Our websites may use cookies to personalize and enhance your experience. By continuing without changing your cookie settings, you agree to this collection. For more information, please see our University Websites Privacy Notice .
![](http://sektorel.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning
- Case Based Learning
What is the case method?
In case-based learning, students learn to interact with and manipulate basic foundational knowledge by working with situations resembling specific real-world scenarios.
How does it work?
Case studies encourage students to use critical thinking skills to identify and narrow an issue, develop and evaluate alternatives, and offer a solution. In fact, Nkhoma (2016), who studied the value of developing case-based learning activities based on Bloom’s Taxonomy of thinking skills, suggests that this approach encourages deep learning through critical thinking:
![case study learning outcomes](https://cetl.media.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1775/2021/01/case-based-chart-01.png)
Sherfield (2004) confirms this, asserting that working through case studies can begin to build and expand these six critical thinking strategies:
- Emotional restraint
- Questioning
- Distinguishing fact from fiction
- Searching for ambiguity
What makes a good case?
Case-based learning can focus on anything from a one-sentence physics word problem to a textbook-sized nursing case or a semester-long case in a law course. Though we often assume that a case is a “problem,” Ellet (2007) suggests that most cases entail one of four types of situations:
- Evaluations
- What are the facts you know about the case?
- What are some logical assumptions you can make about the case?
- What are the problems involved in the case as you see it?
- What is the root problem (the main issue)?
- What do you estimate is the cause of the root problem?
- What are the reasons that the root problem exists?
- What is the solution to the problem?
- Are there any moral or ethical considerations to your solution?
- What are the real-world implications for this case?
- How might the lives of the people in the case study be changed because of your proposed solution?
- Where in your world (campus/town/country) might a problem like this occur?
- Where could someone get help with this problem?
- What personal advice would you give to the person or people concerned?
Adapted from Sherfield’s Case Studies for the First Year (2004)
Some faculty buy prepared cases from publishers, but many create their own based on their unique course needs. When introducing case-based learning to students, be sure to offer a series of guidelines or questions to prompt deep thinking. One option is to provide a scenario followed by questions; for example, questions designed for a first year experience problem might include these:
Before you begin, take a look at what others are doing with cases in your field. Pre-made case studies are available from various publishers, and you can find case-study templates online.
- Choose scenarios carefully
- Tell a story from beginning to end, including many details
- Create real-life characters and use quotes when possible
- Write clearly and concisely and format the writing simply
- Ask students to reflect on their learning—perhaps identifying connections between the lesson and specific course learning outcomes—after working a case
Additional Resources
- Barnes, Louis B. et al. Teaching and the Case Method , 3 rd (1994). Harvard, 1994.
- Campoy, Renee. Case Study Analysis in the Classroom: Becoming a Reflective Teacher . Sage Publications, 2005.
- Ellet, William. The Case Study Handbook . Harvard, 2007.
- Herreid, Clyde Freeman, ed. Start with a Story: The Case Study Method of Teaching College Science . NSTA, 2007.
- Herreid, Clyde Freeman, et al. Science Stories: Using Case Studies to Teach Critical Thinking . NSTA, 2012.
- Nkhoma, M., Lam, et al. Developing case-based learning activities based on the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy . Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference (In SITE) 2016, 85-93. 2016.
- Rolls, Geoff. Classic Case Studies in Psychology , 3 rd Hodder Education, Bookpoint, 2014.
- Sherfield, Robert M., et al. Case Studies for the First Year . Pearson, 2004.
- Shulman, Judith H., ed. Case Methods in Teacher Education . Teacher’s College, 1992.
Quick Links
- Developing Learning Objectives
- Creating Your Syllabus
- Active Learning
- Service Learning
- Critical Thinking and other Higher-Order Thinking Skills
- Group and Team Based Learning
- Integrating Technology in the Classroom
- Effective PowerPoint Design
- Hybrid and Hybrid Limited Course Design
- Online Course Design
![case study learning outcomes](https://cetl.media.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1775/2020/09/icon-consult-yellow-orange-01.png)
Consult with our CETL Professionals
Consultation services are available to all UConn faculty at all campuses at no charge.
![case study learning outcomes U.S. flag](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/coreutils/uswds/img/favicons/favicon-57.png)
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
- Advanced Search
- Journal List
- SAGE Open Nurs
- v.7; Jan-Dec 2021
Case Study Analysis as an Effective Teaching Strategy: Perceptions of Undergraduate Nursing Students From a Middle Eastern Country
Vidya seshan.
1 Maternal and Child Health Department, College of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 66 Al-Khoudh, Postal Code 123, Muscat, Oman
Gerald Amandu Matua
2 Fundamentals and Administration Department, College of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 66 Al-Khoudh, Postal Code 123, Muscat, Oman
Divya Raghavan
Judie arulappan, iman al hashmi, erna judith roach, sheeba elizebath sunderraj, emi john prince.
3 Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Queensland 4111
Background: Case study analysis is an active, problem-based, student-centered, teacher-facilitated teaching strategy preferred in undergraduate programs as they help the students in developing critical thinking skills. Objective: It determined the effectiveness of case study analysis as an effective teacher-facilitated strategy in an undergraduate nursing program. Methodology: A descriptive qualitative research design using focus group discussion method guided the study. The sample included undergraduate nursing students enrolled in the Maternal Health Nursing Course during the Academic Years 2017 and 2018. The researcher used a purposive sampling technique and a total of 22 students participated in the study, through five (5) focus groups, with each focus group comprising between four to six nursing students. Results: In total, nine subthemes emerged from the three themes. The themes were “Knowledge development”, “Critical thinking and Problem solving”, and “Communication and Collaboration”. Regarding “Knowledge development”, the students perceived case study analysis method as contributing toward deeper understanding of the course content thereby helping to reduce the gap between theory and practice especially during clinical placement. The “Enhanced critical thinking ability” on the other hand implies that case study analysis increased student's ability to think critically and aroused problem-solving interest in the learners. The “Communication and Collaboration” theme implies that case study analysis allowed students to share their views, opinions, and experiences with others and this enabled them to communicate better with others and to respect other's ideas which further enhanced their team building capacities. Conclusion: This method is effective for imparting professional knowledge and skills in undergraduate nursing education and it results in deeper level of learning and helps in the application of theoretical knowledge into clinical practice. It also broadened students’ perspectives, improved their cooperation capacity and their communication with each other. Finally, it enhanced student's judgment and critical thinking skills which is key for their success.
Introduction/Background
Recently, educators started to advocate for teaching modalities that not only transfer knowledge ( Shirani Bidabadi et al., 2016 ), but also foster critical and higher-order thinking and student-centered learning ( Wang & Farmer, 2008 ; Onweh & Akpan, 2014). Therefore, educators need to utilize proven teaching strategies to produce positive outcomes for learners (Onweh & Akpan, 2014). Informed by this view point, a teaching strategy is considered effective if it results in purposeful learning ( Centra, 1993 ; Sajjad, 2010 ) and allows the teacher to create situations that promote appropriate learning (Braskamp & Ory, 1994) to achieve the desired outcome ( Hodges et al., 2020 ). Since teaching methods impact student learning significantly, educators need to continuously test the effectives of their teaching strategies to ensure desired learning outcomes for their students given today's dynamic learning environments ( Farashahi & Tajeddin, 2018 ).
In this study, the researchers sought to study the effectiveness of case study analysis as an active, problem-based, student-centered, teacher-facilitated strategy in a baccalaureate-nursing program. This choice of teaching method is supported by the fact that nowadays, active teaching-learning is preferred in undergraduate programs because, they not only make students more powerful actors in professional life ( Bean, 2011 ; Yang et al., 2013 ), but they actually help learners to develop critical thinking skills ( Clarke, 2010 ). In fact, students who undergo such teaching approaches usually become more resourceful in integrating theory with practice, especially as they solve their case scenarios ( Chen et al., 2019 ; Farashahi & Tajeddin, 2018 ; Savery, 2019 ).
Review of Literature
As a pedagogical strategy, case studies allow the learner to integrate theory with real-life situations as they devise solutions to the carefully designed scenarios ( Farashahi & Tajeddin, 2018 ; Hermens & Clarke, 2009). Another important known observation is that case-study-based teaching exposes students to different cases, decision contexts and the environment to experience teamwork and interpersonal relations as “they learn by doing” thus benefiting from possibilities that traditional lectures hardly create ( Farashahi & Tajeddin, 2018 ; Garrison & Kanuka, 2004 ).
Another merit associated with case study method of teaching is the fact that students can apply and test their perspectives and knowledge in line with the tenets of Kolb et al.'s (2014) “experiential learning model”. This model advocates for the use of practical experience as the source of one's learning and development. Proponents of case study-based teaching note that unlike passive lectures where student input is limited, case studies allow them to draw from their own experience leading to the development of higher-order thinking and retention of knowledge.
Case scenario-based teaching also encourages learners to engage in reflective practice as they cooperate with others to solve the cases and share views during case scenario analysis and presentation ( MsDade, 1995 ).
This method results in “idea marriage” as learners articulate their views about the case scenario. This “idea marriage” phenomenon occurs through knowledge transfer from one situation to another as learners analyze scenarios, compare notes with each other, and develop multiple perspectives of the case scenario. In fact, recent evidence shows that authentic case-scenarios help learners to acquire problem solving and collaborative capabilities, including the ability to express their own views firmly and respectfully, which is vital for future success in both professional and personal lives ( Eronen et al., 2019 ; Yajima & Takahashi, 2017 ). In recognition of this higher education trend toward student-focused learning, educators are now increasingly expected to incorporate different strategies in their teaching.
This study demonstrated that when well implemented, educators can use active learning strategies like case study analysis to aid critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaborative capabilities in undergraduate students. This study is significant because the findings will help educators in the country and in the region to incorporate active learning strategies such as case study analysis to aid critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaborative capabilities in undergraduate students. Besides, most studies on the case study method in nursing literature mostly employ quantitative methods. The shortage of published research on the case study method in the Arabian Gulf region and the scanty use of qualitative methods further justify why we adopted the focus group method for inquiry.
A descriptive qualitative research design using focus group discussion method guided the study. The authors chose this method because it is not only inexpensive, flexible, stimulating but it is also known to help with information recall and results in rich data ( Matua et al., 2014 ; Streubert & Carpenter, 2011 ). Furthermore, as evidenced in the literature, the focus group discussion method is often used when there is a need to gain an in-depth understanding of poorly understood phenomena as the case in our study. The choice of this method is further supported by the scarcity of published research related to the use of case study analysis as a teaching strategy in the Middle Eastern region, thereby further justifying the need for an exploratory research approach for our study.
As a recommended strategy, the researchers generated data from information-rich purposively selected group of baccalaureate nursing students who had experienced both traditional lectures and cased-based teaching approaches. The focus group interviews allowed the study participants to express their experiences and perspectives in their own words. In addition, the investigators integrated participants’ self-reported experiences with their own observations and this enhanced the study findings ( Morgan & Bottorff, 2010 ; Nyumba et al., 2018 ; Parker & Tritter, 2006 ).
Eligibility Criteria
In order to be eligible to participate in the study, the participants had to:
- be a baccalaureate nursing student in College of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University
- register for Maternity Nursing Course in 2017 and 2018.
- attend all the Case Study Analysis sessions in the courses before the study.
- show a willingness to participate in the study voluntarily and share their views freely.
The population included the undergraduate nursing students enrolled in the Maternal Health Nursing Course during the Academic Years 2017 and 2018.
The researcher used a purposive sampling technique to choose participants who were capable of actively participating and discussing their views in the focus group interviews. This technique enabled the researchers to select participants who could provide rich information and insights about case study analysis method as an effective teaching strategy. The final study sample included baccalaureate nursing students who agreed to participate in the study by signing a written informed consent. In total, twenty-two (22) students participated in the study, through five focus groups, with each focus group comprising between four and six students. The number of participants was determined by the stage at which data saturation was reached. The point of data saturation is when no new information emerges from additional participants interviewed ( Saunders et al., 2018 ).Focus group interviews were stopped once data saturation was achieved. Qualitative research design with focus group discussion allowed the researchers to generate data from information-rich purposively selected group of baccalaureate nursing students who had experienced both traditional lectures and case-based teaching approaches. The focus group interviews allowed the study participants to express their perspectives in their own words. In addition, the investigators enhanced the study findings by integrating participants’ self-reported experiences with the researchers’ own observations and notes during the study.
The study took place at College of Nursing; Sultan Qaboos University, Oman's premier public university, in Muscat. This is the only setting chosen for the study. The participants are the students who were enrolled in Maternal Health Nursing course during 2017 and 2018. The interviews occurred in the teaching rooms after official class hours. Students who did not participate in the study learnt the course content using the traditional lecture based method.
Ethical Considerations
Permission to conduct the study was granted by the College Research and Ethics Committee (XXXX). Prior to the interviews, each participant was informed about the purpose, benefits as well as the risks associated with participating in the study and clarifications were made by the principal researcher. After completing this ethical requirement, each student who accepted to participate in the study proceeded to sign an informed consent form signifying that their participation in the focus group interview was entirely voluntary and based on free will.
The anonymity of study participants and confidentiality of their data was upheld throughout the focus group interviews and during data analysis. To enhance confidentiality and anonymity of the data, each participant was assigned a unique code number which was used throughout data analysis and reporting phases. To further assure the confidentiality of the research data and anonymity of the participants, all research-related data were kept safe, under lock and key and through digital password protection, with unhindered access only available to the research team.
Research Intervention
In Fall 2017 and Spring 2018 semesters, as a method of teaching Maternal Health Nursing course, all students participated in two group-based case study analysis exercises which were implemented in the 7 th and 13 th weeks. This was done after the students were introduced to the case study method using a sample case study prior to the study. The instructor explained to the students how to solve the sample problem, including how to accomplish the role-specific competencies in the courses through case study analysis. In both weeks, each group consisting of six to seven students was assigned to different case scenarios to analyze and work on, after which they presented their collective solution to the case scenarios to the larger class of 40 students. The case scenarios used in both weeks were peer-reviewed by the researchers prior to the study.
Pilot Study
A group of three students participated as a pilot group for the study. However, the students who participated in the pilot study were not included in the final study as is general the principle with qualitative inquiry because of possible prior exposure “contamination”. The purpose of piloting was to gather data to provide guidance for a substantive study focusing on testing the data collection procedure, the interview process including the sequence and number of questions and probes and recording equipment efficacy. After the pilot phase, the lessons learned from the pilot were incorporated to ensure smooth operations during the actual focus group interview ( Malmqvist et al., 2019 .
Data Collection
The focus group interviews took place after the target population was exposed to case study analysis method in Maternal Health Nursing course during the Fall 2017 and Spring 2018 semesters. Before data collection began, the research team pilot tested the focus group interview guide to ensure that all the guide questions were clear and well understood by study participants.
In total, five (5) focus groups participated in the study, with each group comprising between four and six students. The focus group interviews lasted between 60 and 90 min. In addition to the interview guide questions, participants’ responses to unanswered questions were elicited using prompts to facilitate information flow whenever required. As a best practice, all the interviews were audio-recorded in addition to extensive field notes taken by one of the researchers. The focus group interviews continued until data saturation occurred in all the five (5) focus groups.
Credibility
In this study, participant's descriptions were digitally audio recorded to ensure that no information was lost. In order to ensure that the results are accurate, verbatim transcriptions of the audio recordings were done supported by interview notes. Furthermore, interpretations of the researcher were verified and supported with existing literature with oversight from the research team.
Transferability
The researcher provided a detailed description about the study settings, participants, sampling technique, and the process of data collection and analyses. The researcher used verbatim quotes from various participants to aid the transferability of the results.
Dependability
The researcher ensured that the research process is clearly documented, traceable, and logical to achieve dependability of the research findings. Furthermore, the researcher transparently described the research steps, procedures and process from the start of the research project to the reporting of the findings.
Confirmability
In this study, confirmability of the study findings was achieved through the researcher's efforts to make the findings credible, dependable, and transferable.
Data Analysis
Data were analyzed manually after the lead researcher integrated the verbatim transcriptions with the extensive field notes to form the final data set. Data were analyzed thematically under three thematic areas of a) knowledge development; b) critical thinking and problem solving; and (c) communication and collaboration, which are linked to the study objectives. The researchers used the Six (6) steps approach to conduct a trustworthy thematic analysis: (1) familiarization with the research data, (2) generating initial codes, (3) searching for themes, (4) reviewing the themes, (5) defining and naming themes, (6) writing the report ( Nowell et al., 2017 ).
The analysis process started with each team member individually reading and re-reading the transcripts several times and then identifying meaning units linked to the three thematic areas. The co-authors then discussed in-depth the various meaning units linked to the thematic statements until consensus was reached and final themes emerged based on the study objectives.
