chapter 3 content in research

How To Write The Methodology Chapter

The what, why & how explained simply (with examples).

By: Jenna Crossley (PhD) | Reviewed By: Dr. Eunice Rautenbach | September 2021 (Updated April 2023)

So, you’ve pinned down your research topic and undertaken a review of the literature – now it’s time to write up the methodology section of your dissertation, thesis or research paper . But what exactly is the methodology chapter all about – and how do you go about writing one? In this post, we’ll unpack the topic, step by step .

Overview: The Methodology Chapter

• The purpose  of the methodology chapter
• Why you need to craft this chapter (really) well
• How to write and structure the chapter
• Methodology chapter example
• Essential takeaways

What (exactly) is the methodology chapter?

The methodology chapter is where you outline the philosophical underpinnings of your research and outline the specific methodological choices you’ve made. The point of the methodology chapter is to tell the reader exactly how you designed your study and, just as importantly, why you did it this way.

Importantly, this chapter should comprehensively describe and justify all the methodological choices you made in your study. For example, the approach you took to your research (i.e., qualitative, quantitative or mixed), who  you collected data from (i.e., your sampling strategy), how you collected your data and, of course, how you analysed it. If that sounds a little intimidating, don’t worry – we’ll explain all these methodological choices in this post .

Why is the methodology chapter important?

The methodology chapter plays two important roles in your dissertation or thesis:

Firstly, it demonstrates your understanding of research theory, which is what earns you marks. A flawed research design or methodology would mean flawed results. So, this chapter is vital as it allows you to show the marker that you know what you’re doing and that your results are credible .

Secondly, the methodology chapter is what helps to make your study replicable. In other words, it allows other researchers to undertake your study using the same methodological approach, and compare their findings to yours. This is very important within academic research, as each study builds on previous studies.

The methodology chapter is also important in that it allows you to identify and discuss any methodological issues or problems you encountered (i.e., research limitations ), and to explain how you mitigated the impacts of these. Every research project has its limitations , so it’s important to acknowledge these openly and highlight your study’s value despite its limitations . Doing so demonstrates your understanding of research design, which will earn you marks. We’ll discuss limitations in a bit more detail later in this post, so stay tuned!

Need a helping hand?

How to write up the methodology chapter

First off, it’s worth noting that the exact structure and contents of the methodology chapter will vary depending on the field of research (e.g., humanities, chemistry or engineering) as well as the university . So, be sure to always check the guidelines provided by your institution for clarity and, if possible, review past dissertations from your university. Here we’re going to discuss a generic structure for a methodology chapter typically found in the sciences.

Before you start writing, it’s always a good idea to draw up a rough outline to guide your writing. Don’t just start writing without knowing what you’ll discuss where. If you do, you’ll likely end up with a disjointed, ill-flowing narrative . You’ll then waste a lot of time rewriting in an attempt to try to stitch all the pieces together. Do yourself a favour and start with the end in mind .

Section 1 – Introduction

As with all chapters in your dissertation or thesis, the methodology chapter should have a brief introduction. In this section, you should remind your readers what the focus of your study is, especially the research aims . As we’ve discussed many times on the blog, your methodology needs to align with your research aims, objectives and research questions. Therefore, it’s useful to frontload this component to remind the reader (and yourself!) what you’re trying to achieve.

In this section, you can also briefly mention how you’ll structure the chapter. This will help orient the reader and provide a bit of a roadmap so that they know what to expect. You don’t need a lot of detail here – just a brief outline will do.

Section 2 – The Methodology

The next section of your chapter is where you’ll present the actual methodology. In this section, you need to detail and justify the key methodological choices you’ve made in a logical, intuitive fashion. Importantly, this is the heart of your methodology chapter, so you need to get specific – don’t hold back on the details here. This is not one of those “less is more” situations.

Let’s take a look at the most common components you’ll likely need to cover. 

Methodological Choice #1 – Research Philosophy

Research philosophy refers to the underlying beliefs (i.e., the worldview) regarding how data about a phenomenon should be gathered , analysed and used . The research philosophy will serve as the core of your study and underpin all of the other research design choices, so it’s critically important that you understand which philosophy you’ll adopt and why you made that choice. If you’re not clear on this, take the time to get clarity before you make any further methodological choices.

While several research philosophies exist, two commonly adopted ones are positivism and interpretivism . These two sit roughly on opposite sides of the research philosophy spectrum.

Positivism states that the researcher can observe reality objectively and that there is only one reality, which exists independently of the observer. As a consequence, it is quite commonly the underlying research philosophy in quantitative studies and is oftentimes the assumed philosophy in the physical sciences.

Contrasted with this, interpretivism , which is often the underlying research philosophy in qualitative studies, assumes that the researcher performs a role in observing the world around them and that reality is unique to each observer . In other words, reality is observed subjectively .

These are just two philosophies (there are many more), but they demonstrate significantly different approaches to research and have a significant impact on all the methodological choices. Therefore, it’s vital that you clearly outline and justify your research philosophy at the beginning of your methodology chapter, as it sets the scene for everything that follows.

Methodological Choice #2 – Research Type

The next thing you would typically discuss in your methodology section is the research type. The starting point for this is to indicate whether the research you conducted is inductive or deductive .

Inductive research takes a bottom-up approach , where the researcher begins with specific observations or data and then draws general conclusions or theories from those observations. Therefore these studies tend to be exploratory in terms of approach.

Conversely , d eductive research takes a top-down approach , where the researcher starts with a theory or hypothesis and then tests it using specific observations or data. Therefore these studies tend to be confirmatory in approach.

Related to this, you’ll need to indicate whether your study adopts a qualitative, quantitative or mixed  approach. As we’ve mentioned, there’s a strong link between this choice and your research philosophy, so make sure that your choices are tightly aligned . When you write this section up, remember to clearly justify your choices, as they form the foundation of your study.

Methodological Choice #3 – Research Strategy

Next, you’ll need to discuss your research strategy (also referred to as a research design ). This methodological choice refers to the broader strategy in terms of how you’ll conduct your research, based on the aims of your study.

Several research strategies exist, including experimental , case studies , ethnography , grounded theory, action research , and phenomenology . Let’s take a look at two of these, experimental and ethnographic, to see how they contrast.

Experimental research makes use of the scientific method , where one group is the control group (in which no variables are manipulated ) and another is the experimental group (in which a specific variable is manipulated). This type of research is undertaken under strict conditions in a controlled, artificial environment (e.g., a laboratory). By having firm control over the environment, experimental research typically allows the researcher to establish causation between variables. Therefore, it can be a good choice if you have research aims that involve identifying causal relationships.

Ethnographic research , on the other hand, involves observing and capturing the experiences and perceptions of participants in their natural environment (for example, at home or in the office). In other words, in an uncontrolled environment.  Naturally, this means that this research strategy would be far less suitable if your research aims involve identifying causation, but it would be very valuable if you’re looking to explore and examine a group culture, for example.

As you can see, the right research strategy will depend largely on your research aims and research questions – in other words, what you’re trying to figure out. Therefore, as with every other methodological choice, it’s essential to justify why you chose the research strategy you did.

Methodological Choice #4 – Time Horizon

The next thing you’ll need to detail in your methodology chapter is the time horizon. There are two options here: cross-sectional and longitudinal . In other words, whether the data for your study were all collected at one point in time (cross-sectional) or at multiple points in time (longitudinal).

The choice you make here depends again on your research aims, objectives and research questions. If, for example, you aim to assess how a specific group of people’s perspectives regarding a topic change over time , you’d likely adopt a longitudinal time horizon.

Another important factor to consider is simply whether you have the time necessary to adopt a longitudinal approach (which could involve collecting data over multiple months or even years). Oftentimes, the time pressures of your degree program will force your hand into adopting a cross-sectional time horizon, so keep this in mind.

Methodological Choice #5 – Sampling Strategy

Next, you’ll need to discuss your sampling strategy . There are two main categories of sampling, probability and non-probability sampling.

Probability sampling involves a random (and therefore representative) selection of participants from a population, whereas non-probability sampling entails selecting participants in a non-random  (and therefore non-representative) manner. For example, selecting participants based on ease of access (this is called a convenience sample).

The right sampling approach depends largely on what you’re trying to achieve in your study. Specifically, whether you trying to develop findings that are generalisable to a population or not. Practicalities and resource constraints also play a large role here, as it can oftentimes be challenging to gain access to a truly random sample. In the video below, we explore some of the most common sampling strategies.

Methodological Choice #6 – Data Collection Method

Next up, you’ll need to explain how you’ll go about collecting the necessary data for your study. Your data collection method (or methods) will depend on the type of data that you plan to collect – in other words, qualitative or quantitative data.

Typically, quantitative research relies on surveys , data generated by lab equipment, analytics software or existing datasets. Qualitative research, on the other hand, often makes use of collection methods such as interviews , focus groups , participant observations, and ethnography.

So, as you can see, there is a tight link between this section and the design choices you outlined in earlier sections. Strong alignment between these sections, as well as your research aims and questions is therefore very important.

Methodological Choice #7 – Data Analysis Methods/Techniques

The final major methodological choice that you need to address is that of analysis techniques . In other words, how you’ll go about analysing your date once you’ve collected it. Here it’s important to be very specific about your analysis methods and/or techniques – don’t leave any room for interpretation. Also, as with all choices in this chapter, you need to justify each choice you make.

What exactly you discuss here will depend largely on the type of study you’re conducting (i.e., qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods). For qualitative studies, common analysis methods include content analysis , thematic analysis and discourse analysis . In the video below, we explain each of these in plain language.

For quantitative studies, you’ll almost always make use of descriptive statistics , and in many cases, you’ll also use inferential statistical techniques (e.g., correlation and regression analysis). In the video below, we unpack some of the core concepts involved in descriptive and inferential statistics.

In this section of your methodology chapter, it’s also important to discuss how you prepared your data for analysis, and what software you used (if any). For example, quantitative data will often require some initial preparation such as removing duplicates or incomplete responses . Similarly, qualitative data will often require transcription and perhaps even translation. As always, remember to state both what you did and why you did it.

Section 3 – The Methodological Limitations

With the key methodological choices outlined and justified, the next step is to discuss the limitations of your design. No research methodology is perfect – there will always be trade-offs between the “ideal” methodology and what’s practical and viable, given your constraints. Therefore, this section of your methodology chapter is where you’ll discuss the trade-offs you had to make, and why these were justified given the context.

Methodological limitations can vary greatly from study to study, ranging from common issues such as time and budget constraints to issues of sample or selection bias . For example, you may find that you didn’t manage to draw in enough respondents to achieve the desired sample size (and therefore, statistically significant results), or your sample may be skewed heavily towards a certain demographic, thereby negatively impacting representativeness .

In this section, it’s important to be critical of the shortcomings of your study. There’s no use trying to hide them (your marker will be aware of them regardless). By being critical, you’ll demonstrate to your marker that you have a strong understanding of research theory, so don’t be shy here. At the same time, don’t beat your study to death . State the limitations, why these were justified, how you mitigated their impacts to the best degree possible, and how your study still provides value despite these limitations .

Section 4 – Concluding Summary

Finally, it’s time to wrap up the methodology chapter with a brief concluding summary. In this section, you’ll want to concisely summarise what you’ve presented in the chapter. Here, it can be a good idea to use a figure to summarise the key decisions, especially if your university recommends using a specific model (for example, Saunders’ Research Onion ).

Importantly, this section needs to be brief – a paragraph or two maximum (it’s a summary, after all). Also, make sure that when you write up your concluding summary, you include only what you’ve already discussed in your chapter; don’t add any new information.

Methodology Chapter Example

In the video below, we walk you through an example of a high-quality research methodology chapter from a dissertation. We also unpack our free methodology chapter template so that you can see how best to structure your chapter.

Wrapping Up

And there you have it – the methodology chapter in a nutshell. As we’ve mentioned, the exact contents and structure of this chapter can vary between universities , so be sure to check in with your institution before you start writing. If possible, try to find dissertations or theses from former students of your specific degree program – this will give you a strong indication of the expectations and norms when it comes to the methodology chapter (and all the other chapters!).

Also, remember the golden rule of the methodology chapter – justify every choice ! Make sure that you clearly explain the “why” for every “what”, and reference credible methodology textbooks or academic sources to back up your justifications.

If you need a helping hand with your research methodology (or any other component of your research), be sure to check out our private coaching service , where we hold your hand through every step of the research journey. Until next time, good luck!

Psst... there’s more!

This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...

52 Comments

highly appreciated.

This was very helpful!

This was helpful

Thanks ,it is a very useful idea.

Thanks ,it is very useful idea.

Thank you so much, this information is very useful.

Thank you very much. I must say the information presented was succinct, coherent and invaluable. It is well put together and easy to comprehend. I have a great guide to create the research methodology for my dissertation.

Highly clear and useful.

I understand a bit on the explanation above. I want to have some coach but I’m still student and don’t have any budget to hire one. A lot of question I want to ask.

Thank you so much. This concluded my day plan. Thank you so much.

Thanks it was helpful

Great information. It would be great though if you could show us practical examples.

Thanks so much for this information. God bless and be with you

Thank you so so much. Indeed it was helpful

This is EXCELLENT!

I was totally confused by other explanations. Thank you so much!.

justdoing my research now , thanks for the guidance.

Thank uuuu! These contents are really valued for me!

This is powerful …I really like it

Highly useful and clear, thank you so much.

Highly appreciated. Good guide

That was helpful. Thanks

This is very useful.Thank you

Very helpful information. Thank you

This is exactly what I was looking for. The explanation is so detailed and easy to comprehend. Well done and thank you.

Great job. You just summarised everything in the easiest and most comprehensible way possible. Thanks a lot.

Thank you very much for the ideas you have given this will really help me a lot. Thank you and God Bless.

Such great effort …….very grateful thank you

Please accept my sincere gratitude. I have to say that the information that was delivered was congruent, concise, and quite helpful. It is clear and straightforward, making it simple to understand. I am in possession of an excellent manual that will assist me in developing the research methods for my dissertation.

