impact of gender discrimination essay

45,000+ students realised their study abroad dream with us. Take the first step today

Here’s your new year gift, one app for all your, study abroad needs, start your journey, track your progress, grow with the community and so much more.

Verification Code

An OTP has been sent to your registered mobile no. Please verify

Thanks for your comment !

Our team will review it before it's shown to our readers.

Essay on Gender Discrimination

• Updated on  
• Jul 14, 2022

One of the challenges present in today’s society is gender discrimination. Gender discrimination is when someone is treated unequally based on their gender. Gender discrimination is not just present in the workplace but in schools, colleges and communities as well. As per the Civil Rights Act of 1964,  gender discrimination is illegal in India. This is also an important and common essay topic in schools and competitive exams such as IELTS , TOEFL , SAT , UPSC , etc. Let’s explore some samples of essay on gender discrimination and tips for writing an impactful essay.

Tips for Writing an Impactful Essay

If you want to write a scoring and deep impact essay, here are some tips for writing a perfect informative essay:

• The most important and first step is to write an introduction and background information about and related to the topic
• Then you are also required to use the formal style of writing and avoid using slang language
• To make an essay more impactful, write dates, quotations, and names to provide a better understanding
• You can use jargon wherever it is necessary as it sometimes makes an essay complicated
• To make an essay more creative, you can also add information in bulleted points wherever possible
• Always remember to add a conclusion where you need to summarise crucial points
• Once you are done read through the lines and check spelling and grammar mistakes before submission

Essay on Gender Discrimination in 200 Words

One of the important aspects of a democratic society is the elimination of gender discrimination. The root cause of this vigorous disease is the stereotypical society itself. When a child is born, the discrimination begins; if the child is male, he is given a car, bat and ball with blue, and red colour clothes, whereas when a child is female, she is given barbie dolls with pink clothes. We all are raised with a mentality that boys are good at sports and messy, but girls are not good at sports and are well organised. This discriminatory mentality has a deeper impact when girls are told not to work while boys are allowed to do much work. This categorising males and females into different categories discriminating based on gender are known as gender discrimination. Further, this discriminatory behaviour in society leads to hatred, injustice and much more. This gender discrimination is evident in every woman’s life at the workplace, in educational institutions, in sports, etc., where young girls and women are deprived of their rights and undervalued. This major issue prevailing in society can be solved only by providing equality to women and giving them all rights as given to men.

Essay on Gender Discrimination in 300 Words 

Gender Discrimination, as the term signifies, is discrimination or discriminatory behaviour based on gender. The stereotypical mindset of people in the past has led to the discrimination that women face today. According to Kahle Wolfe, in 2015, women earned 83% of the income paid to men by working the same hours. Almost all women are not only discriminated against based on their salaries but also on their looks.

Further, most women are allowed to follow a certain dress code depending upon the work field and the dress women wear also decides their future career.

This dominant male society teaches males that women are weak and innocent. Thus women are mostly victims and are targeted in crimes. For example, In a large portion of the globe, women are blamed for rapes despite being victims because of their clothes. This society also portrays women as weaker and not eligible enough to take a stand for themselves, leading to the major destruction of women’s personalities as men are taught to let women down. This mindset of people nowadays is a major social justice issue leading to gender discrimination in society.

Further, gender-based discrimination is evident across the globe in a plethora of things, including sports, education, health and law. Every 1 out of 3 women in the world is abused in various forms at some point in their lives by men. This social evil is present in most parts of the world; in India, women are burnt to death if they are incapable of affording financial requirements; in Egypt, women are killed by society if they are sensed doing something unclean in or out of their families, whereas in South Africa baby girls are abandoned or killed as they are considered as burden for the family. Thus gender discrimination can be only eliminated from society by educating people about giving equal rights and respect to every gender.

Top Universities for Gender Studies Abroad

UK, Canada and USA are the top three countries to study gender studies abroad. Here’s the list of top universities you can consider to study abroad for Indian students if you planning to pursue gender studies course abroad:

We hope this blog has helped you in structuring a terrific essay on gender discrimination. Planning to ace your IELTS, get expert tips from coaches at Leverage Live by Leverage Edu .

Sonal is a creative, enthusiastic writer and editor who has worked extensively for the Study Abroad domain. She splits her time between shooting fun insta reels and learning new tools for content marketing. If she is missing from her desk, you can find her with a group of people cracking silly jokes or petting neighbourhood dogs.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Contact no. *

Leaving already?

8 Universities with higher ROI than IITs and IIMs

Grab this one-time opportunity to download this ebook

Connect With Us

45,000+ students realised their study abroad dream with us. take the first step today..

Resend OTP in

Need help with?

Study abroad.

UK, Canada, US & More

IELTS, GRE, GMAT & More

Scholarship, Loans & Forex

Country Preference

New Zealand

Which English test are you planning to take?

Which academic test are you planning to take.

Not Sure yet

When are you planning to take the exam?

Already booked my exam slot

Within 2 Months

Want to learn about the test

Which Degree do you wish to pursue?

When do you want to start studying abroad.

September 2024

January 2025

What is your budget to study abroad?

How would you describe this article ?

Please rate this article

We would like to hear more.

What does gender equality look like today?

Date: Wednesday, 6 October 2021

Progress towards gender equality is looking bleak. But it doesn’t need to.

A new global analysis of progress on gender equality and women’s rights shows women and girls remain disproportionately affected by the socioeconomic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic, struggling with disproportionately high job and livelihood losses, education disruptions and increased burdens of unpaid care work. Women’s health services, poorly funded even before the pandemic, faced major disruptions, undermining women’s sexual and reproductive health. And despite women’s central role in responding to COVID-19, including as front-line health workers, they are still largely bypassed for leadership positions they deserve.

UN Women’s latest report, together with UN DESA, Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals: The Gender Snapshot 2021 presents the latest data on gender equality across all 17 Sustainable Development Goals. The report highlights the progress made since 2015 but also the continued alarm over the COVID-19 pandemic, its immediate effect on women’s well-being and the threat it poses to future generations.

We’re breaking down some of the findings from the report, and calling for the action needed to accelerate progress.

The pandemic is making matters worse

One and a half years since the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic, the toll on the poorest and most vulnerable people remains devastating and disproportionate. The combined impact of conflict, extreme weather events and COVID-19 has deprived women and girls of even basic needs such as food security. Without urgent action to stem rising poverty, hunger and inequality, especially in countries affected by conflict and other acute forms of crisis, millions will continue to suffer.

A global goal by global goal reality check:

Goal 1. Poverty

In 2021, extreme poverty is on the rise and progress towards its elimination has reversed. An estimated 435 million women and girls globally are living in extreme poverty.

And yet we can change this .

Over 150 million women and girls could emerge from poverty by 2030 if governments implement a comprehensive strategy to improve access to education and family planning, achieve equal wages and extend social transfers.

Goal 2. Zero hunger

The global gender gap in food security has risen dramatically during the pandemic, with more women and girls going hungry. Women’s food insecurity levels were 10 per cent higher than men’s in 2020, compared with 6 per cent higher in 2019.

This trend can be reversed , including by supporting women small-scale producers, who typically earn far less than men, through increased funding, training and land rights reforms.

Goal 3. Good health and well-being

Disruptions in essential health services due to COVID-19 are taking a tragic toll on women and girls. In the first year of the pandemic, there were an estimated 1.4 million additional unintended pregnancies in lower and middle-income countries.

We need to do better .

Response to the pandemic must include prioritizing sexual and reproductive health services, ensuring they continue to operate safely now and after the pandemic is long over. In addition, more support is needed to ensure life-saving personal protection equipment, tests, oxygen and especially vaccines are available in rich and poor countries alike as well as to vulnerable population within countries.

Goal 4. Quality education

A year and a half into the pandemic, schools remain partially or fully closed in 42 per cent of the world’s countries and territories. School closures spell lost opportunities for girls and an increased risk of violence, exploitation and early marriage .

Governments can do more to protect girls education .

Measures focused specifically on supporting girls returning to school are urgently needed, including measures focused on girls from marginalized communities who are most at risk.

Goal 5. Gender equality

The pandemic has tested and even reversed progress in expanding women’s rights and opportunities. Reports of violence against women and girls, a “shadow” pandemic to COVID-19, are increasing in many parts of the world. COVID-19 is also intensifying women’s workload at home, forcing many to leave the labour force altogether.

Building forward differently and better will hinge on placing women and girls at the centre of all aspects of response and recovery, including through gender-responsive laws, policies and budgeting.

Goal 6. Clean water and sanitation

In 2018, nearly 2.3 billion people lived in water-stressed countries. Without safe drinking water, adequate sanitation and menstrual hygiene facilities, women and girls find it harder to lead safe, productive and healthy lives.

Change is possible .

Involve those most impacted in water management processes, including women. Women’s voices are often missing in water management processes. 

Goal 7. Affordable and clean energy

Increased demand for clean energy and low-carbon solutions is driving an unprecedented transformation of the energy sector. But women are being left out. Women hold only 32 per cent of renewable energy jobs.

We can do better .

Expose girls early on to STEM education, provide training and support to women entering the energy field, close the pay gap and increase women’s leadership in the energy sector.

Goal 8. Decent work and economic growth

The number of employed women declined by 54 million in 2020 and 45 million women left the labour market altogether. Women have suffered steeper job losses than men, along with increased unpaid care burdens at home.

We must do more to support women in the workforce .

Guarantee decent work for all, introduce labour laws/reforms, removing legal barriers for married women entering the workforce, support access to affordable/quality childcare.

Goal 9. Industry, innovation and infrastructure

The COVID-19 crisis has spurred striking achievements in medical research and innovation. Women’s contribution has been profound. But still only a little over a third of graduates in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics field are female.

We can take action today.

 Quotas mandating that a proportion of research grants are awarded to women-led teams or teams that include women is one concrete way to support women researchers. 

Goal 10. Reduced inequalities

Limited progress for women is being eroded by the pandemic. Women facing multiple forms of discrimination, including women and girls with disabilities, migrant women, women discriminated against because of their race/ethnicity are especially affected.

Commit to end racism and discrimination in all its forms, invest in inclusive, universal, gender responsive social protection systems that support all women. 

Goal 11. Sustainable cities and communities

Globally, more than 1 billion people live in informal settlements and slums. Women and girls, often overrepresented in these densely populated areas, suffer from lack of access to basic water and sanitation, health care and transportation.

The needs of urban poor women must be prioritized .

Increase the provision of durable and adequate housing and equitable access to land; included women in urban planning and development processes.

Goal 12. Sustainable consumption and production; Goal 13. Climate action; Goal 14. Life below water; and Goal 15. Life on land

Women activists, scientists and researchers are working hard to solve the climate crisis but often without the same platforms as men to share their knowledge and skills. Only 29 per cent of featured speakers at international ocean science conferences are women.

 And yet we can change this .

Ensure women activists, scientists and researchers have equal voice, representation and access to forums where these issues are being discussed and debated. 

Goal 16. Peace, justice and strong institutions

The lack of women in decision-making limits the reach and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and other emergency recovery efforts. In conflict-affected countries, 18.9 per cent of parliamentary seats are held by women, much lower than the global average of 25.6 per cent.

This is unacceptable .

It's time for women to have an equal share of power and decision-making at all levels.

Goal 17. Global partnerships for the goals

There are just 9 years left to achieve the Global Goals by 2030, and gender equality cuts across all 17 of them. With COVID-19 slowing progress on women's rights, the time to act is now.

Looking ahead

As it stands today, only one indicator under the global goal for gender equality (SDG5) is ‘close to target’: proportion of seats held by women in local government. In other areas critical to women’s empowerment, equality in time spent on unpaid care and domestic work and decision making regarding sexual and reproductive health the world is far from target. Without a bold commitment to accelerate progress, the global community will fail to achieve gender equality. Building forward differently and better will require placing women and girls at the centre of all aspects of response and recovery, including through gender-responsive laws, policies and budgeting.

• ‘One Woman’ – The UN Women song
• UN Under-Secretary-General and UN Women Executive Director Sima Bahous
• Kirsi Madi, Deputy Executive Director for Resource Management, Sustainability and Partnerships
• Nyaradzayi Gumbonzvanda, Deputy Executive Director for Normative Support, UN System Coordination and Programme Results
• Guiding documents
• Report wrongdoing
• Programme implementation
• Career opportunities
• Application and recruitment process
• Meet our people
• Internship programme
• Procurement principles
• Gender-responsive procurement
• Doing business with UN Women
• How to become a UN Women vendor
• Contract templates and general conditions of contract
• Vendor protest procedure
• Facts and Figures
• Global norms and standards
• Women’s movements
• Parliaments and local governance
• Constitutions and legal reform
• Preguntas frecuentes
• Global Norms and Standards
• Macroeconomic policies and social protection
• Sustainable Development and Climate Change
• Rural women
• Employment and migration
• Facts and figures
• Creating safe public spaces
• Spotlight Initiative
• Essential services
• Focusing on prevention
• Research and data
• Other areas of work
• UNiTE campaign
• Conflict prevention and resolution
• Building and sustaining peace
• Young women in peace and security
• Rule of law: Justice and security
• Women, peace, and security in the work of the UN Security Council
• Preventing violent extremism and countering terrorism
• Planning and monitoring
• Humanitarian coordination
• Crisis response and recovery
• Disaster risk reduction
• Inclusive National Planning
• Public Sector Reform
• Tracking Investments
• Strengthening young women's leadership
• Economic empowerment and skills development for young women
• Action on ending violence against young women and girls
• Engaging boys and young men in gender equality
• Leadership and Participation
• National Planning
• Violence against Women
• Access to Justice
• Regional and country offices
• Regional and Country Offices
• Liaison offices
• 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
• UN Women Global Innovation Coalition for Change
• Commission on the Status of Women
• Economic and Social Council
• General Assembly
• Security Council
• High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development
• Human Rights Council
• Climate change and the environment
• Other Intergovernmental Processes
• World Conferences on Women
• Global Coordination
• Regional and country coordination
• Promoting UN accountability
• Gender Mainstreaming
• Coordination resources
• System-wide strategy
• Focal Point for Women and Gender Focal Points
• Entity-specific implementation plans on gender parity
• Laws and policies
• Strategies and tools
• Reports and monitoring
• Training Centre services
• Publications
• Government partners
• National mechanisms
• Civil Society Advisory Groups
• Benefits of partnering with UN Women
• Business and philanthropic partners
• Goodwill Ambassadors
• National Committees
• UN Women Media Compact
• UN Women Alumni Association
• Editorial series
• Media contacts
• Annual report
• Progress of the world’s women
• SDG monitoring report
• World survey on the role of women in development
• Reprint permissions
• Secretariat
• 2023 sessions and other meetings
• 2022 sessions and other meetings
• 2021 sessions and other meetings
• 2020 sessions and other meetings
• 2019 sessions and other meetings
• 2018 sessions and other meetings
• 2017 sessions and other meetings
• 2016 sessions and other meetings
• 2015 sessions and other meetings
• Compendiums of decisions
• Reports of sessions
• Key Documents
• Brief history
• CSW snapshot
• Preparations
• Official Documents
• Official Meetings
• Side Events
• Session Outcomes
• CSW65 (2021)
• CSW64 / Beijing+25 (2020)
• CSW63 (2019)
• CSW62 (2018)
• CSW61 (2017)
• Member States
• Eligibility
• Registration
• Opportunities for NGOs to address the Commission
• Communications procedure
• Grant making
• Accompaniment and growth
• Results and impact
• Knowledge and learning
• Social innovation
• UN Trust Fund to End Violence against Women
• About Generation Equality
• Generation Equality Forum
• Action packs

• Share full article

Advertisement

This Is How Everyday Sexism Could Stop You From Getting That Promotion

By Jessica Nordell and Yaryna Serkez Oct. 14, 2021

By Jessica Nordell Graphics by Yaryna Serkez

Jessica Nordell is a science and culture journalist. Yaryna Serkez is a writer and a graphics editor for Opinion.

When the computer scientist and mathematician Lenore Blum announced her resignation from Carnegie Mellon University in 2018, the community was jolted. A distinguished professor, she’d helped found the Association for Women in Mathematics, and made seminal contributions to the field. But she said she found herself steadily marginalized from a center she’d help create — blocked from important decisions, dismissed and ignored. She explained at the time : “Subtle biases and microaggressions pile up, few of which on their own rise to the level of ‘let’s take action,’ but are insidious nonetheless.”

It’s an experience many women can relate to. But how much does everyday sexism at work matter? Most would agree that outright discrimination when it comes to hiring and advancement is a bad thing, but what about the small indignities that women experience day after day? The expectation that they be unfailingly helpful ; the golf rounds and networking opportunities they’re not invited to ; the siphoning off of credit for their work by others; unfair performance reviews that penalize them for the same behavior that’s applauded in men; the “ manterrupting ”?

When I was researching my book “The End of Bias: A Beginning” I wanted to understand the collective impact of these less visible forms of bias, but data were hard to come by. Bias doesn’t happen once or twice; it happens day after day, week after week. To explore the aggregate impact of routine gender bias over time, I teamed up with Kenny Joseph, a computer science professor at the University at Buffalo, and a graduate student there, Yuhao Du, to create a computer simulation of a workplace. We call our simulated workplace “NormCorp.” Here’s how it works.

NormCorp is a simple company. Employees do projects, either alone or in pairs. These succeed or fail, which affects a score we call “promotability.” Twice a year, employees go through performance reviews, and the top scorers at each level are promoted to the next level.

NormCorp employees are affected by the kinds of gender bias that are endemic in the workplace. Women’s successful solo projects are valued slightly less than men’s , and their successful joint projects with men accrue them less credit . They are also penalized slightly more when they fail . Occasional “stretch” projects have outsize rewards, but as in the real world, women’s potential is underrecognized compared with men’s, so they must have a greater record of past successes to be assigned these projects. A fraction of women point out the unfairness and are then penalized for the perception that they are “self-promoting.” And as the proportion of women decreases, those that are left face more stereotyping .

We simulated 10 years of promotion cycles happening at NormCorp based on these rules, and here is how women’s representation changed over time.

Simulation of Normcorp promotions over 10 years, with female performance undervalued by 3 percent

Simulation results over time

These biases have all been demonstrated across various professional fields. One working paper study of over 500,000 physician referrals showed that women surgeons receive fewer referrals after successful outcomes than male surgeons. Women economists are less likely to receive tenure the more they co-author papers with men. An analysis at a large company found that women’s, as well as minority men’s, performance was effectively “discounted” compared with that of white men.

And women are penalized for straying from “feminine” personality traits. An analysis of real-world workplace performance evaluations found that more than three-quarters of women’s critical evaluations contained negative comments about their personalities, compared with 2 percent of men’s. If a woman whose contributions are overlooked speaks up, she may be labeled a self-promoter, and consequently face further obstacles to success . She may also become less motivated and committed to the organization . The American Bar Association found that 70 percent of women lawyers of color considered leaving or had left the legal profession entirely, citing being undervalued at work and facing barriers to advancement.

Our model does not take into account women, such as Lenore Blum, who quit their jobs after experiencing an unmanageable amount of bias. But it visualizes how these penalties add up over time for women who stay, so that by the time you reach more senior levels of management, there are fewer women left to promote. These factors not only prevent women from reaching the top ranks in their company but for those who do, it also makes the career path longer and more demanding.

Small change, big difference

Even a tiny increase in the amount of gender bias could lead to dramatic underrepresentation of women in leadership roles over time..

Women’s performance is valued 3 percent less

Women’s performance is valued 5 percent less

Half as many women at level 7 and

only 2 percent of women at C-suite.

Half as many women at level 7 and only 2 percent of women at C-suite.

Women’s performance is valued 3% less

Women’s performance is valued 5% less

When we dig into the trajectory of individual people in our simulation, stories begin to emerge. With just 3 percent bias, one employee — let’s call her Jenelle — starts in an entry-level position, and makes it to the executive level, but it takes her 17 performance review cycles (eight and a half years) to get there, and she needs 208 successful projects to make it. “William” starts at the same level but he gets to executive level much faster — after only eight performance reviews and half Jenelle’s successes at the time she becomes an executive.

Our model shows how large organizational disparities can emerge from many small, even unintentional biases happening frequently over a long period of time. Laws are often designed to address large events that happen infrequently and can be easily attributed to a single actor—for example, overt sexual harassment by a manager — or “pattern and practice” problems, such as discriminatory policies. But women’s progress is hindered even without one egregious incident, or an official policy that is discriminatory.

Women’s path to success might be longer and more demanding

Career paths for employees that reached level 7 by the end of the simulation..

successful projects

“William”

started at the entry-level and reached level 7 in 4 years.

It took “Jenelle”

8.5 years to get

to the same level.

Entry level

1 year of promotions

started at the entry-

level and reached level 7 in 4 years.

8.5 years to get to the same level.

It took “Jenelle” 8.5 years to get to the same level.

Gender bias takes on different dimensions depending on other intersecting aspects of a person’s identity, such as race, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability and more. Another American Bar Association study found that white women and men of color face similar hurdles to being seen as competent, but women of color face more than either group.

Backlash, too, plays out differently for women of different racial groups, points out Erika Hall, an Emory University management professor. A survey of hundreds of women scientists she helped conduct found that Asian American women reported the highest amount of backlash for self-promotion and assertive behavior. An experimental study by the social psychologist Robert Livingston and colleagues, meanwhile, found that white women are more penalized for demonstrating dominant behavior than Black women. Our model does not account for the important variations in bias that women of different races experience.

So what’s to be done? Diversity trainings are common in companies, educational institutions and health care settings, but these may not have much effect when it comes to employees’ career advancement. The sociologists Frank Dobbin and Alexandra Kalev found that after mandatory diversity trainings, the likelihood that women and men of color became managers either stayed the same or decreased , possibly because of backlash. Some anti-bias trainings have been shown to change behavior, but any approach needs to be evaluated, as psychologist Betsy Levy Paluck has said, “on the level of rigorous testing of medical interventions.”

