dialectic essay intro

Home ➔ How to Write an Essay ➔ Dialectic Essay

Dialectic Essay Guide

In our ceaseless quest for knowledge, we often find ourselves engaging in profound debates and discourses. This intellectual journey invariably leads us to one of the most powerful forms of argumentative communication: the dialectic essay. Derived from the ancient art of dialectics, this form of essay writing invites the writer and reader alike to delve into an ocean of alternating perspectives, reconcile apparent contradictions, and generate fresh insights.

A dialectic essay is a form of discourse that weaves together a series of interconnected arguments and counterarguments. The purpose of this dance between contrasting points of view is not to simply win an argument but rather to engage in a rigorous process of intellectual exploration and synthesis. Writing a compelling dialectic essay requires a careful balance between respecting opposing perspectives and crafting a thoughtful, informed argument that navigates the intricate pathways between these divergent viewpoints.

Its focus on balance and synthesis sets the dialectic essay apart from other forms of argumentative writing. While other types of essays often champion a particular viewpoint, the dialectic essay embraces the complexities inherent in most intellectual pursuits. By engaging with opposing perspectives, a dialectic essay offers a rich, nuanced analysis that goes beyond surface-level arguments.

Remember, the strength of a dialectic essay lies not only in the force of your argument but also in the respect you show for alternate perspectives. It’s a delicate dance that requires careful consideration, deep intellectual curiosity, and rigorous analysis. In the following sections of this guide, we will elaborate on the structure of dialectic essays, pre-writing strategies, writing process, and revision techniques. We invite you to join me on this enlightening journey and explore the exciting world of dialectic essays.

Understanding the Structure of Dialectic Essays

A dialectic essay serves as a dialogue between two or more contradicting viewpoints, an intellectual journey that demands a meticulous understanding of its unique structure. In essence, a dialectic essay operates on the triadic structure of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis , a framework rooted in the philosophy of Hegel.

Thesis, Antithesis, and Synthesis

• Thesis: This is the starting point of your essay, the original argument, or proposition. It functions as the basis for the conversation. As such, the thesis should be formulated thoughtfully, being as explicit and direct as possible. You need to delineate your viewpoint lucidly, maintaining a level of depth that prompts intellectual engagement.
• Antithesis: This counter-argument poses a conflict with your original thesis. As an advocate of fair and unbiased discourse, you should engage with this counter-argument thoroughly, recognizing its potential validity. This is not an attempt to dismantle your initial viewpoint, but an exploration of an alternative perspective that is both valid and compelling.
• Synthesis : The last and arguably most crucial part is the synthesis. This is where the magic of the dialectic essay truly unfolds, where the threads of argument and counterargument are woven together. The synthesis takes the salient points of both thesis and antithesis and merges them to create a resolution, a new understanding that transcends the initial binary opposition.

The “thesis” in a dialectic essay and the “ thesis statement ” in other types of essays both refer to an argument or position that the writer is taking. But, while both terms refer to an argument or position, the “thesis” in a dialectic essay is part of a three-part structure of argument, counter-argument, and resolution, whereas a “thesis statement” in other essays is a standalone statement that guides the argument of the entire essay.

The Flow of Arguments in a Dialectic Essay

A dialectic essay should possess a fluid, dynamic progression of ideas. The thesis is presented first, providing a comprehensive understanding of your argument. Following this, the antithesis offers a counterpoint, bringing in contrasting ideas to engage in a constructive conversation with the thesis. The essay then culminates in the synthesis, a reconciliation that draws upon the strongest points of the thesis and antithesis to craft a harmonious resolution.

Comparisons to Other Types of Essays

It’s essential to distinguish a dialectic essay from other forms of argumentative writing. While a persuasive essay might lean heavily on one side, and an argumentative essay tends to debate two viewpoints, a dialectic essay transcends this dichotomy. It acknowledges and deeply engages with both sides of the argument before transcending the debate with a synthesis. The dialectic essay, thus, is a unique combination of analysis, critique, and synthesis.

This triadic structure forms the core of the dialectic essay, a potent framework for intellectual discourse. By mastering this structure, we can effectively navigate the complexity of dialectic essays, generating nuanced, insightful discourses that broaden our understanding of the topic.

Pre-writing Strategies for Dialectic Essays

Choosing the Right Topic

Selecting the appropriate topic is the basis for your dialectic essay. As the author, you should seek a topic that is intriguing and has substantial scope for argument and counterargument. Look for issues that elicit differing viewpoints and lend themselves to comprehensively exploring the thesis-antithesis-synthesis structure.

Conducting Thorough Research

Equipping oneself with a strong knowledge base is essential in writing a compelling dialectic essay. Rigorous research provides the raw material from which your thesis, antithesis, and synthesis will take shape.

• Importance of Credible Sources: Ensure that you consult reliable, authoritative sources . This lends credibility to your arguments and reflects the depth of your research. From academic journals to reputable online resources, cast a wide net but maintain discernment in evaluating the quality of your sources.
• Balancing Bias: It’s crucial to approach your research from a balanced standpoint. Engage with sources that support your thesis, but also actively seek out material that informs your antithesis. This unbiased approach to research will allow for a more authentic, well-rounded exploration of your topic.

Formulating the Thesis and Antithesis

With your research at hand, start distilling your thesis and antithesis. Your thesis should represent a position you can argue convincingly, using your research data to substantiate your claims. Similarly, your antithesis should provide a compelling counter to your thesis, again supported by your research.

Planning the Synthesis: Strategies for Reconciliation of Arguments

The synthesis is where your dialectic essay comes into its own. Here, you reconcile your thesis and antithesis to arrive at a more nuanced understanding. Consider how the arguments of your thesis and antithesis can come together. Are there common points? Can one argument be seen as an extension or critique of the other? Contemplating these questions during your pre-writing phase can simplify the writing process.

Remember, the key to a successful dialectic essay lies in meticulous preparation. By investing time in choosing the right topic, conducting thorough research, and carefully formulating your thesis, antithesis, and synthesis, you lay a solid foundation for your essay. This careful pre-writing process will allow your dialectic essay to truly shine.

Writing a Dialectic Essay

Writing the introduction.

The introduction serves as the gateway to your essay, drawing the reader into the intellectual journey you’re about to embark upon. Begin with a hook—an intriguing statement, a compelling question, or an interesting fact—that immediately captures the reader’s interest. Provide sufficient background information on your topic and conclude with a clear articulation of your thesis.

• Engaging Readers: Crafting an attention-grabbing hook is essential. This first impression sets the tone for your essay and should immediately engage the reader’s intellectual curiosity.
• Background Information and Thesis: Providing context helps orient your reader to the topic at hand. Following this with your clearly articulated thesis ensures your reader understands the initial standpoint from which your argument will develop.

Developing the Thesis

With your reader’s attention captured, delve into your argument. Present your thesis with conviction, providing a comprehensive understanding of your position. Support your thesis with evidence and examples drawn from your research.

• Establishing the Argument: Present your argument in a clear, direct manner. Explain your position and its reasoning, providing an in-depth understanding of your perspective.
• Supporting the Argument: Back up your argument with evidence from your research. Cite specific examples, data, or expert opinions that substantiate your claims, reinforcing the credibility of your thesis.

Developing the Antithesis

The antithesis serves as a counterpoint to your thesis, introducing an alternate perspective. Present this counter-argument as thoroughly as your thesis, highlighting its potential validity.

• Introducing Counterarguments: Present the antithesis as an alternative viewpoint that challenges your thesis. Acknowledge the merits of this perspective, showing respect for its arguments.
• Supporting the Counterarguments: Support your antithesis with research. Provide evidence and examples that strengthen this counter-perspective, further demonstrating its validity.

Creating the Synthesis

The synthesis represents the culmination of your dialectic essay, the point where thesis and antithesis come together to form a new understanding. It should highlight the commonalities between your thesis and antithesis, drawing upon their strongest points to create a harmonious resolution.

• Resolving the Conflict of Arguments: Synthesize your arguments, highlighting areas of agreement, shared insights, or common goals between your thesis and antithesis.
• Drawing Conclusions: This is your opportunity to present a more comprehensive understanding of the topic, one that acknowledges the validity of both your thesis and antithesis but also transcends them.

Writing the Conclusion

Wrap up your essay by recapping your thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. Discuss the implications of your arguments and their broader significance. End on a note that leaves a lasting impression, bringing your intellectual journey to a satisfying close.

• Recapping the Thesis, Antithesis, and Synthesis: Briefly restate your main arguments, reminding your reader of the intellectual journey they’ve taken.
• Implications and Broader Significance: Reflect on what your arguments mean for your topic and for related issues. Consider the broader significance of your synthesis, emphasizing its value to the ongoing discourse on your topic.

The journey through a dialectic essay— writing the introduction , crafting the thesis, developing the antithesis, creating the synthesis, and writing the conclusion—is a meticulous process. Each step is critical to presenting a well-structured, compelling essay. By following this guide, you are well on your way to mastering the art of dialectic essay writing.

Common Challenges in Writing Dialectic Essays and Their Solutions

Difficulty in Establishing a Clear Thesis and Antithesis

One of the most common challenges writers face when crafting a dialectic essay is formulating a clear thesis and antithesis. This issue arises when the writer lacks a thorough understanding of the topic or fails to find strong supporting evidence for both arguments.

• Deepen Your Understanding: Take the time to learn about your chosen topic deeply. The more familiar you are with the subject, the easier it will be to establish clear, confident positions for your thesis and antithesis.
• Thorough Research: Conduct exhaustive research to gather supporting evidence for your thesis and antithesis. The stronger your evidence, the more solid your arguments will be.

Challenges in Balancing or Reconciling Opposing Views

Another common challenge is striking a balance between the thesis and antithesis, and then bringing them together in a meaningful synthesis. This task becomes difficult when the writer leans too heavily toward one perspective or struggles to find common ground.

• Equally Valid Perspectives: Approach both your thesis and antithesis as equally valid perspectives. This mindset encourages a balanced exploration of both arguments.
• Finding Common Ground: Look for areas where your thesis and antithesis overlap or inform each other. These commonalities will form the basis of your synthesis and can guide your reconciliation of the two arguments.

Troubles with Organizing Thoughts and Arguments

Organizing thoughts and arguments in a logical and compelling manner is another hurdle that writers often face. This can result from a lack of clear understanding of the essay’s structure or an inability to connect ideas in a coherent manner.

• Understand the Structure: Familiarize yourself with the dialectic essay’s structure—thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. Understanding this structure can guide the organization of your arguments and thoughts.
• Logical Flow: Ensure that each argument or point flows logically into the next. Your essay should guide readers through your thought process, making the journey from thesis to antithesis to synthesis a natural progression.

Remember, writing a dialectic essay is a journey that involves understanding the topic, conducting comprehensive research, and crafting compelling arguments. While you might encounter these challenges, having strategies to overcome them can ensure that your essay is clear, engaging, and thought-provoking.

Bottom Line

The act of writing dialectic essays does more than merely fulfill an academic requirement. It sharpens critical thinking skills, encourages balanced argumentation, and enhances our ability to reconcile differing perspectives into a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter.

The process requires us to dive deep into the nuances of our chosen topic and examine it from multiple angles, thus enriching our understanding and knowledge. It enhances our research capabilities, hones our writing skills , and teaches us to construct complex, nuanced arguments with clarity and precision.

The path to mastery in writing dialectic essays is paved with continuous practice and learning. With each essay, you become more adept at identifying compelling theses and antitheses, crafting insightful syntheses, and communicating your ideas with clarity and eloquence.

Embrace each challenge as an opportunity to grow and learn. Remember that every hurdle you encounter and overcome strengthens your skills and deepens your understanding. So, continue writing, continue exploring, and continue refining your craft. The intellectual rewards are well worth the effort.

As Aristotle famously said, “We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit.” Writing dialectic essays is not merely an academic exercise but a path toward intellectual excellence. Embrace the journey, and you will reap its bountiful rewards.

Was this article helpful?

