example a research project

17 Research Proposal Examples

Chris Drew (PhD)

Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]

Learn about our Editorial Process

A research proposal systematically and transparently outlines a proposed research project.

The purpose of a research proposal is to demonstrate a project’s viability and the researcher’s preparedness to conduct an academic study. It serves as a roadmap for the researcher.

The process holds value both externally (for accountability purposes and often as a requirement for a grant application) and intrinsic value (for helping the researcher to clarify the mechanics, purpose, and potential signficance of the study).

Key sections of a research proposal include: the title, abstract, introduction, literature review, research design and methods, timeline, budget, outcomes and implications, references, and appendix. Each is briefly explained below.

Watch my Guide: How to Write a Research Proposal

Get your Template for Writing your Research Proposal Here (With AI Prompts!)

Research Proposal Sample Structure

Title: The title should present a concise and descriptive statement that clearly conveys the core idea of the research projects. Make it as specific as possible. The reader should immediately be able to grasp the core idea of the intended research project. Often, the title is left too vague and does not help give an understanding of what exactly the study looks at.

Abstract: Abstracts are usually around 250-300 words and provide an overview of what is to follow – including the research problem , objectives, methods, expected outcomes, and significance of the study. Use it as a roadmap and ensure that, if the abstract is the only thing someone reads, they’ll get a good fly-by of what will be discussed in the peice.

Introduction: Introductions are all about contextualization. They often set the background information with a statement of the problem. At the end of the introduction, the reader should understand what the rationale for the study truly is. I like to see the research questions or hypotheses included in the introduction and I like to get a good understanding of what the significance of the research will be. It’s often easiest to write the introduction last

Literature Review: The literature review dives deep into the existing literature on the topic, demosntrating your thorough understanding of the existing literature including themes, strengths, weaknesses, and gaps in the literature. It serves both to demonstrate your knowledge of the field and, to demonstrate how the proposed study will fit alongside the literature on the topic. A good literature review concludes by clearly demonstrating how your research will contribute something new and innovative to the conversation in the literature.

Research Design and Methods: This section needs to clearly demonstrate how the data will be gathered and analyzed in a systematic and academically sound manner. Here, you need to demonstrate that the conclusions of your research will be both valid and reliable. Common points discussed in the research design and methods section include highlighting the research paradigm, methodologies, intended population or sample to be studied, data collection techniques, and data analysis procedures . Toward the end of this section, you are encouraged to also address ethical considerations and limitations of the research process , but also to explain why you chose your research design and how you are mitigating the identified risks and limitations.

Timeline: Provide an outline of the anticipated timeline for the study. Break it down into its various stages (including data collection, data analysis, and report writing). The goal of this section is firstly to establish a reasonable breakdown of steps for you to follow and secondly to demonstrate to the assessors that your project is practicable and feasible.

Budget: Estimate the costs associated with the research project and include evidence for your estimations. Typical costs include staffing costs, equipment, travel, and data collection tools. When applying for a scholarship, the budget should demonstrate that you are being responsible with your expensive and that your funding application is reasonable.

Expected Outcomes and Implications: A discussion of the anticipated findings or results of the research, as well as the potential contributions to the existing knowledge, theory, or practice in the field. This section should also address the potential impact of the research on relevant stakeholders and any broader implications for policy or practice.

References: A complete list of all the sources cited in the research proposal, formatted according to the required citation style. This demonstrates the researcher’s familiarity with the relevant literature and ensures proper attribution of ideas and information.

Appendices (if applicable): Any additional materials, such as questionnaires, interview guides, or consent forms, that provide further information or support for the research proposal. These materials should be included as appendices at the end of the document.

Research Proposal Examples

Research proposals often extend anywhere between 2,000 and 15,000 words in length. The following snippets are samples designed to briefly demonstrate what might be discussed in each section.

1. Education Studies Research Proposals

See some real sample pieces:

• Assessment of the perceptions of teachers towards a new grading system
• Does ICT use in secondary classrooms help or hinder student learning?
• Digital technologies in focus project
• Urban Middle School Teachers’ Experiences of the Implementation of
• Restorative Justice Practices
• Experiences of students of color in service learning

Consider this hypothetical education research proposal:

The Impact of Game-Based Learning on Student Engagement and Academic Performance in Middle School Mathematics

Abstract: The proposed study will explore multiplayer game-based learning techniques in middle school mathematics curricula and their effects on student engagement. The study aims to contribute to the current literature on game-based learning by examining the effects of multiplayer gaming in learning.

Introduction: Digital game-based learning has long been shunned within mathematics education for fears that it may distract students or lower the academic integrity of the classrooms. However, there is emerging evidence that digital games in math have emerging benefits not only for engagement but also academic skill development. Contributing to this discourse, this study seeks to explore the potential benefits of multiplayer digital game-based learning by examining its impact on middle school students’ engagement and academic performance in a mathematics class.

Literature Review: The literature review has identified gaps in the current knowledge, namely, while game-based learning has been extensively explored, the role of multiplayer games in supporting learning has not been studied.

Research Design and Methods: This study will employ a mixed-methods research design based upon action research in the classroom. A quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test control group design will first be used to compare the academic performance and engagement of middle school students exposed to game-based learning techniques with those in a control group receiving instruction without the aid of technology. Students will also be observed and interviewed in regard to the effect of communication and collaboration during gameplay on their learning.

Timeline: The study will take place across the second term of the school year with a pre-test taking place on the first day of the term and the post-test taking place on Wednesday in Week 10.

Budget: The key budgetary requirements will be the technologies required, including the subscription cost for the identified games and computers.

Expected Outcomes and Implications: It is expected that the findings will contribute to the current literature on game-based learning and inform educational practices, providing educators and policymakers with insights into how to better support student achievement in mathematics.

2. Psychology Research Proposals

See some real examples:

• A situational analysis of shared leadership in a self-managing team
• The effect of musical preference on running performance
• Relationship between self-esteem and disordered eating amongst adolescent females

Consider this hypothetical psychology research proposal:

The Effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Stress Reduction in College Students

Abstract: This research proposal examines the impact of mindfulness-based interventions on stress reduction among college students, using a pre-test/post-test experimental design with both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods .

Introduction: College students face heightened stress levels during exam weeks. This can affect both mental health and test performance. This study explores the potential benefits of mindfulness-based interventions such as meditation as a way to mediate stress levels in the weeks leading up to exam time.

Literature Review: Existing research on mindfulness-based meditation has shown the ability for mindfulness to increase metacognition, decrease anxiety levels, and decrease stress. Existing literature has looked at workplace, high school and general college-level applications. This study will contribute to the corpus of literature by exploring the effects of mindfulness directly in the context of exam weeks.

Research Design and Methods: Participants ( n= 234 ) will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group, receiving 5 days per week of 10-minute mindfulness-based interventions, or a control group, receiving no intervention. Data will be collected through self-report questionnaires, measuring stress levels, semi-structured interviews exploring participants’ experiences, and students’ test scores.

Timeline: The study will begin three weeks before the students’ exam week and conclude after each student’s final exam. Data collection will occur at the beginning (pre-test of self-reported stress levels) and end (post-test) of the three weeks.

Expected Outcomes and Implications: The study aims to provide evidence supporting the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions in reducing stress among college students in the lead up to exams, with potential implications for mental health support and stress management programs on college campuses.

3. Sociology Research Proposals

• Understanding emerging social movements: A case study of ‘Jersey in Transition’
• The interaction of health, education and employment in Western China
• Can we preserve lower-income affordable neighbourhoods in the face of rising costs?

Consider this hypothetical sociology research proposal:

The Impact of Social Media Usage on Interpersonal Relationships among Young Adults

Abstract: This research proposal investigates the effects of social media usage on interpersonal relationships among young adults, using a longitudinal mixed-methods approach with ongoing semi-structured interviews to collect qualitative data.

Introduction: Social media platforms have become a key medium for the development of interpersonal relationships, particularly for young adults. This study examines the potential positive and negative effects of social media usage on young adults’ relationships and development over time.

Literature Review: A preliminary review of relevant literature has demonstrated that social media usage is central to development of a personal identity and relationships with others with similar subcultural interests. However, it has also been accompanied by data on mental health deline and deteriorating off-screen relationships. The literature is to-date lacking important longitudinal data on these topics.

Research Design and Methods: Participants ( n = 454 ) will be young adults aged 18-24. Ongoing self-report surveys will assess participants’ social media usage, relationship satisfaction, and communication patterns. A subset of participants will be selected for longitudinal in-depth interviews starting at age 18 and continuing for 5 years.

Timeline: The study will be conducted over a period of five years, including recruitment, data collection, analysis, and report writing.

Expected Outcomes and Implications: This study aims to provide insights into the complex relationship between social media usage and interpersonal relationships among young adults, potentially informing social policies and mental health support related to social media use.

4. Nursing Research Proposals

• Does Orthopaedic Pre-assessment clinic prepare the patient for admission to hospital?
• Nurses’ perceptions and experiences of providing psychological care to burns patients
• Registered psychiatric nurse’s practice with mentally ill parents and their children

Consider this hypothetical nursing research proposal:

The Influence of Nurse-Patient Communication on Patient Satisfaction and Health Outcomes following Emergency Cesarians

Abstract: This research will examines the impact of effective nurse-patient communication on patient satisfaction and health outcomes for women following c-sections, utilizing a mixed-methods approach with patient surveys and semi-structured interviews.

Introduction: It has long been known that effective communication between nurses and patients is crucial for quality care. However, additional complications arise following emergency c-sections due to the interaction between new mother’s changing roles and recovery from surgery.

Literature Review: A review of the literature demonstrates the importance of nurse-patient communication, its impact on patient satisfaction, and potential links to health outcomes. However, communication between nurses and new mothers is less examined, and the specific experiences of those who have given birth via emergency c-section are to date unexamined.

Research Design and Methods: Participants will be patients in a hospital setting who have recently had an emergency c-section. A self-report survey will assess their satisfaction with nurse-patient communication and perceived health outcomes. A subset of participants will be selected for in-depth interviews to explore their experiences and perceptions of the communication with their nurses.

Timeline: The study will be conducted over a period of six months, including rolling recruitment, data collection, analysis, and report writing within the hospital.

Expected Outcomes and Implications: This study aims to provide evidence for the significance of nurse-patient communication in supporting new mothers who have had an emergency c-section. Recommendations will be presented for supporting nurses and midwives in improving outcomes for new mothers who had complications during birth.

5. Social Work Research Proposals

• Experiences of negotiating employment and caring responsibilities of fathers post-divorce
• Exploring kinship care in the north region of British Columbia

Consider this hypothetical social work research proposal:

The Role of a Family-Centered Intervention in Preventing Homelessness Among At-Risk Youthin a working-class town in Northern England

Abstract: This research proposal investigates the effectiveness of a family-centered intervention provided by a local council area in preventing homelessness among at-risk youth. This case study will use a mixed-methods approach with program evaluation data and semi-structured interviews to collect quantitative and qualitative data .

Introduction: Homelessness among youth remains a significant social issue. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of family-centered interventions in addressing this problem and identify factors that contribute to successful prevention strategies.

Literature Review: A review of the literature has demonstrated several key factors contributing to youth homelessness including lack of parental support, lack of social support, and low levels of family involvement. It also demonstrates the important role of family-centered interventions in addressing this issue. Drawing on current evidence, this study explores the effectiveness of one such intervention in preventing homelessness among at-risk youth in a working-class town in Northern England.

Research Design and Methods: The study will evaluate a new family-centered intervention program targeting at-risk youth and their families. Quantitative data on program outcomes, including housing stability and family functioning, will be collected through program records and evaluation reports. Semi-structured interviews with program staff, participants, and relevant stakeholders will provide qualitative insights into the factors contributing to program success or failure.

Timeline: The study will be conducted over a period of six months, including recruitment, data collection, analysis, and report writing.

Budget: Expenses include access to program evaluation data, interview materials, data analysis software, and any related travel costs for in-person interviews.

Expected Outcomes and Implications: This study aims to provide evidence for the effectiveness of family-centered interventions in preventing youth homelessness, potentially informing the expansion of or necessary changes to social work practices in Northern England.

Research Proposal Template

Get your Detailed Template for Writing your Research Proposal Here (With AI Prompts!)

This is a template for a 2500-word research proposal. You may find it difficult to squeeze everything into this wordcount, but it’s a common wordcount for Honors and MA-level dissertations.

Your research proposal is where you really get going with your study. I’d strongly recommend working closely with your teacher in developing a research proposal that’s consistent with the requirements and culture of your institution, as in my experience it varies considerably. The above template is from my own courses that walk students through research proposals in a British School of Education.

• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 101 Hidden Talents Examples
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 15 Green Flags in a Relationship
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 15 Signs you're Burnt Out, Not Lazy
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 15 Toxic Things Parents Say to their Children

8 thoughts on “17 Research Proposal Examples”

Very excellent research proposals

very helpful

Very helpful

Dear Sir, I need some help to write an educational research proposal. Thank you.

Hi Levi, use the site search bar to ask a question and I’ll likely have a guide already written for your specific question. Thanks for reading!

very good research proposal

Thank you so much sir! ❤️

Very helpful 👌

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

• Request new password
• Create a new account

The Essential Guide to Doing Your Research Project

Student resources.

Examples of Student Research Projects

• Design for Business
• Most Recent
• Presentations
• Infographics
• Data Visualizations
• Forms and Surveys
• Video & Animation
• Case Studies
• Digital Marketing
• Design Inspiration
• Visual Thinking
• Product Updates
• Visme Webinars
• Artificial Intelligence

8 Research Proposal Examples & Template to Use

Written by: Raja Mandal

So you have a groundbreaking research idea you've spent months or even years developing, and now you're ready to take the next step.

How do you get funding for your research, and how should you approach potential funders? The answer is to create a convincing research proposal.

Unfortunately, most research proposals often get rejected. According to the European Research Council, the success rate for repeat proposal applications was only 14.8% in 2023 .

Pitching a novel research concept isn’t enough. To increase your chances of securing funding, your research proposal must check the right boxes in terms of clarity, feasibility, aesthetic appeal and other factors.

If you’re looking for inspiration to create a persuasive and feasible proposal, you’re in the right place. In this article, we have compiled a list of research proposal examples to help you create yours.

These examples will help you understand how to organize your proposal, what information to include and how to present it in a way that encourages others to support your project.

Let's dive in!

Table of Contents

What is a research proposal, what to include in a research proposal, 8 research proposal examples & templates, research proposal faqs.

• A research proposal is a document that outlines your proposed research project, explaining what you plan to study, why it's important and how you will conduct your research.
• A well-structured research proposal includes a title page, abstract and table of contents, introduction, literature review, research design and methodology, contribution to knowledge, research schedule, timeline and budget.
• Visme's research proposal examples and templates offer a great starting point for creating engaging and well-structured proposals.
• Choose a template from Visme's research proposal examples and customize it to fit your needs.
• With Visme’s proposal maker , you can create a research proposal that stands out. Access a drag-and-drop editor and advanced features like AI tools , collaboration features, brand wizard and more.

A research proposal is a structured document that outlines the core idea of your research, the methods you intend to use, the required resources and the expected results.

Think of it as a sales pitch for your research. It answers some big questions: What are you planning to explore? Why is it important to conduct the research? What are your research objectives and the methods you’ll use to achieve them? What are the potential outcomes or contributions of this research to the field?

A research proposal serves two primary purposes. First, it convinces funding bodies or academic committees to support your research project expected to bring new ideas and insights. Second, it provides a roadmap for your research journey, helping you stay focused, organized and on track.

Now, we'll discuss what to include in a research proposal. You'll learn about the important parts of a research proposal template and how they help present your research idea clearly.

Here’s an infographic that you can use to understand the elements of a research proposal quickly.

1. Title Page

Start your research proposal with a title page that clearly states your research. The title page is like a book cover, giving the first impression of your project. Therefore, you must ensure the design is engaging enough to attract your audience at first glance.

Include the following details on your title page:

• Title of your research
• Contact Details
• Name of the department or organization
• Date of submission

2. Abstract and Table of Contents

After the title page comes the abstract and the table of contents.

The abstract is a concise summary of your project that briefly outlines your research question, the reasons behind the study and the methods you intend to use. It is a quick way for readers to understand your proposal without reading the entire document.

The table of contents is a detailed list of the sections and subsections in your proposal, with page numbers. It helps readers navigate through your document and quickly locate different parts they're interested in.

3. Introduction

The introduction of your research proposal sets the tone for the rest of the document. It should grab the reader's attention and make them want to learn more. It's your chance to make a strong case for why your research is worth investigating and how it can fill a gap in current knowledge or solve a specific problem.

Make sure that your introduction covers the following:

• Background Information: Set the stage with a brief snapshot of existing research and why your topic is relevant.
• Research Problem: Identify the specific problem or knowledge gap that your study will address.
• Research Questions or Hypotheses: Present the central question or hypothesis that guides your research focus.
• Aims and Objectives: Outline your research's main goal and the steps you'll take to achieve it.
• Significance and Contribution: Explain how your research will add value to the field and what impact it could have.

4. Literature Review

A literature review is a list of the scholarly works you used to conduct your research. It helps you demonstrate your current knowledge about the topic.

