![sample action research papers for teachers helpful professor logo](https://helpfulprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo-new-font-323x42.png)
![](http://sektorel.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
21 Action Research Examples (In Education)
![sample action research papers for teachers 21 Action Research Examples (In Education)](https://helpfulprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Dave.jpg)
Dave Cornell (PhD)
Dr. Cornell has worked in education for more than 20 years. His work has involved designing teacher certification for Trinity College in London and in-service training for state governments in the United States. He has trained kindergarten teachers in 8 countries and helped businessmen and women open baby centers and kindergartens in 3 countries.
Learn about our Editorial Process
![sample action research papers for teachers 21 Action Research Examples (In Education)](https://helpfulprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Chris-200px.jpg)
Chris Drew (PhD)
This article was peer-reviewed and edited by Chris Drew (PhD). The review process on Helpful Professor involves having a PhD level expert fact check, edit, and contribute to articles. Reviewers ensure all content reflects expert academic consensus and is backed up with reference to academic studies. Dr. Drew has published over 20 academic articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education and holds a PhD in Education from ACU.
![sample action research papers for teachers sample action research papers for teachers](https://helpfulprofessor.com/wp-content/plugins/helpfulprofessor-functions/img/certified-check.png)
Action research is an example of qualitative research . It refers to a wide range of evaluative or investigative methods designed to analyze professional practices and take action for improvement.
Commonly used in education, those practices could be related to instructional methods, classroom practices, or school organizational matters.
The creation of action research is attributed to Kurt Lewin , a German-American psychologist also considered to be the father of social psychology.
Gillis and Jackson (2002) offer a very concise definition of action research: “systematic collection and analysis of data for the purpose of taking action and making change” (p.264).
The methods of action research in education include:
- conducting in-class observations
- taking field notes
- surveying or interviewing teachers, administrators, or parents
- using audio and video recordings.
The goal is to identify problematic issues, test possible solutions, or simply carry-out continuous improvement.
There are several steps in action research : identify a problem, design a plan to resolve, implement the plan, evaluate effectiveness, reflect on results, make necessary adjustment and repeat the process.
Action Research Examples
- Digital literacy assessment and training: The school’s IT department conducts a survey on students’ digital literacy skills. Based on the results, a tailored training program is designed for different age groups.
- Library resources utilization study: The school librarian tracks the frequency and type of books checked out by students. The data is then used to curate a more relevant collection and organize reading programs.
- Extracurricular activities and student well-being: A team of teachers and counselors assess the impact of extracurricular activities on student mental health through surveys and interviews. Adjustments are made based on findings.
- Parent-teacher communication channels: The school evaluates the effectiveness of current communication tools (e.g., newsletters, apps) between teachers and parents. Feedback is used to implement a more streamlined system.
- Homework load evaluation: Teachers across grade levels assess the amount and effectiveness of homework given. Adjustments are made to ensure a balance between academic rigor and student well-being.
- Classroom environment and learning: A group of teachers collaborates to study the impact of classroom layouts and decorations on student engagement and comprehension. Changes are made based on the findings.
- Student feedback on curriculum content: High school students are surveyed about the relevance and applicability of their current curriculum. The feedback is then used to make necessary curriculum adjustments.
- Teacher mentoring and support: New teachers are paired with experienced mentors. Both parties provide feedback on the effectiveness of the mentoring program, leading to continuous improvements.
- Assessment of school transportation: The school board evaluates the efficiency and safety of school buses through surveys with students and parents. Necessary changes are implemented based on the results.
- Cultural sensitivity training: After conducting a survey on students’ cultural backgrounds and experiences, the school organizes workshops for teachers to promote a more inclusive classroom environment.
- Environmental initiatives and student involvement: The school’s eco-club assesses the school’s carbon footprint and waste management. They then collaborate with the administration to implement greener practices and raise environmental awareness.
- Working with parents through research: A school’s admin staff conduct focus group sessions with parents to identify top concerns.Those concerns will then be addressed and another session conducted at the end of the school year.
- Peer teaching observations and improvements: Kindergarten teachers observe other teachers handling class transition techniques to share best practices.
- PTA surveys and resultant action: The PTA of a district conducts a survey of members regarding their satisfaction with remote learning classes.The results will be presented to the school board for further action.
- Recording and reflecting: A school administrator takes video recordings of playground behavior and then plays them for the teachers. The teachers work together to formulate a list of 10 playground safety guidelines.
- Pre/post testing of interventions: A school board conducts a district wide evaluation of a STEM program by conducting a pre/post-test of students’ skills in computer programming.
- Focus groups of practitioners : The professional development needs of teachers are determined from structured focus group sessions with teachers and admin.
- School lunch research and intervention: A nutrition expert is hired to evaluate and improve the quality of school lunches.
- School nurse systematic checklist and improvements: The school nurse implements a bathroom cleaning checklist to monitor cleanliness after the results of a recent teacher survey revealed several issues.
- Wearable technologies for pedagogical improvements; Students wear accelerometers attached to their hips to gain a baseline measure of physical activity.The results will identify if any issues exist.
- School counselor reflective practice : The school counselor conducts a student survey on antisocial behavior and then plans a series of workshops for both teachers and parents.
Detailed Examples
1. cooperation and leadership.
A science teacher has noticed that her 9 th grade students do not cooperate with each other when doing group projects. There is a lot of arguing and battles over whose ideas will be followed.
So, she decides to implement a simple action research project on the matter. First, she conducts a structured observation of the students’ behavior during meetings. She also has the students respond to a short questionnaire regarding their notions of leadership.
She then designs a two-week course on group dynamics and leadership styles. The course involves learning about leadership concepts and practices . In another element of the short course, students randomly select a leadership style and then engage in a role-play with other students.
At the end of the two weeks, she has the students work on a group project and conducts the same structured observation as before. She also gives the students a slightly different questionnaire on leadership as it relates to the group.
She plans to analyze the results and present the findings at a teachers’ meeting at the end of the term.
2. Professional Development Needs
Two high-school teachers have been selected to participate in a 1-year project in a third-world country. The project goal is to improve the classroom effectiveness of local teachers.
The two teachers arrive in the country and begin to plan their action research. First, they decide to conduct a survey of teachers in the nearby communities of the school they are assigned to.
The survey will assess their professional development needs by directly asking the teachers and administrators. After collecting the surveys, they analyze the results by grouping the teachers based on subject matter.
They discover that history and social science teachers would like professional development on integrating smartboards into classroom instruction. Math teachers would like to attend workshops on project-based learning, while chemistry teachers feel that they need equipment more than training.
The two teachers then get started on finding the necessary training experts for the workshops and applying for equipment grants for the science teachers.
3. Playground Accidents
The school nurse has noticed a lot of students coming in after having mild accidents on the playground. She’s not sure if this is just her perception or if there really is an unusual increase this year. So, she starts pulling data from the records over the last two years. She chooses the months carefully and only selects data from the first three months of each school year.
She creates a chart to make the data more easily understood. Sure enough, there seems to have been a dramatic increase in accidents this year compared to the same period of time from the previous two years.
She shows the data to the principal and teachers at the next meeting. They all agree that a field observation of the playground is needed.
Those observations reveal that the kids are not having accidents on the playground equipment as originally suspected. It turns out that the kids are tripping on the new sod that was installed over the summer.
They examine the sod and observe small gaps between the slabs. Each gap is approximately 1.5 inches wide and nearly two inches deep. The kids are tripping on this gap as they run.
They then discuss possible solutions.
4. Differentiated Learning
Trying to use the same content, methods, and processes for all students is a recipe for failure. This is why modifying each lesson to be flexible is highly recommended. Differentiated learning allows the teacher to adjust their teaching strategy based on all the different personalities and learning styles they see in their classroom.
Of course, differentiated learning should undergo the same rigorous assessment that all teaching techniques go through. So, a third-grade social science teacher asks his students to take a simple quiz on the industrial revolution. Then, he applies differentiated learning to the lesson.
By creating several different learning stations in his classroom, he gives his students a chance to learn about the industrial revolution in a way that captures their interests. The different stations contain: short videos, fact cards, PowerPoints, mini-chapters, and role-plays.
At the end of the lesson, students get to choose how they demonstrate their knowledge. They can take a test, construct a PPT, give an oral presentation, or conduct a simulated TV interview with different characters.
During this last phase of the lesson, the teacher is able to assess if they demonstrate the necessary knowledge and have achieved the defined learning outcomes. This analysis will allow him to make further adjustments to future lessons.
5. Healthy Habits Program
While looking at obesity rates of students, the school board of a large city is shocked by the dramatic increase in the weight of their students over the last five years. After consulting with three companies that specialize in student physical health, they offer the companies an opportunity to prove their value.
So, the board randomly assigns each company to a group of schools. Starting in the next academic year, each company will implement their healthy habits program in 5 middle schools.
Preliminary data is collected at each school at the beginning of the school year. Each and every student is weighed, their resting heart rate, blood pressure and cholesterol are also measured.
After analyzing the data, it is found that the schools assigned to each of the three companies are relatively similar on all of these measures.
At the end of the year, data for students at each school will be collected again. A simple comparison of pre- and post-program measurements will be conducted. The company with the best outcomes will be selected to implement their program city-wide.
Action research is a great way to collect data on a specific issue, implement a change, and then evaluate the effects of that change. It is perhaps the most practical of all types of primary research .
Most likely, the results will be mixed. Some aspects of the change were effective, while other elements were not. That’s okay. This just means that additional modifications to the change plan need to be made, which is usually quite easy to do.
There are many methods that can be utilized, such as surveys, field observations , and program evaluations.
The beauty of action research is based in its utility and flexibility. Just about anyone in a school setting is capable of conducting action research and the information can be incredibly useful.
Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom: Building cooperation in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Gillis, A., & Jackson, W. (2002). Research Methods for Nurses: Methods and Interpretation . Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of SocialIssues, 2 (4), 34-46.
Macdonald, C. (2012). Understanding participatory action research: A qualitative research methodology option. Canadian Journal of Action Research, 13 , 34-50. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v13i2.37 Mertler, C. A. (2008). Action Research: Teachers as Researchers in the Classroom . London: Sage.
![sample action research papers for teachers Dave](https://helpfulprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Dave-150x150.jpg)
- Dave Cornell (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/dave-cornell-phd/ 23 Achieved Status Examples
- Dave Cornell (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/dave-cornell-phd/ 25 Defense Mechanisms Examples
- Dave Cornell (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/dave-cornell-phd/ 15 Theory of Planned Behavior Examples
- Dave Cornell (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/dave-cornell-phd/ 18 Adaptive Behavior Examples
![sample action research papers for teachers Chris](https://helpfulprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Chris-200px-150x150.jpg)
- Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 23 Achieved Status Examples
- Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 15 Ableism Examples
- Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 25 Defense Mechanisms Examples
- Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 15 Theory of Planned Behavior Examples
2 thoughts on “21 Action Research Examples (In Education)”
Where can I capture this article in a better user-friendly format, since I would like to provide it to my students in a Qualitative Methods course at the University of Prince Edward Island? It is a good article, however, it is visually disjointed in its current format. Thanks, Dr. Frank T. Lavandier
![sample action research papers for teachers ' src=](https://helpfulprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Chris-200px.jpg)
Hi Dr. Lavandier,
I’ve emailed you a word doc copy that you can use and edit with your class.
Best, Chris.
Leave a Comment Cancel Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
![sample action research papers for teachers Logo for New Prairie Press Open Book Publishing](https://kstatelibraries.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/2019/08/cropped-CADS-logo.jpg)
Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.
1 What is Action Research for Classroom Teachers?
ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS
- What is the nature of action research?
- How does action research develop in the classroom?
- What models of action research work best for your classroom?
- What are the epistemological, ontological, theoretical underpinnings of action research?
Educational research provides a vast landscape of knowledge on topics related to teaching and learning, curriculum and assessment, students’ cognitive and affective needs, cultural and socio-economic factors of schools, and many other factors considered viable to improving schools. Educational stakeholders rely on research to make informed decisions that ultimately affect the quality of schooling for their students. Accordingly, the purpose of educational research is to engage in disciplined inquiry to generate knowledge on topics significant to the students, teachers, administrators, schools, and other educational stakeholders. Just as the topics of educational research vary, so do the approaches to conducting educational research in the classroom. Your approach to research will be shaped by your context, your professional identity, and paradigm (set of beliefs and assumptions that guide your inquiry). These will all be key factors in how you generate knowledge related to your work as an educator.
