Home — Essay Samples — Education — Physical Education — Importance Of Physical Education

test_template

Importance of Physical Education

  • Categories: Academic Performance Physical Education

About this sample

close

Words: 521 |

Updated: 6 November, 2024

Words: 521 | Page: 1 | 3 min read

Table of contents

The importance of physical education, physical health benefits, mental well-being boosts, academic performance perks, building valuable life skills, social interaction & inclusivity, references:.

  • World Health Organization (2020). Guidelines on Physical Activity for Children.
  • Sparkes AC & Smith B (2011). The Benefits of Physical Education: A Review.
  • U.S Department of Health & Human Services (2018). Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.
  • Cotman CW & Berchtold NC (2002). Exercise: A Behavioral Intervention to Enhance Brain Health and Plasticity.
  • Biddle SJH & Asare M (2011). Physical Activity And Mental Health In Children And Adolescents: A Review Of Reviews.

Image of Dr. Charlotte Jacobson

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Let us write you an essay from scratch

  • 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
  • Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

author

Dr. Heisenberg

Verified writer

  • Expert in: Education

writer

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

1 pages / 577 words

4 pages / 1770 words

2 pages / 683 words

2 pages / 1284 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Importance of Physical Education Essay

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Physical Education

Physical education has been an integral part of school curriculum for centuries, with a rich history and evolving significance in promoting overall well-being. In this essay, the importance of physical education in schools will [...]

Cephalocaudal development refers to the pattern of growth and development that occurs from the head down to the feet. This sequence is observed in the development of motor skills and physical capabilities in infants and young [...]

Why is physical education important? This essay discusses the benefits of physical education and its importance for children in schools. First of all, P.E helps kids who do not have an active lifestyle at home be healthy [...]

Should PE Affect a Student’s Grades? This question has sparked debates in educational circles for years. The inclusion of physical education (PE) in a student's curriculum is not just about promoting physical activity but also [...]

In this globalization, many kind of sports has been introduce to the world. Sport also has been considered as an entertainment. So what is sports? Sport is forms of physical activity played by the people through casual or [...]

Over the past several years, there have been numerous reports documenting the decline of participation in physical activity among youth. There are various factors that can be in consideration of one or many reasons on why the [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

  • Instructions Followed To The Letter
  • Deadlines Met At Every Stage
  • Unique And Plagiarism Free

persuasive essay should physical education be required in school

The Importance of Physical Education: 5 Insightful Essay Examples

  • What is Physical Education?
  • Benefits of Physical Education

Enhances Physical Health

Boosts mental health, develops social skills, enhances academic performance, promotes lifelong fitness habits.

  • Example 1: Persuasive Essay on Physical Education

Introduction

Body paragraphs.

  • Physical Health Benefits : PE ensures students get the necessary physical activity to prevent lifestyle diseases.
  • Mental Health Advantages : Exercise is pivotal in managing stress and promoting emotional balance.
  • Social Skills Development : Team activities help students build teamwork and communication skills.
  • Example 2: Analytical Essay on the Benefits of Physical Education
  • Physical Benefits : Analyze how regular physical activity in PE improves fitness levels and overall health.
  • Mental Benefits : Discuss the positive effects of exercise on mental health, including stress relief and improved cognitive function.
  • Social and Academic Benefits : Evaluate how PE helps in social skills development and boosts academic performance.
  • Example 3: Cause and Effect Essay on Physical Education
  • Causes : Structured PE classes provide regular physical activity and teach healthy lifestyle habits.
  • Effects on Physical Health : Improved fitness levels and reduced risk of lifestyle diseases.
  • Effects on Mental and Social Health : Improved mental well-being and social skills development.
  • Academic Impact : Enhanced concentration and academic performance.
  • Example 4: Argumentative Essay on Making PE Mandatory
  • Necessity for Physical Health : PE is critical for preventing health issues related to inactivity.
  • Mental Health Pros : Regular exercise contributes to better mental health.
  • Development of Social Competence : PE promotes teamwork and social interaction.
  • Academic Enhancement : Physical activity positively influences academic outcomes.
  • Counterarguments and Rebuttals : Addressing common objections such as budget constraints and academic priorities.
  • Example 5: Expository Essay on Role of Physical Education
  • Role in Physical Development : Explanation of how PE contributes to physical growth and health.
  • Role in Cognitive Development : Insights into how physical activities enhance cognitive abilities and academic performance.
  • Role in Emotional and Social Development : Examination of PE’s role in promoting social skills and emotional well-being.
  • Long-term Benefits : Discussion on how PE fosters lifelong healthy habits.
  • Tips for Writing an Effective Physical Education Essay
  • Start with a Strong Thesis Statement : Clearly state the purpose of your essay and the key points you will cover.
  • Use Concrete Examples : Provide specific examples and evidence to support your arguments.
  • Maintain a Logical Structure : Use clear and concise headings and subheadings to guide readers through your essay.
  • Address Counterarguments : Acknowledge and refute opposing viewpoints to strengthen your argument.
  • Conclude Effectively : Summarize the main points and reinforce the importance of physical education.
  • Wrapping Up

