How To Write An Editorial

Barbara P

Learn How to Write an Editorial on Any Topic

13 min read

Published on: Dec 23, 2019

Last updated on: Nov 22, 2023

How to Write an Editorial

People also read

Get Better at Math: Solving Math Problems Quick and Easy

Best Tips on How to Avoid Plagiarism

How to Write a Movie Review - Guide & Examples

A Complete Guide on How to Write a Summary for Students

Write Opinion Essay Like a Pro: A Detailed Guide

Evaluation Essay - Definition, Examples, and Writing Tips

How to Write a Thematic Statement - Tips & Examples

How to Write a Bio - Quick Tips, Structure & Examples

How to Write a Synopsis – A Simple Format & Guide

How to Write a Comparative Essay – A Complete Guide

Visual Analysis Essay - A Writing Guide with Format & Sample

List of Common Social Issues Around the World

Writing Character Analysis - Outline, Steps, and Examples

11 Common Types of Plagiarism Explained Through Examples

Article Review Writing: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide with Examples

A Detailed Guide on How to Write a Poem Step by Step

Detailed Guide on Appendix Writing: With Tips and Examples

Share this article

Are you interested in learning how to effectively shape your perspective in an editorial that holds the power to persuade people?

Having the ability to influence people’s views and perspectives through your writing is an admirable talent. But not everyone is blessed with this talent!

Well, an editorial expresses your opinion about any current topic with the aim of persuading the reader to see things from your perspective. 

In this blog, we’ll introduce you to the 4 types of editorials and an easy step-by-step procedure on how to write a compelling editorial. Also, you’ll benefit from the editorial examples and tips we’ve included.

So, let’s get going! 

On This Page On This Page -->

What is an Editorial?

An editorial is a newspaper article that contains and explains the author’s ideas. It can be written on any topic, but usually covers social issues. For an editorial, you always have to provide enough evidence from credible sources.

Editorials are featured in magazines and journals as well. Here the editors make claims or aim to create discussion about their publication. They express viewpoints and analyze trending topics critically. 

A well-written editorial must contain the problem’s description and the possible solutions to the problem. When writing about a specific issue, the writer is expected to give recommendations. 

You should create a message for those who are suffering from that issue and what it takes to improve the situation. Besides, you get a chance to speak to the government and request them to take measures to solve the problem. 

Remember that an editorial is different from an article. Read the comparison below for a better understanding. 

What is the Difference between an Editorial and an Article? 

Both an editorial and an article are the parts of a newspaper. While many people believe that both are the same, there are some key differences between them. 

As said before, an editorial is written by the editor in charge of the newspaper and expresses the views of the editor or the editorial board.

It is an opinionated piece of writing, and it is written to influence the thought process and viewpoint of the readers.

All the other news in a newspaper are called articles. These could be news articles, sports news, or any other relevant news. Usually, it is fact-based, as the writer will have a narrow chance of adding their opinion.

Now, let’s see what are the 4 types of editorials. 

Types of Editorial

Although the goal of an editorial is to somehow persuade the readers, there are some types of editorial styles. They are:

  • Interpret and Explain: This type focuses on providing analysis, background information, and interpretation of a particular issue or event. It aims to help readers comprehend complex topics or developments.
  • Persuade : This type of editorial is written with the sole aim of persuading people to change their viewpoints or to undertake an action. With reasoning, evidence, and facts, the author portrays the solution to a specific issue. 
  • Criticize : This editorial type highlights the issues or shortcomings in a person, decision, or action. The goal is to highlight the problem and suggest a possible solution. 
  • Praise : In a praising editorial, the author commends and shows praise for a person, idea, or organization. The focus is on highlighting the positive aspects of the subject.  

Now, let’s dive into the steps you should take to write a compelling editorial. 

Order Essay

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That's our Job!

How to Write an Editorial Article?

The following steps will help you in writing an editorial piece that can persuade readers to agree with your opinion. 

Step 1. Choose a Topic

Editorials aim to promote critical thinking and persuade people to change their minds on a topic by influencing their opinions. Make sure to choose an interesting topic, a controversial subject, or something that has a purpose.

Controversial topics are a great way to stir debate and get the readers engaged right from the start. With opinion pieces, you have to focus on recent stories that people are talking about. 

Step 2. Research Thoroughly 

Take time and research all aspects of your topic and find all the reasons behind the issue. Look for relevant evidence and examples to support your opinion. Gather all the latest facts and information from credible sources. 

Step 3. Pick a Side 

Make sure to pick a side and create a valid opinion to know what you are talking about. For a valid opinion, you must come up with logical reasoning. Pay careful attention to this step and provide clear reasons to show why your side is the right one. 

Step 4. Define Your Thesis Statement 

After picking your side, articulate your main message or opinion in a concise thesis statement . This statement should address the core argument you will be making in your editorial.

Step 5. Build a Strong Argument 

Now it’s time to structure your argument and back it up with facts. Each point you will address in your argument should correspond to your thesis statement. 

Using examples to support your arguments is a great way to increase the strength of your claims.

Step 6. Consider the Counterargument 

It is a good practice to consider and acknowledge the opposing arguments that relate to your topic of discussion. For a balanced outlook, you should include opposing views in your editorial.

Your editorial will give an unbiased and thoughtful outlook to the reader if you include opposing opinions.

Step 7. Start Writing the Editorial 

After coming up with a valid opinion and supportive arguments, it is time to start the actual writing process. Make sure this writing is short and clear so that the readers do not get bored and easily understand your point of view. 

Start your editorial with a strong hook to catch the reader’s attention right from the start. You can also start your editorial with a question, quote, or summary of what the editorial is all about. 

The body of your work should objectively explain the issue and why the situation is important to handle. Try to cover all the bases and include facts and quotations from credible sources. 

Conclude your editorial with a noteworthy statement. In this section, you can again include quotations or a question to make the ending worth remembering. 

Step 8. Edit and Proofread 

It is essential to go through your writing multiple times and make sure it's free from grammar, punctuation, and spelling mistakes. If you are unable to do this on your own then ask someone else for feedback so that no errors slip by. 

The PDFs below can help you understand how to write an editorial title and pitch to keep the readers hooked throughout the document.

How to Write an Editorial Pitch

How To Write an Editorial Title

How to Write an Editorial for a Journal?

For a journal editorial, there are slightly different rules and criteria that the article and editorial writers have to follow.

For a journal editorial, follow the below guidelines:

Step 1. Choose a Thought-Provoking Topic 

Since an editorial is a thoughtful piece of writing, you must choose a significant topic and strike a thought in the readers. The topic should be as per the nature and topic of the journal, as if it is a medical journal; you must choose a topic belonging to the medical field.

Step 2. Add the Introduction and Thesis of the Chosen Issue 

Introduce the editorial's issue or topic and incorporate a thesis statement outlining the subject matter. An editorial aims to uncover and present an issue, delving into its significance, effects, and potential solutions.

Step 3. Explain the Background of the Problem 

It is common knowledge that every problem has a background. In this section of the editorial, mention and explain the background of the said issue. 

Also, answer the following questions:

How did it occur?  What are its consequences and effects?  What is its impact on the larger public? 

These are some of the questions that you will need to address and answer in this section.

Step 4. Present the Main Argument with Evidence 

Highlight the main points you wish to discuss and substantiate them with relevant evidence. Seek credibility by referencing previous publications and online sources, strengthening the points articulated in the editorial.

Step 5. Write the Conclusion of your Editorial 

The conclusion is the last section of the editorial, and this is where you will conclude your editorial. Finally, wind it up by adding a call to action and personal viewpoint by proposing ways to manage the discussed issue.

Look at this PDF below to understand how to write an impressive editorial for a medical journal.

How to Write an Editorial for A Medical Journal

If you’re a student who needs an editorial for school newspapers, you can get help from the below example to up your editorial writing game.

How to Write An Editorial for Students

How to Write an Editorial for a Newspaper

How to Write an Editorial Letter?

An editorial letter is a letter to the editor of the newspaper, magazine, or any other daily publication. These letters are an important part of a publication, as they represent the voice of the general public.

Usually, these letters are either added on the first page of the newspaper or the last page. 

To write an editorial letter, follow the below steps:

Step 1. Start the Letter with a Salutation

For this, you do not need to know the name of the editor. You can simply add ‘ Letter to the Editor’ as a salutation. However, if you know the name of the editor, then use the name.

Step 2. Start with an Engaging Sentence

The opening is important to grab the attention of the readers. Instead of beating around the bush, get to the point. Tell the reader about the subject of your letter and make it convincing for them.

Step 3. Explain the Importance of the Issue 

Remember that you are writing the letter because you think the issue is significant in your eyes. You have to explain why the issue is significant because the reader may not feel the same emotions. So briefly outline the background and importance of the issue.

Why do you feel that the issue needs to be addressed? Why are you writing this letter? Answer the questions in plain and simple language so that your readers can understand them easily.

Step 4. Provide Relevant Evidence

Provide proof and evidence about the issue that you are discussing. Some key evidence could be found in the cuttings of the newspapers and magazines. Use them to highlight the issue and the need for its solution.

Step 5. Add your Suggestions about the Issues 

What are your thoughts about the issue in question? What do you think should be done to handle the situation? Answer these questions by expressing your views, and giving suggestions to solve the issue. 

Step 6. Keep the Letter Brief and Concise 

Shorter and more focused letters are more likely to be accepted for publication. Once you are done with the letter’s writing, read it and see if anything could be deducted.

In case you feel that the issue will not be covered in an editorial letter, ask the editor to allow you to write a guest column or a feature.

Step 7. Add your Signature 

Newspapers and other publications do not like and publish anonymous letters. After you are done with the writing part, add your full name, contact number, email address, and home address with it. 

Step 8. Revise your Letter 

Make sure that you revise and edit your paper properly before posting it. Check it for clarity as the newspapers prefer well-written, well-researched, and brief letters.

Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Writers!

How to Write an Editorial for a Magazine?

Generally, an editorial in a school and college magazine is written to inform the readers about the magazine’s content. It reflects the culture and standards of the school or college.

It has three parts, like an essay, that includes an introduction, main body paragraphs, and conclusion. 

Some general guidelines for a magazine editorial are given below:

  • It should not be more than 250 words long
  • Pick a side and talk about it only. Do not try to cover everything
  • Don’t write from the first-person perspective.
  • Try not to exaggerate and write everything as it is
  • Use active voice and avoid passive voice as much as possible
  • Avoid using run-on sentences
  • Create a rhythm by adding short and long sentences, and simple and complex words
  • Try to add a tinge of entertainment to your writing

The introduction introduces the magazine's main topic and contribution to public interest. In the main paragraphs, the writer explains the articles and photos, showing their connection to the magazine's main theme.

The conclusion wraps up the main points addressed in the editorial. It provides a summary of the magazine’s main theme and its significance. 

how-to-write-an-editorial-for-a-magazine-example

How to Write an Editorial Response?

An editorial review is different from writing an editorial. Reviewing an editorial is the next step in the editorial publishing process. Like editorial writing, editorial review writing has a process that the reviewer must follow when reviewing an editorial.

Though, as a writer, editorial reviewing is not the work of the writer but sometimes the teacher may ask the students to review the editorial. In case you get any such assignment, follow the below steps:

Step 1. Read the Entire Manuscript Properly

Before starting with the editorial reviewing and proofreading the content manuscript, read the document completely. Give suggestions, and changes, and rearrange the content afterward. Try to understand the purpose of the writer, audience, organization of the content, and thought.

Step 2. Make Notes While Reading the Manuscript

When reading the manuscript, make notes by marking the sections and paragraphs in the manuscript. You can mark them as vague, irrelevant, grammatically incorrect, or inconsistent.

This way, you will know where you will need to make the changes. It also helps you in keeping track of the changes that you need to make in the document.

Step 3. Add the Respective Issues

Once you are done with the marking, reread the content and the paragraphs you have marked and mention their issues. These issues could be anything like weakness of narrative, the irrelevance of the content, shortage of proof and evidence, or grammatical or stylistic errors.

Step 4. Make Recommendations about the Issues

Once you have detected the issues, make recommendations about why the paragraph is lacking. Add the suggestions in a separate file or directly on the document and in the column beside the paragraphs.

Suggest the style of writing, the relevancy of the evidence, or any grammatical issues. Other suggestions may include:

  • Clarity of the content
  • Suitability of the content for the intended audience
  • Structure of the manuscript
  • Grammatical structure
  • The flow of the content

Step 5. Check for Punctuation and other Writing Mechanics

Check the entire document for punctuation and writing mechanics. Here, you can suggest the sections and numbering of the paragraphs. You can also suggest a way of writing that will be more appropriate for the audience.

Are Editorials Just Opinion Pieces?

An editorial and an opinionated article may seem the same, but they are somewhat different from each other. An editorial is usually written by the newspaper's editor in charge and may not have the writer's name.

An opinion piece does not have to be published in a newspaper. It could be anywhere, even online. But if you have written the piece for a newspaper, it will be identified as an Opinion Editorial or an Opposite Editorial (Op-Ed). 

Editorial Ideas

If you are unable to come up with good ideas for your editorial, here are some of the most current topics that you can have a look at.

  • Global warming effects on earth
  • Should gay marriages be allowed?
  • Should marijuana be legalized?
  • Is euthanasia immoral?
  • Do people complain too much?
  • Is there such a thing as a Facebook addict?
  • The dangers of social media addiction
  • Benefits of Organic Food Consumption
  • Benefits of Reading
  • Should cigarettes be banned?

Editorial Example

Editorial writing is a type that can be hard to explain, and typically, it is a combination of facts and opinions. Take a look at this example to learn the whole writing process better. 

 Editorial Writing Sample

To Wrap It Up, Writing an editorial is a  difficult and a huge step in your career, especially when aspiring to become a writer or a journalist. However, you can follow the steps mentioned above to write an interesting editorial.

Having read the detailed guide for writing different types of editorials, you should be able to persuade people with your words in an editorial. Still, we understand that editorial writing is not an easy task for all!

If you are confused and need some help, seeking professional assistance is always an option. Our expert writers are available 24/7 to assist you with all the ‘do my paper’ queries. Rest assured, we offer the best essay writing service to all our customers. 

Contact our support team and get a head start on your editorial writing journey!

Frequently Asked Questions

Who writes an editorial.

Editorials are written by the newspaper's editor or the editorial board, representing the collective viewpoint of the editorial team.

What makes a good opinion editorial?

Op-eds are most effective when they articulate a clear opinion, substantiate it with evidence, and incorporate specific individuals in the provided examples.

Barbara P (Literature, Marketing)

Dr. Barbara is a highly experienced writer and author who holds a Ph.D. degree in public health from an Ivy League school. She has worked in the medical field for many years, conducting extensive research on various health topics. Her writing has been featured in several top-tier publications.

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That’s our Job!

Get Help

Keep reading

How to Write an Editorial

We value your privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience and give you personalized content. Do you agree to our cookie policy?

Website Data Collection

We use data collected by cookies and JavaScript libraries.

Are you sure you want to cancel?

Your preferences have not been saved.

Writing Beginner

How To Write An Editorial (7 Easy Steps, Examples, & Guide)

Writing an editorial is one of those things that sounds like it should be pretty straightforward. Easy, even.

But then you sit down to start typing. Your fingers freeze over the keyboard. You gaze into the perfectly blank white space of your computer screen.

Wait , you think. How do I write an editorial ?

Here’s how to write an editorial:

  • Choose a newsworthy topic (Something with broad interest)
  • Choose a clear purpose (This will guide your entire process)
  • Select an editorial type (Opinion, solution, criticism, persuasive, etc)
  • Gather research (Facts, quotes, statistics, etc)
  • Write the editorial (Using an Editorial Template that includes an introduction, argument, rebuttal, and conclusion)
  • Write the headline (Title)
  • Edit your editorial (Grammar, facts, spelling, structure, etc)

In this article, we’ll go through each of these steps in detail so that you know exactly how to write an editorial.

What Is an Editorial? (Quick Definition)

Stack of newspapers - How To Write an Editorial

Before we jump into the mechanics of how to write an editorial, it’s helpful to get a good grasp on the definition of editorials.

Here is a simple definition to get us started:

An editorial is a brief essay-style piece of writing from a newspaper, magazine, or other publication. An editorial is generally written by the editorial staff, editors, or writers of a publication.

Of course, there’s a lot more to it than simply dashing out an essay.

There is the purpose, different types of editorials, elements of a good editorial, structure, steps to writing an editorial, and the actual mechanics of writing your editorial.

“In essence, an editorial is an opinionated news story.” – Alan Weintraut

What Is the Purpose of an Editorial?

The purpose of an editorial is to share a perspective, persuade others of your point of view, and possibly propose a solution to a problem.

The most important part is to pick one purpose and stick to it.

Rambling, incoherent editorials won’t do. They won’t get you the results or the response you might want.

When it comes to purpose, you want:

  • Singular focus
  • Personal connection

The first two probably make sense with no explanation. That last one (personal connection) deserves more attention.

The best editorials arise from personal passions, values, and concerns. You will naturally write with vigor and voice. Your emotion will find its way into your words.

Every bit of this will make your editorials instantly more compelling.

What Are the Different Types of Editorials?

There are two main types of editorials and a number of different subtypes.

One of the first steps in how to write an editorial is choosing the right type for your intended purpose or desired outcome.

The two main types of editorials:

Opinion Editorial

In an opinion editorial, the author shares a personal opinion about a local or national issue.

The issue can be anything from local regulations to national human trafficking.

Typically, the topic of an editorial is related to the topics covered in the publication. Some publications, like newspapers, cover many topics.

Solution Editorial

In a solution editorial, the author offers a solution to a local or national problem.

It’s often recommended for the author of solution editorials to cite credible sources as evidence for the validity of the proposed solution (BTW, research is also important for opinion editorials).

There are also several editorial subtypes based on purpose:

  • Explain (you can explain a person, place, or thing)
  • Criticism (you can critically examine a person, place, or thing)
  • Praise (celebrate a person, place, or thing)
  • Defend (you can defend a person, place, or thing)
  • Endorsement (support a person, place, or thing)
  • Catalyst (for conversation or change)

How To Write an Editorial (7 Easy Steps)

As a reminder, you can write an editorial by following seven simple steps.

  • Choose a topic
  • Choose a purpose
  • Select an editorial type
  • Gather research
  • Write the editorial
  • Write the headline
  • Edit your editorial

If you want a short, visual explanation of how to write an editorial, check out this video from a bona fide New York Times Editor:

1) Choose a Newsworthy Topic

How do you choose a topic for your editorial?

You have several options. Your best bet is to go with a topic about which you feel strongly and that has broad appeal.

Consider these questions:

  • What makes you angry?
  • What makes your blood boil?
  • What gets you excited?
  • What is wrong with your community or the world?

When you write from a place of passion, you imbue your words with power. That’s how to write an editorial that resonates with readers.

2) Choose a Purpose

The next step for how to write an editorial is to choose your purpose.

What do you want to accomplish with your editorial? What ultimate outcome do you desire? Answering these questions will both focus your editorial and help you select the most effective editorial type.

Remember: a best practice is honing in on one specific purpose.

Your purpose might be:

  • To trigger a specific action (such as voting)
  • To raise awareness
  • To change minds on an issue

3) Select a type

Now it’s time to select the best editorial type for your writing. Your type should align with your purpose.

In fact, your purpose probably tells you exactly what kind of editorial to write.

First, determine which major type of editorial best fits your purpose. You can do this by asking yourself, “Am I giving an opinion or offering a solution?”

Second, select your subtype. Again, look to your purpose. Do you want to explain? Persuade? Endorse? Defend?

Select one subtype and stick to it.

4) Gather Research

Don’t neglect this important step.

The research adds value, trust, credibility, and strength to your argument. Think of research as evidence. What kind of evidence do you need?

You might need:

  • Research findings

All of these forms of evidence strengthen your argument.

Shoot for a mix of evidence that combines several different variations. For example, include an example, some statistics, and research findings.

What you want to avoid:

  • Quote, quote, quote
  • Story, story, story

Pro tip: you can find research articles related to your topic by going to Google Scholar.

For other evidence, try these sources:

  • US Census Bureau
  • US Government
  • National Bureau of Economic Research

You might also want to check with your local librarian and community Chamber of Commerce for local information.

5) Write Your Editorial

Finally, you can start writing your editorial.

Aim to keep your editorial shorter than longer. However, there is no set length for an editorial.

For a more readable editorial, keep your words and sentences short. Use simple, clear language. Avoid slang, acronyms, or industry-specific language.

If you need to use specialized language, explain the words and terms to the reader.

The most common point of view in editorials is first person plural. In this point of view, you use the pronouns “we” and “us.”

When writing your editorial, it’s helpful to follow an Editorial Template. The best templates include all of the essential parts of an editorial.

Here is a basic Editorial template you can follow:

Introduction Response/Reaction Evidence Rebuttal Conclusion

Here is a brief breakdown of each part of an editorial:

Introduction: The introduction is the first part of an editorial. It is where the author introduces the topic that they will be discussing. In an editorial, the author typically responds to a current event or issue.

Response/Reaction: The response/reaction is the part of the editorial where the author gives their opinion on the topic. They state their position and give reasons for why they believe what they do.

Evidence: The evidence is typically a series of facts or examples that support the author’s position. These can be statistics, quotations from experts, or personal experiences.

Rebuttal: The rebuttal is the part of the editorial where the author addresses any arguments or counter-arguments that may be raised against their position. They refute these arguments and offer additional evidence to support their point of view.

Conclusion: The conclusion is the last part of an editorial. It wraps up the author’s argument and provides a final statement on the topic.

6) Write The Headline

Your headline must be catchy, not clickbait. There’s a fine line between the two, and it’s not always a clear line.

Characteristics of a catchy headline:

  • Makes the reader curious
  • Includes at least one strong emotion
  • Clearly reveals the subject of the editorial
  • Short and sweet
  • Doesn’t overpromise or mislead (no clickbait)

Your headline will either grab a reader’s attention or it will not. I suggest you spend some time thinking about your title. It’s that important. You can also learn how to write headlines from experts.

Use these real editorial headlines as a source of inspiration to come up with your own:

  • We Came All This Way to Let Vaccines Go Bad in the Freezer?
  • What’s the matter with Kansas?
  • War to end all wars
  • Still No Exit
  • Zimbabwe’s Stolen Election
  • Running out of time
  • Charter Schools = Choices

Suggested read: How To Write an Autobiography

7) Edit Your Editorial

The final step is to edit and proofread your editorial.

You will want to check your editorial for typos, spelling, grammatical, and punctuation mistakes.

I suggest that you also review your piece for structure, tone, voice, and logical flaws.

Your editorial will be out in the public domain where any troll with a keyboard or smartphone (which, let’s be honest, is everyone) can respond to you.

If you’ve done your job, your editorial will strike a nerve.

You might as well assume that hordes of people might descend on your opinion piece to dissect every detail. So check your sources. Check the accuracy of dates, numbers, and figures in your piece.

Double-check the spelling of names and places. Make sure your links work.

Triple-check everything.

Editorial Structures and Outlines

As you learn how to write an editorial, you have many choices.

One choice is your selection of structure.

There are several editorial structures, outlines, and templates. Choose the one that best fits your topic, purpose, and editorial type.

Every editorial will have a beginning, middle, and end.

Here are a few specific structures you can use:

  • Problem, Solution, Call to Action
  • Story, Message, Call to Action
  • Thesis, Evidence, Recommendation
  • Your View, Opposing Views, Conclusion

How Do You Start an Editorial?

A common way to start an editorial is to state your point or perspective.

Here are a few other ways to start your editorial:

  • The problem
  • Startling statement
  • Tell a story
  • Your solution

Other than the headline, the beginning of your editorial is what will grab your reader.

If you want to write an editorial that gets read, then you must write a powerful opening.

How Do You End an Editorial?

You can end with a call-to-action, a thoughtful reflection, or a restatement of your message.

Keep in mind that the end of your editorial is what readers will most likely remember.

You want your ending to resonate, to charge your reader with emotion, evidence, and excitement to take action.

After all, you wrote the editorial to change something (minds, policies, approaches, etc.).

In a few sections (see below), you will learn a few simple templates that you can “steal” to help you end your editorial. Of course, you don’t have to use the templates.

They are just suggestions.

Often, the best way to conclude is to restate your main point.

What Makes a Good Editorial?

Even if you learn how to write an editorial, it doesn’t mean the editorial will automatically be good. You may be asking, What makes a good editorial ?

A good editorial is clear, concise, and compelling.

Therefore, the best editorials are thought out with a clear purpose and point of view. What you want to avoid is a rambling, journal-type essay. This will be both confusing and boring to the reader.

That’s the last thing you want.

Here are some other elements of a good editorial:

  • Clear and vivid voice
  • Interesting point of view
  • Gives opposing points of view
  • Backed up by credible sources
  • Analyzes a situation
“A good editorial is contemporary without being populist.” —Ajai Singh and Shakuntala Singh

How Do You Know If You’ve Written a Good Editorial?

Many people want to know how to tell if they have written a good editorial.

How do you know?

You can tell by the response you get from the readers. A good editorial sparks a community conversation. A good editorial might also result in some type of action based on the solution you propose.

An article by Ajai Singh and Shakuntala Singh in Mens Sana Monograph says this about good editorials:

It tackles recent events and issues, and attempts to formulate viewpoints based on an objective analysis of happenings and conflicting/contrary opinions. Hence a hard-hitting editorial is as legitimate as a balanced equipoise that reconciles apparently conflicting positions and controversial posturings, whether amongst politicians (in news papers), or amongst researchers (in academic journals).

Note that newsworthy events, controversy, and balance matter in editorials.

It’s also a best practice to include contradicting opinions in your piece. This lends credibility and even more balance to your peice.

Editorial Examples & Templates

As you write your own editorial, study the following example templates “stolen” from real editorials.

You can use these templates as “sentence starters” to inspire you to write your own completely original sentences.

Phrases for the beginning:

  • It’s been two weeks since…
  • Look no further than…
  • The country can’t…

Phrases for the middle:

  • That’s an astonishing failure
  • It should never have come to this
  • Other [counties, states, countries, etc.] are…
  • Within a few days…
  • Not everyone shares my [opinion, pessimism, optimism]
  • Officials say…

Phrases for the end:

  • Let’s commit to…
  • Finally…
  • If we can…we will…

Honestly, the best way to learn how to write an editorial is to read and study as many published editorials as possible. The more you study, the better you will understand what works.

Study more editorials at these links:

  • New York Times editorials
  • USA Today editorials
  • The Washington Post

How To Write an Editorial for Students

Writing an editorial for students is virtually the same as writing an editorial at any other time.

However, your teacher or professor might give you specific instructions, guidelines, and restrictions. You’ll want to read all of these thoroughly, get clarity, and follow the “rules” as much as possible.

Writing an editorial is a skill that will come in handy throughout your life. Whether you’re writing a letter to the editor of your local paper or creating a post for your blog, being able to communicate your ideas clearly and persuasively is an important skill. Here are some tips to help you write an effective editorial:

  • Know your audience. Who are you writing for? What are their concerns and interests? Keep this in mind as you craft your message.
  • Make a clear argument. What is it that you want your readers to know? What do you want them to do? Be sure to state your case clearly and concisely.
  • Support your argument with evidence. Use facts, statistics, and expert opinions to make your case.
  • Use strong language . Choose words that will resonate with your readers and make them want to take action.
  • Be persuasive, not blasting. You want your readers to be convinced by your argument, not turned off by aggressive language. Stay calm and collected as you make your case.

By following these tips, you can write an effective student editorial that will get results.

What Is an Editorial In a Newspaper?

The editorial section of a newspaper is where the publication’s editorial board weighs in on important issues facing the community. This section also includes columns from guest writers and staff members, as well as letters to the editor.

The editorial board is made up of the publication’s top editors, who are responsible for setting the tone and direction of the paper.

In addition to op-eds, the editorial section also features editorials, which are written by the editorial board and represent the official position of the paper on an issue.

While editorial boards may lean one way or another politically, they strive to present both sides of every issue in a fair and unbiased way.

Ultimately, the goal of the editorial section is to promote thoughtful discussion and debate on the topics that matter most to readers.

Final Thoughts: How To Write an Editorial

Whew , we have covered a lot of ground in this article. I hope that you have gained everything you need to know about how to write an editorial.

There are a lot of details that go into writing a good editorial.

If you get confused or overwhelmed, know that you are not alone. Know that many other writers have been there before, and have struggled with the same challenges.

Mostly, know that you got this .

Related posts:

  • How To Write an Ode (7 Easy Steps & Examples)
  • Jasper Commands Template: Ultimate Guide + 300 Commands
  • Best AI Essay Writer (With Examples)
  • The Best Writing Books for Beginners

National Institute of Health (On Editorials)

Table of Contents

1 thought on “How To Write An Editorial (7 Easy Steps, Examples, & Guide)”

Pingback: How To Write a Manifesto: 20 Ultimate Game-Changing Tips - CHRISTOPHER KOKOSKI

Comments are closed.

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Organizing Your Analysis

OWL logo

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

This resource covers how to write a rhetorical analysis essay of primarily visual texts with a focus on demonstrating the author’s understanding of the rhetorical situation and design principles.

There is no one perfect way to organize a rhetorical analysis essay. In fact, writers should always be a bit leery of plug-in formulas that offer a perfect essay format. Remember, organization itself is not the enemy, only organization without considering the specific demands of your particular writing task. That said, here are some general tips for plotting out the overall form of your essay.

