case study reputation management

• Skip to right header navigation
• Skip to main content
• Skip to secondary navigation
• Skip to footer

Business Continuity and Crisis Management Consultants

Reputation Management Case Studies: Big Brand Turnarounds

Discover reputation management case studies from leading brands. Learn how they successfully navigated crises to reshape their image!

December 14, 2023 By //  by  Bryan Strawser

Ever wondered why some businesses bounce back from crises stronger than before?

The secret lies in reputation management. In the ever-changing, highly visible business world of today, a company’s repute can be its most valuable possession or its greatest downside.

This piece will dive into real-world examples where big names like Starbucks and Johnson & Johnson faced significant challenges that threatened their standing. Yet, they managed to navigate these rough waters effectively. We’ll explore how Domino’s Pizza transformed negative customer feedback into an opportunity for improvement and rebranding.

Through these case studies, you’ll gain insights into successful strategies for managing your own company’s reputation amidst adversity. Ready to learn more?

The Imperative of Reputation Management

Reputation management has become an indispensable aspect of any successful business. It shapes public perception and fosters customer trust, two elements that directly influence a company’s bottom line. But it doesn’t stop there; reputation management extends beyond simply controlling the narrative.

This practice encompasses all activities aimed at maintaining a positive image in the public eye. Whether it’s promptly addressing negative reviews or effectively managing crises, every action contributes to how your brand is perceived.

A study on corporate reputation management revealed that companies with robust reputation strategies enjoyed better financial performance than those who neglected this area. This shows the compelling correlation between a good name and profitability.

Navigating the Complexities of Reputation Management

Tackling challenges head-on is vital for effective reputation control. Negative publicity can quickly spiral out of control if not addressed appropriately and timely – damaging both sales and consumer confidence in your brand.

To combat these issues, businesses must implement proactive measures to safeguard their reputations before problems arise. They should monitor online chatter about their brands constantly using tools like Google Alerts or social media listening software – ready to respond immediately when necessary.

Beyond damage control, enterprises need strategic plans focused on building strong relationships with customers through consistent high-quality service delivery coupled with transparent communication practices. Research has shown that these are key factors influencing consumers’ perceptions towards organizations hence affecting overall corporate reputations positively.

Unpacking the Reputation Management Challenge

Navigating reputation management can be a treacherous journey for businesses. It’s not just about combating negative reviews, but also handling crises effectively and proactively. Let’s break down some of these challenges.

Dealing with Negative Reviews

No company is immune to negative reviews. But it’s how you handle them that sets your business apart. The key? Address issues promptly, offer solutions, and make sure customers feel heard.

The Crisis Conundrum

A crisis situation can escalate quickly if not managed properly – from product recalls to public scandals – every minute counts in minimizing damage to your brand image. Remember the old saying “A stitch in time saves nine”? That applies here too.

Fostering Trust through Transparency

To manage reputation successfully, transparency should be at its core. Companies need more than ever to communicate openly during tough times or when things go wrong – this fosters trust among consumers and stakeholders alike.

Maintaining Consistency Across Channels

In today’s multi-channel world where opinions are formed within seconds on social media platforms, consistency across all channels is vital for effective reputation management. A unified voice gives credibility and reinforces brand values while preventing any potential miscommunication or confusion amongst audiences.

Case Study 1 – Starbucks Racial Bias Incident

In April of 2018, a racially charged occurrence occurred at a Starbucks in Philadelphia, causing the coffee chain to be thrust into the spotlight across the US. Two African-American men were arrested for allegedly trespassing while waiting for an associate.

This event triggered widespread backlash and calls to boycott Starbucks. The corporation’s standing was in jeopardy as it confronted serious inquiry concerning its approaches and procedures with respect to racial prejudice.

The Response: Transparency and Training

Understanding the gravity of this situation, Starbucks responded swiftly. CEO Kevin Johnson issued a public apology, expressing deep regret over what transpired and vowing to take steps to ensure such incidents wouldn’t happen again.

To demonstrate their commitment towards resolving these issues, Starbucks announced they would close more than 8,000 stores across the United States for an afternoon in order to conduct racial bias education training. This move affected approximately 175,000 employees—a clear signal that Starbucks took this matter seriously.

A Commitment Towards Long-Term Change

Beyond immediate response measures like employee training sessions or policy changes lies deeper systemic solutions—demonstrating ongoing commitment is key when managing reputational crises effectively. In this case study example with Starbucks’ journey towards addressing bias, we see how organizations can transform negative incidents into opportunities for positive change by committing resources, time, and leadership towards creating a more inclusive culture.

Starbucks’ reputation management strategy following this incident provides important insights for businesses. It shows the significance of timely response, transparent communication, and most importantly—action—that aligns with public expectations and corporate values.

Lessons from Starbucks’ Reputation Management Strategy

In the face of a reputation crisis, Starbucks showcased exemplary management skills. The incident at hand was an allegation of racial bias in 2018. This presented a massive challenge for the company’s image.

The first lesson to glean is the importance of swift and decisive action. Upon learning about this incident, Starbucks did not waste time in addressing it head-on.

Swift Action

This quick response demonstrated accountability and a strong commitment towards resolving issues that threaten their reputation. By acting swiftly, they managed to prevent further damage while also showing that they took such matters seriously.

Transparent Communication

Besides immediate action, another crucial element of Starbucks’ strategy was transparent communication. They openly acknowledged their mistake rather than trying to downplay or ignore it.

This honesty helped restore public trust because customers saw them admitting fault instead of shying away from responsibility – thus creating an environment conducive for rebuilding relationships with its patrons.

Action Plan Implementation

• Closure for Training: As part of their corrective measures, all Starbucks stores were temporarily closed for anti-bias training.
• New Policies: In addition, new policies were implemented aimed at preventing similar incidents in the future.

This multi-pronged approach used by Starbucks provides valuable lessons on how businesses can manage reputational crises effectively.

Case Study 2 – Johnson & Johnson’s Tylenol Crisis

In the realm of crisis management, few examples stand as prominently as Johnson & Johnson’s handling of the 1982 Tylenol crisis. When seven people in Chicago died after ingesting cyanide-laced capsules, it could have spelled disaster for both the product and company.

But instead of retreating into damage control mode, J&J decided to prioritize consumer safety over immediate financial concerns. They swiftly pulled approximately $100 million worth of products off shelves nationwide—a bold move that conveyed their commitment to customer wellbeing above all else.

The Role of Transparency in Reputation Management

J&J did not stop at recalling its products. The company also established a line for concerned consumers and communicated openly about each step they were taking to fix this issue. Their transparency throughout this ordeal helped them regain public trust even amidst such a major health scare.

Proactive Response: A Key Aspect Of Effective Crisis Management

Beyond being open with their customers, J&J took proactive steps towards resolving the situation effectively. This included designing tamper-resistant packaging—a first in pharmaceuticals—and re-launching Tylenol within two months from its withdrawal. Learn more about how J&J handled this incident here.

In retrospect, these actions marked a turning point not only for J&J but also for the industry at large, setting new standards in crisis management and demonstrating how a company’s response can shape its reputation. The Tylenol case is now considered an exemplar of effective reputation management, taught worldwide as a testament to the power of swift action, transparent communication, and prioritizing customer safety.

Insights from Johnson & Johnson’s Crisis Management Approach

The Tylenol crisis is a hallmark in reputation management, and the response by Johnson & Johnson still stands as an exemplar of effective action.

A Proactive Response to Protect Customers

In 1982, seven fatalities occurred following the consumption of Tylenol capsules containing cyanide. Rather than denying responsibility or downplaying the situation, Johnson & Johnson acted swiftly. They made sure to prioritize customer safety over profits and recalled 31 million bottles nationwide—an unprecedented move at that time.

This proactive step was costly but essential. It demonstrated a commitment to their customers’ wellbeing above all else—a critical factor in rebuilding trust following such a devastating event.

Transparent Communication as Key

Besides recalling products off shelves, they launched an aggressive public awareness campaign about the risks associated with consuming their product under these circumstances—once again prioritizing transparency over potential reputational damage. This included clear messaging through media outlets and establishing toll-free hotlines for consumer queries.

Their open communication allowed them to control the narrative surrounding this crisis effectively and provided assurance that every possible measure was being taken for consumers’ protection.

Laying Foundations For Future Trust

Facing one of its most significant challenges head-on led not only to safeguarding its current reputation but also setting up future success for Tylenol brand . Their handling became synonymous with responsible corporate behavior during crises—highlighting how important it is not just what you do when things go wrong but how you respond matters more in terms of long-term reputation management.

Case Study 3 – Domino’s Pizza Turnaround

In the late 2000s, Domino’s Pizza faced a significant reputation crisis. Customer complaints about product quality were rampant, and public perception was negative.

Facing the Music: Addressing Customer Complaints Head-On

Rather than shying away from these criticisms, Domino’s made a bold move. The company openly acknowledged its shortcomings in an ad campaign that surprised many. This demonstrated that they weren’t scared to confess their errors and take steps.

The transparency of this approach resonated with customers. But acknowledging problems isn’t enough; you need to fix them too.

A Recipe for Success: Revamping the Product

Determined to regain customer trust, Domino’s started working on improving their core offering – pizza itself. They reworked recipes based on feedback and introduced new ingredients while enhancing existing ones like cheese and sauce.

This wasn’t just marketing spin either; taste tests confirmed improvement in flavor compared to previous iterations.

Maintaining Momentum: Continuous Improvement

Reviving its image required more than one-off changes though; it needed a continuous improvement strategy as well. Environmental initiatives, pioneering technology , and enhanced customer service played a part.

This comprehensive approach to reputation management demonstrates the importance of listening, responding effectively to feedback, and continuously improving your offerings. Domino’s case study serves as an example for other businesses facing similar challenges.

Key Learnings from Domino’s Pizza’s Reputation Revamp

In 2009, Domino’s Pizza found itself grappling with a reputation crisis. The pizza chain was receiving significant backlash due to the poor quality of its products and service. Rather than ignore these complaints, Domino’s chose to confront them head-on.

The company embarked on an ambitious plan that started by acknowledging their shortcomings in a series of public communications. This included airing commercials where executives read out harsh customer criticisms and admitted that they had failed to meet expectations. It was this honesty and transparency that began paving the way for Domino’s comeback.

Revamping Product Quality

A key element of this strategy involved revamping their core product: the pizza itself. After conducting extensive taste tests and soliciting customer feedback, Domino’s introduced a new recipe which led to more positive reviews.

This shift towards prioritizing customer experience wasn’t just limited to their pizzas though; it extended across all touchpoints including delivery times, mobile app usability, and store cleanliness among others.

Leveraging Technology for Better Customer Experience

To further improve user experience, Domino’s invested heavily in technology. They developed features like real-time tracking for deliveries – providing customers not only with greater convenience but also building trust through transparency about order status.

Fostering Open Communication Channels

Last but certainly not least, communication played an essential role throughout this process. By keeping lines open via social media channels as well as traditional ones – such as phone calls or emails – they ensured customers felt heard and valued. This ongoing dialogue allowed Domino’s to make sure it was addressing genuine customer concerns.

The Domino’s saga is a reminder of the potency of paying attention to clients and making changes based on their opinions. It demonstrates that even in crisis, businesses can turn things around if they are willing to take bold steps towards change.

Key Takeaway: 

When Domino’s Pizza faced a reputation crisis in 2009, they didn’t turn away. Instead, they admitted their flaws publicly and started an overhaul. By improving product quality based on customer feedback, investing in technology for better user experience, and fostering open communication channels – both traditional and social media – Domino’s successfully turned its brand image around.

Managing your reputation isn’t a walk in the park. It demands swift action, transparent communication, and customer-centric thinking.

From these reputation management case studies, you’ve seen how Starbucks bounced back from a racial bias incident with sincere dialogue and company-wide training.

You learned about Johnson & Johnson’s exemplary handling of the Tylenol crisis by prioritizing customer safety over profits. This set a benchmark for others to follow during crises.

Dominos Pizza took their criticism head-on, revamped its product based on feedback, which led to an impressive turnaround story we can all learn from.

All these big brands show us that effective reputation management is possible when companies are ready to take responsibility and prioritize their customers’ interests above all else.

Want to work with us and learn more about reputation management?

• Our proprietary  Resiliency Diagnosis  process is the perfect way to advance your crisis management, business continuity, and crisis communications program. Our thorough standards-based review culminates in a full report, maturity model scoring, and a clear set of recommendations for improvement.
• Our  Exercise in a Box  product contains 15 simple tabletop exercise scenarios that your business leaders can utilize for  crisis microsimulations  with minimal involvement from your team.
• With our  Exercise in a Day ™️  product, you’ll get a comprehensive, ready-to-execute crisis tabletop exercise developed by our team of experts in just one day. Optionally, we’ll even facilitate the exercise and write an after-action report.
• Our  Crisis Communications services  help you rapidly implement and mature your program to ensure your organization is prepared for what lies ahead.
• Our Free  Crisis Communications 101 Introductory Course  can help you understand the basics of crisis communications and reputation management.
• Learn about our  Free Resources , including articles, a  resource library , white papers, reports,  free introductory courses , webinars, and more.
• Set up an  initial call with us  to chat further about how we might be able to work together.