Here's how this part works:

• Summary of Sources: Talk about the main ideas or findings from your research materials and explain how they connect to your research questions.
• Finding Gaps: Show where the current research falls short or doesn't give the full picture—this is where your research comes in!
• Key Theories: Tell the readers about any theories or ways of thinking that help shape your research.
• Learning from Methods: Discuss what previous researchers worked on and how their methods might guide your research.
• Recognizing Authors and Studies: Honor the pioneers whose work has had a major influence on your topic.

5. Research Design and Methodology

This section outlines your plan for answering your research question. It explains how you intend to gather and analyze information, providing a clear roadmap of the investigation process.

Here are the key components:

Population and Sample

Describe the entire group you're interested in (the population). This could be all teachers in a specific state or all social media platform users. After that, you will need to explain how you will choose a smaller group, known as a sample, to study directly. This sample should be selected to accurately represent the larger population you are interested in studying.

To choose the right sampling method, you need to assess your population properly. For instance, to obtain general insights, you can use random sampling to select individuals without bias. If the population consists of different categories, such as professionals and students, you can use stratified sampling to ensure that each category is represented in the sample.

Other popular sampling methods include systematic, convenience, purposive, cluster, and probability sampling techniques.

Research Approach

There are three main approaches for the research: qualitative (focusing on experiences and themes), quantitative (using numbers and statistics), or mixed methods (combining both). Your choice will depend on your research question and the kind of data you need.

Data Collection

This section details the specific methods you'll use to gather information. Will you distribute surveys online or in person? Conduct interviews? Perhaps you'll use existing data sets. Here, you'll also explain how you'll ensure the data collection process is reliable and ethical.

Data Analysis

Once you have collected your data, the next step is to analyze it to obtain meaningful insights. The method you choose depends on the available data type.

If you have quantitative data, you can employ statistical tests to analyze it. And if you're dealing with qualitative data, coding techniques can help you spot patterns and themes in your collected data.

6. Contribution to Knowledge

In this section, you need to explain how your research will contribute to the existing knowledge in your field. You should describe whether your study will fill a knowledge gap, challenge conventional ideas or beliefs or offer a fresh perspective on a topic.

Clearly outline how your work will advance your field of study and why this new knowledge is essential.

7. Research Schedule and Timeline

Create a timeline with important milestones, such as finishing your literature review, completing data collection and finalizing your analysis.

This shows that you've carefully considered the scope of your project and can manage your time effectively. Furthermore, account for possible delays and be prepared to adapt your schedule accordingly.

To create this timeline, consider using a visual tool like a Gantt chart or a simple spreadsheet. These tools will help you organize individual tasks, assign deadlines, and visualize the project's overall progress.

Choose a Gantt chart template from Visme's library and customize it to create your timeline quickly. Here's an example template:

The budget section is your opportunity to show them that you've carefully considered all necessary expenses and that your funding request is justified.

Here's how you can approach this part:

• Understand the Rules: Before making calculations, thoroughly review the funding agency's guidelines. Pay attention to what types of expenses are allowed or excluded and whether there are any budget caps.
• Personnel: Salaries and benefits for yourself, research assistants, or collaborators.
• Equipment: Specialized tools, software, or lab supplies.
• Travel: Transportation, lodging and meals if data collection requires travel.
• Dissemination: Costs for publishing results or presenting at conferences.
• Provide Justifications: Don't just list a cost. Briefly explain why each expense is crucial for completing your research.
• Be Thorough and Realistic: Research prices for specific items using quotes or online comparisons. Don't underestimate expenses, as this can raise troubles about the project's feasibility.
• Don't Forget Contingencies: Include a small buffer (around 5% of your total budget) for unexpected costs that might arise.

Using these research proposal examples and templates, you can create a winning proposal in no time. You will find templates for various topics and customize every aspect of them to make them your own.

Visme’s drag-and-drop editor, advanced features and a vast library of templates help organizations and individuals worldwide create engaging documents.

Here’s what a research student who uses Visme to create award-winning presentations has to say about the tool:

Chantelle Clarke

Research Student

Now, let’s dive into the research proposal examples.

1. Research Proposal Presentation Template

This research proposal presentation template is a powerful tool for presenting your research plan to stakeholders. The slides include specific sections to help you outline your research, including the research background, questions, objectives, methodology and expected results.

The slides create a coherent narrative, highlighting the importance and significance of your research. Overall, the template has a calming and professional blue color scheme with text that enables your audience to grasp the key points.

If you need help creating your presentation slides in a fraction of the time, check out Visme's AI presentation maker . Enter your requirements using text prompts, and the AI tool will generate a complete presentation with engaging visuals, text and clear structure. You can further customize the template completely to your needs.

2. Sales Research Proposal Template

Sales research gives you a deeper understanding of their target audience. It also helps you identify gaps in the market and develop effective sales strategies that drive revenue growth. With this research proposal template, you can secure funding for your next research project.

It features a sleek and professional grayscale color palette with a classic and modern vibe. The high-quality images in the template are strategically placed to reinforce the message without overwhelming the reader. Furthermore, the template includes a vertical bar graph that effectively represents budget allocations, enabling the reader to quickly grasp the information.

Use Visme's interactive elements and animations to add a dynamic layer to your research proposals. You can animate any object and add pop-ups or link pages for a more immersive experience. Use these functionalities to highlight key findings, demonstrate trends or guide readers through your proposal, making the content engaging and interactive.

3. General Funding Research Proposal Template

This proposal template is a great tool for securing funding for any type of research project. It begins with a captivating title page that grabs attention. The beautiful design elements and vector icons enhance the aesthetic and aid visual communication.

This template revolves around how a specific user group adopts cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. The goal is to assess awareness, gauge interest and understand key factors affecting cryptocurrency adoption.

The project methodology includes survey design, data collection, and market research. The expected impact is to enhance customer engagement and position the company as a customer-centric brand.

Do you need additional help crafting the perfect text for your proposal? Visme's AI writer can quickly generate content outlines, summaries and even entire sections. Just explain your requirements to the tool using a text prompt, and the tool will generate it for you.

4. Product Research Proposal Template

Creating a product that delights users begins with detailed product research. With this modern proposal template, you can secure buy-in and funding for your next research.

It starts with a background that explains why the research is important. Next, it highlights what the research is set to achieve, how the research will be conducted, how much it will cost, the timeline and the expected outcomes. With a striking color scheme combining black, yellow, and gray, the template grabs attention and maintains it until the last page.

What we love about this template is the smart use of visuals. You'll find a flowchart explaining the methodology, a bar graph for the budget, and a timeline for the project. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg regarding the visual elements you’ll find in Visme.

Visme offers data visualization tools with 30+ data widgets, such as radial gauges, population arrays, progress bars and more. These tools can help you turn complex data into engaging visuals for your research proposal or any other document.

For larger data sets, you can choose from 20+ types of charts and graphs , including bar graphs , bubble charts , Venn diagrams and more.

5. Tech Research Proposal Template

If you’re a tech researcher, we’ve got the perfect template for you. This research proposal example is about predictive analytics in e-commerce. However, you can customize it for any other type of research proposal.

It highlights the project's objectives, including the effectiveness of predictive analysis, the impact of product recommendations and supply chain optimization. The methods proposed for achieving these objectives involve A/B testing and data analysis, a comprehensive budget and a 12-month timeline for clear project planning.

The title page has a unique triptych-style layout that immediately catches the reader's attention. It has plenty of white space that enhances readability, allowing your audience to focus on the critical points.

Submitting to different funding agencies? You don’t have to manually make changes to your document. Visme's dynamic fields can help save time and eliminate repetitive data entry.

Create custom fields like project names, addresses, contact information and more. Any changes made to these fields will automatically populate throughout the document.

6. Marketing Research Proposal Template

Artificial intelligence (AI) is taking the world by storm and the marketing niche isn’t left out. With this eye-catching template, you can attract attention to your proposed marketing research project for an AI-driven platform.

The main goal of the research is to evaluate the platform's feasibility and marketing potential. To achieve this goal, the scope of work includes a comprehensive analysis of the market and competitors and pilot testing. The proposal also contains a budget overview that clearly outlines the allocation of funds, ensuring a well-planned and transparent approach.

Using Visme's Brand Design Tool , you can easily customize this template to suit your branding with just one click. Simply enter your URL into the brand wizard, and the tool will automatically extract your company logo, brand colors, and brand fonts . Once saved, you or your team members can apply the branding elements to any document. It's that simple!

7. Environmental Research Proposal Template

The environmental research proposal example focuses on carbon emissions, identifies their contributing factors, and suggests sustainable practices to address them. It uses an appropriate sample size and data collection techniques to gather and evaluate data and provide sustainable recommendations to reduce industrial carbon footprints and waste.

From a design standpoint, the green and white color combination matches the theme of nature and environmental friendliness. In addition to its aesthetic appeal, the proposal includes relevant images that support ecological advocacy, making it informative and visually aligned with its purpose.

A key feature of this template is its detailed breakdown of the project's timeline. It uses a Gantt chart to clearly present stages, milestones and deadlines.

Collaborate with your team members to customize these research proposal templates using Visme’s collaborative design features . These features allow you to leave feedback, draw annotations and even make live edits. Invite your teammates via email or a shareable link and allow them to work together on projects.

8. General Approval Research Proposal Template

This research proposal template is a total game-changer - you can use it for any research proposal and customize it however you want. It features a modern and refreshing color scheme that immediately makes it stand out, providing a contemporary look that can adapt to any project's needs.

The template's layout is thoughtfully designed with primary fields that users can easily personalize by changing text, adjusting colors, or swapping images. No matter the research topic, you can tailor the template to fit your specific needs.

Once you're done customizing your research proposal template on Visme, you can download, share and publish it in different ways. For offline usage, you may download the proposal in PDF, PNG, or JPG format. To share it online, you can use a private or public link or generate a code snippet that you can embed anywhere on the web.

Want to create other types of proposals? Here are 29 proposal templates that you can easily customize in Visme.

Q. What Are the Five Steps of Writing a Research Proposal?

Follow these steps to write a solid research proposal:

• Choose a topic within your field of study that can be explored and investigated.
• Research existing literature and studies to build a foundational understanding and prepare your research question.
• Outline your research proposal: introduction, literature review, proposed methodology, budget and timeline.
• Conduct more detailed studies to strengthen your proposition, refine your research question and justify your methodology.
• Follow your outline to write a clear and organized proposal, then review and edit for accuracy before submitting.

If you want to learn more about creating an expert research proposal , we highly recommend checking out our in-depth guide.

Q. How Long Is a Research Proposal?

Research proposals can range from 1,000 to 5,000 words. For smaller projects or when specific requirements aren't provided, aim for a concise and informative proposal that effectively outlines your research plan.

However, the ideal length depends on these factors:

• Projects with complex methodologies or multiple phases may require longer proposals to explain the scope and procedures in detail.
• Universities, academic institutions and funding agencies often have guidelines of a specific length. Always check their requirements beforehand.
• When writing a proposal, adjust the level of study based on the audience. Academic proposals may require comprehensive explanations, while business or non-profit proposals require a more streamlined approach.

Q. How Long Does It Take to Write a Research Proposal?

The time it takes to write a research proposal depends on a few factors:

• Complex research with extensive data collection or analysis will naturally take longer to plan and write about.
• If you're new to writing research proposals, expect to spend more time learning the format and best practices.
• If you've already conducted some research or a thorough literature review, the writing process might go faster.
• Funding applications often have strict deadlines that will dictate your timeline.

Set aside several weeks to a couple of months for researching, writing, and revising your proposal. Start early to avoid stress and produce your best work.

Q. What Not to Do for a Research Proposal?

There are several factors that can make a research proposal weak. Here are some of the most common errors that you should avoid while preparing your research proposal:

• Don’t choose a topic that’s too broad. Focus on a specific area you can thoroughly explore within your proposal’s limits.
• Don’t ignore the rules for formatting and submitting your proposal. Always adhere to the requirements set by your institution or funding body.
• Don’t forget to conduct a thorough literature review. It's crucial to show your grasp of existing research related to your topic.
• Don't be vague about your methods. Ensure they're clearly defined and suitable for answering your research question.
• Don't overlook errors in grammar, typos or structure. A well-proofread proposal reflects professionalism, so review it carefully before submitting it.

Craft Professional & Engaging Proposals with Visme

Writing a compelling research proposal takes effort, but with the right tools, the process becomes a breeze. Use the research proposal examples and templates in this article as a launching point to write your own proposal.

The best part? Visme provides easy-to-use tools with a vast collection of customizable templates, design elements and powerful features.

Whether you're a seasoned researcher or a student, Visme has the resources to help you create visually appealing and well-structured research proposals. In addition to research proposals, Visme helps you create many other document types, such as presentations , infographics , reports and more.

Ready to create your own research proposal? Check out Visme's proposal maker and start crafting professional and engaging proposals in minutes!

Create professional research proposals with Visme

Trusted by leading brands

Recommended content for you:

Create Stunning Content!

Design visual brand experiences for your business whether you are a seasoned designer or a total novice.

About the Author

Raja Antony Mandal is a Content Writer at Visme. He can quickly adapt to different writing styles, possess strong research skills, and know SEO fundamentals. Raja wants to share valuable information with his audience by telling captivating stories in his articles. He wants to travel and party a lot on the weekends, but his guitar, drum set, and volleyball court don’t let him.

How to Write a Research Proposal: (with Examples & Templates)

Table of Contents

Before conducting a study, a research proposal should be created that outlines researchers’ plans and methodology and is submitted to the concerned evaluating organization or person. Creating a research proposal is an important step to ensure that researchers are on track and are moving forward as intended. A research proposal can be defined as a detailed plan or blueprint for the proposed research that you intend to undertake. It provides readers with a snapshot of your project by describing what you will investigate, why it is needed, and how you will conduct the research.  

Your research proposal should aim to explain to the readers why your research is relevant and original, that you understand the context and current scenario in the field, have the appropriate resources to conduct the research, and that the research is feasible given the usual constraints.  

This article will describe in detail the purpose and typical structure of a research proposal , along with examples and templates to help you ace this step in your research journey.  

What is a Research Proposal ?  

A research proposal¹ ,²  can be defined as a formal report that describes your proposed research, its objectives, methodology, implications, and other important details. Research proposals are the framework of your research and are used to obtain approvals or grants to conduct the study from various committees or organizations. Consequently, research proposals should convince readers of your study’s credibility, accuracy, achievability, practicality, and reproducibility.   

With research proposals , researchers usually aim to persuade the readers, funding agencies, educational institutions, and supervisors to approve the proposal. To achieve this, the report should be well structured with the objectives written in clear, understandable language devoid of jargon. A well-organized research proposal conveys to the readers or evaluators that the writer has thought out the research plan meticulously and has the resources to ensure timely completion.  

Purpose of Research Proposals  

A research proposal is a sales pitch and therefore should be detailed enough to convince your readers, who could be supervisors, ethics committees, universities, etc., that what you’re proposing has merit and is feasible . Research proposals can help students discuss their dissertation with their faculty or fulfill course requirements and also help researchers obtain funding. A well-structured proposal instills confidence among readers about your ability to conduct and complete the study as proposed.  

Research proposals can be written for several reasons:³  

• To describe the importance of research in the specific topic  
• Address any potential challenges you may encounter  
• Showcase knowledge in the field and your ability to conduct a study  
• Apply for a role at a research institute  
• Convince a research supervisor or university that your research can satisfy the requirements of a degree program  
• Highlight the importance of your research to organizations that may sponsor your project  
• Identify implications of your project and how it can benefit the audience  

What Goes in a Research Proposal?    

Research proposals should aim to answer the three basic questions—what, why, and how.  

The What question should be answered by describing the specific subject being researched. It should typically include the objectives, the cohort details, and the location or setting.  

The Why question should be answered by describing the existing scenario of the subject, listing unanswered questions, identifying gaps in the existing research, and describing how your study can address these gaps, along with the implications and significance.  

The How question should be answered by describing the proposed research methodology, data analysis tools expected to be used, and other details to describe your proposed methodology.   

Research Proposal Example  

Here is a research proposal sample template (with examples) from the University of Rochester Medical Center. 4 The sections in all research proposals are essentially the same although different terminology and other specific sections may be used depending on the subject.  

Structure of a Research Proposal  

If you want to know how to make a research proposal impactful, include the following components:¹  

1. Introduction  

This section provides a background of the study, including the research topic, what is already known about it and the gaps, and the significance of the proposed research.  

2. Literature review  

This section contains descriptions of all the previous relevant studies pertaining to the research topic. Every study cited should be described in a few sentences, starting with the general studies to the more specific ones. This section builds on the understanding gained by readers in the Introduction section and supports it by citing relevant prior literature, indicating to readers that you have thoroughly researched your subject.  

3. Objectives  

Once the background and gaps in the research topic have been established, authors must now state the aims of the research clearly. Hypotheses should be mentioned here. This section further helps readers understand what your study’s specific goals are.  

4. Research design and methodology  

Here, authors should clearly describe the methods they intend to use to achieve their proposed objectives. Important components of this section include the population and sample size, data collection and analysis methods and duration, statistical analysis software, measures to avoid bias (randomization, blinding), etc.  

5. Ethical considerations  

This refers to the protection of participants’ rights, such as the right to privacy, right to confidentiality, etc. Researchers need to obtain informed consent and institutional review approval by the required authorities and mention this clearly for transparency.  

6. Budget/funding  

Researchers should prepare their budget and include all expected expenditures. An additional allowance for contingencies such as delays should also be factored in.  

