a3 problem solving method

• Guide: A3 Problem Solving

• June 13, 2023
• Learn Lean Sigma

Problem-solving is one of the key tools a successful business needs to structure improvements and one I have been using to solve problems in a structured way in my career are Continental AG and other businesses over the years. When there is a problem in business that is leading to increased costs, waste , quality issues, etc., it is necessary to address these problems. A3 structured problem solving is a Lean Six Sigma methodology that has been designed and developed to support continuous improvement and solve complex business problems in a logical and structured process. 

The guide will give you a full understanding of what A3 Problem solving is and a breakdown of all the steps of how to apply it within your business with an example of where I have made improvements with it previously.

Table of Contents

Importance of a3 in lean management.

The A3 problem-solving method is a key tool in Lean Six Sigma and continuous improvement in business, and in my experience, it is often the standard approach all improvement activities must follow and is particularly popular in the automotive industry. This is because of the following:

Focus on Root Causes : Rather than applying a quick fix to a problem or jumping to conclusions and solutionizing, A3 requires gaining a deep understanding of the root causes of the problem. By addressing these root causes, the chances of recurrence is reduced.

Standardization : With a consistent format, the A3 process ensures that problems are approached in a standardized way, regardless of the team or department. This standardization creates a common language and understanding across the organization and ensures all problems are addressed to the same standard and approach.

Team Involvement : An A3 isn’t an individual process. It requires a cross-functional team to work together on problem-solving, ensuring that a range of perspectives and expertise is considered. This collective approach builds a stronger understanding of the problem and ensures that solutions are well-rounded and robust.

Visual Storytelling : The A3 report serves as a visual storyboard, making it easier for stakeholders at all levels to understand the problem, the analysis, and the countermeasures. This visualization enhances communication and drives alignment.

The 6 Steps of A3 Problem Solving (With Real Example)

The A3 problem-solving process can initially seem difficult if you have never done one before and particularly if you have never been a team member in one. To help you with this we will break down the 6 steps into manageable activities, followed by a real-life example to help you apply this method within your business.

As a side note, the A3 problem-solving process was actually one of the first Lean Six Sigma tools I learned to use three weeks into my continuous improvement career after being thrown into the deep end due to resource availability, so I can understand how difficult it can be to understand. 

Step 1: Describe the problem

Problem description.

The problem description is an important first step in the process as it ensures a common understanding with the team of what the issue is that needs to be addressed. This can be done by using a technique called the 5W1H Is/Is Not method to help gain a clear understanding of the problem. 

To understand the 5W1H Is/Is Not the Process, check out our guide for details of that technique. However, in short, it’s about asking key questions about the problem, for example, “What IS the problem?” and “What IS NOT the problem?”

Let’s say you have been asked to look into a problem where “Machine downtime on the automotive assembly line has increased by 30% over the past three months, leading to production delays and increased costs.”

An example of a 5W1H Is/Is Not on this may result in the following output:

 Based on this we can create a clear problem description as the focus of the project that give the team a clear and common understanding of the issue looking to be resolved in the next steps of the process. The problem description could then be written as:

“Over the past three months, machine downtime on Automotive Assembly Line No.3 has increased by 30%. This has predominantly affected the assembly line workers and leads, leading to production delays and higher labor costs. “

Current Condition

Next is demonstrating the current condition and demonstrating the impact on the business. This can often be done with data and charts to back up the problem that might show trends or changes in outputs.

This might look something like the below and demonstrate a good baseline for confirming the improvement at the end of the A3

Containment Actions

Next is containment actions. Since you have identified a problem, there is likely an impact on the business or the customer. As a team, you should consider what can be done to limit or eliminate this problem in the short term. Remember this is just a containment action and should not be seen as a long-term fix. 

In our situation we decided to “Implement temporary overtime shifts to meet production goals, leading to an increase in labor costs.”

At this stage, the A3 should look similar to the one below; you can use charts and graphics to represent the current state as well if they fit within the limit area. Remember, we must include the content of the A3 within the 1-page A3 Document.

Step 2: Set the A3 Goals

The next step of the A3 is to, as a team, set the goal for the project. As we have a clear understanding of the current condition of the problem, we can use that as our baseline for improvement and set a realistic target for improvement. 

A suggested method for setting the Target condition would be to use the SMART Target method.

If you are not familiar with SMART Targets , read our guide; it will cover the topic in much more detail. In short, a SMART target creates a goal statement that is specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound. 

By doing this you make it very clear what the goal of the project is, how it will be measured, it is something that can be achived, relevant to the needs of the business and has a deadline for when results need to be seen.

For our A3 we decided that the goal would be “Our goal is to achieve at least a 20% reduction in machine downtime on Automotive Assembly Line No.3, lowering it from 90 minutes to no more than 72 minutes per day per machine, within the next 60 days. This reduction is crucial for increasing productivity and reducing labor costs, aligning with our overall business objectives.”

I also recommend using charts in this section to visualize the benefit or improvement to ensure you have stakeholder and sponsor support. Visuals are much easier and faster for people to understand.

At this point, your A3 might look something like the one below, with the first 1/4 or section complete. The next step is to move on to the root cause analysis to get to the root of the problem and ensure the improvement does not focus on addressing the symptoms of the problem.

Step 3: Root Cause Analysis

Root cause analysis is the next step in the process, often referred to as gap analysis, as this step focuses on how to get to the goal condition from the current condition.

Tip: If at this point you find the team going off-topic and focusing on other issues, Ask the question, “Is this preventing us from hitting our goal statement?”  I have found this very useful for keeping on track in my time as an A3 facilitator.

For root cause analysis, a couple of key tools are usually used: a fishbone diagram and a five-why Analysis . Again, we won’t go into the full details of these tools within this guide, as they have been covered in extensive detail in their own guides.

But the aim at this point is as a team, to brainstorm what is preventing us from achieving our target condition. This is done by allowing all members of the team to input the reasons they think it is not being achieved. These inputs are often written on sticky notes and placed on the fishbone diagram. Following this, you may have results similar to the ones below.  Note: it is important that the inputs are specific so they can be understood. e.g. “Calibration” alone is not specific to how it’s causing the problem; specify it with “Calibration: Inaccurate measurements affecting machine settings.”

