what is included in tok essay word count

ToK Essay Word Count and Structure in 2024/2025

Table of contents

• Writing Metier

Since TOK essay is one of the most important papers you should hand in during your IB, many students are curious about the TOK essay word count in the years 2023/2024. In this article, I will give you the exact TOK essay length together with the outline. Let’s ready to know how many words are in each part of the ToK essay.

The Theory of Knowledge is one of the parts of the IB that allows for great learning to happen. Students can have a multidisciplinary experience while also learning to analyze things in great detail. The main purpose of a TOK essay is to help students understand the ‘why’ behind things and provide analytical arguments for and against things in the best way.

IB TOK essay word count for the years 2024/2025

TOK essay constitutes 67% of your final great. You have a prescribed set of November 22 TOK essay titles as well as November 2023 TOK essay topics to choose from. You need to pick one and then write an essay on that. The TOK essay word count is 1600. You need to make sure that you make all of your arguments in this given word count in the best possible way.

Please note that 1600 words limit is only counted in the body section of the TOK essay. It has nothing to deal with TK PPD or TOK essay PPF word limits as they have their own criteria.

To write your TOK essay, you first need to choose a title to which you can do justice. This is not that hard to do because you just need to choose something you can easily work with. Once you have chosen your title, you need to start by jotting down your ideas so that you can begin working on them. Next, you need to choose your areas of knowledge. You can choose from arts, history, human sciences, mathematics , and natural sciences. You must be careful when choosing these since you will have to make claims for and against the examples you give here.

In a TOK essay, you need to follow the courtroom analogy. Like checking with several concepts in CUEGIS essay , in TOK it is almost as if you are providing two sides to an argument in front of a judge who is there to make a decision for you. once you are done with that, you need to conclude your argument by giving one final verdict on it. Make sure to select AOKs and WOKs before start writing your paper. And the other super important part is to select a great suitable RLS – real-life situation . So, you must put your point across and defend your argument by giving claims for and against what you are talking about.

The TOK Essay Structure

There are a total of four sections for your TOK . This part will give you an overview of what you have to include in these four sections and an overview of the word count here.

Introduction

This section should be around 100 to 150 words.

You must start by saying something interesting about the topic in the section. Remember that this is the part where you really have to hook the examiner so that they continue reading what you are writing. So make sure that you write something very impactful. You have to set the tone for the entire essay here. So you must first describe the key terms in the title. Once you do that, you can further work towards uncovering those and basing your entire essay on that. Then you also need to shed light on the different areas of knowledge that you will be using here. This way, the reader will know everything you are talking about here.

First Development

In this section, you should write around 600 words, divided into two paragraphs.

You will be exploring the first area of knowledge here. So you need first to state your claim and then give an example that helps explain your claim clearly. Then you need to further work towards providing a counterclaim, and then you give an example for that as well. This way, you explore the first area of knowledge in great detail, allowing the reader to understand what you are saying fully. You also need to highlight the way of knowing that you have used for this argument of yours. This can be anything like reasoning, faith, sense perception, and so on.

Second Development

Again, you need to break this up into two paragraphs, and you have to focus on writing a total of 600 words here.

Then in this section, you have to move on to the second area of knowledge. You have to do the same thing you did in the previous part here, except that this time you will have another area of knowledge you are exploring. You also need to pick another way of knowing that helps the reader understand how you came to this conclusion. Towards the end of this part, you need to sum up your argument to make the reader understand your point of view much better.

This needs to sum up to around 200 words.

This is the part where you near the end of the essay. Here, you need to talk about your final conclusion. Not just that, but you also need to talk about the different implications of this. You also need to shed light on how this research that you have done is important. This way, you will be able to explain your point of view in a much better way. You could also add in an unresolved question here that can help give greater insight into your essay. So this way, you can finally conclude the essay from this standpoint.

Useful Tips for TOK essay

Many students find the TOK essay very challenging since it follows a very different format. Here are a few tips that can help you understand this and approach it better.

• Choose a topic that you are very comfortable with. That way, you will be able to provide your arguments much better.
• Choose your ways of knowing and your areas of knowledge very wisely. Remember that you have to give examples about these, so make sure that you do justice to them.
• Put aside personal biases so that you can easily work on this in the best way.
• Do not forget about the main TOK concepts before writing your first draft.
• First, make an outline and then follow through with that outline so that you can understand this clearly and so that you also have material to write on.
• Use varied research methods to come up with useful examples for your essay.
• Do not forget about the TOK essay submission deadline . Time management is the key.
• Familiarize yourself with the TOK terminology first to be able to write something great.
• Last but not least, be prepared to get an A in TOK essay , because you deserved it, my friend 😉

With these few tips in mind, you are sure to be able to write a good TOK essay!

Do not forget that you can always opt to buy a ToK essay using our company’s services. We have a team of expert IB writers who can cover almost any type of IB TOK essay you throw at us.

And also read some of our other related articles:

– IB EE Word Count

– IB IA Word Count

Order Original Essay ✅

Free topic suggestions

Vasy kafidoff.

Vasyl Kafidoff is a co-founder and CEO at WritingMetier. He is interested in education and how modern technology makes it more accessible. He wants to bring awareness about new learning possibilities as an educational specialist. When Vasy is not working, he’s found behind a drum kit.

Similar posts

12 tok key concepts | explained.

This write-up is all about TOK concepts, what they are and how essential they are to help you work your way through things. In total, there are 12 TOK concepts. Let's figure out more about each

AOK and WOK in TOK Essays | Detailed Guide

Areas of knowledge and ways of knowing are two essential concepts that you need first to understand before you begin working on these. To find out more about areas of knowledge and ways of knowing, continue reading!

How to get an A in TOK essay? Rubric + A-grade SAMPLES

Writing a Theory of Knowledge essay can seem challenging to most students because they guess how hard it is to get an A in TOK. No matter how hard they try, they feel like they just can’t crack the IB TOK essay, and one of the major reasons for this is that the structure of this essay is very different from other essays.

What Happens If You Fail TOK Essay? True...true...

Some students start off with getting help from other outside sources because they worry that they will not be able to do justice to it anyway. Many ask, what happens if you fail TOK essay? Let’s figure it out.

Why IB Students Fail TOK Exhibition? 😱

The theory of knowledge is one of the most challenging components of the IB for most students. Not only do students have to write an essay for the theory of knowledge, but they also have to work on a TOK exhibition. This exhibition is worth 33% of the entire grade. So, students try very hard to score high on this. In this article, you will learn about why students fail the TOK exhibition and what they can do when they fail. This will help you decipher a better course of action once you fail.

Unique IB CAS Hours Ideas for IBDP

Discover innovative and unique ideas for fulfilling your Creativity, Activity, and Service (CAS) hours in the International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma Program. Read our article for inspiration and tips to make your CAS journey memorable

We rely on cookies to give you the best experince on our website. By browsing, you agree to it. Read more

US IB Theory of Knowledge: TOK Essay

• Knowledge Framework in TOK
• TOK & The Learner Profile Attributes
• The Learner Profile Attributes Quiz
• Areas of Knowledge
• Optional Themes
• Knowledge Questions
• TOK Exhibition
• TOK Exhibition Prompts
• TOK Exhibition Rubric
• Ways of Knowing (Pre 2022)
• Recommended Reading
• RSS News Feeds

TOK Prescribed Titles

The International Baccalaureate Organization releases six TOK essay titles, twice a year for submission either in May or November. So you need to know which cohort you're submitting with. The essay titles for submission in May are released in the previous September. The essay titles for submission in November are released the previous March.

• May 2022 topics
• November 2021 topics
• May 2021 topics
• November 2020 topics
• May 2020 topics
• November 2019 topics
• May 2019 topics
• November 2018 topics
• May 2018 topics
• November 2017 topics

"A" example Essays

• Reason vs Emotion in Ethics
• Breaking Conventions
• Context is All
• Moral Wisdom
• Valuable Knowledge
• Experience & Culture

Essay Guidelines

The word count is 1600 words. This includes quotations. You have to write down the number of words when you submit the essay. The examiner will not read past 1600 words. References, maps/charts/illustrations and bibliographies are not included in the word count. You can choose any standard referencing system, but be consistent with the one you chose.

Assessment Criteria: Markscheme from the TOK Guide (as of Class of 2022)

TOK Essay Frequently Asked Questions

Here are some questions that students and teachers frequently ask about the TOK essay. Read through these questions and the answers to check that you are doing the right thing.

What’s the most important thing to bear in mind?

The first thing is to BE CLEAR! Most students do not even manage to communicate their ideas clearly to the examiner. Regardless of whether or not your answer is stunningly original or crammed with a variety of interesting examples, if it is clear then you will already have a massive head start over the majority of other students from elsewhere in the world. That is why it is absolutely vital to plan in detail – if you have a clear plan you will write a clear essay. If you start the essay without a clear plan then the chances are you will not do very well.

The second thing is to remain focused on the question. It is really easy to lose focus and when you do your score will instantly drop. A slight switch from discussing ‘what we believe is true’ to ‘what is true’ might be enough to make most of your answer irrelevant to the question that you have been asked so you have to be really, really careful here. Always ask yourself whether you are correctly focused on the question.

If my answer is not completely different to everyone else’s will I lose?

Most good essays will offer well balanced, plausible and convincing answer to the knowledge question that has been asked. Clearly there is not an infinite variety of plausible and convincing answers to any question and so you should not expect your answer to be completely different to everyone else’s and nor should you strive to make it bizarrely and outlandishly strange in an attempt to seem original. A good answer will usually point out that x is true in some case cases because of a certain set of reasons, while it is less true in other cases and pretty much completely untrue elsewhere. Students who take very extreme positions tend not to do so well in TOK because, unlike in English where you can usually find some evidence to back up even the most unusual reading, TOK is meant to be firmly grounded in the real world and so, for instance, it is not really that plausible to argue that we can never know anything because that just doesn't fit with how we live our daily lives. Similarly, answers which are overly simply probably won't do that well because most things in TOK just aren’t that clear cut. For example students who claim that Art is completely subjective and that we can never know whether one painting is better than another have trouble when accounting for how the IB award some students Level 7s in art while failing others.

So in this sense your essay might be balanced in the same way as someone else’s but the difference between your essay and everyone else’s should be in exactly how you strike that balance, exactly which discriminations you make and the kinds of evidence that you use to persuade me that your answer is correct. The more convincing your position: the better you will do.

How many examples do I need?

In terms of number of examples there is no set answer. However, in a 1600 word essay you should try to have about 4-6 main body points with one clear example that is central to each one. The best marks will not go to those students who have lots of examples but those who choose examples that support their point really well and then go on to consider the counterclaims against this position (possibly using the same example or a different one) and then respond to this counterclaim (again using the same example or a different one - however three examples in paragraph might be getting a bit too much).

How important is it to talk about myself?

It is important to demonstrate personal engagement, indeed the highest marks will really only be awarded to essays that create a sense that the writer has really engaged and got to grips with the question that they have chosen to answer. However, there are a number of different ways to do this. Using the personal pronoun ‘I’ and talking about something that has happened to you is one way to do this but it will not score highly unless it is a strong example that convincingly supports the point you are trying to make. For example, you will are unlikely to get any points for a personal example about your summer holiday or your Mum’s noodle soup unless it clearly and convincingly supports your answer to the question.

Other ways to demonstrate personal engagement and independent thought are by offering personal definitions of key words and researching original examples that you have come up with yourself rather than the obvious example or the one that everyone else in your class is using because that is the one that the teacher gave you.

Ultimately the best way to demonstrate your personal engagement with the question is through your tone of voice and the sense that you have really ‘got’ what this question is asking and honestly offered your own answer to it. However, this can be hard to identify for an examiner so it is probably best if you try to cover all of the different methods mentioned above in order to come across as a student who is thinking for themselves and relating this question to experiences in their own education.

Should I offer definitions of all the words in my title?

Obviously not – beginning your essay with a list of personal definitions does not make for a very engaging start.   However, there may be some terms in your question title that it is important to define and so you might need to start by doing this. In these case it is best to offer a   brief   personal definition (avoid Dictionary.com!), but be careful with going into any more detail than that. Otherwise the best way to show that you understand what the words in the title mean is to continually link back to the key words from the question throughout your essay. Just like in an English essay you would usually do this at the beginning or end of a paragraph but the best students will be able to make the link clear throughout.

One handy trick to bear in mind when thinking about definitions is that, considering different definitions of key words can actually be a good way of incorporating different perspectives into your essay. For example, if your essay question asks you whether progress is equally possible in the sciences and the arts then how you answer that question might depend on how you define progress and a good structure for the essay might be to start by considering one definition of progress (i.e. progress from one perspective) and then go on to contrast this with the answer that we get if we consider a different definition of progress from another perspective.

Is it a good idea to argue that it’s impossible to know anything at all?

