essay on home as the first social institution

Social Institutions in Sociology: Definition & Examples

Charlotte Nickerson

Research Assistant at Harvard University

Undergraduate at Harvard University

Charlotte Nickerson is a student at Harvard University obsessed with the intersection of mental health, productivity, and design.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Saul McLeod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

On This Page:

Key Takeaways

• A social institution is a group or organization that has specific roles, norms, and expectations, which functions to meet the social needs of society. The family, government, religion, education, and media are all examples of social institutions.
• Social institutions are interdependent and continually interact and influence one another in everyday society. For example, some religious institutions believe they should have control over governmental and educational institutions.
• Social institutions can have both manifest and latent functions . Manifest functions are those that are explicitly stated, while latent functions are not.
• Each social institution plays a vital role in the functioning of society and the lives of the people that inhabit them.

What Are Social Institutions?

Social institutions are the organizations in society that influence how society is structured and functions. They include family, media, education, and the government.

A social institution is an established practice, tradition, behavior, or system of roles and relationships that is considered a normative structure or arrangement within a society.

Bogardus – “A social institution is a structure of society that is organized to meet the needs of people chiefly through well-established procedures.”

H. E. Barnes – “Social institutions are the social structure & machinery through which human society organizes, directs & executes the multifarious activities required to society for human need.”

Broadly, they are patterns of behavior grouped around the central needs of human beings in a society. One such example of an institution is marriage, where multiple people commit to follow certain rules and acquire a familial legal status about each other (Miller, 2007).

Social institutions have several key characteristics:

• They are enduring and stable.
• They serve a purpose, ideally providing better chances for human survival and flourishing.
• They have roles that need to be filled.
• Governing the behavior and expectations of sets of individuals within a given community.
• The rules that govern them are usually ingrained in the basic cultural values of a society, as each institution consists of a complex cluster of social norms .

They also serve general functions, including:

• Allocating resources
• Creating meaning
• Maintaining order
• Growing society and its influence

Examples (and Functions)

The five major social institutions in sociology are family, education, religion, government (political), and the economy.

The family is one of the most important social institutions. It is considered a “building block” of society because it is the primary unit through which socialization occurs.

It is a social unit created by blood, marriage, or adoption, and can be described as nuclear, consisting of two parents and their children, or extended, encompassing other relatives. Although families differ widely around the world, families across cultures share certain common concerns in their everyday lives (Little & McGivern, 2020).

As a social institution, the family serves numerous, multifaceted functions. The family socializes its members by teaching them values, beliefs, and norms.

It also provides emotional support and economic stability. Sometimes, the family may even be a caretaker if one of its members is sick or disabled (Little & McGivern, 2020).

Historically, the family has been the central social institution of Western societies. However, more recently, as sociologists have observed, other social institutions have replaced the family in providing key functions, as family sizes have shrunk and provided more distant ties.

For example, modern schools have, in part, taken on the role of socializing children, and workplaces can provide shared meaning.

• Functions of The Family (Marxism)
• Functionalist Perspective of the Family

E. Durkheim – “Education can be conceived as the socialization of the younger generation. It is a continuous effort to impose on the child ways of seeing, feeling and acting which he could not arrived at spontaneously.”

John J. Macionis – “Education is the social institution through which society provides its members with important knowledge, including basic facts, jobs, skills & cultural norms & values .”

As a social institution, education helps to socialize children and young adults by teaching them the norms, values, and beliefs of their culture. It also transmits cultural heritage from one generation to the next. Education also provides people with the skills and knowledge they need to function in society.

Education may also help to reduce crime rates by providing people with alternatives to criminal activity. These are the “manifest” or openly stated functions and intended goals of education as a social institution (Meyer, 1977).

Education, sociologists have argued, also has a number of latent, or hidden and unstated functions. This can include courtship, the development of social networks, improving the ability for students to work in groups, the creation of a generation gap, and political and social integration (Little & McGivern, 2020).

Although every country in the world is equipped with some form of education system, these systems, as well as the values and teaching philosophies of those who run the systems, vary greatly. Generally, a country”s wealth is directly proportional to the quality of its educational system.

For example, in poor countries, education may be seen as a luxury that only the wealthy can afford, while in rich countries, education is more accessible to a wider range of people.

This is because, in poorer countries, money is often spent on more pressing needs such as food and shelter, diminishing financial and time investments in education (Little & McGivern, 2016).

Religion is another social institution that plays a significant role in society. It is an organized system of beliefs and practices designed to fill the human need for meaning and purpose (Durkheim, 1915).

According to Durkheim, “Religion is a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, that is to say, things set apart and forbidden.”

According to Ogburn, “Religion is an attitude towards superhuman powers.”

Religion can be used to instill moral values and socialize individuals into a community. Religion plays a significant role in shaping the way people view themselves and the world around them.

It can provide comfort and security to those in need. Large religions may also provide a basis for community support, establishing institutions of their own, such as hospitals and schools.

Additionally, it can be used as a form of political control or as a source of conflict. Different sociologists have commented on the broad-scale societal effects of religion.

Max Weber , for example, believed that religion could be a force for social change, while Karl Marx viewed religion as a tool used by capitalist societies to perpetuate inequality (Little & McGivern, 2016).

The government is another social institution that plays a vital role in society. It is responsible for maintaining order, protecting citizens from harm, and providing for the common good.

The government does this through various sub-institutions and agencies, such as the police, the military, and the courts. These legal institutions regulate society and prevent crime by enforcing laws and policies.

The government also provides social services, such as education and healthcare, ensuring the general welfare of a country or region”s citizens (Little & McGivern, 2016).

The economy is a social institution that is responsible for the production and distribution of goods and services. It is also responsible for the exchange of money and other resources.

The economy is often divided into three sectors: the primary sector, the secondary sector, and the tertiary sector (Little & McGivern, 2016).

The primary sector includes all industries that are concerned with the extraction and production of natural resources, such as agriculture, forestry, fishing, and mining.

The secondary sector includes all industries that are concerned with the processing of raw materials into finished products, such as manufacturing and construction.

The tertiary sector includes all industries that provide services to individuals and businesses, such as education, healthcare, and tourism (Little & McGivern, 2016).

Barnes, H. E. (1942). Social institutions.  New York , 29.

Bogardus, E. S. (1922).  A history of social thought . University of Southern California Press.

Bogardus, E. S. (1960).  development of social thought .

Durkheim, E. (2006).  Durkheim: Essays on morals and education  (Vol. 1). Taylor & Francis.

Durkheim, E. (2016). The elementary forms of religious life. In  Social Theory Re-Wired  (pp. 52-67). Routledge.

Little, W., McGivern, R., & Kerins, N. (2016).  Introduction to sociology-2nd Canadian edition . BC Campus.

Macionis, J. J., & Plummer, K. (2005).  Sociology: A global introduction . Pearson Education.

Meyer, J. W. (1977). The effects of education as an institution .  American Journal of Sociology ,  83 (1), 55-77.

Ogburn, W. F. (1937). The influence of inventions on American social institutions in the future.  American Journal of Sociology ,  43 (3), 365-376.

Miller, S. (2007). Social institutions In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Schotter, A. (2008). The economic theory of social institutions.  Cambridge Books .

Weber, M. (1936). Social actions .

What are Social Institutions in Sociology?

In sociology, social institutions are established norms and subsystems that support each society’s survival. These institutions are a key part of the structure of society. They include the family, education, religion, and economic and political institutions.

These institutions are not just physical structures or organizations but also the norms and rules that govern our behavior and attitudes, shaping our social interactions and society at large.

What is the role of a social institution?

Each social institution serves a specific role and function in society, and they work together to maintain the overall stability and survival of society.

For instance, the family institution is responsible for societal roles related to birth, upbringing, and socialization. The educational institution imparts knowledge and skills to individuals so they can contribute productively to society.

Home — Essay Samples — Sociology — Family Relationships — The Family as a Social Institution

The Family as a Social Institution

• Categories: Family Relationships Marriage and Family

About this sample

Words: 637 |

Published: Aug 31, 2023

Words: 637 | Page: 1 | 4 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr Jacklynne

Verified writer

• Expert in: Sociology Life

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

3 pages / 1271 words

3 pages / 1161 words

2 pages / 978 words

2 pages / 970 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Family Relationships

Family is an integral part of everyone's life. It is the first place where we learn about relationships, values, and love. As a college student, I can confidently say that my family has played a significant role in shaping [...]

Teenage parenting can be a challenging task for parents, as it involves dealing with the realities of adolescence and maintaining a strong relationship with their children. During the teenage years, adolescents undergo [...]

After reading about Eric and Chandra’s conflict, I believe that numerous issues are contributing to the conflict. Some of the problems include Eric’s inability to hold down a job, lack of assistance with the household duties, [...]

Lewis, L. (2015). The Importance of Family Vacations. Psychology Today.Orthner, D. K. (2008). The Family Vacation: A Common Ground for Learning and Growth. Journal of Extension.Yeates, M. (2018). The Mental Health Benefits of [...]

It took me eighteen years to realize what an extraordinary influence my mother has been on my life. She's the kind of person who has thoughtful discussions about which artist she would most want to have her portrait painted by [...]

Love language. Is that some special kind of lingo spoken by lovebirds? Many would be at a loss when asked what their love language is, as they may not have given much thought to it. However, just like any other language, it is [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

Exploring the Prominent Role of Social Institutions in Society

• International Research Journal of MMC 4(2):68-74
• CC BY-NC 4.0
• This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations
• Sakaria To Anwar

• Mehdi Rezaei
• Jafar Kordzanganeh

• Int J Environ Res Publ Health

• Andrea Kaltenbach
• Aniko Szabo

• Emile Durkheim
• Michael Fullan
• Cigdem Kagitcibasi
• Lauris Christopher Kaldjian
• Sheila Jasanoff

• Francisco O. Ramirez
• Kraig Beyerlein

• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

15.2 Sociological Perspectives on the Family

Learning objective.

• Summarize understandings of the family as presented by functional, conflict, and social interactionist theories.

Sociological views on today’s families generally fall into the functional, conflict, and social interactionist approaches introduced earlier in this book. Let’s review these views, which are summarized in Table 15.1 “Theory Snapshot” .

Table 15.1 Theory Snapshot

Social Functions of the Family

Recall that the functional perspective emphasizes that social institutions perform several important functions to help preserve social stability and otherwise keep a society working. A functional understanding of the family thus stresses the ways in which the family as a social institution helps make society possible. As such, the family performs several important functions.

First, the family is the primary unit for socializing children . As previous chapters indicated, no society is possible without adequate socialization of its young. In most societies, the family is the major unit in which socialization happens. Parents, siblings, and, if the family is extended rather than nuclear, other relatives all help socialize children from the time they are born.

One of the most important functions of the family is the socialization of children. In most societies the family is the major unit through which socialization occurs.

Colleen Kelly – Kids Playing Monopoly Chicago – CC BY 2.0.

Second, the family is ideally a major source of practical and emotional support for its members. It provides them food, clothing, shelter, and other essentials, and it also provides them love, comfort, help in times of emotional distress, and other types of intangible support that we all need.

Third, the family helps regulate sexual activity and sexual reproduction . All societies have norms governing with whom and how often a person should have sex. The family is the major unit for teaching these norms and the major unit through which sexual reproduction occurs. One reason for this is to ensure that infants have adequate emotional and practical care when they are born. The incest taboo that most societies have, which prohibits sex between certain relatives, helps minimize conflict within the family if sex occurred among its members and to establish social ties among different families and thus among society as a whole.

Fourth, the family provides its members with a social identity . Children are born into their parents’ social class, race and ethnicity, religion, and so forth. As we have seen in earlier chapters, social identity is important for our life chances. Some children have advantages throughout life because of the social identity they acquire from their parents, while others face many obstacles because the social class or race/ethnicity into which they are born is at the bottom of the social hierarchy.

Beyond discussing the family’s functions, the functional perspective on the family maintains that sudden or far-reaching changes in conventional family structure and processes threaten the family’s stability and thus that of society. For example, most sociology and marriage-and-family textbooks during the 1950s maintained that the male breadwinner–female homemaker nuclear family was the best arrangement for children, as it provided for a family’s economic and child-rearing needs. Any shift in this arrangement, they warned, would harm children and by extension the family as a social institution and even society itself. Textbooks no longer contain this warning, but many conservative observers continue to worry about the impact on children of working mothers and one-parent families. We return to their concerns shortly.

The Family and Conflict

Conflict theorists agree that the family serves the important functions just listed, but they also point to problems within the family that the functional perspective minimizes or overlooks altogether.

First, the family as a social institution contributes to social inequality in several ways. The social identity it gives to its children does affect their life chances, but it also reinforces a society’s system of stratification. Because families pass along their wealth to their children, and because families differ greatly in the amount of wealth they have, the family helps reinforce existing inequality. As it developed through the centuries, and especially during industrialization, the family also became more and more of a patriarchal unit (see earlier discussion), helping to ensure men’s status at the top of the social hierarchy.

Second, the family can also be a source of conflict for its own members. Although the functional perspective assumes the family provides its members emotional comfort and support, many families do just the opposite and are far from the harmonious, happy groups depicted in the 1950s television shows. Instead, and as the news story that began this chapter tragically illustrated, they argue, shout, and use emotional cruelty and physical violence. We return to family violence later in this chapter.