After the fishbone diagram has been populated and the team has exhausted all ideas, the team should then vote on the most likely cause to explore with a 5 Whys analysis. This is done because, due to resource limitations, it is unlikely all of the suggestions can be explored and actioned.

In this situation the team decided the “lack of preventative machines: machines not being serviced regularly” was the cause of increased downtime. This was explored with the 5 Whys to get to the root cause of why Assembly line 3 did not have preventative maintenance implemented.

The result of this root cause analysis can be seen below, and you may end up with more ideas on the fishbone, as generally there are a lot of ideas generated by a diverse team during brainstorming.

Step 4: Solutions and Corrective Actions

Now that we understand what the root cause of the problem is, we need to address it with solutions and corrective actions. Again, as a team, consider the root cause of the problem and discuss what actions need to be taken by the team, who will do them, and when they will be done. The result should be an action plan, for example, like the one below:

This action plan needs to be carried out and implemented.

The result of this section will likely just be an action list and look like the below section.

Step 5: Validate Solution and Standardize

Within step 5 it is time to collect data to validate and confirm the actions that have been implement resulted in solving the problem and met the target state of the problem. This is done by continuing to collect data that demonstrated the problem in the baseline to see if the problem is being reduced.

For example, below, the project team continued to collect Assembly Line 3 downtime data on a weekly basis. Initially, there was a steady reduction, likely due to the focus of the project on the problem, which had some impact. However, once the majority of the action was implemented, a huge drop in product downtime was seen, exceeding the target. This showed the actions has been successful

If, in the validation stage, you find that the improvement required is not being made, you should go back to step 3 and reconsult the root cause analysis with the team, pick another area to focus on, and create an action plan for that following the same steps.

Step 6: Preventive Actions and Lessons Learned

In step 6 after the confirmation of project sucess you should look at preventive actions and lessons learned to be shared from this project:

• Preventive Action: The new preventive maintenance schedule will be standardized across all assembly lines. This will prevent other lines having similar issues and make further improvements
• Lessons Learned: A formal review will be conducted to document the process, including challenges faced and how they were overcome, which will then be archived for future reference.

In our project, this looked like the below and will be used as a reference point in the future for similar issues. 

And that is the successful completion of a structured A3 problem-solving technique.

The complete A3 looks like the below image. Yours may slightly differ as the problem and information vary between projects.

Downloadable A3 Reporting Template

To support you with your A3 problem solving, you can download our free A3 problem solving report from the template section of the website.

Problem-solving is important in businesses, specifically when faced with increased costs or quality issues. A3 Structured Problem Solving, rooted in Lean Six Sigma, addresses complex business challenges systematically.

Originally from Toyota’s lean methodology, A3, named after the 11″x17″ paper size, visually maps problem-solving processes. This method ensures concise communication and focuses on crucial details, as illustrated by the provided example.

Emphasized in Lean Management, A3 stresses understanding root causes, standardization across teams, team collaboration, and visual representation for clarity. This tool is not only a guide to understanding the issue but is a standardized format ensuring robust solutions. Particularly for novices, breaking down its six steps, from problem description to setting A3 goals and root cause analysis, provides clarity. Visual aids further enhance comprehension and alignment across stakeholders.

• Sobek II, D.K. and Jimmerson, C., 2004. A3 reports: tool for process improvement. In  IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings  (p. 1). Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).
• Matthews, D.D., 2018.  The A3 workbook: unlock your problem-solving mind . CRC Press.

Q: What is A3 problem solving?

A: A3 problem solving is a structured approach used to tackle complex problems and find effective solutions. It gets its name from the A3-sized paper that is typically used to document the problem-solving process.

Q: What are the key benefits of using A3 problem solving?

A: A3 problem solving provides several benefits, including improved communication, enhanced teamwork, better problem understanding, increased problem-solving effectiveness, and the development of a culture of continuous improvement.

Q: How does A3 problem solving differ from other problem-solving methods?

A: A3 problem solving emphasizes a systematic and structured approach, focusing on problem understanding, root cause analysis, and the development and implementation of countermeasures. It promotes a holistic view of the problem and encourages collaboration and learning throughout the process.

Q: What are the main steps in the A3 problem-solving process?

A: The A3 problem-solving process typically involves the following steps: problem identification and description, current condition analysis, goal setting, root cause analysis, countermeasure development, implementation planning, action plan execution, and follow-up and evaluation.

Q: What is the purpose of the problem identification and description step?

A: The problem identification and description step is crucial for clarifying the problem, its impact, and the desired outcome. It helps establish a common understanding among the team members and ensures everyone is working towards the same goal.

Daniel Croft

Daniel Croft is a seasoned continuous improvement manager with a Black Belt in Lean Six Sigma. With over 10 years of real-world application experience across diverse sectors, Daniel has a passion for optimizing processes and fostering a culture of efficiency. He's not just a practitioner but also an avid learner, constantly seeking to expand his knowledge. Outside of his professional life, Daniel has a keen Investing, statistics and knowledge-sharing, which led him to create the website learnleansigma.com, a platform dedicated to Lean Six Sigma and process improvement insights.

Free Lean Six Sigma Templates

Improve your Lean Six Sigma projects with our free templates. They're designed to make implementation and management easier, helping you achieve better results.

Other Guides

This page uses JavaScript. Please make sure that JavaScript is enabled in your browser.

• kanban library
• pricing & sign up

Thank you! We have sent you an email with details about your accounts.

• Kanban Guide
• Introduction
• History of Kanban
• Agile Framework
• Kanban Fundamentals
• ⬞ Visualize the Workflow
• ⬞ Limit Work in Progress
• ⬞ Manage Flow
• ⬞ Make Policies Explicit
• ⬞ Improve Continuously
• Kanban Elements
• ⬞ Kanban Method
• ⬞ Kanban Card
• ⬞ Kanban Board
• ⬞ Kanban Software
• ⬞ Personal Kanban
• ⬞ Manufacturing
• ⬞ Business Management
• ⬞ Bottlenecks
• Lean Thinking
• ⬞ Lean & Kanban
• ⬞ Just-In-Time (JIT)
• ⬞ Lean Manufacturing
• ⬞ Theory of Constraints (TOC)
• ⬞ Water Spider
• ⬞ Hoshin Kanri
• ⬞ Toyota Kata
• ⬞ Lean Project Management
• ⬞ Lean Accounting
• Lean Methodology
• ⬞ 5S in Lean
• ⬞ Six Sigma
• ⬞ Gemba Walk
• ⬞ Poka-Yoke
• ⬞ The 5 Whys
• ⬞ Flowcharts
• ⬞ Fishbone Diagram
• ⬞ A3 Problem Solving
• ⬞ SIPOC (COPIS)
• ⬞ Design of Experiments
• Lean Metrics
• ⬞ Cumulative Flow
• ⬞ Cycle Time
• ⬞ Lead Time
• ⬞ Process Throughput
• ⬞ Root Cause Analysis
• ⬞ Takt Time
• Kanban Use Cases

What is A3 Problem Solving?

