collaborative problem solving skills

A Framework for Teachable Collaborative Problem Solving Skills

• First Online: 01 January 2014

Cite this chapter

• Friedrich Hesse 5 ,
• Esther Care 6 ,
• Juergen Buder 5 ,
• Kai Sassenberg 5 &
• Patrick Griffin 6  

Part of the book series: Educational Assessment in an Information Age ((EAIA))

14k Accesses

101 Citations

8 Altmetric

In his book “Cognition in the Wild”, Hutchins (1995) invites his readers to scan their immediate environment for objects that were not produced through collaborative efforts of several people, and remarks that the only object in his personal environment that passed this test was a small pebble on his desk. In fact, it is remarkable how our daily lives are shaped by collaboration. Whether it is in schools, at the workplace, or in our free time, we are constantly embedded in environments that require us to make use of social skills in order to coordinate with other people. Given the pervasiveness of collaboration in everyday life, it is somewhat surprising that the development of social and collaborative skills is largely regarded as something that will occur naturally and does not require any further facilitation. In fact, groups often fail to make use of their potential (Schulz-Hardt, Brodbeck, Group performance and leadership. In: Hewstone M, Stroebe W, Jonas K (eds) Introduction to social psychology: a European perspective, 4th edn, pp 264–289. Blackwell, Oxford, 2008) and people differ in the extent to which they are capable of collaborating efficiently with others. Therefore, there is a growing awareness that collaborative skills require dedicated teaching efforts (Schoenfeld, Looking toward the 21st century: challenges of educational theory and practice. Edu Res 28:4–14, 1999). Collaborative problem solving has been identified as a particularly promising task that draws upon various social and cognitive skills, and that can be analysed in classroom environments where skills are both measurable and teachable.

This chapter provides a conceptual framework of collaborative problem solving that is informed by findings from fields of research as diverse as cognitive science, education, social psychology and psycholinguistics.

• Social Skill
• Problem Solver
• Problem Space
• Knowledge Building

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

The acronym ATC21S TM has been globally trademarked. For purposes of simplicity the acronym is presented throughout the chapter as ATC21S.

Brodbeck, F. C., & Greitemeyer, T. (2000). Effects of individual versus mixed individual and group experience in rule induction on group member learning and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36 (6), 621–648.

Article   Google Scholar  

Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Reiner & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Google Scholar  

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language . Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Book   Google Scholar  

Clark, H. H., & Murphy, G. L. (1982). Audience design in meaning and reference. Advances in Psychology, 9 , 287–299.

Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64 , 1–35.

Crowston, K., Rubleske, J., & Howison, J. (2006). Coordination theory: A ten-year retrospective. In P. Zhang & D. Galletta (Eds.), Human-computer interaction in management information systems (pp. 120–138). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

De Wit, F. R. C., & Greer, L. L. (2008). The black-box deciphered: A meta-analysis of team diversity, conflict, and team performance. In Academy of Management best paper proceedings , Anaheim.

Dehler, J., Bodemer, D., Buder, J., & Hesse, F. W. (2011). Guiding knowledge communication in CSCL via group knowledge awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (3), 1068–1078.

Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 (3), 497–509.

Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford: Elsevier.

Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect . Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–236). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53 (1), 5–26.

Griffin, P. (2014). Performance assessment of higher order thinking. Journal of Applied Measurement, 15 (1), 1–16.

Gunzelmann, G., & Anderson, J. R. (2003). Problem solving: Increased planning with practice. Cognitive Systems Research, 4 , 57–76.

Gurtner, A., Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., & Nägele, C. (2007). Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102 (2), 127–142.

Hastie, R., & Pennington, N. (1991). Cognitive and social processes in decision making. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 308–327). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Hayes-Roth, B., & Hayes-Roth, F. (1979). A cognitive model of planning. Cognitive Science, 3 , 275–310.

Higgins, E. T. (1981). Role taking and social judgment: Alternative developmental perspectives and processes. In J. H. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.), Social cognitive development: Frontiers and possible futures (pp. 119–153). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conception of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121 , 43–64.

Horton, W. S., & Keysar, B. (1996). When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition, 59 , 91–117.

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (1998). Cooperation in the classroom . Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., & Thelen, N. (2001). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80 (4), 557–571.

Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (4), 681–706.

Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20 , 403–437.

Larson, J. R., Jr., & Christensen, C. (1993). Groups as problem-solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32 , 5–30.

Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22 , 177–189.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R. (1983). Thinking, problem solving, cognition . New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behaviour . New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Nardi, B. A. (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving . Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Norton, R. (1975). Measurement of ambiguity tolerance. Journal of Personality Assessment, 39 (6), 607–619.

OECD. (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills: A new framework for assessment . Paris: OECD.

Peterson, R. S., & Behfar, K. J. (2005). Leadership as group regulation. In D. M. Messick & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), The psychology of leadership: New perspectives and research (pp. 143–162). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1962). The psychology of the child . New York: Basic Books.

Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it . Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2 (3), 235–276.

Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Heidelberg: Springer.

Salomon, G. (Ed.). (1993). Distributed cognitions . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999). Looking toward the 21st century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28 , 4–14.

Schulz-Hardt, S., & Brodbeck, C. F. (2008). Group performance and leadership. In M. Hewstone, W. Stroebe, & K. Jonas (Eds.), Introduction to social psychology: A European perspective (4th ed., pp. 264–289). Oxford: Blackwell.

Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27 (2), 4–13.

Star, J. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2008). Flexibility in problem solving: The case of equation solving. Learning and Instruction, 18 (6), 565–579.

Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (6), 1467–1478.

Stasser, G., & Vaughan, S. I. (1996). Models of participation during face-to-face unstructured discussion. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups (Vol. 1, pp. 165–192). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group processes and productivity . New York: Academic.

Thompson, L. L., Wang, J., & Gunia, B. C. (2010). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 61 , 491–515.

Trötschel, R., Hüffmeier, J., Loschelder, D. D., Schwartz, K., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2011). Perspective taking as a means to overcome motivational barriers in negotiations: When putting oneself into the opponent’s shoes helps to walk toward agreements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101 (4), 771.

Van Gundy, A. B. (1987). Creative problem solving: A guide for trainers and management . Westport: Greenwood Press.

Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58 , 515–541.

Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 , 1008–1022.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wegner, D. M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–205). New York: Springer.

Weinstein, E. A. (1969). The development of interpersonal competence. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 753–775). Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.

Weldon, E., & Weingart, L. R. (1993). Group goals and group performance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32 (4), 307–334.

Wittenbaum, G. W., Hollingshead, A. B., & Betero, I. C. (2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71 , 286–310.

Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115 , 323–345.

Zuckerman, M., Kernis, M. H., Guarnera, S. M., Murphy, J. F., & Rappoport, L. (1983). The egocentric bias: Seeing oneself as cause and target of others’ behavior. Journal of Personality, 51 (4), 621–630.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Knowledge Media Research Center, Tübingen, Germany

Friedrich Hesse, Juergen Buder & Kai Sassenberg

Assessment Research Centre, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

Esther Care & Patrick Griffin

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Friedrich Hesse .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Assessment Research Centre, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Patrick Griffin

Esther Care

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., Griffin, P. (2015). A Framework for Teachable Collaborative Problem Solving Skills. In: Griffin, P., Care, E. (eds) Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Educational Assessment in an Information Age. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7_2

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7_2

Published : 06 September 2014

Publisher Name : Springer, Dordrecht

Print ISBN : 978-94-017-9394-0

Online ISBN : 978-94-017-9395-7

eBook Packages : Humanities, Social Sciences and Law Education (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research