Introduction

Like any rhetorical analysis essay, an essay analyzing a visual document should quickly set the stage for what you’re doing. Try to cover the following concerns in the initial paragraphs:

  • Make sure to let the reader know you’re performing a rhetorical analysis. Otherwise, they may expect you to take positions or make an evaluative argument that may not be coming.
  • Clearly state what the document under consideration is and possibly give some pertinent background information about its history or development. The intro can be a good place for a quick, narrative summary of the document. The key word here is “quick, for you may be dealing with something large (for example, an entire episode of a cartoon like the Simpsons). Save more in-depth descriptions for your body paragraph analysis.
  • If you’re dealing with a smaller document (like a photograph or an advertisement), and copyright allows, the introduction or first page is a good place to integrate it into your page.
  • Give a basic run down of the rhetorical situation surrounding the document: the author, the audience, the purpose, the context, etc.

Thesis Statements and Focus

Many authors struggle with thesis statements or controlling ideas in regards to rhetorical analysis essays. There may be a temptation to think that merely announcing the text as a rhetorical analysis is purpose enough. However, especially depending on your essay’s length, your reader may need a more direct and clear statement of your intentions. Below are a few examples.

1. Clearly narrow the focus of what your essay will cover. Ask yourself if one or two design aspects of the document is interesting and complex enough to warrant a full analytical treatment.

The website for Amazon.com provides an excellent example of alignment and proximity to assist its visitors in navigating a potentially large and confusing amount of information.

2. Since visual documents often seek to move people towards a certain action (buying a product, attending an event, expressing a sentiment), an essay may analyze the rhetorical techniques used to accomplish this purpose. The thesis statement should reflect this goal.

The call-out flyer for the Purdue Rowing Team uses a mixture of dynamic imagery and tantalizing promises to create interest in potential, new members.

3. Rhetorical analysis can also easily lead to making original arguments. Performing the analysis may lead you to an argument; or vice versa, you may start with an argument and search for proof that supports it.

A close analysis of the female body images in the July 2007 issue of Cosmopolitan magazine reveals contradictions between the articles’ calls for self-esteem and the advertisements’ unrealistic, beauty demands.

These are merely suggestions. The best measure for what your focus and thesis statement should be the document itself and the demands of your writing situation. Remember that the main thrust of your thesis statement should be on how the document creates meaning and accomplishes its purposes. The OWl has additional information on writing thesis statements.

Analysis Order (Body Paragraphs)

Depending on the genre and size of the document under analysis, there are a number of logical ways to organize your body paragraphs. Below are a few possible options. Which ever you choose, the goal of your body paragraphs is to present parts of the document, give an extended analysis of how that part functions, and suggest how the part ties into a larger point (your thesis statement or goal).

Chronological

This is the most straight-forward approach, but it can also be effective if done for a reason (as opposed to not being able to think of another way). For example, if you are analyzing a photo essay on the web or in a booklet, a chronological treatment allows you to present your insights in the same order that a viewer of the document experiences those images. It is likely that the images have been put in that order and juxtaposed for a reason, so this line of analysis can be easily integrated into the essay.

Be careful using chronological ordering when dealing with a document that contains a narrative (i.e. a television show or music video). Focusing on the chronological could easily lead you to plot summary which is not the point of a rhetorical analysis.

A spatial ordering covers the parts of a document in the order the eye is likely to scan them. This is different than chronological order, for that is dictated by pages or screens where spatial order concerns order amongst a single page or plane. There are no unwavering guidelines for this, but you can use the following general guidelines.

  • Left to right and top to down is still the normal reading and scanning pattern for English-speaking countries.
  • The eye will naturally look for centers. This may be the technical center of the page or the center of the largest item on the page.
  • Lines are often used to provide directions and paths for the eye to follow.
  • Research has shown that on web pages, the eye tends to linger in the top left quadrant before moving left to right. Only after spending a considerable amount of time on the top, visible portion of the page will they then scroll down.

Persuasive Appeals

The classic, rhetorical appeals are logos, pathos, and ethos. These concepts roughly correspond to the logic, emotion, and character of the document’s attempt to persuade. You can find more information on these concepts elsewhere on the OWL. Once you understand these devices, you could potentially order your essay by analyzing the document’s use of logos, ethos, and pathos in different sections.

The conclusion of a rhetorical analysis essay may not operate too differently from the conclusion of any other kind of essay. Still, many writers struggle with what a conclusion should or should not do. You can find tips elsewhere on the OWL on writing conclusions. In short, however, you should restate your main ideas and explain why they are important; restate your thesis; and outline further research or work you believe should be completed to further your efforts.

How to Write an Analysis Essay: Examples + Writing Guide

An analysis / analytical essay is a standard assignment in college or university. You might be asked to conduct an in-depth analysis of a research paper, a report, a movie, a company, a book, or an event. In this article, you’ll find out how to write an analysis paper introduction, thesis, main body, and conclusion, and analytical essay example.

Our specialists will write a custom essay specially for you!

So, what is an analytical essay? This type of assignment implies that you set up an argument and analyze it using a range of claims. The claims should be supported by appropriate empirical evidence. Note that you need to explore both the positive and negative sides of the issue fully.

Analytical skills are the key to getting through your academic career. Moreover, they can be useful in many real-life situations. Keep reading this article by Custom-writing experts to learn how to write an analysis!

❓ What Is an Analytical Essay?

  • 🤔 Getting Started

📑 Analytical Essay Outline

  • 📔 Choosing a Title
  • 💁 Writing an Introduction
  • 🏋 Writing a Body
  • 🏁 Writing a Conclusion

🔗 References

Before you learn how to start an analysis essay, you should understand some fundamentals of writing this type of paper. It implies that you analyze an argument using a range of claims supported by facts . It is essential to understand that in your analysis essay, you’ll need to explore the negative sides of the issue and the positive ones. That’s what distinguishes an analytical essay from, say, a persuasive one.

Begin Your Analysis essay with a Literature Review. Then Make an Outline, Write and Polish Your Draft.

These are the steps to write an academic paper :

  • Review the literature . Before starting any paper, you should familiarize yourself with what has already been written in the field. And the analytical essay is no exception. The easiest way is to search on the web for the information.
  • Brainstorm ideas. After you’ve done your search, it is time for a brainstorm! Make a list of topics for your analysis essay, and then choose the best one. Generate your thesis statement in the same way.
  • Prepare an outline . Now, when you’ve decided on the topic and the thesis statement of your analytical essay, think of its structure. Below you will find more detailed information on how your paper should be structured.
  • Write the first draft. You’ve done a lot of work by now. Congratulations! Your next goal is to write the first version of your analysis essay, using all the notes that you have. Remember, you don’t need to make it perfect!
  • Polish your draft. Now take your time to polish and edit your draft to transform it into the paper’s final version.

You are usually assigned to analyze an article, a book, a movie, or an event. If you need to write your analytical essay on a book or an article, you’ll have to analyze the style of the text, its main points, and the author’s purported goals.

Just in 1 hour! We will write you a plagiarism-free paper in hardly more than 1 hour

🤔 Analytical Essay: Getting Started

The key to writing an analysis paper is to choose an argument that you will defend throughout it. For example: maybe you are writing a critical analysis paper on George Orwell’s Animal Farm The first and imperative task is to think about your thesis statement. In the case of Animal Farm , the argument could be:

In Orwell’s Animal Farm , rhetoric and language prove to be more effective ways to keep social control than physical power.

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill gives a great explanation of the thesis statement , how to create one, and what its function is.

But that’s not all. Once you have your thesis statement, you need to break down how you will approach your analysis essay to prove your thesis. To do this, follow these steps:

  • Define the main goal(s) of your analysis . Remember that it is impossible to address each and every aspect in a single paper. Know your goal and focus on it.
  • Conduct research , both online and offline, to clarify the issue contained within your thesis statement.
  • Identify the main parts of the issue by looking at each part separately to see how it works.
  • Try to clearly understand how each part works.
  • Identify the links between the various aspects of the topic .
  • By using the information you found, try to solve your main problem .

At this point, you should have a clear understanding of both the topic and your thesis statement. You should also have a clear direction for your analysis paper firmly planted in your mind and recorded in writing.

This will give you what you need to produce the paper’s outline.

Receive a plagiarism-free paper tailored to your instructions. Cut 20% off your first order!

An outline is the starting point for your work. A typical analytical essay features the usual essay structure. A 500-word essay should consist of a one-paragraph introduction, a three-paragraph body, and a one-paragraph conclusion. Find below a great analytical essay outline sample. Feel free to use it as an example when doing your own work!

Analysis Essay: Introduction

  • Start with a startling statement or provocative question.

“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal”. Animal Farm abounds in ironic and provocative phrases to start an analytical essay.

  • Introduce the work and its author.
  • Give background information that would help the reader understand your opinion.
  • Formulate a thesis statement informing the reader about the purpose of the essay. Essay format does not presuppose telling everything possible on the given topic. Thus, a thesis statement tells what you are going to say, implying what you will not discuss, establishing the limits.

In Animal Farm, Orwell uses different irony types to ridicule totalitarianism to manifest its inability to make every member of society equal and happy.

Analysis Essay: Body

The analytical essay structure requires 2-3 developmental paragraphs, each dedicated to one separate idea confirming your thesis statement. The following template should be used for each of the body paragraphs.

  • Start with a topic sentence that supports an aspect of your thesis.

Dramatic irony is used in Animal Farm to point out society’s ignorance.

  • Continue with textual evidence (paraphrase, summary, direct quotations, specific details). Use several examples that substantiate the topic sentence.

Animals are unaware of the fact that Boxer was never sent to the hospital. He was sent to the slaughterhouse. However, the reader and writer understand that this is a lie.

  • Conclude with an explanation.

By allowing the readers to learn some essential facts before the characters, dramatic irony creates suspense and shows how easy it is to persuade and manipulate the public.

Analysis Essay Conclusion

The next four points will give you a short instruction on how to conclude an analytical essay.

  • Never use new information or topics here.
  • Restate your thesis in a different formulation.
  • Summarize the body paragraphs.
  • Comment on the analyzed text from a new perspective.

📔 Choosing a Title for Your Analysis Essay

Choosing a title seems like not a significant step, but it is actually very important. The title of your critical analysis paper should:

  • Entice and engage the reader
  • Be unique and capture the readers’ attention
  • Provide an adequate explanation of the content of the essay in just a few carefully chosen words

In the Animal Farm example, your title could be:

Get an originally-written paper according to your instructions!

“How Do the Pigs Manage to Keep Social Control on Animal Farm?”

Analysis Essay Topics

  • Analyze the media content.
  • Analyze the specifics and history of hip-hop culture.
  • Sociological issues in the film Interstellar .
  • Discuss the techniques M. Atwood uses to describe social issues in her novel The Handmaid’s Tale .
  • Compare and analyze the paintings of Van Gogh and George Seurat.
  • Analysis of Edgar Allan Poe’s The Black Cat .
  • Examine the juvenile crime rates.
  • Describe the influence of different parenting styles on children’s mind.
  • Analyze the concept of the Ship of Theseus .
  • Compare and analyze the various views on intelligence .
  • Analysis of The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman .
  • Discuss the techniques used by W. Shakespeare in A Midsummer Night’s Dream .
  • Analyze the biography of Frederic Chopin .
  • Manifestation of the Chicano culture in the artwork An Ofrenda for Dolores del Rio .
  • Similarities and differences of Roman, Anglo-Saxon, and Spanish Empires .
  • Describe the problem of stalking and its impact on human mental health.
  • Examine the future of fashion .
  • Analyze the topicality of the article Effectiveness of Hand Hygiene Interventions in Reducing Illness Absence .
  • Discuss Thomas Paine’s impact on the success of American revolution.
  • Meaningful messages in Recitatif by Toni Morrison .
  • Explore the techniques used by directors in the film Killing Kennedy .
  • Compare the leadership styles of Tang Empress Wu Zetian and the Pharaoh Cleopatra .
  • Evaluate the credibility of Kristof’s arguments in his article Remote Learning Is Often an Oxymoron .
  • Analyze genetically modified food .
  • Examine the influence of Europeans on Indian tribes in The Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson .
  • Describe the rhetoric techniques used in The Portrait of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde .
  • The importance of fighting against violence in communities in the documentary film The Interrupters .
  • Analyze indoor and outdoor pollution .
  • Analyze the issue of overprotective parenthood .
  • Explore the connection between eating habits and advertisement.
  • Discuss the urgence of global warming issue .
  • Influence of sleep on people’s body and mental health.
  • Analyze the relationship between Christianity and sports .
  • Discuss the concept of leadership and its significance for company efficiency.
  • Analyze the key lessons of the book Rich Dad Poor Dad by Robert Kiyosaki .
  • Examine the specifics of nursing ethic .
  • The theme of emotional sufferings in the short story A Rose for Emily .
  • Analysis of bias in books for children .
  • Analyze the rhetoric of the article Public Monuments .
  • Describe the main messages in Jean-Paul Sartre’s Nausea .
  • Explore the problem of structural racism in healthcare .
  • The reasons of tango dance popularity.
  • The shortcomings of the American educational system in Waiting for Superman.
  • Analyze and compare Erin’s Law and Megan’s Law .
  • Analyze the James Madison’s essay Federalist 10 .
  • Examine symbols in the movie The Joker .
  • Compare the thematic connection and stylistic devices in the poems The Road Not Taken and Find Your Way .
  • Describe and analyze the life of Eddie Bernice Johnson .
  • Explore the social classes in America .
  • Crucial strengths and weaknesses of the main translation theories .

💁 Writing Your Analytical Essay Introduction

You must understand how to compose an introduction to an analysis paper. The University of Wollongong describes the introduction as a “map” of any writing. When writing the introduction, follow these steps:

  • Provide a lead-in for the reader by offering a general introduction to the topic of the paper.
  • Include your thesis statement , which shifts the reader from the generalized introduction to the specific topic and its related issues to your unique take on the essay topic.
  • Present a general outline of the analysis paper.

Watch this great video for further instructions on how to write an introduction to an analysis essay.

Example of an Analytical Essay Introduction

“Four legs good, two legs bad” is one of the many postulates invented by George Orwell for his characters in Animal Farm to vest them with socialist ideology and control over the animal population. The social revolution on Manor Farm was built on language instruments, first for the collective success of the animals, and later for the power consolidation by the pigs. The novel was written in 1945 when the transition from limitless freedoms of socialist countries transformed into dictatorship. Through his animal protagonists, the author analyzes the reasons for peoples’ belief in the totalitarian regime. In Orwell’s Animal Farm , rhetoric and language prove to be more effective ways to keep social control than physical power.

🏋 Writing Your Analytical Essay Body

The body of the paper may be compared to its heart. This is the part where you show off your talent for analysis by providing convincing, well-researched, and well-thought-out arguments to support your thesis statement. You have already gathered the information, and now all you may start crafting your paper.

To make the body of an analytical essay, keep the following in mind:

  • Discuss one argument per paragraph , although each argument can relate to multiple issues
  • Strike a balance between writing in an unbiased tone, while expressing your personal opinion
  • Be reasonable when making judgments regarding any of the problems you discuss
  • Remember to include the opposing point of view to create a balanced perspective

The bottom line is: you want to offer opposing views, but you must pose your arguments so they will counter those opposing views and prove your point of view. Follow these steps when constructing each body paragraph:

  • Choose the main sentence. The main or topic sentence will be the first line in your essay. The topic sentence is responsible for presenting the argument you will discuss in the paragraph and demonstrate how this argument relates to the thesis statement.
  • Provide the context for the topic sentence , whether it relates to a quote, a specific incident in society, or something else. Offer evidence on who, what, where, when, why, and how.
  • Give your analysis of the argument and how it adequately proves your thesis.
  • Write a closing sentence that sums up the paragraph and provides a transition to the following paragraph.

Example of an Analytical Essay Body

Literacy can grant power, provided that there are animals who cannot read or write. In the beginning, the animals’ literacy and intellect are relatively the same. Old Major is the cleverest pig; he is the kind old philosopher, like Karl Marx or Vladimir Lenin. During his retirement, he develops a theory that all humans are the root of evil. His speech was the foundation for the pigs’ assumption of power. They refined his ideas into a new ideology and called it Animalism. They also learned how to read. It allowed the pigs to declare themselves the “mind workers.” Therefore, the pigs’ literacy assured the illiterate animals in their objective superiority.

Meanwhile, as the pigs were the intellectual elite, they were not supposed to work, which raised their social status by itself. Snowball tried to promote education among all the animals, but most of them failed to master the alphabet. This is a metaphor for the general public being predominantly ignorant and easy to manipulate. At the same time, Boxer and other animals that spend most of the day in hard work merely have no time to develop their intellect. Thus, the pigs’ intention to build a school for pig children was highly efficient. Unequal access to education and unequal ability to express one’s thoughts in perspective reinforce the social divide, making the pigs smarter and more powerful and undermining other animals’ self-esteem.

At this point, the pigs resort to propaganda and rhetoric. Squealer uses his oratorical gift to refine the pigs’ message to the other animals. Upon Napoleon’s order, he breaks the Seven Commandments of farm governance. At night, he climbs the ladder to change them, and once even falls from the ladder trying to change the commandment on alcohol. The “proletarian” animals soon forget what the Seven Commandments were like in the first place and are unsure if they have ever been altered. Further on, Minimus writes a poem praising Napoleon. Finally, Squealer replaces the Commandments with a single assertion: “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.” Language is no longer used to convince. It is used to control and manipulate.

🏁 Writing Your Analytical Essay Conclusion

The conclusion is short and sweet. It summarizes everything you just wrote in the essay and wraps it up with a beautiful shiny bow. Follow these steps to write a convincing conclusion:

  • Repeat the thesis statement and summarize your argument. Even when using the best summary generator for the task, reread it to make sure all the crucial points are included.
  • Take your argument beyond what is simply stated in your paper. You want to show how it is essential in terms of the bigger picture. Also, you may dwell on the influence on citizens of the country.

Example of an Analytical Essay Conclusion

Because of everything mentioned above, it becomes clear that language and rhetoric can rise to power, establish authority, and manipulate ordinary people. Animal Farm is the simplified version of a communist society. It shows how wise philosophers’ good intentions can be used by mean leaders to gain unopposed power and unconditional trust. Unfortunately, this can lead to the death of many innocent animals, i.e., people, as totalitarianism has nothing to do with people’s rule. Therefore, language and oratory are potent tools that can keep people oppressed and weak, deprive them of any chance for improvement and growth, and make them think that there is no other possible existence.

Now you are ready to write an analysis essay! See, it’s easier than you thought.

Of course, it’s always helpful to see other analysis essay examples. The University of Arkansas at Little Rock provides some great examples of an analytical paper .

✏️ Analysis Essay FAQ

A great analytical paper should be well-structured, cohesive, and logically consistent. Each part of the essay should be in its place, creating a smooth and easy-to-read text. Most importantly, the statements should be objective and backed by arguments and examples.

It is a paper devoted to analyzing a certain topic or subject. An analysis essay is all about reviewing certain details of the subject and interpreting them. For example, such an analysis for a poem includes a description of artistic means that helped the poet convey the idea.

Writing an analytical essay on a book/movie/poem start with an outline. Point out what catches the eye when reviewing the subject. See how these details can be interpreted. Make sure that you refer to the main idea/message. Add an appropriate introduction and a logical conclusion.

Being more analytical in writing can be essential for a student. This is a skill that can be self-taught: try to start noticing subtle details and describe them. As you write, interpret the facts and strive to draw conclusions. Try to be as objective as possible.

  • Elements of Analysis
  • How Can I Create Stronger Analysis?
  • How to Write a Literary Analysis Essay: Bucks.edu
  • Essay Structure | – Harvard College Writing Center
  • Analytical Writing: Looking Closely (Colostate.edu)
  • Analytical Thesis Statements – University of Arizona
  • Writing an analytic essay – UTSC – University of Toronto
  • Organizing Your Analysis // Purdue Writing Lab
  • How to Write an Analytical Essay: 15 Steps (with Pictures)
  • Share to Facebook
  • Share to Twitter
  • Share to LinkedIn
  • Share to email

How to Write a Film Analysis Essay: Examples, Outline, & Tips

A film analysis essay might be the most exciting assignment you have ever had! After all, who doesn’t love watching movies? You have your favorite movies, maybe something you watched years ago, perhaps a classic, or a documentary. Or your professor might assign a film for you to make a...

How to Write a Critique Paper: Tips + Critique Essay Examples

A critique paper is an academic writing genre that summarizes and gives a critical evaluation of a concept or work. Or, to put it simply, it is no more than a summary and a critical analysis of a specific issue. This type of writing aims to evaluate the impact of...

How to Write a Creative Essay: Tips, Topics, and Techniques

What is a creative essay, if not the way to express yourself? Crafting such a paper is a task that allows you to communicate your opinion and tell a story. However, even using your imagination to a great extent doesn’t free you from following academic writing rules. Don’t even get...

Compare and Contrast Essay Writing Tips and Examples

A compare and contrast essay — what is it? In this type of paper, you compare two different things or ideas, highlighting what is similar between the two, and you also contrast them, highlighting what is different. The two things might be events, people, books, points of view, lifestyles, or...

How to Write an Expository Essay: Outline, & Example

What is an expository essay? This type of writing aims to inform the reader about the subject clearly, concisely, and objectively. The keyword here is “inform”. You are not trying to persuade your reader to think a certain way or let your own opinions and emotions cloud your work. Just stick to the...

Short Story Analysis: How to Write It Step by Step [New]

Have you ever tried to write a story analysis but ended up being completely confused and lost? Well, the task might be challenging if you don’t know the essential rules for literary analysis creation. But don’t get frustrated! We know how to write a short story analysis, and we are...

How to Write a Persuasive Essay: Step-by-Step Guide + Examples

Have you ever tried to get somebody round to your way of thinking? Then you should know how daunting the task is. Still, if your persuasion is successful, the result is emotionally rewarding. A persuasive essay is a type of writing that uses facts and logic to argument and substantiate...

Common Essay Mistakes—Writing Errors to Avoid [Updated]

One of the most critical skills that students gain during their college years is assignment writing. Composing impressive essays and research papers can be quite challenging, especially for ESL students. Nonetheless, before learning the art of academic writing, you may make numerous common essay mistakes. Such involuntary errors appear in:...

How to Start an Autobiography about Yourself: Full Guide + Autobiography Examples

You’re probably thinking: I’m no Mahatma Gandhi or Steve Jobs—what could I possibly write in my memoir? I don’t even know how to start an autobiography, let alone write the whole thing. But don’t worry: essay writing can be easy, and this autobiography example for students is here to show...

Why I Want to Be a Teacher Essay: Writing Guide [2024]

Some people know which profession to choose from childhood, while others decide much later in life. However, and whenever you come to it, you may have to elaborate on it in your personal statement or cover letter. This is widely known as “Why I Want to Be a Teacher” essay.

Friendship Essay: Writing Guide & Topics on Friendship [New]

Assigned with an essay about friendship? Congrats! It’s one of the best tasks you could get. Digging through your memories and finding strong arguments for this paper can be an enjoyable experience. I bet you will cope with this task effortlessly as we can help you with the assignment. Just...

How to Write an Autobiography: Questions, Principles, & What to Include

When you are assigned an autobiography to write, tens, and even hundreds of questions start buzzing in your head. How to write autobiography essay parts? What to include? How to make your autobiography writing flow? Don’t worry about all this and use the following three simple principles and 15 creative...

This resource helps me a lot. Thanks! You guys have great information. Do you think I can use these steps when taking a test? Could it be known as plagiarized if I just copy and paste the information?

Custom Writing

Glad to help, Hazel! You can use it in your test but you should cite it accordingly

Thanks, very good information.

Thank you for your attention, Jaweria🙂!

Thanks for learning how to critique research papers in a proper way! This is what I need to cope with this task successfully! Thanks!

How much is an essay, and is there a chance it can be plagiarized?

You have to remember that the price for our services depends on a lot of factors. You can find the detailed price quote here: https://custom-writing.org/prices (the page will be opened in a new window). You can check out the prices depending on the subjects and deadlines that you choose. No – it can’t be plagiarized: the papers are written from scratch according to your instructions. We also stress the importance of the fact that you CAN’T, under any circumstances, use our final product as your own work – the papers, which we provide, are to be used for research purposes only!

How To Write An Editorial

Last updated on: Nov 20, 2023

Learn How To Write An Editorial By Experts

By: Cordon J.

Reviewed By: Chris H.

Published on: Sep 14, 2021

How to Write an Editorial

An editorial is a newspaper article that presents the author’s point of view on different topics and issues. Students are often assigned to write editorials of school newspapers.

When assigned to write an editorial piece, you must understand the characteristics of an editorial that appeal to the reader.

Learn how to write an editorial with this complete guide. Also, find below some editorial topics and examples that may assist you when you begin writing your editorial.

How to Write an Editorial

On this Page

What is an Editorial?

An editorial is an article that expresses the editor's ideas and explains the issue at hand. Just because it is an opinion piece doesn’t mean that the author can write their thoughts merely. They can not write an editorial without conducting research and considering the facts.

To build their argument and persuade the readers, editorial writers must present authentic evidence that will support their opinions.

The aim of an editorial is to present an issue clearly and propose a solution to get rid of it.

Author’s need to address the people currently facing the issue. They also need to tell them what can be done to deal with the situation. If necessary, the author must speak to the government, asking them to take appropriate measures to help combat the situation.

Considering the research and effort that goes into writing an editorial, they can be considered similar to a research paper.

Order Essay

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That's our Job!

Types of an Editorial

Typically, there are four different types of editorials, where each serves a unique purpose.

Below is a detailed description of these types.

1. Explain and Interpret – this format gives editors a chance to explain how they tackled sensitive and controversial topics.

2. Criticize – such editorials while focusing on the problem rather than the solution criticize actions, decisions, or certain situations.

3. Persuade – in this format, you propose a solution and convince the readers to take appropriate actions.

4. Praise – this type of editorial is written to show support and commend a notable action of an organization or individual.

How to Write an Editorial?

With social media becoming more popular day by day where everyone can easily express their opinions, people aren't sure of how to write a strong editorial.

Editorials are based on the writer’s opinions. But, if you want the reader to take your word seriously, you must provide facts to support your opinion. Don’t ramble and rant about a personal issue.

Following are the important steps that will help you craft an impressive editorial.

1. Pick a Topic That Will Grab The Reader's Attention

The purpose of an editorial is to change the public’s belief about a particular topic. Or to encourage them to critically analyze issues and, more often than not, suggest a particular course of action.

When brainstorming ideas for your piece, make sure that it is interesting, has a current news angle, and serves a purpose. Sometimes writing on a controversial subject can really help attract the reader.

2. Research and Gather Facts

As an editorial writer, your job is to find the truth about a particular issue. Do your research and look for relevant information so that you can present facts along with your opinion. Go through credible sources only and gather the latest facts.

Check out this detailed blog on the types of research and how to conduct them. It will make this step easier for you.

3. Writing the Editorial

When writing an editorial, keep it short and clear, so the reader stays with you throughout the piece. It shouldn’t be longer than 600 to 800 words. Also, avoid using fancy jargon or technical terms.

  • Introduction

Start the editorial with a unique and catchy question, statistics, facts, and quotations. You could also use any other sentence relevant to the topic that will help grab the reader's attention. Also, present your argument in the form of a thesis statement at this stage.

The body of your editorial piece should explain the issue at hand objectively without any trace of biasedness. Discuss each and every aspect of your topic. Address the 5 W’s and H (what, when, where, who, why, and how.)Start by addressing your opposition, people who have dissimilar views. You can also highlight the positive aspects of the opposition as long as they are factually correct.

Next, you need to refute the opposing side. Provide strong reasons and evidence that can help with the credibility of your stance.

Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Writers!

When addressing a problem, you need to propose a valid and applicable solution.

End the editorial with a strong, thought-provoking statement. Your reader must get a sense of closure and completeness from the ending.

4. Proofread and Edit

Don't forget to go through your article once you are done writing. This will help get rid of otherwise unnoticed mistakes and typos.

Editorial Example

EDITORIAL EXAMPLE PDF

Editorial Topics

Here are some interesting and good ideas to help you write an excellent editorial.

  • The contribution of fast food is making us obese.
  • Should PlayStations be blamed for the death of outdoor activities?
  • The flip side of social media.
  • Should recreational marijuana be legalized?
  • How does recycling help save the environment?
  • The evil that is the selfie culture.NBA season preview.
  • Are e-cigarettes really safe for our health?

We hope that this blog helped answer all of your editorial writing-related queries. In case of any confusion generate sample editorials from our AI paper writer or, feel free to contact 5StarEssays.com and ask to write an essay for me .

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes a good editorial.

Great content needs to be informative, opinionated, and engaging. It should also teach without being pedantic or didactic in order for the reader's attention span to last as long they are reading. Also, keep it as brief as possible.

What are the elements of an editorial?

Following are the main elements of an editorial:

  • Objective explanation
  • Opposing opinions
  • Writer’s opinions

What is editorial style?

Editors use a set of guidelines to help make their words as consistent and effective as possible. This is their specific writing style. It distinguishes their writing from anyone else.

Cordon J.

Speech, Law

Cordon. is a published author and writing specialist. He has worked in the publishing industry for many years, providing writing services and digital content. His own writing career began with a focus on literature and linguistics, which he continues to pursue. Cordon is an engaging and professional individual, always looking to help others achieve their goals.

Was This Blog Helpful?

Keep reading.

