DBQ: Cotton Gin DBQ: United States History & the Constitution How did World War II impact the modern women’s liberation movement? DBQ: Sons of Liberty: Rebels or Revolutionaries?- Filed under Uncategorized
Historical Question: Considering the actions the Sons of Liberty committed against British colonial government, are they deemed as rebels or revolutionaries? Introduction: The Rebels or Revolutionaries DBQ includes the Historical Thinking of : Comparison, Causation, Context and Evidence, and the literacy skills of writing a historical essay. This DBQ serves as a method of analyzing the Stamp Act, Tea Act, Boston Massacre, and the Charleston Tea Party from a cultural standpoint. It aids the students in periodization and identifying the factors that lead to the American Revolution by providing documents that helps to examine the causation and context that led to the creation of the Sons of Liberty The purpose of this assignment is to have students analyze primary sources to formulate a hypothesis/point of view about the Sons of Liberty; the final product will be an essay where students will use selected documents within the DBQ as evidence to support their stance. Standards | Vocabulary | Context | Questions – Doc #1 , #2 , #3 , #4 Time Required: Estimated time frame: three days in a 90 minute class period Click here to download the full DBQ: Sons of Liberty: Rebels or Revolutionaries? Standard 8.2 and Sources with Questions and Essay Organizer South Carolina Standards (2020) Targeted Standard: Standard 8.2: Demonstrate an understanding of how South Carolinians and Americans created a revolutionary form of government during the period of 1757– 1815. 8.2.CO Compare the motives and demographics of loyalists and patriots within South Carolina and the colonies. 8.2.CX Contextualize the roles of various groups of South Carolinians as the colonies moved toward becoming an independent nation. 8.2.E Utilize a variety of primary and secondary sources to analyze multiple perspectives on the development of democracy in South Carolina and the United States. - Sons of Liberty
- British Parliament
- Boston Massacre
- Charleston Tea Party
Historical Context and Background Information: The Sons of Liberty was an organization that was created in the Thirteen American Colonies. The secret society was formed to protect the rights of the colonists and to fight taxation by the British government. They played a major role in most colonies in battling the Parliament requests and taxes from 1773-1775. Guiding Questions and Sources Document 1: Lantern slide depicting a torch light parade in New York City of Sons of Liberty against the Stamp Act of 1870 . - Based off the lantern slide above, what is the shared view of the colonist marching?
- Describe the images in the lantern slide that brought you to your statement above.
- When is it the appropriate time for people to form in groups to rally for a specific cause? Use a modern day example to support your answer.
Citation: Parade of the Sons of Liberty. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://dcmny.org/islandora/object/gsmt:103Document 2 : The Patriotic barber of New York, or the Captain in the suds, 1775 - How are the colonist treating the captain, a supporter of the British Parliament?
- Support your above statement with examples from the image above.
- When minorities were denied service throughout history the owner/operator was seen in a negative light. Is this situation any different, how?
Citation: The Patriotic barber of New York, or the Captain in the suds, (1775). Retrieved July 12, 2018, fromhttps://www.loc.gov/item/97514631/ Document 3 : Bostonians Tarring and Feathering - This propaganda poster was posted throughout cities. What audiences do you think they are aiming to reach?
- Identify the symbolism shown on the Liberty Tree.
- Describe the actions of the men in the background and forefront. How does this reflect their sentiments about the imposed taxes?
- A noose is guaranteed death but tarring and feathering is a form of torture. Why do you think it is was placed in the tree?
Citation: Bostonians Tarring and Feathering. (n.d.). Retrieved July 12, 2018, from https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/sons-of-liberty-illustration.jpgDocument 4 : The Alternative at Williamsburg - Who were the loyalist? Why are they being pressured to sign their allegiance?
- What was the result of ‘tories’ who did not agree with the ‘liberty men’?
- Is it right for a group of people to pressure individuals into something they do not believe in because they are the minority?
