proposed research agenda

WTO / Business / Agendas / Research Agenda Examples: How to Write [10 Free Templates]

Research Agenda Examples: How to Write [10 Free Templates]

A research agenda is an action plan that outlines the tasks that need to be prioritised within a particular field of study or research and the execution system of these tasks.

This agenda is a guiding tool for students with specific interests in a subject or field of research who intend to attain predetermined objectives by the end of their studies.

Most students joining college and university or undertaking research projects will usually have vague ideas of what they want to achieve. A research agenda helps them have a starting point based on their interests, short-term and long-term goals – factors that are vital in decision making, such as deciding the courses and classes to take. The agenda is adaptable in that students can adjust themselves as they progress with their studies or research based on their interactions with faculty, fellow students, research on a particular field, and gaining more knowledge on their chosen academic path.

The agenda improves the student’s sense of direction, thus allowing them to focus on specific areas of their chosen field study. Having an agenda improves your effectiveness as time and resources can be directed to the significant areas of the research topic. A good agenda for research will outline the type of research project, research methods, and tasks to be completed.

Download Templates

Free Research Format Example Template for Word File

Pre-Writing Considerations

A research agenda should help a student get more organised and plan their immediate and future plans within the academic institution. Therefore, the agenda should be specific to the student and must be helpful for them.

Before writing your agenda, consider the following pre-writing considerations:

Discuss your area of interest with the faculty

Consult with faculty and let them know your general interests. Faculty members are typically more informed on general areas of study. They can help you narrow down to the lines of study where there is demand for more expertise and where you can explore your interests further.

Do research

Carry out exhaustive research on the particular field of interest. This will involve a lot of reading and consultations. Gather enough information, and do not hesitate to use external sources and areas outside your immediate interests; it is not unusual to stumble upon a subject that really captures your attention and interest.

Ask your faculty for resources

Ask faculty for additional resources where you can get further insight into the options available to you. They might recommend relevant dissertations, books, seminars, or conferences you can attend to gather more information on what you should focus on in school. Also, ask for any ongoing projects you can participate in. Ensure to consult more than one faculty member; different members will have diverse inputs and perspectives, all of which can be used to improve your agenda. Note that you can use resources within and without the department; for example, engaging with other graduate students on which conferences are better suited for your field of study can be greatly beneficial.

Consider the second year of the program you are assessing. Sometimes, valuable classes in other interdisciplinary fields may provide further insight into creating a research agenda that helps you arrive at the best possible study options.

Identify key authors relevant to your interests

Visit the library or search online for authors whose bodies of work are related to your interests. Read their books, dissertations, and scholarly work and see how they applied their knowledge to your area of interest in research or real-life scenarios. This can help you determine your role in society after successfully completing your course. Citations are also good sources for materials to read.

Take courses relevant to your interests

Try as much as possible to select courses that align with your interests. This gives you extra motivation to undertake their requirements and be extra motivated throughout them. However, this should not be the sole factor of taking courses. Expand your list of options by identifying areas that spark a novel interest even though they appear to be apart from your passions.

Use class assignments to advance your research agenda

Class assignments are also viable tools for acquiring more information on how to improve your research agenda. Look into the term papers and identify topics or areas of study being majored on and research further on the same.

Talk to students with similar interests and collaborate

Anytime you interact with students with similar or overlapping interests, get their opinion on the particular areas of study. They may have a different perspective on the courses or areas of study that would best suit your interests.

How to Write Research Agenda

A research agenda should be comprehensive and detailed enough to help you make an informed decision on what you should be aiming for or prioritising to study.

Below are steps to help you write a good agenda:

Describe your area of interest

Firstly, indicate your area of interest. You can provide some background information on how your specific interest came about, its significance in society, and list any accomplishments in this particular field.

Describe the problem statement(s)

Next, justify the identified area of interest. The agenda should show the problems that the specified area of research can be applied to solve. These problems can be narrowed down to those that align with your interests. Therefore, if there is a challenge you always wanted to solve or be part of the solution, and you would like to focus on areas that help you work towards that, you can expound on how this is possible at this point.

Research methods relevant to your topical area

After the problem statement, identify the research methods you will use to collect information and make the decision on which classes to take. Different methods can be used at this stage, including research groups, conference papers, programs, research articles, observing trends, scholarly works, consultations, etc. Be specific when indicating the research methods. For example, when consulting with faculty members, talk to multiple members as it broadens the perspective with which you will write the agenda.

Include research questions

The next step in creating this agenda is formulating questions that arose during your exploration of the identified areas of study. Questions can be associated with a specific topic, approach, argument, or method of doing things. As you advance in your studies or research, you may find answers to these questions by using what is already known or discovering new ways to address the questions.

Name collaborators, if any

Afterward, indicate any collaborators you have worked with or intend to work with. List the collaborators’ names and their respective capacities or positions. Collaborators can be professors, faculty members, or organisations that deal with the area of study you will be focused on.

List your finest ideas

Next, indicate any ideas that will be helpful in actualizing your research agenda. These can range from in-between certifications you wish to achieve, applications that will be of use down the line, or targets you wish to achieve every year. Come up with ideas that will be sustainable for two to five years from now.

Describe the grants and their deadlines

The agenda should then outline any funding opportunities available to support your research in the particular area of study. Provide a brief description that indicates the name of the grant program, the grantor, a brief overview of the type of research they support, and the associated deadline for submission of proposals.

Include scholarly communication outlets

Lastly, indicate scholarly platforms related to your interest in the research area where you plan on joining and sharing your work. Examples of scholarly platforms are conferences, journals, research papers, publications, and books. Consider actively participating in these outlets by presenting your work and asking for feedback. Try not to limit yourself to conferences within your department; venture into other departmental conferences, as you can always pick up a new idea that enhances your research agenda.

Essential Tips to Write a Good Research Agenda

To improve the quality of your research agenda, below are several writing and planning techniques you can use.

They include:

Clarify your ideas first

Choose an area of study, whether it is from a point of curiosity, brainstorming, or educated analysis. Gather background information and engage with professors and colleagues as you work to refine your idea. Also, research your course to develop strong research questions.

Divide and prioritise all tasks

Create your agenda by breaking down the field of study into subsets or tasks that contribute to the overall objectives you wish to achieve. There are multiple requirements any student has to satisfy in order to complete a graduate program successfully; list them as items that define your journey in the particular area of research. Examples of tasks that a student may have to complete include test results targets, presentations that one has to present at a conference, submission of a proposal, etc.

Keep your agenda flexible

Always create a flexible agenda to accommodate different alternatives and opportunities for accomplishing your set goals. It is acceptable to change to a plan with a more positive impact or better outcome than the original plan.

Keep refining

Keep your agenda up-to-date as you acquire more knowledge in your field of study. Add any supporting data such as a Venn diagram , research findings, or concept maps that add objectivity to your agenda.

Don’t be intimidated

Do not be scared to start your research agenda even if you do not have much knowledge on the specific research area to go on. Carry out personal research, consult with faculty members, and discuss with course mates to get more insight.

Final Thoughts

A research agenda is a good opportunity for students to align what they study with their interests and things they care about. It helps students plan for the tasks they need to undertake to complete their graduate programs in an organised fashion successfully. An agenda should be a continuously changing document as the user progressively gains more insight into their specific area of study. A comprehensive research agenda outlines what needs to be done, the methods that will be used to grow in the field of study, academic and professional targets, collaborators, and any other details that make up the system of the set goals.

About This Article

Was this helpful?

Great! Tell us more about your experience

Not up to par help us fix it, keep reading.

Agendas , Business

Free weekly team meeting agenda templates (format).

30 Free Team Meeting Agenda Templates

Family High School Friends Reunion Agenda Templates

Family , Personal

Free reunion agenda templates (family, college, friends).

How to Prepare an Agenda for Event Planning (Free Templates)

14 Perfect Meeting Minutes & Notes Templates (Word)

9 Free Meeting Planner Templates (Word | PDF)

Free Training Agenda Templates (Formats)

15 Free Sales Meeting Agenda Templates (Progressive Agendas)

How to Write a Descriptive Essay (12 Best Examples)

8 Free Meeting Notes Templates

Charts , Education , Family

12 free behavior chart templates for kids.

Free Weight Loss Charts & Templates (Word, Excel)

Thank you for your feedback.

Your Voice, Our Progress. Your feedback matters a lot to us.

Public Lectures
Faculty & Staff Site >>

Creating a Research Agenda

by UW alumni Justin Reedy, Ph.D., Communication, and Madhavi Murty, Ph.D., Communication, in conversation with UW graduate students

Creating a research agenda should be a major goal for all graduate students—regardless of theoretical interests, methodological preferences, or career aspirations. A research agenda helps you orient yourself toward both short- and long-term goals; it will guide your selection of classes, help you decide which academic conferences (and within those, which specific divisions) to engage in, and steer you in recruiting mentors and research collaborators.

What is a research agenda? It’s a plan and a focus on issues and ideas in a subset of your field. You cannot study everything in your field during your time in graduate school, so decide what to focus on now, and what to defer until another day.

Research agendas are not set in concrete; they naturally change over time as your knowledge grows and as new research questions emerge.

Don’t be intimidated. Many students may start a graduate program with only a few ideas of areas they would like to study, or perhaps a few general research questions. Graduate courses, conversations with faculty and fellow students, and time spent reading the literature in the field can help you start to form a research agenda out of those ideas or research questions.

How to get started

Talk with faculty members about your general interests. Use faculty as a resource to find out which topics are over-studied and where additional work is needed.
If there are students with similar or overlapping interests, get their perspectives as well.
Read a great deal, even in the early weeks of your graduate work. Be open to reading research outside your immediate areas of interests and seeing how they link to your own areas.
Ask faculty for reading lists or copies of syllabi. Such resources help you familiarize yourself with the research already done in areas that interest you. Be sure to follow up on citations that are interesting or intriguing.
Identify key authors relevant to your interests. Read their scholarship and understand the work that has informed their research.

