Encyclopedia Britannica

  • History & Society
  • Science & Tech
  • Biographies
  • Animals & Nature
  • Geography & Travel
  • Arts & Culture
  • Games & Quizzes
  • On This Day
  • One Good Fact
  • New Articles
  • Lifestyles & Social Issues
  • Philosophy & Religion
  • Politics, Law & Government
  • World History
  • Health & Medicine
  • Browse Biographies
  • Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
  • Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
  • Environment
  • Fossils & Geologic Time
  • Entertainment & Pop Culture
  • Sports & Recreation
  • Visual Arts
  • Demystified
  • Image Galleries
  • Infographics
  • Top Questions
  • Britannica Kids
  • Saving Earth
  • Space Next 50
  • Student Center

Sons of Liberty

  • What was the American Revolution?
  • How did the American Revolution begin?
  • What were the major causes of the American Revolution?
  • Which countries fought on the side of the colonies during the American Revolution?
  • How was the American Revolution a civil war?

Iraqi Army Soldiers from the 9th Mechanized Division learning to operate and maintain M1A1 Abrams Main Battle Tanks at Besmaya Combat Training Center, Baghdad, Iraq, 2011. Military training. Iraq war. U.S. Army

Sons of Liberty

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

  • UShistory.org - The Sons of Liberty
  • Alpha History - The Sons of Liberty
  • Boston Tea Party Ships and Museum - Sons of Liberty
  • The Civil Affairs Association - Sons of Liberty: Case Study for Information Advantage in Resistance Movements
  • American Battlefield Trust - Who Were the Sons of Liberty?
  • Sons of Liberty - Children's Encyclopedia (Ages 8-11)
  • Sons of Liberty - Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up)

Sons of Liberty

Sons of Liberty , organization formed in the American colonies in the summer of 1765 to oppose the Stamp Act . The Sons of Liberty took their name from a speech given in the British Parliament by Isaac Barré (February 1765), in which he referred to the colonials who had opposed unjust British measures as the “sons of liberty.”

What was the Boston Tea Party?

The origins of the Sons of Liberty are unclear, but some of the organization’s roots can be traced to the Loyal Nine, a secretive Boston political organization whose members included Benjamin Edes and Samuel Adams . The Boston chapter of the Sons of Liberty often met under cover of darkness beneath the “Liberty Tree,” a stately elm tree in Hanover Square. The Sons of Liberty rallied support for colonial resistance through the use of petitions, assemblies, and propaganda , and they sometimes resorted to violence against British officials. Instrumental in preventing the enforcement of the Stamp Act, they remained an active pre-Revolutionary force against the crown .

American History Central

Sons of Liberty

August 1765–c. 1774

The Sons of Liberty was a radical organization in Colonial America created to carry out public demonstrations against British policies that forced Americans to pay taxes without representation in Parliament. Many men associated with the group are considered Founding Fathers of the United States.

Sons of Liberty, American Revolution, Facts, Significance, History, APUSH

Samuel Adams was associated with the Loyal Nine and the Sons of Liberty. The illustration includes a portrait of Adams ( MFA Boston ), Benjamin Franklin’s “Join or Die” political cartoon, and the flag used by the Sons of Liberty.

Who were the Sons of Liberty?

Sons of liberty summary.

The Sons of Liberty — also known as the Liberty Boys — was a radical group of American colonists in Colonial America that often met in secret in order to plan public protests against the policies of the British government. The first group was formed in Boston in 1765 and quickly spread throughout the colonies. The groups were responsible for organizing riots, vandalism of homes, and harassing government officials — including tarring and feathering. The most prominent groups were in Boston and New York, where they clashed with British authorities from 1765 to the opening of the American Revolutionary War. The Sons of Liberty were involved in the Stamp Act Riots, but their most famous acts were the Gaspee Affair and the Boston Tea Party . Over time, the group reduced violence and took a more political route to protest by forming Committees of Correspondence . Many men associated with the Sons of Liberty, including Samuel Adams, John Adams, Samuel Chase , Christopher Gadsden, John Hancock, Patrick Henry, and Benjamin Rush, are Founding Fathers who played key roles in the establishment of the independent United States of America.

sons of liberty essay

Sons of Liberty Facts

  • The Sons of Liberty also went by the name “Liberty Boys.”
  • The name “Sons of Liberty” came from a speech made in Parliament by Isaac Barré in 1765 in protest of the Stamp Act. During his speech, Barré referred to the royal governors in the colonies as “…men whose behavior on many occasions had caused the blood of those sons of liberty to recoil within them.”
  • The organization started in 1765 to carry out protests against the Stamp Act during the Stamp Act Crisis.
  • The members were mainly merchants, artisans, and laborers who believed the British government was violating their rights as Englishmen, as defined in the English Bill of Rights .
  • Early demonstrations were often violent, which led to criticism throughout the colonies. However, the groups turned to less volatile forms of protest against British colonial policy.
  • The Sons of Liberty spread their beliefs about British colonial policies through Committees of Correspondence, pamphlets, and newspapers.
  • The most famous acts of resistance carried out by the Sons of Liberty were the Stamp Act Riots, the Gaspee Affair, and the Boston Tea Party.
  • The Sons of Liberty were also involved in the Battle of Golden Hill in New York City in 1770 , which preceded the Boston Massacre.
  • By the time of the American Revolution, each colony had its own Sons of Liberty groups in towns and cities.
  • The Sons of Liberty ended around 1774 when the 13 Original Colonies started to form their own provincial governments.

Sons of Liberty History and Overview

Origin of the organization.

The origin of the Sons of Liberty is unclear, but the organization likely started in Boston and was followed closely by a second group operating in New York City. The groups formed after news reached America that the Stamp Act was passed by Parliament. The Boston group is believed to have grown out of smaller groups who merged together, starting with the “Loyal Nine.”

The members of the Loyal Nine were:

  • John Avery, a distiller
  • Henry Bass, a jeweler
  • Thomas Chase, a distiller
  • Stephen Cleverly, a brazier
  • Thomas Crafts Jr., a painter
  • Benjamin Edes, owner and printer of the Boston Gazette newspaper
  • Joseph Field, a ship captain
  • John Smith, a brazier
  • George Trott, a jeweler

Founding Father Samuel Adams is often referred to as a member of the Loyal Nine and the “founder” of the Sons of Liberty. While Adams no doubt was connected to the group through his cousin Henry Bass, he was not a core member of the Loyal Nine.

While the Loyal Nine and their associates, which included Adams, were responsible for planning demonstrations, they worked out deals with Boston gangs to carry them out. The prominent ones were the South End Gang, led by Ebenezer Mackintosh, and the North End Gang, led by Henry Swift. Members of the Loyal Nine and the South End Gang were involved in the First Boston Stamp Act Riot, which took place on August 14, 1765. Over time, the Boston leaders of the Sons of Liberty included prominent figures of the American Revolution, including:

  • Samuel Adams
  • Paul Revere
  • John Hancock
  • Joseph Warren
  • James Otis, Jr.

In New York, the leaders included Hercules Mulligan, Alexander McDougall , Marinus Willett, John Lamb, and Isaac Sears. It is believed Mulligan, an Irish immigrant, and prominent merchant, was responsible for starting the New York Sons of Liberty and invited the others to join him. 

General Alexander McDougall, Illustration

Origin of the Name “Sons of Liberty”

Following the passage of the Sugar Act and Currency Act , British Prime Minister George Grenville started working on the Stamp Act. The bill was drafted by Thomas Whately, and both Whately and Grenville discussed it with some of the agents for the colonies, including Benjamin Franklin , Jarod Ingersoll of Connecticut, and William Knox of Georgia. Despite objections to the act, the agents were unable to present an alternative, so Grenville moved ahead and introduced it to the House of Commons on February 6, 1765 . 

During that session, Isaac Barré gave a speech, criticizing the Stamp Act and referring to the Royal Governors in the colonies as “men whose behavior on many occasions had caused the blood of those sons of liberty to recoil within them.” Despite Barré’s protest, the bill passed both Houses of Parliament. It received Royal Assent on March 22 and was scheduled to take effect on November 1, 1765.

By August, after the First Boston Stamp Act Riot, Samuel Adams wrote an article that appeared in Benjamin Edes’ Boston Gazette. Adams used the name and said:

“The Sons of Liberty on the 14th of August 1765, a Day which ought to be for ever remembered in America, animated with a zeal for their country then upon the brink of destruction, and resolved, at once to save her…”

Members from Different Social Classes

Membership was made up of men from all walks of life, but was largely controlled by the upper class — merchants, politicians, and clergy. However, they created connections with the working class and lower classes — often people who were willing to cause trouble. Over time, some members identified themselves by wearing medallions around their necks. The medallions were stamped with a figure grasping a pole on one side, with the words Sons of Liberty, and a Liberty Tree on the other.

Meeting Places, Liberty Trees, and Liberty Poles

The Sons of Liberty often met indoors, where meetings could be conducted in secret. In Boston, the members were known to meet at Edes print shop or a room at the Green Dragon Tavern. In New York, they were known to meet at Fraunces Tavern. 

As their reputation grew, so did their boldness. The Sons of Liberty in Boston eventually held their meetings in public, under the “Tree of Liberty” that stood at the corner of Washington Street and Essex Street. At the time, the tree was referred to as the Tree of Liberty but is more commonly referred to as simply the “Liberty Tree” today. The Boston Liberty Tree was an old elm tree, estimated to be at least 120 years old.

After the Stamp Act was repealed, Liberty Poles were erected to celebrate the end of the Stamp Act Crisis. Over time, the Liberty Poles became targets of British soldiers and Loyalists, especially in New York City, where an ongoing dispute over the Liberty Pole led to the Battle of Golden Hill in January 1770.

sons of liberty essay

The Sons of Liberty and the Stamp Act

After the French and Indian War , Parliament looked for ways to reduce the debt incurred by the war and to have the American colonies pay for part of the ongoing defense of the frontier from the French and their Native American Indian allies that lived throughout the Ohio Country. This led Parliament to develop and implement legislation that levied taxes on the colonies. The first act that eliminated Salutary Neglect and enforced the collection of taxes was the Sugar Act . It was quickly followed by the Stamp Act in 1765, which led to the rallying cry of “no taxation without representation.” 

The first Sons of Liberty groups were organized to protest the Stamp Act and the name was derived from Barré’s speech when he referred to the royal governors in the colonies as “men whose behavior on many occasions had caused the blood of those sons of liberty to recoil within them.”

The Sons of Liberty started to form, first in the Province of Massachusetts Bay and then in the Province of New York, as groups of like-minded people, who were opposed to what they felt were oppressive British policies, started to band together. The organization of the groups was informal and their meetings were held in secret. They were usually controlled by business owners, lawyers, teachers, and other men who had a good education, and those men used propaganda to stir up the less-educated members of their communities.

The groups organized boycotts against the Stamp Act and coordinated their actions. In 1765, from August through December, they carried out the harassment of tax collectors and government officials who were supposed to enforce the act. The harassment often turned physical and violent, as they were known to tar and feather people they disagreed with and vandalize property.

Stamp Act, Tarring and Feathering a Stamp Agent

As the Stamp Act Crisis intensified in 1765, more groups appeared and were usually based around large cities and ports, such as Baltimore, Philadelphia, and Charleston. They included prominent men such as:

  • Israel Putnam and Benedict Arnold in Connecticut.
  • Benjamin Rush , Charles Thomson, and William Bradford in Pennsylvania.
  • Christopher Gadsden in South Carolina.
  • Patrick Henry in Virginia.

Despite the violence, the groups were also instrumental in passing resolutions in protest of the Stamp Act. The most famous of those resolves was Patrick Henry’s Virginia Resolves .

The groups were also involved in setting up a meeting to discuss a unified colonial response to the Stamp Act. Nine of the American colonies responded by sending delegates to participate in the Stamp Act Congress , which was held in New York City in October 1765.

Ultimately, the unrest in America, along with protests from British merchants, forced Parliament to repeal the Stamp Act in March 1766. Parliament hoped the repeal would put an end to the groups and their meddling in government affairs, but it was wrong. Instead, the movement grew in both numbers and political strength, as members were elected to colonial legislatures. Their public demonstrations started to move more towards theatrics, such as the burning of officials in effigy, and the groups communicated with each other through Committees of Correspondence.

Patrick Henry, Founding Father, Illustration

The Sons of Liberty and Organized Violence

The Sons of Liberty expressed their displeasure with the Stamp Act and, later, the Tea Act by distributing correspondence within the colonies and through numerous publications. The groups also sponsored public demonstrations, which sometimes turned violent. The radical nature of these demonstrations was instrumental in polarizing relations between Britain and the colonies, and the Sons of Liberty stood firm on the idea that the people should govern themselves. Despite their intentions, the group was largely seen as a violent, lawless mob. Some of the prominent events involving the Sons of Liberty were:

First Boston Stamp Act Riot

On August 14, 1765, a violent demonstration took place in Boston. Andrew Oliver, the Stamp Agent for the district, was burned in effigy and his office was attacked. Oliver was forced to resign from his position by reading a letter in front of a mob.

Second Boston Stamp Act Riot

On August 26, another riot took place in Boston. This time the angry mob attacked the homes of William Story, deputy register of the Vice-Admiralty Court, and Benjamin Hallowell, comptroller of customs. Then the mob moved on to the home of Lieutenant Governor Thomas Hutchinson , where they ransacked the house, did considerable damage, and stole money. Hutchinson and his family were able to escape from the house before the mob attacked.

