questions to assess critical thinking skills

15 critical thinking interview questions to find the perfect candidate

In today’s complex, data-driven world of work, critical thinking skills are more important than ever.

According to the World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report , the demand for critical thinking and analysis is growing at a faster rate than any other skill group.

For this reason, hiring managers now need a robust system for assessing critical thinking skills for most positions they fill. When we talk about critical thinking, we refer to a range of sub-skills including research, analysis, judgment, problem-solving, and self-reflection.

The interview is a great opportunity to evaluate a candidate’s critical thinking skills. It enables hiring managers to probe into their personal thinking process while tailoring the assessment to the situational needs of the role. 

For the best results, interviews should be preceded by a Critical Thinking test , along with other skills and personality tests. Pre-employment testing allows you to get an in-depth understanding of your candidates’ abilities, identify top talent, and screen out unsuitable applicants.

To make the interview worthwhile, hiring managers need to ask the right kind of critical thinking questions to candidates. But these aren’t always immediately obvious! That’s why we’ve put together 15 of the best critical thinking interview questions for you to use in your hiring process.

These include 10 behavioral and 5 situational critical thinking questions, allowing you to create an interview structure befitting your business requirements. Sample answers for each question are also included for your reference.

Table of contents

10 behavioral critical thinking interview questions, 5 situational critical thinking questions, what kind of roles can you use critical thinking interview questions, finding critical thinkers for your organization can be easier than you think.

Behavioral interview questions usually call on a candidate to discuss their past performance, enabling hiring managers to learn more about their previous experience and its applicability to the role.

When tailored to critical thinking and analysis, behavioral interview questions give you an insight into a candidate’s thinking style as well as specific critical thinking sub-skills, such as: 

Decision-making

Problem-solving

Information processing

Deductive reasoning

Conflict resolution

The 10 behavioral interview questions below span a range of topics; some may be more relevant than others, depending on the role you are recruiting for.

Here are the 10 behavioral critical thinking questions:

How do you go about completing a task without clear information?

What is the most difficult work-related decision you’ve had to make?

How do you process new ideas and approaches?

How do you respond to opposing viewpoints?

How quickly do you make decisions?

Have you ever anticipated a problem before it arose? How did you deal with it?

What work-related advice would you give to former employers?

How often do you ask co-workers for help?

How should friction between team members be dealt with?

What is the most innovative work-related idea you have come up with? How did it benefit the organization?

Continue reading below to view our sample answers for each question.

1. How do you go about completing a task without clear information?

In time-sensitive work environments, workers often have to make decisions without all the necessary information at hand. Answers to this question should demonstrate how candidates use their resourcefulness to perform effectively under given limitations.

Sample answer :

I prefer to make decisions after taking in all of the facts, but I recognize that the need to act quickly will sometimes take priority. In these situations, I pore over all of the information available and use my intuition to fill in any gaps. This could be by drawing parallels to a similar task from the past or predicting future outcomes to map the best decision in the present.

I experienced this situation in my last job while writing a funding application with a very quick turnaround. The final section to complete before submission was the summary, where it was crucial to really sell our organization’s solution in a compelling and straightforward way. 

My manager was unreachable at the time, so I decided to contact the head office to retrieve the summaries of our previous successful funding applications. Using these examples, I was able to craft a persuasive summary. A few weeks later, we were awarded the funding.

2. What is the most difficult work-related decision you’ve had to make?

This question probes into a candidate’s ability to make decisions under pressure. A good answer will evidence a clear thought process and measured judgment to select an appropriate course of action.

As a manager, layoffs were among the toughest decisions I had to make in my previous role. In those situations, I had to put personal loyalties aside and make tough choices based on the needs of the business.

This involved a regimented process of ranking staff across several different criteria including merit, skills, and tenure. Ultimately, we favored staff with long-term potential, such as those with in-demand skills and a growth mindset.

The decisions were far from easy, but recognizing that someone had to make the call, I never shied away from them either. I think the best approach for any difficult work decision is to be objective, consult data, and consider the long-term impact.

3. How do you process new ideas and approaches?

Open-mindedness is central to critical thinking. Candidates shouldn’t be fearful of doing away with traditional methodologies if a superior alternative emerges. Equally, they should exercise their judgment to evaluate the reliability and veracity of new information. 

I always try to be receptive to new ideas, recognizing that these drive innovation in a business. 

If I find that something can be improved, I seek solutions and conduct initial research to ascertain their effectiveness in other business contexts. If I think they have potential, I test them on a small trial basis before deciding whether to implement them on a full scale.

This situation played out in my last role, where I was the leader of a small team. After transitioning to remote work arrangements during the COVID-19 pandemic, a team member asked if he could rearrange his hours to accommodate certain family commitments.

The request prompted me to consider the effect of flexible working hours on performance, and I decided to trial a ‘flextime’ system. Within a few weeks, productivity had risen significantly and the team reported greater job satisfaction. Flexible hours quickly became a permanent arrangement.

4. How do you respond to opposing viewpoints?

Critical thinking is contingent on a person’s ability to weigh up both sides of an argument. Even when one course of action is evidently worse than another, candidates should be able to respond to opposing perspectives respectfully and constructively.

I think it’s great to hear different perspectives in the workplace, provided that they come from a well-meaning place. Listening to opposing viewpoints helps to refine my own opinion and can often bring the team to a middle ground from which more balanced decisions can be made.

A few months ago, a co-worker and I disagreed on how best to deliver a digital marketing campaign for a client. In short, he wanted to run paid search engine advertisements while I preferred to create content for the client’s company website.

After listening to his argument, I presented my case to show that content marketing was likely to yield a higher return on investment by showing case studies from previous clients in a similar field. 

Eventually, we agreed to the content strategy, and allocated only a small slice of the budget to paid ads. Within a few weeks, the client had doubled the traffic on their website and was extremely satisfied with our project delivery.

5. How quickly do you make decisions?

In a fast-paced work environment, employees must act swiftly and decisively. This question asks the candidate to expand on their decision-making process. Strong answers will strike a balance between careful consideration and urgency. 

While I like to gather as much information as possible before making a decision, I recognize that deadlines will often make this unrealistic. Sometimes, it’s of vital importance to act quickly to stay ahead of a competitor or fast-track a project.

The first step is to assess the immediacy of the deadline; if it’s urgent, I know I have to make a decision ASAP. In this situation, I’ll quickly weigh up the pros and cons of each option and select the course of action that best aligns with the business goals.

While working in customer service, I routinely had to make on-the-spot decisions to select the best solution in different contexts. I always made sure to get a full picture of the customer’s needs, and then chose the most suitable action from the options available. 

Having a strong background understanding of the area and a clear selection process allowed me to make the right call 99% of the time. 

6. Have you ever anticipated a problem before it arose? How did you deal with it?

This question separates the proactive thinkers from the passive ones. Candidates able to answer this question will be demonstrating their ability to plan ahead and anticipate risks—an invaluable skill in any organization.

Working as a retail store manager at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, it immediately became obvious that our store would need to change certain procedures as infections picked up. 

I decided to act quickly, investing in protective equipment for staff, implementing plastic screens at the checkouts, and rearranging the store layout early on in the pandemic to make the site more Covid-friendly for our customers and staff.

Our proactive approach resonated with customers, who appreciated the new measures while other stores in the local area remained slow to adapt. Our trading volume actually rose by around 25% compared to pre-pandemic levels. Staff also reported feeling safer in our monthly surveys.

It’s important to try and pre-empt risks in any business. To do this, I always consider the worst-case scenario that could affect the business and learn from competitors’ failures.

7. What work-related advice would you give to former employers?

This question gauges a candidate’s propensity to voice criticism, and whether they choose to express it in a constructive or negative way. There’s no real right or wrong answer here; candidates simply need to explain their suggestions thoughtfully and thoroughly.

I’ve always tried to provide feedback to my bosses when it was appropriate to do so. Voicing criticism can be a tricky task, so I make an effort to frame the discussion in a constructive and non-malicious way.

One of my former bosses was particularly strong-willed, which sometimes made it difficult for the team to share new ideas. If we were able to show evidence of the potential of a new idea—using data, for example—he would be less dismissive than if we were to suggest it off the cuff. Over time, the boss grew more receptive to outside ideas rather than immediately shrugging them off.

In another company, some of my co-workers were dissatisfied as they felt undervalued by the boss. Rather than take this up with the boss directly, I raised the issue in the quarterly employee survey, suggesting that the senior leadership give more praise and recognition to high-performing staff in order to improve motivation and employee satisfaction.

8. How often do you ask coworkers for help?

Workers should know when to seek help from others while working on a project. 

A good answer here is all about balance. Candidates shouldn’t burden co-workers with work they could do themselves, nor should they be too stubborn to move things forward with some outside opinion or help.

When I’ve been given a task to complete independently, I try to avoid asking my co-workers for help as I know everyone is busy with their own work. Sometimes, though, it can be really useful to get a fresh pair of eyes to look over things when I’ve hit a wall in a project. Help is a two-way street, so I always try to make time to assist co-workers when I am asked. 

About a year ago in my sales position, I was tasked with integrating invoices into a spreadsheet containing order history for different clients. Software isn’t my strong point, so I sought help from a member of the development team—someone with whom I had built a good rapport previously.

I knew this was something that would probably only take him 15 minutes, so I didn’t feel like too much of a burden when I asked for help. He duly completed the task, and the project could move forward. I had previously helped him before, and I also offered my support for anything he needed in the future.

9. How should friction between team members be dealt with?

Conflict resolution is a skill that can be hard to come by for hiring managers. In work environments with people of different opinions and values, it’s important to have someone who can defuse conflict situations with a proactive, patient, and impartial approach.

When managed properly, I think that workplace disagreements can be healthy and help to promote a diversity of opinion. However, when they become personal, they serve no purpose and must be resolved immediately with fairness and good judgment.

In one of my previous roles as a team leader, conflict flared up between two coworkers after disagreeing on how to allocate the quarterly budget. At the first opportunity, I arranged a one-on-one chat with each colleague to understand their reasoning and try to reconcile both positions.

After the situation had been de-escalated, I brought the two together to talk it out in a calm and non-threatening space. With active listening and turn-taking techniques, they were able to settle their differences. I followed up regularly in the weeks after, and we were able to put the conflict behind us.

10.  What is the most innovative work-related idea you have come up with? How did it benefit the organization?

This question asks candidates to consider a time when they have thought outside the box to deliver a new solution in a previous job. Having proactive problem-solvers in your organization will help it stay ahead of the curve. 

In one of my previous roles, I was placed in charge of a small workgroup tasked with finding a way to improve productivity and efficiency. Each member of the group seemed to have their own opinion of the best solution, but most entailed large expenses we could not afford.

Since management needed a low investment solution, I proposed adding two additional fifteen-minute breaks to the working day for employees to read a book, catch up on the news, or go for a walk around the block. This was because I knew many employees felt burnt out by the end of the day, and their work suffered as a result.

The team supported the idea, but management was hesitant at first. After presenting my argument, they agreed to trial the breaks for two weeks. By the second week, the results were clear: employees were working more effectively and they were more satisfied at work. Soon after, the new break system was implemented on a scale across the company.

Situational interview questions assess how a candidate would behave under specific circumstances. Unlike behavioral questions, which call on previous experiences, situational questions place interviewees in the new role to see how they would perform.

The beauty of situational questions is that they allow interviewers to replicate role-specific scenarios where candidates will need to exercise critical thinking. If you were hiring a grant reviewer, for example, you could ask candidates how they would choose between two evenly-matched proposals. 

Our five chosen situational interview questions assess a range of different critical thinking scenarios; below, you’ll find our sample answers. If possible, adapt the situations to the specific role that you’re hiring for.

You notice your manager has made a significant mistake in a report. How do you handle the situation?

How would you deal with a situation where a weak link is affecting the quality of performance?

If you are given ten projects but only have time to complete three, how do you decide which three to work on?

You are leading a time-sensitive project where team members are unable to agree on an appropriate strategy. How do you proceed?

You’ve discovered a new approach that could improve performance while saving resources, but it’s unpopular among your coworkers. How do you present your case to your manager?

1. You notice your manager has made a significant mistake in a report. How do you handle the situation?

In virtually all roles, employees will have someone above them in the chain of command. Candidates shouldn’t be afraid to confront authority figures if they notice something’s wrong, but they must go about this in a constructive and professional manner. 

If I noticed a mistake in my manager’s work, I would wait for an opportunity to speak with them privately to raise the issue. After discussing the mistake, I would offer to help fix it.

I’m sure if I went about this politely, the manager would appreciate my good intentions and the issue could be resolved quickly and cordially. While the situation may be slightly uncomfortable, ensuring the best outcome for the business should always take priority.

I’ve found myself in this position in a previous job while reviewing a document from my manager before it was due to be published. It included a few incorrect statistics and formatting errors which I took the liberty to amend. When I raised this with him in private, he thanked me for my attentiveness and any ill feeling was avoided.

2.  How would you deal with a situation where a weak link in the team is affecting the quality of performance?

This question assesses the candidate’s ability not only to identify workplace problems, but also their willingness to tackle them proactively. Strong candidates won’t shy away from having uncomfortable conversations, but will also be respectful and keep things confidential.

If I noticed that a particular team member was disrupting the delivery of a project, I would look to offer solutions rather than point fingers. The first step would be to identify the cause of the team member’s poor performance.

If it was down to a lack of skills, I would suggest to the team leader in private that they receive appropriate training to help get them up to speed on the project. Alternatively, they could be reassigned to another area that they have greater expertise in.

If their performance was due to poor motivation, I would suggest that the employee be given personalized performance goals, assistance, and feedback. Encouragement, rather than criticism, should help the employee feel more motivated.

3. If you are given ten projects but only have time to complete three, how do you decide which three to work on?

Workers will often need to prioritize tasks based on their urgency and importance. In this situation, critical evaluation is necessary to distinguish the important from the less-important tasks using specific measures like time, effort, and value. 

If I had to manage multiple time-sensitive tasks, I’d first list them all together in a single document and order them based on the urgency of the deadlines. Second, I would flag any tasks which could feasibly be delegated to co-workers for completion.

From the remaining tasks, I would identify those which are both urgent and important. The next step would be to order these based on their value by considering which tasks have the most serious consequences for failing to complete them, and also which tasks have the highest ROI. 

For example, missing a deadline for a brand-new client could be more damaging than missing one for a loyal client of many years, and whose project is less urgent. Using this process, I’d select the three tasks which:

Only I can complete

Bring a lot of value to the business

4. You are leading a time-sensitive project where team members are unable to agree on an appropriate strategy. How do you proceed?

At a certain point in the project planning stage, it’s necessary to make the call to move things forward. Strong candidates will be able to synthesize the key points of the different strategies available to help come to a decision that is supported by the majority. 

In this situation, I would first remind team members of the urgency of the task at hand and the need to move quickly. Next, I would write up a simple, straightforward list of the pros and cons of each available strategy, drawing attention to any potential risks that may be encountered.

I would then give team members a few minutes to consider each option and voice any additional queries they may have. If a clear consensus still cannot be reached at this point, I would take a vote to decide the strategy to move forward with.

I recognize that it’s not always possible to reach a clear agreement. But by stripping the situation back to the simple facts, at least everyone can make an informed and objective decision in a time-sensitive manner.

5. You discover a new approach that could improve performance while saving resources, but it’s unpopular among your co-workers. How would you present your case to your manager?

Innovative thinkers can be great assets to your organization, but they’re of little value if they fail to defend their ideas when faced with disapproval. While other team members’ views should be respected, the strong candidate will be able to argue their case persuasively.

Before putting the idea forward to the manager, I would find out more about the reasoning behind the team’s resistance. It could be that they don’t want to go through a new learning curve or are unconvinced by its benefits.

These insights would allow me to tweak my proposal so that it addresses my co-workers’ doubts. At this point, I would present the idea to my manager and explain that I am willing to support the team in adopting the new approach with presentations and training.

The support sessions would aim to overcome the team’s hesitation by showing how the new approach would benefit them in the long run. I’d also encourage anonymous feedback so that the new approach can be improved. Ultimately, I’d try to reach a place of mutual understanding with positive outcomes for everyone involved.

Critical thinking is important in any job that involves decision-making. However, there are some fields where a candidate’s critical faculties will take priority. These include:

Law : Lawyers , counsels, and contract managers process complex information to build persuasive arguments 

Education : Teachers continually evaluate their students’ progress as well as their own methods to achieve long-term learning goals

Management : Managers analyze information, anticipate problems, and make complex business decisions based on unbiased judgments

Research : Researchers collect information, process data, study patterns, and make inferences to inform future decisions

Human resources : HR professionals make critical, measured judgments when making hires and handling employee conduct

Finance : Finance workers analyze data and objectively evaluate the results to create financial action plans 

Medical : Doctors and other medical staff examine patients and collect information to diagnose health issues and then offer the best solution

Our set of critical thinking interview questions is well suited to the professions above, but you may also want to assess critical thinking skills when recruiting in other areas. 

Critical thinkers make companies more competitive; actively seeking candidates with strong critical thinking skills for all open positions will give your organization a strong competitive edge.

By making a few tweaks to your recruitment process, you can transform your company into a team of critical thinkers! 

For this, you need to incorporate a Critical Thinking test into the candidate selection process , together with other skills tests to filter out unsuitable applicants and shortlist the best talent.

You can then use some of our interview questions in your own interviews to further assess candidates’ critical thinking skills and make the right hiring decision.

With critical thinking assessments in place at different stages of the process, you’re well on your way to hiring analytical minds that will drive innovation and help you future-proof your company.

Related posts

The tech skills gap: What it is, why it exists, and how to close it in 2024

12 essential front end developer skills and how to assess them

7 hiring trends for 2024

Hire the best candidates with TestGorilla

Create pre-employment assessments in minutes to screen candidates, save time, and hire the best talent.

Latest posts

The best advice in pre-employment testing, in your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

Hire the best. No bias. No stress.

Our screening tests identify the best candidates and make your hiring decisions faster, easier, and bias-free.

Free resources

This checklist covers key features you should look for when choosing a skills testing platform

This resource will help you develop an onboarding checklist for new hires.

How to assess your candidates' attention to detail.

Learn how to get human resources certified through HRCI or SHRM.

Learn how you can improve the level of talent at your company.

Learn how CapitalT reduced hiring bias with online skills assessments.

Learn how to make the resume process more efficient and more effective.

Improve your hiring strategy with these 7 critical recruitment metrics.

Learn how Sukhi decreased time spent reviewing resumes by 83%!

Hire more efficiently with these hacks that 99% of recruiters aren't using.

Make a business case for diversity and inclusion initiatives with this data.

Critical Thinking Interview Questions: 15 Interview Questions to Identify Top Candidates

Critical thinking goes beyond technical expertise and is essential in a wide range of professions. It’s a skill that enables employees to analyze information, solve problems, and make informed decisions. You can gauge critical thinking using assessment tests, practical problem solving, or through crafting interview questions highlighting critical thinking abilities.

In this blog, we’ll be going through questions you can ask your candidates to figure out if they have the critical thinking skills you require for your open position. But first, let’s talk about why critical thinking skills are so important.  

Why Are Critical Thinking Skills Necessary?

Critical thinkers are especially necessary positions that require problem solving skills, juggling various priorities, and analyzing data. Although many jobs and industries require a certain level of critical thinking ability, these skills are essential for some job roles and industries, including:

• K-12 : The best teachers are creative problem solvers. Between classroom management and learning fatigue, critical thinking skills help teachers find the best way to connect with their students.
• Leadership Positions : Effective leaders must make strategic decisions, often in ambiguous situations. Critical thinking is crucial in leadership roles.
• Creative Fields : In industries such as design, advertising, and content creation, the ability to think critically allows individuals to come up with innovative and unique solutions and ways to attract prospective customers.
• Healthcare : Medical professionals must critically assess patient conditions, interpret test results, and make decisions that can have a significant impact on a patient’s well-being.
• Technology : IT professionals, software developers, and data analysts rely on critical thinking to troubleshoot, create algorithms, and analyze data.

Now, let’s dive into a list of interview questions that can help you evaluate a candidate’s critical thinking abilities.  

Interview Questions to Assess Critical Thinking:

Note: Feel free to mix and match these questions based on the specific role and the level of critical thinking required. Also–to expand on questions like these, you can use tools like AI Question Assist . interviewstream’s Ethical AI tool helps you come up with position and industry-based questions using community knowledge from a large language

• Tell me about a situation where you faced a complex problem at work? How did you approach it, and what was the outcome?
• How do you typically approach a new project or task? What steps do you take to understand the problem and develop a plan?
• Give an example of a situation where you had to think on your feet and adapt to unexpected challenges.
• Describe a project where you had to evaluate multiple options before making a decision. How did you assess the pros and cons?
• Provide an instance where you identified a problem in your current or previous role that others might have overlooked? What did you do about it?
• What methods do you use to gather and evaluate information when solving complex issues?
• Tell me about a situation where you had to analyze data to make a decision. What tools or methodologies did you use?
• Describe a project where you had to anticipate potential obstacles and develop contingency plans. How did your proactive thinking benefit the project?
• Provide an example of a time when you identified a solution that significantly improved a process or operation at your company?
• Describe a situation where you had to explain a complex concept or solution to someone who had little to no knowledge of the subject. How did you ensure effective communication?
• How do you prioritize tasks and allocate your time when dealing with multiple projects or assignments?
• Explain your process for identifying the root cause of a problem. Can you provide an example from your experience?
• Describe a project where you had to innovate and think outside the box to overcome a challenge or reach a goal?
• Tell me about a time when you had to analyze financial data or budgets to make recommendations or decisions for your department or company.
• How do you approach a project that requires you to think long-term and consider the potential future implications of your decisions?

How to Use Critical Thinking Interview Questions in your Interviewing Process

The ability to think critically and solve complex problems is relevant across a wide range of job roles and industries. You can use the questions above to assess the critical thinking abilities of your candidates. And you can assess those skills even better if you ask these questions in an in-person or video interview .

Especially if you are using these questions in screening interviews , video screening is an effective way to see the candidate process critical thinking questions in real time. For more information on interview questions, we wrote an article on the best interview questions to ask for team players , or you can fill out this form to chat with us today about how interviewstream can help you ask the right questions, every time.

About The Author

Caroline Chessia is the Marketing Operations Specialist at interviewstream. She loves color-coordinated graphs, hiking in the mountains, and every dog she meets—especially the Golden Retrievers.

interviewstream is dedicated to the success of more than 900 clients from K-12 school districts, emerging businesses, midsize companies, large enterprises, colleges, and universities.

• Building Interview Process
• On Demand Interviews
• Interview Scheduling
• Hiring Event Interview Scheduling
• Live Video Interviews
• Interview Insights
• Continuity Plan
• Terms of Service
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy
• Single Sign-On

877-773-3164 (USA Only) [email protected] Support

Top 20 Critical Thinking Skills Interview Questions & Answers

Master your responses to Critical Thinking Skills related interview questions with our example questions and answers. Boost your chances of landing the job by learning how to effectively communicate your Critical Thinking Skills capabilities.

Critical thinking is the cornerstone of effective decision-making and problem-solving, skills that are highly valued across all professions and industries. As employers increasingly seek candidates who can analyze situations thoroughly, generate innovative solutions, and make reasoned decisions, demonstrating your critical thinking prowess has never been more important.

This article delves into the essence of critical thinking skills: what they are, why they matter, and how to showcase them in various scenarios. We’ll guide you through a series of thought-provoking interview questions specifically designed to assess critical thinking, along with strategies for crafting responses that highlight your analytical acumen and capacity for thoughtful judgment. Whether you’re preparing for an upcoming job interview or looking to refine your cognitive toolkit, these insights will help you articulate your critical thinking abilities with clarity and confidence.

Common Critical Thinking Skills Interview Questions

1. how would you differentiate between a strong argument and a weak one in a team meeting.

Discerning between strong and weak arguments showcases an individual’s critical thinking skills and their capacity to engage constructively in team discussions. A candidate who demonstrates this ability can effectively sift through information, identify logical fallacies, and contribute to a culture of reasoned discourse, ultimately driving the team towards sound strategies and solutions.

When responding to this question, focus on illustrating your approach to analyzing the components of an argument: the validity of its premises, the soundness of its reasoning, and the strength of its supporting evidence. Discuss your method for weighing different viewpoints and the criteria you use to judge the argument’s merits. Share an example of a time when you successfully identified a weak argument, how you addressed it, and the outcome of that intervention. This will show that you not only understand the theory behind argument assessment but also apply it effectively in practice.