Generally no … TOK examiners tend to be quite dismissive of essays that argue either that we can’t know anything at all or that you can have your ‘truth’ and I can have my ‘truth’ and that these truths are both true. The first of these approaches is often called ‘lazy scepticism’ and the second ‘easy relativism’ and you can see that the names imply that these are not particularly impressive positions to adopt. This is not to say that it’s impossible to be sceptical about knowledge and argue that there are problems with it because clearly there are. It’s also not to say that it’s impossible to argue that in some situations the ‘truth’ might actually be different for different people. However, by and large TOK is looking at how we can know things despite the problems we face when acquiring with knowledge or in spite of the different opinions that exist. TOK is in many ways a pragmatic and realistic subject that is trying to move away from creating the impression that we just can't know anything at all. As such, the best essays will admit that the acquisition of knowledge may not be straight-forward, but will go on to consider how we can overcome these obstacles in the successful pursuit of knowledge.

Do I have to cover every AOK and WOK in my essay?

No, you won’t have enough space. However, you should start by considering all of the   AOKs   and   WOKs   when you begin planning your essay and then narrow it down to the 2 or 3   AOKs   or   WOKs   where you can say the most interesting things. Make it clear that this narrowing down is a conscious decision that you have made and you can even briefly explain the reasons why you have made the choice that you have, if you think that it is relevant. Remember that the highest marks will go to the students who explore a few really key ideas in depth rather than those who try to cover everything. Remember also that the best and most original ideas are not necessarily going to be the ones that spring to mind first so try to use   AOKs   or   WOKs   that not everyone else is using – as long as they work.

So how do I know which   AOKs   or   WOKs   would be good ones to pick?

In general, it can be good to compare an AOK where a statement 'x' really applies well and contrast that with one where it doesn't or doesn't seem to. So for example 'All knowledge is subjective' seems to fit well with The Arts and Ethics, but less with Maths and Science so if you just talk about The Arts and Ethics then you are just going to have an essay that keeps saying ... and this is also true in Ethics, and we can see another example of subjectivity in the Arts, etc. It would be much better to say that this is true in the arts because of xyz reasons and not true in Maths because of   abc   reasons.

If you are really confident with TOK you might try inverting an obvious stereotype about an AOK and seeing if you can find examples where that isn’t true. For example, most students’ first reactions are that the Arts are a subjective subject whereas Maths is a subject which contains objective, universal truths. While there is some   truth to this stereotype   it is not true all the time and the best students will be able to explore where that stereotype breaks down and why it breaks down.   For example, while judgement in art is subjective, some truths – e.g. that this picture was painted by   Da   Vinci - are empirical and so we can have objective agreement about them. Additionally, even the subjective truths aren't allowed to be absolutely anything - even my Mum doesn't think that my Primary School paintings are as good as   Da   Vinci's. This kind of subtlety is what marks out the best answers.

In addition, do not make sweeping statements about aspects or areas of knowledge that imply that what you are saying is always and absolutely true without exception. Instead, phrase things in a way that acknowledges the limitations of your own knowledge and experience: for example ‘Accepting for the moment the premise that … then we can say …’

Do I have to use TOK words like ‘Areas of Knowledge’ in my essay?

Yes you do as this will demonstrate a good understanding of the course but be wary of just throwing them in everywhere: judicious and correct use of TOK terminology is better than going over the top. The words that should come up more frequently are the key words from the question to show that you are remaining focused on the question and not getting distracted by anything else.

Do I have to include any Philosophy or Philosophical words?

No   - the IB have made it clear that TOK is not a philosophy course, instead it is meant to be grounded in the real world and your own experiences as a student. As such you should try to avoid including complex philosophical points unless you really understand them and they really are fully relevant to the essay, even then it is often to put these points into your own words rather than quote philosophers because TOK is about you thinking for yourself rather than quoting someone else’s thoughts.

Do I have to research the quotations in the question title?

It is a good idea to know where the quotation came from, who said it and why but you wouldn’t necessarily include any of this in your essay. In fact, the quotation may not really be relevant at all to the essay question as they are sometimes just used to give you a flavor of   the what   the essay is about. For example in the ‘What I Tell You Three Times is True’ question – the number ‘three’ and the fact that this comes from Lewis Carroll are not necessarily as important as the point about repetition and so detailed research into the works of Lewis Carroll will not really help you with this question.

Can I use quotations from famous people to back up my argument?

Students often like starting essays, concluding essays or supporting points with quotations from famous people like Oscar Wilde or Albert Einstein. The fact that these people are experts tends to lend an air of credibility to your argument. However, the opinion of someone like Oscar Wilde is only going to be relevant in certain, very specific circumstances, for example, if you are exploring esthetics (the theory about what makes beautiful things beautiful) then it might be worth considering Oscar Wilde’s perspective on this topic as he was an artist… but you have to remember that his view is only one perspective and just because Wilde said it, it doesn’t mean that he has the best or most convincing theory about beauty. You should also remember that, outside of the topic of esthetics, it might not be a such good idea to quote Oscar Wilde at all: his opinions on how to live a good life, for example, can be sharply witty and sound quite appealing ... but we need to remember that he did die penniless and alone in Paris so is he really someone that we want to listen to?

Similarly, Einstein is a hugely important figure in the history of science and it might be worthwhile quoting him if you were exploring the forces that drive or inspire genius. However, again you should bear in mind that Einstein’s personal statement about what inspires him is not necessarily something that is going to be true of all thinkers. On top of that you should remember that it has been almost 100 years since the publication of Einstein’s last great work, the General Theory of Relativity, so if you are looking for an up to date comment on the nature of scientific knowledge then it might be best to look elsewhere.

In general the rule with quotations is that you should only quote from someone when they are an expert in the relevant field and even then you have to bear in mind that their opinion is nothing more than that, an opinion. Just like your opinions have to be backed up with evidence and proof, so do the opinions of experts… just because Einstein said it, it doesn’t mean it’s true until you show me the proof. One danger you should also be aware of if you quote too much is that the expert’s voice can come to replace your own and so you should only quote opinions sparingly. One additional way to prevent the expert’s voice from dominating your essay is to use quotations from them in your counterclaims; if you go on to disagree with the expert then that’s usually a clear indication that you are thinking for yourself.

Finally, be careful where you get your quotation from. ‘Brainyquote.com’ might be a repository of thousands of fantastic and completely accurate quotations but it doesn’t create a great impression of your ability to select reliable sources so try to find the original source for your quotation and quote that!

Do I need to include different perspectives in my essay?

Definitely, although remember that ‘different perspectives’ can mean a range of different things. One nice way to include different perspectives is by considering the question from the ‘perspective’ of the different   AOKs . So, for example, you might answer the question from the perspective of the sciences and then compare this with the perspective of the arts – this is a particularly nice trick because it also enables you to draw in some comparisons between the   AOKs   at the same time. However, there are other perspectives that you considering and exploring different cultural, political, philosophical, historical and intellectual perspectives or different schools of thought within an AOK can lead to a more interesting and more convincing essay.

Do I have to distinguish between ‘personal’ and ‘shared’ knowledge in my essay?

It’s definitely a good idea to consider these ideas in your planning but, as with anything, you should only really include them if they are relevant to your essay. One effective way to include these different kinds of knowledge in your essay is to treat them as different perspectives on the same issue. For example, if you are looking at whether it is possible to make progress in the arts then the answer might be quite different depending on whether I am talking about progress at a personal level (clearly I can get better at drawing) or at a shared / communal level because it’s not entirely clear what it would mean for art overall to get ‘better’. This links nicely with the previous point as a way of considering different perspectives on the same issue and can be a good way of killing two birds with one stone.

From www.mrhoyestokwebsite.com

• << Previous: Knowledge Questions
• Next: TOK Exhibition >>
• Last Updated: Sep 23, 2022 1:19 PM
• URL: https://asmadrid.libguides.com/IBtheoryofknowledge

Theory of knowledge

Theory of knowledge (TOK) is assessed through an exhibition and a 1,600 word essay.

It asks students to reflect on the nature of knowledge, and on how we know what we claim to know.

TOK is part of the International Baccalaureate® (IB) Diploma Programme (DP) core, and is mandatory for all students.

Learn more about theory of knowledge . You can also find examples of TOK essay titles and read about how the IB sets deadlines for TOK .

You may also be interested in the other components of the DP core: creativity, activity, service (CAS) and the extended essay .

Learn more about TOK in a DP workshop for teachers . 

DP subject briefs

Find out about what each subject offers within the Diploma Programme (DP).

Our DP subject briefs—for both standard and higher level—contain information about core requirements, aims and assessment.

• Explore the DP subject briefs

We use cookies on this site. By continuing to use this website, you consent to our use of these cookies.   Read more about cookies

Planning and structuring the TOK essay

TOK Home > Free TOK notes > TOK essay guidance > Planning and structuring the TOK essay

Once you’ve grasped the essay rubric , and chosen your title , you can start planning and structuring your TOK essay. You base this around the 3 interactions with your teacher, which are one-on-one meetings discussing your progress, and receiving feedback.

As well as the interactions, you can also ask your teacher specific questions about your essay, for example, the suitability of arguments and examples.

STEP 3: Plan and structure your TOK essay

Interaction 1.

In your first interaction, you’ll discuss the title that you have chosen and why, your interpretation of its general meaning, and the key words from the title that you’ve identified and will be focusing on.

You should also have a good idea about the areas of knowledge you’ll be using as the context of your essay (these may be specified in the title), the key concepts that could be included, and have a rough idea about the arguments and counterarguments that could be offered.

By the end of the first interaction, you should be clear about your choice (ideally, the meeting will have confirmed you made the right decision, rather than making you rethink it, but that’s still not a problem at this early stage of the essay-writing process), know the context you’ll be using, and be ready to write your introduction.

Interaction 2

During your second interaction, you’ll explain how you have moved your ideas forward, and the arguments and counterarguments that you’re developing. Ideally, you should be able to show your teacher your introduction, and a rough plan of the rest of your essay.

Be ready to discuss personal experiences and real-world examples that you will use to support points, key thinkers, and different points of view. It’s also useful to discuss any challenges and problems that you’ve encountered. Your teacher should then give you plenty of advice on how to turn all of this into a draft essay, which takes you to the final interaction.

Interaction 3

The third interaction is arguably the most important one, as it is when you will discuss your draft essay, and receive written feedback on how to turn this into your final version.

The first thing to ensure is that your draft is as complete as it possibly can be. The reason for this is that your teacher can only give you one set of written feedback, so if you’ve given them something that doesn’t have much detail, they won’t be able to give you any meaningful advice.

Make sure your teacher has had enough time to go over your essay, and has provided you with clear and detailed feedback on the strength and clarity of your arguments, the suitability of your examples, how successfully you’ve considered perspectives and implications, and how effectively your essay answers the questions. You should now feel ready to write the final version of the essay.

A four-step guide to the TOK essay

Click on the buttons below to take you to the four steps of creating a great TOK essay. Don’t forget that we have plenty of videos on this and other aspects of the course, and members of the site have access to a huge amount of other resources to help you master the course and assessment tasks.

Check out our three-minute explainer video on the TOK essay here . The video goes over the basics of the TOK essay, such as how it’s assessed, the word count and other practical details, terms such as ‘perspectives’ and ‘implications’, and the role of real-world examples in justifying claims and arguments.

You’ll find more videos on this and other aspects of TOK here , and you can dive into much more depth via our free and premium webinars, here .

Watch our essay & exhibition webinars

Click on the images below to access these premium webinars on how to create the essay and exhibition. Access more webinars here , and watch our videos on the assessment tasks on this page .

FAQs about the TOK essay

How do i choose my tok essay title.

You choose your essay from six prescribed essay titles, that are released at the beginning of your second DP year. We give a few tips on how to choose a PT that will work for you here . But briefly, choose one that links to your pre-existing knowledge, and that you find personally engaging.

What will I be writing about in my TOK essay?

You’ll be answering your prescribed title, within the context of two areas of knowledge, considering how different perspectives might affect our response to the question, and what the implications of your arguments are.

Can I use ChatGPT to write my essay?

You can use ChatGPT to help you gather materials for your essay, but you should definitely not be using it to write the essay. Be very careful with ChatGPT. It bases its answers on online material, and much of this is inaccurate or out-of-date. For example, depending on what you ask it, it may tell you that you have to explore multiple areas of knowledge (rather than the two stipulated by the titles), and that you have to identify a separate knowledge question to the title (which is absolutely not the case).

How much help should I expect from my teacher?

Your teacher should run through the PTs when they are first released, and then meet you for three interactions, during which you’ll discuss your progress. They are allowed to give you one set of written feedback. But you can consult them at other times with specific questions.

Do I need to use real-world examples in my TOK essay?

Yes, real-life examples help illustrate your points and make your arguments more tangible. They can be drawn from personal experiences, historical events, scientific discoveries, etc.