A3 problem solving is a Lean approach to reporting issues and presenting ways of addressing them. The simple method, developed by Toyota, bases on documenting a problem, together with its current outcome and a suggested change, on a single sheet of A3 paper (420x297mm), giving it the name. You can use it to make a process change proposal, report on project status, or solve a problem.

A3 takes from the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle . Though it appears to be a step-by-step process, the method tends to be used iteratively, with the problem and solution sections being cyclically updated.

Taiichi Ōno of Toyota was known for not appreciating reports longer than one page, which helped the proliferation of the A3 approach within the automotive giant’s offices. A3 is similar to the 8D report also widespread in the automotive industry, though typically for complaints management. Furthermore, the ability to quickly discern a problem and understand its solution is innate to Lean values.

Lean emphasizes visualization, with examples in value stream mapping and Kanban’s visual workflows. That made a single-page report presenting what is going on was a welcome addition to a Lean operation.

Through shared use of A3s to solve all problems and plan initiatives, companies can start to operate an A3 system thinking methodology: address difficulties, suggest change, innovate, and curate logical reasoning rooted in the current needs.

Why use the A3 approach to solving problems?

Lean provides a competitive advantage, strategic and operational benefits through its objective to increase the value delivered to the customer and to reduce waste. Engaging in a process that allows the team to find the correct, best solution in the shortest possible time is highly beneficial.

Understandably, some reports and proposals must contain extensive amounts of data, and they have their place in a business environment. But imagine the value and advantage that distilling this information to 1 page has. Consider how much faster decisions can be made based on that. Besides the time savings, the opportunity to use the systematic approach of PDCA supplements the problem-solving skills required to propose accurate solutions.

In preparing for battle I have always found that plans are useless, but planning is indispensable. Dwight Eisenhower

It’s the act of planning that is important, as it spells out all known obstacles, visualizes the action plan, and helps to foresee potential outcomes and issues along the way. While documenting your problem on an A3 piece of paper may or may not yield benefits, the act of implementing A3 thinking is what makes the difference.

The benefits of using A3 thinking are:

• Quicker problem solving through logical reasoning and application of a step-by-step, visual process. Demanding a root cause identification ensures that difficulties are dealt with, not just temporarily masked.
• Easier planning thanks to the application of objective, critical thinking promoted by the A3’s structure.
• Team development through repeated use of a structural tool to find root causes of problems and their best solutions. The use of one tool across all company levels also promotes cross-department collaboration and knowledge sharing.
• Company growth A3 reports help maintain and keep company knowledge on record, helping to sustain good operating policies and build a strong growth culture rooted in solving a company’s actual problems, not abstract ideas.

How to create an A3 report?

Step 1: The title

It should focus on the problem you are trying to solve and not the solution you want to convey. Examples of titles are: “Decrease Team Misunderstanding of Task Instructions” or “Reduce Customer Complaints with Product XYZ” .

Step 2: Background

According to the authors of “Understanding A3 Thinking: A Critical Component of Toyota’s PDCA Management System” , one of the main strengths of Toyota is that they place importance on understanding a problem. Rather than rush onto a solution, Toyota takes the time to precisely understand what is going on. The principle of going on a Gemba walk attests to this need to perceive problems first-hand.

The report’s background section conveys important related facts and how the problem aligns with the company’s strategic objectives. Presenting this right there on the page helps minimize the cost that a board of highly paid executives would need to spend looking at a problem, without a guarantee of them understanding it, nor coming up with the right solution. Consider this checklist for your background section:

• Do I know the needs of my report’s audience?
• Have I provided enough context?
• Does what it presents align with the audience’s strategic goals?
• Can the background be explained in 30 seconds?

Step 3: Current condition

A correct definition and a good understanding of the problem is your path to finding the right solution. That makes working on defining the current condition 90 % of the A3 effort.

The objective here is to make sure everyone is aware of the problem, whether the report documents it appropriately, and whether anyone questions the report’s findings. The use of graphs, charts, or other visual aids is beneficial.

Step 4: Goal

Your target - if you hit it, you know that your problem-solving effort has been a success. But you need to know what metrics will measure success and what the definition of success is. An example could be “reducing customer complaints by 15%, as measured by call center statistics” .

Step 5: The root cause

The focus of the root cause section should be to differentiate between facts and opinions regarding a problem’s cause and effect. You can include your findings from 5 Whys exercises , an Ishikawa diagram , or any other result of your RCA efforts . If the root cause is not defined correctly, the problem will likely resurface, causing waste and negating the Lean principles.

Step 6: Countermeasures

The countermeasures should be the corrective actions to take for the root cause of the problem to be resolved. If not possible - without a process overhaul - you can use containment actions instead to stop the issue from directly impacting the customer. It is OK to address complex problems iteratively, along with the values of continuous improvement .

The section may include a table of the problem causes, actions taken, action owners, and the achieved results.

Step 7: Effect confirmation

Since the A3 exercise bases on the PDCA cycle, this section of your report should show the effort you expended to confirm your findings. The proof that you have indeed solved the problem. For example, software engineers include samples that replicate the bugs and verify they are no longer present after a fix.

If the exercise has not taken place yet, i.e., when you’re presenting a plan to gain approval, you should outline what exercises you will conduct to check if the aim is successful.

Step 8: Follow up actions

The final section should include any other actions that you might want to consider. A principle worth adhering to here is the “Shitsuke - sustain” step of the 5S plan . Consider what you should do to ensure the benefits of this exercise are maintained. And could they possibly be translated to other areas of the company?

An A3 problem-solving report will help you deliver information in a way that provides instant value and can quickly reduce waste.

The most important thing to remember is that the act of Lean problem solving is more important than creating an A3 document that may contain no valid data and be simply a tick on some corporate checklist.