Families and Social Interaction

Social interactionist perspectives on the family examine how family members and intimate couples interact on a daily basis and arrive at shared understandings of their situations. Studies grounded in social interactionism give us a keen understanding of how and why families operate the way they do.

Some studies, for example, focus on how husbands and wives communicate and the degree to which they communicate successfully (Tannen, 2001). A classic study by Mirra Komarovsky (1964) found that wives in blue-collar marriages liked to talk with their husbands about problems they were having, while husbands tended to be quiet when problems occurred. Such gender differences seem less common in middle-class families, where men are better educated and more emotionally expressive than their working-class counterparts. Another classic study by Lillian Rubin (1976) found that wives in middle-class families say that ideal husbands are ones who communicate well and share their feelings, while wives in working-class families are more apt to say that ideal husbands are ones who do not drink too much and who go to work every day.

Other studies explore the role played by romantic love in courtship and marriage. Romantic love , the feeling of deep emotional and sexual passion for someone, is the basis for many American marriages and dating relationships, but it is actually uncommon in many parts of the contemporary world today and in many of the societies anthropologists and historians have studied. In these societies, marriages are arranged by parents and other kin for economic reasons or to build alliances, and young people are simply expected to marry whoever is chosen for them. This is the situation today in parts of India, Pakistan, and other developing nations and was the norm for much of the Western world until the late 18th and early 19th centuries (Lystra, 1989).

Key Takeaways

• The family ideally serves several functions for society. It socializes children, provides practical and emotional support for its members, regulates sexual reproduction, and provides its members with a social identity.
• Reflecting conflict theory’s emphases, the family may also produce several problems. In particular, it may contribute for several reasons to social inequality, and it may subject its members to violence, arguments, and other forms of conflict.
• Social interactionist understandings of the family emphasize how family members interact on a daily basis. In this regard, several studies find that husbands and wives communicate differently in certain ways that sometimes impede effective communication.

For Your Review

• As you think how best to understand the family, do you favor the views and assumptions of functional theory, conflict theory, or social interactionist theory? Explain your answer.
• Do you think the family continues to serve the function of regulating sexual behavior and sexual reproduction? Why or why not?

Komarovsky, M. (1964). Blue-collar marriage . New York, NY: Random House.

Lystra, K. (1989). Searching the heart: Women, men, and romantic love in nineteenth-century America . New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Rubin, L. B. (1976). Worlds of pain: Life in the working-class family . New York, NY: Basic Books.

Tannen, D. (2001). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation . New York, NY: Quill.

Sociology Copyright © 2016 by University of Minnesota is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Social Institutions (Definition + 7 Examples)

Welcome to this in-depth look at social institutions! These foundational aspects of our lives shape the way we interact, learn, and grow, often without us even realizing it. They are the building blocks of society, impacting everything from our individual roles to the way communities function.

Social institutions are organized systems or structures within a society that work together to meet the needs of its members. These can include family, education, government, and many more. They help to maintain order, shape behavior, and provide frameworks for cooperation.

In this article, we'll explore the various types of social institutions, delve into key theories that help us understand them, and look at how they affect our everyday lives. So, whether you're a student looking for some extra information or an adult wanting to understand society a little better, read on to get a comprehensive understanding of this crucial subject.

What are Social Institutions?

So, let's get started by clarifying what we mean when we talk about social institutions. Social institutions are like the "rules" and "teams" that help our society work smoothly.

Think of them as organized systems that people have created to help solve problems and meet the needs of the community. For example, families take care of kids and schools help people learn important skills.

Brief Historical Background

Now, social institutions haven't just popped up overnight. They have a history that goes way back. If you've ever heard of cave people, you'll know that even they had a basic form of social institutions. They had family groups, leaders, and even rules about sharing food and other resources.

As societies became more complex, so did these institutions. Fast forward to ancient civilizations like Egypt, Greece, or China, and you'll see even more complex systems involving government, religion, and trade.

In the modern world, these institutions have continued to evolve, reflecting the needs and technologies of the times.

Importance in a Functioning Society

You might be asking, "Why are these social institutions so important?" Well, they're kind of like the glue that holds society together. They make sure people have a way to resolve conflicts, learn new things, and take care of each other.

For instance, without a legal system, it would be hard to solve disagreements peacefully. Without schools, learning would be a haphazard process. And without families or other support networks, individuals might find it really tough to survive and be happy.

So, understanding social institutions is a lot like understanding the rules of a game; it helps you know what's happening, why it's happening, and how you can be a part of it. In the next sections, we will take a closer look at specific types of social institutions and dig deeper into how they make our world what it is.

The History of Social Institutions

Understanding the history of social institutions gives us a "time machine" of sorts, allowing us to see how these important building blocks of society have changed over time. Let's take a historical journey to explore the development and transformation of various social institutions.

Prehistoric Societies

Let's start at the beginning—the very beginning. In prehistoric times, human societies were mainly hunter-gatherer communities. The concept of "family" was crucial even back then.

The family was not just a social unit but a survival unit. Groups of families might come together to form tribes, another rudimentary social institution that helped with hunting, gathering, and protection.

Ancient Civilizations

Fast forward a bit, and we arrive at the era of ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Egypt, China, and Greece. Each had its own set of intricate social institutions that went far beyond the family and tribe.

In Mesopotamia, for example, the Code of Hammurabi —one of the earliest sets of laws—helped establish a justice system.

In Egypt, the institution of the monarchy was closely linked with religious institutions, with the Pharaoh often considered a god-king.

Religion itself became a social institution with the dawn of organized belief systems. For example, in ancient China, Confucianism wasn't just a religion; it was a social doctrine that influenced family life, education, and governance.

In Greece, the institution of democracy gave rise to the early forms of what we now know as government.

Middle Ages to Renaissance

Let's leap ahead again, this time to the Middle Ages. This period saw significant changes in social institutions, especially in Europe.

The church became an incredibly powerful institution, sometimes even surpassing the power of kings and queens. Feudalism shaped economic and social structures, establishing rigid classes of lords, vassals, and serfs.

However, during the Renaissance, there was a dramatic shift. New ideas about individualism, science, and art challenged existing social norms . The invention of the printing press led to the spread of knowledge and laid the groundwork for the future institution of mass media.

The Industrial Revolution

The Industrial Revolution was another turning point. The societal shift from agrarian communities to industrial urban centers brought about new social institutions.

For instance, factories became the new workplaces, replacing farms and home-based businesses. This also gave rise to labor unions, a new type of social institution focused on workers' rights.

Public education evolved as an institution during this period as well, especially with the advent of compulsory schooling laws. Suddenly, education wasn't just for the elite; it was for everyone, at least in theory.

In the 20th and 21st centuries, we've seen the advent of even more social institutions, or at least significant modifications to existing ones.

Think about how the internet has transformed media, turning it into a digital playground where anyone can be a broadcaster.

Government institutions have adapted to an increasingly globalized world, leading to the formation of international organizations like the United Nations.

Healthcare has also evolved into a complex institution, with advancements in medicine turning what used to be fatal diseases into manageable conditions. Systems of healthcare vary from country to country, from private healthcare markets in the United States to single-payer systems in countries like Canada.

Reflections

Looking back, it's amazing to see how far social institutions have come. From rudimentary family and tribal systems to intricate networks of governance, media, and healthcare, these structures have continually adapted to meet society's changing needs.

Understanding this history helps us appreciate the flexibility and resilience of social institutions. It also highlights the fact that these institutions are human-made, and thus can be changed and improved as society evolves.

The history of social institutions isn't just a look back in time; it's a roadmap that can help us navigate the complexities of today's world and make informed decisions for the future.

Types of Social Institutions

When you hear the word "family," what comes to mind? For most of us, it might be our parents, siblings, or maybe our extended family like grandparents, aunts, and uncles.

Family as a social institution is the foundational unit of society that serves multiple purposes, like emotional support, raising children, and providing a basic social framework. It's like the starting point in a person's life, where you learn your first words, behaviors, and values.

Historical Context

The concept of family has been around since the dawn of human civilization. In prehistoric times, family structures were more about survival. Families hunted and gathered food together, offering protection against the harsh world outside.

As we moved to agrarian societies, families became units of labor and economic production. In medieval times, family lines were vital for social standing, often influencing your profession and even who you could marry.

In more recent history, industrialization led to the 'nuclear family,' as people moved away from extended families to work in cities. Today, families are even more diverse, ranging from single-parent households to blended families, to families of choice that may not even include blood relatives.

Why does family matter? Well, think about it like your first "classroom" or "support group." It's where you learn basic skills like talking and walking, but also values like sharing and kindness.

Families also serve as a safety net. If you're going through tough times, family members are often the ones who support you emotionally and sometimes financially. The family is also important for society because it's where the next generation learns the norms and values they'll carry into adulthood.

If families are strong, it sets a positive ripple effect for the community at large.

Let's look at some different examples to see how the family institution varies. The "nuclear family," consisting of two parents and their children, is often considered the standard, especially in Western societies.

However, this is just one version of family. "Extended families," which include grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins, are common in many cultures and offer a broader support network.

Single-parent families are increasingly common, challenging the notion that you need two parents for a functional family unit. Then there are "blended families" where one or both parents bring children from previous relationships into a new family setup.

Some cultures have even more unique family structures. In some Middle Eastern cultures, polygamous families, where a man has multiple wives, are accepted.

In certain Native American cultures, "Two-Spirit" individuals serve unique family roles that don't fit neatly into standard Western categories of male or female.

There are also "chosen families," groups of unrelated individuals who commit to supporting and caring for one another. This can often be found in marginalized communities, where biological families might be unsupportive or absent.

2) Education

Education is more than just what we learn in school; it's a social institution that helps individuals develop the knowledge, skills, and character they need to become functioning members of society.

In essence, education serves as society's "training ground" for both academic and social learning.

The idea of formal education isn't as old as you might think. In ancient times, education was usually limited to wealthy families and often involved a one-on-one mentorship system. With the rise of ancient civilizations like Greece, the idea of education began to evolve.

The Greeks were among the first to have a more formal system of education that included schools, although these were still mainly for the wealthy. During the Middle Ages, education was primarily provided by religious institutions.

Fast forward to the industrial revolution, and mass education became the norm. Schools became standardized, and public education was established to provide learning for everyone, not just the rich.

Nowadays, education is seen as a universal right, and various systems exist worldwide, from public to private to homeschooling setups.

Why is education so crucial? For starters, it equips people with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed in life. But it goes beyond that. Education is the institution through which we learn about our history, our culture, and even about how to interact with other people.

A strong educational system can help to reduce inequality, improve economic prospects, and create more engaged citizens. It's not just about reading, writing, and arithmetic; it's about shaping the kind of society we want to live in.

To grasp the breadth of the education institution, consider its various forms. In the United States, public schools serve as the backbone of the educational system, funded by taxpayer dollars and available to all children.

Private schools offer an alternative, often with specialized curricula or smaller class sizes, but they come at a cost.

Charter schools, another variant, operate with greater freedom in terms of curriculum and operation but are still publicly funded.

Other countries offer unique educational setups. In Finland, for example, schools focus more on student welfare and less on standardized testing, and it's one of the best educational systems in the world.

In Japan, schools emphasize discipline and community, with students even taking turns to clean classrooms.

Adult education is another arm of this institution, aimed at providing lifelong learning opportunities. Whether it's GED programs, community colleges, or online courses, the goal is the same: to empower individuals with the knowledge they need to succeed in life.

3) Religion

Religion is more than just a belief in a higher power; it's a social institution that shapes morals, ethics, and social norms. Through rituals, worship, and a shared sense of community, religion often provides a framework for understanding the world and one's place in it.

Religion has been around for a very long time—probably as long as humans have been capable of complex thought. Early forms of religion were often closely tied to nature and the elements, with gods and goddesses representing forces like the sun, the moon, and the sea.

With the rise of ancient civilizations, religions became more organized, leading to the establishment of religious institutions like temples, churches, and mosques. Over time, different cultures and communities developed their own religious traditions and institutions, often tied to governance and law.

For example, the Catholic Church became a dominant institution in medieval Europe, influencing not just spirituality but also politics and education.

Why does religion matter as a social institution? For one, it's a powerful force for social cohesion, bringing people together under a shared set of beliefs and practices.

Religion also has a significant impact on social values and norms, influencing everything from moral codes to laws to how we interact with others.

In some cases, religious institutions also provide social services, like education and healthcare, and serve as a source of charity and community support.

The diversity of religious institutions is remarkable. Consider Christianity, which has multiple denominations like Catholicism, Protestantism, and Eastern Orthodoxy, each with its own set of beliefs, rituals, and organizational structures.

In Islam, Sunni and Shia Muslims have different interpretations of their faith, leading to different religious practices and institutions.

Hinduism, on the other hand, doesn't have a single centralized institution but consists of various schools of thought and a pantheon of gods and goddesses.

Beyond traditional religions, there are also new religious movements and even "secular religions" like Humanism, which offer ethical and moral frameworks without a belief in a divine power.

In some societies, traditional indigenous beliefs continue to serve as a social institution, shaping community life, rites of passage, and social norms.