  • How to Write A Bio – Professional Tips and Examples

How to Write an Editorial

  • Learn How to Write an Article Review with Examples

How to Write an Editorial

  • How to Write a Poem Step-by-Step Like a Pro

How to Write an Editorial

  • How To Write Poetry - 7 Fundamentals and Tips

How to Write an Editorial

  • Know About Appendix Writing With the Help of Examples

How to Write an Editorial

  • List of Social Issues Faced By the World

How to Write an Editorial

  • How To Write A Case Study - Easy Guide

How to Write an Editorial

  • Learn How to Avoid Plagiarism in 7 Simple Steps

How to Write an Editorial

  • Writing Guide of Visual Analysis Essay for Beginners

How to Write an Editorial

  • Learn How to Write a Personal Essay by Experts

How to Write an Editorial

  • Character Analysis - A Step By Step Guide

How to Write an Editorial

  • Obesity Essay: A Complete Guide and Topics

How to Write an Editorial

  • Thematic Statement: Writing Tips and Examples

How to Write an Editorial

  • Expert Guide on How to Write a Summary

How to Write an Editorial

  • How to Write an Opinion Essay - Structure, Topics & Examples

How to Write an Editorial

  • How to Write a Synopsis - Easy Steps and Format Guide

How to Write an Editorial

  • How to Get Better at Math - Easy Tips and Tricks

How to Write an Editorial

  • How to Write a Movie Review - Steps and Examples

How to Write an Editorial

  • Creative Writing - Easy Tips For Beginners

How to Write an Editorial

  • Types of Plagiarism Every Student Should Know

How to Write an Editorial

People Also Read

  • compare and contrast essay topics
  • process analysis essay
  • writing reflective essay
  • essay writing
  • rhetorical analysis essay topics

Burdened With Assignments?

Bottom Slider

Advertisement

  • Homework Services: Essay Topics Generator

© 2024 - All rights reserved

2000+ SATISFIED STUDENTS

95% Satisfaction RATE

30 Days Money-back GUARANTEE

95% Success RATE

linkedin

Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Contact Us

© 2024 5StarEssays.com. All rights reserved.

LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

  • LOG IN Processing...

SIGN UP TO YOUR ACCOUNT

  • Your phone no.
  • Password Password must be minimum 8 characters.
  • Confirm Password
  •    I have read Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms and Conditions .
  • SIGN UP Processing...

FORGOT PASSWORD

  • SEND PASSWORD

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Assignments

  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Analyzing a Scholarly Journal Article
  • Group Presentations
  • Dealing with Nervousness
  • Using Visual Aids
  • Grading Someone Else's Paper
  • Types of Structured Group Activities
  • Group Project Survival Skills
  • Leading a Class Discussion
  • Multiple Book Review Essay
  • Reviewing Collected Works
  • Writing a Case Analysis Paper
  • Writing a Case Study
  • About Informed Consent
  • Writing Field Notes
  • Writing a Policy Memo
  • Writing a Reflective Paper
  • Writing a Research Proposal
  • Generative AI and Writing
  • Acknowledgments

Definition and Introduction

Journal article analysis assignments require you to summarize and critically assess the quality of an empirical research study published in a scholarly [a.k.a., academic, peer-reviewed] journal. The article may be assigned by the professor, chosen from course readings listed in the syllabus, or you must locate an article on your own, usually with the requirement that you search using a reputable library database, such as, JSTOR or ProQuest . The article chosen is expected to relate to the overall discipline of the course, specific course content, or key concepts discussed in class. In some cases, the purpose of the assignment is to analyze an article that is part of the literature review for a future research project.

Analysis of an article can be assigned to students individually or as part of a small group project. The final product is usually in the form of a short paper [typically 1- 6 double-spaced pages] that addresses key questions the professor uses to guide your analysis or that assesses specific parts of a scholarly research study [e.g., the research problem, methodology, discussion, conclusions or findings]. The analysis paper may be shared on a digital course management platform and/or presented to the class for the purpose of promoting a wider discussion about the topic of the study. Although assigned in any level of undergraduate and graduate coursework in the social and behavioral sciences, professors frequently include this assignment in upper division courses to help students learn how to effectively identify, read, and analyze empirical research within their major.

Franco, Josue. “Introducing the Analysis of Journal Articles.” Prepared for presentation at the American Political Science Association’s 2020 Teaching and Learning Conference, February 7-9, 2020, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Sego, Sandra A. and Anne E. Stuart. "Learning to Read Empirical Articles in General Psychology." Teaching of Psychology 43 (2016): 38-42; Kershaw, Trina C., Jordan P. Lippman, and Jennifer Fugate. "Practice Makes Proficient: Teaching Undergraduate Students to Understand Published Research." Instructional Science 46 (2018): 921-946; Woodward-Kron, Robyn. "Critical Analysis and the Journal Article Review Assignment." Prospect 18 (August 2003): 20-36; MacMillan, Margy and Allison MacKenzie. "Strategies for Integrating Information Literacy and Academic Literacy: Helping Undergraduate Students make the most of Scholarly Articles." Library Management 33 (2012): 525-535.

Benefits of Journal Article Analysis Assignments

Analyzing and synthesizing a scholarly journal article is intended to help students obtain the reading and critical thinking skills needed to develop and write their own research papers. This assignment also supports workplace skills where you could be asked to summarize a report or other type of document and report it, for example, during a staff meeting or for a presentation.

There are two broadly defined ways that analyzing a scholarly journal article supports student learning:

Improve Reading Skills

Conducting research requires an ability to review, evaluate, and synthesize prior research studies. Reading prior research requires an understanding of the academic writing style , the type of epistemological beliefs or practices underpinning the research design, and the specific vocabulary and technical terminology [i.e., jargon] used within a discipline. Reading scholarly articles is important because academic writing is unfamiliar to most students; they have had limited exposure to using peer-reviewed journal articles prior to entering college or students have yet to gain exposure to the specific academic writing style of their disciplinary major. Learning how to read scholarly articles also requires careful and deliberate concentration on how authors use specific language and phrasing to convey their research, the problem it addresses, its relationship to prior research, its significance, its limitations, and how authors connect methods of data gathering to the results so as to develop recommended solutions derived from the overall research process.

Improve Comprehension Skills

In addition to knowing how to read scholarly journals articles, students must learn how to effectively interpret what the scholar(s) are trying to convey. Academic writing can be dense, multi-layered, and non-linear in how information is presented. In addition, scholarly articles contain footnotes or endnotes, references to sources, multiple appendices, and, in some cases, non-textual elements [e.g., graphs, charts] that can break-up the reader’s experience with the narrative flow of the study. Analyzing articles helps students practice comprehending these elements of writing, critiquing the arguments being made, reflecting upon the significance of the research, and how it relates to building new knowledge and understanding or applying new approaches to practice. Comprehending scholarly writing also involves thinking critically about where you fit within the overall dialogue among scholars concerning the research problem, finding possible gaps in the research that require further analysis, or identifying where the author(s) has failed to examine fully any specific elements of the study.

In addition, journal article analysis assignments are used by professors to strengthen discipline-specific information literacy skills, either alone or in relation to other tasks, such as, giving a class presentation or participating in a group project. These benefits can include the ability to:

  • Effectively paraphrase text, which leads to a more thorough understanding of the overall study;
  • Identify and describe strengths and weaknesses of the study and their implications;
  • Relate the article to other course readings and in relation to particular research concepts or ideas discussed during class;
  • Think critically about the research and summarize complex ideas contained within;
  • Plan, organize, and write an effective inquiry-based paper that investigates a research study, evaluates evidence, expounds on the author’s main ideas, and presents an argument concerning the significance and impact of the research in a clear and concise manner;
  • Model the type of source summary and critique you should do for any college-level research paper; and,
  • Increase interest and engagement with the research problem of the study as well as with the discipline.

Kershaw, Trina C., Jennifer Fugate, and Aminda J. O'Hare. "Teaching Undergraduates to Understand Published Research through Structured Practice in Identifying Key Research Concepts." Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology . Advance online publication, 2020; Franco, Josue. “Introducing the Analysis of Journal Articles.” Prepared for presentation at the American Political Science Association’s 2020 Teaching and Learning Conference, February 7-9, 2020, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Sego, Sandra A. and Anne E. Stuart. "Learning to Read Empirical Articles in General Psychology." Teaching of Psychology 43 (2016): 38-42; Woodward-Kron, Robyn. "Critical Analysis and the Journal Article Review Assignment." Prospect 18 (August 2003): 20-36; MacMillan, Margy and Allison MacKenzie. "Strategies for Integrating Information Literacy and Academic Literacy: Helping Undergraduate Students make the most of Scholarly Articles." Library Management 33 (2012): 525-535; Kershaw, Trina C., Jordan P. Lippman, and Jennifer Fugate. "Practice Makes Proficient: Teaching Undergraduate Students to Understand Published Research." Instructional Science 46 (2018): 921-946.

Structure and Organization

A journal article analysis paper should be written in paragraph format and include an instruction to the study, your analysis of the research, and a conclusion that provides an overall assessment of the author's work, along with an explanation of what you believe is the study's overall impact and significance. Unless the purpose of the assignment is to examine foundational studies published many years ago, you should select articles that have been published relatively recently [e.g., within the past few years].

Since the research has been completed, reference to the study in your paper should be written in the past tense, with your analysis stated in the present tense [e.g., “The author portrayed access to health care services in rural areas as primarily a problem of having reliable transportation. However, I believe the author is overgeneralizing this issue because...”].

Introduction Section

The first section of a journal analysis paper should describe the topic of the article and highlight the author’s main points. This includes describing the research problem and theoretical framework, the rationale for the research, the methods of data gathering and analysis, the key findings, and the author’s final conclusions and recommendations. The narrative should focus on the act of describing rather than analyzing. Think of the introduction as a more comprehensive and detailed descriptive abstract of the study.

Possible questions to help guide your writing of the introduction section may include:

  • Who are the authors and what credentials do they hold that contributes to the validity of the study?
  • What was the research problem being investigated?
  • What type of research design was used to investigate the research problem?
  • What theoretical idea(s) and/or research questions were used to address the problem?
  • What was the source of the data or information used as evidence for analysis?
  • What methods were applied to investigate this evidence?
  • What were the author's overall conclusions and key findings?

Critical Analysis Section

The second section of a journal analysis paper should describe the strengths and weaknesses of the study and analyze its significance and impact. This section is where you shift the narrative from describing to analyzing. Think critically about the research in relation to other course readings, what has been discussed in class, or based on your own life experiences. If you are struggling to identify any weaknesses, explain why you believe this to be true. However, no study is perfect, regardless of how laudable its design may be. Given this, think about the repercussions of the choices made by the author(s) and how you might have conducted the study differently. Examples can include contemplating the choice of what sources were included or excluded in support of examining the research problem, the choice of the method used to analyze the data, or the choice to highlight specific recommended courses of action and/or implications for practice over others. Another strategy is to place yourself within the research study itself by thinking reflectively about what may be missing if you had been a participant in the study or if the recommended courses of action specifically targeted you or your community.

Possible questions to help guide your writing of the analysis section may include:

Introduction

  • Did the author clearly state the problem being investigated?
  • What was your reaction to and perspective on the research problem?
  • Was the study’s objective clearly stated? Did the author clearly explain why the study was necessary?
  • How well did the introduction frame the scope of the study?
  • Did the introduction conclude with a clear purpose statement?

Literature Review

  • Did the literature review lay a foundation for understanding the significance of the research problem?
  • Did the literature review provide enough background information to understand the problem in relation to relevant contexts [e.g., historical, economic, social, cultural, etc.].
  • Did literature review effectively place the study within the domain of prior research? Is anything missing?
  • Was the literature review organized by conceptual categories or did the author simply list and describe sources?
  • Did the author accurately explain how the data or information were collected?
  • Was the data used sufficient in supporting the study of the research problem?
  • Was there another methodological approach that could have been more illuminating?
  • Give your overall evaluation of the methods used in this article. How much trust would you put in generating relevant findings?

Results and Discussion

  • Were the results clearly presented?
  • Did you feel that the results support the theoretical and interpretive claims of the author? Why?
  • What did the author(s) do especially well in describing or analyzing their results?
  • Was the author's evaluation of the findings clearly stated?
  • How well did the discussion of the results relate to what is already known about the research problem?
  • Was the discussion of the results free of repetition and redundancies?
  • What interpretations did the authors make that you think are in incomplete, unwarranted, or overstated?
  • Did the conclusion effectively capture the main points of study?
  • Did the conclusion address the research questions posed? Do they seem reasonable?
  • Were the author’s conclusions consistent with the evidence and arguments presented?
  • Has the author explained how the research added new knowledge or understanding?

Overall Writing Style

  • If the article included tables, figures, or other non-textual elements, did they contribute to understanding the study?
  • Were ideas developed and related in a logical sequence?
  • Were transitions between sections of the article smooth and easy to follow?

Overall Evaluation Section

The final section of a journal analysis paper should bring your thoughts together into a coherent assessment of the value of the research study . This section is where the narrative flow transitions from analyzing specific elements of the article to critically evaluating the overall study. Explain what you view as the significance of the research in relation to the overall course content and any relevant discussions that occurred during class. Think about how the article contributes to understanding the overall research problem, how it fits within existing literature on the topic, how it relates to the course, and what it means to you as a student researcher. In some cases, your professor will also ask you to describe your experiences writing the journal article analysis paper as part of a reflective learning exercise.

Possible questions to help guide your writing of the conclusion and evaluation section may include:

  • Was the structure of the article clear and well organized?
  • Was the topic of current or enduring interest to you?
  • What were the main weaknesses of the article? [this does not refer to limitations stated by the author, but what you believe are potential flaws]
  • Was any of the information in the article unclear or ambiguous?
  • What did you learn from the research? If nothing stood out to you, explain why.
  • Assess the originality of the research. Did you believe it contributed new understanding of the research problem?
  • Were you persuaded by the author’s arguments?
  • If the author made any final recommendations, will they be impactful if applied to practice?
  • In what ways could future research build off of this study?
  • What implications does the study have for daily life?
  • Was the use of non-textual elements, footnotes or endnotes, and/or appendices helpful in understanding the research?
  • What lingering questions do you have after analyzing the article?

NOTE: Avoid using quotes. One of the main purposes of writing an article analysis paper is to learn how to effectively paraphrase and use your own words to summarize a scholarly research study and to explain what the research means to you. Using and citing a direct quote from the article should only be done to help emphasize a key point or to underscore an important concept or idea.

Business: The Article Analysis . Fred Meijer Center for Writing, Grand Valley State University; Bachiochi, Peter et al. "Using Empirical Article Analysis to Assess Research Methods Courses." Teaching of Psychology 38 (2011): 5-9; Brosowsky, Nicholaus P. et al. “Teaching Undergraduate Students to Read Empirical Articles: An Evaluation and Revision of the QALMRI Method.” PsyArXi Preprints , 2020; Holster, Kristin. “Article Evaluation Assignment”. TRAILS: Teaching Resources and Innovations Library for Sociology . Washington DC: American Sociological Association, 2016; Kershaw, Trina C., Jennifer Fugate, and Aminda J. O'Hare. "Teaching Undergraduates to Understand Published Research through Structured Practice in Identifying Key Research Concepts." Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology . Advance online publication, 2020; Franco, Josue. “Introducing the Analysis of Journal Articles.” Prepared for presentation at the American Political Science Association’s 2020 Teaching and Learning Conference, February 7-9, 2020, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Reviewer's Guide . SAGE Reviewer Gateway, SAGE Journals; Sego, Sandra A. and Anne E. Stuart. "Learning to Read Empirical Articles in General Psychology." Teaching of Psychology 43 (2016): 38-42; Kershaw, Trina C., Jordan P. Lippman, and Jennifer Fugate. "Practice Makes Proficient: Teaching Undergraduate Students to Understand Published Research." Instructional Science 46 (2018): 921-946; Gyuris, Emma, and Laura Castell. "To Tell Them or Show Them? How to Improve Science Students’ Skills of Critical Reading." International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education 21 (2013): 70-80; Woodward-Kron, Robyn. "Critical Analysis and the Journal Article Review Assignment." Prospect 18 (August 2003): 20-36; MacMillan, Margy and Allison MacKenzie. "Strategies for Integrating Information Literacy and Academic Literacy: Helping Undergraduate Students Make the Most of Scholarly Articles." Library Management 33 (2012): 525-535.

Writing Tip

Not All Scholarly Journal Articles Can Be Critically Analyzed

There are a variety of articles published in scholarly journals that do not fit within the guidelines of an article analysis assignment. This is because the work cannot be empirically examined or it does not generate new knowledge in a way which can be critically analyzed.

If you are required to locate a research study on your own, avoid selecting these types of journal articles:

  • Theoretical essays which discuss concepts, assumptions, and propositions, but report no empirical research;
  • Statistical or methodological papers that may analyze data, but the bulk of the work is devoted to refining a new measurement, statistical technique, or modeling procedure;
  • Articles that review, analyze, critique, and synthesize prior research, but do not report any original research;
  • Brief essays devoted to research methods and findings;
  • Articles written by scholars in popular magazines or industry trade journals;
  • Pre-print articles that have been posted online, but may undergo further editing and revision by the journal's editorial staff before final publication; and
  • Academic commentary that discusses research trends or emerging concepts and ideas, but does not contain citations to sources.

Journal Analysis Assignment - Myers . Writing@CSU, Colorado State University; Franco, Josue. “Introducing the Analysis of Journal Articles.” Prepared for presentation at the American Political Science Association’s 2020 Teaching and Learning Conference, February 7-9, 2020, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Woodward-Kron, Robyn. "Critical Analysis and the Journal Article Review Assignment." Prospect 18 (August 2003): 20-36.

  • << Previous: Annotated Bibliography
  • Next: Giving an Oral Presentation >>
  • Last Updated: Feb 8, 2024 10:20 AM
  • URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/assignments

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

  • Knowledge Base
  • How to write an argumentative essay | Examples & tips

How to Write an Argumentative Essay | Examples & Tips

Published on July 24, 2020 by Jack Caulfield . Revised on July 23, 2023.

An argumentative essay expresses an extended argument for a particular thesis statement . The author takes a clearly defined stance on their subject and builds up an evidence-based case for it.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

upload-your-document-ai-proofreader

Table of contents

When do you write an argumentative essay, approaches to argumentative essays, introducing your argument, the body: developing your argument, concluding your argument, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about argumentative essays.

You might be assigned an argumentative essay as a writing exercise in high school or in a composition class. The prompt will often ask you to argue for one of two positions, and may include terms like “argue” or “argument.” It will frequently take the form of a question.

The prompt may also be more open-ended in terms of the possible arguments you could make.

Argumentative writing at college level

At university, the vast majority of essays or papers you write will involve some form of argumentation. For example, both rhetorical analysis and literary analysis essays involve making arguments about texts.

In this context, you won’t necessarily be told to write an argumentative essay—but making an evidence-based argument is an essential goal of most academic writing, and this should be your default approach unless you’re told otherwise.

Examples of argumentative essay prompts

At a university level, all the prompts below imply an argumentative essay as the appropriate response.

Your research should lead you to develop a specific position on the topic. The essay then argues for that position and aims to convince the reader by presenting your evidence, evaluation and analysis.

  • Don’t just list all the effects you can think of.
  • Do develop a focused argument about the overall effect and why it matters, backed up by evidence from sources.
  • Don’t just provide a selection of data on the measures’ effectiveness.
  • Do build up your own argument about which kinds of measures have been most or least effective, and why.
  • Don’t just analyze a random selection of doppelgänger characters.
  • Do form an argument about specific texts, comparing and contrasting how they express their thematic concerns through doppelgänger characters.

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

An argumentative essay should be objective in its approach; your arguments should rely on logic and evidence, not on exaggeration or appeals to emotion.

There are many possible approaches to argumentative essays, but there are two common models that can help you start outlining your arguments: The Toulmin model and the Rogerian model.

Toulmin arguments

The Toulmin model consists of four steps, which may be repeated as many times as necessary for the argument:

  • Make a claim
  • Provide the grounds (evidence) for the claim
  • Explain the warrant (how the grounds support the claim)
  • Discuss possible rebuttals to the claim, identifying the limits of the argument and showing that you have considered alternative perspectives

The Toulmin model is a common approach in academic essays. You don’t have to use these specific terms (grounds, warrants, rebuttals), but establishing a clear connection between your claims and the evidence supporting them is crucial in an argumentative essay.

Say you’re making an argument about the effectiveness of workplace anti-discrimination measures. You might:

  • Claim that unconscious bias training does not have the desired results, and resources would be better spent on other approaches
  • Cite data to support your claim
  • Explain how the data indicates that the method is ineffective
  • Anticipate objections to your claim based on other data, indicating whether these objections are valid, and if not, why not.

Rogerian arguments

The Rogerian model also consists of four steps you might repeat throughout your essay:

  • Discuss what the opposing position gets right and why people might hold this position
  • Highlight the problems with this position
  • Present your own position , showing how it addresses these problems
  • Suggest a possible compromise —what elements of your position would proponents of the opposing position benefit from adopting?

This model builds up a clear picture of both sides of an argument and seeks a compromise. It is particularly useful when people tend to disagree strongly on the issue discussed, allowing you to approach opposing arguments in good faith.

Say you want to argue that the internet has had a positive impact on education. You might:

  • Acknowledge that students rely too much on websites like Wikipedia
  • Argue that teachers view Wikipedia as more unreliable than it really is
  • Suggest that Wikipedia’s system of citations can actually teach students about referencing
  • Suggest critical engagement with Wikipedia as a possible assignment for teachers who are skeptical of its usefulness.

You don’t necessarily have to pick one of these models—you may even use elements of both in different parts of your essay—but it’s worth considering them if you struggle to structure your arguments.

Regardless of which approach you take, your essay should always be structured using an introduction , a body , and a conclusion .

Like other academic essays, an argumentative essay begins with an introduction . The introduction serves to capture the reader’s interest, provide background information, present your thesis statement , and (in longer essays) to summarize the structure of the body.

Hover over different parts of the example below to see how a typical introduction works.

The spread of the internet has had a world-changing effect, not least on the world of education. The use of the internet in academic contexts is on the rise, and its role in learning is hotly debated. For many teachers who did not grow up with this technology, its effects seem alarming and potentially harmful. This concern, while understandable, is misguided. The negatives of internet use are outweighed by its critical benefits for students and educators—as a uniquely comprehensive and accessible information source; a means of exposure to and engagement with different perspectives; and a highly flexible learning environment.

The body of an argumentative essay is where you develop your arguments in detail. Here you’ll present evidence, analysis, and reasoning to convince the reader that your thesis statement is true.

In the standard five-paragraph format for short essays, the body takes up three of your five paragraphs. In longer essays, it will be more paragraphs, and might be divided into sections with headings.

Each paragraph covers its own topic, introduced with a topic sentence . Each of these topics must contribute to your overall argument; don’t include irrelevant information.

This example paragraph takes a Rogerian approach: It first acknowledges the merits of the opposing position and then highlights problems with that position.

Hover over different parts of the example to see how a body paragraph is constructed.

A common frustration for teachers is students’ use of Wikipedia as a source in their writing. Its prevalence among students is not exaggerated; a survey found that the vast majority of the students surveyed used Wikipedia (Head & Eisenberg, 2010). An article in The Guardian stresses a common objection to its use: “a reliance on Wikipedia can discourage students from engaging with genuine academic writing” (Coomer, 2013). Teachers are clearly not mistaken in viewing Wikipedia usage as ubiquitous among their students; but the claim that it discourages engagement with academic sources requires further investigation. This point is treated as self-evident by many teachers, but Wikipedia itself explicitly encourages students to look into other sources. Its articles often provide references to academic publications and include warning notes where citations are missing; the site’s own guidelines for research make clear that it should be used as a starting point, emphasizing that users should always “read the references and check whether they really do support what the article says” (“Wikipedia:Researching with Wikipedia,” 2020). Indeed, for many students, Wikipedia is their first encounter with the concepts of citation and referencing. The use of Wikipedia therefore has a positive side that merits deeper consideration than it often receives.

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

  • Academic style
  • Vague sentences
  • Style consistency

See an example

editorial analysis essay

An argumentative essay ends with a conclusion that summarizes and reflects on the arguments made in the body.

No new arguments or evidence appear here, but in longer essays you may discuss the strengths and weaknesses of your argument and suggest topics for future research. In all conclusions, you should stress the relevance and importance of your argument.

Hover over the following example to see the typical elements of a conclusion.

The internet has had a major positive impact on the world of education; occasional pitfalls aside, its value is evident in numerous applications. The future of teaching lies in the possibilities the internet opens up for communication, research, and interactivity. As the popularity of distance learning shows, students value the flexibility and accessibility offered by digital education, and educators should fully embrace these advantages. The internet’s dangers, real and imaginary, have been documented exhaustively by skeptics, but the internet is here to stay; it is time to focus seriously on its potential for good.

If you want to know more about AI tools , college essays , or fallacies make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!

  • Ad hominem fallacy
  • Post hoc fallacy
  • Appeal to authority fallacy
  • False cause fallacy
  • Sunk cost fallacy

College essays

  • Choosing Essay Topic
  • Write a College Essay
  • Write a Diversity Essay
  • College Essay Format & Structure
  • Comparing and Contrasting in an Essay

 (AI) Tools

  • Grammar Checker
  • Paraphrasing Tool
  • Text Summarizer
  • AI Detector
  • Plagiarism Checker
  • Citation Generator

An argumentative essay tends to be a longer essay involving independent research, and aims to make an original argument about a topic. Its thesis statement makes a contentious claim that must be supported in an objective, evidence-based way.

An expository essay also aims to be objective, but it doesn’t have to make an original argument. Rather, it aims to explain something (e.g., a process or idea) in a clear, concise way. Expository essays are often shorter assignments and rely less on research.

At college level, you must properly cite your sources in all essays , research papers , and other academic texts (except exams and in-class exercises).

Add a citation whenever you quote , paraphrase , or summarize information or ideas from a source. You should also give full source details in a bibliography or reference list at the end of your text.

The exact format of your citations depends on which citation style you are instructed to use. The most common styles are APA , MLA , and Chicago .

The majority of the essays written at university are some sort of argumentative essay . Unless otherwise specified, you can assume that the goal of any essay you’re asked to write is argumentative: To convince the reader of your position using evidence and reasoning.

In composition classes you might be given assignments that specifically test your ability to write an argumentative essay. Look out for prompts including instructions like “argue,” “assess,” or “discuss” to see if this is the goal.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Caulfield, J. (2023, July 23). How to Write an Argumentative Essay | Examples & Tips. Scribbr. Retrieved March 4, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/academic-essay/argumentative-essay/

Is this article helpful?

Jack Caulfield

Jack Caulfield

Other students also liked, how to write a thesis statement | 4 steps & examples, how to write topic sentences | 4 steps, examples & purpose, how to write an expository essay, what is your plagiarism score.

  • Features for Creative Writers
  • Features for Work
  • Features for Higher Education
  • Features for Teachers
  • Features for Non-Native Speakers
  • Learn Blog Grammar Guide Community Academy FAQ
  • Grammar Guide

What Is a Rhetorical Analysis and How to Write a Great One

Helly Douglas

Helly Douglas

Cover image for article

Do you have to write a rhetorical analysis essay? Fear not! We’re here to explain exactly what rhetorical analysis means, how you should structure your essay, and give you some essential “dos and don’ts.”

What is a Rhetorical Analysis Essay?

How do you write a rhetorical analysis, what are the three rhetorical strategies, what are the five rhetorical situations, how to plan a rhetorical analysis essay, creating a rhetorical analysis essay, examples of great rhetorical analysis essays, final thoughts.

A rhetorical analysis essay studies how writers and speakers have used words to influence their audience. Think less about the words the author has used and more about the techniques they employ, their goals, and the effect this has on the audience.

Image showing definitions

In your analysis essay, you break a piece of text (including cartoons, adverts, and speeches) into sections and explain how each part works to persuade, inform, or entertain. You’ll explore the effectiveness of the techniques used, how the argument has been constructed, and give examples from the text.

A strong rhetorical analysis evaluates a text rather than just describes the techniques used. You don’t include whether you personally agree or disagree with the argument.

Structure a rhetorical analysis in the same way as most other types of academic essays . You’ll have an introduction to present your thesis, a main body where you analyze the text, which then leads to a conclusion.

Think about how the writer (also known as a rhetor) considers the situation that frames their communication:

  • Topic: the overall purpose of the rhetoric
  • Audience: this includes primary, secondary, and tertiary audiences
  • Purpose: there are often more than one to consider
  • Context and culture: the wider situation within which the rhetoric is placed

Back in the 4th century BC, Aristotle was talking about how language can be used as a means of persuasion. He described three principal forms —Ethos, Logos, and Pathos—often referred to as the Rhetorical Triangle . These persuasive techniques are still used today.

Image showing rhetorical strategies

Rhetorical Strategy 1: Ethos

Are you more likely to buy a car from an established company that’s been an important part of your community for 50 years, or someone new who just started their business?

Reputation matters. Ethos explores how the character, disposition, and fundamental values of the author create appeal, along with their expertise and knowledge in the subject area.

Aristotle breaks ethos down into three further categories:

  • Phronesis: skills and practical wisdom
  • Arete: virtue
  • Eunoia: goodwill towards the audience

Ethos-driven speeches and text rely on the reputation of the author. In your analysis, you can look at how the writer establishes ethos through both direct and indirect means.

Rhetorical Strategy 2: Pathos

Pathos-driven rhetoric hooks into our emotions. You’ll often see it used in advertisements, particularly by charities wanting you to donate money towards an appeal.

Common use of pathos includes:

  • Vivid description so the reader can imagine themselves in the situation
  • Personal stories to create feelings of empathy
  • Emotional vocabulary that evokes a response

By using pathos to make the audience feel a particular emotion, the author can persuade them that the argument they’re making is compelling.