Should I include my personal opinion in the TOK essay?

While the TOK essay is not about your personal opinion per se, it’s important to reflect on your perspective and how it shapes the way you understand the title. However, you should avoid using the essay as a platform for rants or unsubstantiated claims.

Is it necessary to include counter-arguments in my TOK essay?

Yes, including counter-arguments shows a deeper understanding of the complexity of the topic and demonstrates your critical thinking skills. It also enables you to consider different perspectives, and evaluate the implications of arguments.

Should I include the 12 key concepts in my essay?

Yes, as much as you can, draw on the key concepts such as justification, evidence, perspective, bias, certainty, and objectivity within your arguments linking them to the title, and to the real-world examples you draw on.

How do I ensure that my TOK essay reflects my own original thinking, and avoids plagiarism?

Clearly attribute ideas and sources that are not your own, and strive to present original insights and interpretations supported by evidence and reasoning. See our point above on using ChatGPT – never view this as more than a tool to help you gather material for your essay, rather than a tool to write it for you.

What are some common pitfalls to avoid when writing a TOK essay?

Avoid oversimplifying complex issues, relying solely on personal opinion without justification, neglecting counter-arguments, veering off the question, and failing to include a consideration of different perspectives.

How long do I have to write my essay?

You’ll have 6 months from the time the prescribed titles are released, to the deadline date for uploading your essay to the IB. However, most schools will set their own deadline for completing the essay, so that everyone has plenty of time to complete your PPF, and upload it on time. Follow what your school tells you about this.

How important is the TOK essay PPF?

The PPF (‘Planning and Progress Form’) is the document that you fill in to outline your discussions during the three essay. Although this is not directly assessed, it is an important part of demonstrating that you have approached the TOK essay in an ethical way, which is now particularly important in the era of ChatGPT.

What are some effective strategies for revising and editing my TOK essay to improve clarity and coherence?

Take breaks between revisions, seek feedback from peers or teachers, and carefully proofread for grammar, punctuation, and coherence.

Should I include references or a bibliography in my TOK essay?

While not required, referencing sources appropriately adds credibility to your essay; use footnotes or endnotes for citations.

Subscribe to the free TOK newsletter!

Subscribe to our free newsletter, and collect fantastic examples that will help you to understand the key ideas of TOK, support your essay and exhibition discussions, and help you to become an authentic critical thinker .

You’ll encounter some of the most important thinkers from the past and the present, go beyond the headlines of contemporary events and issues around the globe, and see how TOK concepts manifest in the real-world. Subscribe HERE !

HS Theory of Knowledge: TOK Essay

• General Information
• TOK Exhibition
• ISZL Online Subscription Sources
• TOK Books in the Library
• Open Access Resources
• NoodleTools
• Citation Assistance
• Annotated Bibliography
• Academic Honesty
• Understanding Turnitin
• Understanding Source Types
• HS Library Homepage This link opens in a new window

TOK Essay titles May 2024

1. Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history? Discuss with reference to the arts and history.

2. How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

3. Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

4. Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

5. Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

6. Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

An essay outline writing guide

Essay example

• Example Final TOK Essay.pdf

Essay Guidelines - Word Count

The TOK Essay must be written in standard 12 type size and be double spaced.

The maximum length of the essay is 1,600 words . Extended footnotes or appendices are not appropriate for the TOK essay.

The word count includes: • the main part of the essay • any quotations.

The word count does not include: • any acknowledgments • the references (whether given in footnotes, endnotes or in-text) and bibliography • any maps, charts, diagrams, annotated illustrations or tables.

If an essay exceeds the word limit, then examiners are instructed to stop reading after 1,600 words and to base their assessment on just the first 1,600 words. Students are required to indicate the number of words when the essay is uploaded during the submission process.

TOK Talk Podcast (Essay titles)

1. Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history?

2. How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization     and generalization in the production of knowledge?

3. Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas,  so why are areas of     knowledge often so slow to adopt them?

5. Do we need custodians of knowledge?

6. Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest?

What is the TOK essay?

Essay unpacking tools

• Essay Unpacking_Outline Tool.docx

• Prescribed Titles Unpacking and Essay structure form.docx

Essay Rubric

The assessment instrument provided describes five levels of performance in response to this driving question. These levels are to be seen as holistic descriptors rather than as a checklist of characteristics.

Refer to the offical IB guide P. 48 for more information

• << Previous: General Information
• Next: TOK Exhibition >>
• Last Updated: Jan 15, 2024 2:55 PM
• URL: https://iszl.libguides.com/TOK

How To Write A ToK Essay - Updated 2023

Ace your ToK Essay with our expert tips & tricks! Get the latest and greatest techniques on "How To Write A ToK Essay" and impress the IB examiners.📝💡

Table of content

Purpose of tok, assessment of tok, the game plan, execution of the gameplan, planning for tok essay, structure of tok essay, introduction, conclusions, bibliography.

How to write a TOK Essay? 

To answer that, you must familiarise yourself with what a TOK Essay is about.

Before you start reading this article,  Amanda  has some excellent TOK tips for you!

Theory of Knowledge is one of the most meta subjects that IB offers. Despite its complexity, TOK helps in providing a base for holistic learning and allows students to have a multidisciplinary experience. 

To understand TOK is to understand the essence of IB, a task that most people consider unattainable.

But not for you! 

Thank your lucky stars who made you land on Nail IB. How exactly will Nail IB help you? 

Well, nailing International Baccalaureate is something we will discuss later. 

Let's focus on cracking your TOK essay, shall we?

TOK demonstrates how students  can apply their knowledge  with  greater awareness  and  credibility .

Big words, huh? 

Now that we know that we cannot just slide through the Theory of Knowledge, let's understand how we can conquer this battle all guns blazing.

ToK essay’s primary objective is to answer the  why  behind our studies. 

It makes one aware of the real-life implications of their subjects. The students gain greater awareness of their personal and ideological assumptions and appreciate the diversity of different perspectives. It helps the students find their unique perception, a prerequisite for excelling in the IB TOK essays.

Before we dive into our gameplan, let’s overview the rules of the game.

There are two assessment tasks in the TOK: an essay and a presentation . While a presentation encourages students to explore a real-life situation through the lens of TOK, an essay is written on the basis of the various questions provided by the International Baccalaureate Organisation.

• The presentation is to assess a student’s ability to apply TOK thinking to a real-life situation whereas IB TOK essay is more conceptual.
• The essay is externally assessed by IB and must be on any one of the prescribed TOK essay titles issued by the IB for each examination session.
• Word limit of a TOK essay is 1600 words ( excludes extended notes, footnotes, bibliography).

Now that we have unleashed the game, let’s move ahead towards the gameplan of acing both, your presentation and your essay.

One of the fundamental tasks of TOK is to examine different areas of knowledge and find out their similarities and differences.

The TOK essay requires the students to investigate two Areas of Knowledge (AOK)  and two Ways of Knowing   (WOK) . AOKs and WOKs are investigated via questions such as:

• How do we know what we know? (WOK)
• What counts as evidence for X? (AOK)
• How do we judge which is the best model of Y? (WOK)
• What does theory Z mean in the real world? (AOK + WOK)

The aforementioned are  Knowledge Questions  which help combine the Areas of Knowledge and the Ways of Knowing that they are using. This eliminates the superficial way of learning and makes an individual sensitive to the nature of the information.   Our acquisition of Knowledge can be broadly divided into Shared Knowledge and Personal Knowledge.

Shared knowledge: What WE know It is the product of more than one individual. Although individuals contribute to it, shared knowledge does not solely depend upon the contributions of a particular individual—there are possibilities for others to check and amend individual contributions and add to the body of knowledge that already exists.

Personal knowledge: What I know It is essentially dependent on the experiences of a particular individual. Also known as procedural knowledge, it is gained through experience, practice and personal involvement and is intimately bound up with the particular local circumstances of the individual such as biography, interests, values, and so on.

The best hack to ace TOK essay is to develop a habit of making connections between the construction of knowledge, its acquisition and its relevance in the real world. 

After that one needs to develop an interest in understanding the difference between diversity and cultural perspectives and personal assumptions.

One also needs to critically reflect on their own beliefs and assumptions, leading to more thoughtful, responsible and purposeful lives.

Yes, this is what you signed up for. It may sound a little intimidating but once you get the hang of it you will be able to see the matrix and understand this beautiful world a little better.

Understand that to provide the best version of your writing, it will take you more than one or two drafts. First and foremost, you need to pick your essay topic diligently. Try to choose an essay topic that best interests you. The topic should also allow you to explore the Areas of Knowledge towards which you are naturally inclined. Here are a few sample questions:

a) 'Ways of knowing are a check on our instinctive judgments.' To what extend do you agree with this statement?

b) With reference to two areas of knowledge discuss the way in which shared knowledge can shape their personal knowledge.

c) How can we know if knowledge is produced more through 'Passive Observation' or 'Active-Experiment' within the Human and Natural-sciences under a Mathematical-Perspective?

d) "The whole point of knowledge is to produce both meaning and purpose in our personal lives". Assess the validity of this statement.

Great things take time. It took me more than a couple of weeks to finalize this TOK essay guide. It is completely okay if the first few drafts may not look pleasing or award-winning to you. You will require sharpening your perspective towards the topic each time you polish your draft. Your writing journey from a dull draft to a masterpiece will be a whole process that you will have to be patient with. Have faith in yourself and proceed stepwise.

You need to consider the opinions of others who have devoted hours of research and a lifetime of dedicated studying the topic that surrounds your writing. Unravelling the realms of your mind palace is so Sherlock but let’s not deny the fact that at times, Watson is the one whose expertise helps Sherlock through pretty difficult times. I mean even Batman needs a Robin. In support of my awesome sauce examples, the point I am trying to make is that  finding support for our claims and counterclaims through research is a good thing .

Use real-life examples to support your claims and counterclaims. These examples need to be documented researched examples like studies, experiments, articles, presentations by well-known people, etc. Examples that stem from your diploma subjects are highly encouraged, but those will need to be supported by research as well.   

It is suggested that you choose a title, stick to it, tackle it and not be afraid. Do not change your mind unless there is a good reason. Also, try choosing Areas of knowledge that you truly enjoy. You know slaying a known devil is much easier than an unknown one. Allot a TIMELINE to your essay. Start with creating an outline of your essay. This will help you to track your progress and accomplish your goals

You can use tools like  Trello  to organize your ideas and plan your TOK essay.

Areas of Knowledge (AOKs): TOK distinguishes between eight areas of knowledge. They are mathematics, the natural sciences, the human sciences, the arts, history, ethics, religious knowledge systems, and indigenous knowledge systems. It is suggested that students study and explore six of these eight.

Ways of knowing (WOKs): TOK identifies eight specific WOKs- language, sense perception, emotion, reason, imagination, faith, intuition, and memory. It is suggested that studying four of these eight in-depth would be appropriate. WOKs underlie the methodology of the areas of knowledge and provide a basis for personal knowledge.

Moving ahead, let us discuss the structure of your TOK essay.

Your essay will consist of 4 broad segregations

Before breaking down further on the pillars, keep the following in mind

• Please note what the TOK essay title is asking you. (Read it a couple of times. We highly recommend that you brainstorm ideas with your TOK coordinator)
• Make sure you understand the command term and the question it is asking.
• What kind of knowledge is being elicited?
• When choosing your areas of knowledge (AoK) and ways of knowing (WoK) make sure that you are able to draw contrasts and comparisons, that is, you are able to find evidence that supports as well as challenges your claims.
• Identify key terms in your TOK essay title. Make sure you define them. Your essay will gravitate around them. Key terms/words in your titles are your essay anchors. Your response should be built around them.
• Your writing skills come in handy while you work on your IB TOK essay. Like any other essay make sure you have proper thesis statements and topic sentences to guide the evaluator through your work.
• Respect the TOK essay title. Rephrasing the topic is not encouraged . Your main job is to address the title.

Introduce your topic accurately and state your thesis statement for the essay carefully.  A thesis statement is like a teaser to your entire essay wherein you define your key terms and introduce your interpretation of the question. Make sure that you do not reword the prescribed title in your thesis. Instead, it needs to, as the word says, INTRODUCE your readers to what your essay is about. A strong introduction allows the reader to deduce what knowledge question(s) you are trying to answer.

So, in a nutshell

• Write interesting things about the given TOK essay title .
• Define key terms
• Narrow in on the particularly interesting aspect
• State your thesis statement . This will be your short answer to your given title if you don't know how to write a killer thesis statement check out this blog from SparkNotes .
• State your Roadmap. This will help the readers in understanding the direction of your essay.

The body can be mainly divided into 3 segments.