New York Stamp Act Riot

On October 31, New York merchants met and agreed to stop buying and selling British goods until the Stamp Act was repealed. The day the Stamp Act went into effect, a riot took place in New York. It is referred to as the “General Terror of November 1–4.” Cadwallader Colden, the acting Governor of New York, took refuge in Fort George, which was attacked by an angry mob. Colden was forced to turn the stamped paper over to city officials.

The Liberty Affair

After the Stamp Act was repealed, Parliament still levied taxes on the colonies. Over the course of a year, the Townshend Acts were passed that established new taxes and regulations in the colonies. Anger over the Townshend Acts led to various acts of resistance. In Boston, John Hancock refused to allow customs officials to inspect one of his ships. The incident, known as the Liberty Affair, led to a riot and personal attacks on customs officials. Britain responded by sending troops to occupy Boston.

John Hancock, Portrait, Copley

The Battle of the Liberty Poles

After the Stamp Act was repealed , the people of New York held a celebration on June 4, 1766 — King George III’s birthday — to celebrate. The people were joined by British officials and military officers for the celebration. The Sons of Liberty erected a pole, which had a flag on top with the words, “The King, Pitt, and Liberty.” The pole became known as New York City’s Liberty Pole, and the location upset the soldiers who lived in nearby barracks. Over the next four years, the pole would be cut down — or blown up — several times by the soldiers. Each time, the Sons of Liberty would put up a new one. The continuous back and forth over the Liberty Pole raised tensions between the soldiers and people, which contributed to the violent fighting that took place in January 1770.

The Battle of Golden Hill

The Battle of Golden Hill was a street fight between the New York Sons of Liberty and British troops stationed in the city. In December 1769, the New York Assembly agreed to a scheme devised by Cadwallader Colden which the Sons of Liberty believed was intended to raise money to help support British troops. The Sons of Liberty protested publicly, and Alexander McDougall published a pamphlet that criticized raising money for the troops. British troops cut down the Liberty Pole and posted their own handbill around the city. On January 19, the Sons of Liberty grabbed two soldiers and tried to have them arrested, which led to fighting that spilled over into the next day.

Battle of Golden Hill, Painting, Lefferts

The Gaspee Affair

The Gaspee Affair was a dispute between British officials and colonial officials over how to handle the Gaspee Incident. The incident took place from June 9–10, 1772, and included Rhode Islanders — primarily members of the Providence Sons of Liberty — attacking the British schooner HMS Gaspee , shooting a British naval officer, and destroying the ship by setting it on fire. In the aftermath, British officials investigating the incident wanted to arrest the men responsible and take them to Britain to stand trial. Americans were outraged and believed the right to a fair trial would be violated. Great Britain’s response to the Gaspee Affair led Virginia to call for the colonies to establish a permanent network of Committees of Correspondence.

The Boston Tea Party

The Boston Tea Party was a political protest that took place on the night of December 16, 1773, at Griffin’s Wharf in Boston, Massachusetts. A mob of colonists, which had been organized by the Sons of Liberty, boarded three ships that were carrying tea owned by the British East India Company . They smashed open more than 300 chests of tea and then dumped the tea into Boston Harbor. Parliament responded to the incident by passing the Intolerable Acts , which were a direct cause of the American Revolutionary War.

The Sons of Liberty and Organized Political Resistance

In 1772, the first permanent Committee of Correspondence was organized in Boston by Samuel Adams . Many of the members of the Boston Committee were also members of the Sons of Liberty. The purpose of the committee was to write and send circular letters to the towns in Massachusetts and to the other colonies. In Virginia, Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry led the push to set up a committee for their colony. Other colonies did the same, and members of the Sons of Liberty were usually involved.

When the Massachusetts Assembly was dissolved as part of the Massachusetts Government Act in 1774, the members of the assembly eventually set up the Massachusetts Provincial Congress. This served as the government of the colony after the war broke out on April 19, 1775.

Small committees, known as Committees of Safety, were set up to manage and plan the defenses of the towns in the event war broke out. The Boston committee played a key role on the night of April 18, when Governor Thomas Gage sent troops to Concord to seize weapons and ammunition that were being stored there by American militia forces.

John Lamb Speaking to New York Sons of Liberty

End of the Sons of Liberty

After the Coercive Acts — or the Intolerable Acts — were passed in 1774, most of the colonies joined together to work in unison to deal with British policy. Building on the concept of the Stamp Act Congress, twelve of the thirteen colonies met in Philadelphia in September 1774 in the First Continental Congress . From then on, the popularity of the Sons of Liberty diminished, as its members became involved in more legitimate means, namely provincial governments like the Massachusetts Provincial Congress and local committees.

Sons of Liberty Significance

The Sons of Liberty is important to the history of the United States because it was an effective — although often violent — group that successfully coordinated efforts to resist the policies of the British government. Many members of the Sons of Liberty went on to serve on Committees of Correspondence, participate in the Provincial Congresses, and the Continental Congress, and became Founding Fathers.

Sons of Liberty APUSH

Use the following links and videos to study the Sons of Liberty, Colonial America, and the American Revolution for the AP US History Exam. Also, be sure to look at our Guide to the AP US History Exam .

Sons of Liberty APUSH Definition

The Sons of Liberty was an organization formed by American colonists in the early years of the American Revolution. The group used acts of civil disobedience and violence to protest British Taxation Without Representation and to push for independence. The group was active from 1765 until the beginning of the American Revolutionary War. Many men associated with the group were involved in the establishment of the United States as an independent nation.

American History Central Resources and Related Topics

  • Colonial America Guide
  • Sugar Act — History and Overview
  • Sugar Act — Facts and Statistics
  • Stamp Act — History and Overview
  • Stamp Act — Facts and Statistics
  • Townshend Acts
  • Gaspee Affair
  • Boston Tea Party — History and Overview
  • Boston Tea Party — Facts and Statistics
  • Intolerable Acts

The Sons of Liberty Video — The Daily Bellringer

This video from the Daily Bellringer provides an overview of the Sons of Liberty.

  • Written by Randal Rust

sons of liberty essay

American Revolution

The sons of liberty.

In folklore, the Sons of Liberty were organised, coordinated colonial groups that took radical action against unpopular British policies from 1765 onwards. The reality is that ‘Sons of Liberty’ was an umbrella term that described a range of individuals and groups who opposed British policy and actions. This included groups like the Boston Loyal Nine and the various Committees of Correspondence and Safety. Whatever their membership and focus, the Sons of Liberty became seed groups for revolutionary thought and action.

Organised colonial resistance

Between 1765 and 1775, there were hundreds of colonial groups engaged in protesting or resisting British policy. Because their grievances varied from place to place, they tended to be local, based in a particular city, town or county.

The membership of these groups could range from just a handful of people to a few hundred. They could form in several ways: from informal gatherings in taverns, churches or community events, as offshoots of town meetings or assemblies, from discussions between likeminded political and business interests.

The origin of the name ‘Sons of Liberty’ is well documented. It comes from a speech delivered by Isaac Barré , an Irish-born British member of parliament who was sympathetic to colonial protests against British taxation. In February 1765, during parliamentary debates on the future Stamp Act , Barré famously rose and said of the American colonists:

“They grew by your [Parliament’s] neglect of them. As soon as you began to care about them, that care was exercised in sending persons to rule over them, in one department and another… to misrepresent their actions and to prey upon them; men whose behavior on many occasions has caused the blood of those Sons of Liberty to recoil within them.”

Boston groups

Different groups could be found across the colonies but Boston was the wellspring for active Sons of Liberty chapters. The Massachusetts capital contained several bands of dissidents who carried the name at one time or another.

Some of the first militant groups in Boston was dominated by the affluent classes. The Boston Caucus Club had actually been established almost 50 years before the Stamp Act. Dominated by businessmen, the Boston Caucus became a significant political force, often agitating against British policy or decisions of the royal governor. Its membership included Samuel Adams and Paul Revere .

Another group that formed after the passage of the Stamp Act was the Loyal Nine. This group was comprised of rowdier working-class elements led by a local cobbler, Ebenezer Mackintosh. They were actively encouraged and likely sponsored by affluent businessmen like John Hancock – men happy to see riotous action against British officials but unwilling to be directly associated with it.

From this seed groups emerged dozens of similar gangs, cooked up in Boston taverns during the summer of 1765. Some of their members joined with genuine political grievances while some were just spoiling for a fight with unpopular British officials or soldiers.

Involvement in violence

These groups that emerged in 1765 were responsible for everything from inciting boycotts, posting handbills and writing broadsides, through to intimidation of officials and Loyalists, mobbish behaviour and acts of destruction and violence.

In the summer of 1765, members of the Loyal Nine, along with other Sons of Liberty groups, began meeting around a large elm tree on Boston Common. On August 14th, the group produced an effigy of Andrew Oliver, the local official commissioned to implement the Stamp Act, and hanged it from the branches. A smaller group then attacked his house and offices, prompting a worried Oliver to resign his commission.

Two weeks later, a mob reassembled and set upon Oliver’s brother-in-law Thomas Hutchinson , the Massachusetts lieutenant-governor. Hutchinson had, in fact, opposed the Sugar Act and Stamp Act but as a Loyalist conservative, he had committed to uphold them. The gang invaded Hutchinson’s home, looting anything of value and destroying much else. Hutchinson and his family narrowly escaped and were later compensated by the local assembly.

The threats, intimidation and violence carried out by these groups worked. Within a few weeks, every individual appointed as an agent to distribute tax stamps in the colonies had resigned, making the Stamp Act impossible to implement.

Task-specific groups

Satisfied for now, the mob violence in Boston dissipated and working-class protestors returned to their jobs. Various Sons of Liberty groups continued to meet but they evolved into more organised, task-specific committees. They still aimed to reverse British policy but to do so through more conventional means.

The passing of the Townshend duties in 1767 led to the formation of various non-importation associations. These Sons of Liberty groups worked to convince their fellow colonists to boycott imported goods containing a British tax. They were also not averse to using intimidation against customs officials, importers who dealt in taxed goods or local merchants who sold them.

Other form of group that emerged in 1772 were Committees of Correspondence. The intention of these groups was to organise and promote opposition, chiefly by circulating criticism of British policy and encouraging others to join protests against it. Samuel Adams was a key figure in the Massachusetts Committees of Correspondence, while Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry were influential in Virginia.

When armed conflict became imminent in early 1775, a new form of committee emerged called Committees of Safety. These groups were less concerned about protest and more with mobilising the colonies for a future war. Among their activities were organising militias, gathering or seizing essential supplies, and reporting on British military activities, such as troop movements.

Groups outside Boston

Sons of Liberty groups were not confined to the Massachusetts capital. A sizeable group formed in New York in early 1765. Like the Boston chapter, they met secretly but focused on organisation and propaganda more than mob action. The New York group played an important role in organising and hosting the Stamp Act Congress.

Boston-style riots erupted in New York shortly before the stamp tax was due to go into effect. On the evening of October 31st, a mob of several hundred conducted a symbol funeral for ‘Liberty’. In the days that followed, they burned effigies of George Grenville and local Loyalists.

In Charleston, local politician Christopher Gadsden returned from the Stamp Act Congress dissatisfied and established a Sons of Liberty group there. South Carolina’s Sons of Liberty were particularly active in the autumn of 1765, hanging effigies of local stamp agents and intimidating merchants. In New Jersey, Sons of Liberty members set alight an effigy of the Loyalist speaker.

Sons of Liberty groups also existed in Virginia and Maryland but chiefly among the political classes rather than as popular movements.

Symbols and slogans

Individuals in the Sons of Liberty, such as Paul Revere, were also responsible for producing and distributing anti-British propaganda. In doing so, they used several symbols, slogans and tropes.

The large elm on Boston Common, mentioned above as a rallying point for assemblies, became an important symbol for the Sons of Liberty. During the frenetic activity of 1765, the group often erected a liberty pole, while some revolutionary propaganda also features a red Phrygian bonnet or ‘liberty cap’. Both symbols have their origin in the liberation of slaves in ancient Rome.

Various Sons of Liberty groups also adopted flags. In 1767, the Boston chapter unfurled a banner dubbed the ‘Rebellious Stripes’. It contained nine red and white stripes, one for each of the colonies that attended the Stamp Act Congress in October 1765. A similar flag containing 13 stripes, one for every colony, was also used.

Often depicted in colonial propaganda on both sides is the practice of tarring and feathering. This brutal act of violence, usually carried out by mobs, involves brushing or dousing the victim in hot pine tar and coating them with feathers. While not deadly, it was agonising, potentially disfiguring and publicly humiliating for the victim.

Historians believe between 60 and 80 individuals were tarred and feathered during the revolutionary period. The first recorded incident was in Virginia in 1766 against William Smith, who had informed customs officials about acts of smuggling. Perhaps the worst case was against John Malcom, a Boston Loyalist and customs officer, who was tarred and feathered twice in the space of three months in 1773-74.

“The name ‘Sons of Liberty’ was widely used after the report of Barre’s speech against the Stamp Act spread through the colonies. At first, there was no formal organisation and the name was used by various groups, whether the purpose was the passage of resolutions or the tearing down of a house. By the end of 1765, however, the Sons of Liberty were well organised action groups in several colonies, led by men who were willing to use force to achieve their ends when defeated in the realm of legal political action.” Merrill Jensen, historian

sons of liberty

1. Sons of Liberty was a name given to a variety of colonial groups and individuals that opposed British policy, particularly the Stamp Act and Townshend acts.