Action research is an approach to educational research that is commonly used by educational practitioners and professionals to examine, and ultimately improve, their pedagogy and practice. In this way, action research represents an extension of the reflection and critical self-reflection that an educator employs on a daily basis in their classroom. When students are actively engaged in learning, the classroom can be dynamic and uncertain, demanding the constant attention of the educator. Considering these demands, educators are often only able to engage in reflection that is fleeting, and for the purpose of accommodation, modification, or formative assessment. Action research offers one path to more deliberate, substantial, and critical reflection that can be documented and analyzed to improve an educator’s practice.
Purpose of Action Research
As one of many approaches to educational research, it is important to distinguish the potential purposes of action research in the classroom. This book focuses on action research as a method to enable and support educators in pursuing effective pedagogical practices by transforming the quality of teaching decisions and actions, to subsequently enhance student engagement and learning. Being mindful of this purpose, the following aspects of action research are important to consider as you contemplate and engage with action research methodology in your classroom:
- Action research is a process for improving educational practice. Its methods involve action, evaluation, and reflection. It is a process to gather evidence to implement change in practices.
- Action research is participative and collaborative. It is undertaken by individuals with a common purpose.
- Action research is situation and context-based.
- Action research develops reflection practices based on the interpretations made by participants.
- Knowledge is created through action and application.
- Action research can be based in problem-solving, if the solution to the problem results in the improvement of practice.
- Action research is iterative; plans are created, implemented, revised, then implemented, lending itself to an ongoing process of reflection and revision.
- In action research, findings emerge as action develops and takes place; however, they are not conclusive or absolute, but ongoing (Koshy, 2010, pgs. 1-2).
In thinking about the purpose of action research, it is helpful to situate action research as a distinct paradigm of educational research. I like to think about action research as part of the larger concept of living knowledge. Living knowledge has been characterized as “a quest for life, to understand life and to create… knowledge which is valid for the people with whom I work and for myself” (Swantz, in Reason & Bradbury, 2001, pg. 1). Why should educators care about living knowledge as part of educational research? As mentioned above, action research is meant “to produce practical knowledge that is useful to people in the everyday conduct of their lives and to see that action research is about working towards practical outcomes” (Koshy, 2010, pg. 2). However, it is also about:
creating new forms of understanding, since action without reflection and understanding is blind, just as theory without action is meaningless. The participatory nature of action research makes it only possible with, for and by persons and communities, ideally involving all stakeholders both in the questioning and sense making that informs the research, and in the action, which is its focus. (Reason & Bradbury, 2001, pg. 2)
In an effort to further situate action research as living knowledge, Jean McNiff reminds us that “there is no such ‘thing’ as ‘action research’” (2013, pg. 24). In other words, action research is not static or finished, it defines itself as it proceeds. McNiff’s reminder characterizes action research as action-oriented, and a process that individuals go through to make their learning public to explain how it informs their practice. Action research does not derive its meaning from an abstract idea, or a self-contained discovery – action research’s meaning stems from the way educators negotiate the problems and successes of living and working in the classroom, school, and community.
While we can debate the idea of action research, there are people who are action researchers, and they use the idea of action research to develop principles and theories to guide their practice. Action research, then, refers to an organization of principles that guide action researchers as they act on shared beliefs, commitments, and expectations in their inquiry.
Reflection and the Process of Action Research
When an individual engages in reflection on their actions or experiences, it is typically for the purpose of better understanding those experiences, or the consequences of those actions to improve related action and experiences in the future. Reflection in this way develops knowledge around these actions and experiences to help us better regulate those actions in the future. The reflective process generates new knowledge regularly for classroom teachers and informs their classroom actions.
Unfortunately, the knowledge generated by educators through the reflective process is not always prioritized among the other sources of knowledge educators are expected to utilize in the classroom. Educators are expected to draw upon formal types of knowledge, such as textbooks, content standards, teaching standards, district curriculum and behavioral programs, etc., to gain new knowledge and make decisions in the classroom. While these forms of knowledge are important, the reflective knowledge that educators generate through their pedagogy is the amalgamation of these types of knowledge enacted in the classroom. Therefore, reflective knowledge is uniquely developed based on the action and implementation of an educator’s pedagogy in the classroom. Action research offers a way to formalize the knowledge generated by educators so that it can be utilized and disseminated throughout the teaching profession.
Research is concerned with the generation of knowledge, and typically creating knowledge related to a concept, idea, phenomenon, or topic. Action research generates knowledge around inquiry in practical educational contexts. Action research allows educators to learn through their actions with the purpose of developing personally or professionally. Due to its participatory nature, the process of action research is also distinct in educational research. There are many models for how the action research process takes shape. I will share a few of those here. Each model utilizes the following processes to some extent:
- Plan a change;
- Take action to enact the change;
- Observe the process and consequences of the change;
- Reflect on the process and consequences;
- Act, observe, & reflect again and so on.
![sample action research papers for teachers The basic process of Action Research is as follows: Plan a change; Take action to enact the change; Observe the process and consequences of the change; Reflect on the process and consequences; Act, observe, & reflect again and so on.](https://kstatelibraries.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/sites/15/2019/08/image-1-300x174.png)
Figure 1.1 Basic action research cycle
There are many other models that supplement the basic process of action research with other aspects of the research process to consider. For example, figure 1.2 illustrates a spiral model of action research proposed by Kemmis and McTaggart (2004). The spiral model emphasizes the cyclical process that moves beyond the initial plan for change. The spiral model also emphasizes revisiting the initial plan and revising based on the initial cycle of research:
![sample action research papers for teachers Kemmis and McTaggart (2004) offer a slightly different process for action research: Plan; Act & Observe; Reflect; Revised Plan; Act & Observe; Reflect.](https://kstatelibraries.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/sites/15/2019/08/McKemmis-Taggart-300x161.png)
Figure 1.2 Interpretation of action research spiral, Kemmis and McTaggart (2004, p. 595)
Other models of action research reorganize the process to emphasize the distinct ways knowledge takes shape in the reflection process. O’Leary’s (2004, p. 141) model, for example, recognizes that the research may take shape in the classroom as knowledge emerges from the teacher’s observations. O’Leary highlights the need for action research to be focused on situational understanding and implementation of action, initiated organically from real-time issues:
![sample action research papers for teachers O'Leary (2004) offers another version of the action research process that focuses the cyclical nature of action research, with three cycles shown: Observe; Reflect; Plan; Act; And Repeat.](https://kstatelibraries.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/sites/15/2019/08/Oleary-1-265x300.png)
Figure 1.3 Interpretation of O’Leary’s cycles of research, O’Leary (2000, p. 141)
Lastly, Macintyre’s (2000, p. 1) model, offers a different characterization of the action research process. Macintyre emphasizes a messier process of research with the initial reflections and conclusions as the benchmarks for guiding the research process. Macintyre emphasizes the flexibility in planning, acting, and observing stages to allow the process to be naturalistic. Our interpretation of Macintyre process is below:
![sample action research papers for teachers Macintyre (2000) offers a much more complex process of action research that highlights multiple processes happening at the same time. It starts with: Reflection and analysis of current practice and general idea of research topic and context. Second: Narrowing down the topic, planning the action; and scanning the literature, discussing with colleagues. Third: Refined topic – selection of key texts, formulation of research question/hypothesis, organization of refined action plan in context; and tentative action plan, consideration of different research strategies. Fourth: Evaluation of entire process; and take action, monitor effects – evaluation of strategy and research question/hypothesis and final amendments. Lastly: Conclusions, claims, explanations. Recommendations for further research.](https://kstatelibraries.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/sites/15/2019/08/MacIntyre-300x258.png)
Figure 1.4 Interpretation of the action research cycle, Macintyre (2000, p. 1)
We believe it is important to prioritize the flexibility of the process, and encourage you to only use these models as basic guides for your process. Your process may look similar, or you may diverge from these models as you better understand your students, context, and data.
Definitions of Action Research and Examples
At this point, it may be helpful for readers to have a working definition of action research and some examples to illustrate the methodology in the classroom. Bassey (1998, p. 93) offers a very practical definition and describes “action research as an inquiry which is carried out in order to understand, to evaluate and then to change, in order to improve educational practice.” Cohen and Manion (1994, p. 192) situate action research differently, and describe action research as emergent, writing:
essentially an on-the-spot procedure designed to deal with a concrete problem located in an immediate situation. This means that ideally, the step-by-step process is constantly monitored over varying periods of time and by a variety of mechanisms (questionnaires, diaries, interviews and case studies, for example) so that the ensuing feedback may be translated into modifications, adjustment, directional changes, redefinitions, as necessary, so as to bring about lasting benefit to the ongoing process itself rather than to some future occasion.
Lastly, Koshy (2010, p. 9) describes action research as:
a constructive inquiry, during which the researcher constructs his or her knowledge of specific issues through planning, acting, evaluating, refining and learning from the experience. It is a continuous learning process in which the researcher learns and also shares the newly generated knowledge with those who may benefit from it.
These definitions highlight the distinct features of action research and emphasize the purposeful intent of action researchers to improve, refine, reform, and problem-solve issues in their educational context. To better understand the distinctness of action research, these are some examples of action research topics:
Examples of Action Research Topics
- Flexible seating in 4th grade classroom to increase effective collaborative learning.
- Structured homework protocols for increasing student achievement.
- Developing a system of formative feedback for 8th grade writing.
- Using music to stimulate creative writing.
- Weekly brown bag lunch sessions to improve responses to PD from staff.
- Using exercise balls as chairs for better classroom management.
Action Research in Theory
Action research-based inquiry in educational contexts and classrooms involves distinct participants – students, teachers, and other educational stakeholders within the system. All of these participants are engaged in activities to benefit the students, and subsequently society as a whole. Action research contributes to these activities and potentially enhances the participants’ roles in the education system. Participants’ roles are enhanced based on two underlying principles:
- communities, schools, and classrooms are sites of socially mediated actions, and action research provides a greater understanding of self and new knowledge of how to negotiate these socially mediated environments;
- communities, schools, and classrooms are part of social systems in which humans interact with many cultural tools, and action research provides a basis to construct and analyze these interactions.
In our quest for knowledge and understanding, we have consistently analyzed human experience over time and have distinguished between types of reality. Humans have constantly sought “facts” and “truth” about reality that can be empirically demonstrated or observed.
Social systems are based on beliefs, and generally, beliefs about what will benefit the greatest amount of people in that society. Beliefs, and more specifically the rationale or support for beliefs, are not always easy to demonstrate or observe as part of our reality. Take the example of an English Language Arts teacher who prioritizes argumentative writing in her class. She believes that argumentative writing demonstrates the mechanics of writing best among types of writing, while also providing students a skill they will need as citizens and professionals. While we can observe the students writing, and we can assess their ability to develop a written argument, it is difficult to observe the students’ understanding of argumentative writing and its purpose in their future. This relates to the teacher’s beliefs about argumentative writing; we cannot observe the real value of the teaching of argumentative writing. The teacher’s rationale and beliefs about teaching argumentative writing are bound to the social system and the skills their students will need to be active parts of that system. Therefore, our goal through action research is to demonstrate the best ways to teach argumentative writing to help all participants understand its value as part of a social system.
The knowledge that is conveyed in a classroom is bound to, and justified by, a social system. A postmodernist approach to understanding our world seeks knowledge within a social system, which is directly opposed to the empirical or positivist approach which demands evidence based on logic or science as rationale for beliefs. Action research does not rely on a positivist viewpoint to develop evidence and conclusions as part of the research process. Action research offers a postmodernist stance to epistemology (theory of knowledge) and supports developing questions and new inquiries during the research process. In this way action research is an emergent process that allows beliefs and decisions to be negotiated as reality and meaning are being constructed in the socially mediated space of the classroom.
Theorizing Action Research for the Classroom
All research, at its core, is for the purpose of generating new knowledge and contributing to the knowledge base of educational research. Action researchers in the classroom want to explore methods of improving their pedagogy and practice. The starting place of their inquiry stems from their pedagogy and practice, so by nature the knowledge created from their inquiry is often contextually specific to their classroom, school, or community. Therefore, we should examine the theoretical underpinnings of action research for the classroom. It is important to connect action research conceptually to experience; for example, Levin and Greenwood (2001, p. 105) make these connections:
- Action research is context bound and addresses real life problems.
- Action research is inquiry where participants and researchers cogenerate knowledge through collaborative communicative processes in which all participants’ contributions are taken seriously.