The same is true of all Lean methods and tools - their application alone will not make your company Lean. To truly implement Lean principles, your company culture, thinking, and planning all have to transform.

Did you know?

A low-risk, tiny step in attempting a culture change in a company could be getting the teams to collaborate on digital Kanban Tool ® boards. Their WIP limits monitoring and process visualization stand a chance to slowly change people’s way of thinking towards more Lean patterns. Please enter valid URL This name is not available Please enter valid email address

Did you like this article?

Anything to change or improve - let us know.

Further reading

• Understanding A3 Thinking: A Critical Component of Toyota’s PDCA Management System (BOOK)
• Kanban Tool
• Pricing & sign up
• Kanban Tool On-Site
• Kanban Library
• Kanban Tool Support
• Integrations
• Developer API
• Terms of service
• Privacy policy

© 2009-2024 Kanban Tool ® by Shore Labs . All rights reserved. | All other trademarks, logos and images mentioned on this site belong to their respective owners. | We use cookies on our website.

Kanban Tool is a visual management solution that helps companies visualize workflow, track project progress, and analyze and significantly improve business processes. Kanban Tool provides powerful online Kanban boards with seamless time tracking and insightful analytics. Our Kanban software works perfectly in any business process and is designed for teams that want to visualize work on a Kanban board .

• Consultancy
• Online Courses

SIGN UP TODAY

• Lean , Lean Culture , Lean Training , Lean Wiki , Tools

A Deep Dive into the A3 Problem-Solving Approach

• 11 mins to read
• June 20, 2023
• By Reagan Pannell

In today’s fast-paced and fiercely competitive business world, organisations must find ways to continuously adapt, evolve, and excel. Amidst the myriad methods and techniques for achieving improvements and driving continuous improvement, few have proven as profound and transformative as Toyota’s A3 problem-solving approach. 

A significant driving force behind the company’s rise to global prominence, the A3 process fosters a culture where problems are embraced as opportunities for growth and learning. In this article, we’ll explore the origins and underlying principles of the A3 approach and uncover the secrets to its success in unlocking the power of improvements.

Understanding the A3 Approach

The A3 methodology is an integral part of the Toyota Production System (TPS), a set of principles and practices that have shaped the company’s approach to manufacturing, management, and continuous improvement over the years. Named after the A3 sheet of paper that was historically used to capture the plan, analysis, and follow-up on a single page, the A3 process represents a simple, yet powerful, tool for addressing complex challenges and discovering lasting solutions.

At its core, the A3 approach is rooted in three key elements:

1. Thorough problem analysis: The foundation of the A3 process lies in digging deep to diagnose the true nature and root cause of an issue, rather than jumping to hastily devised fixes that merely address symptoms.

2. Structured documentation: The A3 report serves as both a communication tool and an iterative planning device, with each section building on the previous ones to guide problem solvers through a comprehensive analysis, solution development, and execution process. It’s the foundation of good continuous improvement.

3. Cyclical learning and improvement: Leadership and employees alike are encouraged to commit to hypothesis-driven inquiry, observation, experimentation, and reflection, leading to a culture that actively seeks and leverages opportunities for growth by solving problems.

How to Implement the A3 Process in Your Organisation

The Lean Thinking A3 approach can be distilled into seven essential steps:

1. Identify the problem: 

Clearly articulate and define the issue at hand, avoiding the temptation to jump to solutions or assume important facts to be self-evident..

When identifying the problem, it is important to ensure that all relevant stakeholders in the organisation are consulted. This helps to ensure that the issue is accurately described and understood from multiple perspectives. A thorough problem analysis should also include conducting research into possible causes or root issues, and clearly documenting any observed symptoms of the problem. Additionally, it is essential to identify any major risks associated with not finding a solution and recognise any constraints (both external and internal) that may exist which could limit potential solutions. Lastly, it is important to consider any potential opportunities which may arise from addressing the issue that may have been overlooked at first glance. This is the problem statement part which is a critical component that identifies the difference between the current condition and the target condition.

At this stage, we are not looking at how to solve problems being faced or at the potential solution to solving problems. It’s about developing a good understanding of how the actual results differ from the expected results and providing an in-depth systematic approach to process improvement and developing problem-solving skills.

2. Establish the context and background: 

Provide a high-level overview of the problem, describing the stakeholders involved, relevant data, and the broader organisational context in which the challenge has arisen..

It is important to ensure that all stakeholders are properly considered when identifying any potential solutions as their perspectives can play a vital role in determining an effective solution. All related data should be thoroughly analysed to understand the full scope of potential solutions. This includes resources, costs, timelines, and any legal or regulatory issues that may need to be considered. Additionally, it is important to consider how well-proposed solutions fit within existing organisational policies and procedures as this could impact implementation success. Finally, understanding how proposed solutions would interact with other initiatives or processes currently taking place in the organisation can help inform decisions about whether or not they are viable options. It may include conducting some value stream mapping to dig deeper into the current state.

It is important to fully explore any underlying factors that may be contributing to the issue at hand and ensure in-depth problem analysis. This includes looking deeper into existing systems, structures, and processes related to the problem in order to identify potential areas of improvement or optimisation. Additionally, it is essential to consider any relevant industry trends or external influences that could impact how the problem manifests within the organisation.

When analysing a problem, collecting data from various sources is important to get a more comprehensive understanding of how a particular issue can be addressed. This includes mapping the current process using the VSM, SIPOC, Process Mapping or Flowcharting techniques. Additionally, interviews and surveys can be conducted with stakeholders to gain insights into how they perceive the issue and their perspectives on potential solutions. Lastly, it is important to observe any real-world activities related to the problem to uncover key areas where time, effort, resources, money etc is being wasted. This is the time improvement that may not have been identified otherwise.

GB MASTERCLASS COURSE

Get access to our free gb mastercourse classes, free course previews.

Fundamentals of Lean

Ready to start your journey into the world of Lean with this free course?

FREE COURSE

Lean Thinking

A Lean focused continious improvement certification course

LSS Yellow Belt

Propel your career forward, tackle complex problems and drive change

LEAN SIX SIGMA GREEN BELT

Get 3-days free access to our green belt course, accelerate your career.

3. Set a Goal:

Now that you have identified the problem and outlined the relevant context, it is time to set a project goal or outcome..