We also explored a paradox. Research shows that in many fields, a greater proportion of men correlates with more bias against women . At the same time, in fields or organizations where women make up the majority, men can still experience a “glass escalator,” being fast-tracked to senior leadership roles. School superintendents, who work in the women-dominated field of education but are more likely to be men, are one example. To make sense of this, we conceptualized bias at work as a combination of both organizational biases that can be influenced by organizational makeup and larger societal biases.

What we found was that if societal biases are strong compared with those in the organization, a powerful but brief intervention may have only a short-term impact. In our simulation, we tested this by introducing quotas — requiring that the majority of promotions go to women — in the context of low, moderate, or no societal bias. We made the quotas time-limited, as real world efforts to combat bias often take the form of short-term interventions.

Our quotas changed the number of women at upper levels of the corporate hierarchy in the short term, and in turn decreased the gender biases against women rising through the company ranks. But when societal biases were still a persistent force, disparities eventually returned, and the impact of the intervention was short-lived.

Quotas may not be enough

In the presence of societal biases, the effect of a short-term program of quotas disappears over time..

Societal bias has moderate effect

100% of executives

Quotas are introduced. 70% of all promotions go to women.

Majority of executives are men

YEARS OF PROMOTIONS

Societal bias has no effect

Equal representation

representation

What works? Having managers directly mentor and sponsor women improves their chance to rise. Insisting on fair, transparent and objective criteria for promotions and assignments is essential, so that decisions are not ambiguous and subjective, and goal posts aren’t shifting and unwritten. But the effect of standardizing criteria, too, can be limited, because decision-makers can always override these decisions and choose their favored candidates.

Ultimately, I found in my research for the book, the mindset of leaders plays an enormous role. Interventions make a difference, but only if leaders commit to them. One law firm I profiled achieved 50 percent women equity partners through a series of dramatic moves, from overhauling and standardizing promotion criteria, to active sponsorship of women, to a zero-tolerance policy for biased behavior. In this case, the chief executive understood that bias was blocking the company from capturing all the available talent. Leaders who believe that the elimination of bias is essential to the functioning of the organization are more likely to take the kind of active, aggressive, and long-term steps needed to root out bias wherever it may creep into decision making.

5 Powerful Essays Advocating for Gender Equality

Gender equality – which becomes reality when all genders are treated fairly and allowed equal opportunities –  is a complicated human rights issue for every country in the world. Recent statistics are sobering. According to the World Economic Forum, it will take 108 years to achieve gender parity . The biggest gaps are found in political empowerment and economics. Also, there are currently just six countries that give women and men equal legal work rights. Generally, women are only given ¾ of the rights given to men. To learn more about how gender equality is measured, how it affects both women and men, and what can be done, here are five essays making a fair point.

Take a free course on Gender Equality offered by top universities!

“Countries With Less Gender Equity Have More Women In STEM — Huh?” – Adam Mastroianni and Dakota McCoy

This essay from two Harvard PhD candidates (Mastroianni in psychology and McCoy in biology) takes a closer look at a recent study that showed that in countries with lower gender equity, more women are in STEM. The study’s researchers suggested that this is because women are actually especially interested in STEM fields, and because they are given more choice in Western countries, they go with different careers. Mastroianni and McCoy disagree.

They argue the research actually shows that cultural attitudes and discrimination are impacting women’s interests, and that bias and discrimination is present even in countries with better gender equality. The problem may lie in the Gender Gap Index (GGI), which tracks factors like wage disparity and government representation. To learn why there’s more women in STEM from countries with less gender equality, a more nuanced and complex approach is needed.

“Men’s health is better, too, in countries with more gender equality” – Liz Plank

When it comes to discussions about gender equality, it isn’t uncommon for someone in the room to say, “What about the men?” Achieving gender equality has been difficult because of the underlying belief that giving women more rights and freedom somehow takes rights away from men. The reality, however, is that gender equality is good for everyone. In Liz Plank’s essay, which is an adaption from her book For the Love of Men: A Vision for Mindful Masculinity, she explores how in Iceland, the #1 ranked country for gender equality, men live longer. Plank lays out the research for why this is, revealing that men who hold “traditional” ideas about masculinity are more likely to die by suicide and suffer worse health. Anxiety about being the only financial provider plays a big role in this, so in countries where women are allowed education and equal earning power, men don’t shoulder the burden alone.

Liz Plank is an author and award-winning journalist with Vox, where she works as a senior producer and political correspondent. In 2015, Forbes named her one of their “30 Under 30” in the Media category. She’s focused on feminist issues throughout her career.

“China’s #MeToo Moment” –  Jiayang Fan

Some of the most visible examples of gender inequality and discrimination comes from “Me Too” stories. Women are coming forward in huge numbers relating how they’ve been harassed and abused by men who have power over them. Most of the time, established systems protect these men from accountability. In this article from Jiayang Fan, a New Yorker staff writer, we get a look at what’s happening in China.

The essay opens with a story from a PhD student inspired by the United States’ Me Too movement to open up about her experience with an academic adviser. Her story led to more accusations against the adviser, and he was eventually dismissed. This is a rare victory, because as Fan says, China employs a more rigid system of patriarchy and hierarchy. There aren’t clear definitions or laws surrounding sexual harassment. Activists are charting unfamiliar territory, which this essay explores.

“Men built this system. No wonder gender equality remains as far off as ever.” – Ellie Mae O’Hagan

Freelance journalist Ellie Mae O’Hagan (whose book The New Normal is scheduled for a May 2020 release) is discouraged that gender equality is so many years away. She argues that it’s because the global system of power at its core is broken.  Even when women are in power, which is proportionally rare on a global scale, they deal with a system built by the patriarchy. O’Hagan’s essay lays out ideas for how to fix what’s fundamentally flawed, so gender equality can become a reality.

Ideas include investing in welfare; reducing gender-based violence (which is mostly men committing violence against women); and strengthening trade unions and improving work conditions. With a system that’s not designed to put women down, the world can finally achieve gender equality.

“Invisibility of Race in Gender Pay Gap Discussions” – Bonnie Chu

The gender pay gap has been a pressing issue for many years in the United States, but most discussions miss the factor of race. In this concise essay, Senior Contributor Bonnie Chu examines the reality, writing that within the gender pay gap, there’s other gaps when it comes to black, Native American, and Latina women. Asian-American women, on the other hand, are paid 85 cents for every dollar. This data is extremely important and should be present in discussions about the gender pay gap. It reminds us that when it comes to gender equality, there’s other factors at play, like racism.

Bonnie Chu is a gender equality advocate and a Forbes 30 Under 30 social entrepreneur. She’s the founder and CEO of Lensational, which empowers women through photography, and the Managing Director of The Social Investment Consultancy.

You may also like

What is Social Activism?

15 Inspiring Movies about Activism

15 Examples of Civil Disobedience

Academia in Times of Genocide: Why are Students Across the World Protesting?

Pinkwashing 101: Definition, History, Examples

15 Inspiring Quotes for Black History Month

10 Inspiring Ways Women Are Fighting for Equality

15 Trusted Charities Fighting for Clean Water

15 Trusted Charities Supporting Trans People

15 Political Issues We Must Address

15 Trusted Charities Fighting for LGBTQ+ Rights

16 Inspiring Civil Rights Leaders You Should Know

About the author, emmaline soken-huberty.

Emmaline Soken-Huberty is a freelance writer based in Portland, Oregon. She started to become interested in human rights while attending college, eventually getting a concentration in human rights and humanitarianism. LGBTQ+ rights, women’s rights, and climate change are of special concern to her. In her spare time, she can be found reading or enjoying Oregon’s natural beauty with her husband and dog.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• 06 September 2023

Gender equality: the route to a better world

You have full access to this article via your institution.

The Mosuo people of China include sub-communities in which inheritance passes down either the male or the female line. Credit: TPG/Getty

The fight for global gender equality is nowhere close to being won. Take education: in 87 countries, less than half of women and girls complete secondary schooling, according to 2023 data. Afghanistan’s Taliban continues to ban women and girls from secondary schools and universities . Or take reproductive health: abortion rights have been curtailed in 22 US states since the Supreme Court struck down federal protections, depriving women and girls of autonomy and restricting access to sexual and reproductive health care .

SDG 5, whose stated aim is to “achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls”, is the fifth of the 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, all of which Nature is examining in a series of editorials. SDG 5 includes targets for ending discrimination and violence against women and girls in both public and private spheres, eradicating child marriage and female genital mutilation, ensuring sexual and reproductive rights, achieving equal representation of women in leadership positions and granting equal rights to economic resources. Globally, the goal is not on track to being achieved, and just a handful of countries have hit all the targets.

How the world should oppose the Taliban’s war on women and girls

In July, the UN introduced two new indices (see go.nature.com/3eus9ue ), the Women’s Empowerment Index (WEI) and the Global Gender Parity Index (GGPI). The WEI measures women’s ability and freedoms to make their own choices; the GGPI describes the gap between women and men in areas such as health, education, inclusion and decision making. The indices reveal, depressingly, that even achieving a small gender gap does not automatically translate to high levels of women’s empowerment: 114 countries feature in both indices, but countries that do well on both scores cover fewer than 1% of all girls and women.

The COVID-19 pandemic has made things worse, with women bearing the highest burden of extra unpaid childcare when schools needed to close, and subjected to intensified domestic violence. Although child marriages declined from 21% of all marriages in 2016 to 19% in 2022, the pandemic threatened even this incremental progress, pushing up to 10 million more girls into risk of child marriage over the next decade, in addition to the 100 million girls who were at risk before the pandemic.

Of the 14 indicators for SDG 5, only one or two are close to being met by the 2030 deadline. As of 1 January 2023, women occupied 35.4% of seats in local-government assemblies, an increase from 33.9% in 2020 (the target is gender parity by 2030). In 115 countries for which data were available, around three-quarters, on average, of the necessary laws guaranteeing full and equal access to sexual and reproductive health and rights had been enacted. But the UN estimates that worldwide, only 57% of women who are married or in a union make their own decisions regarding sexual and reproductive health and rights.

Systemic discrimination against girls and women by men, in many contexts, remains a colossal barrier to achieving gender equality. But patriarchy is not some “natural order of things” , argues Ruth Mace, an anthropologist at University College London. Hundreds of women-centred societies exist around the world. As the science writer Angela Saini describes in her latest book, The Patriarchs , these are often not the polar opposite of male-dominated systems, but societies in which men and women share decision making .

After Roe v. Wade: dwindling US abortion access is harming health a year later

One example comes from the Mosuo people in China, who have both ‘matrilineal’ and ‘patrilineal’ communities, with rights such as inheritance passing down either the male or female line. Researchers compared outcomes for inflammation and hypertension in men and women in these communities, and found that women in matrilineal societies, in which they have greater autonomy and control over resources, experienced better health outcomes. The researchers found no significant negative effect of matriliny on health outcomes for men ( A.  Z. Reynolds et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117 , 30324–30327; 2020 ).

When it comes to the SDGs, evidence is emerging that a more gender-equal approach to politics and power benefits many goals. In a study published in May, Nobue Amanuma, deputy director of the Integrated Sustainability Centre at the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies in Hayama, Japan, and two of her colleagues tested whether countries with more women legislators, and more younger legislators, are performing better in the SDGs ( N. Amanuma et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 18 , 054018; 2023 ). They found it was so, with the effect more marked for socio-economic goals such as ending poverty and hunger, than for environmental ones such as climate action or preserving life on land. The researchers recommend further qualitative and quantitative studies to better understand the reasons.

The reality that gender equality leads to better outcomes across other SDGs is not factored, however, into most of the goals themselves. Of the 230 unique indicators of the SDGs, 51 explicitly reference women, girls, gender or sex, including the 14 indicators in SDG 5. But there is not enough collaboration between organizations responsible for the different SDGs to ensure that sex and gender are taken into account. The indicator for the sanitation target (SDG 6) does not include data disaggregated by sex or gender ( Nature 620 , 7; 2023 ). Unless we have this knowledge, it will be hard to track improvements in this and other SDGs.

The road to a gender-equal world is long, and women’s power and freedom to make choices is still very constrained. But the evidence from science is getting stronger: distributing power between genders creates the kind of world we all need and want to be living in.

Nature 621 , 8 (2023)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02745-9

Reprints and permissions

Related Articles

• Sustainability
• Public health

Light bulbs have energy ratings — so why can’t AI chatbots?

Comment 21 AUG 24

Monitor soil health using advanced technologies

Correspondence 23 JUL 24

Freezer holding world’s biggest ancient-ice archive to get ‘future-proofed’

News 16 JUL 24

First biolab in South America for studying world’s deadliest viruses is set to open

News 21 AUG 24

Hopes dashed for drug aimed at monkeypox virus spreading in Africa

News 16 AUG 24

How I’m looking to medicine’s past to heal hurt and support peace in the Middle East

World View 15 AUG 24

The Taliban said women could study — three years on they still can’t

News 14 AUG 24

Who is legally responsible for climate harms? The world’s top court will now decide

Editorial 13 AUG 24

The time to act is now: the world’s highest court must weigh in strongly on climate and nature

World View 08 AUG 24

High-Level Talents at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

For clinical medicine and basic medicine; basic research of emerging inter-disciplines and medical big data.

Nanchang, Jiangxi, China

The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

Faculty Position in Tissue Regeneration and Stem Cell Biology

Dallas, Texas (US)

Children’s Medical Center Research Institute at UT Southwestern

Faculty Position in Metabolism Research

Faculty position in cancer biology.

Postdoctoral Fellow Position - Breast Medical Oncology

Houston, Texas (US)

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Essay on Gender Discrimination

Students are often asked to write an essay on Gender Discrimination in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Gender Discrimination

Understanding gender discrimination.

Gender discrimination refers to the unjust treatment of individuals based on their gender. It occurs when people are treated less favorably because they are male or female.

Forms of Gender Discrimination

This discrimination can take many forms. It can be seen in the workplace with unequal pay or opportunities. In schools, it may manifest as biased treatment or stereotyping.

Effects of Gender Discrimination

The effects of gender discrimination are harmful. It can lead to a lack of self-esteem, depression, and reduced opportunities for those affected.

Combating Gender Discrimination

To combat gender discrimination, we need to promote equality, challenge stereotypes, and encourage respect for all genders.

250 Words Essay on Gender Discrimination

Introduction.

Gender discrimination, also known as sex discrimination, involves treating an individual unfavorably due to their gender. It is a pervasive issue that transcends geographical boundaries and socio-economic contexts, affecting individuals and societies at large.

Manifestations of Gender Discrimination

Gender discrimination manifests in diverse ways, including disparities in education, employment, and healthcare. Women, for instance, often experience wage gaps, occupational segregation, and limited access to education. On the other hand, men may encounter bias in child custody cases or in sectors traditionally dominated by women.

The Impact of Gender Discrimination

The impact of gender discrimination is far-reaching. It stifles economic growth, hampers social progress, and undermines human rights. Gender discrimination can also perpetuate harmful stereotypes, leading to a cycle of inequality that can span generations.

Addressing Gender Discrimination

Addressing gender discrimination requires a multi-faceted approach. Legal frameworks should be implemented and enforced to protect individuals against discrimination. Additionally, educational campaigns can help challenge harmful stereotypes and promote gender equality.

In conclusion, gender discrimination is a pressing issue that demands our collective attention and action. By promoting gender equality, we can create more inclusive societies that value and respect the rights of all individuals, regardless of their gender.

500 Words Essay on Gender Discrimination

Introduction: understanding gender discrimination.

Gender discrimination, a pervasive societal issue, refers to unequal treatment or perceptions of individuals based on their gender. It manifests in various areas of life, from employment and education to health care and personal relationships. This essay delves into the roots of gender discrimination, its implications, and potential solutions.

The Roots of Gender Discrimination

Gender discrimination originates from deep-seated cultural norms and stereotypes. Societies often have preconceived notions about the roles and behaviors appropriate for different genders. These stereotypes, perpetuated through generations, contribute to the discrimination faced by those who do not conform.

For instance, women are often expected to be nurturing, emotional, and submissive, while men are perceived as strong, rational, and dominant. Such binary perceptions not only limit individual potential but also create an environment ripe for discrimination.

Implications of Gender Discrimination

The implications of gender discrimination are far-reaching and multifaceted. In the workplace, it often results in unequal pay and limited opportunities for advancement. According to the World Economic Forum, it could take another 257 years to close the economic gender gap at the current pace of change.

In healthcare, women often face discrimination, leading to inadequate healthcare services. For instance, women’s pain is often taken less seriously than men’s, leading to misdiagnosis or under-treatment.

Addressing gender discrimination requires a multi-pronged approach. Firstly, legal measures should be implemented to ensure equal rights and opportunities for all genders. This includes laws against gender-based violence, policies for equal pay, and regulations ensuring equal access to education and healthcare.

Finally, representation matters. Ensuring diverse representation in all areas of society, from politics to media, can challenge the status quo and promote a more balanced perception of gender roles.

Conclusion: Towards a Gender-Equal Society

Gender discrimination is a deeply ingrained societal issue with far-reaching implications. It is rooted in traditional gender roles and stereotypes, which limit individual potential and perpetuate inequality. Addressing this issue requires legal measures, societal change, and diverse representation. As we strive towards a more gender-equal society, it is crucial to challenge our perceptions and strive for equal rights and opportunities for all, regardless of gender.

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies (Print ISSN: 1078-4950; Online ISSN: 1532-5822)

Review Article: 2023 Vol: 29 Issue: 1

Gender Discrimination: An Overview of Historical and Contemporary Issues

Kendall Oswald, University of Warwick

Citation Information : Oswald, K. (2023). Gender discrimination: an overview of historical and contemporary issues. Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, 29 (1), 1-2.

This research article provides an overview of gender discrimination, including its historical roots and contemporary manifestations. Discrimination based on gender has been a pervasive issue throughout history, with women facing barriers to education, employment, and political participation. Although progress has been made towards gender equality, gender discrimination still persists in many forms today. Gender-based violence, workplace inequality, legal barriers, and poverty are among the contemporary issues that disproportionately affect women. This article highlights the importance of addressing the root causes of gender discrimination and working towards the creation of a society that values and respects individuals regardless of their gender identity or expression. Education, policy reform, and advocacy efforts aimed at promoting gender equality can help create a more just and equitable world for all.

Gender Discrimination, Contemporary Issues, Gender-Based Violence, Workplace Inequality, Legal Barriers, Human Rights, Gender Equality, Policy Reform, Advocacy Efforts.

Introduction

Gender discrimination has been a prevalent issue throughout history, and despite progress towards gender equality, it still persists in many forms today. Discrimination based on gender refers to the unequal treatment of individuals on the basis of their gender identity or expression. This research article examines the history of gender discrimination and how it manifests in contemporary society.

Historical Overview of Gender Discrimination

Gender discrimination has been a significant issue throughout history. Women have been denied the right to education, employment, and political participation based solely on their gender. For example, in the United States, women were not allowed to vote until 1920, and it was not until the 1960s and 1970s that women began to achieve greater social and economic equality. In many parts of the world, gender discrimination is still prevalent. Women continue to face barriers to education and employment, and they are often paid less than men for performing the same job. In some countries, women are not allowed to drive, own property, or even leave their homes without male supervision ( Dilli et al., 2019; Kirton & Greene, 2005 ).

Contemporary Forms of Gender Discrimination

Despite progress towards gender equality, gender discrimination still manifests in many forms in contemporary society. One of the most significant forms of gender discrimination is gender-based violence, including sexual assault and domestic violence. Women are disproportionately affected by gender-based violence, with an estimated one in three women experiencing some form of violence in their lifetime ( Risman, 2018; Robeyns, 2003 ).

Gender discrimination also manifests in the workplace, where women often face barriers to career advancement and are paid less than men for performing the same job. Women are also underrepresented in leadership positions, with only a small percentage of CEOs and board members being female.

In many countries, women still face legal barriers to equality, such as laws that prevent them from inheriting property or require them to have a male guardian. Women are also disproportionately affected by poverty, with many working in low-wage jobs without access to basic benefits such as healthcare and paid leave ( Zhu & Chang, 2019 ).

Gender discrimination has been a pervasive issue throughout history, and while progress towards gender equality has been made, it still persists in many forms today. Discrimination based on gender is a violation of human rights and has significant social and economic consequences. To achieve gender equality, it is crucial to address the root causes of gender discrimination and to work towards the creation of a society that values and respects individuals regardless of their gender identity or expression. This can be achieved through education, policy reform, and advocacy efforts aimed at eliminating gender-based violence, promoting workplace equality, and ensuring legal protections for all individuals. By working towards gender equality, we can create a more just and equitable world for all.

Dilli, S., Carmichael, S. G., & Rijpma, A. (2019). Introducing the historical gender equality index . Feminist Economics , 25 (1), 31-57.

Indexed at , Google Scholar , Cross Ref

Kirton, G., & Greene, A. M. (2005). Gender, equality and industrial relations in the ‘New Europe’: An introduction . European Journal of Industrial Relations , 11 (2), 141-149.

Risman, B. J. (2018). Gender as a social structure (pp. 19-43) . Springer International Publishing.

Google Scholar , Cross Ref

Robeyns, I. (2003). Sen's capability approach and gender inequality: Selecting relevant capabilities . Feminist Economics , 9 (2-3), 61-92.

Zhu, N., & Chang, L. (2019). Evolved but not fixed: A life history account of gender roles and gender inequality . Frontiers in Psychology , 10 , 1709.

Received : 20-Dec-2022, Manuscript No. JIACS-23-13433; Editor assigned : 23-Dec-2022, PreQC No. JIACS-23-13433(PQ); Reviewed : 06-Jan-2023, QC No. JIACS-23-13433; Revised : 13-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. JIACS-23-13433(R); Published : 20-Jan-2023

Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Gender Discrimination — Gender Discrimination in the Workplace: Challenges and Solutions

Gender Discrimination in The Workplace: Challenges and Solutions

• Categories: Gender Discrimination Gender Wage Gap

About this sample

Words: 738 |

Published: Sep 7, 2023

Words: 738 | Pages: 2 | 4 min read

Table of contents

The prevalence of gender discrimination, the impact of gender discrimination, strategies for addressing gender discrimination, tailoring solutions to workplace contexts.