Thank you for your great explanation. It really helped me construct my methodology paper.

thank you for simplifieng the methodoly, It was realy helpful

Very helpful!

Thank you for your great explanation.

The explanation I have been looking for. So clear Thank you

Thank you very much .this was more enlightening.

helped me create the in depth and thorough methodology for my dissertation

Thank you for the great explaination.please construct one methodology for me

I appreciate you for the explanation of methodology. Please construct one methodology on the topic: The effects influencing students dropout among schools for my thesis

This helped me complete my methods section of my dissertation with ease. I have managed to write a thorough and concise methodology!

its so good in deed

wow …what an easy to follow presentation. very invaluable content shared. utmost important.

Peace be upon you, I am Dr. Ahmed Khedr, a former part-time professor at Al-Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt. I am currently teaching research methods, and I have been dealing with your esteemed site for several years, and I found that despite my long experience with research methods sites, it is one of the smoothest sites for evaluating the material for students, For this reason, I relied on it a lot in teaching and translated most of what was written into Arabic and published it on my own page on Facebook. Thank you all… Everything I posted on my page is provided with the names of the writers of Grad coach, the title of the article, and the site. My best regards.

A remarkably simple and useful guide, thank you kindly.

I real appriciate your short and remarkable chapter summary

Bravo! Very helpful guide.

Only true experts could provide such helpful, fantastic, and inspiring knowledge about Methodology. Thank you very much! God be with you and us all!

highly appreciate your effort.

This is a very well thought out post. Very informative and a great read.

THANKS SO MUCH FOR SHARING YOUR NICE IDEA

I love you Emma, you are simply amazing with clear explanations with complete information. GradCoach really helped me to do my assignment here in Auckland. Mostly, Emma make it so simple and enjoyable

Thank you very much for this informative and synthesised version.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

Methods Section: Chapter Three

The methods section , or chapter three, of the dissertation or thesis is often the most challenging for graduate students.  The methodology section, chapter three should reiterate the research questions and hypotheses, present the research design, discuss the participants, the instruments to be used, the procedure, the data analysis plan , and the sample size justification.

Research Questions and Null Hypotheses

Chapter three should begin with a portion that discusses the research questions and null hypotheses.  In the research questions and null hypotheses portion of the methodology chapter, the research questions should be restated in statistical language.  For example, “Is there a difference in GPA by gender?” is a t-test type of question, whereas “Is there a relationship between GPA and income level?” is a correlation type of question.  The important thing to remember is to use the language that foreshadows the data analysis plan .  The null hypotheses are just the research questions stated in the null; for example, “There is no difference in GPA by gender,” or “There is no relationship between GPA and income level.”

Research Design

The next portion of the methods section, chapter three is focused on developing the research design.  The research design has several possibilities. First, you must decide if you are doing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods research. In a quantitative study, you are assessing participants’ responses on a measure.  For example, participants can endorse their level of agreement on some scale.  A qualitative design is a typically a semi-structured interview which gets transcribed, and the themes among the participants are derived.  A mixed methods project is a mixture of both a quantitative and qualitative study.

Participants

In the research methodology, the participants are typically a sample of the population you want to study.  You are probably not going to study all school children, but you may sample from the population of school children.  You need to include information about the characteristics of the population in your study (Are you sampling all males? teachers with under five years of experience?).  This represents the participants portion of your methods section, chapter three.

Need help with your methods section?

Schedule a time to speak with an expert using the calendar below.

Instruments

The instruments section is a critical part of the methodology section, chapter three.  The instruments section should include the name of the instruments, the scales or subscales, how the scales are computed, and the reliability and validity of the scales.  The instruments portion should have references to the researchers who created the instruments.

The procedure section of the methods chapter is simply how you are going to administer the instruments that you just described to the participants you are going to select.  You should walk the reader through the procedure in detail so that they can replicate your steps and your study.

Data Analysis Plan

The data analysis plan is just that — how you are going to analyze the data when you get the data from your participants.   It includes the statistical tests you are going to use, the statistical assumptions of these tests, and the justification for the statistical tests.

Sample Size Justification

Another important portion of your methods chapter three, is the sample size justification.  Sample size justification (or power analysis) is selecting how many participants you need to have in your study.  The sample size is based on several criteria:  the power you select (which is typically .80), the alpha level selected (which is typically .05), and the effect size (typically, a large or medium effect size is selected).  Importantly, once these criteria are selected, the sample size is going to be based on the type of statistic: an ANOVA is going to have a different sample size calculation than a multiple regression.

• Welcome to Chapter 3

Chapter 3 Webinars

• Student Experience Feedback Buttons
• Developing the Quantitative Research Design
• Qualitative Descriptive Design
• Qualitative Narrative Inquiry Research
• SAGE Research Methods
• Alignment of Dissertation Components for DIS-9902ABC
• IRB Resources This link opens in a new window
• Research Examples (SAGE) This link opens in a new window
• Dataset Examples (SAGE) This link opens in a new window

Jump to DSE Guide

Need help ask us.

Was this resource helpful?

• Next: Developing the Quantitative Research Design >>
• Last Updated: Nov 2, 2023 10:17 AM
• URL: https://resources.nu.edu/c.php?g=1007179

© Copyright 2024 National University. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Consumer Information

How To Write Chapter 3 Of A PhD Thesis Proposal (A Detailed Guide)

The format of a PhD thesis proposal varies from one institution to another. In most cases, however, chapter 3 of the PhD thesis is the research methodology chapter.

This article discusses the main sections of the research methodology chapter and provides tips on how best to write it.

Introduction

Research design, population and sampling, random sampling, non-random sampling, data collection methods and tools, questionnaires, focus group discussions, observation, document review, ethical considerations, data analysis, limitations of the study, final thoughts on how to write chapter 3 of a phd thesis proposal.

The first section is a brief introduction to the chapter, which highlights what the chapter is about.

This section discusses the research design that the study will use. The research design should be guided by the research objectives and research questions the student wants to answer. The research design can be: quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods design.

In quantitative research, the study will collect, analyse and present numerical data in the form of statistics. The statistics can be descriptive, inferential, or a mix of both.

In qualitative research, the study collects, analyses and presents data that is in the form of words, opinions, or thoughts of the respondents. Its focus is on the lived-in experiences of the respondents with regard to the problem under investigation.

In mixed-methods research, the study uses a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods. So some of the research questions render themselves to quantitative research, while others to qualitative research.

Each of these research designs has its pros and cons.

Population of study refers to the entire list of your subjects of interest. If the population is so small, the student can opt to include all the subjects in the study. However, if the population is large, it becomes difficult – both time-wise and resource-wise – to include all the subjects in the study.

A sample is a sub-set of the population of study from which data will be collected to enable the student understand the population.

An example of population vs. sample: Suppose a study aims at investigating the effects of COVID-19 pandemic on micro and small enterprises (MSEs) in Kenya. The population of the study will be all the MSEs in Kenya, which are thousands in number, distributed across the country. It will be impossible for the student to collect data from all those MSEs and therefore a sample will be necessary. The sample size the student decides to use will depend on whether the study is quantitative, qualitative or both. For quantitative studies, a large sample size is necessary, while for qualitative study, the sample size need not be large.

Sampling is the process by which a sample is drawn from a population. There are two categories of sampling techniques, namely: random and non-random sampling. The use of either depends on your research design.

In random sampling, the sample is selected randomly and each subject in the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.

The advantage of random sampling is that the results from the sample can be generalised to the population, especially if the sample size is sufficiently large.

Random sampling is used primarily for quantitative studies.

In non-random sampling, the sample is selected deliberately rather than randomly. As a result, the subjects do not have an equal chance of being selected for the sample.

It is also referred to as purposive sampling, meaning that the sample being selected have a specific purpose.

Non-random sampling is used primarily for qualitative sampling.

In this section, the student is expected to discuss in detail the type of data he will collect, that is, whether primary or secondary data (or both) and how he will go about collecting the data from the sample. The methods and tools used also depend on the research design. They include:

Questionnaires are mostly used to collect quantitative data.

Questionnaires are structured in nature and include closed-ended questions.

There are four main types of closed-ended questions used in questionnaires:

• for example: how many children do you have?
• for example: does your household have a radio? 1. Yes 2. No
• for example: what is your highest level of education? 1. No education 2. Primary education 3. Secondary education 4. Tertiary level
• for example: please rate your level of satisfaction with the water services board. 1. Very dissatisfied 2. Dissatisfied 3. Neutral 4. Satisfied 5. Very satisfied

There are two forms of questionnaaire delivery: facilitated questionnaires and self-administered questionnaires.

For facilitated questionnaires, the researcher administers the questionnaire while in self-administered questionnaires, the respondent fills in the questionnaire without the presence of the researcher.

Self-administered questionnaires can be delivered by hand, or mailed via the post office or through email. Facilitated questionnaires can be done either face-to-face or through telephone. Each of these options has its pros and cons.

Interviews are oral discussions between the researcher and the respondent.

Unlike questionnaires, interviews are semi-structured. The researcher uses an interview guide to guide the discussion. The interview guide has some questions that the researcher asks the respondent. However, subsequent questions and discussions are determined by the responses given by the respondent to previous questions.

The flow of interviews will therefore vary from one respondent to another depending on their personalities and openness to responding to the questions.

Whereas interviews are held with individuals, focus group discussions (FGDs) are held with a group of respondents who are key to the problem under investigation.

The participants for an FGD should be selected carefully to represent diverse subjects of the population under investigation.

In the example of the study on the effects of COVID-19 pandemic on micro and small enterprises in Kenya, the student can create a focus group that has the following members: a female-owned enterprise, a male-owned enterprise, a youth-owned enterprise, a family-run enterprise, a non-family-run enterprise, customers of the enterprises, and an employee of the Micro and Small Enterprises Authority (MSEA). Such a focus group would have rich discussions of the views of the different players in the industry.

Observation is also a method of data collection that is commonly used. There are two types of observation: participant observation and non-participant observation.

In participant observation, the researcher immerses himself into the environment of study. In the MSEs study, for example, the researcher would choose to work in one of the enterprises for a period of time where he would observe how the business performs on a day-to-day basis.

In non-participant observation, the researcher removes himself from the environment of study and instead observes from a distance. In the MSEs study, for example, the researcher would go somewhere close to an enterprise and observe how the business performs e.g. how many clients visit the business on a day-to-day basis.

Each observation type has its own pros and cons.

During observation, the researcher should use an observation checklist that guides him on what needs to be observed and the frequency of observation.

In this data collection methods, the student obtains relevant documents to his study and reviews them in-depth. For instance, in the MSEs, the student can review the MSEs Policy of Kenya, Strategic Plan of the Micro and Small Enterprises Authority etc. Such documents are useful in informing the researcher the current state of affairs of the problem under investigation.

This section highlights the ethical considerations that would be followed during the data collection process. The ethical considerations vary from study to study and include:

Consent: the researcher should seek informed consent from the respondent before the data collection begins. For instance, when administering the questionnaire or conducting interviews, the researcher should start by informing the respondent what the study is about, how the respondent was selected, and the benefits of the study and then seek permission to continue with the study. The consent can be in written or oral form.

Compensation for participation: while participating in the study should be voluntary, some research have allowance for monetary compensation. The respondents should be informed of any plans to compensate them but after they have participated in the study, not before.

Confidentiality: the researcher should assure the respondents that their responses will be kept confidential.

Dissemination of the study findings with the respondents: there should be a plan for the student to disseminate the results of the study with the participants, for instance, through validation workshops or written publications.

Additionally, most academic institutions require their students to obtain ethical clearance for their research from the relevant authorities. Students should check if this requirement applies to them and follow the necessary procedure.

In this section, the student should discuss how the data collected will be analysed. Data analysis methods and techniques vary depending on whether the data is quantitative or qualitative.

For quantitative research, the interest of data analysis is the numbers which can be obtained through descriptive statistics and inferential statistics.

Descriptive statistics is usually the first step in analysing quantitative data. There are three categories of descriptive statistics:

• Measures of frequency: frequency table or cross-tabulation table.
• Measures of central tendency: mean, median and mode.
• Measures of variability: range, standard deviation and variance.

Inferential analysis goes a step further and looks at whether the results from the sample can be generalised to the wider population. For studies that involve interventions, inferential analysis is used to check if the intervention has any impact on the population in which it was implemented.

Some inferential analysis techniques include:

• Checking for differences between groups: t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Chi-square test.
• Checking for correlation or causation between variables: linear regression, logistic regression (logit, probit, multinomial logit/probit models etc).

The choice of data analysis technique will depend on the type of data the student has. For instance, a dependent variable that is continuous will use a different analysis technique from a dependent variable that is categorical in nature. Additionally, the choice of the data analysis technique should be guided by the research questions. The results from the analysis should be able to provide answers to the research questions posed.

For qualitative research, data analysis involves analysing the content of the interviews and focus group discussions. The content can be in different forms such as interview recordings and hand-written notes.

The recordings should be transcribed first and the notes should be organised well before analysis can take place.

The analysis of qualitative data involves coding the data, indexing the data and framing the data to identify the themes that emerge from the data.

Besides discussing the data analysis techniques, the student should discuss the softwares that will be used for analysis. There are many softwares in the market that are used for quantitative (such as SPSS and STATA) and qualitative data (such as NVivo).

The last section in the research methodology chapter discusses the potential limitations of the study and how the limitations will be mitigated. An example of study limitation is low response rate of questionnaires, which can be mitigated through triangulation.

The limitations of the study will vary from one study to another and depend on the context within which the study is conducted.

This article provided a detailed guide on how to write the research methodology chapter of a PhD thesis proposal. The research methodology chapter is informed by the research problem and research questions specified in chapter 1 of the thesis proposal. Students should therefore think through carefully their research study from the beginning because what is in the introduction chapter informs the content in the remaining chapters of the proposal and final thesis.

Related posts

How To Write Chapter 1 Of A PhD Thesis Proposal (A Practical Guide)

How To Write Chapter 2 Of A PhD Thesis Proposal (A Beginner’s Guide)

Grace Njeri-Otieno

Grace Njeri-Otieno is a Kenyan, a wife, a mom, and currently a PhD student, among many other balls she juggles. She holds a Bachelors' and Masters' degrees in Economics and has more than 7 years' experience with an INGO. She was inspired to start this site so as to share the lessons learned throughout her PhD journey with other PhD students. Her vision for this site is "to become a go-to resource center for PhD students in all their spheres of learning."

