Root out friction in every digital experience, super-charge conversion rates, and optimize digital self-service
Uncover insights from any interaction, deliver AI-powered agent coaching, and reduce cost to serve
Increase revenue and loyalty with real-time insights and recommendations delivered to teams on the ground
Know how your people feel and empower managers to improve employee engagement, productivity, and retention
Take action in the moments that matter most along the employee journey and drive bottom line growth
Whatever they’re are saying, wherever they’re saying it, know exactly what’s going on with your people
Get faster, richer insights with qual and quant tools that make powerful market research available to everyone
Run concept tests, pricing studies, prototyping + more with fast, powerful studies designed by UX research experts
Track your brand performance 24/7 and act quickly to respond to opportunities and challenges in your market
Explore the platform powering Experience Management
- Free Account
- Product Demos
- For Digital
- For Customer Care
- For Human Resources
- For Researchers
- Financial Services
- All Industries
Popular Use Cases
- Customer Experience
- Employee Experience
- Net Promoter Score
- Voice of Customer
- Customer Success Hub
- Product Documentation
- Training & Certification
- XM Institute
- Popular Resources
- Customer Stories
- Artificial Intelligence
Market Research
- Partnerships
- Marketplace
The annual gathering of the experience leaders at the world’s iconic brands building breakthrough business results, live in Salt Lake City.
- English/AU & NZ
- Español/Europa
- Español/América Latina
- Português Brasileiro
- REQUEST DEMO
- Experience Management
- Qualitative Research Questions
![](http://sektorel.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Try Qualtrics for free
How to write qualitative research questions.
11 min read Here’s how to write effective qualitative research questions for your projects, and why getting it right matters so much.
What is qualitative research?
Qualitative research is a blanket term covering a wide range of research methods and theoretical framing approaches. The unifying factor in all these types of qualitative study is that they deal with data that cannot be counted. Typically this means things like people’s stories, feelings, opinions and emotions , and the meanings they ascribe to their experiences.
Qualitative study is one of two main categories of research, the other being quantitative research. Quantitative research deals with numerical data – that which can be counted and quantified, and which is mostly concerned with trends and patterns in large-scale datasets.
What are research questions?
Research questions are questions you are trying to answer with your research. To put it another way, your research question is the reason for your study, and the beginning point for your research design. There is normally only one research question per study, although if your project is very complex, you may have multiple research questions that are closely linked to one central question.
A good qualitative research question sums up your research objective. It’s a way of expressing the central question of your research, identifying your particular topic and the central issue you are examining.
Research questions are quite different from survey questions, questions used in focus groups or interview questions. A long list of questions is used in these types of study, as opposed to one central question. Additionally, interview or survey questions are asked of participants, whereas research questions are only for the researcher to maintain a clear understanding of the research design.
Research questions are used in both qualitative and quantitative research , although what makes a good research question might vary between the two.
In fact, the type of research questions you are asking can help you decide whether you need to take a quantitative or qualitative approach to your research project.
Discover the fundamentals of qualitative research
Quantitative vs. qualitative research questions
Writing research questions is very important in both qualitative and quantitative research, but the research questions that perform best in the two types of studies are quite different.
Quantitative research questions
Quantitative research questions usually relate to quantities, similarities and differences.
It might reflect the researchers’ interest in determining whether relationships between variables exist, and if so whether they are statistically significant. Or it may focus on establishing differences between things through comparison, and using statistical analysis to determine whether those differences are meaningful or due to chance.
- How much? This kind of research question is one of the simplest. It focuses on quantifying something. For example:
How many Yoruba speakers are there in the state of Maine?
- What is the connection?
This type of quantitative research question examines how one variable affects another.
For example:
How does a low level of sunlight affect the mood scores (1-10) of Antarctic explorers during winter?
- What is the difference? Quantitative research questions in this category identify two categories and measure the difference between them using numerical data.
Do white cats stay cooler than tabby cats in hot weather?
If your research question fits into one of the above categories, you’re probably going to be doing a quantitative study.
Qualitative research questions
Qualitative research questions focus on exploring phenomena, meanings and experiences.
Unlike quantitative research, qualitative research isn’t about finding causal relationships between variables. So although qualitative research questions might touch on topics that involve one variable influencing another, or looking at the difference between things, finding and quantifying those relationships isn’t the primary objective.
In fact, you as a qualitative researcher might end up studying a very similar topic to your colleague who is doing a quantitative study, but your areas of focus will be quite different. Your research methods will also be different – they might include focus groups, ethnography studies, and other kinds of qualitative study.
A few example qualitative research questions:
- What is it like being an Antarctic explorer during winter?
- What are the experiences of Yoruba speakers in the USA?
- How do white cat owners describe their pets?
Qualitative research question types
![qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.qualtrics.com/m/assets/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/image1.png)
Marshall and Rossman (1989) identified 4 qualitative research question types, each with its own typical research strategy and methods.
- Exploratory questions
Exploratory questions are used when relatively little is known about the research topic. The process researchers follow when pursuing exploratory questions might involve interviewing participants, holding focus groups, or diving deep with a case study.
- Explanatory questions
With explanatory questions, the research topic is approached with a view to understanding the causes that lie behind phenomena. However, unlike a quantitative project, the focus of explanatory questions is on qualitative analysis of multiple interconnected factors that have influenced a particular group or area, rather than a provable causal link between dependent and independent variables.
- Descriptive questions
As the name suggests, descriptive questions aim to document and record what is happening. In answering descriptive questions , researchers might interact directly with participants with surveys or interviews, as well as using observational studies and ethnography studies that collect data on how participants interact with their wider environment.
- Predictive questions
Predictive questions start from the phenomena of interest and investigate what ramifications it might have in the future. Answering predictive questions may involve looking back as well as forward, with content analysis, questionnaires and studies of non-verbal communication (kinesics).
Why are good qualitative research questions important?
We know research questions are very important. But what makes them so essential? (And is that question a qualitative or quantitative one?)
Getting your qualitative research questions right has a number of benefits.
- It defines your qualitative research project Qualitative research questions definitively nail down the research population, the thing you’re examining, and what the nature of your answer will be.This means you can explain your research project to other people both inside and outside your business or organization. That could be critical when it comes to securing funding for your project, recruiting participants and members of your research team, and ultimately for publishing your results. It can also help you assess right the ethical considerations for your population of study.
- It maintains focus Good qualitative research questions help researchers to stick to the area of focus as they carry out their research. Keeping the research question in mind will help them steer away from tangents during their research or while they are carrying out qualitative research interviews. This holds true whatever the qualitative methods are, whether it’s a focus group, survey, thematic analysis or other type of inquiry.That doesn’t mean the research project can’t morph and change during its execution – sometimes this is acceptable and even welcome – but having a research question helps demarcate the starting point for the research. It can be referred back to if the scope and focus of the project does change.
- It helps make sure your outcomes are achievable
Because qualitative research questions help determine the kind of results you’re going to get, it helps make sure those results are achievable. By formulating good qualitative research questions in advance, you can make sure the things you want to know and the way you’re going to investigate them are grounded in practical reality. Otherwise, you may be at risk of taking on a research project that can’t be satisfactorily completed.
Developing good qualitative research questions
All researchers use research questions to define their parameters, keep their study on track and maintain focus on the research topic. This is especially important with qualitative questions, where there may be exploratory or inductive methods in use that introduce researchers to new and interesting areas of inquiry. Here are some tips for writing good qualitative research questions.
1. Keep it specific
Broader research questions are difficult to act on. They may also be open to interpretation, or leave some parameters undefined.
Strong example: How do Baby Boomers in the USA feel about their gender identity?
Weak example: Do people feel different about gender now?
2. Be original
Look for research questions that haven’t been widely addressed by others already.
Strong example: What are the effects of video calling on women’s experiences of work?
Weak example: Are women given less respect than men at work?
3. Make it research-worthy
Don’t ask a question that can be answered with a ‘yes’ or ‘no’, or with a quick Google search.
Strong example: What do people like and dislike about living in a highly multi-lingual country?
Weak example: What languages are spoken in India?
4. Focus your question
Don’t roll multiple topics or questions into one. Qualitative data may involve multiple topics, but your qualitative questions should be focused.
Strong example: What is the experience of disabled children and their families when using social services?
Weak example: How can we improve social services for children affected by poverty and disability?
4. Focus on your own discipline, not someone else’s
Avoid asking questions that are for the politicians, police or others to address.
Strong example: What does it feel like to be the victim of a hate crime?
Weak example: How can hate crimes be prevented?
5. Ask something researchable
Big questions, questions about hypothetical events or questions that would require vastly more resources than you have access to are not useful starting points for qualitative studies. Qualitative words or subjective ideas that lack definition are also not helpful.
Strong example: How do perceptions of physical beauty vary between today’s youth and their parents’ generation?
Weak example: Which country has the most beautiful people in it?
Related resources
Qualitative research design 12 min read, primary vs secondary research 14 min read, business research methods 12 min read, qualitative research interviews 11 min read, market intelligence 10 min read, marketing insights 11 min read, ethnographic research 11 min read, request demo.
Ready to learn more about Qualtrics?
- (855) 776-7763
Training Maker
All Products
Qualaroo Insights
ProProfs.com
- Get Started Free
FREE. All Features. FOREVER!
Try our Forever FREE account with all premium features!
How to Write Qualitative Research Questions: Types & Examples
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.proprofssurvey.com/ https://www.proprofs.com/c/images/sameer_bhatia.png )
Sameer Bhatia
Founder and CEO - ProProfs
Review Board Member
Sameer Bhatia is the Founder and Chief Executive Officer of ProProfs.com. He believes that software should make you happy and is driven to create a 100-year company that delivers delightfully ... Read more
Sameer Bhatia is the Founder and Chief Executive Officer of ProProfs.com. He believes that software should make you happy and is driven to create a 100-year company that delivers delightfully smart software with awesome support. His favorite word is 'delight,' and he dislikes the term 'customer satisfaction,' as he believes that 'satisfaction' is a low bar and users must get nothing less than a delightful experience at ProProfs. Sameer holds a Masters in Computer Science from the University of Southern California (USC). He lives in Santa Monica with his wife & two daughters. Read less
![qualitative research questions examples business Emma David](https://www.proprofssurvey.com/ https://www.proprofssurvey.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Emma-David-150x150.png )
Market Research Specialist
Emma David, a seasoned market research professional, specializes in employee engagement, survey administration, and data management. Her expertise in leveraging data for informed decisions has positively impacted several brands, enhancing their market position.
![qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.proprofssurvey.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Feature_SM_How-to-Write-Qualitative-Research-Questions-Types-Examples.png)
Qualitative research questions focus on depth and quality, exploring the “why and how” behind decisions, without relying on statistical tools.
Unlike quantitative research, which aims to collect tangible, measurable data from a broader demographic, qualitative analysis involves smaller, focused datasets, identifying patterns for insights.
The information collected by qualitative surveys can vary from text to images, demanding a deep understanding of the subject, and therefore, crafting precise qualitative research questions is crucial for success.
In this guide, we’ll discuss how to write effective qualitative research questions, explore various types, and highlight characteristics of good qualitative research questions.
Let’s dive in!
What Are Qualitative Research Questions?
Qualitative questions aim to understand the depth and nuances of a phenomenon, focusing on “why” and “how” rather than quantifiable measures.
They explore subjective experiences, perspectives, and behaviors, often using open-ended inquiries to gather rich, descriptive data.
Unlike quantitative questions, which seek numerical data, qualitative questions try to find out meanings, patterns, and underlying processes within a specific context.
These questions are essential for exploring complex issues, generating hypotheses, and gaining deeper insights into human behavior and phenomena.
Here’s an example of a qualitative research question:
“How do you perceive and navigate organizational culture within a tech startup environment?”
![qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.proprofssurvey.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/PP_SM_startup-environment.png)
This question asks about the respondent’s subjective interpretations and experiences of organizational culture within a specific context, such as a tech startup.
It seeks to uncover insights into the values, norms, and practices that shape workplace dynamics and employee behaviors, providing qualitative data for analysis and understanding.
When Should We Use Qualitative Research Questions?
Qualitative research questions typically aim to open up conversations, encourage detailed narratives, and foster a deep understanding of the subject matter. Here are some scenarios they are best suited for:
- Exploring Complex Phenomena : When the research topic involves understanding complex processes, behaviors, or interactions that cannot be quantified easily, qualitative questions help delve into these intricate details.
- Understanding Contexts and Cultures : To grasp the nuances of different social contexts, cultures, or subcultures, qualitative research questions allow for an in-depth exploration of these environments and how they influence individuals and groups.
- Exploring Perceptions and Experiences : When the aim is to understand people’s perceptions, experiences, or feelings about a particular subject, qualitative questions facilitate capturing the depth and variety of these perspectives.
- Developing Concepts or Theories : In the early stages of research, where concepts or theories are not yet well-developed, qualitative questions can help generate hypotheses, identify variables, and develop theoretical frameworks based on observations and interpretations.
- Investigating Processes : To understand how processes unfold over time and the factors that influence these processes, qualitative questions are useful for capturing the dynamics and complexities involved.
- Seeking to Understand Change : When researching how individuals or groups experience change, adapt to new circumstances, or make decisions, qualitative research questions can provide insights into the motivations, challenges, and strategies involved.
- Studying Phenomena Not Easily Quantified : For phenomena that are not easily captured through quantitative measures, such as emotions, beliefs, or motivations, qualitative questions can probe these abstract concepts more effectively.
- Addressing Sensitive or Taboo Topics : In studies where topics may be sensitive, controversial, or taboo, qualitative research questions allow for a respectful and empathetic exploration of these subjects, providing space for participants to share their experiences in their own words.
How to Write Qualitative Research Questions?
Read this guide to learn how you can craft well-thought-out qualitative research questions:
1. Begin with Your Research Goals
The first step in formulating qualitative research questions is to have a clear understanding of what you aim to discover or understand through your research. There are two types of qualitative questionnaires or research – Ontological and Epistemological.
Finding out the nature of your research influences all aspects of your research design, including the formulation of research questions.
Subsequently:
- Identify your main objective : Consider the broader context of your study. Are you trying to explore a phenomenon, understand a process, or interpret the meanings behind behaviors? Your main objective should guide the formulation of your questions, ensuring they are aligned with what you seek to achieve.
- Focus on the ‘how’ and ‘why’ : Qualitative research is inherently exploratory and aims to understand the nuances of human behavior and experience. Starting your questions with “how” or “why” encourages a deeper investigation into the motivations, processes, and contexts underlying the subject matter. This approach facilitates an open-ended exploration, allowing participants to provide rich, detailed responses that illuminate their perspectives and experiences.
Take a quick look at the following visual for a better understanding:
![qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.proprofssurvey.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Competitor_SM_5pollfish-1024x606.png)
So, if you are doing Ontological research, ensure that the questions focus on the “what” aspects of reality (the premise of your research) and opt for the nature of the knowledge for Epistemological research.
2. Choose the Right Structure
The structure of your research questions significantly impacts the depth and quality of data you collect. Opting for an open-ended format allows respondents the flexibility to express themselves freely, providing insights that pre-defined answers might miss.
- Open-ended format : These questions do not constrain respondents to a set of predetermined answers, unlike closed-ended questions. By allowing participants to articulate their thoughts in their own words, you can uncover nuances and complexities in their responses that might otherwise be overlooked.
- Avoid yes/no questions : Yes/no questions tend to limit the depth of responses. While they might be useful for gathering straightforward factual information, they are not conducive to exploring the depths and nuances that qualitative research seeks to uncover. Encouraging participants to elaborate on their experiences and perspectives leads to richer, more informative data.
For example, take a look at some qualitative questions examples shown in the following image:
![qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.proprofssurvey.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Competitor_SM_5researchgate-1024x801.png)
3. Be Clear and Specific
Clarity and specificity in your questions are crucial to ensure that participants understand what is being asked and that their responses are relevant to your research objectives.
- Use clear language : Use straightforward, understandable language in your questions. Avoid jargon, acronyms, or overly technical terms that might confuse participants or lead to misinterpretation. The goal is to make your questions accessible to everyone involved in your study.
- Be specific : While maintaining the open-ended nature of qualitative questions, it’s important to narrow down your focus to specific aspects of the phenomenon you’re studying. This specificity helps guide participants’ responses and ensures that the data you collect directly relates to your research objectives.
4. Ensure Relevance and Feasibility
Each question should be carefully considered for its relevance to your research goals and its feasibility, given the constraints of your study.
- Relevance : Questions should be crafted to address the core objectives of your research directly. They should probe areas that are essential to understanding the phenomenon under investigation and should align with your theoretical framework or literature review findings.
- Feasibility : Consider the practical aspects of your research, including the time available for data collection and analysis, resources, and access to participants. Questions should be designed to elicit meaningful responses within the constraints of your study, ensuring that you can gather and analyze data effectively.
5. Focus on a Single Concept or Theme per Question
To ensure clarity and depth, each question should concentrate on a single idea or theme. However, if your main qualitative research question is tough to understand or has a complex structure, you can create sub-questions in limited numbers and with a “ladder structure”.
This will help your respondents understand the overall research objective in mind, and your research can be executed in a better manner.
For example, suppose your main question is – “What is the current state of illiteracy in your state?”
Then, you can create the following subquestions:
“How does illiteracy block progress in your state?”
“How would you best describe the feelings you have about illiteracy in your state?”
For an even better understanding, you can see the various qualitative research question examples in the following image:
![qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.proprofssurvey.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Competitor_SM_5symondsresearch-1024x595.png)
📊 : Test them with a small group similar to your study population to ensure they are understood as intended and elicit the kind of responses you are seeking. : Be prepared to refine your questions based on pilot feedback or as your understanding of the topic deepens. |
Types of Qualitative Research Questions With Examples
Qualitative survey questions primarily focus on a specific group of respondents that are participating in case studies, surveys, ethnography studies, etc., rather than numbers or statistics.
As a result, the questions are mostly open-ended and can be subdivided into the following types as discussed below:
1. Descriptive Questions
Descriptive research questions aim to detail the “what” of a phenomenon, providing a comprehensive overview of the context, individuals, or situations under study. These questions are foundational, helping to establish a baseline understanding of the research topic.
- What are the daily experiences of teachers in urban elementary schools?
- What strategies do small businesses employ to adapt to rapid technological changes?
- How do young adults describe their transition from college to the workforce?
- What are the coping mechanisms of families with members suffering from chronic illnesses?
- How do community leaders perceive the impact of gentrification in their neighborhoods?
2. Interpretive Questions
Interpretive questions seek to understand the “how” and “why” behind a phenomenon, focusing on the meanings people attach to their experiences. These questions delve into the subjective interpretations and perceptions of participants.
- How do survivors of natural disasters interpret their experiences of recovery and rebuilding?
- Why do individuals engage in voluntary work within their communities?
- How do parents interpret and navigate the challenges of remote schooling for their children?
- Why do consumers prefer local products over global brands in certain markets?
- How do artists interpret the influence of digital media on traditional art forms?
3. Comparative Questions
Comparative research questions are designed to explore differences and similarities between groups, settings, or time periods. These questions can help to highlight the impact of specific variables on the phenomenon under study.
- How do the strategies for managing work-life balance compare between remote and office workers?
- What are the differences in consumer behavior towards sustainable products in urban versus rural areas?
- How do parenting styles in single-parent households compare to those in dual-parent households?
- What are the similarities and differences in leadership styles across different cultures?
- How has the perception of online privacy changed among teenagers over the past decade?
4. Process-oriented Questions
These questions focus on understanding the processes or sequences of events over time. They aim to uncover the “how” of a phenomenon, tracing the development, changes, or evolution of specific situations or behaviors.
- How do non-profit organizations develop and implement community outreach programs?
- What is the process of decision-making in high-stakes business environments?
- How do individuals navigate the process of career transition after significant industry changes?
- What are the stages of adaptation for immigrants in a new country?
- How do social movements evolve from inception to national recognition?
5. Evaluative Questions
Evaluative questions aim to assess the effectiveness, value, or impact of a program, policy, or phenomenon. These questions are critical for understanding the outcomes and implications of various initiatives or situations.
- How effective are online therapy sessions compared to in-person sessions in treating anxiety?
- What is the impact of community gardening programs on neighborhood cohesion?
- How do participants evaluate the outcomes of leadership training programs in their professional development?
- What are the perceived benefits and drawbacks of telecommuting for employees and employers?
- How do residents evaluate the effectiveness of local government policies on waste management?
6. One-on-One Questions
The one-on-one questions are asked to a single person and can be thought of as individual interviews that you can conduct online via phone and video chat as well.
The main aim of such questions is to ask your customers or people in the focus group a series of questions about their purchase motivations. These questions might also come with follow-ups, and if your customers respond with some interesting fact or detail, dig deeper and explore the findings as much as you want.
- What makes you happy in regard to [your research topic]?
- If I could make a wish of yours come true, what do you desire the most?
- What do you still find hard to come to terms with?
- Have you bought [your product] before?
- If so, what was your initial motivation behind the purchase?
7. Exploratory Questions
These questions are designed to enhance your understanding of a particular topic. However, while asking exploratory questions, you must ensure that there are no preconceived notions or biases to it. The more transparent and bias-free your questions are, the better and fair results you will get.
- What is the effect of personal smart devices on today’s youth?
- Do you feel that smart devices have positively or negatively impacted you?
- How do your kids spend their weekends?
- What do you do on a typical weekend morning?
8. Predictive Questions
The predictive questions are used for qualitative research that is focused on the future outcomes of an action or a series of actions. So, you will be using past information to predict the reactions of respondents to hypothetical events that might or might not happen in the future.
These questions come in extremely handy for identifying your customers’ current brand expectations, pain points, and purchase motivation.
- Are you more likely to buy a product when a celebrity promotes it?
- Would you ever try a new product because one of your favorite celebs claims that it actually worked for them?
- Would people in your neighborhood enjoy a park with rides and exercise options?
- How often would you go to a park with your kids if it had free rides?
9. Focus Groups
These questions are mostly asked in person to the customer or respondent groups. The in-person nature of these surveys or studies ensures that the group members get a safe and comfortable environment to express their thoughts and feelings about your brand or services.
- How would you describe your ease of using our product?
- How well do you think you were able to do this task before you started using our product?
- What do you like about our promotional campaigns?
- How well do you think our ads convey the meaning?
10. In-Home Videos
Collecting video feedback from customers in their comfortable, natural settings offers a unique perspective. At home, customers are more relaxed and less concerned about their mannerisms, posture, and choice of words when responding.
This approach is partly why Vogue’s 73 Questions Series is highly popular among celebrities and viewers alike. In-home videos provide insights into customers in a relaxed environment, encouraging them to be honest and share genuine experiences.
- What was your first reaction when you used our product for the first time?
- How well do you think our product performed compared to your expectations?
- What was your worst experience with our product?
- What made you switch to our brand?
11. Online Focus Groups
Online focus groups mirror the traditional, in-person format but are conducted virtually, offering a more cost-effective and efficient approach to gathering data. This digital format extends your reach and allows a rapid collection of responses from a broader audience through online platforms.
You can utilize social media and other digital forums to create communities of respondents and initiate meaningful discussions. Once you have them started, you can simply observe the exchange of thoughts and gather massive amounts of interesting insights!
- What do you like best about our product?
- How familiar are you with this particular service or product we offer?
- What are your concerns with our product?
- What changes can we make to make our product better?
Ask the Right Qualitative Research Questions for Meaningful Insights From Your Respondents
Watch: How to Create a Survey Using ProProfs Survey Maker
By now, you might have realized that manually creating a list of qualitative research questions is a daunting task. Keeping numerous considerations in mind, it’s easy to run out of ideas while crafting qualitative survey questions .
However, investing in smart survey tools, like ProProfs Survey Maker, can significantly streamline this process, allowing you to create various types of surveys in minutes.
With this survey tool , you can generate forms, NPS surveys , tests, quizzes, and assessments.
It’s also useful for conducting polls, sidebar surveys, and in-app surveys. Offering over 100 templates and more than 1,000,000 ready-to-use examples of phenomenological research questions, this software simplifies the task immensely.
Equipped with the right tools and the professional tips shared here, you’re well-prepared to conduct thorough research studies and obtain valuable insights that drive impactful results.
Frequently Asked Questions on Q ualitative Research Questions
1. how do you choose qualitative research questions.
To choose qualitative research questions, identify your main research goal, focus on exploring ‘how’ and ‘why’ aspects, ensure questions are open-ended, and align them with your theoretical framework and methodology.
2. Why are good qualitative research questions important?
Good qualitative research questions are important because they guide the research focus, enable the exploration of depth and complexity, and facilitate the gathering of rich, detailed insights into human experiences and behaviors.
![qualitative research questions examples business Emma David](https://www.proprofssurvey.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Emma-David-150x150.png)
About the author
Emma David is a seasoned market research professional with 8+ years of experience. Having kick-started her journey in research, she has developed rich expertise in employee engagement, survey creation and administration, and data management. Emma believes in the power of data to shape business performance positively. She continues to help brands and businesses make strategic decisions and improve their market standing through her understanding of research methodologies.
Related Posts
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.proprofssurvey.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/How-to-Write-Quantitative-Research-Questions-Types-With-Examples.png)
How to Write Quantitative Research Questions: Types With Examples
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.proprofssurvey.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Survey-Effective-Ways-to-Improve-your-Survey-Response-Rate.jpg)
12 Effective Ways to Improve Your Survey Response Rate
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.proprofssurvey.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Tips-for-using-screening-questions-in-your-survey.jpg)
How to Use Screening Survey Questions Like a Pro
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.proprofssurvey.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/How-to-Embed-a-Feedback-Survey-on-Your-Website.jpg)
How to Collect Website Feedback
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.proprofssurvey.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Checklist-for-Creating-an-Effective-Customer-Survey.png)
Checklist for Creating an Effective Customer Survey
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.proprofssurvey.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Boost-your-business-growth-using-customer-satisfaction-score.png)
What Is a Customer Satisfaction Score and How to Measure It
- User Experience (UX) Testing User Interface (UI) Testing Ecommerce Testing Remote Usability Testing About the company ' data-html="true"> Why Trymata
- Usability testing
Run remote usability tests on any digital product to deep dive into your key user flows
- Product analytics
Learn how users are behaving on your website in real time and uncover points of frustration
- Research repository
A tool for collaborative analysis of qualitative data and for building your research repository and database.
See an example
Trymata Blog
How-to articles, expert tips, and the latest news in user testing & user experience
Knowledge Hub
Detailed explainers of Trymata’s features & plans, and UX research terms & topics
Visit Knowledge Hub
- Plans & Pricing
Get paid to test
- For UX & design teams
- For product teams
- For marketing teams
- For ecommerce teams
- For agencies
- For startups & VCs
- Customer Stories
How do you want to use Trymata?
Conduct user testing, desktop usability video.
You’re on a business trip in Oakland, CA. You've been working late in downtown and now you're looking for a place nearby to grab a late dinner. You decided to check Zomato to try and find somewhere to eat. (Don't begin searching yet).
- Look around on the home page. Does anything seem interesting to you?
- How would you go about finding a place to eat near you in Downtown Oakland? You want something kind of quick, open late, not too expensive, and with a good rating.
- What do the reviews say about the restaurant you've chosen?
- What was the most important factor for you in choosing this spot?
- You're currently close to the 19th St Bart station, and it's 9PM. How would you get to this restaurant? Do you think you'll be able to make it before closing time?
- Your friend recommended you to check out a place called Belly while you're in Oakland. Try to find where it is, when it's open, and what kind of food options they have.
- Now go to any restaurant's page and try to leave a review (don't actually submit it).
What was the worst thing about your experience?
It was hard to find the bart station. The collections not being able to be sorted was a bit of a bummer
What other aspects of the experience could be improved?
Feedback from the owners would be nice
What did you like about the website?
The flow was good, lots of bright photos
What other comments do you have for the owner of the website?
I like that you can sort by what you are looking for and i like the idea of collections
You're going on a vacation to Italy next month, and you want to learn some basic Italian for getting around while there. You decided to try Duolingo.
- Please begin by downloading the app to your device.
- Choose Italian and get started with the first lesson (stop once you reach the first question).
- Now go all the way through the rest of the first lesson, describing your thoughts as you go.
- Get your profile set up, then view your account page. What information and options are there? Do you feel that these are useful? Why or why not?
- After a week in Italy, you're going to spend a few days in Austria. How would you take German lessons on Duolingo?
- What other languages does the app offer? Do any of them interest you?
I felt like there could have been a little more of an instructional component to the lesson.
It would be cool if there were some feature that could allow two learners studying the same language to take lessons together. I imagine that their screens would be synced and they could go through lessons together and chat along the way.
Overall, the app was very intuitive to use and visually appealing. I also liked the option to connect with others.
Overall, the app seemed very helpful and easy to use. I feel like it makes learning a new language fun and almost like a game. It would be nice, however, if it contained more of an instructional portion.
All accounts, tests, and data have been migrated to our new & improved system!
Use the same email and password to log in:
Legacy login: Our legacy system is still available in view-only mode, login here >
What’s the new system about? Read more about our transition & what it-->
25 Essential Qualitative Research Questions with Context
- Health and Well-being:
Question: How do individuals with chronic illnesses perceive and manage their overall well-being?
Context: This question aims to explore the subjective experiences of individuals living with chronic illnesses, focusing on their perceptions of well-being and the strategies they employ to manage their health.
Question: What are the experiences of teachers implementing project-based learning in high school science classrooms?
Context: This question delves into the qualitative aspects of teaching practices, seeking to understand the lived experiences of teachers as they implement a specific instructional approach (project-based learning) in a particular academic context (high school science classrooms).
Question: How do marginalized communities perceive and navigate social inclusion in urban environments?
Context: This question addresses the sociological dimensions of social inclusion within urban settings, focusing on the perspectives and strategies of marginalized communities as they navigate societal structures.
- Psychology:
Question: What are the coping mechanisms employed by individuals facing post-traumatic stress disorder?
Context: This question explores the psychological experiences of individuals dealing with post-traumatic stress disorder, aiming to uncover the qualitative aspects of coping strategies and mechanisms.
- Anthropology:
Question: How does a specific cultural group express identity through traditional rituals and ceremonies?
Context: This anthropological question focuses on cultural practices and rituals as expressions of identity within a specific cultural group, aiming to uncover the meanings and functions of these traditions.
- Gender Studies:
Question: What are the lived experiences of transgender individuals in the workplace, particularly regarding inclusion and discrimination?
Context: This question within gender studies explores the qualitative dimensions of transgender individuals’ workplace experiences, emphasizing the nuanced aspects of inclusion and discrimination they may encounter.
- Environmental Studies:
Question: How do local communities perceive and respond to environmental conservation efforts in their region?
Context: This question addresses the intersection of environmental studies and sociology, aiming to understand the qualitative perspectives of local communities toward conservation initiatives, exploring their perceptions and responses.
- Business and Management:
Question: How do employees perceive leadership styles and their impact on workplace culture?
Context: Within the realm of business and management, this question explores the qualitative aspects of organizational culture, focusing on employees’ perceptions of leadership styles and their influence on the workplace environment.
- Technology and Society:
Question: What are the social implications and user experiences of emerging technologies in the context of augmented reality applications?
Context: This question within the field of technology and society investigates the qualitative dimensions of user experiences and social implications related to the adoption of augmented reality applications.
- Communication Studies:
Question: How do individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds interpret and respond to media representations of body image?
Context: This question explores the intersection of communication studies and cultural studies, aiming to understand the qualitative variations in how individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds interpret and respond to media depictions of body image.
- Political Science:
Question: What are the public perceptions and attitudes toward government policies on climate change?
Context: Within political science, this question delves into the qualitative aspects of public opinion, seeking to understand how individuals perceive and respond to government policies related to climate change.
- Cultural Studies:
Question: How do international students experience acculturation and adaptation in a foreign academic environment?
Context: This question within cultural studies explores the qualitative dimensions of acculturation and adaptation, focusing on the experiences of international students within the context of a foreign academic environment.
- Family Studies:
Question: How do families navigate and negotiate roles and responsibilities in the context of remote work?
Context: In the domain of family studies, this question addresses the qualitative aspects of family dynamics, examining how families navigate and negotiate roles and responsibilities in the context of remote work.
- Public Health:
Question: How do community members perceive and engage with public health campaigns aimed at promoting vaccination in underserved urban areas?
Context: This public health question investigates the qualitative aspects of community perceptions and engagement with vaccination campaigns, particularly in urban areas with limited access to healthcare resources.
- Urban Planning:
Question: What are the experiences of residents in gentrifying neighborhoods regarding changes in their community dynamics, affordability, and social cohesion?
Context: Within urban planning, this question explores the qualitative dimensions of gentrification, focusing on residents’ lived experiences and perceptions of neighborhood transformations.
- Literature and Cultural Criticism:
Question: How do contemporary authors use literature to critique and challenge societal norms around gender roles and identity?
Context: In the realm of literature and cultural criticism, this question examines the qualitative dimensions of literary works, exploring how authors use their craft to challenge and critique societal norms related to gender.
- Social Work:
Question: What are the perceptions of social workers regarding the challenges and opportunities in providing mental health support to homeless populations?
Context: This social work question addresses the qualitative aspects of mental health support within homeless populations, exploring social workers’ perspectives on challenges and opportunities in their roles.
- Tourism and Hospitality:
Question: How do tourists from different cultural backgrounds experience and interpret authenticity in local culinary traditions?
Context: Within tourism and hospitality, this question explores the qualitative aspects of cultural experiences, focusing on tourists’ perceptions and interpretations of authenticity in local culinary traditions.
- Media and Entertainment:
Question: How do audiences engage with and interpret representations of diverse identities in streaming platforms’ original content?
Context: In the realm of media and entertainment, this question investigates the qualitative dimensions of audience engagement and interpretation of diverse identities in content produced by streaming platforms.
- Historical Studies:
Question: What are the narratives and memories of individuals who lived through a significant historical event, and how have these narratives evolved over time?
Context: Within historical studies, this question explores the qualitative aspects of personal narratives and memory, investigating how individuals recall and frame their experiences of a significant historical event.
- Linguistics:
Question: How do multilingual individuals navigate language use and identity in diverse linguistic environments?
Context: In the field of linguistics, this question delves into the qualitative dimensions of language use and identity, focusing on how multilingual individuals navigate linguistic diversity in their environments.
- Cybersecurity:
Question: What are the perceptions and behaviors of employees in organizations regarding cybersecurity practices, and how do these perceptions influence organizational security?
Context: Within cybersecurity, this question explores the qualitative aspects of employees’ perceptions and behaviors related to cybersecurity practices, examining their impact on organizational security.
- Human-Computer Interaction:
Question: How do users experience and adapt to voice-controlled virtual assistants in their daily lives, considering factors such as privacy concerns and usability?
Context: In human-computer interaction, this question investigates the qualitative aspects of user experiences with voice-controlled virtual assistants, considering factors such as privacy concerns and usability challenges.
- International Development:
Question: How do local communities perceive and negotiate the impacts of international development projects on their cultural and economic landscapes?
Context: This international development question explores the qualitative dimensions of community perceptions and negotiations regarding the impacts of international development projects, considering cultural and economic factors.
- Sport Psychology:
Question: What are the psychological experiences and coping mechanisms of athletes during periods of extended competition hiatus, such as the postponement of major sporting events?
Context: In sport psychology, this question delves into the qualitative aspects of athletes’ psychological experiences and coping mechanisms during extended competition hiatus, such as the postponement of major sporting events.
These additional detailed examples provide a broader perspective on qualitative research questions, covering diverse fields of study and highlighting the nuanced inquiries within each domain.
Interested in learning more about the fields of product, research, and design? Search our articles here for helpful information spanning a wide range of topics!
Related Post
What is explanatory research definition, method and examples, what is exploratory research definition, method and examples, generative research vs evaluative research: key comparisons, leave a reply cancel reply.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
What is Evaluative Research? Definition, Method and Examples
![qualitative research questions examples business](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/GC-Logo-Registered.png)
Research Question Examples 🧑🏻🏫
25+ Practical Examples & Ideas To Help You Get Started
By: Derek Jansen (MBA) | October 2023
A well-crafted research question (or set of questions) sets the stage for a robust study and meaningful insights. But, if you’re new to research, it’s not always clear what exactly constitutes a good research question. In this post, we’ll provide you with clear examples of quality research questions across various disciplines, so that you can approach your research project with confidence!
Research Question Examples
- Psychology research questions
- Business research questions
- Education research questions
- Healthcare research questions
- Computer science research questions
Examples: Psychology
Let’s start by looking at some examples of research questions that you might encounter within the discipline of psychology.
How does sleep quality affect academic performance in university students?
This question is specific to a population (university students) and looks at a direct relationship between sleep and academic performance, both of which are quantifiable and measurable variables.
What factors contribute to the onset of anxiety disorders in adolescents?
The question narrows down the age group and focuses on identifying multiple contributing factors. There are various ways in which it could be approached from a methodological standpoint, including both qualitatively and quantitatively.
Do mindfulness techniques improve emotional well-being?
This is a focused research question aiming to evaluate the effectiveness of a specific intervention.
How does early childhood trauma impact adult relationships?
This research question targets a clear cause-and-effect relationship over a long timescale, making it focused but comprehensive.
Is there a correlation between screen time and depression in teenagers?
This research question focuses on an in-demand current issue and a specific demographic, allowing for a focused investigation. The key variables are clearly stated within the question and can be measured and analysed (i.e., high feasibility).