7. Appendices  

This section typically includes information that supports the research proposal and may include informed consent forms, questionnaires, participant information, measurement tools, etc.  

8. Citations  

Important Tips for Writing a Research Proposal  

Writing a research proposal begins much before the actual task of writing. Planning the research proposal structure and content is an important stage, which if done efficiently, can help you seamlessly transition into the writing stage. 3,5  

The Planning Stage  

• Manage your time efficiently. Plan to have the draft version ready at least two weeks before your deadline and the final version at least two to three days before the deadline.
• What is the primary objective of your research?  
• Will your research address any existing gap?  
• What is the impact of your proposed research?  
• Do people outside your field find your research applicable in other areas?  
• If your research is unsuccessful, would there still be other useful research outcomes?  

  The Writing Stage  

• Create an outline with main section headings that are typically used.  
• Focus only on writing and getting your points across without worrying about the format of the research proposal , grammar, punctuation, etc. These can be fixed during the subsequent passes. Add details to each section heading you created in the beginning.   
• Ensure your sentences are concise and use plain language. A research proposal usually contains about 2,000 to 4,000 words or four to seven pages.  
• Don’t use too many technical terms and abbreviations assuming that the readers would know them. Define the abbreviations and technical terms.  
• Ensure that the entire content is readable. Avoid using long paragraphs because they affect the continuity in reading. Break them into shorter paragraphs and introduce some white space for readability.  
• Focus on only the major research issues and cite sources accordingly. Don’t include generic information or their sources in the literature review.  
• Proofread your final document to ensure there are no grammatical errors so readers can enjoy a seamless, uninterrupted read.  
• Use academic, scholarly language because it brings formality into a document.  
• Ensure that your title is created using the keywords in the document and is neither too long and specific nor too short and general.  
• Cite all sources appropriately to avoid plagiarism.  
• Make sure that you follow guidelines, if provided. This includes rules as simple as using a specific font or a hyphen or en dash between numerical ranges.  
• Ensure that you’ve answered all questions requested by the evaluating authority.  

Key Takeaways   

Here’s a summary of the main points about research proposals discussed in the previous sections:  

• A research proposal is a document that outlines the details of a proposed study and is created by researchers to submit to evaluators who could be research institutions, universities, faculty, etc.  
• Research proposals are usually about 2,000-4,000 words long, but this depends on the evaluating authority’s guidelines.  
• A good research proposal ensures that you’ve done your background research and assessed the feasibility of the research.  
• Research proposals have the following main sections—introduction, literature review, objectives, methodology, ethical considerations, and budget.  

Frequently Asked Questions  

Q1. How is a research proposal evaluated?  

A1. In general, most evaluators, including universities, broadly use the following criteria to evaluate research proposals . 6  

• Significance —Does the research address any important subject or issue, which may or may not be specific to the evaluator or university?  
• Content and design —Is the proposed methodology appropriate to answer the research question? Are the objectives clear and well aligned with the proposed methodology?  
• Sample size and selection —Is the target population or cohort size clearly mentioned? Is the sampling process used to select participants randomized, appropriate, and free of bias?  
• Timing —Are the proposed data collection dates mentioned clearly? Is the project feasible given the specified resources and timeline?  
• Data management and dissemination —Who will have access to the data? What is the plan for data analysis?  

Q2. What is the difference between the Introduction and Literature Review sections in a research proposal ?  

A2. The Introduction or Background section in a research proposal sets the context of the study by describing the current scenario of the subject and identifying the gaps and need for the research. A Literature Review, on the other hand, provides references to all prior relevant literature to help corroborate the gaps identified and the research need.  

Q3. How long should a research proposal be?  

A3. Research proposal lengths vary with the evaluating authority like universities or committees and also the subject. Here’s a table that lists the typical research proposal lengths for a few universities.  

Q4. What are the common mistakes to avoid in a research proposal ?  

A4. Here are a few common mistakes that you must avoid while writing a research proposal . 7  

• No clear objectives: Objectives should be clear, specific, and measurable for the easy understanding among readers.  
• Incomplete or unconvincing background research: Background research usually includes a review of the current scenario of the particular industry and also a review of the previous literature on the subject. This helps readers understand your reasons for undertaking this research because you identified gaps in the existing research.  
• Overlooking project feasibility: The project scope and estimates should be realistic considering the resources and time available.   
• Neglecting the impact and significance of the study: In a research proposal , readers and evaluators look for the implications or significance of your research and how it contributes to the existing research. This information should always be included.  
• Unstructured format of a research proposal : A well-structured document gives confidence to evaluators that you have read the guidelines carefully and are well organized in your approach, consequently affirming that you will be able to undertake the research as mentioned in your proposal.  
• Ineffective writing style: The language used should be formal and grammatically correct. If required, editors could be consulted, including AI-based tools such as Paperpal , to refine the research proposal structure and language.  

Thus, a research proposal is an essential document that can help you promote your research and secure funds and grants for conducting your research. Consequently, it should be well written in clear language and include all essential details to convince the evaluators of your ability to conduct the research as proposed.  

This article has described all the important components of a research proposal and has also provided tips to improve your writing style. We hope all these tips will help you write a well-structured research proposal to ensure receipt of grants or any other purpose.  

References  

• Sudheesh K, Duggappa DR, Nethra SS. How to write a research proposal? Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60(9):631-634. Accessed July 15, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037942/  
• Writing research proposals. Harvard College Office of Undergraduate Research and Fellowships. Harvard University. Accessed July 14, 2024. https://uraf.harvard.edu/apply-opportunities/app-components/essays/research-proposals  
• What is a research proposal? Plus how to write one. Indeed website. Accessed July 17, 2024. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/research-proposal  
• Research proposal template. University of Rochester Medical Center. Accessed July 16, 2024. https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/MediaLibraries/URMCMedia/pediatrics/research/documents/Research-proposal-Template.pdf  
• Tips for successful proposal writing. Johns Hopkins University. Accessed July 17, 2024. https://research.jhu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Tips-for-Successful-Proposal-Writing.pdf  
• Formal review of research proposals. Cornell University. Accessed July 18, 2024. https://irp.dpb.cornell.edu/surveys/survey-assessment-review-group/research-proposals  
• 7 Mistakes you must avoid in your research proposal. Aveksana (via LinkedIn). Accessed July 17, 2024. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/7-mistakes-you-must-avoid-your-research-proposal-aveksana-cmtwf/  

Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 21+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster.  

Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$19 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed.  

Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free!  

Related Reads:

How to write a phd research proposal.

• What are the Benefits of Generative AI for Academic Writing?
• How to Avoid Plagiarism When Using Generative AI Tools
• What is Hedging in Academic Writing?  

How to Write Your Research Paper in APA Format

The future of academia: how ai tools are changing the way we do research, you may also like, dissertation printing and binding | types & comparison , what is a dissertation preface definition and examples , how to write your research paper in apa..., how to choose a dissertation topic, how to write an academic paragraph (step-by-step guide), maintaining academic integrity with paperpal’s generative ai writing..., research funding basics: what should a grant proposal..., how to write an abstract in research papers..., how to write dissertation acknowledgements.

• Postgraduate

Research degrees

• Examples of Research proposals
• Find a course
• Accessibility

Examples of research proposals

How to write your research proposal, with examples of good proposals.

Research proposals

Your research proposal is a key part of your application. It tells us about the question you want to answer through your research. It is a chance for you to show your knowledge of the subject area and tell us about the methods you want to use.

We use your research proposal to match you with a supervisor or team of supervisors.

In your proposal, please tell us if you have an interest in the work of a specific academic at York St John. You can get in touch with this academic to discuss your proposal. You can also speak to one of our Research Leads. There is a list of our Research Leads on the Apply page.

When you write your proposal you need to:

• Highlight how it is original or significant
• Explain how it will develop or challenge current knowledge of your subject
• Identify the importance of your research
• Show why you are the right person to do this research
• Research Proposal Example 1 (DOC, 49kB)
• Research Proposal Example 2 (DOC, 0.9MB)
• Research Proposal Example 3 (DOC, 55.5kB)
• Research Proposal Example 4 (DOC, 49.5kB)

Subject specific guidance

• Writing a Humanities PhD Proposal (PDF, 0.1MB)
• Writing a Creative Writing PhD Proposal (PDF, 0.1MB)
• About the University
• Our culture and values
• Academic schools
• Academic dates
• Press office

Our wider work

• Business support
• Work in the community
• Donate or support

Connect with us

York St John University

Lord Mayor’s Walk

[email protected]

01904 624 624

York St John London Campus

6th Floor Export Building

1 Clove Crescent

[email protected]

01904 876 944

• Policies and documents
• Module documents
• Programme specifications
• Quality gateway
• Admissions documents
• Access and Participation Plan
• Freedom of information
• Accessibility statement
• Modern slavery and human trafficking statement

© York St John University 2024

Colour Picker

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Dui id ornare arcu odio.

Felis bibendum ut tristique et egestas quis ipsum. Et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Faucibus pulvinar elementum integer enim neque volutpat ac. Hac habitasse platea dictumst vestibulum rhoncus.

Nec ullamcorper sit amet risus nullam eget felis eget. Eget felis eget nunc lobortis mattis aliquam faucibus purus.

• Privacy Policy

Home » Research Project – Definition, Writing Guide and Ideas

Research Project – Definition, Writing Guide and Ideas

Table of Contents

Research Project

Definition :

Research Project is a planned and systematic investigation into a specific area of interest or problem, with the goal of generating new knowledge, insights, or solutions. It typically involves identifying a research question or hypothesis, designing a study to test it, collecting and analyzing data, and drawing conclusions based on the findings.

Types of Research Project

Types of Research Projects are as follows:

Basic Research

This type of research focuses on advancing knowledge and understanding of a subject area or phenomenon, without any specific application or practical use in mind. The primary goal is to expand scientific or theoretical knowledge in a particular field.

Applied Research

Applied research is aimed at solving practical problems or addressing specific issues. This type of research seeks to develop solutions or improve existing products, services or processes.

Action Research

Action research is conducted by practitioners and aimed at solving specific problems or improving practices in a particular context. It involves collaboration between researchers and practitioners, and often involves iterative cycles of data collection and analysis, with the goal of improving practices.

Quantitative Research

This type of research uses numerical data to investigate relationships between variables or to test hypotheses. It typically involves large-scale data collection through surveys, experiments, or secondary data analysis.

Qualitative Research

Qualitative research focuses on understanding and interpreting phenomena from the perspective of the people involved. It involves collecting and analyzing data in the form of text, images, or other non-numerical forms.

Mixed Methods Research

Mixed methods research combines elements of both quantitative and qualitative research, using multiple data sources and methods to gain a more comprehensive understanding of a phenomenon.

Longitudinal Research

This type of research involves studying a group of individuals or phenomena over an extended period of time, often years or decades. It is useful for understanding changes and developments over time.

Case Study Research

Case study research involves in-depth investigation of a particular case or phenomenon, often within a specific context. It is useful for understanding complex phenomena in their real-life settings.

Participatory Research

Participatory research involves active involvement of the people or communities being studied in the research process. It emphasizes collaboration, empowerment, and the co-production of knowledge.

Research Project Methodology

Research Project Methodology refers to the process of conducting research in an organized and systematic manner to answer a specific research question or to test a hypothesis. A well-designed research project methodology ensures that the research is rigorous, valid, and reliable, and that the findings are meaningful and can be used to inform decision-making.

There are several steps involved in research project methodology, which are described below:

Define the Research Question

The first step in any research project is to clearly define the research question or problem. This involves identifying the purpose of the research, the scope of the research, and the key variables that will be studied.

Develop a Research Plan

Once the research question has been defined, the next step is to develop a research plan. This plan outlines the methodology that will be used to collect and analyze data, including the research design, sampling strategy, data collection methods, and data analysis techniques.

Collect Data

The data collection phase involves gathering information through various methods, such as surveys, interviews, observations, experiments, or secondary data analysis. The data collected should be relevant to the research question and should be of sufficient quantity and quality to enable meaningful analysis.

Analyze Data

Once the data has been collected, it is analyzed using appropriate statistical techniques or other methods. The analysis should be guided by the research question and should aim to identify patterns, trends, relationships, or other insights that can inform the research findings.

Interpret and Report Findings

The final step in the research project methodology is to interpret the findings and report them in a clear and concise manner. This involves summarizing the results, discussing their implications, and drawing conclusions that can be used to inform decision-making.

Research Project Writing Guide

Here are some guidelines to help you in writing a successful research project:

• Choose a topic: Choose a topic that you are interested in and that is relevant to your field of study. It is important to choose a topic that is specific and focused enough to allow for in-depth research and analysis.
• Conduct a literature review : Conduct a thorough review of the existing research on your topic. This will help you to identify gaps in the literature and to develop a research question or hypothesis.
• Develop a research question or hypothesis : Based on your literature review, develop a clear research question or hypothesis that you will investigate in your study.
• Design your study: Choose an appropriate research design and methodology to answer your research question or test your hypothesis. This may include choosing a sample, selecting measures or instruments, and determining data collection methods.
• Collect data: Collect data using your chosen methods and instruments. Be sure to follow ethical guidelines and obtain informed consent from participants if necessary.
• Analyze data: Analyze your data using appropriate statistical or qualitative methods. Be sure to clearly report your findings and provide interpretations based on your research question or hypothesis.
• Discuss your findings : Discuss your findings in the context of the existing literature and your research question or hypothesis. Identify any limitations or implications of your study and suggest directions for future research.
• Write your project: Write your research project in a clear and organized manner, following the appropriate format and style guidelines for your field of study. Be sure to include an introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion.
• Revise and edit: Revise and edit your project for clarity, coherence, and accuracy. Be sure to proofread for spelling, grammar, and formatting errors.
• Cite your sources: Cite your sources accurately and appropriately using the appropriate citation style for your field of study.

Examples of Research Projects

Some Examples of Research Projects are as follows:

• Investigating the effects of a new medication on patients with a particular disease or condition.
• Exploring the impact of exercise on mental health and well-being.
• Studying the effectiveness of a new teaching method in improving student learning outcomes.
• Examining the impact of social media on political participation and engagement.
• Investigating the efficacy of a new therapy for a specific mental health disorder.
• Exploring the use of renewable energy sources in reducing carbon emissions and mitigating climate change.
• Studying the effects of a new agricultural technique on crop yields and environmental sustainability.
• Investigating the effectiveness of a new technology in improving business productivity and efficiency.
• Examining the impact of a new public policy on social inequality and access to resources.
• Exploring the factors that influence consumer behavior in a specific market.

Characteristics of Research Project

Here are some of the characteristics that are often associated with research projects:

• Clear objective: A research project is designed to answer a specific question or solve a particular problem. The objective of the research should be clearly defined from the outset.
• Systematic approach: A research project is typically carried out using a structured and systematic approach that involves careful planning, data collection, analysis, and interpretation.
• Rigorous methodology: A research project should employ a rigorous methodology that is appropriate for the research question being investigated. This may involve the use of statistical analysis, surveys, experiments, or other methods.
• Data collection : A research project involves collecting data from a variety of sources, including primary sources (such as surveys or experiments) and secondary sources (such as published literature or databases).
• Analysis and interpretation : Once the data has been collected, it needs to be analyzed and interpreted. This involves using statistical techniques or other methods to identify patterns or relationships in the data.
• Conclusion and implications : A research project should lead to a clear conclusion that answers the research question. It should also identify the implications of the findings for future research or practice.
• Communication: The results of the research project should be communicated clearly and effectively, using appropriate language and visual aids, to a range of audiences, including peers, stakeholders, and the wider public.

Importance of Research Project

Research projects are an essential part of the process of generating new knowledge and advancing our understanding of various fields of study. Here are some of the key reasons why research projects are important:

• Advancing knowledge : Research projects are designed to generate new knowledge and insights into particular topics or questions. This knowledge can be used to inform policies, practices, and decision-making processes across a range of fields.
• Solving problems: Research projects can help to identify solutions to real-world problems by providing a better understanding of the causes and effects of particular issues.
• Developing new technologies: Research projects can lead to the development of new technologies or products that can improve people’s lives or address societal challenges.
• Improving health outcomes: Research projects can contribute to improving health outcomes by identifying new treatments, diagnostic tools, or preventive strategies.
• Enhancing education: Research projects can enhance education by providing new insights into teaching and learning methods, curriculum development, and student learning outcomes.
• Informing public policy : Research projects can inform public policy by providing evidence-based recommendations and guidance on issues related to health, education, environment, social justice, and other areas.
• Enhancing professional development : Research projects can enhance the professional development of researchers by providing opportunities to develop new skills, collaborate with colleagues, and share knowledge with others.

Research Project Ideas

Following are some Research Project Ideas:

Field: Psychology

• Investigating the impact of social support on coping strategies among individuals with chronic illnesses.
• Exploring the relationship between childhood trauma and adult attachment styles.
• Examining the effects of exercise on cognitive function and brain health in older adults.
• Investigating the impact of sleep deprivation on decision making and risk-taking behavior.
• Exploring the relationship between personality traits and leadership styles in the workplace.
• Examining the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for treating anxiety disorders.
• Investigating the relationship between social comparison and body dissatisfaction in young women.
• Exploring the impact of parenting styles on children’s emotional regulation and behavior.
• Investigating the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions for treating depression.
• Examining the relationship between childhood adversity and later-life health outcomes.