Example: “ Differentiating between a strong and a weak argument is a critical component of effective decision-making. A strong argument is characterized by its logical consistency, the validity of its premises, and the robustness of its supporting evidence. It should be free of logical fallacies and demonstrate a clear line of reasoning that connects the evidence to the conclusion. In contrast, a weak argument often relies on assumptions that are not substantiated, exhibits logical fallacies, or uses anecdotal evidence that does not adequately support the broader claim.

In practice, I assess the strength of an argument by first identifying its core premises and evaluating their truthfulness and relevance to the issue at hand. I then examine the logical structure to ensure that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises. If the argument includes data or research, I consider the credibility of the sources and the methodology used to gather the evidence. For example, I once identified a weak argument in a team meeting where the conclusion was drawn from a non-representative sample of data. By highlighting this flaw and suggesting a more comprehensive analysis, we were able to revisit the issue and develop a more informed and effective strategy, ultimately leading to a successful project outcome.”

2. Describe a situation where your initial hypothesis was incorrect; how did you adapt?

When it comes to critical thinking, flexibility and adaptability are key, not just the ability to make good initial judgments. This question delves into the candidate’s ability to acknowledge errors, learn from them, and apply new information to achieve a better outcome, which is a vital skill in any dynamic work environment where conditions and data can change rapidly.

When responding, it’s crucial to outline a specific instance that showcases your ability to pivot effectively. Begin by briefly explaining the situation and your initial hypothesis. Then, focus on the process of how you identified the error in your thinking and the steps you took to adjust your approach. Emphasize your openness to feedback and new information, the analytical methods you used to re-evaluate the situation, and the ultimate resolution or improved results that came from your adaptability. This response should convey self-awareness, a commitment to continuous improvement, and a level of humility that’s necessary for growth.

Example: “ In a project aimed at optimizing operational efficiency, my initial hypothesis was that the bottleneck was due to outdated technology. Upon analyzing the data, I expected to find that newer systems would significantly enhance performance. However, after a deep dive into the workflow analytics, I discovered that the real issue was a series of suboptimal processes, not the technology itself.

Adapting to this new insight required a shift in strategy. I facilitated a series of workshops with cross-functional teams to map out the existing processes and identify inefficiencies. Utilizing lean management principles, we collaboratively redesigned the workflow, eliminating unnecessary steps and streamlining communication channels. This approach not only resolved the bottleneck without the need for a large investment in new technology but also fostered a culture of continuous improvement among the team. The result was a sustainable increase in productivity and a more agile operation.”

3. What strategies do you employ when encountering information that contradicts your beliefs?

Confronting and scrutinizing one’s own ideas in light of new evidence or perspectives is a crucial aspect of effective critical thinking. This question delves into how a candidate assimilates challenging information, demonstrating their openness to change, ability to think objectively, and willingness to engage in reflective thought—all of which are valuable for innovation and problem-solving in dynamic work environments.

When responding, emphasize your commitment to evidence-based reasoning. Outline a systematic approach: first, you consider the source’s credibility; then, you analyze the new information in the context of existing knowledge. Describe how you weigh the evidence before making a reasoned judgment about whether to revise your beliefs. Provide examples from your experience where you encountered conflicting information, engaged in a thorough analysis, and reached a conclusion that enhanced your understanding or led to a beneficial change in approach. This showcases your capacity for growth and your value as a team member who can navigate complex information landscapes.

Example: “ When encountering information that contradicts my beliefs, my first step is to assess the credibility of the source. I critically evaluate the evidence’s validity, reliability, and relevance. This involves checking for peer review, examining the methodology, and considering the reputation of the source. If the source passes this scrutiny, I proceed to contextualize the new information within the broader framework of existing knowledge. I look for corroborating or conflicting evidence from other reputable sources, and I consider the potential for bias or error in both the new information and my own understanding.

An example of this approach in action was when I encountered a study that challenged prevailing theories in a particular field. Despite my initial skepticism, I delved into the research, scrutinizing the experimental design and statistical analysis. I also sought out expert opinions and additional literature on the topic. This rigorous analysis revealed that the study was indeed a well-conducted piece of research with significant implications. As a result, I revised my beliefs, which not only broadened my perspective but also led to the adoption of new methodologies that proved to be more effective. This experience underscored the importance of remaining open to new evidence and demonstrated my ability to adapt my thinking to incorporate robust, evidence-based insights.”

4. In what ways do you assess the credibility of sources when conducting research?

The integrity of any research endeavor hinges on the ability to discern credible sources from unreliable ones. It showcases an individual’s commitment to accuracy and truth, which is paramount in any role that relies heavily on data analysis, strategic decision-making, or problem-solving. This skill is a testament to one’s intellectual rigor and dedication to maintaining high standards of work.

When responding, outline a systematic approach to evaluating sources, such as checking the author’s credentials, the publication date, the presence of citations, and the reputation of the publication or publisher. Mention the use of cross-referencing with other reputable sources and the importance of peer-reviewed material. It’s also effective to give an example of how you’ve applied these methods in a past project, demonstrating your practical experience with maintaining the quality of your work.

Example: “ When assessing the credibility of sources, I employ a multifaceted approach that begins with evaluating the author’s expertise and qualifications, ensuring they are recognized authorities in their respective fields. I then scrutinize the publication date to ensure the information is current and relevant, especially in fast-evolving disciplines. The presence of citations is crucial as it indicates the research’s foundation and allows for verification of the presented data. Furthermore, the reputation of the publication or publisher is a key consideration; I prioritize sources from established, reputable academic journals and institutions known for their rigorous peer-review processes.

In practice, I cross-reference information across multiple reputable sources to validate consistency and accuracy, placing a higher trust in peer-reviewed material due to its intrinsic scrutiny and academic rigor. For instance, during a recent project, I encountered conflicting data on a critical issue. By applying this systematic approach, I was able to discern that the most reliable information came from a recently published study in a leading scientific journal, which was corroborated by several other peer-reviewed articles. This process not only reinforced the credibility of my research but also provided a solid, defensible foundation for the conclusions drawn.”

5. Share an example of a complex problem you solved through analysis and reasoning.

A methodical approach to tackling complex problems is highly valued in many professions. When faced with intricate issues, the ability to dissect the problem, utilize analytical skills, and apply logical reasoning is essential. This question serves to highlight not only your problem-solving capabilities but also your competence in breaking down a complex situation into manageable parts, prioritizing actions, and making informed decisions based on evidence and sound judgment.

To respond to this question, outline a specific instance where you faced a complicated issue. Walk the interviewer through your thought process, the steps you took to analyze the situation, and how you arrived at a solution. Be sure to emphasize the reasoning behind each decision and the outcome of your actions. It’s important to convey your analytical skills and your ability to remain objective and focused, even when dealing with multifaceted problems.

Example: “ In a project where we were facing a significant discrepancy between projected and actual user engagement metrics, I initiated a root cause analysis to uncover the underlying issues. I began by segmenting the data to identify patterns and anomalies, cross-referencing engagement metrics with user demographics, behaviors, and feedback. Through this granular analysis, I hypothesized that the interface complexity was alienating our less tech-savvy user base.

To test this theory, I designed a controlled A/B test with a simplified interface for one user segment while maintaining the original interface for the control group. The results showed a marked improvement in engagement for the group with the simplified interface. Based on this evidence, I reasoned that reducing complexity would increase overall user engagement. I presented these findings to the team, and we iteratively refined the user interface. This led to a sustained increase in engagement metrics post-implementation, validating the effectiveness of the data-driven approach and the hypothesis.”

6. Outline your process for making decisions under pressure without adequate information.

Making decisions under pressure with incomplete information reflects real-world situations where time-sensitive choices must be made with the best available, albeit limited, data. The capacity to make sound decisions with incomplete information also signals to an employer that a candidate is comfortable with uncertainty and can take initiative, a valuable trait in dynamic and fast-paced work environments.

When responding to this question, outline a clear and methodical process. Begin by explaining how you assess the situation to identify the most critical pieces of information needed. Discuss how you weigh the potential outcomes and risks associated with each option, and describe any mental models or frameworks you use to guide your decision-making. Mention how you consult with relevant stakeholders when possible, and clarify how you ensure accountability for the decisions made. Lastly, emphasize your ability to learn from the outcome, regardless of whether the decision was correct, to improve future decision-making processes.

Example: “ In situations where information is scarce and decisions must be made under pressure, I initiate a triage approach to discern the most critical factors that will influence the outcome. I start by quickly identifying the key objectives and constraints, and then I prioritize the information I do have based on relevance and reliability. Using mental models such as Occam’s Razor to eliminate unlikely scenarios and Pareto’s Principle to focus on the factors that will yield the most significant impact, I map out the potential consequences of various decisions.

After establishing a decision framework, I evaluate the risks associated with each option, considering both short-term and long-term implications. If time permits, I seek input from stakeholders to gain diverse perspectives, which can often illuminate aspects not initially apparent. Once a decision is made, I take ownership of the outcomes, ensuring that there is a clear record of the rationale behind the decision for future accountability. Reflecting on the decision’s effectiveness afterwards is crucial, as it contributes to a feedback loop that refines my decision-making skills for similar high-pressure situations in the future.”

7. When have you had to identify underlying assumptions in a strategic plan, and how did it impact your approach?

Challenging underlying assumptions in a strategic plan requires discerning the foundational beliefs that may not be immediately obvious. Recognizing them allows for a more robust strategy that can withstand scrutiny and adapt to unforeseen challenges. This question evaluates a candidate’s ability to think deeply about strategy, foresee potential pitfalls, and contribute to the development of a more resilient plan.

When responding, it’s important to recount a specific instance where you identified a key assumption that was influencing a strategic direction. Explain the process you used to uncover this assumption and how your discovery led to a change in the plan. Emphasize how your intervention resulted in a more informed decision-making process and potentially averted a costly oversight. Highlight your analytical skills, your attention to detail, and your determination to ensure that strategies are not just taken at face value but are also stress-tested against reality.

Example: “ In a recent strategic planning session, we were evaluating the expansion into a new market, which was underpinned by the assumption that our existing product line would meet the local demand as successfully as in our current markets. Recognizing the potential risk of this assumption, I conducted a thorough market analysis, including customer behavior studies and competitor benchmarking. This revealed that local consumer preferences were significantly different, and our product would require customization to be competitive.

The discovery of this critical assumption prompted a pivot in our strategy. Instead of a direct replication of our existing business model, we integrated a plan for product adaptation and a phased market entry. This approach not only prevented a potential misallocation of resources but also positioned us for a more nuanced and potentially successful market penetration. My insistence on questioning our assumptions and validating them with data was instrumental in crafting a strategy that was both realistic and adaptable to the market realities.”

8. What methods do you use to prioritize conflicting data points during project evaluations?

Sifting through conflicting data points and prioritizing which information drives the decision-making process is a testament to one’s analytical prowess. This question reveals how the candidate distinguishes between the urgent and the important, how they weigh evidence, and their capacity to discern patterns or trends that are not immediately obvious.

When responding to this question, candidates should articulate a structured approach that demonstrates their analytical skills. An effective response might include outlining a step-by-step process of identifying all relevant data points, assessing each piece of data’s validity and reliability, and applying a ranking system to determine which data should take precedence based on the project’s goals and constraints. Candidates should illustrate their answer with a concrete example from their experience, showcasing a scenario where they successfully navigated through a maze of conflicting information to arrive at a well-reasoned conclusion.

Example: “ To prioritize conflicting data points during project evaluations, I employ a systematic approach that begins with identifying the relevance and source of each data point. I assess the validity and reliability of the information by examining the methodology behind the data collection and considering potential biases. I also cross-reference with historical data and industry benchmarks when available.

Once the data’s integrity is established, I apply a weighted ranking system based on the project’s specific objectives and constraints. This involves assigning higher priority to data that is more directly aligned with the strategic goals of the project and the interests of key stakeholders. For example, in a past project evaluation, I was faced with conflicting data regarding potential market expansion. By prioritizing data from sources with a proven track record and aligning it with our strategic growth targets, I was able to recommend an expansion strategy that was both data-driven and aligned with our long-term objectives, ultimately leading to a successful market entry. This methodical approach ensures that decisions are not only based on the most credible data but also tailored to the project’s unique context and goals.”

9. Recall a time you identified a logical fallacy in a colleague’s proposal; how did you address it?

Identifying logical fallacies is a key component of critical thinking, as it assesses a candidate’s ability to think analytically and engage constructively when they encounter flawed arguments. This question also evaluates whether the candidate can maintain professional relationships while challenging ideas, a skill that is crucial for fostering a collaborative environment where truth and efficiency are prioritized over ego.

When responding, it’s important to focus on the method of communication used to address the logical fallacy. Emphasize the respectful and constructive approach taken to discuss the issue with the colleague, ensuring that the critique was about the idea, not the person. Illustrate your capacity for teamwork by explaining how you helped refine the proposal to improve its validity, and share the positive outcome of the discussion, demonstrating the value of your critical thinking in achieving a more robust solution.

Example: “ In a recent team meeting, a colleague presented a proposal based on the correlation between two variables, suggesting a direct causation. I recognized this as a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy, where the assumption was that since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X. To address this, I initiated a one-on-one conversation to avoid putting my colleague on the defensive in front of the team.

During our discussion, I used Socratic questioning to guide my colleague through the thought process, asking for further evidence that could substantiate the causation beyond the observed correlation. This approach facilitated a collaborative examination of the data, leading us to uncover additional variables that were not initially considered. By focusing on the argument’s structure and the evidence at hand, we were able to refine the proposal together, strengthening its logical foundation. The revised proposal was well-received by the team, and the project that ensued was more accurately aligned with the comprehensive data analysis, ultimately leading to a successful outcome.”

10. How do you handle situations where data is ambiguous or incomplete?

Navigating ambiguity and gaps in data requires an individual to apply critical thinking skills to make informed decisions. This also speaks to a candidate’s problem-solving approach, creativity in finding solutions, and their propensity for making data-driven decisions amidst uncertainty.

When responding, it’s important to articulate a structured approach that includes acknowledging the ambiguity, seeking out additional data or resources to fill gaps, consulting with relevant stakeholders or subject matter experts, and employing logical reasoning to arrive at the best possible decision. It’s also beneficial to share a real-life example where you successfully navigated such a situation, detailing the steps taken and the outcome. Demonstrating a willingness to ask the right questions and the tenacity to dig deeper reinforces your value as a critical thinker who can add clarity to complex situations.

Example: “ In situations where data is ambiguous or incomplete, my initial step is to acknowledge the uncertainty and identify the specific areas of ambiguity. I then prioritize these areas based on their potential impact on the decision-making process. Subsequently, I engage in targeted research to gather additional information, which might involve quantitative data collection, qualitative insights, or reaching out to subject matter experts who can provide deeper context.

For instance, in a project where customer feedback data was inconclusive, I spearheaded a focused survey to capture the missing data points and conducted a series of customer interviews to gain qualitative insights. By cross-referencing the quantitative data with the qualitative analysis, I was able to piece together a more coherent understanding of customer needs. This informed our strategy and led to a successful campaign adjustment that resulted in a 20% increase in customer satisfaction. This approach underscores my commitment to not only recognizing and addressing data deficiencies but also leveraging a blend of resources and analytical techniques to resolve ambiguity and inform robust decision-making.”

11. Can you provide an instance where critical feedback led you to change your perspective on an issue?

Being receptive to feedback that challenges your own viewpoints is an integral part of critical thinking. This question delves into a candidate’s humility and adaptability, revealing their willingness to consider other perspectives and use feedback constructively.

When responding, share a specific situation that demonstrates your ability to listen to critical feedback without defensiveness. Outline the feedback received, your initial reaction, and how you processed the information. Then, detail the steps you took to reassess your stance and how this led to a different outcome. This shows your thought process, openness to learning, and ability to pivot based on new information—all valuable traits in any role requiring critical thinking.

Example: “ Certainly. In a project focused on optimizing operational efficiency, I initially advocated for the implementation of a new software system I believed would streamline our processes. After presenting my proposal, I received critical feedback from a colleague who highlighted potential integration issues with our existing legacy systems. My initial reaction was a mix of surprise and skepticism, as I had invested significant time in evaluating the software’s benefits.

Upon reflection, I recognized the validity in my colleague’s concerns and revisited the analysis, this time incorporating a broader scope of technical compatibility. This led me to engage with our IT team to conduct a more thorough assessment. The collaborative effort revealed that while the software had impressive features, it indeed posed substantial risks to our current infrastructure. Consequently, I shifted my perspective and worked on an alternative solution that involved incremental upgrades to our existing systems, which ultimately proved to be more cost-effective and less disruptive to our operations. This experience underscored the importance of embracing critical feedback and reinforced the value of comprehensive evaluation from multiple perspectives in decision-making processes.”

12. What steps do you take to ensure diverse perspectives are considered in your decision-making process?

Incorporating a variety of viewpoints to make informed decisions is a common thread among diverse roles such as teachers, managers, and customer service representatives. It’s not just about avoiding groupthink; it’s about actively seeking out and valuing the rich tapestry of human experience that can dramatically improve the quality of decisions made in any professional context.

When responding to this question, you should articulate a clear, step-by-step approach that demonstrates your commitment to inclusivity. Begin by describing how you actively seek out differing opinions, perhaps by consulting with a varied group of colleagues or stakeholders. Mention any tools or methods, like brainstorming sessions or surveys, that you use to gather diverse perspectives. Then, explain how you evaluate these perspectives, ensuring that you give each the consideration it deserves, and how you integrate them into your final decision. Finally, reflect on a specific instance where this approach led to a successful outcome, highlighting the value of diversity in your thought process.

Example: “ To ensure diverse perspectives are integrated into my decision-making process, I begin by identifying the key stakeholders and experts with varying backgrounds relevant to the decision at hand. I actively seek their insights through structured brainstorming sessions or targeted surveys, ensuring that I am not just hearing the loudest voices but also the nuanced opinions that might otherwise be overlooked.

Once I’ve gathered these perspectives, I utilize a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis to weigh each viewpoint based on its merits, potential impact, and alignment with the strategic goals. This often involves creating a decision matrix that helps in visualizing the trade-offs and synergies between different opinions. In doing so, I am careful to avoid confirmation bias, ensuring that my own preconceptions do not unduly influence the evaluation process.

In one instance, this approach led to the development of a new product feature that addressed an unmet need in a market segment we hadn’t fully considered. By incorporating the diverse insights from both the sales team and the end-users, we were able to design a feature that significantly enhanced user satisfaction and broadened our customer base, demonstrating the tangible benefits of a multifaceted decision-making strategy.”

13. Detail an experience where you used deductive reasoning to arrive at a solution.

Evaluating a candidate’s ability to logically deduce an outcome from given information is the purpose behind questions on deductive reasoning. This skill is vital for roles that require swift and accurate decision-making, and the response can illustrate a candidate’s thought process, attention to detail, and level of expertise.

When responding to this question, candidates should select an example that showcases a well-structured thought process. Start by explaining the situation that required a solution, outlining the known facts or premises. Proceed to describe how you identified the logical sequence that led to your conclusion, ensuring to articulate each step clearly. Finally, share the outcome of your solution and, if possible, any positive impacts it had on the situation. This structured approach demonstrates your critical thinking ability and your competence in applying it effectively.

Example: “ In a project where we were experiencing recurring system failures, I employed deductive reasoning to isolate the cause. The system had multiple components, but the failures were intermittent and not component-specific. I started with the general premise that if all components were failing intermittently, then the issue likely resided in a shared resource or infrastructure.

I systematically evaluated each shared element, starting with the power supply, then network connectivity, and finally the software platform. By deducing that the failures only occurred during peak usage times, I hypothesized that the software platform’s resource allocation was the culprit. Adjusting the configuration to better handle high-load scenarios resolved the issue. This not only eliminated the downtime but also improved overall system performance, leading to a 20% increase in user productivity during peak hours.”

14. In which way do you monitor your own biases when analyzing problems?

Recognizing and controlling for bias ensures that decisions and analyses are not unduly influenced by personal prejudices or preconceptions. Employers seek candidates who are self-aware and can critically evaluate their thought processes to maintain integrity and accuracy in their work.

When responding to this question, it is important to demonstrate self-awareness and a commitment to impartial analysis. Discuss specific strategies you employ, such as seeking out diverse perspectives, relying on data and evidence over assumptions, and regularly reflecting on your thought processes. Provide examples of past situations where you recognized a potential bias and took steps to mitigate its influence on your decision-making. This shows employers that you are not only aware of the importance of unbiased thinking but are also proactive in ensuring it in your professional conduct.

Example: “ When monitoring my own biases during problem analysis, I employ a multi-faceted approach that includes actively seeking out contrary evidence and diverse perspectives. I prioritize data-driven decision-making, ensuring that my conclusions are grounded in evidence rather than preconceived notions. For instance, when faced with a complex issue, I systematically review the available information, deliberately looking for data that challenges my initial hypothesis. This practice helps to counteract confirmation bias and promotes a more balanced understanding of the situation.

Additionally, I regularly engage in reflective practice, analyzing my thought processes and decisions to identify any patterns that may indicate bias. In situations where I’ve recognized the potential for cognitive biases to influence my analysis, I’ve sought out peer review or consulted with colleagues who could provide alternative viewpoints. This not only helps in mitigating personal biases but also enriches the problem-solving process with a broader range of insights, leading to more robust and impartial outcomes.”

15. Describe how you determine the relevance of certain facts over others in a case study.

Distinguishing between what is pertinent and what is peripheral within a case study is an exercise in critical analysis. This skill is essential as it directly impacts the effectiveness and efficiency of problem-solving and decision-making processes.

When responding, highlight your systematic approach to evaluating information. Explain how you identify key issues, weigh the significance of each fact in relation to these issues, and consider the implications of the data on potential outcomes. Illustrate your answer with a specific example from your experience where you successfully determined the relevance of facts to solve a problem or make a decision, thereby demonstrating your analytical prowess in a real-world scenario.

Example: “ In determining the relevance of certain facts over others in a case study, I employ a systematic approach that begins with identifying the core issues at hand. I prioritize facts based on their direct impact on these issues, considering both the short-term and long-term implications of the data. This involves a critical evaluation of each fact’s source, reliability, and its correlation with other pieces of evidence. I also assess the potential consequences of these facts on the decision-making process, ensuring that the most critical information is at the forefront of any analysis.

For instance, when faced with a complex case involving multiple variables, I once identified that a particular set of financial data was pivotal due to its implications on the projected growth of the company. By focusing on the veracity and relevance of this data, I was able to construct a financial model that accurately predicted the company’s trajectory, which was crucial for the strategic decision that followed. This process not only streamlined the decision-making but also provided a clear rationale for the course of action taken, highlighting the significance of discerning relevant facts in a sea of information.”

16. Have you ever encountered a groupthink scenario? How did you respond?

Recognizing the symptoms of groupthink—such as the suppression of dissenting opinions and the illusion of unanimity—and taking action to ensure a diversity of thought is maintained is crucial. This question assesses whether a candidate can strike the delicate balance between teamwork and independent thinking.

When responding, it’s essential to share a specific instance that showcases your awareness of the groupthink situation. Detail how you encouraged open dialogue, invited alternative perspectives, or introduced a devil’s advocate approach to stimulate critical thinking. Emphasize your respect for collective decision-making while also demonstrating your commitment to ensuring all voices were heard and considered before reaching a conclusion. Your answer should reflect your ability to foster an inclusive environment that values each member’s contribution to the team’s success.

Example: “ Yes, I encountered a groupthink scenario during a project where the team was quickly converging on a solution without thoroughly examining potential risks. Recognizing the signs of premature consensus, I intervened by posing critical questions that had not been considered, effectively challenging the prevailing opinion. I suggested a structured brainstorming session where each team member was encouraged to voice dissenting views or potential pitfalls regarding the proposed solution.

To further mitigate the groupthink, I introduced a “red team” exercise, where a subgroup was tasked with identifying flaws in our plan and presenting a counter-argument. This approach not only diversified our perspectives but also uncovered assumptions that had gone unquestioned. By fostering a culture where skepticism was not just tolerated but valued, we were able to refine our strategy and arrive at a more robust, well-vetted conclusion.”

17. What techniques do you apply to forecast potential outcomes and their implications?

Anticipating the consequences of actions and understanding the potential ripple effects on various aspects of a project or decision is an integral part of effective critical thinking. The question assesses whether a candidate can think several steps ahead, rather than just reacting to immediate challenges.

When responding, it’s important to outline specific methodologies such as using SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats), scenario planning, or employing probabilistic thinking. Explain how these techniques allow for a comprehensive evaluation of potential scenarios and how you apply them to make informed decisions. Be prepared to provide a real-world example where you successfully anticipated outcomes and navigated the implications, highlighting your analytical skills and foresight.