Advancing your agenda

Identify courses that will help advance your research agenda—both in terms of specific knowledge about the issues and relevant methods. Remember that the title of a class might not always fully describe it, so contact the professor to find out more about class content.
Look both inside and outside the department for classes—and look outside especially in your second year in the program. Graduate students in interdisciplinary fields, for example, may find very valuable classes in diverse departments.
Think specifically about the research questions you want to ask, and think about how you will answer them. Then pick courses to help you in reaching this goal.
Try to use class assignments to advance your research agenda. If possible, use each seminar paper as a way to focus on a specific part of your overall agenda —whether it be a literature review or a proposal for a study.
Don’t be afraid to take a chance on a course that seems somewhat outside of your agenda or your comfort zone. If the topics or research methods covered in the course draw your interest, you could find a way to incorporate those into your overarching research agenda.

Conference papers, colloquia, and research articles

Ask faculty members if they have research projects in which you can participate.
Work with more than one faculty member. Different faculty members provide different perspectives even if they are interested in the same concepts.
Talk to faculty and other graduate students about conferences you should attend (and conference paper deadlines). Use conference paper deadlines to pace your own research production.
Present your work at conferences, listen to others’ ideas, and solicit feedback on your research.
Consider working towards the publication of your papers. With enough feedback and guidance from faculty, fellow graduate students, and colleagues in the field, what starts out as a seminar or conference paper could turn into a journal article or book chapter.
Attend talks and colloquia on campus—both inside and outside your department. These talks can help you generate research ideas and help you see your research in a new light.
Recruit others to work with you on projects. Student collaborations are especially fruitful when the constituent members have similar interests, but bring different yet complementary perspectives and skills to the endeavor.

Be active: Be a part of the conversation in your field!

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

View all journals
Explore content
About the journal
Publish with us
Sign up for alerts
Published: 23 February 2022

Vaccine safety in an era of novel vaccines: a proposed research agenda

Gregory A. Poland ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5057-4457 1 &
Richard B. Kennedy ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6164-4967 1

Nature Reviews Immunology volume 22 , pages 203–204 ( 2022 ) Cite this article

5241 Accesses

183 Altmetric

Metrics details

Epidemiology
Infectious diseases

Vaccines have outstanding efficacy and safety records, and the evolving science of vaccines is enabling us to better understand their mechanisms of action as well as the pathways that drive vaccine-related adverse events. This understanding is particularly crucial as novel vaccine antigens, platforms and adjuvants are increasingly being used.

The past decade, and particularly the past few years, has seen a rapid acceleration in novel vaccine development, owing to public health emergencies (such as COVID-19 and Ebola), public health urgencies (cholera, meningococcal disease and others) and public health necessities (pneumococcal disease, influenza, hepatitis B and others), as well as improvements to existing vaccines. These developments have been made possible and informed by advances in basic biology and vaccine science, including new vaccine antigens, new vaccine platforms (mRNA and adenovirus vectored) and new vaccine adjuvants.

By virtue of their approval, these vaccines are effective and safe. But how safe? And by what measures? In the US, a robust, redundant and synergistic vaccine safety network exists, involving programmes such as the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). These programmes have enabled, in near real time, the identification of very rare side effects associated with mRNA and adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines, such as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), myocarditis, pericarditis and Guillain–Barré syndrome. Notably, these programmes are well suited to identifying singular major adverse events that have well-defined phenotypic definitions and occur with a strong temporal component. By contrast, these systems are not well adapted to recognizing adverse events without strong phenotypic markers or temporal associations, or those that may be subclinical.

In the context of a public health emergency, there must also necessarily be a balance between rapid deployment of a life-saving vaccine and investigation of less severe adverse events. For example, there have been thousands of reports of the onset and/or worsening of tinnitus in recipients of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through VAERS and other mechanisms. So far, to our knowledge, the CDC Vaccine Safety Office has not formally explored this potential adverse event. Tinnitus is a common problem, with a definable background population rate, that has important ‘quality of life’ implications. But, it is a condition with no observable or measurable phenotypic markers, other than associated hearing loss. How can adverse events be identified and quantified if they cannot be ‘measured’ by standardized diagnostic tests? Similarly, we have only nascent understandings of the theoretical effects of vaccines, such as effects on epigenetics, trained immunity, antigenic imprinting and longer-term mutational pressure. Significant research is necessary to understand more comprehensively the possibility of novel adverse effects of novel vaccines.

Known vaccine-related adverse events

Vaccines have known side effects, both local and systemic, that may be caused by various mechanisms. Vaccine components are tested for toxicity during preclinical development, but it is possible that toxic reactions may only occur in specific situations or in rare population groups and therefore will not be apparent until larger clinical trials or after widespread use in the general population. Inappropriate immune reactions can also drive vaccine-induced side effects through several mechanisms: overstimulation of innate immunity; cross-reactive adaptive immune responses to host epitopes; and the generation of autoimmune responses.

A crucial property of vaccines is the ability to elicit a sufficiently strong innate immune response to enhance antigen presentation and costimulatory signals necessary for robust cellular immune activation. However, these innate immune responses are also responsible for most of the common, transient side effects after vaccination, such as injection site pain, fever and myalgia. More serious events, including allergic reactions and anaphylaxis, can occur but are fortunately rare. Vaccine developers must therefore find the right balance to achieve the minimum reactogenicity necessary for optimal immunogenicity and efficacy.

Cross-reactive immune responses (involving either T cells or B cells) are another key consideration in vaccine design. Cross-reactivity is responsible for the protective efficacy of vaccinia virus vaccine against variola virus (smallpox) as well as of the BCG vaccine (containing Mycobacterium bovis ) against Mycobacterium tuberculosis 1 . Also, immune responses to pneumococcal, meningococcal, rotavirus, human papillomavirus and other vaccines provide broader protection owing to cross-reactivity against pathogen strains not included in the vaccine 2 , 3 , 4 . However, cross-reactivity can on rare occasions target host proteins and lead to immunopathology. One example of this is the development of narcolepsy in a small number of recipients of Pandemrix, the AS03-adjuvanted influenza A/H1N1 vaccine, associated with the HLA-DQB1*06:02 haplotype 5 . Sequence similarity between the influenza nucleoprotein and the receptor for hypocretin (a neurotransmitter that regulates sleep) was proposed as a potential mechanism. Antibodies from affected individuals cross-react with both proteins, and transfer of these antibodies into mice recapitulated the narcoleptic condition 6 , 7 . A more contemporary example is the development of VITT in a small number of recipients of adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccine. Multiple hypotheses, including cross-reactivity between antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and platelet factor 4 have been proposed, but no clear mechanism has been identified so far 8 .

Excessive or chronic inflammation, which could result from infection or vaccination, has also been implicated in promoting the development of autoimmune responses. The data supporting a link between infection and the development of autoimmune disorders are relatively strong and have been reviewed elsewhere 9 . Multiple large, observational and epidemiological studies have been carried out to examine the link between vaccines and allergic or autoimmune diseases 10 . Although these studies have limitations, there is a consistent lack of evidence linking vaccines to autoimmune disease. Nevertheless, the possibility deserves continued attention as we develop new vaccines.

Proposed future research agenda

Safety is a primary consideration in vaccine development, and because vaccines are typically given to healthy individuals to protect against a possible future disease, the bar for safety is necessarily much higher than for other medical interventions. Public interest in, and scrutiny of, vaccine safety has also increased considerably. We believe that vaccine safety is an area in which continued research will provide valuable information to support public heath, which will require increased funding and infrastructure support for basic, translational and clinical research.

First, increased basic research into the molecular and immunological mechanisms elicited by vaccines will provide crucial information regarding the pathways that drive adverse events. This knowledge could potentially enable such problems to be avoided in future vaccines. For example, research into the mechanisms of VITT could be used to modify future iterations of adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines.

Second, continued research in the area of adjuvants will expand our ability to fine-tune innate and adaptive immune responses to optimize protection against different pathogens, while minimizing potentially pathological reactogenicity. For example, ongoing research looks to create type 1-biased or type 2-biased immune responses or to specifically enhance mucosal immunity.

Third, increased use of systems biology approaches will be needed to fully characterize, assess and understand the complex interactions between cells, tissues and molecules that constitute immune responses, both protective and aberrant or pathological.

Fourth, we should invest in heightened surveillance systems during clinical trials and post-marketing. This should include a better understanding of the background rates of potential complications, as well as syndromic surveillance, recognizing the importance of identifying collections of adverse events.

Conclusions

Robust and trustworthy safety surveillance systems that serve the public agenda are essential for public trust and acceptance of vaccines. Furthermore, the identification of safety issues advances the science by allowing for the identification of mechanisms involved in such events and thereby the reverse engineering of new vaccine candidates to avoid activating such mechanisms. Surveillance systems can also enhance our understanding of who will experience vaccine-related adverse events and under what conditions. Can safety issues be predicted at the individual level in the future? How should this inform new vaccine development and vaccine public health policy? Ultimately, we need to accumulate the data required to place risk and benefit in context; no vaccine will ever be completely free of adverse effects — the question is whether the frequency of adverse effects is countered by correspondingly sufficient benefit?

Vojtek, I., Buchy, P., Doherty, T. M. & Hoet, B. Would immunization be the same without cross-reactivity? Vaccine 37 , 539–549 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Wheeler, C. M. et al. Cross-protective efficacy of HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by non-vaccine oncogenic HPV types: 4-year end-of-study analysis of the randomised, double-blind PATRICIA trial. Lancet Oncol. 13 , 100–110 (2012).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Cates, J. E. et al. Do rotavirus strains affect vaccine effectiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 40 , 1135–1143 (2021).