Body (1st Segment)

• AoK Claim:  Here you investigate your first Area of Knowledge and draw parallels between your AoK and the question. This is done by stating your claim. Claims can be general in nature and need not reference a particular area of knowledge. They help you shape your essay and investigate the question further. 
• Evidence: Example of a real-life situation, describe thoroughly and accurately, which supports your stated claim. (AoK)
• Counter-Claim: State your counter-claim: like claims, those can be general and need not reference a particular area of knowledge. Counterclaim helps you show the other side the coin and gives your essay a holistic nature. 
• Evidence: A referenced real-life situation/example. Describe thoroughly and accurately, show how this supports your counterclaim (AoK ).
• Don’t forget to weave in your WoKs:  You need to take into account the source of your knowledge. Here you can also investigate if your nature of acquiring the knowledge has, in any way, affected it. It is good practice to question if your knowledge would be different had it been acquired through a different source/method
• Mini-conclusion: Here you analyze your examples in reference to your claims and counterclaims. You must connect to your thesis statement and the prescribed title. How does your proposed argument, in this particular part of the body, connect to the prescribed title and the knowledge questions you are trying to answer?

Body (2): Follow the above process for your second AOK.

• Use this part of your essay to compare and contrast your varying AoKs. You need to connect them to your thesis and your prescribed title clearly showing how your arguments respond to the PT.

Your conclusion section will make your essay come together. It is the glue that will make your essay stick together. Herein, you need to

• Reiterate your thesis (initial response).
• Use your mini conclusions to write a final conclusion.
• Tell the reader what the significance is for knowing what we know in this particular PT.
• Discuss implications as well.
• Offer another perspective, how will the perspective of a different person affect the claims/counterclaims you make in the essay?
• Don’t forget to make the end strong.

We recommend all the ib students use the  citation machine  (It's FREE) to organize or generate a bibliography for your TOK essay. Please go through this extensive guide provided by the IB before you start working on your citations.

If you are still struggling heaps with your TOK essay feel free to subscribe to our tok notes bundles or get access to more than 500+ IBDP notes and past papers here .

Nail IB is your virtual companion that helps you hustle through your diploma and provide you with the right resources at the right time. To know more about acing IB, click  here .

I hope this article will become the foundation for figuring out how to write a TOK Essay.

Remember to have faith in yourself.

I hope you NAIL your TOK essay!

Quoting the great Napolean Hill

"Whatever the mind of a man can conceive and believe, it can achieve."

IB Resources you will love!

Nan + free ib flashcards, -1 + free ia samples, nan + ib videos by experts, -1 + ib sample practice questions, ib resources for nan + subjects.

Mastering ToK Essay Structure: A Comprehensive Guide

• December 5, 2023
• Student Support , ToK Essay

Introduction to ToK Essay Structure

December is the busy essay writing season for May session schools! I’ve been reading ToK Essays from students all over the world in which I am frequently seeing problems of structuring the ToK Essay effectively. This post aims to address the often-asked question, “ How do I structure my ToK Essay? “

The International Baccalaureate (IB) doesn’t prescribe a single structure for the ToK Essay. They require that you “ provide a clear, coherent and critical exploration of the essay title ” (IB ToK Essay Assessment Instrument, 2020) Achieving this requires a well-thought-out structure that fosters clarity, coherence, and critical exploration. Let’s break down the essentials that every ToK Essay should include, regardless of the chosen title or structure.

Essential Elements of ToK Essays

• Knowledge Arguments (or Knowledge Claims): For each Area of Knowledge (AoK) considered, formulate at least one main knowledge argument or claim.
• Real World Examples: Illustrate your knowledge arguments with real-world examples, which may also include evaluation points.
• Evaluation Points: Consider alternative viewpoints to your knowledge claims. These are crucial for a balanced and critical exploration.
• Implications: Reflect on the implications of your arguments and any conclusions you reach.

These four elements are non-negotiable in any ToK Essay.

Additional Components for Enhanced Essays

• Definitions of Key Concepts: Best integrated within your knowledge arguments.
• Thesis Statement: A sentence summarizing the essay’s main argument. Typically found in the introduction, it helps organise your arguments and maintains coherence.
• Unpacking the Prescribed Title (PT) in the Introduction: Offer your interpretation and explanation of the essay question here.

For a more detailed exploration, refer to my e-book, “ How to Write the ToK Essay in 6 Easy Steps ” linked here

Common ToK Essay Structure

A widely used structure, found in about 75-80% of ToK Essays, looks like this:

This structure is effective for most Prescribed Titles and can lead to high scores.

Alternative Structure for Deeper Analysis

Some students opt for a different approach:

This structure cleverly uses the Knowledge Argument against PT in AoK 2 as evaluation points for the argument supporting PT in AoK 1. This method allows for a more in-depth comparative analysis and potentially higher scores.

Remember, the optimal structure for your ToK Essay is one that enables you to “provide a clear, coherent and critical exploration of the essay title”. For further assistance with essay structures and content, consult my e-book “How to Write the ToK Essay in 6 Easy Steps” or detailed notes for each ToK Essay this season (links in the video description).

Embarking on your ToK Essay journey with a clear understanding of its structure is key to success. Happy writing, and remember, the path to knowledge is as much about the journey as the destination!

Stay TokTastic,

Daniel, Lisbon, Dec 23

Watch the YouTube video:

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Discover more from toktoday.

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Type your email…

Continue reading

• [email protected]

IB TOK Essay Rubric. Grading Criteria

As someone deeply immersed in the IB curriculum, I’ve encountered difficulty writing Theory of Knowledge (TOK) essays more times than I can count. Today, I’m here to tell you about the IB TOK essay rubric and grading criteria, offering insights I’ve gathered over the years. Trust me, understanding these elements can transform your TOK essay from good to exceptional.

What Is IB Theory of Knowledge Essay?

The International Baccalaureate TOK essay is a critical element of the IB Diploma Programme that pushes students to ponder the nature and acquisition of knowledge. This task requires students to examine and articulate their understanding of how we come to know what we claim to know, engaging them in a deep reflection on knowledge itself, its sources, and its application in various contexts.

This essay is a philosophical research that encourages critical thinking and analysis across different areas of knowledge, including ethics, science, mathematics, and the arts. At the heart of the IB TOK essay are several key components that students must know:

• The essay prompts students to reflect on the nature of knowledge and how we come to know what we claim to know. It is an exercise in critical thinking and philosophy, where students examine the bases of knowledge and how it intersects with the world around them.
• Students choose from a list of prescribed titles the IB organization releases annually. These titles prompt discussions on various topics in knowledge, ethics, science, mathematics, human sciences, and more.
• There is a maximum TOK essay word count of 1,600 words. This strict limit requires students to articulate their thoughts clearly and concisely.
• The essay is assessed using criteria that evaluate students’ ability to identify and research knowledge issues, contrast TOK key concepts , demonstrate critical thinking, and organize their ideas coherently.
• Students are encouraged to start early, select a topic that interests them, and engage in extensive research and critical thinking. Collaboration with TOK teachers for guidance and feedback throughout the writing process is also crucial.
• Through the TOK essay, students develop skills in critical thinking, analysis, synthesis of information from various disciplines, and the ability to argue coherently and persuasively.

The TOK essay and the TOK exhibition contribute up to three points towards the total score of the IB Diploma. The performance in TOK is combined with the Extended Essay (EE) to determine the number of additional points awarded.

IB Theory of Knowledge Essay Rubric

As an IB writer and mentor, I’ve seen these guidelines as a checklist and a map for writing insightful, coherent works in the IB Theory of Knowledge . My goal here is to explain these criteria.

🎓✍️ Get Top Marks on Your TOK Essay with Our Professional Writing Service! ✍️🎓 Are you struggling with your Theory of Knowledge essay? Look no further than our expert writing service! Our experienced writers have a deep understanding of the TOK criteria and have helped countless students achieve top grades on their essays. 🌟 We guarantee a unique and personalized approach to your TOK essay, and our writers are all human, ensuring that your essay will not be generated by a machine like CHAT-GPT. Additionally, our service is 100% confidential and risk-free, so you can trust us with your academic success. Don't let a poor TOK essay hold you back from achieving your full potential! Contact our team today and let us help you reach new heights in your academic journey. Get started with our TOK Essay Writing Service now! 💡📚🔝

Addressing the Knowledge Question (0-2 points)

A central component of the TOK essay is its focus on a knowledge question directly related to the chosen title. This question must be explicitly identified early in the essay as a foundation for your analysis and arguments. The clarity with which you state this question and the extent to which it informs the development of your essay is crucial for scoring in this category.

Grasping Knowledge Issues (0-2 points)

Your essay must profoundly comprehend the knowledge issues connected to your central knowledge question. It includes recognizing the diverse methods through which knowledge is obtained and acknowledging the potential limitations and biases influencing our perception of the world. A high score in this area reflects your ability to dig into these complexities and present them thoughtfully within your essay.

Critical Analysis and Evaluation (0-2 points)

A critical dissection and assessment of the knowledge question are imperative in your TOK essay. It involves using relevant examples and evidence to bolster your arguments alongside a meticulous examination of the various approaches to knowledge, highlighting their strengths and pitfalls. Additionally, it includes appraising the comparative worth of these different approaches and showcasing your ability to engage with the question at hand critically.

Incorporating AOKs and WOKs (0-2 points)

our essay must showcase an adept understanding of the multifaceted nature in which knowledge is acquired, highlighting the roles of empirical evidence, logical deduction, and personal experiences. Equally important is demonstrating a thorough grasp of the various Ways of Knowing (WOKs) — including reason, emotion, perception, and language — and articulating how these intersect and interact with the central knowledge question. A high score in this criterion indicates a comprehensive integration and consideration of AOKs and WOKs in your analysis.

Demonstrating Personal Engagement (0-2 points)

Your TOK essay should vividly reflect your connection and engagement with the knowledge question. It should show your awareness of how the arguments presented resonate with your experiences and perceptions and their broader implications for the world you inhabit. Achieving high marks in this area means successfully conveying how researching the knowledge question has influenced your understanding and perspective, integrating personal insight with academic analysis.

Coherence and Structure (0-2 points)

A well-written TOK essay is characterized by its organization and clarity, featuring a distinct introduction, body, and conclusion. The arrangement should be logical and enhance the essay’s central argument, ensuring a seamless flow of ideas from start to finish. High scores in this domain are awarded to essays demonstrating meticulous planning and an ability to guide the reader.

Clarity in Presentation (0-2 points)

Your TOK essay should be articulated clearly, concisely, and well-structured, paying close attention to the accuracy of grammar, spelling, and punctuation. It is also essential to adhere to the proper referencing and citation style throughout the document. Essays that score well in this category prioritize readability and scholarly integrity, making it easy for the reader to follow and appreciate the depth of the analysis. So, follow the IB TOK essay structure in detail.

Innovative Approach and Creativity (0-2 points)

Your TOK essay should exhibit originality and inventiveness in addressing the knowledge question and selecting examples and evidence to bolster your arguments. High-scoring essays in this category are characterized by their creative insights and the ability to think outside the box, demonstrating a proactive approach to elucidating the knowledge question.

IB TOK Essay Grading Criteria Explained

The grading criteria for the TOK essay follow a holistic approach, considering all aspects of the rubric. Essays are marked on a scale, with each level reflecting a range of performance in the criteria mentioned above. Here are some insights:

• Excellent Performance . Essays in this category exhibit a deep understanding of knowledge issues, sophisticated analysis, and clear, coherent organization. They effectively incorporate multiple perspectives and are enriched with well-integrated examples.
• Good Performance . These essays demonstrate a good understanding and analysis of knowledge issues, though they may lack the depth or coherence of the top-tier essays. The organization is solid, and examples are used effectively, though perhaps with less sophistication.
• Satisfactory Performance . Here, essays adequately understand the knowledge issues but may struggle with in-depth analysis or coherent organization. Using examples and considering different perspectives is present but not fully developed.
• Basic Performance . Essays in this range have a basic grasp of the knowledge issues but significant weaknesses in analysis, organization, and examples. They may overlook essential perspectives or implications.

From my experience, the key to excelling under these grading criteria lies in understanding what each criterion asks for and integrating these elements into a cohesive, compelling narrative. Crafting your essay with an awareness of these grading nuances can elevate your work from satisfactory to exceptional.

Passing Grade for the Theory of Knowledge Essay

The TOK essay and the TOK presentation form part of the core of the IB Diploma Programme, and students must pass both components to receive their diploma. The TOK essay and presentation are graded on a letter scale of A (excellent) to E (elementary), with D considered a passing grade. However, it’s important to remember that the final TOK grade is combined with the Extended Essay grade, which can significantly impact your overall diploma points.

You generally need to avoid receiving an E grade to pass the TOK component. The combined points for TOK and the EE can contribute up to 3 bonus points towards your diploma, depending on their combined quality. Scores are determined by a matrix that the IB updates periodically, so aiming for the highest possible grades in TOK and EE is crucial to maximizing your diploma points.