Example: “ In forecasting potential outcomes and their implications, I employ a combination of scenario planning and probabilistic thinking. Scenario planning allows me to explore various future states by considering different variables and their possible interactions. This method is particularly useful in understanding the broader context and long-term implications of decisions. I complement this with probabilistic thinking to assess the likelihood of each scenario, which involves assigning probabilities to outcomes based on available data and trends.

For instance, I once had to anticipate the impact of regulatory changes in a particular industry. By conducting a SWOT analysis, I identified the strengths that could be leveraged, weaknesses that needed addressing, opportunities for growth, and threats from the competition and regulatory environment. I then developed multiple scenarios ranging from minimal to significant regulatory impact and assigned probabilities to each based on historical precedents and current market sentiments. This approach enabled me to recommend strategic actions that were resilient across a range of possible futures, ultimately leading to a favorable outcome for the project at hand.”

18. Illustrate how you dissect complex information into understandable parts for non-experts.

Translating expertise into accessible knowledge for non-experts is a fundamental skill that demonstrates an ability to bridge the gap between expert and layperson. Employers value this because it ensures that the work you do can be understood and appreciated by a broader audience, which is crucial for collaboration, client relations, and leadership.

When responding to this question, focus on a specific example where you broke down a complex concept. Explain the steps you took to identify the key elements of the information and how you considered the audience’s level of understanding. Describe the methods you used to simplify the content, such as analogies, visuals, or chunking the information into digestible parts. Emphasize how your explanation facilitated better comprehension, decision-making, or problem-solving among those non-experts.

Example: “ In a recent project, I was tasked with explaining the intricacies of a sophisticated data encryption algorithm to a group of stakeholders without technical backgrounds. To make the concept accessible, I first identified the core principles of encryption that were crucial for understanding its importance and functionality. I distilled the algorithm into three main components: the data input, the encryption process, and the secure output.

Using the analogy of a secure lockbox, I related the encryption process to placing a valuable item into a box that could only be opened with a unique key, making the abstract concept more tangible. I supplemented this with simple visuals, illustrating the flow of data through the encryption process, and avoided technical jargon. By breaking the information into these manageable segments and using familiar references, the stakeholders were able to grasp how encryption works and why it is essential for safeguarding sensitive information. This understanding empowered them to make informed decisions about implementing security measures within our organization.”

19. How do you balance quantitative data with qualitative insights in your analyses?

Navigating the interplay between hard numbers and the softer, more nuanced aspects of data interpretation is crucial for a well-rounded analysis. Employers want to ensure that the candidate doesn’t rely solely on numerical data, which might miss the human element of business decisions, nor solely on qualitative insights, which might lack empirical grounding.

To respond, showcase examples from your experience where you’ve effectively integrated both types of data to inform a decision or a strategy. Explain the process of how you evaluate and weigh each type of data, and how you ensure that neither is overlooked. Highlight a specific scenario where this balanced approach led to a successful outcome, demonstrating your ability to synthesize diverse forms of information into actionable insights.

Example: “ In my analyses, I approach quantitative data as the foundational bedrock that offers objective measurement, while I treat qualitative insights as the contextual layer that provides depth and nuance. I employ a triangulation method to ensure that the quantitative data is not only statistically significant but also practically relevant. For instance, when interpreting customer satisfaction scores, I complement the numerical data with customer interviews and feedback to understand the underlying reasons behind the scores.

In a specific scenario, I was tasked with analyzing user engagement metrics for a digital platform. While the quantitative data indicated a decline in average session duration, it was the qualitative user feedback that revealed the interface changes had inadvertently increased cognitive load for users. By integrating these insights, I was able to recommend targeted design adjustments that led to improved engagement metrics in subsequent releases. This balance between numbers and narratives ensures that my analyses lead to actionable and human-centered solutions.”

20. Give an example of how you’ve dealt with conflicting expert opinions when formulating a strategy.

Navigating through informational noise and contradiction to prioritize relevant data and integrate disparate viewpoints into a coherent plan of action is a key aspect of critical thinking. Employers are looking for evidence of the candidate’s analytical prowess, their capacity to remain objective, and the courage to make informed decisions even when the path is not clear-cut.

When responding, start by setting the scene with a brief description of the situation that required a strategy, including the nature of the conflicting opinions. Walk the interviewer through your thought process: how you evaluated the credibility of the sources, weighed the evidence, considered the implications, and sought additional information if necessary. Explain the criteria you used to make your decision and, if applicable, how you communicated your strategy to stakeholders. Conclude with the outcome, reflecting on what you learned from the experience and how it shaped your approach to decision-making.

Example: “ In a project aimed at optimizing operational efficiency, I encountered conflicting recommendations from two leading experts in process optimization and organizational behavior. One advocated for a lean management approach, while the other emphasized the importance of employee engagement and suggested a more inclusive, team-based strategy.

To reconcile these opinions, I first assessed the credibility of each expert by reviewing their past work, consulting with peers, and examining the evidence supporting their claims. I then mapped out the potential impact of both strategies on our specific organizational context, considering factors such as company culture, existing workflows, and employee morale. This analysis revealed that while lean management could offer immediate efficiency gains, a strategy that also incorporated elements of team engagement would likely result in more sustainable improvements and higher staff satisfaction.

The chosen strategy combined lean principles with a strong focus on team involvement, ensuring that efficiency gains did not come at the expense of employee well-being. I communicated this integrated approach to stakeholders by highlighting how it balanced expert insights with our unique organizational needs. The outcome was a 15% increase in operational efficiency coupled with improved employee satisfaction scores. This experience underscored the importance of a nuanced approach to strategy formulation, one that considers both expert opinion and the specific context in which it will be applied.”

Top 20 Logical Reasoning Interview Questions & Answers

Top 20 supply chain management interview questions & answers, you may also be interested in..., top 20 customer journey mapping interview questions & answers, top 20 loyalty interview questions & answers, top 20 compliance interview questions & answers, top 20 systems thinking interview questions & answers.

Beyond The Resume: 15 Interview Questions To Assess Critical Thinking

• October 9, 2023
• Easy.Jobs , Guide

As we all know, resumes serve as the initial gateway to potential candidates from the birth of the recruiting system. However, recruiters understand that hiring the right talent involves more than just matching keywords on a piece of paper. It requires a comprehensive assessment of a candidate’s skills, abilities, and, perhaps most importantly, their capacity for critical thinking. In this blog, we’ll dive deep into the art of interviewing, exploring how recruiters can move beyond the resume and employ a set of 15 interview questions to assess critical thinking skills.

💡 What Are Fundamentals To Assess Critical Thinking?

Before we explore specific interview questions to assess critical thinking capabilities of candidates, it’s important to understand the basics of critical thinking. Critical thinking involves analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing information objectively to make informed decisions and solve problems effectively. 

It combines analytical, creative, and logical thinking skills to navigate complex situations. To improve your critical thinking skills, it’s essential to grasp the key components of this cognitive process, which include:

i. Break It Down: First and foremost, you need to simplify complex information to grasp its structure and connections easily.

ii. Assess & Compare: Evaluate arguments, ideas, or solutions based on evidence and logic, considering their strengths and weaknesses.

iii. Connect The Dots: Draw logical conclusions from the information and evidence available. Search relevancy between the information & evidence you have gathered.

iv. Explain Clearly: Articulate your thought processes and conclusions in a way that’s easy for others to understand.

v. Solve Problems: Problem-solving skill is a prominent aspect of critical thinking. Identify issues, explore potential solutions, and make informed decisions.

vi. Think Outside The Box: Foster creativity to generate fresh ideas and approaches when faced with challenges.

📋 Different Types Of Critical Thinking Interview Questions

There are four main types/scenarios where we can categorize interview questions to help assess critical thinking skills. Those are situational, behavioral, hypothetical, & puzzle/brain teaser. In the upcoming section, we’ll allocate our 15 interview questions to assess critical thinking.

• Situational Questions: Questions that present hypothetical scenarios related to the job role to assess a candidate’s problem-solving abilities and decision-making process.
• Behavioral Questions: These questions inquire about a candidate’s past experiences and actions, aiming to predict their future behavior in similar situations.
• Hypothetical Questions : A set of questions that are designed to evaluate a candidate’s ability to think on their feet and approach novel, unfamiliar situations.
• Puzzle & Brain Teaser Questions: These questions are being asked to test a candidate’s critical thinking, logic, and creativity. This type of critical interview question often involves solving mathematical problems, logic puzzles, or answering riddles.

💡 Top 15 Interview Questions To Assess Critical Thinking Of An Interviewee

As hiring managers and recruiters seek individuals who can take challenges, solve problems, and drive innovation, the art of assessing critical thinking during interviews has become paramount. With that said, we’ve compiled 15 questions (categorized into 4 different types) to assess critical thinking skills of an interviewee. 

• Behavioral Questions To Ask A Candidate (With Answers) 

To identify candidates with exceptional critical thinking skills, behavioral questions provide valuable insights. These questions delve into a candidate’s past experiences, offering glimpses of their problem-solving prowess and decision-making abilities.

Question 1: Share an experience where you encountered a multifaceted challenge in your previous role. How did you tackle it, and what strategies did you employ to reach a resolution?

How To Answer:

✅ Begin by describing the specific problem you faced and its complexity.

✅ Outline the steps you took to analyze the issue, including any research or data gathering.

✅ Highlight your decision-making process, showcasing how you weighed the pros and cons.

✅ Conclude with the positive outcome achieved through your critical thinking and problem-solving.

Question 2: Share an instance when you confronted unexpected shifts or adversities in your professional journey. How did you navigate these hurdles, and what takeaways did you gain from this experience?

✅ Narrate the situation, emphasizing the pressure and constraints involved.

✅ Describe your approach to gathering relevant information quickly.

✅ Explain how you prioritized factors and considered potential consequences.

✅ Conclude by highlighting the successful outcome achieved through your decision-making and critical thinking.

Question 3: Share a scenario where you identified an inefficiency or flaw in a process or project. How did you go about improving it, and what were the results?

✅ Present the context and the inefficiency you observed.

✅ Detail your critical analysis of the issue and the factors contributing to it.

✅ Explain your strategy for improvement and the steps you took to implement it.

✅ Conclude by showcasing the positive impact of your critical thinking on the project or process.

Question 4: Tell us about a time when you had to adapt to unexpected changes or challenges at work. How did you navigate these hurdles, and what lessons did you learn from the experience?

✅ Describe the unexpected challenges and their impact on your work.

✅ Explain your flexible approach to adapting to the changes.

✅ Highlight the critical thinking skills you applied to overcome obstacles.

✅ Conclude with the valuable lessons learned and how they’ve influenced your problem-solving approach.

✅ These behavioral questions and their corresponding answers provide a comprehensive view of a candidate’s critical thinking abilities and their capacity to navigate complex situations effectively.

• Situational Questions To Ask A Candidate (With Answers)

Asking a few situational questions can be incredibly effective while evaluating candidates’ critical thinking skills in an interview. These questions prompt candidates to analyze complex scenarios and provide well-thought-out responses. For example:

Question 5: Imagine you are leading a project, and a key team member suddenly resigns just weeks before a critical deadline. What do you do now to handle the situation?

✅ Acknowledge the challenge and potential impact.

✅ Redistribute tasks and responsibilities to the rest of the members

✅ Identify interim solutions to maintain project progress.

✅ Communicate transparently with stakeholders about the situation.

✅ Emphasize adaptability, quick decision-making, and project integrity.

Question 6: You’re a customer service representative, and a client is unhappy due to a product defect that’s beyond your control to fix immediately. How would you do right now with this irate customer?

✅ Express empathy and actively listen to the customer’s concerns.

✅ Explain the situation honestly and what steps are being taken to address it.

✅ Offer alternative solutions or escalate the matter if needed.

✅ Ensure the customer feels heard and valued throughout the interaction.

✅ Highlight de-escalation skills and finding constructive resolutions.

Question 7: You’re a project manager, and your team is divided over two conflicting approaches to a critical project decision. How would you resolve this disagreement?

✅ Facilitate open dialogue among team members, encouraging them to present arguments.

✅ Evaluate options objectively, considering long-term consequences.

✅ Arrive at a consensus or make a well-justified decision.

✅ Mediate conflicts and prioritize project goals.

✅ Emphasize teamwork and conflict resolution.

Question 8: As a marketing manager, your company faces a sudden negative social media backlash due to a controversial campaign. How would you respond to protect the brand’s reputation?

✅ Acknowledge the issue publicly and express concern.

✅ Investigate the situation thoroughly, involving relevant stakeholders.

✅ Formulate a transparent and empathetic response.

✅ Commit to learning from the incident and implementing preventive measures.

✅ Showcase crisis management skills and turn challenges into opportunities for improvement.

• Hypothetical Questions To Ask A Candidate (With Answers)

In assessing critical thinking during interviews, it’s essential to challenge candidates with hypothetical scenarios that demand thoughtful analysis and problem-solving skills. 

Question 9: Imagine you are managing a team project with tight deadlines, and a key team member unexpectedly resigns. What steps would you take to ensure the project’s successful completion, considering both the immediate and long-term implications?

✅ Start by acknowledging the urgency of the situation and the impact of the team member’s departure.

✅ Discuss how you would quickly assess the remaining resources and skills within the team.

✅ Emphasize your ability to adapt and redistribute responsibilities effectively.

✅ Mention your communication strategy to inform stakeholders and maintain transparency.

✅ Conclude by highlighting your commitment to achieving project goals while also addressing the team’s morale and well-being.

Question 10: You’re a marketing manager, and your company’s new product launch is receiving negative online reviews and backlash. How would you approach this crisis, and what steps would you take to mitigate the situation?

✅ Begin by emphasizing the importance of addressing the issue promptly and transparently.

✅ Discuss your strategy for analyzing the root causes of the negative feedback.

✅ Mention how you’d prioritize and execute a response plan, including social media engagement and public statements.

✅ Emphasize your commitment to learning from the feedback and implementing necessary changes.

✅ Conclude by highlighting your focus on preserving the brand’s reputation and rebuilding trust.

Question 11: You are a project manager working on a high-stakes project with a limited budget. Unexpectedly, a crucial vendor increases their prices midway through the project. How would you handle this situation to ensure project success within budget constraints?

✅ Start by acknowledging the budget constraints and the vendor’s pricing change.

✅ Discuss your approach to negotiating with the vendor, exploring alternative solutions, or seeking cost reductions.

✅ Emphasize your risk management strategies and contingency plans in case negotiations fail.

✅ Mention your communication plan to update stakeholders on the situation and potential impacts.

✅ Conclude by highlighting your commitment to delivering the project on time and within budget, even in challenging circumstances.

Question 12: You’re a sales manager, and a key client threatens to terminate their contract due to unresolved service issues. How would you handle this critical client relationship and work towards retaining their business?

✅ Start by acknowledging the importance of the client relationship and the urgency of the situation.

✅ Discuss your strategy for actively listening to the client’s concerns and addressing them promptly.

✅ Mention how you’d collaborate with relevant teams to resolve the service issues.

✅ Emphasize your dedication to providing exceptional service and exceeding the client’s expectations.

✅ Conclude by highlighting your long-term relationship-building approach and the steps you’d take to ensure client satisfaction and retention.

• Brainstorming Questions To Ask A Candidate ( With Answers)

To measure the critical thinking skills of a candidate, the interviewer often asks puzzle and brain teaser questions. By asking these questions, the interviewer assesses critical thinking abilities of candidates. For example:

Question 13: You have two wooden planks, each measuring 4 feet in length. They are not of equal thickness. You need to use these planks to cross a 5-foot-wide chasm. How do you manage now?

Combine the two planks to create a bridge, placing one end on the starting side and the other end on the destination side. Utilize the thicker part of one plank to support the thinner part of the other, effectively forming a stable crossing.

Question 14: You have two jugs, one that can hold exactly 3 liters of water and another that can hold exactly 5 liters of water. How can you measure exactly 4 liters of water using only these two jugs?

This riddle evaluates a candidate’s ability to think creatively and work with limited resources. The solution requires a series of precise steps to fill, pour, and combine the water in both jugs to achieve the desired volume of 4 liters.

Question 15: You are in a room with three light switches, each controlling a different light bulb in another room. You can’t see the bulbs from where you are. You need to determine which switch corresponds to which bulb, but you are only allowed to enter the other room once. How do you do it?

Turn on the first switch and leave it on for a few minutes. To determine which switch controls which bulb, start by turning off the first switch if it’s on, and then turn on the second switch. Afterward, enter the adjacent room with the three bulbs. The bulb currently lit up corresponds to the second switch, while the bulb that is switched off but still warm belongs to the first switch. Lastly, the bulb that is switched off and cold corresponds to the third switch.  This way, you can identify each switch’s association with the bulbs with a single entry into the other room.

Note: These are just 3 examples; they’ll vary from situation to situation.

🧠 Mastering Critical Thinking In Interviews: Your Path To Success

By incorporating these interview questions, you can easily assess critical thinking capabilities and skills of the candidates. Remember, in today’s dynamic professional world, critical thinkers are the driving force behind innovation and success. As you embark on your quest for top talent , these questions will be your compass, guiding you toward individuals who can truly make a difference.

If you have found this blog helpful, share your opinion with our Facebook community . You can subscribe to our blogs for valuable tutorials, guides, knowledge, tips, and the latest recruitment updates.

Shahidul Islam

Share this story.

Best Talent Attraction Tips for Small Business Hiring Teams in 2024

The Power of Employee Experience (EX) & Why Does it Matter In 2024?

Future of BI: Top 10 Business Intelligence Trends To Watch in 2024

How to Create a Business Email: Easy Step-by-Step Guide

Products by wpdeveloper.

Essential Addons

Enhance your Elementor page building experience with 70+ elements.

NotificationX

Best FOMO, Social Proof, Sales Popup for WooCommerce, EDD and more.

Best Documentation & Knowledge Base Plugin for WordPress.

Join 15,000+

Remote Companies

Subscribe For The Latest Updates About Remote Works

No charge. Unsubscribe anytime.

For All Plans

See the demo for entire easy.jobs platform, select, hire, and onboard great talent.

• Documentation
• Terms and Condition
• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 | Brand From

Hosted with

13 critical thinking interview questions to use

If you’re looking to fill a position that requires precise and rational decision-making skills, critical thinking interview questions are an essential component in your interview process .

Many hiring managers overlook this veiled job requirement and skill because it’s not always easily assessed. Some candidates have the technical skills and experience but might not have the emotional intelligence or critical thinking skills to succeed.

That’s where interview questions to assess problem-solving skills can come in handy.

What is critical thinking?

Critical thinking is a thought process that allows a person to evaluate and assess information objectively and calculate responses and judgment. Critical thinking can be compared to rash, reactive thought processes which generate immediate and purely emotional responses.

In the workplace, people with critical thinking skills are highly valued as they usually provide rational advice, thought-out solutions, and fair assessments.

It’s tough to establish the level of a candidate’s critical thinking skills unless you specifically look for it during the interview process. Critical thinking interview questions are one of the tools available to hiring managers to gauge how a candidate will handle unpredictable situations that may arise on the job.

Tailored critical thinking interview questions

There are plenty of examples of different types of interview questions available, but your questions must relate to the position and the environment in your company. For example, if the role requires critical decisions on a technical level, the questions must be structured around the relevant skill. If the role requires critical thinking around people (customers or staff), focus on people skills.

There’s a trend to ask brainteaser questions during interviews to measure a candidate’s response, but please don’t go that route. It’s pointless! Asking something like “Jo is one of three children. Her sisters are named May and June. What’s the third child’s name?” is meaningless.

Whether the candidate answers “Jo” correctly or says “probably April” tells you nothing about their critical thinking abilities or anything else.

Apart from potentially making a candidate feel confused and uncomfortable, you could have them questioning how genuine you are.

Plan every step in the recruitment process before the interviews start. If a role needs rational decision-making, a list of critical thinking interview questions must be compiled, preferably by the hiring team rather than just the hiring manager. Collaborative thinking and inclusive staff recruitment allow for different opinions and perspectives of the same role and its requirements.

Ensure that your interview questions are challenging

These questions aren’t intended to be easy. Questions must be thought-provoking. Make the candidate think about how they would respond to and react in specific, tricky situations. You’re not necessarily looking for the right or wrong answers or solutions. Instead, you’re evaluating the candidate’s response rather than skill.

Virtually every department has positions that profoundly impact outcomes for other team members, customers, production, sales, your company brand, etc. Staff who hold these positions require well-developed critical thinking skills.

When compiling your list of interview questions, go way beyond the job skills or experience needed. Analyze what the impact of poor decision making in this role will have on existing staff, customers, your brand, and your business as a whole.

Once you’ve isolated the areas of influence connected to the role, you can start compiling your list of questions. We’re splitting the question examples into technical roles and roles that involve people skills. Your vacancy might be a combination of both. There can never be a template for critical thinking interview questions because each position and company differs, so use these as a guide to inspire you.

Critical thinking interview questions for hard skills

• What would you do if you had a looming project/production deadline, but you didn’t yet have all the information/components to deliver on time?
• If you’ve figured out a quicker or more cost-effective solution to a problem, but your manager doesn’t get what you’re saying, what would you do?
• If there’s a weak link in your team or supply chain that’s impacting productivity, how would you approach the problem?
• What would you do if a customer or manager was trying to push a project through at the expense of other projects that already have confirmed delivery dates?
• When you’re in a team of specialists, you can easily find differences of opinions on what direction projects should take. How do you find consensus?
• Have you ever had to convince a manager to try out a different solution to solve a problem?

Critical thinking interview questions for soft skills

•  An order hasn’t been delivered to a customer on time, and they’re furious. They want you to cancel the order and close their account immediately. How would you repair the damage and keep the customer?
•  Business has slowed, and you’re in a sales brainstorming session. Someone suggests lowering prices and focusing more on customer satisfaction. What’s your reaction?
•  You have an employee who’s excellent at their job, but is blunt and abrasive with colleagues and that’s causing friction in your department. How do you resolve the matter?
•  You’re in a meeting, and your manager misquotes pricing or a process that can have a significant impact on your department or a project. What do you do?
•  You notice that your manager (or a colleague) is inclined to shift blame and not accept responsibility when under pressure. How do you approach the subject?
• If you had to make a decision based on incomplete information, how would you approach this?
• How would you handle a situation where you and your teammates disagree on how to move forward on a project?

What are you looking for when asking critical thinking interview questions?

You’ll notice that the issues listed above are very broad and there’s no right or wrong answer or outcome.

• What you’re looking for is how the candidate responds. Each question is a hypothetical situation that has the potential to become a big issue if not resolved properly.
• People who have high emotional intelligence and developed critical thinking skills won’t give you any old answer. Faced with a complicated situation, their critical thinking will kick in, and they’ll most likely ask you some questions for more clarity. Don’t be surprised if you get an “mmm, I’ll have to think about that…” response initially — people with developed critical thinking process information before reacting or responding.
• People who don’t ask for more details, and don’t think before responding, likely don’t have developed analytical skills. They’re also more inclined to poor, emotional decision making.

8 benefits of critical thinkers

Critical thinkers who are capable of unbiased and fair judgment all have the following abilities:

• Developed analytical skills: They analyze situations carefully.
• Good reasoning skills: They reason in a logical and fact-based way.
• Solid emotional perception: They can separate truths from lies and point them out.
• Social experience: They conduct further research or fall back on past experiences for reference. They apply known and accepted standards and limit bias.
• Comparative analysis: They distinguish between variances and make comparisons.
• Solution-oriented thinking: They envision a solution and its potential consequences.
• Calculating actions: They quantify their conclusions and take decisive action.
• Creative thinking: They convert the situation from a negative to a positive.

This process may be gradual, developing as a situation evolves, or decisions may be made quickly depending on their skill level. Whether they have to think on their feet or address long-standing problems, people with well-developed critical-thinking skills can face a given situation and resolve it in the best way possible. They also don’t hesitate to make unpopular decisions if it’s in the best interest of the company or people involved.

Use all interview and assessment tools available

For crucial positions, you’ll need more than just a list of critical thinking interview questions to establish if a candidate is a good fit for the role. Psychometric assessments can give you more insight into a candidate’s personality.

Past employment references are also an excellent tool to establish how a candidate has handled pressures in similar situations previously. Past behavior can be a predictor of future behavior, but is not foolproof either. As people mature and environments change, so can their attitude and their aptitude in the workplace.

Get the MidWeekRead

Get the exclusive tips, resources and updates to help you hire better!

Hire better, faster, together!

Bring your hiring teams together, boost your sourcing, automate your hiring, and evaluate candidates effectively.

Critical Thinking Interview Questions & Answers

• Updated July 13, 2023
• Published March 28, 2021

In dynamic and competitive work environments, it’s important that a business can keep up with innovations and changing demands from customers. This is why employers look for candidates who possess strong critical thinking skills and decision-making skills.

