualize what is required and guide their efforts more effectively.
7. Not Providing Feedback
Rubrics should be used as a tool for feedback, not just scoring.
Simply assigning a score without providing detailed feedback can leave students unclear about their strengths and areas for improvement.
Use the rubric to give comprehensive feedback that guides students’ growth.
8. Overlooking Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment
Self-assessment and peer assessment are valuable components of the learning process.
Overlooking these opportunities can limit students’ ability to reflect on their own work and learn from their peers.
Encourage students to use the rubric for self and peer assessment to deepen their understanding and enhance their skills.
What Is a Holistic Scoring Rubric for Writing?
A holistic scoring rubric for writing is a type of rubric that evaluates a piece of writing as a whole rather than breaking it down into separate criteria
This approach provides a single overall score based on the general impression of the writing’s quality and effectiveness.
Here’s a closer look at holistic scoring rubrics.
Key Features of Holistic Scoring Rubrics
- Single Overall Score : Assigns one score based on the overall quality of the writing.
- General Criteria : Focuses on the overall effectiveness, coherence, and impact of the writing.
- Descriptors : Uses broad descriptors for each score level to capture the general characteristics of the writing.
Example Holistic Scoring Rubric
Score | Description |
---|---|
5 | : Exceptionally clear, engaging, and well-organized writing. Demonstrates excellent control of language, grammar, and style. |
4 | : Clear and well-organized writing. Minor errors do not detract from the overall quality. Demonstrates good control of language and style. |
3 | : Satisfactory writing with some organizational issues. Contains a few errors that may distract but do not impede understanding. |
2 | : Basic writing that lacks organization and contains several errors. Demonstrates limited control of language and style. |
1 | : Unclear and poorly organized writing. Contains numerous errors that impede understanding. Demonstrates poor control of language and style. |
Advantages of Holistic Scoring Rubrics
- Efficiency : Faster to use because it involves a single overall judgment rather than multiple criteria.
- Flexibility : Allows for a more intuitive assessment of the writing’s overall impact and effectiveness.
- Comprehensiveness : Captures the overall quality of writing, considering all elements together.
Disadvantages of Holistic Scoring Rubrics
- Less Detailed Feedback : Provides a general score without specific feedback on individual aspects of writing.
- Subjectivity : Can be more subjective, as it relies on the assessor’s overall impression rather than specific criteria.
- Limited Diagnostic Use : Less useful for identifying specific areas of strength and weakness for instructional purposes.
When to Use Holistic Scoring Rubrics
- Quick Assessments : When a quick, overall evaluation is needed.
- Standardized Testing : Often used in standardized testing scenarios where consistency and efficiency are priorities.
- Initial Impressions : Useful for providing an initial overall impression before more detailed analysis.
Free Writing Rubric Templates
Feel free to use the following writing rubric templates.
You can easily copy and paste them into a Word Document. Please do credit this website on any written, printed, or published use.
Otherwise, go wild.
Criteria | 4 (Excellent) | 3 (Good) | 2 (Fair) | 1 (Poor) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Well-developed, engaging, and clear plot, characters, and setting. | Developed plot, characters, and setting with some details missing. | Basic plot, characters, and setting; lacks details. | Underdeveloped plot, characters, and setting. | |
Highly creative and original. | Creative with some originality. | Some creativity but lacks originality. | Lacks creativity and originality. | |
No grammatical errors. | Few minor grammatical errors. | Several grammatical errors. | Numerous grammatical errors. | |
Clear and logical structure. | Mostly clear structure. | Somewhat clear structure. | Lacks clear structure. | |
Rich, varied, and appropriate language. | Varied and appropriate language. | Limited language variety. | Basic or inappropriate language. |
Criteria | 4 (Excellent) | 3 (Good) | 2 (Fair) | 1 (Poor) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Strong, clear, and convincing argument. | Convincing argument with minor gaps. | Basic argument; lacks strong support. | Weak or unsupported argument. | |
Strong, relevant, and well-integrated evidence. | Relevant evidence but not strong. | Some relevant evidence, but weak. | Irrelevant or missing evidence. | |
No grammatical errors. | Few minor grammatical errors. | Several grammatical errors. | Numerous grammatical errors. | |
Clear and logical structure. | Mostly clear structure. | Somewhat clear structure. | Lacks clear structure. | |
Persuasive and engaging language. | Engaging language. | Somewhat engaging language. | Not engaging language. |
Expository Writing Rubric
Criteria | 4 (Excellent) | 3 (Good) | 2 (Fair) | 1 (Poor) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Thorough, accurate, and insightful content. | Accurate content with some details missing. | Basic content; lacks depth. | Incomplete or inaccurate content. | |
Clear and concise explanations. | Mostly clear explanations. | Somewhat clear explanations. | Unclear explanations. | |
No grammatical errors. | Few minor grammatical errors. | Several grammatical errors. | Numerous grammatical errors. | |
Clear and logical structure. | Mostly clear structure. | Somewhat clear structure. | Lacks clear structure. | |
Precise and appropriate language. | Appropriate language. | Limited language variety. | Basic or inappropriate language. |
Descriptive Writing Rubric
Criteria | 4 (Excellent) | 3 (Good) | 2 (Fair) | 1 (Poor) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vivid and detailed imagery that engages the senses. | Detailed imagery with minor gaps. | Basic imagery; lacks vivid details. | Little to no imagery. | |
Highly creative and original descriptions. | Creative with some originality. | Some creativity but lacks originality. | Lacks creativity and originality. | |
No grammatical errors. | Few minor grammatical errors. | Several grammatical errors. | Numerous grammatical errors. | |
Clear and logical structure. | Mostly clear structure. | Somewhat clear structure. | Lacks clear structure. | |
Rich, varied, and appropriate language. | Varied and appropriate language. | Limited language variety. | Basic or inappropriate language. |
Analytical Writing Rubric
Criteria | 4 (Excellent) | 3 (Good) | 2 (Fair) | 1 (Poor) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Insightful, thorough, and well-supported analysis. | Good analysis with some depth. | Basic analysis; lacks depth. | Weak or unsupported analysis. | |
Strong, relevant, and well-integrated evidence. | Relevant evidence but not strong. | Some relevant evidence, but weak. | Irrelevant or missing evidence. | |
No grammatical errors. | Few minor grammatical errors. | Several grammatical errors. | Numerous grammatical errors. | |
Clear and logical structure. | Mostly clear structure. | Somewhat clear structure. | Lacks clear structure. | |
Precise and appropriate language. | Appropriate language. | Limited language variety. | Basic or inappropriate language. |
Final Thoughts: Writing Rubrics
I have a lot more resources for teaching on this site.