Recent Content

SPSS Tutorial #12: Partial Correlation Analysis in SPSS

Partial correlation is almost similar to Pearson product-moment correlation only that it accounts for the influence of another variable, which is thought to be correlated with the two variables of...

SPSS Tutorial #11: Correlation Analysis in SPSS

In this post, I discuss what correlation is, the two most common types of correlation statistics used (Pearson and Spearman), and how to conduct correlation analysis in SPSS. What is correlation...

Last updated 10th July 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings .

Login Alert

• > How to Do Research
• > Write the proposal

Book contents

• Frontmatter
• Acknowledgements
• Introduction: Types of research
• Part 1 The research process
• 1 Develop the research objectives
• 2 Design and plan the study
• 3 Write the proposal
• 4 Obtain financial support for the research
• 5 Manage the research
• 6 Draw conclusions and make recommendations
• 7 Write the report
• 8 Disseminate the results
• Part 2 Methods
• Appendix The market for information professionals: A proposal from the Policy Studies Institute

3 - Write the proposal

from Part 1 - The research process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2018

Just as a builder requires a detailed set of plans to guide the building of a house, so a researcher needs a proposal to help structure and manage the research project. Too often, the proposal is regarded as an inconvenience that is only required in order to obtain external funds for a project or to obtain approval for an academic dissertation. It is thought to be something that can be discarded once the funds have been allocated or the approval given. This is a very limited view of research proposals. Those who take it leave themselves without one of the most useful tools for managing research.

Research proposals, in fact, play a number of important rôles in the research process and, while preparing a proposal may seem like a distraction or an unnecessary waste of time, the work involved should ensure that you think through all the aspects concerned with the project before the research itself begins to take over. Because once the project starts rolling it is often too late to begin making changes and adjustments that would have been obvious in advance if the project had been properly prepared.

The purposes of research proposals

Proposals have a number of different purposes. A small in-house project will clearly require a less complicated proposal than a major project for which external funds are being sought. But the purposes they serve will, by and large, be the same.

To gain the approval of a supervisor

The proposal plays an important rôle in justifying the research to a supervisor. It is the vehicle that you use to argue the case for the research, demonstrating that it is important that you are capable of undertaking – and successfully completing – the work, and that the work will enable you to achieve the educational objectives of the exercise.

For academic research projects, you will need to obtain your supervisor's approval for your ideas at an early stage. You will need to be able to show that you have a clear understanding of the general issues and theories associated with the topic that you wish to study. You should be able to cite the key authors in the field and you should be able to demonstrate how your approach fits with the research that others have carried out.

Access options

Save book to kindle.

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle .

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service .

• Write the proposal
• Book: How to Do Research
• Online publication: 09 June 2018
• Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049825.004

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox .

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive .

Chapter 3 The Research Process

In Chapter 1, we saw that scientific research is the process of acquiring scientific knowledge using the scientific method. But how is such research conducted? This chapter delves into the process of scientific research, and the assumptions and outcomes of the research process.

Paradigms of Social Research

Our design and conduct of research is shaped by our mental models or frames of references that we use to organize our reasoning and observations. These mental models or frames (belief systems) are called paradigms. The word “paradigm” was popularized by

Thomas Kuhn (1962) in his book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, where he examined the history of the natural sciences to identify patterns of activities that shape the progress of science. Similar ideas are applicable to social sciences as well, where a social reality can be viewed by different people in different ways, which may constrain their thinking and reasoning about the observed phenomenon. For instance, conservatives and liberals tend to have very different perceptions of the role of government in people’s lives, and hence, have different opinions on how to solve social problems. Conservatives may believe that lowering taxes is the best way to stimulate a stagnant economy because it increases people’s disposable income and spending, which in turn expands business output and employment. In contrast, liberals may believe that governments should invest more directly in job creation programs such as public works and infrastructure projects, which will increase employment and people’s ability to consume and drive the economy. Likewise, Western societies place greater emphasis on individual rights, such as one’s right to privacy, right of free speech, and right to bear arms. In contrast, Asian societies tend to balance the rights of individuals against the rights of families, organizations, and the government, and therefore tend to be more communal and less individualistic in their policies. Such differences in perspective often lead Westerners to criticize Asian governments for being autocratic, while Asians criticize Western societies for being greedy, having high crime rates, and creating a “cult of the individual.” Our personal paradigms are like “colored glasses” that govern how we view the world and how we structure our thoughts about what we see in the world.

Paradigms are often hard to recognize, because they are implicit, assumed, and taken for granted. However, recognizing these paradigms is key to making sense of and reconciling differences in people’ perceptions of the same social phenomenon. For instance, why do liberals believe that the best way to improve secondary education is to hire more teachers, but conservatives believe that privatizing education (using such means as school vouchers) are more effective in achieving the same goal? Because conservatives place more faith in competitive markets (i.e., in free competition between schools competing for education dollars), while liberals believe more in labor (i.e., in having more teachers and schools). Likewise, in social science research, if one were to understand why a certain technology was successfully implemented in one organization but failed miserably in another, a researcher looking at the world through a “rational lens” will look for rational explanations of the problem such as inadequate technology or poor fit between technology and the task context where it is being utilized, while another research looking at the same problem through a “social lens” may seek out social deficiencies such as inadequate user training or lack of management support, while those seeing it through a “political lens” will look for instances of organizational politics that may subvert the technology implementation process. Hence, subconscious paradigms often constrain the concepts that researchers attempt to measure, their observations, and their subsequent interpretations of a phenomenon. However, given the complex nature of social phenomenon, it is possible that all of the above paradigms are partially correct, and that a fuller understanding of the problem may require an understanding and application of multiple paradigms.

Two popular paradigms today among social science researchers are positivism and post-positivism. Positivism , based on the works of French philosopher Auguste Comte (1798-1857), was the dominant scientific paradigm until the mid-20 th century. It holds that science or knowledge creation should be restricted to what can be observed and measured. Positivism tends to rely exclusively on theories that can be directly tested. Though positivism was originally an attempt to separate scientific inquiry from religion (where the precepts could not be objectively observed), positivism led to empiricism or a blind faith in observed data and a rejection of any attempt to extend or reason beyond observable facts. Since human thoughts and emotions could not be directly measured, there were not considered to be legitimate topics for scientific research. Frustrations with the strictly empirical nature of positivist philosophy led to the development of post-positivism (or postmodernism) during the mid-late 20 th century. Post-positivism argues that one can make reasonable inferences about a phenomenon by combining empirical observations with logical reasoning. Post-positivists view science as not certain but probabilistic (i.e., based on many contingencies), and often seek to explore these contingencies to understand social reality better. The post -positivist camp has further fragmented into subjectivists , who view the world as a subjective construction of our subjective minds rather than as an objective reality, and critical realists , who believe that there is an external reality that is independent of a person’s thinking but we can never know such reality with any degree of certainty.

Burrell and Morgan (1979), in their seminal book Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, suggested that the way social science researchers view and study social phenomena is shaped by two fundamental sets of philosophical assumptions: ontology and epistemology. Ontology refers to our assumptions about how we see the world, e.g., does the world consist mostly of social order or constant change. Epistemology refers to our assumptions about the best way to study the world, e.g., should we use an objective or subjective approach to study social reality. Using these two sets of assumptions, we can categorize social science research as belonging to one of four categories (see Figure 3.1).

If researchers view the world as consisting mostly of social order (ontology) and hence seek to study patterns of ordered events or behaviors, and believe that the best way to study such a world is using objective approach (epistemology) that is independent of the person conducting the observation or interpretation, such as by using standardized data collection tools like surveys, then they are adopting a paradigm of functionalism . However, if they believe that the best way to study social order is though the subjective interpretation of participants involved, such as by interviewing different participants and reconciling differences among their responses using their own subjective perspectives, then they are employing an interpretivism paradigm. If researchers believe that the world consists of radical change and seek to understand or enact change using an objectivist approach, then they are employing a radical structuralism paradigm. If they wish to understand social change using the subjective perspectives of the participants involved, then they are following a radical humanism paradigm.

Figure 3.1. Four paradigms of social science research (Source: Burrell and Morgan, 1979)

Figure 3.2. Functionalistic research process

The first phase of research is exploration . This phase includes exploring and selecting research questions for further investigation, examining the published literature in the area of inquiry to understand the current state of knowledge in that area, and identifying theories that may help answer the research questions of interest.

The first step in the exploration phase is identifying one or more research questions dealing with a specific behavior, event, or phenomena of interest. Research questions are specific questions about a behavior, event, or phenomena of interest that you wish to seek answers for in your research. Examples include what factors motivate consumers to purchase goods and services online without knowing the vendors of these goods or services, how can we make high school students more creative, and why do some people commit terrorist acts. Research questions can delve into issues of what, why, how, when, and so forth. More interesting research questions are those that appeal to a broader population (e.g., “how can firms innovate” is a more interesting research question than “how can Chinese firms innovate in the service-sector”), address real and complex problems (in contrast to hypothetical or “toy” problems), and where the answers are not obvious. Narrowly focused research questions (often with a binary yes/no answer) tend to be less useful and less interesting and less suited to capturing the subtle nuances of social phenomena. Uninteresting research questions generally lead to uninteresting and unpublishable research findings.

The next step is to conduct a literature review of the domain of interest. The purpose of a literature review is three-fold: (1) to survey the current state of knowledge in the area of inquiry, (2) to identify key authors, articles, theories, and findings in that area, and (3) to identify gaps in knowledge in that research area. Literature review is commonly done today using computerized keyword searches in online databases. Keywords can be combined using “and” and “or” operations to narrow down or expand the search results. Once a shortlist of relevant articles is generated from the keyword search, the researcher must then manually browse through each article, or at least its abstract section, to determine the suitability of that article for a detailed review. Literature reviews should be reasonably complete, and not restricted to a few journals, a few years, or a specific methodology. Reviewed articles may be summarized in the form of tables, and can be further structured using organizing frameworks such as a concept matrix. A well-conducted literature review should indicate whether the initial research questions have already been addressed in the literature (which would obviate the need to study them again), whether there are newer or more interesting research questions available, and whether the original research questions should be modified or changed in light of findings of the literature review. The review can also provide some intuitions or potential answers to the questions of interest and/or help identify theories that have previously been used to address similar questions.

Since functionalist (deductive) research involves theory-testing, the third step is to identify one or more theories can help address the desired research questions. While the literature review may uncover a wide range of concepts or constructs potentially related to the phenomenon of interest, a theory will help identify which of these constructs is logically relevant to the target phenomenon and how. Forgoing theories may result in measuring a wide range of less relevant, marginally relevant, or irrelevant constructs, while also minimizing the chances of obtaining results that are meaningful and not by pure chance. In functionalist research, theories can be used as the logical basis for postulating hypotheses for empirical testing. Obviously, not all theories are well-suited for studying all social phenomena. Theories must be carefully selected based on their fit with the target problem and the extent to which their assumptions are consistent with that of the target problem. We will examine theories and the process of theorizing in detail in the next chapter.

The next phase in the research process is research design . This process is concerned with creating a blueprint of the activities to take in order to satisfactorily answer the research questions identified in the exploration phase. This includes selecting a research method, operationalizing constructs of interest, and devising an appropriate sampling strategy.

Operationalization is the process of designing precise measures for abstract theoretical constructs. This is a major problem in social science research, given that many of the constructs, such as prejudice, alienation, and liberalism are hard to define, let alone measure accurately. Operationalization starts with specifying an “operational definition” (or “conceptualization”) of the constructs of interest. Next, the researcher can search the literature to see if there are existing prevalidated measures matching their operational definition that can be used directly or modified to measure their constructs of interest. If such measures are not available or if existing measures are poor or reflect a different conceptualization than that intended by the researcher, new instruments may have to be designed for measuring those constructs. This means specifying exactly how exactly the desired construct will be measured (e.g., how many items, what items, and so forth). This can easily be a long and laborious process, with multiple rounds of pretests and modifications before the newly designed instrument can be accepted as “scientifically valid.” We will discuss operationalization of constructs in a future chapter on measurement.

Simultaneously with operationalization, the researcher must also decide what research method they wish to employ for collecting data to address their research questions of interest. Such methods may include quantitative methods such as experiments or survey research or qualitative methods such as case research or action research, or possibly a combination of both. If an experiment is desired, then what is the experimental design? If survey, do you plan a mail survey, telephone survey, web survey, or a combination? For complex, uncertain, and multi-faceted social phenomena, multi-method approaches may be more suitable, which may help leverage the unique strengths of each research method and generate insights that may not be obtained using a single method.

Researchers must also carefully choose the target population from which they wish to collect data, and a sampling strategy to select a sample from that population. For instance, should they survey individuals or firms or workgroups within firms? What types of individuals or firms they wish to target? Sampling strategy is closely related to the unit of analysis in a research problem. While selecting a sample, reasonable care should be taken to avoid a biased sample (e.g., sample based on convenience) that may generate biased observations. Sampling is covered in depth in a later chapter.

At this stage, it is often a good idea to write a research proposal detailing all of the decisions made in the preceding stages of the research process and the rationale behind each decision. This multi-part proposal should address what research questions you wish to study and why, the prior state of knowledge in this area, theories you wish to employ along with hypotheses to be tested, how to measure constructs, what research method to be employed and why, and desired sampling strategy. Funding agencies typically require such a proposal in order to select the best proposals for funding. Even if funding is not sought for a research project, a proposal may serve as a useful vehicle for seeking feedback from other researchers and identifying potential problems with the research project (e.g., whether some important constructs were missing from the study) before starting data collection. This initial feedback is invaluable because it is often too late to correct critical problems after data is collected in a research study.

Having decided who to study (subjects), what to measure (concepts), and how to collect data (research method), the researcher is now ready to proceed to the research execution phase. This includes pilot testing the measurement instruments, data collection, and data analysis.