2. The first of these groups formed in Boston and New York in early 1765. In Boston, they formed around groups such as the Loyal Nine, comprised chiefly of working-class men.

3. Boston’s Sons of Liberty were very active through 1765 and engaged in protest, intimidation of officials and a degree of violence against Loyalist targets.

4. Later, Sons of Liberty groups became more task-focused, concentrating on responses like propaganda, non-importation, boycotts and correspondence committees.

5. Sons of Liberty groups employed a range of symbols, slogans and tropes to carry their message, such as various flags and liberty devices.

Citation information Title: ‘The Sons of Liberty’ Authors: Jennifer Llewellyn , Steve Thompson Publisher: Alpha History URL: https://alphahistory.com/americanrevolution/sons-of-liberty Date published: July 16, 2019 Date updated: November 22, 2023 Date accessed: August 29, 2024 Copyright: The content on this page is © Alpha History. It may not be republished without our express permission. For more information on usage, please refer to our Terms of Use .

sons of liberty essay

  • History Classics
  • Your Profile
  • Find History on Facebook (Opens in a new window)
  • Find History on Twitter (Opens in a new window)
  • Find History on YouTube (Opens in a new window)
  • Find History on Instagram (Opens in a new window)
  • Find History on TikTok (Opens in a new window)
  • This Day In History
  • History Podcasts
  • History Vault

Who Were the Sons of Liberty?

By: Patrick J. Kiger

Updated: August 3, 2023 | Original: August 19, 2019

Sons of Liberty

The Sons of Liberty were a grassroots group of instigators and provocateurs in colonial America who used an extreme form of civil disobedience—threats, and in some cases actual violence—to intimidate loyalists and outrage the British government. The goal of the radicals was to push moderate colonial leaders into a confrontation with the British Crown.

The Sons marked one of their early victories in December 1765. The Stamp Act —the first tax imposed directly on American colonists by the British government—had only been in effect for a month, when a group of Boston merchants and craftsmen sent a letter to Andrew Oliver , the newly-appointed official collector of stamps. The group informed Oliver that he was to show up the next day at noon at the Liberty Tree in the city’s South End to publicly resign.

“Provided that you comply with the above, you shall be treated with the greatest Politeness and Humanity,” the letter explained. The message left to Oliver’s imagination what terrible fate might befall him if he didn’t comply.

Oliver didn’t need much persuading. He appeared as demanded, walking through the streets of Boston in a driving rainstorm and quit his job, to the cheers of a crowd of 2,000 people.

It was an exhibition of the fearsome clout of the Sons of Liberty. The Sons likely formed from a secretive group of nine Boston-based patriots who called themselves the Loyal Nine. The first Sons chapters sprung up in Boston and New York City, but other cells soon appeared in other colonies as well.

The group may have taken its name from a speech given in Parliament by Isaac Barre , an Irish member sympathetic to the colonists, who warned that the British government’s behavior “has caused the blood of these sons of liberty to recoil within them.”

Their most famous act of disobedience was destroying 92,000 pounds of British tea in Boston Harbor in December 1773. The Boston Tea Party, as the act would become known, was one of the key events that pushed the colonies and the British government toward war.

Samuel Adams and John Hancock of the Sons of Liberty

Prominent Leaders Included Samuel Adams, John Hancock

The Sons’ most prominent leader was Samuel Adams , the son of a wealthy brewer who was more interested in radical rabble-rousing than commerce. Adams wrote his masters thesis at Harvard on the lawfulness of resisting British rule. While George Washington eventually led the war effort against the British, “the truth is that there might not have been a fight to begin with had it not been for the work of Sam Adams,” writes historian Les Standiford .

Another key member was John Hancock , who later was immortalized by his flamboyant signature on the Declaration of Independence . James Otis , Paul Revere , Benedict Arnold , and Dr. Benjamin Rush , among others, were also involved in the group.

Adams and Hancock in particular were so loathed and feared by the British that when General Thomas Gage offered amnesty to Bostonians who stopped their resistance in 1775, he made a point of excluding the two men, “whose offences are of too flagitious a nature” not to be punished severely.

It’s not hard to understand why Gage took a hard line against them. After forming in the summer of 1765, the Boston Sons chapter marched through the streets and burned stamp officer Oliver’s effigy, and then broke into and looted his house. When Massachusetts Lt. Gov. and Chief Justice Thomas Hutchinson , a loyalist, declined to renounce the Stamp Act, they similarly looted and destroyed his house as well.

The Sons didn’t stop there. After Parliament passed the Townshend Acts in 1767, which imposed import duties on goods such as china and glass, Adams organized a boycott to keep British goods out of Massachusetts altogether. According to Adams biographer Dennis Fradin , the Sons enforced the boycott by sending boys to smash the windows and smear excrement on the walls of local shops that didn’t comply. If that didn’t work, the proprietor faced the risk of being kidnapped and tarred and feathered, a painful, humiliating torture that could leave lasting scars.

“Violence was not necessarily accepted as a regular feature of politics, but there was an understanding that it might be part of politics as a last resort,” explains Benjamin L. Carp a historian at Brooklyn College and author of the 2010 book Defiance of the Patriots: The Boston Tea Party and the Making of America .

The Boston Tea Party

During this time, the Sons’ core views evolved, Carp says. They rejected the British notion that they had fought the French and Indian War on behalf of the colonists, and that as a result, the Americans were obligated to pay for continued upkeep of British soldiers in North America. But beyond that, they also rejected the authority of the British Parliament to make laws for Americans. Most of all, they argued the British government could not compel Americans to pay taxes.

Their overarching goals similarly shifted over time. “At the outset, most Sons of Liberty only wanted something limited—for Parliament to repeal the Stamp Act,” Carp explains. “But over time, more and more Sons of Liberty became convinced that independence was the answer.”

The Boston Tea Party

Parliament’s passage in December 1773 of the Tea Act , which propped up the financially struggling British East India Company by giving it a virtual monopoly on selling tea to the colonies, pushed the Sons to become even more brazen. The law threatened the livelihood of the American merchants who had been importing tea from Dutch traders. The Sons couldn’t let that stand.

“I don’t think the Bostonians set out to destroy property. I think they felt it was a last resort,” Carp says. “Their first preference would have been to send the tea back. But when the merchants (consignees) were unwilling, the ship captains were unwilling—it would have ruined them—and the governor was unwilling to bend the rules for them, they felt they had no choice.”

“If they’d allowed the tea to land, they knew that customers wouldn’t be able to resist it—so they would have paid the tax on it AND let a monopoly company, the East India Company, muscle into the local market,” Carp says. 

The Bostonians also knew that if they let the tea be unloaded, they’d lose standing in the eyes of other Sons of Liberty groups in New York, Philadelphia and other places, he notes.

The Sons’ defiance of the British not only helped spur the Revolutionary War , it also fostered an American tradition of grassroots activism that various activist groups have applied over the centuries to push for change.

sons of liberty essay

HISTORY Vault: The American Revolution

Stream American Revolution documentaries and your favorite HISTORY series, commercial-free.

sons of liberty essay

Sign up for Inside History

Get HISTORY’s most fascinating stories delivered to your inbox three times a week.

By submitting your information, you agree to receive emails from HISTORY and A+E Networks. You can opt out at any time. You must be 16 years or older and a resident of the United States.

More details : Privacy Notice | Terms of Use | Contact Us

World History Edu

  • U.S. History

Sons of Liberty: History, Members, Facts & Accomplishments

by World History Edu · July 24, 2021

About a decade before “The shot that was heard round the world” (the first military engagements of the American Revolution at the Battles of Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775), a movement known as the Sons of Liberty had been set up to protect the rights of colonists against the British government’s oppressive tax regime, particularly the Stamp Act of 1765.

With membership stretching across the 13 diminutive American colonies, the Sons of Liberty was a real clandestine political organization that proved to be a thorn in the flesh of the British Parliament and Crown.

In the article below World History Edu explores the history, activities and accomplishments of the Sons of Liberty, a pre-American Revolutionary War underground organization.

Who were the Sons of Liberty?

It was an active and vibrant political organization made up of American colonists from all walks of life who protested what they saw as infringement of the rights and freedom of American colonies by the British government.

The Sons of Liberty did not have proper organized structure. However, they made up for that with a lot of clandestine political moves to thwart the Stamp Act of 1765 . Members of the group called on everyone in the 13 American Colonies to rise up and defend their rights, which they believed were being trampled upon by the British Parliament and Crown.

The Compromise of 1850: History & Major Facts

British taxation policies in the American colonies

In a bid to recoup some amount of the money that was spent defending the colonies from the French during the Seven Years’ War (1756-1763) , the British government resorted to imposing taxes on the American colonists. One particular tax that caused a huge uproar was the Stamp Act of 1765, which taxed things such as pamphlets, almanacs, dice, legal papers, newspapers and among others.

sons of liberty essay

The Stamp Act of 1765 was the most loathed tax of the series of taxes imposed on the American colonies by the British Parliament.

Meaning of the Sons of Liberty

The name Sons of Liberty was derived from a February 1765 given by British Member of Parliament Isaac Barré. In Barré’s speech he described the American colonists that protested against the British government’s taxes-without-representation policy as the “sons of liberty”. Over time the name came to be used for people who resisted British Crown taxation and coercive laws that prevented some colonies from handling their affairs.

Great Britain’s economic woes of the mid-1760s

Following the end of the Seven Years’ War in 1763, Great Britain struggled to balance its books as it had spent a fortune defending its American colonies from the French and her Native American allies. London also had a bit of headache as it pondered how it was going to maintain the over 10,000 soldiers stationed in the colonies. As a result, the British Parliament decided that American colonists bear some of the cost for maintaining those troops. To accomplish this, Great Britain imposed a series of direct taxes on the commercial activities in the 13 diminutive colonies.

One of the first slightly incendiary taxes was the Sugar Act of 1764 which aside from raising revenue for the British government military expenses was designed to reduce sugar and molasses smuggling.

As if tensions weren’t already high enough, the British government followed the Sugar Act with the Stamp Act of 1765. The Stamp Act, a direct tax on all printed materials and stamped paper, infuriated the colonies. This resulted in many of the colonies refusing to comply with those taxes, arguing that their consent was not sought before the decision to roll out the Stamp Act.

Factors that led to the US-Mexico war in 1846

Origins of the Sons of Liberty

sons of liberty essay

The 13 horizontal red and white stripes of the Sons of Liberty was also used by American merchant ships during the American Revolutionary war

It is unclear when and where exactly the Sons of Liberty came to being. However, a good number of historians have claimed that the core of the group goes all the way back to the Loyal Nine in Boston, Massachusetts.

With slogans like “No Taxation without Representation”, the Loyal Nine were a group of middle-class American patriots who became vocal in the political arena in the mid-1760s.

The Loyal Nine was a clandestine Boston political organization that had the likes of Boston shoemaker Ebenezer Mackintosh (1737-1816), beer brewer and businessman Thomas Chase, Boston Gazette printer Benjamin Edes, and jeweler Henry Bass (cousin of Samuel Adams). The wealthy members of the Loyal Nine used Mackintosh to get the crowds riled up in order to protest against the Stamp Act.

sons of liberty essay

Samuel Adams is usually acclaimed as the founder of the Sons of Liberty

It’s been stated that this precursor organization to the Sons of Liberty began meeting at a place near the Boston Gazette office.

The nine original members of the Loyal Nine were Thomas Chase, Steven Cleverly, Henry Bass, Thomas Crafts, Joseph Filed, John Avery, John Smith, Benjamin Edes, and George Trott.

On some occasions, American Patriots like John Adams (later 2nd President of the United States), Benjamin Church, Samuel Adams , James Otis, Paul Revere , Joseph Warren, Thomas Young, and John Hancock participated in their meetings.

The Liberty Tree – the rallying point of the Sons of Liberty

sons of liberty essay

Liberty Tree – The Colonists Under Liberty Tree, Cassell’s Illustrated History of England, 1865.

The Loyal Nine and later the Sons of Liberty had their first protest in August 1765 under a large elm tree in Hanover Square. The tree came to be known as the Liberty Tree. In addition to hosting many protests, the Liberty Tree was a place where speeches (mainly inspired by colonial tea merchants) were made to get more Bostonians to join the cause of defending the rights of American colonists. It was also place where the protesters against the Stamp Act hanged effigies of Stamp officials and other British government officials.

Operations and activities

Led by Samuel Adams, the Sons of Liberty were at the forefront in opposing the Stamp Act of 1765. They deployed both violent and nonviolent tactics, the latter coming after legislative resolutions and public demonstrations fell on deaf ears.