Citation: The Alternative at Williamsburg (n.d.). Retrieved July 12, 2018, from http://www.history.org/foundation/journal/winter12/liberty.cfmDigital Collections Information This DBQ is based on images and/or documents from several institutions including the University of South Carolina Libraries, The National Archives, and The Library of Congress. See individual images for institution information. To see other collections that may be helpful to your search, visit the Digital Collections homepage or visit SCDL ’s collection. DBQ Prepared by Whitney Jones, 2018Made with by Graphene Themes . - Pre-Colonial Mass
- 17th Century Mass
- 18th Century Mass
- 19th Century Mass
The Sons of Liberty: Who Were They and What Did They Do?The Sons of Liberty was a group of political dissidents that formed in the North American British colonies during the early days of the American Revolution in Boston, Mass. The following are some facts about the Sons of Liberty: The Sons of Liberty formed to protest the passage of the Stamp Act of 1765 . The Stamp Act was a tax that required printed materials in the colony, such as newspapers and legal documents, to be published on paper produced in London and embossed with the revenue stamp. The colonists resented the Stamp Act and felt that being taxed without their consent was a violation of their rights as British citizens. The Loyal Nine:When the Sons of Liberty first formed in the summer of 1765, the group was originally known as the Loyal Nine, which consisted of nine Boston shopkeepers and artisans: John Avery Jr, distiller Henry Bass, merchant and cousin to Samuel Adams Thomas Chase, distiller Thomas Crafts, painter Stephen Cleverly, brazier Benjamin Edes, printer of the Boston Gazette Joseph Field, ship captain John Smith, brazier George Trott, jeweler The ninth member was either Henry Welles, a mariner, or Joseph Field, master of a vessel. How the Sons of Liberty Got Their Name:The term “the Sons of Liberty” actually came from a debate over the Stamp Act in Parliament in February of 1765, during which Irishman Isaac Barre made a speech defending the colonists and criticizing the British government’s actions against them, according to the book The Eve of the Revolution: “[Were] they nourished by your indulgence? They grew by your neglect of them. As soon as you began to care about them, that care was exercised in sending persons to rule over them, in one department and another… sent to spy out their liberty, to misrepresent their actions and to prey upon them; men whose behaviour on many occasions has caused the blood of these sons of liberty to recoil within them…” When the group officially expanded and adopted the name “The Sons of Liberty” is not known since the secretive group left virtually no paper trail. Sons of Liberty & the Stamp Act Riot:What is known about the group is that in August of 1765, the Loyal Nine acquired the help of Ebenezer McIntosh, a local cordwainer and leader of the South End Pope’s Day Company (Pope’s Day was the Boston colonial version of Guy Fawkes Day) to pull off its first protest, according to the book A True Republican: The Life of Paul Revere: “On the morning of August 14, 1765, Bostonians witnessed a ritual of protest similar to the mocking, world-turned-upside-down festivities of the Pope’s Day processions. The Loyal Nine prepared effigies of Andrew Oliver, the stamp master, and Lord Bute, the king’s favorite, who, though out of office since the end of 1763, was considered the instigator of the unpopular revenue measures. McIntosh’s men, mostly artisans from the lower ranks of the craft hierarchy, laborers and mariners, hung the effigies from a large elm tree at Essex and Orange Streets in the South End, a tree soon to become famous as Liberty Tree. A label on the breast of Oliver’s effigy praised liberty and denounced ‘Vengence on the Subvertors of it,’ and another label warned: ‘He that takes this down is an enemy to his country.’ At sunset, forty or fifty artisans and tradesman took down the effigies and carried them in a procession to Andrew Oliver’s dock, where the mob leveled a building they believed would be the stamp office, and then to Fort Hill, where they burned the figures. In his journal, John Boyle stressed that the procession was ‘followed by a great concourse of people, some of the highest reputation, and in the greatest order.’ At this point, the less genteel members of the mob, led my McIntosh and angered by Thomas Hutchinson’s attempts to disperse them, proceeded to wreak havoc on Andrew Oliver’s house, pulling down fences, breaking windows, looking glasses, and furniture, stripping his trees of fruit, and drinking his wine.” The following night, August 15, the mob formed a blockade in front of Governor Thomas Hutchinson’s mansion, demanding that he denounce the Stamp Act in his official letters to London. Hutchinson, a loyalist who had written the book The History of the Province of Massachusetts-Bay in which he condemned a revolt by Boston citizens in 1689 against the rule of governor Sir Edmund Andros, refused. A few weeks later, on August 26, the mob returned. “The Bostonians Paying the Excise-man, or Tarring and Feathering,” print by Philip Dawe, circa 1774 After attacking the homes of William Story, deputy register of the Vice-Admiralty Court, and Benjamin Hallowell, comptroller of customs, they then attacked Hutchinson’s house. Hutchinson and his family were able to escape the home just minutes before the mob arrived. Upon breaking into the mansion, the mob destroyed Hutchinson’s furniture, wrecked the garden, tore out the windows, walls, wainscoting, tiles and even tore down the cupola on the roof. In addition, they stole the contents of his wine cellar, £900 in sterling, every valuable object in his home and destroyed his collection of books and papers from his research for his history book. Members of the Sons of Liberty: 1st Row: Samuel Adams • Benedict Arnold • John Hancock • Patrick Henry • James Otis, Jr. 2nd Row: Paul Revere • James Swan • Alexander McDougall • Benjamin Rush • Charles Thomson 3rd Row: Joseph Warren • Marinus Willett • Oliver Wolcott • Christopher Gadsden • Haym Salomon For a number of years after the Stamp Act riot, the Sons of Liberty organized annual celebrations to mark the event, which consisted of parades and gatherings at the Liberty Tree on Boston Common or large dinners, known as “Liberty dinners,” under a tent at the Liberty Tree Tavern in Dorchester. By the end of 1765, Sons of Liberty groups had sprouted up in every state in the colony. Women also joined the cause by forming local chapters of the Daughters of Liberty , which organized spinning groups to spin cloth and supported a boycott against British imports. Members of the Sons of Liberty:Due to the secret nature of the Sons of Liberty, the group never kept any official rosters of its members. Yet, in 1869 a handwritten list titled “An Alphabetical List of the Sons of Liberty Who Dined at the Liberty Tree, Dorchester Aug. 14, 1769” was donated to the Massachusetts Historical Society. This list of over 300 names was compiled by an attendee of the event, William Palfrey, and was donated by his grandson on the 100th anniversary of the event. The names on the list are as follows: A. Adams, Samuel Adams, John, Esq. Avery, John, Esq. Avery, John, Jr. Appleton, Nath. Austin, Benj., Esq. Austin, Samuel Ayres, Joseph Abbot, Samuel Avis, Samuel B. Brattle, Thos. Bradford, John, Capt. Bowes, Nicholas Barber, Nath. Bant, William Boyer, Peter Barrell, Joseph Balch, Nath. Blake, John, Capt. Blanchard, Caleb Brimmer, Martin Brimmer, Hermon Black, Andrew Burt, Benjamin Brigden, Zachary Bowes, William Bruce, Stephen Bass, Moses Belcher Bass, Henry Boynton, Richard, Capt. Breck, William Barrett, Samuel Bradford, Jos., Jr. Brown, John Baker, John Brattle, Brig. General Bowdoin, James, Hon. Burdet, Benj. Barnard, Benj. Brackett, Joshua Bell, William Belcher, Sarson Boardman, Win. Boweyer, Dan. Bowman, Rev. Dan. Barrett, John, Esq. Burbeck, William Billings, Richard Brown, Enoch Binney, Capt. Bryant, .lames Bryant, John C. Cushing, Mr. Speaker Cooper, William Cushing, John Church, Benj. Church, Benj., Jr. Church, Edward Cleverly, Stephen Carnes, Edward Cobb, Capt. Collins, Ezra Copely, John Cudworth, Benj. Cudworth, Nath. Cheever, Wm. Downe Colson, David Colson, Adam Cunningham, Major Cunningham, James Chardon, Peter, Esq. Cranch, Richard Cunningham, Jno. Cazneau, Andrew, Esq. Carter, James Cattle, Wm., Esq., Carolina, Crofts, Thomas Cheever, Ezek., Jr., Esq. Chase, Thomas Cunningham, William Crane, John Clap, Ebenezer Cox, Lemuel Carnes, Joseph Dana, Richard, Esq. Dickinson, Mr., brother to the farmer. Dawes, Thomas, Capt. Dennie, William Davis, William Deshon, Moses, Esq. Dalton, James, Capt. Dalton, Peter Roe Davis, Edward Dashwood, Capt. Dorr, Ebenezer Don-, Harbottle Dean, John, Capt. Davis, Caleb Davis, Aaron Davis, Robert Danforth, Samuel, Dr. Davis, Solomon Dolbeare, Benj. Dorrington, John, Capt. Dickman, William Doane, Elisha, Major E. Erving, John, Hon. Erving, George, Esq. Edes, Benjamin Edwards, John Eliot, Deacon Eliot, Joseph, Jr. Edes, Thomas Emmes, Samuel Edwards, Alex. F. Freeman, Jon., Capt. Fleet, Thomas Fleet, John Foster, Deacon Foster, Timothy Foster, Bossenger Foster, William Fitch, Timothy Flagg, Josiah Fowle, William Farmer, Paul G. Greenleaf, William Gore, John, Capt. Gore, John, Jr. Green, George Gill, John Gill, Moses Grant, Samuel Green, Francis Gardner. Joseph, Dr. Greenleaf, John Gardner, John Gridley, Col. Green, Joshua Green, Edward Greenwood, Capt. Griffiths, John Gooding, Benj. Griffen, Wm., Esq., of Virginia. Green, John Green, Joseph Greenleaf, Oliver Greenleaf, Stephen Greene, Benj., Jr. Gray, William Gwin, Capt, Newbury Gooding, Joseph Gray, Lewis Greaton, John Green, Nath. Gardner, Thomas, member for Cambridge. H. Hancock, John, Esq. Henshaw, Joshua, Esq. Hopkins, Caleb, Capt. Head. John Heath, William, Capt. Hill, Henry Henshaw, Joseph Henshaw, Joshua, Jr. Henderson, Joseph Hatch, Jabez Homer, John, Capt. Holmes, Benj. Mulbury Holmes, Nath. Hichborn, Thomas Hichborn, Thomas, Jr. Harris, Samuel Henchman, Samuel Harkins, John Henshaw, Andrew Hamock, Charles Hill, Alexander Hill, John, Esq. Holbrook, Samuel How, Samuel Houghton, John Hickling, William Hall, Joseph Homes, William, Esq. Henshaw, Daniel Hinckley, John Hunt, Mr., Schoolmaster. Harris, Stephen Harris, Stephen, Jr. Hinckley, Ebenezer Hoskins, William Hill, Dr. Hewes, Robert Honeywell, Richard Horry, Thomas I, J. Jackson, Joseph, Esq. Inches, Henderson Jeffries, John, Dr. Jan-is, Charles, Dr. Johonnot, Francis Jones, Deacon Jarvis, Edward Jackson, Joseph Ingraham, Duncan Jeffries, David, Esq. Johonnot, Zechary, Esq. Johonnot, Gabriel Johonnot, Andrew Jones, William Ingersol, John Jenkins, John K. Kent, Benj., Esq. Knox, Thomas Knox, Thomas Kennedy, William Kneeland, Barth. L. Langdon, John Lucas, John Lovell, James Lasinby, Joseph Langdon, John, Jr. Langdon, Timothy Leach, John Laggett, Thomas Loring, John Loring, Caleb Leverett, John, Capt. Leverett, Thomas Lowell, John M. Mason, Jonathan Marshall, Thomas, Colonel Marston, John, Capt. May, John May, Ephraim Malcom, Daniel, Capt. Matchett, John, Capt. Molineaux, William May, Aaron McDaniel, Jacob Morton, Joseph Morton, Dimond McDaniel, Hugh Miller, Charles McLain, John N. Noyes, Nathaniel O. Otis, James, The Hon. jr. Otis, Samuel Allyne Otis, Joseph P. Pemberton, Samuel, Esq. Partridge, Samuel, Capt. Pitts, John Pitts, James, The Hon. Pitts, William Pitts, James Jr. Palfrey, William Prince, Job, Capt. Parker, Daniel Perkins, James, Jr. Peck, Thomas Handasyd Pattin, William, Capt. Peirpont, Robert Proctor, Edward Proctor, Samuel Pool, Fitch Pulling, John, Jr. Price, Thos. Maurice, Capt. Pico, Joshua Palmes, Richard Pecker, James, Dr. Price, Ezekiel Proctor, John Phillips, William, Esq. Pierce, Isaac Power, Mr., Carolina. Pierce, Mr., Carolina. Q. Quincy, Samuel, Esq. Quincy, Josiah R. Ruddock, John, Esq. Revere, Paul Rand, Isaac, Dr. Ray, Caleb Richardson, James Reid, Mr., Secretary to Gov. Franklin, Jerseys. Read, William, Esq. Ruggles, Samuel Robinson, Lemuel Ratcliffe, Mr., Carolina. Roberts, Peter S. Swift, Samuel, Esq. Sweetser, John, Jr. Smith, John Spear, Nathan Spear, David Salter, Richard Savage, Habijah Savage, John Smith, William Symmes, Eb., Capt. Symmes, John Spooner, William Sharp, Gibbins Scott, John Simpson, Ebenezer Snelling, Jona., Major Sprague, John, Dr. Spooner, George Soley, John Scollay, John, Esq. Storey, Elisha, Dr. Sellon, Samuel Seaver, Ebenezer Surcomb, Richard Stanbridge, Henry Scott, William Searle, Samuel Stoddard, Jonathan Scott, James, Capt. T. Trott, George Trott, Jonathan Turner, William Thompson, Major Trott, Samuel Trott, Thomas Turell, Joseph Tyler, Joseph