Interviewers use job interviews to assess your critical thinking skills. They do this by asking you questions that require you to demonstrate your ability to effectively and efficiently evaluate information to make a calculated decision. Your goal is to demonstrate that you are an innovative person that can provide rational advice and thought-out solutions when needed.

Critical thinking questions are commonly asked during job interviews because workers with strong critical thinking skills are important for companies to excel. Questions about your critical thinking skills are often  behavioral interview questions . These are a strategic type of interview questions that require you to provide an answer that includes an example situation that you experienced in your career and how you acted in that situation.

A basic example of a behavioral question in relation to critical thinking is ‘ describe a time you had to solve a problem at work without having all the information or resources .’ As you can see, the interviewer is looking for you to explain a situation where you had to think outside the box and justify your critical thinking process.

What Are Critical Thinking Interview Questions?

Critical thinking skills are related to your ability to analyze, evaluate and assess information effectively and make calculated decisions. Below we discuss a couple of important skills related to critical thinking. You must demonstrate that you possess these skills to convince the interviewer that you possess the right critical thinking skills to succeed in the position you’re applying for.

Examples of critical thinking skills are:

Observation & analysis.

The ability to observe and analyze a (potential) problem or data set is where a critical thinking process starts. People who possess strong analytical skills examine the information and understand what it means in order to explain the implications to others properly.

After a thoughtful observation and analysis, creative skills and innovation are required to spot patterns in the information or data. Critical thinkers are able to think outside the box to come up with a solution no one else thought of before. This requires flexibility, conceptualization, and imagination to take a different approach from other approaches.

• Communication

Critical thinkers also possess strong communication skills to share their approaches and conclusions with coworkers. It’s essential that ideas and solutions are shared effectively and efficiently with others. Furthermore, working together with others is an important part of the critical thinking process to figure out the right solution to business challenges. Skills involved are active listening, teamwork , collaboration, and interpersonal skills.

Problem-solving

Once an analysis is performed and solutions are discussed, it’s important that a solution is implemented. An essential part of critical thinking is coming up with an efficient solution and assessing the impact of this decision. This requires adaptability as well to modify the course of action as needed throughout the implementation process.

Critical Thinking Behavioral Interview Questions

Most questions interviewers will ask you about your critical thinking skills are  behavioral interview questions . These questions require you to provide specific examples of past work experiences in which you demonstrated your critical thinking skills. For interviewers, understanding your past professional behavior and performance is the best way to gauge your future job behavior and performance.

Behavioral questions are focused on the desired skills or competency area, such as, in this case, critical thinking. Other common competency areas for which behavioral questions are used are teamwork , communication , time management , creative thinking skills , leadership , adaptability , conflict resolution , etc.

Behavioral job interview questions usually start with:

• Give me an example of
• Tell me about a time when you
• What would you do
• Describe a situation where

Examples of critical thinking behavioral interview questions:

• Give me an example of a time you had to solve a problem without having complete information or resources.
• Tell me about a time when you presented a new idea or process to your team.
• What would you do if you had a deadline coming up, but you do not have all the components to deliver a project on time?
• Describe a situation where you find a creative way to overcome a business challenge.

As you can see, the questions mentioned above require you to discuss your past behavior. For interviewers, the most accurate predictor of future performance is your past performance in similar situations.

Before making a hiring decision, interviewers are interested in discussing previous work situations. The right interview preparation will help you do the right research to prepare answers that include the critical thinking skills the interviewer is looking for. This starts with  thoroughly reviewing the job description . The job description usually tells more about the specific skills that are required for the position. You can use this information to prepare answers that include times you were successfully using the skills the employer is looking for.

To answer behavioral questions successfully, you need to provide the interviewer with specific details about a time you used your critical thinking skills. Your answer should include the situation you were in, your task in that situation, the actions you took, and the specific results you got. In short, this is called the STAR method  of providing an answer. The STAR method is discussed in more detail later on in this article.

Why Interviewers Ask Critical Thinking Interview Questions

For interviewers, the most effective way to reveal your critical thinking skills is by asking you to describe past work experiences or provide you with hypothetical scenarios. The main reason for asking you about situations in which you successfully used your critical thinking skills is to get an understanding of how you think and act in specific, challenging situations.

Before hiring a candidate, employers want to determine if you are:

• Responsible enough to identify, analyze, and solve problems
• Able to solve a problem without having all the required data, information, or resources
• Creative enough to come up with out-of-the-box solutions
• A strong communicator who can explain issues and involve others in the problem-solving process
• Taking responsibility for your actions

During a job interview, it’s important that you have a few examples ready to discuss times you used your critical thinking skills in different situations. A proven track record of critical thinking to tackle challenges will help you convince the interviewer. This is also the reason why it’s smart to prepare answers related to the requirements for the position, prior to your job interview.

For example, if you work as a business analyst, you should be able to deal with business challenges such as changing requirements or business needs, which require critical thinking skills. Business analysts need to identify (possible) problems and are required to come up with solutions and strategies.

What Employers Look For In A Critical Thinking Interview

During a job interview, you must convince the interviewers of your critical thinking skills. Interviewers look for candidates whose work ethic and career goals align with the company culture and what they can offer you. This is also the reason why you should relate your answers to the job requirements and what the company is looking for.

The right interview preparation will help you get there. Your goal is to demonstrate that you are a strong critical thinker that is capable of taking on the day-to-day tasks required for the position and have the potential to grow .

Critical thinking interview questions are used to reveal how you identify and approach problems, if you can evaluate a point of view to determine if it’s valid or not, and if you can provide structured reasoning to support an argument. Basically, the interviewers want to get the following questions answered:

• How do you think challenges or issues through in an objective and critical way?
• Can you identify different points of view in relation to a particular problem?
• Are you able to evaluate different points of view to determine how valid or strong they are?
• Can you identify weak points that are in possible solutions or arguments?
• How do you provide structured reasoning and support for arguments when communicating with other people?

Red Flags In Critical Thinking Skills Job Interviews

There are several things you should avoid when answering critical thinking interview questions. Below we discuss a couple of red flags that could hurt your chances of landing the job you want. Make sure you avoid these mistakes during your interview to prevent a situation where you could give the interviewer the wrong impression.

1. No clear critical thinking process

The interviewer wants you to walk them through your critical thinking process. This means that you need to explain how you tackled an issue or problem by using your critical thinking skills.

A perfect answer includes a story in which you explain how you identified a problem, how you analyzed and evaluated the situation to figure out which data, facts, or information was important. Next, tell them how you made inferences and communicated issues and possible solutions with coworkers and other stakeholders. Finally, discuss how you executed the solution you came up with.

Not being able to give the interviewer a clear example in which you walk them through the steps mentioned above could be a warning sign for them. Therefore, make sure that you have a strong answer ready that relates to the job requirements and includes you successfully using your critical thinking skills to your advantage.

2. Not providing enough critical details

When interviewers ask you about your critical thinking skills, and if you can walk them through a specific time you successfully used those skills, it’s important that you include every step of your critical reasoning process.

If you claim to be a strong critical thinker that can take on the responsibilities of the position you’re applying for, you need to make sure you can back this up through clear examples of times you used these skills. Failing to do so could lead to the elimination of your chances to land the job. If the interviewer has trouble verifying your employment history, this is considered a warning sign.

3. Not taking responsibility

Taking responsibility is an important characteristic of a critical thinker. If a problem is identified but not addressed, this could quickly escalate into a bigger problem. If your answers indicate that you do not take responsibility or if you have left things for later, this could leave the impression on the interviews that your critical thinking skills and work engagement is not top-notch. Therefore, make sure you demonstrate that you take responsibility for your actions and that you’re a proactive worker that immediately deals with challenges as soon as they occur or when they are identified as potential problems.

To test you during your job interview, interviewers will ask you about times you failed in specific work situations . This is especially the case for positions where you deal with challenging situations and are required to deal with identifying and solve problems. Interviewers are interested in what went wrong in specific work situations, if you took responsibility for your actions, and what you learned from that situation. Not taking responsibility for, for instance, a  project that may have failed , is considered a warning sign for employers.

Self-awareness and being to reflect on situations that went wrong is an important characteristic to possess in the workplace – especially in work environments where critical thinking skills are important. Employers want to hire a candidate who can admit errors or who made thoughtful mistakes trying to solve problems in the past and learned from them. Employers know that candidates are human and make mistakes, just like everybody else. It’s important that your answers demonstrate that you take responsibility for situations and describe the actions you took to repair any problems or challenges.

Common Critical Thinking Interview Questions

Below we discuss common  behavioral critical thinking interview questions . These questions are broken down into two categories; regular behavioral interview questions and hypothetical interview questions.

Learn everything you need to know about commonly asked interview questions that are frequently asked during job interviews .

Behavioral Critical Thinking Interview Questions:

• Tell me about a time you had to make a decision without having all the data, information, or resources.
• Give me an example of a time you discovered a mistake that
• What do you consider the most difficult decision you had to make at work? What results did you get?
• Describe a time you convince a colleague or supervisor to use an alternative approach to solve a problem.
• Give me an example of a time you were involved in solving a problem among team members on how to approach a project.
• Tell me about a time you came up with a new or unusual idea to deal with a challenge.
• Describe a time you anticipated a potential problem. How did you develop preventative measures?
• Give me an example of a time when you faced an unexpected challenge at work and how you dealt with it.
• Describe a time a customer approached you with a problem or concern. How did you respond?
• Give me an example of a time you had to change your planned course of action at the last moment. How did you re-evaluate your priorities?
• What do you consider your most innovative new idea that you have implemented in the workplace?
• Have you ever improved the workflow of a project based on your analysis? How did you do this?
• When you’re working on several projects, it’s tricky to deliver excellent service to all of them. How do you go about prioritizing the needs of a client?

Situational Critical Thinking Interview Questions:

• How would you go about convincing a coworker, manager, or other stakeholders to try an alternative approach to solve a problem?
• What would you do if you had a deadline coming up, but you did not yet have all the required information to deliver a project on time?
• How would you determine if you need help from others when you’re solving a problem or completing a task?
• If an order has been delayed and an angry client contacts you to cancel the order and close their account, what actions would you take?
• How would you deal with a situation where you identify a weak link in a process that’s impacting quality?
• What would be your approach if you and a colleague or teammates disagree on how to move forward on a project?

How To Answer Critical Interview Questions

Interviewers look for candidates who can demonstrate through examples that they use reason and logic to make decisions. In order to do this, it’s essential that you structure your answers in such a way that you walk the interviewer through an example situation in which you successfully used your critical thinking skills. To get started, you can consider the following steps.

Step 1: Research.

Every interview preparation starts with doing the right research. Before you can answer interview questions in a specific way you need to get to know the position and company better. Furthermore, you should thoroughly understand the job requirements to prepare strong answers.

Read the job description carefully to find specific skills that a candidate needs to possess to perform the job successfully. Think of skills such as creative thinking ,  problem-solving ,  adaptability , a strong work ethic , and  communication . Also, read the company website to get more information about their mission statement and who their main clients are. Furthermore, check their LinkedIn pages and other content/news related to the company.

Researching the job and company will help you identify the required skills, qualities, and work experience for the position you’re applying for. Your research should help you make an educated guess about what kind of interview questions you can expect .

Step 2: Write down the required job skills & competencies.

Behavioral interview questions about critical thinking skills are a perfect opportunity for you to demonstrate why you are the right candidate for the position.

The skills and competencies  you have identified in your research should be your starting point to prepare answers. Write down the required skills and rank them on importance.

Step 3: Create a list of past work experiences that relate to the required job skills.

Once you have ranked the skills on importance, you can start thinking of work experiences related to these skills. Coming up with a specific answer when you’re being put on the spot during an interview is very hard, especially when discussing critical thinking skills.

Interviewers want to hear how you evaluate and assess information objectively and how you make calculated decisions. Therefore, ensure that you come up with strong examples to questions you expect ahead of your interview. Create a list of past work experiences and tailor them to the required critical thinking skills. Highlight situations where you successfully provided rational advice, came up with thought-out solutions, and made fair assessments in your work. Focus on delivering a concise and to-the-point answer.

Step 4: Prepare successful and challenging answer examples.

Strong critical thinkers are essential in the workplace. Critical thinkers use their skills to evaluate and assess information in order to make decisions effectively. During your interview, it’s therefore important that your answers demonstrate that you have successfully identified problems, proposed solutions, evaluated several options, and finally implemented a solution.

It’s also likely that the interviewer will ask you about a time you have failed to solve a problem . Interviewers ask you about failures to assess whether or not you learn from your mistakes and if you’re self-aware enough to acknowledge times you failed. Also, it helps them identify if you take calculated and smart risks when it comes to making decisions.

Step 5: Use the STAR method to structure your answers

The STAR method allows you to concisely provide the interviewer an answer by logically walking them through the situation. STAR is an acronym that stands for a situation ( S ), your task ( T ) in that situation, the actions ( A ) you took, and what results ( R ) you got based on your actions. These are the basic steps you take in your walkthrough.

Below we discuss the STAR interview technique in more detail.

STAR Interview Technique

By using the STAR method, you can give an answer that includes exactly what the interviewer is looking for. Below, the STAR acronym is broken down into each step.

Start your answer by explaining the situation that you faced. The start of your answer ‘story’ should answer questions such as:

• What was the situation/problem?
• Who was involved?
• Why did the situation happen at that time?

It’s important to provide context around what problem needed to be solved. Furthermore, make sure to provide relevant details of why you had to use your critical thinking skills in that particular situation.

Next, explain your specific role in the task ahead. Include important details, such as specific responsibilities. Focus on giving the interviewer an understanding of your task in solving the problem. This part of your answer should answer questions such as:

• Why were you involved in that specific situation?
• What’s the background story?

After you describe your task, it’s time to specifically discuss the actions you took to solve the problem. Give the interviewer a detailed description of the actions you took. This part of your answer should answer questions such as:

• What steps did you take to resolve the situation you were in?
• Why did you choose to complete your tasks this way?

Finish your answer by discussing the results you got from your actions. Detail the outcomes of your actions and ensure to highlight your strengths . Also, make sure to take credit for your behavior that led to the result. Focus on positive results and positive learning experiences. This part of your answer ‘story’ should answer questions such as:

• What exactly happened?
• What did you accomplish?
• How did you feel about the results you got?
• What did you learn from the situation?
• How did this particular situation influence who you are as a professional today?

Sample Answers to Critical Thinking Questions

Below you will find some example questions. The examples are already written in STAR format so that you can clearly see how you can structure your answers when answering critical thinking interview questions.

However, these are ‘general’ examples. Do not forget to structure your own answers in a way that includes enough detail to convince the interviewer that you’re the right person for the job! This means that you need to tailor your answer to the specific skills required for the position you’re applying for.

Critical Thinking Question 1 : ‘Tell Me About a Time You Had To Solve a Challenging Problem At Work.’

‘In my position as a business development manager at ABC Software, I’m responsible for organizing all client events and conferences. ABC Software is a major player in the IT market, and during our events, we invite industry experts to speak on market developments. These events are used to attract new clients but also to maintain our relationship with our existing ones.

Over the last two years, we analyzed our attendee data and found out that our event attendance dropped almost 10%. Furthermore, we discovered that the retention rate of our clients also decreased. When we had to plan the next event, my team and I knew that we have to get our attendance levels back up for the events to stay successful. The goal was to get our networking event popular and recurring again.

I had an idea why the attendance levels dropped, but to get more information, I interviewed several sales consultants as well. The main feedback was that we should focus more on attracting new clients through social media channels. I communicated this with our marketing team, and we decided to also reach out to our client base and ask them what they would like to see on our future events. This led to interesting new insights on topics and speakers that we could invite, plus we also received input on how to improve networking possibilities during our events. Based on our research and feedback, I created a new plan of action to market our events through our social media channels to increase exposure.

After launching our marketing campaign, we immediately gained traction online, which led to an increase in advance registrations. For that specific event, we saw a total increase in attendance of 20% in comparison to the previous year. An online survey showed that the attendees were happy with how the way the new event was structured, and 80% of respondents said that it would be likely that they would recommend our events within their network.

My approach to increase attendance at our events did not go unnoticed. My department director asked me to make a presentation about how I tackled this problem and present this to the board.’

Why this is a strong critical thinking answer:

• This example shows that you’re able to identify issues and that you understand your responsibility to address them.
• The provided example is related but also relevant to the workplace. It’s also concise, which is perfect.
• This answer shows important skills, such as being proactive, teamwork , adaptability , problem-solving skills , and creativity .
• Taking responsibility to find out why the event attendance dropped and subsequently taking action turned out successful, which gives more weight to the situation.

Critical Thinking Question 2: ‘ Tell Me About a Time You Had To Make a Decision Without Complete Information.’

Situation & task.

‘In my current positions as a market research analyst, I have dealt with several situations where I had to make a decision without complete information. Even though it’s important to have all relevant and complete information, in this position, this just isn’t possible at times.

A recent example is when I had to make a sales prediction of a new innovative product feature we were about to launch. However, the product was new in the market in our area, which made it challenging to assess the expected market conditions to make an accurate forecast. 

In a situation where I do not have complete information, I start with analyzing the information that I do have and start working from there.   In this case, I researched information, documentation, and sales results of comparable markets outside of our region for comparison purposes. Furthermore, I called in expert advice of specialists of these comparable markets to get more accurate market knowledge. 

Based on the available information, additional research of comparable markets, and conversations with the experts, I developed a new spreadsheet with more adjustable parameters than normal because there were more uncertainties. Also,  I broke the sales forecast down into monthly, quarterly, half-annually, and annual figures. Breaking the forecast down into smaller timelines made it easier to make adjustments based on actual sales to make the calculations more accurate over time. 

I initiated a brainstorming session with my team leader to discuss my research findings and spreadsheet proposal. I value different points of view, especially from colleagues with more work experience that have dealt with these circumstances before . Based on the feedback I got, I made final adjustments to the report before turning it in.

Even though I did not have all the information required to make a solid prediction like I wanted to, it allowed me to provide my manager with a report with as few assumptions as possible. The product feature launch was a success, and the forecast turned out to be accurate within the set range. My manager asked me to make a presentation about how I approached this situation and explain the new forecast model to my colleagues.’ 

Why this is a strong answer:

• The provided example is to the point and demonstrates critical thinking skills.
• This answer shows other important skills such as problem-solving skills  and  adaptability .
• The answer shows that you’re a team player and that you involve others for the better of a project’s result.

Note : This is a basic example of how to structure a critical thinking answer. However, there’s a chance the interviewer wants you to go into more detail about which specific steps you took to deal with the situation of not having complete information.

Critical Thinking Question 3: ‘ Tell me about a time you convinced a coworker to implement a different process for better results.’

‘Personally, I believe that communication is essential in such a situation to find a way that works best for the company but also best for both of us. Finding a compromise is the main goal to get the work done to the best of our ability.

Task & Action

As a management consultant, I encountered a situation where I had to convince a coworker to implement a different process. A colleague disagreed with the way I wanted to handle an issue that we encountered along the way. To address this issue, I scheduled a meeting with him to discuss the situation. I asked him about his points of view and how he thought we should go about the project.

Even though we had differences in how we felt like how the project should be approached, we quickly concluded that our goal was the same; providing our client with a high-quality final product within the set deadline.

We talked about the project and the specific aspect about which we had a difference. I explained my point of view and that I had already encountered a similar issue in the past. Ultimately, my colleague agreed to tackle the issue in the method I proposed. His insights gave me a good suggestion which we incorporated into the project as well. After that, we successfully worked together and finalized the project in time, and according to the quality level we both were proud of.’

• The provided example is concise and relevant to the workplace where problem-solving skills are important.
• This answer shows important skills such as being proactive, problem-solving skills , persuasion skills, and adaptability .
• The answer shows that you’re a team player and that you listen to the input of others for the better of a project’s result.

Note : There’s always a chance that interviewers ask you follow-up questions about how you convinced your colleague. Make sure that you can answer those questions as well.

Rate this article

Your page rank:

Interview categories

• Interview Questions
• Cover Letter
• Interview Tips

Megainterview/Contact

• Career Interview Questions
• Write For Megainterview!
• Editorial Policy
• Privacy Policy / GDPR
• Terms & Conditions
• Contact: [email protected]

Sign-up for our newsletter

🤝 We’ll never spam you or sell your data

Popular Topics

• Accomplishments
• Adaptability
• Career Change
• Career Goals
• Conflict Resolution
• Creative Thinking
• Critical Thinking
• Cultural Fit
• Customer Service
• Entry-Level & No Experience
• Growth Potential
• Honesty & Integrity
• Job Satisfaction
• Negotiation Skills
• Performance Based
• Phone Interview
• Problem-Solving
• Questions to Ask the Interviewer
• Salary & Benefits
• Situational & Scenario-Based
• Stress Management
• Time Management & Prioritization
• Uncomfortable
• Work Experience

Popular Articles

• What Is The Most Challenging Project You Have Worked On?
• Tell Me About a Time You Had to Deal With a Difficult Customer
• What Have You Done To Improve Yourself In The Past Year?
• Interview Question: How Do You Deal With Tight Deadlines?
• Describe a Time You Demonstrated Leadership
• Tell Me About a Time When You Took Action to Resolve a Problem
• Job Interview Questions About Working in Fast-Paced Environments
• Job Interview: What Areas Need Improvement? (+ Answers)
• Tell Me About a Time You Were On a Team Project That Failed
• Tell Me About a Time You Managed an Important Project

Our mission is to

Help you get hired.

Hofplein 20

3032 AC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Turn interviews into offers

Every other Tuesday, get our Chief Coach’s best job-seeking and interviewing tips to land your dream job. 5-minute read.

Nov 1, 2021

20 Critical Thinking Interview Questions to Ask Candidates

Markellos Diorinos

Co-founder and CEO of Bryq, Markellos has a simple vision: to empower every organization to hire, grow and retain talent more effectively using science backed data.

Identifying critical thinking skills is essential in the recruitment process. Candidates often encounter situations where they lack complete information or data to address an issue. Moreover, solutions to problems are rarely straightforward or dichotomous. Therefore, employees must possess the ability to think creatively and tackle complex challenges. Assessing a candidate's critical thinking capabilities, however, can be a daunting task. Incorporating critical thinking questions during interviews is an effective strategy. These questions, especially when combined with Bryq's cognitive skills assessment, are instrumental in differentiating between candidates who are proactive thinkers and those who take a more passive approach to their problem-solving methods. This combined approach is particularly valuable in refining the selection process during interviews.

What is Critical Thinking...and Why is it Important?

Critical thinking means thinking reasonably without too much emotion or subjectivity. People who think critically try to push all of that aside when making decisions. Instead, these individuals rely on objectivity, reason, and logic to solve problems. These may be considered “soft skills”, but they are becoming increasingly important in the global workforce. Some jobs might require more critical thinking skills than others, but critical thinking skills will need to be utilized in every job role, no matter how straightforward a job might seem.

Take, for instance, a cashier job. It might seem that the only responsibilities a cashier might have are scanning groceries and handling money. But what if there is a price discrepancy? What if the cashier notices that a customer might be stealing merchandise? What if the customer hands over a fake note? These are all possible situations in which a cashier will need to use critical thinking skills to solve problems.

20 Critical Thinking Interview Questions

Critical thinking skills can’t be assessed by reading resumes or looking at previous work experience. Asking a candidate open-ended questions that allow them to demonstrate their ability to think outside of the box and use logic to solve problems will give you a much better idea of how sharp a candidate’s creative thinking skills are. Even asking questions that seem like riddles is a great way to get your candidates thinking! You can also use these questions to check for both hard and soft skills.

Use the following 20 questions to see which of your candidates has both the brains and logic to stand out above the rest: 

Tell us about a time when a project did not go as planned. What can be done to avoid a similar problem in the future?

Have you ever needed to make an important decision quickly?

Has there ever been a time when you needed to decide without knowing all the details of a situation?

Imagine that you are the project manager of an important project. Two of your co-workers cannot get along, delaying the project. How do you go about solving this issue?

Have you ever had to convince your manager that your way of solving a problem was the best? How did you go about convincing them that you were right?

Imagine coming to work to see you have been sent 1,000 emails overnight. If you only have time to answer 200 of them, how would you decide which 200 emails to respond to?

Have you ever foreseen a problem before it happened? What did you do to prevent this from happening?

A customer has approached you with a problem while you are talking to your manager about something very important. How would you react to this?

Describe the color green to somebody who is blind.

How would you go about putting together a 1,000-piece jigsaw puzzle?

While in a meeting, your co-worker suggests a solution to a problem you know will not work. Do you voice your concern to the team in the meeting?