How to write a Dialectic/Dialogic Essay

So, your instructor or professor has finally assigned you a dialogic or dialectic essay, and you are wondering how to go about it. Where do you begin? How do you write one that gets you an A+ grade? What goes where? What is the structure? What steps do you take? Worry not anymore because in this comprehensive guide: you will learn how to write a dialectic essay, some topics you could choose, and many tips that will help you ace this essay.

First, you need to acknowledge that a dialogic or dialectic essay is a rare type that many people would not wish to write casually. It requires research, reasoning, and a special kind of keenness. As a result, it proves more difficult when finding important information on how to write a dialectic essay. On the other hand, this type of essay enables you (the writer) to indulge in meaningful discussions on crucial topics in their respective disciplines.

Below we will discuss the procedure of curving out a perfect dialogic essay like a pro.

Let's find out more about this special assignment.

What is dialectic, debate, or Dialogic essay?

A dialectic essay is an argumentative debate or dialogue where the writer composes a thesis statement and provides arguments and counterarguments that tests it before coming to a conclusion that supports the thesis.

When writing, the writer introduces a thesis statement in the introduction paragraph then argues the information out. After using arguments and counterarguments to prove or disagree with the thesis, then the writer gives an objective conclusion to prove the thesis.

The process of arguing out a thesis statement is divided into three principal parts: pointing out the root argument to support your thesis statement, providing a substantial, weighty counterargument, and then weighing your counterargument.

Arguing out the thesis statement requires the writer to research extensively on the topic of the day to bring out a conclusion that validates the thesis statement. The validation statement does not primarily give any position on the point of discussion. It instead points out the most viable view inside the context and attributes of the evidence in the body of your dialogic essay. A conclusion, in most instances, anchors the thesis statement.

One of our top-rated essay writers noted that a dialogic essay or dialectic essay is not the same as a critical precis that takes a single stand. Instead, you present all the arguments, even when you strongly do not agree with some of them.

In some instances, a professor might ask you to share your personal opinion in the conclusion. Still, all you always have to do when writing this assignment is to discuss all sides rationally.

My professor assigned me a dialectic essay. What's the essence?

A dialogic essay is like a conversation among several people. The first one introduces an argument, then the second person objects to it with a counterargument, sparking a debate. A third person then responds to the objection from the second person with arguments that are different from the first person. And the chain continues.

When assigned this assignment, your professor is not out on a mission to frustrate or torture you. Instead, you are given dialogic essays to assess how you've mastered the art of writing essays.

Equally, a dialectic essay tests your ability to elucidate thoughts on a given issue or subject, especially controversial debatable topics. It is a different point of view essay where you present the subject or issue from different perspectives, all of which matter. You are also assessed whether you can rationally, without bias, consider the pros and cons of a problem, and make a conclusion.

This way, writing a dialectic essay helps you discuss specific topics from different perspectives by accounting for positive and negative aspects.

In sum, writing a dialectic essay equips you with the skill to consider the positives and negatives of a thesis and explore an issue deeper.

How to write a Dialogic Essay and Score an A+

Before writing a dialogic essay, you should begin by choosing a topic. You should then brainstorm around the topic and develop ideas, in the process considering all sides of the argument. Since you must provide factual information to support your opinions/arguments, it is necessary to also research. Finally, when presenting the ideas on paper, you have to consider their audience or the people you are addressing : in most cases, the professor/instructor.

An audience is mostly several people who already know the subjects and encourage their opinion on that. The audience may agree or disagree on the point of discussion. The audience's knowledge infers that you should improve the discussions on the subject to a higher and new level.  A dialectic essay is always unbiased and gives an array of options; the unbiased opinions give a dialogic piece a philosophical flavor.

11 simple steps to write a dialectic essay

We already covered the comprehensive essay writing process , which you have to go through when writing a dialogic essay. However, in a nutshell, here is what you should do:

• Read the assignment instructions to understand what your professor wants
• Choose an appropriate topic based on the range of topics provided, or choose one for approval by your instructor. You can use a concept map when brainstorming for points and developing ideas for your outline .
• Do general research on the topic to familiarize yourself with it
• Develop your thesis statement, which is the central argument of your dialectic essay
• Conduct in-depth research on the scholarly sources that can help you develop ideas in your paper
• Organize the research so that each that supports a given viewpoint is recorded appropriately
• Create an outline for your dialectic essay based on the different perspectives and your thesis statement
• Systematically write your essay without being a perfectionist
• Make your title and reference pages
• Proofread, edit, and polish the first draft into the final dialogic essay
• Name your essay file appropriately and submit it on time

Dialectic Essay Topics

There are so many dialogic topics that you may write about daily or once in a while. However, if it is a free choice essay, it is vital to choose a passionate subject. It may be an assignment in some cases, but you should strive to provide information to the fullest. There are so many channels where you can seek such information. You can research on the internet, books, novels, magazines, or newspapers. As you do so, focus on debatable or argumentative essay topics.

You may sometimes get caught in arguing situations on topics you probably do not believe or hate. That does not mean that you should do it half-heartedly. On the contrary, your work should reflect your intellectual ability. There are many topics you can write a dialogic essay about: technology, ethics, science, sports, politics, education, or arts.

If you are having a hard time finding topics to write on, then have a look at the list below:

• Should video games be used in education systems?
• Should social media profiles be considered in the hiring process?
• Should students be taught typing in place of writing?
• Should children be encouraged to join social media platforms?
• Should there be a legal implication on hate speech witnessed on social media platforms?
• Should the state be granted access to your social media profiles?
• Are we too dependent on computers?
• Do social media influencers affect how people live?
• Can social media fame be translated to real-life success?
• Is online dating effective?
• Are cellphones dangerous?
• Should people pay to use the internet?
• Should content on the internet be censored?
• Can technology be used to manage elections?
• Are online classes better than in-person classes?
• Does the belief in God change a person?
• Does science complement religion?
• Does the level of educations affect one's moral values?
• Should abortion be legalized?
• Should developing countries be blocked on international funds?
• Should loans on struggling countries be regulated?
• Are CCTVs a breach of privacy in public places?
• Is controlling screentime for a teenager fair?
• Should people use animal-tested cosmetics and drugs?
• Should torture be accepted?
• Should the rich people help the poor?
• Is killing a rapist immoral?
• Is killing a murderer ethical?
• Do paparazzi infringe the privacy of celebrities?
• Does cloning improve one's lifespan?
• Should there be a limit on the number of children be regulated on a person?
• Do GMOs have a long time on a person?
• Does cloning animals improve breeding?
• Should COVID-19 vaccines are compelled on people?
• Does COVID-19 affect one's lifespan?
• Is cheerleading a sport?
• Is VAR effective?
• Should the Olympics be held biannually?
• Does the World Cup unite the world?
• Should alcohol and tobacco advertisements be shown in stadiums?
• Does match-fixing affect the fans?
• Should the prime minister be appointed or elected?
• Should voting be online?
• Should prisoners be allowed to vote?
• Should the voting age be raised to twenty-five years?
• Should the chief justice be a state appointee?
• Should Africa have one president like the United States of America?
• Should the campaign budgets of presidents be taxed?
• Should the presidential campaign budgets be capped?
• Should the university be free?
• Does school break benefit the students?
• Does school uniform affect student's performance and discipline?
• Should graffiti be allowed on the walls of the school?
• Should tribal, racial societies be allowed in school?
• Should programming be offered as a subject in high school?

General Dialogic essay topics

• Are teenagers capable of loving intensely?
• Does abortion have moral grounds?
• Can making tobacco production illegal stop smoking?
• Is the death penalty effective?
• Are gun laws effective in gun control?
• Is competition a good thing?
• Are boys too loving in relationships?
• Are girls mean in their friendship?
• Is buying a lottery ticket a good idea?
• Should working moms and dads have special treatment?
• Are assignments punishments to students?
• Is fashion important?
• Should staying on-campus be made mandatory for first-year students?
• Is breakfast the most important meal of the day?
• Does quitting sugar help improve health?
• Is human cloning ethical?
• Is identity theft punishable?
• Should we sleep 8 hours a day?
• Should citizenship by birth be canceled?
• Should we remove the boundaries around the world?
• Can wars be ended?
• Do we need to spend on homeland security?
• Why does government invest in security and not so much in food sustainability?
• Does success in school mean successful life?
• Should advertising to children be prohibited?
• Can social media destroy real-life communication?
• Can same-sex marriage affect the mentality of a child?

Related: Argumentative essay topics.

Dialectic/Dialogic essay structure

Writing a dialogic essay is easier than you thought, but how to fine-tune it to perfection is always hard for most writers. This essay follows the traditional structure of five well-fed paragraphs. An ideal dialectic easy is divided into three main parts: introduction, body, and conclusion.

Introduction

First of all, a dialogic essay should have an introduction. In this part of the paper, you begin by using an attention grabber to lure your readers into reading the essay. It should be a fascinating statement that makes the reader glued and hungry to go through your work. Make sure that your statement is controversial to help you note down both sides of the story.

You should also provide a short and precise definition of the essay topic through the background. This essay topic should have at least two interpretations.

However, make sure you do not give away a lot of details in this introduction part. In most cases your thesis statement can be a one-line statement at most. Two sentences are also acceptable.

The body is the most significant part of your dialogic essay. It comprises mainly three paragraphs, which require the writer to organize it point-by-point structure. The structure starts from small argument statements, provides a counterargument, and then provides contradicting information. This marvelous structure keeps your readers glued to your work as you provide detail by detailed arguments.

In the first paragraph, state your argument and support your statement with credible facts and pieces of evidence you collected from your comprehensive research. Technically, this means that without researching widely, you will not feed this category with enough flesh. Feed this paragraph with all the valuable evidence to support your thesis statement in this paragraph.

In the second paragraph, provide statements that contrast your earlier point of view: offer an objection . These statements should contradict your earlier argument and not the main theses to help your essay be debatable. Feed this section with information and pieces of evidence that support your counterargument to avoid confusing your readers.

The third paragraph of a dialectic essay is anchored on facts that criticize your previous paragraph: offer a response . You should watch out not to repeat statements from the first paragraph when responding to the second paragraph. Instead, provide new evidence that diminishes the second paragraph. This paragraph mainly states scientific or widely known shreds of evidence that object to your earlier section.

The last two paragraphs are aimed at demonstrating your understanding of the thesis.

In this last paragraph, the opening statement should reflect the core claim. Still, it should be written using different words and a different sentence structure. You may opt to rewrite your thesis statement or provide an updated view. In the first option, you are to reiterate that you have proven with all your research that your thesis statement is true or exists depending on the topic of study.

For the second alternative, bring out a new thesis statement. This thesis statement should not be completely different from your earlier statement. It is updated depending on the evidence you have put forth in your writing.

Finally, the writer shows their standing on the topic of discussion by giving a justifier anchored on the thesis statement or arguments in an objective structure.

Outline of a Dialogic/Dialectic essay

As indicated before, a dialectic essay is structured in the five-paragraph format . Let us now break it down.

I. Introduction

• An introductory statement, mostly a hook statement .
• Background information.
• The controversial thesis statement .

