Piano, harpsichord, accordion etc.
Honored Artist of the Russian Federation
Moscow Government Prize “For a Successfully Implemented Project” (arrangements of works by Piazzolla recorded by “Moscow Virtuosi”)
Soloist of the State Chamber Orchestra “Moscow Virtuosi”
Associate Professor of Moscow State Conservatory
Professor of Gnesin Academy
Winner of Kiel international piano competition (Sweden)
Grand Prix of Kiev International piano competition (Ukraine)
Artist of the Lorraine Opera House
Vocal teacher
Special prize of the Schneider-Trnavsky competition (Slovakia)
Winner of the American Musical Studies competition (Austria)
Associate Professor of Institute of Culture and Arts of Moscow City University
Director-general of “Maestoso” Int. Co., Ltd.
Winner of “Bella Voce” Competition (Russia)
Winner of the Obraztsova International Vocal Competition (Russia)
Assistant Professor of Academic Music College at the Moscow State Conservatory
1st prize winner (as part of a quintet) of International Henri Tomazy Competition (France)
Winner of 1st Rimsky-Korsakov International competition (Russia)
Director of “Poco a Poco Piano Lessons” Music School, Osaka
Director of “Russian Piano Academy in Osaka
Top-prize winner of “All-Japan Association of Musicians” Contest-audition
Prize winner of the 2nd Competition for young musicians in Nagoya (Japan)
1st prize winner of the Guitar Foundation of America Competition (USA)
1st prize winner of the Francisco Tárrega Competition (Spain)
Assistant Professor at the Moscow State Conservatory
1st prize winner of Hamamatsu International Piano Competition (Japan)
Winner of Queen Elizabeth piano competition (Belgium)
Soloist of the Bolshoi Theatre Orchestra of Russia
Assistant Professor of Moscow State Conservatory
1st prize winner of All-Union competition of performers on percussion instruments (USSR)
Winner of the competition (as soloist-xylophonist) of brass orchestras (Poland)
Artist-in-residence of the German-Russian Institute of Culture in Dresden (Germany)
Grand Prix winner (as a harpsichord-soloist) of the Competition Music without limits (Lithuania)
Grand Prix winner of the Wanda Landowska Harpsichord competition (Italy)
submission field | |
Application fee: 3000 RUB (~30€ )
Apply Visit Give | Alumni Parents Offices TCNJ Today Three Bar Menu
The list of resources below are available to students interested in/participating in the Mayo Business Plan Competition. Use of these resources is not required unless otherwise indicated. The resources listed below are for informational purposes only and do not imply endorsement.
Students Looking for a Team Students who are committed to participating but do not have a team, have an idea for a business but are new and do not know anyone to ask, or students who have a small team but would like to add to it can fill out the Students Looking for a Team form. We will connect all students who complete the form, via email, and make an initial “introduction”. After that, it is up to the student(s) to further the connection and/or discussion.
LinkedIn Learning Modules You must be logged in with your TCNJ credentials to access these modules at no cost.
How to Write a Business Plan
Sample Business Plans
Sample Business Plan – Section by Section
Business Plan Example & Template
SCORE: Business Plan Templates & Resources
Resources for Financials
How to Create a Pitch Video
Teams may select a mentor of their choice at any time during the competition. Teams progressing into the semi-finals & finals are required to have a mentor. Teams must notify the School of Business when they select a mentor(s) by emailing [email protected] . This is required to ensure there are no conflicts of interest in the judging process. Teams may reach out to School of Business faculty directly. If you would like to select someone from the Mentor List, do not contact them directly. Please email Stephanie Horner, at [email protected] , and she will connect you with the mentor.
Evaluation Rubric
The New Jersey Small Business Development Center at TCNJ
2024 Mayo Business Plan Competition Finals |
---|
TCNJ Today || Parents || Alumni
Campus Life
A-Z | Directory | Map | Offices
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Instagram YouTube
What is moscow prioritization.
MoSCoW prioritization, also known as the MoSCoW method or MoSCoW analysis, is a popular prioritization technique for managing requirements.
The acronym MoSCoW represents four categories of initiatives: must-have, should-have, could-have, and won’t-have, or will not have right now. Some companies also use the “W” in MoSCoW to mean “wish.”
Software development expert Dai Clegg created the MoSCoW method while working at Oracle. He designed the framework to help his team prioritize tasks during development work on product releases.
You can find a detailed account of using MoSCoW prioritization in the Dynamic System Development Method (DSDM) handbook . But because MoSCoW can prioritize tasks within any time-boxed project, teams have adapted the method for a broad range of uses.