A total of 22 undergraduate third-year baccalaureate nursing students who were enrolled in the Maternal Health Nursing Course during the Academic Years 2017 and 2018 participated in the study, through five focus groups, with each group comprising four to six students. Of these, 59% were females and 41% were males. In total, nine subthemes emerged from the three themes. Under knowledge development, emerged the subthemes, “ deepened understanding of content ; “ reduced gap between theory and practice” and “ improved test-taking ability ”. While under Critical thinking and problem solving, emerged the subthemes, “ enhanced critical thinking ability ” and “ heightened curiosity”. The third thematic area of communication and collaboration yielded, “ improved communication ability ”; “ enhanced team-building capacity ”; “ effective collaboration” and “ improved presentation skills ”, details of which are summarized in Table 1 .
Table 1.
Objective Linked Themes and Student Perceptions of Outcome Case Study Analysis.
Thematic Areas/Objectives | Subthemes Related to Student Perceptions | |
---|---|---|
1 | Knowledge Development | Subtheme 1- Deepened understanding of content Subtheme 2-The reduced gap between theory and practice Subtheme 3- Improved test-taking ability |
2 | Critical thinking and problem solving | Subtheme 1- Enhanced critical thinking ability Subtheme 2- Heightened learner curiosity |
3 | Communication and collaboration | Subtheme 1- Improved communication ability Subtheme 2- Enhanced team-building capacity Subtheme 3- Effective collaboration ability Subtheme 4- Improved presentation skills |
Theme 1: Knowledge Development
In terms of knowledge development, students expressed delight at the inclusion of case study analysis as a method during their regular theory class. The first subtheme related to knowledge development that supports the adoption of the case study approach is its perceived benefit of ‘ deepened understanding of content ’ by the students as vividly described by this participant:
“ I was able to perform well in the in-course exams as this teaching method enhanced my understanding of the content rather than memorizing ” (FGD#3).
The second subtheme related to knowledge development was informed by participants’ observation that teaching them using case study analysis method ‘ reduced the gap between theory and practice’. This participant's claim stem from the realization that, a case study scenario his group analyzed in the previous week helped him and his colleagues to competently deal with a similar situation during clinical placement the following week, as articulated below:
“ You see when I was caring for mothers in antenatal unit, I could understand the condition better and could plan her care well because me and my group already analyzed a similar situation in class last week which the teacher gave us, this made our work easier in the ward”. (FGD#7).
Another student added that:
“ It was useful as what is taught in the theory class could be applied to the clinical cases.”
This ‘theory-practice’ connection was particularly useful in helping students to better understand how to manage patients with different health conditions. Interestingly, the students reported that they were more likely to link a correct nursing care plan to patients whose conditions were close to the case study scenarios they had already studied in class as herein affirmed:
“ …when in the hospital I felt I could perceive the treatment modality and plan for [a particular] nursing care well when I [had] discussed with my team members and referred the textbook resource while performing case study discussion”. (FGD#17).
In a similar way, another student added:
“…I could relate with the condition I have seen in the clinical area. So this has given me a chance to recall the condition and relate the theory to practice”. (FGD#2) .
The other subtheme closely related to case study scenarios as helping to deepen participant's understanding of the course content, is the notion that this teaching strategy also resulted in ‘ improved test taking-ability’ as this participant's verbatim statement confirms:
“ I could answer the questions related to the cases discussed [much] better during in-course exams. Also [the case scenarios] helped me a great deal to critically think and answer my exam papers” (FGD#11).
Theme 2: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving
In this subtheme, students found the case study analysis as an excellent method to learn disease conditions in the two courses. This perceived success with the case study approach is associated with the method's ability to ‘ enhance students’ critical thinking ability’ as this student declares:
“ This method of teaching increased my ability to think critically as the cases are the situations, where we need to think to solve the situation”. (FGD#5)
This enhanced critical thinking ability attributed to case study scenario analysis was also manifested during patient care where students felt it allowed them to experience a “ flow of patient care” leading to better patient management planning as would typically occur during case scenario analysis. In support of this finding, a participant mentioned that:
“ …I could easily connect the flow of patient care provided and hence was able to plan for [his] management as often required during case study discussion” (FGD#12)
Another subtheme linked with this theme is the “ heightened curiosity” associated with the case scenario discussions. It was clear from the findings that the cases aroused curiosity in the mind of the students. This heightened interest meant that during class discussion, baccalaureate nursing students became active learners, eager to discover the next set of action as herein affirmed:
“… from the beginning of discussion with the group, I was eager to find the answer to questions presented and wanted to learn the best way for patient management” (FGD#14)
Theme 3: Communication and Collaboration
In terms of its impact on student communication, the subtheme revealed that case study analysis resulted in “ improved communication ability” among the nursing students . This enhanced ability of students to exchange ideas with each other may be attributed to the close interaction required to discuss and solve their assigned case scenarios as described by the participant below:
“ as [case study analysis] was done in the way of group discussion, I felt me and my friends communicated more within the group as we discussed our condition. We also learnt from each other, and we became better with time.” (FGD#21).
The next subtheme further augments the notion that case study analysis activities helped to “ enhance team-building capacity” of students as this participant affirmatively narrates:
“ students have the opportunity to meet face to face to share their views, opinion, and their experience, as this build on the way they can communicate with each other and respect each other's opinions and enhance team-building”. (FGD#19).
Another subtheme revealed from the findings show that the small groups in which the case analysis occurs allowed the learners to have deeper and more focused conversations with one another, resulting in “ an effective collaboration between students” as herein declared:
“ We could collaborate effectively as we further went into a deep conversation on the case to solve”. (FGD#16).
Similarly, another student noted that:
“ …discussion of case scenarios helped us to prepare better for clinical postings and simulation lab experience” (FGD#5) .
A fourth subtheme related to communication found that students also identified that case study analysis resulted in “ improved presentation skills”. This is attributed in part to the preparation students have to go through as part of their routine case study discussion activities, which include organizing their presentations and justifying and integrating their ideas. Besides readying themselves for case presentations, the advice, motivation, and encouragement such students receive from their faculty members and colleagues makes them better presenters as confirmed below:
“ …teachers gave us enough time to prepare, hence I was able to present in front of the class regarding the finding from our group.” (FGD#16).
In this study, the researches explored learner's perspectives on how one of the active teaching strategies, case study analysis method impacted their knowledge development, critical thinking, and problem solving as well as communication and collaboration ability.
Knowledge Development
In terms of knowledge development, the nursing students perceived case study analysis as contributing toward: (a) deeper understanding of content, (b) reducing gap between theory and practice, and (c) improving test-taking ability. Deeper learning” implies better grasping and retention of course content. It may also imply a deeper understanding of course content combined with learner's ability to apply that understanding to new problems including grasping core competencies expected in future practice situations (Rickles et al., 2019; Rittle-Johnson et al., 2020 ). Deeper learning therefore occurs due to the disequilibrium created by the case scenario, which is usually different from what the learner already knows ( Hattie, 2017 ). Hence, by “forcing” students to compare and discuss various options in the quest to solve the “imbalance” embedded in case scenarios, students dig deeper in their current understanding of a given content including its application to the broader context ( Manalo, 2019 ). This movement to a deeper level of understanding arises from carefully crafted case scenarios that instructors use to stimulate learning in the desired area (Nottingham, 2017; Rittle-Johnson et al., 2020 ). The present study demonstrated that indeed such carefully crafted case study scenarios did encourage students to engage more deeply with course content. This finding supports the call by educators to adopt case study as an effective strategy.
Another finding that case study analysis method helps in “ reducing the gap between theory and practice ” implies that the method helps students to maintain a proper balance between theory and practice, where they can see how theoretical knowledge has direct practical application in the clinical area. Ajani and Moez (2011) argue that to enable students to link theory and practice effectively, nurse educators should introduce them to different aspects of knowledge and practice as with case study analysis. This dual exposure ensures that students are proficient in theory and clinical skills. This finding further amplifies the call for educators to adequately prepare students to match the demands and realities of modern clinical environments ( Hickey, 2010 ). This expectation can be met by ensuring that student's knowledge and skills that are congruent with hospital requirements ( Factor et al., 2017 ) through adoption of case study analysis method which allows integration of clinical knowledge in classroom discussion on regular basis.
The third finding, related to “improved test taking ability”, implies that case study analysis helped them to perform better in their examination, noting that their experience of going through case scenario analysis helped them to answer similar cases discussed in class much better during examinations. Martinez-Rodrigo et al. (2017) report similar findings in a study conducted among Spanish electrical engineering students who were introduced to problem-based cooperative learning strategies, which is similar to case study analysis method. Analysis of student's results showed that their grades and pass rates increased considerably compared to previous years where traditional lecture-based method was used. Similar results were reported by Bonney (2015) in an even earlier study conducted among biology students in Kings Borough community college students, in New York, United States. When student's performance in examination questions covered by case studies was compared with class-room discussions, and text-book reading, case study analysis approach was significantly more effective compared to traditional methods in aiding students’ performance in their examinations. This finding therefore further demonstrates that case study analysis method indeed improves student's test taking ability.
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving
In terms of critical thinking and problem-solving ability, the use of case study analysis resulted in two subthemes: (a) enhanced critical thinking ability and (b) heightened learner curiosity. The “ enhanced critical thinking ability” implies that case analysis increased student's ability to think critically as they navigated through the case scenarios. This observation agrees with the findings of an earlier questionnaire-based study conducted among 145 undergraduate business administration students at Chittagong University, Bangladesh, that showed 81% of respondents agree that case study analysis develops critical thinking ability and enables students to do better problem analysis ( Muhiuddin & Jahan, 2006 ). This observation agrees with the findings of an earlier study conducted among 145 undergraduate business administration students at Chittagong University, Bangladesh. The study showed that 81% of respondents agreed that case study analysis facilitated the development of critical thinking ability in the learners and enabled the students to perform better with problem analysis ( Muhiuddin & Jahan, 2006 ).
More recently, Suwono et al. (2017) found similar results in a quasi-experimental research conducted at a Malaysian university. The research findings showed that there was a significant difference in biological literacy and critical thinking skills between the students taught using socio-biological case-based learning and those taught using traditional lecture-based learning. The researchers concluded that case-based learning enhanced the biological literacy and critical thinking skills of the students. The current study adds to the existing pedagogical knowledge base that case study methodology can indeed help to deepen learner's critical thinking and problem solving ability.
The second subtheme related to “ heightened learner curiosity” seems to suggest that the case studies aroused problem-solving interest in learners. This observation agrees with two earlier studies by Tiwari et al. (2006) and Flanagan and McCausland (2007) who both reported that most students enjoyed case-based teaching. The authors add that the case study method also improved student's clinical reasoning, diagnostic interpretation of patient information as well as their ability to think logically when presented a challenge in the classroom and in the clinical area. Jackson and Ward (2012) similarly reported that first year engineering undergraduates experienced enhanced student motivation. The findings also revealed that the students venturing self-efficacy increased much like their awareness of the importance of key aspects of the course for their future careers. The authors conclude that the case-based method appears to motivate students to autonomously gather, analyze and present data to solve a given case. The researchers observed enhanced personal and collaborative efforts among the learners, including improved communication ability. Further still, learners were more willing to challenge conventional wisdom, and showed higher “softer” skills after exposure to case analysis based teaching method. These findings like that of the current study indicate that teaching using case based analysis approach indeed motivates students to engage more in their learning, there by resulting in deeper learning.
Communication and Collaboration
Case study analysis is also perceived to result in: (a) improved communication ability; (b) enhanced team -building capacity, (c) effective collaboration ability, and (d) enhanced presentation skills. The “ improved communication ability ” manifested in learners being better able to exchange ideas with peers, communicating their views more clearly and collaborating more effectively with their colleagues to address any challenges that arise. Fini et al. (2018) report comparable results in a study involving engineering students who were subjected to case scenario brainstorming activities about sustainability concepts and their implications in transportation engineering in selected courses. The results show that this intervention significantly improved student's communication skills besides their higher-order cognitive, self-efficacy and teamwork skills. The researchers concluded that involving students in brainstorming activities related to problem identification including their practical implications, is an effective teaching strategy. Similarly, a Korean study by Park and Choi (2018) that sought to analyze the effects of case-based communication training involving 112 sophomore nursing students concluded that case-based training program improved the students’ critical thinking ability and communication competence. This finding seems to support further the use of case based teaching as an effective teaching-learning strategy.
The “ enhanced team-building capacity” arose from the opportunity students had in sharing their views, opinions, and experiences where they learned to communicate with each other and respect each other's ideas which further enhance team building. Fini et al. (2018) similarly noted that increased teamwork levels were seen among their study respondents when the researchers subjected engineering students to case scenario based-brainstorming activities as occurs with case study analysis teaching. Likewise, Lairamore et al. (2013) report similar results in their study that showed that case study analysis method increased team work ability and readiness among students from five health disciplines in a US-based study.
The finding that case study analysis teaching method resulted in “ effective collaboration ability” among students manifested as students entered into deep conversation as they solved the case scenarios. Rezaee and Mosalanejad (2015) assert that such innovative learning strategies result in noticeable educational outcomes, such as greater satisfaction with and enjoyment of the learning process ( Wellmon et al., 2012 ). Further, positive attitudes toward learning and collaboration have been noted leading to deeper learning as students prepare for case discussions ( Rezaee & Mosalanejad, 2015 ). This results show that case study analysis can be utilized by educators to foster professional collaboration among their learners, which is one of the key expectations of new graduates today.
The finding associated with “improved presentation skills” is consistent with the results of a descriptive study in Saudi Arabia that compared case study and traditional lectures in the teaching of physiology course to undergraduate nursing students. The researchers found that case-based teaching improved student’ overall knowledge and performance in the course including facilitating the acquisition of skills compared to traditional lectures ( Majeed, 2014 ). Noblitt et al. (2010) report similar findings in their study that compares traditional presentation approach with the case study method for developing and improving student's oral communication skills. This finding extends our understanding that case study method improves learners’ presentation skills.
The study was limited to level third year nursing students belonging to only one college and the sample size, which might limit the transferability of the study findings to other settings.
Implications for Practice
These study findings add to the existing body of knowledge that places case study based teaching as a tested method that promotes perception learning where students’ senses are engaged as a result of the real-life and authentic clinical scenarios ( Malesela, 2009 ), resulting in deeper learning and achievement of long-lasting knowledge ( Fiscus, 2018 ). The students reported that case scenario discussions broadened their perspectives, improved their cooperation capacity and communication with each other. This teaching method, in turn, offers students an opportunity to enhance their judgment and critical thinking skills by applying theory into practice.
These skills are critically important because nurses need to have the necessary knowledge and skills to plan high quality care for their patients to achieve a speedy recovery. In order to attain this educational goal, nurse educators have to prepare students through different student- centered strategies. The findings of our study appear to show that when appropriately used, case-based teaching results in acquisition of disciplinary knowledge manifested by deepened understanding of course content, as well as reducing the gap between theory and practice and enhancing learner's test-taking-ability. The study also showed that cased based teaching enhanced learner's critical thinking ability and curiosity to seek and acquire a deeper knowledge. Finally, the study results indicate that case study analysis results in improved communication and enhanced team-building capacity, collaborative ability and improved oral communication and presentation skills. The study findings and related evidence from literature show that case study analysis is well- suited approach for imparting knowledge and skills in baccalaureate nursing education.