Remember, the specific criteria for passing can vary slightly with changes to the IB curriculum and assessment guides, so it’s always a good idea to consult the latest materials or speak with your TOK teacher for the most current information.

In summary, passing the TOK essay requires a comprehensive understanding of the knowledge issues, a critical and reflective approach to the essay question, and a commitment to articulate your thoughts clearly and coherently.

So, mastering the IB TOK essay rubric and grading criteria is a worthwhile path. It’s not just about securing high marks; it’s about developing a nuanced understanding of knowledge. As you prepare to tackle your TOK essay, carry with you the insights and strategies shared.

So, start early, seek feedback, and let your understanding of the rubric infuse every paragraph of your essay. With the right approach, the TOK essay expands your horizons of learning. Good luck, and remember, our experts are always by your side and can help you with the TOK essay .

Valerie Green

Valerie Green is a dedicated educator who spends her time helping high school and college students succeed. She writes articles and guides for various online education projects, providing students with the tools they need to excel in their studies. Friendly and approachable, she is committed to making a difference in the lives of students.

IB Extended Essay Rubric. Grading Criteria

Understanding the IB extended essay rubric is essential for success. The rubric provides a framework that grades students on several key criteria including the sharpness of their research question, the rigor of their methodology, the breadth and depth of their knowledge, the fluidity and clarity of their argumentation, and their personal engagement with the research topic.

This article provides essential insights and strategies for understanding the assessment process and helping you write essays that meet and exceed the rigorous standards of the IB curriculum. Whether you’re striving for clarity of argument, effective integration of knowledge, or personal engagement, our tips will help you achieve a higher score.

IB Internal Assessment Rubric and Grading Criteria

The IB IA rubric is carefully structured to assess students’ understanding, skills and application of subject matter in a nuanced and comprehensive manner. Each subject rubric, whether for sciences such as Biology and Chemistry, humanities such as History and Psychology, or Mathematics, emphasizes a unique set of criteria tailored to assess specific competencies and skills.

Visual Arts IA Topics: The Best Topic Ideas

In the vast world of art, the possibilities for your IA topic are nearly limitless. Yet, this abundance of choice can sometimes feel overwhelming. Whether you’re drawn to traditional painting techniques, the avant-garde movements of the 20th century, or the intersection of digital media and art, your chosen topic should ignite a spark of curiosity and passion within you.

Theatre IA Topics: SL and HL Topic Ideas

Choosing the right topic for IA in the IB Theatre course is a crucial step that significantly influences your research process and overall learning experience. Whether in the Standard Level or Higher Level track, selecting your topic requires careful thought and consideration, aiming to balance personal interest with academic rigor. This guide offers a rich array of topic ideas and research questions to spark your creativity and intellectual curiosity in the vast world of theatre.

Music IA Topics for SL and HL Students

When selecting a topic for your IB Music Internal Assessment, both SL and HL students face a unique set of challenges and opportunities. As a seasoned IB educator with years of experience guiding students through this process, I’ve come to recognize the importance of choosing a topic that aligns with the IB criteria and resonates with your musical interests and strengths.

© 2023  I Bstudenthelp.com. This website is owned and operated by Udeepi OU Harju maakond, Tallinn, Lasnamäe linnaosa, Sepapaja tn 6, 15551. Disclaimer : Services we provide are only to assist the buyer like a guideline to complete any kind of writing assignment. Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions Cookie Policy Revision Policy Refund Policy

• PRO Courses Guides New Tech Help Pro Expert Videos About wikiHow Pro Upgrade Sign In
• EDIT Edit this Article
• EXPLORE Tech Help Pro About Us Random Article Quizzes Request a New Article Community Dashboard This Or That Game Popular Categories Arts and Entertainment Artwork Books Movies Computers and Electronics Computers Phone Skills Technology Hacks Health Men's Health Mental Health Women's Health Relationships Dating Love Relationship Issues Hobbies and Crafts Crafts Drawing Games Education & Communication Communication Skills Personal Development Studying Personal Care and Style Fashion Hair Care Personal Hygiene Youth Personal Care School Stuff Dating All Categories Arts and Entertainment Finance and Business Home and Garden Relationship Quizzes Cars & Other Vehicles Food and Entertaining Personal Care and Style Sports and Fitness Computers and Electronics Health Pets and Animals Travel Education & Communication Hobbies and Crafts Philosophy and Religion Work World Family Life Holidays and Traditions Relationships Youth
• Browse Articles
• Learn Something New
• Quizzes Hot
• This Or That Game New
• Train Your Brain
• Explore More
• Support wikiHow
• About wikiHow
• Log in / Sign up
• Education and Communications

How to Write a TOK Essay

Last Updated: December 28, 2023

This article was co-authored by Stephanie Wong Ken, MFA . Stephanie Wong Ken is a writer based in Canada. Stephanie's writing has appeared in Joyland, Catapult, Pithead Chapel, Cosmonaut's Avenue, and other publications. She holds an MFA in Fiction and Creative Writing from Portland State University. This article has been viewed 250,974 times.

The International Baccalaureate (IB) Theory of Knowledge essay is a 1200–1600 word essay on prescribed topics or titles created by the IB. As the name suggests, your Theory of Knowledge (TOK) essay should focus on knowledge issues (what is knowledge? why and how do we know things?) and link to other areas of knowledge as well. About two-thirds of your final TOK grade is determined by your score on your TOK essay.

Choosing Your Essay Title

• Mathematics
• Natural sciences
• Human sciences
• Religious knowledge systems
• Indigenous knowledge systems

• “Compare the roles played by reason and imagination in at least two Areas of Knowledge.”
• “When mathematicians, historians and scientists say that they have explained something, are they using the word ‘explain’ in the same way?”

• Do you understand the keywords or concepts in the title? You may not be clear on what a title is asking you to do. Go through the title and highlight any words or concepts you are unsure about. Some titles will use keywords from TOK courses, such as “belief”, “knowledge” “truth”. You may want to check back on your class notes and consider what these words mean in the context of the title.
• Do you have a strong interest in the title? The title should play to your interests and you should feel you can write about the title with care and diligence. For example, if you are skilled or interested in the arts, you may choose a title like “Compare the roles played by reason and imagination in at least two Areas of Knowledge” and pick the arts as one area of knowledge. Keep in mind, however, you should balance your passion for the title with an objective perspective.
• Do you have something relevant to say about the title? It’s important that you relate the question to the ideas you have covered in your TOK course, as well as the topics you have studied in class, and your own personal experiences or thoughts. The essay should have an objective tone, but you will still need to inject it with personality, passion, and clarity.

• For example, in a title like: “When mathematicians, historians and scientists say that they have explained something, are they using the word ‘explain’ in the same way?”, you may rephrase it into two sentences. The title refers to three AOK: mathematics, history, and science. It is then asking you to compare and contrast the way these three AOK use explanation as a way of knowing about a topic or issue.
• By breaking down the title into short sentences, you now have a clearer picture of what the title is asking you to do and how you might go about answering the title sufficiently.

Structuring the Essay

• Understanding the knowledge issues: your essay must be focused on the knowledge issues, link and compare at least two knowledge issues, show relevancy between at least two knowledge issues, and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the knowledge issues.
• Knower’s perspective: your essay must demonstrate independent thinking, self-awareness, at least two different perspectives, and several supporting examples.
• Analysis of the knowledge issues: your essay must show insight and depth, justify your main points, present arguments and counter-arguments, and explore any assumptions and implications of your topic.
• Organization of ideas: your essay must be well structured, explain key concepts, be factually accurate, and cite references where applicable.

• You may also be asked “to what extent” or “in what way” a statement is justified. You will then need to present for and against arguments for the statement.
• If you are asked a direct question, your essay should address to what extent or in what ways you are for and against an argument or position.

• Start by doing a general, open brainstorm. Write down everything that comes to mind when you think about the title without passing judgement on any of the ideas, or stopping to read over your brainstorm.
• After five minutes of brainstorming, read over your notes. Identify ideas that relate to each other or that contradict each other. If you are evaluating or assessing a claim in the essay title, create a for column and an against column. Group your brainstorming ideas into either column. Create a third column for grey area ideas, or ambiguities, and place ideas in that column.
• Note any examples of the ideas that you wrote down. For example, you may be addressing a title like: “When mathematicians, historians and scientists say that they have explained something, are they using the word ‘explain’ in the same way?” You may create a brainstorm for each area of knowledge (mathematics, history, science) in relation to the idea of explaining something. You may then use examples of “something” that can be explained in each AOK: a mathematical equation, a historical moment in a battle or a trial, and a scientific theory.

• You should also identify the areas of knowledge you will be discussing in your essay. For example, for a title like: “Compare the roles played by reason and imagination in at least two Areas of Knowledge” you may choose two AOK: the arts and science. You may then compare and contrast the function of “reason” and “imagination” in the arts and in science.

• Paragraph 1: Introduction. You would provide an explanation and interpretation of the title and identify the key terms in the title. You would also state your thesis and explain or identify a knowledge issue related to the title.
• Paragraph 2: First Area of Knowledge. For example, the arts. Discuss how the arts answers the title and provide supporting examples. You should also note any counter-arguments against the title or any limitations of the supporting examples.
• Paragraph 3: Second Area of Knowledge. For example, mathematics. Note how mathematics answers the title and provide supporting examples. You should also note any counter-arguments against the title or any limitations of the supporting examples.
• Paragraph 4: Third Area of Knowledge (if applicable)
• Paragraph 5: Conclusion. Summarize your main ideas and restate your thesis. Conclude by answering the title fully, taking into account the counter arguments and limitations of the areas of knowledge.
• You may also decide to structure your essay based on a main argument and a main counter-argument. Your outline may contain four paragraphs total:
• Paragraph 1: Introduction and explanation of the knowledge issue.
• Paragraph 2: Main argument, with justification and one to two supporting examples.
• Paragraph 3: Main counter-argument, with justification and one to two supporting examples.
• Paragraph 4: Conclusion.

• Some students find it useful to draft their thesis statement once they have finished writing a first draft of the essay. By this point, you will likely have a better sense of the main arguments in the essay and be able to write a clear, concise thesis statement.
• For example, you may need to create a thesis statement for this title: “Compare the roles played by reason and imagination in at least two Areas of Knowledge.” You have chosen two AOK: the arts and mathematics. Consider how reason and imagination function in the arts and in mathematics, as well as the different ways they function in each AOK. Your thesis may be: “Through reason and imagination play an important role in both mathematics and the arts, the imaginative thoughts of mathematicians must be provable, while the imaginative thoughts of artists need only be reasonable.” [5] X Research source

Writing the Essay

• You may want to also refer back to your brainstorming notes to identify the supporting examples for your two areas of knowledge, or your main argument and your main counter-argument.

• For example, you may be discussing the use of reason and imagination in the arts. Rather than discuss a familiar artist, like Picasso, or a familiar example of imaginative thinking, like the Sistine Chapel, use supporting examples that feel original and insightful. Though the essay should be objective in nature, it should also feel reflective and personal. Using a supporting example that you feel passionate about, like Pollack’s kinetic movement paintings, or Rodin’s sculptures, will show you have taken the time to explore unique examples.

• Reference surprising or little known claims, but not well known facts or commonly held opinions. For example: “The sun is the center of the solar system” is a well known fact you will not need to cite. But “Rodin was a traditionally-schooled artist and had a craftsman-like approach to his work” will require a citation as it is maybe a little known fact.
• Reference any sentences or sections where you are closely following someone else’s train of thought or argument, even in your own words.
• Reference exact quotes, and use quotation marks.
• Be consistent with your citations and the way you reference certain sources.

• As you read your essay out loud, make sure there are no vague or abstract sentences or terms. You want to ensure you use your 1600 word count in a clear and concise way. Every word will count in your TOK essay.
• Confirm you have addressed knowledge issues in your essay. Your essay should answer the question “How do you know?” and assess the strengths and weaknesses of knowledge claims in at least two areas of knowledge. You should also use arguments and counter-arguments to support your thesis statement, as well as strong supporting examples.

Community Q&A

You Might Also Like

• ↑ http://www.dirk-solies.de/TOK/how%20to%20write%20a%20ToK%20essay%20cambridge.pdf
• ↑ http://www.toktalk.net/2009/11/20/starting-and-planning-the-tok-essay/

About This Article

To write a TOK essay that compares several areas of knowledge, start with an introductory paragraph that explains your title and states your thesis. Then, write 2-3 main body paragraphs, discussing in each a single area of knowledge and how it relates to your title. Try to provide supporting examples in each case, and address any potential counter-arguments, as well. Finally, end your essay with a conclusion that summarizes your main ideas and restates your thesis. When you’re done, check to be sure that you’re within the 1,200-1,600 word limit for the essay. To learn from our English reviewer how to choose an essay title and create your thesis statement, read on! Did this summary help you? Yes No

• Send fan mail to authors

Reader Success Stories

Sep 28, 2018

Did this article help you?