About Bryan Strawser

Bryan Strawser is Founder, Principal, and Chief Executive at Bryghtpath LLC, a strategic advisory firm he founded in 2014. He has more than twenty-five years of experience in the areas of, business continuity, disaster recovery, crisis management, enterprise risk, intelligence, and crisis communications.

At Bryghtpath, Bryan leads a team of experts that offer strategic counsel and support to the world’s leading brands, public sector agencies, and nonprofit organizations to strategically navigate uncertainty and disruption.

Learn more about Bryan at this link .

PO Box 131416 Saint Paul, MN 55113 USA

[email protected]

Our Capabilities

• Active Shooter Programs
• Business Continuity as a Service (BCaaS)
• IT Disaster Recovery Consulting
• Resiliency Diagnosis®️
• Crisis Communications
• Crisis Exercises
• Global Security Operations Center (GSOC)
• Emergency Planning
• Intelligence & Global Security Consulting
• Workplace Violence & Threat Management

Our Free Courses

Active Shooter 101

Business Continuity 101

Crisis Communications 101

Crisis Management 101

Workplace Violence 101

Our Premium Courses

5-Day Business Continuity Accelerator

Communicating in the Critical Moment

Crisis Management Academy®️

Managing Threats Workshop

Preparing for Careers in Resilience

Our Products

After-Action Templates

Business Continuity Plan Templates

Communications & Awareness Collateral Packages

Crisis Plan Templates

Crisis Playbook®

Disaster Recovery Templates

Exercise in a Box®

Exercise in a Day®

Maturity Models

Ready-Made Crisis Plans

Resilience Job Descriptions

Pre-made Processes & Templates

Rsquare Media

Tesla: A Case Study in Brand Reputation Management

Tesla, the innovative electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer led by CEO Elon Musk, has revolutionized the automotive industry with its cutting-edge technology and commitment to sustainability. However, the company’s journey has been marked by both triumphs and challenges, requiring strategic brand reputation management to maintain its position as a leader in the EV market. This case study examines Tesla’s brand reputation management strategies and highlights key lessons for businesses navigating the complexities of the modern marketplace.

Tesla’s Rise to Prominence

• Pioneering Electric Vehicles : Tesla’s introduction of high-performance electric vehicles challenged the conventional wisdom of the automotive industry and paved the way for widespread adoption of EVs.
• Breakthrough Technology : The company’s focus on battery technology, autonomous driving capabilities, and sustainable energy solutions positioned Tesla as an industry innovator.
• Passionate Fanbase : Tesla cultivated a loyal fanbase of customers who embraced its mission of sustainability and technological advancement.
• Media Attention : The company’s charismatic CEO, Elon Musk, and bold vision for the future attracted significant media coverage and public interest.

Challenges and Reputation Management Strategies

• Supply Chain Issues : Tesla faced challenges in scaling production to meet demand, resulting in delays and quality control issues with some vehicles.
• Transparency and Communication : The company addressed concerns through transparent communication with customers and investors, acknowledging shortcomings and outlining plans for improvement.
• Autopilot Accidents : Incidents involving Tesla vehicles equipped with Autopilot technology raised questions about the safety and reliability of autonomous driving systems.
• Collaboration and Compliance : Tesla collaborated with regulatory agencies and implemented safety enhancements to address concerns and ensure compliance with industry standards.
• Emerging Competition : Increased competition from traditional automakers and new entrants in the EV market challenged Tesla’s market dominance.
• Innovation and Differentiation : Tesla continued to differentiate itself through product innovation, expanding its product lineup and investing in research and development to maintain a competitive edge.

Lessons Learned and Future Outlook

• Customer-Centric Approach : Tesla’s commitment to listening to customer feedback and addressing concerns in a timely manner strengthened its brand reputation and fostered customer loyalty.
• Transparency and Accountability : Open communication and transparency about challenges, setbacks, and future plans helped build trust with stakeholders and mitigate negative perceptions.
• Continuous Innovation : Tesla’s relentless focus on innovation and technological advancement allowed it to stay ahead of the competition and maintain its position as a market leader in the EV industry.

Key Takeaways for Businesses :

• Prioritize customer satisfaction and feedback to build a strong brand reputation.
• Embrace transparency and accountability in addressing challenges and communicating with stakeholders.
• Maintain a commitment to innovation and differentiation to stay ahead in a competitive market landscape.

Tesla’s journey serves as a compelling case study in brand reputation management, highlighting the importance of agility, transparency, and innovation in navigating the complexities of the modern business environment. By implementing strategic reputation management strategies, Tesla has successfully weathered challenges and maintained its position as a frontrunner in the automotive industry.

Elevate Your Brand Reputation with Rsquare Media

Are you ready to enhance your brand’s reputation and navigate the complexities of the modern marketplace with confidence? Rsquare Media offers expert brand reputation management services tailored to your unique needs. Register for your free consultation today and discover how we can help you build and maintain a positive brand image that resonates with your audience.

Click here to schedule your free consultation with Rsquare Media now!

Join us in creating a powerful and enduring brand reputation that sets you apart from the competition. Let Rsquare Media be your trusted partner in achieving your business goals.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

rsquaremedia

rsquare media is an award winning online visibility & reputation management services company that helps clients Be Seen or Not Be Seen – delivering Results at the Speed of Thought

How You Benefit

Quick links.

Online Reputation Management Case Studies: From Crisis To Achievement

A case study is an in-depth analysis of your organization, brand, or business. It addresses your business’s online reputation management worldwide. Every business, either small or large, goes through several ups and downs throughout its journey. Based on these stages, a case study is revealed.

In this case study, a business specifies its crisis management narrative. What challenges have they faced, and how does it impact their online reputation? How do they overcome these challenges, and how do they monitor a satisfied reputation after positive results? 

In this blog post, I’ll share some popular online reputation management case studies and how their crises become achievements . 

Case Study 1: ABC Retail – Harnessing Data Analytics for Personalized Customer Experiences

Challenge/issue.

ABC is a prominent player in the retail industry. But recently, it faced tough competition from other retailers in the market. To overcome this issue and happily thrive in this competitive market, the company revamps its strategies by ensuring customer experience. Their goal was to build a unique identity in the market again. 

To resolve this issue, SaveRepute harnesses the power of data analytics. It implemented advanced solutions and gained valuable insights into customer preferences. The company gets these insights through various resources such as browsing patterns, purchasing history, demographics, and customer feedback. It Utilizes sophisticated tools, analyzes customer data, segments its base, and creates personalized shopping experiences. They offered tailored product recommendations and customized promotions through revamped platforms and targeted campaigns.

After implementing a data analytical approach, it had a transformative impact on ABC Retail. Implementing personalized experiences results in enhanced customer satisfaction, amplified sales, and augmented loyalty. It successfully implemented a unique brand strategy, increasing customer acquisition and brand loyalty amidst a highly competitive retail landscape.

Case Study 2: Local Car Dealership – Remove Negative Reviews By 64%

The local car dealership faced a consistent issue of negative online reviews. It deeply impacts their reputation and customers’ perceptions. Plus, their star rating also affects this. After having these issues, it recognizes the need to proactively address customer concerns and improve its online reputation to attract more customers and drive business growth. 

To resolve this issue, local car dealerships took SaveRepute online reputation management services to boost their business growth. The company offered the best strategies to dealerships to manage their negative reviews with positive reviews with the help of online tools. The company utilizes online tools like Engage to enhance customer experience by timely monitoring and responding to customer reviews across online platforms. This tool also offers sentiment analysis to control overall customer sentiments. As a result, the company proactively requested reviews from satisfied customers, amplifying positive sentiment and strengthening the online reputation of local car dealerships. 

While implementing the online tool yields a significant impact on the growth of car dealerships. Through proactive engagement and timely responsiveness to customer feedback, the dealership achieved a remarkable 64% reduction in negative reviews, a testament to its unwavering commitment to delivering unparalleled customer satisfaction. The proactive utilization of Engage by the company resulted in a significant boost to its online reputation by soliciting positive reviews. The dealership’s brand reputation and customer trust experienced a significant boost due to these commendable efforts.

Case Study 3: Saverepute’s Reputation Repair Service For A Commercial Real Estate Firm

The commercial real estate firm operates across the United States with several regional offices. It encounters negative reviews in search engine results for each market. As the market is now growing more and more, their negative reviews are highlighted more. The client encountered challenges with a malicious website created by a blogger, which aimed to harm the firm’s branded search terms. The client also suspected the involvement of competitors in this matter.

With this issue, real estate firms look over SaveReute reputation repair services . The company manages its reputation by executing powerful strategies. SaveRepute has implemented a comprehensive reputation management plan that caters to the client’s local and national requirements with a two-fold approach, such as local review management and national corporate reputation repair. 

As a result, SaveRepute successfully repaired the commercial real estate firm’s reputation by managing negative local reviews and suppressing the damaging attack site in search results. The firm’s local reputation improved, and its national search results displayed more positive information, enhancing its online reputation.

Case Study 4: SaveRepute Helps Financial service company to overcome negative Yelp Reviews

The emergence of several unfavorable reviews on popular platforms such as the Yelp review website, reposed a significant challenge for a top player in the financial services sector, as they started to feature prominently in Google search results. Despite being in the minority, the adverse evaluations had a significant impact on the enterprise’s brand image and were frequently referenced by potential clients.

SaveRepute recognized the importance of strategically positioning its company’s favorable attributes and expanding its reach across a variety of online platforms. It devised a tailor-made plan that prioritizes enhancing and capitalizing on current online resources while broadening the organization’s virtual presence to match user search queries.

After discovering the impressive outcomes of implementing SaveRepute’s proven strategy. It yielded successful outcomes. Through strategic and focused efforts, all unfavorable search results associated with the company’s name were successfully eliminated from the top search engine rankings within a mere eleven-month period.

Following the successful elimination of unfavorable content, the search engine results for the enterprise remained unblemished for a consecutive period of 12 months, resulting in a consistent escalation of the organization’s digital standing.

Based on the above case studies, it’s conducted that SaveRepute helps several platforms to regain their reputation after it has been questioned. If you lose your business reputation, you can’t regain it until you manage it from each aspect. If you hold a business suffering from the same issue, contact SaveRepute and enjoy its services to experience better business growth than ever.

Aleena Akram

"Meet Aleena Akram, your friendly content writer specializing in Reputation Management. Gain actionable insights through her articles to enhance your online image and tackle negativity. Improve your digital standing now!"

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Recent Posts

• How To Sue A Plumber For Negligence - Reasons You Need To Know
• How To Suing A Nursing Home For Negligence: A Complete Guide
• How To Sue A Fast Food Restaurant: Steps That You Must Know
• How To Remove Negative Feedback From eBay - Get Your Positive Image
• How To Sue Amazon As A Customer? A Complete Guide
• Does Liberty University Have A Bad Reputation?
• Can You Sue A Hotel For Any Kind Of Negligence?
• How to Sue a Police Department for Negligence: 8 Easy Steps
• Why Does Florida Reputation Is Bad - Learn the Truth
• How to Remove a Review From Airbnb: 5 Easy-to-follow Steps

SaveRepute, Saves your Reputation. Boost credibility and trust.

You are using an outdated browser. Upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

• Reputation Management
• Enterprise Companies
• C-Suites & Executives
• Fortune 500 CEO Improved Top 50 Search Results
• National Retailer Recovered $32 Million Monthly
• Electronics Brand Took Over Google Knowledge Panel
• Reputation Management Pricing
• Corporate Reputation Management
• CEO Reputation Management
• Online Reputation Repair
• Reputation Recovery
• Remove Search Results from Google
• Remove News Articles from Google
• Push Down Negative Search Results
• Remove Negative Glassdoor Reviews
• What is Reputational Risk?

Reputation Management Case Studies

Multi-billion dollar financial services firm executive overcomes viral news cycle.

When a major news agency published a false report about an executive at a billion dollar financial services firm, ReputationManagement.com stepped in to undo the damage.

An executive at a multibillion dollar financial services firm had suffered substantial damage to his reputation and business. The viral spread of a false report published by a major news agency was dominating Google search results for the client’s name.

Create opportunities for the client to tell his side of the story on equally reputable websites and media outlets. This provided Google with positive content that would better satisfy searchers researching the client, thus reshaping the search landscape without the damaging articles.

The top search results for the client's name were cleared of all negative content in the first twelve months and have remained that way. The success of our campaign led to a new agreement to help manage the reputation of our client’s company.

Financial Services Company Overcomes Negative Yelp Reviews with Help from ReputationManagement.com

When a few negative Yelp reviews about a prominent financial services company outranked hundreds of positive reviews, ReputationManagement.com worked with the reputable business to make their true reputation more visible to potential customers.

A leader in the financial services industry received a handful of negative — and at times unfair — reviews on domains like Yelp, which ranked at the top of Google. Despite being far outweighed by positive reviews, the negative reviews plagued the business and were often referenced by potential customers during the sales process.

We quickly realized that the business was not properly positioning its positive assets, and they were also falling short in influencing a diverse set of web properties. We developed a customized strategy that included optimizing and leveraging an existing set of web properties, and we expanded the company’s digital footprint to better satisfy user search intent.

The top search results for the company’s name were cleared of all negative content eleven months into the campaign, and have remained free of negative content for the last 12 consecutive months.