This study evaluated the usefulness of Case Study Analysis as a teaching strategy. We found that this method of teaching helps encourages deeper learning among students. For instructors, it provides the opportunity to tailor learning experiences for students to undertake in depth study in order to stimulate deeper understanding of the desired content. The researchers conclude that if the cases are carefully selected according to the level of the students, and are written realistically and creatively and the group discussions keep students well engaged, case study analysis method is more effective than other traditional lecture methods in facilitating deeper and transferable learning/skills acquisition in undergraduate courses.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
ORCID iD: Judie Arulappan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2788-2755
- Ajani K., Moez S. (2011). Gap between knowledge and practice in nursing . Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences , 15 , 3927–3931. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.396 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Bean J. C. (2011). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing critical thinking and active-learning in the classroom (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass. [ Google Scholar ]
- Bonney K. M. (2015). Case study teaching method improves student performance and perceptions of learning gains . Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education , 16 ( 1 ), 21–28. 10.1128/jmbe.v16i1.846 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Braskamp L. A., Ory J. C. (1994). Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and institutional performance . Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass Inc. [ Google Scholar ]
- Centra J. A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness . Jossey-Bass. [ Google Scholar ]
- Chen W., Shah U. V., Brechtelsbauer C. (2019). A framework for hands-on learning in chemical engineering education—training students with the end goal in mind . Education for Chemical Engineers , 28 , 25–29. 10.1016/j.ece.2019.03.002 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Clarke J. (2010). Student centered teaching methods in a Chinese setting . Nurse Education Today , 30 ( 1 ), 15–19. 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.05.009 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Eronen L., Kokko S., Sormunen K. (2019). Escaping the subject-based class: A Finnish case study of developing transversal competencies in a transdisciplinary course . The Curriculum Journal , 30 ( 3 ), 264–278. 10.1080/09585176.2019.1568271 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Factor E. M. R., Matienzo E. T., de Guzman A. B. (2017). A square peg in a round hole: Theory-practice gap from the lens of Filipino student nurses . Nurse Education Today , 57 , 82–87. 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.07.004 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Farashahi M., Tajeddin M. (2018). Effectiveness of teaching methods in business education: A comparison study on the learning outcomes of lectures, case studies and simulations . The International Journal of Management Education , 16 ( 1 ), 131–142. 10.1016/j.ijme.2018.01.003 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Fini E. H., Awadallah F., Parast M. M., Abu-Lebdeh T. (2018). The impact of project-based learning on improving student learning outcomes of sustainability concepts in transportation engineering courses . European Journal of Engineering Education , 43 ( 3 ), 473–488. 10.1080/03043797.2017.1393045 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Fiscus J. (2018). Reflection in Motion: A Case Study of Reflective Practice in the Composition Classroom [ Doctoral dissertation ]. Source: http://hdl.handle.net/1773/42299 [ Google Scholar ]
- Flanagan N. A., McCausland L. (2007). Teaching around the cycle: Strategies for teaching theory to undergraduate nursing students . Nursing Education Perspectives , 28 ( 6 ), 310–314. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Garrison D. R., Kanuka H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education . The internet and higher education , 7 ( 2 ), 95–105. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Hattie J. (2017). Foreword . In Nottingham J. (Ed.), The learning challenge: How to guide your students through the learning pit to achieve deeper understanding . Corwin Press, p. xvii. [ Google Scholar ]
- Hermens A., Clarke E. (2009). Integrating blended teaching and learning to enhance graduate attributes . Education+ Training , 51 ( 5/6 ), 476–490. [ Google Scholar ]
- Hickey M. T. (2010). Baccalaureate nursing graduates’ perceptions of their clinical instructional experiences and preparation for practice . Journal of Professional Nursing , 26 ( 1 ), 35–41. 10.1016/j.profnurs.2009.03.001 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Hodges C., Moore S., Lockee B., Trust T., Bond A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning . Educause review , 27 , 1–12. [ Google Scholar ]
- Jackson N. R., Ward A. E. (2012). Curiosity based learning: Impact study in 1st year electronics undergraduates. 2012 International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), Istanbul, pp. 1–6. 10.1109/ITHET.2012.6246005. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Kolb A. Y., Kolb D. A., Passarelli A., Sharma G. (2014). On becoming an experiential educator: The educator role profile . Simulation & Gaming , 45 ( 2 ), 204–234. 10.1177/1046878114534383 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Lairamore C., George-Paschal L., McCullough K., Grantham M., Head D. (2013). A case-based interprofessional education forum improves students’ perspectives on the need for collaboration, teamwork, and communication . MedEdPORTAL, The Journal of Teaching and learning resources , 9 , 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9484 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Majeed F. (2014). Effectiveness of case based teaching of physiology for nursing students . Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences , 9 ( 4 ), 289–292. 10.1016/j.jtumed.2013.12.005 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Malesela J. M. (2009). Case study as a learning opportunity among nursing students in a university . Health SA Gesondheid (Online) , 14 ( 1 ), 33–38. 10.4102/hsag.v14i1.434 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Malmqvist J., Hellberg K., Möllås G., Rose R., Shevlin M. (2019). Conducting the pilot study: A neglected part of the research process? Methodological findings supporting the importance of piloting in qualitative research studies . International Journal of Qualitative Methods , 18 . 10.1177/1609406919878341 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Manalo E. (ed.). (2019). Deeper learning, dialogic learning, and critical thinking: Research-based strategies for the classroom . Routledge. [ Google Scholar ]
- Martinez-Rodrigo F., Herrero-De Lucas L. C., De Pablo S., Rey-Boue A. B. (2017). Using PBL to improve educational outcomes and student satisfaction in the teaching of DC/DC and DC/AC converters . IEEE Transactions on Education , 60 ( 3 ), 229–237. 10.1109/TE.2016.2643623 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Matua G. A., Seshan V., Akintola A. A., Thanka A. N. (2014). Strategies for providing effective feedback during preceptorship: Perspectives from an Omani Hospital . Journal of Nursing Education and Practice , 4 ( 10 ), 24. 10.5430/jnep.v4n10p24 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Morgan D. L., Bottorff J. L. (2010). Advancing our craft: Focus group methods and practice . Qualitative Health Research , 20 ( 5 ), 579–581. 10.1177/1049732310364625 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- MsDade S. A. (1995). Case study pedagogy to advance critical thinking . Teaching psychology , 22 ( 1 ), 9–10. 10.1207/s15328023top2201_3 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Muhiuddin G., Jahan N. (2006). Students’ perception towards case study as a method of learning in the field of business administration’ . The Chittagong University Journal of Business Administration , 21 , 25–41. [ Google Scholar ]
- Noblitt L., Vance D. E., Smith M. L. D. (2010). A comparison of case study and traditional teaching methods for improvement of oral communication and critical-thinking skills . Journal of College Science Teaching , 39 ( 5 ), 26–32. [ Google Scholar ]
- Nottingham J. (2017). The learning challenge: How to guide your students through the learning pit to achieve deeper understanding . Corwin Press. [ Google Scholar ]
- Nowell L. S., Norris J. M., White D. E., Moules N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria . International Journal of Qualitative Methods , 16 ( 1 ). 10.1177/1609406917733847 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Nyumba T., Wilson K., Derrick C. J., Mukherjee N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation . Methods in Ecology and evolution , 9 ( 1 ), 20–32. 10.1111/2041-210X.12860 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Onweh V. E., Akpan U. T. (2014). Instructional strategies and students academic performance in electrical installation in technical colleges in Akwa Ibom State: Instructional skills for structuring appropriate learning experiences for students . International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies , 6 ( 5 ), 80–86. [ Google Scholar ]
- Park S. J., Choi H. S. (2018). The effect of case-based SBAR communication training program on critical thinking disposition, communication self-efficacy and communication competence of nursing students . Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society , 19 ( 11 ), 426–434. 10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.11.426 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Parker A., Tritter J. (2006). Focus group method and methodology: Current practice and recent debate . International Journal of Research & Method in Education , 29 ( 1 ), 23–37. 10.1080/01406720500537304 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Rezaee R., Mosalanejad L. (2015). The effects of case-based team learning on students’ learning, self-regulation and self-direction . Global Journal of Health Science , 7 ( 4 ), 295. 10.5539/gjhs.v7n4p295 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Rickles J., Zeiser K. L., Yang R., O’Day J., Garet M. S. (2019). Promoting deeper learning in high school: Evidence of opportunities and outcomes . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 41 ( 2 ), 214–234. [ Google Scholar ]
- Rittle-Johnson B., Star J. R., Durkin K., Loehr A. (2020). Compare and discuss to promote deeper learning. Deeper learning, dialogic learning, and critical thinking: Research-based strategies for the classroom . Routlegde, p. 48. 10.4324/9780429323058-4 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Sajjad S. (2010). Effective teaching methods at higher education level . Pakistan Journal of Special Education , 11 , 29–43. [ Google Scholar ]
- Saunders B., Sim J., Kingstone T., Baker S., Waterfield J., Bartlam B., Burroughs H., Jinks C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization . Quality & Quantity , 52 ( 4 ), 1893–1907. 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Savery J. R. (2019). Comparative pedagogical models of problem based learning . The Wiley Handbook of Problem Based Learning , 81–104. 10.1002/9781119173243.ch4 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Shirani Bidabadi N., Nasr Isfahani A., Rouhollahi A., Khalili R. (2016). Effective teaching methods in higher education: Requirements and barriers . Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism , 4 ( 4 ), 170–178. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Streubert H. J., Carpenter D. R. (2011). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative . Wolters Kluwer. [ Google Scholar ]
- Suwono H., Pratiwi H. E., Susanto H., Susilo H. (2017). Enhancement of students’ biological literacy and critical thinking of biology through socio-biological case-based learning . JurnalPendidikan IPA Indonesia , 6 ( 2 ), 213–220. 10.15294/jpii.v6i2.9622 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Tiwari A., Lai P., So M., Yuen K. (2006). A comparison of the effects of problem-based learning and lecturing on the development of students’ critical thinking . Medical Education , 40 ( 6 ), 547–554. 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02481.x [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Wang V., Farmer L. (2008). Adult teaching methods in China and bloom's taxonomy . International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning , 2 ( 2 ), n2. 10.20429/ijsotl.2008 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Wellmon R., Gilin B., Knauss L., Linn M. I. (2012). Changes in student attitudes toward interprofessional learning and collaboration arising from a case-based educational experience . Journal of Allied Health , 41 ( 1 ), 26–34. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Yajima K., Takahashi S. (2017). Development of evaluation system of AL students . Procedia Computer Science , 112 , 1388–1395. 10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.056 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Yang W. P., Chao C. S. C., Lai W. S., Chen C. H., Shih Y. L., Chiu G. L. (2013). Building a bridge for nursing education and clinical care in Taiwan—using action research and confucian tradition to close the gap . Nurse Education Today , 33 ( 3 ), 199–204. 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.02.016 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Columbia University in the City of New York
- Office of Teaching, Learning, and Innovation
- University Policies
- Columbia Online
- Academic Calendar
- Resources and Technology
- Resources and Guides
Case Method Teaching and Learning
What is the case method? How can the case method be used to engage learners? What are some strategies for getting started? This guide helps instructors answer these questions by providing an overview of the case method while highlighting learner-centered and digitally-enhanced approaches to teaching with the case method. The guide also offers tips to instructors as they get started with the case method and additional references and resources.
On this page:
What is case method teaching.
- Case Method at Columbia
Why use the Case Method?
Case method teaching approaches, how do i get started.
- Additional Resources
The CTL is here to help!
For support with implementing a case method approach in your course, email [email protected] to schedule your 1-1 consultation .
Cite this resource: Columbia Center for Teaching and Learning (2019). Case Method Teaching and Learning. Columbia University. Retrieved from [today’s date] from https://ctl.columbia.edu/resources-and-technology/resources/case-method/
Case method 1 teaching is an active form of instruction that focuses on a case and involves students learning by doing 2 3 . Cases are real or invented stories 4 that include “an educational message” or recount events, problems, dilemmas, theoretical or conceptual issue that requires analysis and/or decision-making.
Case-based teaching simulates real world situations and asks students to actively grapple with complex problems 5 6 This method of instruction is used across disciplines to promote learning, and is common in law, business, medicine, among other fields. See Table 1 below for a few types of cases and the learning they promote.
Table 1: Types of cases and the learning they promote.
Type of Case | Description | Promoted Learning |
---|---|---|
Directed case | Presents a scenario that is followed by discussion using a set of “directed” / close-ended questions that can be answered from course material. | Understanding of fundamental concepts, principles, and facts |
Dilemma or decision case | Presents an individual, institution, or community faced with a problem that must be solved. Students may be presented with actual historical outcomes after they work through the case. | Problem solving and decision-making skills |
Interrupted case | Presents a problem for students to solve in a progressive disclosure format. Students are given the case in parts that they work on and make decisions about before moving on to the next part. | Problem solving skills |
Analysis or issue case | Focuses on answering questions and analyzing the situation presented. This can include “retrospective” cases that tell a story and its outcomes and have students analyze what happened and why alternative solutions were not taken. | Analysis skills |
For a more complete list, see Case Types & Teaching Methods: A Classification Scheme from the National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science.
Back to Top
Case Method Teaching and Learning at Columbia
The case method is actively used in classrooms across Columbia, at the Morningside campus in the School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), the School of Business, Arts and Sciences, among others, and at Columbia University Irving Medical campus.
Faculty Spotlight:
Professor Mary Ann Price on Using Case Study Method to Place Pre-Med Students in Real-Life Scenarios
Read more
Professor De Pinho on Using the Case Method in the Mailman Core
Case method teaching has been found to improve student learning, to increase students’ perception of learning gains, and to meet learning objectives 8 9 . Faculty have noted the instructional benefits of cases including greater student engagement in their learning 10 , deeper student understanding of concepts, stronger critical thinking skills, and an ability to make connections across content areas and view an issue from multiple perspectives 11 .
Through case-based learning, students are the ones asking questions about the case, doing the problem-solving, interacting with and learning from their peers, “unpacking” the case, analyzing the case, and summarizing the case. They learn how to work with limited information and ambiguity, think in professional or disciplinary ways, and ask themselves “what would I do if I were in this specific situation?”
The case method bridges theory to practice, and promotes the development of skills including: communication, active listening, critical thinking, decision-making, and metacognitive skills 12 , as students apply course content knowledge, reflect on what they know and their approach to analyzing, and make sense of a case.
Though the case method has historical roots as an instructor-centered approach that uses the Socratic dialogue and cold-calling, it is possible to take a more learner-centered approach in which students take on roles and tasks traditionally left to the instructor.
Cases are often used as “vehicles for classroom discussion” 13 . Students should be encouraged to take ownership of their learning from a case. Discussion-based approaches engage students in thinking and communicating about a case. Instructors can set up a case activity in which students are the ones doing the work of “asking questions, summarizing content, generating hypotheses, proposing theories, or offering critical analyses” 14 .
The role of the instructor is to share a case or ask students to share or create a case to use in class, set expectations, provide instructions, and assign students roles in the discussion. Student roles in a case discussion can include:
- discussion “starters” get the conversation started with a question or posing the questions that their peers came up with;
- facilitators listen actively, validate the contributions of peers, ask follow-up questions, draw connections, refocus the conversation as needed;
- recorders take-notes of the main points of the discussion, record on the board, upload to CourseWorks, or type and project on the screen; and
- discussion “wrappers” lead a summary of the main points of the discussion.
Prior to the case discussion, instructors can model case analysis and the types of questions students should ask, co-create discussion guidelines with students, and ask for students to submit discussion questions. During the discussion, the instructor can keep time, intervene as necessary (however the students should be doing the talking), and pause the discussion for a debrief and to ask students to reflect on what and how they learned from the case activity.
Note: case discussions can be enhanced using technology. Live discussions can occur via video-conferencing (e.g., using Zoom ) or asynchronous discussions can occur using the Discussions tool in CourseWorks (Canvas) .
Table 2 includes a few interactive case method approaches. Regardless of the approach selected, it is important to create a learning environment in which students feel comfortable participating in a case activity and learning from one another. See below for tips on supporting student in how to learn from a case in the “getting started” section and how to create a supportive learning environment in the Guide for Inclusive Teaching at Columbia .
Table 2. Strategies for Engaging Students in Case-Based Learning
Strategy | Role of the Instructor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Debate or Trial | Develop critical thinking skills and encourage students to challenge their existing assumptions. | Structure (with guidelines) and facilitate a debate between two diametrically opposed views. Keep time and ask students to reflect on their experience. | Prepare to argue either side. Work in teams to develop and present arguments, and debrief the debate. | Work in teams and prepare an argument for conflicting sides of an issue. |
Role play or Public Hearing | Understand diverse points of view, promote creative thinking, and develop empathy. | Structure the role-play and facilitate the debrief. At the close of the activity, ask students to reflect on what they learned. | Play a role found in a case, understand the points of view of stakeholders involved. | Describe the points of view of every stakeholder involved. |
Jigsaw | Promote peer-to-peer learning, and get students to own their learning. | Form student groups, assign each group a piece of the case to study. Form new groups with an “expert” for each previous group. Facilitate a debrief. | Be responsible for learning and then teaching case material to peers. Develop expertise for part of the problem. | Facilitate case method materials for their peers. |
“Clicker case” / (ARS) | Gauge your students’ learning; get all students to respond to questions, and launch or enhance a case discussion. | Instructor presents a case in stages, punctuated with questions in Poll Everywhere that students respond to using a mobile device. | Respond to questions using a mobile device. Reflect on why they responded the way they did and discuss with peers seated next to them. | Articulate their understanding of a case components. |
Approaches to case teaching should be informed by course learning objectives, and can be adapted for small, large, hybrid, and online classes. Instructional technology can be used in various ways to deliver, facilitate, and assess the case method. For instance, an online module can be created in CourseWorks (Canvas) to structure the delivery of the case, allow students to work at their own pace, engage all learners, even those reluctant to speak up in class, and assess understanding of a case and student learning. Modules can include text, embedded media (e.g., using Panopto or Mediathread ) curated by the instructor, online discussion, and assessments. Students can be asked to read a case and/or watch a short video, respond to quiz questions and receive immediate feedback, post questions to a discussion, and share resources.
For more information about options for incorporating educational technology to your course, please contact your Learning Designer .
To ensure that students are learning from the case approach, ask them to pause and reflect on what and how they learned from the case. Time to reflect builds your students’ metacognition, and when these reflections are collected they provides you with insights about the effectiveness of your approach in promoting student learning.
Well designed case-based learning experiences: 1) motivate student involvement, 2) have students doing the work, 3) help students develop knowledge and skills, and 4) have students learning from each other.
Designing a case-based learning experience should center around the learning objectives for a course. The following points focus on intentional design.
Identify learning objectives, determine scope, and anticipate challenges.
- Why use the case method in your course? How will it promote student learning differently than other approaches?
- What are the learning objectives that need to be met by the case method? What knowledge should students apply and skills should they practice?
- What is the scope of the case? (a brief activity in a single class session to a semester-long case-based course; if new to case method, start small with a single case).