A. Paragraph one ( presentation of the argument)

• The minor argument that supports the thesis statement.
•  Evidence and facts supported the ideas on a thesis statement.
• Analysis and explanation of your facts and pieces of evidence.
• A closing remark that points out the correlation between the thesis statement and your arguments in paragraph one

B. Paragraph two ( Presentation of the counterargument/objection )

• An opening statement that criticizes the minor argument in the first paragraph
• Evidence and facts sustaining this paragraph's arguments.
• Explanation of your above facts and shreds of evidence.
• A concluding remark showing the correlation between the thesis statement and your second paragraphs claims

C. Paragraph three ( Response )

• An opening statement that gives a critique of your arguments in paragraph two.
• Facts and evidence that anchor the above claims.
• Insightful explanation of your facts and pieces of evidence.
• A closing remark that points out the relationship between your claims in paragraph three and your arguments in paragraph

III. Conclusion

• Restatement of the thesis statement with new words and sentence structure
• Brief remarks on the thesis statement, arguments, claims on the thesis statement, and counterargument
• Closing statements that echo the prevailing shreds of evidence of the thesis statements over the counterarguments above 

Dialectic or Dialogic Essay Tips

When assigned to write a dialectic essay assignment, here are some tips for using to ensure that you capture everything:

• Begin by reading the essay prompt carefully to understand what the assignment requires
• Choose an excellent debatable topic that interests you, unless one is already provided, or you can choose among many.
• Research online to get ideas and familiarize yourself with your topic
• Craft a thesis for your essay
• Research further and organize your sources
• Write a dialectic essay outline where you determine the structure, paragraphing and placement of ideas and counterarguments
• Think of the advantages and disadvantages of the thesis and construct your arguments and counterarguments
• Remember to use paragraph organization strategies such as the PEEL format when developing ideas in a paragraph.
• Use the right tone when writing. For example, in a dialogic or dialectic essay, you are writing a dialogue that addresses a disputable aspect of a current matter of public controversy. It entails three characters, each with their perspectives reflected in each of the three body paragraphs. You should ensure that the opinions are not only strong but also unique. You should use an objective and persuasive tone but never be offensive, condescending, or aggressive, even if you disagree with the arguments.
• In the body of your essay, make sure that the paragraphs object and respond to the previous one
• Your counterarguments should only object to arguments from the previous paragraphs and not the thesis
• Wind up your dialogic essay with a solid conclusion that supports the thesis and initial argument
• When you give reasons, ensure that they are clear, concise, and factual. Do not present any subjective or dubious claims to avoid misunderstanding between those in support and those opposed to your thesis.

Parting Shot

As we live in a multicultural world with diverse people, discussing and seeing multiple points of view enables us to consider a greater variety of problems and solutions. Doing so also helps us to evaluate cross-cultural and global issues.

A dialogic (otherwise dialectic) essay is based on a debate between two or more opposing or diverging positions of a given issue. Thus, a dialogic essay is a fair and balanced look at the differing or opposing points of view.

A dialogic essay requires you to argue two or more positions or opinions and offer a final perspective that is a compromise or a higher resolution of the previous positions. You don't even have to believe in all the opinions, whether you agree or oppose each. However, you must honestly and fairly understand and rationally discuss all the viewpoints.

Related Read: Important persuasive speech topics .

In the final compromise or the synthesis, however, you may offer your own opinion. Expressing your opinion must show that you have rationally integrated the previously presented arguments and counterarguments and provided strong evidence of convincing the particular perspective.

Structurally, it is a five-paragraph essay with an introduction, first perspective, second perspective (opposed to the first), third perspective (weighing in on the first two), and the conclusion or the synthesis.

If you find this guide useful but need someone to write a customized essay for you, you can trust our custom writing service for the best help online.

Gradecrest is a professional writing service that provides original model papers. We offer personalized services along with research materials for assistance purposes only. All the materials from our website should be used with proper references. See our Terms of Use Page for proper details.

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

How to Write an Exclusive Dialectic Essay: Assignment and Sample

Last updated: July 2019

Oh no, not again!

image source: Unsplash

Essay types are numerous, and students have to know them all, as well as understand the difference between them. What to do if a professor assigns a dialectic essay to you?

The assignment : write a dialectic essay on the topic of your choice, it should be about 2 double-spaced typed pages (600 words maximum). Follow the structure and clearly label each section of your essay.

Here goes the definition of a dialectic essay for you again:

Dialectic essay is a sort of argumentative dialogue or debate, where a writer should make a thesis and use different arguments and counterarguments to prove this thesis’ verity.

Unlike critical précis , a dialectic essay is not about taking a single stand on the issue. Here you should represent all arguments, even if you don’t agree with some of them. A professor might ask to share your opinion in conclusion, but this essay type is more about a rational discussion of all sides.

It is like a conversation among several people:

• One introduces and proves an argument.
• Another one objects it, providing a counterargument and, therefore, starting a debate.
• Finally, a third one responds to the objection with arguments, different from those in the first paragraph.

Why do they ask you to write a dialectic essay?

Nope, that’s not because your professors hate you.

By assigning dialectic essays, they want to check your ability to clarify thoughts on a particular subject. This essay type is perfect for presenting the subject from different points of view, considering its both positive and negative aspects, and making a conclusion accordingly.

Writing a dialectic essay, you learn to see all values and vices of the thesis, as well as explore the subject in depth.

What is the structure of a dialectic essay?

It reminds a standard 5-paragraph essay, which consists of an introduction, where you present your argumentative thesis , a body of three parts, and a conclusion.

How to organize a dialectic essay?

Introduction (a thesis itself)

First of all, the introduction of your dialectic essay should represent a thesis . To introduce a debate in the paper, make sure to choose a topic and thesis that have at least two interpretations.

Make your thesis controversial to have an opportunity of representing opposite views in your essay. And yet, don’t make the introduction too long. This part of your dialectic paper consists of one paragraph.

Paragraph 1 of a dialectic essay presents one argument with facts to support and prove it to the audience. It (argument) supports your thesis.

The second paragraph of a dialectic essay responds to the argument of Paragraph 1, providing the objection to it.

NB! This paragraph objects the argument, not the thesis. Give reasons why it’s not the ultimate truth, and support your objecting with proofs. In this way, you make an essay a kind of a debate between two people with opposite views.

Paragraph 3 of a dialectic essay is your response to the objecting. However, don’t refer to the same arguments you used in Paragraph 1. This part of your essay responds to the objection from Paragraph 2.

There is no need to provide new arguments for the thesis because your task here is to criticize Paragraph 2.

As a rule, the only right argument of your debate is that from Paragraph 1. The rest two serve to demonstrate your professor that you understand the thesis in depth and see its all interpretations.

The aim of a final paragraph is to support the initial thesis of your dialectic essay or represent a new one, which would combine both arguments and counterarguments.

NB! Don’t change the thesis! It may be a kind of modification supported by more proofs but not a complete reversal.

This sample of a dialectic essay will help to understand the sense of such a writing assignment better.

Three Opposing Viewpoints on Abortion by Amy Geiger

From: tc.umn.edu

Dialectic Essay Topics

Dialectic Essay Tips

First, you must recognize that dialectic writing is one of the rarest types of papers that do not occur too often. Because of this, learning how to write them well can be a big challenge because there will be little practice. This type of writing generally involves a reasoned dialog between the writer and the arguments for and against.

Here are some essential writing guidelines:

• First, you should read all the teacher’s requirements, because they can differ. In the future, this will help you to make a minimum number of mistakes.
• After that, try to choose a topic you already have experience with. Thanks to this, you can develop a writing plan and not make mistakes in facts.
• Be sure to research the topic to find out all sides and positions of the participants. You need to prove and disprove your arguments at the same time.
• Write an outline of your essay and specify everything down to the smallest detail. This will help you not to get confused in your argumentation.
• After writing, read your essay to your friends and acquaintances. This will help you find weaknesses and correct them.

In general, you need to pay the most attention to your sources of information. Ensure that all the cited studies are written correctly and do not contradict each other.

So, now what?

Once your professor assigns a dialectic essay, follow this checklist to make sure you don’t miss anything:

• Choose a debatable topic (except as noted).
• Come up with a thesis and represent it in the introduction of your dialectic essay.
• Think about all the possible pros and cons of the thesis.
• Organize all ideas to determine both arguments and counterarguments.
• Write three paragraphs of your essay, with each objecting and responding to a previous one.
• Make sure that your counterarguments don’t object the thesis but arguments from previous paragraphs of a dialectic essay.
• Finish your dialectic essay with a conclusion that would support the thesis and initial argument.
• Proofread and edit your essay .

Related posts

• Harvard Referencing Style: A Comprehensive Guide
• Tone in Writing: Types and Examples
• How to Write a Problem Statement for a Research Paper

Our Writing Guides

• Customer Reviews
• Extended Essays
• IB Internal Assessment
• Theory of Knowledge
• Literature Review
• Dissertations
• Essay Writing
• Research Writing
• Assignment Help
• Capstone Projects
• College Application
• Online Class

Dialectic Essay: What It Is, Format, And How to Write It

by  Antony W

June 26, 2024

This is the complete guide on how to write a dialectic essay, step-by-step. We’ll look at what it is, what makes it unique, the right structure to use, and even give you tips you can use to write a comprehensive essay that scores high grades. In short, if you’re looking for a complete guide on a dialectic essay, you’ve come to the right place.

What is a Dialectic Essay?

A dialectic essay is an argumentative debate in which a writer introduces a thesis statement and then uses both arguments and counterarguments to prove their claim.

You can base the discussion on a topic of your choosing, provided your instructor doesn’t give you one in the brief. Your document should be double-spaced, and the length of the essay should be 600 words maximum.

This type of essay is different from an argumentative essay in that instead of taking a position on an issue, you look at both arguments and present them to your audience, even if you don’t agree with those positions. Of course, your instructor might ask you to share your thoughts in the conclusion section of the essay. However, the core principle is that you have to establish a rational discussion of all sides.

The aim of a dialectic essay is to teach students the essence of participation in meaningful discourse on general and controversial topics in various disciplines. In other words, your instructor wants you to write this type of essay because they want to test your ability to clarify thoughts on a given subject. 

Dialectic Essay Format

The first most important point in writing a dialectic essay is to make sure you understand the format. Your instructor will obviously look at the outline first to see if you’ve structured your essay the right way.

This assignment is no any different from a 5-pargarph essay as far as the outline is concerned. It needs to have an introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion.

Check out the image below for structural clarity:

As you can see, the organization is very clear and easy to follow, so writing this essay should be easy.

How to Write a Dialectic Essay

Now that you have a clear structure of the dialectic essay, it’s time to look at what or how you should write the introduction, body, and conclusion section.

Introduction

In a dialectic essay, your introduction has to be the thesis itself. This is the central message that you wish to discuss and pass across.

Remember, the essay looks at both side of an issue regardless of what you consider to be the most suitable position to hold. As such, you should choose a topic and therefore write a thesis that has more than one interpretation.

We suggest that you introduce some form of controversy in the introduction. Doing so gives you the opportunity to examine and represent the opposing point of views in the essay with ease. Remember also that this section is only one paragraph, so it’s best to make it as precise as possible – and short.

Body Paragraphs

There are three paragraphs in the body section of a dialectic essay. The first focuses on an argument, the second describes an objection, and the third gives a response. Let’s look at these even further to give you more clarity.

1. The Argument

There can only be one argument in a dialectic essay. Also, you have to present it with facts. The introduction of the argument accompanied by factual evidence makes it easy for you to support and prove your thesis to your audience. 

2. The Objection

It’s in this paragraph that you respond to the argument you presented on the first paragraph. To make this a dialectic essay, you do have to object the argument, in which case you give sufficient, objective reasons why your argument cannot be the ultimate truth.

It doesn’t end there.

You need to have enough proof to support the objection against your own argument. Doing so turns your essay into a strong debate, as there are already two opposing views here.

3. The Response

It’s in this section that you give a response to the objection in the second paragraph of the body section. You should not introduce a new argument for the thesis in this section, or anywhere else for that matter, as doing so can confuse your reader.  Remember, your aim is to criticize what you’ve already written in the objection section.

Ultimately, the agenda is to show your instructor or professor that you understand your thesis to a great depth and can present all the interpretations the right way.

Ending a dialectic essay isn’t difficult. You just need to know what to include in the section and what to leave out. Here, you support your thesis, although some guides suggest that you can even represent a new one provided you combine it with the argument and counterargument discussed in the essay.

To be clear, it’s completely wrong to change the thesis of this assignment, and can as easily lead to failing to score the grades that you deserve. Some writers choose to modify the thesis a little, in which case it’s never a complete reversal that’s not supported by proof.

Final Thoughts

As you can see, writing a dialectic essay isn’t difficult. From what we’ve looked at, this should be by far the shortest essay you’ll ever write, and there are often no instructions that suggest that you can make the essay longer.

It’s best to think about the strengths and weaknesses of your thesis before you begin to write. This will help you to organize your ideas in a way that gives your essay a good flow from the introduction all the way to the conclusion.