ReputationManagement.com Helps Restore the Positive Reputation of Respected Executive

Outdated press covering a respected executive’s old business deal dominated the web. ReputationManagement.com worked with the high profile individual to bring his many successes to the forefront of his search results.

When searching online for the name of a major executive at a prominent firm, an outdated story about an old business deal ranked at the top of page one. The story ranked well for several years before ReputationManagement.com’s help. Users who saw the article at the top of page one signalled to Google that it was relevant by regularly clicking on it, making it difficult to move from the top of the search results.

The client is a thought-leader in his company’s industry and is also heavily involved within his community, but this information wasn’t properly highlighted online. We worked with the client to leverage his existing network and created content and web pages designed to rank well in search in order to accurately showcase his work.

The negative article was pushed to the bottom of page one within 12 months. Replications of the original article that also appeared on page one were moved off within six months. The client faced several challenges over the course of a three-year campaign, including the unexpected publication of several additional unfavorable articles. Today, page one of the client’s search results is completely clean and factually highlights his successes.

Testimonials

ReputationManagement.com provided us at the outset with a timeline to achieve our objectives. They then delivered what they promised, with quantitative measures every step of the way. Who else gives you that in the whole world of marketing?

The team at ReputationManagement.com has everything you want in a online reputation management partner – they’re highly conversant in the latest digital trends, they're versatile and quick to respond, and they do an excellent job communicating complex topics to laypeople.

With a dedicated team of experts and our proprietary software on your side, you can get back to business.

Case Studies , Reputation Management

Case Study: The Power of a Strong Reputation

June 22, 2023

Too often, local businesses see their reputation as a passive thing. They try to provide their customers with great customer service and take customer feedback seriously, and then they hope for the best.

However, your reputation is far too important to leave up to chance. It’s what separates you from your competition — the reason to choose you over the many other businesses in your area.

When your reputation speaks for itself, it builds trust in your business and amplifies your marketing efforts. But, that kind of reputation won’t happen on its own.

A strong reputation can be an incredibly powerful thing for a local business, and it takes time and consistency to build.

Some stats you should know:

• 87% of consumers read reviews online for local businesses ( Status Labs )
• 52% of consumers won’t patronize a business that has fewer than four stars ( BrightLocal )
• It can take up to 40 good customer experiences to reverse the damage caused by a single negative review ( Inc. )
• Companies that boast an above-average number of reviews on all review sites earn 54% more annual revenue ( Womply )

Local business fuels success with a strong reputation

One local business, with the help of their Marketing Success Manager and Marketing 360®’s reputation management software , learned just how impactful having a strong reputation can be.

With a focus on reputation management, this local business saw their most profitable quarter ever in the first quarter of 2021 — a time when many local businesses were still reeling from the pandemic.

Compared to the first quarter of 2020, this local business saw a 143% increase in their conversion rate, a $74 drop in their cost per conversion — a 25% decrease in cost — and almost double the number of conversions.

They also saw a jump in their organic performance, with a 165% increase in impressions, a 130% increase in clicks and a 171% increase in organic conversions compared to Q1 of 2020.

How did they do it?

The foundation of a local business’s online reputation is its reviews, and in order to ensure that they were getting plenty of reviews, this local business made it a point to simply ask their customers for feedback.

They started requesting reviews from every customer who came through the door by sending a follow-up email after their visit. If the recipient had a Gmail address, they asked them to leave a review on Google.

If the recipient did not have a Gmail address, they asked them to leave a review on Top Rated Local®. This made it easy for customers to leave reviews because Top Rated Local does not require an account.

This push for reviews led to a 94.51 Rating Score on Top Rated Local and a 4.85 average star rating on Google.

From building trust with prospective customers to organic visibility and conversions, there are so many reasons to make reputation management a priority. But, a strong reputation won’t happen on its own.

Building an impactful reputation for your business takes time and consistency, but when you stick with it, it can really pay off.

Build, manage and grow your small business with Marketing 360®

Marketing 360 is a singular platform that offers everything you need to build a modern, professional website, launch ads on popular channels , manage all of your contacts, projects and deals , schedule out social media posts , monitor your SEO performance and so much more, plus the marketing team you need to grow your business.

See our plans and pricing.

Account M26627 Screenshots taken on 4/27/21

*Results are based on past client performance. Individual account performance may vary. Results are not guaranteed.

Originally published on 4/27/21

Get Plans and Pricing Below

Reputation Management

How to Get More Reviews for Your Fitness Business

Case Studies , Social Media Management

Case Study: Plumber Wins With Social Media Management

Crafting Customer Connections: 6 Tips for Masterful Review Responses

Case Study: Property Management Uses Reputation Management to Learn About Customer Satisfaction

Mastering Online Reputation Management: A Therapist’s Essential Guide

Case Studies

Case Study: Furniture Store Sees Conversion Rates Skyrocket

Get the know-how to get ahead.

Get business, marketing and sales tips written by experienced industry practitioners. 100% free. Cancel anytime.

• Email address *

The 2024 Healthcare Rankings Report is Now Available.

Search for:

• Business Listings Increase visibility, guarantee accuracy, and achieve higher conversion.
• Reviews & Review Booster Track, manage and respond to reviews in one place.
• Surveys Build and send surveys on the sites you care about.
• Social Suite Listen, like and respond to posts in one central location.
• Location Pages Get found and convert more customers at all your locations.
• Insights Understand sentiment, analyze feedback and take action with text analytics.
• Inbox Win sales and loyalty to your business via popular messaging services.
• Actions The best help desk ticketing software for any size business.
• Competitive Intelligence Analyze competitors’ ratings & reviews, compare performance and identify new opportunities.
• Integrations Activate the power of feedback data across your tech stack.

The 2024 Healthcare Reports are Available!

• Automotive Increase leads, visibility and new customers for dealerships, groups and OEM brands.
• Restaurants & Hospitality Improve guest satisfaction and your brand’s online presence.
• Retail Attract, convert and retain customers across all store locations.
• Property Management Increase resident satisfaction and drive occupancy rates across all properties.
• Financial Services Improve consumer trust by learning from competitive data and consumer feedback.
• Healthcare Ensure exceptional patient experience across all locations.
• Senior Care Ensure quality senior care experiences by leveraging feedback data.
• Discover Check out the newest platform features and products.
• Learn Explore Reputation platform training materials and videos.
• Support Access our Customer Portal for account assistance.
• Customer Stories Learn how Reputation customers achieve success and drive growth.
• Videos & Webinars Binge watch our webinars for industry tips and product updates.
• Articles Learn about our latest platform updates and industry best practices.
• Reports & Research Explore the latest industry insights with our data-driven research reports.

The Impact of Online Reputation Management

Adam Dorfman

Why Reviews Matter

Consumer Research: 85% of consumers conduct online research before making a purchase and 89% trust online reviews. (Cone Inc.)

Brand Trust: 72% of consumers trust online review as much as word of mouth. (Local Consumer Review Survey)

The Bottom Line: A difference of one “star” in the average rating in a typical online business profile can lead to a 5–9% difference in revenues. (Harvard Business Review)

Reputation’s Two-part Solution

Technology Platform: The Reputation for Enterprise technology platform is a comprehensive solution for monitoring, analyzing, and improving online reviews.

Managed Service: A full-service add-on to the technology platform, leveraging our expertise in online reviews and social media to help our customers request reviews, respond to criticism, and manage their social media presence.

Case Study Overview

Review management vs. control.

A consumer-facing company with locations across the United States contracted Reputation to monitor and improve the online reviews of its stores. We conducted a trial to demonstrate the effectiveness of our Managed Service offerings. The trial contrasted two groups of stores:

• Control Group: Access to our technology platform only.
• Managed Group: Access to the Reputation technology platform, and comprehensive reputation management campaign run by us.

Breakdown: Control vs. Managed

For more information about these results or Reputation for Enterprise, call: 1-800-REPUTATION

Finding #1: Asking for Reviews Significantly Increases Volume of Positive Reviews

Our client is in a seasonal industry, so we contrasted monthly review volumes for Summer 2011 with Summer 2012. Review management significantly increased the number of positive reviews.

Key takeaways

• Average volume for the Control group stayed largely the same between 2011 and 2012 and throughout the trial.
• Average volume for the Managed group was more than 4 times higher during the trial than it was in Summer 2011.
• Average volume for the Managed group was more than 5 times higher than the Control group during the trial.

Positive Reviews Generated, Monthly Average

Finding #2: Asking for Reviews Significantly Reduces the Proportion of Negative Reviews

We also saw that Managed Service reduced the proportion of negative reviews being published. Not only were the Managed stores receiving more positive reviews, they were attracting fewer negative reviews. The Control group saw no change.

• During the trial, the proportion of negative reviews for the Managed group fell by nearly 60%.
• The Control group’s proportion of negative reviews stayed the same.

Proportion of Negative Reviews

“Managed Service leads to 500% more  positive reviews and 60% fewer negative  reviews.”

Finding #3: Customers More Likely to Post a Review When Emails Are Sent Shortly After Sale

At the start of the trial, we sent out review request emails to customers who had made a purchase in the previous 6 weeks. Thereafter, we sent out requests to customers daily, following each sale. We saw a significantly higher response rate when customers were contacted directly after the sale.

• Customers were 9% more likely to open the request email when it was sent shortly after the sale and more than twice as likely to click through to a review site.
• Review management provides the highest return when activities are conducted continuously.

Email Campaign Response

Finding #4: Robust Infrastructure is Key to Success

An audit of the reputation management activities conducted for the client demonstrates the importance of a robust technology and support infrastructure. For 31 locations, we sent out more than 13,000 customized emails over the trial period, generating hundreds of new reviews. We also initiated an automatic alerting system for our engagement team, allowing us to promptly respond to exceptionally positive and negative reviews and maximize customer goodwill for the client.

• Effective reputation management requires both a scalable technology back-end and a coordinated team of trained individuals.
• Detailed data collection and regular audits or reporting can accurately measure the impact of reputation management efforts.

Email Campaign Snapshot

“Reputation management needs to be done  systematically on a daily basis.”

Finding #5: Thematic Analysis of Reviews Highlights Operational Deficiencies

During the trial, we analyzed thousands of reviews of the client’s stores, including both Control and Managed groups, looking for words that were strongly correlated to positive or negative reviews.

By looking at the most positive and negative words found in the analysis, we can extrapolate global trends about the businesses’ customers. These are words that customers use repeatedly in reviews — in either a very glowing or a very critical way.

Top 15 most positive terms

• 14 of 15 are first names of salespeople who assisted the customer

Top 15 most negative terms

• 6 of 15 are about perceived dishonesty on the part of the salesperson
• 6 of 15 are about product defects
• Personal relationships with the customer are by far the most important factors to goodwill in this industry.
• The quality of products is also very important.

Finding #6: Posting to Social Media Generates Goodwill

We also saw a significant positive impact from social media activities conducted on behalf of the client’s stores. For each store, we created Twitter and Facebook accounts as required, posted new content, and interacted with social media users.

Social Media Campaign Snapshot for 18 Stores

• Social media management drives friendly interactions with customers and provides another way to promote positive reviews.
• Thoughtful social media posts help to grow a business’s online audience.

“Customer feedback in reviews and social media provides a valuable source of business  intelligence.”

Return on Investment

Over the course of the trial, we raised the average star rating of the Managed group by 0.9 stars (3.6 to 4.5 out of 5). According to the Harvard Business Review model, this should lead to a 5–9% increase in sales.

The client sent us sales figures for Summer 2012, contrasting the Control and Managed groups. The Control group saw a slight decrease in sales over the trial period, whereas the Managed group saw a large increase.

These results are significantly better than what would be expected, given the HBR study. The Reputation solution provides results that exceed best-case scenarios seen in the real world. This confirms the connection between online reviews and sales, and it underlines the importance of effective review management.

Projected vs. Real Increase in Sales

HBR = Increase in sales predicted by November 2011 Harvard Business Review study on the impact of online reviews.

Conclusions

• Reputation management has a tangible and significant impact on top-line sales.
• ROI from the Reputation solution is nearly double what studies on the impact of online reviews would predict.
• Actively asking for reviews significantly improves a business’s online reputation.
• Successful review management requires expertise, a robust technological infrastructure, and personnel trained in best practices.
• Reputation management must be undertaken systematically on a daily basis for maximum effectiveness.
• Analysis of online reviews provides valuable operational insights that can be leveraged to win over customer loyalty and drive new sales.
• Social media management complements and amplifies the positive effects of review management.

Recently Posted

Leveraging reputation management across the organization: a ceo’s perspective, google search antitrust ruling: what you need to know, how young’s leveraged customer feedback for business growth, urgent care reputation insights: 2024 benchmark report, academic hospital reputation insights: 2024 benchmark report, uk automotive ‘quick take’ report 2024, the critical role of reputation performance in healthcare mergers and acquisitions, how bensons for beds optimised its digital customer journey, uk pharmacies ‘quick take’ report 2023-24, streamlining success: key insights from reputation’s roundtable event.

Please submit the form below to schedule a custom demo.

Case Studies: Effective Campaigns for Online Reputation Management

In the dynamic digital landscape, maintaining a positive online reputation is crucial for businesses to thrive. With the rise of social media and online review platforms, companies are more exposed than ever to public scrutiny. This has given birth to a burgeoning industry — online reputation management (ORM). In this article, we will delve into a few compelling case studies that highlight effective campaigns for online reputation management, with a focus on the services provided by an online reputation management company in India .