Dianna Riley

Jan 10, 2017

Roman Nahum

Jan 16, 2017

Apr 6, 2017

Featured Articles

Trending Articles

Watch Articles

• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• Do Not Sell or Share My Info
• Not Selling Info

wikiHow Tech Help Pro:

Develop the tech skills you need for work and life

Extended Essay Writers

How to Structure the TOK Essay?

Luke MacQuoid

Hello, fellow IB students! Fear not if you’re struggling with the IB Theory of Knowledge essay. I’m here to guide you through writing a stellar work. Having been in your shoes and now a seasoned IB writer, I understand how daunting this task can feel. But let’s break it down together. In this article, I’ll share insights on how to structure the TOK essay, a skill I’ve honed over years of experience.

Fundamentals of TOK Essay Structure

Let’s dig into the TOK essay structure, an essential aspect of successful IB essay writing. In my view, understanding the basic structure is like having a guide for your academic paper. So, a typical TOK essay includes three main parts.

The introduction is where you set the stage. It’s about introducing your topic and presenting your thesis statement — your central argument or standpoint. A strong introduction captures the reader’s attention and clearly outlines what you will discuss.

The body of your essay is where the discussion takes place. Each paragraph should focus on a specific aspect of your thesis. Here’s a simple breakdown:

• Point . Start with a clear point that relates to your thesis.
• Explanation . Elaborate on this point. Why is it relevant? How does it relate to the TOK concepts ?
• Example . Provide examples to support your point. It could be real-life situations, specific knowledge claims, or references to areas of knowledge.
• Analysis . Analyze your example; don’t just describe it. How does it support your argument? What implications does it have for knowledge?

In the conclusion, you’re wrapping up your essay. Restate your thesis in a new light, considering the arguments and examples you’ve presented. It’s your final chance to make an impact on your reader, so make it count by summarizing your main points and leaving them with a final thought or question to ponder.

Remember, while the structure is like a skeleton, how you articulate your arguments, provide evidence, and engage with TOK concepts breathes life into your essay. Keep your writing clear, coherent, and focused on your thesis throughout.

How to Choose the Right Title for Your TOK Essay?

Selecting the appropriate title for your TOK essay is a significant step. From my extensive experience writing and mentoring in the IB program, I can tell you that your chosen title sets the tone for your essay. It’s not just a label; it’s the guiding star of your argument.

When faced with the list of prescribed titles from the IB, take your time to reflect on each one thoroughly. Which of these titles sparks your curiosity or challenges your thinking? The right title should resonate with your interests and knowledge. Here’s why this is crucial:

• Personal Engagement . A title that genuinely interests you will inspire deeper thought and more passionate writing. Your connection to the topic will shine through in your essay, making it more compelling.
• Scope for Exploration . Consider how the title allows for the exploration of TOK concepts. A good title should offer enough breadth to discuss various perspectives and areas of knowledge yet be specific enough to allow for in-depth analysis.
• Connect with Areas of Knowledge . Consider how the titles relate to different areas of knowledge (AOKs) and ways of knowing (WOKs). Choose a title that allows you to draw on the AoKs and WOKs you are most familiar with or find most intriguing.
• Formulate Your Argument . A well-chosen title will help you formulate a clear and concise thesis statement and meet a TOK essay word count . It should offer a clear path to build your arguments upon.

The title of your TOK essay is more than just a starting point; it’s the framework upon which your entire argument is built. Take the time to choose wisely, and ensure it’s a title you can engage deeply and critically. This careful consideration at the beginning significantly affects the ease of writing and the quality of your final essay.

Writing a Captivating Introduction for Your TOK Essay

Writing an introduction for your TOK essay is like setting the stage. It’s your first impression on your reader and, more importantly, the examiner. Having guided many students through this process, I’ve learned that the introduction is not just about stating facts; it’s about engaging, intriguing, and presenting your stance. Your introduction should serve several key purposes.

Present Your Thesis Statement

It is the cornerstone of your essay. Your thesis statement should clearly state your perspective or argument to the TOK title. It must be concise yet powerful, giving the reader a clear sense of your viewpoint and how you intend to research it.

Interpret the Essay Title

Before digging into your argument, you must show you’ve thought deeply about the title. Explain the title and hint at the angles you will research. It sets the context for your argument and shows the examiner that you’re addressing the title directly.

Outline Your Approach

Give the reader a map of your essay. What aspects will you cover? How will you approach them? It doesn’t mean listing every point you’ll make but giving a general idea of the structure and flow of your argument.

Engage the Reader

The introduction is also about capturing the reader’s interest. Start with an intriguing statement, a thought-provoking question, or a compelling quote. It can be a great way to draw the reader into your discussion.

Connect to TOK Concepts

Briefly indicate how your essay will engage with key TOK concepts. It could include the areas of knowledge you will focus on or the ways of knowing that will be most significant in your analysis.

Structuring the Body of Your TOK Essay

This part of the TOK essay is where you develop your ideas, present evidence, and conduct a thorough analysis. Here’s a comprehensive guide to writing the body of your TOK essay.

Paragraph Organization

Start each paragraph with a clear topic sentence related to your thesis. This sentence should introduce the paragraph’s main idea, clearly linking your argument. Each section must focus on a single main idea to maintain clarity and coherence.

Develop Ideas

After introducing the main idea, it’s time to develop it. It involves explaining your point in more detail, relating it to TOK concepts, and showing how it supports your thesis. Be sure to include your insights and understanding. Your engagement with the topic is what brings your essay to life.

Use Evidence

Each point you make should be supported by evidence. It could be real-life situations, historical examples, science, literature, or personal experiences. What’s important is that your examples are relevant and help to substantiate your argument.

Critical Analysis

Don’t just present evidence; analyze it. Discuss its implications, strengths, and weaknesses. How does it support your point? What does it say about knowledge? This analysis demonstrates your critical thinking skills and depth of understanding.

Ensure that your paragraphs are interconnected. The end of each paragraph should naturally lead to the beginning of the next. This can be achieved through transition sentences summarizing one point and hinting at the next or directly linking the concepts discussed in consecutive paragraphs.

Reflect on Counterarguments

In your body paragraphs, it’s also effective to consider counterarguments or alternative perspectives. It shows the breadth of your understanding and strengthens your argument by demonstrating that you have considered and rebutted opposing views.

How to Add Real-Life Examples to Your TOK Essay?

When selecting examples, ensure they directly illuminate the point you’re making. The beauty of TOK is its interdisciplinary nature, so draw various areas like history, science, current events, or even personal experiences. This variety demonstrates your broad understanding of knowledge across different fields.

However, it’s not just about listing examples. The art lies in how you link them to TOK concepts. Each example should be a tool to explore these concepts, shedding light on your argument. It’s essential to analyze your examples, discussing their implications and relevance to the essay question. This approach shows critical thinking and a deep engagement with the material.

Also, consider the limitations of your examples. Acknowledging potential biases or missing perspectives reflects your ability to evaluate knowledge claims from multiple angles critically. Smoothly integrating these examples into your essay improves its flow and coherence, making your arguments more compelling. Remember, effective use of real-life examples can turn a good TOK essay into a great one.

Need help with your IB TOK essay?

From research and analysis to structuring and editing, our skilled mentors will be by your side, helping you write an exceptional TOK essay that meets the word count and stringent IB criteria.

Making Conclusion for Your TOK Essay

The conclusion of your TOK essay is much more than just a summary. It’s your final opportunity to make an impact. Drawing from my extensive experience in IB writing and mentoring, I can give some key elements to include.

Synthesize Key Points

Your conclusion should summarize the main points you’ve made. It isn’t about listing each point again but about drawing connections between them to reinforce how they collectively support your thesis. Show the reader how the pieces fit together.

Address the Implications

Discuss the broader implications of your argument. What does your analysis suggest about the nature of knowledge? How does it contribute to our understanding of the TOK themes? It’s your chance to demonstrate the significance of your discussion beyond the confines of the essay.

Reflect on AOKs and WOKs

Briefly reflect on how your essay engages with different areas of knowledge and ways of knowing. How have these contributed to your understanding of the topic? This reflection shows your ability to think about knowledge holistically and interconnectedly.

Leave Thought-Provoking Idea

End your essay with a thought-provoking idea or question. It could be related to a gap in the current understanding, a future direction for research , or a philosophical question that emerged from your discussion. The goal is to leave the reader thinking deeply about the topic even after reading.

The Bottom Line

And there you have it! A guide on how to structure the TOK essay. Remember, this is your opportunity to showcase your critical thinking skills. With a clear structure and a bit of creativity, you’re well on your way to success. Best of luck, and remember that our experts are always ready to help you with TOK essay writing.

Luke MacQuoid has extensive experience teaching English as a foreign language in Japan, having worked with students of all ages for over 12 years. Currently, he is teaching at the tertiary level. Luke holds a BA from the University of Sussex and an MA in TESOL from Lancaster University, both located in England. As well to his work as an IB Examiner and Master Tutor, Luke also enjoys sharing his experiences and insights with others through writing articles for various websites, including extendedessaywriters.com blog

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Already using Kognity?

• Educator Hub

David Spooner • 05/06/2020  •  25 min read

exhibition | pedagogy | Theory of Knowledge | TOK

Theory of Knowledge: The New Exhibition – Q&A

Thank you to the hundreds of teachers who attended our webinars about the new TOK syllabus! We hope you learned a lot from David Spooner and that it helped you feel more prepared. As we mentioned during the webinar, he answered all your questions from the Q&A session, which you can find below, organised by theme. Please note that due to the very high volume of questions regarding ‘Objects’, we have decided to list those queries in a separate blog post – you can find part 2 here.  

General New Syllabus Questions

How can woks be explicitly disregarded in the new curriculum i feel that how knowledge is created does include woks. .

As I mentioned in the webinar, although ways of knowing as a discrete part of the course have “disappeared”, there is still ample scope to refer to such learning tools (for that is what they are) as part of the core theme, “Knowledge and the Knower. Indeed, it could be said that an understanding of, and reference to, these tools is built into the Guide’s explanation of this core theme. Thus where we read that the core encourages students to reflect on “how we perceive and construct our understanding of the world” (p.14), or how “our interactions with others and with the material world shape our knowledge” (ibid.), it is clear that, at least implicitly, discussions about the roles of reason and intuition – the ways of knowing, in fact – have, far from being disregarded (except as discrete entities to be taught as such), been recognised as threads that might help to guide such reflections. Simply because “Ways of Knowing” are no longer an explicit “thing” to be taught does not mean that human beings do not reason, or perceive, or intuit as part and parcel of the way in which we “construct our understanding of the world”.

Level up your TOK teaching with Kognity

How will subject scope be included in tok now.

If I understand this question correctly, this second webinar focused exclusively on the Exhibition. In the first webinar, we looked at, among other things, the five compulsory areas of knowledge and the knowledge frameworks guiding our study of those areas. As we know, the areas of knowledge broadly imitate the division of the IB Diploma itself (the Human Sciences “cover” Individuals and Societies, and so on). So it is there where students and teachers will be able to refer to, or base lessons upon, stimuli taken from the teaching and learning taking place in other Diploma subjects, allowing students to demonstrate their understanding and their ability to “apply” epistemological reflection to their various subjects . As we saw, there is broadly a division in terms of which sections of the course “lead to” which assessment, such that the study of the various compulsory areas of knowledge is connected to the essay on a prescribed title, whilst the Exhibition is to be based around one of the optional themes or the core theme.

What if the student wants to explore a different theme from the two themes chosen by the teacher? Do they explore it on their own? What support should teachers give to those students?

This is an interesting three-part question. Of course, the Guide implicitly permits this (“…students are encouraged to root their exhibition in one of the TOK themes”, p.39), hence this question. So, how to answer it? Firstly, how would you counsel a student in your “other subject” (Literature, Chemistry, Economics, Theatre…) who wishes to proceed with an IA based on an option not studied, or an EE student who wishes to do their EE on a subject not studied? The pedagogical skills we possess as teachers of young adults are no different in TOK than they are in any of the other subjects we teach, so that is the starting point for answering that question. Only you know your students and their capabilities, thus it is difficult to give blanket advice that might cover such eventualities. Secondly, the Guide recommends eight hours of whole-class contact time be allotted to helping students prepare for the Exhibition, so depending on what you do with this time, there may (or may not) be the opportunity to help such students in choosing their prompt, deciding on the objects to be connected to it, and then suggesting readings and reflections designed to help them. Lastly, and as I mentioned in the webinar, perhaps until the first group of students has completed the new TOK assessments, and the moderation feedback and Subject Report have been received, it might be a good idea to treat the suggestions and encouragements presented in the Guide as – for the moment – absolutes, just to be on the safe side. Instead of the optional themes being chosen exclusively by the teacher, why not include the students in the choice of optional themes? Not only is this – arguably – pedagogically beneficial but, as we know, when students are presented with the opportunity to choose, there is likely to be more “buy-in” to what is being done in the classroom, and may have the consequence of obviating the hypothetical scenario that this question raises.