- What challenges do you anticipate (e.g., student preparation and prior experiences with case learning, discomfort with discussion, peer-to-peer learning, managing discussion) and how will you plan for these in your design?
- If you are asking students to use transferable skills for the case method (e.g., teamwork, digital literacy) make them explicit.
Determine how you will know if the learning objectives were met and develop a plan for evaluating the effectiveness of the case method to inform future case teaching.
- What assessments and criteria will you use to evaluate student work or participation in case discussion?
- How will you evaluate the effectiveness of the case method? What feedback will you collect from students?
- How might you leverage technology for assessment purposes? For example, could you quiz students about the case online before class, accept assignment submissions online, use audience response systems (e.g., PollEverywhere) for formative assessment during class?
Select an existing case, create your own, or encourage students to bring course-relevant cases, and prepare for its delivery
- Where will the case method fit into the course learning sequence?
- Is the case at the appropriate level of complexity? Is it inclusive, culturally relevant, and relatable to students?
- What materials and preparation will be needed to present the case to students? (e.g., readings, audiovisual materials, set up a module in CourseWorks).
Plan for the case discussion and an active role for students
- What will your role be in facilitating case-based learning? How will you model case analysis for your students? (e.g., present a short case and demo your approach and the process of case learning) (Davis, 2009).
- What discussion guidelines will you use that include your students’ input?
- How will you encourage students to ask and answer questions, summarize their work, take notes, and debrief the case?
- If students will be working in groups, how will groups form? What size will the groups be? What instructions will they be given? How will you ensure that everyone participates? What will they need to submit? Can technology be leveraged for any of these areas?
- Have you considered students of varied cognitive and physical abilities and how they might participate in the activities/discussions, including those that involve technology?
Student preparation and expectations
- How will you communicate about the case method approach to your students? When will you articulate the purpose of case-based learning and expectations of student engagement? What information about case-based learning and expectations will be included in the syllabus?
- What preparation and/or assignment(s) will students complete in order to learn from the case? (e.g., read the case prior to class, watch a case video prior to class, post to a CourseWorks discussion, submit a brief memo, complete a short writing assignment to check students’ understanding of a case, take on a specific role, prepare to present a critique during in-class discussion).
Andersen, E. and Schiano, B. (2014). Teaching with Cases: A Practical Guide . Harvard Business Press.
Bonney, K. M. (2015). Case Study Teaching Method Improves Student Performance and Perceptions of Learning Gains†. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education , 16 (1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v16i1.846
Davis, B.G. (2009). Chapter 24: Case Studies. In Tools for Teaching. Second Edition. Jossey-Bass.
Garvin, D.A. (2003). Making the Case: Professional Education for the world of practice. Harvard Magazine. September-October 2003, Volume 106, Number 1, 56-107.
Golich, V.L. (2000). The ABCs of Case Teaching. International Studies Perspectives. 1, 11-29.
Golich, V.L.; Boyer, M; Franko, P.; and Lamy, S. (2000). The ABCs of Case Teaching. Pew Case Studies in International Affairs. Institute for the Study of Diplomacy.
Heath, J. (2015). Teaching & Writing Cases: A Practical Guide. The Case Center, UK.
Herreid, C.F. (2011). Case Study Teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. No. 128, Winder 2011, 31 – 40.
Herreid, C.F. (2007). Start with a Story: The Case Study Method of Teaching College Science . National Science Teachers Association. Available as an ebook through Columbia Libraries.
Herreid, C.F. (2006). “Clicker” Cases: Introducing Case Study Teaching Into Large Classrooms. Journal of College Science Teaching. Oct 2006, 36(2). https://search.proquest.com/docview/200323718?pq-origsite=gscholar
Krain, M. (2016). Putting the Learning in Case Learning? The Effects of Case-Based Approaches on Student Knowledge, Attitudes, and Engagement. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching. 27(2), 131-153.
Lundberg, K.O. (Ed.). (2011). Our Digital Future: Boardrooms and Newsrooms. Knight Case Studies Initiative.
Popil, I. (2011). Promotion of critical thinking by using case studies as teaching method. Nurse Education Today, 31(2), 204–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.06.002
Schiano, B. and Andersen, E. (2017). Teaching with Cases Online . Harvard Business Publishing.
Thistlethwaite, JE; Davies, D.; Ekeocha, S.; Kidd, J.M.; MacDougall, C.; Matthews, P.; Purkis, J.; Clay D. (2012). The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education: A BEME systematic review . Medical Teacher. 2012; 34(6): e421-44.
Yadav, A.; Lundeberg, M.; DeSchryver, M.; Dirkin, K.; Schiller, N.A.; Maier, K. and Herreid, C.F. (2007). Teaching Science with Case Studies: A National Survey of Faculty Perceptions of the Benefits and Challenges of Using Cases. Journal of College Science Teaching; Sept/Oct 2007; 37(1).
Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice. Second Edition. Jossey-Bass.
Additional resources
Teaching with Cases , Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
Features “what is a teaching case?” video that defines a teaching case, and provides documents to help students prepare for case learning, Common case teaching challenges and solutions, tips for teaching with cases.
Promoting excellence and innovation in case method teaching: Teaching by the Case Method , Christensen Center for Teaching & Learning. Harvard Business School.
National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science . University of Buffalo.
A collection of peer-reviewed STEM cases to teach scientific concepts and content, promote process skills and critical thinking. The Center welcomes case submissions. Case classification scheme of case types and teaching methods:
- Different types of cases: analysis case, dilemma/decision case, directed case, interrupted case, clicker case, a flipped case, a laboratory case.
- Different types of teaching methods: problem-based learning, discussion, debate, intimate debate, public hearing, trial, jigsaw, role-play.
Columbia Resources
Resources available to support your use of case method: The University hosts a number of case collections including: the Case Consortium (a collection of free cases in the fields of journalism, public policy, public health, and other disciplines that include teaching and learning resources; SIPA’s Picker Case Collection (audiovisual case studies on public sector innovation, filmed around the world and involving SIPA student teams in producing the cases); and Columbia Business School CaseWorks , which develops teaching cases and materials for use in Columbia Business School classrooms.
Center for Teaching and Learning
The Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL) offers a variety of programs and services for instructors at Columbia. The CTL can provide customized support as you plan to use the case method approach through implementation. Schedule a one-on-one consultation.
Office of the Provost
The Hybrid Learning Course Redesign grant program from the Office of the Provost provides support for faculty who are developing innovative and technology-enhanced pedagogy and learning strategies in the classroom. In addition to funding, faculty awardees receive support from CTL staff as they redesign, deliver, and evaluate their hybrid courses.
The Start Small! Mini-Grant provides support to faculty who are interested in experimenting with one new pedagogical strategy or tool. Faculty awardees receive funds and CTL support for a one-semester period.
Explore our teaching resources.
- Blended Learning
- Contemplative Pedagogy
- Inclusive Teaching Guide
- FAQ for Teaching Assistants
- Metacognition
CTL resources and technology for you.
- Overview of all CTL Resources and Technology
- The origins of this method can be traced to Harvard University where in 1870 the Law School began using cases to teach students how to think like lawyers using real court decisions. This was followed by the Business School in 1920 (Garvin, 2003). These professional schools recognized that lecture mode of instruction was insufficient to teach critical professional skills, and that active learning would better prepare learners for their professional lives. ↩
- Golich, V.L. (2000). The ABCs of Case Teaching. International Studies Perspectives. 1, 11-29. ↩
- Herreid, C.F. (2007). Start with a Story: The Case Study Method of Teaching College Science . National Science Teachers Association. Available as an ebook through Columbia Libraries. ↩
- Davis, B.G. (2009). Chapter 24: Case Studies. In Tools for Teaching. Second Edition. Jossey-Bass. ↩
- Andersen, E. and Schiano, B. (2014). Teaching with Cases: A Practical Guide . Harvard Business Press. ↩
- Lundberg, K.O. (Ed.). (2011). Our Digital Future: Boardrooms and Newsrooms. Knight Case Studies Initiative. ↩
- Heath, J. (2015). Teaching & Writing Cases: A Practical Guide. The Case Center, UK. ↩
- Bonney, K. M. (2015). Case Study Teaching Method Improves Student Performance and Perceptions of Learning Gains†. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education , 16 (1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v16i1.846 ↩
- Krain, M. (2016). Putting the Learning in Case Learning? The Effects of Case-Based Approaches on Student Knowledge, Attitudes, and Engagement. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching. 27(2), 131-153. ↩
- Thistlethwaite, JE; Davies, D.; Ekeocha, S.; Kidd, J.M.; MacDougall, C.; Matthews, P.; Purkis, J.; Clay D. (2012). The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education: A BEME systematic review . Medical Teacher. 2012; 34(6): e421-44. ↩
- Yadav, A.; Lundeberg, M.; DeSchryver, M.; Dirkin, K.; Schiller, N.A.; Maier, K. and Herreid, C.F. (2007). Teaching Science with Case Studies: A National Survey of Faculty Perceptions of the Benefits and Challenges of Using Cases. Journal of College Science Teaching; Sept/Oct 2007; 37(1). ↩
- Popil, I. (2011). Promotion of critical thinking by using case studies as teaching method. Nurse Education Today, 31(2), 204–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.06.002 ↩
- Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice. Second Edition. Jossey-Bass. ↩
- Herreid, C.F. (2006). “Clicker” Cases: Introducing Case Study Teaching Into Large Classrooms. Journal of College Science Teaching. Oct 2006, 36(2). https://search.proquest.com/docview/200323718?pq-origsite=gscholar ↩
This website uses cookies to identify users, improve the user experience and requires cookies to work. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's use of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice .
![case study learning outcomes loading](https://www.mindtools.com/start_loading.png)
Using Case Studies to Teach
![case study learning outcomes case study learning outcomes](https://www.bu.edu/ctl/files/library/images/banners/13.jpg)
Why Use Cases?
Many students are more inductive than deductive reasoners, which means that they learn better from examples than from logical development starting with basic principles. The use of case studies can therefore be a very effective classroom technique.
Case studies are have long been used in business schools, law schools, medical schools and the social sciences, but they can be used in any discipline when instructors want students to explore how what they have learned applies to real world situations. Cases come in many formats, from a simple “What would you do in this situation?” question to a detailed description of a situation with accompanying data to analyze. Whether to use a simple scenario-type case or a complex detailed one depends on your course objectives.
Most case assignments require students to answer an open-ended question or develop a solution to an open-ended problem with multiple potential solutions. Requirements can range from a one-paragraph answer to a fully developed group action plan, proposal or decision.
Common Case Elements
Most “full-blown” cases have these common elements:
- A decision-maker who is grappling with some question or problem that needs to be solved.
- A description of the problem’s context (a law, an industry, a family).
- Supporting data, which can range from data tables to links to URLs, quoted statements or testimony, supporting documents, images, video, or audio.
Case assignments can be done individually or in teams so that the students can brainstorm solutions and share the work load.
The following discussion of this topic incorporates material presented by Robb Dixon of the School of Management and Rob Schadt of the School of Public Health at CEIT workshops. Professor Dixon also provided some written comments that the discussion incorporates.
Advantages to the use of case studies in class
A major advantage of teaching with case studies is that the students are actively engaged in figuring out the principles by abstracting from the examples. This develops their skills in:
- Problem solving
- Analytical tools, quantitative and/or qualitative, depending on the case
- Decision making in complex situations
- Coping with ambiguities
Guidelines for using case studies in class
In the most straightforward application, the presentation of the case study establishes a framework for analysis. It is helpful if the statement of the case provides enough information for the students to figure out solutions and then to identify how to apply those solutions in other similar situations. Instructors may choose to use several cases so that students can identify both the similarities and differences among the cases.
Depending on the course objectives, the instructor may encourage students to follow a systematic approach to their analysis. For example:
- What is the issue?
- What is the goal of the analysis?
- What is the context of the problem?
- What key facts should be considered?
- What alternatives are available to the decision-maker?
- What would you recommend — and why?
An innovative approach to case analysis might be to have students role-play the part of the people involved in the case. This not only actively engages students, but forces them to really understand the perspectives of the case characters. Videos or even field trips showing the venue in which the case is situated can help students to visualize the situation that they need to analyze.
Accompanying Readings
Case studies can be especially effective if they are paired with a reading assignment that introduces or explains a concept or analytical method that applies to the case. The amount of emphasis placed on the use of the reading during the case discussion depends on the complexity of the concept or method. If it is straightforward, the focus of the discussion can be placed on the use of the analytical results. If the method is more complex, the instructor may need to walk students through its application and the interpretation of the results.
Leading the Case Discussion and Evaluating Performance
Decision cases are more interesting than descriptive ones. In order to start the discussion in class, the instructor can start with an easy, noncontroversial question that all the students should be able to answer readily. However, some of the best case discussions start by forcing the students to take a stand. Some instructors will ask a student to do a formal “open” of the case, outlining his or her entire analysis. Others may choose to guide discussion with questions that move students from problem identification to solutions. A skilled instructor steers questions and discussion to keep the class on track and moving at a reasonable pace.
In order to motivate the students to complete the assignment before class as well as to stimulate attentiveness during the class, the instructor should grade the participation—quantity and especially quality—during the discussion of the case. This might be a simple check, check-plus, check-minus or zero. The instructor should involve as many students as possible. In order to engage all the students, the instructor can divide them into groups, give each group several minutes to discuss how to answer a question related to the case, and then ask a randomly selected person in each group to present the group’s answer and reasoning. Random selection can be accomplished through rolling of dice, shuffled index cards, each with one student’s name, a spinning wheel, etc.
Tips on the Penn State U. website: https://sites.psu.edu/pedagogicalpractices/case-studies/
If you are interested in using this technique in a science course, there is a good website on use of case studies in the sciences at the National Science Teaching Association.
- Business Essentials
- Leadership & Management
- Credential of Leadership, Impact, and Management in Business (CLIMB)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation
- Digital Transformation
- Finance & Accounting
- Business in Society
- For Organizations
- Support Portal
- Media Coverage
- Founding Donors
- Leadership Team
![case study learning outcomes case study learning outcomes](https://cloudinary.hbs.edu/hbsit/image/upload/s--EMvzCk3y--/f_auto,c_fill,w_1402,/v20200101/7D5401BC242C004B25529784F1F4A20B.jpg)
- Harvard Business School →
- HBS Online →
- Business Insights →
Business Insights
Harvard Business School Online's Business Insights Blog provides the career insights you need to achieve your goals and gain confidence in your business skills.
- Career Development
- Communication
- Decision-Making
- Earning Your MBA
- Negotiation
- News & Events
- Productivity
- Staff Spotlight
- Student Profiles
- Work-Life Balance
- AI Essentials for Business
- Alternative Investments
- Business Analytics
- Business Strategy
- Business and Climate Change
- Creating Brand Value
- Design Thinking and Innovation
- Digital Marketing Strategy
- Disruptive Strategy
- Economics for Managers
- Entrepreneurship Essentials
- Financial Accounting
- Global Business
- Launching Tech Ventures
- Leadership Principles
- Leadership, Ethics, and Corporate Accountability
- Leading Change and Organizational Renewal
- Leading with Finance
- Management Essentials
- Negotiation Mastery
- Organizational Leadership
- Power and Influence for Positive Impact
- Strategy Execution
- Sustainable Business Strategy
- Sustainable Investing
- Winning with Digital Platforms
5 Benefits of Learning Through the Case Study Method
![case study learning outcomes Harvard Business School MBA students learning through the case study method](https://cloudinary.hbs.edu/hbsit/image/upload/s--8mhtaEDa--/f_auto,c_fill,h_375,w_750,/v20200101/D98BF9617A94D09A6740B667F4631414.jpg)
- 28 Nov 2023
While several factors make HBS Online unique —including a global Community and real-world outcomes —active learning through the case study method rises to the top.
In a 2023 City Square Associates survey, 74 percent of HBS Online learners who also took a course from another provider said HBS Online’s case method and real-world examples were better by comparison.
Here’s a primer on the case method, five benefits you could gain, and how to experience it for yourself.
Access your free e-book today.
What Is the Harvard Business School Case Study Method?
The case study method , or case method , is a learning technique in which you’re presented with a real-world business challenge and asked how you’d solve it. After working through it yourself and with peers, you’re told how the scenario played out.
HBS pioneered the case method in 1922. Shortly before, in 1921, the first case was written.
“How do you go into an ambiguous situation and get to the bottom of it?” says HBS Professor Jan Rivkin, former senior associate dean and chair of HBS's master of business administration (MBA) program, in a video about the case method . “That skill—the skill of figuring out a course of inquiry to choose a course of action—that skill is as relevant today as it was in 1921.”
Originally developed for the in-person MBA classroom, HBS Online adapted the case method into an engaging, interactive online learning experience in 2014.
In HBS Online courses , you learn about each case from the business professional who experienced it. After reviewing their videos, you’re prompted to take their perspective and explain how you’d handle their situation.
You then get to read peers’ responses, “star” them, and comment to further the discussion. Afterward, you learn how the professional handled it and their key takeaways.