XYZ Corporation’s Social Media Renaissance

XYZ Corporation, a leading tech firm, faced a crisis when a disgruntled employee posted negative comments on various social media platforms, tarnishing the company’s image. Recognizing the urgency, XYZ Corporation enlisted the services of an online reputation management company in India to orchestrate a strategic response.

The ORM experts conducted a comprehensive audit of the online sentiment surrounding XYZ Corporation. They identified key influencers and engaged with them positively, steering the narrative away from negativity. Simultaneously, they leveraged social media to highlight the company’s positive aspects, such as its commitment to employee welfare and groundbreaking innovations.

The results were remarkable — not only did the negative comments lose traction, but XYZ Corporation also witnessed an increase in positive engagement and brand sentiment. This case study underscores the importance of proactively managing social media channels and strategically engaging with the online community.

ABC Restaurant’s Review Redemption

ABC Restaurant, a popular eatery, faced a critical challenge when a series of negative reviews surfaced on prominent review sites. The cumulative impact of these reviews was detrimental to the restaurant’s reputation and patronage. In desperation, ABC Restaurant sought the expertise of an online reputation management company in India to salvage their online standing.

The ORM specialists initiated a multi-faceted approach. First, they addressed each negative review individually, offering sincere apologies and showcasing a commitment to improvement. Simultaneously, they encouraged satisfied customers to share their positive experiences online. To counterbalance the negative reviews, the ORM team implemented a targeted SEO strategy to highlight positive content and push down negative search results.

Over time, the negative reviews were buried beneath a plethora of positive feedback, and ABC Restaurant experienced a significant uptick in foot traffic and positive online engagement. This case study emphasizes the importance of actively managing and responding to customer reviews to maintain a positive online image.

PQR E-commerce Platform’s Crisis Communication

PQR, a thriving e-commerce platform, faced a crisis when a data breach compromised customer information. The incident led to widespread panic among users and a barrage of negative media coverage. PQR turned to an online reputation management company in India to navigate this tumultuous situation.

The ORM experts swiftly crafted a crisis communication plan, acknowledging the breach, apologizing for the inconvenience, and outlining the steps taken to rectify the situation. The team used social media, press releases, and targeted outreach to keep customers informed and address concerns transparently. Additionally, they implemented measures to enhance the platform’s security and prevent future breaches.

The result was a remarkable turnaround in public perception. PQR’s commitment to transparency and swift action during the crisis not only restored customer trust but also positioned the company as a responsible and reliable entity in the eyes of the public.

These case studies underscore the significance of effective online reputation management in today’s digital age. Businesses, whether facing a social media storm, negative reviews, or a full-blown crisis, can benefit immensely from partnering with an online reputation management company in India or elsewhere. Proactive strategies, such as engaging with customers on social media, responding to reviews, and transparent crisis communication, play a pivotal role in shaping and maintaining a positive online image.

So if you want to manage your online reputation, here IBRAND tech is an online reputation management company that provides the best online reputation monitoring service in India. Her role is to create/restore/enhance and manage clients’ online reputation and promote their brand globally. If you want to increase your online presence and sales, you should contact IBRAND tech . Only this business permanently deletes unfavorable evaluations from sites like Quora, Trustpilot, Glassdoor, Google My Business, Indeed, AmbitionBox, Goodfirm and Jobbuzz.

Written by Arun Rout

Text to speech

1.800.889.4812

Case Studies

Healthcare reputation management case study.

We reduced the visibility of negative content that was driving patients away. We leveraged Wikipedia, fresh content, search engine marketing, and public relations to dramatically reduce opportunity loss. Executive Summary…

Corporate Wikipedia Article Editing Case Study

A multi-billion dollar company was plagued by competitors masquerading as activists. The attackers generated articles to negatively skew online sentiment toward the company. It was a perfect storm of Google…

Executive Reputation Repair Case Study

Our client is a well-known member of the New York financial community planning to run for political office. Activist groups and journalists plagued our client with negative press and inaccurate…

International ORM Case Study – European Localization

Background A mid-size US-based financial services firm with global offices faced reputational challenges across its European operations, with negative search results impacting its brand perception. The firm sought to improve…

PR Partnership – Reputation Case Study

Reputation X provides white-label online reputation management to PR and digital agencies. Here is an example of one relationship. Executive Summary Service Provider: Reputation X Client: Mid-sized Public Relations Agency…

Review and Rating Management Case Study

Our client was an established online retailer that had undergone a change in ownership and management. The original owner enjoyed very high review star ratings across most platforms, including Yelp, Google…

Law Firm Reputation Management Case Study

Executive Summary Client: Renowned Regional Law Firm Challenge: A single highly visible negative blog post undermining the firm’s established trust and marketing efforts Objective: To diminish the negative blog post’s…

White Label Reputation Services Case Study

Reputation X provides white-label reputation management to PR and digital agencies. Here is an example of one relationship. The issue Reputation management campaigns and public relations campaigns share a common…

Business Wikipedia Article Creation Case Study

Reputation X developed a new Wikipedia article for a financial services company.  Executive Summary Client: New York-Based Financial Services Firm Challenge: Overcoming the Wikipedia development hurdles for a business in…

Ready to Take the Next Step?

Get in touch with our team and we’ll take the first steps toward making you look better online.

More From Forbes

The case for online reputation management: by the numbers.

• Share to Facebook
• Share to Twitter
• Share to Linkedin

Online Reputation

If you’ve ever Google-searched a peer, partner, prospective employee, or that one actor who somehow makes an appearance in all of your favorite shows, then you know how important it is that the results are accurate. (How else will you ever figure out who that actor is?)

And if you’ve ever searched your own name — this is a safe space, so you can admit you’ve done this at least a few times — you probably feel like the accuracy of those results is even more critical.

It’s part of why I write so often about topics like thought leadership and ways to build your brand . In the digital world, the web is often our first and most important impression, and finding ways to monitor, improve, and control our reputations online is something that benefits everyone.

While there are some comprehensive guides out there about online reputation management , the numbers bring the necessity into focus. What do they tell us, exactly? Online reputation affects all of us in many different ways.

Major decisions often come down to online search results

Before the internet, what anyone could learn about you was pretty limited to the Yellow Pages. Reputation was mostly gleaned by word of mouth, so concrete evidence of a person’s character took, well, actually getting to know him or her.

Today, however, meeting someone in person isn’t so much a first impression as it is your chance to confirm or refute what you’ve already found online. People are Googling all the time and making critical decisions based on what they find:

• Seventy-five percent of HR departments are required to research a candidate online before making a hire. Whether you’re actively managing it or not, your online reputation is becoming an important part of the hiring process. Seventy percent of employers have rejected candidates based on information they found online, and 85 percent say positive information has influenced them to make a hire.
• Ninety percent of executive recruiters Google candidates before making a hire. And the number is even higher for executives: Eighty-two percent of executive recruiters report that a candidate’s job prospects improve when positive information is found online, while half of them have eliminated an executive job candidate because of information they found publicly available on the internet.
• Sixty percent of employers screen candidates via social media. This number is rapidly increasing — from 52 percent just last year and 22 percent in 2008. Employers are scanning social for red flags: 46 percent were turned off by provocative or inappropriate photographs, videos, or information; 43 percent by evidence of a candidate drinking or using drugs; 31 percent by bad-mouthing of previous company or fellow employee; and 29 percent by poor communication skills.
• Forty-two percent of U.S. adults online who look someone up do so before doing business with him or her. Forty-five percent said they have found something in an online search that made them decide not to do business with the person, and 56 percent have found something that solidified their decision to do business with that person.

Searches don’t shine positive lights on everyone

People are using Google to find information about you and other people that cross their paths, for better or for worse. The question is this: What are they finding? According to the above study, the prognosis isn’t great for most people:

• According to an aforementioned survey, 48 percent of online U.S. adults who’ve searched their own names say their Google results aren’t positive . Nearly a third say nothing shows up at all. So while the odds that people are searching for you are pretty good, the odds that they’ll find positive results aren’t as great.
• Only 2 percent of users own their entire first page of Google , and less than half own their very first result, which is the most important. This number is astoundingly low. Sure, not all of our names are unique (Am I right, other people named John?), but for company leaders, failing to secure a positive first page is a huge missed opportunity.
• According to the above study, 15 percent of adults have at least one negative result surface about them . It’s even more unfortunate that these people being Googled will greet the researcher with something negative, hurting their professional and social prospects.

The internet isn’t known for being an overly hospitable place

So people are looking you up, and in all likelihood, the results are average at best. You may be willing to live with that, but keep in mind that things can go badly online fast, and the damage can be disproportionate:

• Seventy-three percent of American adults have witnessed online harassment , and 70 percent of young Americans say they have been victims themselves. Negativity comes in all forms, and harassment can be one of the most painful. What we say and do online is essentially permanent, so online harassment or slander has a unique way of staining a person’s reputation.
• People create, share, and consume content constantly. On average each day, they: Upload 52 million Instagram photos send 500 million tweets ; make 3.5 billion Google searches ; and send 269 billion emails. That’s a lot of content and plenty of room for failure. As much as you want to believe you’d never be that person who damages his company’s brand or loses his job over a tweet, anything is possible in a sea of this much content.
• We spend 23 days a year , and rising, on our phones. The massive amount of time we spend on our smartphones means we’re constantly shaping our digital identity and those of others, sometimes without being very mindful of the greater effects.

The days of passive reputation management are over. We’re all online, making major decisions based on the information we find on search and social. Not only is the strength of your personal brand on the line, but your company’s brand is at stake, too. And as a leader, that reputation has to start with you.

John Hall is the CEO of Influence & Co. , a keynote speaker, and the author of “ Top of Mind .” You can book John to speak here .

• Editorial Standards
• Reprints & Permissions

The Reputation Experts

• Google Removals

Case Studies

• In the Press
• About Igniyte
• Expert Comment
• Meet The Senior Team
• How We Work With You
• Search for:

Building A Start-Up Brand Online

Building Brand Awareness

Gaining Full Control Of Online Search Results

Improving Corporate Reputation And Customer Perception

Online Crisis Management

Online Reputation Crisis Management

Positive PR Strategy

Reputation Review: Engaging Global Stakeholders

Successful Google Removals And Positive PR

Understanding And Improving Online Reputation

Repairing Personal Reputation And Taking Control

Removing Negative Content Online – Multi-Region Google Search Results

Rebuilding A Damaged Career

Suppressing Negative Content Online

Cleaning Up Negative Google Search Results

Building A Positive Personal Reputation

High-Profile Personal Online Reputation Management

Restoring Personal Reputation

Get in Touch

1-800-613-1080

[email protected]

• Senior Leadership
• Culture & Careers
• Parent, Child, & Baby
• Youth Marketing
• Multicultural Marketing
• Pet Products Marketing & PR Agency
• Financial Services & Fintech
• Litigation PR & Legal Tech PR
• Real Estate PR & Prop Tech PR
• Internal Communications
• Public Affairs & Government Relations
• SPACs & IPOs
• HR Tech & Future of Work
• Apps & Marketplaces
• AdTech and Digital Media
• Consumer Technology
• Digital Health & Health Technology
• Wine & Spirits
• Travel & Hospitality
• Food & Beverage
• Entertainment & Sports Marketing
• Apparel, Accessories & Specialty Retail
• Beauty PR & Grooming PR
• Homegoods: Lifestyle & Design
• Cannabis PR
• Crisis Communication & Reputation Management
• Public Affairs & Government
• Cause-Driven/Not for Profit
• Event Marketing
• Digital Marketing
• SEO & Online Reputation Management
• Case Studies
• Integrated Marketing
• Public Relations
• Strategic Planning
• Reputation Management
• Event Management
• Celebrity & Influencer Relationships
• Product Integration
• Digital Marketing & Social Media

212.999.5585

[email protected].

Delta Airlines Cautionary Tale: A Case Study in The Crucial Role of PR in Reputation Management  

Reputation management and business continuity planning has become a cornerstone of successful business strategy. Cybersecurity attacks and data breaches have long been at the forefront of crisis preparedness plans, but as companies become more dependent on technology, the scope of potential crises has expanded. IT outages, once a secondary concern, are now at the top of the list for scenario planning, particularly for companies that rely heavily on technology for scale, speed, and safety. 

The Delta Airlines Case: A Cautionary Tale  

The recent events surrounding Delta Airlines’ reaction to the CrowdStrike outages highlight the critical importance of effective reputation management and crisis preparedness. Despite assumptions that Delta would have a robust plan for IT outages, the airline faced a significant crisis that seemed to defy a tested playbook. With a projected $500 million loss in revenue and the emergence of class action lawsuits, Delta is grappling with reputational concerns that span multiple stakeholders, including customers, shareholders, and employees. 

While the incident was caused by a third-party vendor creating a global outage impacting multiple competitors, as well as spanning numerous industries including retailers and banks, any leniency customers may have felt toward Delta has been completely erased by the company’s crisis response. 