Check out some of the blog posts I’ve listed below. I think you might enjoy them.
Read This Next:
- Narrative Writing Graphic Organizer [Guide + Free Templates]
- 100 Best A Words for Kids (+ How to Use Them)
- 100 Best B Words For Kids (+How to Teach Them)
- 100 Dictation Word Ideas for Students and Kids
- 50 Tricky Words to Pronounce and Spell (How to Teach Them)
- Utility Menu
GA4 Tracking Code
fa51e2b1dc8cca8f7467da564e77b5ea
- Make a Gift
- Join Our Email List
Want to follow step-by-step instructions for building your own rubric? Visit the Bok Center's ! |
Whenever we give feedback, it inevitably reflects our priorities and expectations about the assignment. In other words, we're using a rubric to choose which elements (e.g., right/wrong answer, work shown, thesis analysis, style, etc.) receive more or less feedback and what counts as a "good thesis" or a "less good thesis." When we evaluate student work, that is, we always have a rubric. The question is how consciously we’re applying it, whether we’re transparent with students about what it is, whether it’s aligned with what students are learning in our course, and whether we’re applying it consistently. The more we’re doing all of the following, the more consistent and equitable our feedback and grading will be:
Being conscious of your rubric ideally means having one written out, with explicit criteria and concrete features that describe more/less successful versions of each criterion. If you don't have a rubric written out, you can use this assignment prompt decoder for TFs & TAs to determine which elements and criteria should be the focus of your rubric.
Being transparent with students about your rubric means sharing it with them ahead of time and making sure they understand it. This assignment prompt decoder for students is designed to facilitate this discussion between students and instructors.
Aligning your rubric with your course means articulating the relationship between “this” assignment and the ones that scaffold up and build from it, which ideally involves giving students the chance to practice different elements of the assignment and get formative feedback before they’re asked to submit material that will be graded. For more ideas and advice on how this looks, see the " Formative Assignments " page at Gen Ed Writes.
Applying your rubric consistently means using a stable vocabulary when making your comments and keeping your feedback focused on the criteria in your rubric.
How to Build a Rubric
Rubrics and assignment prompts are two sides of a coin. If you’ve already created a prompt, you should have all of the information you need to make a rubric. Of course, it doesn’t always work out that way, and that itself turns out to be an advantage of making rubrics: it’s a great way to test whether your prompt is in fact communicating to students everything they need to know about the assignment they’ll be doing.
So what do students need to know? In general, assignment prompts boil down to a small number of common elements :
- Evidence and Analysis
- Style and Conventions
- Specific Guidelines
- Advice on Process
If an assignment prompt is clearly addressing each of these elements, then students know what they’re doing, why they’re doing it, and when/how/for whom they’re doing it. From the standpoint of a rubric, we can see how these elements correspond to the criteria for feedback:
1. Purpose | ||
2. Genre | Does it have a clear thesis (if it’s an expository essay)? Does it have method and results sections (if it’s a lab report)? | |
3. Evidence and Analysis | Does it use the kinds/number of sources laid out in the prompt? Does it stick to, or move beyond, summary (depending on whether it’s more of an analysis or a reconstruction of someone else’s argument)? | |
4. Audience | Is it appropriately aimed at scholars, peers, general readers, ... ? | |
5. Style and Conventions | MLA or APA? Clarity and proofreading etc. | |
6. Specific Guidelines | Submitted on time, to the designated folder, in the designated format? | |
7. Advice on process |
All of these criteria can be weighed and given feedback, and they’re all things that students can be taught and given opportunities to practice. That makes them good criteria for a rubric, and that in turn is why they belong in every assignment prompt.
Which leaves “purpose” and “advice on process.” These elements are, in a sense, the heart and engine of any assignment, but their role in a rubric will differ from assignment to assignment. Here are a couple of ways to think about each.
On the one hand, “purpose” is the rationale for how the other elements are working in an assignment, and so feedback on them adds up to feedback on the skills students are learning vis-a-vis the overall purpose. In that sense, separately grading whether students have achieved an assignment’s “purpose” can be tricky.
On the other hand, metacognitive components such as journals or cover letters or artist statements are a great way for students to tie work on their assignment to the broader (often future-oriented) reasons why they’ve been doing the assignment. Making this kind of component a small part of the overall grade, e.g., 5% and/or part of “specific guidelines,” can allow it to be a nudge toward a meaningful self-reflection for students on what they’ve been learning and how it might build toward other assignments or experiences.
Advice on process
As with “purpose,” “advice on process” often amounts to helping students break down an assignment into the elements they’ll get feedback on. In that sense, feedback on those steps is often more informal or aimed at giving students practice with skills or components that will be parts of the bigger assignment.
For those reasons, though, the kind of feedback we give students on smaller steps has its own (even if ungraded) rubric. For example, if a prompt asks students to propose a research question as part of the bigger project, they might get feedback on whether it can be answered by evidence, or whether it has a feasible scope, or who the audience for its findings might be. All of those criteria, in turn, could—and ideally would—later be part of the rubric for the graded project itself. Or perhaps students are submitting earlier, smaller components of an assignment for separate grades; or are expected to submit separate components all together at the end as a portfolio, perhaps together with a cover letter or artist statement .
Using Rubrics Effectively
In the same way that rubrics can facilitate the design phase of assignment, they can also facilitate the teaching and feedback phases, including of course grading. Here are a few ways this can work in a course:
Discuss the rubric ahead of time with your teaching team. Getting on the same page about what students will be doing and how different parts of the assignment fit together is, in effect, laying out what needs to happen in class and in section, both in terms of what students need to learn and practice, and how the coming days or weeks should be sequenced.
Share the rubric with your students ahead of time. For the same reason it's ideal for course heads to discuss rubrics with their teaching team, it’s ideal for the teaching team to discuss the rubric with students. Not only does the rubric lay out the different skills students will learn during an assignment and which skills are more or less important for that assignment, it means that the formative feedback they get along the way is more legible as getting practice on elements of the “bigger assignment.” To be sure, this can’t always happen. Rubrics aren’t always up and running at the beginning of an assignment, and sometimes they emerge more inductively during the feedback and grading process, as instructors take stock of what students have actually submitted. In both cases, later is better than never—there’s no need to make the perfect the enemy of the good. Circulating a rubric at the time you return student work can still be a valuable tool to help students see the relationship between the learning objectives and goals of the assignment and the feedback and grade they’ve received.