Before running a MoSCoW analysis, a few things need to happen. First, key stakeholders and the product team need to get aligned on objectives and prioritization factors. Then, all participants must agree on which initiatives to prioritize.
At this point, your team should also discuss how they will settle any disagreements in prioritization. If you can establish how to resolve disputes before they come up, you can help prevent those disagreements from holding up progress.
Finally, you’ll also want to reach a consensus on what percentage of resources you’d like to allocate to each category.
With the groundwork complete, you may begin determining which category is most appropriate for each initiative. But, first, let’s further break down each category in the MoSCoW method.
Moscow prioritization categories.
As the name suggests, this category consists of initiatives that are “musts” for your team. They represent non-negotiable needs for the project, product, or release in question. For example, if you’re releasing a healthcare application, a must-have initiative may be security functionalities that help maintain compliance.
The “must-have” category requires the team to complete a mandatory task. If you’re unsure about whether something belongs in this category, ask yourself the following.
If the product won’t work without an initiative, or the release becomes useless without it, the initiative is most likely a “must-have.”
Should-have initiatives are just a step below must-haves. They are essential to the product, project, or release, but they are not vital. If left out, the product or project still functions. However, the initiatives may add significant value.
“Should-have” initiatives are different from “must-have” initiatives in that they can get scheduled for a future release without impacting the current one. For example, performance improvements, minor bug fixes, or new functionality may be “should-have” initiatives. Without them, the product still works.
Another way of describing “could-have” initiatives is nice-to-haves. “Could-have” initiatives are not necessary to the core function of the product. However, compared with “should-have” initiatives, they have a much smaller impact on the outcome if left out.
So, initiatives placed in the “could-have” category are often the first to be deprioritized if a project in the “should-have” or “must-have” category ends up larger than expected.
One benefit of the MoSCoW method is that it places several initiatives in the “will-not-have” category. The category can manage expectations about what the team will not include in a specific release (or another timeframe you’re prioritizing).
Placing initiatives in the “will-not-have” category is one way to help prevent scope creep . If initiatives are in this category, the team knows they are not a priority for this specific time frame.
Some initiatives in the “will-not-have” group will be prioritized in the future, while others are not likely to happen. Some teams decide to differentiate between those by creating a subcategory within this group.
Although Dai Clegg developed the approach to help prioritize tasks around his team’s limited time, the MoSCoW method also works when a development team faces limitations other than time. For example:
What if a development team’s limiting factor is not a deadline but a tight budget imposed by the company? Working with the product managers, the team can use MoSCoW first to decide on the initiatives that represent must-haves and the should-haves. Then, using the development department’s budget as the guide, the team can figure out which items they can complete.
A cross-functional product team might also find itself constrained by the experience and expertise of its developers. If the product roadmap calls for functionality the team does not have the skills to build, this limiting factor will play into scoring those items in their MoSCoW analysis.
Cross-functional teams can also find themselves constrained by other company priorities. The team wants to make progress on a new product release, but the executive staff has created tight deadlines for further releases in the same timeframe. In this case, the team can use MoSCoW to determine which aspects of their desired release represent must-haves and temporarily backlog everything else.
Although many product and development teams have prioritized MoSCoW, the approach has potential pitfalls. Here are a few examples.
One common criticism against MoSCoW is that it does not include an objective methodology for ranking initiatives against each other. Your team will need to bring this methodology to your analysis. The MoSCoW approach works only to ensure that your team applies a consistent scoring system for all initiatives.
Pro tip: One proven method is weighted scoring, where your team measures each initiative on your backlog against a standard set of cost and benefit criteria. You can use the weighted scoring approach in ProductPlan’s roadmap app .
To know which of your team’s initiatives represent must-haves for your product and which are merely should-haves, you will need as much context as possible.
For example, you might need someone from your sales team to let you know how important (or unimportant) prospective buyers view a proposed new feature.
One pitfall of the MoSCoW method is that you could make poor decisions about where to slot each initiative unless your team receives input from all relevant stakeholders.
Because MoSCoW does not include an objective scoring method, your team members can fall victim to their own opinions about certain initiatives.
One risk of using MoSCoW prioritization is that a team can mistakenly think MoSCoW itself represents an objective way of measuring the items on their list. They discuss an initiative, agree that it is a “should have,” and move on to the next.
But your team will also need an objective and consistent framework for ranking all initiatives. That is the only way to minimize your team’s biases in favor of items or against them.