The Boston chapter of the Sons of Liberty was established around the summer of 1765. And soon, the group’s tentacles had spread to other colonies. The leaders of the of Sons of Liberty worked extremely hard to coordinate their activities, hoping to provide a more united front against Britain’s unsavory tax policies. For example, the chapters in New York and Connecticut began coordinating their activities in the winter of 1765.

sons of liberty essay

The Sons of Liberty was therefore formed in the summer of 1765 to protest against the Stamp Act of 1765. In less than half a year into its formation, the Sons of Liberty had spread to virtually all the 13 American colonies. | Image: Proof sheet of one-penny stamps submitted for approval to Commissioners of Stamps by engraver, May 10, 1765

Tarring and feathering

Being one of the most-hard hit areas in terms of the Stamp Act, Boston’s Sons of Liberty were perhaps the most active. Often times Bostonians resorted to tar and feathering of British government officials and tax collectors. In the streets of Boston, it was not uncommon for the Sons of Liberty to burn the effigies of stamp distributors after they had tarred and feathered them.  Aside from the obvious humiliation, many of those violent acts were done to intimidate the stamp officials into resigning.

The Sons of Liberty did not limit tar and feathering to government officials; they also targeted loyalists to the British Crown. This included established businessmen and traders who benefited the most from maintaining the status quo.

sons of liberty essay

The Liberty Tree hosted many of the protests organized by the Sons of Liberty | Image: The Sons of Liberty tarring and feathering John Malcolm under the Liberty Tree

The raid on Lieutenant Governor Thomas Hutchinson’s house

Another very defining moment in the history of the Sons of Liberty came when they burned down the residence of Lieutenant Governor Thomas Hutchinson. The raid, which occurred on August 26, 1756, was used by some radical leaders of the Sons of Liberty  leader to get the lower classes Bostonians to back them.

Boston Tea Party of 1773

Boston Tea Party

Boston Tea Party took place on December 16, 1773 | Source: W.D. Cooper. Boston Tea Party in The History of North America. London: E. Newberry, 1789. Engraving. Plate opposite p. 58. Rare Book and Special Collections Division, Library of Congress

Compared to the protests against the Stamp Act in 1765, the Tea Act of May 10, 1773 was met with an even greater response from the Sons of Liberty. By 1773, the organization had gotten a lot more effective; they were therefore able to mobilize themselves properly and oppose the Tea Act. The colonists again trumpeted their motto: “no taxation without representation”.

Under the leadership of Paul Revere, a group of about 100 to 120 men disguised themselves as American Indians (mainly Mohawk Indians) and went aboard three vessels which carried tea. The men , who came from all walks of life, then dumped all the tea into the Boston Harbor. In all, about 342 chests of tea (that belonged to the British East India Company) were purposely destroyed. To put into perspective, the cargo that was destroyed on that day weighed about 92,000 pounds. The value of the tea in today’s money is around $1.6 million.

Did you know :  It was not until half a century later that the 1773 destruction of tea at the Boston harbor became known as the Boston Tea Party?

The British government’s response to the Destruction of Tea in 1773

The news of Bostonians destroying tea sent shock waves throughout Britain. Therefore, the British government tasked the Royal Governor of Massachusetts Thomas Hutchinson to quickly crack the whip on the protesters. Governor Hutchinson’s successor, General Thomas Gage, was given broad powers after the colonial charter of Massachusetts got rewritten. Britain also responded by introducing the Intolerable Acts in 1774 to punish Boston for the tea destroyed. The British authorities also closed the Boston port.

With every passing day, the Massachusetts colony became overwhelmed by intensified stringent policies (i.e. the Coercive Acts) introduced by London. More British troops (under the command of General Thomas Gage) were dispatched to Boston to prevent the situation from escalating. All of those measures were aimed at not only teaching Bostonians a lesson but also restoring the British Crown’s authority in Boston.

Boston Tea Party

Governor Thomas Hutchinson was the British official tasked to rein in on the agitations of Bostonians following the Boston Tea Party on December 16, 1773 | Portrait by Edward Truman, 1741

How did the Sons of Liberty and other colonists respond to the Intolerable Acts?

In response to Britain’s increased grip on the North American colonies, the Sons of Liberties and other political active groups called supported the establishment of a continental congress. The First Continental Congress met in the autumn of 1774 and threw their weight behind the decision to boycott British goods. Britain obviously did not take too kindly to those moves by the American colonies.

Colonists outside Boston united in solidarity with Boston, with many leading Sons of Liberty members calling for the boycott of not just British goods but businesses. The rebellious actions of the Sons of Liberty on that faithful day, December 16, 1773, escalated into the American Revolutionary War two years later.

Sons of Liberty: Fast Facts

sons of liberty essay

Leading members of the Sons of Liberty | Image: (L-R): 1st row: Samuel Adams, Benedict Arnold, John Hancock, Patrick Henry, James Otis, Jr. 2nd row: Paul Revere, James Swan, Alexander McDougall, Benjamin Rush, Charles Thomson

Notable members : Samuel Adams, Benjamin Church, Isaac Sears, Hercules Mulligan, Benedict Arnold, Samuel Chase, Patrick Henry, Charles Thomson, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Edes, John Hancock, James Otis, Paul Revere, Joseph Warren,

Founded in : 1765

Dissolved : 1776

Inspired by : the Stamp Act of 1765

Presence : Massachusetts Bay, Virginia, Maryland, New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island

Catchphrase : “No taxation without representation”

Ideals : Liberalism, Republicanism

Greatest Accomplishments: Prevented the implementation of the Stamp Act of 1765 ; Played active role in the political arena in the years leading to American Revolutionary War

Tags: Boston-Massachusetts Samuel Adams Stamp Act 1765 The Sons of Liberty Thomas Hutchinson

You may also like...

sons of liberty essay

Timeline of the United States

October 13, 2023

Trail of tears

Trail of Tears: Story, Death Count & Facts

October 7, 2019

sons of liberty essay

John F. Kennedy’s nomination of Thurgood Marshall to the United States Court of Appeals

August 10, 2023

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

  • Next story  5 Major Events that Led to the American Revolutionary War
  • Previous story  Liberty Tree: History, Stamp Act & Facts
  • Popular Posts
  • Recent Posts

sons of liberty essay

Mobutu Sese Seko

sons of liberty essay

Journey to the West: Origin Story, Themes & Symbolism of the Famed Classical Chinese Novel

sons of liberty essay

Ivan Pavlov – Biography, Major Works & Accomplishments

sons of liberty essay

Queen of the Dead in Ancient Egypt

sons of liberty essay

History of Islam: How and When Did Islam Begin?

African Leaders

Greatest African Leaders of all Time

sons of liberty essay

Queen Elizabeth II: 10 Major Achievements

sons of liberty essay

Donald Trump’s Educational Background

Donald J. Trump

Donald Trump: 10 Most Significant Achievements

John F. Kennedy

8 Most Important Achievements of John F. Kennedy

sons of liberty essay

Odin in Norse Mythology: Origin Story, Meaning and Symbols

Ragnor Lothbrok

Ragnar Lothbrok – History, Facts & Legendary Achievements

sons of liberty essay

9 Great Achievements of Queen Victoria

African Dictators

Most Ruthless African Dictators of All Time

U.S. Presidents

12 Most Influential Presidents of the United States

Hermes, the Greek god

Greek God Hermes: Myths, Powers and Early Portrayals

sons of liberty essay

Kamala Harris: 10 Major Achievements

sons of liberty essay

Kwame Nkrumah: History, Major Facts & 10 Memorable Achievements

Rosa Parks

8 Major Achievements of Rosa Parks

sons of liberty essay

How did Captain James Cook die?

Trail of tears

5 Great Accomplishments of Ancient Greece

Pharaohs of Egypt

Most Famous Pharaohs of Egypt

Elizabeth II versus Elizabeth I

The Exact Relationship between Elizabeth II and Elizabeth I

Morse Code

How and when was Morse Code Invented?

  • Adolf Hitler Alexander the Great American Civil War Ancient Egyptian gods Ancient Egyptian religion Apollo Athena Athens Black history Carthage China Civil Rights Movement Cold War Constantine the Great Constantinople Egypt England France Hera Horus India Isis John Adams Julius Caesar Loki Medieval History Military Generals Military History Napoleon Bonaparte Nobel Peace Prize Odin Osiris Ottoman Empire Pan-Africanism Queen Elizabeth I Religion Set (Seth) Soviet Union Thor Timeline Turkey Women’s History World War I World War II Zeus
Pocket Constitution Books  
");x2("qmparent",lsp,1);lsp.cdiv=b;b.idiv=lsp;if(qm_n&&qm_v

































sons of liberty essay

Voices of the Revolution: Sons of Liberty

In the 225+ years since its independence, the United States of America has developed into a thriving nation, based on the articulate freedoms of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Yet, not every aspect of the Revolutionary Period is full of bright morals and good behavior.

When Britain imposed the Intolerable Acts throughout the 1750s and 60s, a great number of men became extremely angry, and began to act violently against British Loyalists in the colonies. Mobs sprung up all over the colonies, reigning terror on those who remained faithful to the crown.

Sons of Liberty, Revolutionary War

One of these groupings would be a secret Boston association known as the The Loyal Nine , composed of elite gentleman, mainly law men and artisans, who met discretely to organize ways to begin to effectively oppose the actions of the crown. The Loyal Nine were responsible for putting boundaries on the rampant violence of Boston, and set limits on how far the demonstrations should progress. They actively stood against British policies they found to be immoral and unlawful, and had their hands in projects such as The Boston Tea Party .

The original members were Henry Bass, Joseph Field, John Smith, Thomas Chase, John Avery, Stephen Cleverly, Benjamin Edes, George Trott and Thomas Crafts, but Samuel Adams would eventually become involved in the group, adopting a role as one of its leading members. John Adams , aware of his second cousin's role in the group, did not exactly approve of the methods used, and kept his distance from the organization.

As time progressed, and frustration with the crown began to heat up in the colonies, the Loyal Nine merged into the more famous organization known as the Sons of Liberty. The members of this group were Samuel Adams , Joseph Warren, Paul Revere , Benedict Arnold, Benjamin Edes, John Hancock , Patrick Henry, John Lamb, William Mackay, Alexander McDougall, James Otis, Benjamin Rush , Isaac Sears, Haym Solomon, James Swan, Charles Thomson, Thomas Young, Marinus Willett, and Oliver Wolcott .

Samuel Adams

Samuel Adams (September 27 1722 - October 2, 1803)

The second cousin of John Adams, Samuel Adams was a Massachusetts statesman, founding father, and firm voice of the American Revolution. He was one of the main forces behind the American movement for Independence, and was infamous for his role in the turmoil in Boston in the years leading up to the Revolutionary War. Where John Adams was strong spirited, Samuel was practically virulent, a master of propaganda and an engineer of mob violence. He had few qualms about acting in opposition to the British authorities, especially on issues he deemed to be "unfair" to the American colonists. His strong leadership inspired the New England colonies to take up arms against their oppressors, and he continued to be a central figure throughout the latter part of the eighteenth century.

After the war was over, Adams would go on to become a delegate from Massachusetts to the Continental Congress, and fourth Governor of Massachusetts. Despite his unusual sense of morality, Adams' charisma and motivational abilities opened many doors for him throughout his lifetime, and he would cause great change in whatever endeavors he attended to.

Benedict Arnold

Benedict Arnold

A notorious traitor to the revolutionary cause, Benedict Arnold started his political career as a Son of Liberty. As a pharmacist and bookseller in New England, Arnold fell into financial struggles after the introduction of the Intolerable Acts. He did not engage in any popular demonstrations, but became a smuggler and continued to trade as if no "Act" had ever been passed on the colonial form of the black market.

Despite his early activity to oppose the British crown, and his relative success as a Revolutionary War General, Arnold eventually came to lose faith in the American cause, and would change sides and join the British against the American colonies halfway through the war.

Benjamin Edes (October 14, 1732 - December 11, 1803)

Printer and publisher of the Boston Gazette, Benjamin Edes was a political instigator known as one of the main financiers of the Boston Tea Party . Edes, through the Gazette, spread Anti-British propaganda that helped inflame the colonies against their oppressors. He attacked British policies, most significantly the Intolerable Acts . He was eventually arrested on counts of sedition, but he escaped to Watertown, Massachusetts where he continued to produce the Gazette until the late nineteenth century.

John Hancock

John Hancock (January 23, 1737 - October 8, 1793)

Most famous for his bold signature on the Declaration of Independence , John Hancock was a statesman, Second President of the Continental Congress, and Authoritative voice of the Revolution. A merchant whose business was greatly affected by the Intolerable Acts, Hancock joined forces with the Sons of Liberty to actively oppose British influence in the colonies.

Unlike Adams, Hancock was moderately disgusted by the violence enacted by the Sons of Liberty against the Loyalists, and sought to effect change on a more political and diplomatic level, and gave a number of speeches against British oppression which would eventually inspire the more organized move of the American Revolution. His words encouraged many to take up arms, without resorting to mob violence, and he would go down in history as a leading patriot.

Patrick Henry

Patrick Henry (May 29, 1736 - June 6, 1799)

A Founding Father and two time Governor of the state of Virginia, Patrick Henry was a prominent orator who helped to spread Revolutionary sentiment throughout the American colonies. Most famous for the phrase "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death," a speech he made before the Virginia House of Burgesses, Henry was one of the main voices which inspired Virginia to raise troops to fight in the Revolutionary War. Although not a Bostonian, he kept many connections with the Sons of Liberty, and his actions helped spread the movement to the southern colonies.

John Lamb (1735-1800)

The son of a convicted burglar from New York, John Lamb would eventually overcome his father's legacy to become a leading member of the Sons of Liberty. His role was primarily as a writer, and he was responsible for writing articles and publishing handbills which helped to spread the Revolutionary cause in the colonies.