Pilot testing is an often overlooked but extremely important part of the research process. It helps detect potential problems in your research design and/or instrumentation (e.g., whether the questions asked is intelligible to the targeted sample), and to ensure that the measurement instruments used in the study are reliable and valid measures of the constructs of interest. The pilot sample is usually a small subset of the target population. After a successful pilot testing, the researcher may then proceed with data collection using the sampled population. The data collected may be quantitative or qualitative, depending on the research method employed.

Following data collection, the data is analyzed and interpreted for the purpose of drawing conclusions regarding the research questions of interest. Depending on the type of data collected (quantitative or qualitative), data analysis may be quantitative (e.g., employ statistical techniques such as regression or structural equation modeling) or qualitative (e.g., coding or content analysis).

The final phase of research involves preparing the final research report documenting the entire research process and its findings in the form of a research paper, dissertation, or monograph. This report should outline in detail all the choices made during the research process (e.g., theory used, constructs selected, measures used, research methods, sampling, etc.) and why, as well as the outcomes of each phase of the research process. The research process must be described in sufficient detail so as to allow other researchers to replicate your study, test the findings, or assess whether the inferences derived are scientifically acceptable. Of course, having a ready research proposal will greatly simplify and quicken the process of writing the finished report. Note that research is of no value unless the research process and outcomes are documented for future generations; such documentation is essential for the incremental progress of science.

Common Mistakes in Research

The research process is fraught with problems and pitfalls, and novice researchers often find, after investing substantial amounts of time and effort into a research project, that their research questions were not sufficiently answered, or that the findings were not interesting enough, or that the research was not of “acceptable” scientific quality. Such problems typically result in research papers being rejected by journals. Some of the more frequent mistakes are described below.

Insufficiently motivated research questions. Often times, we choose our “pet” problems that are interesting to us but not to the scientific community at large, i.e., it does not generate new knowledge or insight about the phenomenon being investigated. Because the research process involves a significant investment of time and effort on the researcher’s part, the researcher must be certain (and be able to convince others) that the research questions they seek to answer in fact deal with real problems (and not hypothetical problems) that affect a substantial portion of a population and has not been adequately addressed in prior research.

Pursuing research fads. Another common mistake is pursuing “popular” topics with limited shelf life. A typical example is studying technologies or practices that are popular today. Because research takes several years to complete and publish, it is possible that popular interest in these fads may die down by the time the research is completed and submitted for publication. A better strategy may be to study “timeless” topics that have always persisted through the years.

Unresearchable problems. Some research problems may not be answered adequately based on observed evidence alone, or using currently accepted methods and procedures. Such problems are best avoided. However, some unresearchable, ambiguously defined problems may be modified or fine tuned into well-defined and useful researchable problems.

Favored research methods. Many researchers have a tendency to recast a research problem so that it is amenable to their favorite research method (e.g., survey research). This is an unfortunate trend. Research methods should be chosen to best fit a research problem, and not the other way around.

Blind data mining. Some researchers have the tendency to collect data first (using instruments that are already available), and then figure out what to do with it. Note that data collection is only one step in a long and elaborate process of planning, designing, and executing research. In fact, a series of other activities are needed in a research process prior to data collection. If researchers jump into data collection without such elaborate planning, the data collected will likely be irrelevant, imperfect, or useless, and their data collection efforts may be entirely wasted. An abundance of data cannot make up for deficits in research planning and design, and particularly, for the lack of interesting research questions.

• Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices. Authored by : Anol Bhattacherjee. Provided by : University of South Florida. Located at : http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3/ . License : CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

CHAPTER 3 - RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: Data collection method and Research tools

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

• 248,991 Views

HOW TO WRITE CHAPTER THREE OF YOUR RESEARCH PROJECT (RESEARCH METHODOLOGY) | ResearchWap Blog

• Posted: Friday, 17 April 2020
• By: ResearchWap Admin

How To Write Chapter Three Of Your Research Project (Research Methodology)

Methodology In Research Paper

Chapter three of the research project or the research methodology is another significant part of the research project writing. In developing the chapter three of the research project, you state the purpose of research, research method you wish to adopt, the instruments to be used, where you will collect your data, types of data collection, and how you collected it.

This chapter explains the different methods to be used in the research project. Here you mention the procedures and strategies you will employ in the study such as research design, study design in research, research area (area of the study), the population of the study, etc.

You also tell the reader your research design methods, why you chose a particular method, method of analysis, how you planned to analyze your data. Your methodology should be written in a simple language such that other researchers can follow the method and arrive at the same conclusion or findings.

You can choose a survey design when you want to survey a particular location or behavior by administering instruments such as structured questionnaires, interviews, or experimental; if you intend manipulating some variables.

The purpose of chapter three (research methodology) is to give an experienced investigator enough information to replicate the study. Some supervisors do not understand this and require students to write what is in effect, a textbook.

A research design is used to structure the research and to show how all of the major parts of the research project, including the sample, measures, and methods of assignment, work together to address the central research questions in the study. The chapter three should begin with a paragraph reiterating the purpose of research.

It is very important that before choosing design methods, try and ask yourself the following questions:

Will I generate enough information that will help me to solve the research problem by adopting this method?

Method vs Methodology

I think the most appropriate in methods versus methodology is to think in terms of their inter-connectedness and relationship between both. You should not beging thinking so much about research methods without thinking of developing a research methodology.

Metodologia or methodology is the consideration of your research objectives and the most effective method  and approach to meet those objectives. That is to say that methodology in research paper is the first step in planning a research project work. 

Design Methodology: Methodological Approach                

Example of methodology in research paper, you are attempting to identify the influence of personality on a road accident, you may wish to look at different personality types, you may also look at accident records from the FRSC, you may also wish to look at the personality of drivers that are accident victims, once you adopt this method, you are already doing a survey, and that becomes your  metodologia or methodology .

Your methodology should aim to provide you with the information to allow you to come to some conclusions about the personalities that are susceptible to a road accident or those personality types that are likely to have a road accident. The following subjects may or may not be in the order required by a particular institution of higher education, but all of the subjects constitute a defensible in metodologia or methodology chapter.

 READ ALSO:  HOW TO WRITE EFFECTIVE RESEARCH PROJECT ABSTRACT

Methodology

A  methodology  is the rationale for the research approach, and the lens through which the analysis occurs. Said another way, a methodology describes the “general research strategy that outlines the way in which research is to be undertaken” The methodology should impact which method(s) for a research endeavor are selected in order to generate the compelling data.

Example Of Methodology In Research Paper :

• Phenomenology: describes the “lived experience” of a particular phenomenon
• Ethnography: explores the social world or culture, shared beliefs and behaviors
• Participatory: views the participants as active researchers
• Ethno methodology: examines how people use dialogue and body language to construct a world view
• Grounding theory*: assumes a blank slate and uses an inductive approach to develop a new theory

A  method  is simply the tool used to answer your research questions — how, in short, you will go about collecting your data.

Methods Section Of Research Paper Example :

• Contextual inquiry
• Usability study
• Diary study

If you are choosing among these, you might say “what method should I use?” and settle on one or more methods to answer your research question.

 READ ALSO:  HOW TO DEVELOP EFFECTIVE AND UNIQUE PROJECT TOPICS

Research Design Definition: WRITING A RESEARCH DESIGN

A qualitative study does not have variables. A scientific study has variables, which are sometimes mentioned in Chapter 1 and defined in more depth in Chapter 3. Spell out the independent and dependent, variables. An unfortunate trend in some institutions is to repeat the research questions and/or hypotheses in both Chapter 1 and Chapter 3. Sometimes an operational statement of the research hypotheses in the null form is given to set the stage for later statistical inferences. In a quantitative study, state the level of significance that will be used to accept or reject the hypotheses.

Pilot Study

In a quantitative study, a survey instrument that the researcher designed needs a pilot study to validate the effectiveness of the instrument, and the value of the questions to elicit the right information to answer the primary research questions in. In a scientific study, a pilot study may precede the main observation to correct any problems with the instrumentation or other elements in the data collection technique. Describe the pilot study as it relates to the research design, development of the instrument, data collection procedures, or characteristics of the sample.

Instruments

In a research study, the instrument used to collect data may be created by the researcher or based on an existing instrument. If the instrument is the researcher created, the process used to select the questions should be described and justified. If an existing instrument is used, the background of the instrument is described including who originated it, and what measures were used to validate it.

If a Likert scale is used, the scale should be described. If the study involves interviews, an interview protocol should be developed that will result in a consistent process of data collection across all interviews. Two types of questions are found in an interview protocol: the primary research questions, which are not asked of the participants, and the interview questions that are based on the primary research questions and are asked of the participants.

In a qualitative study, this is the section where most of the appendices are itemized, starting with letters of permission to conduct the study and letters of invitation to participate with the attached consent forms. Sample: this has to do with the number of your participants or subjects as the case may be. Analysis (how are you planning to analyze the results?)

ALSO READ:  TRENDING PROJECT TOPICS FOR FINAL YEAR STUDENTS AT A GLANCE

EFFECTIVE GUIDE AND METHODOLOGY SAMPLES

This chapter deals effectively with the research methods to be adopted in conducting the research, and it is organized under the following sub-headings:

• Research Design
• Area of Study

The population of the Study

• Sample and Sampling Techniques
• Instruments for Data Collection

The validity of the Instrument

Reliability of the Instrument

• Administration of the instruments
• Scoring the instruments

Method of Data Collection

Method of Data Analysis

Research Design:

This has to do with the structure of the research instrument to be used in collecting data. It could be in sections depending on different variables that form the construct for the entire topic of the research problems. A reliable instrument with a wrong research design will adversely affect the reliability and generalization of the research. The choice of design suitable for each research is determined by many factors among which are: kind of research, research hypothesis, the scope of the research, and the sensitive nature of the research.

Area of Study:

Research Area; this has to do with the geographical environment of the study area where the places are located, the historical background when necessary and commercial activities of that geographical area. For example, the area of the study is Ebonyi State University. At the creation of Ebonyi State in 1996, the Abakaliki campus of the then ESUT was upgraded to Ebonyi State University College by Edict no. 5 of Ebonyi State, 1998 still affiliated to ESUT with Prof. Fidelis Ogah, former ESUT Deputy Vice-Chancellor as the first Rector. In 1997, the Faculty of Applied and Natural Sciences with 8 departments was added to the fledging University, and later in 1998 when the ESUT Pre-Science Programme was relocated to Nsukka, the EBSUC Pre-Degree School commenced lectures in both Science and Arts in replacement of the former. This study focused on the students of the Business Education department in Ebonyi state university.

The population is regarded in research work as the type of people and the group of people under investigation. It has to be specific or specified. For example educational study teachers in Lagos state. Once the population is chosen, the next thing is to choose the samples from the population.

According to Uma (2007), the population is referred to as the totality of items or object which the researcher is interested in. It can also be the total number of people in an area of study. Hence, the population of this study comprised of all the students in the department of Business Education, Ebonyi State University which is made up of year one to four totaling 482. The actual number for the study was ascertained using Yaro-Yamane's formula which stated thus:

n   =        N

N is the Population

1 is constant

e is the error margin

Then, n   =         482

1+482(0.05)2

= 214.35 approximately 214

Sample and sampling technique:

It may not be possible to reach out to the number of people that form the entire population for the study to either interview, observe, or serve them with copies of the questionnaire. To be realistic, the sample should be up to 20% of the total population. Two sampling techniques are popular among all the sampling techniques. These are random and stratified random sampling techniques. (A). in Random Sampling, the writers select any specific number from a place like a school, village, etc. (B). In Stratified Random Sampling, one has to indicate a specific number from a stratum which could be a group of people according to age, qualification, etc. or different groups from different locations and different considerations attached.

Instruments for Data Collection:

This is a device or different devices used in collecting data. Example: interview, questionnaire, checklist, etc. instrument is prepared in sets or subsections, each set should be an entity thus asking questions about a particular variable to be tested after collecting data. The type of instrument used will determine the responses expected. All questions should be well set so as to determine the reliability of the instrument.

This has to do with different measures in order to determine the validity and reliability of the research instrument. For example, presenting the drafted questionnaire to the supervisor for scrutiny. Giving the questionnaire to the supervisor for useful comments and corrections would help to validate the instrument.

The test-retest reliability method is one of the simplest ways of testing the stability and reliability of an instrument over time. The test-retest approach was adopted by the researcher in establishing the reliability of the instrument. In doing this 25 copies of the questionnaire were administered on twenty-five selected respondents. After two weeks another 25 copies of the same questionnaire were re-administered on the same group. Their responses on the two occasions were correlated using Parsons Product Moment Correlation. A co-efficient of 0.81 was gotten and this was high enough to consider the instrument reliable.

Administration of the instruments:

Here, the writer states whether he or she administers the test personally or through an assistant. He also indicates the rate of return of the copies of the questionnaire administered.

Scoring the instruments:

Here items on the questionnaire or any other device used must be assigned numerical values. For example, 4 points to strongly agree, 3 points to agree, 2 points to disagree, and 1 point to strongly disagree.

Table of Analysis

The researcher collected data using the questionnaire. Copies of the questionnaire were administered by the researcher on the respondents. All the respondents were expected to give maximum co-operation, as the information on the questionnaire is all on things that revolve around their study. Hence, enough time was taken to explain how to tick or indicate their opinion on the items stated in the research questionnaire.

In this study, the mean was used to analyze the data collected. A four (4) point Likert scale was used to analyze each of the questionnaire items.

The weighing was as follows:

VGE—————- Very Great Extent (4 points)

GE—————– Great Extent (3 points)

LE—————– Little Extent (2 points)

VLE—————- Very Little Extent (1 point)

SA—————– Strongly Agree (4 points)

A——————- Agree (3 points)

D—————— Disagree (2 points)

SD—————- Strongly Disagree (1 point)

The mean of the scale will then be determined by summing up the points and dividing their number as follows with the formula:

Where; x= mean

f= frequency

X= Nominal value of the option

∑= summation

N= Total Number

Therefore, the mean of the scale is 2.5.