MoSCoW prioritization is effective for teams that want to include representatives from the whole organization in their process. You can capture a broader perspective by involving participants from various functional departments.
Another reason you may want to use MoSCoW prioritization is it allows your team to determine how much effort goes into each category. Therefore, you can ensure you’re delivering a good variety of initiatives in each release.
If you’re considering giving MoSCoW prioritization a try, here are a few steps to keep in mind. Incorporating these into your process will help your team gain more value from the MoSCoW method.
Remember, MoSCoW helps your team group items into the appropriate buckets—from must-have items down to your longer-term wish list. But MoSCoW itself doesn’t help you determine which item belongs in which category.
You will need a separate ranking methodology. You can choose from many, such as:
For help finding the best scoring methodology for your team, check out ProductPlan’s article: 7 strategies to choose the best features for your product .
To make sure you’re placing each initiative into the right bucket—must-have, should-have, could-have, or won’t-have—your team needs context.
At the beginning of your MoSCoW method, your team should consider which stakeholders can provide valuable context and insights. Sales? Customer success? The executive staff? Product managers in another area of your business? Include them in your initiative scoring process if you think they can help you see opportunities or threats your team might miss.
MoSCoW gives your team a tangible way to show your organization prioritizing initiatives for your products or projects.
The method can help you build company-wide consensus for your work, or at least help you show stakeholders why you made the decisions you did.
Communicating your team’s prioritization strategy also helps you set expectations across the business. When they see your methodology for choosing one initiative over another, stakeholders in other departments will understand that your team has thought through and weighed all decisions you’ve made.
If any stakeholders have an issue with one of your decisions, they will understand that they can’t simply complain—they’ll need to present you with evidence to alter your course of action.
Related Terms
2×2 prioritization matrix / Eisenhower matrix / DACI decision-making framework / ICE scoring model / RICE scoring model
Talk to an expert.
Schedule a few minutes with us to share more about your product roadmapping goals and we'll tailor a demo to show you how easy it is to build strategic roadmaps, align behind customer needs, prioritize, and measure success.
I nternational tchaikovsky competition (moscow, russia), established in 1958, the international tchaikovsky competition in moscow is one of the most prestigious piano competitions globally. held every four years, it attracts exceptional pianists from around the world. named after renowned composer pyotr ilyich tchaikovsky, this competition showcases the mastery of both solo and concerto performances. the competition's rich history, illustrious jury, and the opportunity to perform with renowned orchestras make it a pinnacle event for aspiring pianists., van cliburn international piano competition (fort worth, united states), founded in 1962 and named after legendary pianist van cliburn, this competition has attained a prominent standing in the piano world. held every four years in fort worth, texas, the van cliburn international piano competition draws pianists of extraordinary talent. known for its rigorous selection process, it offers a platform for participants to display both technical prowess and artistic sensitivity. the competition's comprehensive repertoire requirements and the chance to perform with prestigious symphony orchestras contribute to its esteemed reputation., international chopin piano competition (warsaw, poland), dedicated exclusively to the works of frederic chopin, the international chopin piano competition in warsaw is a celebration of the polish composer's music. this competition, held every five years, attracts pianists who excel in interpreting chopin's compositions. since its inception in 1927, the competition has become a testament to the enduring legacy of chopin's music. the competition's focus on, chopin's repertoire, the esteemed jury, and the opportunity to perform at the historic warsaw philharmonic contribute to its global recognition., arthur rubinstein international piano master competition (tel aviv, israel), named after the iconic pianist arthur rubinstein, this competition is held in tel aviv, israel, every three years. it serves as a platform for young pianists to showcase their talent and pays homage to rubinstein's contributions to the piano world. the competition's emphasis on artistic expression, virtuosity, and interpretation of various musical styles distinguishes it as one of the most esteemed piano competitions. the chance to perform with renowned orchestras and the opportunity for exposure to international audiences make it a highly coveted event., leeds international piano competition (leeds, united kingdom), founded in 1961, the leeds international piano competition has a long-standing reputation for nurturing exceptional pianistic talent. held every three years, it attracts a diverse range of pianists from across the globe. the competition's commitment to artistic excellence, its innovative programming, and the opportunity to perform with renowned orchestras have established it as a prominent platform for emerging pianists. additionally, the competition's focus on chamber music and collaborative performances further enhances its appeal., the international tchaikovsky competition, van cliburn international piano competition, international chopin piano competition, arthur rubinstein international piano master competition, and leeds international piano competition stand out as premier events that celebrate the artistry and virtuosity of pianists worldwide. these competitions offer aspiring musicians the opportunity to showcase their talent, connect with influential figures in the music industry, and gain recognition on an international stage. participating in these esteemed events can propel young pianists towards successful careers and contribute to their artistic growth., featured posts.