The Role of Education in Social Mobility: 5 Insightful Essay Examples

The Role of Education in Social Mobility: 5 Insightful Essay Examples

Discover the transformative power of education in social mobility. From early childhood education to lifelong learning, these essays delve into how education shapes opportunities and bridges socioeconomic gaps.

The Importance of Discipline: 5 Great Essay Examples and Tips

The Importance of Discipline: 5 Great Essay Examples and Tips

Enhancing Academic Writing with AI: The Role of Advanced Tools in Essay Composition

Enhancing Academic Writing with AI: The Role of Advanced Tools in Essay Composition

Gauth AI revolutionizes essay writing by addressing common challenges, enhancing efficiency, and improving quality, empowering students to produce better academic work.

DebateWise

Physical Education In Schools Should Be Compulsory

Physical Education In Schools Should Be Compulsory

Should Physical Education in schools be compulsory?

All the Yes points:

Participation in sport promotes health., physical education is an important part of holistic schooling., school sport is about discovering gifts., the quest for national sporting achievement begins in schools., without school support, sports will collapse., sports encompasses life choices., if not forced to exercise in youth, many will never think to do it in adulthood., sport helps to forge character., participation in sport promotes a healthy lifestyle, physical education helps to forge skills that will prove invaluable in later life, schools can punish students who do not participate in the classes with further pe lessons, all the no points:, individuals should have the right to control their own bodies, students should have the right to choose which subjects they complete at school, compulsory physical education risks unnecessary and costly injury, physical education is best taught to selected groups, sport is a waste of school time and resources, yes because….

Participation in sport promotes health. Government is, or should be, concerned with the health of its citizens. Encouraging physical activity in the young through compulsory PE fights child obesity and contributes to forming lifelong habits of exercise. This doesn’t have to be through traditional team sports; increasingly schools are able to offer exercise in the form of swimming, gymnastics, dance, weight training, use of a multigym, aerobics, etc.

No because…

Students should be allowed a choice. Lots of children don’t want to do this. If their parents agree, why should they be forced to (or forced to lie in producing a sick note)? It is different from any other lesson – it is about what one does with one’s body. In any case, it is a red herring to say that PE makes any serious difference to people’s health. There are plenty of more effective ways of ensuring a healthy population than pushing children round a freezing sports pitch once a week; not least would be addressing the disgusting diets our young have today, and encouraging walking or cycling to school rather than total reliance on the car.

Physical Education is an important part of holistic schooling. PE is an aspect of school being about more than just book learning – it is about educating the whole person, a holistic education that betters us in an all-round sense, rather than a merely academic experience. Some aspects of physical education are vital for future wellbeing, e.g. being able to swim, learning to lift heavy weights safely. Arguments about cost seem petty when compared to this aim – and also misguided, since PE departments would continue to exist to serve those that chose to study PE voluntarily, even if the subject were no longer to be compulsory. Arguments about the size of classes may well be correct, but these suggest better funding for PE rather than abandonment of the commitment to public health.

