chrome icon

What is the Eisenhardt Method, really?:

Chat with Paper

Boundary work as a buffer against burnout: Evidence from healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Covid-19 and the global value chain: immediate dynamics and long-term restructuring in the garment industry, covid-19 and the global value chain: immediate dynamics and long-term restructuring in the garment industry, putting qualitative international business research in context(s), organizing form, experimentation, and performance: innovation in the nascent civilian drone industry, how firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems, achieving rigor in qualitative analysis: the role of active categorization in theory building, perspective—relaxing the taboo on telling our own stories: upholding professional distance and personal involvement, finding theory–method fit: a comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building:, templates and turns in qualitative studies of strategy and management, related papers (5), research method: grounded theory for descriptive and exploratory case studies, integrating the grounded theory method and case study research methodology within is research: a possible 'road map', understanding grounded theory, unpacking grounded theory: a venue for education research, challenges of using grounded theory in qualitative research, trending questions (1).

The Eisenhardt Method enhances theory building in case study research by focusing on multiple cases, refining theory development processes, and emphasizing the creation of robust theoretical frameworks.

multiple case study eisenhardt

  • The Inventory

jalopnik

The Eisenhardt Method: Building theories from case studies

The making of management research.

A boardroom is seen in an office building in Manhattan, New York City, New York, U.S., May 24, 2021.

The theory of the case

In 1989, Kathleen Eisenhardt, an untenured assistant professor at Stanford University, published a paper that would lay the foundation for decades of management research. Titled “ Building Theories from Case Study Research ,” the paper laid out an eight-step process for turning in-depth case studies on a small number of companies into concrete theories about organizations that could be tested and studied.

Suggested Reading

Related content.

Her approach, which has come to be known as the “Eisenhardt Method,” has proven controversial. Many academics are skeptical that case study research can produce universal theories just by analyzing a handful of companies. Others quibble with the specific strategies Eisenhardt suggests, or bristle at what they see as a too-rigid template for doing research. Dozens of papers and book chapters have been written criticizing the method, and Eisenhardt has written several follow-up articles to defend and revise her approach.

Let’s study the case.

By the digits

4-10: Number of cases Eisenhardt recommends studying to develop a theory (although it’s not a strict rule)

6: Weeks it took Eisenhardt to write “Building Theories from Case Study Research”

“Virtually zero”: Revisions Eisenhardt said she got from reviewers at the Academy of Management Review on her original paper

100+: Articles Eisenhardt has published in research and business journals, many of which rely on the method she proposed

70,000 and counting: Articles that cite “Building Theories from Case Study Research”

A boy walks up a wooden staircase.

What is the Eisenhardt Method?

Eisenhardt recommends eight steps for developing theories from case study research:

  • Getting started. Pick a focused research question and define any constructs (e.g. conflict, power) you want to study.
  • Selecting cases. Choose cases that are similar enough to control for any extraneous variables, but have one key difference you want to study (e.g. eight mid-sized tech companies in San Francisco that recently replaced their CEOs—four of which are highly successful and four of which are failing).
  • Crafting instruments and protocols. Combine multiple data sources (e.g. interviews, observations, surveys) and make sure there are multiple researchers on your team so that you’ll get many complementary perspectives to help build your theory.
  • Entering the field. Analyze your data even as you’re collecting it. If you start to notice some new, interesting phenomenon emerging, feel free to change your data collection methods or add new cases to study it more closely.
  • Analyzing data. Combine “within-case” analysis, where you describe what happened in a single case in great detail, with “cross-case” analysis, where you look for similarities or differences between cases, to find patterns in the data.
  • Shaping hypotheses. As you start to develop a hypothesis, check how well it fits the data in each individual case and in all your cases as a group. Keep tweaking your hypothesis to get a better fit, and constantly check your evolving theory against the data.
  • Enfolding literature. Compare your emerging theory to any existing research on the subject and incorporate contradictory research to revise and strengthen your own theory.
  • Reaching closure. Stop adding cases, and stop revising your theory, when you start noticing each new case or revision is yielding minimal improvements.

A window of a convenience store shows boxes of White Claw seltzers.

Which of these topics has NOT been studied using the Eisenhardt Method?

A. Product marketing in the keyboard synthesizer industry

B. Flavor design in the hard seltzer industry

C. Innovation in the civilian drone market

D. Hiveminds among soldiers on aircraft carrier flight decks

Find the answer at the bottom!

Kathleen Eisenhardt: Mother of the Method

Kathleen Eisenhardt developed her theory-building method out of necessity. In 1988, when she was co-authoring her first case study papers, ​​“there were few published qualitative studies and almost no guidance on how to execute theory-building research,” she wrote in 2021 . To make matters worse, quantitative researchers—the champions of “hard” science, who rely on numerical data and mathematical models—looked down on case studies and other forms of qualitative research, which rely on descriptive data from interviews, observations, and so on, as “ storytelling .” To Eisenhardt instead, they revealed insights that would get lost in statistical analysis.

So in 1989, Eisenhardt wrote “the paper that I wished that I could have read before I began theory building from cases.” Her method emphasized the importance of sticking to the data and encouraged researchers to develop testable theories in an effort to appeal to the quantitative research community. Published in the Academy of Management Review , it quickly became a manual for other researchers looking to publish case study papers in management journals.

Eisenhardt herself built a career at Stanford’s Graduate School of Business by conducting case studies of Silicon Valley tech companies and developing theories of management in what she calls “ high velocity ” environments, where demand, competitors, technology, and regulation change quickly. “I am what I study,” a 75-year-old Eisenhardt told a group of University of Washington students in 2020. “I drive a sports car. I like things fast.”

Brief history

1848: An accidental explosion drives an iron spike through the skull of railroad foreman Phineas Gage. His doctor records how the resulting brain trauma utterly changes Gage’s personality, which becomes one of the most famous psychological case studies of all time.

1855: French sociologist Pierre Guillaume Frédéric Le Play becomes the first case study field worker after he lives with a series of working class families to observe the impacts of industrialization.

1900: Sigmund Freud publishes The Interpretation of Dreams , in which he uses multiple case studies of his Viennese patients to develop his theory of the unconscious.

1967: Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss publish Grounded Theory , an influential book that sought to legitimize qualitative research.

1984: Social scientist Robert Yin publishes the first of six editions of his book Case Study Research: Design and Methods defending the value of case studies and suggesting a more rigorous approach to conducting them.

1989: Our star (paper) is born! Eisenhardt publishes “Building Theories from Case Study Research.”

2011: Economist Ann Langley and management researcher Chahrazad Abdallah coin the phrase “the Eisenhardt Method” in a paper examining the most commonly used approaches to case study research.

2021: After three decades of defending and revising her theory building strategy in academic journals, Eisenhardt updates her method in a paper titled “What Is the Eisenhardt Method, Really?”

“The principle ‘Let’s get it down to something we can count!’ does not always formulate the best research strategy; ‘Let’s see now, what have we here?’ may point to a more promising program.”

—Philosopher Abraham Kaplan defending the value of qualitative research in his 1964 book The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Sciences

A small child looks through a pair of binoculars.

The Eisenhardt Method revisited

Last year, Eisenhardt published “ What is the Eisenhardt Method, really? ”, a paper reexamining her theory-building approach after 32 years of debate and development. Eisenhardt, by then a tenured professor at Stanford University, mostly stood by her original article, but pushed back against some of the ways she says it has been misinterpreted and misapplied over the years.

Her biggest qualm is with those who see the method as a “rigid template” defined by superficial boxes researchers need to check. The method, Eisenhardt insisted, doesn’t require anyone to use a specific number of cases or a specific type of data. And it doesn’t require researchers to study the performance of management teams, even though that’s how Eisenhardt herself uses it. “Admittedly,” she wrote, “it can be challenging to discern from the outside what the Method is versus what reviewers want versus what are research choices.”

Instead, Eisenhardt wrote, her method is a flexible set of strategies case study researchers can use to develop convincing theories. The only point on which she rigidly insists is that a good theory “balances parsimony (not complicated spaghetti diagrams), accuracy (captures the core features of the phenomenon), and generalizability (relevant beyond the immediate setting), is logically coherent… and is (hopefully) surprising!”

Fun fact! Academic debates over the Eisenhardt Method sometimes devolve into arguments about the nature of the universe . Critics question Eisenhardt’s “ positivist ” assumption that reality is objective and researchers should try to uncover universal truths about the world.

A person in a cream colored shirt stands with their hands on their hips in front of a projector.

Watch this!

This is the end result of the Eisenhardt Method: After studying executives at successful and unsuccessful tech companies, Eisenhardt lays out her theory that the ideal management team has three to five members, each of whom comes from a different professional discipline, and who have a diverse range of ages and backgrounds.

Are you, like Kathleen Eisenhardt, what you study?

Let us know!

💬 Let’s talk!

In last week’s poll about immortality , the search for the fountain of eternal youth didn’t prove very popular—but to the 20% of you who’s ready to go on an adventure, send us a postcard when you get there!

🐦 Tweet this!

🤔 What did you think of today’s email?

💡 What should we obsess over next?

Today’s email was written by Nicolás Rivero (the Rivero Method would emphasize taking frequent breaks for snacks), edited by Susan Howson (the Howson Method would also emphasize this), and produced by Morgan Haefner (the Haefner method is the same, just with coffee).

The correct answer to the pop quiz is B., Flavor design in the hard seltzer industry. Unfortunately this hasn’t been studied—but it should be!

📬 Sign up for Quartz Weekly Obsession

Want to escape the news cycle? Try our Weekly Obsession.

  • Subscribe to RSS

multiple case study eisenhardt

  • in Methodology , Research
  • Leave a comment

What Is the Eisenhardt Method, Really?

There are different types of case-based research methods that differ considerably in their basic assumptions and objectives. An example of such a method is the multi-case theory-building approach, which is based on the work of Kathleen M. Eisenhardt. Her 1989 article, which laid the foundation for this method, has been cited tens of thousands of times to date. Unfortunately, there are countless misconceptions about the method in terms of types of data, number of cases, and performance emphasis. The method is also often overinterpreted as a rigid template, although it was never intended to be such a template. In a new article entitled What Is the Eisenhardt Method, Really? , Eisenhardt now puts her method in a new light and argues that the method’s relatively few defining features enable a wide variety of research possibilities. It should be clear that this new article is important reading for anyone who wants to do research with Eisenhardt’s method and for anyone whose work aims at theory building.