Discuss the rubric with your teaching team during the grading process. If your assignment has a rubric, it’s important to make sure that everyone who will be grading is able to use the rubric consistently. Most rubrics aren’t exhaustive—see the note above on rubrics that are “too specific”—and a great way to see how different graders are handling “real-life” scenarios for an assignment is to have the entire team grade a few samples (including examples that seem more representative of an “A” or a “B”) and compare everyone’s approaches. We suggest scheduling a grade-norming session for your teaching staff.
- Designing Your Course
- In the Classroom
- When/Why/How: Some General Principles of Responding to Student Work
- Consistency and Equity in Grading
- Assessing Class Participation
- Assessing Non-Traditional Assignments
- Decreasing Student Anxiety about Grades
- Beyond “the Grade”: Alternative Approaches to Assessment
- Getting Feedback
- Equitable & Inclusive Teaching
- Artificial Intelligence
- Advising and Mentoring
- Teaching and Your Career
- Teaching Remotely
- Tools and Platforms
- The Science of Learning
- Bok Publications
- Other Resources Around Campus
Essay Rubric: Grading Students Correctly
- Icon Calendar 10 July 2024
- Icon Page 2897 words
- Icon Clock 14 min read
Lectures and tutors provide specific requirements for students to meet when writing essays. Basically, an essay rubric helps tutors to analyze an overall quality of compositions written by students. In this case, a rubric refers to a scoring guide used to evaluate performance based on a set of criteria and standards. As such, useful marking schemes make an analysis process simple for lecturers as they focus on specific concepts related to a writing process. Moreover, an assessment table lists and organizes all of the criteria into one convenient paper. In other instances, students use assessment tables to enhance their writing skills by examining various requirements. Then, different types of essay rubrics vary from one educational level to another. Essentially, Master’s and Ph.D. grading schemes focus on examining complex thesis statements and other writing mechanics. However, high school evaluation tables examine basic writing concepts. In turn, guidelines on a common format for writing a good essay rubric and corresponding examples provided in this article can help students to evaluate their papers before submitting them to their teachers.
General Aspects
An essay rubric refers to a way for teachers to assess students’ composition writing skills and abilities. Basically, an evaluation scheme provides specific criteria to grade assignments. Moreover, the three basic elements of an essay rubric are criteria, performance levels, and descriptors. In this case, teachers use assessment guidelines to save time when evaluating and grading various papers. Hence, learners must use an essay rubric effectively to achieve desired goals and grades, while its general example is:
What Is an Essay Rubric and Its Purpose
According to its definition, an essay rubric is a structured evaluation tool that educators use to grade students’ compositions in a fair and consistent manner. The main purpose of an essay rubric in writing is to ensure consistent and fair grading by clearly defining what constitutes excellent, good, average, and poor performance (DeVries, 2023). This tool specifies a key criteria for grading various aspects of a written text, including a clarity of a thesis statement, an overall quality of a main argument, an organization of ideas, a particular use of evidence, and a correctness of grammar and mechanics. Moreover, an assessment grading helps students to understand their strengths to be proud of and weaknesses to be pointed out and guides them in improving their writing skills (Taylor et al., 2024). For teachers, such an assessment simplifies a grading process, making it more efficient and less subjective by providing a clear standard to follow. By using an essay rubric, both teachers and students can engage in a transparent, structured, and constructive evaluation process, enhancing an overall educational experience (Stevens & Levi, 2023). In turn, the length of an essay rubric depends on academic levels, types of papers, and specific requirements, while general guidelines are:
High School
- Length: 1-2 pages
- Word Count: 300-600 words
- Length: 1-3 pages
- Word Count: 300-900 words
University (Undergraduate)
- Length: 2-4 pages
- Word Count: 600-1,200 words
Master’s
- Length: 2-5 pages
- Word Count: 600-1,500 words
- Length: 3-6 pages
- Word Count: 900-1,800 words
Element | Description |
---|---|
Thesis Statement | A well-defined thesis statement is crucial as it sets a particular direction and purpose of an essay, making it clear what a writer intends to argue or explain. |
Introduction | An introduction captures a reader’s interest and provides a framework for what a paper will cover, setting up a stage for arguments or ideas that follow after an opening paragraph. |
Content | High-quality content demonstrates thorough understanding and research on a specific topic, providing valuable and relevant information that supports a thesis. |
Organization | Effective organization ensures author’s ideas are presented in a clear, well-structure, and logical order, enhancing readability and an overall flow of a central argument. |
Evidence and Support | Providing strong evidence and detailed analysis is essential for backing up main arguments, adding credibility and depth to a final document. |
Conclusion | A strong conclusion ties all the main numbers together, reflects on potential implications of arguments, and reinforces a thesis, leaving a lasting impression on a reader. |
Grammar and Mechanics | Proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation are vital for clarity and professionalism, making a whole text easy to read and understand. |
Style and Tone | Correctness in writing style and author’s tone appropriate to a paper’s purpose and audience enhances an overall effectiveness of a particular text and engages a reader. |
Citations and References | Accurate and complete citations and references are crucial for giving credit to sources, avoiding plagiarism, and allowing readers to follow up on the research. |
Note: Some elements of an essay rubric can be added, deled, or combined with each other because different types of papers, their requirements, and instructors’ choices affect a final assessment. To format an essay rubric, people create a table with criteria listed in rows, performance levels in columns, and detailed descriptors in each cell explaining principal expectations for each level of performance (Steven & Levi, 2023). Besides, the five main criteria in a rubric are thesis statement, content, organization, evidence and support, and grammar and mechanics. In turn, a good essay rubric is clear, specific, aligned with learning objectives, and provides detailed, consistent descriptors for each performance level.
Steps How to Write an Essay Rubric
In writing, the key elements of an essay rubric are clear criteria, defined performance levels, and detailed descriptors for each evaluation.
- Identify a Specific Purpose and Goals: Determine main objectives of an essay’s assignment and consider what skills and knowledge you want students to demonstrate.
- List a Key Criteria: Identify essential components that need to be evaluated, such as thesis statement, introduction, content, organization, evidence and support, conclusion, grammar and mechanics, writing style and tone, and citations and references.