4) Government

Government is the institution responsible for making and enforcing laws, administering public services, and representing the interests of the public.

In other words, it's the "control center" of a society, providing structure and maintaining order so that people can live and work together smoothly.

The concept of governance has been around since the earliest human societies, although it's evolved quite a bit over the years.

In early tribal communities, leadership was often tied to physical strength or lineage. With the emergence of agriculture and settled communities, governance structures became more complex, leading to the rise of monarchies, empires, and early forms of democracy in places like ancient Greece.

The Magna Carta in 1215, a charter agreed to by King John of England, was a landmark in the evolution of governance, laying the groundwork for constitutional government. Over time, various forms of government have emerged, including democracies, dictatorships, and socialist states, each with its own way of organizing power.

So why is government so crucial? Well, imagine a society without laws or someone to enforce them—it would be chaos! Government provides the framework within which other social institutions operate.

It sets rules, offers services like education and healthcare, and provides security through law enforcement and military defense. Without some form of governance, it would be incredibly challenging for a society to function effectively.

Governments come in all shapes and sizes. In the United States, a federal system of government allows for shared power between the national government and individual states, each with its own set of laws and services.

In contrast, a country like China has a centralized, one-party socialist republic where power is concentrated at the top.

Within the broader category of democracies, there are parliamentary systems, like the United Kingdom, and presidential systems, like Brazil.

Some countries have a constitutional monarchy, like Japan, where the monarch has a symbolic role, and the real power lies with elected officials.

Local governance is another layer, providing services like waste management, policing, and local ordinances. City councils, mayors, and community boards are examples of local government institutions.

Emerging trends in government also point towards increased use of technology, creating a digital governance model where services and representation are increasingly moving online.

Estonia is a forerunner in this area, offering e-residency and managing a range of services electronically.

When you hear the word "economy," you might think of money, jobs, or maybe even the stock market. But the economy as a social institution is much broader.

It's the system that organizes the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services within a society. Basically, it's how we all get the things we need and want.

Economic systems have come a long way since the days when we bartered shells and salt. In the earliest human societies, economies were based on hunting and gathering.

Then came agriculture, which allowed people to settle down and led to the development of early markets.

Fast-forward a few millennia, and we have industrialization, which revolutionized production and led to the modern capitalist system.

Different economic models have also been proposed and practiced, such as socialism and communism. Each has its roots in different philosophies about who should control resources and how wealth should be distributed.

Why is the economy important as a social institution? For one, it's what keeps society running. An effective economic system provides jobs, goods, and services that people need to live.

But it's not just about material needs. The economy influences social structures and relationships.

For instance, it can determine social class, access to education, and even your health. Economic policies can either promote social equality or widen the gap between the rich and the poor.

The global economy is incredibly diverse, consisting of various economic systems and institutions. Capitalism, predominantly found in Western countries, emphasizes free markets and individual entrepreneurship.

Socialism, as practiced in certain Scandinavian countries, aims for a more equitable distribution of wealth, often through government intervention in markets.

In some nations, traditional economies still exist, where goods and services are produced for personal use, and trade typically takes the form of barter.

Within an economy, various sectors and industries play crucial roles. Think of the tech industry, which not only provides gadgets and services but has fundamentally changed how we interact and consume information.

Then there's the healthcare industry, which, despite being a matter of life and death, is also a significant economic institution that employs millions of people.

Freelance and gig economies are emerging trends, allowing people to offer services on a project-to-project basis rather than working traditional nine-to-five jobs. While this offers more flexibility, it also brings challenges, like a lack of job security and benefits.

Media might not seem like a traditional institution, but it serves a significant role in shaping society.

In essence, media is the means of communication that reach or influence people widely, whether it's newspapers, television, radio, or more recently, social media platforms. It's the lens through which we understand the world around us.

The history of media as a social institution is a story of constant evolution. Early forms of media included storytelling, songs, and oral traditions that passed down cultural values and information.

With the invention of the printing press in the 15th century, information could be disseminated more broadly, leading to the rise of newspapers and books.

Fast forward to the 20th century, and you've got radio, followed by television, revolutionizing how people consumed news and entertainment.

The digital age brought the Internet, radically changing the way we interact with media. Now, social media platforms have become major players, affecting everything from public opinion to politics.

So why is media such a pivotal social institution? Media plays a critical role in informing the public, shaping opinions, and providing a platform for discourse.

It serves as a watchdog, holding other social institutions, like government and corporations, accountable. However, it can also be a double-edged sword. Media has the power to shape perceptions and influence public opinion, sometimes with biased or inaccurate information.

The diversity within the media landscape is vast. Traditional media outlets, like newspapers and TV stations, have been the standard bearers for journalism for decades.

However, the rise of the Internet has led to a proliferation of news sources, including independent blogs, citizen journalism, and social media influencers.

The role of media varies by country and political system. In countries with free press, media serves as an independent check on government power. In others, state-controlled media can serve as a propaganda tool.

Social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram have changed the game entirely, allowing anyone to become a broadcaster of information, for better or worse.

New forms of media are emerging as technology advances. Virtual reality and augmented reality are starting to be used for immersive storytelling experiences.

Podcasts have become a popular medium for news, entertainment, and education.

Streaming services like Netflix have revolutionized the way we consume TV shows and movies, providing a personalized media experience.

7) Healthcare

Healthcare is more than just hospitals and doctors; it's a social institution responsible for maintaining and restoring health within a community.

Through medical services, public health initiatives, and health education, healthcare aims to improve the quality of life for individuals and society at large.

Believe it or not, healthcare has come a long way. In ancient times, healthcare was often a mix of herbal remedies, spiritual rituals, and what we would now consider rudimentary medical practices.

The Greeks laid some of the foundations for modern medicine, including the idea of medical ethics, famously encapsulated in the Hippocratic Oath . During the Middle Ages, hospitals were often run by religious organizations.

The Renaissance saw significant advancements in anatomy and surgery, thanks in part to the invention of the printing press, which allowed medical knowledge to spread more quickly.

In the 20th century, the development of antibiotics, vaccines, and advanced surgical techniques revolutionized healthcare. Now, we're entering an era of personalized medicine, where treatments can be tailored to individual genetics.

Healthcare is critical for obvious reasons—it keeps us alive and well! But as a social institution, it plays a more complex role.

Good healthcare systems can greatly improve the quality of life in a community, affecting everything from life expectancy to economic productivity.

A poor healthcare system can exacerbate social inequalities, where the wealthy have access to better care, while the less fortunate suffer.

Healthcare policies can also influence other social issues, like reproductive rights and end-of-life care.

Healthcare systems vary widely across the world. In the United States, healthcare is primarily a private enterprise, although public programs like Medicaid and Medicare offer some coverage.

In contrast, countries like Canada and the United Kingdom have universal healthcare systems, funded through taxes and free at the point of use.

Emerging trends in healthcare include the rise of telemedicine, allowing remote consultations with medical professionals.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning are also being used to analyze medical data, predict outcomes, and even assist in surgeries.

Alternative medicine, like acupuncture, herbal remedies, and holistic care, serves as a complement or alternative to traditional Western medicine.

These practices often stem from different cultural or philosophical backgrounds and can be both a part of institutional healthcare and outside of it.

This wraps up our in-depth look at some of the key institutions that shape our society. Each has its own unique history, role, and impact on how we live our lives, from the families we're born into, to the schools we attend, the religious and governmental structures we navigate, the economy we participate in, the media we consume, and the healthcare systems that look after us.

Theories About Social Institutions

Structural functionalism.

Key Figures and Timeline

Structural Functionalism as a sociological theory has roots that can be traced back to early thinkers like Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer, but it was really Émile Durkheim, a French sociologist, who provided a foundational understanding.

Durkheim's work in the late 19th and early 20th centuries laid the groundwork for what would become known as Structural Functionalism.

His ideas were later expanded upon by American sociologist Talcott Parsons in the mid-20th century, making the theory especially prevalent in American sociology during the 1950s and 1960s.

Description

At its core, Structural Functionalism sees society as a complex structure with interrelated parts, all working together to maintain the stability and functionality of the entire system.

This can be likened to the human body, where each organ has a specific function and role to play in keeping the organism alive and well. In societal terms, the "organs" would be the various social institutions like family, religion, education, law, and others.

Each institution serves a unique but complementary function. For instance, the educational system prepares individuals for various roles in society, which in turn sustains the economy.

Durkheim was particularly interested in the functions of religion and education in binding communities together. He emphasized that shared rituals and beliefs contribute to social cohesion, the sense of unity and belonging within a community.

This is particularly crucial in complex modern societies where people engage in specialized roles, leading to a division of labor. This division could be potentially divisive, but shared beliefs and values, often perpetuated through institutions, maintain the social fabric.

Talcott Parsons expanded on these ideas and introduced more complexity into the theory. He developed the AGIL paradigm —Adaptation, Goal attainment, Integration, and Latency—as a way to understand how these institutions fulfill necessary functions for society's survival.

Adaptation relates to the economic system and how society meets its material needs. Goal attainment involves governance and political institutions, Integration pertains to mechanisms that promote social cohesion, and Latency involves the family and educational institutions responsible for socializing individuals into cultural values and norms.

Implications

The implications of Structural Functionalism are numerous and have influenced many fields beyond sociology, including anthropology, psychology, and political science.

For policy-makers, understanding the functionalist perspective could provide insights into how to maintain social stability and cohesion, especially in times of rapid change or crisis.

However, the theory has been criticized for its somewhat complacent view of social inequality. By focusing on the functions that institutions serve, it could be argued that the theory justifies existing social structures and inequalities as "necessary" for the greater stability of society.

This has led to criticisms that Structural Functionalism is inherently conservative, upholding the status quo rather than promoting social change.

Additionally, critics point out that the theory tends to gloss over instances when the function of one institution conflicts with that of another.

For instance, what happens when the economic necessity for both parents to work clashes with the idealized function of the family as a primary unit for child-rearing?

Despite these criticisms, Structural Functionalism remains an important tool for understanding how different elements of society work together to create a stable, functioning system.

It serves as a reminder that institutions, despite their flaws, play a crucial role in shaping and sustaining our social lives.

Conflict Theory

The philosophical roots of Conflict Theory can be traced back to the works of Karl Marx, a 19th-century German philosopher and economist.

Marx was especially concerned with the economic systems that produce inequality and social divisions. His work primarily focused on the conflict between the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) and the proletariat (working class) under capitalism.

In the 20th century, other thinkers, such as Max Weber and C. Wright Mills, extended Marx's ideas to include conflicts arising from other social stratifications like race, gender, and religion .

Unlike Structural Functionalism, which focuses on societal harmony and stability, Conflict Theory puts the spotlight squarely on societal discord, particularly conflicts arising from inequalities.

According to this theory, social institutions are not neutral entities working for the common good of society; rather, they are mechanisms by which powerful groups enforce their will and maintain control over resources and opportunities.

In Marx's original formulation, economic institutions are the primary battleground for this conflict. According to him, capitalist economic systems are designed to benefit those who own the means of production (factories, land, resources) at the expense of those who sell their labor for wages.

This inherent conflict leads to a situation where economic institutions perpetuate class divisions, concentrating wealth and power in the hands of a few.

Max Weber extended this view by arguing that economic factors alone could not account for all social conflicts. Weber introduced other dimensions like social status and political power as additional sources of conflict.

His work laid the foundation for later theories that examined how institutions like the media, educational systems, and the criminal justice system contribute to social stratification.

C. Wright Mills, an American sociologist, contributed to Conflict Theory by introducing the concept of the "power elite," a small group of people drawn from economic, political, and military circles who hold disproportionate influence over society.

Mills contended that this elite uses institutions to frame "the rules of the game" to maintain their advantage.

Conflict Theory has profound implications for understanding social inequalities and for promoting change. It has served as an intellectual foundation for movements focused on social justice, labor rights, and equal opportunity.

By framing social institutions as arenas for conflict, the theory also encourages scrutiny of existing social arrangements and policies. This critical perspective can be harnessed to advocate for reforms that might reduce inequalities and promote a more equitable distribution of resources.

However, the theory has its share of critics. Some argue that by focusing almost exclusively on conflict and inequality, the theory paints an overly negative and confrontational view of society.

They point out that cooperation and mutual benefits, often glossed over in Conflict Theory, are also essential elements of social life.

Moreover, some critics argue that Conflict Theory can be reductionist, meaning it simplifies complex social phenomena down to issues of conflict and inequality.

For example, simply viewing educational systems as tools for perpetuating class inequality can overlook the ways in which education can also serve as a means for social mobility.

Despite these critiques, Conflict Theory remains an invaluable tool for analyzing social institutions. It serves as a counterpoint to more harmonious models like Structural Functionalism, compelling us to scrutinize the inequalities and power imbalances that are often ingrained in the very structures of our societies.

Symbolic Interactionism

The origins of Symbolic Interactionism as a sociological perspective can be traced to the early 20th century. Its foundations are primarily credited to American sociologist George Herbert Mead, who was active during the 1920s and 1930s.

His work laid the groundwork for what would later be formulated as Symbolic Interactionism , particularly in his exploration of the relationship between individual action and social structure.

Later, Herbert Blumer, a student of Mead, coined the term "Symbolic Interactionism" and outlined its basic tenets in the mid-20th century.