Joseph Warren

Joseph Warren (June 11, 1741 - June 17, 1775)

President of the Massachusetts Revolutionary Congress, Revolutionary War General, and established man of medicine, Joseph Warren was a leading activist in the war cause of the 1770s. On April 18, 1775 he dispatched Paul Revere and William Dawes to ride to Lexington in secret to warn John Hancock and Samuel Adams of their pending arrest by British troops and to alert the militia along the way that the British were on the move. During the war, Warren fell in battle, and this moment was immortalized in a painting by John Trumbull called "The Death of General Warren."

Paul Revere

Paul Revere (December 21, 1734 - May 10, 1818)

An early American silversmith and active voice of the Revolution, Paul Revere is most well known for his ride to Lexington to alert the militia of the movement of the British troops and to warn John Hancock and Samuel Adams of their pending arrest. After his business fell into financial ruin after the implementation of the Intolerable Acts, he became one of the main organizers of the intelligence and alarm system which would keep tabs on the British military.

Despite popular historical accounts, he never rode hundreds of miles through New England shouting "the British are coming," but his acts in secret, and in public, did do a great deal to promote the American Revolutionary cause.

William Mackay (died 1800)

Although little is known about William Mackay, history has preserved the fact that he was a Bostonian merchant strongly affected by the implementation of the Stamp Act of 1765, and worked as a Son of Liberty to promote the Revolution.

Alexander McDougall

Alexander McDougall (about 1731- 1786)

Born in New York City sometime around 1731, Alexander McDougall would become a seaman and a prominent New England merchant. After the addition of the Stamp Act, McDougall joined the Sons of Liberty and would become the leader of a faction in New York. He would eventually enlist in a New York City regiment in the Revolutionary War, and become a Major General in 1777.

Alexander McDougall

James Otis, Jr. (February 5, 1725 - May 23, 1783)

A lawyer and member of the Massachusetts provincial assembly, James Otis, Jr. would become one of the leading members of the American Revolutionary cause. He is famous for coining the phrase, "taxation without representation is tyranny," which would go on to become an anthem for patriot opposition to the crown. As a lawyer, Otis became enraged by British imposed "writs of assistance" which permitted British authorities to enter the house of a colonist without notice or probable cause. In response these writs, Otis gave a number of speeches speaking out against British exploitation of the colonists, and his words inspired many people to rise up against the tyranny of the crown.

Benjamin Rush

Benjamin Rush (January 4, 1746 - April 19, 1813)

The founder of Dickinson college in Pennsylvania, signatory to the Declaration of Independence , and Founding Father of the United States, Benjamin Rush is certainly one of the more famous voices of the revolution. Incredibly outspoken, Rush would make many friends, and enemies (most notably George Washington, to whom he gave harsh criticism), and his words would effect great movements towards opposition to Great Britain. Also, Thomas Paine looked to Rush when he was drafting his treatises in favor of the Revolutionary War. A truly learned manRush would join the Medical Committee of the Continental Congress, taking on a more practical role as well as a political one.

Isaac Sears (1730 - 1786)

Nicknamed "King Sears" for his pivotal role in organizing the New York mob, Isaac Sears was a leading member of the Sons of Liberty who leaned predominately towards orchestrating violence and encouraging anti-British demonstration. A prosperous New York City merchant outraged by the Intolerable Acts, Sears was forceful in his opposition to the Stamp Act in particular, using whatever means necessary to dissuade the use of British stamps in the colonies. After the Stamp Act was finally repealed, he erected a number of liberty poles and broadsides (large sheets of paper printed on one side only), signed "the Mohawks," warning that action would be taken against anyone supporting any of the Intolerable Acts. He would eventually become the stand in commander of New York City until Washington arrived to relieve him in 1775.

Haym Solomon

Haym Solomon (April 7, 1740 - January 6, 1785)

A Portuguese Jew by birth, Haym Solomon was a wealthy merchant and financier of the American Revolution. Sympathetic to the American cause, Solomon joined the New York branch of the Sons of Liberty and was arrested as a spy in 1776. After eighteen months of torture aboard the British vessel, he was released under the stipulation that he would remain as an interpreter for British-commissioned mercenaries. While involved in this forced employment, Solomon helped many American prisoners escape their confinement and encouraged the mercenaries to join the Americans.

James Swan

James Swan (1754 - July 31, 1830)

Born in Scotland, James Swan moved to American colonies in the late 1750s where he spent his youth as a shop clerk in Boston. As time went by, he became increasingly interested in the American Revolutionary effort and joined leagues with the Sons of Liberty. As a writer, he published many tracts and articles in opposition to the British crown. Wealthy before the war, he financed Revolutionary efforts until he came to ruin in the early 1780s.

Charles Thomson

Charles Thomson (November 29, 1729 - August 16, 1824)

A Patriot leader from Philadelphia born of Scots-Irish parentage, Charles Thomson became known as the "Samuel Adams of Philadelphia," a nickname given to him by John Adams. As secretary to the Continental Congress for fifteen years, Thomson was able to be directly involved in foreign affairs. Also, along with William Barton, he was given the opportunity to design the Great Seal of the United States . Yet, he was a fiery individual who had many enemies. Famously, one James Searle attacked Thomson on the floor of Congress over a supposed misquotation, and the ensuing cane fight ended with both men being cut in the face.

Thomas Young (1731-1777)

The only member of the Boston Tea Party not to wear a disguise, Thomas Young was a bold advocate of American Independence. As consequence for his courage, the British made an example of Young, punishing him to such severity that he nearly died.

Marinus Willett

Marinus Willett (July 31, 1740 - August 22, 1830)

Equal parts military man and cabinet maker, Marinus Willett had a reputation for street brawling and reckless behavior. He became a leading member of the New York faction of the Sons of Liberty, organizing surprise movements against the British. Most notably, in 1775, he assembled a small band of men, commandeered a British sloop, and captured a protected British storehouse in Turtle Bay. He would eventually enlist in the 1st New York Regiment under command of Alexander McDougall.

Marinus Willett

Oliver Wolcott (November 20, 1726 - December 1, 1797)

A signatory to the United States Declaration of Independence as well as the Articles of Confederation , Wolcott had a minor role in the Sons of Liberty and would go on to become the fourth Governor of Connecticut. One of his major acts for the Revolutionary cause was in erecting a shed on his country estate in Litchfield and, with help from his neighbors, casted more than 40,000 bullets.

Back To Top

To learn more about the Constitution — the people, the events, the landmark cases — order a copy of “The U.S. Constitution & Fascinating Facts About It” today!

Call to order: 1-800-887-6661 or order books online.

© Oak Hill Publishing Company. All rights reserved. Oak Hill Publishing Company. Box 6473, Naperville, IL 60567 For questions or comments about this site please email us at [email protected]

SC Digital Academy

DBQ: Cotton Gin

DBQ: United States History & the Constitution How did World War II impact the modern women’s liberation movement?

DBQ: Sons of Liberty: Rebels or Revolutionaries?

  • Filed under Uncategorized

sons of liberty essay

Historical Question: Considering the actions the Sons of Liberty committed against British colonial government, are they deemed as rebels or revolutionaries?

Introduction: The Rebels or Revolutionaries DBQ includes the Historical Thinking of : Comparison, Causation, Context and Evidence, and the literacy skills of writing a historical essay.

This DBQ serves as a method of analyzing the Stamp Act, Tea Act, Boston Massacre, and the Charleston Tea Party from a cultural standpoint. It aids the students in periodization and identifying the factors that lead to the American Revolution by providing documents that helps to examine the causation and context that led to the creation of the Sons of Liberty

The purpose of this assignment is to have students analyze primary sources to formulate a hypothesis/point of view about the Sons of Liberty; the final product will be an essay where students will use selected documents within the DBQ as evidence to support their stance.

Standards | Vocabulary | Context | Questions – Doc #1 , #2 , #3 , #4

Time Required:  Estimated time frame: three days in a 90 minute class period

Click here to download the full DBQ: Sons of Liberty: Rebels or Revolutionaries? Standard 8.2  and Sources with Questions and Essay Organizer

South Carolina Standards (2020) Targeted Standard: Standard 8.2: Demonstrate an understanding of how South Carolinians and Americans created a revolutionary form of government during the period of 1757– 1815.

8.2.CO Compare the motives and demographics of loyalists and patriots within South Carolina and the colonies.

8.2.CX Contextualize the roles of various groups of South Carolinians as the colonies moved toward becoming an independent nation.

8.2.E Utilize a variety of primary and secondary sources to analyze multiple perspectives on the development of democracy in South Carolina and the United States.

  • Sons of Liberty
  • British Parliament
  • Boston Massacre
  • Charleston Tea Party

Historical Context and Background Information: The Sons of Liberty was an organization that was created in the Thirteen American Colonies. The secret society was formed to protect the rights of the colonists and to fight taxation by the British government. They played a major role in most colonies in battling the Parliament requests and taxes from 1773-1775.

Guiding Questions and Sources

Document 1: Lantern slide depicting a torch light parade in New York City of Sons of Liberty against the Stamp Act of 1870 .

sons of liberty essay

  • Based off the lantern slide above, what is the shared view of the colonist marching?
  • Describe the images in the lantern slide that brought you to your statement above.
  • When is it the appropriate time for people to form in groups to rally for a specific cause? Use a modern day example to support your answer.

Citation: Parade of the Sons of Liberty. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://dcmny.org/islandora/object/gsmt:103

Document 2 : The Patriotic barber of New York, or the Captain in the suds, 1775

sons of liberty essay

  • How are the colonist treating the captain, a supporter of the British Parliament?
  • Support your above statement with examples from the image above.
  • When minorities were denied service throughout history the owner/operator was seen in a negative light. Is this situation any different, how?

Citation: The Patriotic barber of New York, or the Captain in the suds, (1775). Retrieved July 12, 2018, from

https://www.loc.gov/item/97514631/

Document 3 : Bostonians Tarring and Feathering

sons of liberty essay

  • This propaganda poster was posted throughout cities. What audiences do you think they are aiming to reach?
  • Identify the symbolism shown on the Liberty Tree.
  • Describe the actions of the men in the background and forefront. How does this reflect their sentiments about the imposed taxes?
  • A noose is guaranteed death but tarring and feathering is a form of torture. Why do you think it is was placed in the tree?

Citation: Bostonians Tarring and Feathering. (n.d.). Retrieved July 12, 2018, from https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/sons-of-liberty-illustration.jpg

Document 4 : The Alternative at Williamsburg

sons of liberty essay

  • Who were the loyalist? Why are they being pressured to sign their allegiance?
  • What was the result of ‘tories’ who did not agree with the ‘liberty men’?
  • Is it right for a group of people to pressure individuals into something they do not believe in because they are the minority?

Citation: The Alternative at Williamsburg (n.d.). Retrieved July 12, 2018, from http://www.history.org/foundation/journal/winter12/liberty.cfm

Digital Collections Information                    

This DBQ is based on images and/or documents from several institutions including the University of South Carolina Libraries, The National Archives, and The Library of Congress. See individual images for institution information.

To see other collections that may be helpful to your search, visit the Digital Collections homepage or visit SCDL ’s collection.

DBQ Prepared by Whitney Jones, 2018

' src=

Made with by Graphene Themes .

  • Pre-Colonial Mass
  • 17th Century Mass
  • 18th Century Mass
  • 19th Century Mass

History of Massachusetts Blog

The Sons of Liberty: Who Were They and What Did They Do?

The Sons of Liberty was a group of political dissidents that formed in the North American British colonies during the early days of the American Revolution in Boston, Mass.

The following are some facts about the Sons of Liberty:

The Sons of Liberty formed to protest the passage of the Stamp Act of 1765 . The Stamp Act was a tax that required printed materials in the colony, such as newspapers and legal documents, to be published on paper produced in London and embossed with the revenue stamp.

The colonists resented the Stamp Act and felt that being taxed without their consent was a violation of their rights as British citizens.

The Loyal Nine:

When the Sons of Liberty first formed in the summer of 1765, the group was originally known as the Loyal Nine, which consisted of nine Boston shopkeepers and artisans:

John Avery Jr, distiller Henry Bass, merchant and cousin to Samuel Adams Thomas Chase, distiller Thomas Crafts, painter Stephen Cleverly, brazier Benjamin Edes, printer of the Boston Gazette Joseph Field, ship captain John Smith, brazier George Trott, jeweler

The ninth member was either Henry Welles, a mariner, or Joseph Field, master of a vessel.

How the Sons of Liberty Got Their Name:

The term “the Sons of Liberty” actually came from a debate over the Stamp Act in Parliament in February of 1765, during which Irishman Isaac Barre made a speech defending the colonists and criticizing the British government’s actions against them, according to the book The Eve of the Revolution:

“[Were] they nourished by your indulgence? They grew by your neglect of them. As soon as you began to care about them, that care was exercised in sending persons to rule over them, in one department and another… sent to spy out their liberty, to misrepresent their actions and to prey upon them; men whose behaviour on many occasions has caused the blood of these sons of liberty to recoil within them…”

When the group officially expanded and adopted the name “The Sons of Liberty” is not known since the secretive group left virtually no paper trail.