![research-topic-webinar Free Webinar: How To Find A Dissertation Research Topic](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/research-topic-webinar.png)
Examples: Business/Management
Next, let’s look at some examples of well-articulated research questions within the business and management realm.
How do leadership styles impact employee retention?
This is an example of a strong research question because it directly looks at the effect of one variable (leadership styles) on another (employee retention), allowing from a strongly aligned methodological approach.
What role does corporate social responsibility play in consumer choice?
Current and precise, this research question can reveal how social concerns are influencing buying behaviour by way of a qualitative exploration.
Does remote work increase or decrease productivity in tech companies?
Focused on a particular industry and a hot topic, this research question could yield timely, actionable insights that would have high practical value in the real world.
How do economic downturns affect small businesses in the homebuilding industry?
Vital for policy-making, this highly specific research question aims to uncover the challenges faced by small businesses within a certain industry.
Which employee benefits have the greatest impact on job satisfaction?
By being straightforward and specific, answering this research question could provide tangible insights to employers.
Examples: Education
Next, let’s look at some potential research questions within the education, training and development domain.
How does class size affect students’ academic performance in primary schools?
This example research question targets two clearly defined variables, which can be measured and analysed relatively easily.
Do online courses result in better retention of material than traditional courses?
Timely, specific and focused, answering this research question can help inform educational policy and personal choices about learning formats.
What impact do US public school lunches have on student health?
Targeting a specific, well-defined context, the research could lead to direct changes in public health policies.
To what degree does parental involvement improve academic outcomes in secondary education in the Midwest?
This research question focuses on a specific context (secondary education in the Midwest) and has clearly defined constructs.
What are the negative effects of standardised tests on student learning within Oklahoma primary schools?
This research question has a clear focus (negative outcomes) and is narrowed into a very specific context.
Need a helping hand?
Examples: Healthcare
Shifting to a different field, let’s look at some examples of research questions within the healthcare space.
What are the most effective treatments for chronic back pain amongst UK senior males?
Specific and solution-oriented, this research question focuses on clear variables and a well-defined context (senior males within the UK).
How do different healthcare policies affect patient satisfaction in public hospitals in South Africa?
This question is has clearly defined variables and is narrowly focused in terms of context.
Which factors contribute to obesity rates in urban areas within California?
This question is focused yet broad, aiming to reveal several contributing factors for targeted interventions.
Does telemedicine provide the same perceived quality of care as in-person visits for diabetes patients?
Ideal for a qualitative study, this research question explores a single construct (perceived quality of care) within a well-defined sample (diabetes patients).
Which lifestyle factors have the greatest affect on the risk of heart disease?
This research question aims to uncover modifiable factors, offering preventive health recommendations.
![topic-evaluator-banner Research topic evaluator](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/topic-evaluator-banner.png)
Examples: Computer Science
Last but certainly not least, let’s look at a few examples of research questions within the computer science world.
What are the perceived risks of cloud-based storage systems?
Highly relevant in our digital age, this research question would align well with a qualitative interview approach to better understand what users feel the key risks of cloud storage are.
Which factors affect the energy efficiency of data centres in Ohio?
With a clear focus, this research question lays a firm foundation for a quantitative study.
How do TikTok algorithms impact user behaviour amongst new graduates?
While this research question is more open-ended, it could form the basis for a qualitative investigation.
What are the perceived risk and benefits of open-source software software within the web design industry?
Practical and straightforward, the results could guide both developers and end-users in their choices.
Remember, these are just examples…
In this post, we’ve tried to provide a wide range of research question examples to help you get a feel for what research questions look like in practice. That said, it’s important to remember that these are just examples and don’t necessarily equate to good research topics . If you’re still trying to find a topic, check out our topic megalist for inspiration.
![title= qualitative research questions examples business](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/course.png)
Psst... there’s more!
This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...
Research ideas on Political Science
Submit a Comment Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
- Print Friendly
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://atlasti.com/media/site/f8e3e61133-1720599212/academy.png)
The Ultimate Guide to Qualitative Research - Part 1: The Basics
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://atlasti.com/media/pages/authors/jorg-hecker/d7542f6839-1720599065/jorg.png)
- Introduction and overview
- What is qualitative research?
- What is qualitative data?
- Examples of qualitative data
- Qualitative vs. quantitative research
- Mixed methods
- Qualitative research preparation
- Theoretical perspective
- Theoretical framework
- Literature reviews
- Introduction
Why are research questions so important?
Research question examples, types of qualitative research questions, writing a good research question, guiding your research through research questions.
- Conceptual framework
- Conceptual vs. theoretical framework
- Data collection
- Qualitative research methods
- Focus groups
- Observational research
- Case studies
- Ethnographical research
- Ethical considerations
- Confidentiality and privacy
- Power dynamics
- Reflexivity
Research questions
The research question plays a critical role in the research process, as it guides the study design, data collection , analysis , and interpretation of the findings.
A research paper relies on a research question to inform readers of the research topic and the research problem being addressed. Without such a question, your audience may have trouble understanding the rationale for your research project.
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://atlasti.com/media/pages/guides/qualitative-research-guide-part-1/research-question/f90caa9236-1720598952/research-question_1.png)
People can take for granted the research question as an essential part of a research project. However, explicitly detailing why researchers need a research question can help lend clarity to the research project. Here are some of the key roles that the research question plays in the research process:
Defines the scope and focus of the study
The research question helps to define the scope and focus of the study. It identifies the specific topic or issue that the researcher wants to investigate, and it sets the boundaries for the study. A research question can also help you determine if your study primarily contributes to theory or is more applied in nature. Clinical research and public health research, for example, may be more concerned with research questions that contribute to practice, while a research question focused on cognitive linguistics are aimed at developing theory.
Provides a rationale for the study
The research question provides a rationale for the study by identifying a gap or problem in existing literature or practice that the researcher wants to address. It articulates the purpose and significance of the study, and it explains why the study is important and worth conducting.
Guides the study design
The research question guides the study design by helping the researcher select appropriate research methods , sampling strategies, and data collection tools. It also helps to determine the types of data that need to be collected and the best ways to analyze and interpret the data because the principal aim of the study is to provide an answer to that research question.
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://atlasti.com/media/pages/guides/qualitative-research-guide-part-1/research-question/c04d220c21-1720598952/the-research-question-you-choose-can-make-it-easier-for-you-to-choose-the-right-research-methods.-photo-by-einar-storsul.jpg)
Shapes the data analysis and interpretation
The research question shapes the data analysis and interpretation by guiding the selection of appropriate analytical methods and by focusing the interpretation of the findings. It helps to identify which patterns and themes in the data are more relevant and worth digging into, and it guides the development of conclusions and recommendations based on the findings.
Generates new knowledge
The research question is the starting point for generating new knowledge. By answering the research question, the researcher contributes to the body of knowledge in the field and helps to advance the understanding of the topic or issue under investigation.
Overall, the research question is a critical component of the research process, as it guides the study from start to finish and provides a foundation for generating new knowledge.
Supports the thesis statement
The thesis statement or main assertion in any research paper stems from the answers to the research question. As a result, you can think of a focused research question as a preview of what the study aims to present as a new contribution to existing knowledge.
Here area few examples of focused research questions that can help set the stage for explaining different types of research questions in qualitative research . These questions touch upon various fields and subjects, showcasing the versatility and depth of research.
- What factors contribute to the job satisfaction of remote workers in the technology industry?
- How do teachers perceive the implementation of technology in the classroom, and what challenges do they face?
- What coping strategies do refugees use to deal with the challenges of resettlement in a new country?
- How does gentrification impact the sense of community and identity among long-term residents in urban neighborhoods?
- In what ways do social media platforms influence body image and self-esteem among adolescents?
- How do family dynamics and communication patterns affect the management of type 2 diabetes in adult patients?
- What is the role of mentorship in the professional development and career success of early-career academics?
- How do patients with chronic illnesses experience and navigate the healthcare system, and what barriers do they encounter?
- What are the motivations and experiences of volunteers in disaster relief efforts, and how do these experiences impact their future involvement in humanitarian work?
- How do cultural beliefs and values shape the consumer preferences and purchasing behavior of young adults in a globalized market?
- How do individuals whose genetic factors predict a high risk for developing a specific medical condition perceive, cope with, and make lifestyle choices based on this information?
These example research questions highlight the different kinds of inquiries common to qualitative research. They also demonstrate how qualitative research can address a wide range of topics, from understanding the experiences of specific populations to examining the impact of broader social and cultural phenomena.
Also, notice that these types of research questions tend to be geared towards inductive analyses that describe a concept in depth or develop new theory. As such, qualitative research questions tend to ask "what," "why," or "how" types of questions. This contrasts with quantitative research questions that typically aim to verify an existing theory. and tend to ask "when," "how much," and "why" types of questions to nail down causal mechanisms and generalizable findings.
Whatever your research inquiry, turn to ATLAS.ti
Powerful tools to help turn your research question into meaningful analysis, starting with a free trial.
As you can see above, the research questions you ask play a critical role in shaping the direction and depth of your study. These questions are designed to explore, understand, and interpret social phenomena, rather than testing a hypothesis or quantifying data like in quantitative research. In this section, we will discuss the various types of research questions typically found in qualitative research, making it easier for you to craft appropriate questions for your study.
Descriptive questions
Descriptive research questions aim to provide a detailed account of the phenomenon being studied. These questions usually begin with "what" or "how" and seek to understand the nature, characteristics, or functions of a subject. For example, "What are the experiences of first-generation college students?" or "How do small business owners adapt to economic downturns?"
Comparative questions
Comparative questions seek to examine the similarities and differences between two or more groups, cases, or phenomena. These questions often include the words "compare," "contrast," or "differences." For example, "How do parenting practices differ between single-parent and two-parent families?" or "What are the similarities and differences in leadership styles among successful female entrepreneurs?"
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://atlasti.com/media/pages/guides/qualitative-research-guide-part-1/research-question/c626794b8e-1720598952/a-comparative-research-question-relies-on-data-analysis-to-identify-differences-between-two-different-objects-of-inquiry.-photo-.jpg)
Exploratory questions
Exploratory research questions are open-ended and intended to investigate new or understudied areas. These questions aim to identify patterns, relationships, or themes that may warrant further investigation. For example, "How do teenagers use social media to construct their identities?" or "What factors influence the adoption of renewable energy technologies in rural communities?"
Explanatory questions
Explanatory research questions delve deeper into the reasons or explanations behind a particular phenomenon or behavior. They often start with "why" or "how" and aim to uncover underlying motivations, beliefs, or processes. For example, "Why do some employees resist organizational change?" or "How do cultural factors influence decision-making in international business negotiations?"
Evaluative questions
Evaluative questions assess the effectiveness, impact, or outcomes of a particular intervention, program, or policy. They seek to understand the value or significance of an initiative by examining its successes, challenges, or unintended consequences. For example, "How effective is the school's anti-bullying program in reducing incidents of bullying?" or "What are the long-term impacts of a community-based health promotion campaign on residents' well-being?"
Interpretive questions
Interpretive questions focus on understanding how individuals or groups make sense of their experiences, actions, or social contexts. These questions often involve the analysis of language, symbols, or narratives to uncover the meanings and perspectives that shape human behavior. For example, "How do cancer survivors make sense of their illness journey?" or "What meanings do members of a religious community attach to their rituals and practices?"
There are mainly two overarching ways to think about how to devise a research question. Many studies are built on existing research, but others can be founded on personal experiences or pilot research.
Using the literature review
Within scholarly research, the research question is often built from your literature review . An analysis of the relevant literature reporting previous studies should allow you to identify contextual, theoretical, or methodological gaps that can be addressed in future research.
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://atlasti.com/media/pages/guides/qualitative-research-guide-part-1/research-question/e04614de25-1720598953/many-research-questions-come-from-looking-at-the-existing-research-for-gaps-that-can-be-addressed-in-future-research.-photo-by-s.jpg)
A compelling research question built on a robust literature review ultimately illustrates to your audience what is novel about your study's objectives.
Conducting pilot research
Researchers may conduct preliminary research or pilot research when they are interested in a particular topic but don't yet have a basis for forming a research question on that topic. A pilot study is a small-scale, preliminary study that is conducted in order to test the feasibility of a research design, methods, and procedures. It can help identify unresolved puzzles that merit further investigation, and pilot studies can draw attention to potential issues or problems that may arise in the full study.
One potential benefit of conducting a pilot study in qualitative research is that it can help the researcher to refine their research question. By collecting and analyzing a small amount of data, the researcher can get a better sense of the phenomenon under investigation and can develop a more focused and refined research question for the full study. The pilot study can also help the researcher to identify key themes, concepts, or variables that should be included in the research question.
In addition to helping to refine the research question, a pilot study can also help the researcher to develop a more effective data collection and analysis plan. The researcher can test different methods for collecting and analyzing data, and can make adjustments based on the results of the pilot study. This can help to ensure that the full study is conducted in the most effective and efficient manner possible.
Overall, conducting a pilot study in qualitative research can be a valuable tool for refining the research question and developing a more effective research design, methods, and procedures. It can help to ensure that the full study is conducted in a rigorous and effective manner, and can increase the likelihood of generating meaningful and useful findings.
When you write a research question for your qualitative study, consider which type of question best aligns with your research objectives and the nature of the phenomenon you are investigating. Remember, qualitative research questions should be open-ended, allowing for a range of perspectives and insights to emerge. As you progress in your research, these questions may evolve or be refined based on the data you collect, helping to guide your analysis and deepen your understanding of the topic.
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://atlasti.com/media/pages/guides/qualitative-research-guide-part-1/research-question/2298bc7117-1720598952/the-research-question-you-choose-will-determine-the-theories-and-methods-appropriate-for-your-research.-photo-by-jens-lelie.jpg)
Use ATLAS.ti for every step of your research project
From the research question to the key insights, ATLAS.ti is there for you. See how with a free trial.
- Skip to main content
- Skip to primary sidebar
- Skip to footer
- QuestionPro
![qualitative research questions examples business survey software icon](https://www.questionpro.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/surveys-cube-80px.png)
- Solutions Industries Gaming Automotive Sports and events Education Government Travel & Hospitality Financial Services Healthcare Cannabis Technology Use Case NPS+ Communities Audience Contactless surveys Mobile LivePolls Member Experience GDPR Positive People Science 360 Feedback Surveys
- Resources Blog eBooks Survey Templates Case Studies Training Help center
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.questionpro.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/flags/us.png)
Home Market Research
Qualitative Research Questions: What it is and how to write it
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative_research_questions](https://www.questionpro.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/qualitative_research_questions.jpg)
Qualitative research questions are like a compass that points researchers in the right direction to find rich stories, untangle complicated social relationships, and get a clear picture of how people act in subtle ways. Unlike their quantitative counterparts, these questions go beyond numbers and figures to explore the subjective, contextual, and complex parts of the human experience.
It’s well-established that all forms of research come with their own theories and implementation methods. Qualitative research is much the same. Qualitative research is conducted to understand the thought process of both the respondents as well as researchers. It usually is conducted in a natural setup where respondents will be their true selves and would respond transparently.
Results achieved from this research will not be generalized to the entire population but asked research questions , and their vocabulary gives away the researcher’s motive making it easier for respondents to participate in qualitative market research .
LEARN ABOUT: Research Process Steps
Qualitative research survey questions are created to understand a particular topic better or to inspect a new subject to understand the nerve of respondent experiences.
Content Index
What are qualitative research questions?
How to write qualitative research questions, types of qualitative research questions, how to choose qualitative research questions, what should be the process of forming qualitative research questions and questionnaires.
Qualitative research questions are the inquiries that lead to qualitative research studies and investigations. They are meant to help people explore and understand phenomena, experiences, meanings, and views from the participant’s point of view.
Different from quantitative research questions, which often try to measure and quantify variables, qualitative research questions try to understand the richness and complexity of human experiences and social events.
Most qualitative research questions are open-ended and allow for in-depth study. They want more than simple yes/no answers but instead want people to talk about their thoughts, feelings, views, and experiences. These questions try to find deeper meanings, patterns, and connections in a given situation.
Here are some examples of qualitative study questions in different fields:
- In psychology: How do individuals experience and cope with traumatic events?
- In sociology: What factors influence a student’s decision to pursue higher education?
- In anthropology: How do cultural norms and values shape gender roles in a specific community?
- In education: What are the challenges faced by teachers in implementing project-based learning in the classroom?
- In healthcare: What are the experiences and perspectives of patients undergoing long-term treatment for a chronic illness?
Qualitative research questions should be straightforward, specific, and tailored to the research’s goals. They guide the process of gathering data through interviews, observations, or document analysis and give a method for analyzing and interpreting data.
Writing the right qualitative research questions requires careful thought about the research goals, the event being studied, and the wanted level of understanding. Here are some tips to help you write good qualitative research questions:
Begin with a broad research question
Start by posing an all-encompassing question that probes the subject or phenomenon of interest. Exploring and learning from the answer to this open-ended question should be possible.
Specify the research objectives
Clearly state the objectives and purposes of your research. What do you want your qualitative study to accomplish? What facets or dimensions of the subject do you wish to investigate?
Focus on the phenomenon
Decide on whatever specific subject or phenomenon you want to research. Any pertinent topic, including social behavior, cultural customs, personal experiences, and more, may be used.
Use open-ended and exploratory language
In qualitative research, open-ended questions should be used to enable participants to offer thorough and in-depth responses. Avoid yes/no questions and queries with a one-word answer. Use words like “how,” “what,” “why,” or “describe” instead to compel people to express their thoughts and experiences.
LEARN ABOUT: Qualitative Interview
Consider the context and participants
Consider your research’s background as well as the qualities of your subjects. Make sure your qualitative methods are specific to the people you will be studying so that they are pertinent and meaningful to them.
Incorporate theory and literature
Your research questions should be based on pertinent theories and available literature. This gives your investigation a theoretical foundation and places your study within the body of knowledge.
Balance breadth and depth
When formulating your research topics, try to strike a balance between depth and breadth. To fully understand the subject, you should investigate it broadly to get a variety of viewpoints and intensively delve into certain areas.
Avoid leading or biased questions
Ensure your questions are neutral and unbiased. Avoid leading participants towards a particular response. Instead, create questions that allow participants to express their thoughts and experiences freely.
Pilot test your questions
Pilot-test your research questions with a small group of people before finalizing them. This will make it easier to spot any possible problems, ambiguities, or places where clarity may be increased.
Revise and refine
Revise and clarify your research questions based on the comments and understandings received from the pilot testing. Aim for consistency, coherence, and congruence with your research goals.
Remember, qualitative market research questions should be flexible and adaptable throughout the research process. They serve as a guide but may evolve as you delve deeper into the data and discover new insights.
LEARN ABOUT: Steps in Qualitative Research
There are several types of qualitative research questions focus that can be used to guide qualitative studies. Here are some common types:
![qualitative research questions examples business types_of_qualitative_research_questions](https://www.questionpro.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/types_of_qualitative_research_questions.jpg)
1. Descriptive questions
These questions aim to describe and understand a phenomenon or topic in detail. They focus on providing a comprehensive account of the subject matter. For example:
- What are the experiences of individuals living with chronic pain?
- How do employees perceive the organizational culture in a specific company?
2. Exploratory questions
These questions are used to explore new or under-researched areas. They seek to gain a deeper understanding of a topic or phenomenon. For example:
- What are the factors influencing consumers’ decision-making process when purchasing organic food?
- How do teachers perceive the implementation of project-based learning in the classroom?
3. Experiential questions
These questions focus on understanding individuals’ experiences, perspectives, and subjective meanings related to a particular phenomenon. They aim to capture personal experiences and emotions. For example:
- What are the challenges first-generation college students face during their transition to higher education?
- How do individuals with social anxiety disorder experience social interactions?
4. Comparative questions
These questions involve comparing and contrasting different groups, contexts, or perspectives to identify similarities, differences, or patterns. They explore variations in experiences or phenomena. For example:
- How do parenting practices differ between cultures A and B in terms of child discipline?
- What are the similarities and differences in the coping strategies used by individuals with individuals and depression questionnaire with anxiety disorders?
5. Process-oriented questions
These questions focus on understanding a phenomenon’s processes, mechanisms, or dynamics. They aim to uncover how and why certain outcomes or behaviors occur. For example:
- What are the processes by which teams in a workplace reach a consensus on decision-making?
- How does the negotiation process unfold during conflict resolution in interpersonal relationships?
6. Theoretical questions
These questions seek to generate or refine theory. They explore concepts, relationships, or theoretical frameworks to contribute to the existing body of knowledge. For example:
- How does the concept of “self-efficacy” manifest in the context of entrepreneurship?
- What underlying mechanisms explain the relationship between social support and mental health outcomes?
These are just a few examples of the types of qualitative research questions that can be used. The specific type of question you choose will depend on your research objectives, the phenomenon under investigation, and the depth of understanding you aim to achieve.
Explore Insightfully Contextual Inquiry in Qualitative Research
Choosing a good qualitative research question involves a thoughtful and systematic approach to ensure they align with the objectives of your study and allows for an in-depth exploration of the topic. Here are some steps to help you choose effective qualitative research questions:
Identify your research objectives
Clearly define the purpose of your study. What do you want to explore or understand? What specific insights or knowledge are you seeking to gain through your market research?
Review existing literature
Conduct a thorough review of relevant literature to identify existing research gaps or areas requiring further exploration. This will help you understand the current state of knowledge and inform the development of your research questions.
Brainstorm potential qualitative research question
Generate a list of potential research questions that address your research objectives. Consider different angles, perspectives, and dimensions of your topic. Creating open-ended questions that allow for in-depth exploration rather than simple yes/no answers is important.
Prioritize and refine the questions
Evaluate the generated questions based on their relevance to your research objectives, feasibility, and potential to yield meaningful insights. Prioritize the questions that are most likely to provide rich and valuable data. Refine and rephrase the questions as needed to ensure clarity and focus.
Consider the research design and methodology
Take into account the specific qualitative research design and methodology you plan to use. Different research approaches, such as ethnography, interviews, focus groups, or case studies, may require different types of research questions. Ensure that your questions align with your chosen methodology and will help you gather the desired data.
Pilot test the questions
Before finalizing your research questions, consider conducting a pilot test with a small group of participants. This will allow you to assess your questions’ clarity, appropriateness, and effectiveness. Make necessary revisions based on the feedback received.
Seek feedback
Share your research questions with colleagues, mentors, or experts in your field for feedback and suggestions. They can provide valuable insights and help you refine your questions further.
Finalize your research questions
Based on the steps above, select a set of research questions that are well-aligned with your research objectives, provide scope for exploration, and are feasible within the resources and time available for your study.
1. Mention the purpose of conducting qualitative research. It can be in the form of either of these sentences:
- This study will be on the topic of ….
- The reason for conducting this research is ….
2. Create qualitative statements with a defined objective that can be easily communicated to the target audience .
Keep these pointers in mind while designing this statement:
- Try and form single-sentence statements. Single statements can be much more effective than elaborate ones as they help in communicating important messages in an impactful manner in a short and succinct sentence.
- Clarify the purpose of conducting qualitative research in clear words so that respondents understand their contribution to this research.
- Mention the main topic of research that would prompt respondents to have a clearer idea about what they’re getting into.
- It’s the words that make all the difference. Use qualitative words that demonstrate the quality or feeling behind your purpose, such as understanding, describing, explore.
- Specify details that you would want to communicate to your respondents.
- Mention the name of the research website.
3. Other than the primary qualitative questions, you must create sub-questions so that the purpose is executed in a better manner.
- The main question might be – “What is the state of illiteracy in your state?”
- You can create sub-questions such as: “How does illiteracy hamper progress in your state?” or “How would you best describe your feelings about illiteracy?”
4. Highlight these questions using ‘qualitative’ words:
- Start the questions with “What” or “How” to make sure the respondents provide details about their feelings.
- Communicate what you’re trying to “understand,” “explore,” or “identify” using this Qualitative research online survey questionnaire.
- Questions such as “What happened” can be asked to develop a description of the topic.
- Questions about “how did respondents interpret the what happened question” can be asked to examine the outcome.
- Understand the entire qualitative research process by asking questions about “What happened to you with time?”
5. Develop a skeleton to design the primary questions and also the sub-questions. For example:
- Primary Qualitative research survey question: “How do you think _______ (the main topic of research) means?” or “Describe _____(the main topic of research) as you’ve experienced.”
- Sub-question for qualitative research: “What _________ (characteristic) does __________ (respondents) interest in as a _________ (main topic of research)?”
LEARN ABOUT: Structured Questionnaire
Qualitative research questions are key to giving research studies depth and breadth. These questions go into the details and complexities of human experiences, perceptions, and behaviors. This helps researchers get a full picture of a certain occurrence.
Qualitative research questions are meant to explore, describe, and make sense of subjective truths. Most of the time, they are open-ended, so people can say what they think and feel in their own words.
QuestionPro is an online poll and research platform with several tools and features that can make it easier to make and use qualitative research questions. Its easy-to-use design and variety of question types help researchers collect qualitative data quickly and easily, improving the whole research process.
LEARN MORE FREE TRIAL
MORE LIKE THIS
![qualitative research questions examples business Action Planning Tools](https://www.questionpro.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Action-Planning-Tools.jpg)
Action Planning Tools: What It Is & Key Elements
Jul 18, 2024
![qualitative research questions examples business Employee listening strategy](https://www.questionpro.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Employee-Listening-Strategy.jpg)
Employee Listening Strategy: What it is & How to Build One
Jul 17, 2024
![qualitative research questions examples business As your relationships grow, you’ll find that people will come to you for a different perspective or creative way to solve a problem, and it spirals from there.](https://www.questionpro.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/CX-TCXT-Meta_images-8.jpg)
Winning the Internal CX Battles — Tuesday CX Thoughts
Jul 16, 2024
![qualitative research questions examples business Knowledge Management](https://www.questionpro.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Knowledge-Management.jpg)
Knowledge Management: What it is, Types, and Use Cases
Jul 12, 2024
Other categories
- Academic Research
- Artificial Intelligence
- Assessments
- Brand Awareness
- Case Studies
- Communities
- Consumer Insights
- Customer effort score
- Customer Engagement
- Customer Experience
- Customer Loyalty
- Customer Research
- Customer Satisfaction
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Engagement
- Employee Retention
- Friday Five
- General Data Protection Regulation
- Insights Hub
- Life@QuestionPro
- Market Research
- Mobile diaries
- Mobile Surveys
- New Features
- Online Communities
- Question Types
- Questionnaire
- QuestionPro Products
- Release Notes
- Research Tools and Apps
- Revenue at Risk
- Survey Templates
- Training Tips
- Tuesday CX Thoughts (TCXT)
- Uncategorized
- What’s Coming Up
- Workforce Intelligence
Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
- Knowledge Base
Methodology
- What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples
What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples
Published on June 19, 2020 by Pritha Bhandari . Revised on June 22, 2023.
Qualitative research involves collecting and analyzing non-numerical data (e.g., text, video, or audio) to understand concepts, opinions, or experiences. It can be used to gather in-depth insights into a problem or generate new ideas for research.
Qualitative research is the opposite of quantitative research , which involves collecting and analyzing numerical data for statistical analysis.
Qualitative research is commonly used in the humanities and social sciences, in subjects such as anthropology, sociology, education, health sciences, history, etc.
- How does social media shape body image in teenagers?
- How do children and adults interpret healthy eating in the UK?
- What factors influence employee retention in a large organization?
- How is anxiety experienced around the world?
- How can teachers integrate social issues into science curriculums?
Table of contents
Approaches to qualitative research, qualitative research methods, qualitative data analysis, advantages of qualitative research, disadvantages of qualitative research, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about qualitative research.
Qualitative research is used to understand how people experience the world. While there are many approaches to qualitative research, they tend to be flexible and focus on retaining rich meaning when interpreting data.
Common approaches include grounded theory, ethnography , action research , phenomenological research, and narrative research. They share some similarities, but emphasize different aims and perspectives.
Approach | What does it involve? |
---|---|
Grounded theory | Researchers collect rich data on a topic of interest and develop theories . |
Researchers immerse themselves in groups or organizations to understand their cultures. | |
Action research | Researchers and participants collaboratively link theory to practice to drive social change. |
Phenomenological research | Researchers investigate a phenomenon or event by describing and interpreting participants’ lived experiences. |
Narrative research | Researchers examine how stories are told to understand how participants perceive and make sense of their experiences. |
Note that qualitative research is at risk for certain research biases including the Hawthorne effect , observer bias , recall bias , and social desirability bias . While not always totally avoidable, awareness of potential biases as you collect and analyze your data can prevent them from impacting your work too much.
Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting
Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:
- Academic style
- Vague sentences
- Style consistency
See an example
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/dissertation-proofreading-service.png)
Each of the research approaches involve using one or more data collection methods . These are some of the most common qualitative methods:
- Observations: recording what you have seen, heard, or encountered in detailed field notes.
- Interviews: personally asking people questions in one-on-one conversations.
- Focus groups: asking questions and generating discussion among a group of people.
- Surveys : distributing questionnaires with open-ended questions.
- Secondary research: collecting existing data in the form of texts, images, audio or video recordings, etc.
- You take field notes with observations and reflect on your own experiences of the company culture.
- You distribute open-ended surveys to employees across all the company’s offices by email to find out if the culture varies across locations.
- You conduct in-depth interviews with employees in your office to learn about their experiences and perspectives in greater detail.
Qualitative researchers often consider themselves “instruments” in research because all observations, interpretations and analyses are filtered through their own personal lens.
For this reason, when writing up your methodology for qualitative research, it’s important to reflect on your approach and to thoroughly explain the choices you made in collecting and analyzing the data.
Qualitative data can take the form of texts, photos, videos and audio. For example, you might be working with interview transcripts, survey responses, fieldnotes, or recordings from natural settings.
Most types of qualitative data analysis share the same five steps:
- Prepare and organize your data. This may mean transcribing interviews or typing up fieldnotes.
- Review and explore your data. Examine the data for patterns or repeated ideas that emerge.
- Develop a data coding system. Based on your initial ideas, establish a set of codes that you can apply to categorize your data.
- Assign codes to the data. For example, in qualitative survey analysis, this may mean going through each participant’s responses and tagging them with codes in a spreadsheet. As you go through your data, you can create new codes to add to your system if necessary.
- Identify recurring themes. Link codes together into cohesive, overarching themes.
There are several specific approaches to analyzing qualitative data. Although these methods share similar processes, they emphasize different concepts.
Approach | When to use | Example |
---|---|---|
To describe and categorize common words, phrases, and ideas in qualitative data. | A market researcher could perform content analysis to find out what kind of language is used in descriptions of therapeutic apps. | |
To identify and interpret patterns and themes in qualitative data. | A psychologist could apply thematic analysis to travel blogs to explore how tourism shapes self-identity. | |
To examine the content, structure, and design of texts. | A media researcher could use textual analysis to understand how news coverage of celebrities has changed in the past decade. | |
To study communication and how language is used to achieve effects in specific contexts. | A political scientist could use discourse analysis to study how politicians generate trust in election campaigns. |
Qualitative research often tries to preserve the voice and perspective of participants and can be adjusted as new research questions arise. Qualitative research is good for:
- Flexibility
The data collection and analysis process can be adapted as new ideas or patterns emerge. They are not rigidly decided beforehand.
- Natural settings
Data collection occurs in real-world contexts or in naturalistic ways.
- Meaningful insights
Detailed descriptions of people’s experiences, feelings and perceptions can be used in designing, testing or improving systems or products.
- Generation of new ideas
Open-ended responses mean that researchers can uncover novel problems or opportunities that they wouldn’t have thought of otherwise.
Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services
Discover proofreading & editing
Researchers must consider practical and theoretical limitations in analyzing and interpreting their data. Qualitative research suffers from:
- Unreliability
The real-world setting often makes qualitative research unreliable because of uncontrolled factors that affect the data.
- Subjectivity
Due to the researcher’s primary role in analyzing and interpreting data, qualitative research cannot be replicated . The researcher decides what is important and what is irrelevant in data analysis, so interpretations of the same data can vary greatly.
- Limited generalizability
Small samples are often used to gather detailed data about specific contexts. Despite rigorous analysis procedures, it is difficult to draw generalizable conclusions because the data may be biased and unrepresentative of the wider population .
- Labor-intensive
Although software can be used to manage and record large amounts of text, data analysis often has to be checked or performed manually.
If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
- Chi square goodness of fit test
- Degrees of freedom
- Null hypothesis
- Discourse analysis
- Control groups
- Mixed methods research
- Non-probability sampling
- Quantitative research
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Research bias
- Rosenthal effect
- Implicit bias
- Cognitive bias
- Selection bias
- Negativity bias
- Status quo bias
Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.
Quantitative methods allow you to systematically measure variables and test hypotheses . Qualitative methods allow you to explore concepts and experiences in more detail.
There are five common approaches to qualitative research :
- Grounded theory involves collecting data in order to develop new theories.
- Ethnography involves immersing yourself in a group or organization to understand its culture.
- Narrative research involves interpreting stories to understand how people make sense of their experiences and perceptions.
- Phenomenological research involves investigating phenomena through people’s lived experiences.
- Action research links theory and practice in several cycles to drive innovative changes.
Data collection is the systematic process by which observations or measurements are gathered in research. It is used in many different contexts by academics, governments, businesses, and other organizations.
There are various approaches to qualitative data analysis , but they all share five steps in common:
- Prepare and organize your data.
- Review and explore your data.
- Develop a data coding system.
- Assign codes to the data.
- Identify recurring themes.
The specifics of each step depend on the focus of the analysis. Some common approaches include textual analysis , thematic analysis , and discourse analysis .
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
Bhandari, P. (2023, June 22). What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved July 22, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/qualitative-research/
Is this article helpful?
![qualitative research questions examples business Pritha Bhandari](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/pritha-author-pic.jpg)
Pritha Bhandari
Other students also liked, qualitative vs. quantitative research | differences, examples & methods, how to do thematic analysis | step-by-step guide & examples, what is your plagiarism score.
Qualitative research examples
![qualitative research questions examples business UserTesting glyph icon](https://www.usertesting.com/sites/default/files/usertestingv3/styles/width_120px/public/pictures/2021-03/UT%20Glyph%20for%20Blog_Gradient_300x300.png.jpg)
UserTesting
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.usertesting.com/sites/default/files/usertestingv3/styles/blog_guide_hero/public/2023-07/image1_0.jpg.webp)
Qualitative research is a powerful tool that helps you unlock insights into the user experience—quintessential to building effective products and services. It provides a deeper understanding of complex behaviors, needs, and motivations. But what is qualitative research, and when is it ideal to use it? Let’s explore its methodologies and implementation with a few qualitative research examples.
What is qualitative research?
Qualitative research is a behavioral research method that seeks to understand the undertones, motivations, and subjective interpretations inherent in human behavior. It involves gathering nonnumerical data, such as text, audio, and video, allowing you to explore nuances and patterns that quantitative data can’t capture.
Instead of focusing on how many or how much, qualitative research questions delve into the why and how. This approach is instrumental in gaining a comprehensive understanding of a particular context, issue, or phenomenon from the perspective of those experiencing it. Examples of qualitative research questions include “How did you feel when you first used our product?” and “Could you describe your experience when you purchased a product from our website?”
Qualitative research methodology
Qualitative research design employs a variety of methodologies to collect and analyze data. The primary objective is to gather detailed and nuanced insights rather than generalizable findings. Steps include the following:
- Formulating research questions: Qualitative research begins by identifying specific research questions to guide the study. These questions should align with the research objectives and provide a clear focus for data collection and analysis.
- Selection of participants: Participant selection is a critical step in qualitative research. You must recruit participants who provide relevant and diverse perspectives on the research topic. It involves purposive sampling, where participants are chosen based on their knowledge or experiences related to the research questions.
- Data collection: Qualitative research uses various methods to collect data, such as interviews, focus groups, observation, and document analysis. You often employ multiple methods to comprehensively understand the research topic.
- Data analysis: Once the data is collected, it’s analyzed to identify recurring themes, patterns, and meanings. This analysis uses coding, thematic analysis, and constant comparison. The goal is to uncover the underlying perspectives of the participant.
- Interpretation and reporting: This is the final step in which findings are synthesized and interpreted, revealing their significance to the research questions. You can present your findings through descriptive narratives, quotes, and illustrative examples to provide a rich understanding of the research topic.
Types of qualitative research methods
The best qualitative research method primarily depends on your research questions and objectives. Different methods uncover different discernments.
One-on-one interviews
You often use one-on-one interviews to delve deep into a topic or understand individual experiences or perspectives. An interviewer asks a participant open-ended questions to understand their perspective, thoughts, feelings, and experiences regarding a specific topic, product, or service. Read about open ended vs closed ended questions to learn which questions will be most effective in an interview.
Say you’re developing a new electric vehicle mode. You can conduct one-on-one interviews to understand user experiences, probing into aspects such as comfort, design, driving experience, and more.
Focus groups
In-person or remote focus groups involve a small group of people (usually 6–10) discussing a given topic or question under the guidance of a moderator. This method is beneficial when you want to understand group dynamics or collective views. The interaction among group members can disclose awarenesses that may not arise in one-on-one interviews.
In the gaming industry, for example, you can use focus groups to explore player reactions to a new game design. You can encourage group interaction to spark discussions about usability, game mechanics, graphics, storyline, and other aspects.
Case study research
Case study research provides an in-depth analysis of a particular case (an individual, group, organization, event, etc.) within its real-life context. It’s a valuable method for exploring something in-depth and in its natural setting.
For instance, a healthcare case study could explore implementing a new electronic health record system in a hospital, focusing on challenges, successes, and lessons learned.