Symbolic Interactionism focuses on the micro-level of social interactions, examining how individual actions and interpersonal relations shape larger social structures.

Unlike theories that stress the overarching systems, like Structural Functionalism and Conflict Theory, Symbolic Interactionism zeroes in on the everyday, "on-the-ground" interactions that make up social life.

This theory emphasizes the "symbolic" nature of human interaction. In other words, humans attach meaning to things, actions, and people. These meanings are not fixed; they are constantly negotiated and re-negotiated through interaction.

For example, a wedding ring is not just a piece of metal but carries specific meanings about commitment, love, and status. The meaning of the ring is constructed and maintained through various social interactions, from the moment someone proposes marriage to everyday occasions when people notice the ring and interpret its significance.

A key element of Symbolic Interactionism is the concept of the "self." According to George Herbert Mead, the self is not something that we are born with but is developed through social interactions .

Our sense of self is formed as we interpret the reactions of others toward us. This can be seen in simple childhood games like "peek-a-boo," where children learn to anticipate reactions and understand themselves as separate entities capable of inducing responses from others.

Herbert Blumer further refined the theory by identifying three core principles: meaning, language, and thought.

Meaning refers to the interpretation individuals give to things in their life, language is the medium through which meanings are created and conveyed, and thought is the process by which individuals interpret the world around them.

Symbolic Interactionism provides a nuanced way of understanding how social institutions are continuously created, maintained, and transformed.

It offers a mechanism to understand change at the grassroots level, showing how even small interactions can lead to shifts in larger social structures. This has made the theory popular in studies exploring social change, deviance, and identity.

However, the theory has been criticized for its narrow focus on micro-level interactions, often at the expense of understanding broader systemic forces.

Critics argue that by concentrating on the "trees," so to speak, Symbolic Interactionism can miss the "forest" of larger institutional structures and social inequalities.

Additionally, some have pointed out that the theory can be somewhat idealistic in emphasizing the agency of individuals to create and recreate their social worlds.

This perspective may inadvertently minimize the constraints and limitations that social institutions often impose on individuals, such as systemic inequality or rigid cultural norms.

In summary, Symbolic Interactionism offers a detailed lens through which to view the intricacies of social life, highlighting the importance of individual actions and interactions in shaping social institutions.

Despite its limitations, it remains a vital framework for understanding how meaning and identity are constructed in the social world.

Systems Theory

Systems Theory in sociology was influenced by broader developments in fields like biology, computer science, and engineering. One of the key figures who brought Systems Theory into the social sciences is Talcott Parsons, who also contributed to Structural Functionalism.

In the mid-20th century, this theory began to gain traction as a framework for understanding complex systems and their sub-systems, from biological organisms to human societies.

Systems Theory takes a holistic approach to studying societal phenomena, viewing society as a complex system composed of smaller, interrelated systems or institutions.

Unlike Symbolic Interactionism, which focuses on micro-level interactions, or Conflict Theory, which concentrates on social inequalities, Systems Theory is concerned with the structure and functions of the system as a whole.

In this framework, individual social institutions (like family, education, economy, etc.) are considered subsystems that interact with each other and the larger societal system.

These interactions are guided by a set of rules, norms, and practices that dictate how the components relate to each other and adapt to changes within the system.

One important concept in Systems Theory is "homeostasis," the idea that systems naturally seek stability and balance. This is similar to the biological concept where living organisms strive to maintain internal equilibrium.

In a societal context, this might mean that changes in one institution could lead to adjustments in others to maintain overall social stability. For instance, if the economy is doing poorly, social welfare programs might kick in to help alleviate social stress and prevent unrest.

Another key concept is "feedback loops," which are channels of information that help the system adapt and evolve. In social terms, this could be the way public opinion shapes policy decisions, which in turn affect people's opinions, creating a continuous loop of adjustment and readjustment.

The Systems Theory framework is invaluable for understanding the complexity and interconnectedness of social institutions. It provides a macro-level lens that can be useful for policy analysis, organizational studies, and even international relations.

By looking at how various subsystems interact and influence each other, Systems Theory can help identify points of intervention to address complex social issues.

However, the theory has been criticized for its somewhat deterministic view of social structures. Critics argue that by focusing on stability and homeostasis, Systems Theory may overlook the inequalities and power imbalances that exist within and between different subsystems.

Additionally, the abstract nature of Systems Theory has been criticized for making it difficult to apply to specific social issues.

Unlike more concrete theories like Structural Functionalism or Conflict Theory, Systems Theory often operates at a high level of abstraction, which some argue makes it less practical for addressing real-world problems.

Despite these criticisms, Systems Theory remains a useful tool for social scientists and policy-makers alike. It serves as a reminder that social institutions are not isolated entities but are part of a larger, interconnected system that constantly adapts and evolves.

Social Constructionism

The roots of Social Constructionism can be traced back to the works of various thinkers, but one of the most influential figures is Peter L. Berger, who along with Thomas Luckmann, co-authored " The Social Construction of Reality " in 1966.

This seminal work laid the groundwork for what would later become a significant perspective in understanding society and human interaction.

Social Constructionism posits that many aspects of our social reality are not inherent qualities of the world but are constructed through human interaction and interpretation.

In other words, things like gender roles, race, and even the concept of "childhood" are not natural or inevitable but are shaped by society.

What does this mean in practice? Let's consider the idea of "success." In many Western societies, success is often defined by material wealth, career achievements, and social status.

However, these markers are not universal truths but socially constructed ideas. In other societies or historical periods, success might be measured in terms of community contributions, moral virtue, or spiritual enlightenment.

Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckmann argue that social institutions play a critical role in this process of social construction. For example, educational systems impart not just skills and knowledge but also social norms and expectations.

Media, another powerful institution, shapes public perceptions on everything from beauty standards to political issues. Even our most intimate relationships, like family, are governed by socially constructed roles and expectations, such as the idea that fathers are breadwinners while mothers are caregivers.

Social Constructionism has a profound impact on how we understand and engage with social institutions. It questions the "givenness" of social facts, suggesting that things could be otherwise.

This perspective opens the door for social change, as recognizing something as socially constructed means acknowledging that it can be reconstructed.

However, the theory is often criticized for being too relativistic. Critics argue that if everything is socially constructed, the framework might inadvertently undermine objective truth or the severity of social issues like poverty, racism, or inequality.

For instance, labeling these issues as "socially constructed" could be misunderstood to mean they are not real or not serious, which is not the intent of Social Constructionism.

Despite these criticisms, Social Constructionism remains a potent framework for examining the complexities of social institutions and the roles they play in shaping our lives and beliefs.

By emphasizing the constructed nature of social reality, it provides a crucial tool for deconstructing harmful norms and advocating for a more equitable society.

How Social Institutions Affect Individuals

When we think about our daily lives, it's clear that we don't exist in a vacuum. Our choices, behaviors, and even our self-perceptions are deeply influenced by the social institutions that surround us.

From the family we are born into, to the schools we attend, to our workplaces and religious organizations—these institutions play a critical role in shaping who we are and how we interact with the world.

The Role of Family

Arguably, the first and most influential social institution we encounter is the family. The family unit plays a crucial role in our early socialization, teaching us basic skills, beliefs, and norms.

For example, it is within the family that most people first learn about gender roles, often emulating the behaviors and attitudes of their parents or guardians.

The family also serves as our first introduction to concepts like love, trust, and responsibility, laying the foundation for our future interactions and relationships.

Not all family experiences are universally positive, however. Dysfunctional family dynamics, such as neglect or abuse, can have long-lasting negative effects. These early experiences can shape an individual's self-esteem, social skills, and even their mental and physical health.

The influence of the family institution underscores the interconnectedness of social institutions and their ability to impact us on deeply personal levels.

Education as a Shaper of Identity

Another powerful institution that affects individuals is the education system. Schools do more than impart academic knowledge; they also socialize students into particular ways of thinking and behaving.

For instance, grading systems teach the value of competition and achievement, while extracurricular activities like sports or clubs can shape interests and social skills.

The hidden curriculum, which includes unwritten social rules and expectations, also plays a role in shaping behavior, often reinforcing societal norms and hierarchies.

However, the impact of education can be a double-edged sword. While it has the power to uplift and create opportunities, it can also perpetuate inequalities.

For example, schools in underfunded communities may lack the resources to provide quality education, putting students at a disadvantage and affecting their future earning potential and social mobility.

Religion and Spirituality

Religious institutions are another influential factor in the lives of individuals. For those who are part of a religious community, the beliefs, rituals, and ethical guidelines can serve as a roadmap for life. These institutions often offer social support, a sense of belonging, and a framework for understanding the world.

However, they can also impose strict norms and expectations, sometimes leading to feelings of guilt, exclusion, or conflict for those who do not conform to the community's beliefs.

Social institutions are not just abstract concepts or structures; they have real, tangible impacts on individuals. They shape our values, guide our behaviors, and influence our life choices.

Whether it's the family teaching us basic norms, schools shaping our perceptions of success, or religious communities influencing our ethical viewpoints, these institutions play a critical role in making us who we are.

Recognizing this impact is the first step toward understanding the complex interplay between individual lives and the larger social world.

How Social Institutions Interact With Each Other

It's easy to think of social institutions like family, education, religion, or government as separate entities, each operating in its own sphere.

However, these institutions are more like interlocking gears in a complex machine, each influencing and being influenced by the others. Understanding these interactions is key to grasping the complex dynamics that shape societies.

Family and Education

Let's start by looking at how family and education are intertwined. Parents often play an active role in their children's educational process, helping with homework, attending parent-teacher conferences, and even choosing which school their child will attend.

In turn, the educational system impacts family dynamics. For instance, the demands of homework and extracurricular activities can dictate how families allocate their time.

Additionally, schools often reinforce social norms and values initially taught within the family, making the two institutions closely linked in the process of socialization.

Government and Economy

The relationship between government and the economy is another example of institutional interaction. Government policies on taxation, trade, and regulation directly affect the economic landscape, shaping the opportunities and challenges faced by businesses and individuals.

Meanwhile, economic forces can influence political actions. A robust economy often lends popularity to sitting governments, while economic downturns can trigger policy shifts and even regime changes.

Religion and Law

Religion and legal institutions also share a complex relationship. Religious beliefs often inform the ethical and moral codes within a society, some of which may be codified into law.

For example, the concept of "justice" in many legal systems has roots in religious teachings. Conversely, laws can shape religious practices by determining what is legally permissible, as seen in debates over issues like abortion or religious attire.

Media and Everything Else

Media is another social institution that interacts with almost all other institutions. It shapes public perception and opinion about family values, government policies, religious beliefs, and economic issues.

Media's role is particularly interesting because while it is influenced by other institutions (for example, through advertising or political propaganda ), it also has the power to influence them in return by shaping public opinion and social norms.

In essence, social institutions are far from isolated; they interact in intricate ways that shape the fabric of society. Whether it's the family's influence on education or the interplay between government and the economy, these interactions create a dynamic, ever-changing landscape.

Understanding these connections helps us see society not as a collection of independent parts, but as a complex, integrated system where changes in one area often lead to shifts in another.

Criticism and Challenges of Social Institutions

Social institutions are generally considered essential for the functioning of society, providing structure and norms that guide human behavior.

However, they are not without their critics. Various issues arise when examining the effectiveness, fairness, and even the ethical foundations of these institutions.

Perpetuating Inequality

One of the most significant criticisms is that social institutions often perpetuate inequality.

Whether it's the education system that disproportionately benefits students from wealthier backgrounds or criminal justice systems that show systemic bias against minorities, these institutions can reinforce existing social hierarchies.

Critics argue that instead of leveling the playing field, many social institutions do the opposite by creating or perpetuating barriers for certain groups.

Resistance to Change

Another challenge is the inherent resistance to change within many social institutions. Traditions, long-standing policies, and established norms can make it difficult for these structures to adapt to social progress or shifts in public opinion.

For example, religious institutions have historically been slow to accept shifts in societal views on issues like LGBTQ+ rights or gender equality, which can result in a disconnect between the institution and the needs of the community it serves.

Ethical Questions

Social institutions also raise ethical concerns, particularly when they impose norms or values that may be deemed oppressive or discriminatory.

For instance, educational curricula may be criticized for whitewashing history or marginalizing certain perspectives.

Similarly, the healthcare system might face scrutiny for ethical dilemmas, such as unequal access to medical care or the morality of certain treatments.

Conflicting Interests

Additionally, as institutions interact with each other, conflicts of interest can arise. For example, economic institutions may push for deregulation to increase profits, while governmental institutions may seek regulation to protect public health and safety.

The tension between these objectives can result in public policy that satisfies no one completely or, worse, compromises the integrity of both institutions.

Globalization's Challenges

In our increasingly globalized world, social institutions also face the challenge of adapting to multiculturalism and international norms. Institutions that were initially established to serve homogeneous communities may struggle to meet the needs of a diverse population.

The interplay between local traditions and global influences adds another layer of complexity to how institutions should evolve.

In sum, while social institutions play a vital role in organizing society, they are not without flaws. Criticism and challenges, ranging from perpetuating inequality to ethical dilemmas, should be acknowledged and addressed.

These issues highlight the importance of continually evaluating and, when necessary, reforming these institutions to ensure they serve the greater good of society.