- Define Performance Levels: Decide on a particular scale you will use to measure performance (e.g., Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor) and ensure each level is distinct and clearly defined.
- Create Descriptors for Each Criterion: Write detailed descriptions for what constitutes each level of performance for every criterion and be specific about what is expected at each level to avoid misunderstanding.
- Assign Number Values: Determine a specific range for each criterion and performance level and allocate numbers in a way that reflects an actual importance of each criterion in an overall assessment.
- Review and Revise: Examine a complete rubric to ensure it is comprehensive and clear and adjust any descriptions or number values that seem unclear or disproportionate.
- Test a Working Essay Rubric: Apply a grading scheme to a few sample compositions to see if it effectively differentiates between different levels of performance and make adjustments as necessary.
- Involve Peers for Feedback: Share marking criteria with colleagues or peers for feedback and insights on clarity and fairness that you might have overlooked.
- Provide Examples: Include examples of complete papers or writing excerpts at each performance level and help students to understand what is expected for grading.
- Communicate With Students: Share a complete rubric with students before they begin an assignment and explain each criterion and performance level so they understand how their work will be evaluated and what they need to do to achieve highest marks.
Essay Rubric Example
Organization
Excellent/8 points: A submitted essay contains stiff topic sentences and a controlled organization.
Very Good/6 points: A paper contains a logical and appropriate organization. An author uses clear topic sentences.
Average/4 points: A composition contains a logical and appropriate organization. An author uses clear topic sentences.
Needs Improvement/2 points: A provided text has an inconsistent organization.
Unacceptable/0 (zero): A complete document shows an absence of a planned organization.
Grade: ___ .
Excellent/8 points: A submitted essay shows the absence of a planned organization.
Very Good/6 points: A paper contains precise and varied sentence structures and word choices.
Average/4 points: A composition follows a limited but mostly correct sentence structure. There are different sentence structures and word choices.
Needs Improvement/2 points: A provided text contains several awkward and unclear sentences. There are some problems with word choices.
Unacceptable/0 (zero): An author does not have apparent control over sentence structures and word choice.
Excellent/8 points: An essay’s content appears sophisticated and contains well-developed ideas.
Very Good/6 points: A paper’s content appears illustrative and balanced.
Average/4 points: A composition contains unbalanced content that requires more analysis.
Needs Improvement/2 points: A provided text contains a lot of research information without analysis or commentary.
Unacceptable/0 (zero): A complete document lacks relevant content and does not fit the thesis statement. Essay rubric rules are not followed.
Excellent/8 points: A submitted essay contains a clearly stated and focused thesis statement.
Very Good/6 points: A paper comprises a clearly stated argument. However, a particular focus would have been sharper.
Average/4 points: A thesis statement phrasing sounds simple and lacks complexity. An author does not word the thesis correctly.
Needs Improvement/2 points: A thesis statement requires a clear objective and does not fit the theme in a paper’s content.
Unacceptable/0 (zero): A thesis statement is not evident in an introduction paragraph.
Excellent/8 points: A submitted is clear and focused. An overall work holds a reader’s attention. Besides, relevant details and quotes enrich a thesis statement.
Very Good/6 points: A paper is mostly focused and contains a few useful details and quotes.
Average/4 points: An author begins a composition by defining an assigned topic. However, a particular development of ideas appears general.
Needs Improvement/2 points: An author fails to define an assigned topic well or focuses on several issues.
Unacceptable/0 (zero): A complete document lacks a clear sense of a purpose or thesis statement. Readers have to make suggestions based on sketchy or missing ideas to understand an intended meaning. Essay rubric requirements are missed.
Sentence Fluency
Excellent/8 points: A submitted essay has a natural flow, rhythm, and cadence. Its sentences are well-built and have a wide-ranging and robust structure that enhances reading.
Very Good/6 points: Presented ideas mostly flow and motivate a compelling reading.
Average/4 points: A composition hums along with a balanced beat but tends to be more businesslike than musical. Besides, a particular flow of ideas tends to become more mechanical than fluid.
Needs Improvement/2 points: A provided text appears irregular and hard to read.
Unacceptable/0 (zero): Readers have to go through a complete document several times to give this paper a fair interpretive reading.
Conventions
Excellent/8 points: An author demonstrates proper use of standard writing conventions, like spelling, punctuation, capitalization, grammar, usage, and paragraphing. A person also uses correct protocols in a way that improves an overall readability of an essay.
Very Good/6 points: An author demonstrates proper writing conventions and uses them correctly. One can read a paper with ease, and errors are rare. Few touch-ups can make a submitted composition ready for publishing.
Average/4 points: An author shows reasonable control over a short range of standard writing rules. A person also handles all the conventions and enhances readability. Writing errors in a presented composition tend to distract and impair legibility.
Needs Improvement/2 points: An author makes an effort to use various conventions, including spelling, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage, and paragraphing. A provided text contains multiple errors.
Unacceptable/0 (zero): An author makes repetitive errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, grammar, usage, and paragraphing. Some mistakes distract readers and make it hard to understand discussed concepts. Essay rubric rules are not covered.
Presentation
Excellent/8 points: A particular form and presentation of a text enhance an overall readability of an essay and its flow of ideas.
Very Good/6 points: A chosen format has few mistakes and is easy to read.
Average/4 points: An author’s message is understandable in this format.
Needs Improvement/2 points: An author’s message is only comprehensible infrequently, and a provided text appears disorganized.
Unacceptable/0 (zero): Readers receive a distorted message due to difficulties connecting to a presentation of an entire text.
Final Grade: ___ .
Grading Scheme
- A+ = 60+ points
- F = less than 9
Differences in Education Levels
An overall quality of various types of texts changes at different education levels. In writing, an essay rubric works by providing a structured framework with specific criteria and performance levels to consistently evaluate and grade a finished paper. For instance, college students must write miscellaneous papers when compared to high school learners (Harrington et al., 2021). In this case, assessment criteria will change for these different education levels. For example, university and college compositions should have a debatable thesis statement with varying points of view (Mewburn et al., 2021). However, high school compositions should have simple phrases as thesis statements. Then, other requirements in a marking rubric will be more straightforward for high school students (DeVries, 2023). For Master’s and Ph.D. works, a writing criteria presented in a scoring evaluation should focus on examining a paper’s complexity. In turn, compositions for these two categories should have thesis statements that demonstrate a detailed analysis of defined topics that advance knowledge in a specific area of study.