Has there ever been a time when somebody suggested an idea to you that you had not considered? If so, what was your reaction to this?

What steps do you take when addressing a problem?

Describe a time when you noticed a problem at work and came up with a solution.

Have you ever had to adapt your work style for a manager? What adjustments did you make?

Tell us about a time when you set a lofty goal for yourself and achieved it. What steps did you take to make it happen?

What is the one thing you would change about your previous job? How would you go about making these changes?

Has there ever been a time when you were dealt with an unexpected situation at work that caused you to change your approach? Tell us how you handled it.

If your manager made a mistake on an important document, how would you address it?

Is it better to increase prices to gain profit or lower prices to make customers happy?

How to Assess Critical Thinking Skills

The answers to these critical thinking interview questions can and should vary across candidates. The more creative and thought-out the response is, the better the candidate should be able to solve complex problems. However, there are some common characteristics critical thinkers have that you can look for while assessing candidates.

Critical Thinkers Are Logical

They don’t let bias or their typical way of thinking get into their decision-making. They can consider a situation from every angle and use logic to develop a solution to a problem.

Critical Thinkers Are Trustworthy

They make well-reasoned decisions based on fact and logic, not emotion. This means that they make decisions that you can trust. Additionally, they use problem-solving techniques without worrying much about the opinions of others.

Critical Thinkers Are Innovative

They are true innovators at heart. They look at problems from a different perspective. Additionally, critical thinkers offer fresh solutions to your company’s problems that you might not have thought of before.

Unexpected Answers

Candidates who possess critical thinking skills typically give creative solutions to problems. If a candidate gives a typical answer to a question or presents an obvious solution to a problem, they might lack critical thinking skills. Giving “black or white” answers suggests that these candidates don’t know how to think outside the box. You should be looking for answers and solutions that are creative yet backed by logic.

Complete Answers

Some candidates might not give detailed answers to interview questions. Alternatively, some might not even answer your question at all. It’s important to note that many critical thinking interview questions don’t have “right” or “wrong” answers. When we ask questions, we are trying to figure out whether or not the candidate has the capacity to at least try to give a fully thought-out answer backed by logical reasoning that makes sense. If a candidate tells you that the sky is actually green and not blue while presenting logical explanations as to why, you have a critical thinker on your hands. A critical thinker will convince you of things based on logic.

Check Facts

In the answers the candidates gave you, did they search for more information before moving forward in their decision-making process? When solving problems, a critical thinker prefers to find out as much information as they can before making a final decision. Make sure your candidates are making decisions based on facts and not feelings.

Logical Reasoning

In their responses, do candidates use logical reasoning to solve the issues at hand? Or do they jump to conclusions and skip logic in favor of taking action right away? When interviewing candidates, seek out logical reasoning in their answers to determine if they are critical thinkers.

How Bryq Can Help

It’s obvious that looking for critical thinking skills in the interview process is important. Of course, interview questions are only as helpful as the tools you’re using alongside them to find future hires. Bryq’s talent assessment software helps you find the perfect candidate based on personality assessments and assessment questions made to test a candidate’s cognitive abilities and critical thinking skills . Our product is based on Industrial & Organizational Psychology and measures four distinct skills - numerical skills, logical reasoning, verbal skills, and attention to detail.

Hiring employees who possess critical thinking skills can benefit your company tremendously. These employees will offer new solutions to ongoing problems and innovative ideas to improve your processes and will work hard to make sure things go smoothly. Using the critical thinking interview questions above in conjunction with Bryq’s talent assessment software is a surefire way to hire a team of critical thinkers who will get the job done.

Do you want to see our product live in action? We’d love to show you how the magic happens. Click here to book a demo with us today!

Related blog posts

The Role of Culture in Tech Evolution

The Power of Leadership in Shaping Healthcare Culture

Inside Telco: An Exploration of Organizational Culture

Gain a competitive edge with data-informed talent decisions.

Request a demo and see how our platform is Shaping the Future of Work.

Request demo

Join our community! Get the latest HR trends & tips delivered to your inbox.

Recruitment software built for the new way of hiring

Streamline recruitment from acquire to hire ->

Automatically pinpoint top performers fast ->

Kick-off onboarding before day one ->

Hire elite healthcare teams that elevate patient care ->

Medium to Large

Recruit, run, and grow a winning team with Elevatus

Recruit the best educators for your school

Financial Services

Secure the best finance professionals fast

Build public sector teams that you can trust

+ View all industries

HR Resources

The Ultimate 10 Critical-Thinking Interview Questions for Evaluating Genuine Problem-Solvers

June 17, 2022

Reem Al-Tamimi

Content Writer

Turn top talent to employees fast

Hire, assess, onboard and manage top talent for every job. See how Elevatus streamlines everything; from acquire to new hire.

Don't miss a thing!

Stay one step ahead. Subscribe and get the latest updates, news, and insights from Elevatus straight to your inbox.

Ever wondered why hiring a problem solver is crucial for employers? 

In the quest to build an exceptional team, recruiters possess the amazing ability to unlock minds and uncover extraordinary talents. According to a recent AACU report , 93% of employers prioritize critical thinking skills over an undergraduate degree. By carefully crafting the interview process, they embark on a captivating journey to identify candidates with the sought-after skill of critical thinking. These remarkable individuals possess the rare talent to navigate uncharted territories, solve complex puzzles, and connect ideas in profound ways.

Join us as we embark on an exciting exploration of the top 10 interview questions designed to test candidates’ critical thinking skills. Get ready to unlock minds and discover the next generation of innovative thinkers. Let’s dive in and uncover the secrets of exceptional problem solvers.

Discover the 10 Best Interview Questions for Critical Thinking Skill

The interview is a golden opportunity to evaluate a candidate’s critical thinking skills. It provides hiring managers with a window into their individual thinking processes, allowing for a tailored assessment that aligns with the role’s specific situational needs. 

By asking thought-provoking critical-thinking interview questions, recruiters can gauge candidates’ problem-solving abilities and make informed hiring decisions. 

Let’s dive into some of the best critical-thinking interview questions examples to uncover the brightest minds in the candidate pool.

Question #1: Can you share an experience where you successfully convinced your manager or team to adopt a different approach in order to resolve a problem?

This question is crucial during the interview process as it evaluates a candidate’s persuasive abilities and critical thinking skills. What you can expect from candidates is their ability to share an example where they successfully convinced their manager or team to embrace a different approach to solving a problem. 

This is one of the critical-thinking interview questions that you need to look at in its answer for candidates who demonstrate strong communication skills and logical reasoning. Plus, look for the ability to think outside the box.

Also, you need to pay attention to their ability to present compelling arguments, adapt their approach, and address any objections. A candidate’s response will provide insights into their leadership potential and their capability to drive positive outcomes through persuasive abilities. 

Question #2: Can you share an experience where you had to make a rapid decision?

With this important question from our collection of critical-thinking interview questions, recruiters have the opportunity to assess a candidate’s ability to make quick decisions. This question holds immense value as it allows candidates to demonstrate their critical thinking skills in real-time.

When candidates respond, recruiters can expect them to share a specific instance where they had to make a rapid decision. Look for candidates who can effectively communicate the context, factors considered and the reasoning behind their choice. A strong answer will showcase their quick thinking, problem-solving abilities, and the positive outcomes resulting from their swift decision-making.

Question #3: If you discovered an error in your supervisor’s report or presentation, how would you approach the situation?

This is one of the critical-thinking interview questions that are of utmost importance as it evaluates a candidate’s ability to think critically and professionally when faced with inaccuracies in their supervisor’s report or presentation. Candidates should articulate their approach to addressing such situations, highlighting attention to detail, problem-solving abilities, and effective communication.

Emphasize the importance of maintaining a positive work environment, fostering collaboration, and privately discussing the issue with the supervisor. A strong answer will showcase integrity, commitment to accuracy, and a proactive mindset in finding solutions. This thought-provoking question reveals candidates’ critical-thinking skills and their capacity to handle sensitive situations.

Question #4: Describe one of the most challenging workplace decisions you’ve had to make.

When candidates respond to this critical-thinking interview question, providing examples of challenging workplace decisions they’ve made, recruiters gain valuable insights into their problem-solving abilities. Look for candidates who can share specific instances where they faced difficult choices.

Pay attention to their ability to provide clear context, outline the factors they considered, and describe their decision-making process. A strong response will showcase their critical thinking skills, resilience, and the positive outcomes resulting from their decisions. This question allows recruiters to assess candidates’ problem-solving prowess and their potential to thrive in complex work environments. Get ready to uncover the true decision-making capabilities of candidates with this thought-provoking interview question.

Question #5: How would you react if a teammate presented you with a different or odd idea?

Diverse ideas, collaboration skills, and adaptability are key aspects evaluated in this example of critical-thinking interview questions. Candidates are asked to describe how they would respond when presented with a different or odd idea by a teammate. Look for candidates who exhibit a positive and inclusive attitude, recognizing the value of diverse perspectives.

They should demonstrate active listening, thoughtful questioning, and an open-minded approach. A strong answer will highlight their ability to foster creativity and teamwork and explore alternative solutions. Assess their communication and interpersonal skills as they navigate differing viewpoints.

Question #6: How would you handle a team member’s disagreement over how to approach a project?

Creating a harmonious and productive team environment is essential, making this one of the most important critical-thinking interview questions. Candidates are asked how they would handle a disagreement with a team member over the approach to a project. Look for candidates who demonstrate strong communication skills, active listening, and an open mindset.

They should showcase their ability to foster open discussions, find common ground, and reach a resolution while considering the project objectives. A strong answer will highlight their diplomacy, critical thinking, and problem-solving abilities in navigating conflicts. Pay attention to their capacity to promote collaboration, maintain a positive team dynamic, and achieve successful project outcomes. Assess candidates’ ability to handle conflicts constructively with this engaging interview question.

Question #7: Have you ever foreseen an issue and prepared a plan to avoid it?

Proactive problem-solving abilities are key when evaluating candidates, making this critical-thinking interview question highly valuable. Candidates are asked to share a specific example where they anticipated a potential issue and developed a plan to prevent it. Look for candidates who exhibit critical thinking skills, attention to detail, and the ability to assess risks.

They should demonstrate initiative, effective communication, and the implementation of preventive measures. A strong answer will highlight their ability to think ahead, plan strategically, and their commitment to achieving successful outcomes by avoiding potential obstacles. Get ready to uncover candidates’ proactive problem-solving skills with this one of the thought-provoking critical-thinking interview questions.

Question #8: How do you make a decision when you don’t have all the necessary information on hand?

This is one of the critical-thinking interview questions to ask candidates to assess their ability to make decisions in uncertain or incomplete information scenarios. When candidates respond, expect them to describe their approach when faced with such situations. Look for candidates who demonstrate adaptability, critical thinking, and a systematic decision-making process.

They should emphasize the importance of gathering relevant information, seeking input from others, and considering potential risks or consequences. A strong answer will highlight their ability to make informed decisions based on available data, prioritize key factors, and demonstrate confidence in their choices. Pay attention to their problem-solving skills, analytical thinking, and their ability to handle ambiguity effectively.

Question #9: How do you know when you need help from others while solving an issue or completing a task?

Self-awareness, collaboration skills, and the ability to recognize when help is needed from others are key attributes assessed by this critical-thinking interview question. Candidates are asked to describe how they identify the need for assistance in problem-solving or completing tasks. Look for candidates who demonstrate humility, effective communication, and the ability to assess their own limitations.

They should emphasize the value of seeking expertise, leveraging the strengths of others, and fostering a collaborative work environment. A strong answer will highlight their ability to balance independence with recognizing when collaboration is necessary, contributing to successful outcomes, and promoting teamwork . 

Question #10: How would you manage a situation where a teammate does not understand your approach or solution?

When candidates respond to this question, expect them to provide insights into their communication skills, adaptability, and ability to collaborate effectively. They will describe how they would manage a situation where a teammate doesn’t understand their approach or solution. Look for candidates who demonstrate patience, active listening, and the ability to explain complex ideas clearly and concisely.

They should emphasize their willingness to seek common ground, encourage open dialogue, and explore alternative methods of communication. A strong answer will showcase their ability to foster understanding, promote teamwork, and find a resolution that aligns with the team’s objectives. This is one of the critical-thinking interview questions that provide valuable insights into candidates’ problem-solving and communication abilities, making it an engaging part of the interview process.

Unleashing the Power: Assessing Critical-Thinking Skills in Interviews

In today’s fast-paced and complex work environment, the ability to think critically is highly valued. It enables employees to make informed decisions, solve problems, and drive innovation. Assessing candidates’ critical-thinking skills during interviews is essential to identify those who possess the analytical mindset and problem-solving abilities necessary for success. By understanding their mindsets, problem-solving orientation, and capacity to challenge the status quo, recruiters can select individuals who will thrive in challenging roles and contribute to the organization’s growth.

Key points to consider when assessing critical-thinking skills in interviews

Hypothetical scenarios and past examples:.

• Evaluate candidates’ problem-solving abilities using hypothetical scenarios.
• Gather examples from their prior experiences to assess their critical-thinking skills.

Quick Decision-Making:

• Look for candidates who can make solid decisions while working efficiently.
• Assess their ability to think on their feet and make rational choices under time constraints.

Innovation and Improvement:

• Identify candidates who have demonstrated a willingness to challenge existing procedures and improve processes.
• Seek individuals who actively explore ways to enhance efficiency and effectiveness.

Problem-Solving Orientation:

• Observe candidates’ enthusiasm for problem-solving.
• Look for signs of motivation and persistence when faced with challenging situations.

By incorporating these strategies into the interview process, recruiters can effectively assess critical-thinking skills and select candidates who possess the necessary mindset and abilities to excel in today’s dynamic workplace.

Last Few Words

Transforming your company into a team of critical thinkers is within reach, and it starts with making simple adjustments to your recruitment process and utilizing the right tools. By integrating interview questions to determine critical thinking skills into your recruitment solutions alongside other skill assessments, you can effectively shortlist top talent. 

Our carefully curated collection of interview questions can serve as a valuable resource to measure candidates’ critical thinking abilities, enabling you to make informed hiring choices. Embracing critical thinking throughout your organization will empower your team to tackle complex challenges, think creatively, and drive innovation.

Choose wisely, assess thoroughly, and assemble a team of exceptional critical thinkers who will shape the future of your organization. With the right interview questions, you can unlock the full potential of your candidates and pave the way for success.

Unleash the talent revolution: join 200+ leading companies to supercharge your assessment process with eva-assess today!

EVA-SSESS is an on-demand and unbiased video interviewing software that helps enterprises identify, evaluate, develop, and hire top talent in record time. Where they can assess a large pool of applicants quickly, with structured and automated video assessments that save more than 90% of their time. 200+ leading companies across the globe are relying on EVA-SSESS to build customizable assessments, get in-depth psychometric reports, detect ideal keywords, rank applicants, and create an exclusive and memorable applicant experience. Request a free demo today! 

You may also like...

Uncovering the Underlying Triggers and...

Employee turnover can be a costly conundrum for organizations, especially...

July 24, 2023

Employee Turnover vs Attrition: Decoding...

No matter the industry, the ebb and flow of employees...

July 31, 2023

Unravelling the Enigma of Employee...

Companies are like vibrant ecosystems, with employees joining and departing...

Job Crafting Unveiled: A Roadmap...

Do you ever feel like your job is holding you...

June 19, 2023

What's trending

From Qatayef to KPIs: 12...

The holy month is upon us, which means...

April 11, 2024

The High Cost of a...

The hiring process is a crucial part of...

The Battle of Talent Acquisition...

As businesses expand and evolve, they often face...

Recruiting Metrics & KPIs

Candidate Conversion Rate: The Power...

Managing a team of recruiters can sometimes lead...

Considering a Comeback? Remember the...

Ever thought of welcoming a familiar face back...

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Reading Lists
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

A Short Guide to Building Your Team’s Critical Thinking Skills

• Matt Plummer

Critical thinking isn’t an innate skill. It can be learned.

Most employers lack an effective way to objectively assess critical thinking skills and most managers don’t know how to provide specific instruction to team members in need of becoming better thinkers. Instead, most managers employ a sink-or-swim approach, ultimately creating work-arounds to keep those who can’t figure out how to “swim” from making important decisions. But it doesn’t have to be this way. To demystify what critical thinking is and how it is developed, the author’s team turned to three research-backed models: The Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment, Pearson’s RED Critical Thinking Model, and Bloom’s Taxonomy. Using these models, they developed the Critical Thinking Roadmap, a framework that breaks critical thinking down into four measurable phases: the ability to execute, synthesize, recommend, and generate.

With critical thinking ranking among the most in-demand skills for job candidates , you would think that educational institutions would prepare candidates well to be exceptional thinkers, and employers would be adept at developing such skills in existing employees. Unfortunately, both are largely untrue.

• Matt Plummer (@mtplummer) is the founder of Zarvana, which offers online programs and coaching services to help working professionals become more productive by developing time-saving habits. Before starting Zarvana, Matt spent six years at Bain & Company spin-out, The Bridgespan Group, a strategy and management consulting firm for nonprofits, foundations, and philanthropists.  

Partner Center

Why Schools Need to Change Yes, We Can Define, Teach, and Assess Critical Thinking Skills

Jeff Heyck-Williams (He, His, Him) Director of the Two Rivers Learning Institute in Washington, DC

Today’s learners face an uncertain present and a rapidly changing future that demand far different skills and knowledge than were needed in the 20th century. We also know so much more about enabling deep, powerful learning than we ever did before. Our collective future depends on how well young people prepare for the challenges and opportunities of 21st-century life.

Critical thinking is a thing. We can define it; we can teach it; and we can assess it.

While the idea of teaching critical thinking has been bandied around in education circles since at least the time of John Dewey, it has taken greater prominence in the education debates with the advent of the term “21st century skills” and discussions of deeper learning. There is increasing agreement among education reformers that critical thinking is an essential ingredient for long-term success for all of our students.

However, there are still those in the education establishment and in the media who argue that critical thinking isn’t really a thing, or that these skills aren’t well defined and, even if they could be defined, they can’t be taught or assessed.

To those naysayers, I have to disagree. Critical thinking is a thing. We can define it; we can teach it; and we can assess it. In fact, as part of a multi-year Assessment for Learning Project , Two Rivers Public Charter School in Washington, D.C., has done just that.

Before I dive into what we have done, I want to acknowledge that some of the criticism has merit.

First, there are those that argue that critical thinking can only exist when students have a vast fund of knowledge. Meaning that a student cannot think critically if they don’t have something substantive about which to think. I agree. Students do need a robust foundation of core content knowledge to effectively think critically. Schools still have a responsibility for building students’ content knowledge.

However, I would argue that students don’t need to wait to think critically until after they have mastered some arbitrary amount of knowledge. They can start building critical thinking skills when they walk in the door. All students come to school with experience and knowledge which they can immediately think critically about. In fact, some of the thinking that they learn to do helps augment and solidify the discipline-specific academic knowledge that they are learning.

The second criticism is that critical thinking skills are always highly contextual. In this argument, the critics make the point that the types of thinking that students do in history is categorically different from the types of thinking students do in science or math. Thus, the idea of teaching broadly defined, content-neutral critical thinking skills is impossible. I agree that there are domain-specific thinking skills that students should learn in each discipline. However, I also believe that there are several generalizable skills that elementary school students can learn that have broad applicability to their academic and social lives. That is what we have done at Two Rivers.

Defining Critical Thinking Skills

We began this work by first defining what we mean by critical thinking. After a review of the literature and looking at the practice at other schools, we identified five constructs that encompass a set of broadly applicable skills: schema development and activation; effective reasoning; creativity and innovation; problem solving; and decision making.

We then created rubrics to provide a concrete vision of what each of these constructs look like in practice. Working with the Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning and Equity (SCALE) , we refined these rubrics to capture clear and discrete skills.

For example, we defined effective reasoning as the skill of creating an evidence-based claim: students need to construct a claim, identify relevant support, link their support to their claim, and identify possible questions or counter claims. Rubrics provide an explicit vision of the skill of effective reasoning for students and teachers. By breaking the rubrics down for different grade bands, we have been able not only to describe what reasoning is but also to delineate how the skills develop in students from preschool through 8th grade.

Before moving on, I want to freely acknowledge that in narrowly defining reasoning as the construction of evidence-based claims we have disregarded some elements of reasoning that students can and should learn. For example, the difference between constructing claims through deductive versus inductive means is not highlighted in our definition. However, by privileging a definition that has broad applicability across disciplines, we are able to gain traction in developing the roots of critical thinking. In this case, to formulate well-supported claims or arguments.

Teaching Critical Thinking Skills

The definitions of critical thinking constructs were only useful to us in as much as they translated into practical skills that teachers could teach and students could learn and use. Consequently, we have found that to teach a set of cognitive skills, we needed thinking routines that defined the regular application of these critical thinking and problem-solving skills across domains. Building on Harvard’s Project Zero Visible Thinking work, we have named routines aligned with each of our constructs.

For example, with the construct of effective reasoning, we aligned the Claim-Support-Question thinking routine to our rubric. Teachers then were able to teach students that whenever they were making an argument, the norm in the class was to use the routine in constructing their claim and support. The flexibility of the routine has allowed us to apply it from preschool through 8th grade and across disciplines from science to economics and from math to literacy.

Kathryn Mancino, a 5th grade teacher at Two Rivers, has deliberately taught three of our thinking routines to students using the anchor charts above. Her charts name the components of each routine and has a place for students to record when they’ve used it and what they have figured out about the routine. By using this structure with a chart that can be added to throughout the year, students see the routines as broadly applicable across disciplines and are able to refine their application over time.

Assessing Critical Thinking Skills

By defining specific constructs of critical thinking and building thinking routines that support their implementation in classrooms, we have operated under the assumption that students are developing skills that they will be able to transfer to other settings. However, we recognized both the importance and the challenge of gathering reliable data to confirm this.

With this in mind, we have developed a series of short performance tasks around novel discipline-neutral contexts in which students can apply the constructs of thinking. Through these tasks, we have been able to provide an opportunity for students to demonstrate their ability to transfer the types of thinking beyond the original classroom setting. Once again, we have worked with SCALE to define tasks where students easily access the content but where the cognitive lift requires them to demonstrate their thinking abilities.

These assessments demonstrate that it is possible to capture meaningful data on students’ critical thinking abilities. They are not intended to be high stakes accountability measures. Instead, they are designed to give students, teachers, and school leaders discrete formative data on hard to measure skills.

While it is clearly difficult, and we have not solved all of the challenges to scaling assessments of critical thinking, we can define, teach, and assess these skills . In fact, knowing how important they are for the economy of the future and our democracy, it is essential that we do.

Jeff Heyck-Williams (He, His, Him)

Director of the two rivers learning institute.

Jeff Heyck-Williams is the director of the Two Rivers Learning Institute and a founder of Two Rivers Public Charter School. He has led work around creating school-wide cultures of mathematics, developing assessments of critical thinking and problem-solving, and supporting project-based learning.

Read More About Why Schools Need to Change

Bring Your Vision for Student Success to Life with NGLC and Bravely

March 13, 2024

For Ethical AI, Listen to Teachers

Jason Wilmot

October 23, 2023

Turning School Libraries into Discipline Centers Is Not the Answer to Disruptive Classroom Behavior

Stephanie McGary

October 4, 2023

Get 25% off all test packages.

Get 25% off all test packages!

Click below to get 25% off all test packages.

Critical Thinking Tests

• 228 questions

Critical thinking tests, sometimes known as critical reasoning tests, are often used by employers. They evaluate how a candidate makes logical deductions after scrutinising the evidence provided, while avoiding fallacies or non-factual opinions. Critical thinking tests can form part of an assessment day, or be used as a screening test before an interview.

What is a critical thinking test?

A critical thinking test assesses your ability to use a range of logical skills to evaluate given information and make a judgement. The test is presented in such a way that candidates are expected to quickly scrutinise the evidence presented and decide on the strength of the arguments.

Critical thinking tests show potential employers that you do not just accept data and can avoid subconscious bias and opinions – instead, you can find logical connections between ideas and find alternative interpretations.

This test is usually timed, so quick, clear, logical thinking will help candidates get the best marks. Critical thinking tests are designed to be challenging, and often used as part of the application process for upper-management-level roles.

What does critical thinking mean?

Critical thinking is the intellectual skill set that ensures you can process and consider information, challenge and analyse data, and then reach a conclusion that can be defended and justified.

In the most simple terms, critical reasoning skills will make sure that you are not simply accepting information at face value with little or no supporting evidence.

It also means that you are less likely to be swayed by ‘false news’ or opinions that cannot be backed with facts – which is important in high-level jobs that require logical thinking.

For more information about logical thinking, please see our article all about logical reasoning .