Rhetorical Strategy 3: Logos

Logos uses logic or reason. It’s commonly used in academic writing when arguments are created using evidence and reasoning rather than an emotional response. It’s constructed in a step-by-step approach that builds methodically to create a powerful effect upon the reader.

Rhetoric can use any one of these three techniques, but effective arguments often appeal to all three elements.

The rhetorical situation explains the circumstances behind and around a piece of rhetoric. It helps you think about why a text exists, its purpose, and how it’s carried out.

Image showing 5 rhetorical situations

The rhetorical situations are:

  • 1) Purpose: Why is this being written? (It could be trying to inform, persuade, instruct, or entertain.)
  • 2) Audience: Which groups or individuals will read and take action (or have done so in the past)?
  • 3) Genre: What type of writing is this?
  • 4) Stance: What is the tone of the text? What position are they taking?
  • 5) Media/Visuals: What means of communication are used?

Understanding and analyzing the rhetorical situation is essential for building a strong essay. Also think about any rhetoric restraints on the text, such as beliefs, attitudes, and traditions that could affect the author's decisions.

Before leaping into your essay, it’s worth taking time to explore the text at a deeper level and considering the rhetorical situations we looked at before. Throw away your assumptions and use these simple questions to help you unpick how and why the text is having an effect on the audience.

Image showing what to consider when planning a rhetorical essay

1: What is the Rhetorical Situation?

  • Why is there a need or opportunity for persuasion?
  • How do words and references help you identify the time and location?
  • What are the rhetoric restraints?
  • What historical occasions would lead to this text being created?

2: Who is the Author?

  • How do they position themselves as an expert worth listening to?
  • What is their ethos?
  • Do they have a reputation that gives them authority?
  • What is their intention?
  • What values or customs do they have?

3: Who is it Written For?

  • Who is the intended audience?
  • How is this appealing to this particular audience?
  • Who are the possible secondary and tertiary audiences?

4: What is the Central Idea?

  • Can you summarize the key point of this rhetoric?
  • What arguments are used?
  • How has it developed a line of reasoning?

5: How is it Structured?

  • What structure is used?
  • How is the content arranged within the structure?

6: What Form is Used?

  • Does this follow a specific literary genre?
  • What type of style and tone is used, and why is this?
  • Does the form used complement the content?
  • What effect could this form have on the audience?

7: Is the Rhetoric Effective?

  • Does the content fulfil the author’s intentions?
  • Does the message effectively fit the audience, location, and time period?

Once you’ve fully explored the text, you’ll have a better understanding of the impact it’s having on the audience and feel more confident about writing your essay outline.

A great essay starts with an interesting topic. Choose carefully so you’re personally invested in the subject and familiar with it rather than just following trending topics. There are lots of great ideas on this blog post by My Perfect Words if you need some inspiration. Take some time to do background research to ensure your topic offers good analysis opportunities.

Image showing considerations for a rhetorical analysis topic

Remember to check the information given to you by your professor so you follow their preferred style guidelines. This outline example gives you a general idea of a format to follow, but there will likely be specific requests about layout and content in your course handbook. It’s always worth asking your institution if you’re unsure.

Make notes for each section of your essay before you write. This makes it easy for you to write a well-structured text that flows naturally to a conclusion. You will develop each note into a paragraph. Look at this example by College Essay for useful ideas about the structure.

Image showing how to structure an essay

1: Introduction

This is a short, informative section that shows you understand the purpose of the text. It tempts the reader to find out more by mentioning what will come in the main body of your essay.

  • Name the author of the text and the title of their work followed by the date in parentheses
  • Use a verb to describe what the author does, e.g. “implies,” “asserts,” or “claims”
  • Briefly summarize the text in your own words
  • Mention the persuasive techniques used by the rhetor and its effect

Create a thesis statement to come at the end of your introduction.

After your introduction, move on to your critical analysis. This is the principal part of your essay.

  • Explain the methods used by the author to inform, entertain, and/or persuade the audience using Aristotle's rhetorical triangle
  • Use quotations to prove the statements you make
  • Explain why the writer used this approach and how successful it is
  • Consider how it makes the audience feel and react

Make each strategy a new paragraph rather than cramming them together, and always use proper citations. Check back to your course handbook if you’re unsure which citation style is preferred.

3: Conclusion

Your conclusion should summarize the points you’ve made in the main body of your essay. While you will draw the points together, this is not the place to introduce new information you’ve not previously mentioned.

Use your last sentence to share a powerful concluding statement that talks about the impact the text has on the audience(s) and wider society. How have its strategies helped to shape history?

Before You Submit

Poor spelling and grammatical errors ruin a great essay. Use ProWritingAid to check through your finished essay before you submit. It will pick up all the minor errors you’ve missed and help you give your essay a final polish. Look at this useful ProWritingAid webinar for further ideas to help you significantly improve your essays. Sign up for a free trial today and start editing your essays!

Screenshot of ProWritingAid's web editor

You’ll find countless examples of rhetorical analysis online, but they range widely in quality. Your institution may have example essays they can share with you to show you exactly what they’re looking for.

The following links should give you a good starting point if you’re looking for ideas:

Pearson Canada has a range of good examples. Look at how embedded quotations are used to prove the points being made. The end questions help you unpick how successful each essay is.

Excelsior College has an excellent sample essay complete with useful comments highlighting the techniques used.

Brighton Online has a selection of interesting essays to look at. In this specific example, consider how wider reading has deepened the exploration of the text.

Image showing tips when reading a sample essay

Writing a rhetorical analysis essay can seem daunting, but spending significant time deeply analyzing the text before you write will make it far more achievable and result in a better-quality essay overall.

It can take some time to write a good essay. Aim to complete it well before the deadline so you don’t feel rushed. Use ProWritingAid’s comprehensive checks to find any errors and make changes to improve readability. Then you’ll be ready to submit your finished essay, knowing it’s as good as you can possibly make it.

Try ProWritingAid's Editor for Yourself

editorial analysis essay

Be confident about grammar

Check every email, essay, or story for grammar mistakes. Fix them before you press send.

Helly Douglas is a UK writer and teacher, specialising in education, children, and parenting. She loves making the complex seem simple through blogs, articles, and curriculum content. You can check out her work at hellydouglas.com or connect on Twitter @hellydouglas. When she’s not writing, you will find her in a classroom, being a mum or battling against the wilderness of her garden—the garden is winning!

Get started with ProWritingAid

Drop us a line or let's stay in touch via :

How to Write an Analysis on an Editorial

Robert russell.

The op-ed page plays an important role in democratic societies.

Newspaper editorials play an important role in democratic societies. The editorial and opinion page in major newspapers provides a public forum in which ideas, political issues and policies, and other topics can be discussed and debated. Editorials are used to argue for a position from a particular point of view. For editorial and opinion pages to perform their function well in promoting democratic debate and discussion, the reader needs to develop the ability to critically read and assess the claims put forth in the editorial. Editorials have the potential for spreading untruths and misinformation if they are read and assimilated without reflection. If you find fault with an editorial, write a critical analysis and submit it to the newspaper.

Carefully read the editorial twice. Read one time through to get a general feel for the content and tone of the editorial. Write down your basic impression of the editorial based on the initial reading. Read it a second time, paying attention to the details.

Compartmentalize the different parts of the editorial into a list. The list should include (1) the primary topic or topics addressed, (2) statistics and facts claimed by the editorial writer, (3) a summary of the arguments the writer uses to support the thesis and (4) a summary of the ideological perspective or point of view adopted by the writer. The purpose of an editorial is to argue about an issue from a particular point of view.

Scrutinize the elements of the editorial. Begin the analysis by analyzing the facts and statistics used in the editorial. Consider whether the statistics or facts are correct, complete, properly interpreted and so forth. Examine the arguments set forth in the editorial. The author's conclusions should follow from the premises of the argument. Determine if the premises the author used are legitimate or convincing. Finally, weigh the overall character of the editorial. The author should make a persuasive case for her point of view, even if your disagree with it.

Write a rough draft of the analysis. Use the analytic notes from Step 3 to write the analysis. Develop your criticisms and own point of view by carefully reviewing the notes. Writing the rough draft helps clarify the essential points of the analysis. Begin with a strong thesis statement such as "The recent editorial concerning X is misguided on three essential points." List the points where you think the author is misguided. Give the reasons why you think the author's argument is flawed and present your own solution to the problem.

Write the final draft of the analysis. Include the thesis statement in the introductory paragraph. Include the title of the article, the name of the author, the newspaper the editorial appeared in and the date of the editorial. Outline the essential argument and points of the analysis in the introductory paragraph. Write the specific details of the analysis in the main body. The length of the analysis depends on the context of the paper. Write a concluding paragraph that summarizes the essential points.

About the Author

Robert Russell began writing online professionally in 2010. He holds a Ph.D. in philosophy and is currently working on a book project exploring the relationship between art, entertainment and culture. He is the guitar player for the nationally touring cajun/zydeco band Creole Stomp. Russell travels with his laptop and writes many of his articles on the road between gigs.

Related Articles

How to Write a Report in High School

How to Write a Report in High School

Instructions for How to Write a Report

Instructions for How to Write a Report

How to Write an AP US History DBQ Essay

How to Write an AP US History DBQ Essay

How to Write a Personal Opinion Argument Essay

How to Write a Personal Opinion Argument Essay

How to Write a Formal Written Critique

How to Write a Formal Written Critique

How to Write a Suitable Objective Report

How to Write a Suitable Objective Report

How to Critique a Dissertation

How to Critique a Dissertation

How to Write a Constructive Speech

How to Write a Constructive Speech

Three Persuasive Writing Techniques

Three Persuasive Writing Techniques

How to Make a Good Thesis Statement About a Rhetorical Analysis

How to Make a Good Thesis Statement About a Rhetorical...

Define MLA Writing Format

Define MLA Writing Format

How to Write a College Level Book Review

How to Write a College Level Book Review

How to Write a Critical Appreciation Book Report

How to Write a Critical Appreciation Book Report

How to Write a Thesis Statement for an Article Critique

How to Write a Thesis Statement for an Article Critique

How to Write a Non-Fiction Book Summary

How to Write a Non-Fiction Book Summary

How to Write a Negative Debate Speech

How to Write a Negative Debate Speech

How to Write an Essay About a Piece of Literature

How to Write an Essay About a Piece of Literature

How to Write a DBQ Essay

How to Write a DBQ Essay

How to Write a Policy Analysis

How to Write a Policy Analysis

How to Write an MLA Argument Essay

How to Write an MLA Argument Essay

Regardless of how old we are, we never stop learning. Classroom is the educational resource for people of all ages. Whether you’re studying times tables or applying to college, Classroom has the answers.

  • Accessibility
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright Policy
  • Manage Preferences

© 2020 Leaf Group Ltd. / Leaf Group Media, All Rights Reserved. Based on the Word Net lexical database for the English Language. See disclaimer .

  • Affiliate Program

Wordvice

  • UNITED STATES
  • 台灣 (TAIWAN)
  • TÜRKIYE (TURKEY)
  • Academic Editing Services
  • - Research Paper
  • - Journal Manuscript
  • - Dissertation
  • - College & University Assignments
  • Admissions Editing Services
  • - Application Essay
  • - Personal Statement
  • - Recommendation Letter
  • - Cover Letter
  • - CV/Resume
  • Business Editing Services
  • - Business Documents
  • - Report & Brochure
  • - Website & Blog
  • Writer Editing Services
  • - Script & Screenplay
  • Our Editors
  • Client Reviews
  • Editing & Proofreading Prices
  • Wordvice Points
  • Partner Discount
  • Plagiarism Checker
  • APA Citation Generator
  • MLA Citation Generator
  • Chicago Citation Generator
  • Vancouver Citation Generator
  • - APA Style
  • - MLA Style
  • - Chicago Style
  • - Vancouver Style
  • Writing & Editing Guide
  • Academic Resources
  • Admissions Resources

How to Write a Rhetorical Analysis Essay–Examples & Template

editorial analysis essay

What is a Rhetorical Analysis Essay?

A rhetorical analysis essay is, as the name suggests, an analysis of someone else’s writing (or speech, or advert, or even cartoon) and how they use not only words but also rhetorical techniques to influence their audience in a certain way. A rhetorical analysis is less interested in what the author is saying and more in how they present it, what effect this has on their readers, whether they achieve their goals, and what approach they use to get there. 

Its structure is similar to that of most essays: An Introduction presents your thesis, a Body analyzes the text you have chosen, breaks it down into sections and explains how arguments have been constructed and how each part persuades, informs, or entertains the reader, and a Conclusion section sums up your evaluation. 

Note that your personal opinion on the matter is not relevant for your analysis and that you don’t state anywhere in your essay whether you agree or disagree with the stance the author takes.

In the following, we will define the key rhetorical concepts you need to write a good rhetorical analysis and give you some practical tips on where to start.

Key Rhetorical Concepts

Your goal when writing a rhetorical analysis is to think about and then carefully describe how the author has designed their text so that it has the intended effect on their audience. To do that, you need to consider a number of key rhetorical strategies: Rhetorical appeals (“Ethos”, “Logos”, and “Pathos”), context, as well as claims, supports, and warrants.

Ethos, Logos, and Pathos were introduced by Aristotle, way back in the 4th century BC, as the main ways in which language can be used to persuade an audience. They still represent the basis of any rhetorical analysis and are often referred to as the “rhetorical triangle”. 

These and other rhetorical techniques can all be combined to create the intended effect, and your job as the one analyzing a text is to break the writer’s arguments down and identify the concepts they are based on.

Rhetorical Appeals

Rhetorical appeal #1: ethos.

Ethos refers to the reputation or authority of the writer regarding the topic of their essay or speech and to how they use this to appeal to their audience. Just like we are more likely to buy a product from a brand or vendor we have confidence in than one we don’t know or have reason to distrust, Ethos-driven texts or speeches rely on the reputation of the author to persuade the reader or listener. When you analyze an essay, you should therefore look at how the writer establishes Ethos through rhetorical devices.

Does the author present themselves as an authority on their subject? If so, how? 

Do they highlight how impeccable their own behavior is to make a moral argument? 

Do they present themselves as an expert by listing their qualifications or experience to convince the reader of their opinion on something?

Rhetorical appeal #2: Pathos

The purpose of Pathos-driven rhetoric is to appeal to the reader’s emotions. A common example of pathos as a rhetorical means is adverts by charities that try to make you donate money to a “good cause”. To evoke the intended emotions in the reader, an author may use passionate language, tell personal stories, and employ vivid imagery so that the reader can imagine themselves in a certain situation and feel empathy with or anger towards others.

Rhetorical appeal #3: Logos

Logos, the “logical” appeal, uses reason to persuade. Reason and logic, supported by data, evidence, clearly defined methodology, and well-constructed arguments, are what most academic writing is based on. Emotions, those of the researcher/writer as well as those of the reader, should stay out of such academic texts, as should anyone’s reputation, beliefs, or personal opinions. 

Text and Context

To analyze a piece of writing, a speech, an advertisement, or even a satirical drawing, you need to look beyond the piece of communication and take the context in which it was created and/or published into account. 

Who is the person who wrote the text/drew the cartoon/designed the ad..? What audience are they trying to reach? Where was the piece published and what was happening there around that time? 

A political speech, for example, can be powerful even when read decades later, but the historical context surrounding it is an important aspect of the effect it was intended to have. 

Claims, Supports, and Warrants

To make any kind of argument, a writer needs to put forward specific claims, support them with data or evidence or even a moral or emotional appeal, and connect the dots logically so that the reader can follow along and agree with the points made.

The connections between statements, so-called “warrants”, follow logical reasoning but are not always clearly stated—the author simply assumes the reader understands the underlying logic, whether they present it “explicitly” or “implicitly”. Implicit warrants are commonly used in advertisements where seemingly happy people use certain products, wear certain clothes, accessories, or perfumes, or live certain lifestyles – with the connotation that, first, the product/perfume/lifestyle is what makes that person happy and, second, the reader wants to be as happy as the person in the ad. Some warrants are never clearly stated, and your job when writing a rhetorical analysis essay is therefore to identify them and bring them to light, to evaluate their validity, their effect on the reader, and the use of such means by the writer/creator. 

bust of plato the philosopher, rhetorical analysis essay

What are the Five Rhetorical Situations?

A “rhetorical situation” refers to the circumstance behind a text or other piece of communication that arises from a given context. It explains why a rhetorical piece was created, what its purpose is, and how it was constructed to achieve its aims.

Rhetorical situations can be classified into the following five categories:

Asking such questions when you analyze a text will help you identify all the aspects that play a role in the effect it has on its audience, and will allow you to evaluate whether it achieved its aims or where it may have failed to do so.

Rhetorical Analysis Essay Outline

Analyzing someone else’s work can seem like a big task, but as with every assignment or writing endeavor, you can break it down into smaller, well-defined steps that give you a practical structure to follow. 

To give you an example of how the different parts of your text may look when it’s finished, we will provide you with some excerpts from this rhetorical analysis essay example (which even includes helpful comments) published on the Online Writing Lab website of Excelsior University in Albany, NY. The text that this essay analyzes is this article on why one should or shouldn’t buy an Ipad. If you want more examples so that you can build your own rhetorical analysis template, have a look at this essay on Nabokov’s Lolita and the one provided here about the “Shitty First Drafts” chapter of Anne Lamott’s writing instruction book “Bird by Bird”.

Analyzing the Text

When writing a rhetorical analysis, you don’t choose the concepts or key points you think are relevant or want to address. Rather, you carefully read the text several times asking yourself questions like those listed in the last section on rhetorical situations to identify how the text “works” and how it was written to achieve that effect.

Start with focusing on the author : What do you think was their purpose for writing the text? Do they make one principal claim and then elaborate on that? Or do they discuss different topics? 

Then look at what audience they are talking to: Do they want to make a group of people take some action? Vote for someone? Donate money to a good cause? Who are these people? Is the text reaching this specific audience? Why or why not?

What tone is the author using to address their audience? Are they trying to evoke sympathy? Stir up anger? Are they writing from a personal perspective? Are they painting themselves as an authority on the topic? Are they using academic or informal language?

How does the author support their claims ? What kind of evidence are they presenting? Are they providing explicit or implicit warrants? Are these warrants valid or problematic? Is the provided evidence convincing?  

Asking yourself such questions will help you identify what rhetorical devices a text uses and how well they are put together to achieve a certain aim. Remember, your own opinion and whether you agree with the author are not the point of a rhetorical analysis essay – your task is simply to take the text apart and evaluate it.

If you are still confused about how to write a rhetorical analysis essay, just follow the steps outlined below to write the different parts of your rhetorical analysis: As every other essay, it consists of an Introduction , a Body (the actual analysis), and a Conclusion .

Rhetorical Analysis Introduction

The Introduction section briefly presents the topic of the essay you are analyzing, the author, their main claims, a short summary of the work by you, and your thesis statement . 

Tell the reader what the text you are going to analyze represents (e.g., historically) or why it is relevant (e.g., because it has become some kind of reference for how something is done). Describe what the author claims, asserts, or implies and what techniques they use to make their argument and persuade their audience. Finish off with your thesis statement that prepares the reader for what you are going to present in the next section – do you think that the author’s assumptions/claims/arguments were presented in a logical/appealing/powerful way and reached their audience as intended?

Have a look at an excerpt from the sample essay linked above to see what a rhetorical analysis introduction can look like. See how it introduces the author and article , the context in which it originally appeared , the main claims the author makes , and how this first paragraph ends in a clear thesis statement that the essay will then elaborate on in the following Body section:

Cory Doctorow ’s article on BoingBoing is an older review of the iPad , one of Apple’s most famous products. At the time of this article, however, the iPad was simply the latest Apple product to hit the market and was not yet so popular. Doctorow’s entire career has been entrenched in and around technology. He got his start as a CD-ROM programmer and is now a successful blogger and author. He is currently the co-editor of the BoingBoing blog on which this article was posted. One of his main points in this article comes from Doctorow’s passionate advocacy of free digital media sharing. He argues that the iPad is just another way for established technology companies to control our technological freedom and creativity . In “ Why I Won’t Buy an iPad (and Think You Shouldn’t, Either) ” published on Boing Boing in April of 2010, Cory Doctorow successfully uses his experience with technology, facts about the company Apple, and appeals to consumer needs to convince potential iPad buyers that Apple and its products, specifically the iPad, limit the digital rights of those who use them by controlling and mainstreaming the content that can be used and created on the device . 

Doing the Rhetorical Analysis

The main part of your analysis is the Body , where you dissect the text in detail. Explain what methods the author uses to inform, entertain, and/or persuade the audience. Use Aristotle’s rhetorical triangle and the other key concepts we introduced above. Use quotations from the essay to demonstrate what you mean. Work out why the writer used a certain approach and evaluate (and again, demonstrate using the text itself) how successful they were. Evaluate the effect of each rhetorical technique you identify on the audience and judge whether the effect is in line with the author’s intentions.

To make it easy for the reader to follow your thought process, divide this part of your essay into paragraphs that each focus on one strategy or one concept , and make sure they are all necessary and contribute to the development of your argument(s).

One paragraph of this section of your essay could, for example, look like this:

One example of Doctorow’s position is his comparison of Apple’s iStore to Wal-Mart. This is an appeal to the consumer’s logic—or an appeal to logos. Doctorow wants the reader to take his comparison and consider how an all-powerful corporation like the iStore will affect them. An iPad will only allow for apps and programs purchased through the iStore to be run on it; therefore, a customer must not only purchase an iPad but also any programs he or she wishes to use. Customers cannot create their own programs or modify the hardware in any way. 

As you can see, the author of this sample essay identifies and then explains to the reader how Doctorow uses the concept of Logos to appeal to his readers – not just by pointing out that he does it but by dissecting how it is done.

Rhetorical Analysis Conclusion

The conclusion section of your analysis should restate your main arguments and emphasize once more whether you think the author achieved their goal. Note that this is not the place to introduce new information—only rely on the points you have discussed in the body of your essay. End with a statement that sums up the impact the text has on its audience and maybe society as a whole:

Overall, Doctorow makes a good argument about why there are potentially many better things to drop a great deal of money on instead of the iPad. He gives some valuable information and facts that consumers should take into consideration before going out to purchase the new device. He clearly uses rhetorical tools to help make his case, and, overall, he is effective as a writer, even if, ultimately, he was ineffective in convincing the world not to buy an iPad . 

Frequently Asked Questions about Rhetorical Analysis Essays 

What is a rhetorical analysis essay.

A rhetorical analysis dissects a text or another piece of communication to work out and explain how it impacts its audience, how successfully it achieves its aims, and what rhetorical devices it uses to do that. 

While argumentative essays usually take a stance on a certain topic and argue for it, a rhetorical analysis identifies how someone else constructs their arguments and supports their claims.

What is the correct rhetorical analysis essay format?

Like most other essays, a rhetorical analysis contains an Introduction that presents the thesis statement, a Body that analyzes the piece of communication, explains how arguments have been constructed, and illustrates how each part persuades, informs, or entertains the reader, and a Conclusion section that summarizes the results of the analysis. 

What is the “rhetorical triangle”?

The rhetorical triangle was introduced by Aristotle as the main ways in which language can be used to persuade an audience: Logos appeals to the audience’s reason, Ethos to the writer’s status or authority, and Pathos to the reader’s emotions. Logos, Ethos, and Pathos can all be combined to create the intended effect, and your job as the one analyzing a text is to break the writer’s arguments down and identify what specific concepts each is based on.

Let Wordvice help you write a flawless rhetorical analysis essay! 

Whether you have to write a rhetorical analysis essay as an assignment or whether it is part of an application, our professional proofreading services feature professional editors are trained subject experts that make sure your text is in line with the required format, as well as help you improve the flow and expression of your writing. Let them be your second pair of eyes so that after receiving paper editing services or essay editing services from Wordvice, you can submit your manuscript or apply to the school of your dreams with confidence.

And check out our editing services for writers (including blog editing , script editing , and book editing ) to correct your important personal or business-related work.

editorial analysis essay

Call us @ 08069405205

editorial analysis essay

Search Here

editorial analysis essay

  • An Introduction to the CSE Exam
  • Personality Test
  • Annual Calendar by UPSC-2024
  • Common Myths about the Exam
  • About Insights IAS
  • Our Mission, Vision & Values
  • Director's Desk
  • Meet Our Team
  • Our Branches
  • Careers at Insights IAS
  • Daily Current Affairs+PIB Summary
  • Insights into Editorials
  • Insta Revision Modules for Prelims
  • Current Affairs Quiz
  • Static Quiz
  • Current Affairs RTM
  • Insta-DART(CSAT)
  • Insta 75 Days Revision Tests for Prelims 2023
  • Secure (Mains Answer writing)
  • Secure Synopsis
  • Ethics Case Studies
  • Insta Ethics
  • Weekly Essay Challenge
  • Insta Revision Modules-Mains
  • Insta 75 Days Revision Tests for Mains
  • Secure (Archive)
  • Anthropology
  • Law Optional
  • Kannada Literature
  • Public Administration
  • English Literature
  • Medical Science
  • Mathematics
  • Commerce & Accountancy
  • Monthly Magazine: CURRENT AFFAIRS 30
  • Content for Mains Enrichment (CME)
  • InstaMaps: Important Places in News
  • Weekly CA Magazine
  • The PRIME Magazine
  • Insta Revision Modules-Prelims
  • Insta-DART(CSAT) Quiz
  • Insta 75 days Revision Tests for Prelims 2022
  • Insights SECURE(Mains Answer Writing)
  • Interview Transcripts
  • Previous Years' Question Papers-Prelims
  • Answer Keys for Prelims PYQs
  • Solve Prelims PYQs
  • Previous Years' Question Papers-Mains
  • UPSC CSE Syllabus
  • Toppers from Insights IAS
  • Testimonials
  • Felicitation
  • UPSC Results
  • Indian Heritage & Culture
  • Ancient Indian History
  • Medieval Indian History
  • Modern Indian History
  • World History
  • World Geography
  • Indian Geography
  • Indian Society
  • Social Justice
  • International Relations
  • Agriculture
  • Environment & Ecology
  • Disaster Management
  • Science & Technology
  • Security Issues
  • Ethics, Integrity and Aptitude

InstaCourses

  • Indian Heritage & Culture
  • Enivornment & Ecology

Get Free Current Affairs Updates from Insights

Please Enter Your Email ID and Hit the Subscribe Button Below to Join others to Receive Free Updates

Email Address

Subscribe to Insights Current Affairs

MARCH EDITORIALS – 2024

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A vaccine that prevents six cancers
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Mountains of plastic are choking the Himalayan States

FEBRUARY EDITORIALS – 2024

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India’s fight against rare diseases
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Stop the dithering and encourage green elections in India
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : An expansive land management policy is overdue
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A disservice to the education sector
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The NB8 visit to India focuses on cooperation and trust
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Beyond shelter, dweller needs within the four walls
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Having panchayats as self-governing institutions
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Greece’s gateway to Asia, India’s gateway to Europe
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Recalibrating merit in the age of Artificial Intelligence
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : An intervention that will help strengthen legal education
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A demand that could hamper gender equality
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A global alliance to bridge the gender equity gap
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – December 2023
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A privileged strategic partnership, without a gulf
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Equity concerns in banning fossil fuel extraction
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Union’s reins on financial transfers to States
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A critical view of the ‘sanitation miracle’ in rural India
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS Micro-credentials, the next chapter in higher education
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Interim Budget 2024 — in campaign mode
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : What makes the India-France ‘strategic partnership’ tick

JANUARY EDITORIALS – 2024

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A blurred mapping of internal female migration
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Populism does not help public health
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Aadhaar-based pay a bad idea for MGNREGS
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Quality Of Growth
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Why is there no snowfall in Kashmir?     
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The truth about India’s booming toy exports
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Tax contribution by States needs to be revisited
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A case of established law lagging behind new tech
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The geopolitics in the Bangladesh election results
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Jab In Time
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A Speaker’s flawed move to determine the real faction
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Second Chance
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A manifesto for justice that has sprung from crises
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A Less Ableist Politics
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : An ambitious push for values, ethics in higher education
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Structured negotiation as a boost for disability rights
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Reshaped By AI
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The global nuclear order is under strain
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Reigniting the flame of India-Korea defense cooperation
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Reading the tea leaves for 2024

DECEMBER EDITORIALS – 2023

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : An AI For The People
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Growth charts — WHO standards versus India crafted
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A Missing Industrial Policy
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – November 2023
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – October 2023
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Global Goal on Adaptation and the road from Dubai
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India’s jobs crisis, the macroeconomic reasons
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Telecom law upgrades for a digital authoritarian state
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Questionable searches under the Money Laundering Act
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The deep import of the Article 370 verdict
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : An uphill struggle to grow the Forest Rights Act
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A time-honored connect that will help bridge the Gulf
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS COP28 — many a slippery slope ahead
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Article 370 judgment is a case of constitutional monism
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : An anti-terror law and its interference with liberty
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS Harvest the Odisha story to ensure food security
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Calibrating a strategy for India’s future growth
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India’s growing neighborhood dilemmas
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Navigating the U.S.-China relationship
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Ambedkar touch in rethinking social justice policies
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Centers Of Inclusion
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India, disability inclusion and the power of ‘by’
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The GDP surprise
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Unpacking the Dubai climate meeting
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Molding the Himalayas needs caution