This involves clearly articulating the desired state of affairs and any key deliverables of the proposed solution. Whether it is reducing operational costs, increasing efficiency, improving customer experience, or something else entirely – defining specific objectives with measurable metrics can help ensure that project teams stay focused and remain aligned on their ultimate destination.

At this stage, it is also important to consider how long it will take to reach the desired outcome. Establishing an implementation timeline will help safeguard progress and provide a framework for tracking results along the way. Setting milestones for achieving particular goals at certain points in time can be especially helpful in keeping teams accountable throughout the process. Additionally, having a plan for evaluating success after reaching the end target will allow stakeholders to gain further insights into how effective their approach has been in addressing underlying problems, as well as how well-proposed solutions have fared once implemented.

4. Investigate root causes:

Use a variety of techniques (e.g., the 5 whys, fishbone diagrams, pareto charts) to probe the problem’s underlying causes and avoid settling on proximate reasons..

The process of identifying root causes is essential when using data-driven tools. We always want to find the simplest root cause approach.

One of the most widely used methods for root cause analysis is the ‘5 Whys’ technique. This method involves asking a series of ‘why’ questions to determine the underlying cause of a particular symptom or issue. The goal is to keep asking “Why?” until you reach an answer that can provide insight into how to address the problem and prevent it from occurring in the future.

Another commonly used tool for root cause analysis is the fishbone diagram (also known as Ishikawa diagrams). This approach involves visualising all potential causes which could be causing a symptom or issue in a logical format, allowing users to identify patterns and uncover links between root causes and their respective effects. This technique can be helpful in identifying and focusing on key areas for improvement, as well as helping to identify interdependencies between components within an organisation’s systems.

Finally, Pareto Charts are useful for analysing data collected from surveys, interviews, observations, etc., concerning the severity or frequency of occurrence. This type of chart helps users quickly identify which factors are contributing most significantly towards an issue, allowing them to focus resources towards addressing those areas first and foremost. Additionally, Pareto charts can also be used to prioritise different solutions based on their estimated effectiveness in addressing an issue.

In conclusion, understanding the root cause of an issue through rigorous techniques such as 5 Whys, fishbone diagrams, and Pareto charts provides invaluable insight into how best to address it effectively while preventing it from reoccurring in the future. By leveraging these tools along with other data-led approaches such as process mapping and flowcharting, organisations can ensure that any proposed solutions are well-informed by both qualitative and quantitative data sources as well as ensure they are building consensus across the entire organisation.

5. Countermeasures:

Identify the right countermeasures (corrective actions) to implement that will directly impact the root causes identified..

Brainstorming is a useful tool for identifying potential improvements. It involves coming up with ideas and solutions in an open and collaborative manner, without judgement or criticism. By allowing team members to share their thoughts freely, brainstorming can help uncover innovative solutions that may have otherwise gone unnoticed. Additionally, looking at how waste reduction, flow and pull can be used to improve processes can also provide valuable insights into where improvement opportunities lie.

Brainstorm potential solutions that directly target the root causes and create detailed action plans for implementation, complete with assigned roles, responsibilities, and timelines.

Once the countermeasures are identified, it is important to design an implementation plan and assign roles & responsibilities. This will help ensure that all stakeholders understand their part in the implementation and can work together to achieve the desired outcome. Additionally, it is important to track progress along the way – setting measurable milestones that can be tracked against goals established during the initial problem-solving phase will help keep teams accountable and allow for course corrections if needed.

By utilising A3 Problem Solving Tools such as a template, organisations can easily document and share their analyses with relevant stakeholders throughout each stage of the project. Having detailed record-keeping like this also helps teams stay on target over time while providing insights into how proposed solutions may need to be re-evaluated down the line. This implementation plan provides the entire organisation with a clear project status on a one-page report.

6. Evaluate the results:

Measure the impact of your countermeasures against the problem, using well-defined success criteria, key performance indicators, or other relevant metrics..

Once the countermeasures have been implemented, it is essential to measure and evaluate their success. This can be done by tracking performance against the initial objectives established during the goal phase, as well as establishing key performance indicators to gauge how well the proposed solutions have fared.

Additionally, stakeholders should also consider conducting a post-implementation evaluation in order to assess how successful their approach has been in addressing underlying issues and determining what lessons can be learned from the experience. This will enable teams to identify strengths and weaknesses within their existing processes and make any necessary adjustments going forward. By understanding the outcomes of their improvements, organisations are able to gain valuable insights into how well they’ve succeeded in achieving their goals and ensure continued success moving forward.

Once the countermeasures have been implemented and their success measured, it is important to compare the results against the initial objective. This can be done in a variety of ways, including graphical analysis such as charts, process maps or flow diagrams. Graphical analysis helps to visualise the differences between results achieved before and after the implementation of new measures in a meaningful way. It also provides an increased level of clarity when assessing whether the desired outcomes have been achieved or not.

Process maps can be useful in understanding how changes made during the improvement phase have impacted processes within an organisation. By mapping out existing processes and then comparing them against those following implementation of countermeasures, teams can easily pinpoint where improvements were made and analyse how they led to improved performance overall.

Charts, on the other hand, enable users to quickly identify trends that may have emerged from data collected during the project. For example, if performance metrics are tracked before and after countermeasures are implemented, users can use charts and graphs to more clearly observe any patterns that may indicate an improvement or regression in performance over time – providing further insights into which areas need further attention or adjustment moving forward.

Finally, dashboard views provide an effective means of displaying results at a glance while highlighting any anomalies that might warrant further investigation. Dashboards allow stakeholders to gain access to important information quickly and easily while also helping them keep track of progress towards goals set out during initial problem-solving phases. Additionally, because dashboards support data visualisation capabilities they offer a highly interactive user experience which can help teams understand underlying trends with greater clarity and precision.

7. Standardise and share:

If a countermeasure proves successful, integrate it into the organisation’s standard operating procedures and share it with other teams as a best practice..

Once the countermeasures have been successfully implemented and measured against the initial objectives, these changes need to be integrated into the organisation’s standard operating procedures (SOPs) and shared with other teams as best practices. This will ensure that any improvements made during the problem-solving phase are consistently applied across all teams within the organisation.