Watson, P. S., Novy, P. L. & Friedland, L. R. Potential benefits of using a multicomponent vaccine for prevention of serogroup B meningococcal disease. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 85 , 22–27 (2019).

Partinen, M. et al. Narcolepsy as an autoimmune disease: the role of H1N1 infection and vaccination. Lancet Neurol. 13 , 600–613 (2014).

Ahmed, S. S. et al. Antibodies to influenza nucleoprotein cross-react with human hypocretin receptor 2. Sci. Transl Med. 7 , 294ra105 (2015).

Katzav, A. et al. Passive transfer of narcolepsy: anti-TRIB2 autoantibody positive patient IgG causes hypothalamic orexin neuron loss and sleep attacks in mice. J. Autoimmun. 45 , 24–30 (2013).

Bilotta, C. et al. COVID-19 Vaccine-related thrombosis: a systematic review and exploratory analysis. Front. Immunol. 12 , 729251 (2021).

Wraith, D. C., Goldman, M. & Lambert, P. H. Vaccination and autoimmune disease: what is the evidence? Lancet 362 , 1659–1666 (2003).

Offit, P. A. & Hackett, C. J. Addressing parents’ concerns: do vaccines cause allergic or autoimmune diseases? Pediatrics 111 , 653–659 (2003).

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Mayo Vaccine Research Group, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

Gregory A. Poland & Richard B. Kennedy

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory A. Poland .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

G.A.P. offers consultative advice on vaccine and antiviral development to AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Medicago, Emergent Biosolutions, Johnson&Johnson/Janssen, Novavax, Moderna, Merck Research Laboratories, Glaxo SmithKline, Sanofi Pasteur, Eli Lilly and Company, Exelixis, Genevant, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Syneos Health and Vyriad. G.A.P. has received grant funding and royalties from ICW Healthcare Ventures for preclinical studies on a peptide-based COVID-19 vaccine for which he is an inventor. These activities are conducted in compliance with Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest policies. R.B.K. has received royalties from ICW Healthcare Ventures for licensing of peptide vaccine development patents and intellectual property owned by Mayo Clinic of which he is an inventor or co-inventor. R.B.K. has consulted with Merck Research Laboratories on measles vaccines and with Sanofi Pasteur and Outcomes Insights on influenza vaccines.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Poland, G.A., Kennedy, R.B. Vaccine safety in an era of novel vaccines: a proposed research agenda. Nat Rev Immunol 22 , 203–204 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-022-00695-3

Download citation

Published : 23 February 2022

Issue Date : April 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-022-00695-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Quick links

Explore articles by subject
Guide to authors
Editorial policies

Career Advice

Creating a Research Agenda

You have / 5 articles left. Sign up for a free account or log in.

Creating a research agenda should be a major goal for all graduate students — regardless of theoretical interests, methodological preferences, or career aspirations. A research agenda helps you orient yourself toward both short- and long-term goals; it will guide your selection of classes, help you decide which academic conferences (and within those, which specific divisions) to engage in, and steer you in recruiting mentors and research collaborators.

Research agendas are not set in concrete; they naturally change over time as your knowledge grows and as new research questions emerge.

How to get started

Talk with faculty members about your general interests. Use faculty as a resource to find out which topics are over-studied and where additional work is needed.
If there are students with similar or overlapping interests, get their perspectives as well.
Read a great deal, even in the early weeks of your graduate work. Be open to reading research outside your immediate areas of interests and seeing how they link to your own areas.
Ask faculty for reading lists or copies of syllabi. Such resources help you familiarize yourself with the research already done in areas that interest you. Be sure to follow up on citations that are interesting or intriguing.
Identify key authors relevant to your interests. Read their scholarship and understand the work that has informed their research.

Advancing your agenda

Identify courses that will help advance your research agenda — both in terms of specific knowledge about the issues and relevant methods. Remember that the title of a class might not always fully describe it, so contact the professor to find out more about class content.
Look both inside and outside the department for classes — and look outside especially in your second year in the program. Graduate students in interdisciplinary fields, for example, may find very valuable classes in diverse departments.
Think specifically about the research questions you want to ask, and think about how you will answer them. Then pick courses to help you in reaching this goal.
Try to use class assignments to advance your research agenda. If possible, use each seminar paper as a way to focus on a specific part of your overall agenda — whether it be a literature review or a proposal for a study.
Don’t be afraid to take a chance on a course that seems somewhat outside of your agenda or your comfort zone. If the topics or research methods covered in the course draw your interest, you could find a way to incorporate those into your overarching research agenda.

Conference papers, colloquia, and research articles

Ask faculty members if they have research projects in which you can participate.
Work with more than one faculty member. Different faculty members provide different perspectives even if they are interested in the same concepts.
Talk to faculty and other graduate students about conferences you should attend (and conference paper deadlines). Use conference paper deadlines to pace your own research production.
Present your work at conferences, listen to others’ ideas, and solicit feedback on your research.
Consider working toward the publication of your papers. With enough feedback and guidance from faculty, fellow graduate students, and colleagues in the field, what starts out as a seminar or conference paper could turn into a journal article or book chapter.
Attend talks and colloquia on campus — both inside and outside your department. These talks can help you generate research ideas and help you see your research in a new light.
Recruit others to work with you on projects. Student collaborations are especially fruitful when the constituent members have similar interests, but bring different yet complementary perspectives and skills to the endeavor.

Be active: Be a part of the conversation in your field!

A person sits on the floor holding a tablet while icons related to education overlay the image

Universities Investing in Microcredential Leadership

As microcredential programs slowly gain traction, more universities are looking for leaders to coordinate the efforts

Share This Article

Hiring for Humanity

To create an office culture marked by trust, humanity and collaboration, Diana Lawrence poses a rather unexpected que

split screen image of fork, spoon, and knife balanced against each other on one side and the word Menu in script on the other

In Praise of Lunch

Amid the stress and clutter of our daily lives, and the divisions straining our politics and culture, we need sustain

Word “accepted” with asterisk written in white letters on a black background

Bad-Faith Counteroffers

Black and other minoritized faculty don’t receive equitable ones if they receive them at all, which harms both them a

Become a Member
Sign up for Newsletters
Learning & Assessment
Diversity & Equity
Career Development
Labor & Unionization
Shared Governance
Academic Freedom
Books & Publishing
Financial Aid
Residential Life
Free Speech
Physical & Mental Health
Race & Ethnicity
Sex & Gender
Socioeconomics
Traditional-Age
Adult & Post-Traditional
Teaching & Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Digital Publishing
Data Analytics
Administrative Tech
Alternative Credentials
Financial Health
Cost-Cutting
Revenue Strategies
Academic Programs
Physical Campuses
Mergers & Collaboration
Fundraising
Research Universities
Regional Public Universities
Community Colleges
Private Nonprofit Colleges
Minority-Serving Institutions
Religious Colleges
Women's Colleges
Specialized Colleges
For-Profit Colleges
Executive Leadership
Trustees & Regents
State Oversight
Accreditation
Politics & Elections
Supreme Court
Student Aid Policy
Science & Research Policy
State Policy
Colleges & Localities
Employee Satisfaction
Remote & Flexible Work
Staff Issues
Study Abroad
International Students in U.S.
U.S. Colleges in the World
Intellectual Affairs
Seeking a Faculty Job
Advancing in the Faculty
Seeking an Administrative Job
Advancing as an Administrator
Beyond Transfer
Call to Action
Confessions of a Community College Dean
Higher Ed Gamma
Higher Ed Policy
Just Explain It to Me!
Just Visiting
Law, Policy—and IT?
Leadership & StratEDgy
Leadership in Higher Education
Learning Innovation
Online: Trending Now
Resident Scholar
University of Venus
Student Voice
Academic Life
Health & Wellness
The College Experience
Life After College
Academic Minute
Weekly Wisdom
Reports & Data
Quick Takes
Advertising & Marketing
Consulting Services
Data & Insights
Hiring & Jobs
Event Partnerships

4 /5 Articles remaining this month.

Sign up for a free account or log in.

Commercial determinants of health: a proposed research agenda

Published: 28 July 2020
Volume 65 , pages 1147–1149, ( 2020 )

Cite this article

Nino Paichadze ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8263-9881 1 ,
Meghan Werbick 1 ,
Paul Ndebele 1 ,
Imran Bari 1 &
Adnan A. Hyder 1

1186 Accesses

22 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

Get 10 units per month
Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

GBD Compare (2019) Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/ . Accessed 7 Nov 2019

Kickbusch I (2015) Addressing the commercial determinants is critical to emerging economies. Cien Saude Colet 20(4):968–969. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015204.19962014

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Kickbusch I, Allen L, Franz C (2016) The commercial determinants of health. Lancet 4(12):895–896

Google Scholar

Knai C, Petticrew M, Mays N, Capewell S, Cassidy R, Cummins S et al (2018) Systems thinking as a framework for analyzing commercial determinants of health. Milbank Q 96(3):472–498

Article Google Scholar

Lee K, Hawkins B, Wiist WH (2017) Researching corporations and global health governance. In: Lee K, Hawkins B (eds) Researching corporations and global health governance—an interdisciplinary guide. Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd, London

Maani N, Collin J, Friel S, Gilmore AB, McCambridge J, Robertson L et al (2020) Bringing the commercial determinants of health out of shadows: a review of how the commercial determinants are represented in conceptual frameworks. Eur J Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz197

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

WHO (2018) World health statistics 2018: monitoring health for the SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals. World Health Organization, Geneva

Wipfli H, Mack A (2017) Public health. In: Lee K, Hawkins B (eds) Researching corporations and global health governance—an interdisciplinary guide. Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd, London

Download references

This work was not funded, nor did it involve human subjects or ethical approval.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Center on Commercial Determinants of Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA

Nino Paichadze, Meghan Werbick, Paul Ndebele, Imran Bari & Adnan A. Hyder

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nino Paichadze .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This Commentary is part of the special issue “Market-driven forces and Public Health”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Paichadze, N., Werbick, M., Ndebele, P. et al. Commercial determinants of health: a proposed research agenda. Int J Public Health 65 , 1147–1149 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01445-9

Download citation

Received : 03 February 2020

Revised : 14 July 2020

Accepted : 16 July 2020

Published : 28 July 2020

Issue Date : September 2020

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01445-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Find a journal
Publish with us
Track your research

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Publications
Account settings
My Bibliography
Collections
Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

Create a new collection
Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

Search in PubMed
Search in NLM Catalog
Add to Search

TikTok and public health: a proposed research agenda

Affiliations.