This means that any item statement with a mean of 2.50 and above is considered agreed by the respondents and any item statement below 2.5 is considered disagreed.

EDITORS SOURCE: How To Write Chapter Three Of Your Research Project (Research Methodology)

Tags: Research project, chapter three, methodology, project topics,

Project Categories

• AFRICAN LANGUAGES AND LINGUISTIC
• ACCOUNTING EDUCATION
• ACTUARIAL SCIENCE
• ADULT EDUCATION
• AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
• AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION
• ANIMAL SCIENCE
• ARCHITECTURE
• BANKING AND FINANCE
• BIBLICAL AND THEOLOGY
• BIOCHEMISTRY
• BREWING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
• BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
• BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
• BUSINESS EDUCATION

SEE MORE PROJECT CATEGORIES

Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved researchwap.com - Free Project Topics, Research Materials, and Educational Resources

Melting ice is slowing Earth's spin, shifting its axis and even influencing its inner core, research shows

Climate change is altering the Earth to its literal core, new research suggests. 

As polar and glacial ice melts because of global warming, water that was once concentrated at the top and the bottom of the globe is getting redistributed toward the equator. The extra mass around Earth’s middle slows its rotation, which in turn has a lengthening effect on our days .

A new study offers more evidence of that dynamic and further suggests that changes to the planet’s ice have been profound enough to affect the Earth’s axis — the invisible line at its center around which it rotates. Together, those shifts are causing feedback beneath the surface, affecting the fluids that move around in Earth’s molten core. 

The findings were published in two journals, Nature Geoscience and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, over the last week. 

The studies, along with similar research published in March , suggest that humans have tinkered with foundational elements of the planet’s physical properties — a process that will continue until some time after global temperatures stabilize and the melting of ice sheets reaches an equilibrium. 

“You can add Earth’s rotation to this list of things humans have completely affected,” said an author of the two new studies, Benedikt Soja, an assistant professor of space geodesy at ETH Zurich in Switzerland.

The alteration to Earth’s spin is significant enough that it could one day rival the influence of tidal forces caused by the moon, Soja said — if carbon emissions continue at extreme levels.

In general, the speed of Earth’s spin depends on the shape of the planet and where its mass is distributed — factors governed by several counteracting forces.

Scientists often offer a comparison to a figure skater twirling on ice: When skaters spin with their arms outstretched, their rotation will be slower. But if skaters’ arms are kept in tight, they spin faster.

Somewhat similarly, the friction of ocean tides from the moon’s gravitational pull slows the Earth’s rotation. Historically, that has had the largest influence on the planet’s rate of spin, Soja said. 

Meanwhile, the slow rebound of the Earth’s crust in some high-latitude regions after the removal of Ice Age glaciers works in the opposite direction, speeding up the planet’s spin. 

Both of those processes have long been predictable influences on the Earth’s angular velocity.  

But now, rapid ice melt due to global warming is becoming a powerful new force. If humans continue to pollute the planet with carbon emissions, Soja said, the influence of ice loss could overtake the moon’s effect.

“In the worst scenarios, then yeah, climate change would become the most dominant factor,” he said. 

An important fourth factor influencing Earth’s spin is the motion of fluid within its core. Scientists have long understood that that can accelerate or slow the planet’s rotation — a trend that can shift over 10- to 20-year intervals. Right now, the core is temporarily causing the Earth’s spin to speed up slightly, counteracting the slowing due to climate change. Climate change appears to be affecting Earth’s core, as well, as a result of melting ice and shifts in the planet’s rotational axis. 

The researchers behind the new study built a 120-year model of polar motion, or how the axis shifts over time. They found that changes in the distribution of mass on the planet due to melting ice likely contributed to small fluctuations in polar motion. 

Soja estimated that climate change was most likely responsible for 1 meter of change over 10 years. 

The research further suggests that the movement of molten rock inside the Earth adjusts to the changes in its axis and rate of spin — a feedback process in which Earth’s surface influences its interior. 

“The rotation changes slightly, and that, we believe, can indirectly have an effect on the core,” Soja said. “This is something which is not very easy or not possible to measure directly because we cannot go down there.”

The findings have implications for how humans keep time and for how we position satellites in space.   

“If you want to fly a new mission to Mars, for example, we really need to know how the state of the Earth is exactly in space, and if that changes we might actually make a navigation error or a mistake,” Soja said.

A 1-meter change to Earth’s axis, for example, could mean a spacecraft misses its target by 100 or 1,000 meters when it reaches Mars.

As for timekeeping, research published in March suggested that climate change has delayed the need to add a “negative leap second” to Coordinated Universal Time to keep the world’s clocks in line with Earth’s rotation. 

Duncan Agnew, a geophysicist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University of California, San Diego, who led that earlier study, said the new research “meshes very well” with his work.

“It extends the result further into the future and looks at more than one climate scenario,” Agnew said, adding that although Soja and his co-authors took a different approach, they reached a result similar to his. 

“Multiple discoveries are almost the rule in science — this is yet another case,” Agnew said.

Thomas Herring, a professor of geophysics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who was not involved in either study, said the new research may indeed offer insight into how changes on Earth’s surface can influence what’s going on inside. 

“For the feedback between surface processes and the core, I find that plausible,” Herring said in an email, explaining that “large scale” processes at the surface can “penetrate to the fluid core.”

Evan Bush is a science reporter for NBC News.

Research Methodology

• First Online: 29 June 2019

Cite this chapter

• Vaneet Kaur 3  

Part of the book series: Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management ((ITKM))

1087 Accesses

The chapter presents methodology employed for examining framework developed, during the literature review, for the purpose of present study. In light of the research objectives, the chapter works upon the ontology, epistemology as well as the methodology adopted for the present study. The research is based on positivist philosophy which postulates that phenomena of interest in the social world, can be studied as concrete cause and effect relationships, following a quantitative research design and a deductive approach. Consequently, the present study has used the existing body of literature to deduce relationships between constructs and develops a strategy to test the proposed theory with the ultimate objective of confirming and building upon the existing knowledge in the field. Further, the chapter presents a roadmap for the study which showcases the journey towards achieving research objectives in a series of well-defined logical steps. The process followed for building survey instrument as well as sampling design has been laid down in a similar manner. While the survey design enumerates various methods adopted along with justifications, the sampling design sets forth target population, sampling frame, sampling units, sampling method and suitable sample size for the study. The chapter also spells out the operational definitions of the key variables before exhibiting the three-stage research process followed in the present study. In the first stage, questionnaire has been developed based upon key constructs from various theories/researchers in the field. Thereafter, the draft questionnaire has been refined with the help of a pilot study and its reliability and validity has been tested. Finally, in light of the results of the pilot study, the questionnaire has been finalized and final data has been collected. In doing so, the step-by-step process of gathering data from various sources has been presented. Towards end, the chapter throws spotlight on various statistical methods employed for analysis of data, along with the presentation of rationale for the selection of specific techniques used for the purpose of presentation of outcomes of the present research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Aasland, A. (2008). A user manual for SPSS analysis (pp. 1–60).

Google Scholar  

Accenture Annual Report. (2016). Annual Report: 2016 Leading in the New. Retrieved February 13, 2017 from https://www.accenture.com/t20161030T213116__w__/in-en/_acnmedia/PDF-35/Accenture-2016-Shareholder-Letter10-K006.pdf#zoom=50 .

Achieng’Nyaura, L., & Omwenga, D. J. (2016). Factors affecting employee retention in the hotel industry in Mombasa County. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2 (12).

Agariya, A. K., & Yayi, S. H. (2015). ERM scale development and validation in Indian IT sector. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 20 (1), 1–16.

Aibinu, A. A., & Al-Lawati, A. M. (2010). Using PLS-SEM technique to model construction organizations’ willingness to participate in e-bidding. Automation in Construction, 19 (6), 714–724.

Article   Google Scholar  

Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., & Byrne, J. (2012). Antecedents and contingent effects of organizational adaptive Capability on firm product innovativeness. Journal of Production and Innovation Management, 29 (S1), 171–189.

Akman, G., & Yilmaz, C. (2008). Innovative capability, innovation strategy and market orientation. International Journal of Innovation and Management, 12 (1), 69–111.

Akroush, M. N., Abu-ElSamen, A. A., Al-Shibly, M. S., & Al-Khawaldeh, F. M. (2010). Conceptualisation and development of customer service skills scale: An investigation of Jordanian customers. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 8 (6), 625–653.

AlKindy, A. M., Shah, I. M., & Jusoh, A. (2016). The impact of transformational leadership behaviors on work performance of Omani civil service agencies. Asian Social Science, 12 (3), 152.

Al-Mabrouk, K., & Soar, J. (2009). A delphi examination of emerging issues for successful information technology transfer in North Africa a case of Libya. African Journal of Business Management, 3 (3), 107.

Alonso-Almeida. (2015). Proactive and reactive strategies deployed by restaurants in times of crisis: Effects on capabilities, organization and competitive advantage. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27 (7), 1641–1661.

Alrubaiee, P., Alzubi, H. M., Hanandeh, R., & Ali, R. A. (2015). Investigating the relationship between knowledge management processes and organizational performance the mediating effect of organizational innovation. International Review of Management and Business Research, 4 (4), 989–1009.

Alters, B. J. (1997). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34 (1), 39–55.

Al-Thawwad, R. M. (2008). Technology transfer and sustainability-adapting factors: Culture, physical environment, and geographical location. In Proceedings of the 2008 IAJC-IJME International Conference .

Ammachchi, N. (2017). Healthcare demand spurring cloud & analytics development rush. Retrieved February 19, 2017 from http://www.nearshoreamericas.com/firms-focus-developing-low-cost-solutions-demand-outsourcing-rises-healthcare-sector-report/ .

Anatan, L. (2014). Factors influencing supply chain competitive advantage and performance. International Journal of Business and Information, 9 (3), 311–335.

Arkkelin, D. (2014). Using SPSS to understand research and data analysis.

Aroian, K. J., Kulwicki, A., Kaskiri, E. A., Templin, T. N., & Wells, C. L. (2007). Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic language version of the profile of mood states. Research in Nursing & Health, 30 (5), 531–541.

Asongu, S. A. (2013). Liberalization and financial sector competition: A critical contribution to the empirics with an African assessment.

Ayagre, P., Appiah-Gyamerah, I., & Nartey, J. (2014). The effectiveness of internal control systems of banks. The case of Ghanaian banks. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 4 (2), 377.

Azizi, R., Maleki, M., Moradi-moghadam, M., & Cruz-machado, V. (2016). The impact of knowledge management practices on supply chain quality management and competitive advantages. Management and Production Engineering Review, 7 (1), 4–12.

Baariu, F. K. (2015). Factors influencing subscriber adoption of Mobile payments: A case of Safaricom’s Lipana M-Pesa Service in Embu Town , Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).

Babbie, E. R. (2011). Introduction to social research . Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1 (1), 35–67.

Barlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19 (1), 43.

Barrales-molina, V., Bustinza, Ó. F., & Gutiérrez-gutiérrez, L. J. (2013). Explaining the causes and effects of dynamic capabilities generation: A multiple-indicator multiple-cause modelling approach. British Journal of Management, 24 , 571–591.

Barrales-molina, V., Martínez-lópez, F. J., & Gázquez-abad, J. C. (2014). Dynamic marketing capabilities: Toward an integrative framework. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16 , 397–416.

Bastian, R. W., & Thomas, J. P. (2016). Do talkativeness and vocal loudness correlate with laryngeal pathology? A study of the vocal overdoer/underdoer continuum. Journal of Voice, 30 (5), 557–562.

Bentler, P. M., & Mooijaart, A. B. (1989). Choice of structural model via parsimony: A rationale based on precision. Psychological Bulletin, 106 (2), 315–317.

Boari, C., Fratocchi, L., & Presutti, M. (2011). The Interrelated Impact of Social Networks and Knowledge Acquisition on Internationalisation Process of High-Tech Small Firms. In Proceedings of the 32th Annual Conference Academy of International Business, Bath .

Boralh, C. F. (2013). Impact of stress on depression and anxiety in dental students and professionals. International Public Health Journal, 5 (4), 485.

Bound, J. P., & Voulvoulis, N. (2005). Household disposal of pharmaceuticals as a pathway for aquatic contamination in the United Kingdom. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113 , 1705–1711.

Breznik, L., & Lahovnik, M. (2014). Renewing the resource base in line with the dynamic capabilities view: A key to sustained competitive advantage in the IT industry. Journal for East European Management Studies, 19 (4), 453–485.

Breznik, L., & Lahovnik, M. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage: Findings from case studies. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 21 (Special issue), 167–185.

Cadiz, D., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffith, T. L. (2009). Developing and validating field measurement scales for absorptive capacity and experienced community of practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69 (6), 1035–1058.

Carroll, G. B., Hébert, D. M., & Roy, J. M. (1999). Youth action strategies in violence prevention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 25 (1), 7–13.

Cepeda, G., & Vera, D. (2007). Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities: A knowledge management perspective. Journal of Business Research, 60 (5), 426–437.

Chaharmahali, S. M., & Siadat, S. A. (2010). Achieving organizational ambidexterity: Understanding and explaining ambidextrous organisation.

Champoux, A., & Ommanney, C. S. L. (1986). Photo-interpretation, digital mapping, and the evolution of glaciers in glacier National Park, BC. Annals of Glaciology, 8 (1), 27–30.

Charan, C. S., & Nambirajan, T. (2016). An empirical investigation of supply chain engineering on lean thinking paradigms of in-house goldsmiths. The International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 14 (6), 4475–4492.

Chau, P. Y. (2001). Inhibitors to EDI adoption in small business: An empirical investigation. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 2 (2), 78–88.

Chen, L. C. (2010). Multi-skilling in the hotel industry in Taiwan.

Chen, H. H., Lee, P. Y., & Lay, T. J. (2009). Drivers of dynamic learning and dynamic competitive capabilities in international strategic alliances. Journal of Business Research, 62 (12), 1289–1295.

Chen, C. W., Yu, P. H., & Li, Y. J. (2016). Understanding group-buying websites continuous use behavior: A use and gratifications theory perspective. Journal of Economics and Management, 12 (2), 177–204.