Which professions use critical thinking tests, and why?

Typically, critical thinking tests are taken as part of the application process for jobs that require advanced skills in judgement, analysis and decision making. The higher the position, the more likely that you will need to demonstrate reliable critical reasoning and good logic.

The legal sector is the main industry that uses critical thinking assessments – making decisions based on facts, without opinion and intuition, is vital in legal matters.

A candidate for a legal role needs to demonstrate their intellectual skills in problem-solving without pre-existing knowledge or subconscious bias – and the critical thinking test is a simple and effective way to screen candidates.

Another industry that uses critical thinking tests as part of the recruitment process is banking. In a similar way to the legal sector, those that work in banking are required to make decisions without allowing emotion, intuition or opinion to cloud coherent analysis and conclusions.

Critical thinking tests also sometimes comprise part of the recruitment assessment for graduate and management positions across numerous industries.

The format of the test: which skills are tested?

The test itself, no matter the publisher, is multiple choice.

As a rule, the questions present a paragraph of information for a scenario that may include numerical data. There will then be a statement and a number of possible answers.

The critical thinking test is timed, so decisions need to be made quickly and accurately; in most tests there is a little less than a minute for each question. Having experience of the test structure and what each question is looking for will make the experience smoother for you.

There are typically five separate sections in a critical thinking test, and each section may have multiple questions.

Inference questions assess your ability to judge whether a statement is true, false, or impossible to determine based on the given data and scenario. You usually have five possible answers: absolutely true, absolutely false, possibly true, possibly false, or not possible to determine.

Assumptions

In this section, you are being assessed on your ability to avoid taking things for granted. Each question gives a scenario including data, and you need to evaluate whether there are any assumptions present.

Here you are given a scenario and a number of deductions that may be applicable. You need to assess the given deductions to see which is the logical conclusion – does it follow?

Interpretation

In the interpretation stage, you need to read and analyse a paragraph of information, then interpret a set of possible conclusions, to see which one is correct. You are looking for the conclusion that follows beyond reasonable doubt.

Evaluation of Arguments

In this section, you are given a scenario and a set of arguments that can be for or against. You need to determine which are strong arguments and which are weak, in terms of the information that you have. This decision is made based on the way they address the scenario and how relevant they are to the content.

How best to prepare for a critical thinking test

The best way to prepare for any type of aptitude test is to practice, and critical thinking tests are no different.

Taking practice tests, as mentioned above, will give you confidence as it makes you better understand the structure, layout and timing of the real tests, so you can concentrate on the actual scenarios and questions.

Practice tests should be timed. This will help you get used to working through the scenarios and assessing the conclusions under time constraints – which is a good way to make sure that you perform quickly as well as accurately.

In some thinking skills assessments , a timer will be built in, but you might need to time yourself.

Consistent practice will also enable you to pinpoint any areas of the critical thinking test that require improvement. Our tests offer explanations for each answer, similar to the examples provided above.

Publishers of critical thinking tests

The watson glaser critical thinking test.

The Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (W-GCTA) is the most popular and widely used critical thinking test. This test has been in development for 85 years and is published by TalentLens .

The W-GCTA is seen as a successful tool for assessing cognitive abilities, allowing recruiting managers to predict job success, find good managers and identify future leaders. It is available in multiple languages including English, French and Spanish.

The test itself can be used as part of an assessment day or as a screening assessment before an interview. It consists of 40 questions on the 5 sections mentioned above, and is timed at 30 minutes. Click here for more information on Watson Glaser tests .

SHL critical reasoning test

SHL is a major aptitude test publisher, which offers critical thinking as part of its testing battery for pre-employment checks.

SHL tests cover all kinds of behavioural and aptitude tests, from logic to inference, verbal to numerical – and with a number of test batteries available online, they are one of the most popular choices for recruiters.

Cornell critical thinking test

The Cornell critical thinking test was made to test students and first developed in 1985. It is an American system that helps teachers, parents and administrators to confidently predict future performance for college admission, gifted and advanced placement programs, and even career success.

Prepare yourself for leading employers

5 Example critical thinking practice questions with answers

In this section, you need to deduce whether the inferred statement is true, false or impossible to deduce.

The UK Government has published data that shows 82% of people under the age of 30 are not homeowners. A charity that helps homeless people has published data that shows 48% of people that are considered homeless are under 30.

The lack of affordable housing on the sales market is the reason so many under-30s are homeless.

• Definitely True
• Probably True
• Impossible to Deduce
• Probably False
• Definitely False

The information given does not infer the conclusion given, so it is impossible to deduce if the inference is correct – there is just not enough information to judge the inference as correct.

The removal of the five-substitution rule in British football will benefit clubs with a smaller roster.

Clubs with more money would prefer the five-substitute rule to continue.

• Assumption Made

Assumption Not Made

This is an example of a fallacy that could cause confusion for a candidate – it encourages you to bring in any pre-existing knowledge of football clubs.

It would be easy to assume the assumption has been made when you consider that the more money a club has, the more players they should have on the roster. However, the statement does not make the assumption that the clubs with more money would prefer to continue with the five-substitute rule.

All boys love football. Football is a sport, therefore:

• All boys love all sports
• Girls do not love football
• Boys are more likely to choose to play football than any other sport

In this section we are looking for the conclusion that follows the logic of the statement. In this example, we cannot deduce that girls do not love football, because there is not enough information to support that.

In the same way the conclusion that all boys love all sports does not follow – we are not given enough information to make that assumption. So, the conclusion that follows is 3: boys are more likely to choose football than any other sport because all boys like football.

The British Museum has a range of artefacts on display, including the largest privately owned collection of WWII weaponry.

There is a larger privately owned collection of WWII weaponry in the USA.

• Conclusion Follows

Conclusion Does Not Follow

The fact that the collection is in the British Museum does not make a difference to the fact it is the largest private collection – so there cannot be a larger collection elsewhere.

The Department for Education should lower standards in examinations to make it fairer for less able students.

• Yes – top grades are too hard for lower-income students
• No – less fortunate students are not capable of higher standards
• Yes – making the standards lower will benefit all students
• No – private school students will suffer if grade standards are lower
• The strongest argument is the right answer, not the one that you might personally believe.

In this case, we need to assess which argument is most relevant to the statement. Both 1 and 4 refer to students in particular situations, which isn’t relevant to the statement. The same can be said about 2, so the strongest argument is 3, since it is relevant and addresses the statement given.

After using the platform for two weeks, I’ve never felt more prepared for an Aptitude test.

Critical Thinking Tests FAQs

What are the basics of critical thinking.

In essence, critical thinking is the intellectual process of considering information on its merits, and reaching an analysis or conclusion from that information that can be defended and rationalised with evidence.

How do you know if you have good critical thinking skills?

You are likely to be someone with good critical thinking skills if you can build winning arguments; pick holes in someone’s theory if it’s inconsistent with known facts; reflect on the biases inherent in your own experiences and assumptions; and look at problems using a systematic methodology.

Hire better talent

At Neuroworx we help companies build perfect teams

Critical Thinking Tests Tips

The most important factor in your success will be practice. If you have taken some practice tests, not only will you start to recognise the way questions are worded and become familiar with what each question is looking for, you will also be able to find out whether there are any parts that you need extra practice with.

It is important to find out which test you will be taking, as some generic critical thinking practice tests might not help if you are taking specific publisher tests (see the section below).

2 Fact vs fallacy

Practice questions can also help you recognise the difference between fact and fallacy in the test. A fallacy is simply an error or something misleading in the scenario paragraph that encourages you to choose an invalid argument. This might be a presumption or a misconception, but if it isn’t spotted it can make finding the right answer impossible.

3 Ignore what you already know

There is no need for pre-existing knowledge to be brought into the test, so no research is needed. In fact, it is important that you ignore any subconscious bias when you are considering the questions – you need logic and facts to get the correct answer, not intuition or instinct.

4 Read everything carefully

Read all the given information thoroughly. This might sound straightforward, but knowing that the test is timed can encourage candidates to skip content and risk misunderstanding the content or miss crucial details.

During the test itself, you will receive instructions that will help you to understand what is being asked of you on each section. There is likely to be an example question and answer, so ensure you take the time to read them fully.

5 Stay aware of the time you've taken

This test is usually timed, so don’t spend too long on a question. If you feel it is going to take too much time, leave it and come back to it at the end (if you have time). Critical thinking tests are complex by design, so they do have quite generous time limits.

For further advice, check out our full set of tips for critical thinking tests .

Enjoy what you’ve read? Let others know!

• Share on whatsapp
• Share on linkedin
• Share on twitter
• Share on facebook
• Share via email

Try Critical Thinking Tests for Free

Watson glaser 01.

20 Questions | 20 Minutes

Watson Glaser 02

Watson glaser 03, improve your scores with our intelligent learning system, prepare for your watson glaser test.

Immediate access. Cancel anytime.

• 30 Numerical reasoning tests
• 30 Verbal reasoning tests
• 30 Diagrammatic reasoning tests
• 30 Situational judgement tests
• 34 Publisher packages e.g. Watson Glaser
• 252 Employer packages e.g. HSBC
• 29 Extra packages e.g Mechanical
• Dashboard performance tracking
• Full solutions and explanations
• Tips, tricks, guides and resources
• Access to free tests
• Basic performance tracking
• Solutions & explanations
• Tips and resources

Reviews of our Watson Glaser tests

What our customers say about our Watson Glaser tests

Jozef Bailey

United Kingdom

April 05, 2022

Doesn't cover all aspects of Watson-Glaser tests but useful

The WGCTA uses more categories to assess critical thinking, but this was useful for the inference section.

April 01, 2022

Just practicing for an interview

Good information and liked that it had a countdown clock, to give you that real feel in the test situation.

Jerico Kadhir

March 31, 2022

Aptitude test

It was OK, I didn't understand personally whether or not the "cannot say" option was acceptable or not in a lot of the questions, as it may have been a trick option.

Salvarina Viknesuari

March 15, 2022

I like the test because the platform is simple and engaging while the test itself is different than most of the Watson Glaser tests I've taken.

Alexis Sheridan

March 02, 2022

Some of the ratios were harder than I thought!

I like how clear the design and layout is - makes things very easy (even if the content itself is not!)

Cyril Lekgetho

February 17, 2022

Mental arithmetic

I enjoyed the fact that there were multiple questions pertaining to one passage of information, rather than multiple passages. However I would've appreciated a more varied question type.

Madupoju Manish

February 16, 2022

Analytics are the best questions

I like the test because of its time schedule. The way the questions are prepared makes it easy to crack the original test.

Chelsea Franklin

February 02, 2022

Interesting

I haven't done something like this for ages. Very good for the brain - although I certainly experienced some fog whilst doing it.

[email protected]

January 04, 2022

Population/exchange rates were the hardest

Great test as it felt a bit time pressured. Very different types of questions in terms of difficulty.

faezeh tavakoli

January 02, 2022

More attention to detail + be more time conscious

It was asking about daily stuff we all deal with, but as an assessment it's scrutinising how we approach these problems.

By using our website you agree with our Cookie Policy.

85 Critical Thinking Questions to Carefully Examine Any Information

There might be affiliate links on this page, which means we get a small commission of anything you buy. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Please do your own research before making any online purchase.

The ability to think critically will often determine your success in life.

Let’s face it. Every day, we are bombarded by news, social media updates, and an avalanche of information. If you take all of this at face value, it’s easy to be deceived, misled or ripped off.

That’s why it’s important to  develop a mindset that focuses on critical thinking . This is a skill that needs to be developed in the classroom. But it’s also a valuable life skill.

With that in mind, the following post will share 85 critical thinking questions you can use to increase your awareness about different problems by carefully examining available information. 

Let’s get started…

Table of Contents

What Are Critical Thinking Questions?

Critical thinking questions are inquiries that help you think rationally and clearly by understanding the link between different facts or ideas. These questions create a seemingly endless learning process that lets you critique, evaluate, and develop a depth of knowledge about a given subject. Moreover, you get to reinforce your viewpoints or see things in a new way.

We make decisions every day, whether at work or home. Adopting logical, rational, and practical approaches in addressing various issues requiring critical thinking is essential in decision-making. Therefore, before arriving at a decision, always ask yourself relevant questions and carefully analyze the matter’s pros and cons.

Critical Thinking Questions When in an Argument

When you make an argument using a critical thinking approach, you focus on justified claims that are valid and based on evidence. It helps one establish a strong argument.

• Do I disagree with the other person? Might the person I'm arguing with be misinformed on what they are saying?
• Would I be comfortable saying what I am telling him/her if I was in front of a group of people? 
• What would happen if I lose this argument? Is engaging in this argument worth my time and energy? How will I feel if I lose?
• Is there room for ambiguity or misinterpretation? Are we arguing because I didn't make my point explicit? Should I take my time to understand his school of thought?
• Do I need some rest before saying something? Am I arguing because of other reasons other than the issues at hand? Do I need to take some time and cool down?

• Is it more important that I’m right? Am I trying to ask to prove an unnecessary point?
• Is this argument inductive, deductive, or abductive? Is it a weak or strong argument that I need to engage in? Is it compelling or sound? 
• Is my opponent sincere? Given that they are wrong, are they willing to admit that they are wrong? Can they depend on available evidence, wherever it leads?
• Are my opponents only trying to shift their burden to me? What is the best way to prove them wrong without making them feel bad?
• Are the people I'm arguing with only interested in winning, or are they trying to pass some information across and help me discover the truth?

Critical Thinking Questions When Reading a Book 

When you read a book, you probably ask yourself many “why” questions. Why is this a problem? Why did the character say that? Why is this important? The most challenging part of reading a book is assessing the information you are reading. These questions can help.

• If I learn only two things from this book, what will they be? How will they help me? How will I apply them in my daily life?
• What message are the authors trying to pass across? Are they making suggestions or providing evidence for their arguments?
• Given that almost every book is about solving problems, what is the most prevalent issue that the author is trying to solve?
• What is the author’s writing style? What strategy or master plan does the author employ to convey his/her main ideas throughout the book?
• Do I have background information about the book’s topic? If so, how is what the author is saying different from what I already know?
• What didn’t I understand from the book? Should I re-read the book to understand everything the writer is trying to convey?
• Which sections of the book do I love the most, and why? Generally, do I like this book? Should I look for more books that are written by the same author?
• If I had a chance to meet this book’s author, what questions would I ask him/her? What would I tell the writer about the book? Is it a great book worth recommending to your friends and family members?
• Who are the main characters of the book? If there is only one main character, what overarching goal does the character accomplish?
• In what ways did the protagonist change from the start of the book to the end? What caused the changes? Was the protagonist reckless in some ways? Which ways?

Critical Thinking Questions to Spot a Scam

Asking questions when you feel that a fraud or a scam is being presented to you is a good way to stretch your critical thinking muscles. Are you being emailed or messaged by a stranger? Or maybe there are other red flags you are unsure about. If so, ask these questions.

• Does it seem to be too good to be true? Is this stranger pushy or trying to lure me into making a poor decision?
• When trying out online dating: Is my new “friend” professing strong feelings towards me although we’ve only interacted for a few hours?
• Why is a stranger calling me to ask about my Social Security Number (SSN), personal contact information, or bank details while claiming they are from the bank or a phone company? 
• When buying products online, why does the seller ask me to pay for goods using an insecure payment option like Bitcoin or money order?
• Does the email I have received have any spelling or grammatical errors? Is the language used overly formal or informal?
• If I do a quick search about the exact words of the email I received, does Google indicate it's a fraud or scam?
• Why should a stranger manipulate me using obvious questions like “Would you want to be rich or poor?” While they already know the answer?
• Is the email asking me to download an attachment? Or click a link to some insecure website? 
• Is the person trying to make me feel selfish or guilty for not sending them money, whether for a donation or buying a product? 
• Is the stranger portraying a sense of urgency and using pressure tactics? Are they telling me that their family member needs urgent medical attention?

Critical Thinking Questions About Your Life

It can also help to ask yourself a few critical thinking questions about your life. This way, you can gather basic information and uncover solutions to problems you might not have otherwise thought of.

• Where do I wish to be in a few years, probably two, three, or five years? What short-term and long-term goals should I set?
• What have I achieved so far from the time I set my previous goals? What should I be grateful for?
• Do I have any values that guide me in life? If so, what are these values? Am I always true to these values?
• Am I always worried about what people around me think? Can I act independently without the need to meet social expectations?
• What should people say about me at my funeral? Would they talk about how good I made them feel or how rich and flashy I was?
• If I wasn't afraid of anyone or anything, what would I have done? What if I didn't have any fear in me?
• If today was my last day, what extraordinary thing would I do? Can I do it right now?
• What should I do with the things that matter the most to me? 
• What things will make the greatest difference in my future life if I take action now?
• How should I react when I feel unwanted by the people I love the most? Should I tell them?

Critical Thinking Questions for a Debate or Discussion

When you are in the middle of a debate or discussion, you need to know that what you are saying is fact, have evidence to support your claim, and position yourself as an expert in what you are saying. Here are some critical thinking questions to ask when you are in a debate or discussion.

• Is there fairness in this discussion? Is the moderator supporting one side? Do they want to make one side look stupid or wrong? 
• What is the aim of this discussion? Is there a major problem that needs to be solved? If so, how can I help solve it?
• Who are the people affected by this discussion? If they were here, what would they say?
• Do my views on this discussion matter? If I raise my point, will I be redundant?
• What am I supposed to learn from this debate, and how can I use what I have learned in my daily life?
• Does the audience seem to be biased towards one side? Are they booing one side? What can I do even if it's our opponents being booed?
• Who are the discussion panel members? What views have they held about this kind of discussion or any other related discussions in the past?
• How can I make my point without being ambiguous? Before I speak, should I take down some notes to avoid any confusion during my speech?
• Am I ready to apologize if I make a mistake during the discussion? If so, what are the limits?
• What information does my team, or I need before this discussion? 

Critical Thinking Questions About Lying

Admitting when you are wrong, choosing not to cheat, and sharing constructive feedback are all ways to show your honesty. Here are some critical thinking skills to ask regarding lying.

• Will the lie hurt those I am telling, or will it help them? What if being honest might cause my friend unnecessary pain?
• Should I be the one telling this person a lie, or I let someone else do it? 
• Will I be the one hurt if I tell this lie? Will my friend feel I am a betrayer? Will it affect our friendship?
• Do they answer my questions in detail, or are they always trying to ignore and dodge the main problem?
• What if I ask these people the same question using different terms and wording? Will they give me the same response?
• Did the tone of my friend suddenly change after I asked him/her this question? Do they sound louder, faster, or slower compared to how they usually speak?
• Does this person have something to gain by lying to me? What is their motive?
• Does this person take a sudden pause or hesitate more than usual when responding to my question?
• When I look at these people's faces, do their facial expressions match what they say?
• Should I believe this person or not? What are my intuitions? Does it look like they are telling the truth?
• Do they blink like other days when I ask them questions? Are they always trying to avoid direct eye contact?
• Why do they seem uncomfortable when it’s just a normal conversation?  

Critical Thinking Questions When Presented With a Claim

Critical thinking is much more than just evaluating whether a claim is true or not. It also means a critical thinker reflects on what follows from true claims.

• What does this claim mean, and what are its implications? What if it's a false claim?
• Which of my morals, values, or beliefs do I have to give up to accept this claim?
• Do professionals in this field agree or disagree with the claim that has been made?
• Do they have evidence to back their claim? Which is the most robust evidence to support the claim?
• What argument can I come up with to refute this claim? Or what is the best view that can support this claim?
• Who is the primary source of the claim being made? Is the basis of the claim reliable?
• Is it a claim, or it's just an opinion?
• Is the claim likely to be 100% false, true, or partially true?
• Am I allowed to refute the claim and table my evidence, or is it one-sided?

Critical Thinking Interview Questions

Critical thinking skills are valuable in any industry or field and for almost all roles. During a job interview, you will be asked questions so the potential employer can assess your skills and see how you use logic. Your critical thinking ability is just one vital part that can play into your professional development.

• Is there a time you had to convince someone to use an alternate approach to solve a problem?
• Have you ever had to make a difficult decision quickly?
• How would you handle a situation where your supervisor handled something wrong or made a mistake?
• What is one of the most difficult decisions you have ever had to make at work?
• How would you solve a disagreement between coworkers when approaching a project?
• Can you describe a time when you anticipated a problem ahead of time and took the appropriate steps to stop the problem from becoming an issue?
• If you discover a cheaper way to do something or a better solution to a problem and try to explain it to your supervisor, but they don’t understand, what do you do?

Critical Thinking Questions for Kids

We can’t leave the kids out either. Critical thinking questions for kids get them thinking and talking. It also allows a parent to get to know their child better.

• How many grains of sand do you think are on the beach?
• What would happen if it stopped raining?
• Do you think there is life on other planets?
• Should children be able to set their own bedtimes?
• How would you describe what a tree looks like without saying green or leaves?
• Can you name five different emotions?
• Can you talk for five minutes without uttering “um?”

What Are the Basic Principles of Critical Thinking?

Your critical thinking skills involve gathering complete information, understanding and defining terms, questioning the methods by which we get facts, questioning the conclusions, and looking for hidden assumptions and biases.

Additionally, we can’t expect to find all of the answers, and we need to take the time to examine the big picture of it all.

Here are the basic principles:

• Disposition: Someone with critical thinking skills is often skeptical, open-minded, and practices fair-mindedness. They can look at different viewpoints and change positions if the evidence and reason lead them to do so.
• Criteria: In order to think critically, one must also apply criteria. Certain conditions must be met before someone believes in something. The information needs to be from credible sources.
• Argument: An argument is simply a statement or proposition that is shown with supporting evidence. When you use your critical thinking skills, you identify, evaluate, and construct your argument.
• Reasoning: With critical thinking comes reasoning. You must examine logical relationships among the statements being made.
• Point of View: Critical thinkers can see things from different perspectives and different points of view.

What Are Good Analysis Questions?

Analysis is a part of critical thinking that allows you to examine something carefully. Someone with analytical skills can examine the information presented, understand what that information means, and then properly explain that information to others. Analysis in critical thinking provides more clarity on the information you process.

When analyzing, you may ask yourself, “how do I know this,” how would I solve this problem,” and “why does it matter?”

Why Is Critical Thinking an Important Skill?

Critical thinking skills allow you to express thoughts, ideas, and beliefs in a better way. It also leads to improved communication while allowing others to understand you better. Critical thinking fosters creativity and encourages out-of-the-box thinking. This is a skill that can be applied to many different areas of your life.

For example, knowing the answers to critical thinking questions for a job interview will better prepare you for the interview. Many employers, during questioning, are likely to ask you critical thinking questions to assess if you have the ability to evaluate information effectively so you can make more informed decisions.

Final Thoughts on Critical Thinking Questions

Although it's common to get torn between making two or more choices, nobody wants to make the wrong decision. The only thing you can do to avoid this is use critical thinking questions to examine your situation. The answers to these questions will help you make informed decisions and help you comprehend crucial matters in your life. 

Want to learn more about critical thinking and decision-making using a real-life example? Here is  how Jeff Bezos uses critical thinking  to make some of the most challenging life decisions.

Finally, if you want to ask better questions, then watch this short, 20-minute course to learn how to have a great conversation with virtually anyone .

A Crash Course in Critical Thinking

What you need to know—and read—about one of the essential skills needed today..

Posted April 8, 2024 | Reviewed by Michelle Quirk

• In research for "A More Beautiful Question," I did a deep dive into the current crisis in critical thinking.
• Many people may think of themselves as critical thinkers, but they actually are not.
• Here is a series of questions you can ask yourself to try to ensure that you are thinking critically.

Conspiracy theories. Inability to distinguish facts from falsehoods. Widespread confusion about who and what to believe.

These are some of the hallmarks of the current crisis in critical thinking—which just might be the issue of our times. Because if people aren’t willing or able to think critically as they choose potential leaders, they’re apt to choose bad ones. And if they can’t judge whether the information they’re receiving is sound, they may follow faulty advice while ignoring recommendations that are science-based and solid (and perhaps life-saving).

Moreover, as a society, if we can’t think critically about the many serious challenges we face, it becomes more difficult to agree on what those challenges are—much less solve them.

On a personal level, critical thinking can enable you to make better everyday decisions. It can help you make sense of an increasingly complex and confusing world.

In the new expanded edition of my book A More Beautiful Question ( AMBQ ), I took a deep dive into critical thinking. Here are a few key things I learned.

First off, before you can get better at critical thinking, you should understand what it is. It’s not just about being a skeptic. When thinking critically, we are thoughtfully reasoning, evaluating, and making decisions based on evidence and logic. And—perhaps most important—while doing this, a critical thinker always strives to be open-minded and fair-minded . That’s not easy: It demands that you constantly question your assumptions and biases and that you always remain open to considering opposing views.