Field: Economics

• Analyzing the impact of trade agreements on economic growth in developing countries.
• Examining the effects of tax policy on income distribution and poverty reduction.
• Investigating the relationship between foreign aid and economic development in low-income countries.
• Exploring the impact of globalization on labor markets and job displacement.
• Analyzing the impact of minimum wage laws on employment and income levels.
• Investigating the effectiveness of monetary policy in managing inflation and unemployment.
• Examining the relationship between economic freedom and entrepreneurship.
• Analyzing the impact of income inequality on social mobility and economic opportunity.
• Investigating the role of education in economic development.
• Examining the effectiveness of different healthcare financing systems in promoting health equity.

Field: Sociology

• Investigating the impact of social media on political polarization and civic engagement.
• Examining the effects of neighborhood characteristics on health outcomes.
• Analyzing the impact of immigration policies on social integration and cultural diversity.
• Investigating the relationship between social support and mental health outcomes in older adults.
• Exploring the impact of income inequality on social cohesion and trust.
• Analyzing the effects of gender and race discrimination on career advancement and pay equity.
• Investigating the relationship between social networks and health behaviors.
• Examining the effectiveness of community-based interventions for reducing crime and violence.
• Analyzing the impact of social class on cultural consumption and taste.
• Investigating the relationship between religious affiliation and social attitudes.

Field: Computer Science

• Developing an algorithm for detecting fake news on social media.
• Investigating the effectiveness of different machine learning algorithms for image recognition.
• Developing a natural language processing tool for sentiment analysis of customer reviews.
• Analyzing the security implications of blockchain technology for online transactions.
• Investigating the effectiveness of different recommendation algorithms for personalized advertising.
• Developing an artificial intelligence chatbot for mental health counseling.
• Investigating the effectiveness of different algorithms for optimizing online advertising campaigns.
• Developing a machine learning model for predicting consumer behavior in online marketplaces.
• Analyzing the privacy implications of different data sharing policies for online platforms.
• Investigating the effectiveness of different algorithms for predicting stock market trends.

Field: Education

• Investigating the impact of teacher-student relationships on academic achievement.
• Analyzing the effectiveness of different pedagogical approaches for promoting student engagement and motivation.
• Examining the effects of school choice policies on academic achievement and social mobility.
• Investigating the impact of technology on learning outcomes and academic achievement.
• Analyzing the effects of school funding disparities on educational equity and achievement gaps.
• Investigating the relationship between school climate and student mental health outcomes.
• Examining the effectiveness of different teaching strategies for promoting critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
• Investigating the impact of social-emotional learning programs on student behavior and academic achievement.
• Analyzing the effects of standardized testing on student motivation and academic achievement.

Field: Environmental Science

• Investigating the impact of climate change on species distribution and biodiversity.
• Analyzing the effectiveness of different renewable energy technologies in reducing carbon emissions.
• Examining the impact of air pollution on human health outcomes.
• Investigating the relationship between urbanization and deforestation in developing countries.
• Analyzing the effects of ocean acidification on marine ecosystems and biodiversity.
• Investigating the impact of land use change on soil fertility and ecosystem services.
• Analyzing the effectiveness of different conservation policies and programs for protecting endangered species and habitats.
• Investigating the relationship between climate change and water resources in arid regions.
• Examining the impact of plastic pollution on marine ecosystems and biodiversity.
• Investigating the effects of different agricultural practices on soil health and nutrient cycling.

Field: Linguistics

• Analyzing the impact of language diversity on social integration and cultural identity.
• Investigating the relationship between language and cognition in bilingual individuals.
• Examining the effects of language contact and language change on linguistic diversity.
• Investigating the role of language in shaping cultural norms and values.
• Analyzing the effectiveness of different language teaching methodologies for second language acquisition.
• Investigating the relationship between language proficiency and academic achievement.
• Examining the impact of language policy on language use and language attitudes.
• Investigating the role of language in shaping gender and social identities.
• Analyzing the effects of dialect contact on language variation and change.
• Investigating the relationship between language and emotion expression.

Field: Political Science

• Analyzing the impact of electoral systems on women’s political representation.
• Investigating the relationship between political ideology and attitudes towards immigration.
• Examining the effects of political polarization on democratic institutions and political stability.
• Investigating the impact of social media on political participation and civic engagement.
• Analyzing the effects of authoritarianism on human rights and civil liberties.
• Investigating the relationship between public opinion and foreign policy decisions.
• Examining the impact of international organizations on global governance and cooperation.
• Investigating the effectiveness of different conflict resolution strategies in resolving ethnic and religious conflicts.
• Analyzing the effects of corruption on economic development and political stability.
• Investigating the role of international law in regulating global governance and human rights.

Field: Medicine

• Investigating the impact of lifestyle factors on chronic disease risk and prevention.
• Examining the effectiveness of different treatment approaches for mental health disorders.
• Investigating the relationship between genetics and disease susceptibility.
• Analyzing the effects of social determinants of health on health outcomes and health disparities.
• Investigating the impact of different healthcare delivery models on patient outcomes and cost effectiveness.
• Examining the effectiveness of different prevention and treatment strategies for infectious diseases.
• Investigating the relationship between healthcare provider communication skills and patient satisfaction and outcomes.
• Analyzing the effects of medical error and patient safety on healthcare quality and outcomes.
• Investigating the impact of different pharmaceutical pricing policies on access to essential medicines.
• Examining the effectiveness of different rehabilitation approaches for improving function and quality of life in individuals with disabilities.

Field: Anthropology

• Analyzing the impact of colonialism on indigenous cultures and identities.
• Investigating the relationship between cultural practices and health outcomes in different populations.
• Examining the effects of globalization on cultural diversity and cultural exchange.
• Investigating the role of language in cultural transmission and preservation.
• Analyzing the effects of cultural contact on cultural change and adaptation.
• Investigating the impact of different migration policies on immigrant integration and acculturation.
• Examining the role of gender and sexuality in cultural norms and values.
• Investigating the impact of cultural heritage preservation on tourism and economic development.
• Analyzing the effects of cultural revitalization movements on indigenous communities.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Future Research – Thesis Guide

Problem Statement – Writing Guide, Examples and...

Research Findings – Types Examples and Writing...

Appendices – Writing Guide, Types and Examples

Background of The Study – Examples and Writing...

Table of Contents – Types, Formats, Examples

• About University of Sheffield
• Campus life
• Accommodation
• Student support
• Virtual events
• International Foundation Year
• Pre-Masters
• Pre-courses
• Entry requirements
• Fees, accommodation and living costs
• Scholarships
• Semester dates
• Student visa
• Before you arrive
• Enquire now

How to do a research project for your academic study

• Link copied!

Writing a research report is part of most university degrees, so it is essential you know what one is and how to write one. This guide on how to do a research project for your university degree shows you what to do at each stage, taking you from planning to finishing the project.

What is a research project? 

The big question is: what is a research project? A research project for students is an extended essay that presents a question or statement for analysis and evaluation. During a research project, you will present your own ideas and research on a subject alongside analysing existing knowledge. 

How to write a research report 

The next section covers the research project steps necessary to producing a research paper. 

Developing a research question or statement 

Research project topics will vary depending on the course you study. The best research project ideas develop from areas you already have an interest in and where you have existing knowledge. 

The area of study needs to be specific as it will be much easier to cover fully. If your topic is too broad, you are at risk of not having an in-depth project. You can, however, also make your topic too narrow and there will not be enough research to be done. To make sure you don’t run into either of these problems, it’s a great idea to create sub-topics and questions to ensure you are able to complete suitable research. 

A research project example question would be: How will modern technologies change the way of teaching in the future? 

Finding and evaluating sources 

Secondary research is a large part of your research project as it makes up the literature review section. It is essential to use credible sources as failing to do so may decrease the validity of your research project.

Examples of secondary research include:

• Peer-reviewed journals
• Scholarly articles
• Newspapers 

Great places to find your sources are the University library and Google Scholar. Both will give you many opportunities to find the credible sources you need. However, you need to make sure you are evaluating whether they are fit for purpose before including them in your research project as you do not want to include out of date information. 

When evaluating sources, you need to ask yourself:

• Is the information provided by an expert?
• How well does the source answer the research question?
• What does the source contribute to its field?
• Is the source valid? e.g. does it contain bias and is the information up-to-date?

It is important to ensure that you have a variety of sources in order to avoid bias. A successful research paper will present more than one point of view and the best way to do this is to not rely too heavily on just one author or publication. 

Conducting research 

For a research project, you will need to conduct primary research. This is the original research you will gather to further develop your research project. The most common types of primary research are interviews and surveys as these allow for many and varied results. 

Examples of primary research include: 

• Interviews and surveys 
• Focus groups 
• Experiments 
• Research diaries 

If you are looking to study in the UK and have an interest in bettering your research skills, The University of Sheffield is a  world top 100 research university  which will provide great research opportunities and resources for your project. 

Research report format  

Now that you understand the basics of how to write a research project, you now need to look at what goes into each section. The research project format is just as important as the research itself. Without a clear structure you will not be able to present your findings concisely. 

A research paper is made up of seven sections: introduction, literature review, methodology, findings and results, discussion, conclusion, and references. You need to make sure you are including a list of correctly cited references to avoid accusations of plagiarism. 

Introduction 

The introduction is where you will present your hypothesis and provide context for why you are doing the project. Here you will include relevant background information, present your research aims and explain why the research is important. 

Literature review  

The literature review is where you will analyse and evaluate existing research within your subject area. This section is where your secondary research will be presented. A literature review is an integral part of your research project as it brings validity to your research aims. 

What to include when writing your literature review:

• A description of the publications
• A summary of the main points
• An evaluation on the contribution to the area of study
• Potential flaws and gaps in the research 

Methodology

The research paper methodology outlines the process of your data collection. This is where you will present your primary research. The aim of the methodology section is to answer two questions: 

• Why did you select the research methods you used?
• How do these methods contribute towards your research hypothesis? 

In this section you will not be writing about your findings, but the ways in which you are going to try and achieve them. You need to state whether your methodology will be qualitative, quantitative, or mixed. 

• Qualitative – first hand observations such as interviews, focus groups, case studies and questionnaires. The data collected will generally be non-numerical. 
• Quantitative – research that deals in numbers and logic. The data collected will focus on statistics and numerical patterns.
• Mixed – includes both quantitative and qualitative research.

The methodology section should always be written in the past tense, even if you have already started your data collection. 

Findings and results 

In this section you will present the findings and results of your primary research. Here you will give a concise and factual summary of your findings using tables and graphs where appropriate. 

Discussion 

The discussion section is where you will talk about your findings in detail. Here you need to relate your results to your hypothesis, explaining what you found out and the significance of the research. 

It is a good idea to talk about any areas with disappointing or surprising results and address the limitations within the research project. This will balance your project and steer you away from bias.

Some questions to consider when writing your discussion: 

• To what extent was the hypothesis supported?
• Was your research method appropriate?
• Was there unexpected data that affected your results?
• To what extent was your research validated by other sources?

Conclusion 

The conclusion is where you will bring your research project to a close. In this section you will not only be restating your research aims and how you achieved them, but also discussing the wider significance of your research project. You will talk about the successes and failures of the project, and how you would approach further study. 

It is essential you do not bring any new ideas into your conclusion; this section is used only to summarise what you have already stated in the project. 

References 

As a research project is your own ideas blended with information and research from existing knowledge, you must include a list of correctly cited references. Creating a list of references will allow the reader to easily evaluate the quality of your secondary research whilst also saving you from potential plagiarism accusations. 

The way in which you cite your sources will vary depending on the university standard.

If you are an international student looking to  study a degree in the UK , The University of Sheffield International College has a range of  pathway programmes  to prepare you for university study. Undertaking a Research Project is one of the core modules for the  Pre-Masters programme  at The University of Sheffield International College.

Frequently Asked Questions 

What is the best topic for research .

It’s a good idea to choose a topic you have existing knowledge on, or one that you are interested in. This will make the research process easier; as you have an idea of where and what to look for in your sources, as well as more enjoyable as it’s a topic you want to know more about.

What should a research project include? 

There are seven main sections to a research project, these are:

• Introduction – the aims of the project and what you hope to achieve
• Literature review – evaluating and reviewing existing knowledge on the topic
• Methodology – the methods you will use for your primary research
• Findings and results – presenting the data from your primary research
• Discussion – summarising and analysing your research and what you have found out
• Conclusion – how the project went (successes and failures), areas for future study
• List of references – correctly cited sources that have been used throughout the project. 

How long is a research project? 

The length of a research project will depend on the level study and the nature of the subject. There is no one length for research papers, however the average dissertation style essay can be anywhere from 4,000 to 15,000+ words. 

Sample Project Proposals

Main navigation.

Check out a few sample grant proposals below. Read ones annotated with reviewer notes (even if the topic is outside your area of interest) to learn what reviewers look for. You can also see also how resubmitted proposals respond to reviewer comments.

Please note that these proposals serve as exemplars for students applying for VPUE Student Grants. They may not be copied, retained, or distributed, and their use is subject to the Stanford Honor Code.

**To view the following samples, Stanford affiliates will be required to login with their SUNET ID. Individuals external to Stanford will not be granted access to these proposals and any requests for access will be automatically declined/deleted. **

• Arts, Creative Project, Visual Arts, Major Grant ( S. Bedford )
• Arts, Creative Writing, Chappell Lougee Scholarship ( J. Kim )
• Arts, Creative Writing, Chappell Lougee Scholarship, annotated (w/ remote plan) ( L. Laniyan )
• Arts, Music, Theater, Small Grant, annotated ( T. Pauly )
• Humanities, English, Major Grant ( J. Schaffer )
• Humanities, History, Chappell Lougee Scholarship, annotated (w/ remote plan) ( A. Kassam )
• Humanities, History, Major Grant, annotated ( J. Sonnenberg )
• Humanities, Religious Studies, Small Grant, annotated ( L. Funk )
• Humanities, Classics, Chappell Lougee Scholarship ( S. Beller )
• STEM, Biology, Major Grant, annotated ( J. Bui )
• STEM, Biology, Major Grant, annotated (w/ remote plan) ( S. Kong )
• STEM, Biology, Small Grant ( J. McGregor )
• STEM, Chemical Engineering, Major Grant ( J. O'Leary )
• STEM, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Major Grant, annotated ( V. Rosen )
• STEM, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Small Grant, annotated ( C. Kremer )
• STEM, Mathematics, Major Grant, annotated (w/ remote plan) ( M. Stevens )
• STEM, Physics, Major Grant ( J. Chaves )
• Senior Synthesis Project, Small Grant, annotated ( J. O'Leary )
• Social Science, Anthropology, Chappell Lougee Scholarship ( N. Follmann )
• Social Science, CDDRL, Small Grant ( A. Schickele )
• Social Science, Psychology, Major Grant, annotated ( C. Eggleston )
• Social Science, Sociology, Chappell Lougee Scholarship, annotated (w/ remote plan) ( A. Gomez )
• Social Science, Urban Studies, Major Grant, annotated ( K. Parish )

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Research process
• How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates

How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates

Published on 30 October 2022 by Shona McCombes and Tegan George. Revised on 13 June 2023.

A research proposal describes what you will investigate, why it’s important, and how you will conduct your research.

The format of a research proposal varies between fields, but most proposals will contain at least these elements:

Introduction

Literature review.

• Research design

Reference list

While the sections may vary, the overall objective is always the same. A research proposal serves as a blueprint and guide for your research plan, helping you get organised and feel confident in the path forward you choose to take.

Table of contents

Research proposal purpose, research proposal examples, research design and methods, contribution to knowledge, research schedule, frequently asked questions.

Academics often have to write research proposals to get funding for their projects. As a student, you might have to write a research proposal as part of a grad school application , or prior to starting your thesis or dissertation .

In addition to helping you figure out what your research can look like, a proposal can also serve to demonstrate why your project is worth pursuing to a funder, educational institution, or supervisor.

Research proposal length

The length of a research proposal can vary quite a bit. A bachelor’s or master’s thesis proposal can be just a few pages, while proposals for PhD dissertations or research funding are usually much longer and more detailed. Your supervisor can help you determine the best length for your work.

One trick to get started is to think of your proposal’s structure as a shorter version of your thesis or dissertation , only without the results , conclusion and discussion sections.

Download our research proposal template

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Writing a research proposal can be quite challenging, but a good starting point could be to look at some examples. We’ve included a few for you below.

• Example research proposal #1: ‘A Conceptual Framework for Scheduling Constraint Management’
• Example research proposal #2: ‘ Medical Students as Mediators of Change in Tobacco Use’

Like your dissertation or thesis, the proposal will usually have a title page that includes:

• The proposed title of your project
• Your supervisor’s name
• Your institution and department

The first part of your proposal is the initial pitch for your project. Make sure it succinctly explains what you want to do and why.

Your introduction should:

• Introduce your topic
• Give necessary background and context
• Outline your  problem statement  and research questions

To guide your introduction , include information about:

• Who could have an interest in the topic (e.g., scientists, policymakers)
• How much is already known about the topic
• What is missing from this current knowledge
• What new insights your research will contribute
• Why you believe this research is worth doing

As you get started, it’s important to demonstrate that you’re familiar with the most important research on your topic. A strong literature review  shows your reader that your project has a solid foundation in existing knowledge or theory. It also shows that you’re not simply repeating what other people have already done or said, but rather using existing research as a jumping-off point for your own.