Sport is a waste of school time and resources. One or two PE lessons a week make very little difference to an individual’s health – but a huge difference to a school’s budget. It creates a whole extra department in schools, wasting a great deal of money and time that could be better spent on academic lessons. It also requires schools buildings to be surrounded by a large amount of land for playing fields, making it prohibitively expensive to build new schools in urban areas. The quality of teaching is low, as students are taught in huge classes. On the other hand, the quality of teaching and of equipment goes up if there are fewer (but keener) students taking the subject. Frankly, given the average current pupil-teacher ration, the subject is not merely without positive purpose – it may be dangerous to students who are normally not properly supervised.

School sport is about discovering gifts. If not driven by PE, many in society wouldn’t find out that they had a talent for a sport, or even that they enjoyed it. Once experienced, sport can be enjoyed for life, while for some it will provide the possibility of a college scholarship and even a career. Individuals are not humiliated in PE – if they are, the schools concerned should be brought to task just as they would be with regard to humiliation of students in any subject. Rather, as UNESCO says, the student should be helped to fulfil a level of attainment in sport that corresponds to his gifts.

Students can ‘discover’ these delights outside of school, without ‘discovering’ the bullying that comes with PE more than with any other lesson. They are more likely to obtain specialist coaching at sports clubs. Furthermore, for every child that ‘discovers a gift,’ there are many that suffer. PE is unique, in that ‘failure’ in its lessons involves physical humiliation. This is bad for children and especially bad for adolescents, who have more than enough body issues without this.

The quest for national sporting achievement begins in schools. If we don’t have compulsory PE, it is much harder to pick out athletes to represent our country on a wider stage. Even with a ‘sports academy’ model run along Australian lines, it’s much easier to find suitable individuals with a full sports program in every school. State education is not just about aiding the individual – it’s also about the state getting a good return on its investment – in a well-educated populace to drive business and entrepreneurialism etc. This applies equally in sports, too.

Schools aren’t supposed to be about fostering achievers for the state – that smacks of Stalinism. Schools should be tailored to the individual – if the individual student doesn’t want to participate in sports, they shouldn’t have to. If we allowed such national aims to be considered in schools, would we consent to humiliation of those that did badly in maths lessons, to encourage their achievement in maths (and thus business skills?) Of course not. But we allow that in PE.

Without school support, sports will collapse. If full classes aren’t made up, then team activities will end by sheer lack of numbers, no matter if several very talented individuals are at the school (or even potentially talented – they’ll never know without the program). If voluntary take-up of sport in schools is too low, then schools will shut down PE programmes so that there is no choice at all. Not everyone is academic: why deprive those talented sports students of their one chance to shine?

Forcing children that don’t want to play to make up teams in order to allow others to shine smacks of rigid education from a bygone era. In any case, in an increasingly litigious age, a compulsory rather than voluntary sports program is a liability. More and more schools are avoiding the very team games (e.g. rugby, soccer, hockey, football) the proposition discusses here, due to the (realistic) fear of lawsuits.

Sport is different to, say Latin – it encompasses life choices (most importantly, a concern for physical fitness, but also working in a team etc) that ought to be encouraged in all students. Extra classes for interested students can take place separately, and often do in the form of fixtures with other schools, championships etc. Sport shouldn’t be seen as an alternative to academia, an either/or – it should be a part of every student’s life in addition to their other studies. If the opposition is correct about the heavy workload involved in schools, then students are that much more likely not to choose PE in an environment where it is voluntary, and the quality of our children’s health will be even worse. Much better to keep being healthy compulsory, and reform the pressures elsewhere in the curriculum.

Successful sporting nations like Australia realise that sports, like any other specialised subjects, are best taught to selected groups that display both talent and interest in the field – forcing all to compete holds back the able and punishes the less able. The right way to go is to liberate those that don’t want to participate, and allow those that are extremely keen to go to academies that focus their talents more efficiently than a regular school ever could. Furthermore, our children are burdened enough in schools already, especially at the older end of the system, with multiple examinations. PE simply adds, needlessly, to this hectic schedule.