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr. Heisenberg

Verified writer

• Expert in: Social Issues

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

1 pages / 679 words

3 pages / 1280 words

3 pages / 1420 words

1 pages / 1611 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Gender Discrimination

In Greek mythology, Pallas Athena, also known simply as Athena, is one of the most revered and well-known goddesses. She is often depicted as the goddess of wisdom, courage, inspiration, civilization, law and justice, strategic [...]

In Susan Glaspell's play "Trifles," the use of symbols plays a vital role in conveying the story's underlying themes and messages. From the canary to the quilt, these symbols serve as powerful tools that enhance the audience's [...]

Chinua Achebe's novel "Things Fall Apart" is a powerful portrayal of the complex character of Okonkwo, a man who struggles to maintain his traditional values in a rapidly changing world. Okonkwo is a dynamic character, whose [...]

Beauty standards have been a prominent aspect of American culture for decades, influencing the way individuals perceive themselves and others. These standards are often perpetuated through various media platforms, such as [...]

Nowadays, gender inequality is a big problem for the hole world, many place have a big gender inequality. The problem have very bad influence for the world and also for those people who be traded differently. Besides, the gender [...]

The “glass ceiling” has kept ladies away from specific positions and openings in the work environment. Ladies are stereotyped as low maintenance, lower grade workers with restricted open doors for preparing and headway due to [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

69 Gender Discrimination Essay Topic Ideas & Examples

🏆 best gender discrimination topic ideas & essay examples, 🔎 interesting topics to write about gender discrimination, 🎓 good essay topics on gender discrimination.

• Gender Discrimination in the Workplace Essay This essay will document gender bias and gender discrimination in the context of social and physical and the social confines of the work place that is experienced at work in the context of United States […]
• Gender Discrimination in History and Nowadays In literature, especially in the works of Greek philosophers, there is a striking discrepancy in the perceptions of women’s place and homosexuality. Women were regarded as the devil’s seed, and the criteria to classify a […]
• Gender Discrimination in Public Administration The subject of the dispute and the statement of claim was the vacancy of a traffic controller, which was initially offered to Johnson, but then, as part of the program, the place was given to […]
• Discussion of Gender Discrimination in Modern Society In the professional field, women are constantly in discriminatory positions of jeopardy due to their gender. However, women still need to compete in the work environment.
• Gender Roles, Expectations, and Discrimination Despite Isaac being the calmest boy in the school, he had a crush on Grace, a beautiful girl in the school who was from a wealthy family.
• Gender Stereotypes and Sexual Discrimination In this Ted Talk, Sandberg also raises a question regarding the changes that are needed to alter the current disbalance in the number of men and women that achieve professional excellence.
• Discrimination and Politics of Gender and Sexuality Furthermore, the heterosexual had equal rights in terms of marriage as it was legalized in 50 states and there was no longer hiding one’s identity.
• Manifestations of Gender Discrimination in Insurance In the past, insurance companies have engaged in gender discrimination in the classification, acceptance and rating of risks. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the concept of gender discrimination and insurance in the world.
• Gender and the Problem of Discrimination Generally, after the evaluation of the facts, it appears that the consumption of media forms socializes us to hold particular conceptions of gender and the other related concepts and issues, and can even confront gender […]
• Gender Discrimination in the Workplace and Better Management Skills All complexities and worries including gender discrimination and violence at the workplace are the domain of management for which skilled management is an asset par excellent.
• Racial and Gender Discrimination in the Workplace and Housing Job discrimination is that discrimination which arises at the places of work Factors that include the presence of a high population of the unemployed create room for the vice.
• Ethics of Gender Identity Discrimination at Work Besides, ethical theories such as virtue ethics facilitate an understanding of the ethical impasse of whether to terminate the contract of transgender employees or embrace their sexual identity in the workplace environment.
• The Problem of Gender Discrimination In so doing, it has determined that the number of women in the workforce has systematically and continually risen over the course of the past two decades while the number of men in the workforce […]
• Institutions and Gender Discrimination Issues In addition, parents buy clothes and toys that reflect gender issues in society and this contributes to the development of gendered stereotypes.
• Gender Discrimination on Birth Stage There has been a controversial debate over the years on the decline of men due to the emphasis on women’s empowerment.
• Gender Discrimination in Russian Workplaces In the Soviet era, women were seen as an important factor in the industrialization of the country and they were allocated education and work opportunity by Russia’s socialist government.
• Gender-Based Discrimination in the Workplace In order to give a good account of the effects of gender-based discrimination against women, this paper examines the space of women in the automotive engineering industry.
• Problem of the Gender Discrimination in the Workplace This requires the employer to consider some of the things such as the number of women and men that applied for the available positions.
• Age and Gender: Discrimination During the Hiring Process When an employer sets forth to hire employees, there are a number of factors that have to be put into consideration by the concerned employer in order to ensure that those that are recruited have […]
• Gender Discrimination at the Workplace: A Case of Sexual Harassment In the current case and issues surrounding Herman Cain the Republican presidential candidate, it is apparent that cases of sexual harassment have taken place based on the above definition.
• Controversy of Gender and Race Discrimination Gender and race issues should be well tackled, for instance, in some of the societies men are believed to be superior to women and hold all the important positions in the society.
• Gender Discrimination and Intergenerational Transmission of Preferences
• Age and Gender Discrimination in the News Industry
• Analysis of the Phenomenon of Racial and Gender Discrimination
• Avoiding Sexual Orientation and Gender Discrimination in the Workplace
• Overview of Business Ethics and Gender Discrimination
• The Problem of Career and Gender Discrimination in Bahrain
• Caregivers, Firm Policies, and Gender Discrimination Claims
• Collaboration, Alphabetical Order, and Gender Discrimination: Evidence From the Lab
• Cultural Defense for Ethnic Accommodation or Cultural Excuse for Gender Discrimination
• Effective Public Policy Which Reduces Gender Discrimination in the Agricultural Labour Market
• The Link Between Equal Opportunity and Gender Discrimination
• Equal Protection and Gender Discrimination in Military Training
• Ethnic and Gender Discrimination in the Rental Housing Market
• Exploring Gender Discrimination Across Countries and Cultures
• Family Labor Market Decisions and Statistical Gender Discrimination
• Family Matters: Endogenous Gender Discrimination in Economic Development
• The Question of Gender Discrimination Against Asian Americans
• Gender Discrimination and Efficiency in Marriage: The Bargaining Family Under Scrutiny
• Measuring and Testing for Gender Discrimination in Physician Pay: English Family Doctors
• Gender Discrimination and Emigration: Push Factor Versus Screening Process Hypothesis
• Output and Gender Discrimination in Pay: Evidence From Manufacturing Industry
• Gender Discrimination and Evaluators’ Gender: Evidence From the Italian Academy
• Political Instability, Gender Discrimination, and Population Growth in Developing Countries
• Gender Discrimination and Firm Profit Efficiency: Evidence From Brazil
• Prejudice and Gender Discrimination Against Women and Minorities
• Gender Discrimination and Gender Bias in the Modern Society
• Gender Discrimination and Growth: Theory and Evidence From India
• Rent Sharing and Gender Discrimination in Collegiate Athletics
• Social Norms and Gender Discrimination in the Labor Market: An Agent-Based Exercise
• Gender Discrimination and Prejudice Evident in Promotional Content
• Subjective Performance Evaluation and Gender Discrimination
• Gender Discrimination and Self-Employment Dynamics in Europe
• The Analogies Between Racial and Gender Discrimination
• Gender Discrimination and Social Identity: Evidence From Urban Pakistan
• The Glass Ceiling and How Gender Discrimination Affects Women
• Gender Discrimination During the Early Nineteenth Century
• Life and Contributions of Nafis Sadik to the Fight Against Gender Discrimination
• Gender Discrimination Set Straight: Women’s Right to Express the Option of Voting
• The Women During the Persian Rule and the Gender Discrimination
• Gender Discrimination Still Exists in Today’s Era
• Stereotype Topics
• Gender Stereotypes Essay Titles
• Sexism Essay Ideas
• Women’s Role Essay Topics
• Transgender Paper Topics
• Bullying Research Topics
• Gender Issues Questions
• Family Relationships Research Ideas
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2023, September 26). 69 Gender Discrimination Essay Topic Ideas & Examples. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/gender-discrimination-essay-topics/

"69 Gender Discrimination Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." IvyPanda , 26 Sept. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/topic/gender-discrimination-essay-topics/.

IvyPanda . (2023) '69 Gender Discrimination Essay Topic Ideas & Examples'. 26 September.

IvyPanda . 2023. "69 Gender Discrimination Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." September 26, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/gender-discrimination-essay-topics/.

1. IvyPanda . "69 Gender Discrimination Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." September 26, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/gender-discrimination-essay-topics/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "69 Gender Discrimination Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." September 26, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/gender-discrimination-essay-topics/.

Latest Education and Career News

Gender Discrimination Essay for Students and Children

Reported by Anshika Saxena

Published on 22 August 2024

Gender Discrimination Essay: We continuously deal with so many social issues at this time that it has become necessary to educate students about them so that they can be addressed properly. Students are educated about these issues through plays, acts, or writing about them. Essays play important parts in expressing their thoughts and educating them about these norms. One such social issue is Gender discrimination or gender inequality. Here we have provided a sample of essays on gender discrimination or an essay on gender inequality.

We have provided a sample paragraph on gender discrimination and a long essay on gender inequality or gender discrimination. Hope students will find this useful for their own purpose.

Also Read: Essay on Reading is a Good Habit for Students

Paragraph on Gender Discrimination

If we try to define gender discrimination we can say that gender discrimination is the unequal treatment of individuals on the basis of their gender. The biases between males and females have prevailed in our society for a very long time. Women are subjected to gender inequality or discrimination on the basis of gender for a very long time. Gender discrimination has become one of the major social issues to deal with in our society. Women are subjected to gender discrimination in various aspects of life like work, household, education, and other areas.

The roots of gender discrimination come from the long history of mankind. Lack of education act as fuel to this cause. Women were subjected to this practice in a male-dominated patriarchal society because they were considered physically weak and unintelligent when compared to men. They were considered breeding objects whose only aim in life was to take care of a feeling. But now times are changing many organizations along with the government are working together to improve the state of women. Equal representation of women can also be seen in many areas. And with proper education, we can remove this social issue. 

Essay on Gender Inequality or Discrimination (500 words) 

This essay will examine the various forms of gender discrimination, their effects on women and society, and the steps that can be taken to address this issue.

Gender discrimination is a major social issue that has been prevalent throughout history. Discrimination based on a particular gender is treated as gender discrimination. History is witness that women have been the target of this social norm from time immemorial.   

Women have long been subjected to discrimination in various aspects of life, including education, employment, politics, and other areas. Gender discrimination starts at a very early age and from home only. Boys and girls are discriminated on various aspects. 

It disturbs the equilibrium in society and is also a violation of the civil rights of an individual. It can take many forms like harassment, domestic violence, and abortion of selective gender.

Also Check: Essay on Discipline for Students 

Forms of Gender Discrimination:

Gender discrimination can take place anywhere starting from home only. Workplace, politics, and employment are other areas where gender inequality is seen. It can have various forms, including but not limited to:

• Workplace Discrimination: In the workplace, it is seen that women are paid less for the same job profile. They are also denied opportunities and promotions. Women are often subjected to hostile remarks and are not given equal opportunities in the workplace.
• Education Discrimination: This condition is severe in many countries example India where girls are denied access to education or the best quality of education if compared to their counterparts. Often girls are prohibited from taking part in technical or mechanical fields or where physical strength is required. 
• Social Discrimination: Women may be discriminated against in social situations, such as being excluded from certain activities or being subjected to negative stereotypes.

Effects of Gender Inequality:

The effects of gender discrimination are far-reaching. It can affect the individual who is being subjected to discrimination and can prove harmful to society. It can also be detrimental to women’s health, well-being, and overall quality of life. Some of the effects of gender discrimination include:

• Limited Access to Opportunities: Discrimination can limit women’s access to opportunities. They are not given equal opportunities in the field such as education, employment, and political participation. 
• Economic Disadvantage: It can create an imbalance in society and can also prove as a major reason for the underdevelopment of the country. Women may be paid less than men for doing the same job, which can lead to economic disadvantages and financial insecurity.
• Health Issues: Discrimination can lead to mental as well as physical health. It can impact the access of the particular gender to the healthcare system. It can also lead to stress, anxiety, and depression.  This all can have a negative impact on women’s health.
• Violence and Harassment: Women may be subjected to violence and harassment as a result of discrimination. They suffer from domestic violence and harassment including sexual harassment and gender-selective abortion. This can have lasting physical and psychological effects.

Also Read: Essay on My Family for Students

Steps to Address the problem:

Addressing gender discrimination requires a concerted effort from individuals, organizations, and governments. Gender Equality can’t be achieved alone. Some of the steps that can be taken to address gender discrimination include:

• Education and Awareness: The foremost step to address the problem is to raise awareness and educate the individual from the very start. It should start from home and in schools where girls should be treated equally to boys with respect to everything. This will change the attitude and behavior toward women in many ways.
• Legal Reforms: Government should make laws and policies to protect the right of women so that they cannot be the subject of gender discrimination. This can also include that the culprit should be punished. 
• Workplace Reforms: Employers should be encouraged to provide equal opportunities and fair pay to women. Proper ethics should be followed in the workspace and a culture should be created that is inclusive and respectful of all genders.
• Empowerment of Women: Women should be empowered to assert their rights and demand equal treatment. The status of women should be raised in all aspects of life and they should be given access to education, healthcare, and economic opportunities.

Conclusion of Essay on Gender Inequality or Gender Discrimination

Gender discrimination is a pervasive social issue that continues to affect women’s lives in many ways. For the whole society and world to progress gender discrimination should be removed gradually. Gender discrimination is not natural but it is human-made, the result of human thinking. Steps should be taken and a multifaceted approach should be taken. By empowering women we can achieve gender equality and an equitable society for all.

Check out More Essays:

• Essay on Dowry System for Students
• Essay on Books for Students
• Climate Change Essay for Students
• Essay on Sports and Games for Students

Frequently Asked Questions of Essay on Gender Discrimination

Yes, both the terms on a broad basis mean the same. When Discrimination is made on the basis of gender identity or if it is gender-oriented then it is referred to as gender discrimination.

If we try to define gender discrimination we can say that gender discrimination is the unequal treatment of individuals on the basis of their gender. Women are subjected to gender inequality or discrimination on the basis of gender for a very long time. Gender discrimination has become one of the major social issues to deal with in our society.

The major way to eradicate the problem from its roots is through education. Individuals should be educated and taught that no discrimination should be taken on the basis of gender orientation. Second by empowering women and taking some legal and workplace reforms.

Anshika Saxena

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Most recent.

Unique and Interesting College Speech Topics

Interesting Speech Topics to Inspire and Enrich Knowledge

18th Birthday Speech Example

A Comprehensive Guide to ‘Types of Speech’ Its Example & Purpose

Sample of a Valedictorian Speech; Tips, Template, Expert Analysis

150 funny speech topics ideas; informative and humorous.

Welcome to NVSHQ.ORG. Here you will get all the latest information about the trending things on the internet around India. We focus on how to study tips, Exam guides, education, working techniques, case studies, Exam Answers Keys, Exam Admit card articles.

Dehradun, Uttarakhand

Call Us: +91 9997526894

[email protected]

NVSHQ.ORG is part of the  Applaud Web Media  publishing family.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List

Twenty years of gender equality research: A scoping review based on a new semantic indicator

Paola belingheri.

1 Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Energia, dei Sistemi, del Territorio e delle Costruzioni, Università degli Studi di Pisa, Largo L. Lazzarino, Pisa, Italy

Filippo Chiarello

Andrea fronzetti colladon.

2 Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy

3 Department of Management, Kozminski University, Warsaw, Poland

Paola Rovelli

4 Faculty of Economics and Management, Centre for Family Business Management, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bozen-Bolzano, Italy

Associated Data

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its supporting information files. The only exception is the text of the abstracts (over 15,000) that we have downloaded from Scopus. These abstracts can be retrieved from Scopus, but we do not have permission to redistribute them.

Gender equality is a major problem that places women at a disadvantage thereby stymieing economic growth and societal advancement. In the last two decades, extensive research has been conducted on gender related issues, studying both their antecedents and consequences. However, existing literature reviews fail to provide a comprehensive and clear picture of what has been studied so far, which could guide scholars in their future research. Our paper offers a scoping review of a large portion of the research that has been published over the last 22 years, on gender equality and related issues, with a specific focus on business and economics studies. Combining innovative methods drawn from both network analysis and text mining, we provide a synthesis of 15,465 scientific articles. We identify 27 main research topics, we measure their relevance from a semantic point of view and the relationships among them, highlighting the importance of each topic in the overall gender discourse. We find that prominent research topics mostly relate to women in the workforce–e.g., concerning compensation, role, education, decision-making and career progression. However, some of them are losing momentum, and some other research trends–for example related to female entrepreneurship, leadership and participation in the board of directors–are on the rise. Besides introducing a novel methodology to review broad literature streams, our paper offers a map of the main gender-research trends and presents the most popular and the emerging themes, as well as their intersections, outlining important avenues for future research.

Introduction

The persistent gender inequalities that currently exist across the developed and developing world are receiving increasing attention from economists, policymakers, and the general public [e.g., 1 – 3 ]. Economic studies have indicated that women’s education and entry into the workforce contributes to social and economic well-being [e.g., 4 , 5 ], while their exclusion from the labor market and from managerial positions has an impact on overall labor productivity and income per capita [ 6 , 7 ]. The United Nations selected gender equality, with an emphasis on female education, as part of the Millennium Development Goals [ 8 ], and gender equality at-large as one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to be achieved by 2030 [ 9 ]. These latter objectives involve not only developing nations, but rather all countries, to achieve economic, social and environmental well-being.

As is the case with many SDGs, gender equality is still far from being achieved and persists across education, access to opportunities, or presence in decision-making positions [ 7 , 10 , 11 ]. As we enter the last decade for the SDGs’ implementation, and while we are battling a global health pandemic, effective and efficient action becomes paramount to reach this ambitious goal.

Scholars have dedicated a massive effort towards understanding gender equality, its determinants, its consequences for women and society, and the appropriate actions and policies to advance women’s equality. Many topics have been covered, ranging from women’s education and human capital [ 12 , 13 ] and their role in society [e.g., 14 , 15 ], to their appointment in firms’ top ranked positions [e.g., 16 , 17 ] and performance implications [e.g., 18 , 19 ]. Despite some attempts, extant literature reviews provide a narrow view on these issues, restricted to specific topics–e.g., female students’ presence in STEM fields [ 20 ], educational gender inequality [ 5 ], the gender pay gap [ 21 ], the glass ceiling effect [ 22 ], leadership [ 23 ], entrepreneurship [ 24 ], women’s presence on the board of directors [ 25 , 26 ], diversity management [ 27 ], gender stereotypes in advertisement [ 28 ], or specific professions [ 29 ]. A comprehensive view on gender-related research, taking stock of key findings and under-studied topics is thus lacking.

Extant literature has also highlighted that gender issues, and their economic and social ramifications, are complex topics that involve a large number of possible antecedents and outcomes [ 7 ]. Indeed, gender equality actions are most effective when implemented in unison with other SDGs (e.g., with SDG 8, see [ 30 ]) in a synergetic perspective [ 10 ]. Many bodies of literature (e.g., business, economics, development studies, sociology and psychology) approach the problem of achieving gender equality from different perspectives–often addressing specific and narrow aspects. This sometimes leads to a lack of clarity about how different issues, circumstances, and solutions may be related in precipitating or mitigating gender inequality or its effects. As the number of papers grows at an increasing pace, this issue is exacerbated and there is a need to step back and survey the body of gender equality literature as a whole. There is also a need to examine synergies between different topics and approaches, as well as gaps in our understanding of how different problems and solutions work together. Considering the important topic of women’s economic and social empowerment, this paper aims to fill this gap by answering the following research question: what are the most relevant findings in the literature on gender equality and how do they relate to each other ?

To do so, we conduct a scoping review [ 31 ], providing a synthesis of 15,465 articles dealing with gender equity related issues published in the last twenty-two years, covering both the periods of the MDGs and the SDGs (i.e., 2000 to mid 2021) in all the journals indexed in the Academic Journal Guide’s 2018 ranking of business and economics journals. Given the huge amount of research conducted on the topic, we adopt an innovative methodology, which relies on social network analysis and text mining. These techniques are increasingly adopted when surveying large bodies of text. Recently, they were applied to perform analysis of online gender communication differences [ 32 ] and gender behaviors in online technology communities [ 33 ], to identify and classify sexual harassment instances in academia [ 34 ], and to evaluate the gender inclusivity of disaster management policies [ 35 ].

Applied to the title, abstracts and keywords of the articles in our sample, this methodology allows us to identify a set of 27 recurrent topics within which we automatically classify the papers. Introducing additional novelty, by means of the Semantic Brand Score (SBS) indicator [ 36 ] and the SBS BI app [ 37 ], we assess the importance of each topic in the overall gender equality discourse and its relationships with the other topics, as well as trends over time, with a more accurate description than that offered by traditional literature reviews relying solely on the number of papers presented in each topic.

This methodology, applied to gender equality research spanning the past twenty-two years, enables two key contributions. First, we extract the main message that each document is conveying and how this is connected to other themes in literature, providing a rich picture of the topics that are at the center of the discourse, as well as of the emerging topics. Second, by examining the semantic relationship between topics and how tightly their discourses are linked, we can identify the key relationships and connections between different topics. This semi-automatic methodology is also highly reproducible with minimum effort.

This literature review is organized as follows. In the next section, we present how we selected relevant papers and how we analyzed them through text mining and social network analysis. We then illustrate the importance of 27 selected research topics, measured by means of the SBS indicator. In the results section, we present an overview of the literature based on the SBS results–followed by an in-depth narrative analysis of the top 10 topics (i.e., those with the highest SBS) and their connections. Subsequently, we highlight a series of under-studied connections between the topics where there is potential for future research. Through this analysis, we build a map of the main gender-research trends in the last twenty-two years–presenting the most popular themes. We conclude by highlighting key areas on which research should focused in the future.