Ethnographic research
Ethnographic research (or an ethnographic stud y) involves an immersive investigation into a group’s behaviors, culture, and practices. It requires you to engage directly with the participants over a prolonged period in their natural environment. It can help uncover how people interact with products or services in natural settings.
A gaming organization may choose to study players in their natural gaming environments (such as home, game cafes, or e-sport tournaments) to understand their gaming habits, social interactions, and responses to specific features. These insights can inform the development of more engaging and user-friendly games.
Process of observation
The process of observation typically doesn’t involve the same level of immersion as ethnographic research. You observe and record behavior related to a specific context or activity. It can be in natural settings (naturalistic observation) or a controlled environment. It’s more about observing and recording specific behaviors or situations rather than cultural norms or dynamics.
For example, a consumer technology organization could observe how users interact with a new software interface, noting challenges, efficiencies, and overall user experience.
Record keeping
Record keeping refers to collecting and analyzing documents, records, and artifacts that provide an understanding of the study area. Record keeping allows you to access historical and contextual data that can be examined and reexamined. It’s a nonobtrusive method, meaning it doesn’t involve direct contact with the participants, nor does it affect or alter the situation you’re studying.
An online retailer might examine shopping cart abandonment records to identify at what point in the buying process customers tend to drop off. This information can help streamline the checkout process and improve conversion rates.
Qualitative research: Data collection and analysis
Data collection and analysis in qualitative research are closely linked processes that help generate meaningful and useful results.
Data collection
Data collection involves gathering rich, detailed materials to explain and understand the subject. These include interview transcripts, meeting notes, personal diaries, and photographs.
There are various qualitative data collection methods to consider depending on your research questions and the context of your study. For example, you could use one-on-one interviews to understand personal user experiences with a financial services app. However, focus groups may be more appropriate to discuss user preferences in a new media and entertainment platform.
Data analysis
Once data are collected, the analysis process begins. It’s where you extract patterns, themes, and insights from the collected data. It’s one of the most critical aspects of qualitative research, turning raw, unstructured data into valuable insights.
Qualitative data analysis usually takes place with several steps, such as:
- Organizing and preparing the data for analysis
- Reading through the data
- Coding the data
- Generating themes or categories
- Interpreting the findings and
- Representing the data
Your choice of qualitative data analysis method depends on your research questions and the data type you collected. Common analysis methods include thematic, content, discourse, and narrative analysis. Some research platforms provide AI features that can do much of this analysis for researchers to speed up insight gathering.
When to use qualitative research
Qualitative techniques are ideal for understanding human experiences and perspectives. Here are common situations where qualitative research is invaluable:
- Exploring customer motivations, needs, behaviors, and pain points
- Gathering in-depth user feedback on products and services
- Understanding decision-making and buyer journeys
- Discovering barriers to adoption and satisfaction
- Developing hypotheses for future quantitative research
- Testing concepts , interfaces, or designs
- Identifying problems and improvement opportunities
- Learning about group norms, cultures, and social interactions
- Collecting evidence to develop theories and models
- Capturing complex, nuanced insights beyond numbers
Qualitative research methods vs. quantitative research methods
Qualitative and quantitative research differ in their approach to data collection, analysis, and the nature of the findings. Here are some key differences:
- Data collection: Qualitative research uses in-depth interviews , focus groups, observations, and analysis of documents to gather data. In contrast, quantitative research relies on structured surveys, experiments, and standard measurements.
- Analysis: Qualitative research involves analyzing textual or visual data through coding, categorization, and theme identification techniques. Quantitative research uses statistical analysis to examine numerical data for patterns, correlations, and trends.
- Sample size: Qualitative research typically involves smaller sample sizes, often selected through purposive sampling to ensure diversity and relevance. Quantitative research uses larger sample sizes to ensure statistical power and generalizability.
- Generalizability: Qualitative research seeks in-depth insight into specific contexts or groups and does not prioritize generalizability. On the other hand, quantitative research seeks to draw conclusions that apply to a broader context.
- Findings: Qualitative research generates descriptive and explanatory results that provide a deeper understanding of phenomena. Quantitative research produces numerical data that allows for statistical inferences and comparisons.
- Theory development: Qualitative research often contributes to theory development by generating new concepts, theories, or frameworks based on the rich and context-specific data collected. However, quantitative research tests preexisting theories and hypotheses using statistical models.
Advantages and strengths of qualitative research
Qualitative research enriches your research process and outcomes, making it an invaluable tool in many fields, including UX research, marketing, and digital product development.
In-depth understanding
Qualitative research provides a rich, detailed, in-depth understanding of the research subject. Proactive qualitative research takes this further with ongoing data collection, allowing organizations to continuously capture insights and adapt strategies based on evolving user needs.
Contextual data
Qualitative research collects contextually relevant data. It captures nuances that might be missed in numerically-based quantitative data, allowing you to understand the contexts in which behaviors and interactions occur.
Flexibility
The methods used in qualitative research, like interviews and focus groups, enable you to explore different topics in depth and adapt your approach based on the participants’ responses.
Human perspective
Qualitative research lets you capture human experiences and thoughts. It’s advantageous in fields such as UX research, where the human perspective is critical.
Hypothesis generation
The exploratory nature of qualitative research helps you identify new areas for exploration or generate hypotheses you can test using quantitative methods.
Trendspotting
Qualitative research reveals trends in thought and opinions, diving deeper into the problem. This is helpful when trying to understand behaviors, culture, and user interactions.
Disadvantages and limitations of qualitative research
While qualitative research offers many advantages, it’s essential to acknowledge its limitations.
Time-consuming
Collecting and analyzing qualitative data, particularly from in-depth interviews or focus groups, requires significant time investment.
Qualitative research relies on the skills and judgment of the researcher, introducing potential bias into the research process. The researcher may actively shape the research by posing questions, interpreting data, and influencing the findings.
Requires skilled researchers
The quality of qualitative research heavily depends on the researcher’s skills, experience, and perspective. A less experienced researcher may overlook important nuances, potentially affecting the depth and accuracy of the findings.
Lacks generalizability
Qualitative research often involves a smaller, nonrepresentative sample size than quantitative research. Therefore, the findings may not be generalizable to a larger context.
Limited numeric representation
Qualitative research usually focuses on words, observations, or experiences, so it doesn’t provide the numeric estimates often desired in research studies.
Challenging to replicate and standardize
Qualitative research’s inherent flexibility and context dependence make it challenging to repeat the study under the same conditions. This flexibility can often make it hard to standardize. Researchers approach and conduct the study in various ways, leading to inconsistent results and interpretations.
Difficult to measure reliability and validity
Assessing reliability and validity is more difficult with qualitative research since it relies on subjective human interpretation and has few established metrics and statistical tools compared to quantitative research. Triangulation and member checking add credibility but lack the discreteness of quantitative measures. However, there have been advancement s in the measurement of qualitative research that help to quantify its impact.
Qualitative research gives you the opportunity to dive deep into human behavior, experiences, and perceptions. It offers a prolific, intricate perspective that quantifiable data alone can’t provide. Combine qualitative research methodologies with techniques like A/B testing to gain a more holistic understanding of user experiences and preferences.
Despite its limitations, the depth and richness of data procured through qualitative research are undeniable assets. By understanding and utilizing its diverse methods, you will uncover detailed insights from your target audience and enhance your products or services to meet their needs.
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.usertesting.com/sites/default/files/usertestingv3/styles/height_440px/public/2023-04/the%20ux%20research%20methodology%20guidebook.png.jpg)
The UX research methodology guidebook
Learn how to gather the user feedback you need to build best-in-class products.
In this Article
Get started now
Why is qualitative research important?
Qualitative research delves into subjective experiences and social contexts, providing in-depth insights and understanding. It provides a deep understanding of individuals’ needs, motivations, and preferences, allowing organizations to develop products and services that meet customer expectations.
What’s the difference between quantitative and qualitative methods?
Quantitative methods focus on numerical data and statistical analysis, aiming for generalizability and objectivity. Qualitative methods explore meanings, experiences, and behaviors, seeking in-depth understanding and detailed descriptions.
What are the main qualitative research approaches?
The main qualitative research approaches include one-on-one interviews, focus groups, case study research, ethnographic research, observation, and record-keeping. Each approach offers unique benefits and applications.
What is data collection?
Data collection in qualitative research involves gathering information through various methods such as interviews, focus groups, observations, and document analysis. It’s a critical step in generating meaningful insights and understanding human experiences.
How do you analyze qualitative data?
What are the ethical considerations in qualitative research.
Ethical considerations refer to the protection of participants’ rights, privacy, and confidentiality. You must obtain informed consent, maintain anonymity, and handle sensitive information responsibly. Additionally, maintaining transparency, addressing power imbalances, and conducting research unbiased and respectfully are vital ethical considerations in qualitative research.
How can I incorporate qualitative research into my study or project?
To incorporate qualitative research into your study, you must first define your research objectives to guide the choice of methodology. Next, choose a suitable qualitative method, such as interviews or focus groups. Then, collect and analyze the data using appropriate techniques and, finally, interpret and present the findings clearly and meaningfully. Remember to be mindful of the ethical considerations throughout the process.
How do you effectively communicate and present qualitative research findings to stakeholders?
For a quality presentation, create engaging visual representations, such as infographics or data visualizations, and use storytelling techniques to highlight key insights. Also, prepare concise and informative reports and organize interactive presentations or workshops to facilitate discussion and understanding.
How do you translate qualitative research findings into actionable insights?
Identify key themes linked to research goals and propose strategic solutions to address core needs and barriers. These solutions should be tailored to specific needs.
How can I ensure the validity and reliability of qualitative research findings?
About the author(s).
With UserTesting’s on-demand platform, you uncover ‘the why’ behind customer interactions. In just a few hours, you can capture the critical human insights you need to confidently deliver what your customers want and expect.
Related Blog Posts
![qualitative research questions examples business Two women in an office reviewing a document](https://www.usertesting.com/sites/default/files/usertestingv3/styles/medium/public/2023-05/customer-journey-mapping_0.jpg.webp)
What is customer journey mapping?
![qualitative research questions examples business Woman holding credit cart looking at laptop](https://www.usertesting.com/sites/default/files/usertestingv3/styles/medium/public/2023-01/bigstock-Happy-Old-Female-Caucasian.jpg.webp)
Financial services usability testing
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.usertesting.com/sites/default/files/usertestingv3/styles/medium/public/2023-02/bigstock-Happy-Business-People-Meeting.jpg.webp)
![](http://sektorel.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Investing in UX research
Human understanding. Human experiences.
Get the latest news on events, research, and product launches
Oh no! We're unable to display this form.
Please check that you’re not running an adblocker and if you are please whitelist usertesting.com.
If you’re still having problems please drop us an email .
By submitting the form, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use .
![qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.startquestion.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Qualitative-survey-questions-to-ask.webp)
Qualitative Survey Questions with Some Examples
Understanding your customers’ experiences and perceptions is crucial for enhancing your products and services. While quantitative research provides numerical insights, qualitative survey questions dive deeper, exploring the “why” behind customer behaviors.
This article answers what qualitative research questions focus on, their applications, types, and the advantages and disadvantages of using them.
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Questions
Surveys can include both qualitative and quantitative questions. Quantitative questions yield numerical data, easily measured and statistically analyzed, like “How many times have you used our app this week?” or “On a scale of 1-10, how satisfied are you with our service?” This data is invaluable for spotting trends, measuring performance, and making data-driven decisions.
Qualitative research questions, however, seek to understand the underlying reasons, opinions, and motivations behind customer actions. They often start with “why,” “how,” or “what.” For instance, “What features do you find most useful in our app?” or “Can you describe a challenge you faced while using our service?”
![qualitative research questions examples business Collect feedback with proper questions](https://www.startquestion.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/dwa-w-jednym-gwiazdki-i-opisowka.jpg)
Our Tip: A Balanced Approach
These qualitative survey questions examples provide richer, more detailed data, invaluable for customer experience (CX) professionals aiming to boost user satisfaction and loyalty. They uncover insights that quantitative data alone can’t, such as emotional responses and personal stories, revealing deeper customer needs and preferences.
A balanced approach, blending qualitative and quantitative research, typically yields the best results. Quantitative data highlights areas needing attention, while qualitative data explains why these issues exist and suggests potential solutions. This combination offers a comprehensive understanding of customer experiences, guiding more effective improvements and innovations.
When Should We Use Qualitative Research Questions?
Qualitative research questions are especially useful in various scenarios. By asking these “why” questions, you uncover insights that shape strategies, conduct market research, and enhance customer experiences.
Exploring Experiences:
Understand how customers interact with your product or service. For instance, “Can you describe your overall experience with our customer support ?” This type of question helps you focus on uncovering the nuances of customer interactions, highlighting what works well and what needs improvement.
Investigating Processes:
Gain insights into how customers use your product. For example, “Can you walk us through how you typically use our app?” This helps identify pain points in the user journey and opportunities to streamline processes.
Addressing Sensitive Topics:
Delve into issues that might be uncomfortable or nuanced, such as “How do you feel about the privacy features of our app?” A careful approach ensures respondents feel safe and respected while sharing their thoughts.
Understanding Change:
Comprehend shifts in customer behavior or preferences, like “Why did you decide to upgrade to our premium plan?” Understanding these reasons guides strategic decisions and product development.
Uncovering Motivations:
Discover what drives customer decisions. For instance, “What motivated you to choose our product over competitors?” This helps understand the unique value propositions that attract customers to your brand.
Identifying Expectations:
Determine what customers expect from your service or product. For example, “What features would you like to see in future updates?” Knowing these expectations helps prioritize developments to enhance satisfaction and loyalty.
Evaluating Impact:
Assess the impact of changes or new features. For instance, “How has the new dashboard improved your workflow?” This provides direct feedback on recent updates, helping measure their effectiveness.
Try Ready-To-Use CX Surveys
![qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.startquestion.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/national-cancer-institute-L8tWZT4CcVQ-unsplash.jpg)
Patient Satisfaction Survey
![qualitative research questions examples business Ankieta](https://www.startquestion.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/survey-3-768x1024.png)
Net Promoter® Score (NPS) Survey
![qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.startquestion.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/hotel-survey-template-768x512.jpg)
Hotel Survey
![qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.startquestion.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Satisfaction-and-Service-Quality-Survey.jpg)
Service quality survey
![qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.startquestion.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/customer-needs.jpg)
Customer Needs Survey
![qualitative research questions examples business Ankieta](https://www.startquestion.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/survey-2-768x576.png)
Product Feedback Survey (NPS)
Types of Qualitative Research Questions – Examples
There are various types of qualitative research questions, each serving a distinct purpose. Here are some examples focused on customer experience and marketing:
Descriptive
Descriptive questions gather detailed information about specific aspects of your product or service, helping understand what customers notice and appreciate.
- “What specific design elements stand out in our app?”
- “What features do you find most helpful on our website?”
- “Which elements of our service do you value most, and why?”
These effective qualitative research questions uncover details often missed in broader surveys. Customers might highlight a feature’s simplicity or the aesthetic appeal of your app’s interface, offering actionable insights for your design team.
Predictive questions explore potential future behaviors or outcomes, helping anticipate customer needs and preferences for proactive improvements.
- “If we had a project management tool integration for our app, how often would you use it?”
- “How likely are you to recommend our service to a friend after using our new feature?”
- “What impact do you think adding live chat support would have on your overall satisfaction?”
Predictive questions gauge the potential success of new features or changes before implementation, allowing adjustments based on customer feedback and reducing the risk of investing in unwanted developments.
Experiential
Experiential questions focus on understanding customers’ personal experiences and emotions, providing insights into their journey and emotional responses at various touchpoints.
- “How would you describe your first impressions of our application?”
- “Can you share a time when our customer service exceeded your expectations?”
- “What emotions do you associate with using our product, and why?”
These questions help qualitative research methods identify emotional factors influencing customer satisfaction and loyalty, amplifying positive experiences and addressing negative ones to enhance overall perception.
Compar a tive
Comparative questions draw comparisons between different products, services, or experiences, helping understand your competitive position and identify areas for improvement.
- “Was the pricing clear and easy to understand compared to our competitors?”
- “How does our product compare to others you’ve used in terms of ease of use?”
- “In what ways do you think our service stands out from competitors?”
Comparative questions reveal strengths and weaknesses relative to competitors, guiding strategies to enhance unique selling points and address gaps in your offerings.
Process-oriented
Process-oriented questions explore the steps customers take when interacting with your product or service, identifying barriers and opportunities to optimize the customer journey.
- “What are your next steps when you encounter an issue with our product?”
- “How do you typically find information on our website?”
- “What process do you follow to decide to make a purchase on our platform?”
Each qualitative research question, together with its statistical analysis, provide insights into practical aspects of customer interactions, highlighting areas to streamline and make the UX more intuitive.
![qualitative research questions examples business Type of questions to ask in a survey](https://www.startquestion.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/EN-HERO-SurveyExamples-0.png)
Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Qualitative Questions in Surveys
Qualitative methods in conducting online research have their strengths and weaknesses. Let’s take a brief look at them.
In-Depth Data Gathering:
Qualitative questions provide detailed insights into customer thoughts and feelings, helping understand the “why” behind their actions. This depth leads to more targeted and effective improvements.
Encouraging Customers to Speak Their Minds:
These questions invite open-ended responses, letting customers express their opinions and experiences in their own words. This uncovers insights that structured questions might miss, capturing the full range of customer sentiments.
Participant Engagement:
Qualitative questions make surveys more engaging, encouraging participants to spend more time providing thoughtful answers. Engaged participants offer richer data, leading to more valuable insights.
Flexibility in Responses:
Unlike quantitative questions, which limit answers to predefined options, qualitative questions let respondents answer in their own words. This flexibility reveals unexpected insights and nuances.
Contextual Understanding:
Qualitative responses include context that quantitative data lacks, providing a fuller picture of customer experiences and perceptions. This context is crucial for accurately interpreting feedback and making informed decisions.
![qualitative research questions examples business Analyze feedback to make smarter decisions](https://www.startquestion.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Cover-4-1920x911.png)
Disadvantages
Sample Bias:
The open-ended nature of qualitative questions may attract responses from customers with strong opinions, potentially skewing the data. Ensure a diverse range of participants to mitigate this bias.
Privacy Issues:
Collecting detailed personal information can raise privacy concerns, requiring careful data handling to ensure confidentiality. Robust data protection measures are essential to maintain customer trust.
Time-Consuming Analysis:
Analyzing qualitative data is time-consuming, requiring a nuanced approach compared to quantitative data. This often involves coding responses, identifying themes, and interpreting meanings, which can be labor-intensive.
Subjectivity in Interpretation:
Qualitative data is inherently subjective, both in how respondents articulate their answers and in how researchers interpret them. Ensuring consistent, unbiased interpretation requires careful methodological rigor.
Limited Generalizability:
Qualitative data is detailed and specific, making it harder to generalize findings across a larger population. While valuable, these insights often need to be complemented with quantitative research to provide a broader perspective.
![qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.startquestion.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/customer-experience-software-capterra-comparision.png)
Good Qualitative Research Questions – Sum Up
Incorporating qualitative surveys into your research can unlock valuable insights that quantitative data alone can’t. By crafting and strategically using these questions, CX specialists can gain a deeper understanding of customer experiences, motivations, and preferences. Though challenges exist with qualitative data, its rich, detailed feedback is instrumental in shaping product and service strategies, enhancing customer satisfaction and loyalty.
Conducting qualitative research explore the nuanced aspects of CX in focus groups, laying the foundation for meaningful improvements. Whether you’re understanding customer behavior, addressing sensitive issues, or evaluating changes’ impact, qualitative questions offer the depth needed for informed decision-making. By balancing these with quantitative measures, you get a comprehensive view of your customers, enabling you to create more personalized, responsive, and effective CX strategies.
Tool For Quantitative and Qualitative Questions
As you choose qualitative research questions for your surveys, consider your research objective and your target audience’s unique contexts. Tailor questions to elicit detailed, thoughtful responses guiding your efforts to boost customer satisfaction and loyalty. Remember, the ultimate aim is to understand and meet your customers’ needs more effectively, fostering stronger relationships and driving long-term business success.
Ready to ask the right qualitative research questions?
Sign Up to Your Free Startquestion Account Today!
![qualitative research questions examples business Dariusz Jaroń](https://www.startquestion.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Screenshot-2022-11-22-at-11.29.54-197x200.png)
Author: Dariusz Jaroń
Updated: 20 June 2024
![qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.startquestion.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/VoC-methodology-explained.jpg)
Importance and Methodology of the Voice of the Customer
Voice of the Customer (VoC) is more than just collecting feedback—it's the foundation of a client-focused strategy that can drive innovation, improve customer satisfaction, and gain a competitive advantage.
![qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.startquestion.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/How-to-provide-positive-customer-experience.jpg)
How to Understand and Manage Customer Expectations
Customers are not just looking for products or services; they crave experiences that resonate with their needs and values. This article examines how businesses can not only meet but exceed what customers expect, forging lasting relationships and fueling growth.
![qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.startquestion.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Analyze-survey-results-with-insightomat.webp)
Analyzing Open Ended Survey Responses with AI – Meet Insightomat
While closed-ended questions provide quick and quantifiable data, open-ended questions unlock deeper insights into customer sentiments and behaviors. But how do you efficiently analyze the wealth of qualitative data that open-ended questions generate?
![qualitative research questions examples business Symonds Research](https://symondsresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/symo-logo-2022-alt.png)
How to Write the Best Qualitative Market Research Questions to Ask Clients or Customers
Last updated March 15, 2024
Page Contents
What is Qualitative Research?
Qualitative Research is research that is non-numerical and that focuses on things such as users’ impressions, feelings, feedback, thoughts, actions and so on. So, rather than worrying about exact numerical measurements that quantitative researchers use, qualitative research focuses on gaining a deeper understanding of a phenomenon . Focus groups, in-depth interviews, observing people, and analyzing existing data such as texts or website content, are all examples of methods used in qualitative research. Dr Paul Symonds
What Are the Characteristics of a Good Research Question?
![qualitative research questions examples business Asking qualitative questions](https://symondsresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/asking-research-questions.jpg)
1. The Question Should Be Specific
A good research question needs to be specific, as opposed to generic .
The reason is that a generic question is quite hard to answer.
For example, if you ask ‘why are cinema audiences declining’ you can see that the topic is quite broad. There may be lots of reasons. So, where do you even start?
In order to refine this question, you can ask yourself: Why are you asking this question? Is there a specific demographic you want to target?
If you say instead that you want to ‘identify ways in which more people could be attracted to the cinema’, this is already more specific as it is clear that your purpose is to attract more people to the cinema.
You can make the question more specific by saying, for example, ‘identify ways in which more teenagers in Berlin could be attracted to the cinema’. Now, you are specifying an age range and a location.
This will make the question more targeted, easier to answer, and more feasible. So, make the question specific to your purpose.
2. The Questions Should Have a Clarity of Purpose
This means understanding the real reasons why we are asking a question.
For example, in particular, if a manager is asking a question, what is their real intention?
Has the manager already made up their mind about the answer to the question and is s/he just trying to confirm what they think they already know?
Is there a hidden agenda behind the question?
This is particularly important to find out for the researcher if they are external to the organization.
If the purpose is not clear from the start, the research will start in the wrong direction.
3. Focus on One Single Phenomenon, Concept, or Idea
This has to do with focus.
If instead of saying that you want to ‘identify ways in which more teenagers in Berlin could be attracted to the cinema’ you say that you want to ‘identify ways in which more teenagers in Berlin could be attracted to the cinema and the amusement park’, this makes it harder to answer.
Cinemas and amusement parks are two different things, so there may be different motivations why people go to each and, if you want to investigate both, you will dilute your research efforts and might get lost along the way.
4. Define the Sample and Setting
This is connected to point 1, about being specific.
So, you can say that you want to ‘identify ways in which more people could be attracted to the cinema’.
In this case, you have not defined your setting and your sample.
If instead, you say that you want to ‘identify ways in which more teenagers in Berlin could be attracted to the cinema’, you are identifying your setting (Berlin) and your sample (teenagers).
5. The Question Has to Be Feasible
This means that you want to ask a question that you are able to answer with the resources you have and also a question that is realistic to answer.
If you say that you want to find out ‘how to attract people to the cinema in 100 years’ time’, this question not only is not useful but it is also impossible to answer because who knows what will happen in 100 years time; cinemas may not even exist anymore by then.
This is an extreme example, but you get the idea.
What Type of Questions to Ask for Qualitative Market Research – 5 Tips for Asking Effective Questions
![qualitative research questions examples business Market researcher](https://symondsresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/qualitative-interview.jpg)
We can summarize good practice for interviews in 5 main tips.
1. Ask mainly open-ended questions and probing questions.
Closed questions are those that require just a very short answer such as ‘yes’ and ‘no’. In qualitative interviews, you want people to elaborate and open up, so you need to ask mainly open-ended questions so people can talk.
If a closed question is really needed, follow it up with probing questions. For example: Q: ‘Do you like cakes?’ A: ‘Yes’ Q: ‘What types of cake do you like the most and why?’
2. Limit closed questions to the minimum (yes/no or one-word response).
So, you need to ask mainly open-ended questions but you can also ask some closed questions as needed. Just keep them to a minimum.
3. Avoid leading or judgemental questions.
A leading question can produce very biased results .
4. Ask clear questions (avoid ambiguity).
This is also important if you want to have good-quality data.
5. Use everyday vocabulary
Unless you are sure that your interviewee understands a specific vocabulary, if they are experts in something, keep language easy and jargon-free.
Examples of Qualitative Research Questions for Market Research Interviews
![qualitative research questions examples business Extra questions you can ask during market research qualitative research](https://symondsresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/extra-research-questions.jpg)
- Diary question: ask people to describe a day in their life as a way to introduce the interview.
- Critical incidents: ask about the worst/best experiences to understand what is important about a topic.
- Free listing : ask people to list items; for example, all the types of devices they use to surf the Internet.
- Ranking: ask people to rank items generated by free listing in order of importance or efficacy.
Example of Qualitative Market Research Questions Using the Laddering Technique
A type of questioning that is used in customer research to understand why customers prefer certain products, is called the laddering technique.
This technique is based on the Means-End Chain theory. According to this theory, there is a hierarchy or ladder of consumer perceptions that goes from attributes (A) to consumption consequences (C) to personal values (V).
![qualitative research questions examples business Lddering techniques for asking market research questions](https://symondsresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/laddering-technique.jpg)
Attributes are the easiest to recognize. They have to do with the attributes of a product.
For example, you may ask a person: ‘Why did you buy this jumper?’ and they may say: ‘Because I like the color’. This is the attribute of the jumper.
Attributes have consequences for individuals. For example, if you ask your interviewee what they like about that color, they may say: ‘It makes me feel relaxed’. So, that color has an effect on the person.
On a deeper level, there are core values. These are the values that a person cares about the most in their life and which are linked to their deep sense of identity.
For example, you can ask your interviewee why that color makes them feel relaxed and they may connect it with their childhood growing up in the countryside. Or you may ask them why it is important for them to feel relaxed and they may say that it is important for them to live in the moment.
So, you have gone from the attribute of a product to the core values of a person.
![qualitative research questions examples business Classroom lesson plans](https://symondsresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/classroom-lessons-plans.jpg)
While each person is unique and has specific nuances to their sets of ladders and values, you should be able to see patterns developing as you compare the responses from a number of interviewees. So, you will document patterns across different customer types or personas.
Asking repeatedly ‘why’ to participants can get boring for them and they may not always be able to explain why they like or do certain things.
If you explain to your interviewees how this technique works, at the start of the interview, this should help mitigate the irritation they might feel at being asked why repeatedly.
If participants struggle to think of abstract reasons why they might do or like something, it might be helpful to ask them to think of reasons they wouldn’t do something or a value that they do not share . Sometimes, it is easier for people to think of a negative reason.
If you are teaching the laddering technique during a workshop or training session on interviewing skills, you can ask the participants to practice this technique via roleplay.
So, one person can be the interviewee, another one the interviewer, and one or two other people observe. Each group can choose a product or an object and start the interview based on that product.
![qualitative research questions examples business Free Training activities and ice breakers PDF](https://symondsresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/free-training-icebreakers-pdf.jpg)
Benefits of Using Qualitative Questions to Collect Data
You might be planning to collect data using quantitative methods (such as via surveys or questionnaires that use closed yes and no answer questions).
Even so, you might even before that, want to understand the phenomena you are studying first, in order to be able to ask the right kinds of questions.
1. Qualitative Questions Can Be Great for Marketing Research
Marketing is the business area that probably uses research the most. Research can help you find out information about the customer (the person who buys), the consumer (the person who consumes), and the public in general.
Every aspect of marketing can benefit from research.
For example, writing a marketing plan, positioning a new product, understanding customers’ buying behaviors, brand evaluation (understanding how people perceive your brand), and a lot more.
Research can also be requested for strategic reasons.
For example, leveraging extra funding; investigating the potential of a new idea or changing company direction.
2. Qualitative Data Can Assist Managers and/or Business Owners in Decision-Making
Research can assist managers to make a wide range of decisions.
From entering a new market to investigating the potential of a new idea, changing company direction, and deciding how to stock a shelf in a shop.
It is worth pointing out that researchers cannot make decisions for the managers, but research is there to help managers make a more informed decisions.
Ultimately, it is always up to management to decide what to do.
3. Qualitative Data Can Help Solve Immediate or Ongoing Problems in a Business
These can be practical and logistical problems as well as strategical issues.
4. Qualitative Interviews Help You Assess Staff Training Needs
Research is also useful to decide if members of staff need training, and, if so, what type of training they need.
You can find out not only what things exactly they need to know but also if they would benefit more from a training session delivered by a trainer , from e-learning or from just observing other more experienced members of staff, for example.
So, if you assess your staff’s training needs and how to meet them, it will save you spending time and resources on the wrong type of training.
Further Useful Resources
- FREE training activity for Designing Market Research workshops.
- Unstick.me – asking qualitative versus quantitative questions.
- Training Course Materials package for Trainers teaching Market Research and/or Qualitative Research Skills.
![qualitative research questions examples business Learn More about the 'Qualitative Market Research Skills' Course](https://symondsresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/qualitative-course-materials.jpg)
- Recent Posts
- 7 Best Cross & Multi-Generational Training Activities - July 22, 2024
- 10 Adaptability Activities for Employees - July 17, 2024
- 12 Body Language Activities & Exercises for Adult Training - July 17, 2024
![qualitative research questions examples business How improve your presentation skills](https://symondsresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/improve-presentation-skills-150x150.jpg)
>> View All Training Course Materials
Training Materials Catalogue & Prices
![Price List Training materials price list and courses list](https://symondsresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/traning-materials-price-list.jpg)
Payment Options
![qualitative research questions examples business Payment options](https://symondsresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/payment-methods.jpg)
Bulk Discounts
![qualitative research questions examples business Training course discounts](https://symondsresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/training-course-discounts-300x250.jpg)
What Is Included in Our Training Packages?
![What Is Included in Our Training Packages? What's included in the training course materials](https://symondsresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/training-programs-include.jpg)
- Tools and Resources
- Customer Services
- Business Education
- Business Law
- Business Policy and Strategy
- Entrepreneurship
- Human Resource Management
- Information Systems
- International Business
- Negotiations and Bargaining
- Operations Management
- Organization Theory
- Organizational Behavior
- Problem Solving and Creativity
- Research Methods
- Social Issues
- Technology and Innovation Management
- Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
Article contents
Qualitative designs and methodologies for business, management, and organizational research.
- Robert P. Gephart Robert P. Gephart Alberta School of Business, University of Alberta
- and Rohny Saylors Rohny Saylors Carson College of Business, Washington State University
- https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.230
- Published online: 28 September 2020
Qualitative research designs provide future-oriented plans for undertaking research. Designs should describe how to effectively address and answer a specific research question using qualitative data and qualitative analysis techniques. Designs connect research objectives to observations, data, methods, interpretations, and research outcomes. Qualitative research designs focus initially on collecting data to provide a naturalistic view of social phenomena and understand the meaning the social world holds from the point of view of social actors in real settings. The outcomes of qualitative research designs are situated narratives of peoples’ activities in real settings, reasoned explanations of behavior, discoveries of new phenomena, and creating and testing of theories.
A three-level framework can be used to describe the layers of qualitative research design and conceptualize its multifaceted nature. Note, however, that qualitative research is a flexible and not fixed process, unlike conventional positivist research designs that are unchanged after data collection commences. Flexibility provides qualitative research with the capacity to alter foci during the research process and make new and emerging discoveries.
The first or methods layer of the research design process uses social science methods to rigorously describe organizational phenomena and provide evidence that is useful for explaining phenomena and developing theory. Description is done using empirical research methods for data collection including case studies, interviews, participant observation, ethnography, and collection of texts, records, and documents.
The second or methodological layer of research design offers three formal logical strategies to analyze data and address research questions: (a) induction to answer descriptive “what” questions; (b) deduction and hypothesis testing to address theory oriented “why” questions; and (c) abduction to understand questions about what, how, and why phenomena occur.
The third or social science paradigm layer of research design is formed by broad social science traditions and approaches that reflect distinct theoretical epistemologies—theories of knowledge—and diverse empirical research practices. These perspectives include positivism, interpretive induction, and interpretive abduction (interpretive science). There are also scholarly research perspectives that reflect on and challenge or seek to change management thinking and practice, rather than producing rigorous empirical research or evidence based findings. These perspectives include critical research, postmodern research, and organization development.
Three additional issues are important to future qualitative research designs. First, there is renewed interest in the value of covert research undertaken without the informed consent of participants. Second, there is an ongoing discussion of the best style to use for reporting qualitative research. Third, there are new ways to integrate qualitative and quantitative data. These are needed to better address the interplay of qualitative and quantitative phenomena that are both found in everyday discourse, a phenomenon that has been overlooked.
- qualitative methods
- research design
- methods and methodologies
- interpretive induction
- interpretive science
- critical theory
- postmodernism
- organization development
Introduction
Qualitative research uses linguistic symbols and stories to describe and understand actual behavior in real settings (Denzin & Lincoln, 1994 ). Understanding requires describing “specific instances of social phenomena” (Van Maanen, 1998 , p. xi) to determine what this behavior means to lay participants and to scientific researchers. This process produces “narratives-non-fiction division that link events to events in storied or dramatic fashion” to uncover broad social science principles at work in specific cases (p. xii).
A research design and/or proposal is often created at the outset of research to act as a guide. But qualitative research is not a rule-governed process and “no one knows” the rules to write memorable and publishable qualitative research (Van Maanen, 1998 , p. xxv). Thus qualitative research “is anything but standardized, or, more tellingly, impersonal” (p. xi). Design is emergent and is often created as it is being done.
Qualitative research is also complex. This complexity is addressed by providing a framework with three distinct layers of knowledge creation resources that are assembled during qualitative research: the methods layer, the logic layer, and the paradigmatic layer. Research methods are addressed first because “there is no necessary connection between research strategies and methods of data collection and analysis” (Blaikie, 2010 , p. 227). Research methods (e.g., interviews) must be adapted for use with the specific logical strategies and paradigmatic assumptions in mind.
The first, or methods, layer uses qualitative methods to “collect data.” That is, to observe phenomena and record written descriptions of observations, often through field notes. Established methods for description include participant and non-participant observation, ethnography, focus groups, individual interviews, and collection of documentary data. The article explains how established methods have been adapted and used to answer a range of qualitative research questions.
The second, or logic, layer involves selecting a research strategy—a “logic, or set of procedures, for answering research questions” (Blaikie, 2010 , p. 18). Research strategies link research objectives, data collection methods, and logics of analysis. The three logical strategies used in qualitative organizational research are inductive logic, deductive logic and abductive logic (Blaikie, 2010 , p. 79). 1 Each logical strategy makes distinct assumptions about the nature of knowledge (epistemology), the nature of being (ontology), and how logical strategies and assumptions are used in data collection and analysis. The task is to describe important methods suitable for each logical strategy, factors to consider when selecting methods (Blaikie, 2010 ), and illustrates how data collection and analysis methods are adapted to ensure for consistency with specific logics and paradigms.
The third, or paradigms, layer of research design addresses broad frameworks and scholarly traditions for understanding research findings. Commitment to a paradigm or research tradition entails commitments to theories, research strategies, and methods. Three paradigms that do empirical research and seek scientific knowledge are addressed first: positivism, interpretive induction, and interpretive abduction. Then, three scholarly and humanist approaches that critique conventional research and practice to encourage organizational change are discussed: critical theory and research, postmodern perspectives, and organization development (OD). Paradigms or traditions provide broad scholarly contexts that make specific studies comprehensible and meaningful. Lack of grounding in an intellectual tradition limits the ability of research to contribute: contributions always relate to advancing the state of knowledge in specific unfolding research traditions that also set norms for assessing research quality. The six research designs are explained to show how consistency in design levels can be achieved for each of the different paradigms. Further, qualitative research designs must balance the need for a clear plan to achieve goals with the need for adaptability and flexibility to incorporate insights and overcome obstacles that emerge during research.
Our general goal has been to provide a practical guide to inspire and assist readers to better understand, design, implement, and publish qualitative research. We conclude by addressing future challenges and trends in qualitative research.
The Substance of Research Design
A research design is a written text that can be prepared prior to the start of a research project (Blaikie, 2010 , p. 4) and shared or used as “a private working document.” Figure 1 depicts the elements of a qualitative research design and research process. Interest in a topic or problem leads researchers to pose questions and select relevant research methods to fulfill research purposes. Implementation of the methods requires use of logical strategies in conjunction with paradigms of research to specify concepts, theories, and models. The outcomes, depending on decisions made during research, are scientific knowledge, scholarly (non-scientific) knowledge, or applied knowledge useful for practice.