If not forced to exercise in youth, many will never think to do it in adulthood. This is no idle question: obesity in the UK is rising rapidly. Individuals have no right to ‘choice’ about this: they’re being compelled to attend school, to take the lessons the state says they should take. The state doesn’t just impose a curricular compulsion, since physical attendance is forced – so there’s nothing unique in principle about enforced PE. Indeed, what can be more important as an aim for our schools than to encourage public health? It is in recognition of that fact, that in 1978 UNESCO recognised PE as ‘as essential element of lifelong education.’ If PE is made voluntary, it seems obvious that many students – against their long term interests, and the long term interests of society – will choose not to. That will damage this essential element of education, and damage public health. It is true that the health of society is not perfect even with compulsory PE – but how much worse might it be without it?

We acknowledge the right of individuals (or their parents) to control their own bodies – when they have an operation, where they go, what they do. Why is this any different? This discussion should be held in the real world: students actually aren’t compelled to attend PE classes, as ‘sick notes’ are produced with alarming regularity by parents complicit in their child’s wish to avoid this lesson. The aim of ‘compulsory PE’ isn’t being fulfilled at present in any case, and greater efforts to enforce it will only result in more deceit, or children missing school for the entire day – or, in the most extreme cases, being withdrawn from state education by parents unwilling to allow their children to be forced into something they don’t wish to do. Instead, we should simply abandon the whole exercise and allow PE to become voluntary. The UNESCO charter stresses the right to PE, and was addressed to nations that failed to provide it at all – it was not meant to suggest that individuals should be compelled to do it in nations that do.

Sport helps to forge character. Playing team sports builds character and encourages students to work with others. It teaches children how to win and lose with good grace and builds a strong school spirit through competition with other institutions. It is often the experience of playing on a team together which builds the strongest friendships at school, which endure for years afterwards.

Many say the same benefits derive from the common endurance of prison… In particular, injuries sustained through school sport and the psychological trauma of being bullied for sporting ineptitude can mark people for years after they have left school. Teamwork can be better developed through music, drama, community projects, etc. without the need to encourage an ultra-competitive ethos.

Participation in sport promotes health. The effect on self-esteem and well-being as a product of sport can only be experienced by certain children if forced by their schools to first participate. A recent report to the European Parliament declared ‘physical education is a springboard for involvement in sport and physical activities throughout life’[1]. Government is, or should be, concerned with the health of its citizens. Encouraging physical activity in the young through compulsory PE fights child obesity and contributes to forming lifelong habits of exercise. This doesn’t have to be through traditional team sports; increasingly schools are able to offer exercise in the form of swimming, gymnastics, dance, weight training, use of a multi-gym, aerobics, etc [1] Hardman, K. (2007). Current situation and prospects for physical education in the European Union. European Parliament

It is a red herring to say that PE makes any serious difference to people’s health. There are plenty of more effective ways of ensuring a healthy population than pushing children round a freezing sports pitch once a week; not least would be addressing the disgusting diets our young have today, and encouraging walking or cycling to school rather than total reliance on the car. Both methods would involve promoting a healthy lifestyle without forcing the participation in unpopular physical education classes that do little for one’s education.

Physical education helps to forge character and the mutual respect required to succeed in an adult environment. Playing team sports builds character and encourages students to work with others, as they would be expected to do in most business or sporting environments. Sport teaches children how to win and lose with good grace and builds a strong school spirit through competition with other institutions. It is invaluable to imbue with children the delicate balance between a competitive rivalry that encourages effort and, on the other hand, losing the fairness and respect required to enjoy sport. It is often the experience of playing on a team together which builds the strongest friendships at school, which endure for years afterwards. As was noted in a report to the European Parliament, ‘PE…helps children learn to respect and value their own bodies and abilities, and those of others'[1]. Compulsory physical education is the only means by which all children can be forced to appreciate such advantages. [1]Hardman, K. (2007). Current situation and prospects for physical education in the European Union. European Parliament.

Physical education undermines one’s character as much as it strengthens and forges it. For every future athlete who grows in stature as he becomes comfortable in a team environment, there are a number of academic students who are forced weekly to cope with the brutality and criticisms of others more gifted at specific sports. Values like respect are not taught on a football field, any glance at a professional football match leads inexorably to that conclusion. Furthermore, learning about teamwork and co-operation no longer requires hours spent playing sport; they can be taught just as accurately and effectively in a classroom through music, drama, community projects, etc. without the need to encourage an ultra-competitive ethos.