Another important step to complete is to check for plagiarism . Professors don’t appreciate sitting through hours of reading only to learn that students have submitted unoriginal work. Don’t be the student that submits copied assignment late as this could cost you heavily.

About the author 

Antony W is a professional writer and coach at Help for Assessment. He spends countless hours every day researching and writing great content filled with expert advice on how to write engaging essays, research papers, and assignments.

Dialectic Essay: Student Guidelines for A+ Paper

• Icon Calendar 19 August 2024
• Icon Page 3348 words
• Icon Clock 16 min read

Dialectic essays enable students to participate in meaningful discourse on controversial topics in their respective disciplines. Basically, this writing manual discusses a procedure for creating an excellent dialectic essay. Moreover, guidelines commence with an exhaustive definition of a dialectic essay and highlight its distinct characteristics and format. After a detailed introduction to dialectic essay writing, a presented manual provides sample topics and explains their distinguishable traits. Further on, basic steps of how to write a dialectic essay expound on its structure. In turn, a given manual concludes with an outline, template, and dialectic essay example with key recommendations on what people can include in their papers and what they must avoid in writing.

General Aspects

A dialectic essay is a type of essay that requires authors to test a thesis statement exhaustively and reach an objective conclusion. Basically, an entire process of testing a thesis statement has three main stages: identification of a core argument supporting a thesis statement, provision of a viable counterargument, and an evaluation of a counterargument. As a result, authors conduct a comprehensive exploration of a topic of interest to yield a conclusion they validate and write about. A testing process does not necessarily provide a correct position on a debatable topic. Instead, it identifies the most reasonable view within a particular context of the evidence and arguments that are present in a paper’s body. In most cases, a conclusion of a whole discourse supports a dialectic essay’s thesis statement.

What Is a Dialectic Essay and Its Purpose

According to its definition, a dialectic essay is a type and form of argumentative writing that explores a topic from multiple perspectives, seeking to find a synthesis or resolution between them. For example, rooted in the ancient Greek tradition of dialectics, this argumentative style encourages critical thinking and intellectual exploration (McComiskey, 2015). In writing, a paper typically begins with a thesis statement, which is a person’s initial argument or stance on a specific topic. Further on, this claim is followed by an antithesis statement, where an opposing viewpoint is presented, challenging an original argument (Babin et al., 2020). Finally, such a composition concludes with a synthesis, which reconciles conflicting arguments, often proposing a new understanding or a more complex position. As such, the main purpose of writing a dialectic essay is to engage readers in a balanced discussion and allow them to see an entire complexity of a chosen issue rather than a one-sided perspective (Martinich, 2024). By balancing and integrating different viewpoints, a dialectic essay helps to develop a more thoughtful and informed conclusion. In terms of pages and words, the length of a dialectic essay depends on academic levels, specific course requirements, and topic complexities, while general writing guidelines are:

High School

• Length: 1-2 pages
• Word Count: 250-500 words
• Comment: A central focus is often on developing critical thinking and understanding different perspectives.

College (Undergraduate)

• Length: 2-4 pages
• Word Count: 500-1,000 words
• Comment: Students are expected to demonstrate deeper analysis and more complex arguments.

University (Advanced Undergraduate/Graduate)

• Length: 3-6 pages
• Word Count: 750-1,500 words
• Comment: Essays at this level require more thorough research, nuanced analysis, and integration of multiple perspectives for writing.

Master’s

• Length: 4-8 pages
• Word Count: 1,000-2,000 words
• Comment: These compositions involve advanced argumentation, comprehensive research, and in-depth synthesis of opposing views.
• Length: 6-12 pages (or more, depending on a topic’s complexity)
• Word Count: 1,500-3,000+ words
• Comment: Ph.D.-level essays or papers are highly specialized, involving significant original research and detailed, sophisticated arguments to write about.

A critique of both a main argument and a counterargument is a distinct characteristic of a dialectic essay. For example, a standard essay simply presents minor arguments in body paragraphs that support a central claim a person provides in a thesis statement (Babin et al., 2020). However, a dialectic essay goes beyond a simple writing presentation of minor arguments. Firstly, a dialectic essay discusses counterarguments to minor arguments to establish main opposing views. Secondly, such a paper evaluates an overall validity and relative weight of a counterargument in a discussion.

Note: Some writing sections of a dialectic essay can be added, deleted, or combined with each other, depending on specific requirements of assignments and institutions. For example, a standard dialectic essay format involves presenting a thesis, followed by an antithesis that challenges a main claim, and concluding with a synthesis that reconciles the two opposing views (Martinich, 2024). Basically, an example of a dialectical argument is debating whether technology enhances human communication (thesis) or hinders it by reducing face-to-face interactions (antithesis) and then synthesizing a main argument by acknowledging that technology can both enhance and detract from communication, depending on its use. In turn, a dialectic method of writing involves exploring a debatable topic by presenting opposing viewpoints (thesis and antithesis) and then reconciling them through synthesis to reach a balanced conclusion (Ahlqvist, 2022). Finally, to start a dialectic essay, people begin by introducing a controversial topic, providing relevant background information, and clearly stating their thesis, which presents their initial position on a chosen issue.

Engineering and Technology:

• Impacts of Social Media on Society: Progress or Peril?
• Space Exploration: Necessity or Extravagance?
• An Impact of Social Media on Relationship Formation
• Quality of Education in a Technological Age
• A Principal Role of Artificial Intelligence in Human Creativity: Enhancement or Replacement?
• Digital Privacy in a Modern World: Individual Rights Versus National Security

Medicine and Health:

• Examination of Mental Health Disparities Within the LGBTQ+ Community
• Mandatory Vaccinations: A Public Health Necessity or Personal Liberty Infringement?
• A Cause of a Painkiller ‘Pandemic’
• Modern-Day Suicide: Do Not Resuscitate Order
• Genetic Engineering in Humans: Ethical Advancements or Dangerous Precedents?
• An Overall Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Versus Punishment in Criminal Justice Systems

Political Science:

• Universal Basic Income: A Solution or a Trap?
• The Influence of Climate Change on Global Politics
• Effects of Stringent Immigration Law
• A Dominant Political Ideology in America
• Balancing Freedom of Speech and Social Responsibility in a Current Age of Social Media
• A Possible Impact of Universal Basic Income on Work Motivation and Economic Growth
• Climate Change Predictions: Alarmist Propaganda or Scientific Reality?
• Cultural Factors Influencing Eating Disorders
• Welcoming Transgenderism Into Society
• Children’s Experience in Dual-Career Families
• Cultural Appropriation Versus Cultural Appreciation: Navigating a Fine Line
• A New Future of Education: Traditional Classrooms Versus Online Learning Platforms

Psychology:

• Roles of Parental Attachment in Child Development
• Importance of Dream Analysis in Understanding Subconscious Thoughts
• Parental Pressure and Body Image in Teens
• Trading Drug Addictions and Non-Drug Addictions
• A Direct Influence of Consumerism on Environmental Sustainability: A Necessary Evil?
• Globalization’s Influence on Cultural Identity: Homogenization or Enrichment?

Identifying a Dialectic Essay Topic

Students can readily recognize a dialectic essay topic because of its controversial nature. At first sight, learners may categorize a topic as a dialectic essay topic if they realize there are no less than two reasonable perspectives that they can use to create a convincing argument to write about (Martinich, 2024). Upon close examination of an existing body of knowledge on a chosen topic, a student can ascertain that a theme is a dialectic essay topic if he or she finds viable rebuttals to counterarguments, which offer more clarity on contested issues and lead to a logical conclusion in writing.

Steps on How to Write a Dialectic Essay

To write a dialectic essay, people present a thesis, introduce a counterargument, and then reconcile both views in a synthesis that leads to a well-reasoned conclusion. In turn, basic steps include:

• Choose a Topic: Select a controversial topic that has clear opposing viewpoints for a balanced exploration and writing.
• Conduct Research: Gather information and evidence to understand both sides of arguments.
• Develop a Thesis: Formulate your main argument or position on a chosen topic.
• Outline an Essay: Plan a structure of your dialectic paper, including an introduction, thesis, antithesis, synthesis, and conclusion.
• Write an Introduction: Introduce an assigned topic, provide background, and state your thesis clearly.
• Present a Thesis: Elaborate on your thesis with supporting evidence, examples, and reasoning.
• Introduce an Antithesis: Present a counterargument, providing evidence and discussing its strengths and weaknesses.
• Craft a Synthesis: Reconcile a thesis and an antithesis by finding common ground or integrating both viewpoints into a new understanding.
• Write a Conclusion: Summarize key points, restate a synthesized argument, and reflect on broader implications.
• Revise and Edit: Review your dialectic essay for clarity, coherence, and logical flow, making any necessary writing revisions.

Introduction

An introductory paragraph consists of a hook, adequate background information, and a thesis statement. Basically, a primary role of a hook in an opening paragraph is to capture an attention of a reader and trigger interest to read an entire dialectic essay (Babin et al., 2020). Then, a background information element lays a groundwork for authors to announce a central claim of a dialectic paper. In writing, a strong thesis statement for a dialectic essay should be debatable (Cole, 2020). Notably, a standard writing length of an introduction varies with a paper’s word count because a good opening paragraph does not take up more than 10% of a dialectic essay. In turn, some examples of sentence starters for beginning a dialectic essay are:

• In today’s complex world, a hot debate surrounding [topic] has sparked considerable discussion among scholars and the public alike.
• A current issue of [topic] presents a challenging dilemma, as it involves multiple perspectives that often conflict with one another.
• As society continues to evolve, a key question of [topic] remains a contentious and deeply divisive one.
• Exploring a popular topic of [topic] reveals a fascinating clash of ideas, where both sides offer compelling arguments.
• An ongoing debate over [topic] raises important questions about [related concept], making it a subject worthy of critical examination.
• At the heart of a current discussion on [topic] lies a fundamental tension between [viewpoint A] and [viewpoint B].
• A controversy surrounding [topic] highlights a real complexity of balancing [related issues or values].
• Understanding a complex nature of [topic] requires a careful analysis of both its proponents and opponents.
• In considering various arguments for and against [topic], it becomes clear that a presented issue is far from straightforward.
• A crucial debate on [topic] forces people to examine [related concept], where differing perspectives must be reconciled.

Organization

A complexity of a dialectic essay requires students to use a point-by-point organization structure. Basically, this organizational style necessitates a clustering of paragraphs that contain a minor argument, counterargument, and critique of a counterargument under a shared heading to ensure readers distinguish between independent instances of dialectics (Martinich, 2024). In turn, this writing arrangement prevents an intended audience from losing track of a logical link that exists between three paragraphs that form a dialectic instance. Moreover, to construct a Hegelian dialectic, people start with a central thesis, introduce its opposite side (antithesis), and then reconcile two stances through a synthesis that resolves their conflict into a higher understanding. For example, Hegel’s triadic stance follows a logic structure of ‘yes, not, and not not’ to address all the challenges and topics that formalizing dialectics faces (Ficara & Priest, 2023). In writing, a whole arrangement of clusters has an impact on an overall efficacy of a dialectic essay.

Paragraph Structure

All body paragraphs must adhere to a ‘sandwich’ rule. Basically, this writing rule defines a fixed arrangement of components of a paragraph. For example, a topic sentence is a first element of a body paragraph, and it contains a minor argument people discuss within a paragraph (Babin et al., 2020). After a topic sentence, they introduce a specific piece of evidence, which supports a minor argument. Then, learners provide an interpretation of the evidence and point out an actual significance of the evidence to a minor argument. Lastly, they write a concluding sentence that links a minor argument, evidence, interpretation, cluster theme, and thesis statement.

An opening sentence of a conclusion paragraph should be an iteration of a central claim, but students must use different words and sentence structures. For example, learners must write a concise summary of an argument that supports the thesis statement, counterargument, and argument that criticizes this counterargument (Babin et al., 2020). Finally, they reveal a ‘true’ position on a controversial topic by providing a justification that reflects on an argument, counterargument, and critique in an objective writing manner.