- The meanings constructed in the inquiry process lead to social action or these reflections and action lead to the construction of new meanings.
- The credibility/validity of action research knowledge is measured according to whether the actions that arise from it solve problems (workability) and increase participants’ control over their own situation.
Educators who engage in action research will generate new knowledge and beliefs based on their experiences in the classroom. Let us emphasize that these are all important to you and your work, as both an educator and researcher. It is these experiences, beliefs, and theories that are often discounted when more official forms of knowledge (e.g., textbooks, curriculum standards, districts standards) are prioritized. These beliefs and theories based on experiences should be valued and explored further, and this is one of the primary purposes of action research in the classroom. These beliefs and theories should be valued because they were meaningful aspects of knowledge constructed from teachers’ experiences. Developing meaning and knowledge in this way forms the basis of constructivist ideology, just as teachers often try to get their students to construct their own meanings and understandings when experiencing new ideas.
Classroom Teachers Constructing their Own Knowledge
Most of you are probably at least minimally familiar with constructivism, or the process of constructing knowledge. However, what is constructivism precisely, for the purposes of action research? Many scholars have theorized constructivism and have identified two key attributes (Koshy, 2010; von Glasersfeld, 1987):
- Knowledge is not passively received, but actively developed through an individual’s cognition;
- Human cognition is adaptive and finds purpose in organizing the new experiences of the world, instead of settling for absolute or objective truth.
Considering these two attributes, constructivism is distinct from conventional knowledge formation because people can develop a theory of knowledge that orders and organizes the world based on their experiences, instead of an objective or neutral reality. When individuals construct knowledge, there are interactions between an individual and their environment where communication, negotiation and meaning-making are collectively developing knowledge. For most educators, constructivism may be a natural inclination of their pedagogy. Action researchers have a similar relationship to constructivism because they are actively engaged in a process of constructing knowledge. However, their constructions may be more formal and based on the data they collect in the research process. Action researchers also are engaged in the meaning making process, making interpretations from their data. These aspects of the action research process situate them in the constructivist ideology. Just like constructivist educators, action researchers’ constructions of knowledge will be affected by their individual and professional ideas and values, as well as the ecological context in which they work (Biesta & Tedder, 2006). The relations between constructivist inquiry and action research is important, as Lincoln (2001, p. 130) states:
much of the epistemological, ontological, and axiological belief systems are the same or similar, and methodologically, constructivists and action researchers work in similar ways, relying on qualitative methods in face-to-face work, while buttressing information, data and background with quantitative method work when necessary or useful.
While there are many links between action research and educators in the classroom, constructivism offers the most familiar and practical threads to bind the beliefs of educators and action researchers.
Epistemology, Ontology, and Action Research
It is also important for educators to consider the philosophical stances related to action research to better situate it with their beliefs and reality. When researchers make decisions about the methodology they intend to use, they will consider their ontological and epistemological stances. It is vital that researchers clearly distinguish their philosophical stances and understand the implications of their stance in the research process, especially when collecting and analyzing their data. In what follows, we will discuss ontological and epistemological stances in relation to action research methodology.
Ontology, or the theory of being, is concerned with the claims or assumptions we make about ourselves within our social reality – what do we think exists, what does it look like, what entities are involved and how do these entities interact with each other (Blaikie, 2007). In relation to the discussion of constructivism, generally action researchers would consider their educational reality as socially constructed. Social construction of reality happens when individuals interact in a social system. Meaningful construction of concepts and representations of reality develop through an individual’s interpretations of others’ actions. These interpretations become agreed upon by members of a social system and become part of social fabric, reproduced as knowledge and beliefs to develop assumptions about reality. Researchers develop meaningful constructions based on their experiences and through communication. Educators as action researchers will be examining the socially constructed reality of schools. In the United States, many of our concepts, knowledge, and beliefs about schooling have been socially constructed over the last hundred years. For example, a group of teachers may look at why fewer female students enroll in upper-level science courses at their school. This question deals directly with the social construction of gender and specifically what careers females have been conditioned to pursue. We know this is a social construction in some school social systems because in other parts of the world, or even the United States, there are schools that have more females enrolled in upper level science courses than male students. Therefore, the educators conducting the research have to recognize the socially constructed reality of their school and consider this reality throughout the research process. Action researchers will use methods of data collection that support their ontological stance and clarify their theoretical stance throughout the research process.
Koshy (2010, p. 23-24) offers another example of addressing the ontological challenges in the classroom:
A teacher who was concerned with increasing her pupils’ motivation and enthusiasm for learning decided to introduce learning diaries which the children could take home. They were invited to record their reactions to the day’s lessons and what they had learnt. The teacher reported in her field diary that the learning diaries stimulated the children’s interest in her lessons, increased their capacity to learn, and generally improved their level of participation in lessons. The challenge for the teacher here is in the analysis and interpretation of the multiplicity of factors accompanying the use of diaries. The diaries were taken home so the entries may have been influenced by discussions with parents. Another possibility is that children felt the need to please their teacher. Another possible influence was that their increased motivation was as a result of the difference in style of teaching which included more discussions in the classroom based on the entries in the dairies.
Here you can see the challenge for the action researcher is working in a social context with multiple factors, values, and experiences that were outside of the teacher’s control. The teacher was only responsible for introducing the diaries as a new style of learning. The students’ engagement and interactions with this new style of learning were all based upon their socially constructed notions of learning inside and outside of the classroom. A researcher with a positivist ontological stance would not consider these factors, and instead might simply conclude that the dairies increased motivation and interest in the topic, as a result of introducing the diaries as a learning strategy.
Epistemology, or the theory of knowledge, signifies a philosophical view of what counts as knowledge – it justifies what is possible to be known and what criteria distinguishes knowledge from beliefs (Blaikie, 1993). Positivist researchers, for example, consider knowledge to be certain and discovered through scientific processes. Action researchers collect data that is more subjective and examine personal experience, insights, and beliefs.
Action researchers utilize interpretation as a means for knowledge creation. Action researchers have many epistemologies to choose from as means of situating the types of knowledge they will generate by interpreting the data from their research. For example, Koro-Ljungberg et al., (2009) identified several common epistemologies in their article that examined epistemological awareness in qualitative educational research, such as: objectivism, subjectivism, constructionism, contextualism, social epistemology, feminist epistemology, idealism, naturalized epistemology, externalism, relativism, skepticism, and pluralism. All of these epistemological stances have implications for the research process, especially data collection and analysis. Please see the table on pages 689-90, linked below for a sketch of these potential implications:
Again, Koshy (2010, p. 24) provides an excellent example to illustrate the epistemological challenges within action research:
A teacher of 11-year-old children decided to carry out an action research project which involved a change in style in teaching mathematics. Instead of giving children mathematical tasks displaying the subject as abstract principles, she made links with other subjects which she believed would encourage children to see mathematics as a discipline that could improve their understanding of the environment and historic events. At the conclusion of the project, the teacher reported that applicable mathematics generated greater enthusiasm and understanding of the subject.
The educator/researcher engaged in action research-based inquiry to improve an aspect of her pedagogy. She generated knowledge that indicated she had improved her students’ understanding of mathematics by integrating it with other subjects – specifically in the social and ecological context of her classroom, school, and community. She valued constructivism and students generating their own understanding of mathematics based on related topics in other subjects. Action researchers working in a social context do not generate certain knowledge, but knowledge that emerges and can be observed and researched again, building upon their knowledge each time.
Researcher Positionality in Action Research
In this first chapter, we have discussed a lot about the role of experiences in sparking the research process in the classroom. Your experiences as an educator will shape how you approach action research in your classroom. Your experiences as a person in general will also shape how you create knowledge from your research process. In particular, your experiences will shape how you make meaning from your findings. It is important to be clear about your experiences when developing your methodology too. This is referred to as researcher positionality. Maher and Tetreault (1993, p. 118) define positionality as:
Gender, race, class, and other aspects of our identities are markers of relational positions rather than essential qualities. Knowledge is valid when it includes an acknowledgment of the knower’s specific position in any context, because changing contextual and relational factors are crucial for defining identities and our knowledge in any given situation.
By presenting your positionality in the research process, you are signifying the type of socially constructed, and other types of, knowledge you will be using to make sense of the data. As Maher and Tetreault explain, this increases the trustworthiness of your conclusions about the data. This would not be possible with a positivist ontology. We will discuss positionality more in chapter 6, but we wanted to connect it to the overall theoretical underpinnings of action research.
Advantages of Engaging in Action Research in the Classroom
In the following chapters, we will discuss how action research takes shape in your classroom, and we wanted to briefly summarize the key advantages to action research methodology over other types of research methodology. As Koshy (2010, p. 25) notes, action research provides useful methodology for school and classroom research because:
Advantages of Action Research for the Classroom
- research can be set within a specific context or situation;
- researchers can be participants – they don’t have to be distant and detached from the situation;
- it involves continuous evaluation and modifications can be made easily as the project progresses;
- there are opportunities for theory to emerge from the research rather than always follow a previously formulated theory;
- the study can lead to open-ended outcomes;
- through action research, a researcher can bring a story to life.
Action Research Copyright © by J. Spencer Clark; Suzanne Porath; Julie Thiele; and Morgan Jobe is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.
Share This Book
Open access
- Published: 09 May 2018
The Potential of Teacher-Led Research: Teachers’ Action Research Collaborations in Science Education in Singapore
- Gavin W. Fulmer 1 ,
- Hye-Eun Chu 2 &
- Sonya N. Martin 3
Asia-Pacific Science Education volume 4 , Article number: 7 ( 2018 ) Cite this article
5356 Accesses
2 Citations
4 Altmetric
Metrics details
This special issue presents action research projects that serve as examples of research collaborations among teachers and university faculty that are practically significant to both schools and teachers while also having potential to inform theory and build scholarly knowledge. We see these examples of teacher-led research as highlights of work carried out by science teachers as education researchers in Singapore. Action research has been emphasized in Singapore for over 15 years as a way to promote school-based educational innovations and teachers’ self-development (Hairon, 2006 , 2017 ; Tang, 2000 ). However, to date, teacher-led and school-based research following other research models in East Asian contexts, such as Japanese lesson study and Chinese model lessons, have been more widely recognized. This dearth of published work belies the wide use of varied teacher-led research in Singaporean schools as many studies have been conducted over extended periods of time that encompass a wide range of topics. Unfortunately, relatively little has been published to describe the findings emerging from these action research projects.
The action research papers in this special issue originated from collaboration between school science teachers and university researchers and supervisors. The partnerships were bidirectional, establishing theoretical bases in teachers’ action research goals while helping the researchers have more direct views of research on implementation and teacher experience in real classrooms and school settings. Despite disagreement in the literature about how action research should be implemented (Beaulieu, 2013 ), we see that action research is not only a tool for professional development and lesson improvement, but also could serve as an avenue for engaging teachers in scholarship. Thus, the important idea coming from this set of special issue papers is that action research not only has immense potential help to increase teachers’ sense of reflection about teaching, it can also help teachers to look beyond the immediate classroom to speak to issues involving standards interpretation and implementation, novice teacher induction and retention, and more. Previously, these avenues of research were typically seen as the purview of university researchers or district personnel. Nevertheless, these studies show that teachers themselves have the capacity to develop as reflective practitioners, leaders, and researchers.
In the following introduction to this special issue, we give a brief background of the Singaporean education context and the role of action research in this context, summarize the papers that comprise the special issue, and then review the central theme from these action research reports.
Background on Singapore and its education system
Singapore’s education context is an example of a markedly cosmopolitan intersection of historical structures, cultural influences, and contemporary trends. The system has notable similarities to the UK, owing to its history as a British colony and ongoing membership in the Commonwealth of Nations (Gregory & Clarke, 2003 ). Singaporean students attend primary school for Grades 1–6 and secondary school for Grades 7–10, after which they have different routes depending on their own preferences, prior academic performance, and examination results. Singapore has its own adaptation of the Cambridge General Certificate of Education (GCE): The O-Level (Ordinary Level) that students sit at the end of Grade 10. Depending on their O-level results, Singaporean students may go to junior college for Grades 11–12, which prepares students for the GCE A-Level (Advanced Level) examinations and admission to university; to a polytechnic institute, which yields a three-year diploma suitable for entry-level employment in a variety of applied fields such as IT or nursing; or to a vocational education center, which offers two-year certificates in a skilled trade.