Compulsory PE lessons can be treated in the same manner an ordinary educational class is treated; if the student refuses to participate and therefore does not do their work, they are punished with extra work of that same class. In this case, that would necessitate added physical education exercises at a later date or immediately after the class. The excuse that the student does not wish to participate in the class should be seen as no different to if it were stated during a maths or English class, where it would not be accepted. The fact that physical education is qualitatively different to those classes is irrespective; once deemed a compulsory subject, and therefore beneficial, it must be accepted and completed.

The intention of advocating a healthy lifestyle and sports is lost if there is a punishment attached to the class. Furthermore, to expect all students to participate in a class that is so overtly embarrassing to the weaker athletes is almost state-sanctioned bullying. In a maths class, the working and answers of the weakest students are not paraded in front of the class for all to see, and if they try to stop this, kept behind for extra work. It is demonstrably unfair to ask students, fragile about their appearance as it is, to compete physically with classmates. It should be encouraged, but maintain voluntary for those who wish to do so. The others can still be taught about healthy living and exercise without being dragged into physical exertion.

We acknowledge the right of individuals (or their parents) to control their own bodies – when they have an operation, where they go, what they do. Why is this any different? This discussion should be held in the real world: students actually aren’t compelled to attend PE classes, as ‘sick notes’ are produced with alarming regularity by parents complicit in their child’s wish to avoid this lesson. The aim of ‘compulsory PE’ isn’t being fulfilled at present in any case, and greater efforts to enforce it will only result in more deceit, or children missing school for the entire day – or, in the most extreme cases, being withdrawn from state education by parents unwilling to allow their children to be forced into something they don’t wish to do. Instead, we should simply abandon the whole exercise and allow PE to become voluntary. The UNESCO charter stresses the right to PE, and was addressed to nations that failed to provide it at all – it was not meant to suggest that individuals should be compelled to do it in nations that do[1]. [1] UNESCO. (1945, November 16). Constitution of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. Retrieved May 18, 2011.

If not forced to exercise in youth, many will never think to do it in adulthood. This is no idle question: obesity in the UK is rising rapidly and Dr. David Haslam believes schools are part of the problem[1]. Individuals have no right to ‘choice’ about this: they’re being compelled to attend school, to take the lessons the state says they should take. The state doesn’t just impose a curricular compulsion, since physical attendance is forced – so there’s nothing unique in principle about enforced PE. Indeed, what can be more important as an aim for our schools than to encourage public health? It is in recognition of that fact, that in 1978 UNESCO recognised PE as ‘as essential element of lifelong education.’ [2] If PE is made voluntary, it seems obvious that many students – against their long term interests, and the long term interests of society – will choose not to. That will damage this essential element of education, and damage public health. It is true that the health of society is not perfect even with compulsory PE – but how much worse might it be without it? [1] Batty, D. (2008, February 21). Schools make children more obese, leading doctor says. Retrieved May 18, 2011 [2] UNESCO. (1978, November 21). International Charter of Physical Education and Sport. Retrieved May 18, 2011, from United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Students should be allowed a choice with relation to their school subjects, including physical education. Children know, often from early ages, what they want to do with their life from what subjects they enjoy and those they don’t. Lots of children don’t want to do physical education; it is different from any other lesson – it is about what one does with one’s body. For those not confident about their bodies, why should they be forced to go through the embarrassment and stress of a PE class when they could be spending the time most constructively and happily in a classroom? Furthermore, and on the flip side, those who do enjoy PE will still be able to take the class and in an environment surrounded by those who feel similarly. Athletes will no longer be held back by those who force teachers to re-iterate instructions or rules.

Students, unaware of the subjects that will most benefit them in the competitive work environment, have no such right to choose all their subjects at school. Many schools offer students a restricted right to choose subjects at school, but only those which offer comparative advantages. Certain subjects like, in the Western world, English, maths, science and physical education, are not voluntary because they offer advantages to all that form a foundation necessary to excel in other areas. If students were given the right to choose all their subjects, few would do the more difficult subjects like science and maths that, whilst requiring more effort, are more rewarding for society as a whole, and the students themselves.