Figure 1. Elements of qualitative research design.
Research designs describe a problem or research question and explain how to use specific qualitative methods to collect and analyze qualitative data that answer a research question. The purposes of design are to describe and justify the decisions made during the research process and to explain how the research outcomes can be produced. Designs are thus future-oriented plans that specify research activities, connect activities to research goals and objectives, and explain how to interpret the research outcomes using paradigms and theories.
In contrast, a research proposal is “a public document that is used to obtain necessary approvals for a research proposal to proceed” (Blaikie, 2010 , p. 4). Research designs are often prepared prior to creating a research proposal, and research proposals often require the inclusion of research designs. Proposals also require greater formality when they are the basis for a legal contract between a researcher and a funding agency. Thus, designs and proposals are mutually relevant and have considerable overlap but are addressed to different audiences. Table 1 provides the specific features of designs and proposals. This discussion focuses on designs.
Table 1. Decisions Necessitated by Research Designs and Proposals
RESEARCH DESIGNS |
---|
Title or topic of project |
Research problem and rationale for exploring problem |
Research questions to address problem: purpose of study |
Choice of logic of inquiry to investigate each research question |
Statement of ontological and epistemological assumptions made |
Statement or description of research paradigms used |
Explanation of relevant concepts and role in research process |
Statement of hypotheses to be tested (positivist), orienting proposition to be examined (interpretive) or mechanisms investigated (critical realism) |
Description of data sources |
Discussion of methods used to select data from sources |
Description of methods of data collection, summarization, and analysis |
Discussion of problems and limitations |
RESEARCH PROPOSALS: add the items below to items above |
Statement of aims and research significance |
Background on need for research |
Budget and justification for each item |
Timetable or stages of research process |
Specification of expected outcomes and benefits |
Statement of ethical issues and how they can be managed |
Explanation of how new knowledge will be disseminated |
Source: Based on Blaikie ( 2010 ), pp. 12–34.
The “real starting point” for a research design (or proposal) is “the formulation of the research question” (Blaikie, 2010 , p. 17). There are three types of research questions: “what” questions seek descriptions; “why” questions seek answers and understanding; and “how” questions address conditions where certain events occur, underlying mechanisms, and conditions necessary for change interventions (p. 17). It is useful to start with research questions rather than goals, and to explain what the research is intended to achieve (p. 17) in a technical way.
The process of finding a topic and formulating a useful research question requires several considerations (Silverman, 2014 , pp. 31–33, 34–40). Researchers must avoid settings where data collection will be difficult (pp. 31–32); specify an appropriate scope for the topic—neither too wide or too narrow—that can be addressed (pp. 35–36); fit research questions into a relevant theory (p. 39); find the appropriate level of theory to address (p. 42); select appropriate designs and research methods (pp. 42–44); ensure the volume of data can be handled (p. 48); and do an effective literature review (p. 48).
A literature review is an important way to link the proposed research to current knowledge in the field, and to explain what was previously known or what theory suggests to be the case (Blaikie, 2010 , p. 17). Research questions can used to bound and frame the literature review while the literature review often inspires research questions. The review may also provide bases for creating new hypotheses and for answering some of the initial research questions (Blaikie, 2010 , p. 18).
Layers of Research Design
There are three layers of research design. The first layer focuses on research methods for collecting data. The second layer focuses on the logical frameworks used for analyzing data. The third layer focuses on the paradigm used to create a coherent worldview from research methods and logical frameworks.
Layer One: Design as Research Methods
Qualitative research addresses the meanings people have for phenomena. It collects narratives of organizational activity, uses analytical induction to create coherent representations of the truths and meanings in organizational contexts, and then creates explanations of this conduct and its prevalence (Van Maanan, 1998 , pp. xi–xii). Thus qualitative research involves “doing research with words” (Gephart, 2013 , title) in order to describe the linguistic symbols and stories that members use in specific settings.
There are four general methods for collecting qualitative data and creating qualitative descriptions (see Table 2 ). The in-depth case study approach provides a history of an event or phenomenon over time using multiple data sources. Observational strategies use the researcher to observe and describe behavior in actual settings. Interview strategies use a format where a researcher asks questions of an informant. And documentary research collects texts, documents, official records, photographs, and videos as data—formally written or visually recorded evidence that can be replayed and reviewed (Creswell, 2014 , p. 190). These methods are adapted to fit the needs of specific projects.
Table 2. Qualitative Data Collection Methods
Type | Brief Description | Key Example(s) and Reference Source(s) |
---|---|---|
| Provides thick description of a single event or phenomenon unfolding over time | Perlow ( ); Mills, Duerpos, and Wiebe ( ); Stake ( ); Piekkari and Welch ( ) |
| ||
Participant Observation | Observe, participate in, and describe actual settings and behaviors | McCall and Simmons ( ) Barker ( ) Graham ( ) |
Ethnography | Insider description of micro-culture developed through active participation in the culture | Van Maanen ( ); Ybema, Yanow, Wels, and Kamsteeg ( ); Cunliffe ( ); Van Maanen ( ) |
Systematic Self-Observation | Strategy for training lay informants to observe and immediately record selected experiences | Rodrguez, Ryave, and Tracewell ( ); Rodriguez and Ryave ( ) |
| ||
Single-Informant Interviews | ||
Traditional structured interview | Pose preset and fixed questions and record answers to produce (factual) information on phenomena, explore concepts and test theory | Easterby-Smith, Thorpe, and Jackson et al. ( ) |
Unstructured interview | Use interview guide with themes to develop and pose in situ questions that fit unfolding interview | Easterby-Smith et al. ( ) |
Active interview | Unstructured interview with questions and answers co-constructed with informant that reveals the co-construction of meaning | Holstein and Gubrium ( ) |
Ethnographic interview | Meeting where researcher meets informant to pose systematic questions that teach the researcher about the informant’s questions | Spradley ( ) McCurdy, Spradley, and Shandy ( ) |
Long interview | Extended use of structured interview method that includes demographic and open-ended questions. Designed to efficiently uncover the worldview of informants without prolonged field involvement | McCracken ( ) Gephart and Richardson ( ) |
| ||
Focus Group | A group interview used to collect data on a predetermined topic (focus) and mediated by the researcher | Morgan ( ) |
Records and Texts | ||
Photographic and visual methods | Produce accurate visual images of physical phenomena in field settings that can be analyzed or used to elicit informant reports | Ray and Smith ( ) Greenwood, Jack, and Haylock ( ) |
Video methods | Produce “different views’ of activity and permanent record that can be repeatedly examined and used to verify accuracy and validity of research claims | LeBaron, Jarzabkowski, Pratt, and Fetzer ( ) |
Textual data and documentary data collection | Hodder ( ) |
The In-Depth Case Study Method
The in-depth case study is a key strategy for qualitative research (Piekkari & Welch, 2012 ). It was the most common qualitative method used during the formative years of the field, from 1956 to 1965 , when 48% of qualitative papers published in the Administrative Science Quarterly used the case study method (Van Maanen, 1998 , p. xix). The case design uses one or more data collection strategies to describe in detail how a single event or phenomenon, selected by a researcher, has changed over time. This provides an understanding of the processes that underlie changes to the phenomenon. In-depth case study methods use observations, documents, records, and interviews that describe the events in the case unfolded and their implications. Case studies contextualize phenomena by studying them in actual situations. They provide rich insights into multiple dimensions of a single phenomenon (Campbell, 1975 ); offer empirical insights into what, how, and why questions related to phenomena; and assist in the creation of robust theory by providing diverse data collected over time (Gephart & Richardson, 2008 , p. 36).
Maniha and Perrow ( 1965 ) provide an example of a case study concerned with organizational goal displacement, an important issue in early organizational theorizing that proposed organizations emerge from rational goals. Organizational rationality was becoming questioned at the time that the authors studied a Youth Commission with nine members in a city of 70,000 persons (Maniha & Perrow, 1965 ). The organization’s activities were reconstructed from interviews with principals and stakeholders of the organization, minutes from Youth Commission meetings, documents, letters, and newspaper accounts (Maniha & Perrow, 1965 ).
The account that emerged from the data analysis is a history of how a “reluctant organization” with “no goals to guide it” was used by other aggressive organizations for their own ends. It ultimately created its own mission (Maniha & Perrow, 1965 ). Thus, an organization that initially lacked rational goals developed a mission through the irrational process of goal slippage or displacement. This finding challenged prevailing thinking at the time.
Observational Strategies
Observational strategies involve a researcher present in a situation who observes and records, the activities and conversations that occur in the setting, usually in written field notes. The three observational strategies in Table 2 —participant observation, ethnography, and systematic self-observation—differ in terms of the role of the researcher and in the data collection approach.
Participant observation . This is one of the earliest qualitative methods (McCall & Simmons, 1969 ). One gains access to a setting and an informant holding an appropriate social role, for example, client, customer, volunteer, or researcher. One then observes and records what occurs in the setting using field notes. Many features or topics in a setting can become a focus for participant observers. And observations can be conducted using continuum of different roles from the complete participant, observer as participant, and participant observer, to the complete observer who observes without participation (Creswell, 2014 , Table 9.2, p. 191).
Ethnography . An ethnography is “a written representation of culture” (Van Maanen, 1988 ) produced after extended participation in a culture. Ethnography is a form of participant observation that focuses on the cultural aspects of the group or organization under study (Van Maanen, 1988 , 2010 ). It involves prolonged and close contact with group members in a role where the observer becomes an apprentice to an informant to learn about a culture (Agar, 1980 ; McCurdy, Spradley, & Shandy, 2005 ; Spradley, 1979 ).
Ethnography produces fine-grained descriptions of a micro-culture, based on in-depth cultural participation (McCurdy et al., 2005 ; Spradley, 1979 , 2016 ). Ethnographic observations seek to capture cultural members’ worldviews (see Perlow, 1997 ; Van Maanen, 1988 ; Watson, 1994 ). Ethnographic techniques for interviewing informants have been refined into an integrated developmental research strategy—“the ethno-semantic method”—for undertaking qualitative research (Spradley, 1979 , 2016 ; Van Maanen, 1981 ). The ethnosemantic method uses a structured approach to uncover and confirm key cultural features, themes, and cultural reasoning processes (McCurdy et al., 2005 , Table 3 ; Spradley, 1979 ).
Systematic Self-Observation . Systematic self-observation (SSO) involves “training informants to observe and record a selected feature of their own everyday experience” (Rodrigues & Ryave, 2002 , p. 2; Rodriguez, Ryave, & Tracewell, 1998 ). Once aware that they are experiencing the target phenomenon, informants “immediately write a field report on their observation” (Rodrigues & Ryave, 2002 , p. 2) describing what was said and done, and providing background information on the context, thoughts, emotions, and relationships of people involved. SSO generates high-quality field notes that provide accurate descriptions of informants’ experiences (pp. 4–5). SSO allows informants to directly provide descriptions of their personal experiences including difficult to capture emotions.
Interview Strategies
Interviews are conversations between researchers and research participants—termed “subjects” in positivist research and informants in “interpretive research.” Interviews can be conducted as individual face-to-face interactions (Creswell, 2014 , p. 190) or by telephone, email, or through computer-based media. Two broad types of interview strategies are (a) the individual interview and (b) the group interview or focus group (Morgan, 1997 ). Interviews elicit informants’ insights into their culture and background information, and obtain answers and opinions. Interviews typically address topics and issues that occur outside the interview setting and at previous times. Interview data are thus reconstructions or undocumented descriptions of action in past settings (Creswell, 2014 , p. 191) that provide descriptions that are less accurate and valid descriptions than direct, real-time observations of settings.
Structured and unstructured interviews. Structured interviews pose a standardized set of fixed, closed-ended questions (Easterby-Smith, Thorpe, & Jackson, 2012 ) to respondents whose responses are recorded as factual information. Responses may be forced choice or open ended. However, most qualitative research uses unstructured or partially structured interviews that pose open-ended questions in a flexible order that can be adapted. Unstructured interviews allow for detailed responses and clarification of statements (Easterby-Smith et al., 2012 ; McLeod, 2014 )and the content and format can be tailored to the needs and assumptions of specific research projects (Gephart & Richardson, 2008 , p. 40).
The informant interview (Spradley, 1979 ) poses questions to informants to elicit and clarify background information about their culture, and to validate ethnographic observations. In interviews, informants teach the researcher their culture (Spradley, 1979 , pp. 24–39). The informant interview is part of a developmental research sequence (McCurdy et al., 2005 ; Spradley, 1979 ) that begins with broad “grand tour” questions that ask an informant to describe an important domain in their culture. The questions later narrow to focus on details of cultural domains and members’ folk concepts. This process uncovers semantic relationships among concepts of members and deeper cultural themes (McCurdy et al., 2005 ; Spradley, 1979 ).
The long interview (McCracken, 1988 ) involves a lengthy, quasi-structured interview sessions with informants to acquire rapid and efficient access to cultural themes and issues in a group. Long interviews differ ethnographic interviews by using a “more efficient and less obtrusive format” (p. 7). This creates a “sharply focused, rapid and highly intense interview process” that avoids indeterminate and redundant questions and pre-empts the need for observation or involvement in a culture. There are four stages in the long interview: (a) review literature to uncover analytical categories and design the interview; (b) review cultural categories to prepare the interview guide; (c) construct the questionnaire; and (d) analyze data to discover analytical categories (p. 30, fig. 1 ).
The active interview is a dynamic process where the researcher and informant co-construct and negotiate interview responses (Holstein & Gubrium, 1995 ). The goal is to uncover the subjective meanings that informants hold for phenomenon, and to understand how meaning is produced through communication. The active approach is common in interpretive, critical, and postmodern research that assumes a negotiated order. For example, Richardson and McKenna ( 2000 ) explored how ex-patriate British faculty members themselves interpreted and explained their expatriate experience. The researchers viewed the interview setting as one where the researchers and informants negotiated meanings between themselves, rather than a setting where prepared questions and answers were shared.
Documentary, Photographic, and Video Records as Data
Documents, records, artifacts, photographs, and video recordings are physically enduring forms of data that are separable from their producers and provide mute evidence with no inherent meaning until they are read, written about, and discussed (Hodder, 1994 , p. 393). Records (e.g., marriage certificate) attest to a formal transaction, are associated with formal governmental institutions, and may have legally restricted access. In contrast, documents are texts prepared for personal reasons with fewer legal restrictions but greater need for contextual interpretation. Several approaches to documentary and textual data analysis have been developed (see Table 3 ). Documents that researchers have found useful to collect include public documents and minutes of meetings; detailed transcripts of public hearings; corporate and government press releases; annual reports and financial documents; private documents such as diaries of informants; and news media reports.
Photographs and videos are useful for capturing “accurate” visual images of physical phenomena (Ray & Smith, 2012 ) that can be repeatedly reexamined and used as evidence to substantiate research claims (LeBaron, Jarzabkowski, Pratt, & Fetzer, 2018 ). Photos taken from different positions in space may also reveal different features of phenomena. Videos show movement and reveal activities as processes unfolding over time and space. Both photos and videos integrate and display the spatiotemporal contexts of action.
Layer Two: Design as Logical Frameworks
The second research design layer links data collection and analysis methods (Tables 2 and 3 ) to three logics of enquiry that answer specific questions: inductive, deductive, and abductive logical strategies (see Table 4 ). Each logical strategy focuses on producing different types of knowledge using distinctive research principles, processes, and types of research questions they can address.
Table 3. Data Analysis and Integrated Data Collection and Analysis Strategies
Strategy | Brief Explanation | Key References |
---|---|---|
Compassionate Research Methods | Immersive and experimental approach to using ethnographic understanding to enhancing care for others | Dutton, Workman, and Hardin ( ) Hansen and Trank ( ) |
Computer-Aided Interpretive Textual Analysis | Strategy for computer supported interpretive textual analysis of documents and discourse that capture members’ first-order meanings | Kelle ( ) Gephart ( , ) |
Content Analysis | Establishing categories for a document or text then counting the occurrences of categories and showing concern with issues of reliability and validity | Sonpar and Golden-Biddle ( ) Duriau, Reger, and Pfarrer ( ) Greckhamer, Misngyi, Elms, and Lacey ( ) Silverman ( ) |
Document, Record and Artifact Analysis | Uses many procedures for contemporary, non-document data analysis | Hodder ( ) |
Dream Analysis | Technique for detecting countertransference of emotions from researcher to informant to uncover how researchers are tacitly and unconsciously embedded in their own observations and interpretations | de Rond and Tuncalp ( ) |
Ethnomethodology | A sociological approach to analysis of sensemaking practices used in face to face communication | Coulon ( ) Garfinkel ( , ) Gephart ( , ) Whittle ( ) |
Ethnosemantic Analysis | Systematic approach to uncover first-order concepts and terms of members, verify their meaning, and construct folk taxonomies for meaningful cultural domains | Spradley ( ) McCurdy, Spradley, and Shandy ( ) Akeson ( ) Van Maanen ( ) |
Expansion Analysis | Form of discourse analysis that produces a detailed, line by line, data-driven interpretation of a text or transcript | Cicourel ( ) Gephart, Topal, and Zhang ( ) |
Grounded Theorizing | Inductive development of theory from systematically obtained and analyzed observations | Glaser and Strauss ( ) Gephart ( ) Locke ( , ) Smith ( ) Walsh et al. ( ) |
Interpretive Science | A methodology for doing scientific research using abduction that provides discovery oriented replicable scientific knowledge that is interpretive and not positivist | Schutz ( , ) Garfinkel ( ) Gephart ( ) |
Pattern matching | Unspecified process of matching/finding patterns in qualitative data, often confirmed by subjects’ verbal reports and quantitative analysis | Lee and Mitchell ( ) Lee, Mitchell, Wise, and Fireman ( ) Yan and Gray ( ) |
Phenomenological Analysis | Methodology/ies for examining individuals’ experiences | Gill ( ) |
Storytelling Inquiry | Six distinct approaches to storytelling useful for eliciting fine-grained and detailed stories from informants | Boje ( ) Rosile, Boje, Carlon, Downs, and Saylors ( ) Boje and Saylors ( ) |
Narrative and Textual Analysis | Analysis of written and spoken verbal behavior and documents using techniques from literary criticism, rhetoric, and sociolinguistic analysis to understand discourse | McCloskey ( ) Boje ( ) Gephart ( , , ) Ganzin, Gephart, and Suddaby ( ) Martin ( ) Calas and Smircich ( ) Pollach ( ) |
Organization Development/Action Research | Approaches to improving organizational structure and functioning through practice-based interventions | Cummings and Worley ( ) Buono and Savall ( ) Worley, Zardet, Bonnet, and Savall ( ) |
Table 4. Logical Strategies for Answering Qualitative Research Questions with Evidence
Feature | Inductive | Deductive | Abductive |
---|---|---|---|
Ontology | Realist | Realist/Objectivist | Interpretive/Constructionist |
Assumptions | Objective world that is perceived subjectively; hence perceptions of reality can differ | Single objective reality independent of people’s perceptions | |
Questions | What—describe and explain phenomena | Why—explain associations between/among phenomena | What, why, and how—describe and explain conditions for occurrence of phenomena from lay and scientific perspectives |
Aim | |||
Logic | Linear: Begin with singular statements and conclude via induction with generalizations | Linear: Establish associations via induction or abduction then test them using deductive reasoning | Spiral processes: Analytical process moves from lay actors’ accounts to technical descriptions using scientific accounts Scientist makes an hypothesis that appears to explain observations then proposes what gave rise to it (Blaikie, , p. 164) |
Primary Focus | Objective features of settings described through subjective, personal perspectives | Objective features of broad realities described from objective, unbiased perspectives | Intersubjective meanings and interpretations used in everyday life to construct objective features and reveal subjective meanings |
Principles | Facts gained by unbiased observations Elimination method Hypotheses are not used to compare facts | Borrow or invent a theory, express it as a deductive argument, deduce a conclusion, test the conclusion. If it passes, treat the conclusion as the explanation. | Construct second-order scientific theories by generalization/induction and inference from observations of actors’ activities, terms, meanings, and theories. Incorporate members’ meanings—phenomena left out of inductive and deductive research. |
Outcomes | Describes features of domain of social action and infers from one set of facts to another: hence can confirm existence of phenomena in initial domain but cannot discover phenomena outside of previously known domain | Scientist has great freedom to propose theory but nature decides on the validity of conclusions: knowledge limited to prior hypotheses, no discovery possible (Blaikie, , p. 144) | , p. 165) |
Based in part on Blaikie ( 1993 ), ch. 5 & 6; Blaikie ( 2010 ), p. 84, table 4.1
The Inductive Strategy
Induction is the scientific method for many scholars (Blaikie, 1993 , p. 134), and an essential logic for qualitative management research (Pratt, 2009 , p. 856). Inductive strategies ask “what” questions to explore a domain to discover unknown features of a phenomenon (Blaikie, 2010 , p. 83). There are four stages to the inductive strategy: (a) observe and record all facts without selection or anticipating their importance; (b) analyze, compare, and classify facts without employing hypotheses; (c) develop generalizations inductively based on the analyses; and (d) subject generalizations to further testing (Blaikie, 1993 , p. 137).
Inductive research assumes a real world outside human thought that can be directly sensed and described (Blaikie, 2010 ). Principles of inductive research reflect a realist and objectivist ontology. The selection, definition, and measurement of characteristics to be studied are developed from an objective, scientific point of view. Facts about organizational features need to be obtained using unbiased measurement. Further, the elimination method is used to find “the characteristics present in all the positive cases, which are absent in all the negative cases, and which vary in appropriate degrees” (Blaikie, 1993 , p. 135). This requires data collection methods that provide unbiased evidence of the objective facts without pre-supposing their importance.
Induction can establish limited generalizations about phenomena based solely on the observations collected. Generalizations need to be based on the entire sample of data, not on selected observations from large data sets, to establish their validity. The scope of generalization is limited to the sample of data itself. Induction creates evidence to increase our confidence in a conclusion, but the conclusions do not logically follow from premises (Blaikie, 1993 , p. 164). Indeed, inferences from induction cannot be extended beyond the original set of observations and no logical or formal process exists to establish the universality of inferences.
Key data collection methods for inductive designs include observational strategies that allow the researcher to view behavior without making a priori hypotheses, to describe behavior that occurs “naturally” in settings, and to record non-impressionistic descriptions of behavior. Interviews can also elicit descriptions of settings and behavior for inductive qualitative research. Data analysis methods need to describe actual interactions in real settings including discourse among members. These methods include ethnosemantic analysis to uncover key terms and validate actual meanings used by members; analyses of conversational practices that show how meaning is negotiated through sequential turn taking in discourse; and grounded theory-based concept coding and theory development that use the constant comparative method.
Facts or descriptions of events can be compared to one another and generalizations can be made about the world using induction (Blaikie, 2010 ). Outcomes from inductive analysis include descriptions of features in a limited domain of social action that are inferred to exist in other similar settings. Propositions and broader insights can be developed inductively from these descriptions.
The Deductive Strategy
Deductive logic (Blaikie, 1993 , 2010 ) addresses “why” questions to explain associations between concepts that represent phenomena of interest. Researchers can use induction, abduction, or any means, to develop then test the hypotheses to see if they are valid. Hypotheses that are not rejected are temporarily corroborated. The outcomes from deduction are tested hypotheses. Researchers can thus be very creative in hypothesis construction but they cannot discover new phenomena with deduction that is based only on phenomena known in advance (Blaikie, 2010 ). And there is also no purely logical or mechanical process to establish “the validity of [inductively constructed] universal statements from a set of singular statements” from which deductive hypotheses were formed (Hempel, 1966 , p. 15 cited in Blaikie, 1993 , p. 140).
The deductive strategy uses a realist and objectivist ontology and imitates natural science methods. Useful data collection methods include observation, interviewing, and collection of documents that contain facts. Deduction addresses the assumedly objective features of settings and interactions. Appropriate data analysis methods include content coding to identify different types, features, and frequencies of observed phenomena; grounded theory coding and analytical induction to create categories in data, determine how categories are interrelated, and induce theory from observations; and pattern recognition to compare current data to prior models and samples. Content analysis and non-parametric statistics can be used to quantify qualitative data and make it more amenable to analysis, although quantitative analysis of qualitative data is not, strictly speaking, qualitative research (Gephart, 2004 ).
The Abductive Strategy
Abduction is “the process used to produce social scientific accounts of social life by drawing on the concepts and meanings used by social actors, and the activities in which they engage” (Blaikie, 1993 , p. 176). Abductive reasoning assumes that the socially meaningful world is the world experienced by members. The first abductive task is to discover the insider view that is basic to the actions of social actors (p. 176) by uncovering the subjective meanings held by social actors. Subjective meaning (Schutz, 1973a , 1973b ) refers to the meaning that actions hold for the actors themselves and that they can express verbally. Subjective meaning is not inexpressible ideas locked in one’s mind. Abduction starts with lay descriptions of social life, then moves to technical, scientific descriptions of social life (Blaikie, 1993 , p. 177) (see Table 4 ). Abduction answers “what” questions with induction, why questions with deduction, and “how” questions with hypothesized processes that explain how, and under what conditions, phenomena occur. Abduction involves making a logical leap that infers an explanatory process to explain an outcome in an oscillating logic. Deductive, inductive, and inferential processes move recursively from actors’ accounts to social science accounts and back again in abduction (Gephart, 2018 ). This process enables all theory and second-order scientific concepts to be grounded in actors’ first-order meanings.
The abductive strategy contains four layers: (a) everyday concepts and meanings of actors, used for (b) social interaction, from which (c) actors provide accounts, from which (d) social scientific descriptions are made, or theories are generated and applied, to interpret phenomena (Blaikie, 1993 , p. 177). The multifaceted research process, described in Table 4 , requires locating and comprehending members’ important everyday concepts and theories before observing or creating disruptions that force members to explain the unstated knowledge behind their action. The researcher then integrates members’ first-order concepts into a general, second-order scientific theory that makes first-order understandings recoverable.
Abduction emerged from Weber’s interpretive sociology ( 1978 ) and Peirce’s ( 1936 ) philosophy. But Alfred Schutz ( 1973a , 1973b ) is the contemporary scholar who did the most to extend our understanding of abduction, although he never used the term “abduction” (Blaikie, 1993 , 2010 ; Gephart, 2018 ). Schutz conceived abduction as an approach to verifiable interpretive knowledge that is scientific and rigorous (Blaikie, 1993 ; Gephart, 2018 ). Abduction is appropriate for research that seeks to go beyond description to explanation and prediction (Blaikie, 1993 , p. 163) and discovery (Gephart, 2018 ). It employs an interpretive ontology (Schutz, 1973a , 1973b ) and social constructionist epistemology (Berger & Luckmann, 1966 ), using qualitative methods to discover “why people do what they do” (Blaikie, 1993 ).
Dynamic data collection methods are needed for abductive research to capture descriptions of interactions in actual settings and their meanings to members. Observational and interview approaches that elicit members’ concepts and theories are particularly relevant to abductive understanding (see Table 2 ). Data analysis methods must analyze situated, first-order (common sense) discourse as it unfolds in real settings and then systematically develop second-order concepts or theories from data. Relevant approaches to produce and validate findings include ethnography, ethnomethodology, and grounded theorizing (see Table 3 ). The combination of what, why, and how questions used in abduction produces a broader understanding of phenomena than do what and why deductive and inductive questions.
Layer Three: Paradigms of Research
Scholarly paradigms integrate methods, logics, and intellectual worldviews into coherent theoretical perspectives and form the most abstract level of research design. Six paradigms are widely used in management research (Burrell & Morgan, 1979 ; Cunliffe, 2011 ; Gephart, 2004 , 2013 ; Gephart & Richardson, 2008 ; Hassard, 1993 ). The first three perspectives—positivism, interpretive induction, and interpretive abduction—build on logics of design and seek to produce rigorous empirical research that constitutes evidence (see Table 5 ). Three additional perspectives pursue philosophical, critical, and practical knowledge: critical theory, postmodernism, and organization development (see Table 6 ). Tables 5 and 6 describe important features of each research design to show similarities and differences in the processes through which theoretical meaning is bestowed on research results in management and organization studies.
Table 5. Paradigms, Logical Strategies, and Methodologies for Empirical Research
DIMENSION | Positivism | Interpretive Induction | Interpretive Science |
---|---|---|---|
Nature of Reality | Realism: Single objective, durable, knowable reality independent of people | Socially constructed reality with subjective and objective features | Material reality socially constructed through inter-subjective practices that link objective to subjective meanings |
Goal | Discover facts and causal interrelationships among facts (variables) | Provide descriptive accounts, theories and data-based understandings of members’ practices | Develop second-order scientific theories from lay members’ first-order concepts and everyday understandings |
Research Questions | Why questions | What questions | What, why, and how questions |
Methods Foci | Facts Variables, hypotheses, associations, and correlations | Meanings: Describe language use in real life contexts, communication, meaning during organizational action | Meaning: Describe how members construct and maintain a sense of shared meaning and social structure (intersubjectivity) |
Methods Orientation | |||
Logical strategies | Induction | Abduction Induction Deduction | |
Data Collection Methods | Observation Interviews Audio and video records Field notes Document collection | Ethnography Participant observation Interviewing Audio or video tape recording Field notes Document collection | Ethnography Participant observation Informant interviewing Audio or video with detailed transcriptions of conversation and recording Field notes Document collection |
Data Analysis Methods | Pattern matching Content analysis Grounded Theory | Analytical induction Grounded theory coding Gioia method | Schutz’s abductive method Expansion analysis Conversation analysis Ethnomethodogy Interpretive textual analysis |
Research Process | , p. 90) | ||
Research Design Stages | |||
Research Outcomes | |||
Assessing knowledge | |||
Types of Knowledge Sought | Scientific knowledge | Scholarly knowledge that is interpretive and has scientific features | Scientific knowledge that is replicable, reliable and valid Practice-oriented knowledge of members’ gained based on first-order understandings |
Sources: Based on and adapted and extended from Blaikie ( 1993 , pp. 137, 145, & 152); Blaikie ( 2010 , Table 4.1, p. 84); Gephart ( 2013 , Table 9.1, p. 291) and Gephart ( 2018 , Table 3.1, pp. 38–39).
Table 6. Alternative Paradigms, Logical Strategies, and Methodologies
Dimension | Critical Research | Postmodern Perspectives | Organization Development Research |
---|---|---|---|
| Dialectical reality with objective contradictions and reified structures that produce power-based inequities | ||
| Uncover, dereify, and challenge taken-for-granted meanings and practices to reduce power inequities, enable emancipation, and motivate social change | Reduce hidden costs Enhance value added for humans | |
| |||
| Actions and ideologies that create reified, objective social structures that are oppressive—OR—disrupt reified structures | Analysis of texts and discourse that shape and bestow power to show their value-laden nature | |
| Describe and uncover sources of oppression and discord Produce accounts that enable or encourage social action and change Emphasis on description, unveiling of reified structure, change | Describe and uncover sources of oppression and discord Produce accounts that enable or encourage social action and change Emphasis on description, unveiling of reified structure, change | |
| Reflection, Critical reflexivity Dialectical methods | Reflection Deconstruction Linguistic play | Deduction Induction Abduction |
| All methods possibly useful Case descriptions Document collection | Collect documents and texts | Observations, interviews |
| All qualitative methods are possibly useful Dialogical Inquiry Critical ethnography | Storytelling inquiry Critical discourse analysis Narrative and rhetorical analysis Deconstruction | Pattern matching Storytelling Qualimetrics Hidden cost analysis |
| Unmasking of oppression Development of political strategies for action Trigger actions that produce change Trace the conflictual role of power in organizational life | Create texts that disrupt the readers’ conceptions and viewpoints Challenge status quo knowledge Expose hidden knowledge and hidden interests Motivate action to resist categorizations | Qualitative and quantitative improvements in organizational functioning and performance Reduction of hidden costs |
| Quality of theory developed Positive impacts on management policies and practices to reduce oppression, inequities | Novel research to produce novelinsights | Examineperformance outcomes |
| Political knowledge, historical knowledge, change orientation | Disruptive knowledge, change orientation, philosophical, literary, and rhetorical texts | Practical knowledge Actionable knowledge |
Based in part on Gephart ( 2004 , 2013 , 2018 ).
The Positivist Approach
The qualitative positivist approach makes assumptions equivalent to those of quantitative research (Gephart, 2004 , 2018 ). It assumes the world is objectively describable and comprehensible using inductive and deductive logics. And rigor is important and achieved by reliability, validity, and generalizability of findings (Kirk & Miller, 1986 ; Malterud, 2001 ). Qualitative positivism mimics natural science logics and methods using data recorded as words and talk rather than numerals.
Positivist research (Bitektine, 2008 ; Su, 2018 ) starts with a hypothesis. This can, but need not, be based in data or inductive theory. The research process, aimed at publication in peer-reviewed journals, requires researchers to (a) identify variables to measure, (b) develop operational definitions of the variables, (c) measure (describe) the variables and their inter-relationships, (d) pose hypotheses to test relationships among variables, then (e) compare observations to hypotheses for testing (Blaikie, 2010 ). When data are consistent with theory, theory passes the test. Otherwise the theory fails. This theory is also assessed for its logical correctness and value for knowledge. The positivist approach can assess deductive and inductive generalizations and provide evidence concerning why something occurs—if proposed hypotheses are not rejected.
Positivists view qualitative research as highly subject to biases that must be prevented to ensure rigor, and 23 methodological steps are recommended to enhance rigor and prevent bias (Gibbert & Ruigrok, 2010 , p. 720). Replicability is another concern because methodology descriptions in qualitative publications “insufficiently describe” how methods are used (Lee, Mitchell, & Sablynski, 1999 , p. 182) and thereby prevent replication. To ensure replicability, a qualitative “article’s description of the method must be sufficiently detailed to allow a reader . . . to replicate that reported study either in a hypothetical or actual manner.”
Qualitative research allows positivists to observe naturally unfolding behavior in real settings and allow “the real world” of work to inform research and theory (Locke & Golden-Biddle, 2004 ). Encounters with the actual world provide insights into meaning construction by members that cannot be captured with outsider (etic) approaches. For example, past quantitative research provided inconsistent findings on the importance of pre- and post-recruitment screening interviews for job choices of recruits. A deeper investigation was thus designed to examine how recruitment impacts job selection (Rynes, Bretz, & Gerhart, 1991 ). To do so, students undergoing recruitment were asked to “tell us in their own words” how their recruiting and decision processes unfolded (Rynes et al., 1991 , p. 399). Using qualitative evidence, the researchers found that, in contrast to quantitative findings, “people do make choices based on how they are treated” (p. 509), and the choices impact recruitment outcomes. Rich descriptions of actual behavior can disconfirm quantitative findings and produce new findings that move the field forward.
An important limitation of positivism is its common emphasis on outsiders’ or scientific observers’ objective conceptions of the world. This limits the attention positivist research gives to members’ knowledge and allows positivist research to impose outsiders’ meanings on members’ everyday behavior, leading to a lack of understanding of what the behavior means to members. Another limitation is that no formal, logical, or proven techniques exist to assess the strength of “relationships” among qualitative variables, although such assessments can be formally done using well-formed quantitative data and techniques. Thus, qualitative positivists often provide ambiguous or inexplicit quantitative depictions of variable relations (e.g., “strong relationship”). Alternatively, the analysts quantify qualitative data by assigning numeric codes to categories (Greckhamer, Misngyi, Elms, & Lacey, 2008 ), using non-parametric statistics, or quantitative content analysis (Sonpar & Golden-Biddle, 2008 ) to create numerals that depict associations among variables.
An illustrative example of positivist research . Cole ( 1985 ) studied why and how organizations change their working structures from bureaucratic forms to small, self-supervised work teams that allow for worker participation in shop floor activities. Cole found that existing research on workplace change focused on the micropolitical level of organizations. He hypothesized that knowledge could be advanced differently, by examining the macropolitical change in industries or nations. Next, a testable conclusion was deduced: a macro analysis of the politics of change can better predict the success of work team implementation, measured as the spread of small group work structures, than an examination of the micropolitics of small groups ( 1985 ). Three settings were selected for the research: Japan, Sweden, and the United States. Japanese data were collected from company visits and interviews with employment officials and union leaders. Swedish documentary data on semiautonomous work groups were used and supplemented by interviews at Volvo and Saab, and prior field research in Sweden. U.S. data were collected through direct observations and a survey of early quality circle adopters.
Extensive change was observed in Sweden and Japan but changes to small work groups were limited in the United States (Cole, 1985 ). This conclusion was verified using records of the experiences of the three nations in work reform, compared across four dimensions: timing and scope of changes, managerial incentives to innovate, characteristics of mobilization, and political dimensions of change. Data revealed the United States had piecemeal experimentation and resistance to reform through the 1970s; diffusion emerged in Japan in the early 1960s and became extensive; and Swedish workplace reform started in the 1960s and was widely and rapidly diffused.
Cole then answered the questions of “why” and “how” the change occurred in some countries but not others. Regarding why Japanese and Swedish managers were motivated to introduce workplace change due to perceived managerial problems and the changing national labor market. Differences in the political processes also influenced change. Management, labor, and government interest in workplace change was evident in Japan and Sweden but not in the United States where widespread resistance occurred. As to how, the change occurred through macropolitical processes (Cole, 1985 , p. 120), specifically, the commitment of the national business leadership to the change and whether or not the change was contested or uncontested by labor impacted the adoption of change. Organizational change usually occurs through broad macropolitical processes, hence “the importance of macro-political variables in explaining these outcomes” (p. 122).