Recommendations
When observing any essay rubric, people should remember to ensure clarity and specificity in each criterion and performance level. This clarity helps both an evaluator and a student to understand principal expectations and how a written document will be assessed (Ozfidan & Mitchell, 2022). Consistency in language and terminology across an essay rubric is crucial to avoid confusion and maintain fairness. Further on, it is essential to align a working scheme with learning objectives and goals of an essay’s assignment, ensuring all key components, such as thesis, content, organization, and grammar, are covered comprehensively (Stevens & Levi, 2023). Evaluators should also be aware of the weighting and scoring distribution, making sure they accurately reflect an actual importance of each criterion. Moreover, testing a rubric on sample essays before finalizing it can help to identify any mistakes or imbalances in scores. Essentially, providing concrete examples or descriptions for each performance level can guide students in understanding what is expected for each grade (Taylor et al., 2024). In turn, an essay rubric should be reviewed, revised, and updated after each educational year to remain relevant and aligned with current academic standards. Lastly, sharing and explaining grading assessment with students before they start their composition fosters transparency and helps them to put more of their efforts into meeting defined criteria, ultimately improving their writing and learning experience in general.
Common Mistakes
- Lack of Specificity: Descriptions for each criterion and performance level are too vague, leading to ambiguity and confusion for both graders and students.
- Overcomplicating a Rubric: Including too many criteria or overly complex descriptions that make a scoring assessment difficult to use effectively.
- Unbalanced Weighting: Assigning disproportionate number values to different criteria, which can mislead an overall assessment and not accurately reflect an actual importance of each component.
- Inconsistent Language: Using inconsistent terminology or descriptors across performance levels, which can confuse users and make a rubric less reliable.
- Not Aligning With Objectives: Failing to align a particular criteria and performance levels with specific goals and learning outcomes of an assignment.
- Omitting Key Components: Leaving out important criteria that are essential for evaluating a paper comprehensively, such as citations or a conclusion part.
- Lack of Examples: Not providing examples or concrete descriptions of what constitutes each performance level, making it harder for students to understand expectations.
- Ignoring Grammar and Mechanics: Overlooking an actual importance of grammar, spelling, and punctuation, which are crucial for clear and professional writing.
- Not Updating an Essay Rubric: Using outdated rubrics that do not reflect current educational standards or specific assignment needs.
- Insufficient Testing: Failing to test a grading scheme on some sample documents to ensure it effectively differentiates between levels of performance and provides fair assessments.
Essay rubrics help teachers, instructors, professors, and tutors to analyze an overall quality of compositions written by students. Basically, an assessment scheme makes an analysis process simple for lecturers, and it lists and organizes all of the criteria into one convenient paper. In other instances, students use such evaluation tools to improve their writing skills. However, they vary from one educational level to the other. Master’s and Ph.D. assessment schemes focus on examining complex thesis statements and other writing mechanics. However, high school grading criteria examine basic writing concepts. As such, the following are some of the tips that one must consider when preparing any rubric.
- Include all mechanics that relate to essay writing.
- Cover different requirements and their relevant grades.
- Follow clear and understandable statements.
DeVries, B. A. (2023). Literacy assessment and intervention for classroom teachers . Routledge.
Harrington, E. R., Lofgren, I. E., Gottschalk Druschke, C., Karraker, N. E., Reynolds, N., & McWilliams, S. R. (2021). Training graduate students in multiple genres of public and academic science writing: An assessment using an adaptable, interdisciplinary rubric. Frontiers in Environmental Science , 9 , 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.715409
Mewburn, I., Firth, K., & Lehmann, S. (2021). Level up your essays: How to get better grades at university . NewSouth.
Ozfidan, B., & Mitchell, C. (2022). Assessment of students’ argumentative writing: A rubric development. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies , 9 (2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1064
Stevens, D. D., & Levi, A. (2023). Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback, and promote student learning . Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Taylor, B., Kisby, F., & Reedy, A. (2024). Rubrics in higher education: An exploration of undergraduate students’ understanding and perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2299330
To Learn More, Read Relevant Articles
How to Cite a Newspaper Article in APA 7 With Examples
- Icon Calendar 12 October 2020
- Icon Page 754 words
"Who Am I" Essay Examples & Student Guidelines
- Icon Calendar 10 October 2020
- Icon Page 5309 words
University Writing Program
- Collaborative Writing
- Writing for Metacognition
- Supporting Multilingual Writers
- Alternatives to Grading
- Making Feedback Matter
- Peer Review
- Responding to Multilingual Writers’ Texts
- Model Library
Written by Arthur Russell
Just about every discussion of rubrics begins with a caveat: writing rubrics are not a substitute for writing instruction. Rubrics are tools for communicating grading criteria and assessing student progress. Rubrics take a variety of forms, from grids to checklists , and measure a range of writing tasks, from conceptual design to sentence-level considerations.
As with any assessment tool, a rubric’s effectiveness is entirely dependent upon its design and its deployment in the classroom. Whatever form rubrics take, the criteria for assessment must be legible to all students—if students cannot decipher our rubrics, they are not useful.
When effectively integrated with writing instruction, rubrics can help instructors clarify their own expectations for written work, isolate specific elements as targets of instruction, and provide meaningful feedback and coaching to students. Well-designed rubrics will draw program learning outcomes, assignment prompts, course instruction and assessment into alignment.
Starting Points
Course rubrics vs. assignment rubrics.
Instructors may choose to use a standard rubric for evaluating all written work completed in a course. Course rubrics provide instructors and students a shared language for communicating the values and expectations of written work over the course of an entire semester. Best practices suggest that establishing grading criteria with students well in advance helps instructors compose focused, revision-oriented feedback on drafts and final papers and better coach student writers. When deploying course rubrics in writing-intensive courses, consider using them to guide peer review and self-evaluation processes with students. The more often students work with established criteria, the more likely they are to respond to and incorporate feedback in future projects.
At the same time, not every assignment needs to assess every aspect of the writing process every time. Particularly early in the semester, instructors may develop assignment-specific rubrics that target one or two standards. Prioritizing a specific learning objective or writing process in an assignment rubric allows instructors to concentrate time spent on in-class writing instruction and encourages students to develop targeted aspects of their writing processes.
Developing Evaluation Criteria
- Establish clear categories. What specific learning objectives (i.e. critical and creative thinking, inquiry and analysis) and writing processes (i.e. summary, synthesis, source analysis, argument and response) are most critical to success for each assignment?