Our aim is to map a broad topic, gender equality research, that has been approached through a host of different angles and through different disciplines. Scoping reviews are the most appropriate as they provide the freedom to map different themes and identify literature gaps, thereby guiding the recommendation of new research agendas [ 38 ].

Several practical approaches have been proposed to identify and assess the underlying topics of a specific field using big data [ 39 – 41 ], but many of them fail without proper paper retrieval and text preprocessing. This is specifically true for a research field such as the gender-related one, which comprises the work of scholars from different backgrounds. In this section, we illustrate a novel approach for the analysis of scientific (gender-related) papers that relies on methods and tools of social network analysis and text mining. Our procedure has four main steps: (1) data collection, (2) text preprocessing, (3) keywords extraction and classification, and (4) evaluation of semantic importance and image.

Data collection

In this study, we analyze 22 years of literature on gender-related research. Following established practice for scoping reviews [ 42 ], our data collection consisted of two main steps, which we summarize here below.

Firstly, we retrieved from the Scopus database all the articles written in English that contained the term “gender” in their title, abstract or keywords and were published in a journal listed in the Academic Journal Guide 2018 ranking of the Chartered Association of Business Schools (CABS) ( https://charteredabs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/AJG2018-Methodology.pdf ), considering the time period from Jan 2000 to May 2021. We used this information considering that abstracts, titles and keywords represent the most informative part of a paper, while using the full-text would increase the signal-to-noise ratio for information extraction. Indeed, these textual elements already demonstrated to be reliable sources of information for the task of domain lexicon extraction [ 43 , 44 ]. We chose Scopus as source of literature because of its popularity, its update rate, and because it offers an API to ease the querying process. Indeed, while it does not allow to retrieve the full text of scientific articles, the Scopus API offers access to titles, abstracts, citation information and metadata for all its indexed scholarly journals. Moreover, we decided to focus on the journals listed in the AJG 2018 ranking because we were interested in reviewing business and economics related gender studies only. The AJG is indeed widely used by universities and business schools as a reference point for journal and research rigor and quality. This first step, executed in June 2021, returned more than 55,000 papers.

In the second step–because a look at the papers showed very sparse results, many of which were not in line with the topic of this literature review (e.g., papers dealing with health care or medical issues, where the word gender indicates the gender of the patients)–we applied further inclusion criteria to make the sample more focused on the topic of this literature review (i.e., women’s gender equality issues). Specifically, we only retained those papers mentioning, in their title and/or abstract, both gender-related keywords (e.g., daughter, female, mother) and keywords referring to bias and equality issues (e.g., equality, bias, diversity, inclusion). After text pre-processing (see next section), keywords were first identified from a frequency-weighted list of words found in the titles, abstracts and keywords in the initial list of papers, extracted through text mining (following the same approach as [ 43 ]). They were selected by two of the co-authors independently, following respectively a bottom up and a top-down approach. The bottom-up approach consisted of examining the words found in the frequency-weighted list and classifying those related to gender and equality. The top-down approach consisted in searching in the word list for notable gender and equality-related words. Table 1 reports the sets of keywords we considered, together with some examples of words that were used to search for their presence in the dataset (a full list is provided in the S1 Text ). At end of this second step, we obtained a final sample of 15,465 relevant papers.

Text processing and keyword extraction

Text preprocessing aims at structuring text into a form that can be analyzed by statistical models. In the present section, we describe the preprocessing steps we applied to paper titles and abstracts, which, as explained below, partially follow a standard text preprocessing pipeline [ 45 ]. These activities have been performed using the R package udpipe [ 46 ].

The first step is n-gram extraction (i.e., a sequence of words from a given text sample) to identify which n-grams are important in the analysis, since domain-specific lexicons are often composed by bi-grams and tri-grams [ 47 ]. Multi-word extraction is usually implemented with statistics and linguistic rules, thus using the statistical properties of n-grams or machine learning approaches [ 48 ]. However, for the present paper, we used Scopus metadata in order to have a more effective and efficient n-grams collection approach [ 49 ]. We used the keywords of each paper in order to tag n-grams with their associated keywords automatically. Using this greedy approach, it was possible to collect all the keywords listed by the authors of the papers. From this list, we extracted only keywords composed by two, three and four words, we removed all the acronyms and rare keywords (i.e., appearing in less than 1% of papers), and we clustered keywords showing a high orthographic similarity–measured using a Levenshtein distance [ 50 ] lower than 2, considering these groups of keywords as representing same concepts, but expressed with different spelling. After tagging the n-grams in the abstracts, we followed a common data preparation pipeline that consists of the following steps: (i) tokenization, that splits the text into tokens (i.e., single words and previously tagged multi-words); (ii) removal of stop-words (i.e. those words that add little meaning to the text, usually being very common and short functional words–such as “and”, “or”, or “of”); (iii) parts-of-speech tagging, that is providing information concerning the morphological role of a word and its morphosyntactic context (e.g., if the token is a determiner, the next token is a noun or an adjective with very high confidence, [ 51 ]); and (iv) lemmatization, which consists in substituting each word with its dictionary form (or lemma). The output of the latter step allows grouping together the inflected forms of a word. For example, the verbs “am”, “are”, and “is” have the shared lemma “be”, or the nouns “cat” and “cats” both share the lemma “cat”. We preferred lemmatization over stemming [ 52 ] in order to obtain more interpretable results.

In addition, we identified a further set of keywords (with respect to those listed in the “keywords” field) by applying a series of automatic words unification and removal steps, as suggested in past research [ 53 , 54 ]. We removed: sparse terms (i.e., occurring in less than 0.1% of all documents), common terms (i.e., occurring in more than 10% of all documents) and retained only nouns and adjectives. It is relevant to notice that no document was lost due to these steps. We then used the TF-IDF function [ 55 ] to produce a new list of keywords. We additionally tested other approaches for the identification and clustering of keywords–such as TextRank [ 56 ] or Latent Dirichlet Allocation [ 57 ]–without obtaining more informative results.

Classification of research topics

To guide the literature analysis, two experts met regularly to examine the sample of collected papers and to identify the main topics and trends in gender research. Initially, they conducted brainstorming sessions on the topics they expected to find, due to their knowledge of the literature. This led to an initial list of topics. Subsequently, the experts worked independently, also supported by the keywords in paper titles and abstracts extracted with the procedure described above.

Considering all this information, each expert identified and clustered relevant keywords into topics. At the end of the process, the two assignments were compared and exhibited a 92% agreement. Another meeting was held to discuss discordant cases and reach a consensus. This resulted in a list of 27 topics, briefly introduced in Table 2 and subsequently detailed in the following sections.

Evaluation of semantic importance

Working on the lemmatized corpus of the 15,465 papers included in our sample, we proceeded with the evaluation of semantic importance trends for each topic and with the analysis of their connections and prevalent textual associations. To this aim, we used the Semantic Brand Score indicator [ 36 ], calculated through the SBS BI webapp [ 37 ] that also produced a brand image report for each topic. For this study we relied on the computing resources of the ENEA/CRESCO infrastructure [ 58 ].

The Semantic Brand Score (SBS) is a measure of semantic importance that combines methods of social network analysis and text mining. It is usually applied for the analysis of (big) textual data to evaluate the importance of one or more brands, names, words, or sets of keywords [ 36 ]. Indeed, the concept of “brand” is intended in a flexible way and goes beyond products or commercial brands. In this study, we evaluate the SBS time-trends of the keywords defining the research topics discussed in the previous section. Semantic importance comprises the three dimensions of topic prevalence, diversity and connectivity. Prevalence measures how frequently a research topic is used in the discourse. The more a topic is mentioned by scientific articles, the more the research community will be aware of it, with possible increase of future studies; this construct is partly related to that of brand awareness [ 59 ]. This effect is even stronger, considering that we are analyzing the title, abstract and keywords of the papers, i.e. the parts that have the highest visibility. A very important characteristic of the SBS is that it considers the relationships among words in a text. Topic importance is not just a matter of how frequently a topic is mentioned, but also of the associations a topic has in the text. Specifically, texts are transformed into networks of co-occurring words, and relationships are studied through social network analysis [ 60 ]. This step is necessary to calculate the other two dimensions of our semantic importance indicator. Accordingly, a social network of words is generated for each time period considered in the analysis–i.e., a graph made of n nodes (words) and E edges weighted by co-occurrence frequency, with W being the set of edge weights. The keywords representing each topic were clustered into single nodes.

The construct of diversity relates to that of brand image [ 59 ], in the sense that it considers the richness and distinctiveness of textual (topic) associations. Considering the above-mentioned networks, we calculated diversity using the distinctiveness centrality metric–as in the formula presented by Fronzetti Colladon and Naldi [ 61 ].

Lastly, connectivity was measured as the weighted betweenness centrality [ 62 , 63 ] of each research topic node. We used the formula presented by Wasserman and Faust [ 60 ]. The dimension of connectivity represents the “brokerage power” of each research topic–i.e., how much it can serve as a bridge to connect other terms (and ultimately topics) in the discourse [ 36 ].

The SBS is the final composite indicator obtained by summing the standardized scores of prevalence, diversity and connectivity. Standardization was carried out considering all the words in the corpus, for each specific timeframe.

This methodology, applied to a large and heterogeneous body of text, enables to automatically identify two important sets of information that add value to the literature review. Firstly, the relevance of each topic in literature is measured through a composite indicator of semantic importance, rather than simply looking at word frequencies. This provides a much richer picture of the topics that are at the center of the discourse, as well as of the topics that are emerging in the literature. Secondly, it enables to examine the extent of the semantic relationship between topics, looking at how tightly their discourses are linked. In a field such as gender equality, where many topics are closely linked to each other and present overlaps in issues and solutions, this methodology offers a novel perspective with respect to traditional literature reviews. In addition, it ensures reproducibility over time and the possibility to semi-automatically update the analysis, as new papers become available.

Overview of main topics

In terms of descriptive textual statistics, our corpus is made of 15,465 text documents, consisting of a total of 2,685,893 lemmatized tokens (words) and 32,279 types. As a result, the type-token ratio is 1.2%. The number of hapaxes is 12,141, with a hapax-token ratio of 37.61%.

Fig 1 shows the list of 27 topics by decreasing SBS. The most researched topic is compensation , exceeding all others in prevalence, diversity, and connectivity. This means it is not only mentioned more often than other topics, but it is also connected to a greater number of other topics and is central to the discourse on gender equality. The next four topics are, in order of SBS, role , education , decision-making , and career progression . These topics, except for education , all concern women in the workforce. Between these first five topics and the following ones there is a clear drop in SBS scores. In particular, the topics that follow have a lower connectivity than the first five. They are hiring , performance , behavior , organization , and human capital . Again, except for behavior and human capital , the other three topics are purely related to women in the workforce. After another drop-off, the following topics deal prevalently with women in society. This trend highlights that research on gender in business journals has so far mainly paid attention to the conditions that women experience in business contexts, while also devoting some attention to women in society.

Fig 2 shows the SBS time series of the top 10 topics. While there has been a general increase in the number of Scopus-indexed publications in the last decade, we notice that some SBS trends remain steady, or even decrease. In particular, we observe that the main topic of the last twenty-two years, compensation , is losing momentum. Since 2016, it has been surpassed by decision-making , education and role , which may indicate that literature is increasingly attempting to identify root causes of compensation inequalities. Moreover, in the last two years, the topics of hiring , performance , and organization are experiencing the largest importance increase.

Fig 3 shows the SBS time trends of the remaining 17 topics (i.e., those not in the top 10). As we can see from the graph, there are some that maintain a steady trend–such as reputation , management , networks and governance , which also seem to have little importance. More relevant topics with average stationary trends (except for the last two years) are culture , family , and parenting . The feminine topic is among the most important here, and one of those that exhibit the larger variations over time (similarly to leadership ). On the other hand, the are some topics that, even if not among the most important, show increasing SBS trends; therefore, they could be considered as emerging topics and could become popular in the near future. These are entrepreneurship , leadership , board of directors , and sustainability . These emerging topics are also interesting to anticipate future trends in gender equality research that are conducive to overall equality in society.

In addition to the SBS score of the different topics, the network of terms they are associated to enables to gauge the extent to which their images (textual associations) overlap or differ ( Fig 4 ).

There is a central cluster of topics with high similarity, which are all connected with women in the workforce. The cluster includes topics such as organization , decision-making , performance , hiring , human capital , education and compensation . In addition, the topic of well-being is found within this cluster, suggesting that women’s equality in the workforce is associated to well-being considerations. The emerging topics of entrepreneurship and leadership are also closely connected with each other, possibly implying that leadership is a much-researched quality in female entrepreneurship. Topics that are relatively more distant include personality , politics , feminine , empowerment , management , board of directors , reputation , governance , parenting , masculine and network .

The following sections describe the top 10 topics and their main associations in literature (see Table 3 ), while providing a brief overview of the emerging topics.

Compensation

The topic of compensation is related to the topics of role , hiring , education and career progression , however, also sees a very high association with the words gap and inequality . Indeed, a well-known debate in degrowth economics centers around whether and how to adequately compensate women for their childbearing, childrearing, caregiver and household work [e.g., 30 ].

Even in paid work, women continue being offered lower compensations than their male counterparts who have the same job or cover the same role [ 64 – 67 ]. This severe inequality has been widely studied by scholars over the last twenty-two years. Dealing with this topic, some specific roles have been addressed. Specifically, research highlighted differences in compensation between female and male CEOs [e.g., 68 ], top executives [e.g., 69 ], and boards’ directors [e.g., 70 ]. Scholars investigated the determinants of these gaps, such as the gender composition of the board [e.g., 71 – 73 ] or women’s individual characteristics [e.g., 71 , 74 ].

Among these individual characteristics, education plays a relevant role [ 75 ]. Education is indeed presented as the solution for women, not only to achieve top executive roles, but also to reduce wage inequality [e.g., 76 , 77 ]. Past research has highlighted education influences on gender wage gaps, specifically referring to gender differences in skills [e.g., 78 ], college majors [e.g., 79 ], and college selectivity [e.g., 80 ].

Finally, the wage gap issue is strictly interrelated with hiring –e.g., looking at whether being a mother affects hiring and compensation [e.g., 65 , 81 ] or relating compensation to unemployment [e.g., 82 ]–and career progression –for instance looking at meritocracy [ 83 , 84 ] or the characteristics of the boss for whom women work [e.g., 85 ].

The roles covered by women have been deeply investigated. Scholars have focused on the role of women in their families and the society as a whole [e.g., 14 , 15 ], and, more widely, in business contexts [e.g., 18 , 81 ]. Indeed, despite still lagging behind their male counterparts [e.g., 86 , 87 ], in the last decade there has been an increase in top ranked positions achieved by women [e.g., 88 , 89 ]. Following this phenomenon, scholars have posed greater attention towards the presence of women in the board of directors [e.g., 16 , 18 , 90 , 91 ], given the increasing pressure to appoint female directors that firms, especially listed ones, have experienced. Other scholars have focused on the presence of women covering the role of CEO [e.g., 17 , 92 ] or being part of the top management team [e.g., 93 ]. Irrespectively of the level of analysis, all these studies tried to uncover the antecedents of women’s presence among top managers [e.g., 92 , 94 ] and the consequences of having a them involved in the firm’s decision-making –e.g., on performance [e.g., 19 , 95 , 96 ], risk [e.g., 97 , 98 ], and corporate social responsibility [e.g., 99 , 100 ].

Besides studying the difficulties and discriminations faced by women in getting a job [ 81 , 101 ], and, more specifically in the hiring , appointment, or career progression to these apical roles [e.g., 70 , 83 ], the majority of research of women’s roles dealt with compensation issues. Specifically, scholars highlight the pay-gap that still exists between women and men, both in general [e.g., 64 , 65 ], as well as referring to boards’ directors [e.g., 70 , 102 ], CEOs and executives [e.g., 69 , 103 , 104 ].

Finally, other scholars focused on the behavior of women when dealing with business. In this sense, particular attention has been paid to leadership and entrepreneurial behaviors. The former quite overlaps with dealing with the roles mentioned above, but also includes aspects such as leaders being stereotyped as masculine [e.g., 105 ], the need for greater exposure to female leaders to reduce biases [e.g., 106 ], or female leaders acting as queen bees [e.g., 107 ]. Regarding entrepreneurship , scholars mainly investigated women’s entrepreneurial entry [e.g., 108 , 109 ], differences between female and male entrepreneurs in the evaluations and funding received from investors [e.g., 110 , 111 ], and their performance gap [e.g., 112 , 113 ].

Education has long been recognized as key to social advancement and economic stability [ 114 ], for job progression and also a barrier to gender equality, especially in STEM-related fields. Research on education and gender equality is mostly linked with the topics of compensation , human capital , career progression , hiring , parenting and decision-making .

Education contributes to a higher human capital [ 115 ] and constitutes an investment on the part of women towards their future. In this context, literature points to the gender gap in educational attainment, and the consequences for women from a social, economic, personal and professional standpoint. Women are found to have less access to formal education and information, especially in emerging countries, which in turn may cause them to lose social and economic opportunities [e.g., 12 , 116 – 119 ]. Education in local and rural communities is also paramount to communicate the benefits of female empowerment , contributing to overall societal well-being [e.g., 120 ].

Once women access education, the image they have of the world and their place in society (i.e., habitus) affects their education performance [ 13 ] and is passed on to their children. These situations reinforce gender stereotypes, which become self-fulfilling prophecies that may negatively affect female students’ performance by lowering their confidence and heightening their anxiety [ 121 , 122 ]. Besides formal education, also the information that women are exposed to on a daily basis contributes to their human capital . Digital inequalities, for instance, stems from men spending more time online and acquiring higher digital skills than women [ 123 ].

Education is also a factor that should boost employability of candidates and thus hiring , career progression and compensation , however the relationship between these factors is not straightforward [ 115 ]. First, educational choices ( decision-making ) are influenced by variables such as self-efficacy and the presence of barriers, irrespectively of the career opportunities they offer, especially in STEM [ 124 ]. This brings additional difficulties to women’s enrollment and persistence in scientific and technical fields of study due to stereotypes and biases [ 125 , 126 ]. Moreover, access to education does not automatically translate into job opportunities for women and minority groups [ 127 , 128 ] or into female access to managerial positions [ 129 ].

Finally, parenting is reported as an antecedent of education [e.g., 130 ], with much of the literature focusing on the role of parents’ education on the opportunities afforded to children to enroll in education [ 131 – 134 ] and the role of parenting in their offspring’s perception of study fields and attitudes towards learning [ 135 – 138 ]. Parental education is also a predictor of the other related topics, namely human capital and compensation [ 139 ].

Decision-making

This literature mainly points to the fact that women are thought to make decisions differently than men. Women have indeed different priorities, such as they care more about people’s well-being, working with people or helping others, rather than maximizing their personal (or their firm’s) gain [ 140 ]. In other words, women typically present more communal than agentic behaviors, which are instead more frequent among men [ 141 ]. These different attitude, behavior and preferences in turn affect the decisions they make [e.g., 142 ] and the decision-making of the firm in which they work [e.g., 143 ].

At the individual level, gender affects, for instance, career aspirations [e.g., 144 ] and choices [e.g., 142 , 145 ], or the decision of creating a venture [e.g., 108 , 109 , 146 ]. Moreover, in everyday life, women and men make different decisions regarding partners [e.g., 147 ], childcare [e.g., 148 ], education [e.g., 149 ], attention to the environment [e.g., 150 ] and politics [e.g., 151 ].

At the firm level, scholars highlighted, for example, how the presence of women in the board affects corporate decisions [e.g., 152 , 153 ], that female CEOs are more conservative in accounting decisions [e.g., 154 ], or that female CFOs tend to make more conservative decisions regarding the firm’s financial reporting [e.g., 155 ]. Nevertheless, firm level research also investigated decisions that, influenced by gender bias, affect women, such as those pertaining hiring [e.g., 156 , 157 ], compensation [e.g., 73 , 158 ], or the empowerment of women once appointed [ 159 ].

Career progression

Once women have entered the workforce, the key aspect to achieve gender equality becomes career progression , including efforts toward overcoming the glass ceiling. Indeed, according to the SBS analysis, career progression is highly related to words such as work, social issues and equality. The topic with which it has the highest semantic overlap is role , followed by decision-making , hiring , education , compensation , leadership , human capital , and family .

Career progression implies an advancement in the hierarchical ladder of the firm, assigning managerial roles to women. Coherently, much of the literature has focused on identifying rationales for a greater female participation in the top management team and board of directors [e.g., 95 ] as well as the best criteria to ensure that the decision-makers promote the most valuable employees irrespectively of their individual characteristics, such as gender [e.g., 84 ]. The link between career progression , role and compensation is often provided in practice by performance appraisal exercises, frequently rooted in a culture of meritocracy that guides bonuses, salary increases and promotions. However, performance appraisals can actually mask gender-biased decisions where women are held to higher standards than their male colleagues [e.g., 83 , 84 , 95 , 160 , 161 ]. Women often have less opportunities to gain leadership experience and are less visible than their male colleagues, which constitute barriers to career advancement [e.g., 162 ]. Therefore, transparency and accountability, together with procedures that discourage discretionary choices, are paramount to achieve a fair career progression [e.g., 84 ], together with the relaxation of strict job boundaries in favor of cross-functional and self-directed tasks [e.g., 163 ].

In addition, a series of stereotypes about the type of leadership characteristics that are required for top management positions, which fit better with typical male and agentic attributes, are another key barrier to career advancement for women [e.g., 92 , 160 ].

Hiring is the entrance gateway for women into the workforce. Therefore, it is related to other workforce topics such as compensation , role , career progression , decision-making , human capital , performance , organization and education .

A first stream of literature focuses on the process leading up to candidates’ job applications, demonstrating that bias exists before positions are even opened, and it is perpetuated both by men and women through networking and gatekeeping practices [e.g., 164 , 165 ].

The hiring process itself is also subject to biases [ 166 ], for example gender-congruity bias that leads to men being preferred candidates in male-dominated sectors [e.g., 167 ], women being hired in positions with higher risk of failure [e.g., 168 ] and limited transparency and accountability afforded by written processes and procedures [e.g., 164 ] that all contribute to ascriptive inequality. In addition, providing incentives for evaluators to hire women may actually work to this end; however, this is not the case when supporting female candidates endangers higher-ranking male ones [ 169 ].