HBS Online’s adaptation of the case method incorporates the famed HBS “cold call,” in which you’re called on at random to make a decision without time to prepare.
“Learning came to life!” said Sheneka Balogun , chief administration officer and chief of staff at LeMoyne-Owen College, of her experience taking the Credential of Readiness (CORe) program . “The videos from the professors, the interactive cold calls where you were randomly selected to participate, and the case studies that enhanced and often captured the essence of objectives and learning goals were all embedded in each module. This made learning fun, engaging, and student-friendly.”
If you’re considering taking a course that leverages the case study method, here are five benefits you could experience.
5 Benefits of Learning Through Case Studies
1. take new perspectives.
The case method prompts you to consider a scenario from another person’s perspective. To work through the situation and come up with a solution, you must consider their circumstances, limitations, risk tolerance, stakeholders, resources, and potential consequences to assess how to respond.
Taking on new perspectives not only can help you navigate your own challenges but also others’. Putting yourself in someone else’s situation to understand their motivations and needs can go a long way when collaborating with stakeholders.
2. Hone Your Decision-Making Skills
Another skill you can build is the ability to make decisions effectively . The case study method forces you to use limited information to decide how to handle a problem—just like in the real world.
Throughout your career, you’ll need to make difficult decisions with incomplete or imperfect information—and sometimes, you won’t feel qualified to do so. Learning through the case method allows you to practice this skill in a low-stakes environment. When facing a real challenge, you’ll be better prepared to think quickly, collaborate with others, and present and defend your solution.
3. Become More Open-Minded
As you collaborate with peers on responses, it becomes clear that not everyone solves problems the same way. Exposing yourself to various approaches and perspectives can help you become a more open-minded professional.
When you’re part of a diverse group of learners from around the world, your experiences, cultures, and backgrounds contribute to a range of opinions on each case.
On the HBS Online course platform, you’re prompted to view and comment on others’ responses, and discussion is encouraged. This practice of considering others’ perspectives can make you more receptive in your career.
“You’d be surprised at how much you can learn from your peers,” said Ratnaditya Jonnalagadda , a software engineer who took CORe.
In addition to interacting with peers in the course platform, Jonnalagadda was part of the HBS Online Community , where he networked with other professionals and continued discussions sparked by course content.
“You get to understand your peers better, and students share examples of businesses implementing a concept from a module you just learned,” Jonnalagadda said. “It’s a very good way to cement the concepts in one's mind.”
4. Enhance Your Curiosity
One byproduct of taking on different perspectives is that it enables you to picture yourself in various roles, industries, and business functions.
“Each case offers an opportunity for students to see what resonates with them, what excites them, what bores them, which role they could imagine inhabiting in their careers,” says former HBS Dean Nitin Nohria in the Harvard Business Review . “Cases stimulate curiosity about the range of opportunities in the world and the many ways that students can make a difference as leaders.”
Through the case method, you can “try on” roles you may not have considered and feel more prepared to change or advance your career .
5. Build Your Self-Confidence
Finally, learning through the case study method can build your confidence. Each time you assume a business leader’s perspective, aim to solve a new challenge, and express and defend your opinions and decisions to peers, you prepare to do the same in your career.
According to a 2022 City Square Associates survey , 84 percent of HBS Online learners report feeling more confident making business decisions after taking a course.
“Self-confidence is difficult to teach or coach, but the case study method seems to instill it in people,” Nohria says in the Harvard Business Review . “There may well be other ways of learning these meta-skills, such as the repeated experience gained through practice or guidance from a gifted coach. However, under the direction of a masterful teacher, the case method can engage students and help them develop powerful meta-skills like no other form of teaching.”
![case study learning outcomes Your Guide to Online Learning Success | Download Your Free E-Book](https://online.hbs.edu/online/PublishingImages/online_learning_success_CTA_620x200.png)
How to Experience the Case Study Method
If the case method seems like a good fit for your learning style, experience it for yourself by taking an HBS Online course. Offerings span eight subject areas, including:
- Business essentials
- Leadership and management
- Entrepreneurship and innovation
- Digital transformation
- Finance and accounting
- Business in society
No matter which course or credential program you choose, you’ll examine case studies from real business professionals, work through their challenges alongside peers, and gain valuable insights to apply to your career.
Are you interested in discovering how HBS Online can help advance your career? Explore our course catalog and download our free guide —complete with interactive workbook sections—to determine if online learning is right for you and which course to take.
![case study learning outcomes case study learning outcomes](https://online.hbs.edu/PublishingImages/blog/authors/Catherine%20Cote%20Blog%20Bio.png)
About the Author
Creating Learning Outcomes
Main navigation.
A learning outcome is a concise description of what students will learn and how that learning will be assessed. Having clearly articulated learning outcomes can make designing a course, assessing student learning progress, and facilitating learning activities easier and more effective. Learning outcomes can also help students regulate their learning and develop effective study strategies.
Defining the terms
Educational research uses a number of terms for this concept, including learning goals, student learning objectives, session outcomes, and more.
In alignment with other Stanford resources, we will use learning outcomes as a general term for what students will learn and how that learning will be assessed. This includes both goals and objectives. We will use learning goals to describe general outcomes for an entire course or program. We will use learning objectives when discussing more focused outcomes for specific lessons or activities.
For example, a learning goal might be “By the end of the course, students will be able to develop coherent literary arguments.”
Whereas a learning objective might be, “By the end of Week 5, students will be able to write a coherent thesis statement supported by at least two pieces of evidence.”
![](http://sektorel.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Learning outcomes benefit instructors
Learning outcomes can help instructors in a number of ways by:
- Providing a framework and rationale for making course design decisions about the sequence of topics and instruction, content selection, and so on.
- Communicating to students what they must do to make progress in learning in your course.
- Clarifying your intentions to the teaching team, course guests, and other colleagues.
- Providing a framework for transparent and equitable assessment of student learning.
- Making outcomes concerning values and beliefs, such as dedication to discipline-specific values, more concrete and assessable.
- Making inclusion and belonging explicit and integral to the course design.
Learning outcomes benefit students
Clearly, articulated learning outcomes can also help guide and support students in their own learning by:
- Clearly communicating the range of learning students will be expected to acquire and demonstrate.
- Helping learners concentrate on the areas that they need to develop to progress in the course.
- Helping learners monitor their own progress, reflect on the efficacy of their study strategies, and seek out support or better strategies. (See Promoting Student Metacognition for more on this topic.)
Choosing learning outcomes
When writing learning outcomes to represent the aims and practices of a course or even a discipline, consider:
- What is the big idea that you hope students will still retain from the course even years later?
- What are the most important concepts, ideas, methods, theories, approaches, and perspectives of your field that students should learn?
- What are the most important skills that students should develop and be able to apply in and after your course?
- What would students need to have mastered earlier in the course or program in order to make progress later or in subsequent courses?
- What skills and knowledge would students need if they were to pursue a career in this field or contribute to communities impacted by this field?
- What values, attitudes, and habits of mind and affect would students need if they are to pursue a career in this field or contribute to communities impacted by this field?
- How can the learning outcomes span a wide range of skills that serve students with differing levels of preparation?
- How can learning outcomes offer a range of assessment types to serve a diverse student population?
Use learning taxonomies to inform learning outcomes
Learning taxonomies describe how a learner’s understanding develops from simple to complex when learning different subjects or tasks. They are useful here for identifying any foundational skills or knowledge needed for more complex learning, and for matching observable behaviors to different types of learning.
Bloom’s Taxonomy
Bloom’s Taxonomy is a hierarchical model and includes three domains of learning: cognitive, psychomotor, and affective. In this model, learning occurs hierarchically, as each skill builds on previous skills towards increasingly sophisticated learning. For example, in the cognitive domain, learning begins with remembering, then understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and lastly creating.
Taxonomy of Significant Learning
The Taxonomy of Significant Learning is a non-hierarchical and integral model of learning. It describes learning as a meaningful, holistic, and integral network. This model has six intersecting domains: knowledge, application, integration, human dimension, caring, and learning how to learn.
See our resource on Learning Taxonomies and Verbs for a summary of these two learning taxonomies.
How to write learning outcomes
Writing learning outcomes can be made easier by using the ABCD approach. This strategy identifies four key elements of an effective learning outcome:
Consider the following example: Students (audience) , will be able to label and describe (behavior) , given a diagram of the eye at the end of this lesson (condition) , all seven extraocular muscles, and at least two of their actions (degree) .
Audience
Define who will achieve the outcome. Outcomes commonly include phrases such as “After completing this course, students will be able to...” or “After completing this activity, workshop participants will be able to...”
Keeping your audience in mind as you develop your learning outcomes helps ensure that they are relevant and centered on what learners must achieve. Make sure the learning outcome is focused on the student’s behavior, not the instructor’s. If the outcome describes an instructional activity or topic, then it is too focused on the instructor’s intentions and not the students.
Try to understand your audience so that you can better align your learning goals or objectives to meet their needs. While every group of students is different, certain generalizations about their prior knowledge, goals, motivation, and so on might be made based on course prerequisites, their year-level, or majors.
Use action verbs to describe observable behavior that demonstrates mastery of the goal or objective. Depending on the skill, knowledge, or domain of the behavior, you might select a different action verb. Particularly for learning objectives which are more specific, avoid verbs that are vague or difficult to assess, such as “understand”, “appreciate”, or “know”.
The behavior usually completes the audience phrase “students will be able to…” with a specific action verb that learners can interpret without ambiguity. We recommend beginning learning goals with a phrase that makes it clear that students are expected to actively contribute to progressing towards a learning goal. For example, “through active engagement and completion of course activities, students will be able to…”
Example action verbs
Consider the following examples of verbs from different learning domains of Bloom’s Taxonomy . Generally speaking, items listed at the top under each domain are more suitable for advanced students, and items listed at the bottom are more suitable for novice or beginning students. Using verbs and associated skills from all three domains, regardless of your discipline area, can benefit students by diversifying the learning experience.
For the cognitive domain:
- Create, investigate, design
- Evaluate, argue, support
- Analyze, compare, examine
- Solve, operate, demonstrate
- Describe, locate, translate
- Remember, define, duplicate, list
For the psychomotor domain:
- Invent, create, manage
- Articulate, construct, solve
- Complete, calibrate, control
- Build, perform, execute
- Copy, repeat, follow
For the affective domain:
- Internalize, propose, conclude
- Organize, systematize, integrate
- Justify, share, persuade
- Respond, contribute, cooperate
- Capture, pursue, consume
Often we develop broad goals first, then break them down into specific objectives. For example, if a goal is for learners to be able to compose an essay, break it down into several objectives, such as forming a clear thesis statement, coherently ordering points, following a salient argument, gathering and quoting evidence effectively, and so on.
State the conditions, if any, under which the behavior is to be performed. Consider the following conditions:
- Equipment or tools, such as using a laboratory device or a specified software application.
- Situation or environment, such as in a clinical setting, or during a performance.
- Materials or format, such as written text, a slide presentation, or using specified materials.
The level of specificity for conditions within an objective may vary and should be appropriate to the broader goals. If the conditions are implicit or understood as part of the classroom or assessment situation, it may not be necessary to state them.
When articulating the conditions in learning outcomes, ensure that they are sensorily and financially accessible to all students.
Degree
Degree states the standard or criterion for acceptable performance. The degree should be related to real-world expectations: what standard should the learner meet to be judged proficient? For example:
- With 90% accuracy
- Within 10 minutes
- Suitable for submission to an edited journal
- Obtain a valid solution
- In a 100-word paragraph
The specificity of the degree will vary. You might take into consideration professional standards, what a student would need to succeed in subsequent courses in a series, or what is required by you as the instructor to accurately assess learning when determining the degree. Where the degree is easy to measure (such as pass or fail) or accuracy is not required, it may be omitted.
Characteristics of effective learning outcomes
The acronym SMART is useful for remembering the characteristics of an effective learning outcome.
- Specific : clear and distinct from others.
- Measurable : identifies observable student action.
- Attainable : suitably challenging for students in the course.
- Related : connected to other objectives and student interests.
- Time-bound : likely to be achieved and keep students on task within the given time frame.
Examples of effective learning outcomes
These examples generally follow the ABCD and SMART guidelines.
Arts and Humanities
Learning goals.
Upon completion of this course, students will be able to apply critical terms and methodology in completing a written literary analysis of a selected literary work.
At the end of the course, students will be able to demonstrate oral competence with the French language in pronunciation, vocabulary, and language fluency in a 10 minute in-person interview with a member of the teaching team.
Learning objectives
After completing lessons 1 through 5, given images of specific works of art, students will be able to identify the artist, artistic period, and describe their historical, social, and philosophical contexts in a two-page written essay.
By the end of this course, students will be able to describe the steps in planning a research study, including identifying and formulating relevant theories, generating alternative solutions and strategies, and application to a hypothetical case in a written research proposal.
At the end of this lesson, given a diagram of the eye, students will be able to label all of the extraocular muscles and describe at least two of their actions.
Using chemical datasets gathered at the end of the first lab unit, students will be able to create plots and trend lines of that data in Excel and make quantitative predictions about future experiments.
- How to Write Learning Goals , Evaluation and Research, Student Affairs (2021).
- SMART Guidelines , Center for Teaching and Learning (2020).
- Learning Taxonomies and Verbs , Center for Teaching and Learning (2021).
- Our Mission
Making Learning Relevant With Case Studies
The open-ended problems presented in case studies give students work that feels connected to their lives.
![case study learning outcomes Students working on projects in a classroom](https://wpvip.edutopia.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/00005072_hg.jpg?w=200&quality=85)
To prepare students for jobs that haven’t been created yet, we need to teach them how to be great problem solvers so that they’ll be ready for anything. One way to do this is by teaching content and skills using real-world case studies, a learning model that’s focused on reflection during the problem-solving process. It’s similar to project-based learning, but PBL is more focused on students creating a product.
Case studies have been used for years by businesses, law and medical schools, physicians on rounds, and artists critiquing work. Like other forms of problem-based learning, case studies can be accessible for every age group, both in one subject and in interdisciplinary work.
You can get started with case studies by tackling relatable questions like these with your students:
- How can we limit food waste in the cafeteria?
- How can we get our school to recycle and compost waste? (Or, if you want to be more complex, how can our school reduce its carbon footprint?)
- How can we improve school attendance?
- How can we reduce the number of people who get sick at school during cold and flu season?
Addressing questions like these leads students to identify topics they need to learn more about. In researching the first question, for example, students may see that they need to research food chains and nutrition. Students often ask, reasonably, why they need to learn something, or when they’ll use their knowledge in the future. Learning is most successful for students when the content and skills they’re studying are relevant, and case studies offer one way to create that sense of relevance.
Teaching With Case Studies
Ultimately, a case study is simply an interesting problem with many correct answers. What does case study work look like in classrooms? Teachers generally start by having students read the case or watch a video that summarizes the case. Students then work in small groups or individually to solve the case study. Teachers set milestones defining what students should accomplish to help them manage their time.
During the case study learning process, student assessment of learning should be focused on reflection. Arthur L. Costa and Bena Kallick’s Learning and Leading With Habits of Mind gives several examples of what this reflection can look like in a classroom:
Journaling: At the end of each work period, have students write an entry summarizing what they worked on, what worked well, what didn’t, and why. Sentence starters and clear rubrics or guidelines will help students be successful. At the end of a case study project, as Costa and Kallick write, it’s helpful to have students “select significant learnings, envision how they could apply these learnings to future situations, and commit to an action plan to consciously modify their behaviors.”
Interviews: While working on a case study, students can interview each other about their progress and learning. Teachers can interview students individually or in small groups to assess their learning process and their progress.
Student discussion: Discussions can be unstructured—students can talk about what they worked on that day in a think-pair-share or as a full class—or structured, using Socratic seminars or fishbowl discussions. If your class is tackling a case study in small groups, create a second set of small groups with a representative from each of the case study groups so that the groups can share their learning.
4 Tips for Setting Up a Case Study
1. Identify a problem to investigate: This should be something accessible and relevant to students’ lives. The problem should also be challenging and complex enough to yield multiple solutions with many layers.
2. Give context: Think of this step as a movie preview or book summary. Hook the learners to help them understand just enough about the problem to want to learn more.
3. Have a clear rubric: Giving structure to your definition of quality group work and products will lead to stronger end products. You may be able to have your learners help build these definitions.
4. Provide structures for presenting solutions: The amount of scaffolding you build in depends on your students’ skill level and development. A case study product can be something like several pieces of evidence of students collaborating to solve the case study, and ultimately presenting their solution with a detailed slide deck or an essay—you can scaffold this by providing specified headings for the sections of the essay.
Problem-Based Teaching Resources
There are many high-quality, peer-reviewed resources that are open source and easily accessible online.
- The National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science at the University at Buffalo built an online collection of more than 800 cases that cover topics ranging from biochemistry to economics. There are resources for middle and high school students.
- Models of Excellence , a project maintained by EL Education and the Harvard Graduate School of Education, has examples of great problem- and project-based tasks—and corresponding exemplary student work—for grades pre-K to 12.