A compulsory rather than voluntary sports program is a risk for both students and schools. More and more schools are avoiding team games (e.g. rugby, soccer, hockey, football) for the (realistic) fear of lawsuits when injuries and disputes occur. In one example, a defendant was awarded £100,000 by the school of a student who tackled dangerously and caused both neck and ligament injuries to his opponent opponent[1]. Furthermore, injuries sustained through school sport and the psychological trauma of being bullied for sporting ineptitude can mark people for years after they have left school. Furthermore, psychological injuries occur to those who would not otherwise do sport if not forced, these injuries tend to be the longest and most damaging. Voluntary physical education would avoid such traumatic episodes. [1]BBC News (2001, August 8). Rugby injury wins £100,000 damages. Retrieved May 18, 2011.

Compulsory physical education does not risk unnecessary and costly injury. Injuries that occur in physical education are firstly more advisable than injuries that occur in the classroom or playground for PE teachers tend to be trained in first-aid. Furthermore, the psychological bullying occurring in physical education classes is only a small subset of bullying that is rife among schools as a whole. The prowess, or lack of it, that leads to bullying in PE classes is no different to the lack of ‘prowess’ in looks, or name, or spelling that will drive bullying in other educational environments.

Successful sporting nations realise that sports, like any other specialised subjects, are best taught to selected groups that display both talent and interest in the field – forcing all to compete holds back the able and punishes the less able. The right way to go is to liberate those that don’t want to participate, and allow those that are extremely keen to go to academies that focus their talents more efficiently than a regular school ever could. Furthermore, our children are burdened enough in schools already, especially at the older end of the system, with multiple examinations. PE simply adds, needlessly, to this hectic schedule.

Sport is different to, say Latin – it encompasses life choices (most importantly, a concern for physical fitness, but also working in a team etc.) that ought to be encouraged in all students. As Ken Hardman argues, ‘physical education makes a unique contribution to the education of all pupils’[1]. Extra classes for interested students can take place separately, and often do in the form of fixtures with other schools, championships etc. Sport shouldn’t be seen as an alternative to academia, an either/or – it should be a part of every student’s life in addition to their other studies. If the opposition is correct about the heavy workload involved in schools, then students are that much more likely not to choose PE in an environment where it is voluntary, and the quality of our children’s health will be even worse. Much better to keep being healthy compulsory, and reform the pressures elsewhere in the curriculum. [1] Hardman, K. (2007). Current situation and prospects for physical education in the European Union. European Parliament.

Sport is a waste of school time and resources. One or two PE lessons a week make very little difference to an individual’s health– but a huge difference to a school’s budget. It creates a whole extra department in schools, wasting a great deal of money and time that could be better spent on academic lessons[1] It also requires schools buildings to be surrounded by a large amount of land for playing fields, making it prohibitively expensive to build new schools in urban areas. The quality of teaching is low, as students are taught in huge classes. On the other hand, the quality of teaching and of equipment goes up if there are fewer (but keener) students taking the subject. One Californian student asked to comment stated PE ‘doesn’t help me in any way…it’s really a waste of time. I don’t learn anything here.’[2] [1] Active Living Research. (2007). Active Education: Physical Education, Physical Activity and Academic Performance. San Diego. [2] Marshall, J., & Hardman, K. (2000). The State and Status of Physical Education in Schools in International Context. European Physical Education Review, 203-229.

Physical Education is an important part of holistic schooling. PE is an aspect of school being about more than just book learning – it is about educating the whole person, a holistic education that betters us in an all-round sense, rather than a merely academic experience. Some aspects of physical education are vital for future wellbeing, e.g. being able to swim, learning to lift heavy weights safely. Furthermore, ‘kids who are more physically active tend to perform better academically’[1]. Arguments about cost seem petty when compared to this aim – and also misguided, since PE departments would continue to exist to serve those that chose to study PE voluntarily, even if the subject were no longer to be compulsory. Arguments about the size of classes may well be correct, but these suggest better funding for PE rather than abandonment of the commitment to public health. [1] Active Living Research. (2007). Active Education: Physical Education, Physical Activity and Academic Performance. San Diego.