Another interesting perspective, instead, looks at top management teams’ composition and the effects on hiring practices, indicating that firms with more women in top management are less likely to lay off staff [e.g., 152 ].

Performance

Several scholars posed their attention towards women’s performance, its consequences [e.g., 170 , 171 ] and the implications of having women in decision-making positions [e.g., 18 , 19 ].

At the individual level, research focused on differences in educational and academic performance between women and men, especially referring to the gender gap in STEM fields [e.g., 171 ]. The presence of stereotype threats–that is the expectation that the members of a social group (e.g., women) “must deal with the possibility of being judged or treated stereotypically, or of doing something that would confirm the stereotype” [ 172 ]–affects women’s interested in STEM [e.g., 173 ], as well as their cognitive ability tests, penalizing them [e.g., 174 ]. A stronger gender identification enhances this gap [e.g., 175 ], whereas mentoring and role models can be used as solutions to this problem [e.g., 121 ]. Despite the negative effect of stereotype threats on girls’ performance [ 176 ], female and male students perform equally in mathematics and related subjects [e.g., 177 ]. Moreover, while individuals’ performance at school and university generally affects their achievements and the field in which they end up working, evidence reveals that performance in math or other scientific subjects does not explain why fewer women enter STEM working fields; rather this gap depends on other aspects, such as culture, past working experiences, or self-efficacy [e.g., 170 ]. Finally, scholars have highlighted the penalization that women face for their positive performance, for instance when they succeed in traditionally male areas [e.g., 178 ]. This penalization is explained by the violation of gender-stereotypic prescriptions [e.g., 179 , 180 ], that is having women well performing in agentic areas, which are typical associated to men. Performance penalization can thus be overcome by clearly conveying communal characteristics and behaviors [ 178 ].

Evidence has been provided on how the involvement of women in boards of directors and decision-making positions affects firms’ performance. Nevertheless, results are mixed, with some studies showing positive effects on financial [ 19 , 181 , 182 ] and corporate social performance [ 99 , 182 , 183 ]. Other studies maintain a negative association [e.g., 18 ], and other again mixed [e.g., 184 ] or non-significant association [e.g., 185 ]. Also with respect to the presence of a female CEO, mixed results emerged so far, with some researches demonstrating a positive effect on firm’s performance [e.g., 96 , 186 ], while other obtaining only a limited evidence of this relationship [e.g., 103 ] or a negative one [e.g., 187 ].

Finally, some studies have investigated whether and how women’s performance affects their hiring [e.g., 101 ] and career progression [e.g., 83 , 160 ]. For instance, academic performance leads to different returns in hiring for women and men. Specifically, high-achieving men are called back significantly more often than high-achieving women, which are penalized when they have a major in mathematics; this result depends on employers’ gendered standards for applicants [e.g., 101 ]. Once appointed, performance ratings are more strongly related to promotions for women than men, and promoted women typically show higher past performance ratings than those of promoted men. This suggesting that women are subject to stricter standards for promotion [e.g., 160 ].

Behavioral aspects related to gender follow two main streams of literature. The first examines female personality and behavior in the workplace, and their alignment with cultural expectations or stereotypes [e.g., 188 ] as well as their impacts on equality. There is a common bias that depicts women as less agentic than males. Certain characteristics, such as those more congruent with male behaviors–e.g., self-promotion [e.g., 189 ], negotiation skills [e.g., 190 ] and general agentic behavior [e.g., 191 ]–, are less accepted in women. However, characteristics such as individualism in women have been found to promote greater gender equality in society [ 192 ]. In addition, behaviors such as display of emotions [e.g., 193 ], which are stereotypically female, work against women’s acceptance in the workplace, requiring women to carefully moderate their behavior to avoid exclusion. A counter-intuitive result is that women and minorities, which are more marginalized in the workplace, tend to be better problem-solvers in innovation competitions due to their different knowledge bases [ 194 ].

The other side of the coin is examined in a parallel literature stream on behavior towards women in the workplace. As a result of biases, prejudices and stereotypes, women may experience adverse behavior from their colleagues, such as incivility and harassment, which undermine their well-being [e.g., 195 , 196 ]. Biases that go beyond gender, such as for overweight people, are also more strongly applied to women [ 197 ].

Organization

The role of women and gender bias in organizations has been studied from different perspectives, which mirror those presented in detail in the following sections. Specifically, most research highlighted the stereotypical view of leaders [e.g., 105 ] and the roles played by women within firms, for instance referring to presence in the board of directors [e.g., 18 , 90 , 91 ], appointment as CEOs [e.g., 16 ], or top executives [e.g., 93 ].

Scholars have investigated antecedents and consequences of the presence of women in these apical roles. On the one side they looked at hiring and career progression [e.g., 83 , 92 , 160 , 168 , 198 ], finding women typically disadvantaged with respect to their male counterparts. On the other side, they studied women’s leadership styles and influence on the firm’s decision-making [e.g., 152 , 154 , 155 , 199 ], with implications for performance [e.g., 18 , 19 , 96 ].

Human capital

Human capital is a transverse topic that touches upon many different aspects of female gender equality. As such, it has the most associations with other topics, starting with education as mentioned above, with career-related topics such as role , decision-making , hiring , career progression , performance , compensation , leadership and organization . Another topic with which there is a close connection is behavior . In general, human capital is approached both from the education standpoint but also from the perspective of social capital.

The behavioral aspect in human capital comprises research related to gender differences for example in cultural and religious beliefs that influence women’s attitudes and perceptions towards STEM subjects [ 142 , 200 – 202 ], towards employment [ 203 ] or towards environmental issues [ 150 , 204 ]. These cultural differences also emerge in the context of globalization which may accelerate gender equality in the workforce [ 205 , 206 ]. Gender differences also appear in behaviors such as motivation [ 207 ], and in negotiation [ 190 ], and have repercussions on women’s decision-making related to their careers. The so-called gender equality paradox sees women in countries with lower gender equality more likely to pursue studies and careers in STEM fields, whereas the gap in STEM enrollment widens as countries achieve greater equality in society [ 171 ].

Career progression is modeled by literature as a choice-process where personal preferences, culture and decision-making affect the chosen path and the outcomes. Some literature highlights how women tend to self-select into different professions than men, often due to stereotypes rather than actual ability to perform in these professions [ 142 , 144 ]. These stereotypes also affect the perceptions of female performance or the amount of human capital required to equal male performance [ 110 , 193 , 208 ], particularly for mothers [ 81 ]. It is therefore often assumed that women are better suited to less visible and less leadership -oriented roles [ 209 ]. Women also express differing preferences towards work-family balance, which affect whether and how they pursue human capital gains [ 210 ], and ultimately their career progression and salary .

On the other hand, men are often unaware of gendered processes and behaviors that they carry forward in their interactions and decision-making [ 211 , 212 ]. Therefore, initiatives aimed at increasing managers’ human capital –by raising awareness of gender disparities in their organizations and engaging them in diversity promotion–are essential steps to counter gender bias and segregation [ 213 ].

Emerging topics: Leadership and entrepreneurship

Among the emerging topics, the most pervasive one is women reaching leadership positions in the workforce and in society. This is still a rare occurrence for two main types of factors, on the one hand, bias and discrimination make it harder for women to access leadership positions [e.g., 214 – 216 ], on the other hand, the competitive nature and high pressure associated with leadership positions, coupled with the lack of women currently represented, reduce women’s desire to achieve them [e.g., 209 , 217 ]. Women are more effective leaders when they have access to education, resources and a diverse environment with representation [e.g., 218 , 219 ].

One sector where there is potential for women to carve out a leadership role is entrepreneurship . Although at the start of the millennium the discourse on entrepreneurship was found to be “discriminatory, gender-biased, ethnocentrically determined and ideologically controlled” [ 220 ], an increasing body of literature is studying how to stimulate female entrepreneurship as an alternative pathway to wealth, leadership and empowerment [e.g., 221 ]. Many barriers exist for women to access entrepreneurship, including the institutional and legal environment, social and cultural factors, access to knowledge and resources, and individual behavior [e.g., 222 , 223 ]. Education has been found to raise women’s entrepreneurial intentions [e.g., 224 ], although this effect is smaller than for men [e.g., 109 ]. In addition, increasing self-efficacy and risk-taking behavior constitute important success factors [e.g., 225 ].

Finally, the topic of sustainability is worth mentioning, as it is the primary objective of the SDGs and is closely associated with societal well-being. As society grapples with the effects of climate change and increasing depletion of natural resources, a narrative has emerged on women and their greater link to the environment [ 226 ]. Studies in developed countries have found some support for women leaders’ attention to sustainability issues in firms [e.g., 227 – 229 ], and smaller resource consumption by women [ 230 ]. At the same time, women will likely be more affected by the consequences of climate change [e.g., 230 ] but often lack the decision-making power to influence local decision-making on resource management and environmental policies [e.g., 231 ].

Research gaps and conclusions

Research on gender equality has advanced rapidly in the past decades, with a steady increase in publications, both in mainstream topics related to women in education and the workforce, and in emerging topics. Through a novel approach combining methods of text mining and social network analysis, we examined a comprehensive body of literature comprising 15,465 papers published between 2000 and mid 2021 on topics related to gender equality. We identified a set of 27 topics addressed by the literature and examined their connections.

At the highest level of abstraction, it is worth noting that papers abound on the identification of issues related to gender inequalities and imbalances in the workforce and in society. Literature has thoroughly examined the (unconscious) biases, barriers, stereotypes, and discriminatory behaviors that women are facing as a result of their gender. Instead, there are much fewer papers that discuss or demonstrate effective solutions to overcome gender bias [e.g., 121 , 143 , 145 , 163 , 194 , 213 , 232 ]. This is partly due to the relative ease in studying the status quo, as opposed to studying changes in the status quo. However, we observed a shift in the more recent years towards solution seeking in this domain, which we strongly encourage future researchers to focus on. In the future, we may focus on collecting and mapping pro-active contributions to gender studies, using additional Natural Language Processing techniques, able to measure the sentiment of scientific papers [ 43 ].

All of the mainstream topics identified in our literature review are closely related, and there is a wealth of insights looking at the intersection between issues such as education and career progression or human capital and role . However, emerging topics are worthy of being furtherly explored. It would be interesting to see more work on the topic of female entrepreneurship , exploring aspects such as education , personality , governance , management and leadership . For instance, how can education support female entrepreneurship? How can self-efficacy and risk-taking behaviors be taught or enhanced? What are the differences in managerial and governance styles of female entrepreneurs? Which personality traits are associated with successful entrepreneurs? Which traits are preferred by venture capitalists and funding bodies?

The emerging topic of sustainability also deserves further attention, as our society struggles with climate change and its consequences. It would be interesting to see more research on the intersection between sustainability and entrepreneurship , looking at how female entrepreneurs are tackling sustainability issues, examining both their business models and their company governance . In addition, scholars are suggested to dig deeper into the relationship between family values and behaviors.

Moreover, it would be relevant to understand how women’s networks (social capital), or the composition and structure of social networks involving both women and men, enable them to increase their remuneration and reach top corporate positions, participate in key decision-making bodies, and have a voice in communities. Furthermore, the achievement of gender equality might significantly change firm networks and ecosystems, with important implications for their performance and survival.

Similarly, research at the nexus of (corporate) governance , career progression , compensation and female empowerment could yield useful insights–for example discussing how enterprises, institutions and countries are managed and the impact for women and other minorities. Are there specific governance structures that favor diversity and inclusion?

Lastly, we foresee an emerging stream of research pertaining how the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic challenged women, especially in the workforce, by making gender biases more evident.

For our analysis, we considered a set of 15,465 articles downloaded from the Scopus database (which is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature). As we were interested in reviewing business and economics related gender studies, we only considered those papers published in journals listed in the Academic Journal Guide (AJG) 2018 ranking of the Chartered Association of Business Schools (CABS). All the journals listed in this ranking are also indexed by Scopus. Therefore, looking at a single database (i.e., Scopus) should not be considered a limitation of our study. However, future research could consider different databases and inclusion criteria.

With our literature review, we offer researchers a comprehensive map of major gender-related research trends over the past twenty-two years. This can serve as a lens to look to the future, contributing to the achievement of SDG5. Researchers may use our study as a starting point to identify key themes addressed in the literature. In addition, our methodological approach–based on the use of the Semantic Brand Score and its webapp–could support scholars interested in reviewing other areas of research.

Supporting information

Acknowledgments.

The computing resources and the related technical support used for this work have been provided by CRESCO/ENEAGRID High Performance Computing infrastructure and its staff. CRESCO/ENEAGRID High Performance Computing infrastructure is funded by ENEA, the Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development and by Italian and European research programmes (see http://www.cresco.enea.it/english for information).

Funding Statement

P.B and F.C.: Grant of the Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and Construction of the University of Pisa (DESTEC) for the project “Measuring Gender Bias with Semantic Analysis: The Development of an Assessment Tool and its Application in the European Space Industry. P.B., F.C., A.F.C., P.R.: Grant of the Italian Association of Management Engineering (AiIG), “Misure di sostegno ai soci giovani AiIG” 2020, for the project “Gender Equality Through Data Intelligence (GEDI)”. F.C.: EU project ASSETs+ Project (Alliance for Strategic Skills addressing Emerging Technologies in Defence) EAC/A03/2018 - Erasmus+ programme, Sector Skills Alliances, Lot 3: Sector Skills Alliance for implementing a new strategic approach (Blueprint) to sectoral cooperation on skills G.A. NUMBER: 612678-EPP-1-2019-1-IT-EPPKA2-SSA-B.

Data Availability

Gender Inequality Essay

500+ words essay on gender inequality.

For many years, the dominant gender has been men while women were the minority. It was mostly because men earned the money and women looked after the house and children. Similarly, they didn’t have any rights as well. However, as time passed by, things started changing slowly. Nonetheless, they are far from perfect. Gender inequality remains a serious issue in today’s time. Thus, this gender inequality essay will highlight its impact and how we can fight against it.

  About Gender Inequality Essay

Gender inequality refers to the unequal and biased treatment of individuals on the basis of their gender. This inequality happens because of socially constructed gender roles. It happens when an individual of a specific gender is given different or disadvantageous treatment in comparison to a person of the other gender in the same circumstance.

Get the huge list of more than 500 Essay Topics and Ideas

Impact of Gender Inequality

The biggest problem we’re facing is that a lot of people still see gender inequality as a women’s issue. However, by gender, we refer to all genders including male, female, transgender and others.

When we empower all genders especially the marginalized ones, they can lead their lives freely. Moreover, gender inequality results in not letting people speak their minds. Ultimately, it hampers their future and compromises it.

History is proof that fighting gender inequality has resulted in stable and safe societies. Due to gender inequality, we have a gender pay gap. Similarly, it also exposes certain genders to violence and discrimination.

In addition, they also get objectified and receive socioeconomic inequality. All of this ultimately results in severe anxiety, depression and even low self-esteem. Therefore, we must all recognize that gender inequality harms genders of all kinds. We must work collectively to stop these long-lasting consequences and this gender inequality essay will tell you how.

How to Fight Gender Inequality

Gender inequality is an old-age issue that won’t resolve within a few days. Similarly, achieving the goal of equality is also not going to be an easy one. We must start by breaking it down and allow it time to go away.

Firstly, we must focus on eradicating this problem through education. In other words, we must teach our young ones to counter gender stereotypes from their childhood.

Similarly, it is essential to ensure that they hold on to the very same beliefs till they turn old. We must show them how sports are not gender-biased.

Further, we must promote equality in the fields of labour. For instance, some people believe that women cannot do certain jobs like men. However, that is not the case. We can also get celebrities on board to promote and implant the idea of equality in people’s brains.

All in all, humanity needs men and women to continue. Thus, inequality will get us nowhere. To conclude the gender inequality essay, we need to get rid of the old-age traditions and mentality. We must teach everyone, especially the boys all about equality and respect. It requires quite a lot of work but it is possible. We can work together and achieve equal respect and opportunities for all genders alike.

FAQ of Gender Inequality Essay

Question 1: What is gender inequality?

Answer 1: Gender inequality refers to the unequal and biased treatment of individuals on the basis of their gender. This inequality happens because of socially constructed gender roles. It happens when an individual of a specific gender is given different or disadvantageous treatment in comparison to a person of the other gender in the same circumstance.

Question 2: How does gender inequality impact us?

Answer 2:  The gender inequality essay tells us that gender inequality impacts us badly. It takes away opportunities from deserving people. Moreover, it results in discriminatory behaviour towards people of a certain gender. Finally, it also puts people of a certain gender in dangerous situations.

Customize your course in 30 seconds

Which class are you in.

• Travelling Essay
• Picnic Essay
• Our Country Essay
• My Parents Essay
• Essay on Favourite Personality
• Essay on Memorable Day of My Life
• Essay on Knowledge is Power
• Essay on Gurpurab
• Essay on My Favourite Season
• Essay on Types of Sports

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Download the App

Gender Discrimination Essay For Student

Table of Contents

Gender Discrimination Essay: Gender discrimination is a significant issue in today’s society. It occurs when someone is treated unfairly because of their gender. Gender discrimination is not limited to the workplace; it also exists in schools, colleges, and communities. In India, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes gender discrimination illegal. This topic is often discussed in essays for school and competitive exams like IELTS, TOEFL, SAT, UPSC, etc. Let’s look at some essay samples on gender discrimination and tips for writing an effective essay.

Fill Out the Form for Expert Academic Guidance!

Please indicate your interest Live Classes Books Test Series Self Learning

Verify OTP Code (required)

I agree to the terms and conditions and privacy policy .

Fill complete details

Target Exam ---

Short Essay on Gender Discrimination

Gender discrimination refers to unfair treatment based on a person’s gender, often favoring one gender over another. It manifests in various forms, affecting opportunities, rights, and social roles. Addressing gender discrimination is crucial for achieving equality and fostering a more just and inclusive society.

Gender Discrimination Essay in 150 Words

Gender discrimination is a significant problem in India. Women often face unfair treatment and fewer opportunities than men. This must change. Achieving gender equality would bring numerous benefits, including improving the country’s economy, education, and healthcare. Gender discrimination remains a pressing issue in India, and it’s essential to address it. We need to educate people about the importance of equality and respect for all genders to create a fairer and more just society.

Gender Discrimination Essay in 250 Words

Gender discrimination is a significant issue in India, where women often face unequal treatment compared to men. This imbalance deprives women of opportunities and prevents them from realizing their full potential. Achieving gender equality is crucial as it fosters a fairer society, reduces poverty, and promotes economic growth.

Right from birth, girls are unfairly treated in terms of education, healthcare, and nutrition. As they grow older, women continue to encounter discrimination in the workplace and society as a whole. This must change. Girls and women deserve equal opportunities as boys and men for genuine gender equality to take root in India.

Despite various programs and policies addressing gender discrimination, the problem persists deeply in Indian society. It will require dedicated efforts to bring about change. If India aims to fulfill its potential, ending gender discrimination is paramount. Together, we must work to eliminate gender bias, ensuring equal opportunities for everyone to succeed.

Long Essay on Gender Discrimination

Gender discrimination essay in 300 words.

Gender discrimination, in simple terms, refers to the unfair treatment of individuals based on their gender. This issue persists due to outdated societal beliefs about the roles and capabilities of men and women. Unfortunately, these antiquated views continue to impact women today. For example, as recently as 2015, women were earning only 83% of what men earned for performing the same job. The problem extends beyond the workplace, with women facing discrimination based on their appearance.

Many workplaces impose dress codes on women, affecting their career prospects. Society has wrongly ingrained the belief that men are superior and stronger than women, leading to negative consequences for women. They often become targets of crimes, such as rape, with society unfairly blaming them, even when they are the victims, solely because of their clothing choices. This harmful mindset is a significant societal issue perpetuating gender discrimination.

Gender-based discrimination is not confined to the workplace; it permeates various aspects of life, including sports, education, healthcare, and the legal system. Shockingly, statistics reveal that one out of every three women worldwide experiences some form of abuse from men during their lives. This problem is pervasive and deeply ingrained. In some regions, such as India, women face violence or even death if they cannot meet their family’s financial demands. In Egypt, women can endure violence from their own families for behavior deemed unacceptable. In South Africa, baby girls are sometimes abandoned or harmed simply because they are considered a burden.

The only way to eradicate gender discrimination is through education and raising awareness. We must teach everyone the importance of treating all genders equally and with respect. Society must evolve and become more equitable and just for everyone.

Gender Discrimination Essay in 500 Words

Gender discrimination refers to the unjust treatment of individuals based on their gender, creating disparities in their rights and opportunities. This discrimination stems from societal expectations and traditional gender roles, resulting in unequal treatment. Gender discrimination has persisted for centuries, but as society progresses, it is crucial to challenge and eliminate these outdated gender stereotypes. This essay will delve into the topic of gender discrimination to provide a comprehensive understanding.

Causes of Gender Discrimination

The causes of gender discrimination are multi-faceted. Firstly, illiteracy contributes significantly to this issue. When people lack education, they tend to cling to outdated, sexist traditions and norms. Education plays a pivotal role in changing this mindset, as educated individuals are less likely to engage in gender discrimination.

Poverty is another crucial factor intertwined with gender discrimination. It often serves as the root cause because economic dependence primarily falls on male counterparts. Consequently, women bear the brunt of this dependence, remaining financially reliant on men.

Moreover, our society’s patriarchal structure plays a substantial role in perpetuating gender discrimination. Within this framework, males dominate nearly every aspect of life, leading them to believe in their superiority over others. This mindset results in various forms of violence and injustice against females. Consequently, when one gender considers itself superior, achieving equal opportunities for all becomes a challenging task.

Impact of Gender Discrimination

Gender discrimination leaves a profound mark on society, affecting not just specific segments but every facet of it. Initially, it impacts children who become ensnared in gender stereotypes from an early age.

Moreover, it influences young people, shaping their behavior, educational choices, aspirations, attitudes, and more. Consequently, many girls shy away from participating in sports, while women experience physical violence at higher rates than men.