Singapore’s educational context demonstrates cultural influences similar to its Asian neighbors, especially those with Confucian bases. It is an assessment-driven society, influenced by cultural values regarding standardized examination systems similar to other Asian societies (Kennedy, 2007 ). Singapore also has a stated goal for the education system of supporting the national interest and developing a stable nation-state. That means participating in and endorsing the Singaporean meritocratic social model, inculcating values of multiculturalism and nation building, and developing students’ character, citizenship, and leadership (Gopinathan, 2012 ; Gregory & Clarke, 2003 ).
Singapore is also influenced by contemporary trends in education. Accountability pressure is constant, given the high social and economic stakes of standardized assessments for students, parents, teachers, and schools (Ng, 2010 ). The centralized teacher education system, while highly regarded, is also undergoing changes to incorporate new technological tools and to respond to educational models (Tan, 2018 ). At the same time, the Ministry of Education ( 2010 ) has adopted policies that target twenty-first century skills and promote innovation and adaptiveness. That has meant a move to soften the examination pressure, to provide multiple pathways for student advancement and recognition, and to promote alternative assessment practices at the school and classroom levels.
The role of action research in the system
Action research has been promulgated in Singapore by the Ministry of Education since 2000, during the introduction of a teacher collaborative platform called Learning Circles (Hairon, 2017 ), and has continued to be promoted in Singaporean schools at all levels in the past decade (Soh, 2011 ). Promotion of action research has resulted from education policymakers’ recognition of the need for innovations and improvements in the education system so that the Singaporean workforce can meet its future economic needs. Additionally, the Singapore Ministry of Education encourages use of action research as part of its school management and evaluation structures, such as the School Excellence Model and the Enhanced Performance Management System.
Singapore strives to be a leader in educational excellence, with attention to lessons learned from other countries and with extensive efforts at its own innovations. In examining the educational innovations in Singapore’s system, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] , 2014 ) found Singapore’s top five innovations in organizational policy and practice to be: (1) more use of incentives for secondary teachers; (2) more external evaluation of primary and secondary school classrooms; (3) more parental involvement in school projects, programs, and trips; (4) more peer evaluation of teachers in secondary education; and (5) more enrichment education for secondary science students.
These innovations cannot succeed without research—especially action research. While one cannot estimate in isolation the extent to which action research helps Singapore achieve its educational innovations and its relatively high PISA and TIMSS results, it likely plays a meaningful role due to the importance of standardized assessments and school ranking within the Singaporean system. In a context that prioritizes students’ performance, teachers may use action research as a way to incorporate new instructional approaches iteratively while ensuring that student learning outcomes are at least as good as what would be achieved with traditional methods of instruction (Goh & Goh, 2006 ). In this way, action research provides a mechanism for supporting classroom innovation while keeping in mind a consistent learning goal.
Papers in this special issue
Hairon ( 2017 ) presents an overview of action research as it has been adopted and implemented in Singapore. This paper updates and expands on Hairon’s ( 2006 ) paper on action research in this setting, discussing how action research has been officially promoted, but also reviewing some of the challenges that face teachers who enact action research. It discusses some of the presumptions and priorities in action research, compares action research to other approaches common to the system, such as lesson study and professional learning communities, and looks at the skills, expectations, and work culture needs for successful action research.
Fernandez ( 2017 ) conducts a quasi-experiment on students’ learning of thermal physics, comparing an inquiry-based instruction approach in one classroom with traditional instruction in two other classes. The inquiry-based approach helped improve the students’ conceptual understanding and their sense of self-efficacy. The findings demonstrate that inquiry-oriented approaches can be implemented effectively in Singaporean secondary classrooms, with results for both traditional learning outcomes as well as affective ones.
Chua et al. ( 2017 ) report findings from a study of feedback order for chemistry and mathematics secondary students. Previous work on feedback has suggested that score reporting tends to detract from students’ attention to written comments. But to withhold scores would be roundly criticized in the Singaporean context, where parents and students pay great attention to grades and performance. By delaying score reporting until after students have received and responded to written feedback, the authors find that the benefits of descriptive comments can be maintained.
Long and Bae ( 2018 ) report on interviews with beginning primary school teachers where they discuss their conceptions of science inquiry and their challenges in implementing inquiry in their classes. This work differs from conventional views of action research because the teacher focuses on novice teachers’ views and practices as they grapple with the transition to full-time teaching and the use of inquiry-oriented approaches, while dealing with challenges including assessment expectations and lack of resources and planning time.
Teo et al. ( 2017 ) report on a teacher’s experience with participatory action research (PAR) where the teacher and students engaged in cogenerative dialogue (cogen) sessions. The goal of the sessions was to help the teacher transition from a teacher-centered approach to a more student-centered approach using insights from the cogen and with co-teaching by the researcher. The findings serve as a case study in the process of using cogen to transform one’s teaching and show the potential for benefits of cogen in the Singapore context.
Lessons from this special issue
The papers included in this special issue are all built around teachers’ experiences planning, conducting, and reporting on their school-based research projects. The educational level varies from primary school to secondary school. The subject matter also varies widely: physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics, and elementary science. The scope of the research varies from cogenerative dialogue sessions, to classroom units, to interviews with teachers about their experiences across units. This is intentional. An analysis of research presented at a local conference in Singapore revealed that 71 projects were related to action research (Tan et al., 2009 ). Of these, 86% used quantitative methodologies and the remaining 14% used qualitative or mixed methodologies. That more teachers adopted quantitative methods may be explained by the accountability pressures that teachers feel as they must demonstrate the effectiveness of their lessons as stipulated by the Enhanced Performance Management System. The studies in this special issue provide a wide perspective, as they include more qualitative and mixed methods work in addition to quantitative work. The breadth and variability of methodologies allows this set of papers to offer a valuable new perspective of action research in the Singapore context.
The salient emerging theme from these papers is that teachers can serve as knowledgeable partners for research that can contribute directly to the academic debate. The teachers writing these special issue papers are drawing ideas from the academic literature to design and conduct teacher-driven research that touches directly on problems arising in school contexts. Through these partnerships, the papers are then able to draw inferences and communicate directly back to the academic literature. Scholars can read these papers as direct contributions to the body of literature in their respective fields. The pieces can also be seen as highlights of the quality work that teachers can lead with the collaborative support from university partners.
The key lessons from our special issue are that teachers are not simply consumers of research and that action research need not be confined to informing professional development or iterative lesson improvement. Instead, strategic partnerships among teachers and university-based researchers can provide opportunities to find classroom implications from previous literature and to expand the literature based on research that has close ties to teachers’ own experiences. While previous work on action research has often positioned it as a professional development exercise, collaborative work between teachers and researchers can yield findings that can speak back to the academic setting.
We encourage researchers in other settings to build similar connections with teachers that aim to empower them to take the lead in formulating research questions and pursuing promising research alongside faculty members. In this way, we advocate for teachers and their students to be positioned to contribute more equally to the examination of scholarly problems in school settings. We especially hope to see more research like this conducted in the Asia-Pacific region and for the findings of these collaborations to be shared with readers of Asia-Pacific Science Education (APSE). We believe APSE can continue to lead the way in providing a channel for disseminating research that can make a difference in the teaching and learning of science in the region and beyond (for more information, see Martin & Chu, 2015 ).
Beaulieu, R. J. (2013). Action research: Trends and variations. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 14(3), 29–39.
Google Scholar
Chua, H. L., Lee, S. H., & Fulmer, G. W. (2017). Action research on the effect of descriptive and evaluative feedback order on student learning in a specialized mathematics and science secondary school. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 3 (4). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-017-0015-y .
Fernandez, F. B. (2017). Action research in the physics classroom: The impact of authentic, inquiry based learning or instruction on the learning of thermal physics. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 3 (3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-017-0014-z .
Goh, S. H. J. J., & Goh, T. K. (2006). Using inquiry-based instruction for the teaching of electricity in physics. In Celebrating learning through active research: CLEAR symposium 2006 (pp. 279–283). Singapore: North Zone Schools, Ministry of Education.
Gopinathan, S. (2012). Fourth way in action? The evolution of Singapore’s education system. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 11 , 65–70.
Article Google Scholar
Gregory, K., & Clarke, M. (2003). High-stakes assessment in England and Singapore. Theory Into Practice, 42 (1), 66–74.
Hairon, S. (2006). Action research in Singapore education: Constraints and sustainability. Educational Action Research, 14 (4), 513–523.
Hairon, S. (2017). Action research in Singapore: Where are we now? Asia-Pacific Science Education, 3 (5). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-017-0016-x .
Kennedy, K. J. (2007). Barriers to innovative school practice: A socio-cultural framework for understanding assessment practices in Asia. In Paper presented at redesigning pedagogy: Culture . Understanding and: Practice. Singapore.
Long, S. C. J., & Bae, Y. (2018). Action research: First-year primary school science teachers’ conceptions on and enactment of science inquiry in Singapore. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-017-0017-9 .
Martin, S., & Chu, H. E. (2015). Asia-Pacific science education (APSE): Expanding opportunities for publishing science education research. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 1 (3), 1–18 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-015-0006-9 .
Ministry of Education. (2010). Nurturing our young for the future: Competencies for the 21st century . Singapore: Author.
Ng, P. T. (2010). The evolution and nature of school accountability in the Singapore education system. Educational Assessment, Evaluation & Accountability, 22 (4), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-010-9105-z .
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2014). Measuring innovation in education: Singapore country note. Paris: Author. Retrieved 24 MAR 2018 from http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/Measuring-Innovation-in-Education-Singapore.pdf
Soh, K. C. (2011). At the rear mirror and through the wind screen: Teachers becoming teacher-researchers in Singapore schools. New Horizons in Education, 59 (1), 12–24.
Tan, A.-L. (2018). Journey of science teacher education in Singapore: Past, present and future. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-017-0018-8 .
Tan, W. K., Macdonald, D., & Rossi, T. (2009). Educational action research in Singapore: To prove or improve? Asia Pacific journal of education, 29 (3), 357–371.
Tang, N. (2000). Teachers’ network: A new approach in the professional development of teachers. ASCD Review, 9(3), 48–55.
Teo, T. W., bin Badron, M. F., & Tan, A.-L. (2017). Enabling classroom change by infusing cogen and coteaching in participatory action research. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 3 (6). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-017-0019-7 .
Download references
The authors received no funding for this special issue.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Authors’ contribution
All three authors supported the development of the special issue by working with authors and reviewers to prepare high quality research for the journal. All three authors worked to develop the editorial to describe and introduce the research in the special issue. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
College of Education, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
Gavin W. Fulmer
School of Education, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
Hye-Eun Chu
College of Education, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Sonya N. Martin
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Gavin W. Fulmer .
Ethics declarations
Author’s information.
Gavin Fulmer is an Assistant Professor at University of Iowa in Iowa City, USA, and was formerly in the Curriculum, Teaching, & Learning Group at Singapore’s National Institute of Education. His research focuses on development, application, and implications of assessment in science education. Hye-Eun Chu is a Lecturer at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia, and was formerly in the Natural Sciences and Science Education Group at Singapore’s National Institute of Education. Her research focuses on monitoring students’ conceptual development and formative assessment practices in science classrooms. Sonya Martin is an Associate Professor of Science Education at Seoul National University in Korea. For many years, she has conducted classroom-based research with teachers and students using action research methodologies to improve science teaching and learning.
Competing interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article.
Fulmer, G.W., Chu, HE. & Martin, S.N. The Potential of Teacher-Led Research: Teachers’ Action Research Collaborations in Science Education in Singapore. Asia Pac. Sci. Educ. 4 , 7 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-018-0024-5
Download citation
Received : 09 April 2018
Accepted : 16 April 2018
Published : 09 May 2018
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-018-0024-5
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
![sample action research papers for teachers paper cover thumbnail](https://0.academia-photos.com/attachment_thumbnails/35668749/mini_magick20180815-18877-dhcrut.png?1534386714)
Sample Action Research Proposal
![sample action research papers for teachers Profile image of Mharfe Micaroz](https://0.academia-photos.com/10656014/6008074/16912015/s65_mharfe.micaroz.jpg)
An action proposal.
![](http://sektorel.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Related Papers
Andrew Johnson
This chapter excerpt describes the salient elements and basic process of action research.
![sample action research papers for teachers sample action research papers for teachers](https://a.academia-assets.com/images/loswp/related-pdf-icon.png)
Abstract Recent action research books are reviewed. I give attention to books on appreciative inquiry, action science, systems approaches and action learning. Community, health, education and organizational applications are included. Major action research journals are noted.