1 Faculty of Medicine, Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada [email protected].
2 Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
3 Faculty of Medicine, Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
4 Providence Research, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
PMID: 34819326
PMCID: PMC8614045
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007648

Keywords: child health; health policy; mental health & psychiatry; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources.

Europe PubMed Central
PubMed Central
MedlinePlus Health Information
Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Publications
Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

Advanced Search
Journal List
BMJ Glob Health
v.6(11); 2021

TikTok and public health: a proposed research agenda

Marco zenone.

1 Faculty of Medicine, Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

2 Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Skye Barbic

3 Providence Research, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Associated Data

No data are available.

Summary box

TikTok is a short video sharing social media platform that has grown rapidly since its launch, amassing over 1 billion monthly global users as of September 2021.
We argue that public health is served by paying urgent attention to the potential health-related implications of TikTok and suggest research agenda to inform decision-makers, health providers, researchers and the public.
Specific research priorities include investigating health-harming product promotion, medical advice/illness portrayal, dis/misinformation spread, sensitive or hateful content dissemination, problematic usage or addiction and platform corporate activity.

Introduction

TikTok is a short video sharing social media platform that has grown rapidly since its launch, amassing over 1 billion monthly global users as of September 2021. 1 Users on TikTok create and engage with algorithm-suggested content related to their interests on a variety of subjects, including health-related or implicated topics. The global growth of TikTok, while offering an engaging experience for users and approach to connecting to diverse people, is accompanied by concerns, such as the quality of health advice offered in videos and sensitive content. In this commentary, we argue that public health is served by paying urgent attention to the potential health-related implications and opportunities of TikTok and suggest a research agenda to inform decision-makers, health providers, researchers and the public.

Public health-related concerns and research focus areas

Health-harming product promotion.

Early research illustrates products detrimental to health, such as alcohol or vaping items, are widely viewed and portrayed positively on TikTok. For example, a study found that the top 100 videos with the #alcohol hashtag were viewed 291 999 100 times and 98% portrayed alcohol use in a positive manner. 2 In the past, health-harming industries have used influencers—defined as influential persons online—to promote harmful products. The vaping company JUUL employed Instagram influencers and affiliate marketers to promote their products that now constitute a public health crisis. 3 Investigation is needed to explore the marketing, platform facilitators and financial drivers behind the portrayal or promotion of such products on TikTok. Researchers may consider the commercial determinants of health 4 to frame their research questions and conceptualise health-harming industry motives and prior advertising strategies on social media.

Medical advice and health/illness portrayal

There exists evidence that TikTok influencers or users are offering medical-related advice or discuss health-related topics that receive significant engagement. For example, table 1 denotes the popularity of various health-related hashtags, such as #MentalHealth, which received over 17 billion views on tagged videos. 5 Several studies document the portrayal of certain health-related topic education, such as recovering from eating disorders 6 and sexual education. 7 However, the quality of the information offered, qualifications of the persons offering advice or their conflicts of interest, are largely unknown. A recent study on diabetes information on TikTok found that while good actors, such as qualified organisations, gave evidence-based information, those made by for-profit groups had poor quality. 8 A study evaluating medical information related to acne identified that the top 100 videos with the #acne hashtag had ‘information with serious to potentially important shortcomings’. 9 Research is needed to understand who is giving medical advice, the quality of the advice offered, how users interact and incorporate information received into their lives and the opportunities for public health organisations to promote evidence-based information to TikTok users.

*Number of views on TikTok videos with health-related hashtags

Condition or health-related topic hashtag	Total number of tagged-video hashtag views
#Covid19	83.6 billion
#MentalHealth	17 billion
#Pregnancy	16.4 billion
#Cancer	11.4 billion
#Sleep	10.8 billion
#Anxiety	9 billion
#ADHD	7.1 billion
#Vaccine	7 billion
#Autism	4.7 billion
#Nutrition	4 billion
#Addiction	3 billion
#Diabetes	2.9 billion
#Depressed	2.8 billion
#Stress	2.6 billion
#OCD	2 billion
#PTSD	1.8 billion
#BirthControl	1.6 billion
#Bipolar	1.6 billion
#STI	1.2 billion
#IBS	616.6 million
#HIV	455.1 million
#Obesity	499.4 million
#SuicidePrevention	289.7 million

*Total number of tagged TikTok video views with a specified hashtag. Total views collected on 20 October 2021. Certain health-related hashtags, such as #eatingdisorder or related terms, are blocked on the TikTok search engine and thus cannot be totalled or included.

ADHD, Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; IBS, Irritable bowel syndrome; OCD, Obsessive-compulsive disorder; PTSD, Post-traumatic stress disorder; STI, Sexually transmitted infection.

Dis/misinformation spread

Like other social media platforms, the spread of dis/misinformation is a concern on TikTok. A few studies document the spread of public health-related misinformation, on the topics of COVID-19 10 and prostate cancer. 11 The extent of dis/misinformation on other topics has not yet been investigated. Research is warranted to examine dis/misinformation on all public-health and non-public health topics, including but not limited to vaccines, cancer, experimental medicine, conspiracy theories, alternative and unproven medicine, election integrity, drug/medical regulatory processes, climate change and other important topics. The role of TikTok as a platform, including the strategies or processes in place to prevent and report dis/misinformation, also warrant attention.

Viewing sensitive or hateful content

Several TikTok trends depict creators sharing personal, sometimes traumatic, stories such as surviving sexual assault, suicide or an abusive experience such as domestic violence. 12 Sharing the stories, while courageous, may reach persons unprepared to view the content, such as young youth and recent survivors of the aforementioned experiences. Similarly, the person sharing such stories may not be prepared for their video becoming viral or may require support. In other cases—hateful speech, such as racism, sexism or xenophobia, may proliferate on the platform. For example, a recent report from Media Matters for America, a non-profit media watchdog group, documents how the TikTok algorithm may lead users to transphobic content. 13 However, TikTok enables warnings on sensitive or graphic content, provides certain support for users 14 and has banned hate speech. 15 Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of TikTok moderation policies, the dissemination and portrayal of sensitive topics and the experiences of users reacting to and posting such content to determine avenues of support. We encourage research from a duty to care perspective 16 that strategises how to connect users to needed resources, services and follow-up when appropriate. Specific focus is needed to protect underserved groups or those that experience any form of discrimination.

Problematic usage and addiction

A speculative journalistic literature exists labelling TikTok potentially addictive. 17 Research is warranted to investigate how users interact with the platform, such as attitudes towards the platform, problematic usage prevalence and facilitators, differences by age, gender and other demographic variables and evaluation of TikTok policies and initiatives to prevent and minimise overuse harms. Specific research is needed to examine the potential consequences from the algorithms underpinning the TikTok platform from ethical and regulatory perspectives.

Corporate activity

TikTok is a large for-profit business entity that requires research on their business and political activities to ensure accountability in their platform and actions. Other social media platforms, such as Facebook, are alleged to lobby governments or resist certain public health-related calls, such as moderating vaccine misinformation. 18 We encourage researchers, particularly from the commercial determinants of health, to conduct research into TikTok as a corporate political actor and investigate their business practices. In making this research call, we do not make any presumption on the motives or actions of TikTok, but their platform size, reach, resources and influence on discourse, coupled with the historical comparison of other social media platforms and their impacts on public health, warrant attention. We urge TikTok to assist researchers by developing accessible and transparent research tools to monitor content trends, community guidelines enforcement and platform design.

TikTok has changed social media since its expeditious rise. Public health has a responsibility to examine the implications, opportunities and impacts of TikTok on health and advocate for changes where necessary. Given the rapid growth of TikTok—research is needed urgently. Particular demographics, such as young people, use TikTok at higher rates and need focused research attention to understand their app engagement and perceptions. Research should be conducted independently from TikTok and any conflicts of interests when funded by or working with TikTok declared.

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge Dr. Steve Mathias for his contribution to the concept of the manuscript.

Handling editor: Seye Abimbola

Contributors: All authors contributed to project conceptualisation. MZ wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed, edited and approved the final version.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: None declared.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Data availability statement

Ethics statements, patient consent for publication.

Not applicable.

Find It Fast

Funding Opportunities

All Funding Opportunities
What & Who We Fund
PCORI’s Research Funding Process
What You Need to Know to Apply
Merit Review

Applicant and Awardee Resources

Research & related projects.

Explore Our Portfolio
About Our Research
PCORI in the Literature
Peer Review

Engagement in Research

Foundational Expectations for Partnerships
Foundational Expectations in Action
Promotional Toolkit
The Value of Engagement in Research
Engagement Award Program
Engagement Resources
Engagement in Health Research Literature
Influencing the Culture of Research
Engage with Us

Implementation of Evidence

Putting Evidence to Work
Evidence Updates
Evidence Synthesis Reports and Interactive Visualizations
Emerging Topics: Reports and Horizon Scans
PCORI Stories

Highlights of PCORI-Funded Research Results

Health topics.