- Establish observable and measurable criteria of success. For example, consider what counts for “clarity” in written work. For a research paper, clarity might attend to purpose: a successful paper will have a well-defined purpose (thesis, takeaway), integrate and explain evidence to support all claims, and pay careful attention to purpose, context, and audience.
- Adopt student-friendly language. When using academic terminology and discipline-specific concepts, be sure to define and discuss these concepts with students. When in doubt , VALUE rubrics are excellent models of clearly defined learning objective and distinguishing criteria.
Sticking Points: Writing Rubrics in the Disciplines
Even the most carefully planned rubrics are not self-evident. The language we have adopted for writing assessment is itself a potential obstacle to student learning and success . What we count for “clarity” or “accuracy” or “insight” in academic writing, for instance, is likely shaped by our disciplinary expectations and measured by the standards of our respective fields. What counts for “good writing” is more subjective than our rubrics may suggest. Similarly, students arrive in our courses with their own understanding and experiences of academic writing that may or may not be reflected in our assignment prompts.
Defining the terms for success with students in class and in conference will go a long way toward bridging these gaps. We might even use rubrics as conversation starters, not only as an occasion to communicate our expectations for written work, but also as an opportunity to demystify the rhetorical contexts of discipline-specific writing with students.
Helpful Resources
For a short introduction to rubric design, the Creating Rubrics guide developed by Louise Pasternack (2014) for the Center for Teaching Excellence and Innovation is an excellent resource. The step-by-step tutorials developed by North Carolina State University and DePaul Teaching Commons are especially useful for instructors preparing rubrics from scratch. On the use of rubrics for writing instruction and assignments in particular, Heidi Andrade’s “Teaching with Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly” provides an instructive overview of the benefits and drawbacks of using rubrics. For a more in-depth introduction (with sample rubrics), Melzer and Bean’s “Using Rubrics to Develop and Apply Grading Criteria” in Engaging Ideas is essential reading.
Cited and Recommended Sources
- Andrade, Heidi Goodrich. “Teaching with Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.” College Teaching , vol. 53, no. 1, 2005, pp. 27–30, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27559213
- Athon, Amanda. “Designing Rubrics to Foster Students’ Diverse Language Backgrounds.” Journal of Basic Writing , vol. 38, No.1, 2019, pp. 78–103, https://doi.org/10.37514/JBW-J.2019.38.1.05
- Bennett, Cary. “Assessment Rubrics: Thinking inside the Boxes.” Learning and Teaching: The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences , vol. 9, no. 1, 2016, pp. 50–72, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24718020
- Broad, Bob. What We Really Value: Beyond Rubrics in Teaching and Assessing Writing . University Press of Colorado, 2003. https://doi-org.proxy1.library.jhu.edu/10.2307/j.ctt46nxvm
- Melzer, Dan, and John C. Bean. Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom . 3rd ed., Jossey-Bass, 2021 (esp. pp. 253-277), https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy1.library.jhu.edu/lib/jhu/detail.action?docID=6632622
- Pasternack, Louise. “Creating Rubrics,” The Innovative Instructor Blog , Center for Teaching Excellence and Innovation, Johns Hopkins University, 21 Nov. 2014.
- Reynders, G., et al. “Rubrics to assess critical thinking and information processing in undergraduate STEM courses.” International Journal of STEM Education vol. 7, no. 9, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00208-5
- Turley, Eric D., and Chris W. Gallagher. “On the ‘Uses’ of Rubrics: Reframing the Great Rubric Debate.” The English Journal , vol. 97, no. 4, 2008, pp. 87–92, http://www.jstor.org/stable/30047253
- Wiggins, Grant. “The Constant Danger of Sacrificing Validity to Reliability: Making Writing Assessment Serve Writers.” Assessing Writing , vol. 1, no. 1, 1994, pp. 129-139, https://doi.org/10.1016/1075-2935(94)90008-6
- Chess (Gr. 1-4)
- TV (Gr. 1-4)
- Metal Detectors (Gr. 2-6)
- Tetris (Gr. 2-6)
- Seat Belts (Gr. 2-6)
- The Coliseum (Gr. 2-6)
- The Pony Express (Gr. 2-6)
- Wintertime (Gr. 2-6)
- Reading (Gr. 3-7)
- Black Friday (Gr. 3-7)
- Hummingbirds (Gr. 3-7)
- Worst Game Ever? (Gr. 4-8)
- Carnivorous Plants (Gr. 4-8)
- Google (Gr. 4-8)
- Honey Badgers (Gr. 4-8)
- Hyperinflation (Gr. 4-8)
- Koko (Gr. 4-8)
- Mongooses (Gr. 5-9)
- Trampolines (Gr. 5-9)
- Garbage (Gr. 5-9)
- Maginot Line (Gr. 5-9)
- Asian Carp (Gr. 5-9)
- Tale of Two Countries (Gr. 6-10)
- Kevlar (Gr. 7-10)
- Tigers (Gr. 7-11)
- Statue of Liberty (Gr. 8-10)
- Submarines (Gr. 8-12)
- Castles (Gr. 9-13)
- Gutenberg (Gr. 9-13)
- Author's Purpose Practice 1
- Author's Purpose Practice 2
- Author's Purpose Practice 3
- Fact and Opinion Practice 1
- Fact and Opinion Practice 2
- Fact and Opinion Practice 3
- Idioms Practice Test 1
- Idioms Practice Test 2
- Figurative Language Practice 1
- Figurative Language Practice 2
- Figurative Language Practice 3
- Figurative Language Practice 4
- Figurative Language Practice 5
- Figurative Language Practice 6
- Figurative Language Practice 7
- Figurative Language Practice 8
- Figurative Language Practice 9
- Figurative Language of Edgar Allan Poe
- Figurative Language of O. Henry
- Figurative Language of Shakespeare
- Genre Practice 1
- Genre Practice 2
- Genre Practice 3
- Genre Practice 4
- Genre Practice 5
- Genre Practice 6
- Genre Practice 7
- Genre Practice 8
- Genre Practice 9
- Genre Practice 10
- Irony Practice 1
- Irony Practice 2
- Irony Practice 3
- Making Inferences Practice 1
- Making Inferences Practice 2
- Making Inferences Practice 3
- Making Inferences Practice 4
- Making Inferences Practice 5
- Main Idea Practice 1
- Main Idea Practice 2
- Point of View Practice 1
- Point of View Practice 2
- Text Structure Practice 1
- Text Structure Practice 2
- Text Structure Practice 3
- Text Structure Practice 4
- Text Structure Practice 5
- Story Structure Practice 1
- Story Structure Practice 2
- Story Structure Practice 3
- Author's Purpose
- Characterizations
- Context Clues
- Fact and Opinion
- Figurative Language
- Grammar and Language Arts
- Poetic Devices
- Point of View
- Predictions
- Reading Comprehension
- Story Structure
- Summarizing
- Text Structure
- Character Traits
- Common Core Aligned Unit Plans
- Teacher Point of View
- Teaching Theme
- Patterns of Organization
- Project Ideas
- Reading Activities
- How to Write Narrative Essays
- How to Write Persuasive Essays
- Narrative Essay Assignments
- Narrative Essay Topics
- Persuasive Essay Topics
- Research Paper Topics
- Rubrics for Writing Assignments
- Learn About Sentence Structure
- Grammar Worksheets
- Noun Worksheets
- Parts of Speech Worksheets
- Punctuation Worksheets
- Sentence Structure Worksheets
- Verbs and Gerunds
- Examples of Allitertion
- Examples of Hyperbole
- Examples of Onomatopoeia
- Examples of Metaphor
- Examples of Personification
- Examples of Simile
- Figurative Language Activities
- Figurative Language Examples
- Figurative Language Poems
- Figurative Language Worksheets
- Learn About Figurative Language
- Learn About Poetic Devices
- Idiom Worksheets
- Online Figurative Language Tests
- Onomatopoeia Worksheets
- Personification Worksheets
- Poetic Devices Activities
- Poetic Devices Worksheets
- About This Site
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Use
- Understanding CCSS Standards
- What's New?