NOVEMBER EDITORIALS – 2023

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS Women’s political empowerment — more talk, less action
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A $5 trillion economy, but for whom?
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Same-sex couples: A judge to the rescue
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Recognising the impact of climate change on health
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A renewed focus on emerging technologies
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Steering road safety in India back onto the right lane
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS State of the economy — temper the euphoria
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Challenging the Electoral Bond Scheme
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A grave error in the law
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Enhancing representation, for a just electoral system
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Road To Elimination                   
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Revamping the criminal justice system to fit the bill
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS  :    Acknowledge India’s economic successes too
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Move towards e-FIR, but with caution
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A telco double dip attempt that threatens Net neutrality
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Giving the urban Indian a better life
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Biosphere reserves are evolving as pockets of hope
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Impacting a woman’s freedom to reproductive choices
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Stocktaking climate finance — a case of circles in red ink

OCTOBER EDITORIALS – 2023

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Biden Pragmatism
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Unhealthy urban India must get into street fight mode
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Mitigating tragedies in the Himalayan region
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India need to relook the Dam Safety Act
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Green Finance Challenge
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The shape of climate justice in a warming India
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Abortion laws in the spotlight
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Confronting the long-term risks of Artificial Intelligence
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A war that ends the Saudi-Israel ‘normalization’ process
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The case for caste census in India
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : We need evidence-based traditional medicine
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Mental health and the floundering informal worker
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Aligning higher education with the United Nations SDGs
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – September 2023
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Defusing the ticking time bomb called diabetes
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Don’t be guided by short-term political gains
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The trouble with a Nobel for mRNA COVID vaccines
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – August 2023
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – July 2023
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Criminal law Bills and a hollow decolonisation
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Rajghat Consensus
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Reform can address India’s kidney transplant deficit

SEPTEMBER EDITORIALS – 2023

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : From women’s reservation to gender equality
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : With climate change, tackling new disease scenarios
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Children, a key yet missed demographic in AI regulation
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A clear message to industry on dispute resolution
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Ethanol – a savior that gives savings
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Taking a giant leap for a new ethics in outer space
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Cauvery Water Management Authority should act
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Corridor To A New World
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A push for GM mustard disregarding science, the law
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Disentangling the 2030 global renewable energy target
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The complex path to biofuel sustainability
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Ridding India of food insecurity
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : An unforgettable presidency
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : An overhaul, the criminal law Bills, and the big picture
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Finding Seoul in the Indo-Pacific
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Lift-Off And The Law
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The implications of the expansion of BRICS
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Emerging countries need women-led climate action
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A Climate Question For G20
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A progressive UCC must protect the child’s best interests

AUGUST EDITORIALS – 2023

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Cross the boulders in the Indus Waters Treaty
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Election Commission — autonomy in the crosshairs
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : At Delhi summit, demonstrate climate leadership
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : BRICS 2.0
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Cleantech, for an inclusive green future in India
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India’s G-20 opportunity for an African Renaissance
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The U.K.-India relationship is alive with opportunity
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A strong case to restore Section 8(4) of the RP Act
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The BRICS test for India’s multipolarity rhetoric
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – June 2023
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Crafting safe Generative AI systems
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A ‘fab’ way to conduct India-Japan tech diplomacy
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The gaps in the Births and Deaths Registration (Amendment) Act
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : New Bills and a principled course for criminal law reforms
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Consumption-based poverty estimates have relevance
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A time-tested friendship
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The EC’s Guardrails
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Stop the fence-sitting in cluster bomb use
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The grammar of commerce in a new age of geopolitics
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Neither the right to privacy nor the right to information
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Growth Check-List
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : America’s pursuit of Saudi-Israel rapprochement
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India needs evidence-based, ethics-driven medicine
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : From state visit to a more robust trade relationship
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The dangers in the Digital Personal Data Protection Bill
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – May 2023
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : In Article 370 hearing, the original text and spirit count
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Data Beyond Surveys
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Charting the path for the Sixteenth Finance Commission
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – April 2023
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – March 2023

JULY EDITORIALS – 2023

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Weighing in on the National Research Foundation Bill
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The SCO is a success story that can get better
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Moving away from the ‘take-make-dispose’ model
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : ASEAN, a persistence with dialogue, on a trodden path
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :   Dilemmas of India’s great power ambitions
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Upholders of strategic autonomy
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :  India’s data protection law needs refinement
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : More than court action, revisit the Indus Waters Treaty
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A Bill that fences in the right to information
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : What connects India and Bangladesh
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Virtual summit, virtual silence
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : An unacceptable verdict in the constitutional sense
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Quiet diplomacy could ease South China Sea tensions
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Demographic transition and change in women’s lives                                      
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : AI’s disruptive economic impact, an India check
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Restoring the World Trade Organization’s crown jewel
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Sobriety after the euphoria of the U.S. state visit
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India needs a Uniform Civil Code
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Choose a new palette for India’s creative economy
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A macro view of the fiscal health of States
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :  India should refuse America’s ‘NATO Plus’ bait
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A case of unchecked power to restrict online free speech
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Legitimacy Of a uniform civil code

JUNE EDITORIALS – 2023

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Tracing the arc of American ‘exception-ism’ for India
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Laying the foundation for a future-ready digital India
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Outreach to diaspora and statesmanship
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Strike a fine balance, have a just civil code
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A doorway to an entrepreneurial university
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : More HIT than miss in India-Nepal ties
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Making of a high point
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A rising India, in waltz dance steps with the U.S
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Responsibility and the complexities of climate leadership
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Reflections on Artificial Intelligence, as friend or foe
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The next Finance Commission will have a tough task
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Tax law in the shadow of the higher judiciary
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : E-education platforms, their Generative AI chapter
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Amplify the subject of adolescent girl nutrition
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A pragmatic approach, for better India-Nepal ties
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : How does a cyclone affect the monsoon’s onset?
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Sedition — illogical equation of government with state
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A global order as technology’s much needed pole star
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : In the short term, stabilize the Line of Actual Control
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Delhi ordinance is an unabashed power-grab
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : International trade has a carbon problem
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Central Asian foreign policy multi-vectorism pays off
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A parliamentary democracy or an executive democracy

May EDITORIALS – 2023

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Unboxing the ‘export turnaround’ in India’s toy story
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Nutrition In A Warmer World
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :  A belligerence towards Beijing that is unsettling
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : An ordinance, its constitutionality, and scrutiny
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A ‘middle kingdom’ dawns on India’s west
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The paradox of BRICS, its new pathway
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Bare New World
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India as a Quad-led biomanufacturing hub
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :   Tracking SDG progress the Bhopal way
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – February 2023
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – January 2023
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The promise in India’s National     Quantum Mission
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS Two judgments and the principle of accountability
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : New Delhi and the New Washington Consensus
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India can guide G20’s disaster management initiatives
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : This strategic-economic bloc will only tighten the leash
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Marriage for all, even if for a few
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A ground view of the Indian Space Policy 2023
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A New Arab Tale
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The ‘right to health’ goal and a role for Taiwan
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Buddhism, India’s soft power projection tool
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : With COVID-19 ‘over’, applying the lessons learnt
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The horizon for India beyond the G-20, SCO summits
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS A boost for science, a wider window to the universe
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :   Valour and prestige — the world of special operations
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : In ‘India as Eden’ offer, the apple of diluted labour laws
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The LAC crisis and the danger of losing without fighting
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The importance of constitutional punctuality
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Tread a new path, one that prioritizes social justice             
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India, its SDG pledge goal, and the strategy to apply       

April EDITORIALS – 2023

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The women’s reservation Bill cannot wait any longer
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Darwin must stay in Indian school textbooks
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The challenge of reviving a sense of fraternity
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Virtual digital assets,India’s stand and the way ahead
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The limited role of textbooks in history
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Sanskrit as official language, Ambedkar’s amendment
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Pending Bills, the issue of gubernatorial inaction
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A new troika for India’s northeast region
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS  India as most populous can be more boon than bane
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A new edge to the fight against tuberculosis
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : It is a new assault on India’s liberty
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A message for the planners in dealing with the Dragon
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Chinese shenanigans on Arunachal Pradesh
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : How food inflation can be managed keeping El Nino in mind
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Diplomacy, with a change in terms of reference
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A reminder about unfettered constitutional posts
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The goal of building a popular Dalit agenda
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India must board the Online Dispute Resolution bus
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Corporate power and Indian inflation
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Peace That Could Have Been
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Directing AI for better and smarter legislation
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Finland’s journey, from neutral to NATO
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Awaiting lift-off into the Second Space Age
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Rebalance Of Power
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The takeaways from the UN World Water Conference
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A long view of the South Asian drama
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : In controlled digital lending, the issue of public interest
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A new economics for a new world
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Time to put a price on carbon emissions
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A fresh COVID-19 data interpretation approach
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : No ‘sayonara’ for Japan in Indo-Pacific geopolitics
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India needs a national programme on autism
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India’s semiconductor mission might need a compass

March EDITORIALS – 2023

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Vaikom, a satyagraha, and the fight for social justice
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : GPT-4 — a shift from ‘what it can do’ to ‘what it augurs’
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India’s DPIs, catching the next wave
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The need for sector-specific safeguards in ‘techade’
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : This helicopter programme cannot go into a tailspin
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A shared G20 vision for the ocean commons
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : SC order on UAPA lowers the bar for state when restricting freedoms
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Making sense of the disqualification of a Lok Sabha MP
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Why Tipu Sultan must be killed, again
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : No slander please, they are our freedom fighters first
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A climate change survival guide to act on
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The old pension scheme as a burden on the poor
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The limits of American power in West Asia
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : An objective look at a China-led framework
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Concluding on a high note, in Manhattan
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Religious absolutism undermining the autonomy of the Indian Muslim
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Moving forward with a newer concept of Universal Health Care
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Slow steps to India-China border tranquility
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A Union And a Nation
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The forecast after a fake news campaign in Tamil Nadu
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Tested but tired, this force could be in distress
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The colonial past is still relevant
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Towards E-Justice
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : China, India and the promise of the power of two
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : In Saudi-Iranian normalization, new challenges emerge in West Asia
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A resilient India, but growth pangs for China
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A chance for India to shape a data governance regime
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Adultery as misconduct and judicial musings
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Using Ukraine as a bellwether is a path to tragedy
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India and Sweden: Old friends in new times
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A moment of reckoning for AUKUS and Australia
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The ideal track to run India’s logistics system
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Media raids and breaking the silence on press freedom
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Let’s walk together
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :Different faces of the Indian women’s movement
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Applying Active Non-Alignment for Ukraine peace
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A ‘Zeitenwende’ in the India-Germany relationship
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The anti-defection law is facing convulsions
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The hardships of a career in Ayurvedic practice
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS       India’s moment under the diplomatic sun must be used
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : South Asia’s human capital is the resilience it needs
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Positing India’s stand on the Ukraine war
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Phasing out the line, ‘math is not for a girl’
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Politics and ideology within the portals of the judiciary
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India’s democracy, diminished and declining
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A thumbs down for the ‘Adopt a Heritage’ scheme

February EDITORIALS – 2023

  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – December 2022
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Under India’s presidency, a people’s G20
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Unpacking the new set of e-waste rules
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Smoke signals from the renewable energy sphere
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Lessons from Hindenburg’s ‘skin in the game’ approach
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Slow Path To Peace
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Cyberattacks are rising, but there is an ideal patch
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India’s R&D estimates are an incomplete picture
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A case that scans the working of the anti-defection law
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India can become a biodiversity champion     
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Storage Hurdle On Net Zero Track
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Missing in Parliament
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India needs a Budget for its young
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A democratization that is more a fallacy      
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Slow progress to creating a safe workplace for women
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The MP Model In Agriculture
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The curious case of the disqualification of a politician
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A Terror Law Less Arbitrary
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Social security and the story of two Budgets
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Deep sea fish conservation must not go adrift
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : How data can empower MPs to serve people better
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The price pinch
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A manifesto for tackling the silent pandemic of Antimicrobial
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Shaping a more disabled-friendly digital ecosystem        
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Adani story and Indian neoliberalism
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Hill or city, urban planning cannot be an afterthought
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : House rules and the weapon of expunction
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The spirit of the law lies in this dissenting judgment
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : In scholarly peer-review, discard bath water, keep baby     
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: India’s law and order matrix needs a reboot
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India’s green hydrogen challenge
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India must avoid growing into a dystopia
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Pact’s Fine Print
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The lesson from a court appointment drama
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The freedom of speech and an ‘adolescent India
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : An Embattled Green
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India’s just energy transition is more than a coal story
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : ChatGPT and the AI challenge
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Charge sheet scrutiny is not a case of prying eyes
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Trading more within Asia makes economic sense
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : An eye on the future
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The growth deceleration problem cannot be skipped
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A Budget that signals growth with stability
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Solar energy is not the best option for India
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Economic Survey that wasn’t

January EDITORIALS – 2023

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Let Diplomacy Flow
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Tasks for India’s millet revolution
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Avoid further delay in conducting the Census                  
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : In NREGA reforms, prioritize the worker and her dues
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India’s groundwater governance is in better shape
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The moral and intellectual crises in economic policies
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A ‘Holocaust education’ for India to create a just present
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : New UGC proposal: A better way to open up Indian universities
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – November 2022
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Developing schools without barriers
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Working hand in hand to showcase India
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Needed, a new approach to data protection for minors
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Democracy and its structural slippages
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : It’s time for India’s universities to join the world
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A reminder of the flaws in India’s urbanization policies
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A G20 presidency to amplify South Asia’s voice
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : There is hardly any autonomy at the panchayat level
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Flip the page to the chapter on middle schoolchildren
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Judging a decade of the POCSO Act
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Admonishments that endanger the Constitution
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : New free foodgrain scheme as an illusion, doublespeak
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The illogical rejection of the idea of South Asia
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Balance fiscal consolidation with growth  
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Time to streamline the Provident Fund pension scheme
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : What does the Centre want in the Bhopal gas case?
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Rules Of Detachment
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Take a step to regulate deep fakes
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : More than just an address
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Wages Of Distress
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Entering a year of uncertainty
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : China’s oil gambit in Taliban’s Afghanistan
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Reducing preterm births and stillbirths
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The beginning of India’s cultural renaissance     
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Lessons from Russia’s Ukraine war
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A step towards fighting corruption
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Time to invest in India
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The potential of generative AI
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Avoid further delay in conducting the Census   
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India’s G20 Presidency
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The crisis in international law
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Towards making India an uplinking hub
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Stabilizing ties with Nepal in uncertain times
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The values of local self-governance 
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Turning the Spotlight on Health
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : It is crucial for India to embrace multi-domain operations 
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Preventing animal cruelty is a duty of the state
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : When degrees lose their worth
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Demonetisation arose from the Centre, It should have enacted a law
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India-China: between pre-1962 and now
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India’s dilemmas in an Asian century

December EDITORIALS – 2022

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A strong case exists for marriage equality  
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : In the new evolving world, India needs a new vision   
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Leveraging voice technology to combat cyber-fraud
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Changing features of Muslim representation in India
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Where China is headed and what it means for India
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India must build awareness on population control    
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Focus on Africa, the heart of the Global South
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Handling the fallout of China’s wilted COVID strategy
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : How to improve historical thinking      
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A warship programme that must go full steam ahead
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Forest rights and heritage conservation
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Constitutional silences, unconstitutional inaction
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Alleviating the scourge of private healthcare
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : In U.S. actions, the worry of global trade lawlessness
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Reshaping the world’s responses to the terror matrix
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Benchmarks for ECs’ appointments
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The need to make cancer drugs affordable
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Accepting the new normal in the Indo-Pacific contestation
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Upholding the autonomy of the Election Commission
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Criminalizing consensual relationships
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A role for India in a World Wide Web
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India’s crushing court backlogs, out-of-the box reform
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Good governance beyond motherhood and apple pie
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : An Accessible Law
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Is the RTI Act fulfilling its purpose?
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Building climate resilience collectively
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Census as a mirror of past and present       
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Analyzing U.S.-China bilateral ties
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The rise of rural manufacturing
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Big Tech and the need in India for ex-ante regulation
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Curbing individualism in public health
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : An Example and a Warning
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The role of the ‘China Test’ in India’s grand strategy
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The G-20 can be the UN Security Council alternative
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Expand the food safety net without any more delay
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : I Dream of a Middle Path
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : This Winter, Let’s Speak
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : BIMSTEC as key to a new South Asian regional order
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The perils of undoing the framework of reservation
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Babasaheb of the Bahujans
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Scenarios for the future of India, and the world
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Climate talks as shortchanging international law   
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The COVID-19 pandemic, food and socializing
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Democracy interrupted
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Poor soil management will erode food security
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Maritime Stocktaking
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Connecting India’s East with the Indo-Pacific
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Safer roads for a greener, more sustainable environment
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Laying the ground to delegitimize the Supreme Court
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : An Indian recipe to quell micronutrient malnutrition
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Party Congress over, understanding the China puzzle

November EDITORIALS – 2022

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Climate Change Generation
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Settling the language for cooperative federalism
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Data Does Not Lie
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Still a nightmare for domestic violence survivors
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Xi’s Congress rhetoric and the PLA’s march ahead 
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : It’s time to discuss depopulation
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : COP27 and the ambiguity about responsibility
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Securing the EC
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Banking On New Delhi
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Ukraine, right-wingers and the crisis of democracy  
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Poverty, Uncensored
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Fixing India’s malnutrition problem
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Where there is no Inequality
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The ‘India pole’ in international politics
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : New Frontiers in Space
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The dissenting judgment versus the razing of equality
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A reform, much Ignored
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Charting the economic journey ahead
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : 10 years of POCSO
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Indian Air Force needs a new doctrine
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – October 2022
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Opaque political financing could cost democracy dear
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Weighing in on PMGKAY, the free grains scheme
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :  This unseating of vice chancellors is faulty
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Quest for transparency in FTA negotiations
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Undermining federalism, eroding States’ autonomy
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : No money for Terror
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Where no child is left behind
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :  Asia after Ukraine
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: The Gene Revolution
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :   Behind the smokescreen around private climate finance
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Autonomy oils the wheels of higher education excellence
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Raising money for green transitions
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : COP-27: Payback time for rich nations
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :Forgotten in India after fighting from world trenches 
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The EWS judgment and the shadow of Pandora
  • INSIGHTS INTO EDITORIAL: BICKERING GOVERNOR
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :   The Uniform Civil Code
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS:Madrasas face an existential crisis
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Content moderation through co-regulation
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: No consensus’ is derailing counter-terror diplomacy
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :  The age of minimalism in India-Pakistan ties
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: India’s G20 presidency and food security
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: The ambiguity of reservations for the poor

October EDITORIALS – 2022

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The death penalty and humanising criminal justice
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :  The extra-constitutional delusions of Raj Bhavan
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS:Utilize fiscal room to ramp up capital spending
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :  The old but relevant script of the Cuban Missile crisis
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :  Utilize fiscal room to ramp up capital spending
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS:Brexit-Britain’s challenges remain
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :This Diwali, Light a Lamp within
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS:  This Hindi – and Hindi alone – counsel is flawed
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Turkish foreign policy, the East-West divide
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: India, America and the China challenge
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :  Today’s weapon of choice, its expanding dimensions
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – September 2022
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Food day as a reminder to ‘leave no one behind’
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Indian Deep Tech and a case for a strategic fund
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: The democratization of India, the Mandal way
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :  China’s “wolf warrior” era
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Solutions by the people, for the people
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS:Russia’s continued defiance of international law
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS:The coalition of the world
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Domestic ideologies in external settings
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Gubernatorial procrastination is unreasonable
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Changes in the UAE’s immigration rules
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: A decisive shift in the discourse on abortion rights  
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Choose ‘safe surrender’ over infant abandonment
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Letting go of a chance to democratize telecom services

September EDITORIALS – 2022

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: After the floods, Bengaluru needs to clean up its act
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Globe-changing reverberations of the Ukraine war
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Permanent membership of the UNSC is another story
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :Soft power, the new race every country wants to win
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A census is not about counting sheep
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: The ambit of fraternity and the wages of oblivion
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Positioning India in a chaotic world
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The hijab case and the essential practices doctrine
  • Sansad TV: New India Debate- Role Of Media In India
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :Geopolitics without geoeconomics
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – August 2022
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – July 2022
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – June 2022
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : An essential pit stop in parliamentary business
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: The future of old times in India
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: For India, the buzzword now is ‘all-alignment’
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India has lost its way in the use of international law
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India-Bangladesh ties, a model for bilateral cooperation
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Moving out of the shadows, from silence to assertion
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The outline of an essential global pandemic treaty
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Time for a joint space exercise
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: India, 7% plus annual growth, and the realities
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The difficult path to India-Pakistan peace
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India and Australia, from divergence to convergence        
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :India’s cyber infrastructure needs more than patches
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Academia, research and the glass ceiling in India
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Gorbachev and India

August EDITORIALS – 2022

  •   EDITORIAL ANALYSIS    Drop the phone checking, draft surveillance curbing orders
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :Freebies’, a judicial lead and a multi-layered issue
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A draconian law that needs to disappear
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A public judge with an uncertain legacy
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :Heading the G20 and New Delhi’s choices
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A tale of Putin and Xi
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Solar energy: For Amrit Kaal in agriculture  
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : End this asymmetrical conflict over ‘freebies’
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Hard truths about India’s labour reforms
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :This maritime partnership is still a work in progress
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: The fragility of the Northeast’s integration
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :India must protect its hard-won freedoms
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS:Moving policy away from population control
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :Tapping technology to check minor mineral plunder
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Survey data on poverty and broad policy pointers
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A new global vision for G20
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :Withdrawal of the Personal Data Protection Bill was a bad move    
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :Public assets sale and the concern of ‘fiduciary duty’
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: A turning point in crypto regulation, led by Europe
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: By upholding PMLA, SC puts its stamp on Kafka’s law

July EDITORIALS – 2022

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: The poor state of India’s fiscal federalism
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Whose GDP is it anyway?
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: A global order caught up in a swirl of chaos
  • Sansad TV: 75 Years- Laws that Shaped India- Income Tax Act, 1961
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Why Agni path scheme needs to be extended to All India Services
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :Despite pressures, the Indian rupee’s remarkable resilience  
  • Sansad TV: Diplomatic Dispatch- India-Caricom Ties
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: In Pegasus battle, the fight for surveillance reform
  • Sansad TV: The Defenders- India’s Hypersonic Missile Programme
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :Revamp India’s school health services
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Chile marks a notch in global constitutionalism
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and its stature in the modern world
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Preserving democracy in India
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :The Ukraine war and the return to Eurocentrism
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Is protectionism compatible with liberalization?
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: The President is not a mere rubber stamp
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :Create more jobs, revamp employment policy
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The scam faultline is damaging Indian banking
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: A multilateral platform in a polarized world
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : How Shinzo Abe restored Japan’s global standing
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: A community and a health issue of concern
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Words from Bandung to relive in Bali and Delhi
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :The status of China’s Belt and Road Initiative in South Asia
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS:  A Chill Down Asia’s Spine
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : High Costs of agri-trade bans
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: GST: Five years stronger
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: The Free Fall of the Rupee

June EDITORIALS – 2022

  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: The anti defection law — political facts, legal fiction
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Modi’s two Summits: UAE trumps G7
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS:  Indian laws on Abortions
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS:  The Advent of ‘Appsolute’ chaos in NREGA
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: The problems plaguing thermal power generators
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS:  Towards a single low tax regime
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: A new global standard for AI ethics
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS:  A case of the court straying into the legislative sphere
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Recognising the ‘compulsory’ woman worker
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: The Fragile State Of Nuclear Disarmament
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: The Reasons behind the crashing crypto Market
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Malnutrition in India is a worry in a modern scenario
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: The influenza pandemic and ‘nations within a nation
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: The FATF and Pakistan’s Position
  • Sansad TV: Perspective- Inequality in India
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Understanding the Organization of Islamic Cooperation(OIC)
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Musings on ‘Indic civilisation’ and Indianness
  • EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: India is not the fastest growing big economy
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Indian Patent Regime and Its Clash with the US Norms
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Ties Reset
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Ukraine war and global food crisis
  • Insights into Editorial: The Ukraine war and the global food crisis
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Inflation’s long Shadow
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Of what good is a bad bank
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The debates around the Surrogacy Act
  • Insights into Editorial: India gets world’s first liquid-mirror telescope for astronomy
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A ‘silver’ moment to propel a Bay of Bengal dream
  • Insights into Editorial: New India needs free and quality higher education
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The status of eVTOL
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Boost for Boosters
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Control and Delete
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Gradual engagement
  • Insights into Editorial: The European Union’s ban on Russian oil
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : China growing footprint in the Pacific Islands
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The challenge of reforming death penalty
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The Digital India Transformation
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Recovering Slowly
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Caution First
  • Insights into Editorial: Building peace and prosperity with strong BRICS
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : India’s changing goal posts over coal
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Needed, education data that engages the poor parent
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Reservation in public employment
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Paying a price
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Disability and barriers to famine hygiene
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Meeting family planning goals
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS :  Sex as work
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Green hydrogen: Fuel of the future?
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Security in friendship
  • Insights into Editorial: India’s EV ambition rides on three wheels
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – May 2022
  • Insights into Editorial: Of lungs, trees and sin stocks
  • Insights into Editorial: Is Indo-Pacific economic bloc limited in scope?

May EDITORIALS – 2022

  • Insights into Editorial: Disability and the barriers to feminine hygiene
  • Insights into Editorial: India must shift the discourse on abortion rights
  • Insights into Editorial: Serving those who serve: On WHO honour for ASHA workers
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Why vaccine mandates are essential
  • Insights into Editorial: Lessons from Russia for India
  • Insights into Editorial: The rise of AI chips
  • Insights into Editorial: Has Kerala changed its stance on the NEP?
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Balance and Check
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Welcome Relief
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Wheat confusion
  • Insights into Editorial: ‘Holes’ in Biodiversity Bill
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Indo-Pacific Economic Framework
  • Insights EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : A timely reminder
  • Insights into Editorial: Bridging the health policy to execution chasm
  • Insights into Editorial: Improving cold chain systems
  • Insights into Editorial: A concerted effort in re-imagining museums
  • Insights into Editorial: The technical higher education market dissected
  • Insights into Editorial: Reforming WHO
  • Insights into Editorial: Ujjwala scheme | 90 lakh beneficiaries do not get refills
  • Insights into Editorial: Supreme Court puts colonial sedition law on hold
  • Insights into Editorial: The grim forewarnings of a global study on birds
  • Insights into Editorial: The search algorithm in action
  • Insights into Editorial: The importance of emigrants
  • Insights into Editorial: In rising heat, the cry of the wilting outdoor worker
  • Insights into Editorial: Overcoming differences: On India’s new push for stronger ties with Europe
  • Insights into Editorial: Impact of Russia-Ukraine war on Europe’s demography
  • Insights into Editorial: Joblessness on the rise in India
  • Insights into Editorial: The court’s burden
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – April 2022
  • Insights into Editorial: The recent woes of the jute industry in West Bengal
  • Insights into Editorial: Are freebies affecting the economic growth of India?
  • Insights into Editorial: ‘Mission Antyodaya’ should not fall by the wayside

April EDITORIALS – 2022

  • Insights into Editorial: What makes blue straggler stars tick
  • Insights into Editorial: Towards a resolution of the Arunachal-Assam border dispute
  • Insights into Editorial: How quickly can India move away from coal?
  • Insights into Editorial: Fishing for workable solutions in the Palk Bay
  • Insights into Editorial: This is India’s moment of reckoning
  • Insights into Editorial: Bumps ahead: On IMF’s India growth forecast
  • Insights into Editorial: Sri Lankan lessons for India
  • Insights into Editorial: Cryptos and a CBDC are not the same thing
  • Insights into Editorial: The status of India’s National Cyber Security Strategy
  • [Mission 2022] INSIGHTS DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS + PIB SUMMARY 20 APRIL 2022
  • Insights into Editorial: The food vaccine as right, more so for TB patients
  • Insights into Editorial: Hits and misses: India’s solar power energy targets
  • Insights into Editorial: The key phrase is ‘focus on the foetus, for the future’
  • Insights into Editorial: A model struggling to deliver
  • Insights into Editorial: Healthcare As An Optional Public Service (HOPS) as a route to universal health care
  • Insights into Editorial: It is time to let sleeping dogmas lie: on ‘Hindi imposition’
  • Insights into Editorial: Imperatives for land monetization
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – March 2022
  • Insights into Editorial: To begin with, the UGC needs to get the credits right
  • Insights into Editorial: Strengthen secularism, save the republic
  • Insights into Editorial: The road to Ukraine peace runs through Delhi
  • Insights into Editorial: Uniform Civil Code debate gains momentum
  • Insights into Editorial: Making groundwater visible
  • Insights into Editorial: India, Australia sign FTA, trade likely to ‘double in 5 yrs, generate 1 mn jobs’
  • Insights into Editorial: India’s food response as ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam’
  • Insights into Editorial: Unreformable criminal justice
  • Insights into Editorial: Bridging the bay in quest of a stronger BIMSTEC

MARCH EDITORIALS – 2022

  • Insights into Editorial: T cell immune responses seen a year after infection
  • Insights into Editorial: Forging a social contract for data
  • Insights into Editorial: Crisis in Sri Lanka
  • Insights into Editorial: Time after time, parliamentarians want to know if India is changing time
  • Insights into Editorial: Exports cross $400 billion annual target as goods shipments jump
  • Insights into Editorial: Realising the potential of ‘maitri’ and ‘mateship’
  • Insights into Editorial: Harm in the name of good
  • Insights into Editorial: Get these wrinkles out of the South Asian textile story
  • Insights into Editorial: Clean energy should use the battery of a circular economy
  • Insights into Editorial: Transmogrifying a behemoth — the Railways
  • Insights into Editorial: What do we know about the newest crater on the moon?
  • Insights into Editorial: Revive tax increases, stub out tobacco product use
  • Insights into Editorial: Water management needs a hydro-social approach
  • Insights into Editorial: A new vision for old age care
  • Insights into Editorial: A safety net for students abroad
  • Insights into Editorial: The office of the Governor
  • Insights into Editorial: Global stagflation risk: On the need to cut fuel taxes
  • Insights into Editorial: Working women too, with a dream of good childcare
  • Insights into Editorial: Capital verdict: On A.P. High Court judgment on Amaravati
  • Insights into Editorial: Waste pickers need policy support
  • Insights into Editorial: Reporting cyber attacks
  • Insights into Editorial: The history of the Kuki insurgency in Manipur
  • Insights into Editorial: A shrinking green in India’s growing megacities
  • Insights into Editorial: A day to embody the true spirit of science
  • Insights into Editorial: Inflection point for the West-led global order
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – February 2022
  • Insights into Editorial: Ploughing a new channel for India’s food systems