In order to ensure that these improvements become part of the organisation’s long-term strategy, process maps should be updated to reflect the new improved way of working. Process maps provide a visual representation of how workflows are structured within an organisation, and by updating them in line with newly-implemented countermeasures, organisations can ensure that their processes continue to remain up-to-date and efficient moving forward. It may also be necessary to build a follow-up plan if not all tasks are fully completed as well as develop a Lean-focused PDCA cycle to ensure long-term effective collaboration on the solutions that were implemented.

Process documentation should also be updated in order to keep track of changes made during problem-solving. By documenting not just the solutions that were proposed but also why they were proposed, teams can gain valuable insights into their decision-making process which they can leverage for similar future problems.

Furthermore, it is important to update key performance indicators (KPIs) to accurately reflect any progress made during problem-solving. By tracking performance against objectives established before and after countermeasures were implemented, organisations will be able to identify any areas that may still need improvement or require further adjustment going forward. Additionally, tracking KPIs over time will help teams understand whether or not their current strategies are leading them towards meeting their goals in a timely manner or if additional measures may need to be taken in order to achieve desired results more quickly.

Finally, organisations should share successful solutions with other teams in order to promote collaboration and knowledge sharing amongst stakeholders throughout different parts of the business. This will allow for ideas generated through one team’s problem-solving efforts to benefit multiple departments – helping foster creativity and innovation while ensuring that everyone is on board with necessary changes being made throughout the organisation. The last step is key to Toyota’s PDCA management system designed for the entire organisation.

By breaking down the problem-solving process into these seven discrete stages, the A3 method offers practitioners a comprehensive, end-to-end framework for tackling complex challenges and driving improvements in any organisation.

• Visit our Lean Six Sigma Courses

Training the team on A3

To get A3 started, everyone in the entire organisation needs to learn how to use this single-sheet or single-page document. This means training people across all parts of the company so that everyone knows how to use the A3 Problem Solving Tool and A3 template. Training will help make sure that everyone follows a structured approach when using A3.

Getting the organisation fully onboard with A3 Problem Solving is not an easy task and will require a dedicated effort to ensure its successful implementation. To this end, it is important to start with specific areas of the business – whether it be operations, finance or marketing – by setting up targeted training sessions for both operational teams and senior managers. This will help everyone understand how and why A3 is used, as well as the potential benefits it can bring to their business.

Once everyone has mastered the basics of working with an A3 template, companies should look to regularly review and evaluate its effectiveness. This could include setting up quarterly reviews or running workshops where teams discuss successes and areas for improvement when using the A3 tool. Doing this will ensure that any issues are identified early on, allowing the team to quickly adjust accordingly.

At Leanscape, we understand that transitioning to A3 Problem Solving can be a daunting task. With our team of specialists, we can provide your teams with the necessary training and coaching to ensure that they are able to adapt quickly and efficiently. Our comprehensive approach to A3 will equip your team with the knowledge and skills needed to successfully use this powerful tool for improving performance in all areas of your business.

We are committed to helping you develop a culture of continuous improvement within your organisation by teaching best practices and providing guidance through every step of the problem-solving process. Through our specialised training programs, we will help your teams learn how to use the A3 template more effectively, as well as how to interpret data visualisations quickly and accurately – enabling them to take action swiftly when required. Our experienced coaches will also share insights from industry experts on how best to integrate countermeasures into standard operating procedures (SOPs) and process maps, keeping up-to-date with industry trends in order to stay ahead of the competition.

By leveraging Leanscape’s expertise in A3 Problem Solving, you can rest assured knowing that your team is in good hands. Our team is dedicated to providing you with the support needed for successful implementation so that you can achieve sustained performance improvements over time.

100% Free Fundamentals of Lean COURSE

Take our free course.

JOIN FOR FREE

Join our Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt Certification Course

The implementation of A3 Problem Solving provides a comprehensive framework for organisations looking to successfully address complex problems in an efficient and cost-effective manner. By breaking down the problem-solving process into seven distinct stages, users can structure their approach and track the progress of their countermeasures over time.

In order to ensure successful implementation, organisations should dedicate time towards training their teams on how to use the A3 Problem Solving Tool and A3 template. This will give everyone a solid foundation for carrying out future problem-solving activities more effectively, as well as provide insights into the effectiveness of certain countermeasures over time.

Through Leanscape’s specialised training programs, you can ensure that your team is fully equipped with the necessary skills to successfully adopt and incorporate A3 Problem Solving into all areas of your business. Our experienced coaches are committed to helping you develop a culture of continuous improvement within your organisation – providing guidance through every step of the process

Final Thoughts

The A3 approach is an invaluable tool for unlocking the power of improvements within any organisation. By leveraging its structured framework and cyclical learning approach, businesses can remain agile and responsive to ever-changing conditions, allowing them to navigate change more successfully and emerge stronger than ever before. Ultimately, this makes Toyota’s A3 problem-solving process one of the most effective ways to ensure long-term success in today’s fast-paced and competitive market.

Reagan Pannell

Our training courses.

Lean Six Sigma White Belt Course

Lean Thinking Business Course

Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt Course

Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Course

Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Course

Yellow Belt Course

View all courses

Download | learn more, recent articles.

10 Reasons Operational Excellence Deployments Fail

Optimizing Efficiency: Inside the Toyota Production System

Unlocking Operational Excellence: Definitions, Tips, and Strategies for Success

Redefining Automation: Prioritizing Standardization and Optimization

The Vital Role of Successfully Adopting Lean in Driving Operational Improvement

Accelerate Your Professional Growth with Lean Six Sigma Courses

View all articles, green belt course.

Lean Six Sigma Courses

Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Certification Online

Free Lean Six Sigma Certification | Fundamentals of Lean

Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt Online Certification

Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Online Certification

Lean Six Sigma White Belt Online Certification

Other articles.

Delegate Decision Making to the Lowest Level Possible

5 Essential Elements of Operational Learning

12 Best Lean Management Books

ELearning Affiliate Program | Online Business Courses

The 5 Why Problem-Solving Technique | Root Cause Analysis

The Kano Model: A Step-By-Step Guide for Doing a Kano Analysis

03 – Learn to Fail | Principles of Lean

16th June 2023 | 5-Bullet Friday Newsletter from Leanscape

Agile Project Management: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction to Hypothesis Testing

What is the difference between Lean & Six Sigma

Why are project charters important and how to build a project charter

• | lean , lean thinking , problem solving , toolkit , tools

Related Articles

2 Proportion Test: The Basics

An Introduction to the FMEA Model For Risk Management (Failure-Mode-Effect-Analysis)

The Importance of Total Preventative Maintenance (TPM)

Pareto’s Principle: The 80/20 Rule

The benefits of adopting a continuous improvement approach

Lean six sigma online courses.