Chua, R. L., Cockfield, G., & Al-Hakim, L. (2008, November). Factors affecting trust within Australian beef supply chain. In 4th international congress on logistics and SCM systems: Effective supply chain and logistic management for sustainable development (pp. 26–28).

Cognizant Annual Report. (2015). Cognizant annual report 2015. Retrieved February 14, 2017 from http://investors.cognizant.com/download/Cognizant_AnnualReport_2015.pdf .

Cox, B. G., Mage, D. T., & Immerman, F. W. (1988). Sample design considerations for indoor air exposure surveys. JAPCA, 38 (10), 1266–1270.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Editorial: Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3 (2), 95–108.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research . Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Daniel, J. (2011). Sampling essentials: Practical guidelines for making sampling choices . London: Sage.

De Winter, J. C., & Dodou, D. (2010). Five-point Likert items: T test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15 (11), 1–12.

Deans, P. C., Karwan, K. R., Goslar, M. D., Ricks, D. A., & Toyne, B. (1991). Identification of key international information systems issues in US-based multinational corporations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7 (4), 27–50.

Dei Mensah, R. (2014). Effects of human resource management practices on retention of employees in the banking industry in Accra, Ghana (Doctoral dissertation, Kenyatta University).

Dubey, R. (2016). Re-imagining Infosys. Retrieved February 19, 2017 from http://www.businesstoday.in/magazine/cover-story/how-infosys-ceo-is-trying-to-bring-back-the-company-into-high-growth-mode/story/230431.html .

Dunn, S., Cragg, B., Graham, I. D., Medves, J., & Gaboury, I. (2013). Interprofessional shared decision making in the NICU: A survey of an interprofessional healthcare team. Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education, 3 (1).

Einwiller, S. (2003). When reputation engenders trust: An empirical investigation in business-to-consumer electronic commerce. Electronic Markets, 13 (3), 196–209.

Eliassen, K. M., & Hopstock, L. A. (2011). Sleep promotion in the intensive care unit—A survey of nurses’ interventions. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 27 (3), 138–142.

Elliott, M., Page, K., Worrall-Carter, L., & Rolley, J. (2013). Examining adverse events after intensive care unit discharge: Outcomes from a pilot questionnaire. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 19 (5), 479–486.

Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4 (3), 272–299.

Filippini, R., Güttel, W. H., & Nosella, A. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and the evolution of knowledge management projects in SMEs. International Journal of Technology Management, 60 (3/4), 202.

Finstad, K. (2010). Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: Evidence against 5-point scales. Journal of Usability Studies, 5 (3), 104–110.

Fleming, C. M., & Bowden, M. (2009). Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods. Journal of Environmental Management, 90 (1), 284–292.

Foss, N. J., & Pedersen, T. (2004). Organizing knowledge processes in the multinational corporation: An introduction. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (5), 340–349.

Frosi, G., Barros, V. A., Oliveira, M. T., Cavalcante, U. M. T., Maia, L. C., & Santos, M. G. (2016). Increase in biomass of two woody species from a seasonal dry tropical forest in association with AMF with different phosphorus levels. Applied Soil Ecology, 102 , 46–52.

Fujisato, H., Ito, M., Takebayashi, Y., Hosogoshi, H., Kato, N., Nakajima, S., & Horikoshi, M. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the emotion regulation skills questionnaire. Journal of Affective Disorders, 208 , 145–152.

Garg, R., & De, K. (2012). Impact of dynamic capabilities on the export orientation and export performance of small and medium sized enterprises in emerging markets: A conceptual model. African Journal of Business Management, 6 (29), 8464–8474.

Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25 , 186–192.

Getz, L. M., Marks, S., & Roy, M. (2014). The influence of stress, optimism, and music training on music uses and preferences. Psychology of Music, 42 (1), 71–85.

Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (2), 209–226.

Glasow, P. A. (2005). Fundamentals of survey research methodology.

Global MAKE Report. (2016). Global Most Admired Knowledge Enterprises (MAKE) report: Executive summary. Retrieved February 22, 2017 from http://www.knowledgebusiness.com/knowledgebusiness/templates/ViewAttachment.aspx?hyperLinkId=6695 .

Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18 (1), 185–214.

Goltz, N. G. (2012). Influence of the first impression on credibility evaluation of online information (Bachelor’s thesis, University of Twente).

Graham, J. D., Beaulieu, N. D., Sussman, D., Sadowitz, M., & Li, Y. C. (1999). Who lives near coke plants and oil refineries? An exploration of the environmental inequity hypothesis. Risk Analysis, 19 (2), 171–186.

Granados, M. L. (2015). Knowing what social enterprises know. In 5th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise (pp. 1–20).

Guo, Y. M., & Poole, M. S. (2009). Antecedents of flow in online shopping: A test of alternative models. Information Systems Journal, 19 (4), 369–390.

Hadadi, M., Ebrahimi Takamjani, I., Ebrahim Mosavi, M., Aminian, G., Fardipour, S., & Abbasi, F. (2016). Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Persian version of the Cumberland ankle instability tool. Disability and Rehabilitation , 8288(February), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1207105

Haghighi, M. A., Bagheri, R., & Kalat, P. S. (2015). The relationship of knowledge management and organizational performance in science and technology parks of Tehran. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 6 (2), 422–448.

Hahm, S., Knuth, D., Kehl, D., & Schmidt, S. (2016). The impact of different natures of experience on risk perception regarding fire-related incidents: A comparison of firefighters and emergency survivors using cross-national data. Safety Science, 82 , 274–282.

Hansen, S. S., & Lee, J. K. (2013). What drives consumers to pass along marketer-generated eWOM in social network games? Social and game factors in play. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 8 (1), 53–68.

Haq, M. (2015). A comparative analysis of qualitative and quantitative research methods and a justification for adopting mixed methods in social research.

Hashim, Y. A. (2010). Determining sufficiency of sample size in management survey research activities. International Journal of Organisational Management & Entrepreneurship Development, 6 (1), 119–130.

Hill, R. (1998). What sample size is “enough” in internet survey research. Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 6 (3–4), 1–12.

Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21 (5), 967–988.

Hogan, S. J., Soutar, G. N., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Sweeney, J. C. (2011). Reconceptualizing professional service firm innovation capability: Scale development. Industrial Marketing Management, 40 (8), 1264–1273.

Holm, K. E., LaChance, H. R., Bowler, R. P., Make, B. J., & Wamboldt, F. S. (2010). Family factors are associated with psychological distress and smoking status in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. General Hospital Psychiatry, 32 (5), 492–498.

Horng, J. S., Teng, C. C., & Baum, T. G. (2009). Evaluating the quality of undergraduate hospitality, tourism and leisure programmes. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 8 (1), 37–54.

Huan, Y., & Li, D. (2015). Effects of intellectual capital on innovative performance: The role of knowledge- based dynamic capability. Management Decision, 53 (1), 40–56.

Huckleberry, S. D. (2011). Commitment to coaching: Using the sport commitment model as a theoretical framework with soccer coaches (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University).

Humborstad, S. I. W., & Perry, C. (2011). Employee empowerment, job satisfaction and organizational commitment: An in-depth empirical investigation. Chinese Management Studies, 5 (3), 325–344.

Infosys Annual Report. (2015). Infosys annual report 2015. Retrieved February 12, 2017 from https://www.infosys.com/investors/reports-filings/annual-report/annual/Documents/infosys-AR-15.pdf .

Investment Standard. (2016). Cognizant is the best pick out of the 4 information technology service providers. Retrieved February 19, 2017 from http://seekingalpha.com/article/3961500-cognizant-best-pick-4-information-technology-service-providers .

Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48 (6), 999–1015.

John, N. A., Seme, A., Roro, M. A., & Tsui, A. O. (2017). Understanding the meaning of marital relationship quality among couples in peri-urban Ethiopia. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 19 (2), 267–278.

Joo, J., & Sang, Y. (2013). Exploring Koreans’ smartphone usage: An integrated model of the technology acceptance model and uses and gratifications theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (6), 2512–2518.

Kaehler, C., Busatto, F., Becker, G. V., Hansen, P. B., & Santos, J. L. S. (2014). Relationship between adaptive capability and strategic orientation: An empirical study in a Brazilian company. iBusiness .

Kajfez, R. L. (2014). Graduate student identity: A balancing act between roles.

Kam Sing Wong, S., & Tong, C. (2012). The influence of market orientation on new product success. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15 (1), 99–121.

Karttunen, V., Sahlman, H., Repo, J. K., Woo, C. S. J., Myöhänen, K., Myllynen, P., & Vähäkangas, K. H. (2015). Criteria and challenges of the human placental perfusion–Data from a large series of perfusions. Toxicology In Vitro, 29 (7), 1482–1491.

Kaur, V., & Mehta, V. (2016a). Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities: A new perspective for achieving global competitiveness in IT sector. Pacific Business Review International, 1 (3), 95–106.

Kaur, V., & Mehta, V. (2016b). Leveraging knowledge processes for building higher-order dynamic capabilities: An empirical evidence from IT sector in India. JIMS 8M , July- September.

Kaya, A., Iwamoto, D. K., Grivel, M., Clinton, L., & Brady, J. (2016). The role of feminine and masculine norms in college women’s alcohol use. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 17 (2), 206–214.

Kenny, A., McLoone, S., Ward, T., & Delaney, D. (2006). Using user perception to determine suitable error thresholds for dead reckoning in distributed interactive applications.

Kianpour, K., Jusoh, A., & Asghari, M. (2012). Importance of Price for buying environmentally friendly products. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 4 (6), 371–375.

Kim, J., & Forsythe, S. (2008). Sensory enabling technology acceptance model (SE-TAM): A multiple-group structural model comparison. Psychology & Marketing, 25 (9), 901–922.

Kim, Y. J., Oh, Y., Park, S., Cho, S., & Park, H. (2013). Stratified sampling design based on data mining. Healthcare Informatics Research, 19 (3), 186–195.

Kim, R., Yang, H., & Chao, Y. (2016). Effect of brand equity& country origin on Korean consumers’ choice for beer brands. The Business & Management Review, 7 (3), 398.

Kimweli, J. M. (2013). The role of monitoring and evaluation practices to the success of donor funded food security intervention projects a case study of Kibwezi District. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3 (6), 9.

Kinsfogel, K. M., & Grych, J. H. (2004). Interparental conflict and adolescent dating relationships: Integrating cognitive, emotional, and peer influences. Journal of Family Psychology, 18 (3), 505–515.

Kivimäki, M., Vahtera, J., Pentti, J., Thomson, L., Griffiths, A., & Cox, T. (2001). Downsizing, changes in work, and self-rated health of employees: A 7-year 3-wave panel study. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 14 (1), 59–73.

Klemann, B. (2012). The unknowingly consumers of Fairtrade products.

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques . New Delhi: New Age International.

Krause, D. R. (1999). The antecedents of buying firms’ efforts to improve suppliers. Journal of Operations Management, 17 (2), 205–224.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement., 30 , 607–610.

Krige, S. M., Mahomoodally, F. M., Subratty, A. H., & Ramasawmy, D. (2012). Relationship between socio-demographic factors and eating practices in a multicultural society. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 3 (3), 286–295.

Krzakiewicz, K. (2013). Dynamic capabilities and knowledge management. Management, 17 (2), 1–15.

Kuzic, J., Fisher, J., Scollary, A., Dawson, L., Kuzic, M., & Turner, R. (2005). Modus vivendi of E-business. PACIS 2005 Proceedings , 99.

Laframboise, K., Croteau, A. M., Beaudry, A., & Manovas, M. (2009). Interdepartmental knowledge transfer success during information technology projects. International Journal of Knowledge Management , 189–210.

Landaeta, R. E. (2008). Evaluating benefits and challenges of knowledge transfer across projects. Engineering Management Journal, 20 (1), 29–38.

Lee, Y., Chen, A., Yang, Y. L., Ho, G. H., Liu, H. T., & Lai, H. Y. (2005). The prophylactic antiemetic effects of ondansetron, propofol, and midazolam in female patients undergoing sevoflurane anaesthesia for ambulatory surgery: A-42. European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA), 22 , 11–12.

Lee, V. H., Foo, A. T. L., Leong, L. Y., & Ooi, K. B. (2016). Can competitive advantage be achieved through knowledge management? A case study on SMEs. Expert Systems with Applications, 65 , 136–151.

Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C., & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation . New Jersey: Psychology Press.

Leonardi, F., Spazzafumo, L., & Marcellini, F. (2005). Subjective Well-being: The constructionist point of view. A longitudinal study to verify the predictive power of top-down effects and bottom-up processes. Social Indicators Research, 70 (1), 53–77.

Li, D. Y., & Liu, J. (2014). Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 67 (1), 2793–2799.

Liao, S. H., Fei, W. C., & Chen, C. C. (2007). Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: An empirical study of Taiwan’s knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Information Science, 33 (3), 340–359.

Liao, S. H., & Wu, C. C. (2009). The relationship among knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 4 (4), 64.

Liao, T. S., Rice, J., & Lu, J. C. (2014). The vicissitudes of Competitive advantage: Empirical evidence from Australian manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 53 (2), 469–481.

Liu, S., & Deng, Z. (2015). Understanding knowledge management capability in business process outsourcing: A cluster analysis. Management Decision, 53 (1), 1–11.

Liu, C. L. E., Ghauri, P. N., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2010). Understanding the impact of relational capital and organizational learning on alliance outcomes. Journal of World Business, 45 (3), 237–249.

Luís, C., Cothran, E. G., & do Mar Oom, M. (2007). Inbreeding and genetic structure in the endangered Sorraia horse breed: Implications for its conservation and management. Journal of Heredity, 98 (3), 232–237.

MacDonald, C. M., & Atwood, M. E. (2014, June). What does it mean for a system to be useful?: An exploratory study of usefulness. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on designing interactive systems (pp. 885–894). New York: ACM.

Mafini, C., & Dlodlo, N. (2014). The relationship between extrinsic motivation, job satisfaction and life satisfaction amongst employees in a public organisation. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 40 (1), 01–12.