Throughout this article, we've taken a deep dive into the complex world of social institutions. We've examined their history, explored the different types, discussed various theories that seek to explain their function, and looked at their significant impact on individuals and society.

We also delved into the ways these institutions interact with each other and reviewed some of the criticisms and challenges they face.

Understanding social institutions is not just an academic exercise; it has real-world implications for how we navigate our lives and communities. These institutions shape our values, guide our behaviors, and provide the frameworks within which we operate.

They are essential to maintaining social order, but as we've seen, they are not without their flaws. This double-edged nature makes it critical for us to study and understand them, acknowledging both their contributions and their limitations.

As we move forward in an ever-changing, increasingly complex world, it's vital to consider how social institutions will adapt and evolve. The challenges and criticisms they face offer not just cautionary tales but also roadmaps for reform and improvement.

By understanding these intricate systems better, we empower ourselves to participate more fully in them, advocating for positive change and a more equitable and inclusive society.

Related posts:

• Nuclear Family (Definition + History)
• 53+ Deviance Examples in Sociology (Definition + Theories)
• Social Stratification (Definition + Historical Examples)
• 47+ Social Problem Examples (Issues In Society)
• 151+ Social Norms Examples (Cultures + Travel Tips)

Reference this article:

About The Author

PracticalPie.com is a participant in the Amazon Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow Us On:

Youtube Facebook Instagram X/Twitter

Psychology Resources

Developmental

Personality

Relationships

Psychologists

Serial Killers

Psychology Tests

Personality Quiz

Memory Test

Depression test

Type A/B Personality Test

© PracticalPsychology. All rights reserved

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

Understanding Social Institutions: A Comprehensive Guide with Examples

A social institution is a term used to describe a group of people who have come together for a common purpose. The five basic social institutions are family, religion, the economy, education, and the government. Each institution has its own goals and roles for members, culture (way of life), and symbols. 

What Is A Social Institution? 

A society is a community of people with a common identity. The group will have similar beliefs, traditions, and institutions. A society is a community of people with a basic common identity. 

Consider your own society.  It is made up of various groups of people with different functions, which you will likely see as you go about your day.  A social institution is a term used to describe a group of people who have come together for a common purpose. 

The 5 Fundamental Social Institutions

The five basic social institutions are family, religion, the economy, education, and the government.  Other institutions include science, the media, and medicine .  

Each institution has its own goals, roles for members to fulfill those goals, culture (way of life), and symbols.  The different institutions interact in ways but also have separate lives.  

Let’s Look at Each 

We will now individually discuss the five main social institutions.  

A family is a group of individuals who love, hate, trust, question, need, console, and depend on one another as they grow and mature and learn to give a little more, take a little less … all in the same environment, whatever or wherever it may be.  Lynn Johnson, “For Better or For Else” (family comic strip)

The most basic social institution is the family.  

Family comes in many different forms. It is an intimate association that can arise from adoption, marriage , and many other ways in which different people blend together to form a family (such as a commune).  The basic mom, dad, and biological child unit are but one form. 

A family form smaller units of people who work and care for each other.  They share values, including with their children.  When a member is in need, the others (ideally) work to help.  Primitive societies, including hunter-and-gatherers, are primarily made up of family units.  

The film Four Weddings and a Funeral helpfully shows different family types (gay/straight, married/unmarried, friends, siblings), celebrations (film’s title), and symbols (wedding rings).  

[2] Religion 

Religion is a system of beliefs, often involving the supernatural and the afterlife, that provide meaning to our lives and provides guidance on how to be a good person and obtain happiness. 

A theocracy is a society where religion plays the primary role in government. We have a separation of church and state.  Religious institutions play an important part in spreading values and addressing the needs of society.  But, they do not directly control all of society.

Some examples of religious societies would be Catholic priests and nuns, Buddhist temples, and ethical societies that do not believe in a specific god.  Religions have a range of beliefs, celebrations , and symbols (such as the Trinity ).  They take up a “sacred” spot in our lives.  

[3] The Economy

The economy involves the distribution of goods and services, both by private actors (individuals and businesses) and the government. The word originally arose from the management of the household.  Over time, the economy became a worldwide interconnected market.  

There are different types of economies, including traditional economies focused on local community market economies (capitalism) and command economies (communism).  The U.S. has a mixed economy, with a free market that is also heavily regulated by the government.  

Aspects of the economy include banking, real estate, malls, and the stock market. Money is a means of exchange and a basic symbol of the economy.  The economic sphere is also where many adults spend much of their lives, some finding meaning, others struggling to survive.  

[4] Education

Today, education is perhaps the most important function of state and local governments. Compulsory school attendance laws and the great expenditures for education both demonstrate our recognition of the importance of education to our democratic society.

• Brown v. Board of Education

Human language allows us to communicate with each other.  It is a basic means of education, the spreading of knowledge and values.  Human lives are complex.  We need a lot of education.  

In traditional societies, families served as the primary means to educate children and adults who needed to learn various things.  As society became more complex, separate institutions arose to educate people .  Religious institutions have their own schools.  

Students and teachers know very well that schools bring with them their own culture and traditions.  Education is a major way we socialize and is a basic part of a successful society. 

[5]  Government 

Government involves the authority ( power ) to set forth the rules that dictate our private and public lives.  We are divided into different countries, each with a separate government.  Government institutions provide the means to do the governing itself. 

There are different types of government, including monarchy (kings and queens), theocracy (religion), and democracy (rule by the people themselves).  You can learn more about a baker’s dozen here .   The United States has a republican democracy.  

The government has a range of its own separate institutions to carry out its functions, which over time resulted in a large bureaucracy. Different groups of people collect money (tax collectors), protect the people (military, police, prisons), make laws (parliaments), and interpret the laws (courts).  And, each group has its own culture and symbols.  

Institutions as Communities

Social institutions provide the needs of society.  They provide us with a means to live the most successful lives possible.  To quote the Declaration of Independence , they are essential to the “pursuit of happiness.”  Institutions are communities, groups of people with special jobs.  

It should be remembered that communities are rarely isolated from each other.  They interact in many ways. The First Amendment protects free speech, the press, religious freedom, assembly, and the right to petition the government.  

Count all the institutions involved there and consider how they all work together.

Teach and Thrive

A Bronx, NY veteran high school social studies teacher who has learned most of what she has learned through trial and error and error and error.... and wants to save others that pain.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Teaching Philosophies: Teacher versus Student versus Society-Centered in Simple Terms

Teaching involves the spread of knowledge. Many people can be teachers in a variety of ways. Pedagogy, the study of teaching, can help make you a better teacher. The study of teaching includes...

Social Life in Mesopotamian Civilization

Some of the first cities developed in ancient Mesopotamia. Social life in many ways has not changed in 4,000 years. There were social classes with a few holding most of the wealth and power and most...

• Subscriber Services
• For Authors
• Publications
• Archaeology
• Art & Architecture
• Bilingual dictionaries
• Classical studies
• Encyclopedias
• English Dictionaries and Thesauri
• Language reference
• Linguistics
• Media studies
• Medicine and health
• Names studies
• Performing arts
• Science and technology
• Social sciences
• Society and culture
• Overview Pages
• Subject Reference
• English Dictionaries
• Bilingual Dictionaries

Recently viewed (0)

• Save Search
• Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Related Content

Related overviews.

Amiri Baraka (b. 1934)

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

Home: Social Essays

Quick reference.

The entries of Amiri Baraka's Home: Social Essays (1966) chronicle the writer's rapidly emerging nationalistic posture. Including a number of essays that were originally published in such journals as Evergreen Review, Liberator, Kulchur, Cavalier, the Nation, Poetry, the Saturday Review, the New York Sunday Herald Tribune, and Midstream, this collection is also representative of the collective consciousness of much of the African American populace of the period. Written in the wake of the global liberation struggles of Africans, African Americans, and people of color in general, these essays reflect a growing impatience with the gradualism of the American civil rights movement, a contempt for liberalism, a passion for moral engagement, and a fervent embracing of African American history and culture.

As with much of Baraka's work, there is little middle ground in appraisal of these essays. William Harris notes in the introduction to The LeRoi Jones/Amiri Baraka Reader (1991) that Home is “an important book of essays written at its author's fullest powers.” A reviewer from Newsweek (May 1966), on the other hand, notes in an examination of Home that “[Baraka] writes and harangues himself out of the company of civilized men; and forfeits all claim to serious attention.”

In “Cuba Libra,” the longest essay in Home, all of the aforementioned themes are apparent. An accounting of a visit to Castro's newly liberated Cuba, this essay reflects strongly the writer's growing dissatisfaction with the “art-for-art's sake” posture of the Beats. In recounting the dialogue between himself and the more engaged Latin American poets also visiting Cuba, the writer reveals the roots of his politically charged later verse. Although this experience predates the writer's avowal of communism by a good number of years, the idealism that made his ideological conversion possible was abundantly present at the time of this visit.

In a number of these essays, Baraka delves deeply into the roots of African American folkways. Mixing a good bit of humor with the more tragic elements of the collective experience of his people, he celebrates those things that have become emblematic of the African American weltanschauung and style (“Soul Food,” “City of Harlem,” and “Expressive Language”).

Much of Home reflects Baraka's impassioned struggle with the idea of a Black Aesthetic. “The Myth of a ‘Negro Literature,”’ “A Dark Bag,” “LeRoi Jones Talking,” and “The Revolutionary Theater” are all fundamentally concerned with the African American writer's finding his or her authentic, morally engaged voice. The first of these essays, originally presented as an address to the American Society for African Culture in March 1962, is most notable for its castigation of most African American writing in terms of its derivative and apologetic nature. While attacking the literature, however, he exalts the bona fide artistry of African American music. Referring to jazz and blues as the only “consistent exhibitors of ‘Negritude’ in formal American culture,” Baraka evidences embryonic patterns of thought that would appear fully developed in his monumental Blues People (1963). The essays referred to here, especially the hortatory “The Revolutionary Theater,” served as touchstones for the many young writers who would ally themselves with the Black Arts movement of the late 1960s.

From:   Home: Social Essays   in  The Concise Oxford Companion to African American Literature »

Subjects: Literature

Related content in Oxford Reference

Reference entries.

View all related items in Oxford Reference »

Search for: 'Home: Social Essays' in Oxford Reference »

• Oxford University Press

PRINTED FROM OXFORD REFERENCE (www.oxfordreference.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2023. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single entry from a reference work in OR for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice ).

date: 13 August 2024

• Cookie Policy
• Privacy Policy
• Legal Notice
• Accessibility
• [185.126.86.119]
• 185.126.86.119

Character limit 500 /500

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

Sociological Perspectives on the Family

Learning objective.

• Summarize understandings of the family as presented by functional, conflict, and social interactionist theories.

Sociological views on today’s families generally fall into the functional, conflict, and social interactionist approaches introduced earlier in this book. Let’s review these views, which are summarized in Table 15.1 “Theory Snapshot” .

Table 15.1 Theory Snapshot

Social Functions of the Family

Recall that the functional perspective emphasizes that social institutions perform several important functions to help preserve social stability and otherwise keep a society working. A functional understanding of the family thus stresses the ways in which the family as a social institution helps make society possible. As such, the family performs several important functions.

First, the family is the primary unit for socializing children . As previous chapters indicated, no society is possible without adequate socialization of its young. In most societies, the family is the major unit in which socialization happens. Parents, siblings, and, if the family is extended rather than nuclear, other relatives all help socialize children from the time they are born.

Colleen Kelly – Kids Playing Monopoly Chicago – CC BY 2.0.

Second, the family is ideally a major source of practical and emotional support for its members. It provides them food, clothing, shelter, and other essentials, and it also provides them love, comfort, help in times of emotional distress, and other types of intangible support that we all need.

Third, the family helps regulate sexual activity and sexual reproduction . All societies have norms governing with whom and how often a person should have sex. The family is the major unit for teaching these norms and the major unit through which sexual reproduction occurs. One reason for this is to ensure that infants have adequate emotional and practical care when they are born. The incest taboo that most societies have, which prohibits sex between certain relatives, helps minimize conflict within the family if sex occurred among its members and to establish social ties among different families and thus among society as a whole.

Fourth, the family provides its members with a social identity . Children are born into their parents’ social class, race and ethnicity, religion, and so forth. As we have seen in earlier chapters, social identity is important for our life chances. Some children have advantages throughout life because of the social identity they acquire from their parents, while others face many obstacles because the social class or race/ethnicity into which they are born is at the bottom of the social hierarchy.

Beyond discussing the family’s functions, the functional perspective on the family maintains that sudden or far-reaching changes in conventional family structure and processes threaten the family’s stability and thus that of society. For example, most sociology and marriage-and-family textbooks during the 1950s maintained that the male breadwinner–female homemaker nuclear family was the best arrangement for children, as it provided for a family’s economic and child-rearing needs. Any shift in this arrangement, they warned, would harm children and by extension the family as a social institution and even society itself. Textbooks no longer contain this warning, but many conservative observers continue to worry about the impact on children of working mothers and one-parent families. We return to their concerns shortly.

The Family and Conflict

Conflict theorists agree that the family serves the important functions just listed, but they also point to problems within the family that the functional perspective minimizes or overlooks altogether.