Sons of Liberty & the Stamp Act Riot:

What is known about the group is that in August of 1765, the Loyal Nine acquired the help of Ebenezer McIntosh, a local cordwainer and leader of the South End Pope’s Day Company (Pope’s Day was the Boston colonial version of Guy Fawkes Day) to pull off its first protest, according to the book A True Republican: The Life of Paul Revere:

“On the morning of August 14, 1765, Bostonians witnessed a ritual of protest similar to the mocking, world-turned-upside-down festivities of the Pope’s Day processions. The Loyal Nine prepared effigies of Andrew Oliver, the stamp master, and Lord Bute, the king’s favorite, who, though out of office since the end of 1763, was considered the instigator of the unpopular revenue measures. McIntosh’s men, mostly artisans from the lower ranks of the craft hierarchy, laborers and mariners, hung the effigies from a large elm tree at Essex and Orange Streets in the South End, a tree soon to become famous as Liberty Tree. A label on the breast of Oliver’s effigy praised liberty and denounced ‘Vengence on the Subvertors of it,’ and another label warned: ‘He that takes this down is an enemy to his country.’ At sunset, forty or fifty artisans and tradesman took down the effigies and carried them in a procession to Andrew Oliver’s dock, where the mob leveled a building they believed would be the stamp office, and then to Fort Hill, where they burned the figures. In his journal, John Boyle stressed that the procession was ‘followed by a great concourse of people, some of the highest reputation, and in the greatest order.’ At this point, the less genteel members of the mob, led my McIntosh and angered by Thomas Hutchinson’s attempts to disperse them, proceeded to wreak havoc on Andrew Oliver’s house, pulling down fences, breaking windows, looking glasses, and furniture, stripping his trees of fruit, and drinking his wine.”

The following night, August 15, the mob formed a blockade in front of Governor Thomas Hutchinson’s mansion, demanding that he denounce the Stamp Act in his official letters to London.

Hutchinson, a loyalist who had written the book The History of the Province of Massachusetts-Bay in which he condemned a revolt by Boston citizens in 1689 against the rule of governor Sir Edmund Andros, refused. A few weeks later, on August 26, the mob returned.

"The Bostonians Paying the Excise-man, or Tarring and Feathering," print by Philip Dawe, circa 1774

“The Bostonians Paying the Excise-man, or Tarring and Feathering,” print by Philip Dawe, circa 1774

After attacking the homes of William Story, deputy register of the Vice-Admiralty Court, and Benjamin Hallowell, comptroller of customs, they then attacked Hutchinson’s house.

Hutchinson and his family were able to escape the home just minutes before the mob arrived. Upon breaking into the mansion, the mob destroyed Hutchinson’s furniture, wrecked the garden, tore out the windows, walls, wainscoting, tiles and even tore down the cupola on the roof.

In addition, they stole the contents of his wine cellar, £900 in sterling, every valuable object in his home and destroyed his collection of books and papers from his research for his history book.

Members of the Sons of Liberty: 1st Row: Samuel Adams • Benedict Arnold • John Hancock • Patrick Henry • James Otis, Jr. 2nd Row: Paul Revere • James Swan • Alexander McDougall • Benjamin Rush • Charles Thomson 3rd Row: Joseph Warren • Marinus Willett • Oliver Wolcott • Christopher Gadsden • Haym Salomon

Members of the Sons of Liberty: 1st Row: Samuel Adams • Benedict Arnold • John Hancock • Patrick Henry • James Otis, Jr. 2nd Row: Paul Revere • James Swan • Alexander McDougall • Benjamin Rush • Charles Thomson 3rd Row: Joseph Warren • Marinus Willett • Oliver Wolcott • Christopher Gadsden • Haym Salomon

For a number of years after the Stamp Act riot, the Sons of Liberty organized annual celebrations to mark the event, which consisted of parades and gatherings at the Liberty Tree on Boston Common or large dinners, known as “Liberty dinners,” under a tent at the Liberty Tree Tavern in Dorchester.

By the end of 1765, Sons of Liberty groups had sprouted up in every state in the colony.

Women also joined the cause by forming local chapters of the Daughters of Liberty , which organized spinning groups to spin cloth and supported a boycott against British imports.

Members of the Sons of Liberty:

Due to the secret nature of the Sons of Liberty, the group never kept any official rosters of its members. Yet, in 1869 a handwritten list titled “An Alphabetical List of the Sons of Liberty Who Dined at the Liberty Tree, Dorchester Aug. 14, 1769” was donated to the Massachusetts Historical Society.

This list of over 300 names was compiled by an attendee of the event, William Palfrey, and was donated by his grandson on the 100th anniversary of the event. The names on the list are as follows:

A. Adams, Samuel Adams, John, Esq. Avery, John, Esq. Avery, John, Jr. Appleton, Nath. Austin, Benj., Esq. Austin, Samuel Ayres, Joseph Abbot, Samuel Avis, Samuel

B. Brattle, Thos. Bradford, John, Capt. Bowes, Nicholas Barber, Nath. Bant, William Boyer, Peter Barrell, Joseph Balch, Nath. Blake, John, Capt. Blanchard, Caleb Brimmer, Martin Brimmer, Hermon Black, Andrew Burt, Benjamin Brigden, Zachary Bowes, William Bruce, Stephen Bass, Moses Belcher Bass, Henry Boynton, Richard, Capt. Breck, William Barrett, Samuel Bradford, Jos., Jr. Brown, John Baker, John Brattle, Brig. General Bowdoin, James, Hon. Burdet, Benj. Barnard, Benj. Brackett, Joshua Bell, William Belcher, Sarson Boardman, Win. Boweyer, Dan. Bowman, Rev. Dan. Barrett, John, Esq. Burbeck, William Billings, Richard Brown, Enoch Binney, Capt. Bryant, .lames Bryant, John

C. Cushing, Mr. Speaker Cooper, William Cushing, John Church, Benj. Church, Benj., Jr. Church, Edward Cleverly, Stephen Carnes, Edward Cobb, Capt. Collins, Ezra Copely, John Cudworth, Benj. Cudworth, Nath. Cheever, Wm. Downe Colson, David Colson, Adam Cunningham, Major Cunningham, James Chardon, Peter, Esq. Cranch, Richard Cunningham, Jno. Cazneau, Andrew, Esq. Carter, James Cattle, Wm., Esq., Carolina, Crofts, Thomas Cheever, Ezek., Jr., Esq. Chase, Thomas Cunningham, William Crane, John Clap, Ebenezer Cox, Lemuel Carnes, Joseph Dana, Richard, Esq. Dickinson, Mr., brother to the farmer. Dawes, Thomas, Capt. Dennie, William Davis, William Deshon, Moses, Esq. Dalton, James, Capt. Dalton, Peter Roe Davis, Edward Dashwood, Capt. Dorr, Ebenezer Don-, Harbottle Dean, John, Capt. Davis, Caleb Davis, Aaron Davis, Robert Danforth, Samuel, Dr. Davis, Solomon Dolbeare, Benj. Dorrington, John, Capt. Dickman, William Doane, Elisha, Major

E. Erving, John, Hon. Erving, George, Esq. Edes, Benjamin Edwards, John Eliot, Deacon Eliot, Joseph, Jr. Edes, Thomas Emmes, Samuel Edwards, Alex.

F. Freeman, Jon., Capt. Fleet, Thomas Fleet, John Foster, Deacon Foster, Timothy Foster, Bossenger Foster, William Fitch, Timothy Flagg, Josiah Fowle, William Farmer, Paul

G. Greenleaf, William Gore, John, Capt. Gore, John, Jr. Green, George Gill, John Gill, Moses Grant, Samuel Green, Francis Gardner. Joseph, Dr. Greenleaf, John Gardner, John Gridley, Col. Green, Joshua Green, Edward Greenwood, Capt. Griffiths, John Gooding, Benj. Griffen, Wm., Esq., of Virginia. Green, John Green, Joseph Greenleaf, Oliver Greenleaf, Stephen Greene, Benj., Jr. Gray, William Gwin, Capt, Newbury Gooding, Joseph Gray, Lewis Greaton, John Green, Nath. Gardner, Thomas, member for Cambridge.

H. Hancock, John, Esq. Henshaw, Joshua, Esq. Hopkins, Caleb, Capt. Head. John Heath, William, Capt. Hill, Henry Henshaw, Joseph Henshaw, Joshua, Jr. Henderson, Joseph Hatch, Jabez Homer, John, Capt. Holmes, Benj. Mulbury Holmes, Nath. Hichborn, Thomas Hichborn, Thomas, Jr. Harris, Samuel Henchman, Samuel Harkins, John Henshaw, Andrew Hamock, Charles Hill, Alexander Hill, John, Esq. Holbrook, Samuel How, Samuel Houghton, John Hickling, William Hall, Joseph Homes, William, Esq. Henshaw, Daniel Hinckley, John Hunt, Mr., Schoolmaster.

Harris, Stephen Harris, Stephen, Jr. Hinckley, Ebenezer Hoskins, William Hill, Dr. Hewes, Robert Honeywell, Richard Horry, Thomas

I, J. Jackson, Joseph, Esq. Inches, Henderson Jeffries, John, Dr. Jan-is, Charles, Dr. Johonnot, Francis Jones, Deacon Jarvis, Edward Jackson, Joseph Ingraham, Duncan Jeffries, David, Esq. Johonnot, Zechary, Esq. Johonnot, Gabriel Johonnot, Andrew Jones, William Ingersol, John Jenkins, John

K. Kent, Benj., Esq. Knox, Thomas Knox, Thomas Kennedy, William Kneeland, Barth.

L. Langdon, John Lucas, John Lovell, James Lasinby, Joseph Langdon, John, Jr. Langdon, Timothy Leach, John Laggett, Thomas Loring, John Loring, Caleb Leverett, John, Capt. Leverett, Thomas Lowell, John

M. Mason, Jonathan Marshall, Thomas, Colonel Marston, John, Capt. May, John May, Ephraim Malcom, Daniel, Capt. Matchett, John, Capt. Molineaux, William May, Aaron McDaniel, Jacob Morton, Joseph Morton, Dimond McDaniel, Hugh Miller, Charles McLain, John

N. Noyes, Nathaniel

O. Otis, James, The Hon. jr. Otis, Samuel Allyne Otis, Joseph

P. Pemberton, Samuel, Esq. Partridge, Samuel, Capt. Pitts, John Pitts, James, The Hon. Pitts, William Pitts, James Jr. Palfrey, William Prince, Job, Capt. Parker, Daniel Perkins, James, Jr. Peck, Thomas Handasyd Pattin, William, Capt. Peirpont, Robert Proctor, Edward Proctor, Samuel Pool, Fitch Pulling, John, Jr. Price, Thos. Maurice, Capt. Pico, Joshua Palmes, Richard Pecker, James, Dr. Price, Ezekiel Proctor, John Phillips, William, Esq. Pierce, Isaac Power, Mr., Carolina. Pierce, Mr., Carolina.

Q. Quincy, Samuel, Esq. Quincy, Josiah

R. Ruddock, John, Esq. Revere, Paul Rand, Isaac, Dr. Ray, Caleb Richardson, James Reid, Mr., Secretary to Gov. Franklin, Jerseys. Read, William, Esq. Ruggles, Samuel Robinson, Lemuel Ratcliffe, Mr., Carolina. Roberts, Peter

S. Swift, Samuel, Esq. Sweetser, John, Jr. Smith, John Spear, Nathan Spear, David Salter, Richard Savage, Habijah Savage, John Smith, William Symmes, Eb., Capt. Symmes, John Spooner, William Sharp, Gibbins Scott, John Simpson, Ebenezer Snelling, Jona., Major Sprague, John, Dr. Spooner, George Soley, John Scollay, John, Esq. Storey, Elisha, Dr. Sellon, Samuel Seaver, Ebenezer Surcomb, Richard Stanbridge, Henry Scott, William Searle, Samuel Stoddard, Jonathan Scott, James, Capt.

T. Trott, George Trott, Jonathan Turner, William Thompson, Major Trott, Samuel Trott, Thomas Turell, Joseph Tyler, Joseph Tyler, Roval, Hon. Tyler, Thomas, Esq. Tileston, Capt. Thompson, James Tuckerman, Edward Tileston, John Tileston, Thomas

V. Vose, Joseph Vernon, Fortescue

W. Whitwell, Samuel Welles, Arnold, Esq. Waldo, Joseph Wendell, John Mico Wendell, Oliver Welsh, John Warren, Joseph, Dr. Webb, Joseph Walley, Thomas Waldo, Daniel Wyer, Robert, Capt. Whitwell, William Wheelwright, Job Wheatly, Nath. Waldo, John Wendell, Jacob Waters, Josiah, Capt. White, Benjamin Williams, Joseph, Colonel White, William, Capt.

Y. Young, Thomas, Dr.

Paul Revere, one of the most famous members of the Sons of Liberty, was reportedly admitted to the group because he had many qualities that they found desirable in their members, according to the book A True Republican: The Life of Paul Revere:

“Esther Forbes wrote that the leaders of the Revolution in Boston admitted Paul Revere into their society ‘because they wished the sympathy of the large artisan class with whom he was immensely popular, and he represented an important point of view.’ His position as a respected master artisan whose ties of business and friendship connected him to Boston’s artisans, mariners, merchants and Freemasons surely made Paul Revere a desirable member of the patriot cause…Revere’s Masonic experience taught him both to know when to defer to those of superior authority and achievement and when and how to exercise leadership. Revere had also learned to appreciate the opportunity of enlightening his mind through reading, discussion, and fellowship with like-minded men. Revere’s standing in the community, his personality, and his Masonic experience would all make him a worthy member of the patriot circle.”