Mafini, C., Dhurup, M., & Mandhlazi, L. (2014). Shopper typologies amongst a generation Y consumer cohort and variations in terms of age in the fashion apparel market: Original research. Acta Commercii, 14 (1), 1–11.

Mageswari, S. U., Sivasubramanian, C., & Dath, T. S. (2015). Knowledge management enablers, processes and innovation in Small manufacturing firms: A structural equation modeling approach. IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, 13 (1), 33.

Mahoney, J. T. (2005). Resource-based theory, dynamic capabilities, and real options. In Foundations for organizational science. Economic foundations of strategy . Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Malhotra, N., Hall, J., Shaw, M., & Oppenheim, P. (2008). Essentials of marketing research, 2nd Australian edition.

Manan, R. M. (2016). The use of hangman game in motivating students in Learning English. ELT Perspective, 4 (2).

Manco-Johnson, M., Morrissey-Harding, G., Edelman-Lewis, B., Oster, G., & Larson, P. (2004). Development and validation of a measure of disease-specific quality of life in young children with haemophilia. Haemophilia, 10 (1), 34–41.

Marek, L. (2016). Guess which Illinois company uses the most worker visas. Retrieved February 13, 2017 from http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20160227/ISSUE01/302279994/guess-which-illinois-company-uses-the-most-worker-visas .

Martin, C. M., Roach, V. A., Nguyen, N., Rice, C. L., & Wilson, T. D. (2013). Comparison of 3D reconstructive technologies used for morphometric research and the translation of knowledge using a decision matrix. Anatomical Sciences Education, 6 (6), 393–403.

Maskatia, S. A., Altman, C. A., Morris, S. A., & Cabrera, A. G. (2013). The echocardiography “boot camp”: A novel approach in pediatric cardiovascular imaging education. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 26 (10), 1187–1192.

Matson, J. L., Boisjoli, J., Rojahn, J., & Hess, J. (2009). A factor analysis of challenging behaviors assessed with the baby and infant screen for children with autism traits. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3 (3), 714–722.

Matusik, S. F., & Heeley, M. B. (2005). Absorptive capacity in the software Industry: Identifying dimensions that affect knowledge and knowledge creation activities. Journal of Management, 31 (4), 549–572.

Matveev, A. V. (2002). The advantages of employing quantitative and qualitative methods in intercultural research: Practical implications from the study of the perceptions of intercultural communication competence by American and Russian managers. Bulletin of Russian Communication Association Theory of Communication and Applied Communication, 1 , 59–67.

McDermott, E. P., & Ervin, D. (2005). The influence of procedural and distributive variables on settlement rates in employment discrimination mediation. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 45 , 1–16.

McKelvie, A. (2007). Innovation in new firms: Examining the role of knowledge and growth willingness.

Mendonca, J., & Sen, A. (2016). IT companies including TCS, Infosys, Wipro bracing for slowest topline expansion on annual basis. Retrieved February 19 2017 from http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/earnings/it-companies-including-tcs-infosys-wipro-bracing-for-slowest-topline-expansion-on-annual-basis/articleshow/51639858.cms .

Mesina, F., De Deyne, C., Judong, M., Vandermeersch, E., & Heylen, R. (2005). Quality survey of pre-operative assessment: Influence of a standard questionnaire: A-38. European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA), 22 , 11.

Michailova, S., & Zhan, W. (2014). Dynamic capabilities and innovation in MNC subsidiaries. Journal of World Business , 1–9.

Miller, R., Salmona, M., & Melton, J. (2012). Modeling student concern for professional online image. Journal of Internet Social Networking & Virtual Communities, 3 (2), 1.

Minarro-Viseras, E., Baines, T., & Sweeney, M. (2005). Key success factors when implementing strategic manufacturing initiatives. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25 (2), 151–179.

Monferrer, D., Blesa, A., & Ripollés, M. (2015). Catching dynamic capabilities through market-oriented networks. European Journal of International Management, 9 (3), 384–408.

Moyer, J. E. (2007). Learning from leisure reading: A study of adult public library patrons. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 46 , 66–79.

Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105 (3), 430–445.

Murphy, T. H., & Terry, H. R. (1998). Faculty needs associated with agricultural distance education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 39 , 17–27.

Murphy, C., Hearty, C., Murray, M., & McCaul, C. (2005). Patient preferences for desired post-anaesthesia outcomes-a comparison with medical provider perspective: A-40. European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA), 22 , 11.

Nair, A., Rustambekov, E., McShane, M., & Fainshmidt, S. (2014). Enterprise risk management as a dynamic Capability: A test of its effectiveness during a crisis. Managerial and Decision Economics, 35 , 555–566.

Nandan, S. (2010). Determinants of customer satisfaction on service quality: A study of railway platforms in India. Journal of Public Transportation, 13 (1), 6.

NASSCOM Indian IT-BPM Industry Report. (2016). NASSCOM Indian IT-BPM Industry Report 2016. Retrieved January 11, 2017 from http://www.nasscom.in/itbpm-sector-india-strategic-review-2016 .

Nedzinskas, Š. (2013). Dynamic capabilities and organizational inertia interaction in volatile environment. Retrieved from http://archive.ism.lt/handle/1/301 .

Nguyen, T. N. Q. (2010). Knowledge management capability and competitive advantage: An empirical study of Vietnamese enterprises.

Nguyen, N. T. D., & Aoyama, A. (2014). Achieving efficient technology transfer through a specific corporate culture facilitated by management practices. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 25 (2), 108–122.

Nguyen, Q. T. N., & Neck, P. A. (2008, July). Knowledge management as dynamic capabilities: Does it work in emerging less developed countries. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Pacific Basin Finance, Economics, Accounting and Management (pp. 1–18).

Nieves, J., & Haller, S. (2014). Building dynamic capabilities through knowledge resources. Tourism Management, 40 , 224–232.

Nirmal, R. (2016). Indian IT firms late movers in digital race. Retrieved February 19, 2017 from http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/info-tech/indian-it-firms-late-movers-in-digital-race/article8505379.ece .

Numthavaj, P., Bhongmakapat, T., Roongpuwabaht, B., Ingsathit, A., & Thakkinstian, A. (2017). The validity and reliability of Thai Sinonasal outcome Test-22. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 274 (1), 289–295.

Obwoge, M. E., Mwangi, S. M., & Nyongesa, W. J. (2013). Linking TVET institutions and industry in Kenya: Where are we. The International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Science, 2 (4), 91–96.

Oktemgil, M., & Greenley, G. (1997). Consequences of high and low adaptive capability in UK companies. European Journal of Marketing, 31 (7), 445–466.

Ouyang, Y. (2015). A cyclic model for knowledge management capability-a review study. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 5 (2), 1–9.

Paloniemi, R., & Vainio, A. (2011). Legitimacy and empowerment: Combining two conceptual approaches for explaining forest owners’ willingness to cooperate in nature conservation. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 8 (2), 123–138.

Pant, S., & Lado, A. (2013). Strategic business process offshoring and Competitive advantage: The role of strategic intent and absorptive capacity. Journal of Information Science and Technology, 9 (1), 25–58.

Paramati, S. R., Gupta, R., Maheshwari, S., & Nagar, V. (2016). The empirical relationship between the value of rupee and performance of information technology firms: Evidence from India. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 16 (4), 512–529.

Parida, V., Oghazi, P., & Cedergren, S. (2016). A study of how ICT capabilities can influence dynamic capabilities. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29 (2), 1–22.

Parkhurst, K. A., Conwell, Y., & Van Orden, K. A. (2016). The interpersonal needs questionnaire with a shortened response scale for oral administration with older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 20 (3), 277–283.

Payne, A. A., Gottfredson, D. C., & Gottfredson, G. D. (2006). School predictors of the intensity of implementation of school-based prevention programs: Results from a national study. Prevention Science, 7 (2), 225–237.

Pereira-Moliner, J., Font, X., Molina-Azorín, J., Lopez-Gamero, M. D., Tarí, J. J., & Pertusa-Ortega, E. (2015). The holy grail: Environmental management, competitive advantage and business performance in the Spanish hotel industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27 (5), 714–738.

Persada, S. F., Razif, M., Lin, S. C., & Nadlifatin, R. (2014). Toward paperless public announcement on environmental impact assessment (EIA) through SMS gateway in Indonesia. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20 , 271–279.

Pertusa-Ortega, E. M., Molina-Azorín, J. F., & Claver-Cortés, E. (2010). Competitive strategy, structure and firm performance: A comparison of the resource-based view and the contingency approach. Management Decision, 48 (8), 1282–1303.

Peters, M. D., Wieder, B., Sutton, S. G., & Wake, J. (2016). Business intelligence systems use in performance measurement capabilities: Implications for enhanced competitive advantage. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 21 (1–17), 1–17.

Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y., & Lioukas, S. (2011). Dynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21 (3), 615–647.

Rapiah, M., Wee, S. H., Ibrahim Kamal, A. R., & Rozainun, A. A. (2010). The relationship between strategic performance measurement systems and organisational competitive advantage. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 5 (1), 1–20.

Reuner, T. (2016). HfS blueprint Report, ServiceNow services 2016, excerpt for Cognizant. Retrieved February 2, 2017 from https://www.cognizant.com/services-resources/Services/hfs-blueprint-report-servicenow-2016.pdf .

Ríos, V. R., & del Campo, E. P. (2013). Business research methods: Theory and practice . Madrid: ESIC Editorial.

Sachitra, V. (2015). Review of Competitive advantage measurements: The case of agricultural firms. IV, 303–317.

Sahney, S., Banwet, D. K., & Karunes, S. (2004). Customer requirement constructs: The premise for TQM in education: A comparative study of select engineering and management institutions in the Indian context. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53 (6), 499–520.

Sampe, F. (2012). The influence of organizational learning on performance in Indonesian SMEs.

Sarlak, M. A., Shafiei, M., Sarlak, M. A., Shafiei, M., Capability, M., Capability, I., & Competitive, S. (2013). A research in relationship between entrepreneurship, marketing Capability, innovative Capability and sustainable Competitive advantage. Kaveh Industrial City, 7 (8), 1490–1497.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students . Pearson.

Schiff, J. H., Fornaschon, S., Schiff, M., Martin, E., & Motsch, J. (2005). Measuring patient dissatisfaction with anethesia care: A-41. European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA), 22 , 11.

Schwartz, S. J., Coatsworth, J. D., Pantin, H., Prado, G., Sharp, E. H., & Szapocznik, J. (2006). The role of ecodevelopmental context and self-concept in depressive and externalizing symptoms in Hispanic adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30 (4), 359–370.

Scott, V. C., Sandberg, J. G., Harper, J. M., & Miller, R. B. (2012). The impact of depressive symptoms and health on sexual satisfaction for older couples: Implications for clinicians. Contemporary Family Therapy, 34 (3), 376–390.

Shafia, M. A., Shavvalpour, S., Hosseini, M., & Hosseini, R. (2016). Mediating effect of technological innovation capabilities between dynamic capabilities and competitiveness of research and technology organisations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28 , 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1158404 .

Shahzad, K., Faisal, A., Farhan, S., Sami, A., Bajwa, U., & Sultani, R. (2016). Integrating knowledge management (KM) strategies and processes to enhance organizational creativity and performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11 (1), 1–34.

Sharma, A. (2016). Five reasons why you should avoid investing in IT stocks. Retrieved February 19, 2017 from http://www.businesstoday.in/markets/company-stock/five-reasons-why-you-should-avoid-investing-in-infosys-tcs-wipro/story/238225.html .

Sharma, J. K., & Singh, A. K. (2012). Absorptive capability and competitive advantage: Some insights from Indian pharmaceutical Industry. International Journal of Management and Business Research, 2 (3), 175–192.

Shepherd, R. M., & Edelmann, R. J. (2005). Reasons for internet use and social anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 39 (5), 949–958.

Singh, R., & Khanduja, D. (2010). Customer requirements grouping–a prerequisite for successful implementation of TQM in technical education. International Journal of Management in Education, 4 (2), 201–215.

Small, M. J., Gupta, J., Frederic, R., Joseph, G., Theodore, M., & Kershaw, T. (2008). Intimate partner and nonpartner violence against pregnant women in rural Haiti. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 102 (3), 226–231.

Srivastava, M. (2016). IT biggies expect weaker Sept quarter. Retrieved February 19, 2017 from http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/it-biggies-expect-weaker-sept-quarter-116100400680_1.html .

Stoten, D. W. (2016). Discourse, knowledge and power: The continuing debate over the DBA. Journal of Management Development, 35 (4), 430–447.

Sudarvel, J., & Velmurugan, R. (2015). Semi month effect in Indian IT sector with reference to BSE IT index. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 3 (10), 155–159.

Sylvia, M., & Terhaar, M. (2014). An approach to clinical data Management for the Doctor of nursing practice curriculum. Journal of Professional Nursing, 30 (1), 56–62.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Multivariate analysis of variance and covariance. Using Multivariate Statistics, 3 , 402–407.

Teece, D. J. (2014). The foundations of Enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28 (4), 328–352.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), 509–533.

Thomas, J. B., Sussman, S. W., & Henderson, J. C. (2001). Understanding “strategic learning”: Linking organizational learning, knowledge management, and sensemaking. Organization Science, 12 (3), 331–345.

Travis, S. E., & Grace, J. B. (2010). Predicting performance for ecological restoration: A case study using Spartina alterniflora. Ecological Applications, 20 (1), 192–204.

Tseng, S., & Lee, P. (2014). The effect of knowledge management capability and dynamic capability on organizational performance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27 (2), 158–179.

Turker, D. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85 (4), 411–427.

Vanham, D., Mak, T. N., & Gawlik, B. M. (2016). Urban food consumption and associated water resources: The example of Dutch cities. Science of the Total Environment, 565 , 232–239.

Visser, P. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Lavrakas, P. J. (2000). Survey research. In H.T. Reis & C.M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 223-252). New York: Cambridge.

Vitale, G., Sala, F., Consonni, F., Teruzzi, M., Greco, M., Bertoli, E., & Maisano, P. (2005). Perioperative complications correlate with acid-base balance in elderly trauma patients: A-37. European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA), 22 , 10–11.

Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). Leveraging knowledge in the innovation and learning process at GKN. International Journal of Technology Management, 27 (6/7), 674–688.

Wang, C. L., Senaratne, C., & Rafiq, M. (2015). Success traps, dynamic capabilities and firm performance. British Journal of Management, 26 , 26–44.

Wasswa Katono, I. (2011). Student evaluation of e-service quality criteria in Uganda: The case of automatic teller machines. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 6 (3), 200–216.

Wasylkiw, L., Currie, M. A., Meuse, R., & Pardoe, R. (2010). Perceptions of male ideals: The power of presentation. International Journal of Men's Health, 9 (2), 144–153.

Wilhelm, H., Schlömer, M., & Maurer, I. (2015). How dynamic capabilities affect the effectiveness and efficiency of operating routines under high and Low levels of environmental dynamism. British Journal of Management , 1–19.

Wilkens, U., Menzel, D., & Pawlowsky, P. (2004). Inside the black-box : Analysing the generation of Core competencies and dynamic capabilities by exploring collective minds. An organizational learning perspective. Management Review, 15 (1), 8–27.

Willemsen, M. C., & de Vries, H. (1996). Saying “no” to environmental tobacco smoke: Determinants of assertiveness among nonsmoking employees. Preventive Medicine, 25 (5), 575–582.

Williams, M., Peterson, G. M., Tenni, P. C., & Bindoff, I. K. (2012). A clinical knowledge measurement tool to assess the ability of community pharmacists to detect drug-related problems. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 20 (4), 238–248.

Wintermark, M., Huss, D. S., Shah, B. B., Tustison, N., Druzgal, T. J., Kassell, N., & Elias, W. J. (2014). Thalamic connectivity in patients with essential tremor treated with MR imaging–guided focused ultrasound: In vivo Fiber tracking by using diffusion-tensor MR imaging. Radiology, 272 (1), 202–209.

Wipro Annual Report. (2015). Wipro annual report 2014–15. Retrieved February 16, 2017 from http://www.wipro.com/documents/investors/pdf-files/Wipro-annual-report-2014-15.pdf .

Wu, J., & Chen, X. (2012). Leaders’ social ties, knowledge acquisition capability and firm competitive advantage. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29 (2), 331–350.

Yamane, T. (1967). Elementary Sampling Theory Prentice Inc. Englewood Cliffs. NS, USA, 1, 371–390.

Zahra, S., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (4), 917–955.

Zaied, A. N. H. (2012). An integrated knowledge management capabilities framework for assessing organizational performance. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 4 (2), 1–10.

Zakaria, Z. A., Anuar, H. S., & Udin, Z. M. (2015). The relationship between external and internal factors of information systems success towards employee performance: A case of Royal Malaysia custom department. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 4 (2), 54–60.

Zheng, S., Zhang, W., & Du, J. (2011). Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities and innovation in networked environments. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15 (6), 1035–1051.

Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2010). Business research methods . Mason: South Western Cengage Learning.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA

Vaneet Kaur

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Kaur, V. (2019). Research Methodology. In: Knowledge-Based Dynamic Capabilities. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21649-8_3

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21649-8_3

Published : 29 June 2019

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-21648-1

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-21649-8

eBook Packages : Business and Management Business and Management (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

The state of AI in early 2024: Gen AI adoption spikes and starts to generate value

If 2023 was the year the world discovered generative AI (gen AI) , 2024 is the year organizations truly began using—and deriving business value from—this new technology. In the latest McKinsey Global Survey  on AI, 65 percent of respondents report that their organizations are regularly using gen AI, nearly double the percentage from our previous survey just ten months ago. Respondents’ expectations for gen AI’s impact remain as high as they were last year , with three-quarters predicting that gen AI will lead to significant or disruptive change in their industries in the years ahead.

About the authors

This article is a collaborative effort by Alex Singla , Alexander Sukharevsky , Lareina Yee , and Michael Chui , with Bryce Hall , representing views from QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey, and McKinsey Digital.

Organizations are already seeing material benefits from gen AI use, reporting both cost decreases and revenue jumps in the business units deploying the technology. The survey also provides insights into the kinds of risks presented by gen AI—most notably, inaccuracy—as well as the emerging practices of top performers to mitigate those challenges and capture value.

AI adoption surges

Interest in generative AI has also brightened the spotlight on a broader set of AI capabilities. For the past six years, AI adoption by respondents’ organizations has hovered at about 50 percent. This year, the survey finds that adoption has jumped to 72 percent (Exhibit 1). And the interest is truly global in scope. Our 2023 survey found that AI adoption did not reach 66 percent in any region; however, this year more than two-thirds of respondents in nearly every region say their organizations are using AI. 1 Organizations based in Central and South America are the exception, with 58 percent of respondents working for organizations based in Central and South America reporting AI adoption. Looking by industry, the biggest increase in adoption can be found in professional services. 2 Includes respondents working for organizations focused on human resources, legal services, management consulting, market research, R&D, tax preparation, and training.

Also, responses suggest that companies are now using AI in more parts of the business. Half of respondents say their organizations have adopted AI in two or more business functions, up from less than a third of respondents in 2023 (Exhibit 2).

Future frontiers: Navigating the next wave of tech innovations

Join Lareina Yee and Roger Roberts on Tuesday, July 30, at 12:30 p.m. EDT/6:30 p.m. CET as they discuss the future of these technological trends, the factors that will fuel their growth, and strategies for investing in them through 2024 and beyond.

Gen AI adoption is most common in the functions where it can create the most value

Most respondents now report that their organizations—and they as individuals—are using gen AI. Sixty-five percent of respondents say their organizations are regularly using gen AI in at least one business function, up from one-third last year. The average organization using gen AI is doing so in two functions, most often in marketing and sales and in product and service development—two functions in which previous research  determined that gen AI adoption could generate the most value 3 “ The economic potential of generative AI: The next productivity frontier ,” McKinsey, June 14, 2023. —as well as in IT (Exhibit 3). The biggest increase from 2023 is found in marketing and sales, where reported adoption has more than doubled. Yet across functions, only two use cases, both within marketing and sales, are reported by 15 percent or more of respondents.

Gen AI also is weaving its way into respondents’ personal lives. Compared with 2023, respondents are much more likely to be using gen AI at work and even more likely to be using gen AI both at work and in their personal lives (Exhibit 4). The survey finds upticks in gen AI use across all regions, with the largest increases in Asia–Pacific and Greater China. Respondents at the highest seniority levels, meanwhile, show larger jumps in the use of gen Al tools for work and outside of work compared with their midlevel-management peers. Looking at specific industries, respondents working in energy and materials and in professional services report the largest increase in gen AI use.

Investments in gen AI and analytical AI are beginning to create value

The latest survey also shows how different industries are budgeting for gen AI. Responses suggest that, in many industries, organizations are about equally as likely to be investing more than 5 percent of their digital budgets in gen AI as they are in nongenerative, analytical-AI solutions (Exhibit 5). Yet in most industries, larger shares of respondents report that their organizations spend more than 20 percent on analytical AI than on gen AI. Looking ahead, most respondents—67 percent—expect their organizations to invest more in AI over the next three years.

Where are those investments paying off? For the first time, our latest survey explored the value created by gen AI use by business function. The function in which the largest share of respondents report seeing cost decreases is human resources. Respondents most commonly report meaningful revenue increases (of more than 5 percent) in supply chain and inventory management (Exhibit 6). For analytical AI, respondents most often report seeing cost benefits in service operations—in line with what we found last year —as well as meaningful revenue increases from AI use in marketing and sales.

Inaccuracy: The most recognized and experienced risk of gen AI use

As businesses begin to see the benefits of gen AI, they’re also recognizing the diverse risks associated with the technology. These can range from data management risks such as data privacy, bias, or intellectual property (IP) infringement to model management risks, which tend to focus on inaccurate output or lack of explainability. A third big risk category is security and incorrect use.

Respondents to the latest survey are more likely than they were last year to say their organizations consider inaccuracy and IP infringement to be relevant to their use of gen AI, and about half continue to view cybersecurity as a risk (Exhibit 7).

Conversely, respondents are less likely than they were last year to say their organizations consider workforce and labor displacement to be relevant risks and are not increasing efforts to mitigate them.

In fact, inaccuracy— which can affect use cases across the gen AI value chain , ranging from customer journeys and summarization to coding and creative content—is the only risk that respondents are significantly more likely than last year to say their organizations are actively working to mitigate.

Some organizations have already experienced negative consequences from the use of gen AI, with 44 percent of respondents saying their organizations have experienced at least one consequence (Exhibit 8). Respondents most often report inaccuracy as a risk that has affected their organizations, followed by cybersecurity and explainability.

Our previous research has found that there are several elements of governance that can help in scaling gen AI use responsibly, yet few respondents report having these risk-related practices in place. 4 “ Implementing generative AI with speed and safety ,” McKinsey Quarterly , March 13, 2024. For example, just 18 percent say their organizations have an enterprise-wide council or board with the authority to make decisions involving responsible AI governance, and only one-third say gen AI risk awareness and risk mitigation controls are required skill sets for technical talent.

Bringing gen AI capabilities to bear

The latest survey also sought to understand how, and how quickly, organizations are deploying these new gen AI tools. We have found three archetypes for implementing gen AI solutions : takers use off-the-shelf, publicly available solutions; shapers customize those tools with proprietary data and systems; and makers develop their own foundation models from scratch. 5 “ Technology’s generational moment with generative AI: A CIO and CTO guide ,” McKinsey, July 11, 2023. Across most industries, the survey results suggest that organizations are finding off-the-shelf offerings applicable to their business needs—though many are pursuing opportunities to customize models or even develop their own (Exhibit 9). About half of reported gen AI uses within respondents’ business functions are utilizing off-the-shelf, publicly available models or tools, with little or no customization. Respondents in energy and materials, technology, and media and telecommunications are more likely to report significant customization or tuning of publicly available models or developing their own proprietary models to address specific business needs.

Respondents most often report that their organizations required one to four months from the start of a project to put gen AI into production, though the time it takes varies by business function (Exhibit 10). It also depends upon the approach for acquiring those capabilities. Not surprisingly, reported uses of highly customized or proprietary models are 1.5 times more likely than off-the-shelf, publicly available models to take five months or more to implement.

Gen AI high performers are excelling despite facing challenges

Gen AI is a new technology, and organizations are still early in the journey of pursuing its opportunities and scaling it across functions. So it’s little surprise that only a small subset of respondents (46 out of 876) report that a meaningful share of their organizations’ EBIT can be attributed to their deployment of gen AI. Still, these gen AI leaders are worth examining closely. These, after all, are the early movers, who already attribute more than 10 percent of their organizations’ EBIT to their use of gen AI. Forty-two percent of these high performers say more than 20 percent of their EBIT is attributable to their use of nongenerative, analytical AI, and they span industries and regions—though most are at organizations with less than $1 billion in annual revenue. The AI-related practices at these organizations can offer guidance to those looking to create value from gen AI adoption at their own organizations.

To start, gen AI high performers are using gen AI in more business functions—an average of three functions, while others average two. They, like other organizations, are most likely to use gen AI in marketing and sales and product or service development, but they’re much more likely than others to use gen AI solutions in risk, legal, and compliance; in strategy and corporate finance; and in supply chain and inventory management. They’re more than three times as likely as others to be using gen AI in activities ranging from processing of accounting documents and risk assessment to R&D testing and pricing and promotions. While, overall, about half of reported gen AI applications within business functions are utilizing publicly available models or tools, gen AI high performers are less likely to use those off-the-shelf options than to either implement significantly customized versions of those tools or to develop their own proprietary foundation models.

What else are these high performers doing differently? For one thing, they are paying more attention to gen-AI-related risks. Perhaps because they are further along on their journeys, they are more likely than others to say their organizations have experienced every negative consequence from gen AI we asked about, from cybersecurity and personal privacy to explainability and IP infringement. Given that, they are more likely than others to report that their organizations consider those risks, as well as regulatory compliance, environmental impacts, and political stability, to be relevant to their gen AI use, and they say they take steps to mitigate more risks than others do.

Gen AI high performers are also much more likely to say their organizations follow a set of risk-related best practices (Exhibit 11). For example, they are nearly twice as likely as others to involve the legal function and embed risk reviews early on in the development of gen AI solutions—that is, to “ shift left .” They’re also much more likely than others to employ a wide range of other best practices, from strategy-related practices to those related to scaling.

In addition to experiencing the risks of gen AI adoption, high performers have encountered other challenges that can serve as warnings to others (Exhibit 12). Seventy percent say they have experienced difficulties with data, including defining processes for data governance, developing the ability to quickly integrate data into AI models, and an insufficient amount of training data, highlighting the essential role that data play in capturing value. High performers are also more likely than others to report experiencing challenges with their operating models, such as implementing agile ways of working and effective sprint performance management.

About the research

The online survey was in the field from February 22 to March 5, 2024, and garnered responses from 1,363 participants representing the full range of regions, industries, company sizes, functional specialties, and tenures. Of those respondents, 981 said their organizations had adopted AI in at least one business function, and 878 said their organizations were regularly using gen AI in at least one function. To adjust for differences in response rates, the data are weighted by the contribution of each respondent’s nation to global GDP.

Alex Singla and Alexander Sukharevsky  are global coleaders of QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey, and senior partners in McKinsey’s Chicago and London offices, respectively; Lareina Yee  is a senior partner in the Bay Area office, where Michael Chui , a McKinsey Global Institute partner, is a partner; and Bryce Hall  is an associate partner in the Washington, DC, office.

They wish to thank Kaitlin Noe, Larry Kanter, Mallika Jhamb, and Shinjini Srivastava for their contributions to this work.

This article was edited by Heather Hanselman, a senior editor in McKinsey’s Atlanta office.

Explore a career with us

Related articles.

Moving past gen AI’s honeymoon phase: Seven hard truths for CIOs to get from pilot to scale

A generative AI reset: Rewiring to turn potential into value in 2024

Implementing generative AI with speed and safety