Cardiovascular Disease
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Maternal Morbidity and Mortality
Rare Diseases
Women's Health
View All Topics

News & Events

PCORI News Hub
View All Events
2024 PCORI Annual Meeting
The PCORI Strategic Plan
Our Programs
Our Vision & Mission
Financial Statements and Reports
Board of Governors
Methodology Committee
Authorizing Law
Planning Our Organizational Learning, Reporting Our Results
Evaluating Key Aspects of Our Work
PCORI Evaluation Group (PEG)
Advisory Panel Openings
Advisory Panels FAQs
Application Review and Selection Process
Procurement Opportunities
Provide Input

PCORI unveils proposed Research Agenda and invites public comment

Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
Dissemination and Implementation
Public and Patient Engagement
PCORI Engagement Award Program
Evaluation and Analysis
Healthcare Delivery and Disparities Research
PCOR Infrastructure & Innovation
Pursuing Our Commitment to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Our Funding
Strategy Committee
Standing Selection Committee
Nominating Committee for Members of the Methodology Committee
Governance Committee
Finance and Administration Committee
Executive Evaluation and Compensation Committee
Executive Committee
Committee Members
Committee FAQs
Committee Charter
Committee Openings
Evaluating Our Research Portfolio
Evaluating Our Application Merit Review Process
Evaluating Our Engagement in Research Initiatives
Evaluating Stakeholders' Views
Research Support Funding
Operations Support Funding
Judges for the PCORI Matchmaking App Challenge (2013)
The PCORI Matchmaking App Challenge (2014) -- Runners Up
Judges for the PCORI Matchmaking App Challenge (2014)
Draft Reports of Systematic Reviews of Audio-Based Care for Managing Mental Health, Diabetes and Other Chronic Conditions (2024)
Staff Conflict of Interest Disclosures

WASHINGTON, DC—The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) has launched the public comment period on its proposed Research Agenda . The Research Agenda will provide the framework for PCORI’s future funding of comparative clinical effectiveness research and other research initiatives. PCORI will accept public comments on the Research Agenda through January 31, 2022, through its website.

PCORI’s proposed Research Agenda stems from the five National Priorities for Health adopted by the Board of Governors in October of this year. The National Priorities and the proposed Research Agenda both reflect extensive input from stakeholders across the U.S. health care ecosystem and build on PCORI’s work in its first decade.

“The development of our proposed Research Agenda is a critical next step in PCORI’s comprehensive strategic planning process,” said Board Chairperson Christine Goertz, Ph.D. “We look forward to finalizing this agenda and then using it to guide PCORI’s work as the nation’s leading funder of patient-centered comparative clinical effectiveness research.”

The proposed Research Agenda states PCORI will fund research in the following six areas of focus:

Research that fills patient- and stakeholder-prioritized evidence gaps and is representative of diverse patient populations and settings
Research that aims to achieve health equity and eliminate health and health care disparities
Research that builds the evidence base for emerging interventions by leveraging the full range of data resources and partnership
Research that examines the diverse burdens and clinical and economic impacts important to patients and other stakeholders
Research that focuses on health promotion and illness prevention by addressing health drivers that occur where people live, work, learn, and play
Research that integrates implementation science and that advances approaches for communicating evidence so the public can access, understand and act on research findings

More details on the types of projects that could be included in each area of focus are available on PCORI’s website . The Research Agenda is not intended to specify individual research topics or projects. That work is a part of the Research Project Agenda, which will be derived via an ongoing stakeholder-engaged process and is continuously updated to ensure it remains relevant to the evidence needs of the patients and stakeholders PCORI serves.

“Since its establishment, PCORI has played a unique role in health research by funding studies comparing which prevention, diagnostic and treatment approaches work best for whom, given their circumstances and preferences,” said PCORI Executive Director Nakela L. Cook, M.D., M.P.H. “We look forward to hearing from our stakeholders as we chart PCORI’s future to be an even stronger leader in the health research enterprise, focused on generating evidence that provides practical, dependable and trustworthy information to support informed decisions about health and health care.”

Comments on PCORI’s proposed Research Agenda are welcome in English and Spanish. PCORI also will accept input via voiceover IP or email to [email protected] . Read more about the Research Agenda and how to submit comments or input on PCORI’s website .

About PCORI

The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) is the nation’s leading funder of patient-centered comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER). By comparing two or more health or healthcare approaches, CER generates evidence that helps people make better-informed decisions and improves healthcare delivery and outcomes. PCORI takes a holistic approach to its work, ensuring that patients and other health decision makers are engaged as partners throughout the research process, supporting dissemination and implementation of results in practice and strengthening clinical research infrastructure to advance patient-centered CER. PCORI is an independent, non-profit organization authorized by Congress.

For Media Inquiries Only, Contact:

Sofia kosmetatos.

Senior Manager, Media Relations

[email protected] 202-738-3335

Christine Frey

Director, Integrated Communications

[email protected] 443-909-0839

News Release
Addressing Disparities
PCORI Strategic Plan

Recent News Releases

Pcori offers up to $200 million for new health research on substance use, rare diseases, pcori announces $150 million in funding for new health research, media advisory: pcori hosts congressional briefing on telehealth research results, what's happening at pcori.

The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute sends weekly emails about opportunities to apply for funding, newly funded research studies and engagement projects, results of our funded research, webinars, and other new information posted on our site.

Help & FAQ

The Relationship Between Work Engagement and Performance: A Review of Empirical Literature and a Proposed Research Agenda

Learning & Performance Systems

Research output : Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Engagement has been defined in a variety of ways. Engagement in the workplace generally is viewed as a positive, fulfilling, affective-motivational state of work-related well-being. Due to its structural relationship between antecedents (e.g., job resources and personal resources) and consequences (e.g., performance and turnover intention), work engagement has been receiving considerable attention from both scholars and practitioners in the fields of human resource development (HRD), organization development (OD), psychology, and business. In spite of this popularity, there is a scarcity of empirical research on work engagement in the academic literature. The relationship between work engagement and performance, in particular, is deserving of attention given our field's focus on performance improvement. In this article, we review and analyze relevant research and then propose a research agenda to guide future research on this topic. Conclusions and implications for HRD and OD are discussed.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	248-276
Number of pages	29
Journal
Volume	12
Issue number	3
DOIs
State	Published - Sep 2013

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Access to Document

10.1177/1534484312461635

Fingerprint

Work Performance Keyphrases 100%
Work Engagement Keyphrases 100%
Practitioners Psychology 100%
Organization Development Keyphrases 50%
Human Resource Development Keyphrases 50%
Turnover Intention Keyphrases 25%
Workplace Keyphrases 25%
Performance Improvement Keyphrases 25%

T1 - The Relationship Between Work Engagement and Performance

T2 - A Review of Empirical Literature and a Proposed Research Agenda

AU - Kim, Woocheol

AU - Kolb, Judith A.

AU - Kim, Taesung

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Engagement has been defined in a variety of ways. Engagement in the workplace generally is viewed as a positive, fulfilling, affective-motivational state of work-related well-being. Due to its structural relationship between antecedents (e.g., job resources and personal resources) and consequences (e.g., performance and turnover intention), work engagement has been receiving considerable attention from both scholars and practitioners in the fields of human resource development (HRD), organization development (OD), psychology, and business. In spite of this popularity, there is a scarcity of empirical research on work engagement in the academic literature. The relationship between work engagement and performance, in particular, is deserving of attention given our field's focus on performance improvement. In this article, we review and analyze relevant research and then propose a research agenda to guide future research on this topic. Conclusions and implications for HRD and OD are discussed.

AB - Engagement has been defined in a variety of ways. Engagement in the workplace generally is viewed as a positive, fulfilling, affective-motivational state of work-related well-being. Due to its structural relationship between antecedents (e.g., job resources and personal resources) and consequences (e.g., performance and turnover intention), work engagement has been receiving considerable attention from both scholars and practitioners in the fields of human resource development (HRD), organization development (OD), psychology, and business. In spite of this popularity, there is a scarcity of empirical research on work engagement in the academic literature. The relationship between work engagement and performance, in particular, is deserving of attention given our field's focus on performance improvement. In this article, we review and analyze relevant research and then propose a research agenda to guide future research on this topic. Conclusions and implications for HRD and OD are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883612556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883612556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1534484312461635

DO - 10.1177/1534484312461635

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84883612556

SN - 1534-4843

JO - Human Resource Development Review

JF - Human Resource Development Review

Log in using your username and password

Search More Search for this keyword Advanced search
Latest content
Supplements
BMJ Journals

Marco Zenone 1 , 2 ,
Nikki Ow 1 ,
Skye Barbic 1 , 3
1 Faculty of Medicine, Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy , The University of British Columbia , Vancouver , British Columbia , Canada
2 Faculty of Public Health and Policy , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London , UK
3 Providence Research , Providence Health Care , Vancouver , British Columbia , Canada
Correspondence to Mr Marco Zenone; marco.zenone{at}lshtm.ac.uk

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007648

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions.

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

public health
child health
health policy
mental health & psychiatry

Summary box

TikTok is a short video sharing social media platform that has grown rapidly since its launch, amassing over 1 billion monthly global users as of September 2021.

We argue that public health is served by paying urgent attention to the potential health-related implications of TikTok and suggest research agenda to inform decision-makers, health providers, researchers and the public.

Specific research priorities include investigating health-harming product promotion, medical advice/illness portrayal, dis/misinformation spread, sensitive or hateful content dissemination, problematic usage or addiction and platform corporate activity.

Introduction

Public health-related concerns and research focus areas

Health-harming product promotion, medical advice and health/illness portrayal.

View inline

*Number of views on TikTok videos with health-related hashtags

Dis/misinformation spread

Viewing sensitive or hateful content

Problematic usage and addiction

Corporate activity

Data availability statement

No data are available.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication.

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge Dr. Steve Mathias for his contribution to the concept of the manuscript.