Tyler, Roval, Hon. Tyler, Thomas, Esq. Tileston, Capt. Thompson, James Tuckerman, Edward Tileston, John Tileston, Thomas V. Vose, Joseph Vernon, Fortescue W. Whitwell, Samuel Welles, Arnold, Esq. Waldo, Joseph Wendell, John Mico Wendell, Oliver Welsh, John Warren, Joseph, Dr. Webb, Joseph Walley, Thomas Waldo, Daniel Wyer, Robert, Capt. Whitwell, William Wheelwright, Job Wheatly, Nath. Waldo, John Wendell, Jacob Waters, Josiah, Capt. White, Benjamin Williams, Joseph, Colonel White, William, Capt. Y. Young, Thomas, Dr. Paul Revere, one of the most famous members of the Sons of Liberty, was reportedly admitted to the group because he had many qualities that they found desirable in their members, according to the book A True Republican: The Life of Paul Revere: “Esther Forbes wrote that the leaders of the Revolution in Boston admitted Paul Revere into their society ‘because they wished the sympathy of the large artisan class with whom he was immensely popular, and he represented an important point of view.’ His position as a respected master artisan whose ties of business and friendship connected him to Boston’s artisans, mariners, merchants and Freemasons surely made Paul Revere a desirable member of the patriot cause…Revere’s Masonic experience taught him both to know when to defer to those of superior authority and achievement and when and how to exercise leadership. Revere had also learned to appreciate the opportunity of enlightening his mind through reading, discussion, and fellowship with like-minded men. Revere’s standing in the community, his personality, and his Masonic experience would all make him a worthy member of the patriot circle.” Public Reaction to the Sons of Liberty:Newspapers across the colonies praised the Sons of Liberty, calling them “the only guardians and protectors of of the rights and liberties of America” and encouraged them to continue their activities. Yet, the general public were not as enamored with the group, according to the book The Founding of a Nation: “The glowing picture of the Sons of Liberty presented by the newspapers was not accepted by many alarmed Americans who looked upon them as nothing but dangerous, and all too often drunken, mobs. Naturally they kept such opinions to themselves or wrote of them in private letters to friends whom they could trust. There is no doubt that the leaders often found the mobs hard to control. In New York, even children paraded at night carrying effigies and candles. Mobs sometimes appeared on the streets in daytime, as upon the occasion when a British naval lieutenant said that John Holt of the New York Gazette ought to be sent to England and hanged ‘for the licentiousness of his papers.’ For three days mobs paraded the streets, threatening to murder the lieutenant, and order was not restored until General Gage provided the commanders of the naval vessel with extra arms.” “A New Method of Macarony Making, as Practised at Boston,” print, circa 1774. Print shows two men tarring and feathering a British customs officer and forcing him to drink tea. The man holding the teapot is wearing a hat with number 45 on it, a symbol referring to the John Wilkes case of 1763. The other man is holding a noose and carrying a club. The large bow in his hat indicates his membership in the Sons of Liberty. After nearly a year of protests, the Sons of Liberty were finally victorious in March of 1766 when Parliament decided to repeal the Stamp Act. The group organized celebrations across the city to mark the occasion, which included bonfires, fireworks, celebratory cannon fire, ringing church bells and decorating ships and houses with flags and streamers. Since the group’s primary objective was to protest the Stamp Act, it disbanded after the act was repealed. Yet, the group was revived two years later when the passage of the Townshend Act threatened the colonist’s rights once again, according to the book Revolts, Protests, Demonstrations, and Rebellions in America: “In 1768, the Townshend Revenue Act was passed, placing special taxes on common goods such as lead, paint, glass, paper and tea. The Townshend Act garnered an even quicker response from colonists than the Stamp Act. The newly revived Sons of Liberty embarked on a two-year campaign against the Townshend Acts, playing a vital role in spreading rebellion throughout the colonies. In Boston, the Sons of Liberty invited hundreds of citizens to dine with them each August 14 to commemorate the first Stamp Act uprising. In Charlestown, the Sons of Liberty held their meetings in public, so that all could attend and listen. This helped spread the word of resistance to ordinary folks, including the illiterate who could not read pamphlets, newspapers or petitions….The Sons of Liberty helped to establish and enforce a boycott on British goods, causing trade to dry up. It was not long before the British merchants stepped in on behalf of the colonies and the Townshend Acts were repealed in 1770, except for the tax on tea. This would lead to one of the most infamous chapters of American history, the Boston Tea Party.” Sons of Liberty & the Boston Tea Party:This controversy over the tea tax was made worse by the passage of the Tea Act of 1773, which allowed for tea sold by British companies to be shipped directly to the colonies and sold at a discount. As the tax on tea was still in place, this act was a subtle way to persuade colonists to comply with the tax. The act served two purposes, it helped prop up the struggling East India Company, whose sales had taken a huge hit when the colonists started to boycott imported tea after the passage of the Townshend Act, and it goaded colonists into complying with the tax. The colonists were not pleased. They saw through the British government’s plan and the Sons of Liberty groups across the colonies responded by chasing away the tea ships in New York and Philadelphia or abandoning the cargo on the docks in Charlestown. In Boston, the group threatened captains with tarring and feathering until the whole issue came to a head in December of 1773, when colonists refused to let three cargo ships carrying British tea, the Dartmouth, the Eleanor and the Beaver, dock in Boston harbor and unload its cargo. A series of meetings were held, first at Faneuil Hall, then at the Old South Meetinghouse when the number of attendees grew too big for Faneuil Hall to accommodate. During