FEBRUARY EDITORIALS – 2022

  • Insights into Editorial: Understanding the Indus Waters Treaty
  • Insights into Editorial: A lesson from Bangladesh: Protect the mother tongue
  • Insights into Editorial: A miracle cure for HIV
  • Insights into Editorial: L’affaire NSE: is corporate governance an illusion?
  • Insights into Editorial: Rajasthan launches health insurance scheme for all
  • Insights into Editorial: Etching a trade line to bond beyond oil
  • Insights into Editorial: India has still to get a good grip on road safety
  • Insights into Editorial: A case for a more federal judiciary
  • Insights into Editorial: India’s semiconductor dream
  • Insights into Editorial: The era of combative federalism
  • Insights into Editorial: An MSP scheme to transform Indian agriculture
  • Insights into Editorial: Local job laws that raise constitutional questions
  • Insights into Editorial: Revamping SEZs to boost exports
  • Insights into Editorial: RBI’s digital currency plans
  • Insights into Editorial: Step up agri-spending, boost farm incomes
  • Insights into Editorial: The BrahMos deal and India’s defence exports
  • Insights into Editorial: The need to boost labour income and consumption expenditure
  • Insights into Editorial: Interrogating the false merit-reservation binary
  • Insights into Editorial: A disjointed response: On crypto assets and regulation
  • SANSAD TV: PERSPECTIVE: COVID-19 & MENTAL HEALTH
  • Insights into Editorial: India’s economy and the challenge of informality
  • SANSAD TV: PERSPECTIVE- HONG KONG: CHINA’S TIGHTENING GRIP
  • Insights into Editorial: The supreme failure
  • Insights into Editorial: Economic Survey projects 8%-8.5% growth in 2022-23
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – January 2022
  • Insights into Editorial: Bridging the digital divide in education

JANUARY EDITORIALS – 2022

  • Insights into Editorial: The consequences of an ill-considered green strategy
  • Insights into Editorial: In conjunction: On evolution of democratic society
  • Insights into Editorial: Budgeting for the education emergency
  • Insights into Editorial: A proposal for Indian Environmental Service
  • Insights into Editorial: Is suspension of MLAs up for judicial review?
  • Insights into Editorial: Investing in new Economic Shakti for New India  
  • Insights into Editorial: A budget for inclusive and sustainable growth
  • Insights into Editorial: Democratise and empower city governments
  • Insights into Editorial: The global toll of bacterial resistance to drugs
  • Insights into Editorial: Schools without freedom
  • Insights into Editorial: Just what the doctor ordered for the livestock farmer
  • Insights into Editorial: Why is India challenging WTO verdict on sugar?
  • Insights into Editorial: Reaping India’s demographic dividend
  • Insights into Editorial: Act now, recast the selection process of the ECs
  • Insights into Editorial: Extending GST compensation as a reform catalyst
  • Insights into Editorial: A Bill that could alter the mediation landscape
  • Insights into Editorial: Maldives, China ink key deals
  • Insights into Editorial: Use drones more effectively: Civil Aviation Ministry
  • Insights into Editorial: The baton of forest restoration in the net zero race
  • Safety at all costs: These islands of excellence must not be marooned
  • Safety at all costs: Expected economic recovery, and factors it will depend on
  • Insights into Editorial: Aiding in governance
  • Safety at all costs: On implementation of safety protocols in fireworks industry
  • Insights into Editorial: Killing the licence: On NGOs and funding
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – December 2021
  • Insights into Editorial: The pertinent issue of trust and the Indian politician
  • Insights into Editorial: Trade defence: On anti-dumping duty on Chinese goods

DECEMBER EDITORIALS – 2021

  • Insights into Editorial: Is the freedom of speech absolute?
  • Insights into Editorial: The gaps in the plan to tackle plastic waste
  • Insights into Editorial: Looking beyond the Forest Rights Act
  • Insights into Editorial: How Webb Telescope will seek to unlock universe’s secrets
  • Insights into Editorial: Needed, a public health data architecture for India
  • Insights into Editorial: Supporting agriculture the smart way
  • Insights into Editorial: What rising inequality means
  • Insights into Editorial: Thinking before linking
  • Insights into Editorial: Can India become a technology leader?
  • Insights into Editorial: When the chips are down: On India’s Semiconductor Mission
  • Insights into Editorial: The push for Zero Budget Natural Farming
  • Insights into Editorial: A false conflation between duties and rights
  • Insights into Editorial: Enforcing age of marriage
  • Insights into Editorial: The NMP is hardly the panacea for growth in India
  • Insights into Editorial: Seeing dystopia in India’s democracy
  • Insights into Editorial: Which States in the N.E. are under AFSPA?
  • Insights into Editorial: Goods and Services Tax as an unfinished agenda
  • Insights into Editorial: Judicial infrastructure, a neglected case
  • Insights into Editorial: A monumental mistake fomented by impunity
  • Insights into Editorial: Expanding India’s engagement envelope with Russia
  • Insights into Editorial: The need to reopen anganwadis
  • Insights into Editorial: What is the debate on the Dam Safety Bill?
  • Insights into Editorial: Recast this apples-and-oranges ranking method
  • Insights into Editorial: Small grant but a big opportunity for local bodies
  • Insights into Editorial: Boosting green hydrogen
  • Insights into Editorial: A launch window for India as a space start-up hub
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – November 2021
  • Insights into Editorial: All about MSP and the demand for a legal backing

NOVEMBER EDITORIALS – 2021

  • Insights into Editorial: In pursuit of social justice
  • Insights into Editorial: The need for a proper Pre- Legislative Consultation Policy
  • Insights into Editorial: Pointers that India is witnessing a K-shaped recovery
  • Insights into Editorial: Fertility rate falls to below replacement level, signals population is stabilizing
  • Insights into Editorial: Reforming the fertilizer sector
  • Insights into Editorial: ‘Go back to committees’ is the farm laws lesson
  • Insights into Editorial: RBI is right, need to move with caution on cryptocurrencies
  • Insights into Editorial: Seeds of hope: On farm laws repeal
  • Insights into Editorial: More a private sector primer than health-care pathway
  • Insights into Editorial: Wide fault lines within the Global Climate Risk Index
  • Insights into Editorial: Pegasus inquiry must reverse the ‘chilling effect’
  • Insights into Editorial: MPLADS, its suspension, and why it must go
  • Insights into Editorial: What are the two initiatives of the RBI that PM Modi launched
  • Insights into Editorial: The enduring relevance of Nehru’s legacy
  • Insights into Editorial: Does India have a right to burn fossil fuels?
  • Insights into Editorial: Why North Chennai is the worst-hit in this year’s heavy rains
  • Insights into Editorial: India needs to sign up for life-course immunisation
  • Insights into Editorial: A vital cog in Bongaigaon’s response to malnutrition
  • Insights into Editorial: Charting a trade route after the MC12
  • Insights into Editorial: Lower judiciary and centralized recruitment debate
  • Insights into Editorial: Batting for ‘One South Asia’ makes more sense
  • Insights into Editorial: India needs a policy solution for the problem of radicalisation
  • Insights into Editorial: What is the Global Methane Pledge, and why is methane significant for climate change?
  • Insights into Editorial: Time for action: On the G20 summit and the global political economy
  • Insights into Editorial: Living on death row with illness
  • Insights into Editorial: How is Facebook embedding the real world in computing?
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – October 2021

OCTOBER EDITORIALS – 2021

  • Insights into Editorial: Preparing for outbreaks
  • Insights into Editorial: End the impasse: On prolonged impasse over three farm laws
  • Insights into Editorial: India’s Central Asian outreach
  • Insights into Editorial: Mitigating a crisis: On COP26 Glasgow climate meet
  • Insights into Editorial: Responding to adversity with achievement
  • Insights into Editorial: Development that is mindful of nature
  • Insights into Editorial: Connecting ministries for infrastructure projects
  • Insights into Editorial: The other Quad: On virtual meet of Foreign Ministers of India, US, Israel and UAE
  • Insights into Editorial: Improving livestock breeding
  • Insights into Editorial: India needs a caste count
  • Insights into Editorial: Why recovery in employment may lag the recovery in GDP
  • Insights into Editorial: Sowing better to eat better
  • Insights into Editorial: The global war on terror grinds along
  • Insights into Editorial: How severe is India’s coal crisis, and what is the govt doing to address it?
  • Insights into Editorial: Protecting India’s natural laboratories
  • Insights into Editorial: How Delhi came to see Europe as a valuable strategic partner
  • Insights into Editorial: Reflections on the ‘quasi-federal’ democracy
  • Insights into Editorial: Seeding a data revolution in Indian agriculture
  • Insights into Editorial: Recognising altruism: On rewarding Good Samaritans on road
  • Insights into Editorial: First Nobel for climate science
  • Insights into Editorial: RBI microfinance proposals that are anti-poor
  • Insights into Editorial: Taproots to help restore India’s fading green cover
  • Insights into Editorial: Making parties constitutional
  • Insights into Editorial: Why Poshan 2.0 needs more power after Covid
  • Insights into Editorial: A fund without a care for the RTI
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – September 2021
  • Insights into Editorial: How to grease the wheels of justice

SEPTEMBER EDITORIALS – 2021

  • Insights into Editorial: Tackling the Maoists: On Left Wing Extremism
  • Insights into Editorial: Revitalising PM-KUSUM
  • Insights into Editorial: Back in the game: Quad and India-U.S. ties
  • Insights into Editorial: When global firms disengage, employment suffers
  • Insights into Editorial: A disease surveillance system, for the future
  • Insights into Editorial: Sea level rise is certain
  • Insights into Editorial: Changing the agri exports basket
  • Insights into Editorial: The end of the doing business rankings
  • Insights into Editorial: How the 9/11 wars changed the world
  • Insights into Editorial: Act and friction: On appointments to tribunals
  • Insights into Editorial: Three is company: On Australia-U.S.-U.K. security partnership
  • Insights into Editorial: A relief package to lift India’s Telecom gloom
  • Insights into Editorial: How to boost financial inclusion
  • Insights into Editorial: A selective nuclear policy
  • Insights into Editorial: What is the new framework to share financial data?
  • Insights into Editorial: Green hydrogen, a new ally for a zero carbon future
  • Insights into Editorial: Making them pay: on regulating app store operators
  • Insights into Editorial: Nipah amidst a pandemic
  • Insights into Editorial: The key to revitalising India’s reservation system
  • Insights into Editorial: To tackle nutrition challenges, we must also address sanitation issues
  • Insights into Editorial: Why are ‘breakthrough’ infections a concern?
  • Insights into Editorial: Gauging household income key for microfinance clients
  • Insights into Editorial: Cooling the planet: Cutting HFC-use good; new challenges to ozone emerging
  • Insights into Editorial: It’s time to build BRICS better
  • Insights into Editorial: Towards a more humane police force
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – August 2021
  • Insights into Editorial: Why are hydropower projects in the Himalayas risky?

AUGUST EDITORIALS – 2021

  • Insights into Editorial: Making sure that girls don’t drop out of school
  • Insights into Editorial: Asset monetisation — execution is the key
  • Insights into Editorial: It’s time for Industry 4.0
  • Insights into Editorial: Tauktae, Yaas and planning for the next
  • Insights into Editorial: Finding a healthy way to cook
  • Insights into Editorial: Breaking the logjam, handing over the baton
  • Insights into Editorial: Pitfalls of RBI continuing to prioritise economic growth over inflation
  • Insights into Editorial: Sense on net zero: India will do well to keep the focus on historical responsibility
  • Insights into Editorial: More feed, better productivity
  • Insights into Editorial: The script of the new endgame in Afghanistan
  • Insights into Editorial: We need a way to measure true human progress
  • [MISSION 2022]Insights into Editorial: Beating plastic pollution: On Plastic Waste Management Amendment Rules
  • [Mission 2022] Insights into Editorial: Growth needs steps beyond reforms
  • [Mission 2022] Insights into Editorial: Parliament is abdicating its oversight role
  • Insights into Editorial: An urban jobs safety net
  • Insights into Editorial: Parliament Passes Constitution 127th Amendment Bill to Restore States’ Power to Specify SEBCs
  • Insights into Editorial: Code red: On IPCC’s warning on climate points
  • Insights into Editorial: Revisit the idea of ‘aging out’ India’s coal plants
  • Insights into Editorial: Why is retrospective tax being scrapped?
  • Insights into Editorial: An opportunity for India to pitch for holistic maritime security
  • Insights into Editorial: No fundamental right to strike
  • Insights into Editorial: Providing horizontal quota: the Bihar way
  • Insights into Editorial: e-RUPI: Voucher system ahead of digital currency
  • Insights into Editorial: Assam, Mizoram agree to ease border tension
  • Insights into Editorial: Law and lawmakers: On criminal acts and legislative privilege
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – July 2021
  • Insights into Editorial: The long road to winning the battle against trafficking

JULY EDITORIALS – 2021

  • Insights into Editorial: A judgment that must be taken in the right spirit
  • Insights into Editorial: What UNESCO heritage site Dholavira tells us about the Indus Valley Civilisation
  • Insights into Editorial: Wounded mountains: on Himachal landslide tragedy
  • Insights into Editorial: Lessons from India’s food security response
  • Insights into Editorial: Money changer: On need for an official digital currency
  • Insights into Editorial: The direction that the National Curriculum Framework needs to take
  • Insights into Editorial: India must directly engage with Taliban 2.0
  • Insights into Editorial: Moving towards regional value chains
  • Insights into Editorial: Spy in hand: On Pegasus spyware issue
  • Insights into Editorial: The challenge of skilling India
  • Insights into Editorial: India needs a renewed health-care system
  • Insights into Editorial: When were Tilak and Gandhi tried under the sedition law?
  • Insights into Editorial: Unhealthy Data Governance
  • Insights into Editorial: The upcoming crisis in Indian federalism
  • Insights into Editorial: Growth matters but income levels matter more
  • Insights into Editorial: A Kerala model for an anti-discrimination law
  • Insights into Editorial: Shaping a trilateral as Rome looks to the Indo-Pacific
  • Insights into Editorial: Why a Cooperation Ministry
  • Insights into Editorial: Fresh stirrings on federalism as a new politics
  • Insights into Editorial: Challenging negative social norms
  • Insights into Editorial: Crafting a unique partnership with Africa
  • Insights into Editorial: Will a national judiciary work?
  • Insights into Editorial: Rural power solutions even other States can emulate
  • Insights into Editorial: What Indian MSMEs need
  • Insights into Editorial: Meddling too much with e-commerce
  • Insights into Editorial: Will food follow fuel and become costlier?
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – June 2021
  • Insights into Editorial: Centre rolls out second wave stimulus

JUNE EDITORIALS – 2021

  • Insights into Editorial: Reopen the files, reconsider privatisation
  • Insights into Editorial: Country’s anti-drone capability still in nascent stage
  • Insights into Editorial: The rural economy can jump-start a revival
  • Insights into Editorial: Blended learning won’t work
  • Insights into Editorial: The picture is clear, it is top-down misinformation
  • Insights into Editorial: Policy creep: On e-commerce and overregulation risks
  • Insights into Editorial: The state of India’s poor must be acknowledged
  • Insights into Editorial: From Plate to Plough: How sustainable are our agricultural exports?
  • Insights into Editorial: Cold peace: On first Biden-Putin summit in Geneva
  • Insights into Editorial: Needed: full disclosure on electoral bonds
  • Insights into Editorial: Why democracy needs social media
  • Insights into Editorial: The road from Galwan, a year later
  • Insights into Editorial: Refocused vaccination campaigns are possible
  • Insights into Editorial: IISc-Bangalore top research institute in world, reveals QS World Rankings 2022
  • Insights into Editorial: European Space Agency’s EnVision mission to Venus
  • Insights into Editorial: Delhi’s Master Plan 2041, its key areas and challenges
  • Insights into Editorial: Radical action needed: Environment Day theme a mission on green action
  • Insights into Editorial: Developing the sister islands of Indian Ocean
  • Insights into Editorial: Towards a stronger mental health strategy
  • Insights into Editorial: What is a global minimum tax and what will it mean?
  • Insights into Editorial: Saving biodiversity, securing earth’s future
  • Insights into Editorial: Significant progress in SDGs on clean energy, health: NITI index
  • Insights into Editorial: Breaking the cycle of child labour is in India’s hands
  • Insights into Editorial: GDP shrinks by 7.3%; Q4 uptick moderates 2020­21 carnage
  • Insights into Editorial: Recognising caste-based violence against women
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – May 2021
  • Insights into Editorial: A ‘reform wave’ Lakshadweep could do without

MAY EDITORIALS – 2021

  • Insights into Editorial: Nine-pin bowling aimed at free speech, privacy
  • Insights into Editorial: Govt must urgently reform subsidies to create fiscal space
  • Insights into Editorial: The end of the road for India’s GST?
  • Insights into Editorial: Expanding the scope of POCSO
  • Insights into Editorial: A ticking bomb: the pendency problem of Indian courts
  • Insights into Editorial: The many benefits of an eco tax
  • Insights into Editorial: Identifying mutants
  • Insights into Editorial: What is mucormycosis or ‘black fungus’ in Covid-19 patients
  • Insights into Editorial: A collage of laws that leaves the worker out in the cold
  • Insights into Editorial: Unwarranted arrest: On sedition charges
  • Insights into Editorial: Restructuring the tribunals system
  • Insights into Editorial: New approach to drug delivery combines biologics and antibody-drug conjugates
  • Insights into Editorial: Lend a helping hand to children the right way
  • Insights into Editorial: What does US departure from Afghanistan mean for South Asia?
  • Insights into Editorial: What is happening in Jerusalem?
  • Insights into Editorial: Evaluate the Ladakh crisis, keep China at bay
  • Insights into Editorial: Decoding inequality in a digital world
  • Insights into Editorial: Back in the shortage economy
  • Insights into Editorial: What is missing in the draft national electricity policy
  • Insights into Editorial: Supreme Court sets aside law on Maratha reservation
  • Insights into Editorial: Centre must address the Covid-19 vaccine shortage
  • Insights into Editorial: A ‘One Health’ approach that targets people, animals
  • Insights into Editorial: India’s road to clean energy goes via natural gas
  • Insights into Editorial: Public buildings and fire safety rules
  • Insights into Editorial: More job-loss ahead, raise govt spending
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – April 2021
  • Insights into Editorial: Creating critical thinkers

APRIL EDITORIALS – 2021

  • Insights into Editorial: Making social welfare universal
  • Insights into Editorial: Pandemic impact: Necessary to stop reverse migration  
  • Insights into Editorial: A case for judicial federalism
  • Insights into Editorial: Groundwater depletion may reduce winter cropping intensity by 20% in India
  • Insights into Editorial: Green and raw: On ‘tribunalisation’ of justice
  • Insights into Editorial: India’s new Covid-19 vaccine policy
  • Insights into Editorial: The ordinance route is bad, repromulgation worse
  • Insights into Editorial: The long battle against the Maoists
  • Insights into Editorial: The Election Commission of India cannot be a super government
  • Insights into Editorial: India to receive normal monsoon, forecasts IMD
  • Insights into Editorial: ARIES facility will host the support centre for Aditya-L1
  • Insights into Editorial: BR Ambedkar: institution builder, champion of depressed classes
  • Insights into Editorial: BIMSTEC needs to reinvent itself
  • Insights into Editorial: Salvaging strategy: On scaling up COVID-19 vaccinations
  • Insights into Editorial: Muon g–2: landmark study challenges rulebook of particle physics
  • Insights into Editorial: Deconstructing declarations of carbon-neutrality
  • Insights into Editorial: For Lok Adalats, speed overrides quality
  • Insights into Editorial: Redefining combatants
  • Insights into Editorial: Persistent mindlessness: On Chhattisgarh’s Sukma district encounter
  • Insights into Editorial: A good start: On rare diseases and government support for treatment
  • Insights into Editorial: A road map for tolerance
  • Insights into Editorial: The Suez Canal crisis, and its impact on global trade
  • Insights into Editorial: Prudence prevails: on speculation about inflation
  • Insights into Editorial: Still no recognition of the third tier
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – March 2021
  • Insights into Editorial: A road to progress
  • Insights into Editorial: India does not shine when only some gleam

MARCH EDITORIALS – 2021

  • Insights into Editorial: Why India is no country for working women?
  • Insights into Editorial: Remove the wedges in India-Bangladesh ties
  • Insights into Editorial: The case that time forgot
  • Insights into Editorial: Rajya Sabha Approves Bill Giving Primacy to Delhi LG
  • Insights into Editorial: Doubling down on a resilient India
  • Insights into Editorial: Junk inefficiency: On vehicle scrappage policy
  • Insights into Editorial: Aadhaar as a hurdle: On authentication failures and welfare delivery
  • Insights into Editorial: A booster shot for India’s vaccination plan
  • Insights into Editorial: Aligning a missile deal with destination Manila
  • Insights into Editorial: Responsible AI — the need for ethical guard rails
  • Insights into Editorial: Salutary reminder: On Consumer Price Index
  • Insights into Editorial: Poll position: On SC order on local body elections
  • Insights into Editorial: Quad leaders: Committed to free, open, secure and prosperous Indo-Pacific region
  • Insights into Editorial: Working towards climate justice in a non-ideal world
  • Insights into Editorial: A case for a revamped, need-based PDS
  • Insights into Editorial: Ploughing a new furrow in the agri-regulatory system
  • Insights into Editorial: China gives green light for first downstream dams on Brahmaputra
  • Insights into Editorial: Railways and a question of transparency
  • Insights into Editorial: Women’s needs are key to Swachh Bharat success
  • Insights into Editorial: Ending the war in Yemen
  • Insights into Editorial: Rape and marriage: On the Supreme Court’s failure to protect the rights of women
  • Insights into Editorial: Chinese malware may have targeted Indian power systems and seaports: U.S. firm
  • Insights into Editorial: ISRO places Brazil’s Amazonia-1, 18 other satellites in orbit
  • Insights into Editorial: IAEA | The ‘imperfect’ fight against proliferation
  • Insights into Editorial: ‘Lateral entry’ into bureaucracy: reason, process, and controversy
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – February 2021
  • Insights into Editorial: The absurdity of the anti-defection law

FEBRUARY EDITORIALS – 2021

  • Insights into Editorial: A proper transfer policy needed
  • Insights into Editorial: Being petroleum-independent
  • Insights into Editorial: Navigating the storm: On the Fifteenth Finance Commission
  • Insights into Editorial: The pros and cons of hydrogen as an alternative fuel
  • Insights into Editorial: Make peace with nature now
  • Insights into Editorial: Hitting the right notes with the health budget
  • Insights into Editorial: Why India is opening up the Geo-spatial sector
  • Insights into Editorial: Indian investments and BITs
  • Insights into Editorial: Boosting confidence: On need for efficient use of COVID-19 vaccine stocks
  • Insights into Editorial: Nanophotonics: Hyderabad scientists manipulate tiny crystals
  • Insights into Editorial: Water Governance: Challenges and the Way Forward
  • Insights into Editorial: Disinformation is a cybersecurity threat
  • Insights into Editorial: Belated, but bold: On Nirmala’s disinvestment policy
  • Insights into Editorial: New questions: On COVID-19 infecting one-fifth of Indian population
  • Insights into Editorial: Can a ‘bad bank’ solve the growing NPA crisis?
  • Insights into Editorial: Troubled mountains: On Uttarakhand glacier disaster
  • Insights into Editorial: Towards sustainable growth
  • Insights into Editorial: Collection of DNA samples will lead to misuse
  • Insights into Editorial: Why did the Myanmar military stage a coup?
  • Insights into Editorial: The problem of ageing dams
  • Insights into Editorial: A normal budget for abnormal times
  • Insights into Editorial: Mahatma Gandhi’s core values should inspire youth today
  • Insights into Editorial: Economic Survey predicts 11% growth in fiscal 2022
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – January 2021
  • Insights into Editorial: Revise the text of the Budget speech

JANUARY EDITORIALS – 2021

  • Insights into Editorial: Many vulnerabilities: On using blockchains in electronic voting
  • Insights into Editorial: In agri-credit, small farmers are still outside the fence
  • Insights into Editorial: Troubled waters: On Palk Bay fishing conflict
  • Insights into Editorial: More flash droughts in India by end of century
  • Insights into Editorial: A new framework around caste and the census
  • Insights into Editorial: Removing the creases in housework valuation
  • Insights into Editorial: Whatever it takes: On govt. powers to combat vaccine hesitancy
  • Insights into Editorial: Rise of shadow entrepreneurship
  • Insights into Editorial: Update debate: On WhatsApp and privacy
  • Insights into Editorial: There is no doubt that Indian higher education requires reforms
  • Insights into Editorial: Bring pulses under Public Distribution System
  • Insights into Editorial: Terror trail: On Pakistan action against terrorists
  • Insights into Editorial: Reclaiming SAARC from the ashes of 2020
  • Insights into Editorial: Reframing India’s foreign policy priorities
  • Insights into Editorial: Dialogues for democracy, lessons from Rajasthan
  • Insights into Editorial: How serious is the bird flu outbreak in India, and how can it be contained?
  • Insights into Editorial: China holds third South Asia multilateral meet in new push
  • Insights into Editorial: Do we have a grip on disinformation in 2021?
  • Insights into Editorial: A nod to recognizing the value of housework
  • Insights into Editorial: India must integrate its UNSC engagement with broader national goals
  • Insights into Editorial: Maximum Governor: On Governor’s role
  • Insights into Editorial: India approves COVID-19 vaccines Covishield and Covaxin for emergency use
  • Insights into Editorial: India needs to invest urgently in climate action
  • Insights into Editorial: Dealing with India’s two-front challenge
  • Insights into Editorial: Give adequate time for a probe
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – December 2020
  • Insights into Editorial: Tribal ministry panels draft fresh guidelines for community forest, habitat rights

DECEMBER EDITORIALS – 2020

  • Insights into Editorial: Rethinking waste management: Improving governance in India’s North East
  • Insights into Editorial: Article 356 and an activist judiciary
  • Insights into Editorial: Madhya Pradesh Cabinet approves anti-conversion bill
  • Insights into Editorial: This is how we prevent future pandemics, say 22 leading scientists
  • Insights into Editorial: European powers as natural partners in constructing a durable balance of power in Indo-Pacific
  • Insights into Editorial: Public Health Act Needed to Keep Private Hospitals in Check: Parliamentary Panel
  • Insights into Editorial: What is Winter Solstice, which made December 21 the shortest day of the year
  • Insights into Editorial: Supreme Court stays Andhra HC order to study ‘constitutional breakdown’ in State
  • Insights into Editorial: Converting waste to energy
  • Insights into Editorial: Law and disorder
  • Insights into Editorial: PM-KUSUM will shine when implemented fully
  • Insights into Editorial: Hazardous ideas for the Himalayas
  • Insights into Editorial: Modi-Hasina summit to highlight infrastructure, connectivity projects
  • Insights into Editorial: Thousand days of nutrition, and a billion dreams
  • Insights into Editorial: Grain and chaff: On farmer protests
  • Insights into Editorial: A ‘duet’ for India’s urban women
  • Insights into Editorial: Culture and peace: On India’s stand against ‘UN’s selectivity on religions’
  • Insights into Editorial: Challenges in achieving herd immunity through vaccination
  • Insights into Editorial: Regional priorities: On the SCO summit
  • Insights into Editorial: A Failure to Enable
  • Insights into Editorial: Castes count: On T.N. caste-wise survey
  • Insights into Editorial: Can Covid-19 be an opportunity to boost electric mobility in India?
  • Insights into Editorial: A clear reading of the Ayurveda surgery move
  • Insights into Editorial: The perils of deregulated imperfect agrimarkets
  • Insights into Editorial: Skills quotient: The key to accelerate skill development
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – November 2020
  • Insights into Editorial: We must never forget this grim anniversary

NOVEMBER EDITORIALS – 2020

  • Insights into Editorial: Say ‘no’ to corporate houses in Indian banking
  • Insights into Editorial: India’s new economic reforms and challenges ahead
  • Insights into Editorial: The ‘Time Use Survey’ as an opportunity lost
  • Insights into Editorial: Centre, states must seize opportunity to come together for water governance
  • Insights into Editorial: Changing the discourse on victim jurisprudence
  • Insights into Editorial: What mechanism do you have against fake news, Supreme Court asks Centre
  • Insights into Editorial: Can the right to work be made real in India?
  • Insights into Editorial: How will the government regulate online news and OTT platforms?
  • Insights into Editorial: No fireworks: On NGT ban on sale and use of firecrackers
  • Insights into Editorial: Lessons from Vietnam and Bangladesh
  • Insights into Editorial: Why are States opting for legislation on ‘freedom of religion’?
  • Insights into Editorial: Developing urban wetlands is only way to avert water crisis
  • Insights into Editorial: Biden, India and comfort in the old normal
  • Insights into Editorial: The financial capacity of States is being weakened
  • Insights into Editorial: How the US counts its votes in the presidential election
  • Insights into Editorial: The nutrition fallout of school closures
  • Insights into Editorial: A secure future for platform workers
  • Insights into Editorial: Last child matters
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – October 2020

OCTOBER EDITORIALS – 2020

  • Insights into Editorial: Less pollution, more soil fertility
  • Insights into Editorial: Engaging the neighbourhood
  • Insights into Editorial: Countering deepfakes, the most serious AI threat
  • Insights into Editorial: Contesting neighbours, revised geopolitical playbooks
  • Insights into Editorial: India’s UN journey, from outlier to the high table
  • Insights into Editorial: Potholes on the digital payment superhighway
  • Insights into Editorial: The many bright spots on India’s innovation horizon
  • Insights into Editorial: The hues in the green tribunal’s resilient journey
  • Insights into Editorial: Why India must urgently step up efforts to improve its sex ratio
  • Insights into Editorial: The road to zero hunger by 2030
  • Insights into Editorial: The message in the Peace Nobel — multilateralism
  • Insights into Editorial: Phased manufacturing policy that is hardly smart
  • Insights into Editorial: A concerted attack on RTI
  • Insights into Editorial: Towards cleaner air in Delhi
  • Insights into Editorial: We need laws that give farmers more space to sell their produce
  • RSTV: THE BIG PICTURE- NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION
  • Insights into Editorial: Redefining cities: A new urban consensus
  • Insights into Editorial: Scissoring the DNA: On Chemistry Nobel
  • Insights into Editorial: Gig work and its skewed terms
  • Insights into Editorial: Vanquishing viruses: On Nobel prize for medicine
  • Insights into Editorial: Transforming business and the insolvency system
  • Insights into Editorial: A tale of mangrove migration
  • Insights into Editorial: To curb stubble burning, make straw management machines affordable
  • Insights into Editorial: On the Quad, define the idea, chart a path
  • Insights into Editorial: Weighing the costs: On COVID-19 vaccine

SEPTEMBER EDITORIALS – 2020

  • Insights into Editorial: UN and the retreat from multilateralism
  • Insights into Editorial: Parliamentary scrutiny on the back burner
  • Insights into Editorial: Will the farm bills benefit farmers?
  • Insights into Editorial: Weighing in on the efficacy of female leadership
  • Insights into Editorial: Women in armed forces: new strides, miles to go
  • Insights into Editorial: The birth of the United Nations, and its growth in the last 75 years
  • Insights into Editorial: Why are the Agriculture Bills being opposed
  • Insights into Editorial: Great power, little responsibility
  • Insights into Editorial: Reject this inequitable climate proposal
  • Insights into Editorial: What discovery of phosphine gas in the atmosphere of Venus means
  • Insights into Editorial: Impediments to equal productivity, dignity
  • Insights into Editorial: Urban employment as the focal point
  • Insights into Editorial: The second chair: On Lok Sabha Deputy Speaker
  • Insights into Editorial: The twisted trajectory of Bt cotton
  • Insights into Editorial: An agriculture-led revival as flawed claim
  • Insights into Editorial: In blockchain voting, leave out the general election
  • Insights into Editorial: Court’s drift and chinks in the judiciary’s armour
  • Insights into Editorial: Mission Karmayogi- National Programme for Civil Services Capacity Building
  • Appropriate strategy: On India banning more China apps
  • Insights into Editorial: A politics of avoidance that must be questioned
  • Insights into Editorial: Mind the gaps in India’s health care digital push
  • Insights into Editorial:A ‘new’ democracy?
  • Insights into Editorial: The issues in GST compensation
  • Insights into Editorial: Why has Japan mooted the Supply Chain Resilience Initiative?
  • [COMPILATIONS] Insights into Editorials – August 2020
  • Insights into Editorial: A five-point action plan to manage waste effectively

Left Menu Icon

  • Our Mission, Vision & Values
  • Director’s Desk
  • Commerce & Accountancy
  • Previous Years’ Question Papers-Prelims
  • Previous Years’ Question Papers-Mains
  • Environment & Ecology
  • Science & Technology

How To Write A Research Paper

Research Paper Methods Section

Nova A.