FREE COURSE | YELLOW BELT | GREEN BELT | BLACK BELT | MASTERCLASS | WORKSHOPS

LSS White Belt

Looking to get your first recognised Lean Six Sigma Certificate

LSS Green Belt

The ultimate fast-track for future leadership

LSS Black Belt

Become an expert in change management and complex problem-solving.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Keep up to date to the latest insights, courses, training, webinars and more. Join our newsletter today.

Consultancy Services

Corporate Training

Articles & Insights

Academy Login

Sign up to our newsletter

Take our FREE Fundamentals of Lean Training

Accelerate your skills & learn more about Lean.

Partners Zone

• A3 Problem-Solving: Thinking & Templates

As a factory manager, you’re already familiar with problem-solving, but how familiar are you with the A3 problem-solving method?

Today, we tell you everything about the A3 problem-solving method and why it can be precisely what you need to get your factory running as smoothly as ever.

Download your A3 problem-solving template

What is A3?

We already stated that the A3 method is a problem-solving method, so let us dig deeper.

A3 refers to the size of the paper you’d normally use to document this problem-solving process.

A3 paper is bigger than your regular A4, measuring roughly 30 by 42 cm in case you were wondering —or if you’re a fan of the imperial system, 11 by 17 inches—

The reason behind using this specific paper size is that it gives you enough space to present all problem-related information clearly and concisely.

This approach is highly structured, following a step-by-step process to help you develop and implement solutions.

What is A3 thinking?

Before the A3 method, we have A3 thinking. This is the heart of this whole problem-solving process.

A3 thinking deals with issues in a structured and logical way, always relying on the principles of continuous improvement. This means you should look at problems from different angles, gathering as much data as possible. Only then you’ll be able to make a truly informed decision.

The key operating principle behind A3 thinking is that the best way to solve a problem is by having an in-depth understanding of the problem and its causes. This is the only way forward to plan, develop, and implement a permanent solution.

How does the A3 problem-solving method work?

Because this is a structured approach to problem-solving, there are a few key steps to follow to implement it right. Let’s take a look:

STEP 1 ― Identify the problem

As with many other problem-solving methods —if not all— the first thing to do is identify the problem that needs solving. 

You can use root cause analysis to make sure you’re tackling the root of the issue and not just fixing the problem at a superficial level.

STEP 2 ― Gather information

Without proper data, your chances of fixing the problem for good are quite slim.

By getting all the information you can through all the sources available —collecting data, conducting surveys, speaking to relevant people involved with the problem— you make sure you have a complete picture of the problem and its magnitude.

This will help you get a comprehensive understanding of the problem, which is key when developing a solution to fix it permanently.

STEP 3 ― Develop a plan

After gathering all the information, you develop a plan to solve the problem.

In this stage, you can hold a brainstorming session, evaluate different options, and select the best approach.

STEP 4 ― Implement the plan

Time to put your plan into action!

A good way to secure success in your problem-solving efforts is to test your solutions before you implement them, adjust anything according to the situation, and monitor your results.

STEP 5 ― Evaluate your results

When you implement your solution, you need to evaluate your results to make sure your plan is working.

The best way to do this is by collecting additional data or analysing production metrics. 

At this stage, you might identify areas for improvement — don’t ignore them, address them.

Advantages of the A3 problem-solving method

Some of the benefits of the A3 method are more obvious than others. Let’s take a look!

Better collaboration — To get the most out of the A3 method, you need to look at your problem from different angles. The best way to do this is by getting several relevant points of view. This improves collaboration and communication across the whole organisation. 

Increased efficiency — Because this approach has a set number of steps, it becomes a predictable process. This means your teams will work more efficiently to solve the issue, as they’ll know what their next steps are. This also means you’ll successfully avoid wasting time or resources on solutions that won’t work.

Improved decision-making — By gathering data and focusing on factual information rather than opinions or gut feelings, you —and your team— will get better at decision-making. This means you’ll leave the guesswork out of your problem-solving process , ensuring your solutions are based on actual, updated data. 

Continuous improvement — This method is a key part of any continuous improvement process. By identifying and solving problems, you can keep improving your operations, products, and services.

How to use an A3 template successfully

To harness the full potential of this method, you can use an A3 template.

A template helps you present information clearly and concisely, making the process way more efficient.

An A3 template typically includes the following sections:

• Background —   Here you write a short overview of the problem. It should include information about when the problem first emerged, how it’s impacting your operations, and what stakeholders are affected
• Current State — In this section, you describe the current state of the problem. This might involve outlining the symptoms, identifying the root cause, and highlighting any contributing factors
• Goal Set — Time to outline your proposed solution to the problem! This might involve identifying specific actions to take, assigning responsibility for those actions, and setting a timeline for completion
• Analysis — Use this section to highlight what problem-solving method you’re using ( the 5 Whys , 8D , A3…) to identify the underlying causes of the problem. This section might also include information about potential solutions
• Suggestions — This is the time and the place to highlight any suggestions for improvement and problem-solving
• Schedule of Touchpoints — Here, you explain which actions are going to happen when, who’s responsible for them, and an estimated completion date.

By using an A3 template, you can ensure a standardised process for problem-solving. This helps everybody work more efficiently.

mlean ® and the A3 problem-solving method

As far as problem-solving methods go, the A3 is quite effective and straightforward.

But we all know paper is hard to keep track of, and big chunks of A3 that are fundamental for your factory’s operations should be stored away safely for future reference.

Our mlean ® Production System (mPS) is the best way to ensure your problem-solving processes are digitally stored, accessible, and readily available when you need them.

Our software creates a knowledge database using the problems you’ve already solved . This makes your operations much more quick and efficient, increasing productivity, boosting continuous improvement processes, and accelerating your growth.

Book a free demo and see for yourself!

Alba Rodriguez

• Industry Trends (26)
• mlean news (21)
• Product (2)
• Standardization (4)
• Strategy (5)

Recent Post

Factory performance: how to level up your game

How delivery impacts your factory’s ability to be competitive

How factory costs affect you and what to do about it

Connect with us

on social media

with any questions

Book a demo

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate.