Ereading Worksheets
Free reading worksheets, activities, and lesson plans., site navigation.
- Learn About Author’s Purpose
- Author’s Purpose Quizzes
- Character Types Worksheets and Lessons
- List of Character Traits
- Differentiated Reading Instruction Worksheets and Activities
- Fact and Opinion Worksheets
- Irony Worksheets
- Animal Farm Worksheets
- Literary Conflicts Lesson and Review
- New Home Page Test
- Lord of the Flies Chapter 2 Worksheet
- Lord of the Flies Chapter 5 Worksheet
- Lord of the Flies Chapter 6 Worksheet
- Lord of the Flies Chapter 10 Worksheet
- Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass
- Sister Carrie
- The Count of Monte Cristo
- The Odyssey
- The War of the Worlds
- The Wizard of Oz
- Mood Worksheets
- Context Clues Worksheets
- Inferences Worksheets
- Main Idea Worksheets
- Making Predictions Worksheets
- Nonfiction Passages and Functional Texts
- Setting Worksheets
- Summarizing Worksheets and Activities
- Short Stories with Questions
- Story Structure Activities
- Story Structure Worksheets
- Tone Worksheets
- Types of Conflict Worksheets
- Reading Games
- Figurative Language Poems with Questions
- Hyperbole and Understatement Worksheets
- Simile and Metaphor Worksheets
- Simile Worksheets
- Hyperbole Examples
- Metaphor Examples
- Personification Examples
- Simile Examples
- Understatement Examples
- Idiom Worksheets and Tests
- Poetic Devices Worksheets & Activities
- Alliteration Examples
- Allusion Examples
- Onomatopoeia Examples
- Onomatopoeia Worksheets and Activities
- Genre Worksheets
- Genre Activities
- Capitalization Worksheets, Lessons, and Tests
- Contractions Worksheets and Activities
- Double Negative Worksheets
- Homophones & Word Choice Worksheets
- ‘Was’ or ‘Were’
- Simple Subjects & Predicates Worksheets
- Subjects, Predicates, and Objects
- Clauses and Phrases
- Type of Sentences Worksheets
- Sentence Structure Activities
- Comma Worksheets and Activities
- Semicolon Worksheets
- End Mark Worksheets
- Noun Worksheets, Lessons, and Tests
- Verb Worksheets and Activities
- Pronoun Worksheets, Lessons, and Tests
- Adverbs & Adjectives Worksheets, Lessons, & Tests
- Preposition Worksheets and Activities
- Conjunctions Worksheets and Activities
- Interjections Worksheets
- Parts of Speech Activities
- Verb Tense Activities
- Past Tense Worksheets
- Present Tense Worksheets
- Future Tense Worksheets
- Point of View Activities
- Point of View Worksheets
- Teaching Point of View
- Cause and Effect Example Paragraphs
- Chronological Order
- Compare and Contrast
- Order of Importance
- Problem and Solution
- Text Structure Worksheets
- Text Structure Activities
Essay Writing Rubrics
- Narrative Essay Topics and Story Ideas
- Narrative Essay Worksheets & Writing Assignments
- Persuasive Essay and Speech Topics
- Persuasive Essay Worksheets & Activities
- Writing Narrative Essays and Short Stories
- Writing Persuasive Essays
- All Reading Worksheets
- Understanding Common Core State Standards
- Remote Learning Resources for Covid-19 School Closures
- What’s New?
- Ereading Worksheets | Legacy Versions
- Online Figurative Language Practice
- Online Genre Practice Tests
- Online Point of View Practice Tests
- 62 School Project Ideas
- 2nd Grade Reading Worksheets
- 3rd Grade Reading Worksheets
- 4th Grade Reading Worksheets
- 5th Grade Reading Worksheets
- 6th Grade Reading Worksheets
- 7th Grade Reading Worksheets
- 8th Grade Reading Worksheets
- 9th Grade Reading Worksheets
- 10th Grade Reading Worksheets
- Membership Billing
- Membership Cancel
- Membership Checkout
- Membership Confirmation
- Membership Invoice
- Membership Levels
- Your Profile
Want Updates?
43 comments.
I’m a teacher and I find very good materials here. I suggest it to everybody, particularly in education field.
Your materials are of great help. Thanks so much for helping other teachers with your knowledge and experience.
Seggie Mainawa
I am so happy about the information that you have been given. Thank you very much for the information.
Thank you so much sir! Its my first time as an online English teacher for primary level and I come across your site while groping for ideas on how and what to teach…Your site is really of great help and it is much appreciated. I learned a lot and this could help me improve on my teaching resources. Thank you so very much!!! More power and God bless!
This website is super helpful! Great resources for practicing.
Thank you for taking time to share all the resources. They are very helpful in many ways to students and to educators. I have visited it many times during my web search for various topics and I will continue visiting. Job well done to say the least!