Interpretive Induction
Two streams of qualitative research claim the label of “interpretive research” in management and organization studies. The first stream, interpretive induction, emphasizes induction as its primary logical strategy (e.g., Locke, 2001 , 2002 ; Pratt, 2009 ). It assumes a “real world” that is inherently objective but interpreted through subjective lenses, hence different people can perceive or report different things. This research is interpretive because it addresses the meanings and interpretations people give to organizational phenomena, and how this meaning is provided and used. Interpretive induction contributes to scientific knowledge by providing empirical descriptions, generalizations, and low-level theories about specific contexts based on thick descriptions of members’ settings and interactions (first-order understandings) as data.
The interpretive induction paradigm addresses “what” questions that describe and explain the existence and features of phenomena. It seeks to uncover the subjective, personal knowledge that subjects have of the objective world and does so by creating descriptive accounts of the activities of organizational members. Interpretive induction creates inductive theories based on limited samples that provide low-scope, abstract theory. Limitations (Table 5 ) include the fact that inductive generalizations are limited to the sample used for induction and need to be subjected to additional tests and comparisons for substantiation. Second, research reports often fail to provide details to allow replication of the research. Third, formal methods for assessing the accuracy and validity of results and findings are limited. Fourth, while many features of scientific research are evident in interpretive induction research, the research moves closer to humanistic knowledge than to science when the basic assumptions of inductive analysis are relaxed—a common occurrence.
An illustrative example of interpretive induction research . Adler and Adler ( 1988 , 1998 ) undertook a five-year participant-observation study of a college basketball program (Adler, 1998 , p. 32). They sought to “examine the development of intense loyalty in one organization.” Intense loyalty evokes “devotional commitment of . . . (organizational) members through a subordination that sometime borders on subservience” (p. 32). The goal was to “describe and analyze the structural factors that emerged as most related” to intense loyalty (p. 32).
The researchers divided their roles. Peter Adler was the active observer and “expert” who undertook direct observations while providing counsel to players (p. 33). Patricia Adler took the peripheral role of “wife” and debriefed the observer. Two research questions were posed: (a) “what” kinds of organizational characteristics foster intense loyalty? (b) “how” do organizations with intense loyalty differ structurally from those that lack intense loyalty?
The first design stage (Table 5 ) recorded unbiased observations in extensive field notes. Detailed “life history” accounts were obtained from 38 team members interviewed (Adler & Adler, 1998 , p. 33). Then analytical induction and the constant comparative method (Glaser & Strauss, 1967 ) were used to classify and compare observations (p. 33). Once patterns emerged, informants were questioned about variations in patterns (p. 34) to develop “total patterns” (p. 34) reflecting the collective belief system of the group. This process required a “careful and rigorous means of data collection and analysis” that was “designed to maximize both the reliability and validity of our findings” (p. 34). The study found five conceptual elements were essential to the development of intense loyalty: domination, identification, commitment, integration, and goal alignment (p. 35).
The “what” question was answered by inducing a generalization (stage 3): paternalistic organizations with charismatic leadership seek people who “fit” the organization’s style and these people require extensive socialization to foster intense loyalty. This description contrasts with rational bureaucratic organizations that seek people who fit specific, generally known job descriptions and require limited socialization (p. 46). The “how” question is answered by inductive creation of another generalization: organizations that control the extra-organizational activities of members are more likely to evoke intense loyalty by forcing members to subordinate all other interests to those of the organization (p. 46).
The Interpretive Abduction Approach
The second stream of interpretive research—interpretive abduction—produces scientific knowledge using qualitative methods (Gephart, 2018 ). The approach assumes that commonsense knowledge is foundational to how actors know the world. Abductive theory is scientifically built from, and refers to, everyday life meanings, in contrast to positivist and interpretive induction research that omits concern with the worldview of members. Further, interpretive abduction produces second-order or scientific theory and concepts from members’ first-order commonsense concepts and meanings (Gephart, 2018 , p. 34; Schutz, 1973a , 1973b ).
The research process, detailed in Table 5 (process and stages), focuses on collecting thick descriptive data on organizations, identifying and interpreting first-order lay concepts, and creating abstract second-order technical constructs of science. The second-order concepts describe the first-order principles and terms social actors use to organize their experience. They compose scientific concepts that form a theoretical system to objectively describe, predict, and explain social organization (Gephart, 2018 , p. 35). This requires researchers to understand the subjective view of the social actors they study, and to develop second-order theory based on actors’ subjective meanings. Subjective meaning can be shared with others through language use and communication and is not private knowledge.
A central analytical task for interpretive abduction is creating second-order, ideal-type models of social roles, motives, and interactions that describe the behavioral trajectories of typical actors. Ideal-type models can be objectively compared to one another and are the special devices that social science requires to address differences between social phenomena and natural phenomena (Schutz, 1973a , 1973b ). The models, once built, are refined to preserve actors’ subjective meanings, to be logically consistent, and to present human action from the actor’s point of view. Researchers can then vary and compare the models to observe the different outcomes that emerge. Scientific descriptions can then be produced, and theories can be created. Interpretive abduction (Gephart, 2018 , p. 35) allows one to addresses what, why, and how questions in a holistic manner, to describe relationships among scientific constructs, and to produce “empirically ascertainable” and verifiable relations among concepts (Schutz, 1973b , p. 65) that are logical, hold practical meaning to lay actors, and provide abstract, objective meaning to interpretive scientists (Gephart, 2018 , p. 35). Abduction produces knowledge about socially shared realities by observing interactions, uncovering members’ first-order meanings, and then developing technical second-order or scientific accounts from lay accounts.
Interpretive abduction (Gephart, 2018 ) uses well-developed methods to create, refine, test, and verify second-order models, and it provides well-developed tools to support technical, second-level analyses. Research using the interpretive abduction approach includes a study of how technology change impacts sales automobile practices (Barley, 2015 ) and an investigation study of how abduction was used to develop new prescription drugs (Dunne & Dougherty, 2016 ).
An illustrative example of the interpretive abduction approach . Perlow ( 1997 ) studied time management among software engineers facing a product launch deadline. Past research verified the widespread belief that long working hours for staff are necessary for organizational success. This belief has adversely impacted work life and led to the concept of a “time bind” faced by professionals (Hochschild, 1997 ). One research question that subsequently emerged was, “what underlies ‘the time bind’ experienced by engineers who face constant deadlines and work interruptions?” (Perlow, 1997 , p. xvii). This is an inductive question about the causes and consequences of long working hours not answered in prior research that is hard to address using induction or deduction. Perlow then explored assumption underlying the hypothesis, supported by lay knowledge and management literature, that even if long working hours cause professionals to destroy their life style, long work hours “further the goals of our organizations” and “maximize the corporation’s bottom line” (Perlow, 1997 , p. 2).
The research commenced (Table 5 , step 1) when Perlow gained access to “Ditto,” a leader in implementing flexible work policies (Perlow, 1997 , p. 141) and spent nine months doing participant observation four days a week. Perlow collected descriptive data by walking around to observe and converse with people, attended meetings and social events, interviewed engineers at work and home and spouses at home, asked participants to record activities they undertook on selected working days (Perlow, 1997 , p. 143), and made “thousands of pages of field notes” (p. 146) to uncover trade-offs between work and home life.
Perlow ( 1997 , pp. 146–147) analyzed first-order concepts uncovered through his observations and interviews from 17 stories he wrote for each individual he had studied. The stories described workstyles, family lives, and traits of individuals; provided objective accounts of subjective meanings each held for work and home; offered background information; and highlighted first-order concepts. Similarities and differences in informant accounts were explored with an empirically grounded scheme for coding observations into categories using grounded theory processes (Gioia, Corley, & Hamilton, 2012 ). The process allowed Perlow to find key themes in stories that show work patterns and perceptions of the requirements of work success, and to create ideal-type models of workers (step 3). Five stories were selected for detailed analysis because they reveal important themes Perlow ( 1997 , p. 147). For example, second-order, ideal-type models of different “roles” were constructed in step 3 including the “organizational superstar” (pp. 15–21) and “ideal female employee” (pp. 22–32) based on first-order accounts of members. The second-order ideal-type scientific models were refined to include typical motives. The models were compared to one another (step 4) to describe and understand how the actions of these employee types differed from other employee types and how these variations produced different outcomes for each trajectory of action (steps 4 and 5).
Perlow ( 1997 ) found that constant help-seeking led engineers to interrupt other engineers to get solutions to problems. This observation led to the abductively developed hypothesis that interruptions create a time crisis atmosphere for engineers. Perlow ( 1997 ) then created a testable, second-order ideal-type (scientific) model of “the vicious working cycle” (p. 96), developed from first-order data, that explains the productivity problems that the firm (and other research and development firms)—commonly face. Specifically, time pressure → crisis mentality → individual heroics → constant interruptions of others’ work to get help → negative consequences for individual → negative consequences for the organization.
Perlow ( 1997 ) then tested the abductive hypothesis that the vicious work cycle caused productivity problems (stage 5). To do so, the vicious work cycle was transformed into a virtuous cycle using scheduling quiet times to prevent work interruptions: relaxed work atmosphere → individuals focus on own work completion → few interruptions → positive consequences for individual and organization. To test the hypothesis, an experiment was conducted (research process 2 in Table 5 ) with engineers given scheduled quiet times each morning with no interruptions. The experiment was successful: the project deadline was met. The hypothesis about work interruptions and the false belief that long hours are needed for success were supported (design stage 6). Unfortunately, the change was not sustained and engineers reverted to work interruptions when the experiment ended.
There are three additional qualitative approaches used in management research that pursue objectives other than producing empirical findings and developing or testing theories. These include critical theory and research, postmodernism, and change intervention research (see Table 6 ).
The Critical Theory and Research Approach
The term “critical” has many meanings including (a) critiques oriented to uncovering ideological manifestations in social relations (Gephart, 2013 , p. 284); (b) critiques of underlying assumptions of theories; and (c) critique as self-reflection that reflexively encapsulates the investigator (Morrow, 1994 , p. 9). Critical theory and critical management studies bring these conceptions of critical to bear on organizations and employees.
Critical theory and research extend the theories Karl Marx, and the Frankfurt School in Germany (Gephart & Kulicki, 2008 ; Gephart & Pitter, 1995 ; Habermas, 1973 , 1979 ; Morrow, 1994 ; Offe, 1984 , 1985 ). Critical theory and research assume that social science research differs from natural science research because social facts are human creations and social phenomena cannot be controlled as readily as natural phenomena (Gephart, 2013 , p. 284; Morrow, 1994 , p. 9). As a result, critical theory often uses a historical approach to explore issues that arise from the fundamental contradictions of capitalism. Critical research explores ongoing changes within capitalist societies and organizations, and analyzes the objective structures that constrain human imagination and action (Morrow, 1994 ). It seeks to uncover the contradictions of advanced capitalism that emerge from the fundamental contradiction of capitalism: owners of capital have the right to appropriate the surplus value created by workers. This basic contradiction produces further contradictions that become sources of workplace oppression and resistance that create labor issues. Thus contradictions reveal how power creates consciousness (Poutanen & Kovalainen, 2010 ). Critical reflection is used to de-reify taken-for-granted structures that create power inequities and to motivate resistance and critique and escape from dominant structures (see Table 6 ).
Critical management studies build on critical theory in sociology. It seeks to transform management and provide alternatives to mainstream theory (Adler, Forbes, & Willmott, 2007 ). The focus is “the social injustice and environmental destruction of the broader social and economic systems” served by conventional, capitalist managers (Adler et al., 2007 , p. 118). Critical management research examines “the systemic corrosion of moral responsibility when any concern for people or for the environment . . . requires justification in terms of its contribution to profitable growth” (p. 4). Critical management studies goes beyond scientific skepticism to undertake a radical critique of socially divisive and environmentally destructive patterns and structures (Adler et al., 2007 , p. 119). These studies use critical reflexivity to uncover reified capitalist structures that allow certain groups to dominate others. Critical reflection is used to de-reify and challenge the facts of social life that are seen as immutable and inevitable (Gephart & Richardson, 2008 , p. 34). The combination of dialogical inquiry, critical reflection, and a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods and data are common in this research (Gephart, 2013 , p. 285). Some researchers use deductive logics to build falsifiable theories while other researchers do grounded theory building (Blaikie, 2010 ). Validity of critical research is assessed as the capability the research has to produce critical reflexivity that comprehends dominant ideologies and transforms repressive structures into democratic processes and institutions (Gephart & Richardson, 2008 ).
An illustrative example of critical research . Barker ( 1998 , p. 130) studied “concertive control” in self-managed work teams in a small manufacturing firm. Concertive control refers to how workers collaborate to engage in self-control. Barker sought to understand how control practices in the self-managed team setting, established to allow workers greater control over their work, differed from previous bureaucratic processes. Interviews, observations, and documents were used as data sources. The resultant description of work activities and control shows that rather than allowing workers greater control, the control process enacted by workers themselves became stronger: “The iron cage becomes stronger” and almost invisible “to the workers it incarcerates” (Barker, 1998 , p. 155). This study shows how traditional participant observation methods can be used to uncover and contest reified structures and taken-for-granted truths, and to reveal the hidden managerial interests served.
Postmodern Perspectives
The postmodern perspective (Boje, Gephart, & Thatchenkery, 1996 ) is based in philosophy, the humanities, and literary criticism. Postmodernism, as an era, refers to the historical stage following modernity that evidences a new cultural worldview and style of intellectual production (Boje et al., 1996 ; Jameson, 1991 ; Rosenau, 1992 ). Postmodernism offers a humanistic approach to reconceptualize our experience of the social world in an era where it is impossible to establish any foundational underpinnings for knowledge. The postmodern perspective assumes that realities are contradictory in nature and value-laden (Gephart & Richardson, 2008 ; Rosenau, 1992 , p. 6). It addresses the values and contradictions of contemporary settings, how hidden power operates, and how people are categorized (Gephart, 2013 ). Postmodernism also challenges the idea that scientific research is value free, and asks “whose values are served by research?”
Postmodern essays depart from concerns with systematic, replicable research methods and designs (Calas, 1987 ). They seek instead to explore the values and contradictions of contemporary organizational life (Gephart, 2013 , p. 289). Research reports have the character of essays that seek to reconceptualize how people experience the world (Martin, 1990 ; Rosenau, 1992 ) and to disrupt this experience by producing “reading effects” that unsettle a community (Calas & Smircich, 1991 ).
Postmodernism examines intertextual relations—how texts become embedded in other texts—rather than causal relations. It assumes there are no singular realities or truths, only multiple realities and multiple truths, none of which are superior to other truths (Gephart, 2013 ). Truth is conceived as the outcome of language use in a context where power relations and multiple realities exist.
From a methodological view, postmodern research tends to focus on discourse: texts and talk. Data collection (in so far as it occurs) focuses on records of discourse—texts of spoken and written verbal communication (Fairclough, 1992 ). Use of formal or official records including recordings, texts and transcripts is common. Analytically, scholars tend to use critical discourse analysis (Fairclough, 1992 ), narrative analysis (Czarniawska, 1998 ; Ganzin, Gephart, & Suddaby, 2014 ), rhetorical analysis (Culler, 1982 ; Gephart, 1988 ; McCloskey, 1984 ) and deconstruction (Calais & Smircich, 1991 ; Gephart, 1988 ; Kilduff, 1993 ; Martin, 1990 ) to understand how categories are shaped through language use and come to privilege or subordinate individuals.
Postmodernism challenges models of knowledge production by showing how political discourses produce totalizing categories, showing how categorization is a tool for social control, and attempting to create opportunities for alternative representations of the world. It thus provides a means to uncover and expose discursive features of domination, subordination, and resistance in society (Locke & Golden-Biddle, 2004 ).
An illustrative example of postmodern research . Martin ( 1990 ) deconstructed a conference speech by a company president. The president was so “deeply concerned” about employee well-being and involvement at work that he encouraged a woman manager “to have her Caesarian yesterday” so she could participate in an upcoming product launch. Martin deconstructs the story to reveal the suppression of gender conflict in the dialogue and how this allows gender conflict and subjugation to continue. This research established the existence of important domains of organizational life, such as tacit gender conflict, that have not been adequately addressed and explored the power dynamics therein.
The Organization Development Approach
OD involves a planned and systematic diagnosis and intervention into an organizational system, supported by top management, with the intent of improving the organization’s effectiveness (Beckhard, 1969 ; Palmer, Dunford, & Buchanan, 2017 , p. 282). OD research (termed “clinical research” by Schein, 1987 ) is concerned with changing attitudes and behaviors to instantiate fundamental values in organizations. OD research often follows the general process of action research (Lalonde, 2019 ) that involves working with actors in an organization to help improve the organization. OD research involves a set of stages the OD practitioner (the leader of the intervention) uses: (a) problem identification; (b) consultation between OD practitioner and client; (c) data collection and problem diagnosis; (d) feedback; (e) joint problem diagnosis; (f) joint action planning; (g) change actions; and (h) further data gathering to move recursively to a refined step 1.
An illustrative example of the organization development approach . Numerous OD techniques exist to help organizations change (Palmer et al., 2017 ). The OD approach is illustrated here by the socioeconomic approach to management (SEAM) (Buono & Savall, 2007 ; Savall, 2007 ). SEAM provides a scientific approach to organizational intervention consulting that integrates qualitative information on work practices and employee and customer needs (socio) with quantitative and financial performance measures (economics). The socioeconomic intervention process commences by uncovering dysfunctions that require attention in an organization. SEAM assumes that organizations produce both (a) explicit benefits and costs and (b) hidden benefits and costs. Hidden costs refer to economic implications of organizational dysfunctions (Worley, Zardet, Bonnet, & Savall, 2015 , pp. 28–29). These include problems in working conditions; work organization; communication, co-ordination, and co-operation; time management; integrated training; and strategy implementation (Savall, Zardet, & Bonnet, 2008 , p. 33). Explicit costs are emphasized in management decision-making but hidden costs are ignored. Yet hidden costs from dysfunctions often greatly outstrip explicit costs.
For example, a fishing company sought to protect its market share by reducing the price and quality of products, leading to the purchase of poor-quality fish (Savall et al., 2008 , pp. 31–32). This reduced visible costs by €500,000. However, some customers stopped purchasing because of the lower-quality product, producing a loss of sales of €4,000,000 in revenue or an overall drop in economic performance of €3,500,000. The managers then changed their strategy to focus on health and quality. They implemented the SEAM approach, assessed the negative impact of the hidden costs on value added and revenue received, and purchased higher-quality fish. Visible costs (expenses) increased by €1,000,000 due to the higher cost for a better-quality product, but the improved quality (performance) cut the hidden costs by increasing loyalty and increased sales by €5,000,000 leaving an increased profit of €4,000,000.
SEAM allows organizations to uncover hidden costs in their operations and to convert these costs into value-added human potential through a process termed “qualimetrics.” Qualimetrics assesses the nature of hidden costs and organizational dysfunctions, develops estimates of the frequencies and amounts of hidden costs in specific organizational domains, and develops actions to reduce the hidden costs and thereby release additional value added for the organization (Savall & Zardet, 2011 ). The qualimetric process is participative and involves researchers who use observations, interviews and focus groups of employees to (a) describe, qualitatively, the dysfunctions experienced at work (qualitative data); (b) estimate the frequencies with which dysfunctions occur (quantitative data); and (c) estimate the costs of each dysfunction (financial data). Then, strategic change actions are developed to (a) identify ways to reduce or overcome the dysfunction, (b) estimate how frequently the dysfunction can be remedied, and (c) estimate the overall net costs of removing the hidden costs to enhance value added. The economic balance is then assessed for changes to transform the hidden costs into value added.
OD research creates actionable knowledge from practice (Lalonde, 2019 ). OD intervention consultants use multistep processes to change organizations that are flexible practices not fixed research designs. OD plays an important role in developing evidence-based practices to improve organizational functioning and performance. Worley et al. ( 2015 ) provide a detailed example of the large-scale implementation of the SEAM OD approach in a large, international firm.
Here we discuss implication of qualitative research designs for covert research, reporting qualitative work and novel integrations of qualitative and quantitative work.
Covert Research
University ethics boards require researchers who undertake research with human participants to obtain informed consent from the participants. Consent requires that all participants must be informed of details of the research procedure in which they will be involved and any risks of participation. Researchers must protect subjects’ identities, offer safeguards to limit risks, and insure informant anonymity. This consent must be obtained in the form of a signed agreement from the participant, obtained prior to the commencement of research observations (McCurdy et al., 2005 , pp. 29–32).
Covert research that fails to fully disclose research purposes or practices to participants, or that is otherwise deceptive by design or tacit practice, has long been considered “suspect” in the field (Graham, 1995 ; Roulet, Gill, Stenger, & Gill, 2017 ). This is changing. Research methodologists have shown that the over/covert dimension is a continuum, not a dichotomy, and that unintended covert elements occur in many situations (Roulet et al., 2017 ). Thus all qualitative observation involves some degree of deception due practical constraints on doing observations since it is difficult to do fully overt research, particularly in observational contexts with many people, and to gain advance consent from everyone in the organization one might encounter.
There are compelling benefits to covert research. It can provide insights not possible if subjects are fully informed of the nature or existence of the research. For example, the year-long, covert observational study of an asylum as a “total institution” (Goffman, 1961 ) showed how ineffective the treatment of mental illness was at the time. This opened the field of mental health to social science research (Roulet et al., 2017 , p. 493). Covert research can also provide access to institutions that researchers would otherwise be excluded from, including secretive and secret organizations (p. 492). This could allow researchers to collect data as an insider and to better see and experience the world from members’ perspective. It could also reduce “researcher demand effects” that occur when informants obscure their normal behavior to conform to research expectations. Thus, the inclusion of covert research data collection in research designs and proposals is an emerging trend and realistic possibility. Ethics applications can be developed that allow for aspects of covert research, and observations in many public settings do not require informed consent.
The Appropriate Style for Reporting Qualitative Work
The appropriate style for reporting qualitative research has become an issue of concern. For example, editors of the influential Academy of Management Journal have noted the emergence of an “AMJ style” for qualitative work (Bansal & Corley, 2011 , p. 234). They suggest that all qualitative work should use this style so that qualitative research can “benefit” from: “decades of refinement in the style of quantitative work.” The argument is that most scholars can assess the empirical and theoretical contributions of quantitative work but find it difficult to do so for qualitative research. It is easier for quantitatively trained editors and scholars “to spot the contribution of qualitative work that mimics the style of quantitative research.” Further, “the majority of papers submitted to . . . AMJ tend to subscribe to the paradigm of normal science that aims to find relationships among valid constructs that can be replicated by anyone” (Bansal, Smith, & Vaara, 2018 , p. 1193). These recommendations appear to explicitly encourage the reporting of qualitative results as if they were quantitatively produced and interpreted and highlights the advantage of conformity to the prevailing positivist perspective to gain publication in AMJ.
Yet AMJ editors have also called for researchers to “ensure that the research questions, data, and analysis are internally consistent ” (Bansal et al., 2018 , p. 1193) and to “Be authentic , detailed and clear in argumentation” (emphasis added) (Bansal et al., 2018 , p. 1193). These calls for consistency appear to be inconsistent with suggestions to present all qualitative research using a style that mimics quantitative, positivist research. Adopting the quantitative or positivist style for all qualitative reports may also confuse scholars, limit research quality, and hamper efforts to produce innovative, non-positivist research. This article provides six qualitative research designs to ensure a range of qualitative research publications are internally consistent in methods, logics, paradigmatic commitments, and writing styles. These designs provide alternatives to positivist mimicry in non-positivist scholarly texts.
Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Research in New Ways
Qualitative research often omits consideration of the naturally occurring uses of numbers and statistics in everyday discourse. And quantitative researchers tend to ignore qualitative evidence such as stories and discourse. Yet knowledge production processes in society “rely on experts and laypeople and, in so doing, make use of both statistics and stories in their attempt to represent and understand social reality” (Ainsworth & Hardy, 2012 , p. 1649). Numbers and statistics are often used in stories to create legitimacy, and stories provide meaning to numbers (Gephart, 1988 ). Hence stories and statistics cannot be separated in processes of knowledge production (Ainsworth & Hardy, 2012 , p. 1697). The lack of attention to the role of quantification in everyday life means a huge domain of organizational discourse—all talk that uses numbers, quantities, and statistics—is largely unexplored in organizational research.
Qualitative research has, however, begun to study how words and numbers are mutually used for organizational storytelling (Ainsworth & Hardy, 2012 ; Gephart, 2016 ). This focus offers the opportunity to develop research designs to explore qualitative features and processes involved in quantitative phenomena such as financial crises (Gephart, 2016 ), to address how stories and numbers need to work together to create legitimate knowledge (Ainsworth & Hardy, 2012 ), and to show how statistics are used rhetorically to convince others of truths in organizational research (Gephart, 1988 ).
Ethnostatistics (Gephart, 1988 ; Gephart & Saylors, 2019 ) provides one example of how to integrate qualitative and quantitative research. Ethnostatistics examines how statistics are constructed and used by professionals. It explores how statistics are constructed in real settings, how violations of technical assumptions impact statistical outcomes, and how statistics are used rhetorically to convince others of the truth of research outcomes. Ethnostatistics has been used to reinterpret data from four celebrated network studies that themselves were reanalyzed (Kilduff & Oh, 2006 ). The ethnostatistical reanalyses revealed how ad hoc practices, including judgment calls and the imputation of new data into old data set for reanalysis, transformed the focus of network research from diffusion models to structural equivalence models.
Another innovative study uses a Bayesian ethnostatistical approach to understand how the pressure to produce sophisticated and increasingly complex theoretical narratives for causal models has impacted the quantitative knowledge generated in top journals (Saylors & Trafimow, 2020 ). The use of complex causal models has increased substantially over time due to a qualitative and untested belief that complex models are true. Yet statistically speaking, as the number of variables in a model increase, the likelihood the model is true rapidly decreases (Saylors & Trafimow, 2020 , p. 3).
The authors test the previously untested (qualitative) belief that complex causal models can be true. They found that “the joint probability of a six variable model is about 3.5%” (Saylors & Trafimow, 2020 , p. 1). They conclude that “much of the knowledge generated in top journals is likely false” hence “not reporting a (prior) belief in a complex model” should be relegated to the set of questionable research practices. This study shows how qualitative research that explores the lay theories and beliefs of statisticians and quantitative researchers can challenge and disrupt conventions in quantitative research, improve quantitative practices, and contribute qualitative foundations to quantitative research. Ethnostatistics thus opens the qualitative foundations of quantitative research to critical qualitative analyses.
The six qualitative research design processes discussed in this article are evident in scholarly research on organizations and management and provide distinct qualitative research designs and approaches to use. Qualitative research can provide research insights from several theoretical perspectives, using well-developed methods to produce scientific and scholarly insights into management and organizations. These approaches and designs can also inform management practice by creating actionable knowledge. The intended contribution of this article is to describe these well-developed methods, articulate key practices, and display core research designs. The hope is both to better equip researchers to do qualitative research, and to inspire them to do so.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of Karen Lund at The University of Alberta for carefully preparing Figure 1 . Thanks also to Beverly Zubot for close reading of the manuscript and helpful suggestions.
- Adler, P. A. , & Adler, P. (1988). Intense loyalty in organizations: A case study of college athletics. Administrative Science Quarterly , 401–417.
- Adler, P. A. , & Adler, P. (1998). Intense loyalty in organizations: A case study of college athletics. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Qualitative studies of organizations (pp. 31–50). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Adler, P. S. , Forbes, L. C. , & Willmott, H. (2007). Critical management studies. Academy of Management Annals , 1 (1), 119–180.
- Agar, M. H. (1980). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography . New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Ainsworth, S. , & Hardy, C. (2012). Subjects of inquiry: Statistics, stories, and the production of knowledge. Organization Studies , 33 (12), 1693–1714.
- Akeson, C. (2005). Getting the truth: The police detective and the art of interviewing. In D. W. McCurdy , J. P. Spradley , & D. J. Shandy (Eds.), The cultural experience: Ethnography in complex society (2nd ed., pp. 103–111). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
- Avenier, M.-J. , & Thomas, C. (2015). Finding one’s way around various methodological guidelines for doing rigorous case studies: A comparison of four epistemological frameworks. Systèmes d’information & Management , 20 (1), 61–98.
- Bansal, P. , & Corley, K. (2011). From the editors—The coming of age for qualitative research: Embracing the diversity of qualitative methods. Academy of Management Journal , 54 (2), 233–237.
- Bansal, P. , Smith, W. K. , & Vaara, E. (2018). From the editors: New ways of seeing through qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal , 61 (4), 1189–1195.
- Barker, J. R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly , 38 (3), 408–437.
- Barker, J. (1998). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Qualitative studies of organizations (pp. 126–158). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Barley, S. R. (2015). Why the internet makes buying a car less loathsome: How technologies change role relations. Academy of Management Discoveries , 1 (1), 31–60.
- Beckhard, R. (1969). Organization development: Strategies and models . Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Berger, P. L. , & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge . New York, NY: Doubleday.
- Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science . Sussex: Harvester Press; Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
- Bitektine, A. (2008). Prospective case study design: Qualitative method for deductive theory testing. Organizational Research Methods , 11 (1), 160–180.
- Blaikie, N. (1993). Approaches to social enquiry (1st ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
- Blaikie, N. (2010). Designing social research: The logic of anticipation (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
- Boje, D. M. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational and communication research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Boje, D. M. (2008). Storytelling organizations . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Boje, D. M. , Gephart, R. P., Jr. , & Thatchenkery, T. J. (Eds.). (1996). Postmodern management and organization theory . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Boje, D. M. , & Saylors, R. (2014). Quantum storytelling: An ontological perspective on process. In F. Cooren , E. Vaara , A. Langley , & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), Language and communication at work: Discourse, narrativity, and organizing (pp. 197–217). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Buono, A. F. , & Savall, H. (Eds.). (2007). Socio-economic intervention in organizations: The intervener-researcher and the SEAM approach to organizational analysis . Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
- Burrell, G. , & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life . London, UK: Heinemann.
- Calás, M. B. (1987). Organizational science/fiction: The postmodern in the management disciplines (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
- Calás, M. B. , & Smircich, L. (1991). Voicing seduction to silence leadership. Organization Studies , 12 (4), 567–601.
- Campbell, D. T. (1975). Degrees of freedom and the case study. Comparative Political Studies , 8 (2), 178–193.
- Cicourel, A. V. (1980). Three models of discourse analysis: The role of social structure. Discourse Processes , 3 (2), 101–132.
- Cole, R. E. (1985). The macropolitics of organizational change: A comparative analysis of the spread of small-group activities. Administrative Science Quarterly , 30 (4), 560–585.
- Coulon, A. (1995). Ethnomethodology . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Culler, J. (1982). On deconstruction: Theory and criticism after structuralism . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Cummings, T. G. , & Worley, C. G. (2015). Organization development and change (10th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
- Cunliffe, A. L. (2010). Retelling tales of the field: In search of organizational ethnography 20 years on. Organizational Research Methods , 13 (2), 224–239.
- Cunliffe, A. L. (2011). Crafting qualitative research: Morgan and Smircich 30 years on. Organizational Research Methods , 14 (4), 647–673.
- Czarniawska, B. (1998). A narrative approach to organization studies . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- de Rond, M. , & Tuncalp, D. (2017). Where the wild things are: How dreams can help identify countertransference in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods , 20 (3), 413–437.
- Denzin, N. K. , & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (1st ed., pp. 1–7). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Dunne, D. D. , & Dougherty, D. (2016). Abductive reasoning: How innovators navigate in the labyrinth of complex innovation. Organization Studies , 37 (2), 131–159.
- Duriau, V. J. , Reger, R. K. , & Pfarrer, M. D. (2007). A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods , 10 (1), 5–34.
- Dutton, J. E. , Workman, K. M. , & Hardin, A. E. (2014). Compassion at work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior , 1 (1), 277–304.
- Easterby-Smith, M. , Thorpe, R. , & Jackson, P. (2012). Management research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change . Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
- Ganzin, M. , Gephart, R. P., Jr. , & Suddaby, R. (2014). Narrative and the construction of myths in organizations. In F. Cooren , E. Vaara , A. Langley , & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), Language and communication at work: Discourse, narrativity, and organizing (pp. 219–260). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Garfinkel, H. (1964). Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities. Social Problems , 11 (3), 225–250.
- Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Gephart, R. P., Jr. (1978). Status degradation and organizational succession: An ethnomethodological approach. Administrative Science Quarterly , 23 (4), 553–581.
- Gephart, R. P. (1986). Deconstructing the defense for quantification in social science: A content analysis of journal articles on the parametric strategy. Qualitative Sociology , 9 (2), 126–144.
- Gephart, R. P., Jr. (1988). Ethnostatistics: Qualitative foundations for quantitative research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Gephart, R. P., Jr. (1993). The textual approach: Risk and blame in disaster sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal , 36 (6), 1465–1514.
- Gephart, R. P., Jr. (1997). Hazardous measures: An interpretive textual analysis of quantitative sensemaking during crises. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 18 (S1), 583–622.
- Gephart, R. P., Jr. (2004). From the editors: Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal . Academy of Management Journal , 47 (4), 454–462.
- Gephart, R. P., Jr. (2013). Doing research with words: Qualitative methodologies and industrial/organizational psychology. In J. M. Cortina & R. S. Landis (Eds.), Modern research methods for the study of behavior in organizations (pp. 265–317). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Gephart, R. P., Jr. (2016). Counter-narration with numbers: Understanding the interplay of words and numerals in fiscal storytelling. European Journal of Cross-Cultural Competence and Management , 4 (1), 21–40.
- Gephart, R. P., Jr. (2018). Qualitative research as interpretive social science. In C. Cassell , A. L. Cunliffe , & G. Grandy (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative business and management research methods: History and traditions (pp. 33–53). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Gephart, R. P., Jr. , & Kulicki, M. (2008). Environmental ethics and business: Toward a Habermasian perspective. In D. M. Boje (Ed.), Critical theory ethics for business and public administration (pp. 373–393). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
- Gephart, R. P., Jr. , & Pitter, R. (1995). Textual analysis in technology research: An investigation of the management of technology risk. Technology Studies , 2 (2), 325–354.
- Gephart, R. P., Jr. , & Richardson, J. (2008). Qualitative research methodologies and international human resource management. In M. M. Harris (Ed.), Handbook of research in international human resource management (pp. 29–52). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
- Gephart, R. P., Jr. , & Saylors, R. (2019). Ethnostatistics . In P. Atkinson , S. Delamont , A. Cernat , J. W. Sakshaug , & R. A. Williams (Eds.), SAGE research methods foundations . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Gephart, R. P., Jr. , Topal, C. , & Zhang, Z. (2010). Future-oriented sensemaking: Temporalities and institutional legitimation. In T. Hernes & S. Maitlis (Eds.), Process, sensemaking, & organizing (pp. 275–311). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Gibbert, M. , & Ruigrok, W. (2010). The “what” and “how” of case study rigor: Three strategies based on published work. Organizational Research Methods , 13 (4), 710–737.
- Gill, G. J. (2017). Dynamics of democratization: Elites, civil society and the transition process . New York, NY: Macmillan International Higher Education.
- Gioia, D. A. , Corley, K. G. , & Hamilton, A. L. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods , 16 (1), 15–31.
- Glaser, B. G. , & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research . Chicago, IL: Aldine.
- Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates . New York, NY: Anchor Books.
- Graham, L. (1995). On the line at Subaru-Isuzu: The Japanese model and the American worker . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Greckhamer, T. , Misangyi, V. F. , Elms, H. , & Lacey, R. (2008). Using qualitative comparative analysis in strategic management research: An examination of combinations of industry, corporate, and business-unit effects. Organizational Research Methods , 11 (4), 695–726.
- Greenwood, M. , Jack, G. , & Haylock, B. (2019). Toward a methodology for analyzing visual rhetoric in corporate reports. Organizational Research Methods , 22 (3), 798–827.
- Habermas, J. (1973). Legitimation crisis ( T. McCarthy , Trans.). Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp Verlag.
- Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society ( T. McCarthy , Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
- Hansen, H. , & Trank, C. Q. (2016). This is going to hurt: Compassionate research methods. Organizational Research Methods , 19 (3), 352–375.
- Hassard, J. (1993). Sociology and organization theory: Positivism, paradigms and postmodernity . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Hempel, C. (1966). Philosophy of natural science . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work . New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
- Hodder, I. (1994). The interpretation of documents and material culture. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (1st ed., pp. 393–402). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Holstein, J. A. , & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism . Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Kelle, U. (Ed.). (1995). Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: Theory, methods and practice . London, UK: SAGE.
- Kilduff, M. (1993). Deconstructing organizations. Academy of Management Review , 18 (1), 13–31.
- Kilduff, M. , & Oh, H. (2006). Deconstructing diffusion: An ethnostatistical examination of Medical Innovation network data reanalyses. Organizational Research Methods , 9 (4), 432–455.
- Kirk, J. , & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research . Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
- Lalonde, C. (2019). The development of actionable knowledge in crisis management. In R. P. Gephart, Jr. , C. C. Miller , & K. Svedberg Helgesson (Eds.), The Routledge companion to risk, crisis and emergency management (pp. 431–446). New York, NY: Routledge.
- LeBaron, C. , Jarzabkowski, P. , Pratt, M. G. , & Fetzer, G. (2018). An introduction to video methods in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods , 21 (2), 239–260.