The optional themes do not reference the Arts as an area of knowledge. However, the idea of an Exhibition is closely related to the curatorial practice in Visual Arts. How would you situate the knowledge of the Arts in the new course?

In the first webinar, we looked at, among other things, the five compulsory areas of knowledge and the knowledge frameworks guiding our study of those areas. As we know, the areas of knowledge broadly imitate the division of the IB Diploma itself (the Human Sciences “cover” Individuals and Societies, and so on). So it is there where students and teachers will be able to refer to, or base lessons upon, stimuli taken from the teaching and learning taking place in other Diploma subjects, allowing students to demonstrate their understanding and their ability to “apply” epistemological reflection to their various subjects. Thus, the epistemology of the Arts is “dealt with” given that it is one of the five now-compulsory areas of knowledge. However, as the question states, there is a beautiful opportunity here to have a student or teacher of Visual Arts outline and discuss the issue of curatorial practice, and the many knowledge issues it throws up. This could either take place as part of the study of the relevant area of knowledge, or alternatively feature as part of the eight preparation hours recommended by the Guide as explicit preparation for the Exhibition. Neil MacGregor’s introduction to the book published as a companion to the British Museum/BBC exhibition, “A History of the World in 100 Objects” on which the TOK Exhibition was partly based raises many of these curatorial issues, so this might be an opportunity to kill two birds with one stone.

How do you feel this approach (as embodied and described) by the assessment criteria and description of the aims of the project (Exhibition) will support and prepare students for the process of writing the essay? This is the toughest thing for most students.

In terms of the relationship between the two assessments in TOK, and how they complement each other, the Exhibition serves the same purpose as the Presentation did, and for the same reasons. The Exhibition, as did the Presentation and as does the Essay, encourages students to unpick and explore the epistemological issues present in knowledge questions, and attempt to “apply” this thinking to the so-called “real world”. The Presentation aimed to do that via the positing of a “Real Life Situation”, whilst the Exhibition asks students to use material objects as the springboard for unpacking and analysing knowledge issues. In both cases, the analytical skills developed become useful for the Essay.

Is TOK shifting from the constructivist approach to a more pragmatist approach to knowledge?

Given that the overarching ethos of the IB is that of constructivism, the short answer to this question is “no”. Pragmatist epistemology, in essence, argues that a given proposition (in our language, a knowledge claim) is true if it works satisfactorily, and if it is tested out by the practical consequences of accepting it. It could be argued that, in certain areas of knowledge, “what works” is what is considered true. The orientation of the TOK Guide cannot really be said to lie in this direction. The repetition of phrases such as the “acquisition, validation and dissemination of knowledge” and others like it, in both the new and the previous Guide, still appear to indicate a strong constructivist ethos, and “applicability” does not necessarily mean that a reductionist, pragmatist approach has been taken to the course per se. Writing Component

Is it a maximum of 950 words for the entire IA or 950 for each artifact?

It is a maximum of 950 words for the entire IA, as we can see on p.42 of the Guide: “The maximum overall word count for the TOK exhibition is 950 words. This word count includes the written commentaries on each of the three objects… If an exhibition exceeds the word limit, then examiners are instructed to stop reading after 950 words and to base their assessment on only the first 950 words. Extended footnotes or appendices are not appropriate to a TOK exhibition.” As mentioned in the webinar, the Teacher Support Material contains two different examples of how the 950 words might be employed: either a more-or-less equal distribution of the word count over the three objects, or commentaries on each of the three objects followed by a “summative” paragraph linking together the three objects as a collection in response to the IA prompt.

To clarify the IA prompt, do students select one IA prompt for all three objects, or do they select more than one IA prompt?

The guide (p.40) makes it clear that students must select only one ia prompt as the stimulus for discussing their three chosen objects: “students must select one of the … ia prompts on which to base their exhibition, and all three objects must be linked to the same prompt.”, so if a level 9–10 needs a strong justification of each, would that mean that using some of the 950 words for a summary would be wasted.

The examiner’s comments on one of the samples provided in the Teacher Support Material states: “This student has included an introduction to their work. It should be noted that this is not required, but students are free to include a short introduction if they wish to do so.” Similarly, “It should be noted that there is no requirement that students make connections or comparisons between their objects. They may choose to do so, but it is also perfectly acceptable to discuss each of the three objects entirely individually.” Thus, the word “wasted” depends upon what the student is doing with those words. If we also take into consideration another of the examiner’s comments on the same sample, “The piece of work should be judged holistically using the marking instrument, which means that, for example, the discussion of the dictionary should be rewarded wherever it appears in the response, not just where it appears under the section labelled object two”, we can see that it is possible to introduce, or to conclude, the written commentary provided that the student maintains the focus on how the objects raise (and respond to) knowledge issues inherent within the IA prompt.

Is the 950-word commentary that serves as a justification per object in the form of an argument? The regular claim and counterclaim approach? 

Justification of an interpretation may not always be valid but yet it should be acceptable. right , what does it look like when a point is “supported by appropriate evidence” , the assessment criterion states: “well-supported evidence”. what is the nature of this evidence does it have to be real-life based examples/academic reference.

Fundamentally, all TOK evaluations are “argumentative” in the broadest sense – “these are the knowledge issues inherent in the IA prompt, and this is how object X illuminates those issues” (which is both a “justification” of, and argument for, the “particular contribution that each individual object makes to the exhibition” (Guide, p.47)) – and the samples available in the Teacher Support Material certainly consist of a series of knowledge claims which are supported by reference to the ways in which the object can be said to support such claims. The “claim/counterclaim model” appears to be less in evidence in these samples than hitherto in the Presentation (and in the essay), and the assessment instrument likewise makes no reference to counterclaims/counterarguments.

Academic Honesty

How will academic honesty be monitored as i understand it, the kq will be given and will not change for the duration of the syllabus. i am concerned that “help sites” might offer “objects” that match these kq. , if we do virtual exhibitions, how do we ensure academic integrity , how can we stop students from plagiarising or purchasing an exhibition from a format sold or suggested on reddit. any suggestions for staying ahead of the cheaters.

The key thing to remember is that there is a crucial distinction to be made between the IA task itself (which is what we mark according to the assessment instrument) – the selection of prompt, objects, and the production of a 950-word commentary to accompany these – and the “Exhibition” (the “show and tell”) of the students’ work. As is made clear on p.40 of the Guide, “Teachers are required to provide all students with an opportunity for their completed exhibitions to be showcased and exhibited to an audience. As this does not form part of the formal assessment task, teachers have a great deal of flexibility as to how they choose to hold these exhibitions.” We as teachers are permitted to “provide feedback on one draft of this work”. Therefore we “should provide oral or written advice on how the work could be improved, but should not edit the draft. Once complete, this file is submitted to the TOK teacher to be marked. Samples of student work are then submitted to the IB for moderation”. It is during this process, and during the eight hours of class time suggested in the Guide for working on the production of the Exhibition, that any such academic honesty issues will be addressed. The actual “Exhibition”, the physical (or virtual) “showcasing” of student work, only takes place after the IA task has been completed.

General Exhibition Questions

Would a group of students be allowed (by the ib) to set up and run the exhibition as cas.

Given that the Exhibition itself – the physical/virtual display of the students’ IA work – “does not form part of the formal assessment task” (Guide, p.40) there should be no impediment to this, providing, of course, that the CAS Guide does not explicitly discount such an activity. 

Would it be recommended to do mock Exhibitions and keep the students in groups for those?

Regarding the final part of the question, the new IA task is explicitly designed for students to produce individual Exhibitions. As is made clear on p.39 of the Guide, “Each student must create an individual exhibition. Group work may not be undertaken by students. Multiple students in the same TOK class are permitted to create exhibitions on the same IA prompt. However, students in the same class are not permitted to use any of the same objects.” Neither the Guide nor the Teacher Support Material offers any recommendation as to the desirability or efficacy of a “mock Exhibition”. However, on the grounds that “practice runs” are always a helpful feature for any assessment (as many of us have seen with the Presentations), it would seem like a pedagogically good thing to do. The advantage here is that the Presentation was particularly labour-intensive – however useful, it still takes a lot of time to plan and execute. Many of us have already run “trials” of the new TOK Exhibition, and found it to be both instructive as well as “doable”, and much less time-consuming. The TOK team at my current school ran a trial of the Exhibition, with the students off timetable, which lasted one whole day from start to finish. A plenary session in the morning outlined the task and discussed the IA prompts. For the next few hours, students chose a prompt and went on a “scavenger hunt” around the campus to find suitable objects, wrote up and printed out their analyses and, for the last hour of the day, held an Exhibition which other students groups and teachers attended. This is merely one way in which a mock Exhibition could be organised. No doubt you can think of different ways to achieve the same end via a combination of classwork and self-directed study.

Should the TOK teacher be there during the Exhibition?

We need to remember, as is stated on p.40 of the Guide, that the Exhibition – the actual display of the chosen objects and the student explanation of them to any visitors to the Exhibition (as opposed to the file produced by the students) “does not form part of the formal assessment task”. In that sense, it is not a straightforward “like-for-like” replacement of the Presentation: currently, we are present at the Presentation because that is the assessment task which is marked (we do not mark the PPD, but the Presentation itself), whereas with the new TOK IA, it is not the “display” created to showcase the task that is marked.The IA to be marked by us is the file produced by the students containing the 950-word commentary linking the images of the three chosen objects to the IA prompt. [/bg_collapse]

Is there any form they have to fill in to describe the process of preparing the Exhibition?

No. As we read on p.40 of the Guide, “Teachers are permitted to provide feedback on one draft of this work. They should provide oral or written advice on how the work could be improved, but should not edit the draft. Once complete, this file is submitted to the TOK teacher to be marked.” This process of drafting and commenting is intended to not only provide the opportunity for us to help and guide students, but is also, of course, an opportunity for us to provide “oversight” in terms of ensuring that students are adhering to the principles of academic honesty and, as such, “stands in for”, or “substitutes”, the three interactions we have with the students during the writing of their TOK essays, or the discussions we currently have with them during the elaboration of their PPDs relevant to the current Presentation.

How do you feel about the multipurpose Exhibition with the PYP, MYP and DP all in one? Do you think it will really work, or is this an idea created in the IB clouds?

I think the answer to this lies in (i) timing and (ii) energy levels, and may depend on when these things are scheduled into the school year. The MYP Personal Project is often presented before the end of the school year, whilst the TOK Presentation (as is) often takes place at the end. However, I think where such an idea might work is in the form of a “reprise” – the various programme exhibitions may well take place at different times in the school calendar, and what determines this includes the need to evaluate the students’ work but, once that is done, finishing the school year with an informal, no stakes, joint presentation might be a nice way to promote and celebrate the students’ efforts to the wider community, especially since, as it says on p.40 of the Guide, the actual physical Exhibition “does not form part of the formal assessment task”.

Are the ‘pilots’ mentioned actually student-generated, or developed as exemplars by the course revision team?

The sample material included in the IB ToK Teacher Support Material were student-generated. During the curriculum review, several schools were asked to pilot the IA task, and it was these ‘live’ pilots which generated the sample material found on the TSM.

Do you have a sample of an exhibit, like three objects connected to a prompt?

The IB TOK Teacher Support Material includes samples of Exhibition files created by students.

Is the Exhibition an internal assessment and what percentage of the final mark does it represent?

The Guide specifies that the internal assessment in TOK is worth one-third (33%) (p.38) of the overall mark in TOK. The IA task can be divided into two parts: the first is the IA itself (a single file containing their TOK Exhibition).

This must include:

• a title clearly indicating their selected IA prompt
• images of their three objects
• a typed commentary on each object that identifies each object and its specific real-world context, justifies each object’s inclusion in the Exhibition and links to the IA prompt (maximum 950 words)
• appropriate citations and references. (Guide, p.40) 

Meanwhile, the display of the students’ work, the “Exhibition” in its strictest sense, “does not form part of the formal assessment task” (ibid.).

Do we mark the written 950-word commentary or how they orally describe it to us?

As it is an internal assessment, we mark the completed file (comprising photographs of the three objects, together with the 950-word commentary). When the marks have been submitted to the IB, a sample of the files will be required to be sent for moderation.

Can it be in digital format?

The file produced by the student for marking and potential moderation sampling by the IB does, of course, have to be digital. It would be impossible to upload a physical object. The Guide (p.40) outlines what this file must include:

• appropriate citations and references. Some objects may, of course, already be digital (as the suggestions on p.42 of the Guide make clear), although for the actual Exhibition (as opposed to the file produced by the students for assessment purposes) such electronic objects will most likely be printed out and placed on display.