Margie Comrie
Action Research
In this, the third in a series of two-yearly reviews (see also Dick, 2004, and Dick, 2006), I identify some of the action research literature that has appeared in books and edited collections over approximately the past two years. After an overview of the general action research literature I gather together other relevant literature under the following headings: action learning; community-based participatory research; youth work; educational action research; appreciative inquiry; and action science. I conclude the review with a very brief look at action research journals and special issues, other literature of interest, and an attempt to divine present and emergent trends.
ARIEL MONTECALBO
Action research is a type of research related to one’s professional practice. In the field of education, it can be defined as the process of studying a school, classroom, or teaching-learning situation with the purpose of understanding and improving the quality of actions or instruction. In this sense, it is the ultimate form of teacher reflection. Described in this chapter expert are the basic elements and the steps of action research.
Administrative Science Quarterly
Gerald Susman
Abstract This review of recent action research books covers the period from about mid-2004 to mid-2006, complementing an earlier review (Dick, 2004). After noting some important recent additions to the action research literature, I address the literature on several different applications of action research including education, community, participatory development, and organizations. There are briefer sections on other topics. Action research journals and special issues of other journals are also identified.
Kenneth Zeichner
Irene Lacia
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
RELATED PAPERS
Sandy Whitelaw
Michał Zawadzki
Ryan N . Ludovice EdD
Polly Adams
Jack Whitehead
DR. JASHIM UDDIN AHMED
Rosina J Thomas
International Journal of Applied Sciences: Current and Future Research Trends
Khaled El Haj Ismail , adane tsegaye
Retrieved August
Kalyana Mitra, LBU Student Form
Prof.Gitu Giri
Valerie Brown
Ismail Raob
JALT Applied Materials Series
Gregory Hadley
Victoria J Palmer
International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology
Victoria J Marsick
Arthur R Sanford III
Kristy's Salas
Restu Fitrian Aristama
Building Action Research in Higher Education
Marcus Seels
The Learning Organization
Ortrun Zuber-Skerritt
RELATED TOPICS
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
- Find new research papers in:
- Health Sciences
- Earth Sciences
- Cognitive Science
- Mathematics
- Computer Science
- Academia ©2024
Sample Action Research About Education
Sample Action Research courtesy of Sir Kenneth D. Hernandez,CAR-PhD. (Admin TeacherPH Facebook Group)
This is my promised Action Research by one of the teachers at Victoria Reyes Elementary School. Notice that it was conducted only for a week and the Statistics used are very simple yet the interpretation is meaty.
Table of Contents
Victoria Reyes Elementary School Dasmariñas City
An action research on the effectiveness of differentiated instruction in teaching english for grade four classes.
Mary Joy V. Olicia Researcher
I. Introduction
Like Science and Math, English is a difficult but an important subject because the curriculum considers it as a tool subject needed to understand the different content subjects. Basically, it is concerned with developing competencies in listening, speaking, reading, writing, and viewing. Speaking includes skills in using the language expressions and grammatical structures correctly in oral communication while writing skill includes readiness skills, mechanics in guided writing, functional and creative writing (K to 12 Curriculum Guide for Grade 4).
The K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum aims to help learners understand that English language is involved in the dynamic social process which responds to and reflects changing social conditions. It is also inextricably involved with values, beliefs and ways of thinking about the person and the world people dwell. The curriculum aims that pupils are given an opportunity to build upon their prior knowledge while utilizing their own skills, interests, styles, and talents.
However, teachers find difficulties in teaching different kinds of pupils with different intellectual capacities, talent or skills, interest, and learning styles especially in heterogeneous groupings of pupils. This situation calls for teachers to create lessons for all pupils based upon their readiness, interests, and background knowledge. Anderson (2007) noted that it is imperative not to exclude any child in a classroom, so a differentiated learning environment must be provided by a teacher.
Differentiated instruction is based on the concept that the teacher is a facilitator of information, while students take the primary role of expanding their knowledge by making sense of their ability to learn differently (Robinson, Maldonado, & Whaley, 2014).
Wilson (2009) argued that differentiated instruction is the development of the simple to the complex tasks, and a difference between individuals that are otherwise similar in certain respects such as age or grade are given consideration. Additionally, Butt and Kusar (2010) stated that it is an approach to planning, so that one lesson may be taught to the entire class while meeting the individual needs of each child.
According to Tomlinson (2009), DI as a philosophy of teaching is based on the premise that students learn best when their teachers accommodate the differences in their readiness levels, interests, and learning profiles. It sees the learning experience as social and collaborative. The responsibility of what happens in the classroom is first to teacher, but also to the learner (Subban, 2006). Additionally, DI presents an effective means to address learner’s variance which avoids the pitfalls of the one-size-fits-all curriculum. Stronge (2004) and Tomlinson (2004b) claimed that addressing student differences and interest enhance their motivation to learn and make them to remain committed and to stay positive as well.
Stravroula (2011) conducted a study in investigating the impact of DI in mixed ability classrooms and found out that the implementation of differentiation had made a big step in facing the negative effects of socio-economic factors on students’ achievement by managing diversity effectively, providing learning opportunities for all students. The positive change in students’ achievement had shown that differentiation can be considered as an effective teaching approach in mixed ability classrooms.
Furthermore, Servilio (cited by Robinson, 2014) studied the effectiveness of using DI to motivate students to read and found out that an average of 83.4% of the students’ grades improved in reading, 12.5% remained the same, and 41% of the grades decreased.
As educator, the teacher-researcher was motivated to conduct this action research on the effectiveness of DI in teaching English on Grade Four pupils for a week-long lesson. She also she wanted to know the effect of this method on the academic performance of the pupils from results of the diagnostic and achievement test.
II. Statement of the Problem
This study determined the effectiveness of conducting DI to Grade Four English class. Specifically, it answered the following.
1. What is the performance of the two groups of respondents in the pretest?
1.1. Control group
1.2. Experimental group
2. What is the performance of the two groups of respondents in the posttest?
3. Is there a significant difference between the pretest scores of the control and experimental group?
4. Is there a significant difference between the posttest scores of the control and experimental group?
5. Is there a significant difference between the pretest and posttest scores of the control and experimental group?
III. Hypotheses
The following null hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance.
- There is no significant difference between the pretest result of the experimental and control group.
- There is no significant difference between the posttest result of the experimental and control group.
- There is no significant difference between the pretest and posttest result of the experimental and control group.
IV. Methodology
This action research utilized the experimental design since its main purpose was to determine the effectiveness of DI and its possible effect to the mean gain scores on achievement of pupils on a one-week lesson in Grade 4 English.
Two groups were taught the same lessons for one week. The control group was taught using the single teaching with similar activities approach while the experimental group was taught using DI with three sets of activities and three sets of evaluation and facilitation for the three groupings of pupils for the one-week duration. Two regular sections were included in the study out of the five Grade 4 sections that the school have.
Both groups were given the diagnostic test on Friday, September 25, 2015 to identify the classification of pupils whether they belong to the above average group, average group, and below average group. The achievement test was administered on Monday, October 5, 2015 the following week using parallel teacher-made tests. The number of pupils was again identified to know whether there was change in their classification. The results of the pretest and the posttest were compared to determine whether using DI is effective or not.
Data Gathering
After seeking the approval from the principal, the teacher-researcher started the experiment for a week.
The scores of both the pretest and the posttest were taken and these data were coded, tallied, and were statistically treated using the mean, standard deviation, and t-test of significant difference.
The mean and the standard deviation were used to determine the level of performance of control and experimental groups and the classification of pupils, while the t-test was employed to determine the significant difference of the mean scores on pretest and posttest of both groups.
V. Results and Discussions
The following are the results and the analysis done from the data.
A. Performance of the Two Groups of Respondents in the Diagnostic Test (Pretest)
The result of the pretest of the two class groups is presented in Table 1.
Diagnostic scores reveal that the control group has a mean of 11.76 (Sd=4.06) while the experimental group reported a mean score of 12.07 (sd=3.56) which is a little higher.
Pretest Results of the Control and the Experimental Groups Prior to the Experiment
Groups | N | Mean | Standard Deviation |
Control Group | 49 | 11.76 | 4.06 |
Experimental Group | 51 | 12.07 | 3.56 |
The variance results of 4.06 and 3.56 are not that big which signify that both classes are heterogeneous; meaning the pupils were of differing level of intelligence. This is indeed a good baseline since the results suggest that the two sections included in the study are almost the same in the manner that the scores are scattered. This means that the pupil’s grouping are mixed as to their abilities.
Tomlinson (2009) claimed that pupil’s differences should be addressed and the two groups became an ideal grouping for which the experiment was conducted concerning DI.
B. Performance of the Two Groups of Respondents in the Achievement Test (Posttest)
Groups | N | Mean | Standard Deviation |
Control Group | 49 | 13.82 | 3.53 |
Experimental Group | 51 | 16.45 | 2.34 |
The level of performance of the two groups in the posttest is presented in Table 2.
The experimental group of pupils who were exposed to DI obtains a mean score of 16.45 (Sd=2.34) while the control group who were taught using the traditional method obtain a mean score of 13.82 (Sd=3.53).
The result showed that the posttest scores of the experimental groups taught with DI is remarkably better as compared to those which were taught the traditional approach. Looking at the standard deviation scores, it signifies that the variance of the experimental group was smaller than that of the control group which suggest that the pupils’ intellectual ability were not scattered unlike in the pretest result.
The finding is supported by Stravroula’s (2011) study on DI where was able to prove that DI is effective as it positively effects the diverse pupils characteristics. Stronge’s (2004) contention that DI can enhance motivation and performance also supports the result.
C. Classification of Pupils in the Control and Experimental Group Based on the Pretest and Posttest Scores Results
Classification of Pupils Before and After the Differentiated Instruction
![sample action research papers for teachers Classification of Pupils Before and After the Differentiated Instruction](https://www.teacherph.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Classification-of-Pupils-Before-and-After-the-Differentiated-Instruction.jpg)
Table 3 presents the grouping of the pupils both in the control and in the experimental group As per classification of students based on the mean and standard deviation results, a majority of the pupils were on the average group for the control and experimental group prior to the treatment. However, after the experiment, there was a big increase in number of pupils for the average group for the control group and a larger number now belongs to the above average group. There were no pupils reported to be in the below average group for both the control and the experimental group.
Data suggest that both approach in teaching increased the achievement but remarkable increase was noted in the group taught with DI.
D. Classification of Pupils in the Control and Experimental Group Based on the Pretest and Posttest Scores Results
![sample action research papers for teachers Classification of Pupils Before and After the Differentiated Instruction 1](https://www.teacherph.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Classification-of-Pupils-Before-and-After-the-Differentiated-Instruction-1.jpg)
Table 3.1 shows that as per classification of students based on the mean and standard deviation results, a majority of the pupils were on the average group for the control and experimental group prior to the treatment of using DI to the experimental group.
It could be noticed that the percentages of classification are not far from each other. The idea presented by Tomlinson (2009) that differences of pupils should be addressed by the teacher in the classroom is good and according to Robinson, et.al, the teachers are the best facilitators of learning for pupils of diverse background and abilities.
Classification of Pupils After the Differentiated Instruction
![sample action research papers for teachers Classification of Pupils After the Differentiated Instruction](https://www.teacherph.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Classification-of-Pupils-After-the-Differentiated-Instruction.jpg)
Table 3.2 presents that after the experiment, there was a big increase in number of pupils for the average group for the control group and a larger number now belongs to the above average group. There were no pupils reported to be in the below average group for both the control and the experimental group.
Data suggest that both approach in teaching increased the achievement but remarkable increase was noted in the group taught with DI. This improvement in the classification or grouping of pupils in both groups assumes the principle that both groups who are taught by the same teacher with the same lesson could normally have a change in aptitude especially if the teacher has addressed the differences as averred by Anderson (2007). However, the notable changes in the experimental group is surely brought about by the DI exposed to them as supported by Stravroula (2011), Subban (2006), and Stronge (2004). With the DI, the teacher’s approach to the teaching and the activities may have affected very well the acquisition of the learning competencies as was mentioned by Wilson (2009). Specifically however, in English, the contentions of Sevillano (cited by Robinson et al, 2014) directly supports the result.