First, the family as a social institution contributes to social inequality in several ways. The social identity it gives to its children does affect their life chances, but it also reinforces a society’s system of stratification. Because families pass along their wealth to their children, and because families differ greatly in the amount of wealth they have, the family helps reinforce existing inequality. As it developed through the centuries, and especially during industrialization, the family also became more and more of a patriarchal unit (see earlier discussion), helping to ensure men’s status at the top of the social hierarchy.

Second, the family can also be a source of conflict for its own members. Although the functional perspective assumes the family provides its members emotional comfort and support, many families do just the opposite and are far from the harmonious, happy groups depicted in the 1950s television shows. Instead, and as the news story that began this chapter tragically illustrated, they argue, shout, and use emotional cruelty and physical violence. We return to family violence later in this chapter.

Families and Social Interaction

Social interactionist perspectives on the family examine how family members and intimate couples interact on a daily basis and arrive at shared understandings of their situations. Studies grounded in social interactionism give us a keen understanding of how and why families operate the way they do.

Some studies, for example, focus on how husbands and wives communicate and the degree to which they communicate successfully (Tannen, 2001). A classic study by Mirra Komarovsky (1964) found that wives in blue-collar marriages liked to talk with their husbands about problems they were having, while husbands tended to be quiet when problems occurred. Such gender differences seem less common in middle-class families, where men are better educated and more emotionally expressive than their working-class counterparts. Another classic study by Lillian Rubin (1976) found that wives in middle-class families say that ideal husbands are ones who communicate well and share their feelings, while wives in working-class families are more apt to say that ideal husbands are ones who do not drink too much and who go to work every day.

Other studies explore the role played by romantic love in courtship and marriage. Romantic love , the feeling of deep emotional and sexual passion for someone, is the basis for many American marriages and dating relationships, but it is actually uncommon in many parts of the contemporary world today and in many of the societies anthropologists and historians have studied. In these societies, marriages are arranged by parents and other kin for economic reasons or to build alliances, and young people are simply expected to marry whoever is chosen for them. This is the situation today in parts of India, Pakistan, and other developing nations and was the norm for much of the Western world until the late 18th and early 19th centuries (Lystra, 1989).

Key Takeaways

• The family ideally serves several functions for society. It socializes children, provides practical and emotional support for its members, regulates sexual reproduction, and provides its members with a social identity.
• Reflecting conflict theory’s emphases, the family may also produce several problems. In particular, it may contribute for several reasons to social inequality, and it may subject its members to violence, arguments, and other forms of conflict.
• Social interactionist understandings of the family emphasize how family members interact on a daily basis. In this regard, several studies find that husbands and wives communicate differently in certain ways that sometimes impede effective communication.

For Your Review

Komarovsky, M. (1964). Blue-collar marriage . New York, NY: Random House.

Lystra, K. (1989). Searching the heart: Women, men, and romantic love in nineteenth-century America . New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Rubin, L. B. (1976). Worlds of pain: Life in the working-class family . New York, NY: Basic Books.

Tannen, D. (2001). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation . New York, NY: Quill.

Introduction to Sociology: Understanding and Changing the Social World Copyright © 2016 by University of Minnesota is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

10.2 Sociological Perspectives on the Family

Learning objective.

• Summarize understandings of the family as presented by functional, conflict, and social interactionist theories.

Sociological views on today’s families and their problems generally fall into the functional, conflict, and social interactionist approaches introduced in Chapter 1 "Understanding Social Problems" . Let’s review these views, which are summarized in Table 10.1 "Theory Snapshot" .

Table 10.1 Theory Snapshot

Social Functions of the Family

Recall that the functional perspective emphasizes that social institutions perform several important functions to help preserve social stability and otherwise keep a society working. A functional understanding of the family thus stresses the ways in which the family as a social institution helps make society possible. As such, the family performs several important functions.

First, the family is the primary unit for socializing children . No society is possible without adequate socialization of its young. In most societies, the family is the major unit in which socialization happens. Parents, siblings, and, if the family is extended rather than nuclear, other relatives all help socialize children from the time they are born.

Second, the family is ideally a major source of practical and emotional support for its members. It provides them food, clothing, shelter, and other essentials, and it also provides them love, comfort, and help in times of emotional distress, and other types of support.

Third, the family helps regulate sexual activity and sexual reproduction . All societies have norms governing with whom and how often a person should have sex. The family is the major unit for teaching these norms and the major unit through which sexual reproduction occurs. One reason for this is to ensure that infants have adequate emotional and practical care when they are born.

Fourth, the family provides its members with a social identity . Children are born into their parents’ social class, race and ethnicity, religion, and so forth. Some children have advantages throughout life because of the social identity they acquire from their parents, while others face many obstacles because the social class or race/ethnicity into which they are born is at the bottom of the social hierarchy.

Beyond discussing the family’s functions, the functional perspective on the family maintains that sudden or far-reaching changes in conventional family structure and processes threaten the family’s stability and thus that of society. For example, most sociology and marriage-and-family textbooks during the 1950s maintained that the male breadwinner–female homemaker nuclear family was the best arrangement for children, as it provided for a family’s economic and child-rearing needs. Any shift in this arrangement, they warned, would harm children and, by extension, the family as a social institution and even society itself. Textbooks no longer contain this warning, but many conservative observers continue to worry about the impact on children of working mothers and one-parent families. We return to their concerns shortly.

The Family and Conflict

Conflict theorists agree that the family serves the important functions just listed, but they also point to problems within the family that the functional perspective minimizes or overlooks altogether.

First, the family as a social institution contributes to social inequality. Because families pass along their wealth to their children, and because families differ greatly in the amount of wealth they have, the family helps reinforce existing inequality. As it developed through the centuries, and especially during industrialization, the family also became more and more of a patriarchal unit (since men made money working in factories while women stayed home), helping to reinforce men’s status at the top of the social hierarchy.

Second, the family can also be a source of conflict for its own members. Although the functional perspective assumes the family provides its members emotional comfort and support, many families do just the opposite and are far from the harmonious, happy groups depicted in the 1950s television shows. Instead, they argue, shout, and use emotional cruelty and physical violence. We return to family violence later in this chapter.

The conflict perspective emphasizes that many of the problems we see in today’s families stem from economic inequality and from patriarchy. The problems that many families experience reflect the fact that they live in poverty or near poverty. Money does not always bring happiness, but a dire lack of money produces stress and other difficulties that impair a family’s functioning and relationships. The Note 10.9 "Applying Social Research" box discusses other ways in which social class influences the family.

Conflict within a family also stems from patriarchy. Husbands usually earn more money than wives, and many men continue to feel that they are the head of their families. When women resist this old-fashioned notion, spousal conflict occurs.

Applying Social Research

Social Class and the Family

A growing amount of social science research documents social class differences in how well a family functions: the quality of its relationships and the cognitive, psychological, and social development of its children. This focus reflects the fact that what happens during the first months and years of life may have profound effects on how well a newborn prospers during childhood, adolescence, and beyond. To the extent this is true, the social class differences that have been found have troublesome implications.

According to sociologist Frank E. Furstenberg Jr., “steep differences exist across social classes” in mothers’ prenatal experiences, such as the quality of their diet and health care, as well as in the health care that their infants receive. As a result, he says, “children enter the world endowed unequally.” This inequality worsens after they are born for several reasons.

First, low-income families are much more likely to experience negative events , such as death, poor health, unemployment, divorce, and criminal victimization. When these negative events do occur, says Furstenberg, “social class affects a family’s ability to cushion their blow…Life is simply harder and more brutish at the bottom.” These negative events produce great amounts of stress; as Chapter 2 "Poverty" discussed, this stress in turn causes children to experience various developmental problems.

Second, low-income parents are much less likely to read and speak regularly to their infants and young children, who thus are slower to develop cognitive and reading skills; this problem in turn impairs their school performance when they enter elementary school.

Third, low-income parents are also less able to expose their children to cultural experiences (e.g., museum visits) outside the home, to develop their talents in the arts and other areas, and to otherwise be involved in the many nonschool activities that are important for a child’s development. In contrast, wealthier parents keep their children very busy in these activities in a pattern that sociologist Annette Lareau calls concerted cultivation . These children’s involvement in these activities provides them various life skills that help enhance their performance in school and later in the workplace.

Fourth, low-income children grow up in low-income neighborhoods, which often have inadequate schools and many other problems, including toxins such as lead paint, that impair a child’s development. In contrast, says Furstenberg, children from wealthier families “are very likely to attend better schools and live in better neighborhoods. It is as if the playing field for families is tilted in ways that are barely visible to the naked eye.”

Fifth, low-income families are less able to afford to send a child to college, and they are more likely to lack the social contacts that wealthier parents can use to help their child get a good job after college.

For all these reasons, social class profoundly shapes how children fare from conception through early adulthood and beyond. Because this body of research documents many negative consequences of living in a low-income family, it reinforces the need for wide-ranging efforts to help such families.

Sources: Bandy, Andrews, & Moore, 2012; Furstenberg, 2010; Lareau, 2010 Bandy, T., Andrews, K.M., & Moore, K.A. (2012). Disadvantaged families and child outcomes: The importance of emotional support for mothers . Washington, DC: Child Trends; Furstenberg, F. E., Jr. (2010). Diverging development: The not-so-invisible hand of social class in the United States. In B. J. Risman (Ed.), Families as they really are (pp. 276–294). New York, NY: W. W. Norton; Lareau, A. (2010). Unequal childhoods: Inequalities in the rhythms of daily life. In B. J. Risman (Ed.), Families as they really are (pp. 295–298). New York: W. W. Norton.

Families and Social Interaction

Social interactionist perspectives on the family examine how family members and intimate couples interact on a daily basis and arrive at shared understandings of their situations. Studies grounded in social interactionism give us a keen understanding of how and why families operate the way they do.

Some studies, for example, focus on how husbands and wives communicate and the degree to which they communicate successfully (Tannen, 2001). Tannen, D. (2001). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation . New York, NY: Quill. A classic study by Mirra Komarovsky (1964) Komarovsky, M. (1964). Blue-collar marriage . New York, NY: Random House. found that wives in blue-collar marriages liked to talk with their husbands about problems they were having, while husbands tended to be quiet when problems occurred. Such gender differences are less common in middle-class families, where men are better educated and more emotionally expressive than their working-class counterparts, but gender differences in communication still exist in these families. Another classic study by Lillian Rubin (1976) Rubin, L. B. (1976). Worlds of pain: Life in the working-class family . New York, NY: Basic Books. found that wives in middle-class families say that ideal husbands are ones who communicate well and share their feelings, while wives in working-class families are more apt to say that ideal husbands are ones who do not drink too much and who go to work every day.

According to the symbolic interactionist perspective, family problems often stem from the different understandings, perceptions, and expectations that spouses have of their marriage and of their family. When these differences become too extreme and the spouses cannot reconcile their disagreements, spousal conflict and possibly divorce may occur (Kaufman & Taniguchi, 2006). Kaufman, G., & Taniguchi, H. (2006). Gender and marital happiness in later life. Journal of Family Issues, 27 (6), 735–757.

Key Takeaways

• The family ideally serves several functions for society. It socializes children, provides practical and emotional support for its members, regulates sexual reproduction, and provides its members with a social identity.
• Reflecting conflict theory’s emphases, the family may also produce several problems. In particular, it may contribute for several reasons to social inequality, and it may subject its members to violence, arguments, and other forms of conflict.
• Social interactionist understandings of the family emphasize how family members interact on a daily basis. In this regard, several studies find that husbands and wives communicate differently in certain ways that sometimes impede effective communication.

For Your Review

• As you think how best to understand the family, do you favor the views and assumptions of functional theory, conflict theory, or social interactionist theory? Explain your answer.
• Do you think the family continues to serve the function of regulating sexual behavior and sexual reproduction? Why or why not?

The Influence of Social Institutions on People’s Lives Essay

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Institutions hold a great deal of power over people and can influence people’s daily lives dramatically. Every human activity connects to one or several institutions simultaneously, so the population’s daily lives are closely related to social institutions and could be influenced in a positive or a negative way. This essay will explore how institutions affect people’s lives through the example of a college student’s life and evaluate whether their influence is positive or negative.

The family institution shapes an individual’s views on the themes of gender and gender equality in daily life. According to Ang et al. (2021), the family institution mainly perceives both genders as equal, which is positive for gender equality. Authors emphasize that cases of the unequal amount of pocket money received by a sibling of another gender rarely happen in family institutions. On the other hand, the authors identified that in family institutions, the household chores remain divided by the traditional gender roles, which could negatively influence the younger individuals’ perception of gender equality.

In the education institution, both positive and negative effects could take place. According to Van Rensburg and Rothmann (2020), positive interventions and positive practices in different social institutions, like education, could result in higher performance levels and improved motivation of the students. However, depending on the type of educational organization, it could potentially influence the students’ social status and limit the student’s opportunities.

Lastly, the economic institution influences the daily life of the whole population in the same way. The economy determines the labor market, so a positive situation with guaranteed high wages could motivate the students to improve their level of knowledge and spend more time on education processes. However, the economic institution also determines the living conditions for students. During the COVID-19 pandemic, most students had to change their place of living, and many were at a loss of employment. According to Owens et al. (2020), many students experienced housing and food insecurities in the past year.