Outline and Template

Topic: Unique Title

I. Introduction

A. Hook. B. Background information. C. A debatable thesis statement.

A. First paragraph

• A minor argument that supports a thesis statement.
• Evidence supporting this paragraph’s claim.
• Interpretation and analysis of the evidence.
• A concluding statement that shows a direct relationship between a first paragraph’s claim and a thesis statement.

B. Second body paragraph

• A counterargument to a minor argument of a first paragraph.
• A concluding statement that shows a direct relationship between a second paragraph’s counterargument and a thesis statement.

C. Third body paragraph

• An idea that provides a critique of a counterargument.
• A concluding statement that shows a direct relationship between a third paragraph’s claim and a counterargument of a second paragraph.

III. Conclusion

A. Restatement of a thesis statement. B. Summary of a main supporting argument, counterargument, and critique of this counterargument. C. Closing remarks emphasizing a particular dominance of a central claim over a counterargument.

Dialectic Essay Example

Topic: Divorce and Its Effects on the Family

Marriages in the 21 st century are disintegrating at an early stage. Basically, children are bystanders in divorce, but the breaking of the family affects them to a large extent. In turn, divorce improves the quality of parenting and sustains a healthy home environment.

Body Paragraphs

Main Argument

There is no significant difference in the children’s level of happiness. According to the American Family Organization (2020), the disparity in the happiness index of children from a nuclear family and children of divorced parents is decreasing steadily, with an all-time low of 0.001 in the 2019 national family survey. Moreover, the children of divorced families feel loved and safe despite living in a home with only one parent at a time. Hence, divorce is not a determining factor in creating an ideal home environment.

Counterargument

Divorce affects the ability of parents to play their roles in childrearing effectively. For example, Jones (2020) found that the probability of divorced parents to fulfill traditional parenting roles is 0.65. Based on this finding, it is apparent that divorced parents cannot engage in effective parenting at all times when compared to the parents in a traditional nuclear family setup. Accordingly, divorce places additional strain on parenting and the home environment.

Critique of a Counterargument

The maintenance of a broken marriage shows no inherent value to parenting. For instance, Potter’s (2020) study provides evidence that resentment build-up in unhappy marriages and the transference of these feelings to children impairs parenting. Moreover, resentment hurts both parents and children. In turn, the opportunity cost associated with the protection of the nuclear family structure is too high.

The nuclear family structure cannot survive the stress caused by unhappy partners. Moreover, there is no need for parents to force a marriage if the marriage is unsalvageable. Thus, divorce is the right choice because it offers the most protection for the children’s interests.

What to Include

Common Mistakes

• Ignoring a Counterargument: Failing to address an opposing viewpoint in writing weakens an overall dialectic essay’s credibility and balance.
• Presenting a Biased Argument: Overemphasizing one side without fair consideration of the other undermines a dialectical approach.
• Weak Thesis Statement: Writing an unclear or overly broad thesis can make it difficult to develop a focused and coherent argument.
• Insufficient Evidence: Relying on opinions rather than solid evidence weakens both a thesis and an antithesis.
• Overcomplicating a Synthesis: Making a synthesis too complex or vague can confuse readers and dilute a paper’s conclusion.
• Neglecting Logical Flow: Poor organization of ideas can disrupt a dialectic essay’s writing structure, making it hard for readers to follow a main argument.
• Overlooking Revisions: Skipping a revision process leaves behind errors in reasoning, writing, grammar, or clarity.
• Failing to Engage a Reader: An overly technical introduction can fail to capture a reader’s interest from the start.
• Overloading With Information: Including too much information without clear relevance can overwhelm readers and obscure main points.
• Ignoring Formatting and Citation Guidelines: Incorrect formatting or lack of proper citations can lead to academic penalties and reduce a dialectic essay’s professionalism and writing.

A dialectic essay involves writing a thesis, antithesis, and synthesis, allowing for a comprehensive examination of a controversial topic. In writing, a dialectic essay structure begins with an introduction that includes a central thesis statement, followed by body paragraphs organized around a minor argument, counterargument, and critique. Further on, writing a concluding paragraph reiterates a thesis, summarizes key points, and presents a reasoned conclusion. As a result, this type of composition promotes critical thinking by evaluating different perspectives and integrating them into a coherent argument, with examples and outlines provided to guide a writing process. Hence, key takeaways to remember are:

• Students should select a topic that is debatable to create a persuasive dialectic essay.
• Authors must locate evidence from reliable sources and offer appropriate documentation.
• Proper organization of a dialectic essay is critical to an overall clarity of such a paper and its writing.

Ahlqvist, T. (2022). An outline of future-oriented dialectics: Conceptualising dialectical positions, trajectories and processes in the context of futures research. Futures , 143 , 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103037

Babin, M., Burnell, C., Pesznecker, S. M., Rosevear, N., & Wood, J. R. (2020). The word on college reading and writing . Open Oregon Educational Resources.

Cole, A. (2020). The dialectic of space. South Atlantic Quarterly , 119 (4), 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-8663723

Ficara, E., & Priest, G. (2023). Introduction: The formalization of dialectics. History and Philosophy of Logic , 44 (2), 115–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2023.2182598

Martinich, A. P. (2024). Philosophical writing: An introduction (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

McComiskey, B. (2015). Dialectical rhetoric . University Press of Colorado.

To Learn More, Read Relevant Articles

576 Good Compare and Contrast Essay Topics

• Icon Calendar 14 September 2020
• Icon Page 6854 words

Main 5 Parts of an Essay: Easy Guidelines for Writers

• Icon Calendar 12 September 2020
• Icon Page 2872 words

ESSAY SAUCE

FOR STUDENTS : ALL THE INGREDIENTS OF A GOOD ESSAY

Guide: How to write a Dialectic essay

Guide details:.

• Subject area(s): Types of essay
• Reading time: 4 minutes
• Price: Free download
• Published: 25 July 2024*
• Last Modified: 31 July 2024
• File format: Text
• Words: 1,193 (approx)
• Number of pages: 5 (approx)
• Tags: Guides

Text preview of this guide:

This page of the guide has 1,193 words.

The dialectic essay is typically used in philosophy to explore the whole range of perspectives about a philosophical stance. Students often tend to endorse one opinion without being able to see the merits of the opposition’s point of view. For example, if the student is against abortion, they may be unable to understand why the opposition feels that the right to choose is important. The dialectic essay forces the student to consider the opposing side’s opinion. Elements of the dialectic essay are also used in the basic argumentative essay because the structure allows the writer to refute the opposition’s argument.

Tone and Audience

The audience of the essay consists of people who have an opinion about the philosophical issue. Some of the audience may agree with the writer’s thesis, whereas others may espouse the opposing viewpoint. Because the audience has a mix of opinions, the writer should strive for a fair and balanced tone that does not use emotional appeals or inflammatory language. Maintaining an objective and respectful tone ensures that the essay appeals to a broad audience and encourages thoughtful consideration of the arguments presented.

Basic Structure

The basic structure of the dialectic essay has three main parts:

• The Thesis: In the first portion, the writer presents their opinion and supports it with sources and examples. This section sets the stage for the discussion and lays out the writer’s initial stance.
• The Antithesis: After the writer has made their case, they present the opposition’s argument. This section requires the writer to step into the shoes of their opponents and present their arguments as convincingly as possible.
• The Synthesis: Finally, the writer either refutes the opposition’s argument, accepts part of the opposition’s argument and refutes part of it, or abandons their original argument in favor of the opposition’s argument. This nuanced conclusion helps the writer synthesize the arguments and reach a balanced perspective.

This structure is similar to that of a traditional argumentative essay , but with some major differences. The argumentative essay also includes the opposing side’s opinion, but the intent of including their viewpoint is to strengthen the original argument by knocking holes in the opposition’s position. The writer of an argumentative essay never ends the essay having changed their opinion, as they can in a dialectic essay. This openness to changing one’s mind is a hallmark of the dialectic essay and reflects a deeper engagement with the philosophical debate.

Introduction and Thesis

The introduction of the dialectic essay provides background for the philosophical argument. It may or may not use outside sources. The thesis of the essay states a position that the author endorses, such as “Abortion should be illegal.” The introduction should set the context for the debate, briefly explaining why the issue is significant and outlining the main points that will be discussed. For example, the introduction might mention the ethical, legal, and social dimensions of the abortion debate, setting up the detailed exploration that will follow.

Supporting Paragraphs

The supporting paragraphs present evidence for the writer’s argument. Like the introduction, the assignment may ask the student to use outside support, or it may ask the student to use hypothetical examples to support the point. Each paragraph should focus on a specific aspect of the argument, providing detailed reasoning and evidence. For instance, in the abortion essay, one paragraph might discuss the moral implications of abortion, using philosophical theories such as Kantian ethics or utilitarianism to support the writer’s stance. Another paragraph might present legal arguments, referencing court cases and legal precedents.

Presenting The Opposition’s Argument

After the writer’s complete argument and the supporting evidence are presented, the writer presents the opposition’s objections to the argument. The author must present this argument in a fair and balanced manner, striving to avoid emotional language. This section should be as robust as the supporting paragraphs, demonstrating that the writer understands and respects the opposing viewpoint. For example, the writer might discuss the arguments for the right to choose, including bodily autonomy and women’s rights, citing relevant philosophical and legal sources. Presenting these arguments thoroughly shows that the writer has engaged deeply with the topic and considered multiple perspectives.

In the conclusion, the writer decides which opinion is valid, or if a mixture of both is valid. If the writer continues to avoid their original opinion, they should present evidence that supports their position, even in light of the opposition’s argument. If the author accepts the opposition’s argument, they must explain why their opinion was changed. If they move to an undecided position or accept parts of each argument, the author must also explain that position.

For instance, in the abortion essay, the writer might conclude by affirming their original stance against abortion but acknowledging the importance of women’s rights and suggesting potential compromises, such as stricter regulations rather than an outright ban. Alternatively, the writer might decide that the right to choose is more compelling and explain how the process of writing the essay led to this change in perspective.

Practical Examples

To further illustrate the dialectic essay, let’s consider a few practical examples:

• Capital Punishment: Suppose the thesis is “Capital punishment should be abolished.” The supporting paragraphs might discuss the ethical implications, such as the potential for executing innocent people and the moral arguments against taking a life. The opposition’s argument might present the idea that capital punishment deters crime and provides justice for victims. The conclusion might synthesize these views, perhaps suggesting reforms to the justice system to prevent wrongful executions while maintaining some form of capital punishment for the most heinous crimes.
• Climate Change Policies: If the thesis is “Government regulations are essential to combat climate change,” the supporting paragraphs could provide evidence of environmental damage and the effectiveness of regulations in reducing emissions. The opposition’s argument might focus on the economic impact of such regulations and the potential for innovation in the private sector to address climate change. The conclusion might acknowledge the economic concerns but argue that the urgency of climate change necessitates government intervention, proposing a balanced approach that includes both regulations and incentives for private innovation.
• Universal Basic Income (UBI): For a thesis like “Universal Basic Income should be implemented,” the supporting paragraphs might highlight the benefits of UBI, such as reducing poverty and providing financial stability. The opposition’s argument could address concerns about the cost of UBI and its potential to discourage work. The conclusion might explore a middle ground, such as pilot programs to test the feasibility of UBI and adjustments based on the outcomes.

The dialectic essay is a powerful tool for exploring philosophical issues in depth. By considering both sides of an argument and being open to changing one’s perspective, writers can develop a more nuanced understanding of complex issues. The structure of the dialectic essay, with its emphasis on presenting and refuting opposing arguments, encourages critical thinking and intellectual honesty. By carefully planning, presenting balanced arguments, and thoughtfully concluding, writers can create compelling dialectic essays that contribute meaningfully to philosophical discourse.

Discover more:

Recommended for you.

• Distinguish fact from opinion
• How to write a persuasive essay
• How to write a 5 paragraph essay

About this guide:

This is a free guide to help you with your studies.