Public Reaction to the Sons of Liberty:

Newspapers across the colonies praised the Sons of Liberty, calling them “the only guardians and protectors of of the rights and liberties of America” and encouraged them to continue their activities.

Yet, the general public were not as enamored with the group, according to the book The Founding of a Nation:

“The glowing picture of the Sons of Liberty presented by the newspapers was not accepted by many alarmed Americans who looked upon them as nothing but dangerous, and all too often drunken, mobs. Naturally they kept such opinions to themselves or wrote of them in private letters to friends whom they could trust. There is no doubt that the leaders often found the mobs hard to control. In New York, even children paraded at night carrying effigies and candles. Mobs sometimes appeared on the streets in daytime, as upon the occasion when a British naval lieutenant said that John Holt of the New York Gazette ought to be sent to England and hanged ‘for the licentiousness of his papers.’ For three days mobs paraded the streets, threatening to murder the lieutenant, and order was not restored until General Gage provided the commanders of the naval vessel with extra arms.”

"A New Method of Macarony Making, as Practised at Boston," print, circa 1774. Print shows two men tarring and feathering a British customs officer and forcing him to drink tea. The man holding the teapot is wearing a hat with number 45 on it, a symbol referring to the John Wilkes case of 1763. The other man is holding a noose and carrying a club. The large bow in his hat indicates his membership in the Sons of Liberty.

“A New Method of Macarony Making, as Practised at Boston,” print, circa 1774. Print shows two men tarring and feathering a British customs officer and forcing him to drink tea. The man holding the teapot is wearing a hat with number 45 on it, a symbol referring to the John Wilkes case of 1763. The other man is holding a noose and carrying a club. The large bow in his hat indicates his membership in the Sons of Liberty.

After nearly a year of protests, the Sons of Liberty were finally victorious in March of 1766 when Parliament decided to repeal the Stamp Act.

The group organized celebrations across the city to mark the occasion, which included bonfires, fireworks, celebratory cannon fire, ringing church bells and decorating ships and houses with flags and streamers.

Since the group’s primary objective was to protest the Stamp Act, it disbanded after the act was repealed.

Yet, the group was revived two years later when the passage of the Townshend Act threatened the colonist’s rights once again, according to the book Revolts, Protests, Demonstrations, and Rebellions in America:

“In 1768, the Townshend Revenue Act was passed, placing special taxes on common goods such as lead, paint, glass, paper and tea. The Townshend Act garnered an even quicker response from colonists than the Stamp Act. The newly revived Sons of Liberty embarked on a two-year campaign against the Townshend Acts, playing a vital role in spreading rebellion throughout the colonies. In Boston, the Sons of Liberty invited hundreds of citizens to dine with them each August 14 to commemorate the first Stamp Act uprising. In Charlestown, the Sons of Liberty held their meetings in public, so that all could attend and listen. This helped spread the word of resistance to ordinary folks, including the illiterate who could not read pamphlets, newspapers or petitions….The Sons of Liberty helped to establish and enforce a boycott on British goods, causing trade to dry up. It was not long before the British merchants stepped in on behalf of the colonies and the Townshend Acts were repealed in 1770, except for the tax on tea. This would lead to one of the most infamous chapters of American history, the Boston Tea Party.”

Sons of Liberty & the Boston Tea Party:

This controversy over the tea tax was made worse by the passage of the Tea Act of 1773, which allowed for tea sold by British companies to be shipped directly to the colonies and sold at a discount. As the tax on tea was still in place, this act was a subtle way to persuade colonists to comply with the tax.

The act served two purposes, it helped prop up the struggling East India Company, whose sales had taken a huge hit when the colonists started to boycott imported tea after the passage of the Townshend Act, and it goaded colonists into complying with the tax.

The colonists were not pleased. They saw through the British government’s plan and the Sons of Liberty groups across the colonies responded by chasing away the tea ships in New York and Philadelphia or abandoning the cargo on the docks in Charlestown.

In Boston, the group threatened captains with tarring and feathering until the whole issue came to a head in December of 1773, when colonists refused to let three cargo ships carrying British tea, the Dartmouth, the Eleanor and the Beaver, dock in Boston harbor and unload its cargo.

A series of meetings were held, first at Faneuil Hall, then at the Old South Meetinghouse when the number of attendees grew too big for Faneuil Hall to accommodate.

During the meetings, a series of proposals and counter-proposals were explored but ultimately, on December 16th, Hutchinson refused to send the ships back to England and ordered the colonists to stop blocking the ships from landing.

According to various sources, the Sons of Liberty had anticipated this response and activated their secret plan to rush to the harbor where they rowed out to the ships and threw 90,000 pounds of tea into the harbor. This protest became the group’s most famous act of rebellion.

The identity of all the participants in the Boston Tea Party is not completely known but it has been confirmed that at least four of the Loyal Nine: Thomas Chase, Thomas Crafts, Benjamin Edes and Stephen Cleverly, as well as several Sons of Liberty: including Paul Revere and Thomas Young, participated.

The Sons of Liberty continued to be active until the Revolutionary War ended in 1783 and the group finally disbanded.

Sources: “Sons of Liberty.” Massachusetts Historical Society , www.masshist.org/objects/cabinet/august2001/august2001.html Carp, Benjamin L.”Terms of Estrangement: Who Were the Sons of Liberty?” Colonial Williamsburg Official History & Citizenship Site , Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, www.history.org/Foundation/journal/winter12/liberty.cfm “Sons of Liberty.” Boston Tea Party Ships and Museum , www.bostonteapartyship.com/sons-of-liberty The Oxford Handbook of the History of Nationalism . Edited by John Breuilly. Oxford University Press, 2013. Jensen, Merrill. The Founding of a Nation: A History of the American Revolution, 1763-1776 . Hackett Publishing Company, 1968. Revolts, Protests, Demonstrations, and Rebellions in American History . Edited by Steven Laurence Danver. Vol. I, ABC-CLIO, 2011. Becker, Carl. The Eve of the Revolution . Yale University Press, 1918. Triber, Jayne E. A True Republican: The Life of Paul Revere . University of Massachusetts Press, 1998.

17 thoughts on “ The Sons of Liberty: Who Were They and What Did They Do? ”

An amazing part of our history, and a part of my history,as Benjamin Edes was my great grandfather 6 generations back.

That’s very cool, Ben. William Burbeck was my 7th great grandfather. Maybe they mingled at the Liberty Tree dinner.

wow i wish i had a cool generation like you guys

You probably do! Unless, of course, your ancestors were loyalists, in which case you should probably keep it to yourself. lol

this is fucking great

hey watch the language

yea dude watch the language profanity

ya dude don’t cuss

Calm yourself children read this stuff

how would I cite this?

In MLA 8 it would be: Brooks, Rebecca Beatrice. “The Sons of Liberty: Who Were They and What Did They Do?” History of Massachusetts Blog, Rebecca Beatrice Brooks, 14 Nov. 2014, historyofmassachusetts.org/the-sons-of-liberty-who-were-they-and-what-did-they-do/

thank you so very much

I learned so much

This is so helpful b/c im writing a paper and needed some sources and this is one of the many i used and i love it

Awesome, this helped me with an assignment I had

Aaron May is my 6th great-grandfather. Glad to see a family history of sticking it to the man.

Comments are closed.

Who Were the Sons of Liberty?

sons of liberty essay

The Sons of Liberty was a secret underground society created due to the social and political fallout of the French and Indian War . The war, which took place throughout the world, was just one part of a larger conflict called the Seven Years War, a war that many historians consider to be “The First World War.” The French and Indian War, coupled with the fighting throughout the globe, nearly pushed the British Empire to the brink of financial collapse due to the increased spending needed to fight an international war. As a result, the British increased taxation among the colonies and stationed soldiers of the Crown within these colonies to guard the Empire’s new territorial gains. The British Empire needed money and goods for their empire, and they turned to the colonies for both. However, the Sons of Liberty made it their goal that the Empire received neither.

The British Parliament rationalized that the fighting in North America against the French was to protect the colonists and their interests, and thus, they should pay their share in taxes to help pay off their war-debt alongside stationing British soldiers within the new territorial gains. So, the solution was to forcefully quarter soldiers with American colonists via the Quartering Act . This quartering also increased the required funds needed in order to sustain the lives of thousands of British soldiers, who also had to be fed, out of pocket, by the colonists. The first of many taxes forced upon the American people was the Sugar Act , which taxed the transport and sale of raw sugar, molasses, and rum throughout the colonies. Smuggling, however, helped to circumvent this tax, but only partly

Additionally, the increased taxation of the colonies combined with the financial hardships of the colonists due to the forced quartering of British soldiers, and the numerous taxes finally boiled over once the British Parliament passed the Stamp Act . The Act required an additional tax for a stamp on all paper documents or products; this included items such as deeds and other legal documents, to newspapers, and even playing cards. Because the British, quite literally, found a way to tax almost every aspect of colonial life, the Sons of Liberty instigated riots throughout Boston, Massachusetts.  

sons of liberty essay

Once the Stamp Act had passed, a secret group called the Loyal Nine, the precursor to the Sons of Liberty, gathered crowds around the famous Liberty Tree in Boston. The crowd, angered by the Stamp Act and provoked by the encouragement of the Loyal Nine, began rioting throughout the streets of Boston. These riots targeted the taxable goods and the tax collectors, which put many colonial officials at risk of being tarred and feathered or even killed. The rioters also destroyed an immeasurable amount of property. In one case, Boston rioters raided the home of the Lieutenant Governor Thomas Hutchinson and stole an estimated £250,000 worth of his possessions. The Loyal Nine, having sparked resistance, turned to publishing patriotic ideas in the Boston Gazette. Eventually, the Loyal Nine began signing their political dissent as ‘The Sons of Liberty’ thus establishing a much larger resistance group. What was originally organized in Boston by a local brewer turned politician, Samuel Adams , quickly snowballed into a larger network of resistance to the British Crown . With the coordination of various Sons of Liberty chapters, the Stamp Act was repealed within one year of it being enacted. However, this victory came at a price. The British Parliament passed the Declaratory Act when they repealed the Stamp Act. The Declaratory Act was more of a formal threat than an actual piece of legislation, as the Act stated that the British King and Parliament have the power to enact any and all legislation onto the colonies. This Act only served to reinforce the Sons of Liberty’s idea of “No Taxation Without Representation,” as written by a fellow member, James Otis Jr.

Despite the revolutionary patriotic sentiments of the colonies, Britain was still in debt and needed money. The British Parliament, in desperation, passed the Townshend Acts , which increased taxes and tariffs on numerous products from Britain like lead, paint, paper, ink, porcelain, glass, and tea. Additionally, the Act functioned as a general search warrant, which allowed British soldiers to enter any colonist’s home to find and take smuggled goods. As the Sons of Liberty took to smuggling in cheaper goods to avoid British taxes. Eventually, Sons of Liberty member and tea smuggler John Hancock was captured and put on trial by the British. Hancock turned to fellow Sons of Liberty member, cousin of Samuel Adams, and prominent attorney, John Adams . Adams successfully defended Hancock, but smuggling had increasingly become riskier. So, under the direction of the Sons of Liberty, the colonists organized a boycott of all British goods being sold in the colonies. Under Samuel Adams and other members of the Sons of Liberty, the boycott was enforced throughout Boston and the surrounding Massachusetts area. Anyone who dared to sell British goods risked their store being vandalized or worse. Even their physical safety was at risk as the Sons of Liberty turned to violence to threaten shopkeepers that did not comply with the boycott. As a result of the unrest in Boston, Lieutenant General Thomas Gage , the British Commander of North America, was sent to Boston to control the patriots and the Sons of Liberty. However, the British mission of pacification and peacekeeping failed on the night of March 5 th , 1770 when eight British soldiers guarding the Customs House in Boston opened fire upon a mob of angry colonists . When the smoke cleared, five colonists were dead, and another six wounded. No one, not even the British soldiers, could recall how the shooting started and if there was even an order given. However, a local Boston silversmith, engraver, and Sons of Liberty member Paul Revere used this massacre as propaganda to fuel patriotic feelings and a general anti-British sentiment throughout the colonies. Soon, news spread throughout the colonies about the massacre with the accompanying engraving depicting the ‘complete brutality’ and ‘barbarism’ of the British Army.  

sons of liberty essay

Due to the increasing success of the Sons of Liberty, the British Parliament eased many of the duties in the colonies. However, the Parliament continued the high tax on tea, as the British Crown desperately needed money. Even worse, the British East India Company was close to bankruptcy. The British East India Company, essentially an extension of the British government, was an imperial trade company that transported tea from Asia for consumption in western markets. However, rather than have a private civilian owner of the East India Company, much like a CEO, the company was instead to be owned by the British Parliament and King. Via the Tea Act , the British Government was forcing the colonists to pay extremely high taxes on British tea, while the British tea importers paid no taxes or import duties. These actions created a monopoly for the British East India Company in the colonial tea market, undercutting local merchants and other foreign tea importers.  