In this section, share exactly how your project will contribute to ongoing conversations in the field by:

• Comparing and contrasting the main theories, methods, and debates
• Examining the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches
• Explaining how will you build on, challenge, or synthesise prior scholarship

Following the literature review, restate your main  objectives . This brings the focus back to your own project. Next, your research design or methodology section will describe your overall approach, and the practical steps you will take to answer your research questions.

To finish your proposal on a strong note, explore the potential implications of your research for your field. Emphasise again what you aim to contribute and why it matters.

For example, your results might have implications for:

• Improving best practices
• Informing policymaking decisions
• Strengthening a theory or model
• Challenging popular or scientific beliefs
• Creating a basis for future research

Last but not least, your research proposal must include correct citations for every source you have used, compiled in a reference list . To create citations quickly and easily, you can use our free APA citation generator .

Some institutions or funders require a detailed timeline of the project, asking you to forecast what you will do at each stage and how long it may take. While not always required, be sure to check the requirements of your project.

Here’s an example schedule to help you get started. You can also download a template at the button below.

Download our research schedule template

If you are applying for research funding, chances are you will have to include a detailed budget. This shows your estimates of how much each part of your project will cost.

Make sure to check what type of costs the funding body will agree to cover. For each item, include:

• Cost : exactly how much money do you need?
• Justification : why is this cost necessary to complete the research?
• Source : how did you calculate the amount?

To determine your budget, think about:

• Travel costs : do you need to go somewhere to collect your data? How will you get there, and how much time will you need? What will you do there (e.g., interviews, archival research)?
• Materials : do you need access to any tools or technologies?
• Help : do you need to hire any research assistants for the project? What will they do, and how much will you pay them?

Once you’ve decided on your research objectives , you need to explain them in your paper, at the end of your problem statement.

Keep your research objectives clear and concise, and use appropriate verbs to accurately convey the work that you will carry out for each one.

I will compare …

A research aim is a broad statement indicating the general purpose of your research project. It should appear in your introduction at the end of your problem statement , before your research objectives.

Research objectives are more specific than your research aim. They indicate the specific ways you’ll address the overarching aim.

A PhD, which is short for philosophiae doctor (doctor of philosophy in Latin), is the highest university degree that can be obtained. In a PhD, students spend 3–5 years writing a dissertation , which aims to make a significant, original contribution to current knowledge.

A PhD is intended to prepare students for a career as a researcher, whether that be in academia, the public sector, or the private sector.

A master’s is a 1- or 2-year graduate degree that can prepare you for a variety of careers.

All master’s involve graduate-level coursework. Some are research-intensive and intend to prepare students for further study in a PhD; these usually require their students to write a master’s thesis . Others focus on professional training for a specific career.

Critical thinking refers to the ability to evaluate information and to be aware of biases or assumptions, including your own.

Like information literacy , it involves evaluating arguments, identifying and solving problems in an objective and systematic way, and clearly communicating your ideas.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

McCombes, S. & George, T. (2023, June 13). How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved 21 August 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/the-research-process/research-proposal-explained/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, what is a literature review | guide, template, & examples, how to write a results section | tips & examples.

5 compelling examples of research projects

Last updated

3 April 2024

Reviewed by

Creative and innovative minds dream up big ideas that build the trends of tomorrow, but the research behind the scenes is often the secret sauce to company success. Businesses need a way to learn how their products or services will resonate with the market and where to invest their marketing efforts. 

Market analysis template

Save time, highlight crucial insights, and drive strategic decision-making

• Research project examples

Data collected from research products can help you verify theories, understand customer behavior , and quantify KPIs for a clear picture of how to improve business practices. 

Many types of research projects can help businesses find ways to fuel growth and adapt to market changes. These five examples of market research projects highlight the various ways businesses can use research and measurable data to grow successfully and avoid poor investments.  

Example 1: Competitive analysis

It's important for businesses of all sizes to understand the competitive landscape and where they stand in comparison to direct competitors. By identifying your competitors and evaluating their strengths and weaknesses, you can find ways to position your company for greater success. 

Competitive analysis can be used to better understand the market, improve marketing methods, and identify underserved customers.

The goals of competitive analysis may include:

Identifying your company's position in the market

Uncovering industry trends

Finding new marketing techniques

Identifying a new target customer base

Planning for new product innovation

Competitive research is conducted by identifying competitors and analyzing their performance. After identifying your direct competitors and gathering data about their products and services, you can dig deeper to learn more about how they serve customers. This may include gathering information about sales and marketing strategies, customer engagement , and social media strategies.

When analyzing direct competitors, organizing information about your competitors' attributes, strategies, strengths, and weaknesses will help you reveal themes that give you greater insight into the market.

Competitor analysis templates

Example 2: market segmentation.

Every business relies on customers for success. Researching your target audience and your potential position in the market is essential to developing strong marketing plans. 

Market segmentation can be used to plan marketing campaigns, identify ideal product prices, and personalize your brand.

The goals of market segmentation research may include: 

Identifying the target audience

Planning for new products or services

Expanding to a new location

Improving marketing efforts

Personalizing communications with customers

Improving customer satisfaction

There are many ways to collect and organize data for market segmentation research. Depending on your products and services, you might choose to divide your target population into groups based on demographics, location, behavior patterns, lifestyle aspects, etc. Organizing such data allows you to create buyer personas and test marketing strategies.

Example 3: New product development research

Companies must invest significant time and money into the development of a new product . Product development research is an important part of promoting a successful launch of a new product. 

The goals of product development research may include:

Forecasting the usage of products

Identifying accurate pricing

How products compare to competitors

Potential barriers to success

How customers will respond to new or updated products

Product development research includes studies conducted during the planning phase all the way through prototype testing and market planning. Research may include online surveys to determine which demographics would be most interested in the product or how a new product might be used. Advanced studies can include product testing to gather feedback about issues customers are having or features that could be improved.

Example 4: Customer satisfaction

According to the CallMiner Churn Index 2020 , U.S. companies lose $168 billion per year due to avoidable consumer switching. Customer satisfaction leads to loyalty and repeat purchases. Furthermore, happy customers leave good reviews and act as natural brand ambassadors. 

Findings from customer satisfaction surveys can help companies get a better understanding of the customer journey and develop new processes.

The goals of customer satisfaction research may include: 

Understanding overall customer satisfaction

Finding bottlenecks or points along the customer journey that decrease the level of customer satisfaction

Measuring the level of likelihood to recommend to others ( Net Promoter Score )

Measuring customer satisfaction may include surveys to determine satisfaction with the company, opinions about the sales process, or about a specific process like the user-friendliness of an app or company website. This can be achieved by organizing data derived from customer interviews , customer satisfaction surveys , reviews, and customer loyalty programs. 

Example 5: Brand research

No product or business is without competition. Establishing your brand in the market can help you stand out from the crowd. Brand research can help you understand whether your marketing campaigns are reaching their goals and how customers perceive your brand. 

Some goals of brand research may include:

Positioning your brand more competitively in the marketplace

Measuring the effectiveness of brand marketing

Determining the public perception of your brand

Developing new marketing campaigns

Tracking brand success on a regular basis

There are a variety of ways to conduct research about how consumers perceive your brand. In-person focus groups can help you get an in-depth view of how your brand is perceived and why. Surveys can help you gather data surrounding brand preference, brand loyalty, and what people associate with your brand. Ongoing research in these areas can help you build your brand value over time and find ways to share your company mission and personality with consumers.

• How to find ideas for your next research project

Successfully running a business requires you to be well-informed on product development, branding, customer service, industry trends, marketing, sales, organizational processes, employee satisfaction , and more. 

Various research products can help you stay informed and up-to-date in all these areas. However, determining where to focus your efforts and invest your capital can be challenging. These actions can help you find ideas for your next research project.

Identify problems or issues

Remember, research is conducted to satisfy a question or reach a goal. Identify problems that impact customer retention , sales, or company performance. Use these problems to determine which types of research topics are most likely to help your company achieve greater success. If performance is low, consider a research project to determine employee satisfaction levels and identify how to improve them. If sales are low, consider research into sales processes or customer satisfaction. 

Confirm the potential for a new idea

New products or services help companies grow and attract more customers. However, they require a big upfront investment from your organization. You can prove that your next big idea will be a hit by developing research projects around the need for a new product and your target customers. Solid data is often needed to convince company leaders and stakeholders to invest in a new product or service.

Check out the competition

Where do you stand in comparison to your competitors? If you're unsatisfied with your position in the market, learning more about what your competitors are doing right can help you determine how to improve. 

• Characteristics of a good market research idea

Shallow or vague research topics can lead to lackluster results that don't really add value to your studies. To conduct a successful research project, it's important to develop a plan that will yield productive data. When choosing a topic for your next research project, look for these characteristics. 

The topic is relevant to your current position

The idea is manageable (research can be conducted with your resources and budget)

The project has a specific and focused goal

You can clearly define and outline the scope of the project

The subject matter isn't too broad or narrow to yield useful results

While research can be science-based or for academic purposes, market research is conducted for a variety of reasons to help businesses grow or reach new levels of success. Understanding market research goals is the key to developing highly effective research projects that yield useful data. By examining examples of different research projects and your organizational goals, you can more easily decide where to focus your efforts.

Which topic is best for a research project?

There isn't a single topic that provides the best research project for every researcher. The best research topics serve a purpose like gaining a deeper understanding of a specific phenomenon, solving problems, improving processes, generating ideas, etc. Finding the best topic for research requires an investigation into what type of research project is likely to yield the most effective results.

How do you structure a research project?

The structure of your research project should clarify what you will investigate, why it is important, and how you will conduct your research. To get funding or approval for a research project, researchers are often required to submit a research proposal which acts as a blueprint and guide for a research plan. Any formal or informal research plan should include these features.

The identity and position of the researcher

An introduction of the topic and why it's relevant

The objective of the project and why you think the research is worth doing

An overview of existing knowledge on the topic

A detailed list of practical steps for how you will reach your objective, including gathering data and how you'll gain insights from the data you obtain

A clear timeline of the project and the planned project budget

What's the difference between a project and a research project?

A project is a planned set of activities with a specific outcome, while a research project is the investigation of data, sources, and facts to reach new conclusions. In a business context, a project may be the development of a marketing campaign, planning a new product or service, or establishing new policies. Research projects use relevant data to fuel business projects and activities.

What are some examples of practical research topics?

Practical research projects can range across a variety of subjects and purposes. Research is often conducted to further medical knowledge, change and adapt laws, address economic changes, advance academic studies, or improve business success. Here are a few examples.

How eating a diet high in fruits and vegetables affects advanced Crohn's disease

How to improve customer satisfaction by 20% in six weeks

The impact of increasing voter turnout by 25% on the presidential election

The percentage increase of new customers with the addition of online enrollment for banking services

The most effective way to improve employee retention in a company with 1,000 employees

Should you be using a customer insights hub?

Do you want to discover previous research faster?

Do you share your research findings with others?

Do you analyze research data?

Start for free today, add your research, and get to key insights faster

Editor’s picks

Last updated: 3 April 2024

Last updated: 30 April 2024

Last updated: 13 May 2024

Last updated: 22 July 2023

Last updated: 26 July 2024

Last updated: 10 August 2024

Latest articles

Related topics, .css-je19u9{-webkit-align-items:flex-end;-webkit-box-align:flex-end;-ms-flex-align:flex-end;align-items:flex-end;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-box-pack:center;-ms-flex-pack:center;-webkit-justify-content:center;justify-content:center;row-gap:0;text-align:center;max-width:671px;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}}@media (max-width: 799px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}} decide what to .css-1kiodld{max-height:56px;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-1kiodld{display:none;}} build next, decide what to build next, log in or sign up.

Get started for free

1000+ FREE Research Topics & Title Ideas

Select your area of interest to view a collection of potential research topics and ideas.

Or grab the full list 📋 (for free)

PS – You can also check out our free topic ideation webinar for more ideas

How To Find A Research Topic

If you’re struggling to get started, this step-by-step video tutorial will help you find the perfect research topic.

Research Topic FAQs

What (exactly) is a research topic.

A research topic is the subject of a research project or study – for example, a dissertation or thesis. A research topic typically takes the form of a problem to be solved, or a question to be answered.

A good research topic should be specific enough to allow for focused research and analysis. For example, if you are interested in studying the effects of climate change on agriculture, your research topic could focus on how rising temperatures have impacted crop yields in certain regions over time.

To learn more about the basics of developing a research topic, consider our free research topic ideation webinar.

What constitutes a good research topic?

A strong research topic comprises three important qualities : originality, value and feasibility.

• Originality – a good topic explores an original area or takes a novel angle on an existing area of study.
• Value – a strong research topic provides value and makes a contribution, either academically or practically.
• Feasibility – a good research topic needs to be practical and manageable, given the resource constraints you face.

To learn more about what makes for a high-quality research topic, check out this post .

What's the difference between a research topic and research problem?

A research topic and a research problem are two distinct concepts that are often confused. A research topic is a broader label that indicates the focus of the study , while a research problem is an issue or gap in knowledge within the broader field that needs to be addressed.

To illustrate this distinction, consider a student who has chosen “teenage pregnancy in the United Kingdom” as their research topic. This research topic could encompass any number of issues related to teenage pregnancy such as causes, prevention strategies, health outcomes for mothers and babies, etc.

Within this broad category (the research topic) lies potential areas of inquiry that can be explored further – these become the research problems . For example:

• What factors contribute to higher rates of teenage pregnancy in certain communities?
• How do different types of parenting styles affect teen pregnancy rates?
• What interventions have been successful in reducing teenage pregnancies?

Simply put, a key difference between a research topic and a research problem is scope ; the research topic provides an umbrella under which multiple questions can be asked, while the research problem focuses on one specific question or set of questions within that larger context.

How can I find potential research topics for my project?

There are many steps involved in the process of finding and choosing a high-quality research topic for a dissertation or thesis. We cover these steps in detail in this video (also accessible below).

How can I find quality sources for my research topic?

Finding quality sources is an essential step in the topic ideation process. To do this, you should start by researching scholarly journals, books, and other academic publications related to your topic. These sources can provide reliable information on a wide range of topics. Additionally, they may contain data or statistics that can help support your argument or conclusions.

Identifying Relevant Sources

When searching for relevant sources, it’s important to look beyond just published material; try using online databases such as Google Scholar or JSTOR to find articles from reputable journals that have been peer-reviewed by experts in the field.

You can also use search engines like Google or Bing to locate websites with useful information about your topic. However, be sure to evaluate any website before citing it as a source—look for evidence of authorship (such as an “About Us” page) and make sure the content is up-to-date and accurate before relying on it.

Evaluating Sources

Once you’ve identified potential sources for your research project, take some time to evaluate them thoroughly before deciding which ones will best serve your purpose. Consider factors such as author credibility (are they an expert in their field?), publication date (is the source current?), objectivity (does the author present both sides of an issue?) and relevance (how closely does this source relate to my specific topic?).

By researching the current literature on your topic, you can identify potential sources that will help to provide quality information. Once you’ve identified these sources, it’s time to look for a gap in the research and determine what new knowledge could be gained from further study.

How can I find a good research gap?

Finding a strong gap in the literature is an essential step when looking for potential research topics. We explain what research gaps are and how to find them in this post.

How should I evaluate potential research topics/ideas?

When evaluating potential research topics, it is important to consider the factors that make for a strong topic (we discussed these earlier). Specifically:

• Originality
• Feasibility

So, when you have a list of potential topics or ideas, assess each of them in terms of these three criteria. A good topic should take a unique angle, provide value (either to academia or practitioners), and be practical enough for you to pull off, given your limited resources.

Finally, you should also assess whether this project could lead to potential career opportunities such as internships or job offers down the line. Make sure that you are researching something that is relevant enough so that it can benefit your professional development in some way. Additionally, consider how each research topic aligns with your career goals and interests; researching something that you are passionate about can help keep motivation high throughout the process.

How can I assess the feasibility of a research topic?

When evaluating the feasibility and practicality of a research topic, it is important to consider several factors.

First, you should assess whether or not the research topic is within your area of competence. Of course, when you start out, you are not expected to be the world’s leading expert, but do should at least have some foundational knowledge.

Time commitment

When considering a research topic, you should think about how much time will be required for completion. Depending on your field of study, some topics may require more time than others due to their complexity or scope.

Additionally, if you plan on collaborating with other researchers or institutions in order to complete your project, additional considerations must be taken into account such as coordinating schedules and ensuring that all parties involved have adequate resources available.

Resources needed

It’s also critically important to consider what type of resources are necessary in order to conduct the research successfully. This includes physical materials such as lab equipment and chemicals but can also include intangible items like access to certain databases or software programs which may be necessary depending on the nature of your work. Additionally, if there are costs associated with obtaining these materials then this must also be factored into your evaluation process.

Potential risks

It’s important to consider the inherent potential risks for each potential research topic. These can include ethical risks (challenges getting ethical approval), data risks (not being able to access the data you’ll need), technical risks relating to the equipment you’ll use and funding risks (not securing the necessary financial back to undertake the research).

Need hands-on help?

Private coaching might be just what you need.