Essay Categories:

• Accounting essays
• Architecture essays
• Business essays
• Computer science essays
• Criminology essays
• Economics essays
• Education essays
• Engineering essays
• English language essays
• Environmental studies essays
• Essay examples
• Finance essays
• Geography essays
• Health essays
• History essays
• Hospitality and tourism essays
• Human rights essays
• Information technology essays
• International relations
• Leadership essays
• Linguistics essays
• Literature essays
• Management essays
• Marketing essays
• Mathematics essays
• Media essays
• Medicine essays
• Military essays
• Miscellaneous essays
• Music Essays
• Nursing essays
• Philosophy essays
• Photography and arts essays
• Politics essays
• Project management essays
• Psychology essays
• Religious studies and theology essays
• Sample essays
• Science essays
• Social work essays
• Sociology essays
• Sports essays
• Types of essay
• Zoology essays

How To Write An Outstanding Dialectic Essay

Publication Date: 22 Apr 2019

A dialectic essay is a peculiar type of academic writing. Students of many disciplines aren’t required to write such paper simply because a dialectic essay is written in a polemic style. Indeed, not much can be argued upon in mathematics or physics while such disciplines as philosophy, sociology or politics do require a student to explore various subjects in a dialectic manner.

If you received such assignment as composing a dialectic essay and you’re not sure how to do it, you can find examples of good papers online or at the library and try writing an essay yourself. In case you don’t know whether the examples that you stumbled upon are quality ones, you can use professional essay writing service so that an expert writer could craft a paper for you and you could learn how it has to be done.

This article will show the basic peculiarities of composing such challenging paper as a dialectic essay so that you could craft a decent piece of writing and receive approval from your mentor.

A dialectic essay definition

A dialectic essay is a type of paper where you need to make a thesis and provide arguments and counter-arguments to test the main point and come up with a corresponding conclusion, usually the one, which supports the main thesis.

The purpose of a dialectic essay

The main idea behind writing a dialectic essay is to develop analytical skills in students and check how they can synthesize the information. When the subject is presented from different sides, it is important to find verity in both positive and negative aspects and come up with your own conclusion based on your exploration of the issue.

The structure of a dialectic essay

A traditional five- paragraph structure is the most suited for a dialectic essay. That is, the text should consist of an introduction, a three-paragraph body and a concluding section.

• Introduction

This part needs to be short and concise with a definition of the essay topic and the introduction of the thesis statement . Don’t give away too many details of a further discussion but try to catch reader’s attention so that he wants to read further and is eager to reveal the conclusion that you will come up with at the end of your essay.

• The body of an essay

Obviously, this part of the paper is the largest and it typically may consist of three paragraphs. Now you get a chance to elaborate on the subject and present all arguments that you gathered as a result of your research.

In the first paragraph, you need to state your argument and provide the reasons and pieces of evidence, which you gathered while researching various media such as articles, videos, websites, and so on. Whatever valid facts for the support of the thesis you’ve found, present them in this paragraph.

The second section needs to be dedicated to the counter-argument. The objection should refer to the point of view presented in the previous paragraph and not to the main thesis that needs to be viewed only as debatable.

The third paragraph is aimed at expressing your response to the objection in the previous paragraph. Be careful not to repeat yourself with the arguments, which you’ve already listed in the first body paragraph. What you need to do is to criticize the counter-argument of the second section.

In the concluding paragraph, you can either restate your initial thesis statement or present an updated thesis.

In the first case, you will be able to reiterate the initial idea with more certainty since you’ve already proven in the above analysis that the thesis in question is now verified.

In the second case, you can provide a new thesis, which should not be completely contradictory to your initial statement. It needs to be slightly updated as a result of the discussion presented in the essay.

Tips to consider when writing a dialectic essay

• The topic of your essay should be debatable enough for you to come up with a valid argument and a similarly viable objection.
• Keep in mind your audience and use the correct tone. The nature of a dialectic essay implies controversy so your tone needs to be persuasive and objective but never aggressive, offensive or condescending no matter whether you agree with one of the arguments or are completely against it.
• Whatever reasons you give, they need to be factual and clear. Steer away from presenting any dubious and subjective claims so that you could avoid any misunderstandings between those who support the thesis statement and those who object it.

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

7 Dialectic Note-taking

A dialectical approach to taking notes sounds much more complicated than it is. A dialectic is a dialogue, a discussion between two (or more) voices trying to figure something out. Whenever we read new or challenging material, it can be helpful to take dialectic notes to create clear spaces for organizing these different sets of thoughts—put yourself in a conversation with the text through your notes.

Creating Dialectic Notes

Start by drawing a vertical line down the middle of a fresh sheet of paper to make two long columns.

The Left Column

This column will be a straightforward representation of the main ideas in the text you are reading (or viewing). In it, you will note things like:

• What are the author’s main points in this section?
• What kind of support is the author using in this section?
• Other points of significant interest
• Note the source and page number, if any, so that you can find and document this source later

You can   directly quote these points, but if you do, you must use quotation marks immediately, so you don’t “forget” that you took the exact words from the text. If you  paraphrase , do not use quotation marks. Be consistent so that you don’t make more work for yourself when you start writing your draft. For more guidance with writing summaries , paraphrasing , and quoting , follow these links.

The Right Column

The right column is for your ideas—the questions and connections you make as you encounter the author’s ideas. This might include:

• Questions you want to ask in class
• Bigger-picture questions you might explore further in writing
• Connections to other texts you’ve read or viewed for this class
• Connections to your own personal experiences
• Connections to the world around you (issues in your community, stories on the news, or texts you’ve read or viewed outside of this class)

Bottom of the Page

It is often a good idea to leave space at the bottom of the page (or on the back) for

• additional notes about this piece
• what your instructor teaches about it
• comments and questions your peers make during class discussion

Once you’ve finished the text and have taken your dialectic notes while reading it, you might have something that looks a bit like this (for the sake of the example, I read a story I’d never read before from an author I’m familiar with, so you could see genuine reactions to a first read):

Once you have this set of dialectic notes, there are a number of ways you can use them. Here are a few:

• They can help you contribute to class discussion about this piece and the topics it addresses.
• Significant questions you encountered while reading are already written down and collected in one place so you don’t have to sift back through the reading to re-discover those questions.
• These notes provide a place where many of your observations and thoughts about the piece are already organized, which can help you see patterns and connections within those observations. Finding these connections can be a strong starting point for written assignments.
• If you are asked to respond to this piece in writing, these notes can serve as a reference point as you develop a draft. They can give you new ideas if you get stuck and help keep the original connections you saw when reading fresh in your mind as you respond more formally to that reading.
• They can be part of your Gathering Ideas step in the Writing Process.

Text Attributions

• This chapter was adapted from “ Dialectic Note-taking ” in The Word on College Reading and Writing by Carol Burnell, Jaime Wood, Monique Babin, Susan Pesznecker, and Nicole Rosevear, which is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 Licence . Adapted by Allison Kilgannon.

words taken directly from a text and placed into your work exactly as they are MUST be put within quotation marks (or block quote) with appropriate framing

a close representation of the original wording of a text, but in your own words

Advanced English Copyright © 2021 by Allison Kilgannon is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

• How it Works

Please, login

• Preferred Writers
• Identity Verification
• Store Credit

How To Write A Dialectic Essay

If you are given the task of writing a dialectic essay , you are ultimately analyzing a certain topic. Let's say there is a topic that you have to take a side on such as Roe v. Wade. You are basically explaining both sides of the story, evaluating the good and the bad. It's easy to set up a dialectic essay. Below is a “How To Guide” on writing a good dialectic essay. Follow these guidelines and you will be on your way to a successful essay.

Structuring the Essay

In order to get your point across, you should, first, structure it properly. Basic essays consist of five paragraphs. These paragraphs should be made up of the following:

— The Introduction (with Thesis )

— The Objective

— The Opposition

— The Reaction

— The Conclusion

The Introduction

Always remember that the introduction is basically the thesis. Let's say you are given the task of choosing any particular subject. Be sure to pick a topic that has a thesis with two different ideas and meanings. You should never make the argument one-sided. If that's the case, then you're basically writing a narrative essay. You want to write an essay that gives your reader a topic two different sides to the story. Most importantly, you have to be non-bias towards the topic. This isn't an opinionated essay. It's strictly informative. Also, be sure to keep your thesis short and to the point. There is no need in making it more than one paragraph. All you need to do is set it up and add the thesis. That's what makes an introduction.

The Objective

Here is where you make your argument. On what ground does this thesis have reason? You have to give both sides to the story. While doing so, you should make it easy for the reader to understand each side. This should ultimately back the thesis paragraph. Also, keep this short and to the point. You do not want to delve too far into it since it will take away from the next two paragraphs. Think of it as building blocks. You're building your way up to the conclusion by taking in all of the fact and stating them. Just be sure not to overstep your boundaries and keep the objective to minimum.

The Opposition

This is where you state the facts about what others think about your topic. Make sure you state how the feel and why they feel that way about the topic. Give out strong facts—even if you do not necessarily support it —and make sure you speak the true on the argument. Make sure you throw bias out of the window and keep it fair and balanced. 

The Reaction

For this part of the essay, you should keep in mind that this is completely separate from what you have written thus far. You are only showing your reaction to the opposition from above. So basically it starts the debate process and critiquing the opposition. So you essentially saying, “This idea is good but here is why that idea is better.” Give the reader something to think about. Let them ponder the situation. That best explains the “reaction” process. When writing, think about what the reader might think if you added a certain fact in the argument. How would they react to it? Would their opinion begin to shift without you showing any bias? That is what you are looking for in this part of the dialectic essay. The reaction will then set up the final paragraph and bring it all together.

As stated before, this is where you bring it all together. For the final paragraph, you are bringing it all back to the thesis statement from the introduction. You could also develop a new thesis. But for the most part you should stick to the original.  If anything you can modify your thesis but not change the entire feeling of the dialectic essay.

If you follow these guidelines, you will have written a successful dialectic essay. Remember to stick to the point. Always stay on topic with your thesis. Most importantly, remain unbiased toward the topic. It is easy to get sidetrack during a debate and wander away from you thesis. Just remember it an essay and not a decision you are making for yourself.

I was very specific when I wanted to get a paper online. I wanted an essay writing service Australia based. I’m really happy I found Aussi Essay. I got a lovely paper that really expressed my point of view. I was detailed with the requirements and the writer followed them.

I keep recommending this website as the best essay writing service. I’ve been using it for two years now and I don’t plan to change it. All writers are really cool. I have my preferred ones and I often request their ID.

All good! I needed a law essay writing service Australia and I’m so happy that this website includes law essays in its offers. The writer understood what I needed. The result was perfect.

I’ve been searching for a good essay writing service in Australia for a very long time. I tried few services and they didn’t work. Finally, I found AussiEssay and it definitely works. The writers are talented and they have degrees.

AussiEssay.com is definitely the best essay writing service, Australia writers with degrees work here. I’ve used writing and editing services from this website. Great work every single time!

I needed an online essay writer and my friend saved my life. He recommended this website, and I found what I needed. The writer was very knowledgeable. He helped me narrow down the topic, and he captured my own personality through the essay.

If you need an essay writer Australia, this is the service to count on. I’ve recommended it to several of my friends and they all like it. I’m a loyal user and I always get discounts. The prices already rock, but the discounts make them even more attractive.

I have told my friends about your essay writing service. I was worried the work would be copied or rewritten and not custom written. I am pleased with the results. Thank your writers on my behalf.

This is the first essay writing service I have used that HASN'T sold my details to spammers. I know this because it is the first time I have paid for an order and then NOT received hundreds of spam emails from companies in other countries.

It is true that this company can be trusted. I am pleased with their service and can find no reason to fault them.

We use cookies. What does it mean? OK

How To Format A Dialectic Essay

• Views 11989
• Author Sandra W.

What Constitutes A Dialectic Essay And How Do I Write A Dialectic Essay ?