E. Results of Significant Difference Between the Pretest Scores of the Control and Experimental Group
Significant Difference Between the Pretest Scores of the Control Group and Experimental Group
![sample action research papers for teachers Significant Difference Between the Pretest Scores of the](https://www.teacherph.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Significant-Difference-Between-the-Pretest-Scores-of-the.jpg)
Table 4 presents the significant difference in the pretest scores of the two groups.
The computed t-ratio of 0.8109 is lesser than the tabular of 1.9845 at 98 degrees of freedom. Hence the hypothesis of no significant difference is accepted. There is no significant difference in the pretest scores of the class groups.
This result is good since the baseline data prior to the use of DI suggest that the pupils have similar intellectual abilities which will be very crucial for trying out the experiment in the teaching approach. The data suggest that the groups are very ideal for the experiment since they possess similarities prior to the experiment.
F. Significant Difference Between the Posttest Scores of the Control and Experimental Group
Table 5 presents the significant difference of the posttest scores between the control and the experimental group.
Results of Post-test the Control and Experimental Group
![sample action research papers for teachers Results of Post-test the Control and Experimental Group](https://www.teacherph.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Results-of-Post-test-the-Control-and-Experimental-Group.jpg)
From the data, it is very clear that the difference in scores in the achievement favor the experimental group which was taught using DI. Hence, it is safe to say that DI is effective based on the data generated.
G. Significant Difference Between the Pre-test and Post-test Scores of the Control and Experimental Group
Significant Difference Between the Pretest and Posttest Scores of the Control and Experimental Group
![sample action research papers for teachers Significant Difference Between the Pretest and Posttest Scores 21](https://www.teacherph.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Significant-Difference-Between-the-Pretest-and-Posttest-Scores-21.jpg)
Table 6 presents the comparison of the pretest and post test scores of the control and the control groups.
Clearly, for the control, there is no significant difference as signified by the computed t coefficient of 0.09 which is lesser than the tabular value of 1.9850 using 96 degrees of freedom. However, for the control group, it is very obvious that the calculated t-ratio of 1.02 is greater than the tabular value of 1.9840. Hence, the hypothesis of no significant difference between the pretest and posttest scores for the control group is accepted but is rejected for the experimental group.
The results are very significant since the group exposed without DI did not report difference in score unlike in the group taught using DI which showed significant difference. This then makes it safe to conclude that DI is effective in teaching English.
VI. Findings
The following are the findings of this action research.
- The mean scores of both control (11.76, Sd=4.06) and the experimental (12.07, Sd=3.56) groups do not significantly differ based on the t-coefficient result of 0.8109 which is lesser than the tabular of 1.9845 at 98 degrees of freedom.
- The mean scores of the control (16.45, Sd=2.34) and the experimental (13.82, Sd=3.53) significantly differ which favor the use of DI from the t-ratio of 3.423 is greater than the tabular value of 1.9845 at 0.05 level of significance using 98 degrees of freedom.
- During the pretest, majority of the pupils are average (control group, 35 or 71.43% and 37 or 72.55%). After the treatment, however, majority of the pupils in the control group became average (34 or 69.39%) and above average (35 or 68.63%).
- There is no significant difference between the control group’s pretest and posttest scores based on the computed t coefficient of 0.09 which is lesser than the tabular value of 1.9850 using 96 degrees of freedom but significant difference exists for the experimental group as signified by the calculated t-ratio of 1.02 is greater than the tabular value of 1.9840 using 98 degrees of freedom.
VII. Conclusions
Based on the findings, the following are the conclusions.
- The pretest scores of the control and the experimental group do not differ significantly.
- The posttest scores of the groups significantly differ resulting to higher scores for the experimental group.
- No significant difference exists in the pretest and posttest scores of the control group, but significant difference is noted for the experimental group.
- There is an improvement in the groupings of pupils both in the control and experimental group but significant improvement was shown for the pupils taught using DI.
- Use of DI is effective considering the higher scores of the experimental group compared to the control group.
VIII. Recommendation
Based on the above findings and conclusions, the following recommendations are suggested.
- DI should be used in teaching pupils in English especially in heterogeneous classes because it improved their classroom performance.
- Teachers should be given in-service trainings on DI for them to gain more knowledge and clear understanding of the approach.
- Although tedious on the part of the teachers, they should be encouraged to prepare and use DI to motivate pupils to participate in class discussions.
- This action research should be continued.
IX. References:
Anderson, K. M. (2007). Tips for teaching: Differentiating instruction to include all students. Preventing School Failure, 51(3), pp. 49-54. Retrieved from Education Research Complete database. (Accession No. 24944365)
Butt, M. & Kausar, S. (2010). A comparative study using differentiated instructions of public and private school teachers. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 12(1), pp. 105-124. Retrieved from Education Research Complete database. (Accession No. 78221508)
K to 12 Curriculum Guide, www.deped.gov.ph
Robinson, L., Maldonado, N., & Whaley, J. (2014). Perceptions about implementation of differentiated instruction: Retrieved October 2015 http://mrseberhartsepicclass.weebly.com/
Stravroula, V. A, Leonidas., & Mary, K. (2011). investigating the impact of differentiated instruction in mixed ability classrooms: It’s impact on the quality and equity dimensions of education effectiveness. Retrieved October 2015 http://www.icsei.net/icsei2011/Full%20Papers/0155.pdf
Stronge, J. (2004). Teacher effectiveness and student achievement : What do good teachers do? Paper presented at the American Association of School Administrators Annual Conference and Exposition, San Francisco, California.
Subban, P.(2006). Differentiated Instruction: A research basis. International Education Journal, 7(7), pp. 935-947.
Tomlinson, C. A., (2009) Intersections between differentiation and literacy instruction: Shared principles worth sharing. The NERA Journal, 45(1), 28-33.Retrieved from Education Research Complete database. (Accession No. 44765141)
Tomlinson, C. A. (2004a). Differentiation in diverse settings. School Administrator, 61(7), 28-33
Wilson, S. (2009). Differentiated instruction: How are design, essential questions in learning, assessment, and instruction part of it? New England Reading Association Journal, 44(2), pp. 68-75. Retrieved from Education Source database. (Accession No. 508028374)
Download Sample Action Research About Education (.docx) – Available in our Facebook Group Files
Mark Anthony Llego
Mark Anthony Llego, a visionary from the Philippines, founded TeacherPH in October 2014 with a mission to transform the educational landscape. His platform has empowered thousands of Filipino teachers, providing them with crucial resources and a space for meaningful idea exchange, ultimately enhancing their instructional and supervisory capabilities. TeacherPH's influence extends far beyond its origins. Mark's insightful articles on education have garnered international attention, featuring on respected U.S. educational websites. Moreover, his work has become a valuable reference for researchers, contributing to the academic discourse on education.
55 thoughts on “Sample Action Research About Education”
I am so happy reading your action research. its been a long time missing making and even complying research subjects in my MA. After reading your action research, I feel motivating to get into it again. Hoping you can share the format your action research. You are so kind. God bless!
Dear Sir, I have found your paper very handy. As an English instructor I believe it helps me to teach my students as per their level. I Wonder if you send me the tools you have used in your action research? Thanks for posting your sample A.C. I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Thank you for sharing your action research, sir. You’re one of a kind. Can I use your AR sir?
This is a great help to me as a beginner sir can I have ur soft copy sir so that I can have a guide in doing a research too. Thank u and God Bless po
kailan po ito pinublish?
Kindly send me the soft copy of this action research as a basis for my incoming AR po.This is of great help for me ..Thank you and GOD BLESS
Sir Mark, can i have a sample title for an action research regarding adopt a school program.
Sir good day…pls review the data. some do not coincide with the interpretation…ty
Sir Mark..kindly share the soft copy of this study on DI as basis only sir.. ????????
What is your fb group so I can join sir?
Sir, Magandang araw, baka po maaaring makahingi ng sample po ng action plan ninyo. Para lang po magkaroon ako idea. Maraming salamat po.
Good day! I am currently handling the Teacher Education interns. One of their requirements is an action research. May I also use your research as a model for their action research? Thank you in advance, Sir Mark.
Sir Mark, please make sure naman na tama ang research content especially the statistical analysis. We appreciate the effort of sharing but please review it first before posting. There are errors in interpreting statistical data. Salamat.
Hi Sir Japhet!
Thank you for letting us know about this. Your feedback helps us do better. We are looking into this issue and hope to resolve it promptly and accurately.
All the best!
Hi sir thank you for this new insights in your research. Sir can i ask for the instruments you have used in your research? Also sir i am wondering how you classified your respondents accordingly? Thanks you. God speed.
Thanks sir for being generous in sharing us things like this.. you know sir, real talk, some were not sharing ideas and samples of such (especially long ago).. I don’t know, maybe… they just kept it to themselves, for their own personal agenda. No one even dare ask samples or format of action research or innovations…
thank you for this action research sir. It helps a lot.Can i use this as a reference for my action research?thank you.
Can I have a template of the action research proposal po for guidance lang po of the fonts, margins and etc. thank you.
can i have or can share to me this topic:Level of Preparedness of Antipolo District Teachers Towards Airborne Diseases and Viruses: A Basis for Contingency Planning
Hi….pls can you share your action research to us……I really appreciate if you would…..thank you in advance
Thank you for sharing your action research. pwede pong makahingi nan sample yung pang classroom na sample. Salamat sir . God Bless
good evening sir, pwede po bang makahingi ng copy ng action research. thanks po
gud day sir mark….pwdi po ba makakuha ng sample action research about education(inside classrom)…reference lang po para sa gagawin kong action reseARCH…TNX POH
hello po request nga po ako sample ng research oh teacher’s capacity building
HELLO PO PWEDE PO DIN E CONDUCT DITO SA AMIN YONG RESEARCH PO NINYO AT PWEDE PO NYO BA AKO TULUNGAN BAKA PO PWEDE SEND NYO PO SOFT COPY SA E MAIL KO PO WITH THE INSTRUMENT YOU USED PO TY AND GOD BLESS
thank you sir/maam, its a big help for us educators for innovation.
Sir Mark Llego pwede po bang makakuha ng sample action research sa Adopt-a-school [rogram or Brigada Eskwela Implementation po..salamat po..
thank u very much sir…your sample research is really a big help..blessing ka ni Lord. Continue to be a blessing pa po.
hi sir . thanks for this i am now enlighted with how action research works. ?. by the way sir can i use this as my basis for conducting my action research here in our school?
Thank you sir for sharing. May I ask permission to use this as a reference? Can you also send me a Soft copy of this, either doc or pdf, for it is no longer available sa fb page:(. Thank you so much sir.
Thanks Sir for this sample action research, may I also download for further reading so that I will have a basis in conducting action research in my workplace… again thank you Sir.
can I ask permission to use this action research.? thank you!
THANK VERY MUCH MADAM. CAN I USE THIS FOR MY REFERENCE?
gud day Maam MARY jOY May I also use your study to my class. thank u po in advance. God bless and more power.
I am interested to read your action reserch. can you please send me
Thank you for sharing us your sample action research sir. May this post could contribute in formulating our intervention that could really suit to the need if the learner. More power and may God bless you always.
wala bang pdf file nito? link pls
pls sir kindly send the soft copy of the parts of action research?kung pwd lng po,pls,tnx.godbless po
Good day! We just want to ask for your permission to use your action research regarding the topic Effectiveness of “Differentiated Instruction In Teaching English for Grade Four Classes” and we kindly ask if we could also acquire the research instrument that you used for that particular topic. I would appreciate if you would respond to this.. Thank you in advance
Good Day! We kindly ask if we could use your research regarding the ”Effectiveness of Differentiated Instruction In Teaching English for Grade Four Classes” for our action research We believe that your expertise will be a great help in this endeavor. Thank you!
Hi po sir,, pwd po humingi ng sample ng action research regarding with basic ict instructions po and also about education po inside the classroom.. Tnx sir If yes,, here’s my email address [email protected]
gud day sir mark….pwdi po ba makauha ng sample action research about education(inside classrom)…reference lang po para sa gagawin kong action reseARCH…YNX POH
Pwede po ba ako makahingi ng soft copy. Mag gawa kasi ako ng action research? Tle major po ako
Can I ask for a copy of this one? if yes, please send to my email, [email protected] ….