The company’s communication with customers regarding compensation for disrupted travel failed to consider the challenge of resolving such a high volume of issues in a timely manner, leading to a secondary wave of frustration directed specifically at Delta. A strong crisis preparedness plan would have dictated clear policies, timelines, and the best channels for disseminating information, which could have mitigated some of the damage 

Furthermore, Delta’s decision to cancel flights en masse, rather than delay them like some competitors, compounded the problem. This made it more difficult to rebook passengers, who were left scrambling to find seats on nearly full flights during the peak of summer travel. 

The Downside of Public Finger-Pointing  

Rather than adopting a ‘we’re all in this together’ approach, Delta has inexplicably come out attacking, in a head scratching move for reputational experts, CrowdStrike and Microsoft very publicly. They’ve even threatened to sue their partners, creating more negative news for themselves than the other airlines had to contend with. 

Public threats of lawsuits by corporations don’t achieve really any reputational benefits. In this case it added more problems and extended the life of a negative story. Cue the additional headlines about the losses Delta is facing.  The move also limited legal and comms teams as you start to show your hand externally. 

Then, CrowdStrike struck back publicly airing out some of Delta’s dirty IT laundry and reminding them of the limits of liability they contractually agreed to. None of it a good look for Delta. 

Microsoft took their turn too, with attorney Mark Cheffo saying, “Our preliminary review suggests that Delta, unlike its competitors, apparently has not modernized its IT infrastructure, either for the benefit of its customers or for its pilots and flight attendants.”  

This back-and-forth did little to help Delta’s standing with its customers, who didn’t care about the corporate blame game and simply wanted to be compensated and treated fairly. 

What Can We Learn from This?  

Scenario Planning is Critical : Companies must expand their crisis preparedness plans beyond traditional threats like data breaches to include IT outages, especially in tech-reliant industries. 

Clear Communication is Essential : In a crisis, clear, timely, and well-planned communication can make the difference between a managed situation and a full-blown reputational disaster. Make sure your plan covers all the ‘what-if’s’ that can arise and consider all external factors that might have an impact on your company and how you execute your crisis plan.    

Avoid Public Blame Games: While assigning blame might sometimes be necessary, publicly threatening lawsuits against vendors or partners during a crisis can further worsen your own situation. This approach can invite additional criticism from the public and prolong negative media coverage, further complicating crisis management efforts. 

Crisis Preparedness Must Be Comprehensive: An excellent crisis preparedness plan extends beyond technical solutions to include clear communication strategies, customer care plans, and active stakeholder engagement. Regular internal testing, along with continuous review and revision of your company’s messaging and crisis communication plan, is crucial for maintaining effectiveness. Revisiting the plan one to two times a year is recommended to consider new industry information or updates, the evolving news cycle, and any other factors that could impact your prepared plan. 

Why PR Firms Are Crucial in Reputation Management  

PR firms play an indispensable role in reputation management. They bring expertise in crisis communication, helping companies navigate the complexities of public perception during a crisis. PR professionals understand how to craft messages that resonate with different stakeholders, from customers to investors, and how to deploy these messages through the most effective channels. 

Moreover, PR firms offer an external perspective, allowing them to identify potential reputational risks that may not be apparent to those within the company. They can also help in developing comprehensive crisis preparedness plans that include scenario planning, communication strategies, and stakeholder engagement. 

By prioritizing reputation management and involving PR professionals in crisis planning, companies can better prepare for unforeseen events and protect their standing in the eyes of the public. 

Some of the most common scenarios we see companies want to prepare for: Cyber Security/Data breaches, IT/system outages, DE&I issues, Natural disasters, Active Shooters, and Corporate Malfeasance. 

Engage: Takeaways from DEF CON 32

This year’s DEF CON theme was “engage” and that absolutely came through between the record...

Use Performance Marketing To Target Specific Audiences Showing Relevant Ads to Potential Customers

Performance marketing, a data-driven approach focused on measurable results, has transformed how...

Reputation management and business continuity planning has become a cornerstone of successful...

• Case Studies

• Web Presence
• Affiliate Marketing

Reputation Management Case Studies

• Smear Campaign
• Social Media Suppression
• Microsite Development

Case Study: Reputation Management: Smear Campaign

As online reputation management is a sensitive topic, most clients prefer to keep their identities anonymous. The case studies that follow are based on actual work we have successfully executed over the past 10 years. For the sake of confidentiality, we have used fictitious names, locations and other information.

The Scenario

Acme Printing, founded by Russian immigrant Boris Smirnov has been in business for 10 years. He worked hard to build the company from a one-man show to a full-service graphics bureau with an outstanding record of quality customer service. Boris entered the online space and his business flourished. People were printing business cards, letterhead and other stationary through his service because of his combination of good pricing, good service and a good product. As his business grew, Boris captured market-share from his top competitors, and that’s where the troubles began.

Boris’s service hadn’t changed; he still provided a great product and excellent support, and yet negative reviews started popping up all over the web, accusing him of selling inferior products, not accepting returns and rude customer service reps. After a little digging, he noticed that many of these reviews were cut and paste copies of one another. This raised his suspicions that it might be a competitor, disgruntled employee or jaded customer on a mission to destroy his company’s reputation.

At this point, Boris wasn’t sure of the next steps, so he contacted a number of reputation management firms and decided to move forward with Consorte Marketing .

The Interview

Although reputation management is typically an ongoing process (hence, “management”), Boris had more immediate goals in mind:

• Remove or suppress the libelous reviews, ratings and accusations
• Find the source
• Take action to ensure that this activity would cease

Boris gave us some background on potential culprits. One that stood out was a competitor who he had a history of friction with, who also happened to have been a Russian immigrant with a similar story – we’ll call him Ivan. Historically, we found that some of these negative reviews correlated with the same timeframes as interactions between Boris and Ivan.

The Implementation

Our first step was to gather information during a Discovery phase. Boris gave us the URLs for every review he had already discovered online, and we expanded it into a much more comprehensive list. We then categorized these reviews, prioritized them according to urgency for resolution, looked for similarities that would suggest they came from the same source, and put together clues that eventually led us to the source of the material.

After we compiled this list, we had a handful of reviews that were unquestionably fake, and were able to get many of them unpublished, mostly from online industry forums and message boards. Some of the owners of these websites provided us with additional information that we added to our list of clues. Eventually we had 80% of the posts removed by talking with the administrators of many of these websites. Another 15% were removed via a more direct approach – Take Down Requests written by an internet lawyer. The remaining 5% could not be removed as they were on websites that are typically uncooperative in these scenarios. For those, suppression would have been the appropriate course of action.

Through this very intense project, not only were we able to have much of the misleading information taken offline, but the trail of breadcrumbs led us to several online profiles where we were able to capture the culprit’s name and a picture of his face. We also retrieved location information from these profiles that matched the geo-location we obtained from his IP address and other sources.

The person behind the posts turned out to be located in Russia. Ivan did not make the posts directly; this was done by an online marketing gun-for-hire who, for a fee, would maintain an aggressive smear campaign against any company or individual. This individual was informed that we had identified him and the posts stopped immediately. The next step was to convince him to release the name of the person or organization who hired him. As he was located in another country, enforcement was a challenge. However, through international channels and offshore connections, further action would have been possible. However, Boris was glad that we were able to clean up this mess, and put enough pressure on the source behind it to stop. It has been over a year and there has been no additional activity.

Boris continues to get rave reviews from satisfied customers and his printing business continues to grow.

Privacy Overview

Global mining company protects its reputation and ensures compliance with Intelligent Authoring 

In today’s dynamic market, staying compliant with evolving safety regulations is paramount. For leaders in mining and metals, navigating the complexities of product regulations across different countries and languages is critical to reputational integrity, market access and smooth supply chain operations.  

A global leader in this industry recently approached its compliance challenges by leveraging Sphera’s Product Compliance Software to establish a robust Safety Data Sheet (SDS) authoring and management system. The solution streamlines content creation and management, ensures the accuracy of SDSs and eliminates the risk of noncompliance.  

Now this mining and metals giant is proficient at SDS creation and promotes a culture of safety and compliance that strengthens its market position.      

IN THIS CASE STUDY

Standardized and enhanced quality of Safety Data Sheets across global enterprise  

Streamlined work process by automating distribution of SDS with products and enabling operational staff to support SDS authoring  

Fostered a culture of safety and compliance that strengthens market position  

Manual, time-intensive processes reliant on Word and Excel  

Risk of market exclusion and reputational damage  

Constantly shifting regulatory landscape  

Increasingly complex language requirements  

SPHERA’S PRODUCT COMPLIANCE SOFTWARE  

Understanding the intricacies of global safety regulations is essential for any organization. Noncompliance can lead to severe consequences, including hefty fines, operational disruptions and reputational damage. Sphera’s software empowers companies to achieve and maintain compliance, safeguard their reputation and ensure continued market access.  

Within the company, the use of Sphera’s Product Compliance Software, particularly the Intelligent Authoring Module, was instrumental in establishing its product stewardship team’s reputation as the foremost authority for accurate safety data sheets. Sales, marketing and shipping teams can now operate in confidence knowing that the content they create is accurate and distributed to all personnel. This helps cultivate a safety culture where employees are actively engaged in safety practices, leading to a reduction in accidents and injuries.  

Externally, Sphera’s solution helps the company build credibility with suppliers and vendors. It also makes it possible to effectively challenge classifications and validate external SDSs. This instills vendor confidence in the safe management of materials and ensures strict compliance with even the most rigorous regulatory requirements.   

By leveraging Sphera’s solution, this global mining leader has unlocked a winning formula: efficient SDS creation, a safe work environment, strengthened relationships throughout the supply chain and unwavering adherence to global safety regulations. This powerful combination positions the company for continued success in the international marketplace.  

By leveraging Sphera’s Intelligent Authoring Solution, this company embraced a systematic method for creating SDSs and improving regulatory compliance and operational efficiency.   

Moreover, they enhanced their adaptability and credibility. Through Sphera’s multilingual features and regular compliance updates, the brand was able to streamline compliance with global regulations, leading to expanded market reach, heightened sales opportunities and a prominent competitive standing.

“As a product steward, I’m more confident in our ability to comply with global regulations, and I believe that we’re now in a stronger position to enter new markets. The Sphera product has enabled us to be more efficient and more competitive. – Product Steward

Global, industry-leading mining company

Case studies, sphera in action.

Schwalbe: Driving change in the bicycle industry

Blaser Swisslube: Supporting Global Operations with a Comprehensive Product Compliance Solution

Northrop Grumman: Maximizing efficiency with improved data management

Spheracloud®

Request a demo

Get in touch.

• Corporate Sustainability
• Environmental Accounting
• Health and Safety Management
• Operational Compliance
• Master Data Management
• Advanced Risk Assessment
• Control of Work
• Life Cycle Assessment
• Chemical Management Software
• Hazardous Material Management
• Product Compliance Software
• Supply Chain Sustainability
• Supply Chain Risk Management
• Sustainability Strategy Guidance
• Sustainability Performance Improvement
• Sustainability Communication and Reporting
• Chemicals & Life Sciences
• Consumer Services & Technology
• Industrials & Manufacturing
• Oil & Gas
• Hazardous Materials
• Financial Services
• Customer case studies
• Customer Care
• Resource Library
• Case studies
• Sustainable Success book
• Webinar recordings
• White papers
• Upcoming events
• On-demand recordings
• All Regulations
• California SB 253
• California SB 261
• EU Taxonomy
• Indian Business Responsibility & Sustainability
• Don’t delete – see zac
• Join our team
• German (German)

Privacy Overview

Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.

Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Open Search

  Mobile Menu

Milton Ranch Restoration: A Case Study for Successful Collaboration 

There are many benefits that come from the restoration of prairie systems. And collaboration is key to making it happen. 

Growing up, Bill Milton split his time between the Bay Area and his father’s ranch near Helena, Montana. After his father passed away, he wandered around for a time, before returning to Montana. In 1978, Bill and his wife Dana bought a ranch, now known as Milton Ranch, just north of Roundup, Montana. The Milton’s made a home on the ranch where they raised their three children. 

Milton Ranch is 15,000 acres, and sits within the largest intact grassland ecosystem in the world. The grasslands are home to antelope, deer, elk, and prairie dogs. Many birds visit the ranch as well, including ducks and geese, white pelicans and cormorants, and bird species of concern like the Sprague’s pipit. While some of the land was previously farmed, a majority of those fields have since been returned to native grasses, and the Milton’s continue to do the same to the remaining non-native fields. Over 400 cow-calf pairs graze on the grasses. About two thirds of the Milton ranch is deeded land, and the remaining third is leased from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the State of Montana.  

When asked about his favorite time to be on the land, Bill Milton shared, “All the time. I love early mornings, and all the different lights at different times of the day. When you work on land, there is an interdependence going on. Over the years you see how the grasses and animals change. When you are here for a long time, you pick up on those differences and see subtleties that someone who just showed up wouldn't notice.”  

The Milton’s take a holistic approach to land management, recognizing the positive relationship that is possible between cows and the landscape they live on. This holistic approach involves moving the cows frequently, often daily, to provide short but intense grazing periods to the cows and long recovery periods to the grasslands.  

Close to ten miles of ephemeral stream runs through the center of Milton Ranch. The creek is an unnamed tributary of Willow Creek, and a part of the Musselshell Watershed. The Milton’s understand that rivers do not stop at fence lines or jurisdictional boundaries, and that land management shouldn’t either. To better steward their ranch, the Milton family is teaming up with the BLM,  National Wildlife Federation (NWF), and Anabranch Solutions , a small riverscape restoration business, to carry out restoration on the creek.  