- Lee, T. W. , & Mitchell, T. R. (1994). An alternative approach: The unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Academy of Management Review , 19 (1), 51–89.
- Lee, T. W. , Mitchell, T. R. , & Sablynski, C. J. (1999). Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology, 1979–1999. Journal of Vocational Behavior , 55 (2), 161–187.
- Lee, T. W. , Mitchell, T. R. , Wise, L. , & Fireman, S. (1996). An unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Academy of Management Journal , 39 (1), 5–36.
- Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Locke, K. (2002). The grounded theory approach to qualitative research. In F. Drasgow & N. Schmitt (Eds.), Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations: Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 17–43). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Locke, K. , & Golden-Biddle, K. (2004). An introduction to qualitative research: Its potential for industrial and organizational psychology. In S. G. Rogelberg (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 99–118). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
- Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet , 358 (9280), 483–488.
- Maniha, J. , & Perrow, C. (1965). The reluctant organization and the aggressive environment. Administrative Science Quarterly , 10 (2), 238–257.
- Martin, J. (1990). Deconstructing organizational taboos: The suppression of gender conflict in organizations. Organization Science , 1 (4), 339–359.
- McCall, G. J. , & Simmons, J. L. (1969). (Eds.). Issues in participant observation: A text and reader . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- McCloskey, H. J. (1984). Ecological ethics and politics .Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield
- McCloskey, D. N. (1985). The rhetoric of economics (1st ed.). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
- McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- McCurdy, D. , Spradley, J. , & Shandy, D. (2005). The cultural experience: Ethnography in complex society (2nd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
- McLeod, S. A. (2014, February 5). The interview research method . Simply Psychology.
- Mills, A. J. , Durepos, G. , & Wiebe, E. (Eds.). (2010). Encyclopedia of case study research (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Morrow, R. A. (with Brown, D. D. ). (1994). Critical theory and methodology (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Offe, C. (1984). Das Wachstum der Dienstleistungsarbeit: Vier soziologische Erklärungsansätze. In C. Offe (Ed.), Arbeitsgeselleschaft. Strukturprobleme und Zukunftsperspektiven (pp. 291–319). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus Verlag.
- Offe, C. (1985). New social movements: Challenging the boundaries of institutional politics. Social Research , 52 (4), 817–868.
- Palmer, I. , Dunford, R. , & Buchanan, D. A. (2017). Managing organizational change: A multiple perspectives approach (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
- Perlow, L. A. (1997). Finding time: How corporations, individuals, and families can benefit from new work practices . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Piekkari, R. , & Welch, C. (2012). Pluralism in international business and international management research: Making the case. In R. Piekkari & C. Welch (Eds.), Rethinking the case study in international business and management research (pp. 3–23). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
- Peirce, C. S. (1936). The Collected Papers . Eds. Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss . Cambridge M.A.: Harvard University Press.
- Pollach, I. (2012). Taming textual data: The contribution of corpus linguistics to computer-aided text analysis. Organizational Research Methods , 15 (2), 263–287.
- Poutanen, S. , & Kovalainen, A. (2010). Critical theory. In A. J. Mills , G. Durepos , & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (Vol. 1, pp. 260–264). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Pratt, M. G. (2009). For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal , 52 (5), 856–862.
- Ray, J. L. , & Smith, A. D. (2012). Using photographs to research organizations: Evidence, considerations, and application in a field study. Organizational Research Methods , 15 (2), 288–315.
- Richardson, J. , & McKenna, S. (2000). Metaphorical “types” and human resource management: Self-selecting expatriates. Industrial and Commercial Training , 32 (6), 209–218.
- Rodriguez, N. , & Ryave, A. (2002). Systematic self-observation . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Rodriguez, N. , Ryave, A. , & Tracewell, J. (1998). Withholding compliments in everyday life and the covert management of disaffiliation. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography , 27 (3), 323–345.
- Rosenau, P. M. (1992). Post-modernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads, and intrusions . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Rosile, G. A. , Boje, D. M. , Carlon, D. M. , Downs, A. , & Saylors, R. (2013). Storytelling diamond: An antenarrative integration of the six facets of storytelling in organization research design. Organizational Research Methods , 16 (4), 557–580.
- Roulet, T. J. , Gill, M. J. , Stenger, S. , & Gill, D. J. (2017). Reconsidering the value of covert research: The role of ambiguous consent in participant observation. Organizational Research Methods , 20 (3), 487–517.
- Rynes, S. L. , Bretz, R. D. , & Gerhart, B. (1991). The importance of recruitment in job choice: A different way of looking. Personnel Psychology , 44 (3), 487–521.
- Savall, H. (2007). ISEOR’s socio-economic method: A case of scientific consultancy. In A. F. Buono & H. Savall (Eds.), Socio-economic intervention in organizations: The intervener-researcher and the SEAM approach to organizational analysis (pp. 1–31). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
- Savall, H. , & Zardet, V. (2011). The qualimetrics approach: Observing the complex object . Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
- Savall, H. , Zardet, V. , & Bonnet, M. (2008). Releasing the untapped potential of enterprises through socio-economic management . Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization.
- Saylors, R. , & Trafimow, D. (2020). Why the increasing use of complex causal models is a problem: On the danger sophisticated theoretical narratives pose to truth . Organizational Research Methods , 1094428119893452.
- Schein, E. H. (1987). The clinical perspective in fieldwork . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Schutz, A. (1973a). Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected papers, volume I: The problem of social reality (pp. 3–47). The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
- Schutz, A. (1973b). Concept and theory formation in the social sciences. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected papers, volume I: The problem of social reality (pp. 48–66). The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
- Silverman, D. (2014). Interpreting qualitative data (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Smith, A. (2015). What grounded theory is . . . Organizational Research Methods , 18 (4), 578–580.
- Sonpar, K. , & Golden-Biddle, K. (2008). Using content analysis to elaborate adolescent theories of organization. Organizational Research Methods , 11 (4), 795–814.
- Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant observation . Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
- Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Su, N. (2018). Positivist qualitative methods. In C. Cassell , A. L. Cunliffe , & G. Grandy (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative business and management research methods: History and traditions (pp. 17–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Van Maanen, J. (1973). Observations on the making of policemen. Human Organization , 32 (4), 407–418.
- Van Maanen, J. (1981, March). Fieldwork on the beat: An informal introduction to organizational ethnography . Paper presented at the workshop on Innovations in Methodology for Organizational Research, Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC.
- Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Van Maanen, J. (1998). Different strokes: Qualitative research on the Administrative Science Quarterly from 1956 to 1996. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Qualitative studies of organizations (pp. ix–xxxii). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Van Maanen, J. (2010). A song for my supper: More tales of the field. Organizational Research Methods , 13 (2), 240–255.
- Walsh, I. , Holton, J. A. , Bailyn, L. , Fernandez, W. , Levina, N. , & Glaser, B. (2015). What grounded theory is . . . A critically reflective conversation among scholars. Organizational Research Methods , 18 (4), 581–599.
- Watson, T. J. (1994) . In search of management: Culture, chaos, and control in managerial work . London, UK: Routledge.
- Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology . Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Whittle, A. (2018). Ethnomethodology. In C. Cassell , A. L. Cunliffe , & G. Grandy (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative business and management research methods: History and traditions (pp. 217–232). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Worley, C. G. , Zardet, V. , Bonnet, M. , & Savall, A. (2015). Becoming agile: How the SEAM approach to management builds adaptability . Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
- Yan, A. , & Gray, B. (1994). Bargaining power, management control, and performance in United States-China joint ventures: A comparative case study. Academy of Management Journal , 37 (6), 1478–1517.
- Ybema, S. , Yanow, D. , Wels, H. , & Kamsteeg, F. (2009). Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexity of everyday life . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
1. The fourth logic is retroduction. This refers to the process of building hypothetical models of structures and mechanisms that are assumed to produce empirical phenomena. It is the primary logic used in the critical realist approach to scientific research (Avenier & Thomas, 2015 ; Bhaskar, 1978 ). Retroduction requires the use of inductive or abductive strategies to discover the mechanisms that explain regularities (Blaikie, 2010 , p. 87). There is no evident logic for discovering mechanisms and this requires disciplined scientific thinking aided by creative imagination, intuition, and guesswork (Blaikie, 2010 ). Retroduction is likr deduction in asking “what” questions and differs from abduction because it produces explanations rather than understanding, causes rather than reasons, and hypothetical conceptual mechanisms rather than descriptions of behavioral processes as outcomes. Retroduction is becoming important in the field but has not as yet been extensively used in management and organization studies (for examples of uses, see Avenier & Thomas, 2015 ); hence, we do not address it at length in this article.
Related Articles
- Agency Theory in Business and Management Research
- Assessing the State of Top Management Teams Research
- Case Study Research: A State-of-the-Art Perspective
- Advances in Team Creativity Research
Printed from Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Business and Management. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).
date: 23 July 2024
- Cookie Policy
- Privacy Policy
- Legal Notice
- Accessibility
- [185.126.86.119]
- 185.126.86.119
Character limit 500 /500
![qualitative research questions examples business a hand holding three question marks](https://www.fullsession.io/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/close-up-baby-holding-toy-table-1.jpg)
6 Main Qualitative Questions Examples
Qualitative vs. quantitative research, the importance of qualitative questions, key elements of effective qualitative research questions, role in the research design, 6 types and examples of qualitative questions, how to choose qualitative research questions, start collecting qualitative data right now, fullsession pricing plans.
- FAQs about Qualitative Research Questions
Qualitative research uncovers the details of human behavior, beliefs, and feelings. It gives us insights that numbers can’t always tell.
These research questions help us understand the “how” and “why” of things.
In this article, we’ll look at six examples of good qualitative questions. We aim to highlight how picking the right questions can improve your study.
It is important to understand the differences between qualitative and quantitative research.
Qualitative research questions aim to explore concepts, experiences, and perspectives. They offer the qualitative research expert an in-depth insight into the subject.
On the other hand, quantitative research questions focus on measurable aspects. They seek statistical comparisons to reach factual conclusions.
Both quantitative and qualitative questions have important roles in research. They serve unique purposes and provide different types of data.
Unlike quantitative research, qualitative questions aren’t about numbers and statistical analysis. It’s about understanding the reason behind data from a focus group.
Why pick qualitative research? When conducting qualitative research, you want to know why someone does something, not just count how many times they do it.
You ask, and you listen. That’s the power of qualitative research. The right question is a key that unlocks valuable knowledge.
Effective qualitative research aims to unveil hidden truths. But how do you achieve it? With thought-provoking questions.
Here are the elements of the qualitative research questions for an in-depth exploration:
Open-ended and Exploratory
Qualitative research questions aim to understand the “how” and “why” of a topic. They invite people to share their views and stories.
Open-ended and exploratory questions help researchers grasp complex issues. These questions allow for diverse and detailed answers to a particular subject.
Clarity and Focus
Qualitative research questions need to be clear, focused, and brief. They help ensure the research meets its goals.
Being specific guides data collection and analysis, leading to valuable findings.
Relationships and Personal Experiences
Qualitative research questions examine how different factors relate to personal experiences and seek to understand why people act in certain ways.
They also explore how people respond to their surroundings, including culture and workplace rules.
Ethical Considerations
When creating qualitative research questions, it’s important to think about ethics. Questions need to respect participants’ dignity, privacy, and independence.
This makes sure that the research does not cause harm or distress. Ethics also matter when explaining and sharing results, as researchers must present data truthfully and with care.
The right qualitative research questions are crucial in the design of research projects for several reasons:
- Guidance on Research Methods: Directs the choice of qualitative research methods. Options include:
- Focus Groups: Small groups discuss topics with a moderator.
- In-Depth Interviews: Offers detailed insights from individual viewpoints.
- Qualitative Surveys: Gathers open-ended responses from a broad audience.
- Ensuring the Right Tools are Used: Matching objectives with the most suitable research tools. Enables thorough investigation and captures the complexity of experiences.
- Facilitating a Clear Understanding: Aims to uncover not just what is happening but why. Explores thoughts, feelings, behaviors, and the effects of various influences.
- Informing the Research Design: Influences all design aspects, including participant selection and analysis framework. Ensures ethical standards guide the research process.
Here are six types of qualitative questions with examples:
1. Descriptive
These questions are aimed at describing the characteristics or features of a product.
- Example 1: How do users describe their initial impressions when they first interact with our new software interface?
- Example 2: What are the specific colors and design elements that users notice about the new smartphone model when they see it for the first time?
2. Exploratory
Exploratory questions are designed to investigate how things work or how users interact with a product.
- Example 1: What strategies do users employ to navigate through the features of our newly launched app?
- Example 2: How do users attempt to solve problems when they encounter errors using our digital service platform?
3. Experiential
These questions focus on the user’s experiences and emotions related to the product.
- Example 1: Can you describe a memorable experience you had while using our product?
- Example 2: What emotions do you feel when using our product under stressful conditions?
4. Comparative
Comparative questions look at differences between products, user groups, or other variables.
- Example 1: How do new users’ experiences with our product compare to those of long-term users?
- Example 2: In what ways does our product perform better or worse than our main competitor’s product in similar conditions?
5. Process-oriented
These questions delve into the processes or sequences of actions related to using the product.
- Example 1: Can you walk me through the process you typically follow when setting up our product for the first time?
- Example 2: What steps do you take when you troubleshoot an issue with our product?
6. Theoretical
Theoretical questions aim to understand the underlying principles or theories that explain user behavior or product dynamics.
- Example 1: What theories can explain why users prefer our product’s design over traditional designs?
- Example 2: Based on your knowledge, what psychological principles might influence how users adapt to our product’s innovative features?
When selecting qualitative questions, the aim is to deeply understand user interactions, perceptions, and experiences with the product.
Here are some key considerations for choosing good qualitative research questions:
- Define Your Objectives
Start by clearly defining the research objective of your product testing. What specific aspects of the product are you looking to evaluate? Are you interested in usability, aesthetics, functionality, or user satisfaction? Your objectives will guide the types of questions you need to ask. For example, if user satisfaction is your focus, you might ask about the user’s emotional response to the product.
- Consider the Type of Qualitative Research
Different types of qualitative methods—such as ethnographic, narrative, phenomenological, or grounded theory—may influence the style and structure of your questions. For instance, narrative research focuses on stories and experiences, so your questions should encourage storytelling about product use.
- Ensure Questions are Open-Ended
Qualitative questions should be open-ended to allow for detailed responses that can reveal insights not anticipated by the researcher. Instead of asking, “Do you like our product?” which prompts a yes or no answer, ask, “How do you feel about our product?” to encourage a more detailed and nuanced response.
- Be Clear and Concise
While questions should allow for open-ended answers, they must also be clear and concise to avoid confusing the respondent. Ambiguity can lead to unreliable qualitative data , as different participants might interpret the questions differently.
- Sequence the Questions Logically
The order in which you ask questions can impact the flow of conversation and the quality of information gathered. Start with more general questions to make the respondent comfortable before moving to more specific or sensitive topics. This sequence helps build rapport and can lead to more honest and detailed responses later in the discussion.
- Consider the Participant
Tailor your questions to fit the background and experience level of your participants. Questions that are too technical or too basic can frustrate users or fail to elicit useful information. Understanding your audience allows you to frame questions that are appropriately challenging and engaging.
- Pilot Test Your Questions
Before finalizing your set of questions, conduct a pilot test with a small group of participants. This testing can reveal if any questions are confusing or ineffective at eliciting useful responses. Feedback from this phase can be invaluable in refining your questions.
- Be Prepared to Adapt
Finally, while it’s important to prepare your questions carefully, also be flexible during actual interactions. The conversation may reveal new paths of inquiry that are worth exploring. Being adaptive can help you capture deep insights that strictly adhering to a prepared list of questions might miss.
It takes less than 5 minutes to set up your first website or app feedback form, with FullSession , and it’s completely free!
After that, you will be able to collect high-quality feedback and avoid the guesswork.
The FullSession platform offers a 14-day free trial. It provides two paid plans—Basic and Business. Here are more details on each plan.
- The Basic plan costs $39/month and allows you to monitor up to 5,000 monthly sessions.
- The Business plan costs $149/month and helps you to track and analyze up to 25,000 monthly sessions.
- The Enterprise plan starts from 100,000 monthly sessions and has custom pricing.
If you need more information, you can get a demo.
FAQs about Qualitative Research Questions
What is a qualitative research question.
Qualitative research questions focus on ways to gather deep insights into people’s experiences, beliefs, and perceptions. Such questions invite detailed narrative responses.
Can qualitative research questions change during the study?
It’s not uncommon for qualitative research questions to evolve during the course of a study. As preliminary data is collected and analyzed, new insights may emerge that prompt a qualitative researcher to refine their questions.
How are qualitative questions used in business?
Businesses use qualitative questions to uncover valuable insights. They can explore customer behavior, employee satisfaction, or market trends. One example could be: “What factors drive consumer loyalty to our brand?”
Are there specific words to use in qualitative research questions?
Yes, use words like “describe,” “explain,” and “how” to frame qualitative questions. These terms promote more detailed and comprehensive answers. They are key to qualitative analysis.
![qualitative research questions examples business](https://www.fullsession.io/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/cta-2.png)
Enhance Your Insights With Richer User Behavior Data
Discover FullSession's Digital Experience Intelligence solution firsthand. Explore FullSession for free
![qualitative research questions examples business FullSession Heatmap](https://www.fullsession.io/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/image1-2.png)
Qualitative research: methods and examples
Last updated
13 April 2023
Reviewed by
Qualitative research involves gathering and evaluating non-numerical information to comprehend concepts, perspectives, and experiences. It’s also helpful for obtaining in-depth insights into a certain subject or generating new research ideas.
As a result, qualitative research is practical if you want to try anything new or produce new ideas.
There are various ways you can conduct qualitative research. In this article, you'll learn more about qualitative research methodologies, including when you should use them.
Make research less tedious
Dovetail streamlines research to help you uncover and share actionable insights
- What is qualitative research?
Qualitative research is a broad term describing various research types that rely on asking open-ended questions. Qualitative research investigates “how” or “why” certain phenomena occur. It is about discovering the inherent nature of something.
The primary objective of qualitative research is to understand an individual's ideas, points of view, and feelings. In this way, collecting in-depth knowledge of a specific topic is possible. Knowing your audience's feelings about a particular subject is important for making reasonable research conclusions.
Unlike quantitative research , this approach does not involve collecting numerical, objective data for statistical analysis. Qualitative research is used extensively in education, sociology, health science, history, and anthropology.
- Types of qualitative research methodology
Typically, qualitative research aims at uncovering the attitudes and behavior of the target audience concerning a specific topic. For example, “How would you describe your experience as a new Dovetail user?”
Some of the methods for conducting qualitative analysis include:
Focus groups
Hosting a focus group is a popular qualitative research method. It involves obtaining qualitative data from a limited sample of participants. In a moderated version of a focus group, the moderator asks participants a series of predefined questions. They aim to interact and build a group discussion that reveals their preferences, candid thoughts, and experiences.
Unmoderated, online focus groups are increasingly popular because they eliminate the need to interact with people face to face.
Focus groups can be more cost-effective than 1:1 interviews or studying a group in a natural setting and reporting one’s observations.
Focus groups make it possible to gather multiple points of view quickly and efficiently, making them an excellent choice for testing new concepts or conducting market research on a new product.
However, there are some potential drawbacks to this method. It may be unsuitable for sensitive or controversial topics. Participants might be reluctant to disclose their true feelings or respond falsely to conform to what they believe is the socially acceptable answer (known as response bias).
Case study research
A case study is an in-depth evaluation of a specific person, incident, organization, or society. This type of qualitative research has evolved into a broadly applied research method in education, law, business, and the social sciences.
Even though case study research may appear challenging to implement, it is one of the most direct research methods. It requires detailed analysis, broad-ranging data collection methodologies, and a degree of existing knowledge about the subject area under investigation.
Historical model
The historical approach is a distinct research method that deeply examines previous events to better understand the present and forecast future occurrences of the same phenomena. Its primary goal is to evaluate the impacts of history on the present and hence discover comparable patterns in the present to predict future outcomes.
Oral history
This qualitative data collection method involves gathering verbal testimonials from individuals about their personal experiences. It is widely used in historical disciplines to offer counterpoints to established historical facts and narratives. The most common methods of gathering oral history are audio recordings, analysis of auto-biographical text, videos, and interviews.
Qualitative observation
One of the most fundamental, oldest research methods, qualitative observation , is the process through which a researcher collects data using their senses of sight, smell, hearing, etc. It is used to observe the properties of the subject being studied. For example, “What does it look like?” As research methods go, it is subjective and depends on researchers’ first-hand experiences to obtain information, so it is prone to bias. However, it is an excellent way to start a broad line of inquiry like, “What is going on here?”
Record keeping and review
Record keeping uses existing documents and relevant data sources that can be employed for future studies. It is equivalent to visiting the library and going through publications or any other reference material to gather important facts that will likely be used in the research.
Grounded theory approach
The grounded theory approach is a commonly used research method employed across a variety of different studies. It offers a unique way to gather, interpret, and analyze. With this approach, data is gathered and analyzed simultaneously. Existing analysis frames and codes are disregarded, and data is analyzed inductively, with new codes and frames generated from the research.
Ethnographic research
Ethnography is a descriptive form of a qualitative study of people and their cultures. Its primary goal is to study people's behavior in their natural environment. This method necessitates that the researcher adapts to their target audience's setting.
Thereby, you will be able to understand their motivation, lifestyle, ambitions, traditions, and culture in situ. But, the researcher must be prepared to deal with geographical constraints while collecting data i.e., audiences can’t be studied in a laboratory or research facility.
This study can last from a couple of days to several years. Thus, it is time-consuming and complicated, requiring you to have both the time to gather the relevant data as well as the expertise in analyzing, observing, and interpreting data to draw meaningful conclusions.
Narrative framework
A narrative framework is a qualitative research approach that relies on people's written text or visual images. It entails people analyzing these events or narratives to determine certain topics or issues. With this approach, you can understand how people represent themselves and their experiences to a larger audience.
Phenomenological approach
The phenomenological study seeks to investigate the experiences of a particular phenomenon within a group of individuals or communities. It analyzes a certain event through interviews with persons who have witnessed it to determine the connections between their views. Even though this method relies heavily on interviews, other data sources (recorded notes), and observations could be employed to enhance the findings.
- Qualitative research methods (tools)
Some of the instruments involved in qualitative research include:
Document research: Also known as document analysis because it involves evaluating written documents. These can include personal and non-personal materials like archives, policy publications, yearly reports, diaries, or letters.
Focus groups: This is where a researcher poses questions and generates conversation among a group of people. The major goal of focus groups is to examine participants' experiences and knowledge, including research into how and why individuals act in various ways.
Secondary study: Involves acquiring existing information from texts, images, audio, or video recordings.
Observations: This requires thorough field notes on everything you see, hear, or experience. Compared to reported conduct or opinion, this study method can assist you in getting insights into a specific situation and observable behaviors.
Structured interviews : In this approach, you will directly engage people one-on-one. Interviews are ideal for learning about a person's subjective beliefs, motivations, and encounters.
Surveys: This is when you distribute questionnaires containing open-ended questions
Free AI content analysis generator
Make sense of your research by automatically summarizing key takeaways through our free content analysis tool.
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmu68mmhtb17/76gOBiC91O5cj02edxTX0t/385646b46c425b354a88e2a1e09d9739/AI_content_analysis_thumbnail.png?w=460&h=392&q=80&fm=png)
- What are common examples of qualitative research?
Everyday examples of qualitative research include:
Conducting a demographic analysis of a business
For instance, suppose you own a business such as a grocery store (or any store) and believe it caters to a broad customer base, but after conducting a demographic analysis, you discover that most of your customers are men.
You could do 1:1 interviews with female customers to learn why they don't shop at your store.
In this case, interviewing potential female customers should clarify why they don't find your shop appealing. It could be because of the products you sell or a need for greater brand awareness, among other possible reasons.
Launching or testing a new product
Suppose you are the product manager at a SaaS company looking to introduce a new product. Focus groups can be an excellent way to determine whether your product is marketable.
In this instance, you could hold a focus group with a sample group drawn from your intended audience. The group will explore the product based on its new features while you ensure adequate data on how users react to the new features. The data you collect will be key to making sales and marketing decisions.
Conducting studies to explain buyers' behaviors
You can also use qualitative research to understand existing buyer behavior better. Marketers analyze historical information linked to their businesses and industries to see when purchasers buy more.
Qualitative research can help you determine when to target new clients and peak seasons to boost sales by investigating the reason behind these behaviors.
- Qualitative research: data collection
Data collection is gathering information on predetermined variables to gain appropriate answers, test hypotheses, and analyze results. Researchers will collect non-numerical data for qualitative data collection to obtain detailed explanations and draw conclusions.
To get valid findings and achieve a conclusion in qualitative research, researchers must collect comprehensive and multifaceted data.
Qualitative data is usually gathered through interviews or focus groups with videotapes or handwritten notes. If there are recordings, they are transcribed before the data analysis process. Researchers keep separate folders for the recordings acquired from each focus group when collecting qualitative research data to categorize the data.
- Qualitative research: data analysis
Qualitative data analysis is organizing, examining, and interpreting qualitative data. Its main objective is identifying trends and patterns, responding to research questions, and recommending actions based on the findings. Textual analysis is a popular method for analyzing qualitative data.
Textual analysis differs from other qualitative research approaches in that researchers consider the social circumstances of study participants to decode their words, behaviors, and broader meaning.
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmu68mmhtb17/7CszC04ZhmBtH7L4YT1VUU/14f6fb929cee0d02e003c00ca5437444/research.png?w=256&h=160&q=80&fm=png)
Learn more about qualitative research data analysis software
- When to use qualitative research
Qualitative research is helpful in various situations, particularly when a researcher wants to capture accurate, in-depth insights.
Here are some instances when qualitative research can be valuable:
Examining your product or service to improve your marketing approach
When researching market segments, demographics, and customer service teams
Identifying client language when you want to design a quantitative survey
When attempting to comprehend your or someone else's strengths and weaknesses
Assessing feelings and beliefs about societal and public policy matters
Collecting information about a business or product's perception
Analyzing your target audience's reactions to marketing efforts
When launching a new product or coming up with a new idea
When seeking to evaluate buyers' purchasing patterns
- Qualitative research methods vs. quantitative research methods
Qualitative research examines people's ideas and what influences their perception, whereas quantitative research draws conclusions based on numbers and measurements.
Qualitative research is descriptive, and its primary goal is to comprehensively understand people's attitudes, behaviors, and ideas.
In contrast, quantitative research is more restrictive because it relies on numerical data and analyzes statistical data to make decisions. This research method assists researchers in gaining an initial grasp of the subject, which deals with numbers. For instance, the number of customers likely to purchase your products or use your services.
What is the most important feature of qualitative research?
A distinguishing feature of qualitative research is that it’s conducted in a real-world setting instead of a simulated environment. The researcher is examining actual phenomena instead of experimenting with different variables to see what outcomes (data) might result.
Can I use qualitative and quantitative approaches together in a study?
Yes, combining qualitative and quantitative research approaches happens all the time and is known as mixed methods research. For example, you could study individuals’ perceived risk in a certain scenario, such as how people rate the safety or riskiness of a given neighborhood. Simultaneously, you could analyze historical data objectively, indicating how safe or dangerous that area has been in the last year. To get the most out of mixed-method research, it’s important to understand the pros and cons of each methodology, so you can create a thoughtfully designed study that will yield compelling results.
Should you be using a customer insights hub?
Do you want to discover previous research faster?
Do you share your research findings with others?
Do you analyze research data?
Start for free today, add your research, and get to key insights faster
Editor’s picks
Last updated: 18 April 2023
Last updated: 27 February 2023
Last updated: 6 February 2023
Last updated: 6 October 2023
Last updated: 5 February 2023
Last updated: 16 April 2023
Last updated: 9 March 2023
Last updated: 12 December 2023
Last updated: 11 March 2024
Last updated: 4 July 2024
Last updated: 6 March 2024
Last updated: 5 March 2024
Last updated: 13 May 2024
Latest articles
Related topics, .css-je19u9{-webkit-align-items:flex-end;-webkit-box-align:flex-end;-ms-flex-align:flex-end;align-items:flex-end;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-box-pack:center;-ms-flex-pack:center;-webkit-justify-content:center;justify-content:center;row-gap:0;text-align:center;max-width:671px;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}}@media (max-width: 799px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}} decide what to .css-1kiodld{max-height:56px;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-1kiodld{display:none;}} build next, decide what to build next.
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmu68mmhtb17/17ZYa6NHX7Cxs8IQ6qjsrJ/847a33e6669349a48c62f76bee8312ea/1.png?w=84&h=84&q=80&fm=png)
Users report unexpectedly high data usage, especially during streaming sessions.
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmu68mmhtb17/2Shmch4SlrH6Jhpy8xX2lJ/a29b5842d6fe850fe34c7df6de5804d3/2.png?w=84&h=84&q=80&fm=png)
Users find it hard to navigate from the home page to relevant playlists in the app.
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmu68mmhtb17/NBTArUW1okjZYDrAbCt6D/3bdbfae8f41fcbd5b24eb9997beda473/3.png?w=84&h=84&q=80&fm=png)
It would be great to have a sleep timer feature, especially for bedtime listening.
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmu68mmhtb17/5gXUnpstdzPtrzGDMf4YAp/eafd05b570ddf2df2e9fb763800b0499/4.png?w=84&h=84&q=80&fm=png)
I need better filters to find the songs or artists I’m looking for.
Log in or sign up
Get started for free
![qualitative research questions examples business American University Online](https://programs.online.american.edu/sites/default/files/logo.png)
- make a call
- schedule an appointment
- Chat Loading...
- Request Info
855-725-7614
- Online Graduate Degree Programs
- School of Public Affairs
- Master of Public Administration and Policy
- MS in Counter-Terrorism and Homeland Security
- College of Arts and Sciences
- MA in Economics, Applied Economics Specialization
- MS in Nutrition Education
- School of Communication
- School of Professional and Extended Studies
- MS in Health Promotion Management
- MS in Human Resource Analytics and Management
- MS in Measurement & Evaluation
- MS in Sports Analytics and Management
- Online Graduate Certificates
- School of Professional and Extended Studies Graduate Certificate Programs
- Graduate Certificate in Human Resource Analytics and Management
- Graduate Certificate in Nutrition Education
- Graduate Certificate in Project Monitoring & Evaluation
- Graduate Certificate in Sports Analytics and Management
- Financial Aid and Tuition
- Scholarships
- International Students
- Military Students
- Schedule an Appointment
- University Registrar
- Campus Programs
- Why American University
- Accreditation and Rankings
- President's Message
- Online Student Life
- Virtual Open Houses & Webinars
- Frequently Asked Questions
Qualitative Methods in Monitoring and Evaluation: Qualitative Research Questions
- Online Degrees
- Program Resources
You are here
Selecting your research topic and crafting a qualitative research question from it is the first, and possibly the hardest, step of qualitative research. You will likely start with a topic, and as you start reading and do exploratory research, hone that topic into a research question that can be answered using qualitative methods.
I suggest that students start big and then narrow their topics. As you review the literature and current events around your larger topic, you will likely discover what questions academics and policymakers are asking about that topic. You should identify your topic’s puzzles, those questions that have yet to be answered. Then you should choose one of these puzzles to meld into your research question.
Throughout this process, you should constantly remind yourself of the purpose of qualitative inquiry. As researchers, we use qualitative data collection techniques to gather rich, emic data around a topic. That data highlights experiences and perceptions that help to provide explanation. As you explore your larger topic, focus on those puzzles that need qualitative explanation. As you hone your topic into possible research questions, ask yourself why qualitative data collection techniques would be the best way to provide insight into your topic and answer your research question. This is actually harder than you might think, as many of us tend towards the quantitative. Usually, crafting a qualitative research question means asking a why or a what explains question, NOT a how or a descriptive question.
The best qualitative research questions are:
- Interesting to you. Depending on the purpose of your research and your research output, you will likely spend a lot of time on your topic. Pick a topic that you find interesting, so that you will be engaged throughout the research process.
- Original. When we conduct primary research, we are not summarizing the research of others. We are coming up with our own research question and qualitative design to answer it. Your qualitative research could identify a brand new topic, or it could take a new spin on an old topic, or look at a new topic in a different light.
- Answerable. Your research question should be answerable using qualitative methods. Not every research question can and should be answered using qualitative data collection techniques. You should craft a question that is best answered using qualitative research.
- Manageable. Your research question should be manageable within your time, space, and budget constraints. Craft a question that fits within the purpose and scope of your research. Some qualitative questions might take an article length paper to answer, and some may take a book! Some questions might require a longer time to answer, travel that you are not able to do, or a larger budget than you have to support your research. Craft your question with these constraints and parameters in mind.
Once you have a research question, you will need to draft your qualitative research design. Your design will need to provide specifics on the qualitative data collection techniques you intend to use to answer your research question. You should think in advance about what kinds of data you will need, and what qualitative data collection techniques would be most useful to gather it. You have a number of tools available in your qualitative data collection toolkit, and you need to figure out which is most appropriate for your data collection need. You might use observation, participant observation , interviews , focus groups , or participatory tools , for example. You also need to think through how you will address missing or incomplete data, and how you will manage and analyze the data that you collect.
Qualitative Questions and Evaluation
When we conduct an evaluation , we usually start by crafting a logic model or Logical Framework (LogFrame) . As evaluators, we usually ask qualitative questions that help us to understand an organization’s logic model or to populate its LogFrame. We might ask a broad question such as: What explains this organization’s theory of change? Such a broad question would also have support questions such as: What does this organization do? Why does it do it that way? What are some examples of projects? How are those projects managed? Who are the beneficiaries? What are this organization’s challenges? What are this organization’s risks and assumptions?
Good qualitative research questions that help us to craft an evaluation might include questions around program need, and program conceptualization and design (Rossi, Lipsey, and Freeman, 2004). Depending on the purpose of the evaluation and your evaluation design, you might ask process-focused questions such as who, what, when, where, why, and how; or you might ask outcome focused questions around changes, effects, and impacts.
Your qualitative research and the answers to all of these questions could help you to develop a LogFrame that you could use to guide a future evaluation that asks questions around program operations and service delivery, program outcomes, or program cost efficiency. Your evaluation design would include evaluation questions that likely have a mixed method element that uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative data and methods to help measure progress or change. Our evaluation questions are not necessarily qualitative in nature; they are often questions that require mixed methods or quantitative tools and analyses to answer. However, we often use qualitative research questions and data collection techniques to help us craft our evaluation questions, LogFrame, and evaluation design.
Rossi, Peter, Mark Lipsey, and Howard Freeman. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. 7th edition. Thousand Oaks, SAGE, 2004.
About The Author
Dr. Beverly Peters has more than twenty years of experience teaching, conducting qualitative research, and managing community development, microcredit, infrastructure, and democratization projects in several countries in Africa. As a consultant, Dr. Peters worked on EU and USAID funded infrastructure, education, and microcredit projects in South Africa and Mozambique. She also conceptualized and developed the proposal for Darfur Peace and Development Organization’s women’s crisis center, a center that provides physical and economic assistance to women survivors of violence in the IDP camps in Darfur. Dr. Peters has a Ph.D. from the University of Pittsburgh. Learn more about Dr. Peters.
To learn more about American University’s online MS in Measurement & Evaluation or Graduate Certificate in Project Monitoring & Evaluation, request more information or call us toll free at 855-725-7614.
(855) 725-7614
- Terms & Conditions
- About American University
![qualitative research questions examples business](https://programs.online.american.edu/sites/default/files/btm-amu-crest-logotype-blue.png)
![qualitative research questions examples business Academic Success Center](https://libapps.s3.amazonaws.com/customers/4266/images/NU_Logo_ASC_6-21-23_Faded.png)
Research Writing and Analysis
- NVivo Group and Study Sessions
- SPSS This link opens in a new window
- Statistical Analysis Group sessions
- Using Qualtrics
- Dissertation and Data Analysis Group Sessions
- Defense Schedule - Commons Calendar This link opens in a new window
- Research Process Flow Chart
- Research Alignment Chapter 1 This link opens in a new window
- Step 1: Seek Out Evidence
- Step 2: Explain
- Step 3: The Big Picture
- Step 4: Own It
- Step 5: Illustrate
- Annotated Bibliography
- Literature Review This link opens in a new window
- Systematic Reviews & Meta-Analyses
- How to Synthesize and Analyze
- Synthesis and Analysis Practice
- Synthesis and Analysis Group Sessions
- Problem Statement
- Purpose Statement
- Conceptual Framework
- Theoretical Framework
- Locating Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks This link opens in a new window
- Quantitative Research Questions
Qualitative Research Questions
- Trustworthiness of Qualitative Data
- Analysis and Coding Example- Qualitative Data
- Thematic Data Analysis in Qualitative Design
- Dissertation to Journal Article This link opens in a new window
- International Journal of Online Graduate Education (IJOGE) This link opens in a new window
- Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning (JRIT&L) This link opens in a new window
![qualitative research questions examples business Question Mark in Red circle](https://libapps.s3.amazonaws.com/customers/4266/images/question-mark-31190_1280.jpg)
What’s in a Qualitative Research Question?
Qualitative research questions are driven by the need for the study. Ideally, research questions are formulated as a result of the problem and purpose, which leads to the identification of the methodology. When a qualitative methodology is chosen, research questions should be exploratory and focused on the actual phenomenon under study.