- The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning at Purdue University is an open-source journal that publishes examples of problem-based learning in K–12 and post-secondary classrooms.
- The Tech Edvocate has a list of websites and tools related to problem-based learning.
In their book Problems as Possibilities , Linda Torp and Sara Sage write that at the elementary school level, students particularly appreciate how they feel that they are taken seriously when solving case studies. At the middle school level, “researchers stress the importance of relating middle school curriculum to issues of student concern and interest.” And high schoolers, they write, find the case study method “beneficial in preparing them for their future.”
- International
- Business & Industry
- MyUNB Intranet
- Activate your IT Services
- Give to UNB
- Centre for Enhanced Teaching & Learning
- Teaching & Learning Services
- Teaching Tips
- Instructional Methods
- Creating Effective Scenarios, Case Studies and Role Plays
Creating effective scenarios, case studies and role plays
Printable Version (PDF)
Scenarios, case studies and role plays are examples of active and collaborative teaching techniques that research confirms are effective for the deep learning needed for students to be able to remember and apply concepts once they have finished your course. See Research Findings on University Teaching Methods .
Typically you would use case studies, scenarios and role plays for higher-level learning outcomes that require application, synthesis, and evaluation (see Writing Outcomes or Learning Objectives ; scroll down to the table).
The point is to increase student interest and involvement, and have them practice application by making choices and receive feedback on them, and refine their understanding of concepts and practice in your discipline.
These types of activities provide the following research-based benefits: (Shaw, 3-5)
- They provide concrete examples of abstract concepts, facilitate the development through practice of analytical skills, procedural experience, and decision making skills through application of course concepts in real life situations. This can result in deep learning and the appreciation of differing perspectives.
- They can result in changed perspectives, increased empathy for others, greater insights into challenges faced by others, and increased civic engagement.
- They tend to increase student motivation and interest, as evidenced by increased rates of attendance, completion of assigned readings, and time spent on course work outside of class time.
- Studies show greater/longer retention of learned materials.
- The result is often better teacher/student relations and a more relaxed environment in which the natural exchange of ideas can take place. Students come to see the instructor in a more positive light.
- They often result in better understanding of complexity of situations. They provide a good forum for a large volume of orderly written analysis and discussion.
There are benefits for instructors as well, such as keeping things fresh and interesting in courses they teach repeatedly; providing good feedback on what students are getting and not getting; and helping in standing and promotion in institutions that value teaching and learning.
Outcomes and learning activity alignment
The learning activity should have a clear, specific skills and/or knowledge development purpose that is evident to both instructor and students. Students benefit from knowing the purpose of the exercise, learning outcomes it strives to achieve, and evaluation methods. The example shown in the table below is for a case study, but the focus on demonstration of what students will know and can do, and the alignment with appropriate learning activities to achieve those abilities applies to other learning activities.
![case study learning outcomes An image of alignment](https://www.unb.ca/fredericton/cetl/_assets/images/teaching-tips/alignment.png)
(Smith, 18)
What’s the difference?
Scenarios are typically short and used to illustrate or apply one main concept. The point is to reinforce concepts and skills as they are taught by providing opportunity to apply them. Scenarios can also be more elaborate, with decision points and further scenario elaboration (multiple storylines), depending on responses. CETL has experience developing scenarios with multiple decision points and branching storylines with UNB faculty using PowerPoint and online educational software.
Case studies
Case studies are typically used to apply several problem-solving concepts and skills to a detailed situation with lots of supporting documentation and data. A case study is usually more complex and detailed than a scenario. It often involves a real-life, well documented situation and the students’ solutions are compared to what was done in the actual case. It generally includes dialogue, creates identification or empathy with the main characters, depending on the discipline. They are best if the situations are recent, relevant to students, have a problem or dilemma to solve, and involve principles that apply broadly.
Role plays can be short like scenarios or longer and more complex, like case studies, but without a lot of the documentation. The idea is to enable students to experience what it may be like to see a problem or issue from many different perspectives as they assume a role they may not typically take, and see others do the same.
Foundational considerations
Typically, scenarios, case studies and role plays should focus on real problems, appropriate to the discipline and course level.
They can be “well-structured” or “ill-structured”:
- Well-structured case studies, problems and scenarios can be simple or complex or anything in-between, but they have an optimal solution and only relevant information is given, and it is usually labelled or otherwise easily identified.
- Ill-structured case studies, problems and scenarios can also be simple or complex, although they tend to be complex. They have relevant and irrelevant information in them, and part of the student’s job is to decide what is relevant, how it is relevant, and to devise an evidence-based solution to the problem that is appropriate to the context and that can be defended by argumentation that draws upon the student’s knowledge of concepts in the discipline.
Well-structured problems would be used to demonstrate understanding and application. Higher learning levels of analysis, synthesis and evaluation are better demonstrated by ill-structured problems.
Scenarios, case studies and role plays can be authentic or realistic :
- Authentic scenarios are actual events that occurred, usually with personal details altered to maintain anonymity. Since the events actually happened, we know that solutions are grounded in reality, not a fictionalized or idealized or simplified situation. This makes them “low transference” in that, since we are dealing with the real world (although in a low-stakes, training situation, often with much more time to resolve the situation than in real life, and just the one thing to work on at a time), not much after-training adjustment to the real world is necessary.
- By contrast, realistic scenarios are often hypothetical situations that may combine aspects of several real-world events, but are artificial in that they are fictionalized and often contain ideal or simplified elements that exist differently in the real world, and some complications are missing. This often means they are easier to solve than real-life issues, and thus are “high transference” in that some after-training adjustment is necessary to deal with the vagaries and complexities of the real world.
Scenarios, case studies and role plays can be high or low fidelity :
High vs. low fidelity: Fidelity has to do with how much a scenario, case study or role play is like its corresponding real world situation. Simplified, well-structured scenarios or problems are most appropriate for beginners. These are low-fidelity, lacking a lot of the detail that must be struggled with in actual practice. As students gain experience and deeper knowledge, the level of complexity and correspondence to real-world situations can be increased until they can solve high fidelity, ill-structured problems and scenarios.
Further details for each
Scenarios can be used in a very wide range of learning and assessment activities. Use in class exercises, seminars, as a content presentation method, exam (e.g., tell students the exam will have four case studies and they have to choose two—this encourages deep studying). Scenarios help instructors reflect on what they are trying to achieve, and modify teaching practice.
For detailed working examples of all types, see pages 7 – 25 of the Psychology Applied Learning Scenarios (PALS) pdf .
The contents of case studies should: (Norton, 6)
- Connect with students’ prior knowledge and help build on it.
- Be presented in a real world context that could plausibly be something they would do in the discipline as a practitioner (e.g., be “authentic”).
- Provide some structure and direction but not too much, since self-directed learning is the goal. They should contain sufficient detail to make the issues clear, but with enough things left not detailed that students have to make assumptions before proceeding (or explore assumptions to determine which are the best to make). “Be ambiguous enough to force them to provide additional factors that influence their approach” (Norton, 6).
- Should have sufficient cues to encourage students to search for explanations but not so many that a lot of time is spent separating relevant and irrelevant cues. Also, too many storyline changes create unnecessary complexity that makes it unnecessarily difficult to deal with.
- Be interesting and engaging and relevant but focus on the mundane, not the bizarre or exceptional (we want to develop skills that will typically be of use in the discipline, not for exceptional circumstances only). Students will relate to case studies more if the depicted situation connects to personal experiences they’ve had.
- Help students fill in knowledge gaps.
Role plays generally have three types of participants: players, observers, and facilitator(s). They also have three phases, as indicated below:
Briefing phase: This stage provides the warm-up, explanations, and asks participants for input on role play scenario. The role play should be somewhat flexible and customizable to the audience. Good role descriptions are sufficiently detailed to let the average person assume the role but not so detailed that there are so many things to remember that it becomes cumbersome. After role assignments, let participants chat a bit about the scenarios and their roles and ask questions. In assigning roles, consider avoiding having visible minorities playing “bad guy” roles. Ensure everyone is comfortable in their role; encourage students to play it up and even overact their role in order to make the point.
Play phase: The facilitator makes seating arrangements (for players and observers), sets up props, arranges any tech support necessary, and does a short introduction. Players play roles, and the facilitator keeps things running smoothly by interjecting directions, descriptions, comments, and encouraging the participation of all roles until players keep things moving without intervention, then withdraws. The facilitator provides a conclusion if one does not arise naturally from the interaction.
Debriefing phase: Role players talk about their experience to the class, facilitated by the instructor or appointee who draws out the main points. All players should describe how they felt and receive feedback from students and the instructor. If the role play involved heated interaction, the debriefing must reconcile any harsh feelings that may otherwise persist due to the exercise.
Five Cs of role playing (AOM, 3)
Control: Role plays often take on a life of their own that moves them in directions other than those intended. Rehearse in your mind a few possible ways this could happen and prepare possible intervention strategies. Perhaps for the first role play you can play a minor role to give you and “in” to exert some control if needed. Once the class has done a few role plays, getting off track becomes less likely. Be sensitive to the possibility that students from different cultures may respond in unforeseen ways to role plays. Perhaps ask students from diverse backgrounds privately in advance for advice on such matters. Perhaps some of these students can assist you as co-moderators or observers.
Controversy: Explain to students that they need to prepare for situations that may provoke them or upset them, and they need to keep their cool and think. Reiterate the learning goals and explain that using this method is worth using because it draws in students more deeply and helps them to feel, not just think, which makes the learning more memorable and more likely to be accessible later. Set up a “safety code word” that students may use at any time to stop the role play and take a break.
Command of details: Students who are more deeply involved may have many more detailed and persistent questions which will require that you have a lot of additional detail about the situation and characters. They may also question the value of role plays as a teaching method, so be prepared with pithy explanations.
Can you help? Students may be concerned about how their acting will affect their grade, and want assistance in determining how to play their assigned character and need time to get into their role. Tell them they will not be marked on their acting. Say there is no single correct way to play a character. Prepare for slow starts, gaps in the action, and awkward moments. If someone really doesn’t want to take a role, let them participate by other means—as a recorder, moderator, technical support, observer, props…
Considered reflection: Reflection and discussion are the main ways of learning from role plays. Players should reflect on what they felt, perceived, and learned from the session. Review the key events of the role play and consider what people would do differently and why. Include reflections of observers. Facilitate the discussion, but don’t impose your opinions, and play a neutral, background role. Be prepared to start with some of your own feedback if discussion is slow to start.
An engineering role play adaptation
Boundary objects (e.g., storyboards) have been used in engineering and computer science design projects to facilitate collaboration between specialists from different disciplines (Diaz, 6-80). In one instance, role play was used in a collaborative design workshop as a way of making computer scientist or engineering students play project roles they are not accustomed to thinking about, such as project manager, designer, user design specialist, etc. (Diaz 6-81).
References:
Academy of Management. (Undated). Developing a Role playing Case Study as a Teaching Tool.
Diaz, L., Reunanen, M., & Salimi, A. (2009, August). Role Playing and Collaborative Scenario Design Development. Paper presented at the International Conference of Engineering Design, Stanford University, California.
Norton, L. (2004). Psychology Applied Learning Scenarios (PALS): A practical introduction to problem-based learning using vignettes for psychology lecturers . Liverpool Hope University College.
Shaw, C. M. (2010). Designing and Using Simulations and Role-Play Exercises in The International Studies Encyclopedia, eISBN: 9781444336597
Smith, A. R. & Evanstone, A. (Undated). Writing Effective Case Studies in the Sciences: Backward Design and Global Learning Outcomes. Institute for Biological Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
![case study learning outcomes University of New Brunswick](https://www.unb.ca/webcomps/_css/unb_logo_white.png)
- Campus Maps
- Campus Security
- Careers at UNB
- Services at UNB
- Conference Services
- Online & Continuing Ed
Contact UNB
- © University of New Brunswick
- Accessibility
- Web feedback
- Case, scenario, problem, inquiry-based learning
- Teaching guidance
- Teaching practices
- Active learning
Facilitate students to apply disciplinary knowledge, critical thinking and problem-solving skills in safe, real-life contexts.
Case, scenario, problem and inquiry-based learning are active learning strategies suitable for a face-to-face, online or hybrid environment. These approaches require students to apply their disciplinary knowledge, critical thinking and problem-solving skills in a safe, real-world context.
Case-based learning (CBL) presents students with a case or dilemma situated in an authentic context, which they are required to solve. Students are provided with background, situation and supporting data. They can work individually or as a group. The course coordinator takes on a facilitator’s role to guide learning rather than dictate answers.
Scenario-based learning (SBL) uses interactive scenarios based on the principles of situated learning theory (Lave & Wenger, 1991). It works by simulating real-world practice, provide safe opportunities to engage in situations that may be otherwise difficult for students to experience in their studies.
Problem-based learning (PBL) supports learning through an enquiry-guided method for students to solve a real-life problem. Students use ‘triggers’ derived from the problem to define their own learning outcome/objectives. There is a specific, guided methodology for implementing PBL.
Inquiry-based learning (IBL) encourages students to explore material, ask questions, and share ideas in small groups with guided learning. It uses a constructivist approach with the goal for students to make meaning, guided by the Course Coordinators.
Best practice
Technology considerations, case studies, references and further reading, case-based learning (cbl).
A case study is generally based on real situations (names and facts often changed to ensure anonymity). Many case studies include supporting data and documentation and require students to answer an open-ended question or develop a solution(s). The facilitator has an active role in shaping questions that will guide students in their learning.
Most effective cases:
- are developed in line with defined learning objectives
- have an educational purpose
- are authentic and relevant
- draw on common/typical scenarios
- consider dilemmas to promote decision-making
- add supporting data where necessary, and
- have relatable characters, and some include the voice of characters (e.g. patients) to add drama and realism.
In facilitating case-based learning:
- Give students ample time to read and think about the case. You can provide the case before class.
- Introduce the case briefly and provide some guidelines for how to approach it.
- Create groups (ideally 3–6 students) and monitor them to ensure everyone is involved.
- Have groups present their solutions/reasoning.
- Ask questions for clarification and to move discussions to another level.
- Synthesise issues raised. Be sure to bring the various strands of the discussion back together at the end. Ask groups to summarise their findings and compare group responses. Help the whole class interpret and understand the implications of their solutions.
(Adapted from Case Studies , Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence & Educational Innovation, Carnegie Mellon University)
Scenario-based learning (SBL)
Scenarios put students in a simulated context to provide rich learning experiences.
When designing a scenario:
- Identify the learning outcomes . It is important to identify what you want students to achieve on completing the scenario and then work backwards from the learning outcomes to create the situation that will lead to this learning.
- Decide on your format . Is your scenario delivered in face-to-face or online environments? What media (photographs, audio, video) and other resources will you need? If you use an online scenario, will you provide other supporting activities, such as wikis, discussion forums, etc.?
- Choose a topic . Remember that non-routine tasks lend themselves to scenario-based learning. Consider using ‘critical incidents’ and challenging situations that have occurred in your subject area.
- Identify the trigger event or situation . This will be the starting point of your scenario. As you create the scenario, identify decision points and key areas for feedback and student reflection. Creating a storyboard is an effective way to do this.
- Peer review your scenario . Ask colleagues to work through the scenario to ensure that it flows in the way you expect and achieves the outcomes you intended.
Problem-based learning (PBL)
Problem-based learning can be used to engage in active learning that challenges higher-order thinking in collaboration with peers.
There are various ways to plan, design and implement PBL in your classroom. The following resources may suit your context:
- Wood (2007) identified a structure for incorporating PBL into the curriculum and emphasises that PBL will only be successful if the problems developed are of high quality.
- Ganareo and Lyons (2015) outline key steps to design, implement and assess PBL to help develop twenty-first-century skills such as teamwork, digital literacy and problem-solving.
- The ‘Seven Jump’ method (Gijselaers, 1995) used at Maastricht describes the key steps students go through to resolve a problem during PBL tutorial sessions.
'Jump' activities | Timing | |
---|---|---|
1. | Clarify terms and concepts not readily comprehensible | First meeting |
2. | Define the problem | |
3. | Analyse the problem and offer tentative explanations | |
4. | Draw up an inventory of explanations | |
5. | Formulate learning objectives | |
6. | Collect further information through private study | Between meetings |
7. | Synthesise the new information and evaluate and test it against the original problem. Reflect on and consolidate learning. | Second meeting |
Inquiry-based learning (IBL)
Inquiry-based learning (IBL) encourages students to explore a specific topic, ask questions, and share ideas.
Heick identified four phases of Inquiry-Based Learning :
- Interaction : dive into engaging, relevant, and credible media forms to identify a ‘need’ or opportunity for inquiry.
- Clarification : summarising, paraphrasing, and categorising learning with teacher or expert support.
- Questioning : asking questions to drive continued, self-directed inquiry.
- Design : designing an accessible, relevant, and curiosity-driven action or product to culminate and justify inquiry.
When planning case, scenario, problem and inquiry-based learning, you need to consider the context of the learners and select technologies that support the steps you have planned.