Due to the holistic management techniques already in practice on the ranch, the riparian areas are in fairly good shape. To help maintain the health of the riparian areas, they are not grazed during peak growing season more than once every four years. That gives riparian vegetation three out of every four years to build root mass and take advantage of available moisture. However, there is still an opportunity to improve the health of these riparian areas. As central Montana becomes more arid, conserving water resources is an important part of maintaining resilience. 

Shelby Weigand, senior coordinator for riparian connectivity at NWF said “although Milton Ranch experienced intense grazing and stream modification in the past, due to improved grazing practices, it is on an upward trend. We want to continue that upward movement.”  

To help maintain water resources and increase resilience, partners are working to restore the creek on Milton Ranch. The goal of the restoration project is to connect the floodplain, maintain flows in the creek later into the year, and improve native vegetation along the creek. The project will involve installing beaver dam analogs, and post-assisted log structures, which cause water to slow down and spread out. Partners will also plant woody vegetation such as buffaloberry, chokecherry, and willow, that will be fenced in so the plants can be used as seed or rhizome banks. 

While some of the work will happen on Milton Ranch, it will also improve the creek on BLM and State of Montana owned land. Shane Trautner, rangeland management specialist for the BLM field office in Billings, has worked on previous stewardship projects with the Miltons, and he is pleased to be partnering with them again. Trautner was tasked with collecting woody material to use for the structures. He is collaborating with BLM’s hazardous fuels crews to get woody material from thinning projects in the area. Some of the material will come from the Milton Ranch, and the remainder will be sourced twenty miles west of the site. Materials will be collected and staged close to the date of implementation, so they are malleable and easy to build with.  

During project implementation, NWF will be hosting a workshop to discuss the benefits of restoration in prairie systems. Weigand and Trautner hope that while the Milton Ranch may be the starting point for restoration in the Musselshell Watershed, it can also be a catalyst for future projects.  

“This is about more than just Bill’s place,” said Trautner. “Ultimately the goal is to expand and use collective resources to keep building and fine tuning from here. I want to document real change in the watershed.” 

Bill Milton agrees, noting that “these restoration projects are good for everybody. It is good for ranchers to have partnerships and organizations to tell a good story to increase appreciation for ranching and how it can be beneficial for landscapes. Collaboration is our superpower.”  

About the Author 

Rose Vejvoda is a graduate student at Northern Arizona University, where she is a candidate for a Professional Master of Science in Climate Science and Solutions, and a graduate certificate in Greenhouse Gas Accounting. Rose received her undergraduate degree from Montana State University where she studied English Writing, and Sustainability Studies. She has a passion for using effective storytelling to build relationships, uplift local communities, and help people feel connected to the natural world. Rose wrote this story while she was a Freshwater Ecosystems Intern at Natural Resources Defense Council working with BLM.  

Rose Vejvoda, Intern

Montana/Dakotas State Office

5001 Southgate Drive Billings , MT 59101 United States

Blog Topic:

Related stories.

• August 13, 2024 BLM’s Operational Medical Support program collaborates with Yosemite National Park
• August 9, 2024 BLM In Belize: Employees Participate in International Assignment Taking Them From Districts of Utah to Caves of Central America
• August 6, 2024 BLM, Volunteers Restore Habitat for Threatened Species
• July 31, 2024 Mother’s Day Site helps unlock ancient mysteries while asking more questions
• July 30, 2024 VIDEO: A transformative journey for Arizona’s Sky Islands

• You are here:
• Agile Business Consortium
• DSDM Project Framework

Chapter 10: MoSCoW Prioritisation

Previous  chapter: 9  Workshops

10.1 Introduction

In a DSDM project where time has been fixed, it is vital to understand the relative importance of the work to be done in order to make progress and keep to deadlines. Prioritisation can be applied to requirements/User Stories, tasks, products, use cases, acceptance criteria and tests, although it is most commonly applied to requirements/ User Stories. (User Stories are a very effective way of defining requirements in an Agile style; see later chapter on Requirements and User Stories for more information.) MoSCoW is a prioritisation technique for helping to understand and manage priorities. The letters stand for:

• S hould Have
• C ould Have
• W on’t Have this time

The use of MoSCoW works particularly well on projects. It also overcomes the problems associated with simpler prioritisation approaches which are based on relative priorities:

• The use of a simple high, medium or low classification is weaker because definitions of these priorities are missing or need to be defined. Nor does this categorization provide the business with a clear promise of what to expect. A categorisation with a single middle option, such as medium, also allows for indecision
• The use of a simple sequential 1,2,3,4… priority is weaker because it deals less effectively with items of similar importance. There may be prolonged and heated discussions over whether an item should be one place higher or lower

The specific use of Must Have, Should Have, Could Have or Won’t Have this time provides a clear indication of that item and the expectations for its completion.  

10.2 The MoSCoW Rules

10.2.1 Must Have

These provide the Minimum Usable SubseT (MUST) of requirements which the project guarantees to deliver. These may be defined using some of the following:

• No point in delivering on target date without this; if it were not delivered, there would be no point deploying the solution on the intended date
• Not legal without it
• Unsafe without it
• Cannot deliver a viable solution without it

Ask the question ‘what happens if this requirement is not met?’ If the answer is ‘cancel the project – there is no point in implementing a solution that does not meet this requirement’, then it is a Must Have requirement. If there is some way around it, even if it is a manual and painful workaround, then it is a Should Have or a Could Have requirement. Categorising a requirement as a Should Have or Could Have does not mean it won’t be delivered; simply that delivery is not guaranteed.  

10.2.2 Should Have

Should Have requirements are defined as:

• Important but not vital
• May be painful to leave out, but the solution is still viable
• May need some kind of workaround, e.g. management of expectations, some inefficiency, an existing solution, paperwork etc. The workaround may be just a temporary one

One way of differentiating a Should Have requirement from a Could Have is by reviewing the degree of pain caused by the requirement not being met, measured in terms of business value or numbers of people affected.  

10.2.3 Could Have

Could Have requirements are defined as:

• Wanted or desirable but less important
• Less impact if left out (compared with a Should Have)

These are the requirements that provide the main pool of contingency, since they would only be delivered in their entirety in a best case scenario. When a problem occurs and the deadline is at risk, one or more of the Could haves provide the first choice of what is to be dropped from this timeframe.  

10.2.4 Won’t Have this time

These are requirements which the project team has agreed will not be delivered (as part of this timeframe). They are recorded in the Prioritised Requirements List where they help clarify the scope of the project. This avoids them being informally reintroduced at a later date. This also helps to manage expectations that some requirements will simply not make it into the Deployed Solution, at least not this time around. Won’t Haves can be very powerful in keeping the focus at this point in time on the more important Could Haves, Should Haves and particularly the Must Haves.

10.3 MoSCoW Relating to a Specific Timeframe

In a traditional project, all requirements are treated as Must Have, since the expectation is set from the start that everything will be delivered and that typically time (the end date) will slip if problems are encountered. DSDM projects have a very different approach; fixing time, cost and quality and negotiating features. By the end of Foundations, the end dates for the project and for the first Project Increment are confirmed. In order to meet this commitment to the deadline, DSDM projects need to create contingency within the prioritised requirements. Therefore the primary focus initially is to create MoSCoW priorities for the project. However, when deciding what to deliver as part of the Project Increment, the next focus will be to agree MoSCoW priorities for that Increment. So at this point, a requirement may have two priorities; MoSCoW for the project and MoSCoW for the Increment. Finally, when planning a specific Timebox (at the start of each Timebox) the Solution Development Team will allocate a specific priority for the requirements for this Timebox. At this point, the majority of requirements are Won’t Have (for this Timebox). Only requirements that the Solution Development Team plan to work on in the development timebox are allocated a Must Have, Should Have or Could Have priority. Therefore requirements may have three levels of priority:

• MoSCoW for the project
• MoSCoW for the Project Increment
• MoSCoW for this Timebox

It is important that the bigger picture objectives (completion of the Project Increment and delivery of the project) are not forgotten when working at the Timebox level. One simple way to deal with this is to create a separate Timebox PRL, a subset of the project PRL that is specifically associated with an individual Timebox and leave the priorities unchanged on the main PRL for the project.  

10.4 Ensuring effective prioritisation

10.4.1 Balancing the priorities

When deciding the effort allocated for Must Have requirements, remember that anything other than a Must Have is, to some degree, contingency, since the Must Haves define the Minimum Usable SubseT which is guaranteed to be delivered.

DSDM recommends:

• Getting the percentage of project/Project Increment Must Haves (in terms of effort to deliver) to a level where the team’s confidence to deliver them is high – typically no more than 60% Must Have effort
• Agreeing a pool of Could Haves for the project/Project Increment that reflects a sensible level of contingency - typically around 20% Could Have effort. Creating a sensible pool of Could Haves sets the correct expectations for the business from the start – that these requirements/User Stories may be delivered in their entirety in a best case scenario, but the primary project/Project Increment focus will always be on protecting the Must Haves and Should Haves

This spread of priorities provides enough contingency to ensure confidence in a successful project outcome. NB When calculating effort for a timeframe, Won’t Haves (for this timeframe) are excluded. DSDM’s recommendations reflect a typical project scenario. The important thing to make MoSCoW work is to have some visible flexibility in the level of requirements which must be delivered. The safe percentage of Must Have requirements, in order to be confident of project success, is not to exceed 60% Must Have effort.

Figure 10a: MoSCoW – balancing priorities

Levels of Must Have effort above 60% introduce a risk of failure, unless the team are working in a project where all of these criteria are true:

• Estimates are known to be accurate
• The approach is very well understood
• The team are “performing” (based on the Tuckman model)
• The environment is understood and low-risk in terms of the potential for external factors to introduce delays

In some circumstances the percentage of Must Have effort may be significantly less than 60%. However this can be used to the benefit of the business, by providing the greatest possible flexibility to optimise value delivered across a larger proportion of Should Haves. The exact split of effort between Musts, Shoulds, and Coulds is down to each project team to agree, although DSDM also recommends creating a sensible pool of Could Haves, typically around 20% of the total effort. Effective MoSCoW prioritisation is all about balancing risk and predictability for each project.  

10.4.2 Agreeing up front how priorities will work

DSDM defines what the different priorities mean – the MoSCoW Rules. But whereas the definition of a Must Have is not negotiable, the difference between a Should Have and a Could Have can be quite subjective. It is very helpful if the team agree, at the start of their project, how these lower level priorities will be applied. Understanding in advance some objective criteria that separate a Should Have from a Could Have and ensuring that all roles on the project buy into what has been agreed can avoid much heated discussion later. Look for defined boundaries that decide whether a requirement is a Should Have or a Could Have?

Ideally this agreement is reached before the requirements are captured.   

10.4.3 When to prioritise

very item of work has a priority. Priorities are set before work commences and the majority of this prioritisation activity happens during Foundations. However, priorities should be kept under continual review as work is completed. As new work arises, either through introduction of a new requirement or through the exposure of unexpected work associated with existing requirements, the decision must be made as to how critical it is to the success of the current work using the MoSCoW rules. When introducing new requirements, care needs to be taken not to increase the percentage of Must Have requirement effort beyond the agreed project level. The priorities of uncompleted requirements should be reviewed throughout the project to ensure that they are still valid. As a minimum, they should be reviewed at the end of each Timebox and each Project Increment.  

10.4.4 Discussing and reviewing priorities

Any requirement defined as a Must Have will, by definition, have a critical impact on the success of the project. The Project Manager, Business Analyst and any other member of the Solution Development Team should openly discuss requirements prioritised as Must Have where they are not obvious Must Haves (“Without this would we cancel the project/increment?”); it is up to the Business Visionary or their empowered Business Ambassador to explain why a requirement is a Must Have. The escalation of decision-making processes should be agreed early on, e.g. Business Ambassador and Business Analyst to Business Visionary to Business Sponsor, and the level of empowerment agreed around decision-making at each level. At the end of a Project Increment, all requirements that have not been met are re-prioritised in the light of the needs of the next Increment. This means that, for instance, a Could Have that is not met in one Increment may be reclassified subsequently as a Won’t Have for the next Increment, because it does not contribute enough towards the business needs to justify its inclusion. However, it could just as easily become a Must Have for the next Increment, if its low priority in the first Increment was based on the fact it was simply not needed in the first Solution Increment.  

10.5 Using MoSCoW to Manage Business Expectations

The MoSCoW rules have been defined in a way that allows the delivery of the Minimum Usable SubseT of requirements to be guaranteed. Both the Solution Development Team and those to whom they are delivering share this confidence because the high percentage effort of Shoulds and Coulds provides optimum contingency to ensure delivery of the Must Haves. The business roles can certainly expect more than delivery of only the Must Haves. The Must Haves are guaranteed but it is perfectly reasonable for the business to expect delivery of more than the Minimum Usable SubseT in the timeframe, except under the most challenging of circumstances. DSDM’s recommendation to create a sensible pool of Could Have contingency – typically around 20% of the total project/increment effort - identifies requirements that are less important or which have less impact if not delivered, in order to protect the more important requirements. This approach implies that the business can reasonably expect the Should Have requirements to be met, in addition to all of the Must Haves. It also implies that in a best case scenario, the Could Have requirements would also be delivered. The Solution Development Team cannot have the confidence to guarantee delivery of all the Must Have, Should Have and Could Have requirements, even though these have all been estimated and are included in the plan. This is because the plan is based on early estimates and on requirements which have not yet been analysed in low-level detail. Applying pressure to a team to guarantee delivery of Musts, Shoulds and Coulds is counter-productive. It usually results in padded estimates which give a false perception of success. “We always achieve 100% (because we added significant contingency to our figures”). So, combining sensible prioritisation with timeboxing leads to predictability of delivery and therefore greater confidence. This also protects the quality of the solution being delivered. Keeping project metrics to show the percentage of Should Haves and Could Haves delivered on each Project Increment or Timebox will either re-enforce this confidence, if things are going well, or provide an early warning of problems, highlighting that some important (but not critical) requirements may not be met at the project level.  