Moving forward, gender discrimination takes a toll on adults, especially in the form of a gender pay gap in the workforce. Men often earn more for performing identical tasks as women. Additionally, older women face a higher risk of homelessness compared to men.

The impact extends to indigenous women, who face even graver challenges. They are at a significantly higher risk of succumbing to family violence, with an alarming rate 11 times higher than men. Yet, the situation is far from favorable for men either, as it imposes unrealistic standards and represses their emotional expression. This societal divide restricts men from freely expressing their emotions without judgment. In many places, men also lack access to parental leave, leading to increased suicide rates among them. In essence, gender discrimination casts a shadow over everyone.

Gender Discrimination Essay FAQs

What is the main issue of gender discrimination.

The main issue of gender discrimination is treating people unfairly based on their gender, limiting opportunities and rights.

What are the types of gender discrimination?

Types of gender discrimination include unequal pay, stereotypes, limited access to education, and violence based on gender.

What is gender discrimination in India paragraph?

Gender discrimination in India refers to the unfair treatment of individuals based on their gender, affecting their rights, safety, and opportunities.

What is the reason for gender discrimination in India?

Gender discrimination in India is caused by traditional beliefs, stereotypes, and social norms that favor one gender over the other.

What is gender discrimination in a short note?

Gender discrimination is unfair treatment of individuals due to their gender, creating inequality.

What is the problem of gender discrimination in India?

The problem of gender discrimination in India leads to unequal opportunities, violence, and limited rights for many.

Gender discrimination is treating someone unfairly because of their gender, which is a social problem.

Gender discrimination in India is when people are treated differently based on their gender, impacting their lives and rights.

What is gender discrimination in English word?

In English, gender discrimination refers to unjust treatment based on a person's gender.

How does gender discrimination affect society?

Gender discrimination harms society by limiting equality, opportunities, and causing social divisions.

What is the impact of gender discrimination in Indian society?

The impact of gender discrimination in Indian society includes inequality, violence, and hindrance to progress.

What are the causes of gender discrimination in India?

Causes of gender discrimination in India include deep-rooted traditions, stereotypes, and unequal power dynamics between genders.

Related content

Get access to free Mock Test and Master Class

Register to Get Free Mock Test and Study Material

Offer Ends in 5:00

Select your Course

Please select class.

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Reading Lists
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

Research: How Bias Against Women Persists in Female-Dominated Workplaces

• Amber L. Stephenson,
• Leanne M. Dzubinski

A look inside the ongoing barriers women face in law, health care, faith-based nonprofits, and higher education.

New research examines gender bias within four industries with more female than male workers — law, higher education, faith-based nonprofits, and health care. Having balanced or even greater numbers of women in an organization is not, by itself, changing women’s experiences of bias. Bias is built into the system and continues to operate even when more women than men are present. Leaders can use these findings to create gender-equitable practices and environments which reduce bias. First, replace competition with cooperation. Second, measure success by goals, not by time spent in the office or online. Third, implement equitable reward structures, and provide remote and flexible work with autonomy. Finally, increase transparency in decision making.

It’s been thought that once industries achieve gender balance, bias will decrease and gender gaps will close. Sometimes called the “ add women and stir ” approach, people tend to think that having more women present is all that’s needed to promote change. But simply adding women into a workplace does not change the organizational structures and systems that benefit men more than women . Our new research (to be published in a forthcoming issue of Personnel Review ) shows gender bias is still prevalent in gender-balanced and female-dominated industries.

• Amy Diehl , PhD is chief information officer at Wilson College and a gender equity researcher and speaker. She is coauthor of Glass Walls: Shattering the Six Gender Bias Barriers Still Holding Women Back at Work (Rowman & Littlefield). Find her on LinkedIn at Amy-Diehl , X/Twitter @amydiehl , and visit her website at amy-diehl.com .
• AS Amber L. Stephenson , PhD is an associate professor of management and director of healthcare management programs in the David D. Reh School of Business at Clarkson University. Her research focuses on the healthcare workforce, how professional identity influences attitudes and behaviors, and how women leaders experience gender bias.
• LD Leanne M. Dzubinski , PhD is professor of leadership and director of the Beeson International Center at Asbury Seminary, and a prominent researcher on women in leadership. She is coauthor of Glass Walls: Shattering the Six Gender Bias Barriers Still Holding Women Back at Work (Rowman & Littlefield).

Partner Center

Report | Wages, Incomes, and Wealth

“Women’s work” and the gender pay gap : How discrimination, societal norms, and other forces affect women’s occupational choices—and their pay

Report • By Jessica Schieder and Elise Gould • July 20, 2016

Download PDF

Press release

Share this page:

What this report finds: Women are paid 79 cents for every dollar paid to men—despite the fact that over the last several decades millions more women have joined the workforce and made huge gains in their educational attainment. Too often it is assumed that this pay gap is not evidence of discrimination, but is instead a statistical artifact of failing to adjust for factors that could drive earnings differences between men and women. However, these factors—particularly occupational differences between women and men—are themselves often affected by gender bias. For example, by the time a woman earns her first dollar, her occupational choice is the culmination of years of education, guidance by mentors, expectations set by those who raised her, hiring practices of firms, and widespread norms and expectations about work–family balance held by employers, co-workers, and society. In other words, even though women disproportionately enter lower-paid, female-dominated occupations, this decision is shaped by discrimination, societal norms, and other forces beyond women’s control.

Why it matters, and how to fix it: The gender wage gap is real—and hurts women across the board by suppressing their earnings and making it harder to balance work and family. Serious attempts to understand the gender wage gap should not include shifting the blame to women for not earning more. Rather, these attempts should examine where our economy provides unequal opportunities for women at every point of their education, training, and career choices.

Introduction and key findings

Women are paid 79 cents for every dollar paid to men (Hegewisch and DuMonthier 2016). This is despite the fact that over the last several decades millions more women have joined the workforce and made huge gains in their educational attainment.

Critics of this widely cited statistic claim it is not solid evidence of economic discrimination against women because it is unadjusted for characteristics other than gender that can affect earnings, such as years of education, work experience, and location. Many of these skeptics contend that the gender wage gap is driven not by discrimination, but instead by voluntary choices made by men and women—particularly the choice of occupation in which they work. And occupational differences certainly do matter—occupation and industry account for about half of the overall gender wage gap (Blau and Kahn 2016).

To isolate the impact of overt gender discrimination—such as a woman being paid less than her male coworker for doing the exact same job—it is typical to adjust for such characteristics. But these adjusted statistics can radically understate the potential for gender discrimination to suppress women’s earnings. This is because gender discrimination does not occur only in employers’ pay-setting practices. It can happen at every stage leading to women’s labor market outcomes.

Take one key example: occupation of employment. While controlling for occupation does indeed reduce the measured gender wage gap, the sorting of genders into different occupations can itself be driven (at least in part) by discrimination. By the time a woman earns her first dollar, her occupational choice is the culmination of years of education, guidance by mentors, expectations set by those who raised her, hiring practices of firms, and widespread norms and expectations about work–family balance held by employers, co-workers, and society. In other words, even though women disproportionately enter lower-paid, female-dominated occupations, this decision is shaped by discrimination, societal norms, and other forces beyond women’s control.

This paper explains why gender occupational sorting is itself part of the discrimination women face, examines how this sorting is shaped by societal and economic forces, and explains that gender pay gaps are present even  within  occupations.

Key points include:

• Gender pay gaps within occupations persist, even after accounting for years of experience, hours worked, and education.
• Decisions women make about their occupation and career do not happen in a vacuum—they are also shaped by society.
• The long hours required by the highest-paid occupations can make it difficult for women to succeed, since women tend to shoulder the majority of family caretaking duties.
• Many professions dominated by women are low paid, and professions that have become female-dominated have become lower paid.

This report examines wages on an hourly basis. Technically, this is an adjusted gender wage gap measure. As opposed to weekly or annual earnings, hourly earnings ignore the fact that men work more hours on average throughout a week or year. Thus, the hourly gender wage gap is a bit smaller than the 79 percent figure cited earlier. This minor adjustment allows for a comparison of women’s and men’s wages without assuming that women, who still shoulder a disproportionate amount of responsibilities at home, would be able or willing to work as many hours as their male counterparts. Examining the hourly gender wage gap allows for a more thorough conversation about how many factors create the wage gap women experience when they cash their paychecks.

Within-occupation gender wage gaps are large—and persist after controlling for education and other factors

Those keen on downplaying the gender wage gap often claim women voluntarily choose lower pay by disproportionately going into stereotypically female professions or by seeking out lower-paid positions. But even when men and women work in the same occupation—whether as hairdressers, cosmetologists, nurses, teachers, computer engineers, mechanical engineers, or construction workers—men make more, on average, than women (CPS microdata 2011–2015).

As a thought experiment, imagine if women’s occupational distribution mirrored men’s. For example, if 2 percent of men are carpenters, suppose 2 percent of women become carpenters. What would this do to the wage gap? After controlling for differences in education and preferences for full-time work, Goldin (2014) finds that 32 percent of the gender pay gap would be closed.

However, leaving women in their current occupations and just closing the gaps between women and their male counterparts within occupations (e.g., if male and female civil engineers made the same per hour) would close 68 percent of the gap. This means examining why waiters and waitresses, for example, with the same education and work experience do not make the same amount per hour. To quote Goldin:

Another way to measure the effect of occupation is to ask what would happen to the aggregate gender gap if one equalized earnings by gender within each occupation or, instead, evened their proportions for each occupation. The answer is that equalizing earnings within each occupation matters far more than equalizing the proportions by each occupation. (Goldin 2014)

This phenomenon is not limited to low-skilled occupations, and women cannot educate themselves out of the gender wage gap (at least in terms of broad formal credentials). Indeed, women’s educational attainment outpaces men’s; 37.0 percent of women have a college or advanced degree, as compared with 32.5 percent of men (CPS ORG 2015). Furthermore, women earn less per hour at every education level, on average. As shown in Figure A , men with a college degree make more per hour than women with an advanced degree. Likewise, men with a high school degree make more per hour than women who attended college but did not graduate. Even straight out of college, women make $4 less per hour than men—a gap that has grown since 2000 (Kroeger, Cooke, and Gould 2016).

Women earn less than men at every education level : Average hourly wages, by gender and education, 2015

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

The data underlying the figure.

Source :  EPI analysis of Current Population Survey Outgoing Rotation Group microdata

Copy the code below to embed this chart on your website.

Steering women to certain educational and professional career paths—as well as outright discrimination—can lead to different occupational outcomes

The gender pay gap is driven at least in part by the cumulative impact of many instances over the course of women’s lives when they are treated differently than their male peers. Girls can be steered toward gender-normative careers from a very early age. At a time when parental influence is key, parents are often more likely to expect their sons, rather than their daughters, to work in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) fields, even when their daughters perform at the same level in mathematics (OECD 2015).

Expectations can become a self-fulfilling prophecy. A 2005 study found third-grade girls rated their math competency scores much lower than boys’, even when these girls’ performance did not lag behind that of their male counterparts (Herbert and Stipek 2005). Similarly, in states where people were more likely to say that “women [are] better suited for home” and “math is for boys,” girls were more likely to have lower math scores and higher reading scores (Pope and Sydnor 2010). While this only establishes a correlation, there is no reason to believe gender aptitude in reading and math would otherwise be related to geography. Parental expectations can impact performance by influencing their children’s self-confidence because self-confidence is associated with higher test scores (OECD 2015).

By the time young women graduate from high school and enter college, they already evaluate their career opportunities differently than young men do. Figure B shows college freshmen’s intended majors by gender. While women have increasingly gone into medical school and continue to dominate the nursing field, women are significantly less likely to arrive at college interested in engineering, computer science, or physics, as compared with their male counterparts.

Women arrive at college less interested in STEM fields as compared with their male counterparts : Intent of first-year college students to major in select STEM fields, by gender, 2014

Source:  EPI adaptation of Corbett and Hill (2015) analysis of Eagan et al. (2014)

These decisions to allow doors to lucrative job opportunities to close do not take place in a vacuum. Many factors might make it difficult for a young woman to see herself working in computer science or a similarly remunerative field. A particularly depressing example is the well-publicized evidence of sexism in the tech industry (Hewlett et al. 2008). Unfortunately, tech isn’t the only STEM field with this problem.

Young women may be discouraged from certain career paths because of industry culture. Even for women who go against the grain and pursue STEM careers, if employers in the industry foster an environment hostile to women’s participation, the share of women in these occupations will be limited. One 2008 study found that “52 percent of highly qualified females working for SET [science, technology, and engineering] companies quit their jobs, driven out by hostile work environments and extreme job pressures” (Hewlett et al. 2008). Extreme job pressures are defined as working more than 100 hours per week, needing to be available 24/7, working with or managing colleagues in multiple time zones, and feeling pressure to put in extensive face time (Hewlett et al. 2008). As compared with men, more than twice as many women engage in housework on a daily basis, and women spend twice as much time caring for other household members (BLS 2015). Because of these cultural norms, women are less likely to be able to handle these extreme work pressures. In addition, 63 percent of women in SET workplaces experience sexual harassment (Hewlett et al. 2008). To make matters worse, 51 percent abandon their SET training when they quit their job. All of these factors play a role in steering women away from highly paid occupations, particularly in STEM fields.

The long hours required for some of the highest-paid occupations are incompatible with historically gendered family responsibilities

Those seeking to downplay the gender wage gap often suggest that women who work hard enough and reach the apex of their field will see the full fruits of their labor. In reality, however, the gender wage gap is wider for those with higher earnings. Women in the top 95th percentile of the wage distribution experience a much larger gender pay gap than lower-paid women.

Again, this large gender pay gap between the highest earners is partially driven by gender bias. Harvard economist Claudia Goldin (2014) posits that high-wage firms have adopted pay-setting practices that disproportionately reward individuals who work very long and very particular hours. This means that even if men and women are equally productive per hour, individuals—disproportionately men—who are more likely to work excessive hours and be available at particular off-hours are paid more highly (Hersch and Stratton 2002; Goldin 2014; Landers, Rebitzer, and Taylor 1996).

It is clear why this disadvantages women. Social norms and expectations exert pressure on women to bear a disproportionate share of domestic work—particularly caring for children and elderly parents. This can make it particularly difficult for them (relative to their male peers) to be available at the drop of a hat on a Sunday evening after working a 60-hour week. To the extent that availability to work long and particular hours makes the difference between getting a promotion or seeing one’s career stagnate, women are disadvantaged.

And this disadvantage is reinforced in a vicious circle. Imagine a household where both members of a male–female couple have similarly demanding jobs. One partner’s career is likely to be prioritized if a grandparent is hospitalized or a child’s babysitter is sick. If the past history of employer pay-setting practices that disadvantage women has led to an already-existing gender wage gap for this couple, it can be seen as “rational” for this couple to prioritize the male’s career. This perpetuates the expectation that it always makes sense for women to shoulder the majority of domestic work, and further exacerbates the gender wage gap.

Female-dominated professions pay less, but it’s a chicken-and-egg phenomenon

Many women do go into low-paying female-dominated industries. Home health aides, for example, are much more likely to be women. But research suggests that women are making a logical choice, given existing constraints . This is because they will likely not see a significant pay boost if they try to buck convention and enter male-dominated occupations. Exceptions certainly exist, particularly in the civil service or in unionized workplaces (Anderson, Hegewisch, and Hayes 2015). However, if women in female-dominated occupations were to go into male-dominated occupations, they would often have similar or lower expected wages as compared with their female counterparts in female-dominated occupations (Pitts 2002). Thus, many women going into female-dominated occupations are actually situating themselves to earn higher wages. These choices thereby maximize their wages (Pitts 2002). This holds true for all categories of women except for the most educated, who are more likely to earn more in a male profession than a female profession. There is also evidence that if it becomes more lucrative for women to move into male-dominated professions, women will do exactly this (Pitts 2002). In short, occupational choice is heavily influenced by existing constraints based on gender and pay-setting across occupations.

To make matters worse, when women increasingly enter a field, the average pay in that field tends to decline, relative to other fields. Levanon, England, and Allison (2009) found that when more women entered an industry, the relative pay of that industry 10 years later was lower. Specifically, they found evidence of devaluation—meaning the proportion of women in an occupation impacts the pay for that industry because work done by women is devalued.

Computer programming is an example of a field that has shifted from being a very mixed profession, often associated with secretarial work in the past, to being a lucrative, male-dominated profession (Miller 2016; Oldenziel 1999). While computer programming has evolved into a more technically demanding occupation in recent decades, there is no skills-based reason why the field needed to become such a male-dominated profession. When men flooded the field, pay went up. In contrast, when women became park rangers, pay in that field went down (Miller 2016).

Further compounding this problem is that many professions where pay is set too low by market forces, but which clearly provide enormous social benefits when done well, are female-dominated. Key examples range from home health workers who care for seniors, to teachers and child care workers who educate today’s children. If closing gender pay differences can help boost pay and professionalism in these key sectors, it would be a huge win for the economy and society.

The gender wage gap is real—and hurts women across the board. Too often it is assumed that this gap is not evidence of discrimination, but is instead a statistical artifact of failing to adjust for factors that could drive earnings differences between men and women. However, these factors—particularly occupational differences between women and men—are themselves affected by gender bias. Serious attempts to understand the gender wage gap should not include shifting the blame to women for not earning more. Rather, these attempts should examine where our economy provides unequal opportunities for women at every point of their education, training, and career choices.

— This paper was made possible by a grant from the Peter G. Peterson Foundation. The statements made and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors.

— The authors wish to thank Josh Bivens, Barbara Gault, and Heidi Hartman for their helpful comments.

About the authors

Jessica Schieder joined EPI in 2015. As a research assistant, she supports the research of EPI’s economists on topics such as the labor market, wage trends, executive compensation, and inequality. Prior to joining EPI, Jessica worked at the Center for Effective Government (formerly OMB Watch) as a revenue and spending policies analyst, where she examined how budget and tax policy decisions impact working families. She holds a bachelor’s degree in international political economy from Georgetown University.

Elise Gould , senior economist, joined EPI in 2003. Her research areas include wages, poverty, economic mobility, and health care. She is a co-author of The State of Working America, 12th Edition . In the past, she has authored a chapter on health in The State of Working America 2008/09; co-authored a book on health insurance coverage in retirement; published in venues such as The Chronicle of Higher Education ,  Challenge Magazine , and Tax Notes; and written for academic journals including Health Economics , Health Affairs, Journal of Aging and Social Policy, Risk Management & Insurance Review, Environmental Health Perspectives , and International Journal of Health Services . She holds a master’s in public affairs from the University of Texas at Austin and a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Wisconsin at Madison.

Anderson, Julie, Ariane Hegewisch, and Jeff Hayes 2015. The Union Advantage for Women . Institute for Women’s Policy Research.

Blau, Francine D., and Lawrence M. Kahn 2016. The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations . National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 21913.

Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 2015. American Time Use Survey public data series. U.S. Census Bureau.

Corbett, Christianne, and Catherine Hill. 2015. Solving the Equation: The Variables for Women’s Success in Engineering and Computing . American Association of University Women (AAUW).

Current Population Survey Outgoing Rotation Group microdata (CPS ORG). 2011–2015. Survey conducted by the Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Labor Statistics [ machine-readable microdata file ]. U.S. Census Bureau.

Goldin, Claudia. 2014. “ A Grand Gender Convergence: Its Last Chapter .” American Economic Review, vol. 104, no. 4, 1091–1119.

Hegewisch, Ariane, and Asha DuMonthier. 2016. The Gender Wage Gap: 2015; Earnings Differences by Race and Ethnicity . Institute for Women’s Policy Research.

Herbert, Jennifer, and Deborah Stipek. 2005. “The Emergence of Gender Difference in Children’s Perceptions of Their Academic Competence.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology , vol. 26, no. 3, 276–295.

Hersch, Joni, and Leslie S. Stratton. 2002. “ Housework and Wages .” The Journal of Human Resources , vol. 37, no. 1, 217–229.

Hewlett, Sylvia Ann, Carolyn Buck Luce, Lisa J. Servon, Laura Sherbin, Peggy Shiller, Eytan Sosnovich, and Karen Sumberg. 2008. The Athena Factor: Reversing the Brain Drain in Science, Engineering, and Technology . Harvard Business Review.

Kroeger, Teresa, Tanyell Cooke, and Elise Gould. 2016.  The Class of 2016: The Labor Market Is Still Far from Ideal for Young Graduates . Economic Policy Institute.

Landers, Renee M., James B. Rebitzer, and Lowell J. Taylor. 1996. “ Rat Race Redux: Adverse Selection in the Determination of Work Hours in Law Firms .” American Economic Review , vol. 86, no. 3, 329–348.

Levanon, Asaf, Paula England, and Paul Allison. 2009. “Occupational Feminization and Pay: Assessing Causal Dynamics Using 1950-2000 U.S. Census Data.” Social Forces, vol. 88, no. 2, 865–892.

Miller, Claire Cain. 2016. “As Women Take Over a Male-Dominated Field, the Pay Drops.” New York Times , March 18.

Oldenziel, Ruth. 1999. Making Technology Masculine: Men, Women, and Modern Machines in America, 1870-1945 . Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2015. The ABC of Gender Equality in Education: Aptitude, Behavior, Confidence .

Pitts, Melissa M. 2002. Why Choose Women’s Work If It Pays Less? A Structural Model of Occupational Choice. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Working Paper 2002-30.

Pope, Devin G., and Justin R. Sydnor. 2010. “ Geographic Variation in the Gender Differences in Test Scores .” Journal of Economic Perspectives , vol. 24, no. 2, 95–108.

See related work on Wages, Incomes, and Wealth | Women

See more work by Jessica Schieder and Elise Gould

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Women’s perceptions of discrimination at work: gender stereotypes and overtime—an exploratory study in portugal.