- Small group discussion in person or online (e.g. discussion boards , Zoom breakout rooms ).
- Identify relevant questions, (e.g. in person or through PadletUQ ).
- Research (e.g. journal articles, databases, search engines, Library Catalogue)
- Face-to-face or online brainstorming (e.g. discussion boards , PadletUQ, Zoom breakout rooms , or mind map).
- Spreadsheet software (e.g. Microsoft Excel, Google Sheets) for graphing and presenting data.
- Presentation software (e.g. Microsoft PowerPoint, Adobe Express , Prezi) for presenting investigation results.
- Collaborate (e.g. Zoom if presenting online, or Microsoft Teams ).
View centrally-supported active learning tools
Case study 1 – Case-based assessment for physiotherapy students |
Designed as a sequential case-based online and in-class approach, students are able to scaffold their clinical skills and reasoning through developing and implementing case-based assessment and management strategies.
|
---|---|
Case study 2 – Condensed problem-based assignment |
Students are set discipline-specific problem-based exercises for completion during class. The objective is to craft a written response (1500 words) to the problem or use group collaboration to develop and deliver a 10–15 minute presentation proposing a solution. |
View more case studies (UQ Assessment Ideas Factory)
4 Phases of Inquiry-based Learning , Teachthought
Active & Inquiry-based Learning , Victoria University Melbourne Australia
Azer, S. A. (2007). Twelve tips for creating trigger images for problem-based learning cases. Medical Teacher, 29 (2-3), 93-97. doi:10.1080/01421590701291444
Case-based Teaching and Problem-based Learning (University of Michigan, Centre for Research on Learning & Teaching)
Case Studies , Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence & Educational Innovation, Carnegie Mellon University
Clark, R., (2009). Accelerating expertise with scenario-based learning. Learning Blueprint . Merrifield, VA: American Society for Teaching and Development.
Davis, B. (1993). Tools for Teaching . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Davis, C. & Wilcock, E. (2003). Teaching Materials Using Case Studies.
Enquiry-based learning (Griffith University)
Errington, E.P., (2003). Developing scenario-based learning: Practical insights for tertiary educators . Palmerston North, N.Z .: Dunmore Press. 9-20.
Ganareo, V., & Lyons, R. (2015). Problem-Based Learning: Six Steps to Design, Implement, and Assess .
Gijselaers, W. (1995). Perspectives on problem-based learning. In W. Gijselaers, D. Tempelaar, P. Keizer, J. Blommaert, E. Benard, & H. Kasper (Eds.), Educational Innovation in Economics and Business Administration (pp. 39-52). Netherlands: Springer.
Gossman, P., Stewart, T., Jaspers, M., & Chapman, B. (2007). Integrating web-delivered problem-based learning scenarios to the curriculum. Active Learning In Higher Education , 8(2), 139-153.
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 8 (1), 0-17. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1149&context=jutlp
Kindley, R. W. (2002). Scenario-based e-learning: a step beyond traditional e-learning. ASTD Magazine . Retrieved from http://www.astd.org/
Problem-Based Learning at Maastricht University
Retrieved from https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/course-design-ideas/problem-based-learning-six-steps-to-design-implement-and-assess/
Ribeiro, L. R. C. (2011). The Pros and Cons of Problem-Based Learning from the Teacher's Standpoint.
Savery, John R. (2006) Overview of Problem-based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions, Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning 1 (1)
Schwartz, P., Mennin, S., & Webb, G. (2001). Problem-Based Learning: Case Studies, Experience and Practice (Eds.). London, UK: Kogan Page Limited.
Using Case Studies to Teach , Centre for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching, Boston University
Weimer, M. (2009). Problem-Based Learning: Benefits and Risks . Retrieved from http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/effective-teaching-strategies/problem-based-learning-benefits-and-risks/
Wood, D. F. (2003). Problem-based learning. BMJ, 326, 328-330. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7384.328
- Project-based learning
- Reflective learning
- Collaborative learning
- Experiential learning
- In-class active learning activities
Resources
- Active learning tools
- UQ Assessment Ideas Factory
ITaLI offers personalised support services across various areas including case, scenario, problem, inquiry-based learning.
- Teaching Methods
Case studies in improving students’ learning outcomes, is it effective?
- Journal of Physics Conference Series 1806(1):012186
- 1806(1):012186
- This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.
![case study learning outcomes I Wayan Redhana at Ganesha University of Education](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/11431281222210560-1707171598835_Q64/I-Wayan-Redhana.jpg)
- Ganesha University of Education
Abstract and Figures
![case study learning outcomes Summary of score mean and standard deviations of students' learning outcomes](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350538698/figure/tbl1/AS:1020995729121287@1620435759501/Summary-of-score-mean-and-standard-deviations-of-students-learning-outcomes_Q320.jpg)
Discover the world's research
- 25+ million members
- 160+ million publication pages
- 2.3+ billion citations
![case study learning outcomes Nathasya Imanuella](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/1181713547968516-1658753873614_Q64/Nathasya-Imanuella.jpg)
- I Nyoman Suardana
![case study learning outcomes Nancy Schiller](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/1057917788770304-1629238664421_Q64/Nancy-Schiller.jpg)
- Ryani Fauziah
![case study learning outcomes Fathiah Alatas](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/11431281084670218-1663318974420_Q64/Fathiah-Alatas.jpg)
- Samilia Ekeocha
![case study learning outcomes Joydip Das](https://c5.rgstatic.net/m/4671872220764/images/template/default/profile/profile_default_m.jpg)
- Dhara N. Shah
![case study learning outcomes Munder Zagaar](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/302962591633410-1449243318286_Q64/Munder-Zagaar.jpg)
- Reza Dostizadeh
- Kathryn Lee
- Res Sci Technol Educ
![case study learning outcomes Eylem Yalçınkaya Önder](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/11431281217320892-1705162907669_Q64/Eylem-Yalcinkaya-Oender.jpg)
- Demet Yıldıran
![case study learning outcomes Randi Tosterud](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/278677544816646-1443453312256_Q64/Randi-Tosterud-2.jpg)
- Marie Louise Hall-Lord
- BRIT J EDUC TECHNOL
- Ikseon Choi
![case study learning outcomes Sang Joon Lee](https://c5.rgstatic.net/m/4671872220764/images/template/default/profile/profile_default_m.jpg)
- Jeongwan Kang
- Recruit researchers
- Join for free
- Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up
![case study learning outcomes National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/cropped-Logosmall.png)
National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment
- Mission & Vision
- National Advisory Panel
- NILOA Staff
- Partner & Collaborating Organizations
- Occasional Papers
- Assessment in Practice
- Case Studies
- Assignment Library
- Featured Assignments
- Assignment Charrette
- Equity Responses
- Transparency Framework
- Excellence in Assessment
- Evidence-Based Storytelling
- Featured Websites Archive
- Curriculum Mapping
- Learning Recognition Collaborative
- Degree Qualifications Profile
- Assessment Resources
- Newsletters
- NILOA Surveys Archive
- Resources for Newcomers
- LARC Assessment Modules
- Questions at Hand
- Audience Type
Case studies provide short, instructive examples of good assessment practice, along with lessons learned that are widely applicable.
![Alverno Seal Alverno Seal](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Alverno-Seal-399x399.png)
Alverno College is a case study site due to innovative and long-standing assessment practices as well as a commitment to student-centered teaching. Although Alverno is well established in its assessment practices, other institutions can learn from and adapt many aspects of Alverno’s assessment model to improve and sustain their own meaningful assessment work.
![title= case study learning outcomes](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/APUS-seal.jpeg)
American Public University System (APUS) is a case study site for its unique mission and significant headway made in working with the Degree Qualifications Profile (DQP), leading to institution-wide implementation and adoption, the thoughtful process for working through DQP use, the development of signature assignments, and the incorporation of the DQP framework into the university system’s program review process.
![Augustana seal Augustana seal](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Augustana-seal-225x225.jpg)
Augustana College is a case study site due to its approach to faculty involvement and a long-standing commitment to assessing and communicating student learning. Augustana’s focus on teaching and learning, the dynamic role of the Assessment Review Committee, and communication strategies has allowed them to make several improvements on campus based on their assessment activities.
Capella University is a case study site for its systematic, embedded student learning outcomes assessment process; its administrative support and vision of what assessment can do for individual learners; its transparency efforts such as Capella Results, which publicizes assessment results; and its use of assessment results to enhance learner success.
![carnegie mellon seal carnegie mellon seal](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/carnegie-mellon-seal-250x250.png)
Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) was selected as a case study for the approach to student learning outcomes assessment that reflects the institution’s commitment to interdisciplinarity and innovative teaching and learning. Three elements have been instrumental in CMU’s advances in program-level student learning outcomes assessment: 1) an institutionalized research-oriented and data-informed university decision-making process driven by deans and departments; 2) an organizational culture with established processes promoting continuous improvement; and 3) the elevation of a cross-campus faculty resource–the Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence–as the hub of assessment support. The original case study took place in 2012 with a follow-up study published in 2021 .
![Colorado State seal Colorado State seal](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Colorado-State-seal-225x225.png)
Colorado State University publicized its commitment to ensuring transparency and accountability to students, parents, and the public; expanded its continuous improvement system for managing information sharing to serve the decision-making and reporting needs of various audiences through the CSU Plan for Researching Improvement and Supporting Mission, or PRISM; uses a peer review system for feedback, and serves as a model for bridging the work of academic affairs and student affairs together through student learning outcomes assessment.
![Daemen Seal Daemen Seal](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Daemen-Seal.jpg)
Daemen College is a case study site due to their involvement in the Council of Independent Colleges (CIC) consortium on the Degree Qualifications Profile (DQP). As part of this project, Daemen College engaged with the DQP to further their preexisting curricular mapping projects, as well as advance their newly instituted assessment program and assignment design initiative, including a co-curricular inventory.
![title= case study learning outcomes](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Georgia-State-seal.png)
Georgia State University (GSU) and Georgia Perimeter College (GPC) were selected as case study sites for its work in testing the Degree Qualifications Profile (DQP) to facilitate transfer. The University of Georgia System project was a partnership between GSU and GPC to explore the application of the DQP to improve the success of transfer students in biology, psychology, and criminal justice programs that involve high numbers of transfer students between the two institutions.
![Perimeter logo Perimeter logo](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Perimeter-logo-225x225.jpg)
Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) was invited to write a case study because of its strong and rich history of using numerous forms of applied and experiential learning to promote student engagement along with its ongoing Comprehensive Learner Record (CLR) work.
![Juniata seal Juniata seal](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Juniata-seal-225x225.png)
Juniata College was identified as a case study site for the faculty-led Center for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL Center) that champions and supports evidence-based teaching; an administration-supported accountability website that provides data and information about outcomes to multiple audiences; and the use of evidence of student learning to make improvements at the institution and individual course levels.
![KCKCCLogo KCKCCLogo](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/KCKCCLogo-250x150.jpeg)
Kansas City Kansas Community College (KCKCC) is a case study site due to its creation of an alternative system for documenting student achievement of Degree Qualifications Profile (DQP) proficiencies. Based on an interactive curriculum mapping database where faculty enter information about individual student performance on each learning outcome and competency in their courses, reports are generated for students and programs to review and direct future action.
![LaGuardia logo LaGuardia logo](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/LaGuardia-logo-225x219.png)
LaGuardia Community College is a case study site due to its reputation as a leader in learning outcomes assessment, particularly through the use of electronic portfolios (ePortfolios), commitment to assessment, collaboration across units at the college, and the institution’s robust program review system which includes assessment.
![McKendree seal McKendree seal](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/McKendree-seal-240x240.png)
McKendree University is a case study site for its crosswalk of various learning frameworks (such as the Degree Qualifications Profile, LEAP Essential Learning Outcomes, National Collegiate Athletic Association’s (NCAA) Division II Life and Balance key attributes) to McKendree’s student learning outcomes, as well as the deliberate process of gaining campus awareness and support through their committee structure and learning outcome timeline. The original case study took place in 2016 with a follow-up study published in 2020 .
![case study learning outcomes case study learning outcomes](https://nl.edu/media/nledu/content-assets/images/identity/NLU_2Color_RGB-449x156.png)
National Louis University is a Degree Qualifications Profile (DQP) case study institution due to the intentional use of the DQP in the design of its Pathways Program including competency development, curricular focus, and assessment alignment. NLU’s use of the DQP provides an example for other institutions interested in using the DQP to develop new programs as well as curricular pathways that include a focus upon differentiated levels of learning.
![NCA&T seal NCA&T seal](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/NCAT-seal-250x250.png)
North Carolina A&T State University is a case study site due to the commitment to improving the institution by developing a culture of inquiry through administrative leadership that encourages discussions and collaboration around student learning outcomes assessment activities; the use of professional development opportunities to help foster the involvement and commitment of faculty members; and the systematic and intentional use of student feedback.
![pac_stack pac_stack](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/pac_stack.jpg)
Palo Alto College was selected as a NILOA case study based on its successful efforts in adapting NILOA’s assignment design toolkit to engage faculty, staff and students in assessment. Offering intimate workshops frequently throughout the academic calendar year has created a ground swell of faculty reinvesting themselves in the curriculum.
![PointLoma seal PointLoma seal](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/PointLoma-seal.png)
Point Loma Nazarene University is a case study site for its involvement of faculty and staff across a range of academic fields to move beyond conversations about outcomes and curriculum alignment to significant assessment activity that is comparable across programs, as well as their efforts in transparency of process and practice.
![StOlaf seal StOlaf seal](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/StOlaf-seal-225x225.png)
St. Olaf College is a case study institution due to the framing of assessment as inquiry in support of student learning that is meaningful, manageable, and mission-driven; the utilization-focus/backward-design approach employed in assessment; the integration of student learning outcomes assessment processes into faculty governance structures; along with the collaborative involvement of multiple stakeholders and diverse ways in which evidence of student learning is utilized throughout the institution. The original case took place in 2012 and the update occurred in 2020 .
![TexasA&Minternational seal TexasA&Minternational seal](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/TexasAMinternational-seal-225x225.jpeg)
Texas A&M International University (TAMIU) is a case study site for its commitment to choosing assessment measures and tools appropriate for its students; its long history with and innovative approach to assessment; and the influential role of professional development at the institution to help prepare “Assessment Champions and expand the number of pockets of excellence in terms of assessment practices throughout the campus.
![uiuc seal uiuc seal](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/uiuc-seal.jpeg)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s case study provides insight into how the Department of African American Studies at UIUC utilizes assessment in course design, being mindful of aligning diversity and inclusion outcomes within the course and program goals, and ensuring students attain these Case Study outcomes in both in-person and online courses utilizing equitable assessments and student involvement in the assessment process
![UtahState seal UtahState seal](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/UtahState-seal-230x230.png)
Utah State University is a case study site for the faculty-led involvement in the state of Utah Tuning projects; integration of the Degree Qualifications Profile (DQP) with various programs and colleges on campus; and bridging the work of national initiatives such as Utah’s status as a LEAP state, participation in AAC&U’s Quality Collaboratives project, involvement with the Multi-State Collaborative and WICHE Passports Initiative, general education revision; and its integration of High-Impact Practices to make connections across the entire institution to better serve students.
![WashingtonState seal WashingtonState seal](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/WashingtonState-seal-230x230.png)
Washington State University (WSU) is a case study site because of its promising approach to student learning outcomes assessment in the often-challenging context of a large, highly decentralized research university, characterized by a deliberately incremental and iterative process, moving the institution step-by-step toward habits, practices, and policies that support ongoing educational improvement.
Privacy Overview
![case study learning outcomes](https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/NILOA2019Logothumbnailsmall-e1548900472307.png)
- Directories
![case study learning outcomes Trefny Innovative Instruction Center](https://trefnycenter.mines.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Mines-Logo-150-years.png)
Foundations of Course Design: Developing Course Learning Outcomes
What are course learning outcomes.
Course Learning Outcomes (or CLOs) are measurable statements that define what your students will learn and be able to do by the end of the term if they are successful in the course ( Otter 1992 ). CLOs differ from course goals, as outcomes are specific statements that are focused on what students will achieve throughout the semester. Conversely, course goals are broad statements that provide a big picture of what students will take away from the course. Importantly, CLOs set key targets and learning parameters for both you and your students. In other words, CLOs help students understand what they can expect to learn throughout the semester, and give you a foundation to design the rest of your course. Faculty will often begin their course design with CLOs to ensure that all of the course content helps students meet the stated goals.
Sample CLOs include:
- Evaluate energy balances for reaching systems such as combustion.
- Use microeconomic models to predict (graphically and/or mathematically) the behavior of economic agents, the outcomes of markets, and the impacts of government policy in a variety of market environments.
- Outline the genetic steps a healthy cell must undergo to become a cancerous growth or to become infected by a virus.
- Characterize the difference between devices of the same “family” (BJTs vs. MOSFETS, lasers vs. LEDs vs. photovoltaics).
Why Are CLOs Important?
Studies show that clear, observable, and measurable learning outcomes are necessary to design rich courses for effective learning ( Casey et al. 1997 , Davis 1993 , Lowman 1984 , DeLong et al. 2005 , Biggs & Tang 2011 , Fink 2013 , Wiggins et al. 2005 ). Having clear and concise learning outcomes helps students understand and articulate what they’ll learn in your course, track their progress throughout the semester, and know what they will be assessed on in advance. These benefits allow students to take ownership of and self-regulate their learning. CLOs help faculty clarify expectations of their students and develop appropriate course content . On a broader scale, CLOs serve as a preview that help students understand skills they will need to develop to succeed in their respective programs and disciplines.
How do I use CLOs?
Through our Engineering Learning framework , you will engage in a process of backward design . Your CLOs set the stage for the rest of your course scaffolding. Once you have identified 6-8 CLOs, you will then create summative assessments that measure each learning outcome (note: some assessments might have multiple CLOs—that is completely normal and expected!). It is imperative that your assessments cognitively align with your CLOs. In other words, if you expect students to be able to create a model, chances are an exam is not the best way to assess that learning outcome. From there, you will design learning pathways through lesson plans and formative assessments that check student progress on each CLO and prepare them for success on the upcoming summative assessment.
To help students familiarize themselves with your course, your CLOs should be in the university catalog course description , and stated clearly at the beginning of your syllabus . CLOs are often paired with course descriptions on syllabi. It is important to return to your CLOs throughout the semester through regular progress check-ins. You might also consider making learning outcomes at the lesson and module level that align with your broader CLOs. Your formative and summative assessments should also explicitly state which CLOs are being assessed—make sure your assessments align with these stated outcomes!
![title= case study learning outcomes](https://trefnycenter.mines.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/44/2024/08/learning.path_.png)
CLOs establish clear and measurable learning targets for all students in the course. Working backward from your CLOs helps you to ensure that every activity, assignment, and assessment is intentionally and explicitly tied to at least one of your outcomes. This consistency will help guide students along a learning pathway toward successfully acquiring new skills and knowledge.
What Should CLOs Look Like?
CLOs should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound statements that center student learning. For a 3-credit course, aim for 6-8 CLO s. Each CLO should contain 3 elements:
ACTION VERB
A verb that describes the cognitive-process level and what students will do when interacting with the essential knowledge. E.g., Students will draw an isocline curve.
ESSENTIAL KNOWLEDGE
The knowledge and skills students are expected to acquire or construct by the end of the course. E.g., Students will draw an isocline curve.
Specific Details
Details that make course learning expectations clear and set parameters around the CLO. E .g., Students will draw an isocline curve using manual graphic techniques when given a specific differential equation .
We recommend that the action verb aligns with the cognitive process level of “Apply” or above in Bloom’s taxonomy of learning (see sample verbs below). However, the “remember” and “understand” categories are important stepping stones to help students achieve these outcomes!
lower order thinking skills
![title= case study learning outcomes](https://trefnycenter.mines.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/44/2024/08/arrow.png)
higher order thinking skills
Recognize Identify Label Recall Retrieve Locate List Name State Define Describe
Interpret Clarify Paraphrase Represent Translate Illustrate Sketch Categorize Summarize Generalize Infer Conclude Interpolate Compare Map Match Explain
Execute Carry out Run Implement Use Calculate Solve Estimate Graph Determine (e.g., determine relationships)
Differentiate Discriminate Distinguish Focus Organize Integrate Outline Parse Structure Attribute Deconstruct Predict Compare and contrast
Validate Detect Monitor Test Experiment Cite Evidence Critique Argue Judge Justify Defend Persuade Score Recommend
Generate Hypothesize Propose Plan Design Develop Manage Produce Construct Assemble Build Create
CLOs: A Step-By-Step Guide
Step 1: identify essential knowledge and skills .
As a first step , ask yourself: what knowledge or skills are essential for your students to develop by the end of the course? Consider the kind of knowledge that you are asking your students to demonstrate in your course. As stated by Anderson & Krathwohl (2001) , there are four types of knowledge across CLOs. All four types of knowledge are important; however, instructors should design their courses to emphasize conceptual or procedural knowledge, while also giving students practice with metacognition .
Factual knowledge
Knowledge of terminology.
Procedural knowledge
Knowledge of methods and techniques.
Conceptual knowledge
Knowledge of theory and principles.
Metacognitive knowledge
Self and strategic knowledge.
Step 2: Determine Your Cognitive-Process Level and Action Verb
Next, identify the cognitive level on which you’ll be assessing students, using Bloom’s Taxonomy and the chart above as a guide. Ask yourself: how will your students interact with the knowledge they’re demonstrating? To illustrate, here’s an example of how you might ask students to interact with the same knowledge at different cognitive levels.
Students will be able to remember Maxwell’s equations. Students will be about to describe Maxwell’s equations in their own terms. Students will be able to apply Maxwell’s equations to simplified systems. Students will be able to analyze a system using Maxwell’s equations.
All of these CLOs deal with Maxwell’s equation, but the way that students interact with that knowledge (the cognitive-process level) is very different, which will directly impact the types of learning experiences, practice opportunities, and assessments you develop for your course.
Example. Communicate scientific ideas to diverse audiences
In a course, you might want students to communicate the technical concepts they are learning about to diverse audiences (audiences with the same technical backgrounds, the general public, a manager with some technical background, etc.). When students are working to communicate these ideas to different audiences, they might…
- Analyze pieces of communication: Students look at different pieces of communication and identify the different rhetorical strategies used to create an argument.
- Evaluate the effectiveness of different pieces of communication: Students look at different pieces of communication (reports, presentations, summaries, etc.) and evaluate how effective they are based on certain criteria.
- Create reports and presentations for a variety of audiences: Students create multiple reports or presentations to persuade different audiences.
Step 3: Add Specific Details
Once you’ve identified the essential knowledge and cognitive level , it’s time to add specific details to further clarify expectations for your students. These specific details often include boundaries (areas of the content in which you expect students to focus) and conditions (circumstances in which students will be expected to perform). The key is to provide enough detail that students know what is expected of them without overwhelming them with too much information. Look at the example CLOs below, color coded and formatted to identify appropriate cognitive process level action verb , essential knowledge , and specific details to further clarify expectations :
- By the end of the course, students will be able to analyze markets for goods, services, and resources using the supply and demand model .
- By the end of the course, students will be able to design the layout of a workspace to maximize efficiency using computer-assisted design and drawing tools .
- By the end of the course, students will be able to describe the properties and processes common to all cells , including exchange with the external environment, transport across selectivity permeable membranes, homeostasis, and the enzymatic promotion of chemical reactions .
- By the end of the course, students will be able to design solutions to mitigate geological risks associated with natural and man-made slopes and underground excavations in rock .
- By the end of the course, students will be able to apply the apparatus of linearization, nullclines, conservation and dissipation to analyze linear and nonlinear differential equations .
- By the end of the course, students will be able to calculate the velocities and accelerations of rigid bodies in general plane motion .
- By the end of the course, students will be able to compare and contrast the social impacts and ethical issues arising from data collection and statistical and machine learning .
- By the end of the course, students will be able to model single-input single-output (SISO) systems using both transfer function and state space realizations in continuous-and discrete-time .
![title= case study learning outcomes](https://trefnycenter.mines.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/44/2024/08/ai.clo_.png)
Use Generative AI to Develop Course Learning Outcomes
Generative AI (genAI) tools such as Microsoft Co-Pilot , Google Gemini , ChatGPT can prove useful when brainstorming new course learning outcomes. To get started, copy and paste the following prompt into one of the tools above:
“I’m designing a course on the topic of [ x ] for [ # students] and want to make sure that students learn [ y ]. Students should have opportunities to be creative and demonstrate their knowledge in multiple ways throughout the term. Please write 6-8 learning outcomes that are specific, measurable, and at the cognitive-process level verb of “apply” or higher (according to Bloom’s taxonomy). These should be relevant to students’ lives outside of the classroom and set them up for success for a future career in their industry (and more broadly in life). They should include a mixture of conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, and metacognitive knowledge.”
Don’t stop there—refine your initial outputs by providing additional contextual information about your course (a course description, for instance), and tailor your CLO development toward your specific teaching and learning needs.
You might also consider this CLO Generator (Arizona State University). Please consider the social , environmental , and legal impacts of using generative AI. We recommend consulting our “ Effective Teaching and Generative AI ” resource for more information.
![case study learning outcomes Cart](https://hbr.org/resources/css/images/cart-icon.png)
- SUGGESTED TOPICS
- The Magazine
- Newsletters
- Managing Yourself
- Managing Teams
- Work-life Balance
- The Big Idea
- Data & Visuals
- Reading Lists
- Case Selections
- HBR Learning
- Topic Feeds
- Account Settings
- Email Preferences
Embracing Gen AI at Work
- H. James Wilson
- Paul R. Daugherty
![case study learning outcomes case study learning outcomes](https://hbr.org/resources/images/article_assets/2024/08/R2405L_BLINDSALIDA.png)
The skills you need to succeed in the era of large language models
Today artificial intelligence can be harnessed by nearly anyone, using commands in everyday language instead of code. Soon it will transform more than 40% of all work activity, according to the authors’ research. In this new era of collaboration between humans and machines, the ability to leverage AI effectively will be critical to your professional success.
This article describes the three kinds of “fusion skills” you need to get the best results from gen AI. Intelligent interrogation involves instructing large language models to perform in ways that generate better outcomes—by, say, breaking processes down into steps or visualizing multiple potential paths to a solution. Judgment integration is about incorporating expert and ethical human discernment to make AI’s output more trustworthy, reliable, and accurate. It entails augmenting a model’s training sources with authoritative knowledge bases when necessary, keeping biases out of prompts, ensuring the privacy of any data used by the models, and scrutinizing suspect output. With reciprocal apprenticing, you tailor gen AI to your company’s specific business context by including rich organizational data and know-how into the commands you give it. As you become better at doing that, you yourself learn how to train the AI to tackle more-sophisticated challenges.
The AI revolution is already here. Learning these three skills will prepare you to thrive in it.
Generative artificial intelligence is expected to radically transform all kinds of jobs over the next few years. No longer the exclusive purview of technologists, AI can now be put to work by nearly anyone, using commands in everyday language instead of code. According to our research, most business functions and more than 40% of all U.S. work activity can be augmented, automated, or reinvented with gen AI. The changes are expected to have the largest impact on the legal, banking, insurance, and capital-market sectors—followed by retail, travel, health, and energy.
- H. James Wilson is the global managing director of technology research and thought leadership at Accenture Research. He is the coauthor, with Paul R. Daugherty, of Human + Machine: Reimagining Work in the Age of AI, New and Expanded Edition (HBR Press, 2024). hjameswilson
- Paul R. Daugherty is Accenture’s chief technology and innovation officer. He is the coauthor, with H. James Wilson, of Human + Machine: Reimagining Work in the Age of AI, New and Expanded Edition (HBR Press, 2024). pauldaugh
Partner Center
![](http://sektorel.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Case studies encourage students to use critical thinking skills to identify and narrow an issue, develop and evaluate alternatives, and offer a solution. ... Ask students to reflect on their learning—perhaps identifying connections between the lesson and specific course learning outcomes—after working a case; Additional Resources. Barnes ...
INTRODUCTION. The case study teaching method is a highly adaptable style of teaching that involves problem-based learning and promotes the development of analytical skills ().By presenting content in the format of a narrative accompanied by questions and activities that promote group discussion and solving of complex problems, case studies facilitate development of the higher levels of Bloom ...
These study findings add to the existing body of knowledge that places case study based teaching as a tested method that promotes perception learning where students' senses are engaged as a result of the real-life and authentic clinical scenarios (Malesela, 2009), resulting in deeper learning and achievement of long-lasting knowledge (Fiscus ...
Case method 1 teaching is an active form of instruction that focuses on a case and involves students learning by doing 2 3. Cases are real or invented stories 4 that include "an educational message" or recount events, problems, dilemmas, theoretical or conceptual issue that requires analysis and/or decision-making.
Case studies are a form of problem-based learning, where you present a situation that needs a resolution. A typical business case study is a detailed account, or story, of what happened in a particular company, industry, or project over a set period of time. The learner is given details about the situation, often in a historical context.
Advantages to the use of case studies in class. A major advantage of teaching with case studies is that the students are actively engaged in figuring out the principles by abstracting from the examples. This develops their skills in: Problem solving. Analytical tools, quantitative and/or qualitative, depending on the case.
While several factors make HBS Online unique—including a global Community and real-world outcomes—active learning through the case study method rises to the top.. In a 2023 City Square Associates survey, 74 percent of HBS Online learners who also took a course from another provider said HBS Online's case method and real-world examples were better by comparison.
Learning outcomes benefit instructors. Learning outcomes can help instructors in a number of ways by: Providing a framework and rationale for making course design decisions about the sequence of topics and instruction, content selection, and so on. Communicating to students what they must do to make progress in learning in your course.
1. Identify a problem to investigate: This should be something accessible and relevant to students' lives. The problem should also be challenging and complex enough to yield multiple solutions with many layers. 2. Give context: Think of this step as a movie preview or book summary.
(2013), case studies relevant to course content can be found or adapted from other sources or created from scratch. As with any course activity, it is important for case studies to meet the established learning outcomes of the course. In designing a continuous case study, instructors can purposefully select the most appropriate
Search for: HOME; OUR MISSION. About; ACCESS MODELS. Institutional. Library Provisioned Textbooks
Printable Version (PDF) Scenarios, case studies and role plays are examples of active and collaborative teaching techniques that research confirms are effective for the deep learning needed for students to be able to remember and apply concepts once they have finished your course. See Research Findings on University Teaching Methods.
Identify the learning outcomes. It is important to identify what you want students to achieve on completing the scenario and then work backwards from the learning outcomes to create the situation that will lead to this learning. ... Problem-Based Learning: Case Studies, Experience and Practice (Eds.). London, UK: Kogan Page Limited. Using Case ...
tive use of case studies for your students (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2019):• Settin. the Stage: Place students in groups of 2-4 using whatever method you feel will be productive. Provide a timeframe for completion of the case study while ensuring support for learning and psychological safety.
able to achieve the learning outcome being assessed. Each case study presented a patient scenario and asked students a series of questions (five to seven short answer questions) that prompted students to explain the science behind the patient's condition (Supplemental Item 2). The case studies were given to 71 students enrolled in
Keywords: Case-based learning, cellular respiration, undergraduate, misconception. Case-based learning (CBL) is a pedagogical method that uses case studies as active learning tools. A case study is composed of an engaging and/or controversial story, usually a dilemma that requires a basic under-standing of scientific principles [1].
There is a need to examine the effect of using discussion cases to enrich students' learning outcomes. A research framework was created to study this multidimensional relationship, via the instruments of interactivity, students' time devotion and students' engagement in order to find which factors could improve learning outcomes, including positive group interaction and individual ...
those analyzing the case can identify. 1.2 What is a Learning Outcome? A learning outcome is a statement that speci es what learners will know or be able to do as a result of a learning activity. Outcomes are usually expressed as knowledge, skills, or attitudes. Learning outcomes provide direction in the planning of a learning activity. They ...
A mixed method approach to data collection was used, including both qualitative and quantitative methodologies, to investigate the relationship between the university environment and student perceptions of satisfaction, needs, and learning outcomes. A case study was appropriate as "an in-depth exploration of a bonded system (e.g. an activity ...
This study aimed to describe the effectiveness of the case study-based chemistry learning textbook in improving students' learning outcomes. The type of research carried out is a quasi-experiment.
Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) was selected as a case study for the approach to student learning outcomes assessment that reflects the institution's commitment to interdisciplinarity and innovative teaching and learning. Three elements have been instrumental in CMU's advances in program-level student learning outcomes assessment: 1) an institutionalized research-oriented and data ...
Studies show that clear, observable, and measurable learning outcomes are necessary to design rich courses for effective learning (Casey et al. 1997, Davis 1993, Lowman 1984, DeLong et al. 2005, Biggs & Tang 2011, Fink 2013, Wiggins et al. 2005).Having clear and concise learning outcomes helps students understand and articulate what they'll learn in your course, track their progress ...
Knowledge, also designated as "Knowledge & Understanding" (UCE Birmingham, 2006), the result of assimilation of information through learning. Knowledge is the body of facts, principles, theories and practices related to an area of work or study. Skills, also designated as "Intellectual (thinking) Skills" and "Practical Skills (subject-specifics ...
VivifyScrum EDU is an educational platform designed to teach Scrum methodology through a gamified experience, much like Duolingo for Scrum. The project aimed to create an engaging and accessible way for users to learn Scrum for free, using a theme inspired by Japanese martial arts and masters to make the learning journey both fun and effective.
Summary. Today artificial intelligence can be harnessed by nearly anyone, using commands in everyday language instead of code. Soon it will transform more than 40% of all work activity, according ...
Objectives Holistic segmentation of CT structural alterations with 3D deep learning has recently been described in cystic fibrosis (CF), allowing the measurement of normalized volumes of airway abnormalities (NOVAA-CT) as an automated quantitative outcome. Clinical validations are needed, including longitudinal and multicenter evaluations. Materials and methods The validation study was ...