the meetings, a series of proposals and counter-proposals were explored but ultimately, on December 16th, Hutchinson refused to send the ships back to England and ordered the colonists to stop blocking the ships from landing. According to various sources, the Sons of Liberty had anticipated this response and activated their secret plan to rush to the harbor where they rowed out to the ships and threw 90,000 pounds of tea into the harbor. This protest became the group’s most famous act of rebellion. The identity of all the participants in the Boston Tea Party is not completely known but it has been confirmed that at least four of the Loyal Nine: Thomas Chase, Thomas Crafts, Benjamin Edes and Stephen Cleverly, as well as several Sons of Liberty: including Paul Revere and Thomas Young, participated. The Sons of Liberty continued to be active until the Revolutionary War ended in 1783 and the group finally disbanded. Sources: “Sons of Liberty.” Massachusetts Historical Society , www.masshist.org/objects/cabinet/august2001/august2001.html Carp, Benjamin L.”Terms of Estrangement: Who Were the Sons of Liberty?” Colonial Williamsburg Official History & Citizenship Site , Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, www.history.org/Foundation/journal/winter12/liberty.cfm “Sons of Liberty.” Boston Tea Party Ships and Museum , www.bostonteapartyship.com/sons-of-liberty The Oxford Handbook of the History of Nationalism . Edited by John Breuilly. Oxford University Press, 2013. Jensen, Merrill. The Founding of a Nation: A History of the American Revolution, 1763-1776 . Hackett Publishing Company, 1968. Revolts, Protests, Demonstrations, and Rebellions in American History . Edited by Steven Laurence Danver. Vol. I, ABC-CLIO, 2011. Becker, Carl. The Eve of the Revolution . Yale University Press, 1918. Triber, Jayne E. A True Republican: The Life of Paul Revere . University of Massachusetts Press, 1998. 17 thoughts on “ The Sons of Liberty: Who Were They and What Did They Do? ”An amazing part of our history, and a part of my history,as Benjamin Edes was my great grandfather 6 generations back. That’s very cool, Ben. William Burbeck was my 7th great grandfather. Maybe they mingled at the Liberty Tree dinner. wow i wish i had a cool generation like you guys You probably do! Unless, of course, your ancestors were loyalists, in which case you should probably keep it to yourself. lol this is fucking great hey watch the language yea dude watch the language profanity ya dude don’t cuss Calm yourself children read this stuff how would I cite this? In MLA 8 it would be: Brooks, Rebecca Beatrice. “The Sons of Liberty: Who Were They and What Did They Do?” History of Massachusetts Blog, Rebecca Beatrice Brooks, 14 Nov. 2014, historyofmassachusetts.org/the-sons-of-liberty-who-were-they-and-what-did-they-do/ thank you so very much I learned so much This is so helpful b/c im writing a paper and needed some sources and this is one of the many i used and i love it Awesome, this helped me with an assignment I had Aaron May is my 6th great-grandfather. Glad to see a family history of sticking it to the man. Comments are closed. Who Were the Sons of Liberty?The Sons of Liberty was a secret underground society created due to the social and political fallout of the French and Indian War . The war, which took place throughout the world, was just one part of a larger conflict called the Seven Years War, a war that many historians consider to be “The First World War.” The French and Indian War, coupled with the fighting throughout the globe, nearly pushed the British Empire to the brink of financial collapse due to the increased spending needed to fight an international war. As a result, the British increased taxation among the colonies and stationed soldiers of the Crown within these colonies to guard the Empire’s new territorial gains. The British Empire needed money and goods for their empire, and they turned to the colonies for both. However, the Sons of Liberty made it their goal that the Empire received neither. The British Parliament rationalized that the fighting in North America against the French was to protect the colonists and their interests, and thus, they should pay their share in taxes to help pay off their war-debt alongside stationing British soldiers within the new territorial gains. So, the solution was to forcefully quarter soldiers with American colonists via the Quartering Act . This quartering also increased the required funds needed in order to sustain the lives of thousands of British soldiers, who also had to be fed, out of pocket, by the colonists. The first of many taxes forced upon the American people was the Sugar Act , which taxed the transport and sale of raw sugar, molasses, and rum throughout the colonies. Smuggling, however, helped to circumvent this tax, but only partly Additionally, the increased taxation of the colonies combined with the financial hardships of the colonists due to the forced quartering of British soldiers, and the numerous taxes finally boiled over once the British Parliament passed the Stamp Act . The Act required an additional tax for a stamp on all paper documents or products; this included items such as deeds and other legal documents, to newspapers, and even playing cards. Because the British, quite literally, found a way to tax almost every aspect of colonial life, the Sons of Liberty instigated riots throughout Boston, Massachusetts. Once the Stamp Act had passed, a secret group called the Loyal Nine, the precursor to the Sons of Liberty, gathered crowds around the famous Liberty Tree in Boston. The crowd, angered by the Stamp Act and provoked by the encouragement of the Loyal Nine, began rioting throughout the streets of Boston. These riots targeted the taxable goods and the tax collectors, which put many colonial officials at risk of being tarred and feathered or even killed. The rioters also destroyed an immeasurable amount of property. In one case, Boston rioters raided the home of the Lieutenant Governor Thomas Hutchinson and stole an estimated £250,000 worth of his possessions. The Loyal Nine, having sparked resistance, turned to publishing patriotic ideas in the Boston Gazette. Eventually, the Loyal Nine began signing their political dissent as ‘The Sons of Liberty’ thus establishing a much larger resistance group. What was originally organized in Boston by a local