In the P.E. class, when the student is not good at P.E., some students could get bullied. Because in some schools, the person who is good at P.E., is the most popular person. But, if the student is not good at P.E., they could get bullied and that could make a trauma. That can make a mental disease.

PE Is humiliating as well as unnecessary, Now I´m not an expert on this topic, but isn´t Hauling around a heavy backpack all day enough?

wow, just how lazy are you…

“Knowledge which is acquired under compulsion obtains no hold on the mind…” as quoted by famous American writer Sylvia Plath. I think this quote justifies my point of argument that physical education should not at all be compulsory in school….

physical education in school is not at all compulsory for it is a total waste of time for those children who are not at all interested ….. and therefore spontaneously put no effort in it. It is better if it is made an elective issue as this will not only save the time of those who are interested in other school extra- curricular activities but also make the ones who are efficient in it…

Physical education is key to longer, happier lives. Our kids and schools need more of it.

Physical education should be on equal footing with academic classes. it teaches kids persistence, resilience, positive thinking and how to stay healthy..

In Franklin, Tennessee, on March 2, 2006.

Spot quiz: What is the only subject in school that engages a child’s mind, body, and spirit, promotes their physical and emotional health, helps them to learn better and cultivates the character they need to become productive adults? And what subject is consistently underfunded, understaffed and underscheduled?

If you answered physical education to both questions, you get an A grade.

At a time when American children are increasingly absorbed in their screens and one-third are overweight , the need for robust physical education is acute. Last month, the federal government updated its recommendations for physical activity for the first time in 10 years. The guidelines now include recommendations for children as young as age 3 , and advise a minimum of 60 minutes per day of moderate to vigorous activity for ages 6-17.  Alas, only one in five teenagers  meets this standard. 

Inactivity has been called “the new smoking,” and the prevalence of obesity and inactivity may well mean children today will  lead shorter lifespans than their parents . Children desperately need to learn the importance of physical fitness, how to achieve it, and how to maintain it. Well-taught physical education keeps students moving and motivated, building their competence and confidence so that they can stay fit over a lifetime.

Funding for PE classes is shockingly low

Alas, just when children need it most, PE has slipped to the bottom of the curricular ladder in all too many school districts. It is profoundly shocking that the median PE budget for American schools is only $764 a year, according to the Society of Health and Physical Educators. In a school of 500 students, that means only $1.50 per child for PE, when total per pupil annual expenditures in our public schools often exceeds $12,000.

This is of special concern in the inner city, where families have few fitness resources outside of school. But it is troubling everywhere, as a perfect storm of circumstances has conspired to minimize activity in children’s lives, not only putting them at risk for life-threatening diseases later on, but depriving them of the mental and cognitive benefits  we know exercise provides. Harvard neuropsychiatrist John Ratey has called exercise “ Miracle-Gro for the brain ,” and hundreds of studies show exercise enhances learning as well as emotional health and social development.

More: Starvation issues in universities? The real college problem is obesity.

Taxing our soda and interfering with our diets won't always result in slimmer waistlines

Body positivity is not an excuse for obesity: Your Say

We are also putting unfit children at financial risk as adults. Researchers at Johns Hopkins University have calculated that an  overweight individual’s lifetime medical expenses related to his or her excess weight average $62,331, and lost wages around $93,100, roughly double the costs for a person of healthy weight — and enough money to put a child through college or make a down payment on a house.

Traditionally, schools have been instrumental in supporting children’s health, because they are uniquely positioned to reach the maximum number of children over a 12-year period. They help to ensure students are immunized, provide health screenings, and strive to serve nutritional meals. Physical education is every bit as important as the right shots and eating your vegetables, and yet not one state follows the Centers for Disease Control recommendations for time spent in PE at all grade levels. Some children with the means and desire to play sports get exercise that way, but the reality is that 70 percent of children drop out of organized sports by age 13.

Studies show kids in PE continue healthy habits

By contrast, regular PE class means all children can access the myriad benefits exercise provides until they reach adulthood – and beyond. According to the Physical Activity Council, children who have physical education in school are twice as likely to be active outside PE class and to remain active when they become adults . Correlation does not equate to cause, but it makes sense that children who learn good fitness habits in school will practice them out of school, and that a fit childhood sets a foundation for fitness as an adult.