In conclusion, this essay explored how different institutions influenced people’s lives through the example of a college student’s life and attempted to evaluate whether the influence of institutions is positive or negative. The study showed that the college students’ life is majorly affected by the family, education, and economic institutions. Moreover, all institutions could affect an individual’s daily life both positively and negatively.

Ang, S. M., Koo L. K., Chang, Z. J., Low, K.W., Ong, Z., &Yeoh, B. K. (2021). Gender inequality, conflict and sexism within the family institution: A pilot study on university students’ experience. International Journal of Social Science Research, 3 (2), 1-13.

Owens, M.R., Brito-Silva, F., Kirkland, T., Moore, C.E., Davis, K.E., Patterson, M.A., Miketinas, D.C., & Tucker, W. J. (2020). Prevalence and social determinants of food insecurity among college students during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Nutrients, 12 (9), 1-17. Web.

Van Rensburg, C. J., & Rothmann, S. (2020). Towards positive institutions: Positive practices and employees’ experiences in higher education institutions. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology , 46 , 1-11. Web.

• Social Interaction and Everyday Life in the Internet Age
• The Concepts of Inferences and Assumptions
• "Race" Biographical Movie: Jesse Owens' Motif
• The Power of Nurse Educator Self-Reflection
• Application Specific Internet of Things by Ang & Seng
• Analysis of How Australian Families Spend Their Time
• Communication and Moderating Conflict
• Journey Map: Term Definition
• Harassment Law - Tennie Pierce Discrimination
• Healthy Grief: Kübler-Ross, Job, and Buddhist Stages of Grieving
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2022, August 6). The Influence of Social Institutions on People’s Lives. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-influence-of-social-institutions-on-peoples-lives/

"The Influence of Social Institutions on People’s Lives." IvyPanda , 6 Aug. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/the-influence-of-social-institutions-on-peoples-lives/.

IvyPanda . (2022) 'The Influence of Social Institutions on People’s Lives'. 6 August.

IvyPanda . 2022. "The Influence of Social Institutions on People’s Lives." August 6, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-influence-of-social-institutions-on-peoples-lives/.

1. IvyPanda . "The Influence of Social Institutions on People’s Lives." August 6, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-influence-of-social-institutions-on-peoples-lives/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "The Influence of Social Institutions on People’s Lives." August 6, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-influence-of-social-institutions-on-peoples-lives/.

The Family: A Socially Constructed Idea

Elizabeth B. Pearce

To begin our study of contemporary families in the United States, we will first define an important concept that is used for a large portion of this book: social constructions . A social construction is a mutual understanding and accepted reality created by members of a society: something that is not determined by biology or the natural world. Is there anything that humans have created that holds no real value in the natural world, yet we have assigned a great deal of value to it? If you are thinking of cash, you’re right on the money. Humans have determined that certain pieces of paper and metal objects are worth an agreed-upon value. For example, in the United States, a one dollar bill is worth 100 times the value of a penny.  One of the ways that we can tell money is a social construction is that it varies from culture to culture and over time. When you visit another country, the United States dollar bill has to be “exchanged” for money that has a different appearance and value. Compare money with another thing of value to human beings: air. Air is needed by all human beings to survive. The need for air and its value do not change over time or from culture to culture.

Social constructions also relate to behavior and activities. For example, what food would you expect to see on the menu when you go out for breakfast in the United States? What if the eating place were described as a “Mexican” restaurant? And what if you traveled to another country, say, Korea? What is eaten for breakfast varies from culture to culture and even person to person. And yet, in general, we have a socially constructed idea of what is typically breakfast food in the United States: eggs, bacon, cereal, toast, and fruit, but not vegetables, noodles, pinto beans, or hot dogs. One of the ways that you can recognize that something is a socially constructed idea is that it differs from place to place and changes over time. In addition, whatever is part of the socially constructed idea (in this case what typical breakfast foods are) becomes “the norm” or what is expected. While we might welcome trying some different foods for breakfast, they are not what is seen as the typical, or expected, American breakfast foods.

What does this have to do with families? While studying families, we must continually remind ourselves that the idea of the family, and in particular the internalized belief that there is a “normal family,” is a social construction. What is a normal family? I suspect that we can each paint a picture in our heads, based on the years each of us has been exposed to portrayals of families in institutions such as the media, schools, government, and health care. Generally, the traditional American family has been identified as the nuclear family , most often represented as a male and female heterosexual married couple who is middle class, White, and with several children. When society or the individuals within a society designate one kind of family to be traditional, this may imply a value, or a preference, for this kind of family structure with these particular social characteristics . This is sometimes called the “Leave it to Beaver” family after the popular sitcom television show that ran from 1957 until 1963, pictured below left. A current popular sitcom, Modern Family , which just concluded its 11th season in 2020, also features this traditional family, but includes two other families which feature people of other ethnic groups, and a same-sex couple. Together they form an extended family who all live in the same town. It is important to note, however, that the primacy of the upper middle-class, White family image continues to be emphasized.

As we study families we must keep in mind that this idea of the typical family is not representative of all families, yet it is continually reinforced by the social processes and institutions in our society. Media in particular continually reminds us of what families are “supposed to” look like. Whether you consume big-budget films, social media platforms, video games, and/or books and magazines, take a look. What kind of people and families do you see represented? While representation of women, people of color, and people of differing sexualities and gender expressions has increased in media, they still predominantly play less consequential characters within the plot lines. Although the majority of families in the United States no longer fit the traditional model, [1] social institutions perpetuate the idea of a certain family structure. Government, schools, medical institutions, businesses, and places of worship all reinforce a typical view of family through the forms, activities, requirements, and processes that are shared with the public. How many times have you tried to fill out a form with checkboxes only to find that you did not “fit” into one of the boxes? Typical examples include giving parental choices of “mother” and “father,” couple status choices such as “married” or “single,” and gender choices such as “male” or female,” all of which reinforce a binary view of individuals and families.

The preference for an idealized traditional family type contributes to less social support for families who don’t fit this type: for example, single-parent families, LGBTQ+ families, rural families, or families with a member who is disabled, unemployed, or who has a criminal record. Accepted structures and practices such as not being able to access a safe neighborhood or good school because of income, “Daddy-Daughter Dances,” churches that exclude or condemn LGBTQ+ ministers and/or members, and educational materials that cannot be read with low vision are all examples of ways that some individuals and families are less recognized and less privileged. You can probably think of other examples from your own family’s perspective. Families exist in multiple forms that are functional.

The social construction of difference describes value being assigned to a perceived difference [2] (in this case, the form and function of families). While Allan Johnson wrote about differences in privilege related to social characteristics such as race, ethnicity , gender, and ability, we will extend this concept to the social construction of differences amongst families. Via the socially constructed idea of family, American systems and structures regularly create and reinforce inequities amongst American families.

Equity, Equality, and Fairness

You will notice that this text often refers to equity rather than equality or fairness. It’s important that equity is defined as everyone having what they need, even if it means that some need to be given more to get there. This drawing by one of the text’s authors illustrates the difference (you may have seen different variations of this concept as memes on social media). If you’d like to read more about it, this blog has a good explanation .

This text asserts that all families need equitable resources, and analyzes the experiences and structures that get in the way. In the first panel of the drawing, although all of the participants have equal-sized boxes, they do not all get to have an equal experience. In the second drawing, the participants can have the viewing experience because the boxes have been equitably distributed. And in the third panel, the structure that limited equitable access has been removed so that all participants can view the game without additional resources.

In this text, we will study American families with an emphasis on the current inequities in the United States. To help us understand the socially constructed nature of our view of the family and the systems that affect families, we will take a comparative approach . [3] This means that, while our focus is current American families, we will also look at how families have evolved in America, what the practices are of immigrant cultures in America, and how other countries develop systems that affect families. We will also utilize empirical research, data that are collected in a variety of ways, analyzed, and presented to further our understanding.

21st Century American Families

While we are studying families, it is important to note the concept of kinship . While definitions vary, it is widely agreed that the term kinship is broader than the term family. Kinship refers to the social structure that ties people together (whether by blood, marriage, legal processes, or other agreements) and includes family relationships. Kinship acknowledges that individuals have a role in defining who is a member of their own family and how familial relationships extend across society.

What are families in the United States like today? Because we are constrained by both our personal experiences, as well as the societal representations of “typical families,” it is important to talk about what kinds of kinship structures and changes are actually occurring. At times, the study of families has been referred to as the study of “the family.” This text avoids that terminology because we are studying many types of families.

In order to describe current American families and kinship structures, it is probably easiest to compare them with families of the past and families in other countries. Here is a snapshot of some kinship patterns:

There is no longer one dominant family form in the United States; children are living in increasingly varied family arrangements.

In this chart, based on data from the Pew Research Center, increases are noted in children living with a single parent (yellow color) and cohabiting parents (gray color).

Americans are getting married later in life.

This graph shows the increase, for both men (blue) and women (red) in the median age of first marriage:

Both marriage and divorce rates are declining in the United States.

The marriage rate (blue) is declining a bit faster than the divorce rate (red), which is one of the factors that makes it appear as if divorce is increasing. It’s actually declining, just at a slower rate than marriage is declining:

Fertility rates are declining in the U.S.

Women are having fewer children, following the “Baby Boom” years between approximately 1946 and 1964.

Families are increasingly living in multigenerational households.

Multigenerational living includes families with two or more adult generations and families that have grandchildren under the age of twenty-five and grandparents living together. This style of living hit a low of 12% of all families in the U.S. in 1980. Since then, multigenerational living has increased in most racial and ethnic groups, age groups, and genders. [4]

Most expect to work until an older age now than did workers in the 20th century.

Beneficial trends such as longer life expectancy and being healthier longer affect people’s decisions to work longer. Less beneficial trends such as concern about having adequate health care coverage, fewer jobs that have pensions associated with them, and the increasing number of workers who have multiple part-time jobs also affect this trend.

This graph shows differentiation by gender and by education level, but there is also differentiation related to wealth, income, and kind of employment. Look at the difference between 1992 (light blue) and 2004 (red). Notice that for both genders, and with all education levels, people are expecting to work longer!

But expectations do not always match experience, and there is sufficient evidence that older workers are consistently forced out of stable, well-paying jobs at a significant percentage.

To delve into additional data and read more about how this affects families, read If You’re Over 50, Chances Are the Decision to Leave a Job Won’t be Yours, a data analysis by ProPublica and the Urban Institute. 

Functions of the Family within Society

Families have both private and public functions . Notably, American society today is more concerned with the private function of families, which focuses on the intimate relationships that family members share with one another. Americans value the idea that a core part of the family function is the indefinite length of loving relationships. [5]

In the past, and today in other cultures and countries, families were more focused on the public function such as the production of what would be called public goods in an economic model. The most common public good in American families are children, but caring for elderly or differently-abled adults could also be considered as producing a public good. Volunteering and contributing to places of worship, charitable organizations, and other not-for-profit agencies is another way to perform the public function. As public institutions, families support, contribute to, and benefit from the overall social structure. Although our society currently focuses on the private function, families implicitly perform both; these functions are complementary to one another. In this text we will raise awareness of the public function.

The focus on the private function of families may relate to the United States’ identity as an individualistic society . [6] In America, there is a focus on what individuals can achieve, with value placed on accomplishments that are gained without the support of society. Many other countries have collectivist [7] cultures which emphasize social support for all, so that all members of the group are able to meet their goals and needs.

Licenses and Attributions

Open Content, Shared Previously Figure 1.1.  Photo  by  Krzysztof Kotkowicz . License:  Unsplash License. Figure 1.2.  “Breakfast Burrito”  by  JBrazito . License:  CC BY-NC 2.0. Figure 1.3.  Photo of the Cleaver family  by ABC Television. Public domain.

Adaptations: juxtaposed with “Modern Family” photo.

Figure 1.6. “Median age at first marriage: 1890-present” by the  US Census . Public domain.

Figure 1.10. “Expectation of working full time after age 65” is from the  Health and Retirement Study  by the National Institute on Aging. Public domain.

Figure 1.11. “ A majority of older Americans with stable jobs are pushed out of work ” by Peter Gosselin/ProPublica. License:  CC-BY-NC-ND 2.0 .

Open Content, Original

Figure 1.4. “Equality, Equity, Equity for All” by Katie Niemeyer. License:  CC BY 4.0 . Based on  ideas originally illustrated  by Angus Maguire and Craig Froehle.

Figure 1.5. “For children, growing diversity in family living arrangements.” License:   CC BY 4.0 . Based on  data from Pew Research Center .

Figure 1.7. “Marriage and divorce rates in the US, 1990-2007.” License:   CC BY 4.0 . Based on  data from Statistical Abstracts/U.S. Census .

Figure 1.8. “Trends in the U.S. Fertility Rate.” License:   CC BY 4.0 . Based on  data compiled by childtrends.org .

Figure 1.9. “One-in-five Americans live in a multigenerational household.” License:   CC BY 4.0 . Based on  data from Pew Research Center .

All Rights Reserved Content Figure 1.3.  Modern Family photo (c) American Broadcasting Company. Image used under fair use.

Adaptations: juxtaposed with “Leave it to Beaver” photo.