A dialectical essay focuses on a proposed argument or main idea and then objects that point of view using possible ideas. This type of essay explores a variety of solutions instead of discussing one answer. Ultimately, making conclusions on this type of essay uses information currently at hand. Dialectic essays are common in studying and writing essays. Below is the structure of a dialectic essay as given by iwriteessays.com

Introduction (thesis statement)

• The introduction part of your dialectic essay should present the main thesis statement. If the writer has to choose a topic then he should come up with a topic based on a thesis statement that has at least two interpretations.
• The writer should come up with a debatable and a controversial topic to rise opposite arguments; this will make the essay more dialectic.
• Design the introduction of your essay such that it is neither too long nor too short. Make sure you only have a single introductory paragraph that states your thesis.
• The initial paragraph of your essay’s body presents your single argument for the thesis. Develop you thesis and defend it as you try to make the readers of your essay agree with your argument.
• Remember to support the thesis statement in this very paragraph.
• In this paragraph, you should object to the arguments raised in the previous section .
• The writer should be very attentive not to paint the thesis as a false argument.
• List all the reasons supporting why your essay is not acceptable. Make your essay debatable between two people holding different views on the same topic.
• The aim of the third paragraph is to respond to the objection. However, take caution not to give previous arguments in the first paragraph.
• This part of the essay should respond to the objection given in the second paragraph in a debatable manner. Your main task is criticizing the second paragraph
• Remember as an important note that the thesis statement in the opening paragraph. The rest of the arguments in the tow paragraph demonstrate the writers understanding and possible interpretation of the topic.

 Conclusion

• The aim of conclusion in dialectic essay is either to support the original thesis or state a new point of view. It combines both the writer’s arguments and counterarguments.
• The writer should avoid making a complete change on the thesis statement. You should be open to more ideas.

Recent Posts

• A Sample Essay on Birds 21-08-2023 0 Comments
• Is Homeschooling an Ideal Way... 21-08-2023 0 Comments
• Essay Sample on Man 14-08-2023 0 Comments
• Academic Writing(23)
• Admission Essay(172)
• Book Summaries(165)
• College Tips(312)
• Content Writing Services(1)
• Essay Help(517)
• Essay Writing Help(76)
• Essays Blog(0)
• Example(337)
• Infographics(2)
• Letter Writing(1)
• Outlines(137)
• Photo Essay Assignment(4)
• Resume Writing Tips(62)
• Samples Essays(315)
• Writing Jobs(2)

• Our Services
• Free Essays
• Place an order 1 (888) 465-3440 1 (888) 414-0271 Live Chat

How to Write a Dialectical Essay?

How to Write a Dialectical Essay: Important Info

• How to Write a Dialectical Essay with a Powerful Conclusion

The Structure of Your Essay

• Dialectic Essay Sample

Buy Essays: Pay for Your Perfect Paper

If you are asked to write a dialectic essay, the process will require you to find a controversial topic for exploration. Because of this, it can help to begin by looking through articles in journals, newspapers, and on the Internet. This will enable you to collect sufficient information on the topic you intend to discuss. Remember to cite all materials properly and pay careful attention to the academic style or format you have been instructed to or chosen to use. 

It is possible you will find quite a bit of helpful information on the Internet about writing this type of essay. One of the most important factors is to choose reliable and credible websites. Additionally or alternatively, you are welcome to use the instructions provided below.

“How to write a dialectical essay?” is one of the frequently questions that many students try to find an answer to. The emphasis of such a type essay is in the presentation of the opposite points of view or attitudes concerning a certain issue and a bit different understanding of the problem under study. It implies objecting a specific technique and brainstorming with the key purpose to discover diverse ideas related to the chosen topic. The main essence of a dialectical essay is very controversial and essential. Throughout the process of writing, a person denies a specific fact or evidence, and presents controversial arguments. The key purpose of the author is to determine a novel objective of the well-known issue. The nature of the dialectical essay is very philosophical.

It should be noted that this written task requires fascinating preparation, knowledge, as well as experience. Like any other essay type, it has its peculiar characteristics. To satisfy all the content needs, it is imperative to keep to the tips given below. Primarily, the writer will face the need to do some research in order to determine new perspectives of the issue under study. To deliver am amazing dialectical essay, it is of great significance to be competent in the chosen topic, as well as knowledgeable about it.

The following assignment requires that students approach the problem utilizing various objectives. The essay is aimed at exploring a set of solutions instead of making emphasis on a specific one. Consider that whenever your teacher asks you to complete such an essay, it means that he / she is eager to estimate your thinking flexibility and creativity, as well as the skills aimed at clarifying the ideas or considerations regarding a specific subject or topic. A writer of a dialectical essay should discover both negative and positive aspects of the issue / problem and provide all the pros or cons concerning the chosen issue.

Useful Hints on How to Write a Dialectical Essay with a Powerful Conclusion

The structural elements assisting in writing a dialectical essay can be easily seen if you refer to dialectic essay examples available online, but we would like to focus on the most important of them in the article below.

There are essential constituents of the structure giving a clear explanation on how to write a dialectical essay. Take into account that the dialectic essay should comprise five paragraphs. Every of them has its peculiar features. The introduction one should include a thesis statement. The thesis statement may have two interpretations. Essentially, it should be formulated in such a way the writer may approach it from two different perspectives. Further, in the essay, it should provide the readers with the controversial ideas. The format of the introduction should be clear, short, informative, and eye-catching.

In an ordinary essay, the body is composed of two-three paragraphs, which can either support or deny the key thesis argument or point of view. On the contrast, the characteristics are different in a dialectic essay. After the introduction, there should be an argument paragraph. The task is to give one argument that supports the key thesis. It is possible to provide the readers with certain reasons, why it is worth supporting this key thesis.

The objection paragraph is supposed to be the next one. The task of the author here is to object the statements indicated in the precious paragraph. There is on the significant nuance that the author should be well aware. It should be stressed that the objective section does not have to comprise the sentences which content denies the thesis statement or doubts of its rightness.

The third paragraph of the body is referred to as a response. In the following part, the writer should respond to the statements indicated in the objection section of the essay. You ought to specify it clearly. Consider that you should not provide any novel arguments. You should present a critical approach in your essay.

The last element of a dialectical essay is the conclusion. The task of the author is to formulate the results of the debates presented in the work. The writer should take a decision which viewpoint is valid and reliable and should be paid attention to. Sometimes the composition of several points should be credible and reliable. Moreover, the writer should present some piece of evidence that supports her / his position, in some cases even through the prism of the opposing arguments. In case, when the writer changes his / her viewpoint, he /she should explain to the readers each point or consideration. The writer should provide some reasons, as well as defend her / his point of view throughout the essay.

Once the essay is ready, you should read it very carefully and make the final adjustments. It is of great significance that the conclusion ought to support the thesis statement, as well as the arguments presented in the essay. The opposing arguments ought not to deny the key statement of the essay. However, they should object the other pieces of argumentation provided in the dialectical essay.

Always keep in mind that a dialectical essay is a type of writing that approaches the set or chosen question from two different angles, which are opposite. The conclusion means the alternative viewpoint is based on the data looked into. The task of the author is to search for the disputes, contrasts, as well as oppositions. Then it is imperative to search for the key idea that will combine all those points and make it the most significant issue of your writing. While working on your dialectical essay, you should utilize your dialectical thinking. The structural characteristics of the dialectical essay allow combining the controversial viewpoints and make it look logically organized and full of sense.

There are a few techniques that can be applied during the writing process. You can utilize a con and pro collection grid. The following technique can help you arrange all of your points of view accordingly and avoid creating a mess in your work. Moreover, you can always apply the brainstorming technique in case you lack some ideas.

The format of the essay is also an important criterion affecting the quality of writing. It concerns citing, as well as plagiarism and editing issues. In the majority of cases, the dialectical essay should comprise about 600-800 words.

In case there is a necessity to clearly realize how to write a dialectical essay, you should not get worried or panic. Make sure that you know all its peculiar features, are well aware of the requirements, as well as have critical thinking. Without doubt, you will be able to prepare a dialectical essay of premium quality!

• Introductory Paragraph

The introduction paragraph should be used to introduce the topic of your essay. Usually, this includes:

• An overview of the topic you will be discussing in your essay
• A presentation of the various opinions on the topic you will be discussing.
• The main point that demonstrates why it is important to explore the particular topic you will be discussing. 
• Background Information

Provide your readers with any background information you think will be useful.

• Presentation of Your Viewpoint (First Part)

Identify the main point or idea of your paper and focus on this. You should use this section to provide as much powerful and reliable evidence as possible. This means presenting an opinion you will go on to support. Say why you believe your opinion is objective and valid. Provide information on any experts who agree with your chosen viewpoint.

• Presentation of Your Viewpoint (Second Part)

You should use this section to examine the main point or idea of the work you are exploring. Give a further opinion on the topic you are examining and make reference to others who support this. Offer a few well-reasoned arguments in support of this point of view.   

• Analysis of Any Opinion(s) You Present

Mention any opposing viewpoints and say why you think these are not valid. Analyze any arguments that support or oppose your viewpoint.

• Give Your Own Opinion

Give your own opinion on the topic. Towards the end, present any conclusion(s) you arrive at. Why have you taken a particular stance? Set out solid arguments to support your choice.

Do not overlook the importance of including any historical facts or information that is relevant to your topic’s development.

Pay attention to spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Try to make your essay or paper as gripping as possible. Establish whether your readers already know anything about the matter you are examining.  

It is essential to double-check the points listed below when writing a dialectic essay:

• Is the information you provided correct?
• Is your chosen topic sufficiently important or significant?
• Are people likely to act in the exact same manner in different circumstances or situations?

Is it important that everyone be treated equally?

Check Our Dialectic Essay Sample

Now when you have faced a problem of essay writing you clearly understand that a professional help would be very opportune. From the first sight it may seem unreal to find somebody ready to help you immediately. But it is far from the truth. EssaysLab.com offers you qualified assistance for your academic paper writing, here you can find anything you need – you can buy essays or order any other writing services. We understand the importance of such assignments and we do our best to provide you with the top quality essays.

• Fill in the order form, adding all the details about your Essay.
• Pay for the order and we receive a payment for it.
• You can contact our professional support team.
• Get your Essay which will result in an excellent grade.

Although essay writing is not a clear demonstration of your understanding of the subject it is still and it will always be an integral part of the school prospectus on different academic levels. It is one of the reasons why writing services have become so widespread and why it is so easy to buy essays online.

Without doubts you are able to write your essay paper on your own, but imagine how much time you can save and how better your result can be if you get a professional writing assistance.

We have also been students in we know the difficulties of written assignments. So many stages, each of them special and particular– developing a topic, thesis statement, researching information, proofreading and editing is a huge task. After you have tried to write articles on your own you may have understood that good essay writing is everything but simple.

Buy an essay and make your life easier, cooperate with us and get benefits. At EssaysLab.com you can find everything you need for writing– help, support, and writing tips and whole papers. Why spend hours reading, researching, writing without even having enough sleep, when you can buy an essay and solve this problem in a five minute period.

Why we claim to be one of the best writing services on the web? Well, it is not difficult to suggest it. We offer the most beneficial deals and we provide an attentive customer support. For us every client is important and special, and his/her needs constitute to our top priorities. We understand our customers and we try to support them in their desire to save money and get high quality assistance. That is why we have started this company – to help people. We know that we are able to assure the best services, and we do. From now you can forget about your writing problems, you can enjoy your weekends and sleep at nights while our experts will do all the work for you. Buy your essay now and make sure that we are the best!

• We’ll write any essay from scratch according to your instructions
• Prices start from only 11.99 $/page
• Placing an order takes 3 minutes
• All papers are plagiarism free

You May Find These Useful:

Buy Capstone Project Write a Response Paper Thesis Writing Services Buy Answer Questions

Read Reviews

My writer is the best and I’ll use him from now on!

The paper was great – Thank you!

The writer was just marvelous, producing a finely written paper and referencing it exactly as I asked.

Feedback is that I am so glad I found you. My writing worries are over!

Encyclopedia

Writing with artificial intelligence.

Dialectic is the process of reasoned dialog and logical analysis . Argument is a form of dialect.

Synonyms: Debate, Rational Discourse, Legal Analysis, Scholarship as a Conversation

People engage in dialectics (spoken dialog or written dialog with others)

• when they debate one another in face-to-face situations
• when they use logical reasoning to debate interpretations of events and texts.
• when they engage in logical reasoning about opposing ideas, topics , theses/research questions , research methods–and so on.
• when they engage in Information Literacy practices, particularly Critical Literacy , summary , paraphrase , and citation .