How To Write The Methods Section of a Research Paper Step-by-Step

13 min read

Published on: Mar 6, 2024

Last updated on: Mar 5, 2024

research paper methods section

People also read

How to Write a Research Paper Step by Step

How to Write a Proposal For a Research Paper in 10 Steps

A Comprehensive Guide to Creating a Research Paper Outline

Types of Research - Methodologies and Characteristics

300+ Engaging Research Paper Topics to Get You Started

Interesting Psychology Research Topics & Ideas

Qualitative Research - Types, Methods & Examples

Understanding Quantitative Research - Definition, Types, Examples, And More

Research Paper Example - Examples for Different Formats

How To Start A Research Paper - Steps With Examples

How to Write an Abstract That Captivates Your Readers

How To Write a Literature Review for a Research Paper | Steps & Examples

Types of Qualitative Research Methods - An Overview

Understanding Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research - A Complete Guide

How to Cite a Research Paper in Different Citation Styles

Easy Sociology Research Topics for Your Next Project

200+ Outstanding History Research Paper Topics With Expert Tips

How To Write a Hypothesis in a Research Paper | Steps & Examples

How to Write an Introduction for a Research Paper - A Step-by-Step Guide

How to Write a Good Research Paper Title

How to Write a Conclusion for a Research Paper in 3 Simple Steps

How to Write an Abstract For a Research Paper with Examples

How To Write a Thesis For a Research Paper Step by Step

How to Write a Discussion For a Research Paper | Objectives, Steps & Examples

How to Write the Results Section of a Research Paper - Structure and Tips

How to Write a Problem Statement for a Research Paper in 6 Steps

Share this article

The method and material section stands as the cornerstone of any research paper. Crafting this section with precision is important, especially when aiming for a target journal. 

If you're navigating the intricacies of research paper writing and pondering on how to ace the methodology, fear not – we've got you covered. Our guide will walk you through the essentials, ensuring your methodology shines in the eyes of your target journal. 

Let's jump into the basics of the method section!

On This Page On This Page -->

What is the Methods Section of a Research Paper?

The methods section of a research paper provides a detailed description of the procedures, techniques, and methods employed to conduct the study ( American Psychological Association, 2020 ). It outlines the steps taken to collect, analyze, and interpret data, allowing other researchers to replicate the study and assess the validity of the results. 

This section includes information on the study design, participants, materials or apparatus used, data collection procedures, and statistical analyses. Typically, the methodology section is placed after the introduction and before the results section in a research paper.

Order Essay

Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Writers!

Importance of Methods Section

The methods section of a research paper holds significant importance. Here is why: 

  • Replicability: The methods section ensures the replicability of the study by providing a clear and comprehensive account of the procedures used.
  • Transparency: It enhances transparency, allowing other researchers to understand and evaluate the validity of the study's findings.
  • Credibility: A well-documented methods section enhances the credibility of the research, instilling confidence in the study's design and execution.
  • Guidance for Future Research: It serves as a guide for future research, offering insights into methodologies that can be applied or modified in similar studies.
  • Ethical Considerations: The section highlights ethical considerations, promoting responsible and accountable research practices.

Structure of Methods Section of a Research Paper

There are some important parts of the method section of a research paper that you will need to include, whether you have done an experimental study or a descriptive study. 

Provided structured approach below ensures clarity and replicability of the research methodology:

Formatting of the Methods Section 

Make the main " Methods " heading centered, bold, and capitalized. For subtopics under "Methods," like participant details or data collection, use left-aligned, bold, and title cases. 

Feel free to include even sub-headings for more specifics. This formatting helps readers easily follow your study steps.

Next, we will address the most common query, i.e., how to write the methodology section of a research paper. Let’s explain the steps for writing the methodology section of a research paper:

Step 1: Start with Study Design

The initial step in the method section of a research paper is to provide a clear description of the study type. This involves outlining the overall plan and structure of the research. 

Different types of studies, such as cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional, may be employed based on the research objectives.

For instance:

Starting with the study design sets the stage for understanding the methodology. It provides readers with a foundation for subsequent sections in the methods portion of the research paper.

Step 2: Describe Participants

In the methods section, the second step involves providing a detailed account of the participants involved in the study. Start by describing the characteristics of both human and non-human subjects, using clear and descriptive language.

Address specific demographic characteristics relevant to your study, such as age, sex, ethnic or racial group, gender identity, education level, and socioeconomic status. Clearly outlining these essential details ensures transparency, replicability, and a comprehensive understanding of the study's sample.

Sampling Procedures:

  • Clearly outline how participants were selected, specifying any inclusion and exclusion criteria applied.
  • Appropriately identify the sampling procedure used, such as random sampling, convenience sampling, or stratified sampling.
  • If applicable, note the percentage of invited participants who actually participated.
  • Specify if participants were self-selected or chosen by their institutions (e.g., schools submitting student data).

Sample Size and Power:

  • Detail the intended sample size estimation per condition and the statistical power aimed for in the study.
  • Provide information on any analyses conducted to determine the sample size and power.
  • Emphasize the importance of statistical power for detecting effects if present.
  • State whether the final sample size differed from the originally intended sample.
  • Base your interpretations of study outcomes solely on the final sample, reinforcing the importance of transparency in reporting.

Step 3: State Materials or Apparatus

In the third step, thoroughly describe the materials or apparatus used in your research. In addition, gives detailed information on the tools and techniques employed to measure relevant outcome variables.

Primary and Secondary Measures:

  • Clearly define both primary and secondary outcome measures aligned with research questions.
  • Specify all instruments used, citing hardware models, software versions, or references to manuals/articles.
  • Report settings of specialized apparatus, such as screen resolution.

Reliability and Validity:

  • For each instrument, detail measures of reliability and validity.
  • Include an explanation of how consistently (reliability) and precisely (validity) the method measures the targeted variables.
  • Provide examples or reference materials to illustrate the reliability and validity of tests, questionnaires, or interviews.

Covariates and Quality Assurance:

  • Describe any covariates considered and their relevance to explaining or predicting outcomes.
  • Review methods used to assure measurement quality, such as researcher training, multiple assessors, translation procedures, and pilot studies.
  • For subjectively coded data, report interrater reliability scores to gauge consistency among raters.

Step 4 Write the Procedure

Next is the procedure section of the research paper, which thoroughly details the procedures applied for administering the study, processing data, and planning data analyses.

Data Collection Methods and Research Design

  • Summarize data collection methods (e.g., surveys, tests) and the overall research design.
  • Provide detailed procedures for administering surveys, tests, or any other data collection instruments.
  • Clarify the research design framework, specifying whether it's experimental, quasi-experimental, descriptive, correlational, and/or longitudinal.
  • For multi-group studies, report assignment methods, group instructions, interventions, and session details.

Data Analysis 

  • Clearly state the planned data analysis methods for each research question or hypothesis.
  • Specify descriptive statistics, inferential statistical tests, and any other analysis techniques.
  • Include software or tools used for data analysis (e.g., SPSS, R).
  • Provide a brief rationale for choosing each analysis method.

Step 5: Mention Ethical Approvals

In the fifth step of the methods section, explicitly address the ethical considerations of your research, ensuring transparency and adherence to ethical standards. Here are some key ethical considerations: 

  • IRB Approval:

Clearly state that the research received approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) or an equivalent ethical review body.

  • Informed Consent:

Specify the process of obtaining informed consent, including the provision of information sheets to participants.

  • Confidentiality:

Describe measures taken to maintain confidentiality, such as assigning unique identification numbers and securing data.

  • Participant Rights:

Emphasize participants' right to withdraw from the study at any point without consequences.

  • Debriefing:

Mention if debriefing procedures were implemented to address any participant concerns post-study.

Methods Section of Research Paper Examples

Exploring sample methodology sections is crucial when composing your first research paper, as it enhances your understanding of the structure. We provide PDF examples of methodology sections that you can review to gain inspiration for your own research paper.

Methods Section of A Qualitative Research Paper

Methods Section of Research Paper Template

Methods Section of Research Proposal Example

Methods Section of Research Paper APA

How To Write A Method For An Experiment

Journal Guidelines to Consider

When writing the methods section, be mindful of the specific guidelines set by your target journal. These guidelines can vary, impacting the structure, word limitations, and even the presentation of your methodology. 

Here's a detailed explanation, along with an example:

Structure & Word Limitations

If a journal follows APA guidelines, it might allow flexibility in structuring the method section. However, some journals may impose strict limitations on the manuscript's length and the number of subsections. 

For instance, a journal might specify a maximum of 3000 words for the entire paper and limit the method section to 500 words. In such cases, ensure you adhere to these constraints, potentially submitting supplemental files for additional details.

Standardized Checklists

Journals often request authors to use standardized checklists for various study types to ensure completeness. 

For a randomized clinical trial, the CONSORT(Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) checklist might be required. If your research involves observational studies, the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) checklist may be applicable. 

For diagnostic accuracy studies, adherence to the STARD (Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) checklist is common. These checklists serve as a systematic way to include essential details in your manuscript, aligning with the journal's preferred reporting standards.

Blind Review Procedures

Some journals implement single- or double-blind review procedures. If a double-blind review is in place, authors need to remove any information that might reveal their identity or institutional affiliations. 

For instance, the method section cannot explicitly mention the institution's name, researchers' identities, or the institutional ethics committee. This ensures an unbiased evaluation of the research without reviewers being influenced by the authors' affiliations.

The Dos And Don’ts Of Writing The Methods Section

While it's important to be thorough, certain elements are better suited for other sections of the paper. Here are some Do’s and Don’ts of writing the methods section:

Dos of Writing the Methods Section

Here are what to include in the methods section: 

  • Clarity and Precision: Clearly and concisely describe the procedures used in your study. Ensure that another researcher can replicate your work based on your explanation.
  • Chronological Order: Present the methods in a logical and chronological sequence. This helps readers follow the flow of your research.
  • Detail and Specificity: Provide sufficient detail to allow for replication. Specify equipment, materials, and procedures used, including any modifications.
  • Consistency with Study Design: Align your methods with the overall design of your study. Clearly state whether it's experimental, observational, or another design.
  • Inclusion of Participants: Detail participant characteristics, including demographics and any inclusion/exclusion criteria. Clearly state the sample size.
  • Operational Definitions: Define and operationalize key variables. Clearly explain how each variable was measured or manipulated.
  • Transparency in Data Collection: Describe the data collection process, including the timing, location, and any relevant protocols followed during the study.
  • Statistical Information: Outline the statistical methods used for analysis. Specify the software, tests employed and significance levels.
  • Ethical Considerations: Discuss ethical approvals obtained, informed consent procedures, and measures taken to ensure participant confidentiality. Address any potential conflicts of interest.

Don'ts of Writing the Methods Section

  • Extraneous Details: Unlike the discussion section avoid including unnecessary details or information that does not contribute directly to understanding the research methods.
  • Results Discussion: Refrain from discussing or interpreting the results in the methods section. Focus solely on describing the methods employed.
  • Ambiguity and Vagueness: Steer clear of vague or ambiguous language. Be precise and specific in your descriptions.
  • Overemphasis on Background: While some background information is relevant, avoid turning the methods section into an extensive literature review . Keep the focus on the research methods.
  • Personal Opinions: Do not include personal opinions or anecdotes. Stick to factual and objective descriptions.
  • Excessive Jargon: Minimize the use of technical jargon that may be confusing to readers who are not experts in your field. If necessary, provide clear explanations.
  • Inadequate Explanation of Modifications: If you deviate from standard procedures, clearly explain the modifications and justify why they were made.
  • Inconsistency with Design: Ensure that your methods align with the study design. Avoid inconsistencies that could create confusion for readers.

In conclusion , learning the art of writing the methods section is pivotal for any research paper. Following a step-by-step approach, from defining the study design to detailed data collection and analysis, ensures clarity and replicability. 

Remember, precision matters. If you find yourself grappling with the intricacies of your methodology, don't hesitate to reach out to CollegeEssay.org.  

Our professional writing service is ready to assist you in crafting a robust and well-structured methods section. 

Connect with our research paper writing service for expert guidance and conquer the challenges of research paper writing.

Nova A. (Literature, Marketing)

As a Digital Content Strategist, Nova Allison has eight years of experience in writing both technical and scientific content. With a focus on developing online content plans that engage audiences, Nova strives to write pieces that are not only informative but captivating as well.

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That’s our Job!

Get Help

Keep reading

research paper methods section

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Refunds & Cancellations
  • Our Writers
  • Success Stories
  • Our Guarantees
  • Affiliate Program
  • Referral Program
  • AI Essay Writer

Disclaimer: All client orders are completed by our team of highly qualified human writers. The essays and papers provided by us are not to be used for submission but rather as learning models only.

editorial analysis essay

Become a Writer Today

12 Best Editorial Writing Topics With Examples (2024)

Editorial content writing aims to inform or educate readers. Discover relevant editorial writing topics you can use, plus examples to help you in writing.

Editorials let writers share their points of view on different topics. It’s an opinion piece where you must research and find relevant facts that establish your credibility and demonstrate your writing skills. You might use editorial writing as a journalist; in that case, these best journalism tips will get you started! Keep reading to see our editorial writing topics to launch your career.

What Type of Writing is an Editorial?

What is an editorial opinion piece, 1. science and health, 2. environmental challenges, 3. social media and social networking, 4. devices and technology, 5. finances and the economy, 6. sports and entertainment, 7. significant past events, 8. social issues, 9. controversial topics, 10. current events, 11. “future of” editorials, 12. versus editorials, what are some essential rules for writing an editorial, what is the difference between an editorial and a blog post.

Editorial writing topics

Editorial content writing is the opposite of content made to sell products. Instead, this type of writing is focused on entertaining, educating, or informing readers. It’s all to attract them to want to know your business further. With consistency, you improve your engagement and lay the foundation for a target audience loyal to your content.

Opinion pieces, as their name suggests, are articles published in periodicals, magazines, and newspapers presenting the writers’ opinions on a specific topic. These pieces can be signed or unassigned by the writer and are produced to offer readers a wide range of views about the subject. Below are interesting editorial topics you can use.

Editorials about science and health are usually selected by professionals who want to share their reviews or opinions on a specific subject in their specialized field. They help the readers understand natural phenomena, new products or technology related to science, research studies or methods, and claims made by fellow professionals, companies, or organizations.

Some examples are:

  • The Sudden Outbreak of Swine Flu
  • Bioterrorism and Its Effects on a Country
  • Science in a Time of Crisis: Communication, Engagement and the Lived Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic
  • Junk Foods’ Negative Impacts on Children’s Growth
  • Quick Meals and How They Contribute to Obesity in the US

Editorial writers for this topic must know how these challenges work and affect society. These environmental issues coax the readers to take the problems tackled in these pieces more seriously as they identify threats to humans and our ecosystems with reliable research and data.

  • Tackling Our Biggest Environmental Challenges
  • Global Warming, Climate Change, and Their Effects on People and Animals
  • The Positive Impacts of Reuse, Reduce, Recycle
  • How Oil Spills Destroy Bodies of Water
  • Should We Decrease Companies’ Carbon Credits ?

Social media and social networking

Because social networking sites only became prevalent post-2004, research regarding their adverse consequences has yet to be thoroughly scoured. Additionally, brainstorming about editorials on social media is easier for the younger generations since they’ve been exposed to it for longer and have first-hand experience with its effects.

  • The Different Pressures of Social Media
  • Do We Need Stricter Cyber Crime Laws?
  • Reality Shows and How They Alter Teenager’s View of the Real World

Editorials on technology often link devices and their influence on a group, usually students or employees who operate these devices in their daily activities. Pieces about this topic delve into the contributions and drawbacks of technology regarding convenience, innovation, and well-being.

  • Why Technology Can Be a Catalyst for Social Good
  • The Ethical Issues Concerning Nanotechnology
  • The Risks of Giving Toddlers Phones
  • General Data Protection Regulation: Are You Protected Enough?

Finances and the economy are always relevant subjects, and topics linked to them never run out. Therefore, many editorial pieces are prompted by constant analysis of economic trends, issues, and practices within a county, country, and globally. Editorial articles also explain how ripple effects affect an individual’s wealth.

  • The Big Quit: Why Millenials Are Tired of Working
  • Economic Recession and Its Effects
  • Saving the Economy or Saving Lives: An Unnecessary Choice
  • Causes of the Subprime Mortgage Crisis

If you’re writing for your school newspaper, see these excellent examples of newspaper headlines .

This topic highlights lifestyle, media updates, and game news reports. Sports can also focus on a coach, team, or player’s profile, where the editorial writer comments and analyzes their style and gameplay. It can also brush other sports subjects, such as the Iran football team who refused to sing their national anthem amidst the Mahsa Amini protests .

  • Is Qatar the Right Host for the FIFA World Cup ?
  • What To Know About the Latest NBA Season
  • What Went Wrong With Rambo: The Video Game ?
  • Steroids and Doping for Sports
  • Habits: A Pandemic of Lost Routines

Middle and high school students find this topic more manageable to discuss since the information they need is already available. The editorial writer can examine a subject they relate with, like their ethnicity or personal experiences, to make the piece more compelling. They can also probe extreme historical events and reflect on their ongoing effects on current times.

  • The Boston Tea Party of 1997
  • A Glimpse of the Past: A Look at Black History

An unsigned editorial relays a newspaper’s stand on a social issue in a professional setting. The piece scrutinizes the social problems and shares most of the editorial board’s opinion on such matters. These social issues depend on various factors, such as pending cases, laws, and politics, that impact many people in a society.

  • The Necessity of College Schooling
  • Legal Recognition of Same-sex Marriage Should Proceed
  • Capital Punishment Be Mandatory in All States
  • Pardoning Student Loan: Is It Fair?

Controversial topics are subjects that rouse arguments and stir clashing groups who disapprove of another’s mindset. These themes spark debate among opposing parties with strong views, biases, or prejudices.

An editorial reveals both of the parties’ viewpoints and remains objective. It presents facts pertinent to the topic, such as why a partaker dramatically insists on or resists changes or if any participants are open to negotiations.

  • Legalization of Marijuana: What Comes Next?
  • Should Students Grade Their Teachers?
  • What Follows Roe v Wade: It Doesn’t Stop Here

Journalists and other professional writers must keep up to speed to tackle current events and deliver fresh news. Readers are encouraged to read the most recent stories that pique their interest. Editorials that use current events intend to attract attention and keep the audience up-to-date on the latest affairs worldwide.

  • The Victory of New Government Candidates
  • The Russian and Ukrainian War
  • Are You a Victim of Voter Fraud?

Here’s a tip, when there’s little happening in your field, check out these newspaper column ideas to be inspired on what to write next.

A good editorial knows how to keep its readers curious by opening a discussion regarding thought-provoking issues and posing possibilities. These editorials aim to educate and persuade readers to do something in support of or against the topic with facts and data.

  • Future of Organic Food
  • Future for Printed Journals
  • Future of Smartphones
  • Our Future is Uncertain and Stressful

Versus editorials compare and contrast two conflicting themes or ideas and expound on why they are opposed. If you’re wondering, an op-ed is not the same as an editorial. An op-ed is usually placed opposite the editorial and written by an individual not affiliated with the editorial team or the newspaper. Some examples of this are:

  • ‘Faith vs. Fact:’ Why Religion and Science Are Mutually Incompatible
  • Darwinism vs. Creationism
  • Healthcare in Denmark vs. Healthcare in the US

FAQs About Editorial Writing Topics

Editorials are not meant to advertise anything. They are pieces that state the writer’s objective opinion based on evidence and in-depth research. An editorial must analyze the topic with supporting facts from unbiased sources and either inform, persuade, criticize, or praise. It should also be entertaining to read.

The main difference between blogs and editorials is their reliance on facts and research. If blogs let writers share their personal beliefs, editorials offer expert opinions. Additionally, blogs adopt a casual tone and avoid jargon, whereas editorials have a more professional style to convince readers of the pieces’ credibility.

editorial analysis essay

Maria Caballero is a freelance writer who has been writing since high school. She believes that to be a writer doesn't only refer to excellent syntax and semantics but also knowing how to weave words together to communicate to any reader effectively.

View all posts

Opinion: We know how voters feel about Trump and Biden. But how do the experts rank their presidencies?

Wax figures of nine American presidents.

  • Show more sharing options
  • Copy Link URL Copied!

Presidents Day occurs at a crucial moment this year, with the presidency on the cusp of crisis as we inexorably shuffle toward a rematch between the incumbent and his predecessor. It’s the sort of contest we haven’t seen since the 19th century, and judging by public opinion of President Biden and former President Trump, most Americans would have preferred to keep it that way.

But the third installment of our Presidential Greatness Project , a poll of presidential experts released this weekend, shows that scholars don’t share American voters’ roughly equal distaste for both candidates.

Biden, in fact, makes his debut in our rankings at No. 14, putting him in the top third of American presidents. Trump, meanwhile, maintains the position he held six years ago: dead last, trailing such historically calamitous chief executives as James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson. In that and other respects, Trump’s radical departure from political, institutional and legal norms has affected knowledgeable assessments not just of him but also of Biden and several other presidents.

Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump greets supporters as he arrives at a campaign stop in Londonderry, N.H., Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2024. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

Opinion: Panicking over polls showing Donald Trump ahead of President Biden? Please stop

Like Biden, Obama and Reagan had rough reelection polls. Too many journalists treat polls as predictive, but political professionals use them to inform campaigns.

Jan. 24, 2024

The overall survey results reveal stability as well as change in the way scholars assess our nation’s most important and controversial political office. Great presidents have traditionally been viewed as those who presided over moments of national transformation, led the country through major crises and expanded the institution of the presidency. Military victories, economic growth, assassinations and scandals also affect expert assessments of presidential performance.

The presidents at the top of our rankings, and others like ours, reflect this. Hallowed leaders such as Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Delano Roosevelt and George Washington consistently lead the list.

Our latest rankings also show that the experts’ assessments are driven not only by traditional notions of greatness but also by the evolving values of our time.

Donald Trump speaks at a rally in Las Vegas.

Op-Ed: Worst. President. Ever.

President Trump’s final grade will be in the hands of scholars. It doesn’t look good.

Jan. 13, 2021

One example is the continuing decline in esteem for two important presidents, Andrew Jackson and Woodrow Wilson. Their reputations have consistently suffered in recent years as modern politics lead scholars to assess their early 19th and 20th century presidencies ever more harshly, especially their unacceptable treatment of marginalized people.

More acutely, this survey has seen a pronounced partisan dynamic emerge, arguably in response to the Trump presidency and the Trumpification of presidential politics.

Proponents of the Biden presidency have strong arguments in their arsenal, but his high placement within the top 15 suggests a powerful anti-Trump factor at work. So far, Biden’s record does not include the military victories or institutional expansion that have typically driven higher rankings, and a family scandal such as the one involving his son Hunter normally diminishes a president’s ranking.

Biden’s most important achievements may be that he rescued the presidency from Trump, resumed a more traditional style of presidential leadership and is gearing up to keep the office out of his predecessor’s hands this fall.

Trump’s position at the bottom of our rankings, meanwhile, puts him behind not only Buchanan and Johnson but also such lowlights as Franklin Pierce, Warren Harding and William Henry Harrison, who died a mere 31 days after taking office.

Trump’s impact goes well beyond his own ranking and Biden’s. Every contemporary Democratic president has moved up in the ranks — Barack Obama (No. 7), Bill Clinton (No. 12) and even Jimmy Carter (No. 22).

Yes, these presidents had great accomplishments such as expanding healthcare access and working to end conflict in the Middle East, and they have two Nobel Prizes among them. But given their shortcomings and failures, their rise seems to be less about reassessments of their administrations than it is a bonus for being neither Trump nor a member of his party.

Indeed, every modern Republican president has dropped in the survey, including the transformational Ronald Reagan (No. 16) and George H.W. Bush (No. 19), who led the nation’s last decisive military victory.

Academics do lean left, but that hasn’t changed since our previous surveys. What these results suggest is not just an added emphasis on a president’s political affiliation, but also the emergence of a president’s fealty to political and institutional norms as a criterion for what makes a president “great” to the scholars who study them.

As for the Americans casting a ballot for the next president, they are in the historically rare position of knowing how both candidates have performed in the job. Whether they will consider each president’s commitment to the norms of presidential leadership, and come to rate them as differently as our experts, remains to be seen.

Justin Vaughn is an associate professor of political science at Coastal Carolina University. Brandon Rottinghaus is a professor of political science at the University of Houston.

More to Read

Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump speaks at his Mar-a-Lago estate, Friday, Feb. 16, 2024, in Palm Beach, Fla. (AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell)

Trump as the candidate of stability? That’s how many voters now see it

Feb. 23, 2024

President Joe Biden delivers remarks on a $95 billion Ukraine Israel aid package being debated in Congress, in the State Dining Room of the White House, Tuesday, Feb. 13, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

Letters to the Editor: Biden’s defense of democracy and competence are much more important than his age

Feb. 18, 2024

President Joe Biden speaks in the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Thursday, Feb. 8, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

Letters to the Editor: A president’s wisdom doesn’t come from brilliance and youth

Feb. 11, 2024

A cure for the common opinion

Get thought-provoking perspectives with our weekly newsletter.

You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.