• Pew Research Center. (2015, December 17). The American family today. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2015/12/17/1-the-american-family-today/ ↵
• Johnson, A.G. (2006). Privilege, power, and difference (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ↵
• American Sociological Association. (2020). Comparative/historical approaches. https://www.asanet.org/topics/comparativehistorical-approaches ↵
• Pew Research. (2018, April 5). Record 64 million Americans live in multigenerational households. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/04/05/a-record-64-million-americans-live-in-multigenerational-households/ ↵
• Cherlin, A. (2016). Public and private families. McGraw-Hill. ↵
• Morin, A. (2019, August 19). Individualistic cultures and behavior. Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-are-individualistic-cultures-2795273 ↵
• Collectivist and individualist cultures | Psychology Wiki | Fandom. Retrieved December 29, 2019, from https://psychology.wikia.org/wiki/Collectivist_and_individualist_cultures - [different source?] ↵

Meaning assigned to an object or event by mutual agreement (explicit or implicit) of the members of a society; can change over time and/or location.

A socially transmitted worldview created, learned and shared by a group which includes values, beliefs, customs and behaviors and which is reflected in language, objects, food, and social institutions.

A family group that consists of two parents and their children living together in one household.

Describes traits that may be biologically determined and/or socially constructed. Examples include sex, gender, race, ethnicity, ability, age, sexuality, nationality, first language, and religion.

Patterns of behavior, interactions or change among people in an organization or broader society.

Unit of importance that meets the needs of society structured with defined rules and roles.

Hierarchical value is assigned to perceived differences between one socially constructed idea and another. Class, race, and other hierarchies based on social identity are social constructions of difference.

A social category and shared identity based on a common culture or national sense of belonging.

Lack of fair treatment, opportunity, or conditions.

Ensuring that people have what they need in order to have a healthy, successful life equal to others.  Different from equality in that some may receive more help than others in order to be at the same level of success.

Within the fields of anthropology and sociology, the act of examining and contrasting social processes and institutions with a view to draw inferences and understand patterns.

The social structure that ties people together (whether by blood, marriage, legal processes, or other agreements) and includes family relationships.

Products and services that may be enjoyed by people who do not themselves produce them. Examples include drinking water, law enforcement, infrastructure, and national defense.

Emphasizes the needs and success of the individual over the needs of the whole community.

A society viewpoint that focuses on meeting the needs and goals of all members of a group, rather than focusing on individual successes.

Contemporary Families: An Equity Lens 1e Copyright © 2020 by Elizabeth B. Pearce is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

• Faculty of Arts and Sciences
• FAS Theses and Dissertations
• Communities & Collections
• By Issue Date
• FAS Department
• Quick submit
• Waiver Generator
• DASH Stories
• Accessibility
• COVID-related Research

Terms of Use

• Privacy Policy
• By Collections
• By Departments

Essays on Social Institutions and Development

Citable link to this page

Collections.

• FAS Theses and Dissertations [6584]

Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)

Show Statistical Information

Title Page Setup

A title page is required for all APA Style papers. There are both student and professional versions of the title page. Students should use the student version of the title page unless their instructor or institution has requested they use the professional version. APA provides a student title page guide (PDF, 199KB) to assist students in creating their title pages.

Student title page

The student title page includes the paper title, author names (the byline), author affiliation, course number and name for which the paper is being submitted, instructor name, assignment due date, and page number, as shown in this example.

Title page setup is covered in the seventh edition APA Style manuals in the Publication Manual Section 2.3 and the Concise Guide Section 1.6

Related handouts

• Student Title Page Guide (PDF, 263KB)
• Student Paper Setup Guide (PDF, 3MB)

Student papers do not include a running head unless requested by the instructor or institution.

Follow the guidelines described next to format each element of the student title page.

Professional title page

The professional title page includes the paper title, author names (the byline), author affiliation(s), author note, running head, and page number, as shown in the following example.

Follow the guidelines described next to format each element of the professional title page.

Chapter 10: The Changing Family

10.2 sociological perspectives on the family, learning objective.

• Summarize understandings of the family as presented by functional, conflict, and social interactionist theories.

Sociological views on today’s families and their problems generally fall into the functional, conflict, and social interactionist approaches introduced in Chapter 1 “Understanding Social Problems” . Let’s review these views, which are summarized in Table 10.1 “Theory Snapshot” .

Table 10.1 Theory Snapshot

Social Functions of the Family

Recall that the functional perspective emphasizes that social institutions perform several important functions to help preserve social stability and otherwise keep a society working. A functional understanding of the family thus stresses the ways in which the family as a social institution helps make society possible. As such, the family performs several important functions.

First, the family is the primary unit for socializing children . No society is possible without adequate socialization of its young. In most societies, the family is the major unit in which socialization happens. Parents, siblings, and, if the family is extended rather than nuclear, other relatives all help socialize children from the time they are born.

One of the most important functions of the family is the socialization of children. In most societies the family is the major unit through which socialization occurs.

Second, the family is ideally a major source of practical and emotional support for its members. It provides them food, clothing, shelter, and other essentials, and it also provides them love, comfort, and help in times of emotional distress, and other types of support.

Third, the family helps regulate sexual activity and sexual reproduction . All societies have norms governing with whom and how often a person should have sex. The family is the major unit for teaching these norms and the major unit through which sexual reproduction occurs. One reason for this is to ensure that infants have adequate emotional and practical care when they are born.

Fourth, the family provides its members with a social identity . Children are born into their parents’ social class, race and ethnicity, religion, and so forth. Some children have advantages throughout life because of the social identity they acquire from their parents, while others face many obstacles because the social class or race/ethnicity into which they are born is at the bottom of the social hierarchy.

Beyond discussing the family’s functions, the functional perspective on the family maintains that sudden or far-reaching changes in conventional family structure and processes threaten the family’s stability and thus that of society. For example, most sociology and marriage-and-family textbooks during the 1950s maintained that the male breadwinner–female homemaker nuclear family was the best arrangement for children, as it provided for a family’s economic and child-rearing needs. Any shift in this arrangement, they warned, would harm children and, by extension, the family as a social institution and even society itself. Textbooks no longer contain this warning, but many conservative observers continue to worry about the impact on children of working mothers and one-parent families. We return to their concerns shortly.

The Family and Conflict

Conflict theorists agree that the family serves the important functions just listed, but they also point to problems within the family that the functional perspective minimizes or overlooks altogether.

First, the family as a social institution contributes to social inequality. Because families pass along their wealth to their children, and because families differ greatly in the amount of wealth they have, the family helps reinforce existing inequality. As it developed through the centuries, and especially during industrialization, the family also became more and more of a patriarchal unit (since men made money working in factories while women stayed home), helping to reinforce men’s status at the top of the social hierarchy.

Second, the family can also be a source of conflict for its own members. Although the functional perspective assumes the family provides its members emotional comfort and support, many families do just the opposite and are far from the harmonious, happy groups depicted in the 1950s television shows. Instead, they argue, shout, and use emotional cruelty and physical violence. We return to family violence later in this chapter.

The conflict perspective emphasizes that many of the problems we see in today’s families stem from economic inequality and from patriarchy. The problems that many families experience reflect the fact that they live in poverty or near poverty. Money does not always bring happiness, but a dire lack of money produces stress and other difficulties that impair a family’s functioning and relationships. The Note 10.9 “Applying Social Research” box discusses other ways in which social class influences the family.

Conflict within a family also stems from patriarchy. Husbands usually earn more money than wives, and many men continue to feel that they are the head of their families. When women resist this old-fashioned notion, spousal conflict occurs.

Applying Social Research

Social Class and the Family

A growing amount of social science research documents social class differences in how well a family functions: the quality of its relationships and the cognitive, psychological, and social development of its children. This focus reflects the fact that what happens during the first months and years of life may have profound effects on how well a newborn prospers during childhood, adolescence, and beyond. To the extent this is true, the social class differences that have been found have troublesome implications.

According to sociologist Frank E. Furstenberg Jr., “steep differences exist across social classes” in mothers’ prenatal experiences, such as the quality of their diet and health care, as well as in the health care that their infants receive. As a result, he says, “children enter the world endowed unequally.” This inequality worsens after they are born for several reasons.

First, low-income families are much more likely to experience negative events , such as death, poor health, unemployment, divorce, and criminal victimization. When these negative events do occur, says Furstenberg, “social class affects a family’s ability to cushion their blow…Life is simply harder and more brutish at the bottom.” These negative events produce great amounts of stress; as Chapter 2 “Poverty” discussed, this stress in turn causes children to experience various developmental problems.

Second, low-income parents are much less likely to read and speak regularly to their infants and young children, who thus are slower to develop cognitive and reading skills; this problem in turn impairs their school performance when they enter elementary school.

Third, low-income parents are also less able to expose their children to cultural experiences (e.g., museum visits) outside the home, to develop their talents in the arts and other areas, and to otherwise be involved in the many nonschool activities that are important for a child’s development. In contrast, wealthier parents keep their children very busy in these activities in a pattern that sociologist Annette Lareau calls concerted cultivation . These children’s involvement in these activities provides them various life skills that help enhance their performance in school and later in the workplace.

Fourth, low-income children grow up in low-income neighborhoods, which often have inadequate schools and many other problems, including toxins such as lead paint, that impair a child’s development. In contrast, says Furstenberg, children from wealthier families “are very likely to attend better schools and live in better neighborhoods. It is as if the playing field for families is tilted in ways that are barely visible to the naked eye.”

Fifth, low-income families are less able to afford to send a child to college, and they are more likely to lack the social contacts that wealthier parents can use to help their child get a good job after college.

For all these reasons, social class profoundly shapes how children fare from conception through early adulthood and beyond. Because this body of research documents many negative consequences of living in a low-income family, it reinforces the need for wide-ranging efforts to help such families.

Sources: Bandy, Andrews, & Moore, 2012; Furstenberg, 2010; Lareau, 2010

Families and Social Interaction

Social interactionist perspectives on the family examine how family members and intimate couples interact on a daily basis and arrive at shared understandings of their situations. Studies grounded in social interactionism give us a keen understanding of how and why families operate the way they do.

Some studies, for example, focus on how husbands and wives communicate and the degree to which they communicate successfully (Tannen, 2001). A classic study by Mirra Komarovsky (1964) found that wives in blue-collar marriages liked to talk with their husbands about problems they were having, while husbands tended to be quiet when problems occurred. Such gender differences are less common in middle-class families, where men are better educated and more emotionally expressive than their working-class counterparts, but gender differences in communication still exist in these families. Another classic study by Lillian Rubin (1976) found that wives in middle-class families say that ideal husbands are ones who communicate well and share their feelings, while wives in working-class families are more apt to say that ideal husbands are ones who do not drink too much and who go to work every day.

According to the symbolic interactionist perspective, family problems often stem from the different understandings, perceptions, and expectations that spouses have of their marriage and of their family. When these differences become too extreme and the spouses cannot reconcile their disagreements, spousal conflict and possibly divorce may occur (Kaufman & Taniguchi, 2006).

Key Takeaways

• The family ideally serves several functions for society. It socializes children, provides practical and emotional support for its members, regulates sexual reproduction, and provides its members with a social identity.
• Reflecting conflict theory’s emphases, the family may also produce several problems. In particular, it may contribute for several reasons to social inequality, and it may subject its members to violence, arguments, and other forms of conflict.
• Social interactionist understandings of the family emphasize how family members interact on a daily basis. In this regard, several studies find that husbands and wives communicate differently in certain ways that sometimes impede effective communication.

For Your Review

• As you think how best to understand the family, do you favor the views and assumptions of functional theory, conflict theory, or social interactionist theory? Explain your answer.
• Do you think the family continues to serve the function of regulating sexual behavior and sexual reproduction? Why or why not?

Bandy, T., Andrews, K.M., & Moore, K.A. (2012). Disadvantaged families and child outcomes: The importance of emotional support for mothers . Washington, DC: Child Trends.

Furstenberg, F. E., Jr. (2010). Diverging development: The not-so-invisible hand of social class in the United States. In B. J. Risman (Ed.), Families as they really are (pp. 276–294). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

Kaufman, G., & Taniguchi, H. (2006). Gender and marital happiness in later life. Journal of Family Issues, 27 (6), 735–757.

Komarovsky, M. (1964). Blue-collar marriage . New York, NY: Random House.

Lareau, A. (2010). Unequal childhoods: Inequalities in the rhythms of daily life. In B. J. Risman (Ed.), Families as they really are (pp. 295–298). New York: W. W. Norton.

Rubin, L. B. (1976). Worlds of pain: Life in the working-class family . New York, NY: Basic Books.

Tannen, D. (2001). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation . New York, NY: Quill.

• Social Problems: Continuity and Change. Provided by : Social Problems: Continuity and Change is adapted from a work produced and distributed under a Creative Commons license (CC BY-NC-SA) in 2010 by a publisher who has requested that they and the original author not receive attribution. This adapted edition is produced by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing through the eLearning Support Initiative.. Located at : http://open.lib.umn.edu/socialproblems/ . License : CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
• Kids playing Monopoly Chicago. Authored by : Colleen Kelly. Provided by : Flickr. Located at : https://www.flickr.com/photos/familytravelck/7112758505/ . License : CC BY: Attribution

Privacy Policy