In today’s polarized environment, many people think of themselves as critical thinkers simply because they ask skeptical questions—often directed at, say, certain government policies or ideas espoused by those on the “other side” of the political divide. The problem is, they may not be asking these questions with an open mind or a willingness to fairly consider opposing views.

When people do this, they’re engaging in “weak-sense critical thinking”—a term popularized by the late Richard Paul, a co-founder of The Foundation for Critical Thinking . “Weak-sense critical thinking” means applying the tools and practices of critical thinking—questioning, investigating, evaluating—but with the sole purpose of confirming one’s own bias or serving an agenda.

In AMBQ , I lay out a series of questions you can ask yourself to try to ensure that you’re thinking critically. Here are some of the questions to consider:

• Why do I believe what I believe?
• Are my views based on evidence?
• Have I fairly and thoughtfully considered differing viewpoints?
• Am I truly open to changing my mind?

Of course, becoming a better critical thinker is not as simple as just asking yourself a few questions. Critical thinking is a habit of mind that must be developed and strengthened over time. In effect, you must train yourself to think in a manner that is more effortful, aware, grounded, and balanced.

For those interested in giving themselves a crash course in critical thinking—something I did myself, as I was working on my book—I thought it might be helpful to share a list of some of the books that have shaped my own thinking on this subject. As a self-interested author, I naturally would suggest that you start with the new 10th-anniversary edition of A More Beautiful Question , but beyond that, here are the top eight critical-thinking books I’d recommend.

The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark , by Carl Sagan

This book simply must top the list, because the late scientist and author Carl Sagan continues to be such a bright shining light in the critical thinking universe. Chapter 12 includes the details on Sagan’s famous “baloney detection kit,” a collection of lessons and tips on how to deal with bogus arguments and logical fallacies.

Clear Thinking: Turning Ordinary Moments Into Extraordinary Results , by Shane Parrish

The creator of the Farnham Street website and host of the “Knowledge Project” podcast explains how to contend with biases and unconscious reactions so you can make better everyday decisions. It contains insights from many of the brilliant thinkers Shane has studied.

Good Thinking: Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk and How Critical Thinking Can Save the World , by David Robert Grimes

A brilliant, comprehensive 2021 book on critical thinking that, to my mind, hasn’t received nearly enough attention . The scientist Grimes dissects bad thinking, shows why it persists, and offers the tools to defeat it.

Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know , by Adam Grant

Intellectual humility—being willing to admit that you might be wrong—is what this book is primarily about. But Adam, the renowned Wharton psychology professor and bestselling author, takes the reader on a mind-opening journey with colorful stories and characters.

Think Like a Detective: A Kid's Guide to Critical Thinking , by David Pakman

The popular YouTuber and podcast host Pakman—normally known for talking politics —has written a terrific primer on critical thinking for children. The illustrated book presents critical thinking as a “superpower” that enables kids to unlock mysteries and dig for truth. (I also recommend Pakman’s second kids’ book called Think Like a Scientist .)

Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters , by Steven Pinker

The Harvard psychology professor Pinker tackles conspiracy theories head-on but also explores concepts involving risk/reward, probability and randomness, and correlation/causation. And if that strikes you as daunting, be assured that Pinker makes it lively and accessible.

How Minds Change: The Surprising Science of Belief, Opinion and Persuasion , by David McRaney

David is a science writer who hosts the popular podcast “You Are Not So Smart” (and his ideas are featured in A More Beautiful Question ). His well-written book looks at ways you can actually get through to people who see the world very differently than you (hint: bludgeoning them with facts definitely won’t work).

A Healthy Democracy's Best Hope: Building the Critical Thinking Habit , by M Neil Browne and Chelsea Kulhanek

Neil Browne, author of the seminal Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking, has been a pioneer in presenting critical thinking as a question-based approach to making sense of the world around us. His newest book, co-authored with Chelsea Kulhanek, breaks down critical thinking into “11 explosive questions”—including the “priors question” (which challenges us to question assumptions), the “evidence question” (focusing on how to evaluate and weigh evidence), and the “humility question” (which reminds us that a critical thinker must be humble enough to consider the possibility of being wrong).

Warren Berger is a longtime journalist and author of A More Beautiful Question .

• Find a Therapist
• Find a Treatment Center
• Find a Support Group
• International
• New Zealand
• South Africa
• Switzerland
• Asperger's
• Bipolar Disorder
• Chronic Pain
• Eating Disorders
• Passive Aggression
• Personality
• Goal Setting
• Positive Psychology
• Stopping Smoking
• Low Sexual Desire
• Relationships
• Child Development
• Therapy Center NEW
• Diagnosis Dictionary
• Types of Therapy

Understanding what emotional intelligence looks like and the steps needed to improve it could light a path to a more emotionally adept world.

• Coronavirus Disease 2019
• Affective Forecasting
• Neuroscience

Critical Thinking Assessment: 4 Ways to Test Applicants

In the current age of information overload, critical thinking (CT) is a vital skill to sift fact from fiction. Fake news, scams, and disinformation can have a negative impact on individuals as well as businesses. Ultimately, those with finer CT skills can help to lead their team with logical thinking, evidence-based motivation, and smarter decisions.

Today, most roles require critical thinking skills. And understanding how to test and evaluate critical thinking skills can not only help to differentiate candidates but may even predict job performance .

This article will cover:

What is critical thinking?

• Critical thinking vs problem-solving
• 5 critical thinking sub-skills
• The importance of assessing critical thinking skills
• 4 ways to leverage critical thinking assessments

Critical thinking is the process of analyzing and evaluating information in a logical way. And though a valuable skill since as far back as the early philosophers’ era, it is just as vital today. For candidates to succeed in the digital economy , they need modern thinking skills that help them think critically.

Whether we realize it or not, we process tons of data and information on a daily basis. Everything from social media to online news, data from apps like Strava – and that’s on top of all the key metrics in relation to our professional role.

Without a shadow of a doubt, correctly interpreting information — and recognizing disinformation — is an essential skill in today’s workplace and everyday life. And that’s also why teaching critical thinking skills in education is so important to prepare the next generation for the challenges they will face in the modern workplace.

Critical thinking isn’t about being constantly negative or critical of everything. It’s about objectivity and having an open, inquisitive mind. To think critically is to analyze issues based on hard evidence (as opposed to personal opinions, biases, etc.) in order to build a thorough understanding of what’s really going on. And from this place of thorough understanding, you can make better decisions and solve problems more effectively. Bernard Marr | Source

Today, candidates with CT skills think and reason independently, question data, and use their findings to contribute actively to their team rather than passively taking in or accepting information as fact.

Why are critical thinking skills important?

In the workplace, those with strong CT skills no longer rely on their gut or instinct for their decisions. They’re able to problem-solve more effectively by analyzing situations systematically.

With these skills, they think objectively about information and other points of view and look for evidence to support their findings rather than simply accepting opinions or conclusions as facts.

When employees can turn critical thinking into a habit, it ultimately reduces personal bias and helps them be more open to their teammates’ suggestions — improving how teams collaborate and collectively solve problems.

Critical thinking vs. Problem solving – what’s the difference?

Let’s explore the difference between these two similar concepts in more detail.

Critical thinking is about processing and analyzing information to reach an objective, evidence-based conclusion. Let’s take a look at an example of critical thinking in action:

• A member of the team suggests using a new app they’ve heard about to automate and speed up candidate screening . Some like the idea, but others in the team share reasons why they don’t support the idea. So you visit the software website and look at the key features and benefits yourself, then you might look for reviews about it and ask your HR counterparts what they think of it. The reviews look promising, and a few of your fellow practitioners say it’s worked well for them. Next, you look into the costs compared to the solution your team is already using and calculate that the return on investment (ROI) is good. You arrive at the conclusion that it’d be worth testing the platform with the free trial version and recommend this to your team.

On the other hand, problem solving can involve many of the same skills as critical thinking, such as observing and evaluating. Still, it focuses on identifying business obstacles and coming up with solutions. So, let’s return to the example of the candidate screening software and see how it might work differently in the context of problem-solving :

• For weeks, the talent acquisition team has complained about how long it takes to screen candidates manually. One of the team members decides to look for a solution to their problem. They assess the team’s current processes and resources and how to best solve the issues. In their research, they discover the new candidate screening platform and test out its functionality for a few days. They feel it would benefit the team and suggest it at the next meeting. Great problem solving, HR leader!

What are the 5 sub-skills that make up critical thinking?

Now that we’ve established what CT is, let’s break it down into the 5 core sub-skills that make up a critical thinking mindset .

• Observation : Being observant of your environment is the first step to thinking critically. Observant employees can even identify a potential problem before it becomes a problem.
• Analysis : Once you’ve observed the issue or problem, you can begin to analyze its parts. It’s about asking questions, researching, and evaluating the findings objectively. This is an essential skill, especially for someone in a management role.
• Inference : Also known as construct validity, is about drawing a conclusion from limited information. To do this effectively may require in-depth knowledge of a field. Candidates with this skill can contribute a lot of value to a startup, for instance, where initially, there may be little data available for information processing.
• Communication : This pertains to expressing ideas and your reasoning clearly and persuasively, as well as actively listening to colleagues’ suggestions or viewpoints. When all members of a team or department can communicate and consider different perspectives, it helps tasks (and, well, everything) move along swiftly and smoothly.
• Problem solving : Once you begin implementing a chosen solution, you may still encounter teething problems. At that point, problem solving skills will help you decide on the best solution and how to overcome the obstacles to bring you closer to your goal.

What is a critical thinking assessment test?

Though there are a few different ways to assess critical thinking, such as the Collegiate Learning Assessment, one of the most well-known tests is the Watson Glaser™ Critical Thinking Appraisal .

Critical thinking tests, or critical reasoning tests, are psychometric tests used in recruitment at all levels, graduate, professional and managerial, but predominantly in the legal sector. However, it is not uncommon to find companies in other sectors using critical thinking tests as part of their selection process. This is an intense test, focusing primarily on your analytical, or critical thinking, skills. Source

These tests are usually timed and typically include multiple choice items, short answers or short scenario-based questions to assess students or prospective candidates. They test candidates’ ability to interpret data without bias, find logical links between information, and separate facts from false data .

But how do these tests measure critical thinking?

In addition to educational and psychological testing, many employers today use critical thinking tests to assess a person’s ability to question information — to ask What , Why , and How of the data. A standard critical thinking test breaks down this aptitude by examining the following 5 components:

• assumption – analyzing a scenario to determine if there are any assumptions made
• deduction – the ability to choose which deductions are logical
• evaluating evidence – in support of and against something
• inference – conclusions, drawn from observed facts
• interpretation – interpreting the accuracy of a stated conclusion (based on a scenario)

Why is it important to assess critical thinking skills during the recruitment process?

Critical thinking skills may be considered a soft skill , but it’s become a prerequisite in certain industries, like software, and for many roles. Marketing managers, project managers, accountants, and healthcare professionals, for example, all require a degree of CT skills to perform their roles.

The kinds of businesses that require critical thinking include technology , engineering , healthcare , the legal sector , scientific research, and education . These industries are typically very technical and rely on data . People working in these fields research and use data to draw logical conclusions that help them work smarter and more efficiently.

In the hiring process, test takers with good critical thinking skills stand out . Why? Because they are able to demonstrate their ability to collaborate, problem-solve, and manage pressure in a rational, logical manner. As a result, they’re more likely to make the right business decisions that boost efficiency and, ultimately, a business’s bottom line.

Examples of jobs that rely on critical thinking skills

Critical thinking is not rocket science, but it is an important skill when making decisions — especially when the correct answer is not obvious. Here are a few examples of job roles that rely on critical thinking dispositions:

• computer programmers or developers : may use critical thinking and other advanced skills in a variety of ways, from debugging code to analyzing the problem, finding potential causes, and coming up with suitable solutions. They also use CT when there is no clear roadmap to rely on, such as when building a new app or feature.
• criminologists : must have critical thinking abilities to observe criminal behavior objectively and to analyze the problem in such a way that they can be confident in the conclusions they present to the authorities.
• medical professionals : need to diagnose their patients’ condition through observation, communication, analysis and solving complex problems to decide on the best treatment.
• air traffic controllers: need a super clear, calm head to deal with their high-stress job. They observe traffic, communicate with pilots, and constantly problem-solve to avoid airplane collisions.
• legal professionals : use logic and reasoning to analyze various cases – even before deciding whether they’ll take on a case – and then use their excellent communication skills to sway people over to their reasoning in a trial setting.
• project managers : have to deal with a lot of moving parts at the same time. To successfully keep projects on time and budget, they continually observe and analyze the progress of project components, communicate continually with the team and external stakeholders and work to solve any problems that crop up.

What are the risks of not testing for critical thinking?

By not evaluating critical thinking beforehand, you may end up hiring candidates with poor CT skills. Especially when hiring business leaders and for key positions, this has the potential to wreak havoc on a business. Their inaccurate assumptions are more likely to lead to bad decisions , which could cost the company money .

Weak critical thinking can result in a number of issues for your organization and justifies the expense or added effort of asking your candidate to complete critical thinking tests in the hiring process. For example, poor CT skills may result in:

• making mistakes
• not being able to take action when needed
• working off false assumptions
• unnecessary strain on work relationships

4 ways to assess critical thinking skills in candidates

Now that we’ve seen how important it is for most candidates today to have strong critical thinking skills, let’s take a look at some of the assessment instruments the talent acquisition team can use.

#1 – A homework assignment

A homework assignment is a task that assesses whether test takers have the right skills for a role. If critical thinking is essential for a particular job, you could provide candidates with a homework assignment that specifically tests their ability to:

• accurately interpret relevant evidence
• reach logical conclusions
• judge information skeptically
• communicate their own viewpoint and others’ backed by facts

Tip : use Toggl Hire’s skills screening tests to easily filter out the good candidates first and speed up your hiring process.

#2 – Behavioral and situational interview questions

Ask the candidate to provide examples of situations when they used CT for solving problems or making a decision. This can provide insight into the candidate’s ability to analyze information and make informed decisions. For example:

Critical thinking example questions:

• Tell me about a time when you had to make a really difficult decision at work.
• What would you do in a situation where your manager made a mistake in a presentation or report?
• How would you respond if a colleague shared a new idea or solution with you?
• How do you evaluate the potential outcomes of different actions or decisions?
• Can you describe a situation where you had to think on your feet and come up with a creative solution to a problem?
• How do you ensure that your decision-making is based on relevant and accurate information?

#3 – Discuss the candidate’s critical thinking skills with their references

Additionally, the hiring manager can ask the candidate’s references about how the candidate demonstrated CT skills in the past.

• Can you recall a time when (the candidate) had to convince you to choose an alternative solution to a problem?
• Tell me about a time when (the candidate) had to solve a team disagreement regarding a project.

#4 – Critical thinking tests

Ask the candidate to complete a critical thinking test and score against critical thinking rubrics. You can then share feedback on their test scores with them and explore their willingness to improve their score, if necessary. Or compare their score to other applicants, and prioritize those with higher scores if the role truly requires a critical thinker.

Create your next critical thinking assessment with Toggl Hire

Assessing critical thinking skills is becoming a key component in the hiring process, especially for roles that require a particularly advanced skillset. Critical thinking is a sign of future performance. Candidates that clearly demonstrate these skills have a lot to offer companies, from better decision-making to more productive relationships and cost savings.

If your team needs help automating the screening process, and creating custom skills tests based on specific roles, try Toggl Hire’s skills test questions engine or the Custom Test Builder to create the exact questions you want from scratch.

Juste loves investigating through writing. A copywriter by trade, she spent the last ten years in startups, telling stories and building marketing teams. She works at Toggl Hire and writes about how businesses can recruit really great people.

Join 30,000+ subscribers getting the best tips on productivity, work management, hiring and more!

We promise we won't spam you and you can unsubscribe anytime.

You might also like...

Related to Talent Assessments

What Is the Halo and Horn Effect & How It Impacts Hiring

9 Factors that Predict Job Performance

10 Tips How to Evaluate Leadership Skills When Hiring

Take a peek at our most popular categories:

Critical thinking definition

Critical thinking, as described by Oxford Languages, is the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgement.

Active and skillful approach, evaluation, assessment, synthesis, and/or evaluation of information obtained from, or made by, observation, knowledge, reflection, acumen or conversation, as a guide to belief and action, requires the critical thinking process, which is why it's often used in education and academics.

Some even may view it as a backbone of modern thought.

However, it's a skill, and skills must be trained and encouraged to be used at its full potential.

People turn up to various approaches in improving their critical thinking, like:

• Developing technical and problem-solving skills
• Engaging in more active listening
• Actively questioning their assumptions and beliefs
• Seeking out more diversity of thought
• Opening up their curiosity in an intellectual way etc.

Is critical thinking useful in writing?

Critical thinking can help in planning your paper and making it more concise, but it's not obvious at first. We carefully pinpointed some the questions you should ask yourself when boosting critical thinking in writing:

• What information should be included?
• Which information resources should the author look to?
• What degree of technical knowledge should the report assume its audience has?
• What is the most effective way to show information?
• How should the report be organized?
• How should it be designed?
• What tone and level of language difficulty should the document have?

Usage of critical thinking comes down not only to the outline of your paper, it also begs the question: How can we use critical thinking solving problems in our writing's topic?

Let's say, you have a Powerpoint on how critical thinking can reduce poverty in the United States. You'll primarily have to define critical thinking for the viewers, as well as use a lot of critical thinking questions and synonyms to get them to be familiar with your methods and start the thinking process behind it.

Are there any services that can help me use more critical thinking?

We understand that it's difficult to learn how to use critical thinking more effectively in just one article, but our service is here to help.

We are a team specializing in writing essays and other assignments for college students and all other types of customers who need a helping hand in its making. We cover a great range of topics, offer perfect quality work, always deliver on time and aim to leave our customers completely satisfied with what they ordered.

The ordering process is fully online, and it goes as follows:

• Select the topic and the deadline of your essay.
• Provide us with any details, requirements, statements that should be emphasized or particular parts of the essay writing process you struggle with.
• Leave the email address, where your completed order will be sent to.
• Select your prefered payment type, sit back and relax!

With lots of experience on the market, professionally degreed essay writers , online 24/7 customer support and incredibly low prices, you won't find a service offering a better deal than ours.

Thinking Skills Assessments

March 14, 2024

Explore key methods to assess and enhance critical thinking and problem-solving skills in educational settings.

Main, P. (2024, March 14). Thinking Skills Assessments. Retrieved from www.structural-learning.com/post/thinking-skills-assessments

What are Thinking Skills Assessments?

Thinking Skills Assessments (TSAs) are structured tests designed to evaluate an individual's cognitive capabilities, particularly in the context of university admissions. Historically associated with the entry criteria of prestigious universities, TSAs have become a critical tool in educational settings, including schools and colleges. They offer an academic assessment beyond traditional exam scores, emphasizing an applicant's ability to think critically and reason effectively.

The typical TSA comprises about 50 multiple-choice questions, evaluating a wide range of cognitive abilities . They measure critical thinking skills and the ability to apply these skills in academic situations. By understanding the average score or marking scheme, educators can align assessment content with desired learning outcomes.

Building assessments like these require a meticulous approach. For instance, Cambridge Assessment, a renowned Assessment Team, creates a thinking skill assessment that challenges students under timed conditions. This encourages the development of time management strategies, which are crucial for academic success.

These assessments also serve a dual purpose. They not only gauge a student's preparedness for rigorous academic pursuits but also foster metacognitive awareness . Students become more aware of their intellectual strengths and weaknesses, a key component in developing self-understanding. Through regular practice with practice materials, such as critical-thinking tests and skill tests, students can improve their chances of success in various academic and intellectual arenas, from Oxford PPE to History and Economics.

In essence, TSAs are more than a gateway to university applications; they are instruments for enhancing intellectual abilities and metacognitive skills , essential for lifelong learning and self-awareness.

Critical Thinking in Focus: Measuring Analytical Abilities

Critical thinking is at the heart of academic and intellectual endeavors. It is a skill that allows individuals to analyze information, conceptualize ideas , and evaluate arguments. A critical-thinking test, therefore, becomes an essential component of Thinking Skills Assessments. These tests challenge students to dissect complex scenarios and select the correct answer under timed conditions, which simulates the pressure of real-world problem-solving.

The assessment of critical thinking skills involves an array of tests, including but not limited to, scenarios requiring basic double-digit math test to more complex critical thinking screening tests. These tests aim to measure a student's ability to engage with, understand, and critique the information presented to them, reflecting their analytical capabilities.

The assessment content in such tests is designed to gauge a student’s verbal reasoning ability and numerical reasoning skills, both of which are predictive of academic success . For example, in a typical assessment, the student might face a critical-thinking question that requires analyzing a piece of text under timed conditions. The performance on such questions, indicated by the average score or raw mark, offers insight into the student's analytical prowess.

Universities like Oxford and Cambridge, known for their rigorous academic standards, include these assessments as part of their university applications process. The TSA Oxford, for instance, incorporates a 30-minute writing task alongside multiple-choice questions to measure the depth and clarity of a student’s thought process.

Regular practice with these tests can significantly enhance a student's critical thinking abilities. Assessment software and practice materials provide a platform for students to engage in academic assessment regularly, refining their critical thinking skills over time. The transformation from answering choice assessments to mastering comprehensive culture tests is not just about attaining a numerical score but also about preparing for the diverse challenges of future academic and professional landscapes.

5 Ways to Measuring Problem-Solving Skills

Problem-solving is a dynamic skill set that involves interpreting, reasoning, and devising a strategy to navigate and resolve an issue. Assessing this ability is crucial as it stands as a predictor of performance in academic and real-world settings. Here are five methods used in Thinking Skills Assessments to measure problem-solving skills:

• Multiple-choice questions : These questions are designed to test a student's ability to apply logic and reasoning to solve problems. They often involve numerical score challenges or puzzles that require an understanding of underlying principles. Each correct answer, or raw mark, reflects the student's problem-solving proficiency.
• Timed conditions : Performing under pressure is a significant aspect of problem-solving. Assessments under timed conditions force students to prioritize their strategies and make quick decisions, akin to real-life situations.
• Case studies : Students are presented with complex scenarios related to academic subjects like History and Economics. They must analyze the information, identify issues, and propose solutions. This reflects their ability to tackle real-world problems using academic knowledge .
• Writing tasks : A 30-minute writing task can offer insight into a student’s problem-solving approach. It showcases how they structure their thoughts, articulate their reasoning, and reach conclusions.
• Critical thinking questions : These delve into a student's ability to use deductive and inductive reasoning to solve problems. By evaluating the arguments presented and constructing a logical response, students demonstrate their problem-solving capabilities.

Regular practice with assessment software and customizable assessments allows students to enhance their skills. An array of tests, from basic math to complex critical-thinking tests, ensures a comprehensive evaluation of a student's abilities. This practice not only boosts their exam scores but also their overall academic performances.

Moreover, the anonymous, 22-question assessments often used by schools provide a baseline of a student's problem-solving skills without the pressure of high-stakes testing. These assessments help in building a culture of continuous improvement and self-awareness among students.

The mastery of problem-solving skills equips students with the capacity to navigate their academic pursuits and future careers successfully.

Gauging Planning and Execution Skills

Planning and execution skills are critical for translating thought into action and are a fundamental component of successful academic and professional outcomes. Assessments that measure these skills typically include:

• Structured scenarios : These are tasks where students must create a plan based on a given scenario. The quality of the plan and its potential effectiveness are indicators of the student's ability to foresee, strategize, and execute.
• Project-based assessments : Similar to real-world tasks, these require students to manage a project from conception to completion. This could involve a choice assessment within a collaborative group setting , reflecting not only planning but also interpersonal intellect and leadership abilities .
• Simulations : By immersing students in virtual environments where they must make decisions and see the consequences unfold, simulations offer a dynamic and interactive way to assess planning and execution.
• Behavioral tasks : Involving activities such as organizing materials under a time constraint or completing a series of tasks in a particular order, these tests provide a tangible measure of a student's capacity to plan and prioritize.
• Reflective essays : After completing a task, students may be asked to reflect on their planning and execution process. This not only measures their ability to plan but also their metacognitive awareness of their own thinking processes.

For example, an assessment may include a basic triple-digit math test that requires developing a step-by-step solution under timed conditions. The speed and accuracy of the solution indicate the student's planning abilities and their skill in executing the plan effectively.