While I appreciate the competing concerns schools must prioritize today, I believe it is time to make physical education a core subject on equal footing with academic classes. It is well established that children have a right to a quality education, and physical education is a fundamental aspect of that right, giving children the knowledge they need to stay healthy and equipping them for life’s challenges by teaching persistence, resilience, and positive thinking.

Our country boasts one of the highest standards of living in the world. Surely we can find a way to give our kids the gift of physical education and fitness. We did it in the past, when schools rallied behind JFK’s call for a fit nation as “ a vital prerequisite to America’s realization of its full potential ,” and we can do it again today. Indeed, some schools already have, and we can learn from them. All it takes is the will to make it happen, and Americans have always had plenty of that. 

William E. Simon Jr., a former assistant U.S. attorney and the 2002 Republican nominee for governor of California, is co-founder of UCLA Health Sound Body Sound Mind and the author of "Break a Sweat, Change Your Life: The Urgent Need for Physical Education in Schools."

IMAGES

  1. Spanish 1 Mid Term

    persuasive essay should physical education be required in school

  2. Essay On Why Is Education Important

    persuasive essay should physical education be required in school

  3. Joshua M

    persuasive essay should physical education be required in school

  4. Persuasive Essay

    persuasive essay should physical education be required in school

  5. Persuasive Essay Sample

    persuasive essay should physical education be required in school

  6. Importance Of Physical Education In Schools

    persuasive essay should physical education be required in school

VIDEO

  1. ENG 1A

  2. Persuasive Speech

  3. Persuasive Speech- Why You Should Exercise

  4. Importance of physical education in schools. For XI and XII English

  5. Speech 3: Persuasive (Why Homework Should Be Banned

  6. Russian education

COMMENTS

  1. Physical Education in Schools: [Essay Example], 676 words

    In this essay, I will argue that physical education should be a mandatory part of the school curriculum, providing evidence to support the claim that it is essential for the physical, mental, and social development of students.

  2. Importance of Physical Education in Schools: [Essay Example ...

    In this essay, the importance of physical education in schools will be explored, including its history, benefits, role in promoting social skills, as well as the challenges and controversies it faces.

  3. Argumentative Essay on Physical Education in Schools

    Physical education is a key factor in helping develop a child’s ability to stay focused in the classroom. There have been several studies for students in elementary through college, showing when a student is performing in physical activities it enlarges the basal ganglia of the brain.

  4. Should Physical Education Be Required In Schools Essay

    Although physical education takes time away from other subjects in the classroom, physical education should be required in schools because our generation is becoming overweight and it helps students do better in class.

  5. Importance Of Physical Education: [Essay Example], 521 words

    So there you have it: physical education is super important in schools. It keeps kids fit but also helps with mental health and boosts academic performance. On top of that, it teaches crucial life skills while promoting social interaction and inclusiveness.

  6. Argument Essay: The Need For Physical Education In Schools

    Although physical education takes time away from other subjects in the classroom, physical education should be required in schools because our generation is becoming overweight and it helps students do better in class.

  7. The Importance of Physical Education: 5 Insightful Essay Examples

    Physical education should be a mandatory part of the school curriculum, given its numerous benefits. This essay argues for the compulsory inclusion of PE in schools.

  8. Physical Education In Schools Should Be Compulsory

    Physical Education In Schools Should Be Compulsory. Table of Contents. Should Physical Education in schools be compulsory? All the Yes points: Participation in sport promotes health. Physical Education is an important part of holistic schooling. School sport is about discovering gifts. The quest for national sporting achievement begins in schools.

  9. Kids need more physical education, it should be a core school ...

    Physical education should be on equal footing with academic classes. It teaches kids persistence, resilience, positive thinking and how to stay healthy. William E. Simon Jr. Opinion...

  10. Persuasive Essay On Physical Education - 1044 Words - bartleby

    Physical education hopes to accomplish, to engage all students, not just the athlete elite, in fun activities that will instill a lifelong commitment to fitness.” (Johnson, 264). Physical education in the classroom can be a vital steeping stone to the way that teenagers think about fitness.