I have used this site numerous times and find the worksheets and power points so perfectly crafted. You drive the points home, with clarity and ease of understanding.
jerusha gooden
Essay long about slavery and sugar plantion everything to do please help me need you about you need l want to ok
Thank you so much. It a great blessing to see them and have.them in my phone. Great blessings
I totally appreciate all your resources; saves me a lot of time. Thanks
Dear Sir, I am so happy to have found this site! It is quite comprehensive. I stumbled across it looking for help in tutoring English to elementary students and I find myself completing your worksheets just to stay sharp! Thank you for all your hard work. It is most appreciated.
Thank you for visiting and taking the time to comment!
BRAVO! I found your site when I was looking for parts of speech resources and am absolutely blown away. THANK YOU for this gift in ELA resources that are spot on and ready to use. I think this is the first site I have found that I can actually use the resource confidently without having to recreate the wheel on my own. I’ve been exploring for over an hour and am seriously ‘geeked out’ by everything. Bless you!
Thank you for the kind words. I’m glad you like the site. Please come back again!
Dominic Potter
Thank you so much,well appreciated.
Pru Claassen
Good day I require rubrics for Grade 8 and 9 English First Additional Language please… Essays as well as transactional writing.
What a gift — helping teachers teach. Praying that your generosity of spirit in sharing what you have created is multiplied hundred fold.
Your website is very generous with information.
Thank you! Ms Simmons
I was in search of such site for our teacher Dr Imran khan wants us to write a research paper in Linguistics
I want a resource about cause and effect essay and about compare and contrast essay but this site is actually awesome and I had a lot to do with this amazing site
Simple and accurate, thank you. Very useful to teach students.
Just want to say thank you. This website is truly a gem!!! So many fantastic resources all in one place – and all for free. I cannot thank you enough for your dedication. You have helped me many nights this past year as I have scrambled through my first year of teaching. All of your materials are straightforward, ready-for-use, and engaging for students. What more could I ask for??
That’s exactly what I was going for. Thank you for the kind words and for visiting my site. Best wishes!
Thank you very much for sharing these with us. It is very very helpful!
Thank you so much for these resources.They are so helpful..Can you please include one sample essay if possible. Thanks, Lavanya.
very interesting resource!
Thank you so much for the wonderful work that you are producing.
You are most welcome. Thank you for visiting.
Edward Elmer
I am a teacher with the Sacramento County Office of Education in Sacramento California. I just want to say how thankful I am for discovering your site. You have my utmost admiration for your material. Are you developing more in the future?
Thanks again, Edward Elmer
Thank you kindly.
I am working on more materially. This site is my life’s work. I will continue to update it and improve it as my time allows.
Thank you for the kind words.
Your web page is AWESOME! Thank you for sharing all these wonderful activities!!
You are most welcome. Thank you for visiting!
it is really good
gino coronado
i learned a lot upon browsing some of the sample of rubrics hope you can put as many sample you can have
I’m happy to hear it. I have more that I will add soon.
mr. morton, love you…not because you shared these great ws, but to see how amazingly your thinking and teaching is crystal clear.lucky your students must be and making big in life with LA skills accquired from a superb mentor like you. its just not only fun to teach but also to solve your sheets. thats the best part of it! 😉
I am honored by your comments.
I hope to return your kindness by continuing to add more content in the years to come.
Best wishes.
Very useful information loved teaching my students theme using your resources!! Thank you!!
Thank u so much for the resources, checking essay are quiet easy than before, this is such a great help for us teachers.
Wow!! What an incredible resource. Thank you very much.
thanks… helpful for my composition class!
ladymacbeth
Thanks for everything Mr. Morton. I am a high school teacher of both enthusiastic readers/writers, and very nonenthusiastic readers/writers. How nice to find your resources. I’m sure I will be able to entice even the most reluctant to do some writing with the help of your prompts. Thanks for sharing!
I’m happy to hear it. I’d love to add more writing resources soon.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Subscribe Now
Popular content.
- Author's Purpose Worksheets
- Characterization Worksheets
- Common Core Lesson and Unit Plans
- Online Reading Practice Tests
- Plot Worksheets
- Reading Comprehension Worksheets
- Summary Worksheets
- Theme Worksheets
New and Updated Pages
- Capitalization Worksheets
- Contractions Worksheets
- Double Negatives Worksheets
- Homophones & Word Choice Worksheets
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Use rubrics to assess project-based student work including essays, group projects, creative endeavors, and oral presentations. Rubrics can help instructors communicate expectations to students and assess student work fairly, consistently and efficiently.
Essay Rubric. Directions: Your essay will be graded based on this rubric. Consequently, use this rubric as a guide when writing your essay and check it again before you submit your essay.
A writing rubric is a scoring guide used to evaluate written work. It lists criteria and describes levels of quality from excellent to poor. Rubrics provide a standardized way to assess writing. They make expectations clear and grading consistent.
Purpose. Genre. Evidence and Analysis. Audience. Style and Conventions. Specific Guidelines. Advice on Process. If an assignment prompt is clearly addressing each of these elements, then students know what they’re doing, why they’re doing it, and when/how/for whom they’re doing it.
This rubric delineates specific expectations about an essay assignment to students and provides a means of assessing completed student essays.
An essay rubric refers to a way for teachers to assess students’ composition writing skills and abilities. Basically, an evaluation scheme provides specific criteria to grade assignments. Moreover, the three basic elements of an essay rubric are criteria, performance levels, and descriptors.
Essay Rubric. Directions: Your essay will be graded based on this rubric. Consequently, use this rubric as a guide when writing your essay and check it again before you submit your essay.
Rubric for Persuasive Essay. Use the following criteria to evaluate persuasive essays. Score 4. Score 3. Score 2. Score 1. Audience and Purpose. Provides arguments, illustrations, and words that forcefully appeal to the audience and effectively serve persuasive purpose.
For a research paper, clarity might attend to purpose: a successful paper will have a well-defined purpose (thesis, takeaway), integrate and explain evidence to support all claims, and pay careful attention to purpose, context, and audience. Adopt student-friendly language.
Persuasive Essay Rubric 1 – This rubric mainly covers the structure of the essay: attention catcher, introduction, body paragraphs, conclusion and so forth. Includes a page explaining the structure of the essay. Persuasive Essay Rubric 1 RTF. Persuasive Essay Rubric 1 PDF. Preview Persuasive Essay Rubric 1 in your web browser.