Eisenhardt, K.M. (2021). What Is the Eisenhardt Method, Really? Strategic Organization , 19(1), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020982866

Tags: Case Study , Theory Building

' src=

About Andreas Wieland

Leave a reply cancel reply.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Email Address

Recent Posts

  • Prioritizing Quality Over Quantity in Academia
  • Propositional, Perspectival, and Provocative Styles of Theorizing
  • Geopolitical, Economic, and Technological Trends in Logistics
  • Enhancing Methodological Transparency in SCM Research
  • The Supply Chain: A System in Crisis
  • Methodology
  • January 2024
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • February 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • Better Operations
  • BVL's SCM Blog
  • Cottrill Research
  • Global Supply Chain Blog
  • Inventory & Supply Chain Optimization
  • Jay, Barry, & Chuck's OM Blog
  • O.R. by the Beach
  • Punk Rock Operations Research
  • Purchasing Insight
  • SCM-blog.de (de)
  • Supply Chain @ MIT
  • Supply Chain and Logistics Blog
  • Supply Chain Matters
  • Supply Chain View from the Field
  • Supply Chains Rock
  • SupplyChainMusings.com
  • SupplyChainNetwork.com
  • SupplyChainOpz
  • The Freightos Blog
  • The Logistics Blog by Alan McKinnon
  • The Operations Room
  • WFP Logistics Blog

Supply Chain Management Research

Powered by WordPress.com .

Discover more from Supply Chain Management Research

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Type your email…

Continue reading

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

  • Advanced Search
  • Journal List
  • Sage Choice
  • PMC11334375

Logo of sageopen

Methodologic and Data-Analysis Triangulation in Case Studies: A Scoping Review

Margarithe charlotte schlunegger.

1 Department of Health Professions, Applied Research & Development in Nursing, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland

2 Faculty of Health, School of Nursing Science, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany

Maya Zumstein-Shaha

Rebecca palm.

3 Department of Health Care Research, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

Associated Data

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-wjn-10.1177_01939459241263011 for Methodologic and Data-Analysis Triangulation in Case Studies: A Scoping Review by Margarithe Charlotte Schlunegger, Maya Zumstein-Shaha and Rebecca Palm in Western Journal of Nursing Research

We sought to explore the processes of methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies using the example of research on nurse practitioners in primary health care.

Design and methods:

We conducted a scoping review within Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework, considering studies that defined a case study design and used 2 or more data sources, published in English or German before August 2023.

Data sources:

The databases searched were MEDLINE and CINAHL, supplemented with hand searching of relevant nursing journals. We also examined the reference list of all the included studies.

In total, 63 reports were assessed for eligibility. Ultimately, we included 8 articles. Five studies described within-method triangulation, whereas 3 provided information on between/across-method triangulation. No study reported within-method triangulation of 2 or more quantitative data-collection procedures. The data-collection procedures were interviews, observation, documentation/documents, service records, and questionnaires/assessments. The data-analysis triangulation involved various qualitative and quantitative methods of analysis. Details about comparing or contrasting results from different qualitative and mixed-methods data were lacking.

Conclusions:

Various processes for methodologic and data-analysis triangulation are described in this scoping review but lack detail, thus hampering standardization in case study research, potentially affecting research traceability. Triangulation is complicated by terminological confusion. To advance case study research in nursing, authors should reflect critically on the processes of triangulation and employ existing tools, like a protocol or mixed-methods matrix, for transparent reporting. The only existing reporting guideline should be complemented with directions on methodologic and data-analysis triangulation.

Case study research is defined as “an empirical method that investigates a contemporary phenomenon (the ‘case’) in depth and within its real-world context, especially when the boundaries between phenomenon and context may not be clearly evident. A case study relies on multiple sources of evidence, with data needing to converge in a triangulating fashion.” 1 (p15) This design is described as a stand-alone research approach equivalent to grounded theory and can entail single and multiple cases. 1 , 2 However, case study research should not be confused with single clinical case reports. “Case reports are familiar ways of sharing events of intervening with single patients with previously unreported features.” 3 (p107) As a methodology, case study research encompasses substantially more complexity than a typical clinical case report. 1 , 3

A particular characteristic of case study research is the use of various data sources, such as quantitative data originating from questionnaires as well as qualitative data emerging from interviews, observations, or documents. Therefore, a case study always draws on multiple sources of evidence, and the data must converge in a triangulating manner. 1 When using multiple data sources, a case or cases can be examined more convincingly and accurately, compensating for the weaknesses of the respective data sources. 1 Another characteristic is the interaction of various perspectives. This involves comparing or contrasting perspectives of people with different points of view, eg, patients, staff, or leaders. 4 Through triangulation, case studies contribute to the completeness of the research on complex topics, such as role implementation in clinical practice. 1 , 5 Triangulation involves a combination of researchers from various disciplines, of theories, of methods, and/or of data sources. By creating connections between these sources (ie, investigator, theories, methods, data sources, and/or data analysis), a new understanding of the phenomenon under study can be obtained. 6 , 7

This scoping review focuses on methodologic and data-analysis triangulation because concrete procedures are missing, eg, in reporting guidelines. Methodologic triangulation has been called methods, mixed methods, or multimethods. 6 It can encompass within-method triangulation and between/across-method triangulation. 7 “Researchers using within-method triangulation use at least 2 data-collection procedures from the same design approach.” 6 (p254) Within-method triangulation is either qualitative or quantitative but not both. Therefore, within-method triangulation can also be considered data source triangulation. 8 In contrast, “researchers using between/across-method triangulation employ both qualitative and quantitative data-collection methods in the same study.” 6 (p254) Hence, methodologic approaches are combined as well as various data sources. For this scoping review, the term “methodologic triangulation” is maintained to denote between/across-method triangulation. “Data-analysis triangulation is the combination of 2 or more methods of analyzing data.” 6 (p254)

Although much has been published on case studies, there is little consensus on the quality of the various data sources, the most appropriate methods, or the procedures for conducting methodologic and data-analysis triangulation. 5 According to the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) clearinghouse for reporting guidelines, one standard exists for organizational case studies. 9 Organizational case studies provide insights into organizational change in health care services. 9 Rodgers et al 9 pointed out that, although high-quality studies are being funded and published, they are sometimes poorly articulated and methodologically inadequate. In the reporting checklist by Rodgers et al, 9 a description of the data collection is included, but reporting directions on methodologic and data-analysis triangulation are missing. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the process of methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies. Accordingly, we conducted a scoping review to elicit descriptions of and directions for triangulation methods and analysis, drawing on case studies of nurse practitioners (NPs) in primary health care as an example. Case studies are recommended to evaluate the implementation of new roles in (primary) health care, such as that of NPs. 1 , 5 Case studies on new role implementation can generate a unique and in-depth understanding of specific roles (individual), teams (smaller groups), family practices or similar institutions (organization), and social and political processes in health care systems. 1 , 10 The integration of NPs into health care systems is at different stages of progress around the world. 11 Therefore, studies are needed to evaluate this process.

The methodological framework by Arksey and O’Malley 12 guided this scoping review. We examined the current scientific literature on the use of methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies on NPs in primary health care. The review process included the following stages: (1) establishing the research question; (2) identifying relevant studies; (3) selecting the studies for inclusion; (4) charting the data; (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting the results; and (6) consulting experts in the field. 12 Stage 6 was not performed due to a lack of financial resources. The reporting of the review followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Review) guideline by Tricco et al 13 (guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses [ Supplementary Table A ]). Scoping reviews are not eligible for registration in PROSPERO.

Stage 1: Establishing the Research Question

The aim of this scoping review was to examine the process of triangulating methods and analysis in case studies on NPs in primary health care to improve the reporting. We sought to answer the following question: How have methodologic and data-analysis triangulation been conducted in case studies on NPs in primary health care? To answer the research question, we examined the following elements of the selected studies: the research question, the study design, the case definition, the selected data sources, and the methodologic and data-analysis triangulation.

Stage 2: Identifying Relevant Studies

A systematic database search was performed in the MEDLINE (via PubMed) and CINAHL (via EBSCO) databases between July and September 2020 to identify relevant articles. The following terms were used as keyword search strategies: (“Advanced Practice Nursing” OR “nurse practitioners”) AND (“primary health care” OR “Primary Care Nursing”) AND (“case study” OR “case studies”). Searches were limited to English- and German-language articles. Hand searches were conducted in the journals Nursing Inquiry , BMJ Open , and BioMed Central ( BMC ). We also screened the reference lists of the studies included. The database search was updated in August 2023. The complete search strategy for all the databases is presented in Supplementary Table B .

Stage 3: Selecting the Studies

Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

We used the inclusion and exclusion criteria reported in Table 1 . We included studies of NPs who had at least a master’s degree in nursing according to the definition of the International Council of Nurses. 14 This scoping review considered studies that were conducted in primary health care practices in rural, urban, and suburban regions. We excluded reviews and study protocols in which no data collection had occurred. Articles were included without limitations on the time period or country of origin.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria.

CriteriaInclusionExclusion
Population- NPs with a master’s degree in nursing or higher - Nurses with a bachelor’s degree in nursing or lower
- Pre-registration nursing students
- No definition of master’s degree in nursing described in the publication
Interest- Description/definition of a case study design
- Two or more data sources
- Reviews
- Study protocols
- Summaries/comments/discussions
Context- Primary health care
- Family practices and home visits (including adult practices, internal medicine practices, community health centers)
- Nursing homes, hospital, hospice

Screening process

After the search, we collated and uploaded all the identified records into EndNote v.X8 (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and removed any duplicates. Two independent reviewers (MCS and SA) screened the titles and abstracts for assessment in line with the inclusion criteria. They retrieved and assessed the full texts of the selected studies while applying the inclusion criteria. Any disagreements about the eligibility of studies were resolved by discussion or, if no consensus could be reached, by involving experienced researchers (MZ-S and RP).

Stages 4 and 5: Charting the Data and Collating, Summarizing, and Reporting the Results

The first reviewer (MCS) extracted data from the selected publications. For this purpose, an extraction tool developed by the authors was used. This tool comprised the following criteria: author(s), year of publication, country, research question, design, case definition, data sources, and methodologic and data-analysis triangulation. First, we extracted and summarized information about the case study design. Second, we narratively summarized the way in which the data and methodological triangulation were described. Finally, we summarized the information on within-case or cross-case analysis. This process was performed using Microsoft Excel. One reviewer (MCS) extracted data, whereas another reviewer (SA) cross-checked the data extraction, making suggestions for additions or edits. Any disagreements between the reviewers were resolved through discussion.

A total of 149 records were identified in 2 databases. We removed 20 duplicates and screened 129 reports by title and abstract. A total of 46 reports were assessed for eligibility. Through hand searches, we identified 117 additional records. Of these, we excluded 98 reports after title and abstract screening. A total of 17 reports were assessed for eligibility. From the 2 databases and the hand search, 63 reports were assessed for eligibility. Ultimately, we included 8 articles for data extraction. No further articles were included after the reference list screening of the included studies. A PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection and inclusion process is presented in Figure 1 . As shown in Tables 2 and ​ and3, 3 , the articles included in this scoping review were published between 2010 and 2022 in Canada (n = 3), the United States (n = 2), Australia (n = 2), and Scotland (n = 1).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 10.1177_01939459241263011-fig1.jpg

PRISMA flow diagram.

Characteristics of Articles Included.

AuthorContandriopoulos et al Flinter Hogan et al Hungerford et al O’Rourke Roots and MacDonald Schadewaldt et al Strachan et al
CountryCanadaThe United StatesThe United StatesAustraliaCanadaCanadaAustraliaScotland
How or why research questionNo information on the research questionSeveral how or why research questionsWhat and how research questionNo information on the research questionSeveral how or why research questionsNo information on the research questionWhat research questionWhat and why research questions
Design and referenced author of methodological guidanceSix qualitative case studies
Robert K. Yin
Multiple-case studies design
Robert K. Yin
Multiple-case studies design
Robert E. Stake
Case study design
Robert K. Yin
Qualitative single-case study
Robert K. Yin
Robert E. Stake
Sharan Merriam
Single-case study design
Robert K. Yin
Sharan Merriam
Multiple-case studies design
Robert K. Yin
Robert E. Stake
Multiple-case studies design
Case definitionTeam of health professionals
(Small group)
Nurse practitioners
(Individuals)
Primary care practices (Organization)Community-based NP model of practice
(Organization)
NP-led practice
(Organization)
Primary care practices
(Organization)
No information on case definitionHealth board (Organization)

Overview of Within-Method, Between/Across-Method, and Data-Analysis Triangulation.

AuthorContandriopoulos et al Flinter Hogan et al Hungerford et al O’Rourke Roots and MacDonald Schadewaldt et al Strachan et al
Within-method triangulation (using within-method triangulation use at least 2 data-collection procedures from the same design approach)
:
 InterviewsXxxxx
 Observationsxx
 Public documentsxxx
 Electronic health recordsx
Between/across-method (using both qualitative and quantitative data-collection procedures in the same study)
:
:
 Interviewsxxx
 Observationsxx
 Public documentsxx
 Electronic health recordsx
:
 Self-assessmentx
 Service recordsx
 Questionnairesx
Data-analysis triangulation (combination of 2 or more methods of analyzing data)
:
:
 Deductivexxx
 Inductivexx
 Thematicxx
 Content
:
 Descriptive analysisxxx
:
:
 Deductivexxxx
 Inductivexx
 Thematicx
 Contentx

Research Question, Case Definition, and Case Study Design

The following sections describe the research question, case definition, and case study design. Case studies are most appropriate when asking “how” or “why” questions. 1 According to Yin, 1 how and why questions are explanatory and lead to the use of case studies, histories, and experiments as the preferred research methods. In 1 study from Canada, eg, the following research question was presented: “How and why did stakeholders participate in the system change process that led to the introduction of the first nurse practitioner-led Clinic in Ontario?” (p7) 19 Once the research question has been formulated, the case should be defined and, subsequently, the case study design chosen. 1 In typical case studies with mixed methods, the 2 types of data are gathered concurrently in a convergent design and the results merged to examine a case and/or compare multiple cases. 10

Research question

“How” or “why” questions were found in 4 studies. 16 , 17 , 19 , 22 Two studies additionally asked “what” questions. Three studies described an exploratory approach, and 1 study presented an explanatory approach. Of these 4 studies, 3 studies chose a qualitative approach 17 , 19 , 22 and 1 opted for mixed methods with a convergent design. 16

In the remaining studies, either the research questions were not clearly stated or no “how” or “why” questions were formulated. For example, “what” questions were found in 1 study. 21 No information was provided on exploratory, descriptive, and explanatory approaches. Schadewaldt et al 21 chose mixed methods with a convergent design.

Case definition and case study design

A total of 5 studies defined the case as an organizational unit. 17 , 18 - 20 , 22 Of the 8 articles, 4 reported multiple-case studies. 16 , 17 , 22 , 23 Another 2 publications involved single-case studies. 19 , 20 Moreover, 2 publications did not state the case study design explicitly.

Within-Method Triangulation

This section describes within-method triangulation, which involves employing at least 2 data-collection procedures within the same design approach. 6 , 7 This can also be called data source triangulation. 8 Next, we present the single data-collection procedures in detail. In 5 studies, information on within-method triangulation was found. 15 , 17 - 19 , 22 Studies describing a quantitative approach and the triangulation of 2 or more quantitative data-collection procedures could not be included in this scoping review.

Qualitative approach

Five studies used qualitative data-collection procedures. Two studies combined face-to-face interviews and documents. 15 , 19 One study mixed in-depth interviews with observations, 18 and 1 study combined face-to-face interviews and documentation. 22 One study contained face-to-face interviews, observations, and documentation. 17 The combination of different qualitative data-collection procedures was used to present the case context in an authentic and complex way, to elicit the perspectives of the participants, and to obtain a holistic description and explanation of the cases under study.

All 5 studies used qualitative interviews as the primary data-collection procedure. 15 , 17 - 19 , 22 Face-to-face, in-depth, and semi-structured interviews were conducted. The topics covered in the interviews included processes in the introduction of new care services and experiences of barriers and facilitators to collaborative work in general practices. Two studies did not specify the type of interviews conducted and did not report sample questions. 15 , 18

Observations

In 2 studies, qualitative observations were carried out. 17 , 18 During the observations, the physical design of the clinical patients’ rooms and office spaces was examined. 17 Hungerford et al 18 did not explain what information was collected during the observations. In both studies, the type of observation was not specified. Observations were generally recorded as field notes.

Public documents

In 3 studies, various qualitative public documents were studied. 15 , 19 , 22 These documents included role description, education curriculum, governance frameworks, websites, and newspapers with information about the implementation of the role and general practice. Only 1 study failed to specify the type of document and the collected data. 15

Electronic health records

In 1 study, qualitative documentation was investigated. 17 This included a review of dashboards (eg, provider productivity reports or provider quality dashboards in the electronic health record) and quality performance reports (eg, practice-wide or co-management team-wide performance reports).

Between/Across-Method Triangulation

This section describes the between/across methods, which involve employing both qualitative and quantitative data-collection procedures in the same study. 6 , 7 This procedure can also be denoted “methodologic triangulation.” 8 Subsequently, we present the individual data-collection procedures. In 3 studies, information on between/across triangulation was found. 16 , 20 , 21

Mixed methods

Three studies used qualitative and quantitative data-collection procedures. One study combined face-to-face interviews, documentation, and self-assessments. 16 One study employed semi-structured interviews, direct observation, documents, and service records, 20 and another study combined face-to-face interviews, non-participant observation, documents, and questionnaires. 23

All 3 studies used qualitative interviews as the primary data-collection procedure. 16 , 20 , 23 Face-to-face and semi-structured interviews were conducted. In the interviews, data were collected on the introduction of new care services and experiences of barriers to and facilitators of collaborative work in general practices.

Observation

In 2 studies, direct and non-participant qualitative observations were conducted. 20 , 23 During the observations, the interaction between health professionals or the organization and the clinical context was observed. Observations were generally recorded as field notes.

In 2 studies, various qualitative public documents were examined. 20 , 23 These documents included role description, newspapers, websites, and practice documents (eg, flyers). In the documents, information on the role implementation and role description of NPs was collected.

Individual journals

In 1 study, qualitative individual journals were studied. 16 These included reflective journals from NPs, who performed the role in primary health care.

Service records

Only 1 study involved quantitative service records. 20 These service records were obtained from the primary care practices and the respective health authorities. They were collected before and after the implementation of an NP role to identify changes in patients’ access to health care, the volume of patients served, and patients’ use of acute care services.

Questionnaires/Assessment

In 2 studies, quantitative questionnaires were used to gather information about the teams’ satisfaction with collaboration. 16 , 21 In 1 study, 3 validated scales were used. The scales measured experience, satisfaction, and belief in the benefits of collaboration. 21 Psychometric performance indicators of these scales were provided. However, the time points of data collection were not specified; similarly, whether the questionnaires were completed online or by hand was not mentioned. A competency self-assessment tool was used in another study. 16 The assessment comprised 70 items and included topics such as health promotion, protection, disease prevention and treatment, the NP-patient relationship, the teaching-coaching function, the professional role, managing and negotiating health care delivery systems, monitoring and ensuring the quality of health care practice, and cultural competence. Psychometric performance indicators were provided. The assessment was completed online with 2 measurement time points (pre self-assessment and post self-assessment).

Data-Analysis Triangulation

This section describes data-analysis triangulation, which involves the combination of 2 or more methods of analyzing data. 6 Subsequently, we present within-case analysis and cross-case analysis.

Mixed-methods analysis

Three studies combined qualitative and quantitative methods of analysis. 16 , 20 , 21 Two studies involved deductive and inductive qualitative analysis, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. 20 , 21 One used deductive qualitative analysis. 16 The method of analysis was not specified in the studies. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics in 3 studies. 16 , 20 , 23 The descriptive statistics comprised the calculation of the mean, median, and frequencies.

Qualitative methods of analysis

Two studies combined deductive and inductive qualitative analysis, 19 , 22 and 2 studies only used deductive qualitative analysis. 15 , 18 Qualitative data were analyzed thematically in 1 study, 22 and data were treated with content analysis in the other. 19 The method of analysis was not specified in the 2 studies.

Within-case analysis

In 7 studies, a within-case analysis was performed. 15 - 20 , 22 Six studies used qualitative data for the within-case analysis, and 1 study employed qualitative and quantitative data. Data were analyzed separately, consecutively, or in parallel. The themes generated from qualitative data were compared and then summarized. The individual cases were presented mostly as a narrative description. Quantitative data were integrated into the qualitative description with tables and graphs. Qualitative and quantitative data were also presented as a narrative description.

Cross-case analyses

Of the multiple-case studies, 5 carried out cross-case analyses. 15 - 17 , 20 , 22 Three studies described the cross-case analysis using qualitative data. Two studies reported a combination of qualitative and quantitative data for the cross-case analysis. In each multiple-case study, the individual cases were contrasted to identify the differences and similarities between the cases. One study did not specify whether a within-case or a cross-case analysis was conducted. 23

Confirmation or contradiction of data

This section describes confirmation or contradiction through qualitative and quantitative data. 1 , 4 Qualitative and quantitative data were reported separately, with little connection between them. As a result, the conclusions on neither the comparisons nor the contradictions could be clearly determined.

Confirmation or contradiction among qualitative data

In 3 studies, the consistency of the results of different types of qualitative data was highlighted. 16 , 19 , 21 In particular, documentation and interviews or interviews and observations were contrasted:

  • Confirmation between interviews and documentation: The data from these sources corroborated the existence of a common vision for an NP-led clinic. 19
  • Confirmation among interviews and observation: NPs experienced pressure to find and maintain their position within the existing system. Nurse practitioners and general practitioners performed complete episodes of care, each without collaborative interaction. 21
  • Contradiction among interviews and documentation: For example, interviewees mentioned that differentiating the scope of practice between NPs and physicians is difficult as there are too many areas of overlap. However, a clear description of the scope of practice for the 2 roles was provided. 21

Confirmation through a combination of qualitative and quantitative data

Both types of data showed that NPs and general practitioners wanted to have more time in common to discuss patient cases and engage in personal exchanges. 21 In addition, the qualitative and quantitative data confirmed the individual progression of NPs from less competent to more competent. 16 One study pointed out that qualitative and quantitative data obtained similar results for the cases. 20 For example, integrating NPs improved patient access by increasing appointment availability.

Contradiction through a combination of qualitative and quantitative data

Although questionnaire results indicated that NPs and general practitioners experienced high levels of collaboration and satisfaction with the collaborative relationship, the qualitative results drew a more ambivalent picture of NPs’ and general practitioners’ experiences with collaboration. 21

Research Question and Design

The studies included in this scoping review evidenced various research questions. The recommended formats (ie, how or why questions) were not applied consistently. Therefore, no case study design should be applied because the research question is the major guide for determining the research design. 2 Furthermore, case definitions and designs were applied variably. The lack of standardization is reflected in differences in the reporting of these case studies. Generally, case study research is viewed as allowing much more freedom and flexibility. 5 , 24 However, this flexibility and the lack of uniform specifications lead to confusion.

Methodologic Triangulation

Methodologic triangulation, as described in the literature, can be somewhat confusing as it can refer to either data-collection methods or research designs. 6 , 8 For example, methodologic triangulation can allude to qualitative and quantitative methods, indicating a paradigmatic connection. Methodologic triangulation can also point to qualitative and quantitative data-collection methods, analysis, and interpretation without specific philosophical stances. 6 , 8 Regarding “data-collection methods with no philosophical stances,” we would recommend using the wording “data source triangulation” instead. Thus, the demarcation between the method and the data-collection procedures will be clearer.

Within-Method and Between/Across-Method Triangulation

Yin 1 advocated the use of multiple sources of evidence so that a case or cases can be investigated more comprehensively and accurately. Most studies included multiple data-collection procedures. Five studies employed a variety of qualitative data-collection procedures, and 3 studies used qualitative and quantitative data-collection procedures (mixed methods). In contrast, no study contained 2 or more quantitative data-collection procedures. In particular, quantitative data-collection procedures—such as validated, reliable questionnaires, scales, or assessments—were not used exhaustively. The prerequisites for using multiple data-collection procedures are availability, the knowledge and skill of the researcher, and sufficient financial funds. 1 To meet these prerequisites, research teams consisting of members with different levels of training and experience are necessary. Multidisciplinary research teams need to be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of different data sources and collection procedures. 1

Qualitative methods of analysis and results

When using multiple data sources and analysis methods, it is necessary to present the results in a coherent manner. Although the importance of multiple data sources and analysis has been emphasized, 1 , 5 the description of triangulation has tended to be brief. Thus, traceability of the research process is not always ensured. The sparse description of the data-analysis triangulation procedure may be due to the limited number of words in publications or the complexity involved in merging the different data sources.

Only a few concrete recommendations regarding the operationalization of the data-analysis triangulation with the qualitative data process were found. 25 A total of 3 approaches have been proposed 25 : (1) the intuitive approach, in which researchers intuitively connect information from different data sources; (2) the procedural approach, in which each comparative or contrasting step in triangulation is documented to ensure transparency and replicability; and (3) the intersubjective approach, which necessitates a group of researchers agreeing on the steps in the triangulation process. For each case study, one of these 3 approaches needs to be selected, carefully carried out, and documented. Thus, in-depth examination of the data can take place. Farmer et al 25 concluded that most researchers take the intuitive approach; therefore, triangulation is not clearly articulated. This trend is also evident in our scoping review.

Mixed-methods analysis and results

Few studies in this scoping review used a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis. However, creating a comprehensive stand-alone picture of a case from both qualitative and quantitative methods is challenging. Findings derived from different data types may not automatically coalesce into a coherent whole. 4 O’Cathain et al 26 described 3 techniques for combining the results of qualitative and quantitative methods: (1) developing a triangulation protocol; (2) following a thread by selecting a theme from 1 component and following it across the other components; and (3) developing a mixed-methods matrix.

The most detailed description of the conducting of triangulation is the triangulation protocol. The triangulation protocol takes place at the interpretation stage of the research process. 26 This protocol was developed for multiple qualitative data but can also be applied to a combination of qualitative and quantitative data. 25 , 26 It is possible to determine agreement, partial agreement, “silence,” or dissonance between the results of qualitative and quantitative data. The protocol is intended to bring together the various themes from the qualitative and quantitative results and identify overarching meta-themes. 25 , 26

The “following a thread” technique is used in the analysis stage of the research process. To begin, each data source is analyzed to identify the most important themes that need further investigation. Subsequently, the research team selects 1 theme from 1 data source and follows it up in the other data source, thereby creating a thread. The individual steps of this technique are not specified. 26 , 27

A mixed-methods matrix is used at the end of the analysis. 26 All the data collected on a defined case are examined together in 1 large matrix, paying attention to cases rather than variables or themes. In a mixed-methods matrix (eg, a table), the rows represent the cases for which both qualitative and quantitative data exist. The columns show the findings for each case. This technique allows the research team to look for congruency, surprises, and paradoxes among the findings as well as patterns across multiple cases. In our review, we identified only one of these 3 approaches in the study by Roots and MacDonald. 20 These authors mentioned that a causal network analysis was performed using a matrix. However, no further details were given, and reference was made to a later publication. We could not find this publication.

Case Studies in Nursing Research and Recommendations

Because it focused on the implementation of NPs in primary health care, the setting of this scoping review was narrow. However, triangulation is essential for research in this area. This type of research was found to provide a good basis for understanding methodologic and data-analysis triangulation. Despite the lack of traceability in the description of the data and methodological triangulation, we believe that case studies are an appropriate design for exploring new nursing roles in existing health care systems. This is evidenced by the fact that case study research is widely used in many social science disciplines as well as in professional practice. 1 To strengthen this research method and increase the traceability in the research process, we recommend using the reporting guideline and reporting checklist by Rodgers et al. 9 This reporting checklist needs to be complemented with methodologic and data-analysis triangulation. A procedural approach needs to be followed in which each comparative step of the triangulation is documented. 25 A triangulation protocol or a mixed-methods matrix can be used for this purpose. 26 If there is a word limit in a publication, the triangulation protocol or mixed-methods matrix needs to be identified. A schematic representation of methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies can be found in Figure 2 .

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 10.1177_01939459241263011-fig2.jpg

Schematic representation of methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies (own work).

Limitations

This study suffered from several limitations that must be acknowledged. Given the nature of scoping reviews, we did not analyze the evidence reported in the studies. However, 2 reviewers independently reviewed all the full-text reports with respect to the inclusion criteria. The focus on the primary care setting with NPs (master’s degree) was very narrow, and only a few studies qualified. Thus, possible important methodological aspects that would have contributed to answering the questions were omitted. Studies describing the triangulation of 2 or more quantitative data-collection procedures could not be included in this scoping review due to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Conclusions

Given the various processes described for methodologic and data-analysis triangulation, we can conclude that triangulation in case studies is poorly standardized. Consequently, the traceability of the research process is not always given. Triangulation is complicated by the confusion of terminology. To advance case study research in nursing, we encourage authors to reflect critically on methodologic and data-analysis triangulation and use existing tools, such as the triangulation protocol or mixed-methods matrix and the reporting guideline checklist by Rodgers et al, 9 to ensure more transparent reporting.

Supplemental Material

Acknowledgments.

The authors thank Simona Aeschlimann for her support during the screening process.

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 10.1177_01939459241263011-img1.jpg

Supplemental Material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.

Information

  • Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

  • Active Journals
  • Find a Journal
  • Proceedings Series
  • For Authors
  • For Reviewers
  • For Editors
  • For Librarians
  • For Publishers
  • For Societies
  • For Conference Organizers
  • Open Access Policy
  • Institutional Open Access Program
  • Special Issues Guidelines
  • Editorial Process
  • Research and Publication Ethics
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Testimonials
  • Preprints.org
  • SciProfiles
  • Encyclopedia

land-logo

Article Menu

multiple case study eisenhardt

  • Subscribe SciFeed
  • Recommended Articles
  • Google Scholar
  • on Google Scholar
  • Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Uncertainty assessment of species distribution prediction using multiple global climate models on the tibetan plateau: a case study of gentiana yunnanensis and gentiana siphonantha.

multiple case study eisenhardt

1. Introduction

2. materials and methods, 2.1. study area, 2.2. species data, 2.3. climate and environment data, 2.4. global climate models, 2.5. species distribution modeling, 3.1. model performance, 3.2. current potential distribution, 3.3. future potential distribution simulations, 3.3.1. impacts of gcms on sdm, 3.3.2. range shift under future climate change with mme-4, 4. discussion, 5. conclusions, author contributions, data availability statement, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest.

Click here to enlarge figure

GCMPeriodSSPPercLoss *PercGain **SRC ***
ACCESS-CM22041–2060 SSP2-4.548.04431.524−16.52
2041–2060 SSP5-8.552.97731.693−21.284
2081–2100 SSP2-4.560.38239.043−21.339
2081–2100SSP5-8.582.39579.704−2.691
CMCC-ESM22041–2060 SSP2-4.536.28557.186+20.901
2041–2060 SSP5-8.542.38843.684+1.296
2081–2100 SSP2-4.556.52655.463−1.063
2081–2100SSP5-8.575.51109.853+34.342
MPI-ESM1-2-HR2041–2060 SSP2-4.526.37126.623+0.252
2041–2060 SSP5-8.533.97826.487−7.491
2081–2100 SSP2-4.538.65932.557−6.102
2081–2100SSP5-8.567.04375.848+8.805
UKESM1-0-LL2041–2060 SSP2-4.552.01949.915−2.104
2041–2060 SSP5-8.561.28462.254+0.969
2081–2100 SSP2-4.567.681.549+13.949
2081–2100SSP5-8.590.56487.737−2.827
GCMPeriodSSPPercLoss *PercGain **SRC ***
ACCESS-CM22041–2060 SSP2-4.511.83515.244+3.409
2041–2060 SSP5-8.514.42416.181+1.757
2081–2100 SSP2-4.518.56316.316−2.247
2081–2100SSP5-8.543.15211.929−31.223
CMCC-ESM22041–2060 SSP2-4.59.64512.267+2.622
2041–2060 SSP5-8.510.64313.915+3.272
2081–2100 SSP2-4.519.09616.265−2.831
2081–2100SSP5-8.540.61813.833−26.784
MPI-ESM1-2-HR2041–2060 SSP2-4.55.41412.431+7.016
2041–2060 SSP5-8.57.44714.406+6.959
2081–2100 SSP2-4.58.82613.909+5.083
2081–2100SSP5-8.520.35315.44−4.912
UKESM1-0-LL2041–2060 SSP2-4.513.20918.332+5.122
2041–2060 SSP5-8.518.67219.768+1.097
2081–2100 SSP2-4.525.12918.764−6.365
2081–2100SSP5-8.554.60613.273−41.333
  • Li, Q.; Xue, Y.K. Simulated impacts of land cover change on summer climate in the Tibetan Plateau. Environ. Res. Lett. 2010 , 5 , 12. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Shang, W.; Duan, K.Q.; Li, S.S.; Ren, X.J.; Huang, B. Simulation of the dipole pattern of summer precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau by CMIP6 models. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021 , 16 , 014047. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Cao, X.Y.; Zhou, B.R.; Zhou, H.K.; Qiao, B.; Yan, Y.Q.; Zhao, T.; Cheng, Q.; Zhao, H.F.; Yu, H.Y. Research progress on the impact of climate change on vegetation ecosystem in the Tibetan Plateau. J. Arid Meteorol. 2022 , 40 , 1068–1080. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Lu, C.X.; Xie, G.D.; Xiao, Y.; Yu, Y.J. Ecosystem diversity and economic valuation of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2004 , 24 , 2749–2755. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Li, Y.C.; Li, M.Y.; Li, C.; Liu, Z.Z. Optimized Maxent Model Predictions of Climate Change Impacts on the Suitable Distribution of Cunninghamia lanceolata in China. Forests 2020 , 11 , 302. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Nunez, S.; Arets, E.; Alkemade, R.; Verwer, C.; Leemans, R. Assessing the impacts of climate change on biodiversity: Is below 2 °C enough? Clim. Chang. 2019 , 154 , 351–365. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Thuiller, W. Biodiversity—Climate change and the ecologist. Nature 2007 , 448 , 550–552. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Liu, H.Y.; Mi, Z.R.; Lin, L.; Wang, Y.H.; Zhang, Z.H.; Zhang, F.W.; Wang, H.; Liu, L.L.; Zhu, B.A.; Cao, G.M.; et al. Shifting plant species composition in response to climate change stabilizes grassland primary production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018 , 115 , 4051–4056. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Shen, M.G.; Piao, S.L.; Jeong, S.J.; Zhou, L.M.; Zeng, Z.Z.; Ciais, P.; Chen, D.L.; Huang, M.T.; Jin, C.S.; Li, L.Z.X.; et al. Evaporative cooling over the Tibetan Plateau induced by vegetation growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015 , 112 , 9299–9304. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zhou, M.P.; Yu, Z.B.; Gu, H.H.; Ju, Q.; Gao, Y.Y.; Wen, L.; Huang, T.K.; Wang, W. Evaluation and projections of surface air temperature over the Tibetan Plateau from CMIP6 and CMIP5: Warming trend and uncertainty. Clim. Dyn. 2023 , 60 , 3863–3883. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Hu, H.W.; Wei, Y.Q.; Wang, W.Y.; Chen, Z.N. Potential spatial distributions of Tibetan antelope and protected areas on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Biodivers. Conserv. 2024 , 33 , 1845–1867. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Karuno, A.P.; Mi, X.; Chen, Y.H.; Zou, D.H.; Gao, W.; Zhang, B.L.; Xu, W.; Jin, J.Q.; Shen, W.J.; Huang, S.; et al. Impacts of climate change on herpetofauna diversity in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Conserv. Biol. 2023 , 37 , 15. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Liu, D.T.; Chen, J.Y.; Sun, W.B. Distributional responses to climate change of two maple species in southern China. Ecol. Evol. 2023 , 13 , 11. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • He, X.; Burgess, K.S.; Gao, L.M.; Li, D.Z. Distributional responses to climate change for alpine species of Cyananthus and Primulaendemic to the Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains. Plant Divers. 2019 , 41 , 26–32. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • You, J.L.; Qin, X.P.; Ranjitkar, S.; Lougheed, S.C.; Wang, M.C.; Zhou, W.; Ouyang, D.X.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, J.C.; Zhang, W.J.; et al. Response to climate change of montane herbaceous plants in the genus Rhodiola predicted by ecological niche modelling. Sci. Rep. 2018 , 8 , 12. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Cui, T.; Li, C.; Tian, F.Q. Evaluation of Temperature and Precipitation Simulations in CMIP6 Models Over the Tibetan Plateau. Earth Space Sci. 2021 , 8 , e2020EA001620. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zhu, Y.Y.; Yang, S.N. Evaluation of CMIP6 for historical temperature and precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau and its comparison with CMIP5. Adv. Clim. Chang. Res. 2020 , 11 , 239–251. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Hu, Q.; Hua, W.; Yang, K.Q.; Ming, J.; Ma, P.; Zhao, Y.; Fan, G.Z. An assessment of temperature simulations by CMIP6 climate models over the Tibetan Plateau and differences with CMIP5 climate models. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2022 , 148 , 223–236. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zhang, C.; Qi, W.; Dong, J.W.; Deng, Y. How the CMIP6 climate models project the historical terrestrial GPP in China. Int. J. Climatol. 2022 , 42 , 9449–9461. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Jin, C.X.; Jiang, C.; Zhang, X.Y. Evaluation and Projection of Temperature in Southwestern China by CMIP6 Models. Chin. J. Agrometeorol. 2022 , 43 , 597–611. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Liang, Q.L.; Xu, X.T.i.; Mao, K.S.; Wang, M.C.; Wang, K.; Xi, Z.X.; Liu, J.Q. Shifts in plant distributions in response to climate warming in a biodiversity hotspot, the Hengduan Mountains. J. Biogeogr. 2018 , 45 , 1334–1344. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Yan, Y.J.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.J.; He, J.S.; Yang, R.H.; Wu, H.J.; Wang, X.L.; Jiao, L.; Tang, Z.Y.; Yao, Y.J. Range shifts in response to climate, change of Ophiocordyceps sinensis, a fungus endemic to the Tibetan Plateau. Biol. Conserv. 2017 , 206 , 143–150. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Yan, Y.J.; Tang, Z.Y. Protecting endemic seed plants on the Tibetan Plateau under future climate change: Migration matters. J. Plant Ecol. 2019 , 12 , 962–971. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Li, J.M.; Ehlers, T.A.; Werner, M.; Mutz, S.G.; Steger, C.; Paeth, H. Late quaternary climate, precipitation δ 18 O, and Indian monsoon variations over the Tibetan Plateau. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2017 , 457 , 412–422. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Lamsal, P.; Kumar, L.; Aryal, A.; Atreya, K. Future climate and habitat distribution of Himalayan Musk Deer Moschus chrysogaster. Ecol. Inform. 2018 , 44 , 101–108. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Peng, Y.Z.; Duan, A.; Hu, W.T.; Tang, B.; Li, X.Y.; Yang, X.Y. Observational constraint on the future projection of temperature in winter over the Tibetan Plateau in CMIP6 models. Environ. Res. Lett. 2022 , 17 , 034023. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wang, C.J.; Wang, Z.M.; Wang, W.H.; Peng, X.J. Advances in chemical components and pharmacology of genus Gentiana . China J. Chin. Mater. Medica 2009 , 34 , 2987–2994. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Mirzaee, F.; Hosseini, A.; Jouybari, H.B.; Davoodi, A.; Azadbakht, M. Medicinal, biological and phytochemical properties of Gentiana species. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2017 , 7 , 400–408. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Zheng, D. The system of physico-geographical regions of the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) Plateau. Sci. China Ser. D 1996 , 39 , 410–417. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Zhang, H.; Sun, J.; Xiong, J.N. Spatial-Temporal Patterns and Controls of Evapotranspiration across the Tibetan Plateau (2000–2012). Adv. Meteorol. 2017 , 2017 , 7082606. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Editorial Committee of Flora of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Gentianaceae in Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae ; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1988; Volume 62, pp. 14–75. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Zhou, W.; Qin, Y.M.; Liu, X.L. Distribution and Evaluation of Medicinal Gentian Resources in Yunnan. Yunnan J. Tradit. Chin. Med. Mater. Medica 2015 , 36 , 81–83. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Zhao, Z.L.; Su, J.; Wang, Z.H. Pharmacognostical studies on root of Gentiana siphonantha. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 2006 , 37 , 1875–1878. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Hijmans, R.J. Raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. R package version 3.6.23. 2023. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/package=raster (accessed on 22 August 2024).
  • Wai, T.H.; Liang, X.; Xie, H.; Liu, L.; Pan, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, L.; Xu, X. Global richness patterns of alpine genus Gentiana depend on multiple factors. Ecol. Evol. 2024 , 14 , e11366. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Breiner, F.T.; Guisan, A.; Bergamini, A.; Nobis, M.P. Overcoming limitations of modelling rare species by using ensembles of small models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2015 , 6 , 1210–1218. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Di Cola, V.; Broennimann, O.; Petitpierre, B.; Breiner, F.T.; D’Amen, M.; Randin, C.; Engler, R.; Pottier, J.; Pio, D.; Dubuis, A.; et al. ecospat: An R package to support spatial analyses and modeling of species niches and distributions. Ecography 2017 , 40 , 774–787. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Lee, S.; Qi, J.Y.; McCarty, G.W.; Yeo, I.Y.; Zhang, X.S.; Moglen, G.E.; Du, L. Uncertainty assessment of multi-parameter, multi-GCM, and multi-RCP simulations for streamflow and non-floodplain wetland (NFW) water storage. J. Hydrol. 2021 , 600 , 126564. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Chauvier, Y.; Descombes, P.; Gueguen, M.; Boulangeat, L.; Thuiller, W.; Zimmermann, N.E. Resolution in species distribution models shapes spatial patterns of plant multifaceted diversity. Ecography 2022 , 2022 , e05973. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Liu, C.; Newell, G.; White, M. The effect of sample size on the accuracy of species distribution models: Considering both presences and pseudo-absences or background sites. Ecography 2019 , 42 , 535–548. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Trew, B.T.; Maclean, I.M.D. Vulnerability of global biodiversity hotspots to climate change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2021 , 30 , 768–783. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zu, K.L.; Wang, Z.H.; Zhu, X.Y.; Lenoir, J.; Shrestha, N.; Lyu, T.; Luo, A.; Li, Y.Q.; Ji, C.J.; Peng, S.J.; et al. Upward shift and elevational range contractions of subtropical mountain plants in response to climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 2021 , 783 , 146896. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Gholami, H.; Lotfirad, M.; Ashrafi, S.M.; Biazar, S.M.; Singh, V.P. Multi-GCM ensemble model for reduction of uncertainty in runoff projections. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2023 , 37 , 953–964. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Keilman, N. Modelling education and climate change. Nat. Sustain. 2020 , 3 , 497–498. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Della Rocca, F.; Bogliani, G.; Breiner, F.T.; Milanesi, P. Identifying hotspots for rare species under climate change scenarios: Improving saproxylic beetle conservation in Italy. Biodivers. Conserv. 2019 , 28 , 433–449. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Garza, G.; Rivera, A.; Barrera, C.S.V.; Martinez-Avalos, J.G.; Dale, J.; Arroyo, T.P.F. Potential Effects of Climate Change on the Geographic Distribution of the Endangered Plant Species Manihot walkerae. Forests 2020 , 11 , 689. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • McSweeney, C.F.; Jones, R.G.; Lee, R.W.; Rowell, D.P. Selecting CMIP5 GCMs for downscaling over multiple regions. Clim. Dyn. 2015 , 44 , 3237–3260. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Barbet-Massin, M.; Jiguet, F.; Albert, C.H.; Thuiller, W. Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: How, where and how many? Methods Ecol. Evol. 2012 , 3 , 327–338. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Bio1 (°C)Bio5 (°C)Bio6 (°C)Bio12 (mm)Bio16 (mm)Bio17 (mm)
G. yunnanensis6.70
(−0.14~15.40)
17.53
(11.00~25.10)
−7.71
(−15.40~1.80)
803.58
(638.00~943.00)
406.55
(311.00~525.00)
33.81
(10~60)
G. siphonantha−0.40
(−5.35~5.63)
15.43
(−16.1~26.30)
−21.04
(−25.20~−16.30)
397.26
(115.00~616.00)
240.93
(70.00~375.00)
6.26
(2.00~13.00)
SpeciesPeriodSSPPercLoss *PercGain **SRC ***
G. yunnanensis2041–2060 SSP2-4.540.86638.871−1.995
2041–2060 SSP5-8.546.85438.671−8.183
2081–2100 SSP2-4.555.21851.176−4.042
2081–2100SSP5-8.578.87299.762+20.89
G. siphonantha2041–2060 SSP2-4.59.04514.733+5.688
2041–2060 SSP5-8.511.46816.391+4.922
2081–2100 SSP2-4.516.65716.572−0.085
2081–2100SSP5-8.539.27613.642−25.634
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

Song, Y.; Xu, X.; Zhang, S.; Chi, X. Uncertainty Assessment of Species Distribution Prediction Using Multiple Global Climate Models on the Tibetan Plateau: A Case Study of Gentiana yunnanensis and Gentiana siphonantha . Land 2024 , 13 , 1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091376

Song Y, Xu X, Zhang S, Chi X. Uncertainty Assessment of Species Distribution Prediction Using Multiple Global Climate Models on the Tibetan Plateau: A Case Study of Gentiana yunnanensis and Gentiana siphonantha . Land . 2024; 13(9):1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091376

Song, Yuxin, Xiaoting Xu, Shuoying Zhang, and Xiulian Chi. 2024. "Uncertainty Assessment of Species Distribution Prediction Using Multiple Global Climate Models on the Tibetan Plateau: A Case Study of Gentiana yunnanensis and Gentiana siphonantha " Land 13, no. 9: 1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091376

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

MDPI

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

  • Alzheimer's disease & dementia
  • Arthritis & Rheumatism
  • Attention deficit disorders
  • Autism spectrum disorders
  • Biomedical technology
  • Diseases, Conditions, Syndromes
  • Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • Gastroenterology
  • Gerontology & Geriatrics
  • Health informatics
  • Inflammatory disorders
  • Medical economics
  • Medical research
  • Medications
  • Neuroscience
  • Obstetrics & gynaecology
  • Oncology & Cancer
  • Ophthalmology
  • Overweight & Obesity
  • Parkinson's & Movement disorders
  • Psychology & Psychiatry
  • Radiology & Imaging
  • Sleep disorders
  • Sports medicine & Kinesiology
  • Vaccination
  • Breast cancer
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Colon cancer
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Heart attack
  • Heart disease
  • High blood pressure
  • Kidney disease
  • Lung cancer
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Post traumatic stress disorder
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Schizophrenia
  • Skin cancer
  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Full List »

share this!

August 29, 2024

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies . Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

Case study showcases effectiveness of multimodality approaches for diagnosing hydrocephalus

by Beijing Institute of Technology Press Co., Ltd

A breakthrough in diagnosing hydrocephalus: Multimodality approaches enhance accuracy and reduce costs

A recent case report published in Cyborg Bionic Systems details the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) using multimodality diagnostic approaches, highlighting significant advancements in medical diagnostics and patient care. The study conducted by a team of researchers from Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China, presents a comprehensive case study of a 68-year-old male patient diagnosed with iNPH, showcasing the effectiveness of these advanced diagnostic techniques.

iNPH is a condition characterized by the accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) causing ventricular dilation, often mistaken for brain atrophy due to similar symptoms such as cognitive impairment and gait disturbances. The prevalence of this condition increases with age, affecting approximately 1.30% of individuals over 65 and rising to 5.9% among those over 80.

In the documented case, the patient suffered from deteriorated gait, cognitive decline, and urinary incontinence , symptoms that gradually worsened over several years. Initially misdiagnosed, his condition prompted the use of multimodality diagnostic approaches after traditional methods provided inconclusive results. The diagnostic process included brain imaging, cerebrospinal fluid tap tests (CSFTT), continuous intracranial pressure monitoring, and a novel infusion study, which collectively led to an accurate diagnosis and subsequent treatment.

The infusion study, a critical component of the diagnosis, involves the measurement of cerebrospinal fluid resistance (Rcsf), which has been identified as a crucial physical marker for diagnosing hydrocephalus. In this case, an Rcsf level exceeding the normal range significantly indicated the presence of hydrocephalus, confirming the necessity for surgical intervention.

Following the diagnosis, the patient underwent a ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery, which involves the insertion of a tube to drain excess CSF from the brain to the abdominal cavity. The surgery was successful, with the patient showing remarkable improvement in symptoms and overall quality of life.

This case underscores the vital role of multimodality diagnostic approaches in the medical field. Not only do these techniques enhance diagnostic accuracy, but they also reduce clinical costs and time spent on diagnosis, providing a quicker path to recovery for patients. The effectiveness of these approaches in complex cases like iNPH demonstrates their potential for broader application, promising significant improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of similar conditions.

Moreover, the study advocates for the adoption of these techniques in standard medical practice, suggesting that they could significantly reduce the rates of misdiagnosis and improve clinical outcomes. As medical technology continues to advance, the integration of such multimodal diagnostic tools holds the promise of transforming patient care , offering more precise, efficient, and cost-effective solutions for challenging medical diagnoses.

Explore further

Feedback to editors

multiple case study eisenhardt

Immunotherapy research offers new hope for children with primary liver carcinomas

16 minutes ago

multiple case study eisenhardt

Study unveils novel treatment for blocking SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells

47 minutes ago

multiple case study eisenhardt

Novel pathway could lead to potential treatment for metabolic liver disease

52 minutes ago

multiple case study eisenhardt

Music study links dulled emotional reactions in anhedonia with prolonged activity of the brain's attentional networks

multiple case study eisenhardt

New anti-cancer 'degrader' targets protein essential to infant leukemia

multiple case study eisenhardt

AI-based tongue imaging could help enable non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease

multiple case study eisenhardt

Neuron populations in the medial prefrontal cortex shown to code the learning of avoidant behaviors

2 hours ago

multiple case study eisenhardt

Brain training: Study links cardiovascular fitness to brain health

5 hours ago

multiple case study eisenhardt

Managing early stages of abortion care at home after 12 weeks is safe and reduces time spent in hospital, study finds

16 hours ago

multiple case study eisenhardt

Billions worldwide consume inadequate levels of micronutrients critical to human health, new study finds

Related stories.

multiple case study eisenhardt

Many patients with iNPH develop Alzheimer's disease, too

Nov 15, 2019

multiple case study eisenhardt

Patients who had been waiting in operation queue died earlier

May 25, 2020

multiple case study eisenhardt

Consensus on the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage-related hydrocephalus

Jun 12, 2023

multiple case study eisenhardt

Biodegradable electronic tent technology offers less invasive brain disease diagnosis

Aug 12, 2024

multiple case study eisenhardt

Alzheimer's Association publishes final version of its new diagnostic criteria for the disease

Jul 3, 2024

Recommended for you

multiple case study eisenhardt

Mechanisms of how morphine relieves pain mapped out

20 hours ago

multiple case study eisenhardt

Brain study suggests regions that grew the most during evolution are most susceptible to aging

Aug 29, 2024

multiple case study eisenhardt

Study describes a new molecular pathway involved in the control of reproduction

18 hours ago

Let us know if there is a problem with our content

Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form . For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines ).

Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request

Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors.

Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.

E-mail the story

Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Medical Xpress in any form.

Newsletter sign up

Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties.

More information Privacy policy

Donate and enjoy an ad-free experience

We keep our content available to everyone. Consider supporting Science X's mission by getting a premium account.

E-mail newsletter

The production of bronze weapons in the Chu state: a case study of bronze arrowheads excavated from the Yuwan cemetery in Hubei, China

  • Published: 27 August 2024
  • Volume 16 , article number  152 , ( 2024 )

Cite this article

multiple case study eisenhardt

  • Ke Zhang 1 ,
  • Qiang Li 2 , 3 ,
  • Bin Bai 3 ,
  • Jian He 3 &
  • Haichao Li 2 , 3  

29 Accesses

Explore all metrics

During the Eastern Zhou Dynasty (770–222 BC), a large number of bronze arrowheads were unearthed from the Chu tombs, which is of great significance to the study of bronze weapons in the Chu state. However, little is known about the production technology, mode, and provenance of the raw materials for bronze weapons in the Chu state. Therefore, we conducted archaeometallurgical analyses of 16 bronze arrowheads excavated from the Yuwan cemetery using metallographic microscopy, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy, and multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The results indicate that the arrowheads are all copper-tin–lead ternary alloys with a high tin content and adequate mechanical properties. The differences in the production process, lead–tin content, and copper groups indicate that bronze arrowheads were produced at a high rate and in multiple batches. Furthermore, comparative lead isotope studies of galena from different regions revealed that during the Warring States period, the Chu state possessed a strong supply network of metal resources, and after occupying regions with abundant metal resources, it was transported to the Chu state for bronze production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

multiple case study eisenhardt

Similar content being viewed by others

multiple case study eisenhardt

Scientific analysis of bronze objects of the first millennium to the second century BCE excavated from the Jiangkou Site, Pengshan, Sichuan

multiple case study eisenhardt

Improvement and integration: scientific analyses of willow-leaf shaped bronze swords excavated from the Shuangyuan Village Cemetery, Chengdu, China

Metallurgical and chemical characterization of bronze remains found at the houhe site in shanxi province, china, data availability.

Data supporting the findings of this study are available in the article.

Bai B, Wang Z, Tang J et al (2020) Excavation Report on the Chu Tombs at Yuwan in Shayang County of jingmen City, Hubei Province. Jianghan Archaeol 03:33–48

Google Scholar  

Chen D, Han Y, Wang Z et al (2021a) The prestigious tin-lead horse fittings in the Warring States Period: Evidence from funerary artifacts of a Warring States Tomb at Shouxian, Anhui. Archaeometry 63:1290–1305. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12673

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Chen D, Yang Y, Wang T et al (2021b) Imitation or importation: archaeometallurgical research on bronze dagger-axes from Shuangyuan Village Cemetery of the Shu State in the Eastern Zhou Dynasty. J Archaeol Sci-Rep 40:103218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103218

Article   Google Scholar  

Chen D, Qiao B, Luo W (2021c) Archaeometallurgical research on the manufacture of lead mingqi from Nanyang in Chu state during the Warring States period. Archaeometry 63:810–825. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12645

Chen D, Yang Y, Wang T et al (2022) Improvement and integration: scientific analyses of willow-leaf shaped bronze swords excavated from the Shuangyuan Village Cemetery, Chengdu. China Herit Sci 10:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00725-2

He T, Chen Y (1999) Scientific Analysis of Jiangling Warring States Bronzes. Stud History of Natural Sci 02:63–72+99.

Hsu YK, Benjamin JS (2019) A geochemical characterization of lead ores in China: an isotope database for provenancing archaeological material. PLoS ONE 14(4):e0215973. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215973

Lehner J (2017) Compositional analysis of copper alloys from the middle plateau excavations at Boğazköy. Walter De Gruyter Press, Berlin.

Li H, Zhou Z, Liu Y (2020b) Fighting and burial: the production of bronze weapons in the Shu state based on a case study of Xinghelu cemetery, Chengdu. China Herit Sci 8:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-020-00379-y

Li H, Zuo Z, Cui J et al (2020c) Copper alloy production in the Warring States period (475–221 BCE) of the Shu state: a metallurgical study on copper alloy objects of the Baishoulu cemetery in Chengdu, China. Herit Sci 8:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-020-00412-0

Li H, Zuo Z, Cui J et al (2020d) Bronze production in the Ancient Chengdu Plains: a diachronic metallurgical perspective on a separate cultural region. J Cult Herit 43:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.11.005

Li H, Cui J, Chen J et al (2020a) Verification and Application of 'Copper Groups' Method. Jianghan Archaeol. 02: 103–109+102.

Liao D (2017) The bows and arows unearthed from Chu Tombs of the Warring States and their related problems. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing University, Jiangsu.

Lin Y, Luo S, Xiao L et al (2022) Techniques and Traditions of Warring States Bronzes from the Southern Edge of the Chu Territory. Cultural Relics 05:188–197

Luo Z, Fan A, Jin Z et al (2022) Scientific analysis and research on the Warring States bronze mirrors unearthed from Changsha Chu cemetery, Hunan province. China Archaeometry 64(5):1187–1201. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12776

Luo Z, Jin Z, Hu G et al (2023a) Lead isotopes of Eastern Zhou Bronzes Unearthed from Shaoyang of Hunan. Jianghan Archaeol 03:125–133

Luo Z, Yang M, Liu J et al (2023b) Diversified manufacturing processes and multiple mineral sources: Features of Warring States bronze vessels excavated from Chutai Cemetery M1. Anhui Province Sci China Technol Sci 66:2297–2307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2363-y

Ma J, Wu X, Yan X (2023) Metal Trade and National Integration: bronze technology and metal resources of Yue Style Bronzes from Hunan (8–5 C. BCE). Herit Sci 11:128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-00973-w

Marcos MT, Li XJ, Bevan A et al (2014) Forty thousand arms for a single emperor: from chemical data to the labor organization behind the bronze arrows of the terracotta army. J Archaeol Method Theory 21:534–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-012-9158-z

Mu D, Luo W, Song G et al (2019) The features as a county of Chu state: Chemical and metallurgical characteristics of the bronze artifacts from the Bayilu site. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 3:1123–1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-018-0596-8

Nan P (2018) Research on bronze technology of Jin Kingdom in spring and autumn period. PhD Thesis, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing.

Pollard AM, Bray P, Cuénod A, Hommel P, Hsu YK, Liu R, Perucchetti L, Pouncett J, Saunders M (2018) Beyond provenance new approaches to interpreting the chemistry of archaeological copper alloys. Leuven University Press, Leuven. https://doi.org/10.11116/9789461662668

Pollard AM, Liu R (2022) The six recipes of Zhou – a new perspective on Jin (金) and Xi (锡). Antiquity 96:1200–1213. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2022.81

Shi Y (2006) Researches on bronze arrows before Qin Dynasty in northern China. PhD Thesis, Jilin University, Jilin.

Sun S, Han R, Li X (2011) Microstructure Atlas of Ancient Chinese Metallic Materials-Nonferrous Metal Volume. Science Press, Beijing

The Museum of Hubei Province (1989) Tomb of Marquis Yi of Zeng State. Cultural Relics Press, Beijing

Wang Y (2007) An experimental study of the simulation of a long tang of bronze arrowheads. Cultural Relics 11:91–94+96.

Wen J, Ling X, Zhao CC et al (2013) Primary analysis on lead isotope characteristics in Chu State bronzes in Eastern Zhou Period unearthed from Luan District, Anhui Province. J Northwest Univ (nat Sci Ed) 43:1016–1020

Xiang M (2017) Archaeological perspective on Ba's and Shu's ancient histories-focusing on the graves of Ba-Shu culture from East Zhou to West Han periods. PhD Thesis, Jilin University, Jilin.

Yang Z, Jiang Z, Thonglith L et al (2024) New evidence of metal exchange in Southeast Asia during the Iron Age: scientific analysis of excavated bronze in Vilabouly. Laos Archaeol Anthropol Sci 16:26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-023-01933-y

Yang H (2015) A New Opinion on the "ji" of the "Liuji" (Six Formulae of Bronze Alloys). Relics Museol. 01: 35–38+70.

Yin X (2023) Archaeological findings and new evidence of musical instruments and weapons in Chuci . Master’s Thesis, Shandong Normal University, Shandong.

Yuan Y (2008) A Preliminary Study of Chu Arrowheads with a Flat-Tip. Jianghan Archaeol. 03:48–52+54+53.

Zhang H (2012) The production process of iron tang and bronze arrowheads in the Warring States period and its evolution. J Chifeng Univ (philosophy Soc Sci Chinese Edition) 33(05):21–23

Zhang J, Liang C, Wang Z et al (2019) Metallographic and Component Analysis of the Bronze Vessels xcavated from Yugang Cemetery at Xiangyang City. Jianghan Archaeol. 03:126–134+102.

Zhao F, Sun M, Li P et al (2024) Revealing the manufacturing and corrosion characteristics of Chinese archaeological metal arrows by non-destructive neutron techniques. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 16:50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-024-01957-y

Zhao B (2013) A study of the changes in the boundary of the State of Chu: geopolitics as a research perspective. PhD Thesis, Fudan University, Shanghai.

Zhao M (2019) Study on the function of arrowheads unearthed from the Tombs of the Nobles in the Eastern Zhou Dynasty. Master’s Thesis, Xiamen University, Fujian.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Xiaoyu Liu, Anhui University, for assistance with Figure 1.

This research was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No. 21AKG008).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

The Yuelu Academy, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China

Centre for Archaeological Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China

Qiang Li & Haichao Li

School of Archaeology and Museology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China

Qiang Li, Bin Bai, Jian He & Haichao Li

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

K. Zhang: conceptualisation, methodology, formal analysis and investigation, and the writing of the original draft preparation.

Q. Li: conceptualisation, methodology, formal analysis and investigation, and the writing of the original draft preparation.

J. He: resources, writing—review, and editing.

B. Bai: Methodology, formal analysis, writing the original draft, and project administration.

H.C. Li: Methodology, formal analysis, writing the original draft, and project administration.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bin Bai or Haichao Li .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Qiang Li is Co-first author.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1554 KB)

Rights and permissions.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Zhang, K., Li, Q., Bai, B. et al. The production of bronze weapons in the Chu state: a case study of bronze arrowheads excavated from the Yuwan cemetery in Hubei, China. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 16 , 152 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-024-02061-x

Download citation

Received : 08 April 2024

Accepted : 15 August 2024

Published : 27 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-024-02061-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Yuwan cemetery
  • The Chu state
  • Bronze weapons
  • Elemental compositions
  • Lead isotope ratios
  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

IMAGES

  1. Case study research design (based on Eisenhardt’s research framework

    multiple case study eisenhardt

  2. Process of Building Theory from Case Study Research (Eisenhardt, 1989

    multiple case study eisenhardt

  3. Eisenhardt's approach to multiple case study

    multiple case study eisenhardt

  4. Stages of case study research (Eisenhardt, 1998, p. 533).

    multiple case study eisenhardt

  5. Building Theories from Case Study Research Eisenhardt (1989) -- XMind

    multiple case study eisenhardt

  6. 1 Eisenhardt's case study road map as it is applied in this thesis

    multiple case study eisenhardt

VIDEO

  1. Speed is the LEAST important factor in a Case Interview #mckinsey #consulting #caseinterview

  2. Combining MRD assays with functional imaging in multiple myeloma

  3. Combinatorial CAR-T approaches being explored in multiple myeloma

  4. Kiera Wade Warren: Dissertation Defense_Baylor University_EdD in Learning and Organizational Change

  5. Prof Parry describes the paper "Building, Theories from Case Study Research" by Eisenhardt 1989

  6. BPE Multiple case scenarios

COMMENTS

  1. Building Theories from Case Study Research

    triangulation of multiple investigators, within-case and cross-case analyses, and the role of existing literature. The result is a more nearly ... Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, Building Theories from Case Study Research, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4 (Oct., 1989), pp. 532-550 ...

  2. What is the Eisenhardt Method, really?

    Abstract. This essay sharpens and refreshes the multi-case theory-building approach, sometimes termed The "Eisenhardt Method.". The Method's singular aim is theory building, especially with multiple cases and theoretical logic. Its defining features (e.g. research questions without obvious answers, careful case selection, well-identified ...

  3. What is the Eisenhardt Method, really?

    We used a single case study design with multiple units of analysis, which is suitable for studying a contemporary phenomenon within its real-life context (Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007;Yin, 2018 ...

  4. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges.

    In this commentary, we focus on the related research strategy of theory building from cases, particularly multiple cases. Scholars have used case studies to develop theory about topics as diverse as group process. Building theory from case studies is a research strategy that involves using one or more cases to create theoretical constructs, propositions and/or midrange theory from case-based ...

  5. What is the Eisenhardt Method, really?:

    What is the Eisenhardt Method, really?: Kathleen M. Eisenhardt. - 04 Feb 2021. - Strategic Organization. - Vol. 19, Iss: 1, pp 147-160. 218 Citations. TL;DR: In this article, the authors sharpened and refreshes the multi-case theory-building approach, sometimes termed Theisenhardt Method, which aims at theory building with multiple cases.

  6. Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.

    Professor Eisenhardt's contributions to multiple-case theory-building methods have been among the most significant of her generation. Her 1989 article on case study research, as well as further articles - 'Better stories and better constructs: the case for rigor and comparative logic' (Eisenhardt 1991) and 'Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges' (Eisenhardt and ...

  7. Eisenhardt's impact on theory in case study research

    Eisenhardt's (1989, p. 548) purpose for the article is "to describe the process of theory building from case studies". The article does so in a systematic way which compares theory building with case studies to hypothesis testing research. The present article summarizes Eisenhardt's (1989) article and highlights the contributions that ...

  8. What is the Eisenhardt Method, really?

    This essay sharpens and refreshes the multi-case theory-building approach, sometimes termed The "Eisenhardt Method." The Method's singular aim is theory building, especially with multiple cases and theoretical logic. Its defining features (e.g. research questions without obvious answers, careful case selection, well-identified constructs and relationships, theoretical arguments, boundary ...

  9. Eisenhardt's impact on theory in case study research

    Eisenhardt (1989) defines the case study approach as "a research strategy which focuses on understanding the dynamics present within single settings" (Eisenhardt, 1989, p. 534) and employs multiple levels of analysis and multiple types of data collection.According to Eisenhardt (1989), case study research may analyze data from one or more cases, and either from within one case or across ...

  10. PDF Building Theories from Case Study Research Kathleen M. Eisenhardt The

    The Case Study Approach The case study is a research strategy which focuses on understanding the dynamics present within single settings. Examples of case study research include Selznick's (1949) description of TVA, Allison's (197 1) study of the Cuban missile crisis, and Pettigrew's (1973) research on deci- sion making at a British retailer.

  11. Eisenhardt's approach to multiple case study

    Multiple case study is a prevalent approach in qualitative research, with Kathleen Eisenhardt's method being a notable example. Unlike quantitative research,...

  12. What you need to know about the Eisenhardt Method

    Eisenhardt recommends eight steps for developing theories from case study research: Getting started. Pick a focused research question and define any constructs (e.g. conflict, power) you want to ...

  13. What is the Eisenhardt Method, really?

    The Method's singular aim is theory building, especially with multiple cases and theoretical logic. Its defining features (e.g. research questions without obvious answers, careful case selection, ... This paper was Building Theories from Case Study Research (Eisenhardt, 1989a). Building Theories became more influential than I could have ever ...

  14. Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges

    K. Eisenhardt, Melissa E. Graebner. Published 1 February 2007. Business. Academy of Management Journal. TLDR. The research strategy of theory building from cases, particularly multiple cases, involves using one or more cases to create theoretical constructs, propositions, and/or midrange theory from case-based, empirical evidence. Expand.

  15. Toward a theory of team resource mobilization: A systematic review and

    Following the logic of multiple case study research (Eisenhardt, 1989), these features make empirical studies on agile teams suitable for theory development on questions related to resource mobilization. ... (60%) used qualitative methods such as multiple case studies (k = 20) and ethnographic approaches (k = 4). The average qualitative study ...

  16. What Is the Eisenhardt Method, Really?

    There are different types of case-based research methods that differ considerably in their basic assumptions and objectives. An example of such a method is the multi-case theory-building approach, which is based on the work of Kathleen M. Eisenhardt. Her 1989 article, which laid the foundation for this method, has been cited tens of thousands of times to date.

  17. Research Approach: Multiple-Case Study

    Abstract. To investigate innovation and reconfiguration happening in brick-and-mortar retail during the COVID-19 crisis, a multiple-case comparative research strategy was applied (Eisenhardt, 1991). In general, case studies use different perspectives and data sources to illustrate complex phenomena in a real-world context.

  18. Building Theories from Case Study Research

    This paper describes the process of inducting theory using case studies—from specifying the research questions to reaching closure. Some features of the process, such as problem definition and construct validation, are similar to hypothesis-testing research. Others, such as within-case analysis and replication logic, are unique to the inductive, case-oriented process. Overall, the process ...

  19. Methodologic and Data-Analysis Triangulation in Case Studies: A Scoping

    A case study relies on multiple sources of evidence, with data needing to converge in a triangulating fashion." 1(p15) This design is described as a stand-alone research approach equivalent to grounded theory and can entail single and multiple cases. 1,2 However, case study research should not be confused with single clinical case reports.

  20. Land

    The Tibetan Plateau and the adjacent mountain regions, renowned for their complex terrain, play a significant role in climate regulation, harbor extraordinarily high species richness, and are one of the world's major biodiversity hotspots [1,2].This region hosts diverse ecosystems and numerous endemic and rare species, providing irreplaceable ecosystem services and functions to humanity [3,4].

  21. Finding Theory-Method Fit: A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches

    Theory building from case studies (Eisenhardt, 1989a; Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007) ... A multiple-case study author has a much different writing challenge than a single-case author. Regarding page limits, a criticism of my work and the work of other multicase authors from some reviewers is, "We don't see enough description." ...

  22. Case study showcases effectiveness of multimodality approaches for

    A recent case report published in Cyborg Bionic Systems details the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) using multimodality diagnostic approaches, highlighting significant ...

  23. Higher education in the era of artificial intelligence: academic

    Higher education is crucial for the development of states and societies and improving the overall quality of life. However, entry into higher education is often influenced by factors beyond qualifications, and individuals in the field face suppression from the controlling parties. These challenges undermine the value of education and the integrity of democratic processes like elections. In ...

  24. Comprehensive assessment of current municipal solid waste ...

    Chennai city has implemented numerous strategies and plans to effectively manage the municipal solid waste by the municipal corporation. One of the prime strategy is the establishment of public-private partnership schemes, which play a crucial role in enhancing waste management practices. This case study focus to assess the conservancy operations carried out by multiple stakeholders in order ...

  25. Toward Developing a Framework for Conducting Case Study Research

    All in all, we believe that in using the case study research as a methodology we have two types: single case study or multiple case study which follows a replication logic. ... (Eisenhardt, 1989). Whichever case selection strategy is used as the underlying principle common to all of these strategies is selecting information-rich cases.

  26. What is the Eisenhardt Method, really?

    This essay sharpens and refreshes the multi-case theory-building approach, sometimes termed The "Eisenhardt Method.". The Method's singular aim is theory building, especially with multiple cases and theoretical logic. Its defining features (e.g. research questions without obvious answers, careful case selection, well-identified constructs ...

  27. The production of bronze weapons in the Chu state: a case study of

    During the Eastern Zhou Dynasty (770-222 BC), a large number of bronze arrowheads were unearthed from the Chu tombs, which is of great significance to the study of bronze weapons in the Chu state. However, little is known about the production technology, mode, and provenance of the raw materials for bronze weapons in the Chu state. Therefore, we conducted archaeometallurgical analyses of 16 ...

  28. What is the Eisenhardt Method, really?

    And this fit with my own work. For example, Kaye Schoonhoven and I used insights from my strategic decision-making case studies (e.g. Eisenhardt, 1989b) for the theoretical arguments in our deductive econometrics-based paper on venture growth (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1990). Yet I now realize that many deductive researchers are neither able ...