College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences

Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences

• What We Do & Why It Matters
• Our Partnerships
• Student Ambassadors
• Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice
• Career Possibilities
• Financial Support
• Student Services
• Student Organizations
• Undergraduate Degree
• Graduate Degrees
• Certificates
• Study Abroad
• Online Programs
• Emeritus Faculty
• Affiliated Faculty
• Graduate Students
• Postdoctoral Researchers
• Research Areas
• Research Labs
• Outreach and Extension
• Research News
• NRES Seminars

Sample Individual Research Projects

The following are individual research projects completed in the NRES online M.S. program that may be of use to current students preparing for this phase of their degrees. These alumni have granted permission for their project to be posted. These works may not be reproduced or redistributed without the author's explicit consent.

• Danielle McLaughlin (2016)  Using Q-Methodology to Understand Environmental Opposition to Fracking Research Director: Dr. Bethany Cutts
• Christin Crutchfield (2016)  Effect of Land Management Practices on Soil Moisture Retention Research Director: Dr. Michelle Wander
• Ann Devine (2016)  Peregrine Falcon Dispersal and Habitat Imprinting (1994-2013) Research Director: Dr. Michael Ward
• Danielle Hilbrich (2015)  Determining the Effectiveness of the Clean Boats Crew: An Education and Outreach Program Aimed at Preventing the Spread of Aquatic Invasive Species in Lake County, Illinois Research Director: Dr. Craig Miller
• Joshua Yellin (2014)  Evaluating the Efficacy of an Artificial Floating Island as Fish Habitat in the Chicago River: A Pilot Study Research Director: Dr. Christopher Taylor
• Jeffrey Weiss (2014)  Virtual Buffalo Creek: A Tool to Educate Citizens and Students on Issues in a Watershed with Symptoms of Urban Stream Syndrome in Northeastern Illinois Research Director: Dr. Robert Hudson
• Margaret Edwards (2014)  Sources of Variation in Height to Dry Weight Ratios of the Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea verginica) Research Director: Dr. Ruth Carmichael
• Rebecca Grill (2013)  Can Lake Michigan Ravine Streams Support Potadromous Fish? Research Director: Dr. Leon Hinz
• Samantha Rich (2013)  Distribution and Functional Linkages of Large Woody Debris in the Nearshore-Elwha River, Olympic Peninsula Research Director: Anne Shaffer
• Christie Wortz (2012)  Using Infrared Cameras to Create Population Indices for White-Tailed Deer on the Islands of Lake Sidney Lanier, Georgia Research Director: Dr. Robert Schooley
• Jason Hargrove (2011)  Assessing the Potential Hazards at O'Hare International Airport Wetlands Using Field Observations and Avian Radar Research Director: Dr. Edwin Herricks
• Mark Melka (2011)  Classroom in Nature Research Director: Dr. Andrea Faber Taylor
• Russell Brandenburg (2010)  A Post Project Analysis: An Assessment of an Urban Riparian Ecosystem Restoration in Central Ohio Research Director: Dr. Anton Endress
• Janet Backs (2008)  Urban greening: low maintenance planters as a means for urban residents to to participate in greening initiatives Research Director: Dr. Wes Jarrell.
• Anne-Marie Eischen (2008)  Project-based Learning in an UIUC Horticultural Capstone Course Research Director: Dr. Daniel Warnock.
• Kathleen Frazier (2007)  Effects of Juglone on  Juglans Nigra  Seedling Growth Research Director: Dr. Jeff Dawson.

View an interactive map of internships in 2018

• Open access
• Published: 23 August 2024

Facilitating co-research: lessons learned from reflection forms within three participatory action research projects

• Helga Emke   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8675-2577 1 , 3 , 6   na1 ,
• Ann Vandendriessche 2   na1 ,
• Mai Chinapaw 3 , 6 ,
• Benedicte Deforche 2 , 4 ,
• Maïté Verloigne 2 ,
• Teatske Altenburg 3 , 6 &
• Manou Anselma 3 , 5  

Health Research Policy and Systems volume  22 , Article number:  117 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

Mutual learning and shared decision-making are key elements of Participatory Action Research (PAR), highlighting the important role of the facilitator to support this. This study aims to illustrate how a facilitator can contribute to successful PAR sessions based on the reflection of three PAR projects.

Participatory sessions took place with adolescents for 3–4 school years. After each session ( n  = 252 sessions across three projects), facilitators filled in a reflection form that assessed the group process and their facilitating role. Facilitators independently coded a selection of 135 reflection forms partly deductive and partly inductive based on core PAR principles derived from a pragmatic literature search.

A well-prepared session – for example, including active and creative participatory methods and a clearly stated goal – contributed to efficiency and the necessary flexibility. Making agreements, making sure everyone is heard and taking 'fun-time' appeared important for creating and maintaining a safe, functional and positive atmosphere. Finally, facilitators needed to encourage co-researchers to take the lead and adapt to the group dynamics, to ensure ownership and shared decision-making.

In-depth qualitative analyses of a standardized reflection form used in three different PAR projects resulted in various lessons to support facilitators in collaborating with co-researchers in PAR projects.

Detailed preparation of participatory sessions with multiple scenarios allows the flexibility needed for productive sessions.

Ensuring a positive, safe and functional atmosphere encouraged productive participatory sessions.

Facilitators need to continuously adapt to the characteristics, moods and emotions of co-researchers.

We present an improved reflection form to support facilitators in optimizing their PAR sessions.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Participatory action research (PAR) is a promising approach to improve health and reduce health inequities. In this approach, there is collaboration and shared decision-making between researchers and the population of interest to develop actions improving that population’s own situation [ 1 ]. Actions developed using PAR are more likely to meet the needs and preferences of the population of interest, and thereby may be more effective than traditional more top-down developed actions [ 2 ]. Mutual learning and respect are essential in the participatory process, with participants’ experiences valued as a legitimate form of knowledge that can influence practice [ 1 ]. In the participatory process, participants are trained as co-researchers to provide them with knowledge, skills and abilities to conduct research in their own particular context and that of their peers [ 1 , 3 ]. Particularly for children and adolescents, participating in PAR and, thus, being a co-researcher can improve their individual development, empowerment and critical awareness of societal issues [ 4 ].

When conducting PAR, there are several core principles to take into account [ 5 ]. Wright and colleagues identified 11 common participatory principles, including that co-research should promote critical reflexivity of co-researchers and academic researchers [ 6 ]. Academic researchers will become better researchers when they reflect on their behaviour, thoughts and co-operation during their collaboration with co-researchers [ 7 ]. This is especially important when academic researchers act as facilitators of the PAR process, for example, by reflecting on power differences between the academic researchers and the co-researchers [ 5 ]. Reflexivity reveals the influence of the facilitator on the PAR process, the generated data and the group dynamics [ 8 ]. However, guidance on how to structurally reflect on and improve the role of the facilitator is currently lacking [ 9 ].

Due to the grant-based funding of academic research, in most projects the overall aim and research questions are already set. Within these boundaries, researchers can and should still promote a shared and dynamic PAR process, endorsing mutual learning and decision-making, where co-researchers can contribute to the best of their potential [ 9 ]. Facilitators who are flexible and open-minded and who have good verbal and written communication skills and the ability to maintain a supportive and encouraging attitude are generally capable to create such a PAR process [ 10 ]. However, apart from more general guidelines [ 5 ], there is currently a lack of data of how PAR can be successfully facilitated. Critical reflection by facilitators can provide insight in success factors of a good PAR session. This insight can further improve future PAR projects.

The current study aims to illustrate how a facilitator can contribute to a successful PAR process based on standardized reflection forms collected in three PAR projects with children and adolescents. This paper presents how a standardized reflection form can inform the facilitators in improving their PAR facilitation in practice, including specific examples, lessons learned and recommendations from the three PAR projects using this form. Based on the analysis of the reflection forms, suggestions will be made to improve the reflection form.

In the following sections, we give a description of each project, the design of the participatory sessions across the three projects, the reflection form and how the forms were coded and analysed based on a pragmatic literature research.

All three projects focused on improving one or multiple energy balance-related behaviours in children and/or adolescents. The leading academic researchers (H.E., A.V., M.A.) collaborated with their co-researchers in so-called Action Teams, consisting of 3–12 children or adolescents. The academic researcher had a facilitating role. Often a second facilitator (e.g. an intern) was present to assist in the process. We obtained a written active informed consent to participate in the participatory process from at least one of the parents or guardians in all three projects and in the LIKE and Healthy sleep project also from the co-researchers themselves. Table 1 presents more information on the three PAR projects and background information of the facilitating researchers. All three researchers had a positive attitude towards both PAR and the healthy behaviour they wanted to promote. The researchers were highly motivated to co-create with children and adolescents and expected empowerment and effective interventions adjusted to the target population to be outcomes of the PAR. Additional File 1 shows an overview of the composition of each Action Team per project, the frequency and duration of sessions and how the co-researchers were recruited.

Design participatory sessions

Across the three PAR projects, sessions were typically structured with a check-in, the main part of the session and a check-out. The check-in was used for an active game for fun and team spirit and to (re)state the goal of the session and project. During the main part of the session the Action Teams worked on the research topic through varying exercises. We used energizers to help the co-researchers regain their focus or energy when needed. An example was letting the co-researchers play rock-paper-scissors with their whole body for a few minutes. The co-researchers suggested or rejected games or energizers when they liked or disliked a specific game or energizer. Additionally, during some sessions, we applied capacity building to teach the co-researchers certain skills. In two of the PAR projects, another academic researcher, announced as a “research expert” was invited and explained research methods and ethics. In all three projects, the co-researchers acquired organizational skills by being intensively involved and taking the lead throughout the PAR process. During the check-out, we encouraged the co-researchers to summarize the session and plan the next session.

Reflection form

The leading academic researchers (H.E., A.V., M.A.) from the three PAR projects used the same standardized reflection form to reflect on the group process as well as on their own role as a facilitator. This form was developed using relevant literature on PAR and the facilitation of group sessions as part of the Kids in Action project in 2016 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands [ 11 ] and later applied in the Healthy Sleep Project in Ghent, Belgium [ 13 ] and the LIKE-project in Amsterdam [ 14 ].

The three facilitating researchers (H.E., A.V., M.A.) filled in the reflection form after each PAR session (Table  2 ). The first part of the reflection form contained 10 items (statements or questions) about the group process, whereas the second part of the reflection form contained 6 items (statements or questions) prompting the facilitator to reflect on their own role as a facilitator. Statements could be answered with −−, −, 0, + or ++, and additional information could be added when necessary. All statements and open questions invited the researcher to reflect on what went well during the session and what could be improved in regard to meeting the principles of participatory research (i.e. “Everyone could give their opinion”) and facilitating collaboration as a team (i.e. “Facilitators had a positive influence on the group atmosphere”).

Data used for analysis included answers to the open questions in the reflection forms as well as the optional additional information provided to the statements. Grading (−−, −, 0, +, ++) of the statements in the reflection forms was not included in the current study. We used thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke to identify, analyze and interpret themes within our qualitative data using the following phases (1) familiarizing of the data, (2) generating initial codes, (3) searching for themes, (4) reviewing themes, (5) defining and naming themes, and 6) producing the report [ 15 ]. First, we started with familiarizing ourselves with our data by (re-)reading several reflection forms filled in by various facilitators. Then, we generated initial codes based on core principles of facilitating a PAR session that were found through a pragmatic literature search, including scientific articles, manuals, guides and frameworks on participatory research, co-creation and facilitation [ 5 , 10 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. We individually searched literature using (scientific) search engines and summarized relevant literature. We discussed the summaries in a face-to-face meeting, and from these we identified guidelines to facilitate the PAR process and clustered the guidelines in themes. Subsequently, we checked whether the defined themes matched the different items of the reflection form, ensuring that the themes would be useful in coding the reflection forms. The defined themes matched most of the items from the reflection form; items that were not represented in the coding book could be added at a later stage while coding.

The three facilitating researchers filled in 252 reflection forms across the three PAR studies (H.E.: 84, A.V.: 69, M.A.: 99). To ensure inclusion of reflection forms on a diversity of PAR sessions, we first sorted the reflection forms by Action Team per school and research phase: (1) the needs assessment phase, (2) the action development phase, and (3) the implementation and evaluation phase, as each Action Team and each phase of the project required a different facilitation approach. For each project, we randomly selected forms from each phase per Action Team until data saturation. Each researcher only coded the reflections forms from the sessions she facilitated, to enable including contextual information and to prevent misinterpretation.

To test and fine-tune the codebook, each researcher searched for themes in three reflection forms from the sessions that she facilitated, using NVivo 11. Then we reviewed the themes, which led to new codes, re-ordering of existing themes and subthemes, and specifying definitions of codes. Afterwards, we individually coded reflection forms from the sessions that we facilitated ourselves (135 in total; H.E.: 41, A.V.: 41, M.A.: 53) using the finalized codebook. To determine whether data saturation was reached, we compared the coded segments. When no additional codes arose during comparison, we concluded that data saturation was reached and no additional reflection forms needed to be included; however, small changes were made in defining and naming the themes in the codebook. For example, similar sub-codes were better defined or merged. Using this final codebook, we checked the coded segments from the reflection forms from our own projects again. Together we discussed the segments of each code and made a summary of the findings per code, which we used to produce the paper.

Additional File 2 presents an overview of the coding scheme. The coding scheme consisted of 10 themes, that were grouped into 3 subthemes: (1) preparing the PAR sessions – including (i) design of the sessions, (ii) guarding the scope of the project, and (iii) facilitation skills; (2) managing a safe, positive and functional atmosphere during PAR sessions – including (iv) ownership, (v) capacity building, (vi) functional atmosphere, (vii) positive atmosphere and (viii) safe atmosphere; (3) dealing with influencing factors – including (ix) circumstances and (x) group dynamics. The results section is structured according to these three themes. For each theme, detailed information and specific examples are given to illustrate the lessons learned. Finally, each theme ends with a recapitulation of lessons learned from the reflection forms, offering a quick overview of lessons learned.

Preparing the sessions

Sessions were more successful when prepared in detail, including which participatory methods to use, a time schedule, a “plan B”, and access to a quiet location where the setup could be changed to fit the session and tasks. A successful meeting entailed reaching all the aims for the meeting within the scheduled time and when decision-making was shared with the co-researchers. Starting a session with explaining the goal of the session and how it fitted the overall aim of the co-research helped to keep the co-researchers involved and motivated. When the goal of the session was not clear for the co-researchers, sessions were more chaotic and difficult to facilitate.

This session wasn’t as well prepared, which shows from the group. It might be a good idea to give a brief overview of what needs to be discussed at the beginning of each session. – Healthy Sleep Project I explained in advance the expectations of this meeting which made it [the aim] clear. Doing so gave me more time to chat and connect with everyone when they were working by themselves. – LIKE project

When a session was well prepared, facilitators could be more flexible and more easily adapt to the circumstances. Examples are adapting an assignment to fit the atmosphere or using the co-researchers’ alternative ideas for the assignment. Preparing a time schedule consisting of a few topics definitively necessary to discuss in that session and a few optional topics for when time was left allowed for more flexibility. Also preparing alternative plans for unexpected influencing factors (see “ Dealing with influencing factors ”) enhanced flexibility, for example when the regular meeting room could not be used and the meeting took place in the school hallway. Active games as part of the check-in also helped co-researchers to be more focused during the session. This was similar for the main part of the session, where active and creative participatory methods ensured that co-researchers enjoyed the session and kept their focus. On the other hand, co-researchers sometimes became too energized from an energizer, and had a hard time to refocus.

Woosh [an energizer] was nice for building a good atmosphere, and as an energizer it enables them to become “energized”. However, I think it was not an ideal exercise for this group, particularly if a more serious task is next. – Healthy Sleep Project

Before the start of a session, the room in which the session would take place was prepared. When sessions were conducted at school, a more informal atmosphere was created by adjusting the setting to not resemble a school setup. Distracting objects were removed out of the room or furniture moved to improve the efficiency of the session. Tables were, for example, spread across the room so subgroups could work together without getting distracted by others (see “ Managing the positive, safe and functional atmosphere during PAR sessions ”). The focus of some co-researchers seemed to improve when going outside or being more physical activity during a session.

Today we were sitting in the sitting area [where children can sit on the floor], which doesn’t work well. On the other hand, we can move around more, compared to sitting at a table, which works better for the more restless individuals. – Kids in Action.

The main lessons from this theme are: (1) prepare and share the structure of the meeting and start each session with explaining the session goal, (2) plan for flexibility, (3) select various active and creative participatory methods, and (4) play with various meeting areas and setups.

Managing the safe, positive and functional atmosphere during PAR sessions

When co-researchers had fun and shared in decision-making, this resulted in more successful sessions in which progress could be made. Therefore, ensuring a safe, positive and functional atmosphere appeared important.

Creating a good relationship with the co-researchers contributed to ensure a safe atmosphere. Making agreements or rules together with the co-researchers at the start of or during the PAR process facilitated a safe and functional atmosphere. Co-researchers were encouraged to think of rules themselves regarding creating and maintaining respectful and fruitful relationships within the group. Examples of agreements included listening to each other or taking turns to talk. The facilitators and co-researchers referred to these agreements when necessary. When difficult situations arose that were not covered by these agreements, the facilitator had to indicate boundaries and be strict to avoid chaos. This did not necessarily create a negative atmosphere: the clarity and structure created by the boundaries actually improved the atmosphere in most cases. Only in some instances was it necessary to address the co-researcher(s) who distorted the session separately after the session. In the case where a co-researcher’s participation had to be ended, this decision was discussed together with the co-researcher, their parents and the school teacher.