1. Introduction

2.1. a previous study and an exploratory survey carried out in 2021, 2.2. a desk review in portugal, 3. results and discussion, 4. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Adăscăliței, Dragos, Jason Heyes, and Pedro Mendonça. 2022. The intensification of work in Europe: A multilevel analysis. British Journal of Industrial Relations 60: 324–47. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Adnett, Nick, and Stephen Hardy. 2001. Reviewing the Working Time Directive: Rationale implementation and case law. Industrial Relations Journal 32: 114–25. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Andringa, Wouter, Rense Nieuwenhuis, and Minna Van Gerven. 2015. Women’s working hours: The interplay between gender role attitudes, motherhood, and public childcare support in 23 European countries. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 35: 582–99. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Artazcoz, Lucía. 2021. Gender Inequalities in Working Time and Health in Europe. In Gender, Working Conditions and Health. What Has Changed? Brussels: ETUI. Available online: https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/2_Gender%20inequalities%20in%20working%20time%20and%20health%20in%20Europe.pdf (accessed on 7 January 2023).
• Artazcoz, Lucía, and Anabel Gutiérrez Vera. 2012. Gender differences in the relationship between long working hours and health status in Catalonia. Archivos de Prevencion de Riesgos Laborales 15: 129–35. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Artazcoz, Lucía, Imma Cortès, Fernando G. Benavides, Vicenta Escribà-Agüir, Xavier Bartoll, Hernán Vargas, and Carme Borrell. 2016. Long working hours and health in Europe: Gender and welfare state differences in a context of economic crisis. Health & Place 40: 161–68. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Askenazy, Philippe. 2004. Shorter work time, flexibility and intensification. Eastern Economic Journal 30: 603–14. [ Google Scholar ]
• Askenazy, Philippe. 2013. Working time regulation in France from 1996 to 2012. Cambridge Journal of Economics 37: 323–47. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bain, Jessica, and Annick Masselot. 2012. Gender equality law and identity building for Europe. Canterbury Law Review 18: 97–117. [ Google Scholar ]
• Berniell, Inés, and Jan Bientenbeck. 2017. The Effect of Working Hours on Health . IZA DP 10524 IZA–Institute of Labor Economics. Available online: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/izaizadps/dp10524.htm (accessed on 7 January 2023).
• Bosch, Gerhard, and Steffen Lehndorff. 2001. Working-time reduction and employment: Experiences in Europe and economic policy recommendations. Cambridge Journal of Economics 25: 209–43. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Booth, Alison L., Marco Francesconi, and Jeff Frank. 2002. Temporary jobs: Stepping stones or dead ends? The Economic Journal 112: 189–213. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Burchell, Brendan, and Colette Fagan. 2004. Gender and the intensification of work: Evidence from the European Working Conditions Surveys. Eastern Economic Journal 30: 627–42. [ Google Scholar ]
• Calmfors, Lars. 1985. Work sharing, employment and wages. European Economic Review 27: 293–309. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Crompton, Rosemary, Suzan Lewis, and Clare Lyonette, eds. 2007. Women, Men, Work and Family in Europe . London: Palgrave Macmillan. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dembe, Allard E. 2009. Ethical issues relating to the health effects of long working hours. Journal of Business Ethics 84: 195–208. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dembe, Allard E., J. B. Erickson, Rachel G. Delbos, and Steven M. Banks. 2005. The impact of overtime and long work hours on occupational injuries and illnesses: New evidence from the United States. Occupational & Environmental Medicine 62: 588–97. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• EIGE. 2018. Study and Work in the EU: Set Apart by Gender: Review of the Implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action in the EU Member States . Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. [ Google Scholar ]
• EIGE. 2019. Gender Equality Index 2019: Portugal. European Institute for Gender Equality. Available online: https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2019 (accessed on 8 December 2021).
• Eurofound. 2006. Working Time Options over the Life Course: New Work Patterns and Company Strategies . Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available online: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_files/pubdocs/2005/160/en/1/ef05160en.pdf (accessed on 6 January 2023).
• Eurofound. 2009. Working Conditions in the European Union: Working Time and Work Intensity . Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available online: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/2009/working-conditions-european-union-working-time-and-work-intensity (accessed on 8 December 2021).
• Eurofound. 2010. Stereotypes about Gender and Work . Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available online: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/resources/article/2010/stereotypes-about-gender-and-work (accessed on 5 January 2023).
• Eurofound. 2013a. Women, Men and Working Conditions in Europe . Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available online: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/2013/women-men-and-working-conditions-europe (accessed on 7 January 2023).
• Eurofound. 2013b. Working Time and Work–Life Balance in a Life Course Perspective—A Report Based on the Fifth European Working Conditions Survey . Dublin: Eurofound. Available online: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/2013/working-time-and-work-life-balance-life-course-perspective (accessed on 5 January 2023).
• Eurofound. 2016. Working Time Developments in the 21st Century: Work Duration and Its Regulation in the EU . Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available online: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/2016/working-time-developments-21st-century-work-duration-and-its-regulation-eu (accessed on 8 December 2021).
• Eurofound. 2017. Developments in Working Time 2015–2016 . Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available online: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/2017/developments-working-time-2015-2016 (accessed on 8 December 2021).
• Eurofound. 2018. Striking a Balance: Reconciling Work and Life in the EU . Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available online: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/2018/striking-balance-reconciling-work-and-life-eu (accessed on 8 December 2021).
• Eurofound. 2019. Working Time in 2017–2018 . Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available online: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/2019/working-time-2017-2018 (accessed on 8 December 2021).
• Eurofound. 2020. Labour Market Change: Trends and Policy Approaches towards Flexibilisation . Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available online: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/2020/labour-market-change-trends-and-policy-approaches-towards-flexibilisation (accessed on 7 January 2023).
• Eurofound. 2021a. European Jobs Monitor 2021: Gender Gaps and the Employment Structure. Joint Report by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre and Eurofound. Available online: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/2021/european-jobs-monitor-2021-gender-gaps-and-employment-structure (accessed on 7 January 2023).
• Eurofound. 2021b. Portugal: Working life in the COVID-19 Pandemic 2020 . Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available online: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/2021/working-life-covid-19-pandemic-2020 (accessed on 7 January 2023).
• Eurofound, and ILO (International Labour Office). 2017. Working Anytime, Anywhere: The Effects on the World of Work . Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Geneva: The International Labour Office. Available online: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/2017/working-anytime-anywhere-effects-world-work (accessed on 7 January 2023).
• European Commission. 2009. Gender Segregation in the Labour Market: Root Causes, Implications and Policy Responses in the EU . Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/39e67b83-852f-4f1e-b6a0-a8fbb599b256 (accessed on 7 January 2023).
• European Commission. 2015. Strategic Engagement for Gender Equality 2016–2019 . SWD(2015)278 Final. Brussels: European Commission. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/24968221-eb81-11e5-8a81-01aa75ed71a1 (accessed on 7 January 2023).
• European Commission. 2020. Europe’s Digital Progress Report (EDPR) 2017, Country Profile Portugal . Brussels: European Commission. Available online: https://www.astrid-online.it/static/upload/port/portugaledprcountryprofile.pdf (accessed on 5 January 2023).
• European Parliament & the Council of the European Union. 2006. Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast). Official Journal of the European Union , L 204/23. [ Google Scholar ]
• European Parliament & the Council of the European Union. 2024. Directive (EU) 2024/1500 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 on standards for equality bodies in the field of equal treatment and equal opportunities between women and men in matters of employment and occupation, and amending Directives 2006/54/EC and 2010/41/EU. Official Journal of the European Union , 24/1500. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fagan, Colette, Clare Lyonette, Mark Smith, and Abril Saldaña-Tejeda. 2012. The Influence of Working Time Arrangements on Work-Life Integration or ‘Balance’: A Review of the International Evidence . Geneva: International Labour Organization. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fischer, Ann R., and Kenna Bolton Holz. 2007. Perceived discrimination and women’s psychological distress: The roles of collective and personal self-esteem. Journal of Counseling Psychology 54: 154–64. [ Google Scholar ]
• Freeman, Richard B. 1998. Work-sharing to full employment: Serious option or populist fallacy? In Generating Jobs: How to Increase Demand for Less-Skilled Workers . Edited by Richard Freeman and Peter Gottschalk. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 195–222. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ganster, Daniel, Christopher Rosen, and Gwenith Fisher. 2018. Long working hours and well-being: What we know, what we do not know, and what we need to know. Journal of Business and Psychology 33: 25–39. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Garnsey, Elizabeth. 1978. Women’s work and theories of class stratification. Sociology 12: 223–43. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gershuny, Jonathan. 2000. Chaging Times: Work and Leisure in Postindustrial Society . Oxford: Oxford University Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Golden, Lonnie. 2012. The Effects of Working Time on Productivity and Firm Performance: A Research Synthesis Paper . ILO Conditions of Work and Employment Series, WP 33. Geneva: International Labour Organization. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2149325 (accessed on 9 January 2023).
• Haines, Victor, Alain Marchand, Émilie Genin, and Vicent Rousseau. 2012. A balanced view of long work hours. International Journal of Workplace Health Management 5: 104–19. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hein, Catherine. 2005. Reconciling Work and Family Responsibilities . Geneva: International Labour Organization. Available online: https://webapps.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/2005/105B09_142_engl.pdf (accessed on 7 January 2023).
• Hewlett, Sylvia Ann, and Carolyn Buck Luce. 2006. Extreme jobs: The dangerous allure of the 70-hour workweek. Harvard Business Review 84: 49–59. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hook, Jennifer L., and Becky Pettit. 2016. Reproducing occupational inequality: Motherhood and occupational segregation. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 23: 329–62. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• ILO. 2005. Hours of Work. From Fixed to Flexible? Report of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations (Articles 19, 22 and 35 of the Constitution), Report 93 III. Geneva: International Labour Organization. [ Google Scholar ]
• ILO. 2018a. Decent Work in Portugal 2008–18: From Crisis to Recovery . Geneva: International Labour Organization. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_646867.pdf (accessed on 7 January 2023).
• ILO. 2018b. Global Wage Report 2018/19: What Lies Behind Gender Pay Gaps? Geneva: International Labour Organization. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_650553.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2023).
• ILO. 2020. Global Wage Report 2020/21: Wages and Minimum Wages in the Time of COVID-19 . Geneva: International Labour Organization. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/publications/flagship-reports/global-wage-report-2020-21-wages-and-minimum-wages-time-covid-19 (accessed on 10 January 2023).
• Kay, Rachel. 2020. Automation and Working Time in the UK. In Work in the Future, The Automation Revolution . Edited by Robert Skidelsky and Nan Craig. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 175–87. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kelliher, Clare, and Deirdre Anderson. 2010. Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations 63: 83–106. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mahon, Evelyn. 1998. Changing Gender Roles, State, Work and Family Lives. In Women, Work and the Family in Europe . Edited by Eileen Drew, Ruth Emerek and Evelyn Mahon. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 153–58. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mandel, Hadas, and Moshe Semyonov. 2006. A welfare state paradox: State interventions and women’s employment opportunities in 22 countries. American Journal of Sociology 111: 1910–49. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Melby, Kari, Anna-Birte Ravn, and Christina Carlsson Wetterberg. 2008. A Nordic Model of gender equality? Introduction. In Gender Equality and Welfare Politics in Scandinavia—The Limits of Political Ambition? Edited by Kari Melby, Anna-Birte Ravn and Christina Carlsson Wetterberg. Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp. 1–24. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• MTSSS. 2016. Livro Verde Sobre as Relações   Laborais 2016 . MTSSS. Available online: https://www.portugal.gov.pt/download-icheiros/ficheiro.aspx?v=%3d%3dBAAAAB%2bLCAAAAAAABAAzNjI0BwAQG9WaBAAAAA%3d%3d (accessed on 7 December 2021).
• MTSSS. 2021. Livro Verde Sobre o Futuro   do Trabalho . MTSSS. Available online: https://www.portugal.gov.pt/download-ficheiros/ficheiro.aspx?v=%3d%3dBQAAAB%2bLCAAAAAAABAAzNLQwMQMAqSscTAUAAAA%3d (accessed on 5 January 2023).
• Neschen, Albena, and Sabine Hügelschäfer. 2021. Gender Bias in Performance Evaluations: The Impact of Gender Quotas. Journal of Economic Psychology 85: 102383. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• OECD. 2015. In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All . Paris: OECD Publishing. Available online: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/deliver/9789264235120-en.pdf?itemId=/content/publication/9789264235120-en&mimeType=pdf (accessed on 7 December 2021).
• OECD. 2016. New Forms of Work in the Digital Economy . OECD Digital Economy Papers 260. Paris: OCDE. Available online: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5jlwnklt820x-en.pdf?expires=1707245325&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=E7329FAE1002319B41F9B6CB6D585633 (accessed on 7 December 2021).
• OECD. 2017. Hours Worked . Paris: OECD. Available online: https://data.oecd.org/emp/hours-worked.htm (accessed on 7 December 2021).
• Parry, Jane, Zoe Young, Stephen Bevan, Michail Veliziotis, Yehuda Baruch, Mina Beigi, Zofia Bajorek, Emma Salter, and Chira Tochia. 2021. Working from Home under COVID-19 Lockdown: Transitions and Tensions, Work after Lockdown . Swindon: Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC). Available online: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/446405/1/Work_After_Lockdown_Insight_report_Jan_2021_1_.pdf (accessed on 7 December 2021).
• Rebelo, Glória. 2019. Working Time Organization: Influences in Work-family Balance and Career. International Journal on Working Conditions 18: 113–30. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rothwell, Sheila. 1981. Women and working time. Equal Opportunities International 1: 25–38. [ Google Scholar ]
• Rubery, Jill, and Isabel Tavora. 2021. The COVID-19 crisis and gender equality: Risks and opportunities. In Social Policy in the European Union: State of Play 2020: Facing the Pandemic . Edited by B. Vanhercke, S. Spasova and B. Fronteddu. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) and European Social Observatory (OSE), pp. 71–96. Available online: https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/06-Chapter4-The%20Covid%E2%80%9119%20crisis%20and%20gender%20equality.pdf (accessed on 7 January 2023).
• Rubery, Jill, Mark Smith, and Colette Fagan. 1998. National Working-Time Regimes and Equal Opportunities. Feminist Economics 4: 71–101. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rubery, Jill, Mark Smith, and Colette Fagan. 1999. Women’s Employment in Europe: Trends and Prospects . Abingdon: Routledge. [ Google Scholar ]
• Russell, Helen, Philip J. O’Connell, and Frances McGinnity. 2009. The impact of flexible working arrangements on work–life conflict and work pressure in Ireland. Gender, Work and Organization 16: 73–97. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Scase, Richard, Jonathan Scales, and Colin Smith. 1999. Long working hours hurt health and family. Leadership & Organization Development Journal , 20. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Steptoe, Andrew, Zara Lipsey, and Jane Wardle. 1998. Stress, hassles and variations in alcohol consumption, food choice and physical exercise: A diary study. British Journal of Health Psychology 3: 51–63. [ Google Scholar ]
• Trzcinski, Eileen, and Elke Holst. 2011. Why Men Might “Have It All” While Women Still Have to Choose between Career and Family in Germany. The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) Papers, WP 356. Available online: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.367187.de/diw_sp0356.pdf (accessed on 5 December 2021).
• UN. 2006. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2006 . New York: United Nations. Available online: https://www.un.org/zh/millenniumgoals/pdf/MDGReport2006.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2021).
• UN. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development . New York: United Nations. Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2021).

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Rebelo, G.; Delaunay, C.; Martins, A.; Diamantino, M.F.; Almeida, A.R. Women’s Perceptions of Discrimination at Work: Gender Stereotypes and Overtime—An Exploratory Study in Portugal. Adm. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14080188

Rebelo G, Delaunay C, Martins A, Diamantino MF, Almeida AR. Women’s Perceptions of Discrimination at Work: Gender Stereotypes and Overtime—An Exploratory Study in Portugal. Administrative Sciences . 2024; 14(8):188. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14080188

Rebelo, Glória, Catarina Delaunay, Alexandre Martins, Maria Fernanda Diamantino, and António R. Almeida. 2024. "Women’s Perceptions of Discrimination at Work: Gender Stereotypes and Overtime—An Exploratory Study in Portugal" Administrative Sciences 14, no. 8: 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14080188

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

Women are advancing in the workplace, but women of color still lag behind

A little over 100 years ago, the U.S. Congress ratified the 19th amendment, which ruled that women could not be denied the right to vote because of their sex. This amendment was the result of hard-fought efforts from many women (and some men) who recognized that disenfranchisement then, as now, was a blight on the nation and hindered the U.S.’s potential to achieve its stated goals of becoming a functioning democracy. The 19th amendment was especially significant for Black women who, despite the 15th amendment’s promises of voting rights regardless of race, still could not vote because of their gender. The fact that it took two different constitutional amendments—passed a half century apart—to secure Black women’s right to vote underscores how both race and gender have always mattered in significant ways when it comes to women of color.

A century later, race and gender continue to create divergent and uneven outcomes for women of all races and for men of color. This is particularly evident in the underrepresentation and experiences of women employed in professional occupations. An oft-cited statistic, for instance, reveals that as a result of factors including, but not limited to, motherhood penalties, gender discrimination, and occupational segregation, women make 79 cents for every dollar men earn. But Black women earn only 64 cents on the dollar, and for Latinas it is a dismal 54 cents. As it was in the early 20th century, women of color continue to experience occupational and economic disadvantages that reflect the ways both race and gender affect their work experiences.

How do racism and sexism impact women of color in professional settings? Research indicates that both factors adversely affect women in a variety of occupations through stifled leadership opportunities, the ongoing persistence of specific forms of sexual harassment, and subtle but pervasive doubts about competence, intelligence, and skill that are unrelated to actual performance.

For instance, in today’s professional occupations, networks, mentors, and connections play important roles in advancement. Research indicates that Black women are more ambitious and more likely to say that they want to advance in their companies than their white women counterparts, but are less likely to find mentors who will aid their climb up the corporate ladder. As sociologist Tsedale Melaku points out , sometimes this is a function of white executives’ unfamiliarity and discomfort with Black women. As one attorney in Melaku’s study notes, executives who rarely, if ever, have Black people in their personal or professional circles may be uncertain or uncomfortable interacting with them as peers. Other times, this lack of mentoring is a consequence of intentional exclusion when leaders make it a point not to include Black women in teams, as mentees, or on important projects. But either way, these patterns thwart Black women’s mobility in organizations and their ability to realize ambitions and secure leadership roles. And Black women are left to struggle harder to access and advance in these professions, with occupational underrepresentation and wage disparities to show for it.

It is important to note that these issues are not limited to Black women. In a recent study, sociologist Margaret Chin finds that Asian American women experience racialized and gendered forms of sexual harassment that leads to isolation and results in exclusion from leadership opportunities. Latinas, too, find that coworkers may interact with them based on stereotypes that they are unintelligent or illegally in the country, depictions that then require extra work to disprove.

Women of color are usually underrepresented in professional, high status jobs in law, medicine, academia, and business. When they do make it to these rarified roles but are the only ones in an organizational setting, they are more likely to doubt the company’s commitment to inclusion and equity and thus are more likely to want to pursue opportunities elsewhere.

Yet we know that when companies put measures into place that focus on achieving more gender diversity, women of color often lose out unless there is an explicit focus on race as well as gender. Affirmative action policies put into place in the wake of the civil rights movement have disproportionately benefited white women, and this is certainly true in today’s workplaces. This is not to say that white women face an easy road, particularly in professions that are disproportionately dominated by men. But race and racism create specific, unique challenges for women of color that are too easily ignored with broad platitudes that seek to advance women’s representation without questioning which women are most likely to benefit.

My recent book, Flatlining: Race, Work, and Health Care in the New Economy , highlights how some of these intersections of race and gender impact health care professionals. Black women doctors in my study observed that both race and gender were key factors that shaped the challenges they face in the field. Despite being 7% of the U.S. population, Black women are a paltry 3% of medical doctors today, a disparity that has devastating consequences for health equity in a rapidly diversifying society. Working in a profession dominated by men, Black women doctors are very attuned to the ways that sexism impacts their lives. For instance, nearly every Black woman doctor with whom I spoke shared accounts of being mistaken for a nurse rather than a doctor, so much so that they argued that when it came to their everyday interactions, gender was a much more significant factor than race. As Ayana, a neonatologist, put it, “I see my coworkers that are males and the race doesn’t matter. If you’re male, they will call you a doctor. If you’re female, they will call you a nurse. But it’s regardless of your race. I see my white coworkers, even just because they’re female they still call them nurse.”

Race and racism create specific, unique challenges for women of color that are too easily ignored with broad platitudes that seek to advance women’s representation without questioning which women are most likely to benefit.

However, this unfortunately common microaggression—and the fact that, for women doctors, it transcends race—does not mean that Black women were oblivious to or shielded from racism in the medical profession. In fact, they astutely noted that structural factors also established a context that perpetuated racial disparities in the field. Bella, a geneticist, pointed out that she entered into her field with the intention of reducing racial health disparities. However, the extremely low numbers of Black doctors in her specialty area put her at a disadvantage when it came to finding mentors who could guide her in that goal, as most of her white senior colleagues did not share her focus on providing genetic services to Black populations who might otherwise be overlooked and ignored. Bella told me, “I find it difficult to identify mentors or people who are familiar with those populations, people who are also passionate about educating those populations about genetic services or resources. So I have not really had much luck identifying people who are working with those populations who can help me better address some of the needs or some of the disparities that I see.”

Black women in other health care professions faced different challenges. In fact, one of the most interesting findings from my study was how much Black workers’ experiences varied depending on the occupations in which they were employed. While Black women doctors encountered persistent, daily gender biases that occurred in the context of structural, racialized barriers—both of which made advancement in the profession difficult—Black women nurses reported few instances with gender biases and instead described routine, frequent, and explicitly racist encounters with colleagues. Nurses were not employed in a culturally masculinized space like Black doctors, but in the absence of overt gender bias, they dealt with racist interactions with white coworkers. Melinda, a nurse who primarily tended to new mothers in the postpartum unit of a hospital, recounted one such interaction with a colleague. While discussing an upcoming after-work gathering, a coworker informed Melinda that she would only be welcome in this colleague’s home if she was there to clean it. As Melinda shared, “[She] actually said to me, we were talking about after work getting together, hanging out, and said, ‘Oh, you can come to my house, but you’d have to be carrying a pail and wearing a rag on your head to come to my home.’”