Since the Exhibition is to be conducted in year 1, what is the recommendation for a mock Exhibition?

Neither the Guide nor the Teacher Support Material offers any recommendation as to the desirability or efficacy of a “mock Exhibition”. However, on the grounds that “practice runs” are always a helpful feature for any assessment (as many of us have seen with the Presentations), it would seem like a pedagogically good thing to do. The advantage here is that the Presentation was particularly labour-intensive – however useful, it still takes a lot of time to plan and execute. Many of us have already run “trials” of the new TOK Exhibition, and found it to be both instructive as well as “doable”, and much less time-consuming. The TOK team at my current school ran a trial of the Exhibition, with the students off timetable, which lasted one whole day from start to finish. A plenary session in the morning outlined the task and discussed the IA prompts. For the next few hours, students chose a prompt and went on a “scavenger hunt” around the campus to find suitable objects, wrote up and printed out their analyses and, for the last hour of the day, held an Exhibition which other students groups and teachers attended. This is merely one way in which a mock Exhibition could be organised. No doubt you can think of different ways to achieve the same end via a combination of classwork and self-directed study.

Any thoughts on timing – i.e. when should we hold the Exhibition? Does it have to be in the second year or can we hold it at the end of the first year? 

Regarding the timeline of the course, when do you recommend the tok exhibition takes place is the exhibition something that can take place during the course or is it best to wait until the end,  when in the first year should the students do their presentations.

The Exhibition must take place during the first year of the course. As the Guide states, “The TOK exhibition task has been explicitly designed to be completed during the first year of the DP” (p.39), which implies that the optional themes that the task is to be based on need to be taught in the first year, and the core theme at the very least introduced also in the first year. It would perhaps make good pedagogical as well as structural (i.e. in terms of structuring the course) sense to hold it at the end of the year so that it can serve as both a culmination and a celebration.

Some schools get the presentation done by the end of DP year 1. With this new assessment, is there a recommended time, between year 1 and year 2, that would be best for candidates to work on this internal assessment? What would you suggest?

As the Guide states, “The TOK exhibition task has been explicitly designed to be completed during the first year of the DP” (p.39), which implies that the optional themes that the task is to be based on need to be taught in the first year, and the core theme at the very least introduced also in the first year.

Is the theme chosen by the students guided by teachers, or should teachers decide for them? Also, is it an individual theme for each student, or will it be the same theme for all students in one year level?

Given that the Exhibition is based on one of the optional themes or the core theme, Knowledge and the Knower, and given that we must teach two of the five optional themes, students will end up with a fairly wide range of themes to choose from. The theme (and IA prompt), then, is chosen individually by students from within that range. Whilst of course they are guided by us, the teachers, and the eight suggested class hours are there for the purpose of precisely that explanation and guidance, the ultimate choice is still in the hands of the students. Within a group of students – a class or even the entire cohort – there may inevitably be some overlap in terms of either the option chosen, or the focus of the analysis within the option, or even of IA prompt chosen (more than one student in a group/cohort may choose the same IA prompt). It is up to us to “guide them apart” for both good pedagogical reasons, and to ensure academic honesty.

About the Author

David has been teaching TOK since 1999, in a variety of countries including Ghana, the UK, Spain, Finland, Greece, Lebanon, Jordan and Italy. He has been an IB workshop leader since 2004, and has a range of examining experience. In addition to this, he is an IB Verification Visitor and Consultant for schools wishing to adopt the IB Diploma.

Blog articles

Custom TOK essays, exhibitions, scripts, presentations, PPDs

TOK Essay Word Count in 2023

The International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge (TOK) essay is a 1200-1600 word essay on a prescribed topic . The minimum word count for the TOK essay is 1200 words, while the maximum word count is 1600 words.

It is important to note that these word counts are strict limits, and students are expected to stay within them. Exceeding the word count can result in a lower score, as the essay is evaluated on various criteria including the quality of the argument, the use of examples , and the organization of the essay, among others.

TOK Essay Word Count Breakdown for Each Section

To meet the minimum word count requirement and to effectively structure the essay , it is recommended that students aim to include the following sections in their TOK essay:

• Introduction (100-200 words ): This part should introduce the topic and provide a brief overview of the main arguments that will be presented in the essay.
• Body (800-1200 words ): This should consist of two to four paragraphs, each containing around 200-300 words. These paragraphs should present the main arguments and supporting evidence for the essay.
• Conclusion (100-200 words) : This part should summarize the main points of the essay and provide a final analysis or evaluation of the topic.

To meet the maximum word count, students can include additional paragraphs or expand on their arguments in more detail. However, it is important to ensure that the essay remains focused and well-organized, and that each paragraph has a clear purpose.

What Happens if You Go Over the Word Count for TOK Essay?

Exceeding the word limit on your Theory of Knowledge essay is like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole – it just doesn’t fit the mold. The International Baccalaureate places a firm cap on the word count, hovering around 1,600 words, and straying from this limit can significantly impact your grade.

It means that assessors are only instructed by IBO to read the first 1,600 words of your TOK essay, and in most cases, they will grade these first 1600 words. So it’s important to keep your thoughts succinct and on point.

Staying within the word limit showcases your ability to craft a well-articulated argument, displaying your understanding of the task at hand.

So, heed the word count like a lighthouse in a stormy sea – it will guide you to success!

Follow the exact wordcount and structure to get the best grades

In summary, the TOK essay word count in 2023 is 1200-1600 words, with a strict minimum and maximum limit. Students should aim to write a well-structured and thoughtfully argued essay within these limits and follow the TOK essay rubric in order to achieve a high score.

Need help with your IB TOK essay ?

Unlock your potential and unleash the brilliance of your TOK essay with the help of our experts at BuyTOKEssay.com! Whether you’re starting from scratch or fine-tuning your existing essay to meet the demands of your supervisor, our team is here to make your dream of a perfect paper a reality. Say goodbye to writer’s block and hello to success with just one click.

If you are lack of time, have only week to complete your TOK essay , or even less, our IB writers can land you a hand. You can al;ways count on BuyToKEssay.com website!

Liliana Duman

Liliana Duman has a strong background in teaching English language, having graduated from Hacettepe University’s English Language Teaching Department in 2008. With over two decades of experience in the field, she has a wealth of knowledge and expertise to share with her students. In addition to her bachelor’s degree, Liliana holds a master’s in Teaching Turkish as a Second Language and has previously worked at Başkent and Hacettepe University in Ankara. Currently, she is an EFL instructor at Sakarya University, teaching various skills, including methodology, speaking, reading, writing, and listening. In addition to her teaching, Liliana has also contributed to material development and testing efforts. As well as her work as a teacher, Liliana is an experienced private online ToK essay tutor, providing personal help for both IB ToK students and teachers in all aspects of IB ToK essays and exhibitions. She is dedicated to helping her students succeed and achieve their full potential. In her spare time, Liliana also writes articles for buytokessay.com, sharing her expertise and insights on ToK with a wider audience.

Related Posts

What is Theory of Knowledge in IB?

IB TOK Essay Structure in Detail

TOK Essay Grading Rubric

12 TOK Key Concepts with Examples

May 2023 TOK Essay Prompts

Prompt #1 – Is replicability necessary in the production of knowledge?

3 thoughts on “tok essay word count in 2023”.

Everything is very open with a really clear explanation of the issues. Thanks for answering for the question without any blah-blah-bllahs… It was really informative. Your website is very useful. Many thanks for sharing!

Thanks for your blog, nice to read. Do not stop.

Nice post. As an IB tutor, I think there should be more and more posts like this one available online

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Customer Reviews
• Extended Essays
• IB Internal Assessment
• Theory of Knowledge
• Literature Review
• Dissertations
• Essay Writing
• Research Writing
• Assignment Help
• Capstone Projects
• College Application
• Online Class

What Is The Word Count For A TOK Exhibition (Quick Answer)

by  Antony W

September 29, 2023

Theory of Knowledge Exhibition requires you to conduct independent research, come up with three objects with real-world context, and write a commentary. But what’s the word count for the ToK Exhibition commentary?

Generally, the ToK Exhibition commentary should be 950 words. Since IB instructs examiners not to assess more words than recommended, stick to the required word count. A rule of thumb to get this right is to distribute words evenly among the three objects.

In this guide, you’ll learn more about the length of the Theory of Knowledge Exhibition.

In particular, we’ll give you a template that you can use to ensure equal distribution of words so that your commentary doesn’t go past the suggested word count.

Let’s get started.

Key Takeaways

• IB phased out the ToK Presentation from the course and replaced it with the Exhibition assignment.
• You will still write the Theory of Knowledge Essay , but the assignment guideline for the essay are unchanged.
• The ToK Exhibition is an individual assignment, with no instance of classroom discussion allowed on the topic.

In addition to looking at the length of the exhibition project, this guide will give you some useful insights to help you better prepare to score full marks for the assignment.

Free Features

Need help to complete and ace your essay? Order our writing service.  

Get all academic paper features for $65.77 FREE

What is TOK Exhibition?

The TOK Exhibition is a new assessment task introduced to the course to replace the TOK Presentation. It examines how students can apply TOK Concepts learned in the classroom to the real world around them.

Assessed internally and moderated externally, the TOK Exhibition assignment is worth 33% of the final TOK grades.

Although the TOK Exhibition task requires you to do a live presentation of the Exhibition Objects, you won’t earn any marks for the presentation itself.

Your teacher will assess the exhibition file after the oral presentation, which is why it’s important to write the best 950-word commentary. 

TOK Exhibition vs TOK Presentation: What’s the Difference?

Before we go any further with this guide, you should note that the TOK Exhibition isn’t the same as the Theory of Knowledge Presentation.

Notably, the TOK Exhibition focuses on evaluating how IB students can manifest TOK outside their classroom.

It has a different assessment instrument, a unique task, and a different moderation process.

Knowledge and the knower is the core theme of the TOK Exhibition assignment. IB requires that you think of yourself as the knower and link to your learner’s profile .

Also, the IB TOK Exhibition task introduces two optional themes, which are “knowledge and politics” and “knowledge and technology”.

What is the Maximum Word Count for a TOK Exhibition? 

The TOK Exhibition commentary should be 950 words for the entire Internal Assessment.

Keep in mind that IB instructs examiners not to consider word counts past the set limit and instead base their assessment only on the first 950 words. 

Even if you have a lot to write about each of your three objects, it’s important to keep the word limit in mind.

A good approach to keep your assignment close to the word count would be to have an equal distribution of words across the three objects.

Note that the word count in the TOK Exhibition commentary doesn’t include the references used in the assignment.

Also, you must not include appendices and/or extended footnotes in your TOK exhibition.

What’s the Optimal Word Count Distribution for TOK Exhibition?

To write well and with ease, it helps to have a format for your exhibition commentary. Below is an example of a structure you can use:

• Title: You should copy and paste your chosen IA prompt in this section. Don’t tweak or change word placement. The prompt must appear as is. 
• Introduction (30 words): Your commentary doesn’t necessarily need an introduction. However, having one can give your readers a clear picture of what it is you intend to explore.
• Object 1 (290 words): You should explain your first object. In addition to defining the object, you must give its real-world context.
• Object 2 (290 words): Explain your second object, making sure that, in addition to giving its definition, you mention its real-world context.
• Object 3 (290 words): You must show the image of your third object and develop its explanation. Also, make sure you explain it real-world context.
• Conclusion (50 words): In 50 words, give the reader a summary of the objects you used to answer your chosen IA prompt.

You can develop your own structure, but the outline above is a good option to use if you wish to maintain a fair distribution of words across the three objects of your choice.

The explanation for each object must link to the main concept of the prompt. Furthermore, the points you make for each object must be independent of each other.

Your conclusion should comment on the question and demonstrate how TOK manifests itself in the real world based on the objects (or images of the objects) you selected.

Don’t hesitate to vary the word count for each object if you feel there’s a need to do so. Only make sure that your commentary doesn’t exceed the expected word count.

How Long Does It Take to Write a TOK Exhibition?

It’s up to you to decide how much time you want to spend working on your ToK Exhibition.

We recommend that you check how much time you have left and plan yourself accordingly.

Also, try to avoid last minute rush as they don’t often yield the best results.

Final Thoughts

Your ToK Exhibition doesn’t have to be a complex assignment.

As long as you know how to select your objects, link them together, and write a comprehensive commentary, you should score top marks for the assignment.

If you find the task overwhelming or difficult to complete, you can hire our ToK exhibition service and work with an IB expert to help you get the task done.

In addition to helping you prepare the necessary exhibition files, our top writers will help you complete the commentary within 24 hours.  

About the author 

Antony W is a professional writer and coach at Help for Assessment. He spends countless hours every day researching and writing great content filled with expert advice on how to write engaging essays, research papers, and assignments.