More From the Los Angeles Times

LOS ANGELES, CA - JANUARY 03: Gov. Gavin Newsom expressed shock that the largest mental health institution is the county jail. Newsom kicked off his campaign for Proposition 1 at Los Angeles General Medical Center in Los Angeles, CA on Wednesday, Jan. 3, 2024. The Proposition is the only statewide initiative on the March 5 primary ballot and asks voters to approve bonds to fund more treatment for mental illness and drug addiction. The initiative is a component of his efforts to tackle homelessness in the state. (Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)

Newsom’s Prop 1 holds narrow lead in California primary

March 5, 2024

Los Angeles, CA - March 05: Los Angeles County district attorney George Gascon meets with media in Grand Park on Tuesday, March 5, 2024 in Los Angeles, CA. (Myung Chun / Los Angeles Times)

Gascón, Hochman jump out to early leads in hotly contested L.A. County D.A. race

Cyclist in new bike lane. MOVE Culver City is a new initiative that reconfigures pedestrian, traffic, bus, and bicycle lanes in downtown Culver City to reduce congestion and emissions. Los Angeles, California, USA. (Photo by: Citizen of the Planet/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

Measure HLA, an effort to create hundreds of miles of bus and bike lanes, takes commanding lead in early returns

Sunlight shines on the U.S. Capitol dome on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, Feb. 21, 2022. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

Here’s what results in key California House races look like so far

  • Share full article

Advertisement

The Ezra Klein Show logo

  • March 5, 2024   •   1:02:18 Marilynne Robinson on Biblical Beauty, Human Evil and the Idea of Israel
  • March 1, 2024   •   1:05:52 The Wars in Ukraine and Gaza Have Changed. America’s Policy Hasn’t.
  • February 23, 2024   •   51:24 Your Questions on Open Conventions, a Gaza Schism and Biden’s Chances
  • February 21, 2024   •   1:02:55 Here’s How an Open Democratic Convention Would Work
  • February 16, 2024   •   25:12 Democrats Have a Better Option Than Biden
  • February 9, 2024   •   1:05:42 Building the Palestinian State With Salam Fayyad
  • February 6, 2024   •   59:17 What Relationships Would You Want if You Believed They Were Possible?
  • February 1, 2024   •   1:09:13 ‘Why Haven’t the Democrats Completely Cleaned the Republicans’ Clock?’
  • January 25, 2024   •   1:08:34 ‘The Strongest Democratic Party That Any of Us Have Ever Seen’
  • January 19, 2024   •   1:08:27 ‘I Have No Idea How This Ends. I’ve Never Seen It So Broken.’
  • January 16, 2024   •   48:25 A Republican Pollster on Trump’s Undimmed Appeal
  • January 12, 2024   •   1:04:35 The Constitution Says Insurrectionists Can’t Hold Office. So What Is Trump?

Democrats Have a Better Option Than Biden

It requires them to embrace an old-fashioned approach to winning a campaign..

Produced by ‘The Ezra Klein Show’

[You can listen to this episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” on the NYT Audio app , Apple , Spotify , Amazon Music , Google or wherever you get your podcasts .]

A full transcript of this audio essay is available here:

Ezra Klein: My heart breaks a bit for Joe Biden. This is a man who has been running for president since he was young. He wins the presidency, finally, unexpectedly, when he’s old. And that age brought him wisdom. It brought an openness that hadn’t always been there in him. He’s governed as a throwback to a time before “I alone can fix it,” a time when presidents were party leaders, coalition builders.

Biden has held together a Democratic Party that could easily have splintered. Think back to the 2020 campaign, when he beat Bernie Sanders, when he beat Elizabeth Warren, when his victory was seen as, was in reality, the moderate wing triumphing over the progressive wing, the establishment over the insurgents.

But instead of making them bend the knee, instead of acting as a victor, Biden acted as a leader. He partnered with Bernie Sanders. He built the unity task forces. He integrated Warren’s and Sanders’s ideas and staff into not just his campaign but also his administration.

I had a conversation recently with Pramila Jayapal, the chair of the House progressive caucus, and I asked her why the Democratic Party hadn’t ruptured the way Republicans did. She pointed me back to that moment. Biden, she said, made this “huge attempt to pull the Democratic Party back together before the 2020 election in a way I’ve really never seen before.”

And it worked. Democrats had 50 votes in the Senate. Fifty votes that stretched from Bernie Sanders on the left all the way to Joe Manchin on the right. Biden and Chuck Schumer, they often could not lose even one of those votes, and at crucial moments, they didn’t.

With that almost-impossible-to-hold-together coalition, the Biden administration and congressional Democrats passed a series of bills — the bipartisan infrastructure deal, the Inflation Reduction Act, the CHIPS and Science Act — that will make this a decade of infrastructure and invention. A decade of building, of decarbonizing, of researching. They expanded the Affordable Care Act, and it worked — more than 21 million people signed up for the A.C.A. last year, a record. They did what Democrats have promised to do forever and took at least the first steps toward letting Medicare negotiate drug prices.

And the Biden team, they said they were going to run the economy hot, that at long last, they were going to prioritize full employment, and they did. And then inflation shot up. Not just here but in Europe, in Canada, pretty much everywhere. The pandemic had twisted global supply chains and then the economy had reopened, and people desperate to live again took their pandemic savings and spent. And the Biden team, in partnership with Jerome Powell and the Federal Reserve, got the rate of inflation back down, and we are still beneath 4 percent unemployment.

And I don’t want to just skip over that accomplishment. Most economists said that could not be done. The overwhelming consensus was we were headed for a recession, that the so-called soft landing was a fantasy. It got mocked as “immaculate disinflation.” But that is what happened. We didn’t have a recession. We are still seeing strong wage gains for the poorest Americans. Inequality is down. Growth is quick. America is far stronger economically right now than Europe, than Canada, than China. You want to be us.

And yet Biden’s poll numbers are dismal. His approval rating lingers in the high 30s. Most polls show him losing to Donald Trump in 2024. Then comes the special counsel report, which finds no criminal wrongdoing in his treatment of classified information, which is — remember — the question the special counsel was appointed to investigate. But the counsel takes a drive-by on Biden’s cognitive fitness. Says a jury would think him a “well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory.” Says Biden doesn’t remember when his son Beau died.

And Biden, enraged, does what people have been asking him to do this whole time. He takes the age issue head on. And he gives a news conference full of fury.

And then, when he is about to leave, he comes back to take one more question — this one on Israel and Gaza, where he says that America is no longer lock step behind Benjamin Netanyahu’s invasion, and then describing the effort he put in getting President Sisi to open the Egyptian border for aid, he slips. He calls Sisi the president of Mexico. Makes the kind of slip anyone can make, but a kind of slip he is making too often now, a kind of slip that means more when he makes it than when someone else does.

Since the beginning of Biden’s administration, I have been asking people who work with him: How does he seem? How read in is he? What’s he like in the meetings? Maybe it’s not a great sign that I felt the need to do that, that a lot of reporters have been doing that, but still. And I am convinced, watching him, listening to the testimony of those who meet with him — not all people who like him — I am convinced he is able to do the job of the presidency. He is sharp in meetings; he makes sound judgments. I cannot point you to a moment where Biden faltered in his presidency because his age had slowed him.

But here’s the thing. I can now point you to moments when he is faltering in his campaign for the presidency because his age is slowing him. This distinction between the job of the presidency and the job of running for the presidency keeps getting muddied, including by Biden himself.

This is the question Democrats keep wanting to answer, the question the Biden administration keeps pretending only to hear: Can Biden do the job of president? But that is not the question of the 2024 campaign. The insistence that Biden is capable of being president is being used to shut down discussion of whether he’s capable of running for president.

I’ve had my own journey on this. I’ve written a number of columns about how Biden keeps proving pundits wrong, about how he’s proved me wrong. He won in 2020 despite plenty of naysayers. The Democrats won in 2022, defying predictions. I had, in 2022, been planning to write a column after the midterms saying there should be a primary because Democrats need to see how strong of a campaigner Biden still was. The test needed to be run. But when they overperformed, that drained all interest among the major possible candidates in running. That test wasn’t going to happen. But still, I thought, Biden might surprise again. I’d grown wary of underestimating him.

We had to wait till this year — till now, really — to see Biden even begin to show what he’d be like on the campaign trail. And what I think we’re seeing is that he is not up for this. He is not the campaigner he was, even five years ago. That’s not insider reporting on my part. Go watch a speech he gave in Pennsylvania, kicking off his campaign in 2019. And then go watch the speech he gave last month, in Valley Forge, kicking off his election campaign. No comparison here. Both speeches are on YouTube, and you can see it. The way he moves, the energy in his voice. The Democrats denying decline are only fooling themselves.

But even given that, I was stunned when his team declined a Super Bowl interview. Biden is not up by 12 points. He can’t coast to victory here. He is losing. He is behind in most polls. He is behind, despite everything people already know about Donald Trump. He needs to make up ground. If he does not make up ground, Trump wins.

The Super Bowl is one of the biggest audiences you will ever have. And you just skip it? You just say no?

The Biden team’s argument, to be fair, is this: Who wants to see the president during the Super Bowl, anyway? And even if they did the interview, CBS would just choose three or four minutes of a 15-minute interview to air. What if CBS chooses a clip that makes Biden look bad?

That’s all true. But that’s all true in the context of a team that does not believe that the more people see Biden, the more they will like him. There’s a reason other presidents do the Super Bowl interview. There’s a reason Biden himself did it in 2021 and 2022, that Trump said he’d gladly take Biden’s place this year.

I was talking to James Carville, who’s one of the chief strategists behind Bill Clinton’s 1992 campaign, and he put this really well to me. He said to me that a campaign has certain assets, but the most desirable asset is the candidate. And the Biden campaign does not deploy Biden like he is a desirable asset.

Biden has done fewer interviews than any recent president, and it’s not close. By this point in their presidencies, Barack Obama had given more than 400 interviews and Trump had given more than 300. Biden has given fewer than 100. And a bunch of them are softball interviews — he’ll go on Conan O’Brien’s podcast, or Jay Shetty’s mindfulness podcast. The Biden team says this is a strategy, that they need apolitical voters, the ones who are not listening to political media. But one, this strategy isn’t working — Biden is down, not up. And two, no one really buys this argument. I don’t buy this argument. This isn’t a strategy chosen from a full universe of options. This is a strategic adaptation to Biden’s perceived limits as a candidate. And what’s worse, it may be a wise one.

I want to say this clearly: I like Biden. I think he’s been a good president. I think he is a good president. I don’t like having this conversation. And I know a lot of liberals, a lot of Democrats are going to be furious at me for this show.

But to say this is a media invention, that people are worried about Biden’s age because the media keeps telling them to be worried about Biden’s age? If you have really convinced yourself of that, in your heart of hearts, I almost don’t know what to tell you. In poll after poll, 70 percent to 80 percent of voters are worried about his age. This is not a thing people need the media to see. It is right in front of them, and it is also shaping how Biden and his campaign are acting.

Democrats keep telling themselves, when they look at the polls, that voters will come back to Biden when the campaign starts in earnest and they begin seeing more of Trump, when they have to take what he is and what it would mean for him to return seriously.

But that is going to go both ways. When the campaign begins in earnest, they will also see much more of Joe Biden. People who barely pay attention to him now, they will be watching his speeches. They will see him on the news constantly. Will they actually like what they see? Will it comfort them?

That was why that news conference mattered. That news conference had a point. It had a purpose. The purpose was to reassure voters of Biden’s cognitive fitness, particularly his memory. And Biden couldn’t do that, not for one night, not for fewer than 15 minutes. And these kinds of gaffes have become commonplace for him. He recently said he’d been speaking to the former French president Francois Mitterrand when he meant Emmanuel Macron. He said he’d been talking to the former German chancellor Helmut Kohl when he meant Angela Merkel.

None of these matter much on their own. The human mind just does this. But it does it more as you get older. And they do matter collectively. Voters believe Biden is too old for the job he seeks. He needs to persuade them otherwise, and he is failing at that task — arguably the central task of his re-election campaign.

And that can become a self-fulfilling cycle. His staff knows that news conference was a disaster. So how will they respond? What will they do now? They will hold him back from aggressive campaigning even more, from unscripted situations. They will try to make doubly sure that it doesn’t happen again. But they need a candidate — Democrats need a candidate — who can aggressively campaign, because again — and I cannot emphasize this enough — they are currently losing.

Part of my job is talking to the kinds of Democrats who run and win campaigns constantly. All of them are worried about this. None of them say that this is an invention or not a real issue. And this is key: It’s not the age itself they are worried about. The age of 81 doesn’t mean anything. It’s the impression Biden is giving of age. Of slowness. Of frailty.

The presidency is a performance. You are not just making decisions, you are also acting out the things people want to believe about their president — that the president is in command, strong, energetic, compassionate, thoughtful, that they don’t need to worry about all that is happening in the world, because the president has it all under control.

Whether it is true that Biden has it all under control, it is not true that he seems like he does. Some political strategists I know think that’s why his poll numbers are low. That even when good things happen, people don’t really think he did them. One was telling me that what worries him most about Biden is how stable his approval rating is — it doesn’t really go up or down. Inflation has gone down a lot in recent months. People feel a lot better about the economy. You can see that in consumer sentiment data. But Biden’s approval rating, it has not gone up. His performance on Ukraine did not make it go up. The passage of the Inflation Reduction Act and the CHIPS Act did not make it go up. To this strategist, it looked like a lot of Americans just don’t give Biden credit for things even when he deserves them. And Biden isn’t now a capable or aggressive enough campaigner to win that credit for himself.

The arguments I see even some smart Democrats making so they don’t have to look at this directly are self-defeating. The one I hear most often is that Trump is also old. He’s 77. He also mixes up names — he recently called Nancy Pelosi Nikki Haley. He sometimes speaks in gibberish. And it’s all true. But that is a reason to nominate a candidate who can exploit the fact that Trump is old and confused. The point is not to give Trump an even match. The point is to beat Trump.

Another argument I see is that this is ageism. This is an unfair thing to point out about Biden. It is age discrimination and, I have actually seen people make this argument, age discrimination is illegal in the workplace. But it is not illegal in the electorate. If the voters are ageist and Biden loses because of it, there is no recourse. You cannot sue the voters for age discrimination.

And then there’s the argument you’ve heard on my podcast. An argument I’ve made before. Biden doesn’t look like a strong candidate, but Democrats keep on winning. Biden won in 2020. Democrats won in 2022. They’ve been winning special elections in 2023. They just won George Santos’s seat in New York. There’s an anti-MAGA majority in this country and they will come out to stop Trump. And I think that might be true. I still think Biden might win against Trump, even with all I’ve said. It’s just that there’s a very good chance he might lose. Maybe even better than even odds. And Trump is dangerous. I want better odds than that.

I think one reason Democrats react so defensively to critiques of Biden is they’ve come to a kind of fatalism. They believe it is too late to do anything else. And if it is too late to do anything else, then to talk about Biden’s age is to contribute to Donald Trump’s victory.

But that’s absurd.

It is February. Fatalism this far before the election is ridiculous. Yeah, it’s too late to throw this to primaries. But it’s not too late to do something.

So then what? Step one, unfortunately, is convincing Biden that he should not run again. That he does not want to risk being Ruth Bader Ginsburg — a heroic, brilliant public servant who caused the outcome she feared most because she didn’t retire early enough. That in stepping aside he would be able to finish out his term as a strong and focused president, and people would see the honor in what he did, in putting his country over his ambitions.

The people whom Biden listens to — Barack Obama, Chuck Schumer, Mike Donilon, Ron Klain, Nancy Pelosi, Anita Dunn — they need to get him to see this. Biden may come to see it himself.

I take nothing away from how hard that is, how much Biden wants to finish the job he has started, keep doing the good he believes he can do. Retirement can be, often is, a trauma. But losing to Donald Trump would be far worse.

Let’s say that happens: Biden steps aside. Then what? Well, then Democrats do something that used to be common in politics but hasn’t been in decades. They pick their nominee at the convention. This is how parties chose their nominees for most of American history. From roughly 1831 to 1968, this is how it worked. In a way, this is still how it works.

I’m going to do a whole episode on how an open convention works, so this is going to be a quick version. The way we pick nominees now is still built around conventions. When someone wins a primary or a caucus, what he actually wins is delegate slots. How that works is different in different states. Then they go to the convention to choose the actual nominee.

The whole convention structure is still there. We still use it. It is still the delegates voting at the convention. What’s different now than in the past is that most delegates arrive at the convention committed to a candidate. But without getting too into the weeds of state delegate rules here, if their candidate drops out, if Biden drops out, they can be released to vote for who they want.

The last open convention Democrats had was 1968, a disaster of a convention where the Democratic Party split between pro- and anti-Vietnam War factions, where there was violence in the streets, where Democrats lost the election.

But that’s not how most conventions have gone. It was a convention that picked Abraham Lincoln over William Seward. It was a convention that chose F.D.R. over Al Smith. I’ve been reading Ed Achorn’s book “The Lincoln Miracle: Inside the Republican Convention That Changed History.” My favorite line in it comes from Senator Charles Sumner, who sends a welcome note to the delegates, “whose duty it will be to organize victory.”

Whose duty it will be to organize victory — I love that. That’s what a convention is supposed to do. It’s what a political party is supposed to do: organize victory. Because victory doesn’t just happen. It has to be organized.

Everybody I have talked about this, literally everybody, has brought up the same fear. Call it the Kamala Harris problem. In theory, she should be the favorite. But she polls slightly worse than Biden. Democrats don’t trust that she would be a stronger candidate. But they worry that if she wasn’t chosen it would rip the party apart. I think this is wrong on two levels.

First, I think Harris is underrated now. I’ve thought this for a while. I’ve said this before, that I think she’s going to have a good 2024. Is she a political juggernaut, a generational political talent? Probably not. But she’s a capable politician, which is one reason Biden chose her as his running mate in the first place. She has not thrived as vice president. The D.C. narrative on her has turned extremely negative. But when Kamala Harris ran campaigns as Kamala Harris, this wasn’t how she was seen. And Harris, in private settings — she’s enormously magnetic and compelling.

Her challenge would be translating that into a public persona, which is — and let’s be blunt about this — a hard thing to do when you’ve grown up in a world that has always been quick to find your faults. A world that is afraid of women being angry, of Black people being angry. A world where, for most of your life, it was demanded of you that you be cautious and careful and measured and never make a mistake. And then you get on the public stage and people say, oh, you’re too cautious and too careful and too measured. It’s a very, very, very hard bind to get out of. But maybe she can do it.

Still, it is the party’s job to organize victory. If Harris cannot convince delegates that she has the best shot at victory, she should not and probably would not be chosen. And I don’t think that would rip the party apart. There is a ton of talent in the Democratic Party right now: Gretchen Whitmer, Wes Moore, Jared Polis, Gavin Newsom, Raphael Warnock, Josh Shapiro, Cory Booker, Ro Khanna, Pete Buttigieg, Gina Raimondo, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Chris Murphy, Andy Beshear, J.B. Pritzker — the list goes on.

Some of them would make a run at the nomination. They would give speeches at the convention, and people would actually pay attention. The whole country would be watching the Democratic convention, and probably quite a bit happening in the run-up to it, and seeing what this murderer’s row of political talent could actually do. And then some ticket would be chosen based on how those people did.

Could it go badly? Sure. But that doesn’t mean it will go badly. It could make the Democrats into the most exciting political show on earth. And over there on the other side will be Trump getting nominated and a who’s who of MAGA types slavering over his leadership. The best of the Democratic Party against the worst of the Republican Party. A party that actually listened to the voters against a party that denies the outcome of the elections. A party that did something different over a party that has again nominated a threat to democracy who has never — not once — won the popular vote in a general election.

That seems like an OK contrast to me.

Yes, the Democratic Party has been winning elections recently. But it is winning those elections in part because it takes candidate recruitment seriously. That was true in 2020. Biden wasn’t the candidate that set the base’s heart aflutter, but he seemed like the candidate with the best shot at winning. So Democrats did the strategic thing and picked him. And they won. In 2022, Democrats carefully chose candidates who fit their districts, who fit their states while Republicans chose MAGA-soaked extremists. And that is why those Democrats won.

The lesson here is not that Democrats don’t need to think hard about who they run in elections. It’s that they do need to think hard about who they run in elections. And they have been. They need to be strategic, not sentimental. And they have been. Because the alternative is Donald Trump. And Donald Trump is dangerous. And right now, Donald Trump is ahead.

I have this nightmare that Trump wins in 2024. And then in 2025 and 2026, out come the campaign tell-all books, and they’re full of emails and WhatsApp messages between Biden staffers and Democratic leaders, where they’re all saying to each other, this is a disaster, he’s not going to win this, I can’t bear to watch this speech, we’re going to lose. But they didn’t say any of it publicly, they didn’t do anything, because it was too dangerous for their careers, or too uncomfortable given their loyalty to Biden.

I’ve said on the show before that we live in a strange era with the parties. We’ve gone from the cliché being that Democrats fall in love and Republicans fall in line, to the reality being that Democrats fall in line and Republicans fall apart. I’ve mostly meant that as a critique of Republican chaos, but too much order can be its own kind of pathology. A party that is too quick to fall in line, that cannot break line, is a party that will be too slow, maybe unable, to solve hard problems.

So yes, I think Biden, as painful as this is, should find his way to stepping down as a hero. That the party should help him find his way to that, to being the thing he said he would be in 2020, the bridge to the next generation of Democrats. And then I think Democrats should meet in August at the convention to do what political parties have done there before: organize victory.

I recognize there’s going to be a lot of questions and comments and pushback to this piece. So we’re going to do an “Ask Me Anything” episode next week — on this, on 2024 broadly. We’ve set up a voice mail box, if you want to leave a message that could get played on the show. Please keep them under a minute. We’re not going to use ones that are very long. The number for that is 212-556-7300. Or you can email us, both text and a voice note, at [email protected].

You can listen to our whole conversation by following “The Ezra Klein Show” on the NYT Audio app , Apple , Spotify , Google or wherever you get your podcasts . View a list of book recommendations from our guests here .

An image of President Joe Biden

This audio essay for “The Ezra Klein Show” was fact-checked by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Rollin Hu and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser.

Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook , Instagram , TikTok , X and Threads .

IMAGES

  1. 013 Analysis Essay Sample Example How To Begin ~ Thatsnotus

    editorial analysis essay

  2. 015 Editorial V Essay ~ Thatsnotus

    editorial analysis essay

  3. Analysis essay format

    editorial analysis essay

  4. Sample Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    editorial analysis essay

  5. Learn How to Write an Editorial Like A Professional Journalist

    editorial analysis essay

  6. School essay: Examples of editorial essays

    editorial analysis essay

VIDEO

  1. Helping students with essays I The best essay 2023

  2. Essay Session

  3. Life in a Big city _ Essay

  4. Write Your Literature Review FAST

  5. Essay

  6. LITERARY ESSAYS

COMMENTS

  1. How to Write a Literary Analysis Essay

    Table of contents. Step 1: Reading the text and identifying literary devices. Step 2: Coming up with a thesis. Step 3: Writing a title and introduction. Step 4: Writing the body of the essay. Step 5: Writing a conclusion. Other interesting articles.

  2. PDF HOW TO WRITE A LITERARY ANALYSIS ESSAY

    REMEMBER: Writing is the sharpened, focused expression of thought and study. As you develop your writing skills, you will also improve your perceptions and increase your critical abilities. Writing ultimately boils down to the development of an idea. Your objective in writing a literary analysis essay

  3. Learn How to Write an Editorial on Any Topic

    To write an editorial letter, follow the below steps: Step 1. Start the Letter with a Salutation. For this, you do not need to know the name of the editor. You can simply add ' Letter to the Editor' as a salutation. However, if you know the name of the editor, then use the name. Step 2. Start with an Engaging Sentence.

  4. How to Write a Rhetorical Analysis

    A rhetorical analysis is a type of essay that looks at a text in terms of rhetoric. This means it is less concerned with what the author is saying than with how they say it: their goals, techniques, and appeals to the audience. A rhetorical analysis is structured similarly to other essays: an introduction presenting the thesis, a body analyzing ...

  5. How To Write An Editorial (7 Easy Steps, Examples, & Guide)

    An editorial is a brief essay-style piece of writing from a newspaper, magazine, or other publication. An editorial is generally written by the editorial staff, editors, or writers of a publication. ... It tackles recent events and issues, and attempts to formulate viewpoints based on an objective analysis of happenings and conflicting/contrary ...

  6. How to Write an Analytical Essay in 6 Steps

    Although analytical essays tend to be more detailed, specific, or technical than other essays, they still follow the same loose essay structure as the rest: 1 Introduction. 2 Body. 3 Conclusion. The introduction is where you present your thesis statement and prepare your reader for what follows.

  7. Practice Analyzing and Interpreting an Editorial

    Lesson Transcript. Kara Wilson is a 6th-12th grade English and Drama teacher. She has a B.A. in Literature and an M.Ed, both of which she earned from the University of California, Santa Barbara ...

  8. Organizing Your Analysis

    There is no one perfect way to organize a rhetorical analysis essay. In fact, writers should always be a bit leery of plug-in formulas that offer a perfect essay format. Remember, organization itself is not the enemy, only organization without considering the specific demands of your particular writing task.

  9. How to Write an Analysis Essay: Examples + Writing Guide

    Provide a lead-in for the reader by offering a general introduction to the topic of the paper. Include your thesis statement, which shifts the reader from the generalized introduction to the specific topic and its related issues to your unique take on the essay topic. Present a general outline of the analysis paper.

  10. How to Write an Editorial

    Below is a detailed description of these types. 1. Explain and Interpret - this format gives editors a chance to explain how they tackled sensitive and controversial topics. 2. Criticize - such editorials while focusing on the problem rather than the solution criticize actions, decisions, or certain situations. 3.

  11. How to Write a Critical Analysis Essay

    How to Write a Critical Analysis Essay. Written by MasterClass. Last updated: Jun 7, 2021 • 3 min read. Critical analysis essays can be a daunting form of academic writing, but crafting a good critical analysis paper can be straightforward if you have the right approach. Critical analysis essays can be a daunting form of academic writing, but ...

  12. Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Assignments

    One of the main purposes of writing an article analysis paper is to learn how to effectively paraphrase and use your own words to summarize a scholarly research study and to explain what the research means to you. Using and citing a direct quote from the article should only be done to help emphasize a key point or to underscore an important ...

  13. How to Write an Editorial in 5 Steps

    1. Decide on a topic. Since editorials are based on opinion, your topic should be arguable and have multiple points of view. Your essay will reflect your personal bias or the bias of the group you are representing, so you should expect some of your readers to disagree with your stance.

  14. How to Write a Rhetorical Analysis: 6 Steps and an Outline for Your

    5. State your thesis. Now that you've completed your analysis of the material, try to summarize it into one clear, concise thesis statement that will form the foundation of your essay. Your thesis statement should summarize: 1) the argument or purpose of the speaker; 2) the methods the speaker uses; and 3) the effectiveness of those methods ...

  15. How to Write an Argumentative Essay

    For example, both rhetorical analysis and literary analysis essays involve making arguments about texts. In this context, you won't necessarily be told to write an argumentative essay—but making an evidence-based argument is an essential goal of most academic writing, and this should be your default approach unless you're told otherwise.

  16. How to Write a Great Rhetorical Analysis Essay: With Examples

    Name the author of the text and the title of their work followed by the date in parentheses. Use a verb to describe what the author does, e.g. "implies," "asserts," or "claims". Mention the persuasive techniques used by the rhetor and its effect. Create a thesis statement to come at the end of your introduction.

  17. How to Write an Analysis on an Editorial

    Newspaper editorials play an important role in democratic societies. The editorial and opinion page in major newspapers provides a public forum in which ideas, political issues and policies, and other topics can be discussed and debated. Editorials are used to argue for a position from a particular point of view. For ...

  18. How to Write a Rhetorical Analysis Essay-Examples & Template

    Rhetorical appeal #3: Logos. Logos, the "logical" appeal, uses reason to persuade. Reason and logic, supported by data, evidence, clearly defined methodology, and well-constructed arguments, are what most academic writing is based on. Emotions, those of the researcher/writer as well as those of the reader, should stay out of such academic ...

  19. Editorials

    Opinion analysis and political endorsements from The New York Times editorial board.

  20. How To Write an Analysis (With Examples and Tips)

    Writing an analysis requires a particular structure and key components to create a compelling argument. The following steps can help you format and write your analysis: Choose your argument. Define your thesis. Write the introduction. Write the body paragraphs. Add a conclusion. 1. Choose your argument.

  21. Editorial Essay Example

    Editorial Analysis Essay 2/10/13 Editorial Analysis "We are all equal; it is not birth but virtue alone that makes the difference." This insightful quote from the famous French philosopher and historian "Voltaire" seems to accurately represent the beliefs of the factions of American citizens pushing to allow women to fight in combat ...

  22. Editorials

    EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : It is crucial for India to embrace multi-domain operations. EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Preventing animal cruelty is a duty of the state. EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : When degrees lose their worth. EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Demonetisation arose from the Centre, It should have enacted a law.

  23. How To Write The Methods Section of a Research

    Importance of Methods Section. The methods section of a research paper holds significant importance. Here is why: Replicability: The methods section ensures the replicability of the study by providing a clear and comprehensive account of the procedures used. Transparency: It enhances transparency, allowing other researchers to understand and evaluate the validity of the study's findings.

  24. 12 Best Editorial Writing Topics With Examples (2024)

    6. Sports and Entertainment. This topic highlights lifestyle, media updates, and game news reports. Sports can also focus on a coach, team, or player's profile, where the editorial writer comments and analyzes their style and gameplay.

  25. Experts rank Biden among the best presidents. Trump? Not so much

    Presidents Day occurs at a crucial moment this year, with the presidency on the cusp of crisis as we inexorably shuffle toward a rematch between the incumbent and his predecessor. It's the sort ...

  26. Opinion

    This audio essay for "The Ezra Klein Show" was fact-checked by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show's production team also includes ...