Striking a Balance: The Device-Time Piano Parenting Deal
Improve your Piano Skill: Common Mistakes in Learning Piano Technique
The Importance of Musical Theory: Unlocking the True Potential of Musicians
Title: Harmonious Construction: The Step-by-Step Journey of Learning a New Piece of Music
10 Proven Strategies to Ignite Your Child's Passion for Piano
Unlocking the Keys: Utilizing YouTube as a Valuable Resource for Learning the Piano
Resonating Through Time: A Journey into the History of Pianos
The Music Journey: Considering the Ramifications of Allowing Your Child to Give Up
The Power of Collaboration: Why Aspiring Pianists Should Collaborate with Other Musicians
Preserving the Melodic Treasure: Essential Tips for Caring for Your Piano
Making the Most of Your Piano Lesson: Active Engagement and Effective Learning
Nurturing Musical Talent: Recognizing Signs of a Music Prodigy in Your Child
Apply Visit Give | Alumni Parents Offices TCNJ Today Three Bar Menu
The Mayo Business Plan Competition is designed to increase student appreciation for the challenge of developing a viable business. Through an iterative process the MBPC recognizes those students best able to articulate a plan that addresses these challenges. In recognition of both the time involved and difficulty of the task, the competition provides a substantial reward for the successful teams.
Participants: All TCNJ students from ALL majors are welcome to participate. Students with ideas that translate into viable business products or services can come from virtually any School and major. Each team must be comprised of no less than two and no more than four current TCNJ students.
Sponsoring Donors: The School of Business thanks Professor Herbert B. Mayo for establishing and supporting the Mayo Business Plan Competition and Eric Szabo ’97 for his generous support.
Business Building, Room 114 The College of New Jersey P.O. Box 7718 2000 Pennington Rd. Ewing, NJ 08628
Office of the Dean
Faculty & Staff
Driving Directions
Request Info
TCNJ Today || Parents || Alumni
Campus Life
A-Z | Directory | Map | Offices
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Instagram YouTube
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Mayo Business Plan Competition Finals. The Mayo Business Plan Competition Finals will take place this Wednesday, March 27, 2024, beginning at 5:00 pm in Mayo Concert Hall. The final three teams will present their final business plans to the judges and compete for their part of the $60,000 in prize money! Come out and support the final three ...
The Mayo Business Plan Competition was established in 2011 through the generosity of finance professor emeritus Herbert B. "Buddy" Mayo. Through the TCNJ Foundation, Mayo established an endowment that supports the competition — one of the most robust in New Jersey. [solidbox] Dylan Romanski, Alex Fabiano, and Caley Faith Cortezano
The final three teams competing in the 2024 Mayo Business Plan Competition have been selected. A top prize of $30,000 will be awarded to the winning team with prizes of $20,000 and $10,000 for second and third-place teams. Open to the public, the live finals will be held on March 27, 2024, at 5:00 pm, Mayo Concert Hall.
Golden Connections, an AI-powered health and wellness digital platform designed to help with the needs of senior citizens and their caregivers, won the first-place prize of $30,000 in the 2024 Mayo Business Plan Competition. Lauren Cunningham '24, Emma Route '25, and Sangam Shivaprasad '24 developed the digital platform to serve as a ...
The Mayo Business Plan Competition Finals will take place this Wednesday, March 27, 2024, beginning at 5:00 pm in Mayo Concert Hall. The final three teams will present their final business plans to the judges and compete for their part of the $60,000 in prize money! Come out and support the final three teams! If you cannot attend in person, this event will be live-streamed.
2023 Mayo Business Plan Competition Finalists Announced. The final three teams competing in the 2023 Mayo Business Plan Competition have been selected. A top prize of $30,000 will be awarded to the winning team with prizes of $20,000 and $10,000 for second and third place teams.
The final three teams competing in the 2023 Mayo Business Plan Competition have been selected. A top prize of $30,000 will be awarded to the winning team with prizes of $20,000 and $10,000 for second and third place teams. Open to the public, the live finals will be held on March 29, 5:00pm, in the Mayo Concert Hall.