From the Dissertation Center, Chapter 1: Research Question Overview , there are several considerations when forming a qualitative research question. Qualitative research questions should
Below is an example of a qualitative phenomenological design. Note the use of the term “lived experience” in the central research question. This aligns with phenomenological design.
RQ1: “ What are the lived experiences of followers of mid-level managers in the financial services sector regarding their well-being on the job?”
If the researcher wants to focus on aspects of the theory used to support the study or dive deeper into aspects of the central RQ, sub-questions might be used. The following sub-questions could be formulated to seek further insight:
RQ1a. “How do followers perceive the quality and adequacy of the leader-follower exchanges between themselves and their novice leaders?”
RQ1b. “Under what conditions do leader-member exchanges affect a follower’s own level of well-being?”
Qualitative research questions also display the desire to explore or describe phenomena. Qualitative research seeks the lived experience, the personal experiences, the understandings, the meanings, and the stories associated with the concepts present in our studies.
We want to ensure our research questions are answerable and that we are not making assumptions about our sample. View the questions below:
How do healthcare providers perceive income inequality when providing care to poor patients?
In Example A, we see that there is no specificity of location or geographic areas. This could lead to findings that are varied, and the researcher may not find a clear pattern. Additionally, the question implies the focus is on “income inequality” when the actual focus is on the provision of care. The term “poor patients” can also be offensive, and most providers will not want to seem insensitive and may perceive income inequality as a challenge (of course!).
How do primary care nurses in outreach clinics describe providing quality care to residents of low-income urban neighborhoods?
In Example B, we see that there is greater specificity in the type of care provider. There is also a shift in language so that the focus is on how the individuals describe what they think about, experience, and navigate providing quality care.
Other Qualitative Research Question Examples
Vague : What are the strategies used by healthcare personnel to assist injured patients?
Try this : What is the experience of emergency room personnel in treating patients with a self-inflicted household injury?
The first question is general and vague. While in the same topic area, the second question is more precise and gives the reader a specific target population and a focus on the phenomenon they would have experienced. This question could be in line with a phenomenological study as we are seeking their experience or a case study as the ER personnel are a bounded entity.
Unclear : How do students experience progressing to college?
Try this : How do first-generation community members describe the aspects of their culture that promote aspiration to postsecondary education?
The first question does not have a focus on what progress is or what students are the focus. The second question provides a specific target population and provides the description to be provided by the participants. This question could be in line with a descriptive study.
- << Previous: Quantitative Research Questions
- Next: Trustworthiness of Qualitative Data >>
- Last Updated: Jul 22, 2024 8:15 PM
- URL: https://resources.nu.edu/researchtools
![qualitative research questions examples business NCU Library Home](https://libapps.s3.amazonaws.com/customers/4266/images/NU_NCU_Nav_Library.png)
![Site Logo Study Site Homepage](https://study.sagepub.com/sites/all/themes/sage_companion/assets/images/Sage_logo.png)
- Request new password
- Create a new account
Completing Your Qualitative Dissertation: A Road Map from Beginning to End
Student resources, 101 qualitative dissertation questions.
These questions and answers correlate to pages in Completing Your Qualitative Dissertation: A Road Map from Beginning to End, Third Edition , which you have purchased.
As teachers of qualitative research and advisors of doctoral students, we have witnessed and experienced many of the frustrations of students confronted with the academic challenge of writing a dissertation. The questions below have been raised time and again in conversations with students and research colleagues. The intent of including these questions in the companion website for Completing Your Qualitative Dissertation: A Road Map From Beginning to End is that they will hopefully stimulate critical thinking, reflection, and dialogue, thereby motivating doctoral students or prospective doctoral students to seek and consult additional relevant texts and resources in order to delve deeper into the many issues raised. These questions might also be used to prompt discussion between doctoral students and their advisors.
One caveat in compiling this list of questions is to demystify the dissertation process but not to sacrifice intellectual rigor for the sake of simplification. Completing a qualitative dissertation indeed is a rigorous and demanding process, and understanding the process means grasping many complex and interrelated issues. As a second caveat, one must remember that while most institutions will approach the dissertation in common ways, at the same time there are differences in terms of the organization and presentation, as well as distinct differences in terms of what and how qualitative language and terminology are used. This book presents information as guidelines that are meant to be flexible per institutional expectations and requirements, and subject to modification depending on your institution, department, and program. As such, students should always consult with their advisors and committee members to ascertain specific or particular institutional or departmental requirements.
The questions and answers correspond to the book’s structure and are divided into eight parts:
Parts 1–2 cover conceptual information; that is, the thinking and planning aspects of the dissertation. Parts 3–6 cover the practical aspects involved in preparing to actually write the dissertation. Part 7 includes the detailed requirements related to each of the chapters that compose the dissertation. Part 8 provides the information that one needs regarding the various activities that occur after writing the dissertation.
- Part 1: Planning and Gearing Up
- Part 2: Choosing an Appropriate Qualitative Approach
- Part 3: Preparing and Writing the Proposal
Part 4: Conducting the Research: Data Collection
Part 5: conducting the research: data analysis, part 6: conducting the research: interpretation and synthesis.
- Part 7: Writing Up and Presenting the Research
Part 8: Planning for the Dissertation Defense and Beyond
Part 9: preparing for the defense, part 1: planning and gearing up.
1. How does qualitative research and quantitative research differ, and what are the defining features of qualitative research?
Rather than determine cause and effect, or predict or describe the distribution of an attribute among a population, qualitative researchers are interested in understanding how people interpret their experiences and how they construct their worlds. The two paradigms or orientations that inform qualitative research, namely Interpretivism and Critical Theory, place emphasis on seeking understanding of the meanings of human actions and experiences, and on generating accounts of meaning from the viewpoints of those involved. Both paradigms assume that reality is socially constructed and that there is no single observable reality, but rather multiple realities or interpretations. For more information regarding the key defining features of qualitative research, see pages 37–44; 53–55 .
2. What is implied by “rigor” in qualitative research, and what does it mean to conduct a “rigorous” qualitative study?
Sound research requires a systematic and rigorous approach to the design and implementation of the study, the collection and analysis of data, and the interpretation and reporting of findings. Central to the rigor of qualitative research is whether participants’ perspectives have been authentically represented in the research process, and whether the findings are coherent in the sense that they “fit” the data and social context from which they were derived. Because rigor is about being very transparent, evaluating the quality of qualitative research includes criteria that are concerned with good practice in the conduct of the research (methodological rigor), as well as criteria related to the trustworthiness of interpretations made (interpretive rigor). For more information regarding rigor vis-à-vis qualitative research, refer to pages 162–164; 240–242 .
3. Writing a qualitative dissertation is a long and iterative process. What exactly is this “process,” and what should a student expect?
Writing a dissertation is a process but not one that is neat and linear. This work is intellectually rigorous—requiring intensive thinking, preparation, and planning—and is very much a matter of having tenacity, perseverance, and patience. For most people, conducting research and writing a document such as this is a first-time endeavor, an undertaking for which there is little experience. For a broad overview of the qualitative dissertation process, see page 3 .
4. How does one manage data in the most efficient and practical manner throughout the dissertation process?
As you proceed with your research, you will begin to gather and accumulate a diverse array of material that has potential relevance. You certainly do not want to lose any of your material, nor do you want to drown in it. Organizing and managing dissertation-related “stuff” right from the beginning is essential to getting on track and staying focused. For more information regarding data management strategies, see pages 19–20; 65–66 .
5. How can I start thinking about planning my time and resources?
The ability to focus, problem-solve, and make informed decisions at every step of the way will bring your study to completion. Because the time commitment required is substantial, you will need to pace yourself from the beginning. For some practical strategies, suggestions, and tips, see pages 20–23.
6. What would be a realistic timeline in which to complete my dissertation, and how can I remain practical about this?
If you work on your dissertation only when you feel like it, the project will most likely never be completed. Scheduling your time allows you to develop a plan for writing, and also helps reduce the pressure associated with deadlines, as well as the tendency to procrastinate. Moreover, setting a schedule also helps integrate your writing into the rest of your life. There are some basic principles for developing an effective writing schedule, and these can be found on pages 35–36.
7. Journaling is said to be an integral aspect of the qualitative dissertation process. Why is this necessary? Aside from keeping track of information, you also need to keep track of your thinking. One way to ensure that you preserve your reasoning and thinking and are able to spell out the development of your ideas, is to keep a research journal. The rationale for recording your thinking is explained on page 23.
8. What is the actual starting point of any qualitative dissertation?
The starting point for any research project, and indeed the first major challenge in conducting research, involves identifying and developing a sound topic. How to go about selecting a worthy and researchable topic and considering potential options is described on page 24.
9. Does my selected topic need to be original or unique?
A dissertation should be an original piece of research and should make a significant contribution to the field. However, it is important to remember that making an original contribution does not imply that there need be an enormous “breakthrough.” In social science research, the discovery of new facts is rarely an important or even challenging criterion. Rather, research is a process of searching or re-searching for new insights; it is about advancing knowledge or understanding of a practice or phenomenon. More information on going about selecting a topic is provided on page 27.
10. Once I have decided on an area of interest, how do I go about developing and refining a researchable topic?
Once you have identified a general area of interest, you will need to begin narrowing your topic. The process of developing a researchable topic is a process of idea generation—the movement from a general interest “out there” toward a more clearly refined idea around a researchable problem. More about this “narrowing” process is discussed on pages 28–30.
Part 2: Choosing an Appropriate Qualitative Approach
11. What are the most common traditions or genres of qualitative research, and what are the key differences between them?
There are numerous qualitative traditions or genres, each of which has ways of defining a research topic, critically engaging the literature on that topic, identifying significant research problems, designing the study, and collecting, analyzing, and presenting the data so that it will be most relevant and meaningful. Understanding the logic behind a research approach allows your study to be appropriately positioned within an inquiry tradition and also lays the foundation for supporting your study’s findings. Pages 44–45 offer a descriptive and critical overview of some of the most current qualitative traditions.
12. What are the key characteristics of Case Study methodology, and how do I conduct a case study?
As a form of qualitative research methodology, case study is an intensive description and analysis of a bounded social phenomenon (or multiple bounded phenomena)—be this a social unit or a system such as a program, institution, process, event, or concept. Case study is at the same time both a methodology (a type of design in qualitative inquiry) and an object of study. Case study is an exploratory form of inquiry that affords significant interaction with research participants, providing an in-depth picture of the unit of study. More information can be found on pages 46–47.
13. What is Ethnography and how is an ethnographic study conducted?
Ethnography, as both a method and a product, has multiple intellectual traditions located in diverse disciplines. The researcher studies a cultural or social group in its natural setting, closely examining customs and ways of life, with the aim of describing and interpreting cultural patterns of behavior, values, and practices. Rooted in cultural anthropology, ethnography involves extended observations of the group, most often through the researcher as a participant observer becoming immersed in the day-to-day lives of the participants. More information can be found on pages 47–48.
14. What is Phenomenology, and what are the characteristics of a phenomenological study?
Phenomenology is both a philosophy and a method, the purpose of which is to investigate the meaning of the lived experience of people to identify the core essence of human experience or phenomena as described by research participants. Phenomenology does not endeavor to develop a theory to explain the world; rather, the aim is to facilitate deeper insight to help us maintain greater contact within the world. Phenomenologists focus on describing what all participants have in common, the basic purpose of research being to reduce individual experiences with a phenomenon to a description of the universal essence. More information can be found on pages 48–49.
15. What is Grounded Theory, and what does a grounded theory study look like?
The purpose of grounded theory is to inductively generate theory that is grounded in, or emerges from, the data. A core component of grounded theory is to move beyond description and to have the researcher generate or discover a theory that is “grounded” in data from the field—especially in actions, interactions, and social processes. Research involves multiple recurrent stages of data collection and the refinement of abstract categories of information. More information can be found on pages 49–50.
16. What is Narrative Inquiry, and how does one go about conducting this type of research?
Narrative research has many forms, incorporates a variety of practices and applications, and is rooted in different social disciplines. As a method, narrative research begins with the experiences as expressed in lived and told stories of individuals or cultures. In this form of research, the researcher studies the lives of one or more individuals through the telling of stories, including poetry, play, or performance. Paramount to all narrative work is the centrality of relationship in the research process and recognition of the sacredness of the stories that participants share and trust within the research environment. Uncertainty and tension guide the work, and rather than produce conclusive findings, the process is intended to offer understanding and meaning. More information can be found on pages 50–51.
17. What is Action Research, and what is an action research study?
Action research is a systematic orientation toward inquiry that seeks effective solutions to complex problems that people confront in their communities and organizations. Especially valuable to those involved in professional, organizational, and community research, action research focuses on specific situations that people encounter by engaging them in collaborative relationships and working on developing localized solutions. Action research, being about collaborative and democratic practices, makes it essentially political because it aims to influence processes of change. Action research is an intervention because it promotes actual change. More information can be found on pages 51–52.
18. What are Postmodernism, Poststructuralism, and Critical Theory Research?
In the past two decades, a critical turn has taken place in the social sciences, humanities, and applied fields, with scholars challenging the historical assumptions of neutrality in inquiry, asserting that all research is fundamentally political. It is increasingly argued that research involves issues of power and that traditionally conducted social science research has silenced, marginalized, and oppressed groups in society by making them the passive objects of inquiry. Postmodernism views the world as complex and reality as transitional. In recognition of the socially constructed nature of the world, meaning rather than knowledge is sought because knowledge is seen as constrained by the discourses that were developed to protect powerful interests. Poststructuralism, with its emphasis on language, forms a subset of postmodernism. More information on these genres can be found on pages 52–53.
19. With all the different options available, how do I go about choosing an appropriate qualitative research approach for my study?
The choice of research approach is directly tied to one’s research problem and purpose. A research problem should not be modified to fit a particular research approach; nor can you assume a particular qualitative approach regardless of your research problem. Having decided on a qualitative research approach, you will proceed to appropriately design your study within the framework of one of the traditions or genres of qualitative inquiry. Thus, the components of the design process (e.g., the theoretical framework, research purpose, and methods of data collection and data analysis) reflect the principles and features that characterize that tradition. More information can be found on pages 55–56.
Part 3: Preparing and Writing the Proposal
20. What exactly is the dissertation proposal, and what is its function and purpose?
The proposal is an integral and very distinct segment of the dissertation process. It is a well-thought-out written action plan that identifies a narrowly defined problem; a purpose that describes how the problem will be addressed; research questions that are tied to the purpose and, when answered, will shed light on the problem; a review of the literature and relevant research to determine what is already known about the topic; and data collection and data analysis methods. More information regarding the content and process of the dissertation proposal can be found on pages 61–62.
21. How do I go about developing my proposal, and what are the key components of a qualitative dissertation proposal?
As mentioned at the outset of this book, and as you will be reminded throughout, while most institutions approach the proposal and dissertation in common ways, at the same time there are differences in terms of the organization and presentation, and distinct differences in terms of what and how qualitative language and terminology are used. This book presents information as guidelines that are meant to be flexible per institutional expectations and requirements, and subject to modification depending on your institution, department, and program. You will no doubt have to attend carefully to the variations that reflect the expectations and requirements of your particular institution. More information pertaining to the core elements of a qualitative proposal (introduction, literature review, and methodology) can be found on pages 63–65.
22. What are some additional elements that I should be aware of when preparing my proposal?
In addition to the three key parts of the proposal (introduction, literature review, methodology), there are some other elements that you will need to address, and information regarding these elements can be found on pages 65–66.
23. What is an elevator speech?
You may have heard the term "elevator speech." This refers to your ability to clearly and concisely answer the question "what is your study about?" A few points about an elevator speech and its relationship vis-a-vis your proposal are presented on page 66.
24. The idea of a “literature review” really scares me! There seems to be so much that is required! How do I even begin to think about it?
Literature review is a distinct form of academic writing, a skill that doctoral candidates must master to demonstrate knowledge of the literature landscape that surrounds any given dissertation research problem. Right from the beginning, the literature review is an essential, integral, and ongoing part of the research process. Producing good reviews is a test of your ability to manage the relevant texts and materials, analytically interpret ideas, and integrate and synthesize ideas and data with existing knowledge. Guidelines and suggestions regarding undertaking, managing, and operationalizing literature reviews are provided on pages 105–108.
25. What are some of the most important guidelines regarding academic writing?
A dissertation demonstrates your ability to write a coherent volume of intellectually demanding work. It involves the combination of performing research and writing about your research to describe and explain it. As a researcher/writer, knowing how to best express your ideas in written form to convey them to the reader becomes an essential skill. The dissertation requires a high level of scholarly writing, and as such you will have to get into the mode of writing for a particular audience, that is, the academic community. Further information regarding academic writing requirements is presented on pages 66–68.
26. What are the general format and style requirements for a qualitative dissertation?
A research report must consistently follow a selected system for format and style. Format refers to the general pattern of organization and arrangement of the report. Style refers to appropriate writing conventions and includes rules of grammar, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation to be followed in preparing the report. Most colleges and universities require the use of a specific style—either their own or that in a published style manual. You will need to make inquiries regarding your particular department’s recommended style preference. Regardless of which style manual you use, you are expected to adhere to its rules meticulously. Further information regarding format and style is presented on pages 68–70.
27. What are some of the most important aspects of academic integrity, and what constitutes plagiarism?
The strength of your writing rests on your ability to refer to and incorporate the work of others. It is imperative, however, that you attribute recognition to all and any sources of information that you use. Integrity matters! There are few intellectual offenses more serious than plagiarism in academic and professional contexts. A charge of plagiarism can have severe consequences, including expulsion from a university or loss of a job, not to mention a writer’s loss of credibility and professional standing. Further information regarding academic integrity and strategies for avoiding plagiarism is presented on pages 71–73.
28. What is Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, and why is it necessary?
Any research designed to research human subjects, interact with human subjects, provide interventions for human subjects, obtain identifiable information about living subjects, or observe and record private behavior of human subjects, must come under the jurisdiction of the governing board of Institutional Research. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) have emerged in accredited academic institutions of higher education as bureaucratic entities responsible for the regulation, governance, and enforcement of significant research ethics. While there are some variations across disciplines and national boundaries, IRB approval is a stamp of credibility backed by a legitimate academic institution. This credibility is valuable both for the researcher and for the research participants. Further information regarding application for IRB approval is discussed on pages 74–75.
29. What are the differences between “methodology” and “research methods”?
Methodology determines how the researcher thinks about a study, how decisions about the study are made, and how researchers position themselves to engage firstly with participants and then with the data that are generated. The term methods commonly denote specific techniques, procedures, or tools used by the researcher to generate and analyze data. The methods that a qualitative researcher chooses are informed by both the research design and the research methodology so that there is a conceptual fit across all levels. More about methodology and methods, and the interrelationship between them, can be found on page 157 .
30. What is meant by “methodological congruence”?
As the researcher, you actively create the link among problem, purpose, and approach through a process of reflecting on problem and purpose, focusing on researchable questions and considering how to best address these questions. Thinking along these lines affords a research study “methodological congruence.” In essence, the position of the researcher is the bridge between philosophy, methodology, and the application of methods. Thus, the alignment between the research question, chosen methodology and personal philosophy, and the ability of the researcher to be reflexive in relation to the research is critical to ensure congruence in the study that will be manifested in the products of the research. More information regarding the notion of methodological congruence can be found on pages 153–154.
31. What are the most commonly used methods of data collection in qualitative research?
Based on the research questions, specific data collection methods are chosen to gather the required information in the most appropriate and meaningful way. A solid rationale for the choice of methods used is crucial, as this indicates methodological congruence, and illustrates that the choice of methods is grounded in the study’s overall research design. Details pertaining to some of the most commonly used methods of data collection (e.g., interviews, focus groups, observation, critical incidents, surveys, and document review) can be found on pages 154–157.
32. What is meant by “triangulation” of methods, and how important is this?
Triangulation enhances the quality of data from multiple sources (e.g., people, events) in multiple ways (e.g., interviews, observations, document review) with the idea that this will illuminate different facets of situations and experiences, and help portray them in their entirety and complexity. More about triangulation strategies and the significance thereof in qualitative research can be found on page 154.
33. What are some of the most important considerations when writing up the methods section?
To show that you have done a critical reading of the literature, and to acknowledge that data collection methods are not without some advantages, your discussion should be sufficiently detailed. More information pertaining to these necessary details is presented on page 158.
34. The idea of “researcher as instrument” is often portrayed as problematic. How do I best understand this phenomenon, and how can I go about defending this perspective to those who see qualitative research as limited and subjective?
“Researcher as instrument” raises important ethical, accountability, and social justice issues, including inter-subjectivity, power, positioning, and voice. Importantly, the reflexive researcher understands that all research is value-bound and that a reflective stance is therefore imperative; that is, reflexivity implies the explicit self-consciousness on the part of the researcher, including social, political, and value positions. Reflexivity is defined as the researcher’s conscious awareness of her or his cognitive and emotional filters comprising their experiences, world-views, and biases that may influence their interpretation of participants’ perceptions. More information on this key qualitative research issue can be found on pages 54–55; 242–243.
35. What is qualitative data analysis really all about?
Qualitative data analysis is the process of bringing order, structure, and meaning to the masses of data you have collected. Although there are stages dedicated to formal analysis, analysis is an inherent and ongoing part of the research and writing process. Many students become overwhelmed at this point of the dissertation process, having completed or still being immersed in data collection and faced with mounds and mounds of “stuff” and unsure about what needs to be done first. Indeed, there can be a really vast amount of data that need to be transcribed, organized, and reduced. More on qualitative data analysis can be found on pages 187–189.
36. What advice is there for student researchers to best prepare themselves for the huge task of data analysis?
The data generated by qualitative methods are voluminous, and the sheer quantity of raw data can indeed be quite daunting. The best piece of advice I can offer is that if data are to be thoroughly analyzed, they must be well organized . Attention to detail in managing data is important at every stage of the research process. This notion becomes all too clear when it is time to write up the research. Strategies regarding data management in preparation for data analysis are presented on pages 189–190.
37. What does it mean to develop an “analytic mindset”?
Qualitative research does not purport to be objective nor is this a goal of qualitative research. However, to be rigorous, qualitative research does strive to be transparent, and to openly and clearly document and communicate all decisions taken throughout the research process. This must become an integral part of your thinking and mindset. More about ways of maintaining transparency, and hence ensuring the rigor of your study, is discussed on pages 158–159; 188–189.
38. There are many different ways to go about doing qualitative data analysis. How do I decide on the best approach for my specific study?
Different qualitative research traditions or genres promote specific strategies for data analysis. Whatever approach you choose to use should be suited to the research tradition that you have adopted. In addition, the preference of your advisor and your department will of course need to be taken into consideration. Different analytic strategies are discussed on pages 190–193.
39. What are “codes,” and what are their role and function in the qualitative data analysis process?
Much is made about coding as a fundamental skill for qualitative analysis. Although there is really nothing that mysterious about it, the literature on data analysis and coding in particular is voluminous, and the vast amount of information can certainly be overwhelming. Details pertaining to codes and the overall coding process are provided on pages 197–199.
40. What is the procedure for coding data?
The reason you have spent so much time and energy talking to participants is to find out what their experience is and to endeavor to understand it from their perspective. You, as the researcher, will be exercising judgment as to what you think is significant in each interview transcript. Some passages may stand out because they are striking to you in some way. Others may stand out because they are contradictory and seem inconsistent with your conceptual framework. In this regard, you must be vigilant in not only seeking material that supports your own opinions but also remaining open to the unexpected. All of the aspects of coding your material are presented on pages 201–202.
41. What do you do once you have coded your data?
Once you have coded your material, you are ready to categorize your units of information. What is imperative is that your coding scheme and conceptual framework continue to remain flexible. All aspects of the process of assigning your codes to categories are presented on pages 202–204.
42. What is content analysis, and how does it differ from coding?
In traditional content analysis studies, counting the number of times a particular set of codes occurs is an important measure in assessing the frequency of items or phenomena. However, in the qualitative analysis process, frequency of occurrence is not necessarily an indicator of significance. The analytic approaches for most coding methods do not ask you to count; they ask you to ponder, speculate, assess, integrate, and synthesize. Qualitative analysis therefore goes way beyond simply counting . See pages 199–200 for further discussion on this distinction.
43. There is a lot of talk around computer software analysis programs? What types are available, and are these preferable than conducting a manual “old fashioned” analysis of my data?
If you choose to make use of computer aided software, then searching for the most appropriate program is important so that it directly supports and is usable in terms of your study’s research design and methodology. Information regarding the most common software currently in use, including benefits and limitations, is provided on pages 205–207.
44. How does “data analysis” differ from “interpretation of findings”?
By way of data analysis , you are forming a record of frequently occurring phenomena or patterns of behavior. Once you have established patterns, these patterns need to be explained. This is where interpretation of findings comes into play. Whereas the chapter of data analysis presents the findings of your research by organizing data from various sources into categories to produce a readable narrative, the purpose of the chapter dealing with interpretation of findings is to provide interpretative insights into your study’s findings. You now have an opportunity to communicate to others what you think your findings mean and integrate your findings with literature, research, and practice. More about this is discussed on pages 233–236.
45. What essentially is “interpretation” in qualitative research? How do I go about interpreting what I have found?
Qualitative research begins with questions, and its ultimate purpose is learning. To inform the questions, the researcher collects data . Data are like building blocks that, when grouped into patterns, become information , which in turn, when applied or used, becomes knowledge . The challenge of qualitative analysis lies in making sense of large amounts of data—reducing raw data, identifying what is significant, and constructing a framework for communicating the meaning of your findings. This is discussed on pages 240–243.
46. How and in what ways does analysis of findings differ among the various qualitative research traditions?
Analytical approaches are linked to particular forms of data collection and are underpinned by specific conceptual and philosophical traditions. These differences are discussed on page 238.
47. How and in what ways does interpretation of findings differ among the various qualitative research traditions?
Just as there are clear analytic distinctions among traditions or genres demanding that the researcher will have to think about data analysis in a particular way, so are interpretation and representation strategies specific to each tradition. These differences are discussed on page 241.
48. How do I prepare myself for analysis and interpretation?
You might ask yourself what the chapter on interpretation of findings is really all about and what it should constitute. Since findings are not to be taken at face value, how does one go about seeking the deeper meanings behind the findings? What is really involved? And how does one get started? How to begin thinking about your analysis and interpretation is presented on page 236.
49. How do I begin to go about analyzing and interpreting my findings?
You are most likely asking yourself what the chapter on analysis of findings is really all about and what it should constitute. How does one get started, and what is really involved? You may want to structure your thinking according to three interrelated activities: (a) Seeking significant patterns and themes among the findings, (b) making use of description and interpretation, and (c) providing some sort of synthesis or integration. More about these activities and how to go about “peeling back” the many layers in order to explain the meaning behind your findings is provided on pages 236–244.
50. What are the limitations of my credibility in the analytic and interpretive process? After all, I bring my own perspectives and experiences, and hence assumptions, subjectivity and biases!
Whereas in quantitative research the role of the researcher is detached with the aim of being as objective as possible, in qualitative research, the researcher is personally involved, believing that research is always value-bound. Factors that enhance the credibility of a qualitative study are discussed on page 244.
51. A lot is made about the notion of “synthesis.” What are the implications of synthesizing findings in qualitative research?
Qualitative research involves moving from a holistic perspective to individual parts (analysis) and then back to a holistic look at the data (synthesis). Whereas the findings chapter splits apart and separates out pieces and chunks of data to tell the “story of the research,” the analysis chapter is an attempt to reconstruct a holistic understanding of your study. Analysis is intended to ultimately depict an integrated picture. More details are presented on pages 243–244.
Part 7: Writing Up and Presenting the Research
You will notice that the questions in Part 7 below are organized around particular standard dissertation chapters. Please be aware that different institutions have different expectations and requirements with regard to the structure and flow of dissertation chapters. Students will need to consult with their advisors in this regard.
7.1 Introduction to the Study
52. What is the overall purpose of Chapter One (the study’s Introduction), and what are the key components of this chapter?
The first chapter of your dissertation is the most critical, and everything that follows hinges on how well this chapter is constructed. The introductory chapter therefore sets the stage for the study; it also makes a case for the significance of the problem, contextualizes the study, and provides an introduction to its basic components—most specifically, directing the reader to the research problem, research purpose, and research questions. This first chapter of the dissertation also forms part of the proposal. The various elements that comprise this chapter are discussed on pages 9–10; 85.
53. How do I move from identifying a research topic to developing and articulating a viable research problem?
The sooner you can begin to narrow your research interests (topic) and identify and develop a topical focus (research problem), the better. Beginning researchers often confuse a topic with a research problem. A topic refers to a general area of interest. A research problem is more specific; it seeks to understand some aspect of the general topic. More on how to begin narrowing down a research topic and developing a clear research problem is discussed on pages 86–88.
54. What is the research problem, and how does this inform the development of research purpose and research questions?
At the heart of a dissertation is the articulation of the research problem. This is the place where most committee members go first to understand and assess the merits of a proposal or a dissertation. More on the research problem and how it informs the research questions is discussed on pages 88–91.
55. How do I go about developing and honing my research problem statement?
The problem statement serves a foundational role in that it communicates what is the formal reason for engaging in the dissertation in the first place. The problem statement is the discrepancy between what we already know and what we want to know. The problem statement also illustrates why we care; that is, why your study should be conducted. More details about what constitute a viable problem statement, and how to go about assessing viability, is discussed on pages 87–89.
56. What is the purpose statement, and how do I articulate this?
Once you have identified your own narrowly defined topic and concise problem statement, you are ready to formulate your purpose statement. The purpose statement is the major objective or intent of the study ; it enables the reader to understand the central thrust of the research. More about the purpose statement and how to go about developing this is discussed on pages 88–90.
57. How do I develop and articulate effective and relevant research questions?
The research questions are directly tied to the research purpose. Answering the questions must accomplish the study’s purpose and contribute to shedding light on and addressing the problem. One must be able to trace all the ideas in the research questions back through the purpose statement to the problem statement; this underscores that you must ask relevant and effective questions. Details regarding how to craft research questions are included in pages 90–92.
58. What are some other additional elements that need to be included in the introductory chapter?
The first chapter of your dissertation (and of your proposal) introduces and describes the critical components that set in place a research study: problem, purpose, and research questions. In addition, there are some other associated elements or subsections. It should be noted that there may be some variations in required subheadings depending on individual programs and/or universities, and you should be sure to check for this. An outline of typical subheadings that compose Chapter One is presented on pages 92–94.
7.2 The Literature Review Chapter
59. What is the function and purpose of the literature review chapter in the qualitative dissertation?
The literature review is a sophisticated form of research in its own right that requires a great deal of research skill and insight. You are expected to identify appropriate topics or issues, justify why these are the appropriate choice for addressing the research problem, search for and retrieve the appropriate literature, analyze and critique the literature, create new understandings of the topic through synthesis, and develop a conceptual framework that will provide the underlying structure for your study. More on the function and purpose of the literature review chapter is presented on pages 104–105.
60. What is the scope of the literature review chapter in the dissertation? In other words, how extensive is the review meant to be?
The major purpose of reviewing the literature is to determine what has already been done that relates to your topic. This knowledge not only prevents you from unintentionally duplicating research that has already been conducted, but it also affords you the understanding and insight needed to situate your topic within an existing framework. Therefore, a thorough search and reading of related literature is, in a very real sense, part of your own academic development—part of becoming an “expert” in your chosen field of inquiry. Given all of this, you might be asking, “What is the scope of a literature review, and how extensive will this review need to be?” These questions are responded to on pages 105–108.
61. How do I start preparing for the literature review?
Thinking about the entire literature review may be overwhelming and intimidating. Instead of viewing it as one big whole, try to think of it as a series of steps—and steps within those steps—and prepare to tackle each topic one by one, setting small achievable goals within each topic area. The different stages of the literature review process, and all the key elements involved in digesting scholarly sources, are discussed on pages 108–118.
62. What is the idea of “synthesis” vis-à-vis the literature review? And how is synthesis different from summary?
Synthesis and summary are strategies that are used in reading, review, and research. Both are important skills or techniques in making sense of what one is reading, and each one plays an important role in the qualitative research process. However, they are very different activities. Each has a different purpose, process, and outcome. This is discussed on pages 121–122.
63. What should I know about and be aware of with regard web/online resources?
Although not always scholarly, the Internet will more than likely be your initial starting point for topic ideas and information. However, anyone anywhere can put information on the web, so any information from the Internet should be cited with caution. Remember that using the Internet to find academic information takes a lot of hard work to carefully evaluate and determine if a web resource is a reliable, authoritative, or even a scholarly information resource. Criteria for evaluating the credibility, accuracy, currency, and legitimacy of web resources are discussed on pages 113–114.
64. How do I present my literature review in the dissertation?
Qualitative researchers use existing literature to guide their studies in various ways depending on the type of study being conducted. There are also differences regarding the purpose and process for presenting the review of the literature with respect to each of the research traditions. Guidelines for presenting a literature review are discussed on pages 122–124.
65. So much is made of the conceptual framework. What is it, and how can I start thinking about this?
Graduate students often lack a clear understanding of the nature of the conceptual framework; what it is, its purpose, where it is derived from, how it is developed, how it is used, and what effect it has on research. Thus, they find themselves at a loss in the process of developing a conceptual framework. Moreover, oftentimes experienced researchers and advisors encounter challenges in guiding candidates as to what constitutes a rigorous and meaningful conceptual framework. As such, the structure and function of a conceptual framework continues to mystify and frustrate. More information on this is presented on pages 124–127.
66. What are the role, function, and application of the conceptual framework in the dissertation?
The conceptual framework plays a central role throughout the entire research process, and, most important, in the final analysis. A well-conceived conceptual framework is influenced by and at the same time influences the research process at all levels and at all stages. There are a set of distinct roles and functions of the conceptual framework in a qualitative dissertation, and these are discussed on pages 127–128.
67. What is the essential value of the dissertation’s conceptual framework? And are there any limitations associated with a conceptual framework?
The conceptual or theoretical framework strengthens your study in many ways, and there are also some caveats to be aware of. The value and limitations are explained on pages 128–130.
68. How do I go about developing and presenting my study’s conceptual framework? Does this have to be an elaborate diagram?
In acknowledging the conceptual framework as an integral element of the research process, as a qualitative researcher, you need to know how to develop and create a conceptual or theoretical framework and where to introduce this in the dissertation. The term is somewhat an abstract notion, conjuring up a “model” or “diagram” of some sort. Moreover, there is no uniform and consistent definition, and discussions in the literature around conceptual frameworks are not clear or precise. Strategies for developing the conceptual framework and ideas for presenting it in the dissertation are discussed on pages 130–132.
7.3 The Methodology Chapter
69. What is the purpose of the Methodology chapter?
The Methodology chapter of the dissertation presents the research design and the specific procedures used in conducting your study. In this chapter, you will show the reader that you understand the methodological implications of the choices you have made and, in particular, that you have thought carefully about the linkages between your study’s purpose and research questions, and the research approach and research methods that you have selected. More details regarding the purpose of this chapter are presented on pages 143–145.
70. What are the key components of the Methodology chapter?
The dissertation’s methodology chapter covers a lot of ground. In this chapter, you will document each step that you have taken in designing and conducting the study. This chapter situates the study within a particular methodological tradition and provides a detailed description of all aspects of the design and procedures of the study. While your headings and subheadings in this chapter are contingent on your particular university’s requirements, make sure your sections are in a logical sequence and what you write is comprehensive, clear, precise, and sufficiently detailed. An overview of the elements that would constitute a comprehensive and sound methodology chapter is presented on pages 11–12; 146–147.
71. What is the research sample, and how is this different from the research population?
The research sample is a subset of the population. Identifying your research sample, and the method you used to select that sample, provides the reader with some sense of the scope of your study. In addition, your study’s credibility relies on the quality of procedures you have used to select the research participants. Further information regarding qualitative research samples is provided on page 147.
72. How do I go about selecting my research sample, and how large does it need to be?
In qualitative research, selection of the research sample is purposeful . The logic of purposeful sampling lies in selecting information-rich cases, with the objective of yielding insight and understanding of the phenomenon under investigation. This method is in contrast to the random sampling procedures that characterize quantitative research, which is based on statistical probability theory. Further information regarding purposeful sampling and sample size is discussed on pages 148–149.
73. What kinds of information am I going to need from the research site and research sample?
Four areas of information are typically needed for most qualitative studies: contextual, perceptual, demographic, and theoretical. Additional details regarding the types of information needed, and how to go about collecting that information, are discussed on pages 149–151.
74. What is “research design,” and what are the implications of the choice of research design for my study?
Engaging in research involves choosing a study design that corresponds with your study’s problem, purpose, research questions, choice of site, and research sample. This calls to the fore the concept of methodological congruence, whereby all the study’s components are interconnected and interrelated so that the study itself is a cohesive whole rather than the sum of fragmented or isolated parts. You will also need to consider whether the design is a comfortable match with your worldview and your skills. How to go about developing the research design of your study and the criteria to take into consideration in doing so are presented on pages 151–152.
75. What are the key ethical considerations in conducting qualitative research?
In any research study, ethical issues relating to the protection of the participants are of vital concern. As researchers, we are morally bound to conduct our research in a manner that minimizes potential harm to those involved in the study. For the most part, issues of ethics focus on establishing safeguards that will protect the rights of participants and include informed consent, on protecting participants from harm, and on ensuring confidentiality. As a qualitative researcher, you need to remain attentive throughout your study to the researcher–participant relationship, which is determined by roles, status, and cultural norms. Central issues with regard to ethics in qualitative research are discussed on pages 161–162.