Did you obtain informed consent and assent of the parents and students? I read in the procedure that the experiment started after approval of the principal. Did they know that they are part of a study? or there is deception? I know that “Hawthorne Effect” may happen if students knew that they are part of the experiment but the researcher needs to established ethical considerations. For the content, how can the researcher ensure that the students in the control group didn’t get any information that another section (experimental group) have different instructional approach? It’s a threat of validity! Also, I see a selection bias, there’s no randomization.
good day. may nakita po akong action research na galing div.of tarlac pero iba naman ang format. I am planning also to conduct may own AR but i dont know which format to follow. Can you please enlighten me. Thanks and more power.
Pwede po ba ako makakuha ng soft copy nitong sample action research. Thnk u nga po pala sa pag accept.
Join lang kayo sa Facebook group namin Sir.. 🙂
ano po ba fb group niyo sir?
Pwd po malaman ang fb group nyo po? thanks
Sir gud p.m. pwede po bng mkhuha ng K to 12 new curriculum for objectives lesson plan in English, Araling Panlipunan and edukasyon pagpapakatao wala pa kc teacher manual …thank you sir
Sir Mark Llego pwede po bang makakuha ng sample action research sa ICT Basic Computer po..salamat po..
The computed value of 1.02 is not greater than the tabular value of 1.9840. Hence, the Ho should be accepted…
Leave a Comment Cancel reply
Can't find what you're looking for.
We are here to help - please use the search box below.
- NAEYC Login
- Member Profile
- Hello Community
- Accreditation Portal
- Online Learning
- Online Store
Popular Searches: DAP ; Coping with COVID-19 ; E-books ; Anti-Bias Education ; Online Store
How to Do Action Research in Your Classroom
![sample action research papers for teachers A teacher at a chalkboard](https://www.naeyc.org/sites/default/files/styles/page_header_media_large/public/102017/slat27_2.jpg?itok=O1SkEuPi)
You are here
This article is available as a pdf. please see the link on the right..
![sample action research papers for teachers StatAnalytica](https://statanalytica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/logo.webp)
200+ List of Topics for Action Research in the Classroom
![sample action research papers for teachers List of Topics for Action Research in the Classroom](https://statanalytica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/List-of-Topics-for-Action-Research-in-the-Classroom-1024x576.jpg)
In the dynamic landscape of education, teachers are continually seeking innovative ways to enhance their teaching practices and improve student outcomes. Action research in the classroom is a powerful tool that allows educators to investigate and address specific challenges, leading to positive changes in teaching methods and learning experiences.
Selecting the right topics from the list of topics for action research in the classroom is crucial for ensuring meaningful insights and improvements. In this blog post, we will explore the significance of action research in the classroom, the criteria for selecting impactful topics, and provide an extensive list of potential research areas.
Understanding: What is Action Research
Table of Contents
Action research is a reflective process that empowers teachers to systematically investigate and analyze their own teaching practices. Unlike traditional research, action research is conducted by educators within their own classrooms, emphasizing a collaborative and participatory approach.
This method enables teachers to identify challenges, implement interventions, and assess the effectiveness of their actions.
How to Select Topics From List of Topics for Action Research in the Classroom
Choosing the right topic is the first step in the action research process. The selected topic should align with classroom goals, address students’ needs, be feasible to implement, and have the potential for positive impact. Teachers should consider the following criteria when selecting action research topics:
- Alignment with Classroom Goals and Objectives: The chosen topic should directly contribute to the overall goals and objectives of the classroom. Whether it’s improving student engagement, enhancing learning outcomes, or fostering a positive classroom environment, the topic should align with the broader educational context.
- Relevance to Students’ Needs and Challenges: Effective action research addresses the specific needs and challenges faced by students. Teachers should identify areas where students may be struggling or where improvement is needed, ensuring that the research directly impacts the learning experiences of the students.
- Feasibility and Practicality: The feasibility of the research is crucial. Teachers must choose topics that are practical to implement within the constraints of the classroom setting. This includes considering available resources, time constraints, and the level of support from school administrators.
- Potential for Positive Impact: The ultimate goal of action research is to bring about positive change. Teachers should carefully assess the potential impact of their research, aiming for improvements in teaching methods, student performance, or overall classroom dynamics.
List of Topics for Action Research in the Classroom
- Impact of Mindfulness Practices on Student Focus
- The Effectiveness of Peer Tutoring in Mathematics
- Strategies for Encouraging Critical Thinking in History Classes
- Using Gamification to Enhance Learning in Science
- Investigating the Impact of Flexible Seating Arrangements
- Assessing the Benefits of Project-Based Learning in Language Arts
- The Influence of Classroom Decor on Student Motivation
- Examining the Use of Learning Stations for Differentiation
- Implementing Reflective Journals to Enhance Writing Skills
- Exploring the Impact of Flipped Classroom Models
- Analyzing the Effects of Homework on Student Performance
- The Role of Positive Reinforcement in Classroom Behavior
- Investigating the Impact of Classroom Libraries on Reading Proficiency
- Strategies for Fostering a Growth Mindset in Students
- Assessing the Benefits of Cross-Curricular Integration
- Using Technology to Enhance Vocabulary Acquisition
- The Impact of Outdoor Learning on Student Engagement
- Investigating the Relationship Between Attendance and Academic Success
- The Role of Parental Involvement in Homework Completion
- Assessing the Impact of Classroom Rituals on Community Building
- Strategies for Increasing Student Participation in Discussions
- Exploring the Influence of Classroom Lighting on Student Alertness
- Investigating the Impact of Daily Agendas on Time Management
- The Effectiveness of Socratic Seminars in Social Studies
- Analyzing the Use of Graphic Organizers for Concept Mapping
- Implementing Student-Led Conferences for Goal Setting
- Examining the Effects of Mind Mapping on Information Retention
- The Influence of Classroom Temperature on Academic Performance
- Investigating the Benefits of Cooperative Learning Strategies
- Strategies for Addressing Test Anxiety in Students
- Assessing the Impact of Positive Affirmations on Student Confidence
- The Use of Literature Circles to Enhance Reading Comprehension
- Exploring the Effects of Classroom Noise Levels on Concentration
- Investigating the Benefits of Cross-Grade Collaborations
- Analyzing the Impact of Goal Setting on Student Achievement
- Implementing Interactive Notebooks for Conceptual Understanding
- The Effectiveness of Response to Intervention (RTI) Programs
- Strategies for Integrating Social-Emotional Learning (SEL)
- Investigating the Impact of Classroom Discussions on Critical Thinking
- The Role of Brain Breaks in Enhancing Student Focus
- Assessing the Benefits of Inquiry-Based Learning in Science
- Exploring the Effects of Music on Studying and Retention
- Investigating the Use of Learning Contracts for Individualized Learning
- The Influence of Classroom Colors on Mood and Learning
- Strategies for Promoting Collaborative Problem-Solving
- Analyzing the Impact of Flexible Scheduling on Student Productivity
- The Effectiveness of Mindful Breathing Exercises on Stress Reduction
- Investigating the Benefits of Service Learning Projects
- The Role of Peer Assessment in Improving Writing Skills
- Exploring the Impact of Field Trips on Cultural Competency
- Assessing the Benefits of Personalized Learning Plans
- Strategies for Differentiating Instruction in Large Classrooms
- Investigating the Influence of Teacher-Student Relationships on Learning
- The Effectiveness of Vocabulary Games in Foreign Language Classes
- Analyzing the Impact of Classroom Discussions on Civic Engagement
- Implementing Goal-Setting Strategies for Test Preparation
- The Role of Classroom Celebrations in Building a Positive Environment
- Strategies for Enhancing Student Reflection and Metacognition
- Investigating the Effects of Positive Behavior Supports (PBS)
- The Influence of Classroom Humor on Student Engagement
- Assessing the Benefits of Student-Led Research Projects
- Exploring the Impact of Timed vs. Untimed Tests on Anxiety
- Investigating the Use of Educational Podcasts for Learning
- The Effectiveness of Debate Activities in Developing Persuasive Skills
- Analyzing the Impact of Mindful Walking Breaks on Concentration
- Strategies for Promoting Digital Citizenship in the Classroom
- The Role of Visualization Techniques in Mathematics Learning
- Assessing the Benefits of Classroom Agreements for Behavior
- Exploring the Effects of Goal-Setting in Physical Education
- Investigating the Influence of Classroom Seating Charts on Behavior
- The Effectiveness of Peer Editing in Improving Writing Skills
- Strategies for Integrating Cultural Competency in History Lessons
- Analyzing the Impact of Classroom Pets on Student Well-Being
- The Role of Morning Meetings in Building Classroom Community
- Investigating the Benefits of Using Learning Centers in Elementary Schools
- Exploring the Effects of Virtual Reality in Geography Education
- Assessing the Impact of Homework Choice on Student Motivation
- Strategies for Promoting Growth Mindset in Mathematics
- The Influence of Classroom Layout on Group Collaboration
- Investigating the Benefits of Mindful Listening Practices
- The Effectiveness of Using Real-World Examples in Science Lessons
- Analyzing the Impact of Student-Led Assessments on Accountability
- Exploring the Use of Learning Contracts for Student Responsibility
- Investigating the Benefits of Teaching Digital Literacy Skills
- Strategies for Implementing Peer Mentoring Programs
- The Role of Graphic Novels in Promoting Literacy
- Assessing the Impact of Flexible Grouping in Mathematics Classes
- The Effectiveness of Using Storytelling for Conceptual Understanding
- Investigating the Influence of Classroom Rituals on Attendance
- Exploring the Benefits of Mindfulness Practices in Physical Education
- Strategies for Integrating Social Justice Education in the Curriculum
- Analyzing the Impact of Goal-Setting on Homework Completion
- The Role of Classroom Mindfulness Activities in Stress Reduction
- Investigating the Benefits of Using Educational Apps for Vocabulary
- The Effectiveness of Using Drama in History Lessons
- Assessing the Impact of Classroom Routines on Time Management
- Exploring the Influence of Teacher-Student Rapport on Academic Achievement
- Strategies for Promoting Active Listening Skills in the Classroom
- Investigating the Benefits of Using Concept Mapping in Science
- The Role of Classroom Socratic Seminars in Developing Critical Thinking
- Assessing the Impact of Mindful Eating Practices on Student Focus
- Exploring the Effects of Flipped Learning in Physical Education
- Investigating the Benefits of Using Educational Games for Math Fluency
- The Effectiveness of Peer Assessment in Art Classes
- Strategies for Fostering Creativity in Science Education
- Analyzing the Impact of Morning Stretches on Student Alertness
- The Role of Classroom Discussions in Enhancing Social Studies Learning
- Investigating the Benefits of Using Augmented Reality in History Lessons
- Assessing the Impact of Growth Mindset Interventions on Test Anxiety
- Strategies for Incorporating Environmental Education in the Curriculum
- The Effectiveness of Using Conceptual Maps in Literature Analysis
- Exploring the Influence of Classroom Lighting on Reading Comprehension
- Investigating the Benefits of Using Learning Apps for Language Acquisition
- The Role of Classroom Experiments in Science Education
- Analyzing the Impact of Mindful Breathing Exercises on Test Performance
- Strategies for Promoting Collaborative Problem-Solving in Mathematics
- Assessing the Benefits of Mindfulness Practices in Physical Education
- Exploring the Effects of Flexible Seating on Student Collaboration
- Investigating the Influence of Homework Choice on Student Motivation
- The Effectiveness of Using Educational Podcasts for History Learning
- Strategies for Integrating Sustainability Education Across Subjects
- Analyzing the Impact of Mindful Writing Practices on Language Arts Skills
- The Role of Peer Teaching in Enhancing Understanding of Complex Concepts
- Investigating the Benefits of Using Digital Storytelling in Literature Classes
- The Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Learning in Social Studies
- Assessing the Impact of Student-Led Book Clubs on Reading Engagement
- Strategies for Incorporating Financial Literacy in Mathematics Education
- Exploring the Influence of Classroom Decor on Science Interest
- Investigating the Benefits of Mindful Movement Breaks in the Classroom
- The Role of Reflection Journals in Developing Critical Thinking Skills
- Analyzing the Impact of Virtual Field Trips on Geography Learning
- Strategies for Promoting Inclusive Physical Education Practices
- Assessing the Benefits of Using Educational Board Games for Learning
- The Effectiveness of Mindfulness Practices in Foreign Language Classes
- Investigating the Influence of Classroom Rituals on Academic Rigor
- Exploring the Impact of Student-Led Conferences on Goal Setting
- The Role of Mindful Listening Practices in Improving Communication Skills
- Investigating the Benefits of Using Educational Apps for Science Exploration
- Analyzing the Effectiveness of Socratic Seminars in Philosophy Classes
- Strategies for Promoting Gender Equity in STEM Education
- Assessing the Impact of Classroom Celebrations on Student Well-Being
- The Effectiveness of Using Debate Activities in Language Arts
- Exploring the Influence of Positive Affirmations on Classroom Climate
- Investigating the Benefits of Using Concept Mapping in History Essays
- Strategies for Incorporating Media Literacy in Social Studies
- Analyzing the Impact of Mindful Reflection Practices on Homework Completion
- The Role of Peer Collaboration in Enhancing Artistic Skills
- Investigating the Benefits of Using Educational Apps for Vocabulary Acquisition