Russell AM ,
Ortega JM , et al
↵ et al Jackler RK , Chau C , Getachew BD . JUUL advertising over its first three years on the market. 21 Jan 2019 [cited 2021 October 20] . Available: https://tobacco-img.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21231836/JUUL_Marketing_Stanford.pdf
Kickbusch I ,
Herrick SSC ,
Hallward L ,
Fowler LR ,
Smith HS , et al
Zhao YC , et al
Levoska MA , et al
Baumel NM ,
Spatharakis JK ,
Karitsiotis ST , et al
Gao T , et al
↵ et al Little O , Richards A , Beecham N . TikTok’s algorithm leads users from transphobic videos to far-right rabbit holes. Media Matters for America 8 Oct 2021 [cited 2021 Oct 20] . Available: https://www.mediamatters.org/tiktok/tiktoks-algorithm-leads-users-transphobic-videos-far-right-rabbit-holes

Handling editor Seye Abimbola

Contributors All authors contributed to project conceptualisation. MZ wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed, edited and approved the final version.

Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests None declared.

Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Read the full text or download the PDF:

CHIPS for America Act & FABS Act

Congress Passes Investments in Domestic Semiconductor Manufacturing, Research & Design

In July 2022, Congress passed the CHIPS Act of 2022 to strengthen domestic semiconductor manufacturing, design and research, fortify the economy and national security, and reinforce America’s chip supply chains.

The share of modern semiconductor manufacturing capacity located in the U.S. has eroded from 37% in 1990 to 12% today, mostly because other countries’ governments have invested ambitiously in chip manufacturing incentives and the U.S. government has not. Meanwhile, federal investments in chip research have held flat as a share of GDP, while other countries have significantly ramped up research investments.

To address these challenges, Congress passed the CHIPS Act of 2022, which includes semiconductor manufacturing grants, research investments, and an investment tax credit for chip manufacturing. SIA also supports enactment of an investment tax credit for semiconductor design.

By passing the CHIPS Act, Congress has risen to a defining challenge of our time, seized an historic opportunity to fortify American semiconductor manufacturing, design, and research, and delivered a big win for our country.

CHIPS Award Announcements>

STATEMENT: SIA Applauds Passage of CHIPS Act of 2022>

FACT SHEET: CHIPS Act of 2022>

SIA News>

What They’re Saying>

Global Incentives>

Featured News

Letters to policymakers, policy reports, other resources, semiconductors in america coalition (siac).

The European Green Deal

Find out what progress the von der Leyen Commission has made so far with the European Green Deal towards becoming climate-neutral by 2050.

Striving to be the first climate-neutral continent

Climate change and environmental degradation are an existential threat to Europe and the world. To overcome these challenges, the European Green Deal will transform the EU into a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy, ensuring:

no net emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050
economic growth decoupled from resource use
no person and no place left behind

The European Green Deal is also our lifeline out of the COVID-19 pandemic. One third of the €1.8 trillion investments from the NextGenerationEU Recovery Plan, and the EU’s seven-year budget will finance the European Green Deal.

The European Commission has adopted a set of proposals to make the EU's climate, energy, transport and taxation policies fit for reducing net greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030 , compared to 1990 levels. More information on Delivering the European Green Deal .

Discover the European Green Deal visual story

12 March 2024 - The Commission has published a Communication on managing climate risks in Europe that sets out how the EU and its countries can implement policies that save lives, cut costs, and protect prosperity. It comes as a direct response to the first-ever European Climate Risk Assessment by the European Environment Agency. It also addresses the concerns that many Europeans have following last’s year record temperatures and extreme weather events. The Commission is calling for action from all levels of government, the private sector and civil society to improve governance and tools for climate risk owners, manage risks across sectors and set the right preconditions to finance climate resilience.

Key figures

Featured initiatives.

The island of Samsoe: an example of a self-sufficient community in renewable energy

The Federal Register

The daily journal of the united states government.

Legal Status

This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.

The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.

The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.

Request for Information (RFI): Inviting Comments and Suggestions on an ODS Strategic Plan 2025-2029: A Blueprint for a Coordinated Dietary Supplement Research Agenda at NIH

A Notice by the National Institutes of Health on 07/01/2024

This document has a comment period that ends in 54 days. (08/30/2024) Submit a formal comment

Thank you for taking the time to create a comment. Your input is important.

Once you have filled in the required fields below you can preview and/or submit your comment to the Health and Human Services Department for review. All comments are considered public and will be posted online once the Health and Human Services Department has reviewed them.

You can view alternative ways to comment or you may also comment via Regulations.gov at /documents/2024/07/01/2024-14481/request-for-information-rfi-inviting-comments-and-suggestions-on-an-ods-strategic-plan-2025-2029-a .

What is your comment about?

Note: You can attach your comment as a file and/or attach supporting documents to your comment. Attachment Requirements .

this will NOT be posted on regulations.gov

Opt to receive email confirmation of submission and tracking number?
Tell us about yourself! I am... *
First Name *
Last Name *
State Alabama Alaska American Samoa Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Guam Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virgin Islands Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming
Country Afghanistan Åland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine, State of Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Réunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe
Organization Type * Company Organization Federal State Local Tribal Regional Foreign U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Senate
Organization Name *
You are filing a document into an official docket. Any personal information included in your comment text and/or uploaded attachment(s) may be publicly viewable on the web.
I read and understand the statement above.
Preview Comment

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register .

Document Statistics

Published document.

This document has been published in the Federal Register . Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Enhanced Content - Table of Contents

This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents. This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links has no substantive legal effect.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Supplementary information:, enhanced content - submit public comment.

Submit a public comment on this document

Enhanced Content - Read Public Comments

This feature is not available for this document.

Enhanced Content - Sharing

Email this document to a friend

Enhanced Content - Document Print View

Print this document

Enhanced Content - Document Tools

These tools are designed to help you understand the official document better and aid in comparing the online edition to the print edition.

These markup elements allow the user to see how the document follows the Document Drafting Handbook that agencies use to create their documents. These can be useful for better understanding how a document is structured but are not part of the published document itself.

Enhanced Content - Developer Tools

This document is available in the following developer friendly formats:.

JSON: Normalized attributes and metadata
XML: Original full text XML
MODS: Government Publishing Office metadata

More information and documentation can be found in our developer tools pages .

Official Content

View printed version (PDF)

This PDF is the current document as it appeared on Public Inspection on 06/28/2024 at 8:45 am. It was viewed 0 times while on Public Inspection.

If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507 . Learn more here .

National Institutes of Health, HHS.

Request for information.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH), Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS) is continuing to use a structured planning process to develop its five-year strategic plans. After a new director joined ODS in July 2023 a new strategic plan for 2025-2029 was developed titled “A Blueprint for a Coordinated Dietary Supplement Research Agenda at NIH.” ODS is committed to engaging its partners and other interested parties including representatives of the scientific community, industry, other federal agencies, policymakers, and the public in the strategic planning process by soliciting their comments on the draft ODS Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years (CY) 2025-2029.

The RFI is open for public comment for a period of 60 days. To ensure consideration, comments must be submitted by August 30, 2024.

All comments must be submitted electronically to [email protected] . You will receive an electronic confirmation acknowledging receipt of your response.

Barbara Cohen, Ph.D., at [email protected] or (301) 435-2920.

This notice is in accordance with the 21st Century Cures Act, wherein NIH institutes are required to regularly update their strategic plans. The purpose of the CY 2025-2029 ODS Strategic Plan ( https://ods.od.nih.gov/ Start Printed Page 54473 About/StrategicPlan.aspx ) is to communicate how ODS will advance its mission to coordinate cutting-edge dietary supplement research across NIH Institutes, Centers, and Offices (ICOs) and other federal agencies to foster knowledge and optimize health across the lifespan. The plan articulates ODS' priorities as follows:

To coordinate and support dietary supplement research focused on biological, population, and product sciences.
To develop NIH dietary supplement initiatives that incorporate rigorous dietary supplement research methods and make best use of available NIH funding mechanisms.
To support ODS programs and develop and disseminate dietary supplement research findings and research resources to ODS audiences.

ODS has completed a draft of its Five-Year Strategic Plan for CY 2025-2029 ( https://ods.od.nih.gov/About/StrategicPlan.aspx ) and is interested in receiving feedback from all interested parties on the following:

Any additional emerging public health issues or knowledge gaps that ODS can help address.
Partnerships NIH should pursue, both inside and outside of government, to advance research on dietary supplements.

ODS encourages organizations to submit a single response reflective of the views of the organization as a whole.

Responses to this RFI are voluntary and may be submitted anonymously. Please do not include any personally identifiable information or any information that you do not wish to make public. Proprietary, classified, confidential, or sensitive information should not be included in your response. NIH will use the information submitted in response to this Request for Information (RFI) at its discretion. NIH reserves the right to use any submitted information on public websites, in reports, in summaries of the state of the science, in any possible resultant solicitation(s), grant(s), or cooperative agreement(s), or in the development of future funding opportunity announcements. This RFI is for informational and planning purposes only and is not a solicitation for applications or an obligation on the part of the Government to provide support for any ideas identified in response to it. Please note that the Government will not pay for the preparation of any information submitted or for the use of that information.

No basis for claims against the U.S. Government shall arise as a result of a response to this RFI or from the Government's use of such information. Additionally, the Government cannot guarantee the confidentiality of the information provided.

Dated: June 20, 2024.

Lawrence A. Tabak,

Principal Deputy Director, National Institutes of Health.

[ FR Doc. 2024-14481 Filed 6-28-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P

Executive Orders

Reader Aids

Information.

About This Site
Accessibility
No Fear Act
Continuity Information

Public finance and budgets

Countries across the OECD are facing long-term fiscal pressures in areas such as health, ageing, climate change, and defence. At the same time, governments must grapple with mounting debt levels, rising interest rates and high levels of uncertainty. In this increasingly constrained fiscal environment, reconciling new and emerging spending pressures with already stretched public finances requires high-quality budget institutions and processes.