Dialectics is sometimes referred to as  the ceaseless debate –a recurring cycle of interpretation and reinterpretation.

Legal discourse is built on the foundation of dialectics–the notion that logos rather than pathos or ethos should be used to vet truth claims.

Brevity - Say More with Less

Clarity (in Speech and Writing)

Coherence - How to Achieve Coherence in Writing

Flow - How to Create Flow in Writing

Inclusivity - Inclusive Language

The Elements of Style - The DNA of Powerful Writing

Recommended

Academic Writing – How to Write for the Academic Community

Structured Revision – How to Revise Your Work

Professional Writing – How to Write for the Professional World

Credibility & Authority – How to Be Credible & Authoritative in Research, Speech & Writing

Citation Guide – Learn How to Cite Sources in Academic and Professional Writing

Page Design – How to Design Messages for Maximum Impact

Suggested edits.

• Please select the purpose of your message. * - Corrections, Typos, or Edits Technical Support/Problems using the site Advertising with Writing Commons Copyright Issues I am contacting you about something else
• Your full name
• Your email address *
• Page URL needing edits *
• Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Other Topics:

Citation - Definition - Introduction to Citation in Academic & Professional Writing

• Joseph M. Moxley

Explore the different ways to cite sources in academic and professional writing, including in-text (Parenthetical), numerical, and note citations.

Collaboration - What is the Role of Collaboration in Academic & Professional Writing?

Collaboration refers to the act of working with others or AI to solve problems, coauthor texts, and develop products and services. Collaboration is a highly prized workplace competency in academic...

Genre may reference a type of writing, art, or musical composition; socially-agreed upon expectations about how writers and speakers should respond to particular rhetorical situations; the cultural values; the epistemological assumptions...

Grammar refers to the rules that inform how people and discourse communities use language (e.g., written or spoken English, body language, or visual language) to communicate. Learn about the rhetorical...

Information Literacy - Discerning Quality Information from Noise

Information Literacy refers to the competencies associated with locating, evaluating, using, and archiving information. In order to thrive, much less survive in a global information economy — an economy where information functions as a...

Mindset refers to a person or community’s way of feeling, thinking, and acting about a topic. The mindsets you hold, consciously or subconsciously, shape how you feel, think, and act–and...

Rhetoric: Exploring Its Definition and Impact on Modern Communication

Learn about rhetoric and rhetorical practices (e.g., rhetorical analysis, rhetorical reasoning,  rhetorical situation, and rhetorical stance) so that you can strategically manage how you compose and subsequently produce a text...

Style, most simply, refers to how you say something as opposed to what you say. The style of your writing matters because audiences are unlikely to read your work or...

The Writing Process - Research on Composing

The writing process refers to everything you do in order to complete a writing project. Over the last six decades, researchers have studied and theorized about how writers go about...

Writing Studies

Writing studies refers to an interdisciplinary community of scholars and researchers who study writing. Writing studies also refers to an academic, interdisciplinary discipline – a subject of study. Students in...

Featured Articles

Dialectic Essay Examples: Great Strategies for Effective Writing

As you may probably know, there are various types of academic essays. If you have not heard of dialectic essays before, you may look for dialectic essay examples on the net. As a student, you may be often asked to provide academic essays of different types. Therefore, it is essential to understand the difference between different essay types. As such, when you are assigned a dialectic essay, you need to take into consideration the structure and mode of organization. Read on and find out what a dialectic essay is.

A dialectic essay is a type of an argumentative debate or dialogue where it is important for a writer to formulate a thesis statement comprising of different “for” and “against” arguments (counterarguments are a must) that are aimed to support the thesis.

Why Do You Need to Write Dialectic Essays?

If you are given a task to submit a dialectic essay, you need to demonstrate your abilities and skills in clarifying and explaining your thoughts on a specific topic/ issue. With the help of dialectic essay writing, you can discuss a specific topic from different perspectives, where you take into account all its positive and negative aspects. If you look at some of dialectic essay examples, you will see that the conclusion is composed based on the analysis of the pros and cons of the topic discussion.

Dialectic Essay Structure

The organization is the same as of a classical five-paragraph essay. It is a must to have an introductory paragraph, body paragraphs, and conclusion. When developing the main body, which normally consists of three body paragraphs, you need to develop the argument in great detail. To put it simply, you need to elaborate on the argument presented in the thesis statement. Read on to find detailed information about the structure of dialectic essay examples.

• Introductory paragraph In the introduction, you have to present a thesis statement. In any case, you need to include both an argument and a counterargument when formulating the thesis. As such, you need to take into account two possible interpretations of the issue. Since you have to focus on both of the arguments, it is advisable to choose a controversial topic to make the essay more interesting.
• Presentation of the argument In the first body paragraph, present the argument and support it with solid reasons or expert opinion. Make sure the supporting evidence is strong enough so that the audience could agree with you.
• Presentation of the counterargument In the next paragraph, focus on the objection. Make sure the objection does not deny the thesis you have formulated (does not refute it or makes false) but only the argument mentioned in the previous paragraph. Provide reasons why the counterargument should also be considered and claimed true.
• Response In the third body paragraph, make sure to respond to the counterargument. It should be presented in a form of a debate. As such, respond to the objection. You do not need to present some new argument – merely respond to the counterargument presented in the second body paragraph.
• Conclusion In the conclusive paragraph, make sure to provide clear and strong support for the originally written thesis or provide a new one, which is frequently a combination of the argument and counterargument. As a rule, you should not provide a new argument that completely differs from what you have discussed in the paper.

Dialectic Essay Sample PDF

Writing and structuring a top-quality dialectic essay.

Introductory Paragraph

• This unit should provide a thesis statement. When choosing a topic, you need to remember that it should be based on your thesis statement which is to be interpreted at least in two different ways.
• The writer should examine a disputable question which requires providing arguments and facts to give the paper specific features.
• Remember that the introductory section of your paper should be neither very long nor very short. It should include only one paragraph presenting your thesis statement.
• An argument supporting your thesis should be presented in the first paragraph of your paper body. Then, it is required to discuss your thesis in a way that will make readers take your position.
• Do not forget that it is necessary to provide incontrovertible facts to prove your thesis statement.
• The data presented in this paragraph should oppose the information mentioned in the previous one.
• By stating an opposing opinion, you need to be very cautious not to present your thesis as a fake one.
• Number the points according to which your work contains invalid content. Try to make your paper disputable as if it presents controversial viewpoints expressed by two people.
• The third paragraph should give a proper answer to the posed question. Nevertheless, you should not impart the same facts as in the first paragraph of your work.
• In this section, you need to provide the arguments that would oppose the contradictory ones given in the second paragraph of your paper. Here, you are to critically analyze the second paragraph
• It is essential to keep in mind that a thesis statement has to be presented in the introduction. All the rest paragraphs should focus on different aspects of the topic.

Concluding Unit

• In this paragraph, you need to support your thesis. However, you may also present a new viewpoint. This section combines both supporting and opposing arguments.
• Do not alter your thesis statement completely. Show that you are ready to discuss new ideas.

You may also be interested in:

Ideas for best exploratory essay topics   scholarship essay    how to write a five paragraph essay   how to make an exploratory essay engaging.

Cornell Chronicle

• Architecture & Design
• Arts & Humanities
• Business, Economics & Entrepreneurship
• Computing & Information Sciences
• Energy, Environment & Sustainability
• Food & Agriculture
• Global Reach
• Health, Nutrition & Medicine
• Law, Government & Public Policy
• Life Sciences & Veterinary Medicine
• Physical Sciences & Engineering
• Social & Behavioral Sciences
• Coronavirus
• News & Events
• Public Engagement
• New York City
• Photos of the Week
• Big Red Sports
• Freedom of Expression
• Student Life
• University Statements
• Around Cornell
• All Stories
• In the News
• Expert Quotes
• Cornellians

Online crowds wield power, for good and bad

By tom fleischman, cornell chronicle.

How do online crowds form, grow and behave? How do they wield influence? What distinguishes desirable crowd activism from mob harassment?

In the summer of 2022, Cornell Tech and Cornell Law School professor  James Grimmelmann and postdoctoral fellow Charles Duan hosted a virtual workshop in which participants attempted to answer these questions and more.

At the end of the two-day online workshop Grimmelmann, the Tessler Family Professor of Digital and Information Law at Cornell Tech and at Cornell Law School, and co-organizer Duan, now an assistant professor of law at American University’s Washington College of Law, asked participants to reflect on the conversations and identify important themes about platforms and crowds.

The result: “ The Barons and the Mob: Essays on Centralized Platforms and Decentralized Crowds,” an introduction to the complexities of online crowds and the importance of understanding their nature in the context of efforts toward online platform regulation.

The introduction references a pair of online user “revolts.” In 2007, one of the users of news aggregator Digg posted an encryption key that could be used to circumvent copyright protection on Blu-Ray discs. Sixteen years later, Grimmelmann and Duan wrote, “history rhymed with itself” when Reddit, in preparation for a rumored IPO, started charging developers to access its previously free application programming interface. Users of both platforms rose up in revolt. In Digg’s case, the crowd won the revolt – not so with Reddit.

“The Digg disruption and the Reddit rebellion,” they wrote, “demonstrate the conflict between the two great sources of power on the Internet: the centralized platforms that control the infrastructure of online communities, and the decentralized crowds of users who come together in them.”

In all, a dozen experts share their perspectives in “The Barons and the Mob,” tackling what makes an online crowd; the influence of money on crowds; identifying misinformation; authenticity; network economics and other topics.

Grimmelmann spoke with the Chronicle about the essay collection:

Question: What was the impetus behind the workshop?

Answer: The idea came out of seeing some of the ways that crowds were self-consciously being weaponized for political and commercial purposes. The “to the moon” sentiment of the  wallstreetbets subreddit wasn’t all that different from the kind of online energy associated with political movements or with influencer beefs. But platforms seemed to consider some of these crowds to be serious problems they had to block, and some of them to be benign intended uses. That paradox led us to look more closely at how platforms and crowds related to each other.

Q: Are there other moments in history that radically changed the dynamic between the “barons” and the “mob” – perhaps the invention of the printing press?

A: The printing press definitely helped catalyze new kinds of distributed groups, from scientific collaborations to journalism for “the public.” The age of revolution – starting especially with the French Revolution – demonstrated the dramatic power of the mob on the street compared with old aristocratic hierarchies. The mobs prevailed in the long run: Old forms of centralized power were swept aside and gave way to new political forms that were more responsive to mass public sentiment.

Q: Has the power dynamic between platforms and crowds morphed over time? Have crowds learned how to wield greater power over the last 20 to 30 years?

A: The Reddit moderator revolt last summer was a really striking moment, because Reddit explicitly decided that it was willing to take on the full power of a highly organized user group. It was a big bet, and Reddit basically won: Its IPO went ahead, and today the site has much more effective power over its user base. The pendulum seems to have swung in the direction of the platforms; they’re better able to predict and steer crowd dynamics than they were a few years ago.

You can see TikTok as an extreme example of this trend: The site harnesses crowd energy and enthusiasm but systematically works to prevent crowds from forming and sustaining themselves in ways that would form durable power alternatives.

Q: Do you see an ultimate “winner” in this push-and-pull between the “lords” (platforms) and the “commoners” (users)? Can there ever be a winner?

A: No – the tension is eternal. Without either of these forms, social media wouldn’t function. Platforms need crowds in order to be viable businesses, and crowds need platforms as a place to gather. They each have an interest in the other’s existence.

Q: Are there other big questions to be addressed in this space?

A: Yes – we don’t know how online crowds are catalyzed and controlled. We don’t know how to think about them as groups with agency for economic purposes. We don’t know what legitimate and effective forms of moderation to respond to them look like. We don’t know how regulations will go awry when crowds respond to them. And there are many more: This report is just a starting point, and a way of inviting people to think seriously about these issues.

Media Contact

Becka bowyer.

Get Cornell news delivered right to your inbox.

You might also like

Gallery Heading