And these experiences still varied from those of Black women technicians, who did not describe overt, explicitly gendered biases in their work. Rather, they described friction with (mostly white) women nurses who, stressed out by policies that encouraged overwork and emboldened by a lack of organizational restraint, assigned them extra work that was not delegated to white colleagues. Amber put it this way: “The nurses are always full throttle. When they answer the phone, I can guarantee you, there’s always an attitude.” Though Amber experienced tensions with nurses, these difficulties were not synonymous with what Black women nurses and doctors described. Thus, even in spaces where Black workers are underrepresented, it is critical not to assume that they all share common experiences.

These intersecting factors help highlight some of the common challenges Black women workers encounter, but they also underscore that policies designed to improve gender parity in workplaces will not be successful if they ignore the ways that the issues women face in the workplace are also shaped by race, as well as other factors—citizenship, occupational status, sexual identity, and more. This also applies to companies that profess their commitment to achieving racial equity and state their opposition to systemic racism, as many are now doing in the wake of national protests against racial inequality. It remains to be seen whether these companies will take the long-term, sustained, comprehensive actions that would be necessary to make the changes they now say they wish to see. But it’s also clear that without a comparable commitment to identifying and resolving the challenges women of all races face in the modern workplace, these efforts cannot succeed either.

The good news is that there is some research that documents ways that organizations—both in health care and in other industries—can become more equitable. Changing hiring practices so that organizations pair with institutions that are known for training workers of color is a first step. For instance, universities like Meharry Medical College and Xavier University in New Orleans produce a disproportionate number of Black students who go on to become physicians. Organizations can partner with places like these that are renowned for training skilled Black workers. Additionally, collecting data to understand what challenges and obstacles their employees are facing, particularly those from underrepresented groups, is important as well. Companies can also directly involve managers in developing solutions, rather than tinkering around the edges of existing policies. Organizations can also enact paid leave for all workers—or better yet, lobby for federal policies ensuring paid sick and parental leave policies, so that these policies are available to all workers regardless of their place of employment. And companies can change aspects of their culture that allow sexual harassment to flourish, since, as the #MeToo movement has shown us, this is a major problem for many vulnerable workers in virtually every industry.

Ultimately, race and gender continue to matter in complicated, intersecting ways for women workers today. While the U.S. has undoubtedly made some key social progressions since women finally achieved suffrage in 1920, we run the risk of hindering further gains if we fail to learn the lessons from that time. As we continue to develop various initiatives and policies to reflect a rapidly diversifying population, it’s important to not to repeat the mistakes of the past by again leaving women of color ignored and overlooked.

This piece is part of 19A: The Brookings Gender Equality Series.  Learn more about the series and read published work »

About the Author

Adia harvey wingfield, professor of sociology – washington university in st. louis, more from the 19a series.

The history of women’s work and wages and how it has created success for us all

Former Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen examines the history of women entering the labor force and analyzes both the challenges that remain today and potential solutions to meet those challenges.

To protect Black women and save America from itself, elect Black women

Andre M. Perry explains how Black women in elected office are shaping America’s policy agenda in important ways.

Are women happier than men? Do gender rights make a difference?

Are women happier than men? Carol Graham finds that the answer is yes, but it’s complicated, and at times in surprising ways.

• Media Relations
• Terms and Conditions
• Privacy Policy

LGBTQ Students: How Sexual Orientation And Gender Identity Can Impact The College Experience

College can be a turbulent time for any student, but members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) community often experience additional layers of stress due to discrimination or lack of inclusion. Understanding more about the challenges some LGBTQ students may encounter in college and ways to support these students could contribute to a world where queerness is not only accepted but celebrated. 

Definitions of gender identity, sexual orientation, and gender expression

Before exploring how to support LGBTQ students on campus, individuals may familiarize themselves with the following terms. 

Gender identity

Gender identity is a person’s internal sense of what gender they are, which may or may not match their biological sex or the sex they were assigned at birth. Gender might not fit into neatly divided gender categories, as can be the case with transgender and non-binary youth or adults. Gender identity is unique and differs from gender expression. 

Sexual orientation

Sexual orientation is a pattern of sexual or romantic attraction a person experiences towards others and an identity. Sexuality can involve attraction to a particular gender, multiple genders, all genders, or no genders. Some people find sexuality fluid, while others might be fixed in their sexual orientation. 

Gender expression

Separate from gender identity, gender expression refers to a person’s external display of gender, often through aesthetic choices like clothing or hairstyle. Gender expression can help someone be comfortable in their skin and may reduce gender dysphoria. Gender Dysphoria causes disgust and discomfort in one’s body due to the sense that their body doesn’t fit their true gender. 

Gender expression, sexual orientation, and gender identity in education: Challenges faced by LBGTQ students

Queer, transgender, and non-binary students can face a number of challenges in their school climate. These challenges can range from subtle bias to outright discrimination and harassment, including the use of anti-queer or anti-trans slurs. This discrimination can create a hostile educational environment, which may lead to the development of mental health concerns, which research indicates are often higher among LGBTQ youth , particularly transgender students. 

Navigating identity and education: College as a time of self-discovery 

For some students, college may be the first time in their lives that they can explore who they are, as it may be the first time they are living on their own. For LGBTQ students, self-discovery may be heightened, as college might be the first environment in which they are able to engage with openly queer people who affirm their identities and experiences. This process can be liberating and frightening, as it may also be the first time students encounter direct harassment and discrimination, as well. 

Creating inclusive schools and environments for LGBTQ students

Truly inclusive environments don’t only allow for the existence of LGBTQ students but also support LGBTQ students in thriving. Creating these environments can involve a significant shift in how institutions treat all students when regarding gender and sexual orientation. 

The importance of inclusive language in education 

Inclusive language can promote a more welcoming environment for all people. Inclusive language that focuses explicitly on LGBTQ populations can include:

• Use gender-neutral language whenever possible, such as saying “people” instead of “women and men” or “parents” instead of “mothers and fathers”
• Normalize the sharing of pronouns
• Call someone by their chosen name, even if that name does not match the name on their student ID
• Challenge discriminatory language and anti-gay and anti-trans slurs
• Create a no-tolerance policy for homophobia, transphobia, and oppressive behavior or speech 

Promoting awareness of LGBTQ challenges in higher education

Not everyone may fully understand the impact of policy on the lives of LGBTQ students. However, there are ways schools, faculty, and other organizations can support these individuals, including the following. 

Discrimination protections

Recent updates to federal law include gender identity and sexual orientation as protected classes under Title IX, which prohibits educational discrimination against certain groups. Federal agencies, including the Office of Civil Rights, have been charged with enforcing these federal laws. However, some states have changed state laws in ways that may negatively affect LGBTQ students, such as states restricting people from using bathrooms that are not consistent with their biological sex or the sex they were assigned at birth. 

Given these contradictions, colleges and universities may proactively protect their LGBTQ students. Higher education institutions can include explicit language in their anti-discrimination policies forbidding harassment based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Communicating these policies to the broader campus community and consistently enforcing them can be crucial, as unenforced policies lead to a harmful school environment that can be dangerous to students. 

The importance of recognizing sexual orientation and gender identity in campus policies

Campus policies can go beyond preventing discrimination. Policies can also codify support for LGBTQ students in campus functioning, ensuring these students have equal access to school resources and school activities. These policies can include: 

• Incorporating gender-neutral or single-stall restrooms all over campus, with menstrual hygiene products available in all restrooms
• Allowing students to select their university housing based on their gender identity, as opposed to their biological sex or the sex they were assigned at birth
• Making sure campus health and counseling centers provide staff who are trained in the needs of LGBTQ people

How to be an ally

An ally can be loosely defined as anybody who does not identify as a member of the LGBTQ community but supports LGBTQ people and wants to make the world safer and more inclusive for them. Research conducted by the Harvard Business Review found that people who were able to make the most difference in supporting the LGBTQ population had the following characteristics:

• They were accepting and made other people feel safe and supported, regardless of their identity
• They took action to advocate for, raise awareness of, or defend LGBTQ people
• They had humility about their own levels of knowledge and awareness and didn’t make advocacy work about themselves 

On campus, allyship may look like amplifying LGBTQ voices, challenging homophobia and transphobia, and educating other people on LGBTQ concerns. 

Resources for LGBTQ student support  

Whether you are an LGBTQ student navigating higher education or an ally trying to learn more and support people with different experiences than you, there may be times when you seek additional mental health support. The following resources might be available: 

• Campus counseling centers: Colleges and universities may offer free or low-cost on-campus counseling centers for all students. These centers have staff who are specifically trained to address the mental health needs of college students, including LGBTQ students. 
• Online therapy: With online therapy through an accredited service, you may access counseling services from anywhere with a reliable internet connection. 
• National organizations: Organizations like the Human Rights Campaign and the Trevor Project can provide resources and mental health support specifically for members of the LGBTQ community. 
• Crisis helplines: If you are seeking immediate support, the federal 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline is available, as well as the Trevor Project hotline and online chat for LGBTQ+ youth up to age 25. 

Therapy options for students

Campus counseling centers can be helpful but are often in high demand. If you are an LGBTQ student hoping to connect specifically with an LGBTQ counselor, you may be asked to wait longer to secure an appointment. Online therapy through a platform like BetterHelp may bridge this accessibility gap, as you can often be matched with a counselor within 48 hours of signing up for therapy. In addition, online therapy platforms may offer support groups, such as those for LGBTQ+ people, to meet others with their identity. 

Research has found that online therapy may be as effective as traditional in-person therapy at addressing mental health concerns, including those more likely to impact LGBTQ college students. One study examined the use of online therapy in treating depression and anxiety symptoms and found that symptom reduction was comparable to in-person treatment. 

College can be a time of freedom and liberation for LGBTQ college students, but academics may be intensely stressful if these students encounter discrimination and harassment. Therapy, whether in person or online, can be one way of receiving additional support for LGBTQ students navigating college. Consider reaching out to a therapist to get started.                 

• Thriving In College Despite Student Anxiety Medically reviewed by Julie Dodson , MA
• I Don’t Want To Go To College, But I Want To Be Successful: How To Achieve Success Without A College Degree
• Relationships and Relations

Gender Norms and Female Labor Supply in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Dynamic Panel Quantile Regression Analysis

• Published: 20 August 2024

Cite this article

• Laurent-Fabrice Ambassa   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5622-6891 1 &
• Honoré Bidiasse 2  

This paper investigates the multidimensional effects of both formal and informal gender norms on female labor force participation in Sub-Saharan Africa. The analysis includes a sample of 42 Sub-Saharan African nations between 2009 and 2019. Using a panel quantile regression model, the findings reveal that gender stereotypes significantly limit young women’s employment opportunities, regardless of whether they reside in rural or urban areas. This effect is amplified in rural areas as fertility rates increase. Discrimination related to physical integrity, access to resources, male preference, civil liberties, and bargaining power further impacts women’s participation in the labor market. In light of these findings, Sub-Saharan African countries must develop programs for women and girls or enact laws to combat discriminatory practices. Examples of such initiatives include efforts to reduce gender-based norms, like the Oxfam We-Care initiative, and promoting education for women, which has been shown to positively impact female labor supply.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Source: authors

Similar content being viewed by others

Gender Equality Issues in Labor Markets: Lessons for COVID-19 Era

Labor Participation and Gender Inequalities in India: Traditional Gender Norms in India and the Decline in the Labor Force Participation Rate (LFPR)

Gender, crisis and the welfare state: female labor market outcomes across oecd countries, explore related subjects.

• Medical Ethics

The phrase is frequently used to describe the difficulty women in developing nations have in juggling their roles as mothers, wives, and domestic workers.

Mobility : laws related to women’s freedom of movement, travel, and access to public spaces. Workplace : laws governing women’s employment, including protections against discrimination, maternity leave, and equal pay. Pay : gender wage equality, including provisions related to equal pay for equal work. Marriage : laws related to marriage, such as minimum age of marriage, consent, and property rights within marriage. Parenthood : It looks at parental leave policies, including maternity and paternity leave, and protections for pregnant women. Entrepreneurship : laws affecting women’s ability to start and run businesses, access credit, and own property. Assets : It examines property rights, inheritance laws, and women’s ability to own and control assets independently. Pension : This aspect evaluates pension and retirement benefits, ensuring equitable treatment for women.

References  

Alesina, A., Giuliano, P., & Nunn, N. (2013). On the origins of gender roles: Women and the plough. The quarterly journal of economics, 128 (2), 469–530.

Article   Google Scholar  

Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68 (August 1990), 29–51.

Arriola, L. R., & Johnson, M. C. (2014). Ethnic politics and women’s empowerment in Africa: Ministerial appointments to executive cabinets. American Journal of Political Science, 58 (2), 495–510.

Bandara, A. (2015). The economic cost of gender gaps in effective labor: Africa’s missing growth reserve. Feminist Economics, June , 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2014.986153

Bayanpourtehrani, G., & Sylwester, K. (2012). Female labour force participation and religion : A cross-country analysis. Bulletin of Economic Research , 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8586.2012.00443.x

Bick, A., & Fuchs-Schündeln, N. (2018). Taxation and labour supply of married couples across countries: A macroeconomic analysis. The Review of Economic Studies, 85 (3), 1543–1576. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdx057

Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87 , 115–143.

Boserup, E. (1970). Women’s role in economic development .

Branisa, B., Klasen, S., & Ziegler, M. (2013). Gender inequality in social institutions and gendered development outcomes. World Development, 45 , 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.12.003

Chakraborty, T., Mukherjee, A., Rachapalli, S. R., & Saha, S. (2018). Stigma of sexual violence and women’s decision to work. World Development, 103 , 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.031

Chernozhukov, V., & Hansen, C. (2008). Instrumental variable quantile regression: A robust inference approach. Journal of Econometrics, 142 (1), 379–398.

Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, p. 201–234‑201–234). Elsevier.

Contreras, D., & Plaza, G. (2010). Cultural factors in women’s labor force participation in Chile. Feminist Economics, 16 (2), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701003731815

De Laat, J., & Sevilla-sanz, A. (2011). The fertility and women’s labor force participation puzzle in OECD countries : The role of men’s home production. Feminist Economics , November 2014 , 37‑41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2011.573484

De Soysa, I., & Jütting, J. (2007). Informal institutions and development: How they matter and what makes them change. Informal institutions. How social norms help or hinder development , 29–43.

Dean, J. T., & Jayachandran, S. (2019). Changing family attitudes to promote female employment. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109 , 138–42.

Dieckhoff, M., Gash, V., & Steiber, N. (2015). Measuring the effect of institutional change on gender inequality in the labour market. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 39 , 59–75.

Duflo, E. (2012). Women Empowerment and Economic Development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50 , 1051–1079.

Fernández, R., & Fogli, A. (2009). Culture: An empirical investigation of beliefs, work, and fertility. American economic journal: Macroeconomics, 1 (1), 146–77.

Google Scholar  

Field, E., Pande, R., Rigol, N., Schaner, S., & Troyer Moore, C. (2021). On her own account: How strengthening women’s financial control impacts labor supply and gender norms. American Economic Review, 111 (7), 2342–75.

Gaddis, I., & Klasen, S. (2014). Economic development, structural change, and women’s labor force participation: A reexamination of the feminization U hypothesis. Journal of Population Economics, 27 (3), 639–68.

Ghassan, B., Brück, T., Ferguson, T. N., & Stojetz, W. (2019). Rural youth in the context of fragility and conflict .

Goldin, C. (1986). The female labor force and american economic growth, 1890–1980 .

Goldin, C. (1995). The U-shaped female labor force function in economic development and economic history .

Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political studies, 44 (5), 936–957.

Harding, M., & Lamarche, C. (2009). A quantile regression approach for estimating panel data models using instrumental variables. Economics Letters, 104 (3), 133–135.

IMF. (2018). Pursuing women’s economic empowerment. Policy Papers, 18 (029), 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498308526.007

Iversen, T., & Rosenbluth, F. (2010). Women, work, and politics: The political economy of gender inequality . Yale University Press. http://www.amazon.com/Women-Work-Politics-Inequality-Institution/dp/0300153104/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpi_3 .

Jayachandran, S. (2021a). Social norms as a barrier to women’s employment in developing countries. IMF Economic Review , 0123456789 . https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-021-00140-w

Jayachandran, S. (2021b). Social norms as a barrier to women’s employment in developing countries. IMF Economic Review , 0123456789 . https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-021-00140-w

Jütting, J. P., Morrisson, C., Dayton-Johnson, J., & Drechsler*, D. (2008). Measuring gender (in) equality: The OECD gender, institutions and development data base. Journal of Human Development , 9 (1), 65–86

Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A critical analysis of the third Millennium Development Goal. Gender and Development, 13 (1), 13–24.

Kabeer, N. (2020). Women’s empowerment and economic development : A feminist critique of storytelling practices in “ randomista ” economics. Feminist Economics , 5701 (May). https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2020.1743338

Kan, S., & Aytimur, R. E. (2018). Labor force participation of women left behind in Tajikistan. Oxford Development Studies, 00 (00), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2018.1484899

Killingsworth, M. R. (1983). Labor supply (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

Book   Google Scholar  

Klasen, S., & Lamanna, F. (2009). The impact of gender inequality in education and employment on economic growth : New evidence for a panel of countries. Feminist Economics , 5701 . https://doi.org/10.1080/13545700902893106

Koenker, R. (2004). Quantile regression for longitudinal data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 91 (1), 74–89.

Koenker, R., & Bassett, G., Jr. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46 , 33–50.

Kottis, A. P. (1990). Shift over time and regional variation in women’s labor force participation rates in a developing economy : The case of Greece. Journal of Development Economics, 33 , 117–132.

Lv, Z., & Yang, R. (2018). Does women’s participation in politics increase female labor participation ? Evidence from panel data analysis. Economics Letters, 170 , 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.05.013

Machado, J. A. F., & Silva, J. M. C. S. (2019). Quantiles via moments. Journal of Econometrics, 213 (1), 145–173.

Mackie, G., Moneti, F., Shakya, H., & Denny, E. (2015). What are social norms? How are they measured. San Diego, CA .

Majbouri, M. (2016). Against the wind : Labor force participation of women and economic instability in Iran. Feminist Economics , 5701 (June). https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2016.1150597

Marcus, R. (2018). The norms factor .

Mill, J. S. (1882). On liberty: The subjection of women . H. Holt andcompany.

Miyata, S., & Yamada, H. (2016). Do Female Gender Role Attitudes Affect Labour Market Participation in Egypt ? Do female gender role attitudes affect labour market participation in Egypt ? The Journal of Development Studies , 0388 (May). https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2015.1113262

Morrisson, C., & Jütting, J. P. (2005). Women’s discrimination in developing countries: A new data set for better policies. World Development, 33 (7), 1065–1081.

Na-Chiengmai, D. (2018). Female labor force contribution to economic growth. Chiang Mai University Journal of Economics, 22 (3), 47–62.

Naudé, W., & Serumaga-zake, P. (2010a). Development Southern Africa. An analysis of the determinants of labour force participation and unemployment in South Africa’s North-West province. Development Southern Africa , August 2015 .

Naudé, W., & Serumaga-zake, P. (2010b). Development Southern Africa. An analysis of the determinants of labour force participation and unemployment in South Africa’s North-West province. Development Southern Africa , August 2015 . https://doi.org/10.1080/03768350120041929

North, D. C., et al. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance . Cambridge University Press.

Obodoechine, E. N. (2019). Impact of female labor participation in African countries. University Honors Program Theses , 1‑18.

Oduro, A. D., & Staveren, I. Van. (2016a). Engendering economic policy in Africa. Feminist Economics , 5701 (January). https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2015.1059467

Oduro, A. D., & Staveren, I. Van. (2016b). Engendering Economic Policy in Africa. Feminist Economics , 5701 (January). https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2015.1059467

Pearse, R., & Connell, R. (2016). Gender norms and the economy : Insights from social research. Feminist Economics , 5701 (March). https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2015.1078485

Powell, D. (2016). Quantile regression with nonadditive fixed effects quantile regression with nonadditive fixed effects

Psacharopoulos, G., & Tzannatos, Z. (1989). Female labor force participation : An international perspective. The World Bank Research Observer, 4 (2), 187–201.

Reimers, C. W. (1985). Cultural differences in labor force participation among married women. The American Economic Review, 75 (2), 251–255.

Ruiters, M., & Charteris, A. (2020). Gender equality in labour force participation, economic growth and development in South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 0 (0), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2020.1772042

Seguino, S. (2000). Gender inequality and economic growth: A cross-country analysis. World Development, 28 (7), 1211–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00018-8

Seguino, S., & Were, M. (2013). Gender, development and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Economies, 23 (AERC Supplement), 18–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejt024

Tam, H. (2011). U-shaped female labor participation with economic development: Some panel data evidence. Economics Letters, 110 (2), 140–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.11.003

Thévenon, O. (2016). OECD countries : A family policies in comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 37 (1), 57–87. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23043262 .

Tzannatos, Z. (1999). Women and labor market changes in the global economy : Growth helps, inequalities hurt and public policy matters. World Development, 27 (3), 551–569.

Wallace, P. A., Datcher-Loury, L., & Malveaux, J. (1980). Black women in the labor force . MIT Press (MA).

Wollstonecraft, M. (2016). Vindication of the rights of woman. In democracy: A reader (pp. 297–306). Columbia University Press.

World Bank. (2013). World development indicators 2013 (English) . Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/449421468331173478/World-development-indicators-2013 .

Xiao, S., & Asadullah, M. N. (2020). Social norms and gender differences in labor force participation in China. Feminist Economics, 1 (0), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2020.1758337

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Development Economics, Research Group in Economic and Management (RGEM), FSEGA/University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon

Laurent-Fabrice Ambassa

Research Group in Economic and Management (RGEM), FSEGA/University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon

Honoré Bidiasse

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent-Fabrice Ambassa .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

See Table  13 .

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Ambassa, LF., Bidiasse, H. Gender Norms and Female Labor Supply in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Dynamic Panel Quantile Regression Analysis. J Knowl Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02281-5

Download citation

Received : 07 January 2024

Accepted : 26 July 2024

Published : 20 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02281-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

JEL Classification

• Female labor force participation rate
• Social norms
• Gender social institutions
• Quantile regression
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research