Select a language

Key messages, oecd countries are facing long-term fiscal pressures..

The long-term fiscal pressures associated with climate change and reducing greenhouse gas emissions; ageing populations and shrinking labour supply; and rising health care and social care costs continued to mount. Interest expenditures are now increasing significantly. The current geopolitical tensions are adding further new spending pressures, including in the defence area, as well as greater economic uncertainty.

Reconciling these pressures with already stretched public finances requires high quality budget institutions and strengthened public understanding

Budgets are about more than money. They are a statement of a nation’s priorities. Engagement and oversight of the budget process by Independent Fiscal Institutions, parliaments and the public is fundamental to democratic governance and trust in government. Empowering the public to understand fiscal challenges is essential for generating the will to solve them

Governments must have credible public financial management frameworks to build trust in budgetary governance and maintain enough fiscal space to be able to finance crisis responses when needed.

Governments must have credible public financial management frameworks to build trust in budgetary governance and maintain enough fiscal space to finance crisis responses when needed.

Each of the crises of recent years has shown the importance of preserving the resilience of public finances; countries need to be able to finance large and unexpected expenditures, such as in the aftermath of major natural disasters, to support a distressed sector or to address the consequences of a major pandemic. However, debt levels in OECD countries have risen significantly in recent years.

General government expenditures amounted to 46.3% of GDP on average across OECD countries in 2021

Between 2019 and 2021 general government expenditures as a percentage of GDP increased by 5.4 percentage points, from 40.9% in 2019. This increase is largely explained by the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to significant economic disruption. This prompted large-scale fiscal stimuluses, including increased spending on healthcare, social welfare programmes, and support for businesses and individuals affected by the pandemic, while at the same time GDP was falling.

General Fiscal Balance

The fiscal balance is the difference between a government’s revenues and its expenditures. It signals if public accounts are balanced or if there are surpluses or deficits. Recurrent deficits over time imply the accumulation of public debt and may send worrying signals to consumers and investors about the sustainability of public accounts which, in turn, may deter consumption or investment decisions. Nonetheless, if debt is kept at a sustainable level, deficits can help to finance necessary public investment, or in exceptional circumstances, such as unexpected external shocks (e.g. pandemics, wars or natural disasters), can contribute to maintaining living conditions and preserving social stability.

Related data

Related publications.

Related policy issues

Fiscal Frameworks Fiscal frameworks outline the government's fiscal intentions and explain how these will be implemented concretely. Well-designed fiscal frameworks provide clarity and stability in government fiscal operations, ensuring that spending on policy priorities of governments, like healthcare, education, and climate adaptation, are funded and sustainable. Additionally, they build resilience by helping governments prepare effectively for economic challenges. Learn more
Fiscal federalism network The OECD Network on Fiscal Relations across Levels of Government, also known as the “Fiscal Network”, provides a platform for countries to engage on intergovernmental fiscal relations and fiscal decentralisation policy issues. Its core mission is to improve the efficiency, equity and stability of fiscal systems through cross-country policy analysis and international comparisons. The Network facilitates best practice sharing through high-level meetings and maintaining a comprehensive decentralisation database, informing policymaking and reforms. Through collaborative efforts like workshops and the Fiscal Federalism publication series, the Network enables policymakers to access and contribute to research and insights on managing financial relationships across government levels. Supported by a multidisciplinary OECD team, the Network emphasises concrete outcomes, offering members a structured environment to learn, share and apply successful policy strategies. Learn more
Gender budgeting Gender budgeting is a public governance tool that governments can use to assess how budget decisions impact gender equality. When implemented effectively, gender budgeting helps expose how gender inequalities may have inadvertently become embedded in public policies and the allocation of resources and promotes budget measures that will be effective at closing gender gaps. Learn more
Green budgeting Green budgeting uses the tools of budgetary policy making to provide policy makers with a clearer understanding of the environmental and climate impacts of budgeting choices, while bringing evidence together in a systematic and co-ordinated manner for more informed decision making to fulfil national and international commitments. Learn more
Health budgeting Without a major policy shift, health spending is projected to outstrip both expected growth in the overall economy and in government revenues across OECD countries. Competing priorities for government spending are also squeezing health budgets. Urgent action is therefore needed to finance more resilient health systems while ensuring the fiscal sustainability of health systems. Learn more
Parliamentary budget offices and independent fiscal institutions Our work with parliaments and independent fiscal institutions (IFIs) supports fiscal transparency and accountability. At a time when the sustainability of public finances is under close scrutiny, these oversight institutions play a crucial role in raising the quality of the debate on fiscal policy and ensuring that public budgets are managed effectively. Learn more
Performance budgeting In an environment of budget constraints and high citizen expectations it is necessary to demonstrate that public expenditure is providing value for money and delivering on performance. The availability of good-quality performance information not only assists policymakers in making more informed budgetary decisions but also enables the broader public to hold the government accountable for delivering the outcomes promised to citizens. Learn more
Public accounts Good management of public money is vital for good governance, ensuring essential services like healthcare and education run smoothly. Public accounts track government income and spending, they show how money is managed and if the government can fund these crucial services. Learn more
Public debt management Prudent public debt management is critical for well-functioning national financial systems and helps to reinforce sound fiscal and monetary policies. Public debt portfolios, both in terms of their size and composition, have the potential to generate substantial risk to countries’ balance sheets and overall financial stability. The OECD promotes good practices in public debt and risk management and provides recommendations to assist policy makers in their efforts to adopt and implement prudent debt management policies. Learn more
Spending Reviews Spending reviews are tools for systematically analysing the government’s existing expenditure. The OECD has found that spending reviews have proved to be an important tool for governments, not only to control total expenditure by making space for more resources, but also to align spending allocations with government priorities and to improve the effectiveness of policies and programmes. Learn more

Biden Campaign Takes Aim at Project 2025, a Set of Conservative Proposals

The plan to dramatically reshape the federal government differs from Trump’s official platform, and has drawn attention on social media.

Share full article

President Biden is seen in silhouette walking down a staircase at an airstrip.

By Simon J. Levien

June 27, 2024

Hours before the presidential debate on Thursday, President Biden’s campaign launched a website targeting Project 2025, a policy and staffing playbook assembled by allies of former President Donald J. Trump that proposes an overhaul of the government under a new Republican administration.

The Biden campaign’s website associates Project 2025 — a transition agenda compiled by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, and dozens of similarly aligned groups — with Mr. Trump, saying it would enable him to “gut democratic checks and balances, and consolidate power in the Oval Office.”

Project 2025 is not Mr. Trump’s official platform; his campaign instead points to Agenda47 , which focuses on substantially curtailing immigration and encouraging economic growth. But Project 2025 has nonetheless raised Democratic fears about what a second Trump term would look like.

Conservative policy groups in 2016 were largely unprepared for Mr. Trump’s win. Since its announcement in 2022, these groups prepared Project 2025, a 920-page document outlining a radical transformation of the executive branch. The platform proposes replacing many federal civil servant jobs with political appointees who would be loyal to the president. The plan also proposes a cracking down on abortion rights, criminalizing pornography, cutting climate research funding and eliminating the Commerce Department.

Detailed policy proposals rarely attract much attention, but Project 2025 has resonated in liberal social media circles. John Oliver released a “Last Week Tonight” segment on Project 2025 last week that has more than five million views on YouTube. Charlamagne tha God, a podcaster, has told his fans that the platform would enshrine an “authoritarian state” in America. Excerpts from Project 2025 have also gone viral on TikTok.

Sarafina Chitika, a spokeswoman for the Biden-Harris campaign, said that Project 2025 underscored the stakes of the 2024 election.

“The American people are tuning in to just how extreme and unpopular Donald Trump’s second-term playbook is — and they’re ready to stop him this November,” Ms. Chitika said in a statement.

It remains to be seen if Mr. Biden will make Project 2025 a focus of his comments at the debate tonight.

Simon J. Levien is a Times political reporter covering the 2024 elections and a member of the 2024-25 Times Fellowship class, a program for journalists early in their careers. More about Simon J. Levien

IMAGES

Graphical display of the four phases of proposed research agenda for
Research Agenda Examples: How to Write [10 Free Templates]
Research Agenda Templates
Research Agenda Examples: How to Write [10 Free Templates]
Research Agenda Templates
Research Agenda Templates in Pages, Word, Google Docs

VIDEO

Committee on Finance (Subcommittee “A”) (October 11, 2023)
Video Presentation Proposal James Campbell
Davie County Board of Commissioners Special Called Meeting; June 24, 2024
Committee on Finance (Subcommittee “G”) (September 13, 2023)
Project 2025: Trump's Blueprint for a Conservative Takeover?
Committee on Finance (Subcommittee “B”) (October 4, 2023)