76. How do I best understand issues of “trustworthiness” or “legitimation” regarding qualitative research?
Qualitative research is based to a large degree on reflection and interpretation. The researcher as instrument brings her or his experience and perspective to the table. Qualitative research does not purport to be objective, nor is this a goal of qualitative research. However, to be rigorous, qualitative research does strive to be transparent and to openly, legitimately, and clearly document and communicate all decisions taken throughout the research process. Issues of trustworthiness in qualitative research (credibility, dependability, and confirmability) and how these compare with quantitative research criteria are discussed on pages 162–163.
77. How can I better understand conflicting reports about the generalizability of qualitative research?
Although generalizability is not the intended goal of qualitative research, what must be addressed is the issue of transferability ; that is, the ways in which your reader determines whether and to what extent some of the elements of your study can be used as a way to understand similar elements of another context. Exactly what transferability implies and how to account for transferability in your qualitative study are discussed on page 164.
78. What is meant by “limitations” and “delimitations” in a qualitative research study, and what is the difference between these two concepts?
Limitations of the study are the characteristics of design or methodology that expose the conditions that may weaken the study. Delimitations refer to the initial choices made about the broader, overall design of your study and are those characteristics that define and clarify the conceptual boundaries of your research . More about limitations and delimitations and how to account for these in your study is discussed on pages 164–166.
7.4. Analyzing Data and Reporting Findings
79. What constitutes the dissertation’s findings analysis chapter?
In this chapter, you present the analysis of your raw data, which are your findings. You have now moved beyond data to information . The challenge of qualitative analysis lies in making sense of large amounts of data, identifying what is significant, and constructing a framework for communicating the essence of what the data reveal. This chapter lays the foundation for the analysis, conclusions, and recommendations that will appear in subsequent chapters. Factors to take into consideration when preparing and writing this chapter, as well as a suggested outline, are provided on pages 13; 187–189.
80. What is the procedure involved in qualitative data analysis, and what is the role of the conceptual framework?
Data analysis demands a heightened awareness of the data and an open mind to recurring and common threads, some of which may be subtle. The process can be repetitious, tedious, and time consuming. While there is a somewhat systematic and stepwise procedure to prepare and analyze the data, the interrelationship among these steps is not necessarily linear. The phases involved in data analysis and the integral function of your conceptual framework are presented on pages 193–197.
81. How are research findings to be presented in a qualitative dissertation?
As the researcher, your goal is to tell a story that should be vivid and interesting, while also accurate and credible. In your report, the events, the people, and their words and actions are made explicit so that readers can experience the situation in a similar way to the researcher, as well as experience the world of the research participants.
Qualitative analysis is a creative and ongoing process that requires thoughtful judgments about what is significant and meaningful in the data. General guidelines for presenting this chapter are presented on pages 207–208.
82. What does this mean to present findings by way of quotation categories, and how do I go about doing this?
In qualitative research, interviewing is usually the major source of the data needed for understanding the phenomenon under study. The findings of qualitative research are typically reported in a narrative manner. Reports of qualitative studies usually include extensive samples of quotations from participants, and these provide the detail and substantiate the story that you are telling. An overwhelming question facing any researcher embarking on the write-up of the research report is, “Where do I begin to tell my story?” The various steps involved in this process are discussed on pages 208–212.
83. What is meant by thematic presentation of findings?
While the standard form of presenting quotes in qualitative research is to weave the quotes into your narrative, this is not the only form. Quotes can also be presented within charts, tables, or figures, with the overall goal to convey the story-line of your research according to the most predominant themes. More about this way of presenting findings can be found on pages 212–213.
7.5 Analysis and Interpretation of Findings
84. What is the role and function of the analysis and synthesis chapter?
The previous chapter of the dissertation involved the analysis of data to produce the study’s findings. Organizing, preparing, and presenting the findings of your research is a somewhat objective exercise; the researcher is, in this instance, a reporter of information. This chapter involves the analysis, interpretation, and synthesis of those findings . Both chapters involve analytic decisions, and these two chapters together should convince a reader that you, the researcher, are sufficiently knowledgeable about the interlocking analytic processes that constitute qualitative research. Further details pertaining to this chapter’s place in the dissertation are provided in pages 13–14; 233–236.
85. What does it mean to seek patterns and themes?
Qualitative analysis is essentially about searching for patterns and themes; that is, the trends that you see emerging from among your findings. Now again, when you are analyzing your findings, you look for themes once again—this time not in raw data but in the findings that have emerged. Bear in mind that analytical approaches are linked to particular forms of data collection and are underpinned by specific conceptual and philosophical traditions. Each tradition provides a perspective on reality that is specific to that tradition. More on this is discussed on pages 238–240.
86. Once I have established patterns and themes, how do I go on to describe and interpret my study’s findings?
A qualitative dissertation should not only provide sufficient description to allow the reader to understand the basis for an interpretation but also provide meaningful interpretation to allow the reader to appreciate the description. An interpretive reading of your data involves constructing a version of what you think the findings mean or represent or what you think you can infer from the findings . Interpretation, in effect, moves the whole analytic process to a higher level. Guidelines for interpreting your material are presented on pages 240–243.
7.6 Conclusions and Recommendations Chapter
87. Formulating the study’s conclusions and recommendations constitute the final chapter of the dissertation. What should I be aware of regarding this chapter?
The final chapter of the dissertation presents a set of concluding statements and recommendations. By way of the conclusions, the story of your research is wrapped up , bringing it to its logical finale. Recommendations are the application of those conclusions. Writing conclusions and providing recommendations will draw on your ability to be a critical and, at the same time, creative thinker. Characteristics of worthy conclusions and recommendations are presented on pages 15; 269–270.
88. How do I begin thinking about developing trustworthy conclusions?
When you were developing the study’s key findings, you engaged in critical thinking and reflection about all the potential deeper meanings behind these findings. As such, you were able to brainstorm a number of possible interpretations that explained your findings. In generating conclusions, you now need to go back to your findings and interpretations. A process to stimulate thinking about developing conclusions and making sure that your findings, interpretations, and conclusions are all aligned is presented on pages 270–271.
89. How do I write up my study’s conclusions?
As a general rule of thumb, you should provide at least one conclusion for each finding. However, the process is not altogether linear, and so it is possible that one conclusion can (but does not always) cut across more than one finding. It is important to bear in mind when thinking about and formulating each of your conclusions that they must be logically tied to one another . More about writing conclusions, as well as a tool for generating conclusions, is presented on pages 271–272.
90. How can I go about I developing actionable recommendations?
Recommendations follow your findings and conclusions. They are the application of those conclusions. A tool for generating the study’s recommendations is presented on pages 272–273.
91. How do I write up my recommendations?
You make recommendations based on your own experiences in conducting the research, as well as in any other professional capacity. Recommendations can have implications for policy and practice, as well as for further research. Further details pertaining to providing recommendations are presented on page 273.
92. Will I have an opportunity to reflect on my research and findings?
Most certainly! As you near the end of your study, you may want to pause and reflect on the long qualitative journey you have undertaken. You may include this reflection in the last chapter, following your conclusions and recommendations. Suggestions about this piece of the dissertation are provided on pages 273–274.
93. Why is alignment such an important component to consider, and why should this be revisited as I near completion of the dissertation?
You will have known throughout your research about the importance of alignment among the first three core critical elements: problem, purpose, and research questions. As you reach the final stages of writing your dissertation, it is crucial that you once again make certain that all the necessary elements that constitute your dissertation are aligned with one another. This will ensure that your study is tight and that you have taken an important step in ensuring methodological integrity ; this is extremely important for the defense when, among other things, the methodological integrity of your research is finely scrutinized. More about alignment is presented on pages 283–284.
94. How do I craft my study’s title?
The title of your dissertation should catch the readers’ attention while at the same time properly informing them of the main focus of your study. Crafting an effective title is an iterative and ongoing exercise. A title has many uses. Most important, it should accurately reflect your work. More details about the title are provided on pages 284–285.
95. How do I prepare an Abstract?
Writing a good abstract requires that you explain what you did and what you found in simple, direct language. The abstract needs to be dense with information but also readable, well organized, concise and specific, focused, and coherent. Abstracts can differ in terms of style and word count. It is suggested that you consult with your advisor, departmental regulations, and the relevant style manual regarding abstract requirements. More about the abstract is provided on pages 285–289.
96. What is the essential purpose of the dissertation defense?
The defense, in effect, moves your dissertation from the private domain into the arena of public discourse, providing you with some sense of closure. Actual procedures for conducting the meeting and the formalities involved are discussed on pages 302–303.
97. What is the process for selecting a defense committee?
Be aware that each university or college has a different system regarding dissertation committee structure and the process of preparing for that structure. Each institution has its own way of going about setting up the defense meeting, and it is recommended that you consult with your institution’s office of doctoral studies with regard to the correct procedures and protocol. Some general guidelines are provided on pages 300–301.
98. How can I best prepare myself for this milestone event, and what are some beneficial pre-defense strategies that I should know about?
Because this is the culminating aspect of a rigorous, traditional, and long-standing ritual, you are likely to approach the defense with some sense of anxiety. This is certainly understandable! Therefore, the more you can frame the defense as an opportunity to present your research publicly and the more you take a proactive position, the better the experience is likely to be. Guidelines toward this end are provided on pages 302–306.
99. Following the defense and all necessary revisions to my dissertation, what opportunities can I pursue regarding publishing my research?
The dissertation process comes to a definitive end when the final document is submitted and the doctoral degree is awarded. At this juncture, you might consider looking beyond the dissertation and think of how you can share what you have researched with a broader audience than the academic community. Publishing your findings is a way to contribute to the ongoing knowledge base and work toward advancing your professional career. Details regarding publishing your research are provided on pages 308–309.
100. Following the defense and all necessary revisions to my dissertation, what opportunities can I pursue regarding presenting my research?
In addition to publications, completion of the dissertation provides you with opportunities to present your study in other academic settings and research forums, such as graduate seminars and professional associations. Details regarding presenting your research are provided on page 310.
101. It is sometimes said that “the best dissertation is a DONE dissertation.” However, how does one actually evaluate the quality of a qualitative dissertation?
I have no doubt that you will ask yourself whether there are key criteria or pointers that can help you determine the quality of your work as you navigate this long and intense journey. The short answer to this question is yes! Once you have some idea of the core elements that are required for the various sections of your dissertation, an evaluation rubric is included for your convenience on pages 316–325 . Please be sure to use this rubric as a broad set of guidelines only in checking your work at different points along the way and in assessing or evaluating the quality of your work overall once completed. Hopefully this tool will be useful to you in determining where limitations may lie and where improvements can be made.
- Editor’s Pick
- Digital Marketing
- Sales Performance
- Service and Support
- Social Business
- Customer Journey
- Customer Loyalty
- Customer Strategy
- Omnichannel
- Personalization
- Voice of Customer
- Contact Center
- Customer Analytics
- Chief Customer Officer
- Employee Engagement
- Performance Metrics
- All Content
- Top Authors
- Top Authors by Topic
- Hall of Fame
- Author Directory
- Free CX E-Book
- Terms of Use
- Privacy Policy
- How to Contribute
![The Global Thought Leader in Customer-Centric Business CustomerThink](https://customerthink.com/wp-content/uploads/ct_logo9c.png)
Insights into Invaluable Qualitative Research Questions + 5 Examples
![qualitative research questions examples business Share on LinkedIn](https://customerthink.com/files2/images/LinkedinShare-icon.png)
Learn some of the key components of qualitative research questions + 5 examples
When we think about research questions, we think of two main types: qualitative and quantitative. Where quantitive questions measure data, metrics, numbers, the “what”, and the quantifiable aspects of our inquiry, qualitative data explore the “why” and “how” of the matter.
Examples of quantitative questions:
- How many people use the public restroom per day?
- What is the median income of a resident in X city?
Qualitative research helps answer questions about how people feel and what they think, rather than simply what they do. Qualitative research involves descriptors rather than numbers and seeks to understand human experiences through narrative, phenomenological, and ethnographical examination. Qualitative research is inductive, going from the specific to the general or in other words deeply exploring individual experiences to develop a greater understanding of the larger picture.
Examples of qualitative questions:
- What brought you to use the app?
- How did it feel using the new feature?
Qualitative research can help us gain detailed information about people’s experiences by “addressing questions beyond ‘what works’, towards ‘what works for whom when, how and why, and focusing on intervention improvement rather than accreditation 1 ,”
What Are The Qualitative Research Methods?
There are many options for conducting qualitative research. The following is a list of popular methods:
- One-on-one Interview
- Focus Groups
- Ethnographic research
- Record keeping
- Observations
- Case study research
- Phenomenology
- Grounded theory
- The Point of Curiosity
To begin crafting your research questions, consider what you want to know about the topic you’re studying. If you release a new feature on your app, for example, you may want to know how that feature is being experienced by your users.
The Overarching Question
It is essential to ask a guiding question that provides a focus for the study. From there, we can determine what kinds of data need to be collected.
Imagine you have several questions about how the users of your product feel about an update to the product. You want to know if they enjoyed the look of the new product, how they like the smell of it, and whether they prefer the old version or the new version. This can be boiled down to a single question.
What are the customers’ thoughts on the recent updates to our product? From the essential question, the parameters and objectives for the research emerge.
Framing Your Question
The theoretical framing of your question may need to shift as you collect data. Imagine the aforementioned product changes were reported to have been rolled out in a way that the customer had opinions about. The reaction they had to the implementation of the change becomes a factor to study, too. Therefore, rather than simply asking questions about the user experience of the updated product, you can include additional questions about the implementation that inquire how the customers reacted to the process of change as well as the change itself.
Ethics Matter
It is imperative for researchers to avoid causing harm whenever possible. Especially if you are working with marginalized populations, it is important to consider the impact of your inquiry. Attempt to formulate questions that avoid harm in to physical, emotional, and mental health. To learn more about this topic, check out the study 2 in our source list from the International Journal of Qualitative Studies In Education.
Crafting Your Questions
The questions you write should have the goal of:
Producing rich data
Being understandable to non-experts in your field Complementing the method of research. For example, in ethnographical research, questions will help you understand the culture of the study whereas, in phenomenological research, questions may be open-ended.
The Flow Of Questions
![qualitative research questions examples business Overarching question to driving questions to the theoretical framework to the relationship between question & framework](https://customerthink.com/wp-content/uploads/unnamed-file-3.png)
5 Sample Qualitative Research Questions
What is the user’s perception of the brand?
How do users interact with the product?
What are the user’s frustrations with the product?
Why do customers purchase our product?
How do people feel about the quality of your product when compared to competitors?
Now that we have explored what qualitative research questions are, the methods of research, why these research questions matter, how to write them, consider the following:
- It’s important be to inclusive of all relevant perspectives in your question writing.
- It’s important to create specific questions that will generate clear, data-rich answers.
- Write questions that reflect your research goals and perspectives.
- Write questions that encourage in-depth answers to get rich data.
***sources 1. Busetto, L., Wick, W. & Gumbinger, C. How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurol. Res. Pract. 2, 14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z 2. Jane Agee (2009) Developing qualitative research questions: a reflective process, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22:4, 431-447, DOI: 10.1080/09518390902736512. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09518390902736512
RELATED ARTICLES MORE FROM AUTHOR
![Bridging the Gap: Unveiling the Hidden Potential in Travel Loyalty Programs Who's Your Ideal Customer? (Photo by Alexas_Fotos on Pixabay)](https://customerthink.com/wp-content/uploads/frog-travelling-pixabay-897419_640.jpg)
Bridging the Gap: Unveiling the Hidden Potential in Travel Loyalty Programs
![Major XI Industry Challenge: The Confusion, Mistrust And Disappointment Over Metrics qualitative research questions examples business](https://customerthink.com/wp-content/uploads/analysis-2958826_1920-pixabay-analytics-1-218x150.jpg)
Major XI Industry Challenge: The Confusion, Mistrust And Disappointment Over Metrics
![How to Resolve Consumer Issues and Build Strong Brand Reputation qualitative research questions examples business](https://customerthink.com/wp-content/uploads/help-2478193_1280-pixabay-customer-service-1-218x150.jpg)
How to Resolve Consumer Issues and Build Strong Brand Reputation
Add your comment please use comments to add value to the discussion. maximum one link to an educational blog post or article. we will not publish brief comments like "good post," comments that mainly promote links, or comments with links to companies, products, or services..
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Notify me when new comments are added
6 Ways to Support Your Remote Customer Service Team
4 tips to better cater to your customers.
MarketPlace
Featured Listings
Summer Special for CCXP Certification Prep Boost your CX career! CCXP Exam Prep online course is now $99. Master all 5 CXPA pillars with our comprehensive, self-paced program. Enjoy 6 months of access to expert content, interactive activities, and practice tests. Don't miss this chance to become a certified CX professional. Enroll now and save $400!
Hooked On Customers: The Five Habits of Legendary Customer-Centric Companies CustomerThink founder and author Bob Thompson reveals the five organizational habits of successful customer-centric businesses.
![qualitative research questions examples business Examples of qualitative data.](https://images.ctfassets.net/dkgr2j75jrom/6dLXvoEeUxKnxjLtqcIvFk/ca9cd155dc6edafedd65f0e52e2d7ec0/fs-pillarpage-header-og__1_.jpg?w=3402&h=1787&fl=progressive&q=50&fm=jpg&bg=transparent)
What is qualitative data? How to understand, collect, and analyze it
A comprehensive guide to qualitative data, how it differs from quantitative data, and why it's a valuable tool for solving problems.
What is qualitative research?
Importance of qualitative data.
- Differences between qualitative and quantitative data
Characteristics of qualitative data
Types of qualitative data.
- Pros and cons
- Collection methods
Everything that’s done digitally—from surfing the web to conducting a transaction—creates a data trail. And data analysts are constantly exploring and examining that trail, trying to find out ways to use data to make better decisions.
Different types of data define more and more of our interactions online—one of the most common and well-known being qualitative data or data that can be expressed in descriptions and feelings.
This guide takes a deep look at what qualitative data is, what it can be used for, how it’s collected, and how it’s important to you.
Key takeaways:
Qualitative data gives insights into people's thoughts and feelings through detailed descriptions from interviews, observations, and visual materials.
The three main types of qualitative data are binary, nominal, and ordinal.
There are many different types of qualitative data, like data in research, work, and statistics.
Both qualitative and quantitative research are conducted through surveys and interviews, among other methods.
What is qualitative data?
Qualitative data is descriptive information that captures observable qualities and characteristics not quantifiable by numbers. It is collected from interviews, focus groups, observations, and documents offering insights into experiences, perceptions, and behaviors.
Qualitative data analysis cannot be counted or measured because it describes the data. It refers to the words or labels used to describe certain characteristics or traits.
This type of data answers the "why" or "how" behind the analysis . It’s often used to conduct open-ended studies, allowing those partaking to show their true feelings and actions without direction.
Think of qualitative data as the type of data you’d get if you were to ask someone why they did something—what was their reasoning?
Qualitative research not only helps to collect data, it also gives the researcher a chance to understand the trends and meanings of natural actions.
This type of data research focuses on the qualities of users—the actions behind the numbers. Qualitative research is the descriptive and subjective research that helps bring context to quantitative data.
It’s flexible and iterative. For example:
The music had a light tone that filled the kitchen.
Every blue button had white lettering, while the red buttons had yellow.
The little girl had red hair with a white hat.
Qualitative data is important in determining the frequency of traits or characteristics.
Understanding your data can help you understand your customers, users, or visitors better. And, when you understand your audience better, you can make them happier. First-party data , which is collected directly from your own audience, is especially valuable as it provides the most accurate and relevant insights for your specific needs.
Qualitative data helps the market researcher answer questions like what issues or problems they are facing, what motivates them, and what improvements can be made.
Examples of qualitative data
You’ve most likely used qualitative data today. This type of data is found in your everyday work and in statistics all over the web. Here are some examples of qualitative data in descriptions, research, work, and statistics.
Qualitative data in descriptions
Analysis of qualitative data requires descriptive context in order to support its theories and hypothesis. Here are some core examples of descriptive qualitative data:
The extremely short woman has curly hair and brilliant blue eyes.
A bright white light pierced the small dark space.
The plump fish jumped out of crystal-clear waters.
The fluffy brown dog jumped over the tall white fence.
A soft cloud floated by an otherwise bright blue sky.
Qualitative data in research
Qualitative data research methods allow analysts to use contextual information to create theories and models. These open- and closed-ended questions can be helpful to understand the reasoning behind motivations, frustrations, and actions —in any type of case.
Some examples of qualitative data collection in research:
What country do you work in?
What is your most recent job title?
How do you rank in the search engines?
How do you rate your purchase: good, bad, or exceptional?
Qualitative data at work
Professionals in various industries use qualitative observations in their work and research. Examples of this type of data in the workforce include:
A manager gives an employee constructive criticism on their skills. "Your efforts are solid and you understand the product knowledge well, just have patience."
A judge shares the verdict with the courtroom. "The man was found not guilty and is free to go."
A sales associate collects feedback from customers. "The customer said the check-out button did not work.”
A teacher gives feedback to their student. "I gave you an A on this project because of your dedication and commitment to the cause."
A digital marketer watches a session replay to get an understand of how users use their platform.
Qualitative data in statistics
Qualitative data can provide important statistics about any industry, any group of users, and any products. Here are some examples of qualitative data set collections in statistics:
The age, weight, and height of a group of body types to determine clothing size charts.
The origin, gender, and location for a census reading.
The name, title, and profession of people attending a conference to aid in follow-up emails.
Difference between qualitative and quantitative data
Qualitative and quantitative data are much different, but bring equal value to any data analysis. When it comes to understanding data research, there are different analysis methods, collection types and uses.
Here are the differences between qualitative and quantitative data :
Qualitative data is individualized, descriptive, and relating to emotions.
Quantitative data is countable, measurable and relating to numbers.
Qualitative data helps us understand why, or how something occurred behind certain behaviors .
Quantitative data helps us understand how many, how much, or how often something occurred.
Qualitative data is subjective and personalized.
Quantitative data is fixed and ubiquitous.
Qualitative research methods are conducted through observations or in-depth interviews.
Quantitative research methods are conducted through surveys and factual measuring.
Qualitative data is analyzed by grouping the data into classifications and topics.
Quantitative data is analyzed using statistical analysis.
Both provide a ton of value for any data collection and are key to truly understanding trending use cases and patterns in behavior . Dig deeper into quantitative data examples .
![qualitative research questions examples business Qualtitative vs quantitative examples](https://images.ctfassets.net/dkgr2j75jrom/6EkS63alrQ62cHmOClGQnZ/b96701f832d50d393f859d73225c2b57/PillarPage-Qual-Quan__1_-min.png?w=750&h=383&q=50&fm=png&bg=transparent)
The characteristics of qualitative data are vast. There are a few traits that stand out amongst other data that should be understood for successful data analysis.
Descriptive : describing or classifying in an objective and nonjudgmental way.
Detailed : to give an account in words with full particulars.
Open-ended : having no determined limit or boundary.
Non-numerical : not containing numbers.
Subjective : based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.
With qualitative data samples, these traits can help you understand the meaning behind the equation—or for lack of a better term, what’s behind the results.
As we narrow down the importance of qualitative data, you should understand that there are different data types. Data analysts often categorize qualitative data into three types:
1. Binary data
Binary data is numerically represented by a combination of zeros and ones. Binary data is the only category of data that can be directly understood and executed by a computer.
Data analysts use binary data to create statistical models that predict how often the study subject is likely to be positive or negative, up or down, right or wrong—based on a zero scale.
2. Nominal data
Nominal data , also referred to as “named, labeled data” or “nominal scaled data,” is any type of data used to label something without giving it a numerical value.
Data analysts use nominal data to determine statistically significant differences between sets of qualitative data.
For example, a multiple-choice test to profile participants’ skills in a study.
3. Ordinal data
Ordinal data is qualitative data categorized in a particular order or on a ranging scale. When researchers use ordinal data, the order of the qualitative information matters more than the difference between each category. Data analysts might use ordinal data when creating charts, while researchers might use it to classify groups, such as age, gender, or class.
For example, a Net Promoter Score ( NPS ) survey has results that are on a 0-10 satisfaction scale.
When should you use qualitative research?
One of the important things to learn about qualitative data is when to use it.
Qualitative data is used when you need to determine the particular trends of traits or characteristics or to form parameters for larger data sets to be observed. Qualitative data provides the means by which analysts can quantify the world around them.
You would use qualitative data to help answer questions like who your customers are, what issues or problems they’re facing, and where they need to focus their attention, so you can better solve those issues.
Qualitative data is widely used to understand language consumers speak—so apply it where necessary.
Pros and cons of qualitative data
Qualitative data is a detailed, deep understanding of a topic through observing and interviewing a sample of people. There are both benefits and drawbacks to this type of data.
Pros of qualitative data
Qualitative research is affordable and requires a small sample size.
Qualitative data provides a predictive element and provides specific insight into development.
Qualitative research focuses on the details of personal choice and uses these individual choices as workable data.
Qualitative research works to remove bias from its collected data by using an open-ended response process.
Qualitative data research provides useful content in any thematic analysis.
Cons of qualitative data
Qualitative data can be time-consuming to collect and can be difficult to scale out to a larger population.
Qualitative research creates subjective information points.
Qualitative research can involve significant levels of repetition and is often difficult to replicate.
Qualitative research relies on the knowledge of the researchers.
Qualitative research does not offer statistical analysis, for that, you have to turn to quantitative data.
Qualitative data collection methods
Here are the main approaches and collection methods of qualitative studies and data:
1. Interviews
Personal interviews are one of the most commonly used deductive data collection methods for qualitative research, because of its personal approach.
The interview may be informal and unstructured and is often conversational in nature. The interviewer or the researcher collects data directly from the interviewee one-to-one. Mostly the open-ended questions are asked spontaneously, with the interviewer allowing the flow of the interview to dictate the questions and answers.
The point of the interview is to obtain how the interviewee feels about the subject.
2. Focus groups
Focus groups are held in a discussion-style setting with 6 to 10 people. The moderator is assigned to monitor and dictate the discussion based on focus questions.
Depending on the qualitative data that is needed, the members of the group may have something in common. For example, a researcher conducting a study on dog sled runners understands dogs, sleds, and snow and would have sufficient knowledge of the subject matter.
3. Data records
Data doesn’t start with your collection, it has most likely been obtained in the past.
Using already existing reliable data and similar sources of information as the data source is a surefire way to obtain qualitative research. Much like going to a library, you can review books and other reference material to collect relevant data that can be used in the research.
For example, if you were to study the trends of dictionaries, you would want to know the past history of every dictionary made, starting with the very first one.
4. Observation
Observation is a longstanding qualitative data collection method, where the researcher simply observes behaviors in a participant's natural setting. They keep a keen eye on the participants and take down transcript notes to find out innate responses and reactions without prompting.
Typically observation is an inductive approach, which is used when a researcher has very little or no idea of the research phenomenon.
Other documentation methods, such as video recordings, audio recordings, and photo imagery, may be used to obtain qualitative data.
Further reading: Site observations through heatmaps
5. Case studies
Case studies are an intensive analysis of an individual person or community with a stress on developmental factors in relation to the environment.
In this method, data is gathered by an in-depth analysis and is used to understand both simple and complex subjects. The goal of a case study is to see how using a product or service has positively impacted the subject, showcasing a solution to a problem or the like.
6. Longitudinal studies
A longitudinal study is where people who share a single characteristic are studied over a period of time.
This data collection method is performed on the same subject repeatedly over an extended period. It is an observational research method that goes on for a few years and, in some cases, decades. The goal is to find correlations of subjects with common traits.
For example, medical researchers conduct longitudinal studies to ascertain the effects of a drug or the symptoms related.
Qualitative data analysis tools
And, as with anything—you aren’t able to be successful without the right tools. Here are a few qualitative data analysis tools to have in your toolbox:
MAXQDA —A qualitative and mixed-method data analysis software
Fullstory —A behavioral data and analysis platform
ATLAS.ti —A powerful qualitative data tool that offers AI-based functions
Quirkos —Qualitative data analysis software for the simple learner
Dedoose —A project management and analysis tool for collaboration and teamwork
Taguette —A free, open-source, data analysis and organization platform
MonkeyLearn —AI-powered, qualitative text analysis, and visualization tool
Qualtrics —Experience management software
Frequently asked questions about qualitative data
Is qualitative data subjective.
Yes, categorical data or qualitative data is information that cannot generally be proven. For instance, the statement “the chair is too small” depends on what it is used for and by whom it is being used.
Who uses qualitative data?
If you’re interested in the following, you should use qualitative data:
Understand emotional connections to your brand
Identify obstacles in any funnel, for example with session replay
Uncover confusion about your messaging
Locate product feature gaps
Improve usability of your website, app, or experience
Observe how people talk, think, and feel about your brand
Learn how an organization selects vendors and partners
What are the steps for qualitative data?
1. Transcribe your data : Once you’ve collected all the data, you need to transcribe it. The first step in analyzing your data is arranging it systematically. Arranging data means converting all the data into a text format.
2. Organize your data : Go back to your research objectives and organize the data based on the questions asked. Arrange your research objective in a table, so it appears visually clear. Avoid working with unorganized data, there will be no conclusive results obtained.
3. Categorize and assign the data : The coding process of qualitative data means categorizing and assigning variables, properties, and patterns. Coding is an important step in qualitative data analysis, as you can derive theories from relevant research findings. You can then begin to gain in-depth insight into the data that help make informed decisions.
4. Validate your data : Data validation is a recurring step that should be followed throughout the research process. There are two sides to validating data: the accuracy and reliability of your research methods, which is the extent to which the methods produce accurate data consistently.
5. Conclude the data analysis : Present your data in a report that shares the method used to conduct the research studies, the outcomes, and the projected hypothesis of your findings in any related areas.
Is qualitative data better than quantitative data?
One is not better than the other, rather they work cohesively to create a better overall data analysis experience. Understanding the importance of both qualitative and quantitative data is going to produce the best possible data content analysis outcome for any study.
Further reading : Qualitative vs. quantitative data — what's the difference?
Related posts
![qualitative research questions examples business qualitative research questions examples business](https://images.ctfassets.net/dkgr2j75jrom/7v84La3u0dOECMBAe2cbyN/c5b7a3622087007bd00ccdde4227e502/fs-blog-og-qualitative-data-examples.jpg?w=1500&h=785&fl=progressive&q=50&fm=jpg&bg=transparent)
Learn how to analyze qualitative data. We show examples of how to collect, organize, and analyze qualitative data to gain insights.
Here's how you can quantitatively analyze your qualitative digital experience data to unlock an entirely new workflow.
![qualitative research questions examples business A number sign](https://images.ctfassets.net/dkgr2j75jrom/5Uicrdu4I8S6Mj4QYBEILm/e13a28e963accd3e0cf9b82b3b4cb470/fs-blog-og-quantitative-data-examples-types.jpg?w=1500&h=785&fl=progressive&q=50&fm=jpg&bg=transparent)
Quantitative data is used for calculations or obtaining numerical results. Learn about the different types of quantitative data uses cases and more.
![qualitative research questions examples business A person next to a chart graph](https://images.ctfassets.net/dkgr2j75jrom/11ulSGu57FYHobpvrqzvfh/d9d2925f118200e943e71b8d766f1bf5/fs-blog-og-qualitative-vs-quantitative-data.jpg?w=1500&h=785&fl=progressive&q=50&fm=jpg&bg=transparent)
Qualitative and quantitative data differ on what they emphasize—qualitative focuses on meaning, and quantitative emphasizes statistical analysis.
![](http://sektorel.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
COMMENTS
Qualitative research questions help you understand consumer sentiment. They're strategically designed to show organizations how and why people feel the way they do about a brand, product, or service. It looks beyond the numbers and is one of the most telling types of market research a company can do. The UK Data Service describes this ...
25 examples of expertly crafted qualitative research questions. It's easy enough to cover the theory of writing a qualitative research question, but sometimes it's best if you can see the process in practice. In this section, we'll list 25 examples of B2B and B2C-related qualitative questions. Let's begin with five questions.
5. Ask something researchable. Big questions, questions about hypothetical events or questions that would require vastly more resources than you have access to are not useful starting points for qualitative studies. Qualitative words or subjective ideas that lack definition are also not helpful.
The first step in formulating qualitative research questions is to have a clear understanding of what you aim to discover or understand through your research. There are two types of qualitative questionnaires or research - Ontological and Epistemological. Finding out the nature of your research influences all aspects of your research design ...
Context: Within tourism and hospitality, this question explores the qualitative aspects of cultural experiences, focusing on tourists' perceptions and interpretations of authenticity in local culinary traditions. Media and Entertainment: Question: How do audiences engage with and interpret representations of diverse identities in streaming ...
Examples: Business/Management. Next, let's look at some examples of well-articulated research questions within the business and management realm. ... This example research question targets two clearly defined variables, which can be measured and analysed relatively easily. ... Ideal for a qualitative study, this research question explores a ...
The first question asks for a ready-made solution, and is not focused or researchable. The second question is a clearer comparative question, but note that it may not be practically feasible. For a smaller research project or thesis, it could be narrowed down further to focus on the effectiveness of drunk driving laws in just one or two countries.
Positivist research is commonly linked to quantitative research methods, whereas interpretive research is linked to qualitative research methods. Interpretivist answers the questions associated with credibility, conformability, transferability, and dependability, instead of the usual positivist criteria of reliability and generalizability ...
The research question helps to define the scope and focus of the study. It identifies the specific topic or issue that the researcher wants to investigate, and it sets the boundaries for the study. A research question can also help you determine if your study primarily contributes to theory or is more applied in nature.
In qualitative research, open-ended questions should be used to enable participants to offer thorough and in-depth responses. Avoid yes/no questions and queries with a one-word answer. Use words like "how," "what," "why," or "describe" instead to compel people to express their thoughts and experiences. LEARN ABOUT: Qualitative ...
Qualitative research methods. Each of the research approaches involve using one or more data collection methods.These are some of the most common qualitative methods: Observations: recording what you have seen, heard, or encountered in detailed field notes. Interviews: personally asking people questions in one-on-one conversations. Focus groups: asking questions and generating discussion among ...
Qualitative research is a behavioral research method that seeks to understand the undertones, motivations, and subjective interpretations inherent in human behavior. It involves gathering nonnumerical data, such as text, audio, and video, allowing you to explore nuances and patterns that quantitative data can't capture.
Types of Qualitative Research Questions - Examples. There are various types of qualitative research questions, each serving a distinct purpose. Here are some examples focused on customer experience and marketing: ... fostering stronger relationships and driving long-term business success. Ready to ask the right qualitative research questions?
Exploring 100 key questions (and answers) on the nature and practice of qualitative inquiry, this unique book addresses the practical decisions that researchers must make in their work, from the design of the study, through ethics approval, implementation, and writing.
The Questions Should Have a Clarity of Purpose. 3. Focus on One Single Phenomenon, Concept, or Idea. 4. Define the Sample and Setting. 5. The Question Has to Be Feasible. What Type of Questions to Ask for Qualitative Market Research - 5 Tips for Asking Effective Questions. Examples of Qualitative Research Questions for Market Research Interviews.
The article explains how established methods have been adapted and used to answer a range of qualitative research questions. The ... An illustrative example of critical research. ... In C. Cassell, A. L. Cunliffe, & G. Grandy (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative business and management research methods: History and traditions (pp. 33-53 ...
Qualitative research uncovers the details of human behavior, beliefs, and feelings. It gives us insights that numbers can't always tell. These research questions help us understand the "how" and "why" of things. In this article, we'll look at six examples of good qualitative questions. We aim to highlight how picking the right ...
reference and deconstruct a sample research question. The sample is derived from my dissertation that launched a significant portion of my research agenda through the ensuing decades. In this chapter, I dissect the sample question to reveal and brieflydefine the six parts of the Anatomy of a Qualitative Research Question. In the ensuing ...
Qualitative research is a broad term describing various research types that rely on asking open-ended questions. Qualitative research investigates "how" or "why" certain phenomena occur. ... Everyday examples of qualitative research include: ... suppose you own a business such as a grocery store (or any store) and believe it caters to a ...
Selecting your research topic and crafting a qualitative research question from it is the first, and possibly the hardest, step of qualitative research. You will likely start with a topic, and as you start reading and do exploratory research, hone that topic into a research question that can be answered using qualitative methods. I suggest that students start big and then narrow their topics ...
When a qualitative methodology is chosen, research questions should be exploratory and focused on the actual phenomenon under study. From the Dissertation Center, Chapter 1: Research Question Overview, there are several considerations when forming a qualitative research question. Qualitative research questions should . Below is an example of a ...
Ultimately, the choice depends on the research question. The research question dictates the appropriate qualitative approach, from which point the researcher knows the possible types of data that can be collected and how to analyze the data. We intend that Tables 2 and 3 demonstrate two things. First, there are many ways to approach a ...
These questions and answers correlate to pages in Completing Your Qualitative Dissertation: A Road Map from Beginning to End, Third Edition, which you have purchased.. As teachers of qualitative research and advisors of doctoral students, we have witnessed and experienced many of the frustrations of students confronted with the academic challenge of writing a dissertation.
Tweet. Learn some of the key components of qualitative research questions + 5 examples. When we think about research questions, we think of two main types: qualitative and quantitative. Where quantitive questions measure data, metrics, numbers, the "what", and the quantifiable aspects of our inquiry, qualitative data explore the "why ...
Qualitative data in research. Qualitative data research methods allow analysts to use contextual information to create theories and models. These open- and closed-ended questions can be helpful to understand the reasoning behind motivations, frustrations, and actions—in any type of case. Some examples of qualitative data collection in research: