apple inc managing a global supply chain case study

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

• You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
• You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
• You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
• A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

• Programs Overview
• MSc in Management
• Full-Time MBA
• Accelerated MBA
• Accelerated MBA for HBAs
• Executive MBA
• Master of Management in Analytics
• The Ivey Academy
• Pre-Ivey Experiences
• Ivey Asia - Executive Education
• Faculty & Research Overview
• Faculty Directory
• Area Groups
• Centres & Institutes
• Ivey Impact
• Purpose, Mission and Values
• Strategic Planning
• Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion
• Careers at Ivey
• Ivey Idea Forum
• Media Centre
• Contact Communications
• Alumni Overview
• Get Involved
• Benefits & Services

Apple Inc.: Global Supply Chain Management

Nov 12, 2020

• Apple Podcasts

Fraser Johnson , professor of operations management at the Ivey Business School, joins host Matt Quin to take another look at his  award-winning  case,  Apple Inc.: Managing a Global Supply Chain  (2014), as well as the recently published update,  Apple Inc.: Global Supply Chain Management  (2020).  In this episode, Johnson and Quin discuss Apple's business model, how he has brought the company into the classroom over the years, and why junior faculty ought to consider writing cases. Professor Johnson is the Leenders Supply Chain Management Association Chair at the Ivey Business School, Western University, where he teaches courses in supply chain management and operations. Johnson is also the Director of the  Ivey Purchasing Managers Index , one of the most widely watched and utilized indicators of future economic activity in Canada.

Hi, I'm at Quinn. Thanks for joining us for decision point from Ivy Publishing at the Ivy Business School. Today we returned to another award winning and best selling case. Apple INC managing a global supply chain, originally published in two thousand and fourteen. Authoring Professor Frasier Johnson from the Ivy Business School, presents a snapshot of Apple up against competitors such as blackberry and Samsu. Unlike other companies with leading supply chains, such as Walmart, apple's approach to supply chain strategy and supplier management padded, investing far less in assets to support distribution. Instead, the company is now famous for its focus on innovation, new product development and brand management. In this episode we ask Professor Johnson about how apple was able to use its business model and supply chain strategy to help it continue capturing significant value from hardware sales. We also take a look at the updated two thousand and twenty case in the increased complexity for apple as it continues to add services in products to compete in the mature smartphone market. I hope you enjoyed today's episode. So, Frasier, thanks very much for joining us today. Apple was a really different company in two thousand and fourteen. What prompted you to write the case then, and how have you audit what's changed as you've taught it throughout the years? Well, apples a fascinating company. A lot of the cases that are done in the supply chain area tend to be with traditional manufacturing companies like Toyota or large retailers like Walmart, and one of the things that really interested me about apple was or business model with the IPHONE, with these annual product introductions, with big spikes in demand, and exactly how were they able to get their supply chain organized to be able to meet these big peaks in demand that they were facing. So the great thing about cases is it puts the student in the seat of a protagonist. This particular case Examines Apple from the perspective of Jessica Grant. She's an analyst with a Toronto based Money Management Firm. You, as an author, did a great job of giving students a primer of how apple was able to reach the margins with the iphones through supplier relationships and really tight coordination of the supply chain. Can you remind listeners what's at stake in the case for apple when it was set in two thousand and fourteen. Well, apple was one of the early innovators in the smartphone business and if you take a look at what's happened to the company over the last decade or so, the iphone is a way that apple connects with their consumers. Those they do things like sell services to individuals. Really, you know, the analogy that I use in the teaching note is that the iphone represents the the the razor that they used to be able to sell the blades to the consumers. So as apple looks to expand as market in the smartphone business, really what it does is give them a platform to be able to connect with their consumers. And from the students perspective, you're putting them in the role of the analyst in the case allows them to take a look at the entire business operation as opposed to taking the role of a functional executive with a specific functional related problem. So let's talk teaching notes for a second, because you've written a lot of case as many of them are best sellers. Let's dive into the teaching note part of this. In the teaching note you mentioned flexibility as a key part of the apple supplier management strategy. With recently apple moving away from mentell process. There's in away from Samsung as a screen supplier. It seems that the company is really continuing to embrace this approach of flexibility. What do you see in the company? Back in two thousand and seven when apple launched the iphone, they basically outsourced everything. HMM. So to bring a iphone to market they had to work closely with their suppliers. And the other interesting part of this is a short product life cycle of the IPHONE. They bring a new product ote every year and that was one of the it's one of the other important parts of the case. How do you work with suppliers where you're constantly launching and relaunching a new product every year, in selling product in the in the millions? So if you take a look at a company like Walmart, for example, they practice every day low pricing, so they try to minimize the bull whip effect and provide stable demand so they can work with their suppliers to reduce their total costs. Apples a complete opposite. They embrace variability. They have, as I said earlier, these annual releases with huge product introductions, with high volumes and then volumes taper off slowly until they bring out a new product and repeat the process all over again. And so you've built this in these comparators, in in the narratives. So one of the things that we know is important about the uptake of a case, in the sales of a case, is also the teaching note, and you write great teaching notes. You've mentioned apple versus Walmart. What are some other things that you try to include in a teaching note to help a faculty member use it in the classroom? What are your keys to success? Well, you know, what you want is, as somebody writing a case, to have a teaching note that resonates with other instructors. So when I say resonates, it's got to be something that they can relate to. It doesn't want to be so complicated that when they read the case and then take a look at the teaching note, become intimidated with the material that they see. They have to be able to understand it. They'd be had to be able to translate the material that you provided the teaching note into a classroom setting, so being able to talk about the issues at instructors face, including a teaching strategy appropriate questions to ask as part of delivery of the material are all very important. The other thing that I think is important to recognize is it before the case is completed, you've also got to write the teaching note. So don't publish the case and then come back to the teaching note a month later or two months later. Rate both documents simultaneously, because you have to use your teaching note as a quality control check to make sure that there's enough information in the case for the students and the instructors to be able to complete the analysis properly. And I know something you've done and our other colleagues have done is way to finalize that teaching note, if you will, until you've taught it a couple times and see how certain questions go or there might be some new information that comes out that you can include. So I know you've done that a few times as well. Right. Yeah, for many of the cases that I've written I will go back to the great staff at I've publishing and make revisions to the teaching note and perhaps to the case I'm talking about, minor at it to make in case issues have come up in the class discussion and I can help clarify the case by making qualifying statements. Sometimes when you're right a case, even with the editing process that you go through, sometimes students don't always interpret the information properly. So gives me a chance to be able to go back in and, you know, just a couple of sentences put not tend to clarify what certain peoples of data mean. For example, one of the tips that you gave is to try to not make things overly complicated. At the time of the case there's a lot happening at at apple with the five c being released. Profit margins were down slightly from, you know, two thousand and nine to two thousand and eleven. What do you think of and consider as you're writing a case to maintain that focus without, you know, there's a lot that you can put in a case. How do you remain so focused as an author? Well, I think that you're right a case in a particular point of time and as you as you say, you know, a lot has happened at apple in the last decade, or I guess thirteen years, since they brought out the first iphone, and you know the way that I view a lot of cases. You like my one an apple my other cases on Walmart and Amazon, is that they're almost live cases in the sense that, you know, I keep crack of what's going on in these organizations throughout the year before I teach the case so that we can use the information in the case is kind of a launching board, but we can also I can also incorporate through the introduction of power point slides, for example, and other information in terms of more recent developments. In the case of Apple, you see them, for example, insourcing more product buying the chip division from Intel and moving more to insourcing mode as opposed to an outsourcing mode, and that's the kind of stuff that you can incorporate into the class discussion. You've mentioned that you've released an updated case, which is great. We encourage faculty to do that and authors to do that. We welcome that and it's a smart thing to do because the cases evolve, the companies evolved in the situations, in the environment that the business is working evolved as well. Could you talk a little bit about the new case and the new complexities for Apple? Is As we sit here, in two thousand and twenty I wrote the first apple case, as you stated earlier, in two thousand and fourteen and if you take a look at what was happening to apple at that point, the sales for iphones were on the upsway and you know, if apple had a problem at that point, it was simply keeping up with demand. Now, if you take a look at what's happening in two thousand and twenty, the situation that the company faces and the challenges for its supply chain or are a lot different. As we talked about earlier, it's more moved to more of an insourcing model. On the other side of it, sales of the IPHONE are now starting to flatten out and the smartphone market is starting to mature. So we've see in back in two thousand and fourteen, apple competing in an environment where the markets growing margins are pretty healthy and it's having trouble keeping up with the man to in two thousand and twenty, where you're facing consecutive years of sales declines of the IPHONE and a maturing market with a lot of price pressure on margins. The other thing that you see with apple in two thousand and twenty compared to two thousand and fourteen is an increased emphasis on services. So one of the things that we can talk about in the new case is how does apple manage its services supply chain? So it really gives you a double edge. On one side we can talk about changes to the iphone and what apple does to manage its iphone successfully, but also how do they use the iphone in terms of its relationships and connectivity with its customers as part of its services supply chain? I've mentioned before how popular this case is. It's been climbing up the best seller list for years. Why do you think that is it? Is it the brand? Is it because the student can hold this thing in their hands and have a relation with with the company? What do you think is made us so popular? You know, I like to say cases like this teach themselves, and you know it's an overused line maybe in some areas, but students are familiar with the company, instructors are familiar with the company. The brand is strong. Even students that don't necessarily get excited about coming to class and talking in a case discussion do like the technology companies and I think there's something in the case for people that most people, particularly students, can relate to in terms of the technology and how they use their iphones and even the debate among the students in the class, among the iphone users versus the non iphone users. So every time I teach the case I ask you know, who's using apple products, and iphones included, and who's not using them, and why is that? You know, why do you like apple? Why do you use your products? On the other end of the spectrum, who are the Anti Apple people and why have they made a conscious decision not to participate in what I call in my new case apple ecosystem? And that kind of allows us to talk about the company strategy, which then evolves into a further more detailed discussion about how they're able to support Tho strategy with their supply chain capabilities. Yeah, it's a very accessible for for students of many Undergrad students, Grad students, high school students, can they can all take a different approach with it, but apple is a company is pretty accessible. Have there been any challenges or surprises when you've taught this where you go, oh, that's a different perspective or I have to remember to the include that in my next version of the case. Anything that comes to mind. The major event for me was in two thousand and nineteen as I was teaching the case and my supply chain management elective. And you know, as I'm standing up in front of the class talking about what's happening with a company in two thousand and nineteen, about exactly how much it changed at at Apple, and you know that point. You know after I, as I do after every class, I make notes to myself in terms of things that I want to remember for the following year, I made the decision that I commit the time to updating the case and writing and ended up doing that writing the case this year. So to me, you know, when you deal with cases like apple, you know a lot of the changes and things that happen, both in the classroom as a result of what happens at the company and as part of your preparation in terms of teaching the case. Is kind of evolutionary. Is of most revolutionary. Yeah, but eventually, you know, with companies like this, you do reach a point where you've got to think about revising the product, and that's one thing I want to give as a really good tip, and I don't want to overlook this, I'm just looking at some notes I've got here, is that the importance of immediately after the class, taking down notes as an instructor H who's either taught this case a number of times or just new to it. All the great case teachers that I've seen makeup point immediately, even at the breaks, of writing down some notes about ways it could be done differently or different things to approach or something that didn't go so well. So I want to make sure that if we hit that point for those that are listening, because that's such a great tip that I don't want to overlook. So anything else that you make a point of doing right before class or during a break or right after the class as a process for case teaching? Yeah, yeah, I think that this is maybe a minor point, but I think a relevant one. I think regardless of how many times you've taught a case and regardless of whether or not you're the one that wrote the case, and sometimes I think people that write cases can be too overconfident in terms of their level of understanding with the material to invest the time before class to get ready, regret, regardless of how many times you've taught the case. So don't just pick the file up and walk into class. US remind yourself about the essential details of the case and the case facts and think about how you're going to manage the conversation with the student. And, as I said earlier the debrief after class, every time I teach a case, I sit in my office after class and make note to my teach on the front of my teaching plan in terms of things that I would adjuster do differently or things that I want to remind myself worked well and to do. And that regular pays off, because I've seen you teach. You've welcome to a lot of our team members from I be publishing to watch a teach. So I've seen it at work. As we wrap up today on the discussion, I want to come back to the writing of cases. Do you have anything that stands out to you that you wish somebody had told you when you were just starting to write cases? Any any tips for new case writers as they ventured down this road? I think that you, as a new faculty member, writing cases is a is a great way to first of all learn about management practice and if you're writing feel cases working with companies in terms of material or case development, it gives you a chance to be able to talk to managers about some of the issues that they're facing and it keeps you current and, you know, being able to and you can do that through your research, certainly, but writing cases is another way to be able to stay in touch with what's going on in terms of management practice. The second point is a writing cases helps you establish credibility with your students. Students pay attention to the material that's being used in terms of the case studies, and if your name's on the author list of the case study that they're using, it tells the students that you know you're doing work in this area. These chances are they're probably not reading your research and helps establish some credibility in terms of your familiarity with the subject matter and the material that you're using in class. Well, that's fantastic. Thank you so much, Frasier, for taking the time to speak with us and, moreover, working with our team on publishing cases and bringing cases to the class. I know when we get a submission from you, our team always enjoys the process, so thank you for that as well. It's my pleasure. Thanks for the great job that everybody to I be publishing, does and supporting the word that the faculty does in terms of writing and publishing cases. If you enjoyed today's episode, subscribe to Decision Point on spotify or wherever you listen. Be sure to check out the show notes for links to cases, resources and more. have any feedback, send us an email at cases at IV DOC A.

• Ivey Publishing

Product details

Teaching and learning

Time period, geographical setting, featured company, featured protagonist.

• Jessica Grant (female), Analyst

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

APPLE INC.: MANAGING A GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN 1

Related Papers

Hemerson M Ramos

In December 1980, Apple Inc. went public presenting an initial price share of $22. Within minutes, the company’s market price was worth $1.78bn, marking a financial trend that culminated in Apple’s actual worth value of $1 trillion (Neate, 2015). The company’s core values, base for the formulation of Apple’s strategies, are undoubtedly responsible for its current success in the high-tech market, being perceived by stakeholders worldwide as a disruptive company in terms of innovation, technology and design (Gustin, 2015). Gendron (2012) notes that in order to evaluate the success of a company, it becomes imperative the utilisation of business analysis tools. Therefore, this report will discuss how Apple’s strategies have been used to build and sustain competitive advantage, allowing the company to become a benchmark to all players in the technological market. Moreover, while not offering recommendations, this paper intends not only to highlight Apple’s strategies for success, but also to present some of the issues faced by the company in the adoption of certain strategic decisions. Finally, the methodology employed in this investigation consists in the utilisation of theoretical tools such as SWOT, Porter’s Five Forces, Value Chain and Three Horizons. An evaluation of the usefulness of these strategic tools is presented, proposing a discussion in relation to the effectiveness of frameworks created in an ‘analogic’ world in the current ever-changing reality we live in.

The Oxford Handbook of the Corporation

Martijn Boersma

Many of the great international corporations of the past have now largely been disembodied into global value chains. This chapter considers the implications of the continued advance of global value chains as the mode of production for an increasing number of goods and services, and how this has impacted considerably on the economies and societies both of the developed world and the emerging economies. In turn, this has transformed corporations themselves into largely finance, design, and marketing agencies which are often distant from the production and operations which they ultimately control. While the globalization of production has brought employment and economic growth to many developing countries, it is also associated with exploitative employment relations, environmental irresponsibility, and recurrent ethical dilemmas. While corporations may disaggregate production in distant networks of contractors, they cannot as readily disaggregate the moral responsibility for the social and environmental impact of their mode of production.

Scot King , Bruce Holman , Marilyn Gates

Samuel Roscoe

Johnna Montgomerie

This paper uses a business model framework to analyze the main limitations of Apple Inc. post-2003, a significant turning point in the company's history. As such, we move beyond an exclusive focus on what makes Apple unique or different by evaluating the mundane and out-dated elements of its business model. To do so, we examine the end-to-end supply chain, from source to store, to present a more holistic evaluation of the Apple business model. Drawing on the existing literature, we argue that the quintessential element of the Apple business model is its ability to ‘own the consumer’. In short, the Apple business model is designed to drive consumers into its ecosystem and then hold them there, which has been hugely successful to date and has allowed Apple to wield enormous power in the end-to-end supply chain. We demonstrate this through a detailed evaluation of Apple's physical and content supply chains and its retailing strategy. Moreover, we find that the very business processes that enable unparalleled corporate control bring with them new problems that Apple has thus far been unable, or unwilling, to adequately address.

Thomas Clarke , Martijn Boersma

The continued advance of global value chains as the mode of production for an increasing number of goods and services has impacted considerably on the economies and societies both of the developed world and the emerging economies. Although there have been many efforts at reform there is evidence of unresolved dilemmas of human rights, environmental issues and ethical dilemmas in the operation of the global value chain. This paper focuses on the role and performance of Apple Inc in the global value chain in Asia. Apple is the most successful corporation on earth measured in financial terms and yet has failed to find a solution to recurrent employment and environmental problems occurring in plants manufacturing Apple components. This analysis informs the current theoretical debate on the development of the global value chain and the continuing institutional failure that leaves employees vulnerable and the environment neglected.

New Technology, Work and Employment

Ngai PUN , Mark Selden

Piyantha Kumara

Operation Management is very important disciplined in production and service sector business to prosper. This paper discussed the three important strategic dimensions as design good services, quality management and supply chain management of the world giant digital company Microsoft Corporation. The study found that Microsoft has correctly handled the strategic areas of operation management and well manage them. Especially Microsoft used the right blend of human resources and advance technology for success especially artificial intelligence and industry 4.0. Microsoft processing strong strength areas such as the leader in the cloud business, highest global presence, a large number of product portfolios and brand equity are some strong area. To compare and contrast the 4Vs concept with Microsoft, the researcher has selected it is one of the closest competitor International Business Machines (IBM) corporation and found both of the performing very well in the industry having its individual culture and highly recognized their flagship brand due to own identity.

Seamus Grimes National University of Ireland, Galway

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Ayman Fouad

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

• Case Studies

Technology & Operations

Apple Inc.: Global Supply Chain Management

Apple Inc.: Global Supply Chain Management ^ W20472

Are you an educator.

Register as a Premium Educator at hbsp.harvard.edu , plan a course, and save your students up to 50% with your academic discount.

Product Description

Publication Date: June 01, 2020

Source: Ivey Publishing

Industry: Telecom

This case focuses on the supply chain strategy of Apple Inc. (Apple). Set in early 2020, it provides a detailed description of the company's supply chain network and capabilities. Data in the case allows students to develop an understanding of Apple's source of competitiveness and to gain insights into the management of a large, complex global supply chain network that focused on the intersection of services, hardware and software. Students will obtain an understanding of the supply chain challenges faced by Apple, in the context of supporting its corporate strategy and growth objectives.

This Product Also Appears In

Buy together, related products.

Apple Inc.: Managing a Global Supply Chain

Lucent Technologies: Global Supply Chain Management

Coats: Supply Chain Challenges

Copyright permissions.

If you'd like to share this PDF, you can purchase copyright permissions by increasing the quantity.

Order for your team and save!