COMMENTS

Research Agenda Examples: How to Write [10 Free Templates]
A research agenda is an action plan that outlines the tasks that need to be prioritised within a particular field of study or research and the execution system of these tasks.. This agenda is a guiding tool for students with specific interests in a subject or field of research who intend to attain predetermined objectives by the end of their studies.
Creating a Research Agenda
Try to use class assignments to advance your research agenda. If possible, use each seminar paper as a way to focus on a specific part of your overall agenda —whether it be a literature review or a proposal for a study. Don't be afraid to take a chance on a course that seems somewhat outside of your agenda or your comfort zone.
Developing a research agenda: contributing new knowledge via ...
A research agenda can be viewed as both a noun and a verb. As a noun, a research agenda comprises a framework that allows you to attack a topic from multiple vantage points. A research agenda provides a map for your career—or at least for the next few years (e.g., 3-5) of your career.
Writing a Research Plan
One person I spoke to said that a research plan should be "about three pages of 1.5-spaced text, and NEVER more than five." Another source prefers "three semi-independent (but related) sub-proposals not more than about three to four pages (single-spaced) each with a half page of important and relevant references."
Healthcare analytics—A literature review and proposed research agenda
The study contributes to the body of literature by providing a state-of-the-art review of healthcare analytics as well as proposing a research agenda to advance the knowledge in this area. The results of this research can be beneficial for both healthcare science and data science researchers as well as practitioners in the field. Keywords ...
Health literacy measurement: a proposed research agenda
Existing measures are mainly focused on assessing what individuals can read and understand in clinical contexts. This leaves important factors untested, such as how individuals use information, and how health professionals and systems communicate with patients. This article outlines key elements of a proposed research agenda focusing on ...
Vaccine safety in an era of novel vaccines: a proposed research agenda
Proposed future research agenda. Safety is a primary consideration in vaccine development, and because vaccines are typically given to healthy individuals to protect against a possible future ...
PDF A PROPOSED RESEARCH AGENDA
o realizing this agenda. The agenda is written to inform ongoing and future research, workforce development, education, and emergency management practice over a. 3- to 5-year time horizon. The report itself is intended for academic researchers and students from various disciplines, emergency management organizat.
Creating a Research Agenda
Think specifically about the research questions you want to ask, and think about how you will answer them. Then pick courses to help you in reaching this goal. Try to use class assignments to advance your research agenda. If possible, use each seminar paper as a way to focus on a specific part of your overall agenda — whether it be a ...
Commercial determinants of health: a proposed research agenda
In our proposed research agenda, we also highlight the need for research addressing four key pathways—marketing, lobbying, corporate social responsibility and supply chains of private corporations—through which private industry exerts influence on consumers and public policy. The "collective harm" produced through the marketing ...
TikTok and public health: a proposed research agenda
TikTok and public health: a proposed research agenda. TikTok and public health: a proposed research agenda BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Nov;6(11):e007648. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007648. Authors Marco Zenone 1 2 , Nikki Ow 3 , Skye Barbic 3 4 Affiliations 1 Faculty of Medicine, Department of ...
Health Literacy Measurement: A Proposed Research Agenda
This article outlines key elements of a proposed research agenda focusing on development of a new, comprehensive approach to measuring health literacy. Building a comprehensive approach to measurement of the social construct called health literacy may well be the most significant and necessary task facing health literacy research and practice.
PDF TikTok and public health: a proposed research agenda
TikTok and public health: a proposed research agenda Marco Zenone,1,2 Nikki Ow,1 Skye Barbic1,3 Commentary To cite: Zenone M, Ow N, Barbic S. TikTok and public health: a proposed research agenda. BMJ Global Health 2021;6:e007648. doi:10.1136/ bmjgh-2021-007648 Handling editor Seye Abimbola Received 6 October 2021 Accepted 4 November 2021
TikTok and public health: a proposed research agenda
TikTok is a short video sharing social media platform that has grown rapidly since its launch, amassing over 1 billion monthly global users as of September 2021. We argue that public health is served by paying urgent attention to the potential health-related implications of TikTok and suggest research agenda to inform decision-makers, health ...
Health Literacy Measurement: A Proposed Research Agenda
This article outlines key elements of a proposed research agenda focus-ing on development of a new, comprehensive approach to measuring health literacy. Building a comprehensive approach to measurement of the social construct called health literacy may well be the most significant and necessary task facing health literacy research and practice.
Health Literacy Measurement: A Proposed Research Agenda
that support the agenda proposed in this article: 1. New measures of health literacy need to be based on sound theory. 2. Researchers and practitioners need to be able to measure both sides of the ...
About PCORI's Research Agenda
The proposed Research Agenda was developed in consultation with stakeholders encompassing numerous perspectives and experiences in the US healthcare ecosystem and builds on PCORI's work in its first decade. The feedback and input gathered during the December 10, 2021 to January 31, 2022 public comment period was considered when finalizing the ...
PCORI unveils proposed Research Agenda and invites public comment
The Research Agenda will provide the framework for PCORI's future funding of comparative clinical effectiveness research and other research initiatives. PCORI will accept public comments on the Research Agenda through January 31, 2022, through its website. PCORI's proposed Research Agenda stems from the five National Priorities for Health ...
Mapping the antecedents and consequences of thriving at work: A review
The proposed framework and future research directions have the potential to help unpack the unique relationship between work-related contextual factors and thriving. ... Muchiri, M. K., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2021). Mapping the antecedents and consequences of thriving at work: A review and proposed research agenda. International Journal of ...
PDF Developing a Long-Term Research Agenda
Important points to remember. A long-term research agenda is a developmental approach to evaluation whereby evidence of effectiveness is built over time. A long-term research agenda is unique and should be tailored to fit each individual program. There is value to building evidence at all stages along the continuum.
The importance of a Research Agenda
2 min read. ·. Dec 4, 2018. A research agenda identifies research priorities which will lead to more successful research, outlining a clear framework for making decisions about future research ...
The Relationship Between Work Engagement and Performance: A Review of
T2 - A Review of Empirical Literature and a Proposed Research Agenda. AU - Kim, Woocheol. AU - Kolb, Judith A. AU - Kim, Taesung. PY - 2013/9. Y1 - 2013/9. N2 - Engagement has been defined in a variety of ways. Engagement in the workplace generally is viewed as a positive, fulfilling, affective-motivational state of work-related well-being.
TikTok and public health: a proposed research agenda
TikTok is a short video sharing social media platform that has grown rapidly since its launch, amassing over 1 billion monthly global users as of September 2021. We argue that public health is served by paying urgent attention to the potential health-related implications of TikTok and suggest research agenda to inform decision-makers, health ...
Project 2025
Reshape the U.S. federal government to support the agenda of next Republican president: Location: Washington, D.C ... Funding for climate research would be cut while the National Institutes of Health (NIH) would ... the policies proposed by Project 2025 constitute not restrictions but rather "medical safeguards" for women. Waters also said ...
SEC.gov
This index of the SEC's rulemaking activity can be filtered by year, status (proposed or final), or division/office that recommended the rulemaking to the Commission. Twice a year under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the SEC is required to publish an agenda identifying rules that the agency estimates it may consider in the next 12 months.
CHIPS for America Act & FABS Act
Meanwhile, federal investments in chip research have held flat as a share of GDP, while other countries have significantly ramped up research investments. To address these challenges, Congress passed the CHIPS Act of 2022, which includes semiconductor manufacturing grants, research investments, and an investment tax credit for chip manufacturing.
The European Green Deal
The European Commission has adopted a set of proposals to make the EU's climate, energy, transport and taxation policies fit for reducing net greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030, compared to 1990 levels.More information on Delivering the European Green Deal.. Discover the European Green Deal visual story
Federal Register :: Request for Information (RFI): Inviting Comments
The National Institutes of Health (NIH), Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS) is continuing to use a structured planning process to develop its five-year strategic plans. After a new director joined ODS in July 2023 a new strategic plan for 2025-2029 was developed titled "A Blueprint for a Coordinated Dietary Supplement Research Agenda at NIH."
Public finance and budgets
Public finance is the economic field focusing on the financial activities of government entities at various levels. Our work examines government expenditures, including public services, infrastructure, social welfare, defence, education, healthcare, and more. These are outlined in the national budget, reflecting financial commitments to meet obligations and provide essential services. Our ...
Biden Campaign Takes Aim at Project 2025, a Set of Conservative
The Biden campaign's website associates Project 2025 — a transition agenda compiled by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, and dozens of similarly aligned groups — with Mr ...

Research Agenda Examples: How to Write [10 Free Templates]

Download Templates

Pre-Writing Considerations

Discuss your area of interest with the faculty

Do research

Ask your faculty for resources

Identify key authors relevant to your interests

Take courses relevant to your interests

Use class assignments to advance your research agenda

Talk to students with similar interests and collaborate

How to Write Research Agenda

Describe your area of interest

Describe the problem statement(s)

Research methods relevant to your topical area

Include research questions

Name collaborators, if any

List your finest ideas

Describe the grants and their deadlines

Include scholarly communication outlets

Essential Tips to Write a Good Research Agenda

Clarify your ideas first

Divide and prioritise all tasks

Keep your agenda flexible

Keep refining

Don’t be intimidated

Final Thoughts

About This Article

Great! Tell us more about your experience

Agendas , Business

30 Free Team Meeting Agenda Templates

Family , Personal

How to Prepare an Agenda for Event Planning (Free Templates)

14 Perfect Meeting Minutes & Notes Templates (Word)

9 Free Meeting Planner Templates (Word | PDF)

Free Training Agenda Templates (Formats)

15 Free Sales Meeting Agenda Templates (Progressive Agendas)

How to Write a Descriptive Essay (12 Best Examples)

8 Free Meeting Notes Templates

Charts , Education , Family

Free Weight Loss Charts & Templates (Word, Excel)

Creating a Research Agenda

How to get started

Advancing your agenda

Conference papers, colloquia, and research articles

Vaccine safety in an era of novel vaccines: a proposed research agenda

Known vaccine-related adverse events

Proposed future research agenda

Conclusions

Author information

Corresponding author

Ethics declarations

Rights and permissions

About this article

Share this article

Quick links

Creating a Research Agenda

Universities Investing in Microcredential Leadership

Share This Article

Hiring for Humanity

In Praise of Lunch

Bad-Faith Counteroffers

Sign up for a free account or log in.

Commercial determinants of health: a proposed research agenda

Cite this article

Access this article

Author information

Corresponding author

Ethics declarations

Additional information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Share this article

Save citation to file

Add to My Bibliography

TikTok and public health: a proposed research agenda

Conflict of interest statement

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources

TikTok and public health: a proposed research agenda

Skye Barbic