brewer turned politician, Samuel Adams , quickly snowballed into a larger network of resistance to the British Crown . With the coordination of various Sons of Liberty chapters, the Stamp Act was repealed within one year of it being enacted. However, this victory came at a price. The British Parliament passed the Declaratory Act when they repealed the Stamp Act. The Declaratory Act was more of a formal threat than an actual piece of legislation, as the Act stated that the British King and Parliament have the power to enact any and all legislation onto the colonies. This Act only served to reinforce the Sons of Liberty’s idea of “No Taxation Without Representation,” as written by a fellow member, James Otis Jr. Despite the revolutionary patriotic sentiments of the colonies, Britain was still in debt and needed money. The British Parliament, in desperation, passed the Townshend Acts , which increased taxes and tariffs on numerous products from Britain like lead, paint, paper, ink, porcelain, glass, and tea. Additionally, the Act functioned as a general search warrant, which allowed British soldiers to enter any colonist’s home to find and take smuggled goods. As the Sons of Liberty took to smuggling in cheaper goods to avoid British taxes. Eventually, Sons of Liberty member and tea smuggler John Hancock was captured and put on trial by the British. Hancock turned to fellow Sons of Liberty member, cousin of Samuel Adams, and prominent attorney, John Adams . Adams successfully defended Hancock, but smuggling had increasingly become riskier. So, under the direction of the Sons of Liberty, the colonists organized a boycott of all British goods being sold in the colonies. Under Samuel Adams and other members of the Sons of Liberty, the boycott was enforced throughout Boston and the surrounding Massachusetts area. Anyone who dared to sell British goods risked their store being vandalized or worse. Even their physical safety was at risk as the Sons of Liberty turned to violence to threaten shopkeepers that did not comply with the boycott. As a result of the unrest in Boston, Lieutenant General Thomas Gage , the British Commander of North America, was sent to Boston to control the patriots and the Sons of Liberty. However, the British mission of pacification and peacekeeping failed on the night of March 5 th , 1770 when eight British soldiers guarding the Customs House in Boston opened fire upon a mob of angry colonists . When the smoke cleared, five colonists were dead, and another six wounded. No one, not even the British soldiers, could recall how the shooting started and if there was even an order given. However, a local Boston silversmith, engraver, and Sons of Liberty member Paul Revere used this massacre as propaganda to fuel patriotic feelings and a general anti-British sentiment throughout the colonies. Soon, news spread throughout the colonies about the massacre with the accompanying engraving depicting the ‘complete brutality’ and ‘barbarism’ of the British Army. Due to the increasing success of the Sons of Liberty, the British Parliament eased many of the duties in the colonies. However, the Parliament continued the high tax on tea, as the British Crown desperately needed money. Even worse, the British East India Company was close to bankruptcy. The British East India Company, essentially an extension of the British government, was an imperial trade company that transported tea from Asia for consumption in western markets. However, rather than have a private civilian owner of the East India Company, much like a CEO, the company was instead to be owned by the British Parliament and King. Via the Tea Act , the British Government was forcing the colonists to pay extremely high taxes on British tea, while the British tea importers paid no taxes or import duties. These actions created a monopoly for the British East India Company in the colonial tea market, undercutting local merchants and other foreign tea importers. In 1773, the refusal to pay for British tea on behalf of the colonists fell upon deaf ears, and the East India Company’s trading ships were to enter Boston Harbor to sell the tea. However, rather than purchase the tea, on the night of December 16 th , 1773 the Sons of Liberty boarded the trade ships docked in Griffin’s Wharf and threw the shipments of tea overboard in an event known as the Boston Tea Party. Members of the Sons of Liberty allied with local patriot tea merchants, smugglers of Dutch tea, and any patriot infuriated by the taxation without representation to wear traditional Native American garments to signify that these colonials identify more with their American roots rather than their status as British subjects. After three hours, over 342 chests of tea were heaved into the harbor. The destruction of the tea imports cost the British Empire, valued today at over $1,700,000. In retaliation, the British Government passed the Intolerable Acts, which were called the Coercive Acts in the colonies. These Acts covered four major points. The Act shut down Boston Harbor , suspended trials by jury, prohibited elections and the meeting of the state assembly, and aggressively forced the quartering of British soldiers in private buildings and homes. These Acts punished the Boston Sons of Liberty and the Massachusetts colony, but also inspired increasingly revolutionary ideals. The resistance encouraged other Sons of Liberty chapters to rebel in their own ways. For example, the Maryland chapter of the Sons of Liberty set the trade ship the ‘Peggy Stewart’ on fire because it was importing British tea. Eventually, the patriotic resistance to British rule became too much to handle and revolution and war was inevitable. When lawmakers of Virginia gathered in 1775 to discuss negotiations with the British King, Sons of Liberty member, Patrick Henry exclaimed to the Second Virginia Convention “Give me liberty or give me death!”. Thus, cementing the American stance for independence from British rule and initiating the American commitment to the Revolutionary War. Echoes of Courage: Folk Music’s Ties to America's WarsAnswers to Questions Kids Ask About the Revolutionary War"Negro, Mulatto, or Indian man slave[s]": African Americans in the Rhode Island Regiments, 1775-1783You may also like. American RevolutionSons of liberty. - They had their own flag which had five red and four white vertical stripes.