Reflective Judgment

Reflective judgment is the capacity to critically evaluate evidence and arguments in the context of one’s own belief systems and make reasoned decisions. It is a higher-order thinking skill essential for mature understanding and decision-making. Here’s how reflective judgment can be assessed:

• Argument analysis : Tests that present students with arguments on various issues. Students must identify assumptions, analyze logic, and evaluate conclusions, reflecting their ability to make informed judgments.
• Opinion essays : A writing task, like the 30-minute essay in TSA Oxford, requires students to articulate their stance on complex topics. This evaluates their ability to reflect upon and justify their beliefs and decisions.
• Scenario-based questions : These questions place students in hypothetical situations where they must make decisions based on incomplete or conflicting information, testing their ability to form judgments in uncertain conditions.
• Ethical dilemmas : Presenting students with moral quandaries assesses their capacity to navigate gray areas, balance competing values, and arrive at a reasoned position.
• Self-assessment questionnaires : Tools like the anonymous, 22-question assessment can provide insight into students’ self-perception and metacognitive awareness regarding their thought processes.

For instance, a student’s approach to a critical-thinking screening test may involve weighing different perspectives before arriving at a conclusion, demonstrating their ability to think reflectively and judge critically.

Reflective judgment is not only crucial for academic success but also for navigating the complexities of the world. Cultivating this skill through regular practice , such as engagement with critical thinking questions and tackling types of questions under timed conditions, is pivotal in developing well-rounded thinkers.

Assessing Deductive and Inductive Skills

Deductive and inductive reasoning are pivotal cognitive processes in logical thinking and problem-solving. Several well-known tests are available for schools and colleges to assess these skills:

• Law School Admission Test (LSAT) : Recognized for its rigorous logical reasoning sections, the LSAT challenges test-takers to identify logical fallacies and draw conclusions from complex premises, engaging both deductive and inductive reasoning skills.
• Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) : The GRE includes both quantitative and qualitative sections that test a student's ability to reason deductively. The analytical writing section, in particular, requires constructing and evaluating arguments—a core part of inductive reasoning.
• International Critical Thinking Essay Test : Developed by leading experts in critical thinking, this essay test assesses reasoning through writing, demanding students apply both inductive and deductive skills to make and assess arguments.
• Cornell Critical Thinking Tests : Available in different levels for various age groups, these tests are used worldwide to assess students’ deductive and inductive reasoning abilities through multiple-choice questions.
• Raven’s Progressive Matrices : This non-verbal multiple-choice test is designed to measure abstract reasoning, which is closely related to inductive reasoning skills, and is suitable for all age groups.
• Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal : A well-established critical-thinking test used in the corporate and educational sectors to assess the ability of individuals to reason deductively and inductively.
• Medicine and Health Sciences Admissions Test (UMAT/HPAT) : These tests include sections that evaluate logical reasoning and problem-solving, crucial for future professionals in the healthcare field.

Each of these tests presents an array of questions under timed conditions, evaluating a student's quick thinking and logical reasoning capabilities. They are invaluable tools for educators looking to enhance their students' reasoning skills. Schools and colleges can use these tests to prepare students not only for their academic pursuits but also for successful careers that require sharp deductive and inductive reasoning abilities.

Assessing Social and Emotional Thinking

Assessing social and emotional thinking , components of interpersonal intellect, is nuanced. Traditional tests may not capture the full spectrum of these abilities. These skills involve understanding and managing one's emotions, empathy, and navigating social complexities—capabilities that are deeply personal and context-dependent.

The challenge in measuring social and emotional intelligence lies in the subjective nature of emotions and the variability of social interactions . It requires more than a multiple-choice test or a correct answer. Tools like role-playing exercises, peer feedback mechanisms, and reflective journals are often used to provide a more dynamic and authentic assessment environment.

One approach is the use of scenario-based assessments that ask students to interpret emotions, intentions, and social cues within varied contexts. Another is through group projects that offer a window into a student’s interpersonal skills, such as collaboration and conflict resolution.

Despite the difficulties in quantification, the importance of these skills in academic and professional success is undeniable. They contribute significantly to a student’s academic assessment, affecting group dynamics and overall academic performance.

Thinking Skills Assessment Past Paper Questions

Assessments in thinking skills often present students with scenarios that require analysis, inference, and deduction. Here’s how typical questions are structured and their educational purpose:

• Example: "A flat subscription fee for a public library is charged regardless of usage. Arguably, this is unjust as infrequent users pay the same as those who visit daily. A usage-based fee could replace the flat fee, ensuring equity and possibly increasing funding."
• Educational purpose: This task assesses students' ability to understand principles of fairness and equity in civic policies. It invites them to apply this principle to a different context, testing their transfer of knowledge.
• Example: "Student evaluations show an increase in positive feedback on courses each semester, yet there is no correlating evidence of students' enhanced performance in practical applications. It could be inferred that instructors are increasingly better at appealing to student interests rather than improving actual learning."
• Educational purpose: The task tests students’ ability to identify assumptions behind conclusions, a key element of critical thinking. It encourages examination of evidence quality and the potential disconnect between measured success and actual competence.
• Example: "The number of home burglaries is high, yet few homeowners have security systems. If more homeowners installed security systems, burglaries might significantly decrease."
• Educational purpose: This task evaluates students' critical thinking by identifying potential flaws in causal reasoning. It challenges them to consider other factors that may contribute to the problem, evaluating the strength of the argument.

Each question, accompanied by multiple-choice options, is designed to push students to engage with the material critically. Such questions encourage the development of intellectual abilities and metacognitive awareness regarding how arguments and evidence can be interpreted and critiqued.

These questions have a dual purpose. They test specific critical thinking skills, such as evaluation of arguments, and they also promote a deeper understanding of the complexities involved in real-world problems. In doing so, students become better equipped to apply these skills in various academic and professional situations.

Further Reading on Thinking Skills Assessments

Here are five key studies or papers on the efficacy of thinking skills assessments:

• Tschannen-Moran and Hoy (2001) discuss teacher efficacy and its connection to educational outcomes such as instructional behavior and student achievement. This study emphasizes the challenges in measuring teacher efficacy, which indirectly impacts the development and assessment of thinking skills in students.
• Liu, Frankel, and Roohr (2014) delve into the critical thinking skills necessary for college graduates to contribute effectively in the global workforce. Their research reviews definitions, assessments, and challenges related to critical thinking assessment in higher education, highlighting the importance of thinking skills in the admissions process and across universities.
• Muijs, Kyriakides, van der Werf, Creemers, Timperley, and Earl (2014) synthesize evidence from research on effective teaching and teacher development , with an emphasis on teaching for metacognitive and thinking skills. This review supports the use of assessments that measure thinking skills to improve teaching effectiveness and student learning.
• Abrami, Bernard, Borokhovski, Waddington, Wade, and Persson (2015) summarize empirical evidence on instruction's impact on critical thinking skills and dispositions . The findings demonstrate effective strategies for teaching and assessing critical thinking skills in various disciplinary areas, which can inform the admissions process and benchmark scores for secondary education.
• Amua-Sekyi (2016) discusses the influence of assessment on teaching and learning practices in Ghana, highlighting that traditional assessment methods do not effectively promote the cognitive processes and thinking skills desired in schools. This paper calls for a greater recognition of assessment's role in teaching thinking skills, suggesting implications for attainable and common scores in thinking skills assessments .

These studies provide valuable insights into the efficacy of thinking skills assessments and their implications for educational practices, including the admissions process, benchmark scores, and application across universities.

Enhance Learner Outcomes Across Your School

Download an Overview of our Support and Resources

We'll send it over now.

Please fill in the details so we can send over the resources.

What type of school are you?

We'll get you the right resource

Is your school involved in any staff development projects?

Are your colleagues running any research projects or courses?

Do you have any immediate school priorities?

Please check the ones that apply.

Download your resource

Thanks for taking the time to complete this form, submit the form to get the tool.

FlashLearners

Education And Career Blog

9 Interview Questions That Assess Critical Thinking (With Answers)

Modified On Sep 27, 2023

During an interview, employers are likely to ask you questions that test your critical thinking skills. This way, they can assess whether you have the ability to effectively evaluate information and make smart decisions. When answering such questions, you want to provide responses that show you’re an innovative and thoughtful candidate. In this article, we share interview questions to assess critical thinking and sample answers you can use as inspiration.

PAGE CONTENTS

Interview questions with sample answers

Use these sample answers as inspiration when preparing for interview questions that test your critical thinking skills:

How would you present a new idea or technique to your team?

What would you do if a colleague was finding it challenging to understand the data you were presenting, explain your decision-making process., what is the most difficult work-related decision you’ve ever had to make, what would you do if you noticed your supervisor made a mistake, what would you do if you needed to make a decision without complete information, are you open to new concepts and ideas, how does communication help with your critical thinking abilities, share a time you had to use critical thinking to solve a problem..

Your job may require you to teach or present new concepts or skills to your team. Employers may ask this question to learn if you can effectively share information with others. To create an effective answer, think about what ways you learn the best, whether they be visual, audible, reading/writing, or kinesthetic. Find a way to incorporate some of these learning methods into your answer.

Example:   “I find that the most effective way to learn a new idea or technique is through a visual presentation. That’s why when giving a presentation to my team, I would make sure to incorporate graphs, charts, photos, videos, and other visuals. Throughout my experience giving presentations, I’ve noticed that people tend to grasp information better when they have such visuals. It’s a way to capture their interest and get them focused on what I’m saying.”

One important part of critical thinking is to have the ability to come up with multiple solutions to a single problem. This question helps an employer assess if you have this ability. Answer this question by showing that you understand other’s learning styles. Make it evident that you can tailor your teaching style to a colleague’s needs.

Example:   “I would make sure to be patient as my colleague is learning about my data. I understand that they are learning this for the first time and may need help further understanding what I am saying. That’s why the first thing I would do is ask my colleagues what they understand so far. This way, I know what information I need to explain to them in a new way. If simply explaining something is confusing to them, I would try a more visual or hands-on approach. Since everyone has a different learning style, it’s useful to have multiple ways to present information.”

Critical thinking and decision-making are directly related. Employers ask this question to have a better understanding of how you make decisions. In your answer, explain how you make decisions step-by-step. Show that you make smart, thoughtful decisions based on data and information.

Example:   “The first step in my decision-making process is to gather as much information about my decision as possible. I want to make sure I have multiple perspectives and anticipated outcomes about every important decision I make. After looking at all the information, I think about how my decision may impact my team and the company as a whole. Depending on the situation, I may get a second opinion to make sure I have considered all the important factors surrounding my choice.”

READ ALSO: TOP 30 ONLINE FIRE SCIENCE DEGREE PROGRAMS

Certain jobs require you to make challenging decisions. Employers ask this question to make sure you have experience making decisions that require a lot of critical thinking. In your answer, share a time that shows you have this skill set. Explain how you made your decision and what the outcome was.

Example:   “When I was a creative director, I had the important task of deciding who would be our new  graphic designer . This was a challenging decision because this person would work on our top clients’ campaigns. I made this decision by taking my time with the hiring process. I wanted to make sure I properly screened and interviewed each candidate. This process taught me that certain important decisions require a lot of work first. It paid off well since I ended up hiring a very talented designer.”

There may be a time in your career when you need to correct a higher-level employee. Employers ask this question to see if you have the critical thinking skills to determine a professional way to correct your mistake. Through your answer, show that you are ethical enough to correct the mistake and professional enough to do so politely.

Example:   “I would wait until I had an opportunity to discuss their mistake one-on-one. This way, I could kindly explain the mistake they made and what is actually correct. This type of scenario has happened in the past, and the person who made the mistake is always appreciative of discussing the matter privately. This gives them a chance to think of a way to correct their mistake.”

During a fast-paced time in your career, you may need to make a decision quicker than you’d prefer. An employer may ask this question to decide if you can still make good decisions even if you don’t have enough information. In your answer, show that you can work under pressure and make good decisions despite the limitations.

Example:   “Although I prefer to have complete information to make important decisions, I understand that sometimes this isn’t possible. That’s why I would use all the information that I do have and try to figure out the rest based on the context. For instance, if I was making a decision based on an incomplete study, I would try to find similar studies to help me with my decision-making process.”

A big part of critical thinking is being open to new concepts and ideas. Employers ask this question to learn if you’re open-minded and willing to listen to others’ input. Answer this question by explaining how open-mindedness can lead to more creative ideas and innovations. Explain how you have benefited by being open-minded.

Example:   “I do consider myself open-minded. I find that being open to new concepts and ideas is a way to come up with more innovative and creative solutions. For instance, at my last job, I often consulted the interns to gain a new perspective. I often found that they came up with some of the most unique ideas.”

Communicating with others can help you think about a problem in new ways. This question helps employers determine if you have strong communication skills. Create a response that shows you are open to collaborating with others to problem-solve. Explain how open communication leads to effective teamwork.

Example:   “I find that communicating a problem or decision with my coworkers helps me think through things better. Even saying something out loud tends to help me with critical thinking. Likewise, hearing other people’s perspectives can help me gain new insights and come up with better solutions.”

Employers ask this question to determine if you’ve actually had to use critical thinking to find a solution. Think of a time you had to deeply think about a problem. Share what your process was with the interviewer.

Example:   “One time my client pushed my team’s deadline up an entire week with only a day’s notice. They were our highest-paying client, so I told them we would find a way to make it work. I had to quickly come up with a solution to fit two week’s worth of work into one week. After meeting with my team, we all decided to divide up the work evenly and hire a contractor to do some of our easier tasks. Effective teamwork and communication made it possible to find a solution.”

I hope you find this article helpful.

About Chinedu

Based in Nigeria's Enugu, I'm a student crafting captivating tales as a writer and igniting sparks as a Motivational Speaker.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

• Table of Contents
• New in this Archive
• Chronological
• Editorial Information
• About the SEP
• Editorial Board
• How to Cite the SEP
• Special Characters
• Support the SEP
• PDFs for SEP Friends
• Make a Donation
• SEPIA for Libraries
• Back to Entry
• Entry Contents
• Entry Bibliography
• Academic Tools
• Friends PDF Preview
• Author and Citation Info
• Back to Top

Supplement to Critical Thinking

How can one assess, for purposes of instruction or research, the degree to which a person possesses the dispositions, skills and knowledge of a critical thinker?

In psychometrics, assessment instruments are judged according to their validity and reliability.

Roughly speaking, an instrument is valid if it measures accurately what it purports to measure, given standard conditions. More precisely, the degree of validity is “the degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of test scores for proposed uses of tests” (American Educational Research Association 2014: 11). In other words, a test is not valid or invalid in itself. Rather, validity is a property of an interpretation of a given score on a given test for a specified use. Determining the degree of validity of such an interpretation requires collection and integration of the relevant evidence, which may be based on test content, test takers’ response processes, a test’s internal structure, relationship of test scores to other variables, and consequences of the interpretation (American Educational Research Association 2014: 13–21). Criterion-related evidence consists of correlations between scores on the test and performance on another test of the same construct; its weight depends on how well supported is the assumption that the other test can be used as a criterion. Content-related evidence is evidence that the test covers the full range of abilities that it claims to test. Construct-related evidence is evidence that a correct answer reflects good performance of the kind being measured and an incorrect answer reflects poor performance.

An instrument is reliable if it consistently produces the same result, whether across different forms of the same test (parallel-forms reliability), across different items (internal consistency), across different administrations to the same person (test-retest reliability), or across ratings of the same answer by different people (inter-rater reliability). Internal consistency should be expected only if the instrument purports to measure a single undifferentiated construct, and thus should not be expected of a test that measures a suite of critical thinking dispositions or critical thinking abilities, assuming that some people are better in some of the respects measured than in others (for example, very willing to inquire but rather closed-minded). Otherwise, reliability is a necessary but not a sufficient condition of validity; a standard example of a reliable instrument that is not valid is a bathroom scale that consistently under-reports a person’s weight.

Assessing dispositions is difficult if one uses a multiple-choice format with known adverse consequences of a low score. It is pretty easy to tell what answer to the question “How open-minded are you?” will get the highest score and to give that answer, even if one knows that the answer is incorrect. If an item probes less directly for a critical thinking disposition, for example by asking how often the test taker pays close attention to views with which the test taker disagrees, the answer may differ from reality because of self-deception or simple lack of awareness of one’s personal thinking style, and its interpretation is problematic, even if factor analysis enables one to identify a distinct factor measured by a group of questions that includes this one (Ennis 1996). Nevertheless, Facione, Sánchez, and Facione (1994) used this approach to develop the California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory (CCTDI). They began with 225 statements expressive of a disposition towards or away from critical thinking (using the long list of dispositions in Facione 1990a), validated the statements with talk-aloud and conversational strategies in focus groups to determine whether people in the target population understood the items in the way intended, administered a pilot version of the test with 150 items, and eliminated items that failed to discriminate among test takers or were inversely correlated with overall results or added little refinement to overall scores (Facione 2000). They used item analysis and factor analysis to group the measured dispositions into seven broad constructs: open-mindedness, analyticity, cognitive maturity, truth-seeking, systematicity, inquisitiveness, and self-confidence (Facione, Sánchez, and Facione 1994). The resulting test consists of 75 agree-disagree statements and takes 20 minutes to administer. A repeated disturbing finding is that North American students taking the test tend to score low on the truth-seeking sub-scale (on which a low score results from agreeing to such statements as the following: “To get people to agree with me I would give any reason that worked”. “Everyone always argues from their own self-interest, including me”. “If there are four reasons in favor and one against, I’ll go with the four”.) Development of the CCTDI made it possible to test whether good critical thinking abilities and good critical thinking dispositions go together, in which case it might be enough to teach one without the other. Facione (2000) reports that administration of the CCTDI and the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST) to almost 8,000 post-secondary students in the United States revealed a statistically significant but weak correlation between total scores on the two tests, and also between paired sub-scores from the two tests. The implication is that both abilities and dispositions need to be taught, that one cannot expect improvement in one to bring with it improvement in the other.

A more direct way of assessing critical thinking dispositions would be to see what people do when put in a situation where the dispositions would reveal themselves. Ennis (1996) reports promising initial work with guided open-ended opportunities to give evidence of dispositions, but no standardized test seems to have emerged from this work. There are however standardized aspect-specific tests of critical thinking dispositions. The Critical Problem Solving Scale (Berman et al. 2001: 518) takes as a measure of the disposition to suspend judgment the number of distinct good aspects attributed to an option judged to be the worst among those generated by the test taker. Stanovich, West and Toplak (2011: 800–810) list tests developed by cognitive psychologists of the following dispositions: resistance to miserly information processing, resistance to myside thinking, absence of irrelevant context effects in decision-making, actively open-minded thinking, valuing reason and truth, tendency to seek information, objective reasoning style, tendency to seek consistency, sense of self-efficacy, prudent discounting of the future, self-control skills, and emotional regulation.

It is easier to measure critical thinking skills or abilities than to measure dispositions. The following eight currently available standardized tests purport to measure them: the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (Watson & Glaser 1980a, 1980b, 1994), the Cornell Critical Thinking Tests Level X and Level Z (Ennis & Millman 1971; Ennis, Millman, & Tomko 1985, 2005), the Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test (Ennis & Weir 1985), the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (Facione 1990b, 1992), the Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment (Halpern 2016), the Critical Thinking Assessment Test (Center for Assessment & Improvement of Learning 2017), the Collegiate Learning Assessment (Council for Aid to Education 2017), the HEIghten Critical Thinking Assessment (https://territorium.com/heighten/), and a suite of critical thinking assessments for different groups and purposes offered by Insight Assessment (https://www.insightassessment.com/products). The Critical Thinking Assessment Test (CAT) is unique among them in being designed for use by college faculty to help them improve their development of students’ critical thinking skills (Haynes et al. 2015; Haynes & Stein 2021). Also, for some years the United Kingdom body OCR (Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations) awarded AS and A Level certificates in critical thinking on the basis of an examination (OCR 2011). Many of these standardized tests have received scholarly evaluations at the hands of, among others, Ennis (1958), McPeck (1981), Norris and Ennis (1989), Fisher and Scriven (1997), Possin (2008, 2013a, 2013b, 2013c, 2014, 2020) and Hatcher and Possin (2021). Their evaluations provide a useful set of criteria that such tests ideally should meet, as does the description by Ennis (1984) of problems in testing for competence in critical thinking: the soundness of multiple-choice items, the clarity and soundness of instructions to test takers, the information and mental processing used in selecting an answer to a multiple-choice item, the role of background beliefs and ideological commitments in selecting an answer to a multiple-choice item, the tenability of a test’s underlying conception of critical thinking and its component abilities, the set of abilities that the test manual claims are covered by the test, the extent to which the test actually covers these abilities, the appropriateness of the weighting given to various abilities in the scoring system, the accuracy and intellectual honesty of the test manual, the interest of the test to the target population of test takers, the scope for guessing, the scope for choosing a keyed answer by being test-wise, precautions against cheating in the administration of the test, clarity and soundness of materials for training essay graders, inter-rater reliability in grading essays, and clarity and soundness of advance guidance to test takers on what is required in an essay. Rear (2019) has challenged the use of standardized tests of critical thinking as a way to measure educational outcomes, on the grounds that  they (1) fail to take into account disputes about conceptions of critical thinking, (2) are not completely valid or reliable, and (3) fail to evaluate skills used in real academic tasks. He proposes instead assessments based on discipline-specific content.

There are also aspect-specific standardized tests of critical thinking abilities. Stanovich, West and Toplak (2011: 800–810) list tests of probabilistic reasoning, insights into qualitative decision theory, knowledge of scientific reasoning, knowledge of rules of logical consistency and validity, and economic thinking. They also list instruments that probe for irrational thinking, such as superstitious thinking, belief in the superiority of intuition, over-reliance on folk wisdom and folk psychology, belief in “special” expertise, financial misconceptions, overestimation of one’s introspective powers, dysfunctional beliefs, and a notion of self that encourages egocentric processing. They regard these tests along with the previously mentioned tests of critical thinking dispositions as the building blocks for a comprehensive test of rationality, whose development (they write) may be logistically difficult and would require millions of dollars.

A superb example of assessment of an aspect of critical thinking ability is the Test on Appraising Observations (Norris & King 1983, 1985, 1990a, 1990b), which was designed for classroom administration to senior high school students. The test focuses entirely on the ability to appraise observation statements and in particular on the ability to determine in a specified context which of two statements there is more reason to believe. According to the test manual (Norris & King 1985, 1990b), a person’s score on the multiple-choice version of the test, which is the number of items that are answered correctly, can justifiably be given either a criterion-referenced or a norm-referenced interpretation.

On a criterion-referenced interpretation, those who do well on the test have a firm grasp of the principles for appraising observation statements, and those who do poorly have a weak grasp of them. This interpretation can be justified by the content of the test and the way it was developed, which incorporated a method of controlling for background beliefs articulated and defended by Norris (1985). Norris and King synthesized from judicial practice, psychological research and common-sense psychology 31 principles for appraising observation statements, in the form of empirical generalizations about tendencies, such as the principle that observation statements tend to be more believable than inferences based on them (Norris & King 1984). They constructed items in which exactly one of the 31 principles determined which of two statements was more believable. Using a carefully constructed protocol, they interviewed about 100 students who responded to these items in order to determine the thinking that led them to choose the answers they did (Norris & King 1984). In several iterations of the test, they adjusted items so that selection of the correct answer generally reflected good thinking and selection of an incorrect answer reflected poor thinking. Thus they have good evidence that good performance on the test is due to good thinking about observation statements and that poor performance is due to poor thinking about observation statements. Collectively, the 50 items on the final version of the test require application of 29 of the 31 principles for appraising observation statements, with 13 principles tested by one item, 12 by two items, three by three items, and one by four items. Thus there is comprehensive coverage of the principles for appraising observation statements. Fisher and Scriven (1997: 135–136) judge the items to be well worked and sound, with one exception. The test is clearly written at a grade 6 reading level, meaning that poor performance cannot be attributed to difficulties in reading comprehension by the intended adolescent test takers. The stories that frame the items are realistic, and are engaging enough to stimulate test takers’ interest. Thus the most plausible explanation of a given score on the test is that it reflects roughly the degree to which the test taker can apply principles for appraising observations in real situations. In other words, there is good justification of the proposed interpretation that those who do well on the test have a firm grasp of the principles for appraising observation statements and those who do poorly have a weak grasp of them.

To get norms for performance on the test, Norris and King arranged for seven groups of high school students in different types of communities and with different levels of academic ability to take the test. The test manual includes percentiles, means, and standard deviations for each of these seven groups. These norms allow teachers to compare the performance of their class on the test to that of a similar group of students.

Copyright © 2022 by David Hitchcock < hitchckd @ mcmaster . ca >

• Accessibility

Support SEP

Mirror sites.

View this site from another server:

• Info about mirror sites

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is copyright © 2023 by The Metaphysics Research Lab , Department of Philosophy, Stanford University

Library of Congress Catalog Data: ISSN 1095-5054