The 2023 Mayo Business Plan Competition Prize Money The first MBPC in 2012 awarded $20,000 in prize money which has now grown to $60,000 due to continued support. A Special Thanks The School of Business thanks Professor Herbert B. Mayo for establishing and supporting the Mayo Business Plan Competition and Eric Szabo '97 for his generous support.
The Mayo Business Plan Competition, which began in 2011, enhances academics "while inspiring creative entrepreneurial students," said School of Business Dean Kathryn Jervis. Students from all different schools and departments at TCNJ were represented in the business competition, which was judged by a team of alumni who have achieved success ...
The Mayo Business Plan Competition, established and generously funded by Professor Herbert B. Mayo, offers a real-world opportunity where students are encouraged to grapple with the complexities of crafting a viable, original business plan. ... Commenting on the impactful personal touch of Golden Connection's ambitious plan, Dean of TCNJ's ...
Competition Schedule. Timeline and Directions for 2024-2025. 9/18/24 Mayo Business Plan Competition Kick-Off/Information Session - At least one team member is strongly advised to attend the MBPC kick-off & information session. This session will include reviewing the timeline for the competition, requirements, what is entailed in participating ...
Explore Programs. Areas of Study; Majors, Minors, and Specializations; Teacher Education Programs; Seven-Year Medical and Optometry Programs; Dual Degree Programs; Learning Outcomes
Congratulations to the CrystalCost and Kinetic Art Display teams who have made it to the finals of the 2023 Mayo Business Plan Competition! The final round will take place on March 29th at 5:00pm in the Mayo Concert Hall. First place will receive $30,000, while second and third place will receive $20,000 and $10,000, respectively.
The final three teams competing in the 2022 Mayo Business Plan Competition have been selected. The live finals will be held on March 30, 2022, 5:00pm, in the Mayo Concert Hall. This event is open to the public. A top prize of $30,000 will be awarded to the winning team with prizes of $20,000 and $10,000 for second and third place teams.
What is the Mayo Business Plan Competition Prizes? First Place Prize- $30,000. Second Place Prize- $20,000. Third Place Prize- $10,000. Meet Our Finance Major. Madison is a senior Finance Major at The College of New Jersey, where she is highly involved in Lions on Wall Street (TCNJ's Investment Banking Club) and the School of Business Peer ...
Congratulations to these TCNJ Engineering students whose teams have made it to the semi-finals of the 2023 Mayo Business Plan Competition! Three of the six semi-finalists will advance to the finals, where they will have the chance to win up to $30,000. Best of luck to all! CrystalCost
TCNJ junior receives prestigious Boren Award for study abroad in Moscow next year. Posted on August 1, 2011. Furman and Dean Rifkin . EWING, NJ…Rising TCNJ senior Bryan Furman has received a Boren Award for study abroad in Moscow in the 2011-2012 academic year. Boren Awards are highly competitive academic scholarships awarded by the federal ...
The International Moscow Music Online-Competition is an opportunity to demonstrate your talent and dedication to music, and receive a Diploma of the international competition in electronic form. Recordings are judged by leading musicians, experts from many different countries. Grand Prix 1000 $. Special money prizes.
Team Zero Wins 2021 Mayo Business Plan Competition!!! The Mayo Business Plan Competition finals took place on March 31, 2021. A full recording of the event can be found here. Congratulations to the team winners Joaquin Garcia '21 (marketing major), Jay Lim '21 (chemistry major), Thomas Fitzgerald '21 (finance major) and Axel Delakowski ...
Contact. The Mayo Business Plan Competition The College of New Jersey 2000 Pennington Rd. Ewing, NJ 08628. Stephanie Horner 609.771.3050 [email protected]
MoSCoW prioritization, also known as the MoSCoW method or MoSCoW analysis, is a popular prioritization technique for managing requirements. The acronym MoSCoW represents four categories of initiatives: must-have, should-have, could-have, and won't-have, or will not have right now. Some companies also use the "W" in MoSCoW to mean "wish.".
Explore the finest piano competitions globally. Discover prestigious events showcasing virtuosity, artistry, and musical excellence. Gain insights into renowned competitions, judging criteria, and career opportunities. Understand the transformative impact of participating in these esteemed events. Embrace the world of piano competitions, where talents are discovered, celebrated, and propelled ...
Sponsoring Donors: The School of Business thanks Professor Herbert B. Mayo for establishing and supporting the Mayo Business Plan Competition and Eric Szabo '97 for his generous support. Save the Date for the 2017 Mayo Business Plan Competition Info Session on Thursday, Oct. 20, at 6pm in the BB Lounge.