- In 1772, members of the Sons of Liberty set fire to the British ship the HMS Gaspee.
- They had the motto of "No taxation without representation."
- In protest to the Stamp Act, a mob formed by the Sons of Liberty got out of control and destroyed much of the home of Lieutenant Governor Thomas Hutchinson.
- A constant battle was waged in New York City over Liberty Poles. The Sons of the Liberty would put them up and British soldiers would tear them down. As a result, the Liberty Pole became a symbol of the colonists' freedom.
- The British sometimes referred to them as the "Sons of Violence" in hopes of giving them a bad reputation.
- By the time the revolution began, the Sons of Liberty were fairly well organized with groups from different colonies communicating and planning protests together.
- Take a ten question quiz about this page.
- Listen to a recorded reading of this page:
- Biographies
- Compare Countries
- World Atlas
Sons of LibertyRelated resources for this article. - Primary Sources & E-Books
The Sons of Liberty were groups of American colonists who formed to oppose British taxes on the 13 colonies. They fought for the rights of the colonists. Like many other colonists, the Sons of Liberty thought that they shouldn’t be taxed by the British unless they were represented in the British Parliament. The Sons of Liberty disagreed not only with the taxes but also with how the British were ruling the American colonies in general. The activities of the Sons of Liberty helped lead the colonies into the American Revolution. The Sons of Liberty formed in the summer of 1765 to oppose the Stamp Act. The British Parliament passed the Stamp Act to raise money by making the colonists pay a tax on all business and legal papers, newspapers, pamphlets, and playing cards. Did You Know? The Boston chapter of the Sons of Liberty often met in secret under cover of darkness beneath an elm tree. The elm came to be known as the “Liberty Tree.” The Sons of Liberty rallied support for colonial resistance through the use of petitions, assemblies, and protests. They published newspaper accounts of their activities to encourage colonists to disobey the Stamp Act. At times they would use violence against England’s officials. The Sons of Liberty were key in keeping the British authorities from enforcing the Stamp Act. They remained an active force against England in the years leading up to the American Revolution. The Sons of Liberty participated in such events as the Boston Tea Party in 1773. During that event, colonists disguised as Native Americans destroyed tea to protest a British tax on that product. Explore Further - American Revolution
- Boston Tea Party
- Samuel Adams
- John Hancock
- Paul Revere
It’s here: the NEW Britannica Kids website!We’ve been busy, working hard to bring you new features and an updated design. We hope you and your family enjoy the NEW Britannica Kids. Take a minute to check out all the enhancements! - The same safe and trusted content for explorers of all ages.
- Accessible across all of today's devices: phones, tablets, and desktops.
- Improved homework resources designed to support a variety of curriculum subjects and standards.
- A new, third level of content, designed specially to meet the advanced needs of the sophisticated scholar.
- And so much more!
Want to see it in action?Start a free trialTo share with more than one person, separate addresses with a comma Choose a language from the menu above to view a computer-translated version of this page. Please note: Text within images is not translated, some features may not work properly after translation, and the translation may not accurately convey the intended meaning. Britannica does not review the converted text. After translating an article, all tools except font up/font down will be disabled. To re-enable the tools or to convert back to English, click "view original" on the Google Translate toolbar. - Privacy Notice
- Terms of Use
|
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Sons of Liberty. Date: 1765 - c. 1783. Key People: Isaac Sears. Sons of Liberty, organization formed in the American colonies in the summer of 1765 to oppose the Stamp Act. The Sons of Liberty took their name from a speech given in the British Parliament by Isaac Barré (February 1765), in which he referred to the colonials who had opposed ...
Sons of Liberty Summary. The Sons of Liberty — also known as the Liberty Boys — was a radical group of American colonists in Colonial America that often met in secret in order to plan public protests against the policies of the British government. The first group was formed in Boston in 1765 and quickly spread throughout the colonies.
A 1765 handbill, announcing an upcoming "Sons of Liberty" public event.. The Sons of Liberty was a loosely organized, clandestine, sometimes violent, political organization active in the Thirteen American Colonies founded to advance the rights of the colonists and to fight taxation by the British government. It played a major role in most colonies in battling the Stamp Act in 1765 [1] and ...