[group was misbehaving] You want the working environment to remain healthy, in order to support appropriate behaviour. For instance, to enable this, I established my boundaries, yet remained pleasant in this situation. – Healthy Sleep Project

Furthermore, to ensure a safe atmosphere, one of the most important tasks of facilitators was to make sure that each co-researcher felt acknowledged and heard during the session. In situations where a dominant person took over the conversation and prevented others from expressing themselves, it helped to ask if everyone agreed with what was being said and to address individuals. This sometimes opened unexpected conversations or perspectives. A useful approach was to let all co-researchers write down their opinion and then let everyone share what they had written down, so everyone’s opinion was considered. Being hasty as a facilitator could be a pitfall, as then only the loudest voices were heard and there was less time to show appreciation of other co-researchers. Expressing appreciation to all co-researchers appeared important, as it made them feel acknowledged and it increased their motivation.

Taking time to have fun with the group and getting to know each other rather than being strict to increase efficiency contributed to a positive atmosphere. Playing a game or having an informal conversation sometimes led to deviations from the plan, yet it resulted in a stronger relationship with the co-researchers. Co-researchers often had personal questions for the facilitator; taking the time to answer such questions promoted having an open and strong relationship with the co-researchers, which aided a safe, positive and functional atmosphere. This actually allowed us to be more strict when necessary. Creating a positive atmosphere was sometimes at the expense of a functional atmosphere, but a good team spirit increased the motivation and, thus, the efficiency in the longer term.

I share a lot about myself, am able to laugh along as well as join conversations that others initiate (it really interests me too). It makes for a pleasant atmosphere, but perhaps this is less favourable for focusing purposes. – Healthy Sleep Project We sometimes had to reprimand the others, but maybe we should have been more stern to maintain a better working environment. – Kids in Action It would be nice if they [the adolescents] could listen to each other better without me needing to raise my voice. Therefore, we can perhaps still be more strict or ask them how we can manage that together (refer to the rules?) – LIKE project

Several approaches to moderate the ongoing conversation and guide co-researchers during their thought process stimulated a functional atmosphere in which shared decisions could be made and ideas could be elaborated on. Examples are: asking the co-researchers questions, offering them new angles or summarizing what they had said. It worked even better to ask a co-researcher to summarize what had been said. Co-researchers were also encouraged to think creatively and think of alternatives when an idea appeared not feasible. This was sometimes considered difficult by facilitators because they did not want to immediately destruct an idea and demotivate the co-researchers. This mainly happened in groups with younger co-researchers, who had many ideas but struggled with feasibility, especially in the beginning of their participation. In some groups, especially with co-researchers following vocational education, it was necessary for the facilitators to bring in some ideas as inspiration to facilitate the brainstorm. Co-researchers could then explain why they did or did not like the idea and build on from there.

The process was very smooth and natural. I was able to ask the right questions and leave silences to allow more ideas to surface. I had a good attitude to brainstorming. (We also get training for that at [name organization]). – Healthy Sleep Project I think that, together, we were well engaged with brainstorming. Actually, some of those involved in this had come up with the majority of ideas. In some instances, ideas necessitated adaption, but I do think almost all the ideas came from the children. – Kids in Action

When concrete tasks had to be worked out, it was more functional to split the action group into smaller groups to work on a separate task. Everyone could then contribute more actively, co-researchers worked more focused and personal strengths arose. It was useful to have one facilitator per subgroup if possible, to let subgroups work at different tables or in different rooms, and to think about the subgroup composition. Co-researchers could choose a task or subgroup themselves or were divided by us according to age, sex, strengths and so on. To keep the co-researchers focused, it helped to use visual support during explanations or group discussions, for example, writing or drawing what co-researchers talked about on a whiteboard or flip-over. At the end of the session, subgroups reported to each other what they had worked on using these visual summaries, so that every co-researcher stayed up to date about the progress and they could decide as a group on the next steps. Staying up to date about all decisions in the project was important for the sense of ownership among co-researchers. Therefore, it was also important to inform co-researchers about meetings that took place without them (e.g. between facilitators and school board or advisors) and ask the opinion of co-researchers about decisions that had to be made in response to such meetings.

Finally, encouraging co-researchers to take the lead – by asking them what they wanted to do themselves and giving them as many responsibilities as possible – increased their sense of ownership. This was aided by the time spent on capacity building. Co-researchers were very capable of gaining research and organizational skills. At the end of the session, co-researchers were often asked what they would like to do the following session, which helped to keep them engaged and design sessions that fit their interests. This again had a positive influence on their sense of ownership. When the sense of ownership in co-researchers increased, co-researchers started to be more assertive.

The children cooperated on their own initiative to set up a questionnaire. – Kids in Action I was good at relinquishing control and letting [one of the adolescents] be more in charge. This allowed them to gain some leadership. Nonetheless, I was able to successfully take the lead again when needed. – LIKE project The adolescents often asked each other for advice, engaged in dialogue and came up with solutions for the others. This made it a super interactive session. – Healthy Sleep Project

The main lessons that can be concluded from this theme are: (1) make good agreements or rules together about how to create and maintain a respectful and fruitful relationship within the group, (2) take time to have fun and to get to know each other, (3) guide co-researchers in structuring their ideas, (4) make sure everyone is heard, (5) split the group into smaller subgroups for concrete tasks, (6) be transparent about meetings that take place without the co-researchers being present, and (7) encourage co-researchers to take the lead.

Dealing with influencing factors

The characteristics, moods and emotions of facilitators and the co-researchers often influenced the session and all attendees. For example, when facilitators lacked energy, this reflected on the co-researchers. In addition, co-researchers could, for example, be nervous for exams that were coming up, excited about a good grade or on edge because of bad weather conditions. Those factors were unpredictable and had to be dealt with on the spot. Other factors, such as co-researchers’ personality, were more predictable and, therefore, methods could already be adapted to this.

You can clearly notice your own influence on the group. Having been so busy lately, I felt like chilling with them and not stressing much about time (or people not paying attention). Today I enjoyed that (instead of the strict time management and progress) = > outcome: they enjoyed themselves a lot and were outgoing BUT their input was of lower quality than last week. – Healthy Sleep Project

To a certain extent, facilitators tried to neutralize the effect of hindering factors. If facilitators were, for example, in a hurry and felt stressed, it helped to take 10 min before the session to relax. If that did not work and an extra facilitator was present, the second facilitator was given more responsibility. If co-researchers were distracted, it helped to let them share what was on their mind instead of urging them to immediately start working on the project. In this sense, the dynamics and energy of the group had to be considered constantly. Dealing with these varying circumstances required different facilitation skills and methods from the facilitators. For this, it helped to have taken facilitation courses or joined more experienced PAR researchers earlier on which enabled learning by doing.

Z. came in later today. He wanted to join the conversation right away, but he did not really know what we were talking about. I should have let the two other girls get him up to speed first. – Kids in Action

The dynamics in the group were also influenced by the composition of the group. The reflection forms indicated that when there were both dominant and shy co-researchers in one group, the moderating role of the facilitator became more important. With younger co-researchers, more pedagogical and facilitation skills were needed, as they could be more energetic and lost their focus more quickly. When a co-researcher impeded the atmosphere or bullied others, skills to manage tough situations were needed, such as having a serious one-on-one conversation with that co-researcher.

The PAR process ran more smoothly when all co-researchers were on time and attended all sessions, as it was very distracting when co-researchers showed up late and missed out what had already been discussed. It was useful to decide on the frequency and time of sessions together with the co-researchers, as some preferred to have sessions in the morning (but others were still half-asleep then), while others preferred the late afternoon (but others were half-asleep by then).

I could direct them to attend weekly. Additionally, the kids attending every week are much more involved and their tasks are more evident. For the ones only in occasional attendance, I think the work is less fulfilling since they don't have a clear understanding of what their purpose is. —Kids in Action

The main lessons that can be concluded within this theme are: (1) the facilitator’s mood and energy is reflected in the co-researchers, (2) a facilitator needs a diverse skillset (e.g. to adequately handle different personalities within the group), and (3) to decide on a meeting time and frequency together with the co-researchers.

This study aimed to illustrate how a facilitator can contribute to a successful PAR process based on a standardized reflection form from three PAR projects with children and adolescents. Several lessons learned that are likely also valuable for PAR with adult co-researchers. The added value of our study over existing more general guidelines [ 5 ] is that our findings result from in-depth qualitative analysis of a standardized reflection form used in three separate projects. Our reflection form proved to be a valuable tool for uncovering detailed examples and specific recommendations for the PAR process and our role as facilitator, enabling facilitators to improve their facilitation during the participatory process. These findings provide researchers who want to conduct PAR with a more practical summary of best practices for facilitators and detailed examples. The insights provided regarding ethics, methods and evaluation may be informative for future PAR projects and researchers wanting to develop or further elaborate on a co-creation methodology.

Successful sessions need considerable preparation. Facilitators need to maintain a safe, positive and functional atmosphere during sessions which can be influenced by the mood of both the facilitator and co-researchers. These findings confirm previous research [ 22 , 23 , 24 ].

Engaging with co-researchers on a personal level and ensuring a good connection with the group seemed important, confirming findings by facilitators from other PAR projects [ 25 ]. This contributed to a trustworthy relationship where all co-researchers felt they could speak their mind and be themselves, which in turn positively influenced the sense of ownership and control over the process, which are core principles of PAR [ 5 ]. Co-researchers took a more leading role in the sessions when they felt more ownership. These observations correspond with the Theoretical Framework of Symbolic Interactionism, which suggests that individuals’ engagement is based on their personal meaning in life, which is shaped by their interactions with others [ 26 ]. However, facilitators should be aware that closer relationships with co-researchers also bring greater potential for exploitation [ 27 ]. Since participation is often voluntary, it is critical that decisions are made together with the co-researchers, for example, about the aim of the study, their preferred role and how much time they want to invest.

Above all, our findings show that a flexible attitude from the facilitator in being goal oriented, being able to build strong relationships with co-researchers and having strong facilitation skills are essential for a successful PAR process. Especially finding a balance between moderating the conversation and letting co-researchers steer the conversation (in sometimes directions unrelated to the research topic) is a common challenge for PAR facilitators [ 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Sharing power with adolescents might be challenging for facilitators, and the most recurrent criticism on Youth PAR is the risk that researchers keep too much control. This can result in tokenism and falsely claiming collaboration with adolescents [ 31 ]. An important responsibility lies with the facilitator and their integrity regarding this challenge: facilitators should be compassionate, courageous, honest, humble and righteous and have the ability to have moral insight about a situation to establish ethical relationships in participatory research [ 32 ]. As facilitators play an important role in the PAR process, critical reflection through journaling or group dialogues on their behaviour and thoughts during collaboration with co-researchers is recommended [ 33 ]. Continuous reflection throughout the PAR process will provide insights into the facilitators’ influence on the research process, the social dynamics with co-researchers and power differentials that arise [ 8 , 33 ]. As a helpful tool to guide this reflection, we provide the adapted reflection form in Additional File 3 .

Based on the results of this study, we adjusted the reflection form for future use (Additional File 3 ). As a functional atmosphere and suitable working methods emerged as important themes, we added the following questions to the reflection form: “Were all goals of the session reached? If not, why not? If yes, how were they reached?” and “How were the used participatory methods received and did they give the anticipated output?”. As reflecting on the influence of the facilitators’ mood and personal characteristics on the session was not part of the reflection form, we added the following question: “How did the mood and personal characteristics of the facilitator influence the session?”. Finally, as equal collaboration and shared decision-making must be pursued at all times during PAR [ 6 ], we added the following questions: “To what extent were co-researchers in the lead during the session? How did this become visible? How was this reached?”.

Some limitations of the study need to be acknowledged. This study was conceived after the data had been collected, and we did not know in advance that we would combine the reflection forms of the three projects during the PAR process. Therefore, not all situations were described elaborately or easily interpretable for others. Furthermore, as the grading system within the reflection form (−−, −, 0, +, ++) was not concretized, we interpreted this differently when filling out the forms and, therefore, could not include the grading in the current study. We changed the grading system to disagree, neutral and agree in the updated reflection form in Additional File 3 . Another limitation of our study is the potential bias introduced by facilitators analysing their own reflection forms, which was necessary to include contextual information and to prevent misinterpretation. Although we believe that our findings are of use to a wide spread of PAR researchers, researchers using our recommendations should take the context in which these originated (PAR with children and adolescents in West Europe) into account.

A strength of this study was that a large amount of data was collected over long time periods (3–4 years for each of the projects). Another strength is that the three PAR projects that used the reflection forms worked with co-researchers from different age groups, social backgrounds and educational levels. This led to insights that can be used for a wider range of PAR projects. A third and final strength of this study is that real-world data were analysed on the basis of already identified principles of facilitating PAR processes, linking available core principles of facilitating PAR processes in literature to data.

In-depth qualitative analyses of a standardized reflection form used in three different PAR projects resulted in various lessons to support facilitators in collaborating with co-researchers in PAR projects: 1) when preparing PAR sessions, facilitators should plan for flexibility, include active and creative participatory methods, play with varying locations and set-ups and let co-researchers influence the pace and clearly state the goal at the beginning of the sessions; 2) to ensure a safe, positive and functional atmosphere, make good agreements on how to work together and make sure everyone is heard as well as take time to have fun and get to know each other; 3) to ensure ownership and shared decision-making, facilitators need to encourage co-researchers to take the lead and be transparent about additional meetings that facilitators or involved researchers have without the co-researchers; 4) to handle influencing factors such as the mood of co-researchers, a facilitator needs a diverse skillset.

Availability of data and materials

The reflection form and final codebook are shared in the study and Additional file. The filled in reflection forms cannot be shared because individual privacy could be compromised.

Abbreviations

Participatory Action Research

Socio-Economic Status

Baum F, MacDougall C, Smith D. Participatory action research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(10):854.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Kornet-van der Aa D, Altenburg T, van Randeraad-van der Zee C, Chinapaw M. The effectiveness and promising strategies of obesity prevention and treatment programmes among adolescents from disadvantaged backgrounds: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2017;18(5):581–93.

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Bozlak CT, Kelley MA. Participatory action research with youth. In: Participatory action research. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 67.

Google Scholar  

Kim J. Youth involvement in participatory action research (PAR). Crit Soc Work. 2016. https://doi.org/10.22329/csw.v17i1.5891 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Wright M. International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR) (2013) position paper 1: what is participatory health research? Version: Mai 2013. Berlin: International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research; 2013.

Wright MT, Springett J, Kongats K. What is participatory health research? In: Wright MT, Kongats K, editors. Participatory health research: voices from around the world. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 3–15.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Watt D. On becoming a qualitative researcher: the value of reflexivity. Qual Rep. 2007;12(1):82–101.

Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage; 2018.

Dewar B, Sharp C. Appreciative dialogue for co-facilitation in action research and practice development. Int Pract Dev J. 2013;3(2). https://www.fons.org/library/journal/volume3-issue2/article7/

Boyden J, Ennew J, editors. Children in focus—a manual for participatory research with children. Save the Children Sweden; 1997.

Anselma M, Altenburg T, Chinapaw M. Kids in action: the protocol of a youth participatory action research project to promote physical activity and dietary behaviour. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3): e025584.

Anselma M, Altenburg TM, Emke H, van Nassau F, Jurg M, Ruiter RAC, et al. Co-designing obesity prevention interventions together with children: intervention mapping meets youth-led participatory action research. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):130.

Vandendriessche A, Deforche B, Dhondt K, Altenburg TM, Verloigne M. Combining participatory action research with intervention mapping to develop and plan the implementation and evaluation of a healthy sleep intervention for adolescents. Health Promot Perspect. 2023;13(4):316.

Waterlander WE, Luna Pinzon A, Verhoeff A, Den Hertog K, Altenburg T, Dijkstra C, et al. A system dynamics and participatory action research approach to promote healthy living and a healthy weight among 10–14-year-old adolescents in Amsterdam: the LIKE programme. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(14):4928.

Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis. J Posit Psychol. 2017;12(3):297–8.

Abma T, Lips S, Schrijver J. Sowing seeds to harvest healthier adults: the working principles and impact of participatory health research with children in a primary school context. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(2):451.

Ansell N, Robson E, Hajdu F, van Blerk L. Learning from young people about their lives: using participatory methods to research the impacts of AIDS in southern Africa. Children’s Geogr. 2012;10(2):169–86.

Haarmans H. 2018-01, editor: Facilitations Academy. 2018.

Jurrius K. Uit de spagaat! Naar een kwaliteitsraamwerk voor Participatief Jongeren Onderzoek. Utrecht University; 2013.

Ozer EJ. Youth-led participatory action research: developmental and equity perspectives. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2016;50:189–207.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Shamrova DP, Cummings CE. Participatory action research (PAR) with children and youth: an integrative review of methodology and PAR outcomes for participants, organizations, and communities. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2017;81:400–12.

Vandael K, Dewaele A, Buysse A, Westerduin S. Guide to co-creation. Ghent: Ghent University & Ministry of Makers; 2018.

Ozer EJ, Ritterman ML, Wanis MG. Participatory action research (PAR) in middle school: opportunities, constraints, and key processes. Am J Community Psychol. 2010;46(1–2):152–66.

Horgan D. Child participatory research methods: attempts to go ‘deeper.’ Childhood. 2016;24:245–59.