10.6 How does MoSCoW Relate to the Business Vision

10.6.1 The Business Sponsor’s perspective

The starting point for all projects is the business vision. Associated with the business vision are a set of prioritised requirements that contribute to delivery of the vision. Also associated with the business vision is a Business Case that describes the project in terms of what value it will deliver back to the business. Depending on the organization, this Business Case may be an informal understanding or it may be defined formally, showing what Return On Investment (ROI) is expected in order to justify the cost of the project. The MoSCoW priorities are necessary to understand the Minimum Usable SubseT and the importance of individual requirements. The Business Visionary must ensure that the requirements are prioritised, evaluated in business terms, and delivered to provide the ROI required by the Business Case, in line with the business vision.  

10.7 Making MoSCoW Work

Requirements are identified at various levels of detail, from a high-level strategic viewpoint (typically during Feasibility) through to a more detailed, implementable level (typically during Evolutionary Development). Highlevel requirements can usually be decomposed to yield a mix of sub-requirements, which can then be prioritised individually. This ensures the flexibility is maintained, so that if necessary, some of the detailed less important functionality can be dropped from the delivered solution to protect the project deadline. It is this decomposition that can help resolve one of the problems that often confront teams: that all requirements appear to be Must Haves. If all requirements were genuinely Must Haves, then the flexibility derived from the MoSCoW prioritisation would no longer work. There would be no lower priority requirements to be dropped from the deliverables to keep a project on time and budget. This goes against the DSDM ethos of fixing time and cost and flexing features (the triangles diagram in the Philosophy and Fundamentals chapter). Believing everything is a Must Have is often symptomatic of insufficient decomposition of requirements. Remember that team members may cause scope creep by working on ”interesting” things rather than the important things. MoSCoW can help avoid this.  

10.8 Tips for Assigning Priorities

1. Ensure that the business roles, in particular the Business Visionary and the Business Analyst, are fully up to speed as to why and how DSDM prioritises requirements.

2. Consider starting with all requirements as Won’t Haves, and then justify why they need to be given a higher priority.

3. For each requirement that is proposed as a Must Have, ask: ‘what happens if this requirement is not met?’ If the answer is ‘cancel the project; there is no point in implementing a solution that does not meet this requirement’, then it really is a Must Have. If not, then decide whether it is Should Have or a Could Have (or even a Won’t Have this time)

4. Ask: ‘if I come to you the night before Deployment and tell you there is a problem with a Must Have requirement and that we can’t deliver it – will you stop the Deployment?’ If the answer is ‘yes’ then this is a Must Have requirement. If not, decide whether it is Should Have or a Could Have.

5. Is there a workaround, even if it is a manual one? If a workaround exists, then it is not a Must Have requirement. When determining whether this is a Should Have or a Could Have requirement, compare the cost of the workaround with the cost of delivering the requirement, including the cost of any associated delays and any additional cost to implement it later, rather than now.

6. Ask why the requirement is needed – for this project and this Project Increment.

7. Is this requirement dependent on any others being fulfilled? A Must Have cannot depend on the delivery of anything other than a Must Have because of the risk of a Should Have or Could Have not being delivered.

8. Allow different priorities for acceptance criteria of a requirement.

9. Can this requirement be decomposed? Is it necessary to deliver each of these elements to fulfil the requirement? Are the decomposed elements of the same priority as each other? 10. Tie the requirement to a project objective. If the objective is not a Must Have, then probably neither is the requirement relating to it. 11. Does the priority change with time? For example, for an initial release a requirement is a Should Have, but it will become a Must Have for a later release. 12. Prioritise testing, using MoSCoW. 13. Use MoSCoW to prioritise your To Do list. It can be used for activities as well as requirements.   

10.9 Summary

MoSCoW (Must Have, Should Have, Could Have, Won’t Have this time) is primarily used to prioritise requirements, although the practice is also useful in many other areas. On a typical project, DSDM recommends no more than 60% effort for Must Have requirements on a project, and a sensible pool of Could Haves, usually around 20% effort. Anything higher than 60% Must Have effort poses a risk to the success and predictability of the project, unless the environment and any technology is well understood, the team is well established and the external risks minimal.

Next chapter: 11 Iterative Development

Global Modern Architecture

W2 – simple case studies.

Case Study 1 – Indian Institute of Forest Management

The Indian Institute of Forest Management complex in Bhopal, India houses the Indian Institute of Forest Management (IIFM), which trains and promotes forestry and natural resource management. The space is designed to provide multiple semi-separate areas connecting to create a larger whole to provide autonomy within the academic community. The complex contains classrooms, conference rooms, admin offices, an auditorium, a library, and a spacious courtyard. Separate from the academic area is a zone designated for living, with dormitories and eating/cooking areas. In recent years, visitors have noted that the maintenance of the buildings has decayed.

• Type: Institutional
• Architect: Anant Raje
• Location: Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh Stale

Case Study 2 – Moscow metropolitan underground railway system

Opening in 1935, the Moscow Metro consisted of 13 stations along one line. The earliest stations show a relatively modest design style. Over time, stations adopted anything from incredibly ornate baroque to art deco and modernist architecture and interior architecture. Pre-war Stalinist style is also common in earlier stations with large, strong columns (see Mayakovskaya station) and vaulted ceilings. Much later in time during the cold war, design took a back seat to economics. However, as the cold war progressed, heavily decorated stations emerged again as a symbol of Moscow’s technological progress (perceived or otherwise). Technological themes like aviation made larger appearances during this era. In the 21 st century, modern stations look just that – modern and more standardized against other international metros.

• Type: Station
• Architect: Multiple – some examples: Vladimir Schuko, Vladimir Gelfreich, Robert Pogrebnoi, and Yuriy Zenkivich
• Location: Multiple stations within Moscow
• Year: First station build 1935

Case Study 2 – Jean-Marie Tjibaou Cultural Centre

The Jean-Marie Tjibaou Cultural Centre resides in the capital of New Caledonia, Nouméa, and was intended to soften the sociopolitical conflict between the indigenous Kalak population and the French colonizers. While the architects design is meant to invoke images of the Kanaks vertically shaped structures. It is noted that the architect is not Kanak, and bulk of the materials used to construct the center were imported from off the island. The vertical beams of the structure are undeniably whimsical in their open, almost unfished appearance.

• Type: Cultural center/leisure
• Architect: Renzo Piano
• Location: Nouméa, New Caledonia

• https://worldarchitecture.org/architecture-news/ehmmf/anant_rajedesigned_iifm_bhopal_needs_urgent_restoration_ingenious_approach_for_future_growth.html
• https://architexturez.net/doc/az-cf-178749 
• https://www.rbth.com/multimedia/pictures/2016/05/15/moscow-metro-schusev_592427
• https://www.archdaily.com/157480/ad-classics-moscow-metro-robert-pogrebnoi-and-yuriy-zenkivich
• https://www.railway-technology.com/features/moscow-metro-stations/
• https://arquitecturaviva.com/works/centro-cultural-jean-marie-tjibaou-noumea-1 

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

• w2-simple case study (24)
• Uncategorized (19)
• W2 – readings (14)

Openness and Flexibility

regions , Uncategorized , W4

Week 4 Readings

Uncategorized , W4

Week 4 Reading Post

Modernism & Simplicity

regions , W4 , weeks

Bleak Ornamentation & Abstract Interiors

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Performance management decision-making model: case study on foreign language learning curriculums.

1. Introduction

2. literature review, 2.1. questionnaire and pem, 2.2. index setting and statistical testing, 3. research methods, 4. an applied example, 5. conclusions, author contributions, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Li, R. Research trends of blended language learning: A bibliometric synthesis of SSCI-indexed journal articles during 2000–2019. ReCALL 2022 , 34 , 309–326. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, X.; Huang, X. Improvement and Optimization Method of College English Teaching Level Based on Convolutional Neural Network Model in an Embedded Systems Context. Comput. Aided Des. Appl. 2024 , 21 , 212–227. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Graham, K.M.; Yeh, Y.F. Teachers’ implementation of bilingual education in Taiwan: Challenges and arrangements. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. 2023 , 24 , 461–472. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, S.H. Establishment of a Performance-Evaluation Model for Service Quality in the Banking Industry. Serv. Ind. J. 2009 , 29 , 235–247. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Marković, S.; Janković, S.R. Exploring the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in croatian hotel industry. Tour. Hosp. Manag.-Croat. 2013 , 19 , 149–164. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yang, C.C. Establishment and applications of the integrated model of service quality measurement. Manag. Serv. Qual. 2003 , 13 , 310–324. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wong, R.C.P.; Szeto, W.Y. An alternative methodology for evaluating the service quality of urban taxis. Transp. Policy 2018 , 69 , 132–140. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Martínez-Caro, E.; Cegarra-Navarro, J.G.; Cepeda-Carrión, G. An application of the performance-evaluation model for e-learning quality in higher education. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2015 , 26 , 632–647. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mustafa, H.; Omar, B.; Mukhiar, S.N.S. Measuring destination competitiveness: An importance-performance analysis (IPA) of six top island destinations in South East Asia. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2020 , 25 , 223–243. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pai, F.Y.; Yeh, T.M. Effective implementation for introducing ISO/TS 16949 in semiconductor manufacturing industries, Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2013 , 24 , 462–478. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jeng, M.Y.; Yeh, T.M.; Pai, F.Y. A Performance Evaluation Matrix for Measuring the Life Satisfaction of Older Adults Using eHealth Wearables. Healthcare 2022 , 10 , 605. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kucukaltan, B.; Irani, Z.; Aktas, E. A decision support model for identification and prioritization of key performance indicators in the logistics industry. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016 , 65 , 346–358. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yu, C.M.; Chang, H.T.; Hsu, S.Y. An assessment of quality and quantity for foreign language training course to enhance students’ learning effectiveness. Int. J. Inf. Manag. Sci. 2017 , 28 , 53–66. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yeh, L.C.; Tung, C.C.; Yang, S.Y.; Chen, J.H.; Shiau, F.H. The Development of the University Teacher Instructional Evaluation Scale. Psychol. Test. 2005 , 52 , 59–82. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lambert, D.M.; Sharma, A. A customer-based competitive analysis for logistics decisions. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 1990 , 20 , 17–24. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hung, Y.H.; Huang, M.L.; Chen, K.S. Service Quality Evaluation by Service Quality Performance Matrix. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2003 , 14 , 79–89. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yu, C.M.; Chang, H.T.; Chen, K.S. Developing a performance evaluation matrix to enhance the learner satisfaction of an e-learning system. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2018 , 29 , 727–745. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, F. A data-driven prediction approach for sports team performance and its application to national basketball association. Omega 2021 , 98 , 102123. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nam, S.; Lee, H.C. A text analytics-based importance performance analysis and its application to airline service. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 6153. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wu, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, R.; Cai, J. An approach to discovering product/service improvement priorities: Using dynamic importance-performance analysis. Sustainability 2018 , 10 , 3564. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gutierrez, D.M.; Scavarda, L.F.; Fiorencio, L.; Martins, R.A. Evolution of the performance measurement system in the logistics department of a broadcasting company: An a.ction research. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015 , 160 , 1–12. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rodriguez, R.R.; Saiz, J.J.A.; Bas, A.O. Quantitative relationships between key performance indicators for supporting decision-making processes. Comput. Ind. 2009 , 60 , 104–113. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cheng, S.W. Practical implementation of the process capability indices. Qual. Eng. 1994 , 7 , 239–259. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Xu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Meng, P. A novel intelligent deep learning-based uncertainty-guided network training in market price. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2022 , 18 , 5705–5711. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, H.Y.; Lin, K.P. Fuzzy supplier selection model based on lifetime performance index. Expert Syst. Appl. 2022 , 208 , 118135. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Durmuş, V. Does the healthcare decentralization provide better public health security capacity and health services satisfaction? An analysis of OECD countries. J. Health Organ. Manag. 2024 , 38 , 209–226. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Syafrudin, M.; Alfian, G.; Fitriyani, N.L.; Rhee, J. Performance analysis of IoT-based sensor, big data processing, and machine learning model for real-time monitoring system in automotive manufacturing. Sensors 2018 , 18 , 2946. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gopalakrishnan, S.; Kumaran, M.S. Iiot framework based ml model to improve automobile industry product. Intell. Autom. Soft Comput. 2022 , 31 , 1435–1449. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Chen, K.-S.; Yu, C.-M.; Yu, C.-H.; Chen, Y.-P. Performance Management Decision-Making Model: Case Study on Foreign Language Learning Curriculums. Information 2024 , 15 , 481. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15080481

Chen K-S, Yu C-M, Yu C-H, Chen Y-P. Performance Management Decision-Making Model: Case Study on Foreign Language Learning Curriculums. Information . 2024; 15(8):481. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15080481

Chen, Kuen-Suan, Chun-Min Yu, Chun-Hung Yu, and Yen-Po Chen. 2024. "Performance Management Decision-Making Model: Case Study on Foreign Language Learning Curriculums" Information 15, no. 8: 481. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15080481

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

• Social Media Listening
• Online Reputation Management & Monitoring
• Brand Perception Study
• Product Performance Study
• Content Performance Analysis
• Campaign Performance Study
• Reports & Guides

Online Reputation Management Success: Inspiring Case Studies

The pervasive nature of the internet has made managing one’s online reputation increasingly important for both businesses and individuals. As online reviews and social media shape public perception, implementing effective online reputation management (ORM) strategies has become critical to achieving success. These inspiring case studies showcase the transformative power of well-executed ORM approaches and explore the nuances of each situation to provide a more in-depth understanding of the strategies employed.