- The Effectiveness of Mindful Breathing Exercises in Test Preparation
- Assessing the Impact of Flipped Learning in Science Laboratories
- Strategies for Promoting Civic Engagement in Social Studies Classes
- Exploring the Influence of Outdoor Learning on Scientific Inquiry
- Investigating the Benefits of Using Learning Stations for Literature Analysis
- The Role of Mindful Movement in Improving Physical Education Experiences
- Analyzing the Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Language Learning
- Strategies for Incorporating Global Perspectives in Geography Education
- Assessing the Impact of Mindful Coloring Activities on Stress Reduction
- The Effectiveness of Using Educational Games for History Review
- Investigating the Benefits of Mindful Breathing Exercises in Mathematics
- Exploring the Influence of Classroom Rituals on Study Habits
- The Role of Mindful Listening Practices in Enhancing Oral Communication
- Analyzing the Impact of Student-Led Workshops on Study Skills
- Strategies for Promoting Critical Media Literacy in Language Arts
- Assessing the Benefits of Mindfulness Practices in Physical Fitness
- The Effectiveness of Using Educational Apps for Music Appreciation
- Investigating the Influence of Classroom Decor on Artistic Expression
- Exploring the Impact of Mindful Eating Practices on Nutrition Awareness
- The Role of Peer Assessment in Improving Science Fair Projects
- Analyzing the Benefits of Mindful Breathing Exercises in History Classes
- Strategies for Promoting Teamwork in Physical Education
- Assessing the Impact of Classroom Celebrations on Cultural Understanding
- The Effectiveness of Using Conceptual Maps in Geography Education
- Investigating the Benefits of Mindful Movement Breaks in Mathematics
- The Role of Mindful Listening Practices in Improving Musical Skills
- Analyzing the Impact of Student-Led Discussions in Philosophy Classes
- Strategies for Incorporating Environmental Stewardship in Science Education
- Assessing the Benefits of Using Educational Games for Physical Fitness
- Exploring the Influence of Classroom Decor on Mathematical Interest
- Investigating the Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Art Appreciation
- The Role of Mindful Movement in Enhancing Physical Education Experiences
- Strategies for Promoting Cultural Competency in Language Arts
- Analyzing the Impact of Mindful Breathing Exercises on Test Anxiety
- The Effectiveness of Using Educational Apps for Science Exploration
- Investigating the Benefits of Peer Teaching in Mathematics Classes
- Exploring the Influence of Classroom Rituals on Language Arts Skills
- Assessing the Impact of Mindful Coloring Activities on Creative Expression
- The Role of Mindful Listening Practices in Improving Public Speaking
- Investigating the Benefits of Using Learning Stations for History Learning
- The Effectiveness of Peer Assessment in Improving Writing Skills
- Strategies for Promoting Digital Literacy in Geography Education
- Analyzing the Impact of Mindful Eating Practices on Healthy Habits
- Assessing the Benefits of Using Educational Games for Social Studies
- The Effectiveness of Mindful Movement Breaks in Science Education
- Exploring the Influence of Classroom Decor on Writing Motivation
- Investigating the Role of Mindfulness Practices in Mathematics Anxiety
- Strategies for Incorporating Financial Literacy in Social Studies
- Analyzing the Benefits of Using Concept Mapping in Science Labs
- The Role of Mindful Breathing Exercises in Improving Music Education
- Exploring the Impact of Virtual Reality on Foreign Language Acquisition
- Assessing the Benefits of Mindful Movement Breaks in History Classes
Tips for Conducting Action Research in the Classroom
- Setting Clear Research Goals and Objectives: Clearly define the goals and objectives of the research to ensure a focused and purposeful investigation.
- Involving Stakeholders in the Research Process: Engage students, parents, and colleagues in the research process to gather diverse perspectives and insights.
- Collecting and Analyzing Relevant Data: Use a variety of data collection methods, such as surveys, observations, and assessments, to gather comprehensive and meaningful data.
- Reflecting on Findings and Adjusting Teaching Practices: Regularly reflect on the research findings and be open to adjusting teaching practices based on the insights gained from the research.
Case Studies or Examples
Highlighting successful action research projects provides inspiration and practical insights for teachers.
Sharing case studies or examples of impactful research can demonstrate the positive outcomes and improvements that can result from well-conducted action research.
In conclusion, action research is a valuable tool for educators seeking to enhance their teaching practices and improve student outcomes.
Selecting the right topics from a list of topics for action research in the classroom is crucial for the success of action research projects, and teachers should consider alignment with goals, relevance to students, feasibility, and potential impact.
By exploring a diverse range of topics, teachers can embark on meaningful action research journeys, contributing to the continuous improvement of education.
Related Posts
![sample action research papers for teachers best way to finance car](https://statanalytica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/smart-way-to-finance-your-car-1024x576.jpg.webp)
Step by Step Guide on The Best Way to Finance Car
![sample action research papers for teachers how to get fund for business](https://statanalytica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/fund-your-business-1024x576.png.webp)
The Best Way on How to Get Fund For Business to Grow it Efficiently
![sample action research papers for teachers American Psychological Association](https://apastyle.apa.org/Content/Images/megamenu/images@2x/apa-logo.png)
References provide the information necessary for readers to identify and retrieve each work cited in the text .
Check each reference carefully against the original publication to ensure information is accurate and complete. Accurately prepared references help establish your credibility as a careful researcher and writer.
Consistency in reference formatting allows readers to focus on the content of your reference list, discerning both the types of works you consulted and the important reference elements (who, when, what, and where) with ease. When you present each reference in a consistent fashion, readers do not need to spend time determining how you organized the information. And when searching the literature yourself, you also save time and effort when reading reference lists in the works of others that are written in APA Style.
![sample action research papers for teachers sample action research papers for teachers](https://apastyle.apa.org/images/references-page-category_tcm11-282727_w1024_n.jpg)
Academic Writer ®
Master academic writing with APA’s essential teaching and learning resource
![sample action research papers for teachers illustration or abstract figure and computer screen](https://apastyle.apa.org/images/tile-course-adoption_tcm11-284491_w320_n.png)
Course Adoption
Teaching APA Style? Become a course adopter of the 7th edition Publication Manual
![sample action research papers for teachers illustration of woman using a pencil to point to text on a clipboard](https://apastyle.apa.org/images/tile-instructional-aids_tcm11-284490_w320_n.png)
Instructional Aids
Guides, checklists, webinars, tutorials, and sample papers for anyone looking to improve their knowledge of APA Style
![](http://sektorel.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
COMMENTS
The methods of action research in education include: conducting in-class observations. taking field notes. surveying or interviewing teachers, administrators, or parents. using audio and video recordings. The goal is to identify problematic issues, test possible solutions, or simply carry-out continuous improvement.
Abstract and Figures. Classroom participation is must for the enhancement of the academic learning. This paper looks specifically on the strategy on how to improve the learners' classroom ...
One single teacher who participated in the second stage of the research (i.e., action research) was determined by the purposive criterion sampling method . Criteria such as the teacher's volunteerism, ability to spare time, being open to professional development, and aiming to improve classroom communication and interaction were considered.
Action research is a tool that is used to help teac hers and other educators uncover strategies to. improve teaching practices (Sagor, 2004); it is a viable and realistic endeavor for all ...
The self-study framework grounds action research as one form of teacher-research, which has emerged as a methodology in educational research to help teachers engage in inquiry (Pinnegar & Hamilton, 2009). Action research is emancipatory because it "demands that practitioners take a hard look at the structures and social arrangements that ...
Specific goals of this handbook are to help educators do the following: Define and explain Action Research. Demonstrate an understanding of how to use the recursive nature of Action Research to improve their teaching of instructional literacy. Provide examples of the Action Research process in action.
Action research is a process for improving educational practice. Its methods involve action, evaluation, and reflection. It is a process to gather evidence to implement change in practices. Action research is participative and collaborative. It is undertaken by individuals with a common purpose.
SUBMIT PAPER. Review of Research in Education. Impact Factor: 2.4 / 5-Year Impact Factor: 8.6 . JOURNAL HOMEPAGE. SUBMIT PAPER. Close Add email alerts. ... By situating teachers as learners, action research offers a systematic and intentional approach to changing teaching. When working as part of a community of practice, action researchers ...
Specifically, action. research is defined as one form of meaningful research that can be conducted by teachers with. students, colleagues, parents, and/or families in a natural setting of the classroom or school. Action research allows teachers to become the "researcher" and provides opportunities for them.
Passion is integral to doing action research and can be a resource for identifying a research question, as indicated by Dana and Yendol-Hoppey (2008, pp. 15-48). After analyzing more than 100 teacher class-room research studies, they identified eight passions as possibilities for finding a research question: 1.
The study suggests creating groups among teachers in nearby localities who can share, help and collaborate in each other's action research. Teacher's World: Journal of Education and Research ...
etc.) whose effects need to be better understood. The researchers develop a viable plan for collecting the. The researchers develop a viable plan for collecting the data. necessary data. needed to illuminate the implementation of the operative theory. The researchers implement the new theory of action and.
Two teacher-educators, an instructor and a teaching assistant, designed an action research project focused on enhancing their professional practice and the practice of their students by introducing the preservice teachers to action research. Both teacher-educators viewed this decision as progressive and emancipatory, as action research ...
Action research is a paradigm and not a method. As a paradigm, action research is a conceptual, social, philosophical, and cultural framework for doing research, which embraces a wide variety of research methodologies. 29. and forms of inquiry. Unlike positivism, with its emphasis on prediction, control, and generalization through quantitative ...
The Journal of Teacher Action Research is an international journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles written by teachers and researchers to inform classroom practice. The journal serves as a practical medium to read and publish classroom-based research. Our review process differs from other journals because we also look for potential.
We see these examples of teacher-led research as highlights of work carried out by science teachers as education researchers in Singapore. Action research has been emphasized in Singapore for over 15 years as a way to promote school-based educational innovations and teachers' self-development (Hairon, 2006, 2017; Tang, 2000). However, to date ...
View PDF. Andrew Johnson. Action research is a type of research related to one's professional practice. In the field of education, it can be defined as the process of studying a school, classroom, or teaching-learning situation with the purpose of understanding and improving the quality of actions or instruction.
by Mark Anthony Llego. Sample Action Research courtesy of Sir Kenneth D. Hernandez,CAR-PhD. (Admin TeacherPH Facebook Group) This is my promised Action Research by one of the teachers at Victoria Reyes Elementary School. Notice that it was conducted only for a week and the Statistics used are very simple yet the interpretation is meaty.
Action research and collaboration in professional learning. Action research has a long tradition of bridging gaps between research and practice development and has witnessed many iterations since its original forms in the 1950s, including the teacher-as-researcher movement in educational settings (cf. Zeichner & Noffke, Citation 2001).However, several critical aspects have been identified when ...
Donate to help NAEYC advance a strong and dynamic early childhood profession and connect educators to cutting-edge resources. Connect with professionals in your community at conferences, networking events, advocacy efforts, leadership opportunities and more! Action research can introduce you to the power of systematic reflection on your practice.
Highlighting successful action research projects provides inspiration and practical insights for teachers. Sharing case studies or examples of impactful research can demonstrate the positive outcomes and improvements that can result from well-conducted action research. Conclusion. In conclusion, action research is a valuable tool for educators ...
Sample Action Research - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. The document discusses a study on the effect of teachers' teaching styles on student motivation. The study was conducted by distributing questionnaires to students before and after teachers applied English as a Second Language strategies in their classrooms.
Ikrar Pramudya. The aim of this research was to find out the influence of learning model implementation toward student's achievement in mathematics. This research was using quasi-experimental ...
References provide the information necessary for readers to identify and retrieve each work cited in the text. Consistency in reference formatting allows readers to focus on the content of your reference list, discerning both the types of works you consulted and the important reference elements with ease.