Schiller U, Jaffray P, Ridley T, Du Plessis C. Facilitating a participatory action learning action research process in a higher educational context. Action Res. 2021;19(2):301–17.

Blumer H. Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Berkeley: Univ of California Press; 1986.

Dodson L, Piatelli D, Schmalzbauer L. Researching inequality through interpretive collaborations: shifting power and the unspoken contract. Qual Inq. 2007;13(6):821–43.

Wilson N, Dasho S, Martin AC, Wallerstein N, Wang CC, Minkler M. Engaging young adolescents in social action through photovoice: the youth empowerment strategies (YES!) project. J Early Adolesc. 2007;27(2):241–61.

Flicker S, Maley O, Ridgley A, Biscope S, Lombardo C, Skinner HA. e-PAR: using technology and participatory action research to engage youth in health promotion. Action Res. 2008;6(3):285–303.

Anderson AJ. A qualitative systematic review of youth participatory action research implementation in US high schools. Am J Community Psychol. 2020;65(1–2):242–57.

Fox R. Resisting participation: critiquing participatory research methodologies with young people. J Youth Stud. 2013;16(8):986–99.

Schaffer MA. A virtue ethics guide to best practices for community-based participatory research. Progr Community Health Partnersh Res Educ Action. 2009;3(1):83–90.

Malorni A, Lea CH III, Richards-Schuster K, Spencer MS. Facilitating youth participatory action research (YPAR): a scoping review of relational practice in US youth development & out-of-school time projects. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2022;136: 106399.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank all participating children/adolescents, schools and community partners for their effort and contributions to these participatory studies.

This study is part of the Kids in Action study, which was funded by FNO (Grant Number 101569). The Medical Ethics Committee of the VUmc (2016.366) approved the study. The healthy sleep project was funded by the Special Research Fund- Doctoral Scholarship Ghent University (BOF DOC2018003201). The Medical Ethics Committee of the Ghent University approved the study protocol (B670201630466). The LIKE study was supported by a grant from the Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative: An initiative with support of the Dutch Heart Foundation, ZonMw, CVON2016-07 LIKE. The Medical Ethical Committee of the VU University Medical Centre approved the study protocol (2018.234).

Author information

Helga Emke and Ann Vandendriessche share first authorship as they contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Ann Vandendriessche, Benedicte Deforche & Maïté Verloigne

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Helga Emke, Mai Chinapaw, Teatske Altenburg & Manou Anselma

Movement and Nutrition for Health and Performance Research Group, Faculty of Physical Education and Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

Benedicte Deforche

Mulier Instituut, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Manou Anselma

Health Behaviour and Chronic Diseases and Methodology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Helga Emke, Mai Chinapaw & Teatske Altenburg

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

The study was designed by H.E., A.V. and M.A. M.C., B.D., M.V. and T.A. provided support on the design of the paper. The paper was drafted by H.E., A.V. and M.A., with all authors providing feedback to drafts. All authors approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helga Emke .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

A written active informed consent to participate in the participatory process was obtained from at least one of the parents or guardians in all three projects and in the LIKE and Healthy Sleep project also from the co-researchers themselves.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1, additional file 2, additional file 3, rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Emke, H., Vandendriessche, A., Chinapaw, M. et al. Facilitating co-research: lessons learned from reflection forms within three participatory action research projects. Health Res Policy Sys 22 , 117 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01210-x

Download citation

Received : 19 October 2023

Accepted : 03 August 2024

Published : 23 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01210-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Facilitation
• Co-research
• Participatory action research

Health Research Policy and Systems

ISSN: 1478-4505

• Submission enquiries: Access here and click Contact Us
• General enquiries: [email protected]

What Is a Fellowship Agreement?

A fellowship agreement is a legally binding contract that outlines the terms and conditions of a fellowship program, including duration, stipend, benefits, expectations, and responsibilities of both the fellow and the fellowship provider. It clarifies the functions and responsibilities of both parties, including task delegation, performance metrics, and communication protocols. The agreement also covers compensation and benefits, research objectives, intellectual property rights, and dispute resolution procedures. By understanding the intricacies of a fellowship agreement, individuals can certify a smooth and successful collaboration, and gain valuable insights into the complexities of fellowship programs that await further exploration.

Table of Contents

Key Components of a Fellowship Agreement

A fellowship agreement typically comprises several key elements that outline the terms and conditions of the fellowship, including the duration, stipend, benefits, and expectations of the fellow. These critical components are vital to establishing a clear understanding between the fellowship provider and the fellow. The fellowship parameters, including the duration, outline the specific timeframe of the fellowship, while the stipend and benefits clarify the compensation and perks provided to the fellow. Additionally, the agreement nuances, such as the expectations of the fellow, specify the responsibilities and obligations of the fellow during the fellowship period. A thorough agreement guarantees that both parties are aware of their responsibilities and obligations, minimizing potential disputes and facilitating a successful fellowship experience. By outlining these key components, the fellowship agreement provides a foundation for a productive and successful collaboration between the fellowship provider and the fellow, thereby supporting a harmonious and effective partnership.

Benefits for Organizations and Fellows

Fellowship agreements offer numerous benefits to both organizations and fellows, fostering a mutually rewarding experience that extends beyond the fellowship period. One of the primary advantages for fellows is career advancement opportunities. A fellowship agreement provides a platform for individuals to gain valuable skills, knowledge, and experience, thereby enhancing their professional profiles. This, in turn, opens up new avenues for career growth and advancement. Additionally, fellowship agreements offer unparalleled networking opportunities, allowing fellows to connect with experienced professionals, industry leaders, and like-minded individuals. These connections can lead to lasting relationships, collaborations, and future job opportunities.

For organizations, fellowship agreements provide access to fresh perspectives, innovative ideas, and specific skills. Fellows bring new energy and enthusiasm to the organization, contributing to a dynamic and stimulating work environment. Moreover, organizations can leverage the knowledge and proficiency of fellows to drive innovation, improve processes, and achieve strategic objectives. Overall, a well-structured fellowship agreement creates a win-win situation, where both organizations and fellows reap benefits that extend beyond the fellowship period.

Defining Roles and Responsibilities

Clearly outlining positions and responsibilities is vital to a successful fellowship agreement, as it enables both parties to understand their obligations and expectations. This clarity helps to prevent misunderstandings and ensures that both the organization and the fellow are on the same page.

To achieve this, the agreement should explicitly define the roles and responsibilities of both parties, including:

• Task Delegation : Clearly outline the tasks and projects that the fellow will be responsible for, as well as the expectations for task completion and deadlines.
• Performance Metrics : Establish the metrics by which the fellow's performance will be evaluated, ensuring that both parties have a clear understanding of what constitutes success.
• Communication Protocols : Define the communication channels and protocols for regular check-ins, progress updates, and issue escalation, ensuring that both parties are informed and aligned throughout the fellowship.

Duration and Stipend Expectations

The Duration and Stipend Expectations of the fellowship agreement outline the terms of the fellowship period and the associated financial support. This section defines the specific duration of the fellowship, including the start and end dates, as well as the stipend payment schedule. By establishing clear expectations, both the fellow and the sponsoring organization can guarantee a mutually beneficial and productive collaboration.

Stipend Payment Schedule

A stipend payment schedule outlining the duration and stipend expectations is as follows:

This schedule provides a clear understanding of the payment structure and frequency, facilitating that fellows are aware of their financial obligations and entitlements. The stipend payment schedule typically includes the following key elements:

• Monthly stipend amount : A fixed amount paid to the fellow on a monthly basis, which may be subject to tax implications.
• Payment frequency : The schedule outlines the frequency of payments, which may be monthly, bi-monthly, or quarterly, offering payment flexibility to accommodate individual financial needs.
• Duration of stipend payments : The schedule specifies the start and end dates of stipend payments, clarifying that fellows understand the duration of their financial support.

Fellowship Duration Terms

Defining the fellowship duration terms is vital, as it establishes the parameters of the fellowship program, outlining the duration of stipend payments and the fellow's commitment to the program. This pivotal aspect of the fellowship agreement confirms that both the fellow and the funding organization are clear on the program's timeline and expectations.

The award period, typically specified in the fellowship agreement, outlines the fixed timeline for the fellowship program. However, program flexibility is often built into the agreement to accommodate unforeseen circumstances or changes in research objectives. Flexible extensions may be granted in certain cases, allowing the fellow to complete their research objectives or adjust to new circumstances.

A well-defined fellowship duration guarantees that both parties are aware of their commitments and can plan accordingly. It also enables the fellow to concentrate on their research objectives, secure in the knowledge that their stipend payments will continue for the specified duration. By establishing a clear understanding of the fellowship duration terms, the fellowship agreement provides a foundation for a successful and productive research experience.

Research Objectives and Deliverables

Research objectives outline the specific goals and outcomes anticipated from the fellowship, providing a clear understanding of the project's scope and expectations. A well-defined research objective serves as a guiding force, ensuring that the project stays focused and on track. It is essential to establish clear and measurable objectives to facilitate the successful completion of the project.

The following key aspects of research objectives should be considered:

• Project Goals : Clearly define the project's purpose and what it aims to achieve.
• Study Timeline : Establish a realistic timeline for the project, including milestones and deadlines.
• Data Quality : Ensure the collection and analysis of high-quality data that meets the project's requirements.

Intellectual Property Rights and Ownership

During the fellowship, it is crucial to establish clear guidelines regarding intellectual property rights and ownership to prevent potential disputes and facilitate the fair allocation of credit and benefits. A well-defined IP policy guarantees that both the fellow and the sponsoring institution understand their rights and responsibilities regarding research outputs, data, and inventions. This policy should address IP protection, including patent and copyright laws, to safeguard the creative work and innovations generated during the fellowship.

In addition, the agreement should specify the terms of ownership and licensing, including the use of open licenses such as Creative Commons, which can facilitate knowledge sharing and collaboration. By establishing clear guidelines, the fellowship agreement can promote a culture of transparency, trust, and cooperation, allowing the fellow to concentrate on their research objectives without concerns about IP disputes. A thorough IP policy can also facilitate the commercialization of research findings, securing that the benefits of the research are shared fairly among all stakeholders.

Termination and Dispute Resolution

In the event of unforeseen circumstances or disagreements, a well-structured fellowship agreement should outline clear procedures for termination and dispute resolution, safeguarding that the rights and interests of all parties involved are protected. This guarantees that any disputes arising during the fellowship are resolved efficiently and fairly, minimizing the risk of prolonged legal battles.

To achieve this, fellowship agreements often include provisions for:

• Mediation clauses : Requiring parties to engage in mediation to resolve disputes before pursuing litigation .
• Arbitration processes : Establishing a neutral third-party arbitration process to resolve disputes, rather than relying on the court system.
• Termination procedures : Outlining the circumstances under which the fellowship can be terminated, and the procedures for doing so.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a fellowship agreement be used for internships or volunteer work?.

A fellowship agreement can be adapted for internships or volunteer work, offering employer benefits such as talent pipeline development and enhanced brand reputation, while facilitating career development opportunities for participants.

Are Fellowship Agreements Only Used in Academic or Research Settings?

Fellowship agreements are not exclusive to academic or research settings; industry standards often involve corporate sponsors supporting professional development opportunities, demonstrating the agreement's versatility beyond traditional academic and research contexts.

Can a Fellowship Agreement Be Terminated Early by Either Party?

A fellowship agreement can be terminated early by mutual consent or with adequate early notice, as specified in the agreement, allowing either party to exit the arrangement amicably and with minimal disruption.

Are Fellowship Agreements Only Used for Individual Fellows or Teams?

Fellowship agreements can accommodate both individual fellows and teams, fostering collaborative dynamics and group incentives to achieve shared objectives, with flexible terms that adapt to diverse project requirements and participant structures.

Can a Fellowship Agreement Be Used for Projects Outside the Us?

Yes, a fellowship agreement can be used for projects outside the US, facilitating global projects and international collaborations, as its provisions can be adapted to accommodate diverse legal and cultural frameworks.

UNLOCK YOUR COPY

Frequently asked questions

What is a research project.

A research project is an academic, scientific, or professional undertaking to answer a research question . Research projects can take many forms, such as qualitative or quantitative , descriptive , longitudinal , experimental , or correlational . What kind of research approach you choose will depend on your topic.

Frequently asked questions: Writing a research paper

The best way to remember the difference between a research plan and a research proposal is that they have fundamentally different audiences. A research plan helps you, the researcher, organize your thoughts. On the other hand, a dissertation proposal or research proposal aims to convince others (e.g., a supervisor, a funding body, or a dissertation committee) that your research topic is relevant and worthy of being conducted.

Formulating a main research question can be a difficult task. Overall, your question should contribute to solving the problem that you have defined in your problem statement .

However, it should also fulfill criteria in three main areas:

• Researchability
• Feasibility and specificity
• Relevance and originality

Research questions anchor your whole project, so it’s important to spend some time refining them.

In general, they should be:

• Focused and researchable
• Answerable using credible sources
• Complex and arguable
• Feasible and specific
• Relevant and original

All research questions should be:

• Focused on a single problem or issue
• Researchable using primary and/or secondary sources
• Feasible to answer within the timeframe and practical constraints
• Specific enough to answer thoroughly
• Complex enough to develop the answer over the space of a paper or thesis
• Relevant to your field of study and/or society more broadly

A research aim is a broad statement indicating the general purpose of your research project. It should appear in your introduction at the end of your problem statement , before your research objectives.

Research objectives are more specific than your research aim. They indicate the specific ways you’ll address the overarching aim.

Once you’ve decided on your research objectives , you need to explain them in your paper, at the end of your problem statement .

Keep your research objectives clear and concise, and use appropriate verbs to accurately convey the work that you will carry out for each one.

I will compare …

Your research objectives indicate how you’ll try to address your research problem and should be specific:

Research objectives describe what you intend your research project to accomplish.

They summarize the approach and purpose of the project and help to focus your research.

Your objectives should appear in the introduction of your research paper , at the end of your problem statement .

The main guidelines for formatting a paper in Chicago style are to:

• Use a standard font like 12 pt Times New Roman
• Use 1 inch margins or larger
• Apply double line spacing
• Indent every new paragraph ½ inch
• Include a title page
• Place page numbers in the top right or bottom center
• Cite your sources with author-date citations or Chicago footnotes
• Include a bibliography or reference list

To automatically generate accurate Chicago references, you can use Scribbr’s free Chicago reference generator .

The main guidelines for formatting a paper in MLA style are as follows:

• Use an easily readable font like 12 pt Times New Roman
• Set 1 inch page margins
• Include a four-line MLA heading on the first page
• Center the paper’s title
• Use title case capitalization for headings
• Cite your sources with MLA in-text citations
• List all sources cited on a Works Cited page at the end

To format a paper in APA Style , follow these guidelines:

• Use a standard font like 12 pt Times New Roman or 11 pt Arial
• If submitting for publication, insert a running head on every page
• Apply APA heading styles
• Cite your sources with APA in-text citations
• List all sources cited on a reference page at the end

No, it’s not appropriate to present new arguments or evidence in the conclusion . While you might be tempted to save a striking argument for last, research papers follow a more formal structure than this.

All your findings and arguments should be presented in the body of the text (more specifically in the results and discussion sections if you are following a scientific structure). The conclusion is meant to summarize and reflect on the evidence and arguments you have already presented, not introduce new ones.

The conclusion of a research paper has several key elements you should make sure to include:

• A restatement of the research problem
• A summary of your key arguments and/or findings
• A short discussion of the implications of your research

Don’t feel that you have to write the introduction first. The introduction is often one of the last parts of the research paper you’ll write, along with the conclusion.

This is because it can be easier to introduce your paper once you’ve already written the body ; you may not have the clearest idea of your arguments until you’ve written them, and things can change during the writing process .

The way you present your research problem in your introduction varies depending on the nature of your research paper . A research paper that presents a sustained argument will usually encapsulate this argument in a thesis statement .

A research paper designed to present the results of empirical research tends to present a research question that it seeks to answer. It may also include a hypothesis —a prediction that will be confirmed or disproved by your research.

The introduction of a research paper includes several key elements:

• A hook to catch the reader’s interest
• Relevant background on the topic
• Details of your research problem

and your problem statement

• A thesis statement or research question
• Sometimes an overview of the paper

Ask our team

Want to contact us directly? No problem.  We  are always here for you.

• Email [email protected]
• Start live chat
• Call +1 (510) 822-8066
• WhatsApp +31 20 261 6040

Our team helps students graduate by offering:

• A world-class citation generator
• Plagiarism Checker software powered by Turnitin
• Innovative Citation Checker software
• Professional proofreading services
• Over 300 helpful articles about academic writing, citing sources, plagiarism, and more

Scribbr specializes in editing study-related documents . We proofread:

• PhD dissertations
• Research proposals
• Personal statements
• Admission essays
• Motivation letters
• Reflection papers
• Journal articles
• Capstone projects

Scribbr’s Plagiarism Checker is powered by elements of Turnitin’s Similarity Checker , namely the plagiarism detection software and the Internet Archive and Premium Scholarly Publications content databases .

The add-on AI detector is powered by Scribbr’s proprietary software.

The Scribbr Citation Generator is developed using the open-source Citation Style Language (CSL) project and Frank Bennett’s citeproc-js . It’s the same technology used by dozens of other popular citation tools, including Mendeley and Zotero.

You can find all the citation styles and locales used in the Scribbr Citation Generator in our publicly accessible repository on Github .