Case Study 1: National Restaurant Chain

A national restaurant chain faced a series of negative reviews and a decline in customer satisfaction. To combat this, they implemented the following ORM strategies:

1.1 Proactive social media monitoring: The company dedicated a team to monitoring social media platforms, identifying both positive and negative feedback. This helped them stay informed about customer opinions and react quickly to any concerns.

1.2 Engaging with customers directly: The restaurant chain made an effort to respond to customer complaints promptly and personally, demonstrating empathy and a genuine desire to resolve issues. This human touch helped foster trust and rebuild relationships with dissatisfied customers.

1.3 Addressing negative reviews: The company took a proactive approach to address negative reviews on platforms like Yelp and Google Reviews. They provided explanations when necessary, took corrective measures, and even offered incentives for customers to give them a second chance.

As a result, the chain experienced improved online ratings, increased customer trust, and enhanced brand loyalty.

Case Study 2: High-profile Executive

A high-profile executive was struggling with negative search results affecting their professional credibility. They employed the following ORM strategies:

2.1 Developing a strong personal brand: The executive worked on building a distinct personal brand that highlighted their expertise and thought leadership. This involved crafting a compelling personal narrative and sharing it across various digital platforms.

2.2 Creating and promoting content: The executive consistently produced high-quality content, such as articles, videos, and podcasts, showcasing their knowledge and accomplishments. They leveraged social media and other relevant channels to promote this content, ensuring it reached a wider audience.

2.3 Garnering positive press coverage: By actively participating in industry events, contributing to expert panels, and collaborating with reputable publications, the executive was able to secure positive press coverage that helped overshadow the negative search results.

These efforts led to improved search engine results and enhanced the professional credibility of the executive.

Case Study 3: Small Business Owner

A small business owner faced a barrage of negative reviews that threatened their online reputation. They implemented the following ORM strategies:

3.1 Identifying and resolving the root cause: The business owner investigated the source of the negative reviews and identified the main issues customers were facing. By addressing these problems directly, they were able to prevent further negative feedback and improve customer satisfaction.

3.2 Encouraging satisfied customers to leave reviews: The business owner implemented a system for soliciting reviews from happy customers, providing them with an easy way to share their positive experiences. This influx of positive reviews helped to balance out the negative ones.

3.3 Implementing a review management system: The owner adopted a review management tool that allowed them to monitor customer feedback across various platforms and address any concerns promptly.

These actions resulted in an increase in positive reviews and a strengthened online presence for the business.

Case Study 4: Nonprofit Organization

A nonprofit organization faced public backlash due to misconceptions and negative publicity. To address these issues, they employed the following ORM strategies:

4.1 Utilizing influencers and supporters: The organization reached out to influencers and supporters in their industry, asking them to share positive messages about their mission and work. This helped create a network of advocates that could counteract the negative publicity.

4.2 Addressing misconceptions: The nonprofit published a series of blog posts, videos, and social media content that clarified its mission, values, and accomplishments. By providing accurate information and promoting transparency, they were able to dispel the misconceptions that had led to the negative publicity.

4.3 Building partnerships with other reputable organizations: By forming strategic alliances with other well-regarded nonprofits and organizations, the nonprofit was able to enhance its credibility and reinforce its positive image.

These efforts enhanced public trust, increased donor engagement, and higher contributions to the organization.

Case Study 5: E-commerce Company

An e-commerce company faced challenges with its online reputation due to a series of customer complaints and negative reviews. They implemented the following ORM strategies:

5.1 Improving customer service: The company made a concerted effort to improve its customer service, focusing on communication and responsiveness. They provided additional training to their customer service team and introduced new channels for customers to reach them.

5.2 Implementing a proactive feedback system: The e-commerce company encouraged customers to provide feedback on their shopping experience, both positive and negative. This allowed them to identify areas for improvement and address customer concerns more effectively.

5.3 Showcasing positive customer experiences: The company leveraged user-generated content, such as customer testimonials and reviews, to highlight positive experiences and build credibility with potential customers.

As a result, the e-commerce company experienced a significant improvement in its online reputation and saw an increase in customer satisfaction and sales.

Key Takeaways

The case studies above highlight the importance of addressing ORM issues promptly and tailoring strategies to specific situations and goals. Effective ORM can yield long-term benefits for businesses and individuals, including improved online presence, increased trust, and enhanced credibility.

The case studies presented in this article clearly illustrate the positive impact of well-planned online reputation management. In a world where online presence plays a significant role, investing in ORM is crucial for maintaining a favorable image and opening doors to new opportunities. We encourage you to consider ORM services as a valuable tool to strengthen and improve your online reputation, setting the stage for ongoing success in your business endeavors.

Germin8 Solutions Pvt Ltd

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Germin8 List of Services

Latest post.

• Maximizing Market Influence: The Role of Data in Shaping Business Strategies
• Mastering Content Analysis: Enhancing Engagement with Strategic Insights
• Comments section – the new space for brand engagement
• “Get me a representative, I’ll wait”
• Best Practices for Delivering Superior Customer Experience on Social Media
• Contact Form

Moscow School of Management, Skolkovo, Russia by David Adjaye- Design inspired by Geometric Abstract Artwork

Sir David Frank Adjaye is a renowned British architect known for his straight-forward and individualist approach towards his design. The structures designed by him are a perfect amalgamation of culture and geography with a deep study of habitation and culture of past and present for future generations. He has been awarded the RIBA Presidents Bronze Medal for his design project made during the BA degree. 

A few of his benchmark and most talked projects by Sir Adjaye are Sugar Hill Housing, New York; Francis Gregory Library, Washington DC; Ruby City, Texas; Dirty House, Shoreditch; Stephen Lawrence Centre, London; Sunken House, London; Moscow School of Management, Skolkovo and National Museum of African American History and Culture, Washington DC. A few of his ongoing projects to look out for are Studio Museum, New York and the National Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre, London. 

Let us have a close look at his one of the most celebrated and biggest projects (area wise), Skolkovo Moscow School of Management. 

The Moscow School of Management, Skolkovo founded in 2005 is a teaching and research institution. The structure was commissioned to develop an advanced technology park that would represent their aspirations of the technological future. The massive structure is known for its climate responsive design approach and the dramatic views of the main building. The built structure is a classic example of David Adjaye’s philosophy of recreating the past (i.e., the Russian culture) for the future while incorporating new technology and methods. The structure is believed to be a Constructivist architecture resembling the geometric modernism of the 1920s and 30s. Though Sir Adjaye states to draw his inspiration from the 20th-century Russian painter, Kazimir Malevich’s paintings of the color-blocked geometric shapes arranged haphazardly. 

Total Area:  42891 sq. m. Client:  Moscow School of Management Contract Value:  USD 360 million

Climatic Responsive Conceptual Planning

Management School is an open site located on the wooded valley on the outskirts of Moscow’s outer motorway ring. Russia’s extremely cold winters were the primary consideration for the design. Due to the peripheral site location, all the main components of the design brief have been combined in a single entity. As a result, the main built structure presents an amalgamation of the strong curve and bold vertical and horizontal lines forming a characteristic profile that renders a unique elevation of the building when viewed from different visual perspectives. 

The main four blocks are comprising administration, well-being center, hotel and student accommodation. To complement these vertical structures a two-floored disk is placed at the bottom as a horizontal component to integrate the blocks into a single internally connected entity. 

The disk blends with the surrounding landscape of the Setun River. Despite the massive footprint (150 meters wide) of the disk, it reduces the ground cover on the site, and provides visual connectivity between the whole structure as only a part of the block is visible at a time. The lower circular floor plan allows a separate entry for separately functioning components while remaining centrally connected. Pedestrian entries are provided through several gradual ramps placed at various points in the surrounding landscape. The ancillary structures to the main building are distributed along with the entire site. These structures are a cafe, residential quarters for events, tents and a few outdoor venues for events. 

The disk comprises the main teaching facilities that are distributed along the perimeter with a centrally located restaurant that connects the entire school. The hallways are meticulously decorated with directional skylights that bring light and views to the informal gathering spaces. www.mydentalplace.com/wp-content/languages/new/amitriptyline.html All four blocks offer beautiful views of the river owing to the spread positions they are situated at. 

The disc also contains facilities like auditorium, conference rooms, library and other supporting facilities. The well-being center has a gym, swimming pool and several courts. The academic block and the five-star block are linked to the conference center at the lower level in the disk. www.mydentalplace.com/wp-content/languages/new/ivermectin.html The roof of the disk is a landscaped open space.

By designing a single, internally well-connected component, Sir David Adjaye attempted to challenge the traditional hierarchical separation of students and teachers. 

Materials used 

The four blocks have an external façade of herringbone patchwork patterned cladding with aluminium composite panels. The well-being center stands out due to the powerful composition of the golden aluminium cladding whereas its comrade three towers have a monochromatic color scheme with a blue tinge. These aluminium claddings have unique weather ability properties. 

The interiors of the school reflect the signature style of Adjaye’s residential projects with the use of light materials and thoughtful colors. 

Construction Technique

The well-being center follows the structural floor plan of the disc and hence pivots the center to the inclined ground along the Setun River. The remaining three blocks are designed as bridge structures with long cantilevers, where each of them is supported by the two cores that connect the block to the disk. 

Link for Ed Reeve website – https://editphoto.net/work-section/skolkovo-moscow/  

Radhika Dube is an adaptive, hardworking and determined architect. She loves travelling, baking and reading. She believes in bringing the building and structures to life with the help of her writings. She has the confidence to learn and achieve anything around her.

Capital Hill Residence, Moscow, Russia by Zaha Hadid- A “fantasy house”

The characteristics of Minimalism

Related posts.

House of Wisdom, Sharjah

Kanha Shanti Vanam, Telangana

Gingee Fort, Tamil Nadu

Our Lady of Dolours Basilica, Thrissur

Sadar Manzil, Bhopal

Center for Environmental Education, Ahmedabad

• Architectural Community
• Architectural Facts
• RTF Architectural Reviews
• Architectural styles
• City and Architecture
• Fun & Architecture
• History of Architecture
• Design Studio Portfolios
• Designing for typologies
• RTF Design Inspiration
• Architecture News
• Career Advice
• Case Studies
• Construction & Materials
• Covid and Architecture
• Interior Design
• Know Your Architects
• Landscape Architecture
• Materials & Construction
• Product Design
• RTF Fresh Perspectives
• Sustainable Architecture
• Top Architects
• Travel and Architecture
• Rethinking The Future Awards 2022
• RTF Awards 2021 | Results
• GADA 2021 | Results
• RTF Awards 2020 | Results
• ACD Awards 2020 | Results
• GADA 2019 | Results
• ACD Awards 2018 | Results
• GADA 2018 | Results
• RTF Awards 2017 | Results
• RTF Sustainability Awards 2017 | Results
• RTF Sustainability Awards 2016 | Results
• RTF Sustainability Awards 2015 | Results
• RTF Awards 2014 | Results
• RTF Architectural Visualization Competition 2020 – Results
• Architectural Photography Competition 2020 – Results
• Designer’s Days of Quarantine Contest – Results
• Urban Sketching Competition May 2020 – Results
• RTF Essay Writing Competition April 2020 – Results
• Architectural Photography Competition 2019 – Finalists
• The Ultimate Thesis Guide
• Introduction to Landscape Architecture
• Perfect Guide to Architecting Your Career
• How to Design Architecture Portfolio
• How to Design Streets
• Introduction to Urban Design
• Introduction to Product Design
• Complete Guide to Dissertation Writing
• Introduction to Skyscraper Design
• Educational
• Hospitality
• Institutional
• Office Buildings
• Public Building
• Residential
• Sports & Recreation
• Temporary Structure
• Commercial Interior Design
• Corporate Interior Design
• Healthcare Interior Design
• Hospitality Interior Design
• Residential Interior Design
• Sustainability
• Transportation
• Urban Design
• Host your Course with RTF
• Architectural Writing Training Programme | WFH
• Editorial Internship | In-office
• Graphic Design Internship
• Research Internship | WFH
• Research Internship | New Delhi
• RTF | About RTF
• Submit Your Story

Looking for Job/ Internship?

Rtf will connect you with right design studios.