In folklore, the Sons of Liberty were organised, coordinated colonial groups that took radical action against unpopular British policies from 1765 onwards. The reality is that 'Sons of Liberty' was an umbrella term that described a range of individuals and groups who opposed British policy and actions. This included groups like the Boston ...
The Sons of Liberty were a grassroots group of instigators and provocateurs in colonial America who used an extreme form of civil disobedience—threats, and in some cases actual violence—to ...
The Sons of Liberty. In Boston in early summer of 1765 a group of shopkeepers and artisans who called themselves The Loyal Nine, began preparing for agitation against the Stamp Act. As that group grew, it came to be known as the Sons of Liberty. And grow it did! These were not the leading men of Boston, but rather workers and tradesmen.
Sons of Liberty: Rebels or Revolutionaries? Background: During the 1750's and 1760's, South Carolina and the other American colonies became involved in the military and economic rivalry between the French and the English. This rivalry led to a series of wars. The war changed the relationship of the colonies with the mother
The Boston chapter of the Sons of Liberty was established around the summer of 1765. And soon, the group's tentacles had spread to other colonies. The leaders of the of Sons of Liberty worked extremely hard to coordinate their activities, hoping to provide a more united front against Britain's unsavory tax policies.
John Hancock (January 23, 1737 - October 8, 1793) Most famous for his bold signature on the Declaration of Independence, John Hancock was a statesman, Second President of the Continental Congress, and Authoritative voice of the Revolution.A merchant whose business was greatly affected by the Intolerable Acts, Hancock joined forces with the Sons of Liberty to actively oppose British influence ...
Sons of Liberty DBQ: Sources and Essay Organizer Note: It is important to allow students to form their own opinions as long as primary sources support their argument. Shmoop.com offers a step-by-step method of creating an argumentative essay, teachers are suggested to use this site to avert the stress of writing.
SONS OF LIBERTY. Disregarding American protests that the colonists could not be taxed because they were not represented in Parliament, in March 1765 the British government enacted a stamp tax to take effect in the American colonies on November 1, 1765. Speaking against the proposed Stamp Act in the House of Commons, Isaac Barré had described the Americans as "Sons of Liberty" who would stead ...
The purpose of this assignment is to have students analyze primary sources to formulate a hypothesis/point of view about the Sons of Liberty; the final product will be an essay where students will use selected documents within the DBQ as evidence to support their stance. Standards | Vocabulary | Context | Questions - Doc #1, #2, #3, #4
This was a time-honored liberty of representative legislatures of the colonial governments. The passage of the Stamp Act meant that starting on November 1, 1765, the colonists would contribute £60,000 per year—17 percent of the total cost—to the upkeep of the ten thousand British soldiers in North America (Figure 5.2.2).
The Sons of Liberty was a group of political dissidents that formed in the North American British colonies during the early days of the American Revolution in Boston, Mass. The following are some facts about the Sons of Liberty: The Sons of Liberty formed to protest the passage of the Stamp Act of 1765. The Stamp Act was a tax that required ...
A 1765 handbill, announcing an upcoming "Sons of Liberty" public event.. In popular thought, the Sons of Liberty was a formal underground organization with recognized members and leaders. More likely, the name was an underground term for any men resisting new Crown taxes and laws. [3] The well-known label allowed organizers to make or create anonymous summons to a Liberty Tree, "Liberty Pole ...
The Sons of Liberty was a secret underground society created due to the social and political fallout of the French and Indian War. The war, which took place throughout the world, was just one part of a larger conflict called the Seven Years War, a war that many historians consider to be "The First World War.". The French and Indian War ...
A constant battle was waged in New York City over Liberty Poles. The Sons of the Liberty would put them up and British soldiers would tear them down. As a result, the Liberty Pole became a symbol of the colonists' freedom. The British sometimes referred to them as the "Sons of Violence" in hopes of giving them a bad reputation.
The Sons of Liberty were groups of American colonists who disagreed with British rule of the 13 North American colonies . Among the members were many well-known patriots, such as Samuel Adams , John Hancock , and Paul Revere . Their activities helped lead the colonies into the American Revolution .
The Sons of Liberty formed in the summer of 1765 to oppose the Stamp Act. The British Parliament passed the Stamp Act to raise money by making the colonists pay a tax on all business and legal papers, newspapers, pamphlets, and playing cards. The first Sons of Liberty groups started in Boston, but soon others appeared throughout the colonies.
Essay On Sons Of Liberty. The Sons of Liberty are shrouded in secrecy and mystery, but they played a vital part in the pursuit of American Independence. The Sons of Liberty were established in Boston and New York through the guidance of Samuel Adams. The Sons of Liberty would meet under the cover of darkness to avoid detection from the British ...
358 Words2 Pages. The Sons of Liberty was a secret organization that began its rage in 1765. This vicious group committed cruel and brutal acts. They were set against the idea of the stamp act. Many believed that the sons of liberty were heroes, but truly they were an organization of fanatics.The name " Sons of Liberty" was taken from Isaac ...
527 Words. 3 Pages. Open Document. The Sons of Liberty was an organization that was created in the Thirteen American Colonies.The secret group was formed to protect the rights of the colonists and to fight taxation by the British government.By the end of the year the Sons of Liberty existed to every colony.The Sons of Liberty formed out of a ...
The Stamp Act of 1765 was passed to ease the debt on Britain due to the Sevens' Year War. The tax was a tax on all newspapers and documents. The tax did not sit well with the colonies. There was opposition to the tax right from the start. The Sons of Liberty were defiant and started their protests right away.