In 1773, the refusal to pay for British tea on behalf of the colonists fell upon deaf ears, and the East India Company’s trading ships were to enter Boston Harbor to sell the tea. However, rather than purchase the tea, on the night of December 16 th , 1773 the Sons of Liberty boarded the trade ships docked in Griffin’s Wharf and threw the shipments of tea overboard in an event known as the Boston Tea Party. Members of the Sons of Liberty allied with local patriot tea merchants, smugglers of Dutch tea, and any patriot infuriated by the taxation without representation to wear traditional Native American garments to signify that these colonials identify more with their American roots rather than their status as British subjects. After three hours, over 342 chests of tea were heaved into the harbor. The destruction of the tea imports cost the British Empire, valued today at over $1,700,000.  

sons of liberty essay

In retaliation, the British Government passed the Intolerable Acts, which were called the Coercive Acts in the colonies. These Acts covered four major points. The Act shut down Boston Harbor , suspended trials by jury, prohibited elections and the meeting of the state assembly, and aggressively forced the quartering of British soldiers in private buildings and homes. These Acts punished the Boston Sons of Liberty and the Massachusetts colony, but also inspired increasingly revolutionary ideals. The resistance encouraged other Sons of Liberty chapters to rebel in their own ways. For example, the Maryland chapter of the Sons of Liberty set the trade ship the ‘Peggy Stewart’ on fire because it was importing British tea.

Eventually, the patriotic resistance to British rule became too much to handle and revolution and war was inevitable. When lawmakers of Virginia gathered in 1775 to discuss negotiations with the British King, Sons of Liberty member, Patrick Henry exclaimed to the Second Virginia Convention “Give me liberty or give me death!”. Thus, cementing the American stance for independence from British rule and initiating the American commitment to the Revolutionary War.

A collage inspired by Revolutionary War music

Echoes of Courage: Folk Music’s Ties to America's Wars

A still from When Washington Walked Away from Power

Answers to Questions Kids Ask About the Revolutionary War

sons of liberty essay

"Negro, Mulatto, or Indian man slave[s]": African Americans in the Rhode Island Regiments, 1775-1783

You may also like.

American Revolution

Sons of liberty.

Flag used by the Sons of Liberty

  • They had their own flag which had five red and four white vertical stripes.
  • In 1772, members of the Sons of Liberty set fire to the British ship the HMS Gaspee.
  • They had the motto of "No taxation without representation."
  • In protest to the Stamp Act, a mob formed by the Sons of Liberty got out of control and destroyed much of the home of Lieutenant Governor Thomas Hutchinson.
  • A constant battle was waged in New York City over Liberty Poles. The Sons of the Liberty would put them up and British soldiers would tear them down. As a result, the Liberty Pole became a symbol of the colonists' freedom.
  • The British sometimes referred to them as the "Sons of Violence" in hopes of giving them a bad reputation.
  • By the time the revolution began, the Sons of Liberty were fairly well organized with groups from different colonies communicating and planning protests together.

Raising the liberty pole

  • Take a ten question quiz about this page.
  • Listen to a recorded reading of this page:



























































  • Fundamentals NEW

Britannica Kids logo

  • Biographies
  • Compare Countries
  • World Atlas

Sons of Liberty

Related resources for this article.

  • Primary Sources & E-Books

The Sons of Liberty were groups of American colonists who formed to oppose British taxes on the 13 colonies. They fought for the rights of the colonists. Like many other colonists, the Sons of Liberty thought that they shouldn’t be taxed by the British unless they were represented in the British Parliament. The Sons of Liberty disagreed not only with the taxes but also with how the British were ruling the American colonies in general. The activities of the Sons of Liberty helped lead the colonies into the American Revolution.

The Sons of Liberty formed in the summer of 1765 to oppose the Stamp Act. The British Parliament passed the Stamp Act to raise money by making the colonists pay a tax on all business and legal papers, newspapers, pamphlets, and playing cards.

Did You Know? The Boston chapter of the Sons of Liberty often met in secret under cover of darkness beneath an elm tree. The elm came to be known as the “Liberty Tree.”

The Sons of Liberty rallied support for colonial resistance through the use of petitions, assemblies, and protests. They published newspaper accounts of their activities to encourage colonists to disobey the Stamp Act. At times they would use violence against England’s officials. The Sons of Liberty were key in keeping the British authorities from enforcing the Stamp Act. They remained an active force against England in the years leading up to the American Revolution. The Sons of Liberty participated in such events as the Boston Tea Party in 1773. During that event, colonists disguised as Native Americans destroyed tea to protest a British tax on that product.

Explore Further

  • American Revolution
  • Boston Tea Party
  • Samuel Adams
  • John Hancock
  • Paul Revere

It’s here: the NEW Britannica Kids website!

We’ve been busy, working hard to bring you new features and an updated design. We hope you and your family enjoy the NEW Britannica Kids. Take a minute to check out all the enhancements!

  • The same safe and trusted content for explorers of all ages.
  • Accessible across all of today's devices: phones, tablets, and desktops.
  • Improved homework resources designed to support a variety of curriculum subjects and standards.
  • A new, third level of content, designed specially to meet the advanced needs of the sophisticated scholar.
  • And so much more!

inspire icon

Want to see it in action?

subscribe icon

Start a free trial

To share with more than one person, separate addresses with a comma

Choose a language from the menu above to view a computer-translated version of this page. Please note: Text within images is not translated, some features may not work properly after translation, and the translation may not accurately convey the intended meaning. Britannica does not review the converted text.

After translating an article, all tools except font up/font down will be disabled. To re-enable the tools or to convert back to English, click "view original" on the Google Translate toolbar.

  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use

IMAGES

  1. Loyal Nine or The Sons of Liberty Essay Example

    sons of liberty essay

  2. Famous Americans- The Sons of Liberty by Write Moments

    sons of liberty essay

  3. Sons of Liberty Online Assignment W/Article (Microsoft Word)

    sons of liberty essay

  4. Sons of Liberty

    sons of liberty essay

  5. Sons of Liberty Essay Example

    sons of liberty essay

  6. Sons of Liberty: Liberty Pole by Teach N Learn

    sons of liberty essay

COMMENTS

  1. Sons of Liberty

    Sons of Liberty. Date: 1765 - c. 1783. Key People: Isaac Sears. Sons of Liberty, organization formed in the American colonies in the summer of 1765 to oppose the Stamp Act. The Sons of Liberty took their name from a speech given in the British Parliament by Isaac Barré (February 1765), in which he referred to the colonials who had opposed ...

  2. Sons of Liberty, Facts, Summary, Significance, APUSH

    Sons of Liberty Summary. The Sons of Liberty — also known as the Liberty Boys — was a radical group of American colonists in Colonial America that often met in secret in order to plan public protests against the policies of the British government. The first group was formed in Boston in 1765 and quickly spread throughout the colonies.

  3. Sons of Liberty

    A 1765 handbill, announcing an upcoming "Sons of Liberty" public event.. The Sons of Liberty was a loosely organized, clandestine, sometimes violent, political organization active in the Thirteen American Colonies founded to advance the rights of the colonists and to fight taxation by the British government. It played a major role in most colonies in battling the Stamp Act in 1765 [1] and ...

  4. The Sons of Liberty

    In folklore, the Sons of Liberty were organised, coordinated colonial groups that took radical action against unpopular British policies from 1765 onwards. The reality is that 'Sons of Liberty' was an umbrella term that described a range of individuals and groups who opposed British policy and actions. This included groups like the Boston ...

  5. Who Were the Sons of Liberty?

    The Sons of Liberty were a grassroots group of instigators and provocateurs in colonial America who used an extreme form of civil disobedience—threats, and in some cases actual violence—to ...

  6. The Sons of Liberty

    The Sons of Liberty. In Boston in early summer of 1765 a group of shopkeepers and artisans who called themselves The Loyal Nine, began preparing for agitation against the Stamp Act. As that group grew, it came to be known as the Sons of Liberty. And grow it did! These were not the leading men of Boston, but rather workers and tradesmen.

  7. PDF Sons of Liberty: Rebels or Revolutionaries?

    Sons of Liberty: Rebels or Revolutionaries? Background: During the 1750's and 1760's, South Carolina and the other American colonies became involved in the military and economic rivalry between the French and the English. This rivalry led to a series of wars. The war changed the relationship of the colonies with the mother

  8. Sons of Liberty: History, Members, Facts & Accomplishments

    The Boston chapter of the Sons of Liberty was established around the summer of 1765. And soon, the group's tentacles had spread to other colonies. The leaders of the of Sons of Liberty worked extremely hard to coordinate their activities, hoping to provide a more united front against Britain's unsavory tax policies.

  9. The Sons of Liberty

    John Hancock (January 23, 1737 - October 8, 1793) Most famous for his bold signature on the Declaration of Independence, John Hancock was a statesman, Second President of the Continental Congress, and Authoritative voice of the Revolution.A merchant whose business was greatly affected by the Intolerable Acts, Hancock joined forces with the Sons of Liberty to actively oppose British influence ...

  10. PDF Grade 8 Sons of Liberty: Rebels or Revolutionaries?

    Sons of Liberty DBQ: Sources and Essay Organizer Note: It is important to allow students to form their own opinions as long as primary sources support their argument. Shmoop.com offers a step-by-step method of creating an argumentative essay, teachers are suggested to use this site to avert the stress of writing.

  11. Sons Of Liberty

    SONS OF LIBERTY. Disregarding American protests that the colonists could not be taxed because they were not represented in Parliament, in March 1765 the British government enacted a stamp tax to take effect in the American colonies on November 1, 1765. Speaking against the proposed Stamp Act in the House of Commons, Isaac Barré had described the Americans as "Sons of Liberty" who would stead ...

  12. DBQ: Sons of Liberty: Rebels or Revolutionaries?

    The purpose of this assignment is to have students analyze primary sources to formulate a hypothesis/point of view about the Sons of Liberty; the final product will be an essay where students will use selected documents within the DBQ as evidence to support their stance. Standards | Vocabulary | Context | Questions - Doc #1, #2, #3, #4

  13. 5.2: The Stamp Act and the Sons and Daughters of Liberty

    This was a time-honored liberty of representative legislatures of the colonial governments. The passage of the Stamp Act meant that starting on November 1, 1765, the colonists would contribute £60,000 per year—17 percent of the total cost—to the upkeep of the ten thousand British soldiers in North America (Figure 5.2.2).

  14. The Sons of Liberty: Who Were They and What Did They Do?

    The Sons of Liberty was a group of political dissidents that formed in the North American British colonies during the early days of the American Revolution in Boston, Mass. The following are some facts about the Sons of Liberty: The Sons of Liberty formed to protest the passage of the Stamp Act of 1765. The Stamp Act was a tax that required ...

  15. Sons of Liberty

    A 1765 handbill, announcing an upcoming "Sons of Liberty" public event.. In popular thought, the Sons of Liberty was a formal underground organization with recognized members and leaders. More likely, the name was an underground term for any men resisting new Crown taxes and laws. [3] The well-known label allowed organizers to make or create anonymous summons to a Liberty Tree, "Liberty Pole ...

  16. Who Were the Sons of Liberty?

    The Sons of Liberty was a secret underground society created due to the social and political fallout of the French and Indian War. The war, which took place throughout the world, was just one part of a larger conflict called the Seven Years War, a war that many historians consider to be "The First World War.". The French and Indian War ...

  17. American Revolution: Sons of Liberty

    A constant battle was waged in New York City over Liberty Poles. The Sons of the Liberty would put them up and British soldiers would tear them down. As a result, the Liberty Pole became a symbol of the colonists' freedom. The British sometimes referred to them as the "Sons of Violence" in hopes of giving them a bad reputation.

  18. Sons of Liberty

    The Sons of Liberty were groups of American colonists who disagreed with British rule of the 13 North American colonies . Among the members were many well-known patriots, such as Samuel Adams , John Hancock , and Paul Revere . Their activities helped lead the colonies into the American Revolution .

  19. Sons of Liberty

    The Sons of Liberty formed in the summer of 1765 to oppose the Stamp Act. The British Parliament passed the Stamp Act to raise money by making the colonists pay a tax on all business and legal papers, newspapers, pamphlets, and playing cards. The first Sons of Liberty groups started in Boston, but soon others appeared throughout the colonies.

  20. Essay On Sons Of Liberty

    Essay On Sons Of Liberty. The Sons of Liberty are shrouded in secrecy and mystery, but they played a vital part in the pursuit of American Independence. The Sons of Liberty were established in Boston and New York through the guidance of Samuel Adams. The Sons of Liberty would meet under the cover of darkness to avoid detection from the British ...

  21. Sons Of Liberty Essay

    358 Words2 Pages. The Sons of Liberty was a secret organization that began its rage in 1765. This vicious group committed cruel and brutal acts. They were set against the idea of the stamp act. Many believed that the sons of liberty were heroes, but truly they were an organization of fanatics.The name " Sons of Liberty" was taken from Isaac ...

  22. Sons Of Liberty Essay

    527 Words. 3 Pages. Open Document. The Sons of Liberty was an organization that was created in the Thirteen American Colonies.The secret group was formed to protect the rights of the colonists and to fight taxation by the British government.By the end of the year the Sons of Liberty existed to every colony.The Sons of Liberty formed out of a ...

  23. Free Essay: Sons of liberty

    The Stamp Act of 1765 was passed to ease the debt on Britain due to the Sevens' Year War. The tax was a tax on all newspapers and documents. The tax did not sit well with the colonies. There was opposition to the tax right from the start. The Sons of Liberty were defiant and started their protests right away.