• Privacy Overview
• Strictly Necessary Cookies
• 3rd Party Cookies
• Cookie Policy

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!

More information about our Cookie Policy

Continuous Improvement Toolkit

Effective Tools for Business and Life!

A3 Thinking: A Structured Approach to Problem Solving

• 5 MINUTES READ

Also known as A3 Problem Solving.

Variants include 8D and CAPA.

A significant part of a leader’s role involves addressing problems as they arise. Various approaches and tools are available to facilitate problem-solving which is the driving force behind continuous improvement. These methods range from the advanced and more complex methodologies like Six Sigma to the simpler and more straightforward A3 thinking approach.

The power of the A3 approach lies in its systematic and structured approach to problem-solving. Although it appears to be a step-by-step process, A3 is built around the PDCA philosophy. It relies on the principle that it is much better to address the real root-cause rather than trying to find a solution. Hence, it’s important not to jump to the solution when solving a problem as it is likely to be less effective.

A3 thinking provides an effective way to bring together many of the problem-solving tools into one place. For example, techniques such as the 5 Whys and fishbone analysis can be used during the ‘Analysis’ stage to help identifying the root causes. Additionally, visual aids and graphs are highly recommended in the A3 report, as they are more effective than text in communicating ideas and providing concise project updates.

A3 thinking involves the practice of consolidating the problem, analysis, countermeasures, and action plan onto a single sheet of paper, commonly an A3-sized sheet. This brief document serves as a summary of the project at hand and is regarded as a valuable storytelling tool for project communication. Utilizing the A3 approach doesn’t require any specialized software or advanced computer skills. You may however use readily available A3 templates , or rely on basic tools such as paper, pencil and an eraser as you will need to erase and rewrite several times.

One of the characteristics of the A3 approach is that it does not get into specific details. Detailed documents are usually attached to the A3 report to prevent overwhelming the reader with an excess of information.

The A3 process is typically structured in multiple stages based on the PDCA model. The primary focus is on developing understanding of the current situation and defining the desired outcome before thinking about the solution. While the exact number of stages may vary depending on the preference of the company, what truly matters is adhering to a structured approach to problem-solving.

A3 Seven Stages Model

An A3 process is often managed by an individual who should own and maintain the A3 report. This individual takes the lead in steering the process, facilitating team involvement, and preparing the A3 report with team input. One of the most common models for A3 thinking is the seven stages model which is described in the following.

1. Background – The first step is to identify the business reason for choosing this problem or opportunity. In this stage, you need to identify the gap in performance and the extent of the problem.

2. Current situation – The purpose of this stage is to document the current state of the problem. You may need to refer to the process map or go to the Gemba to truly understand the current situation.

3. Target – The purpose of this stage is to define the desired future state. Clearly identify the expected benefits from solving the problem, the scope, and the key metrics that will help measure the success of the project.

4. Analysis – The objective of this stage is to conduct an in-depth analysis of the problem and understand why it’s happening. It might involve tools like the 5 Whys and cause-and-effect analysis, as well as advanced statistical methods.

5. Countermeasures – Countermeasures are the actions to be taken to eliminate root causes or reduce their effects. The team should brainstorm and evaluate possible countermeasures based on the analysis conducted earlier.

6. Implementation Plan – To achieve the target, develop a workable plan to implement the countermeasures. Gantt charts are great ways to manage implementation plans very simply and easily. Once the action plan is finalized, the team should begin working on the activities needed to implement the countermeasures.

7. Follow-up – The final stage involves evaluating the implementation of the plan and the results achieved. Follow-up actions are important to ensure the benefits extend beyond the project’s completion.

A3 thinking is considered to be the practical form of the PDCA model.

There are many online templates that can be used to manage your problem-solving efforts. One of the simplest and most straightforward ways is to use this A3 problem solving template .

Wrapping Up

A3 thinking represents a logical and structured approach for problem solving and continuous improvement. This approach can be used for most kinds of problems and in any part of the business. Originating from the Toyota Production System (TPS), it has been adopted by many Lean organizations around the world.

A3 thinking not only provides a systematic approach for problem-solving. The development of a continuous improvement culture is at the core of A3 thinking. It has become one of the most popular Lean tools today where people and teams work together to solve problems, share results and learn from each other.

Other Formats

Do you want to use the slides in your training courses?

A3 Thinking Training Material – $18.85

Related Articles

Project Charter

Gantt Chart

Related Templates

A3 Problem Solving

Written by:

CIToolkit Content Team

Lean Manufacturing Tools

Lean manufacturing tools, techniques and philosophy | lean and related business improvement ideas.

A3 Problem Solving | A3 Root Cause Analysis

Problems are inevitable, no matter how hard we plan and what precautions we take, they will eventually creep up and bite us. Rushing in and trying to fix the problems quickly, however, rarely seems to truly make these problems go away. Often, they come back time after time. The reason for this is that we fail to use a methodical approach to identify the true root causes of the problems and fail to put in a robust fix that will prevent the problem reoccurring.

A3 problem solving is one easy way to put in place a process that will help you to solve problems permanently as well as making improvements to your processes.

What is A3 Problem Solving

As with many things from Toyota, A3 problem solving attempts to make things as simple and as visual as possible. A3 refers to the paper size used for the reporting and all the process is contained within the confines of this single sheet of 11” by 17” paper. Some suggest that the reason for the single piece of paper is down to the rumored refusal of Taiichi Ohno to read any more than a single page of any report.

There is nothing magical or revolutionary about the process either. It simply follows the Deming’s Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle or PDCA. It is also very similar to other processes and layouts that other companies have used over the years such as Ford’s 8D process for problem solving.

The effectiveness of the form however lays more in the attitude of the teams implementing the A3 process than the form itself. Problems are opportunities to improve what you are doing and should never simply be seen as just a “problem”.

A3 problem solving sheets are not going to be a magic wand that you can wave over your problems to solve them. Without a dedicated team to follow the process they are unlikely to help you.

The A3 Problem Solving Process

The A3 root cause analysis process is usually broken down into 7 steps, some break it down into 8 or 9, however the total number of steps and what they are called are not important as long as you follow the idea behind them. The steps follow the PDCA process and take you through a logical step by step route to clearly identify:

• What is the problem
• Why we need to fix it
• What is the actual root cause
• How we will contain the problem in the short term
• Plan how we fix the root cause
• Confirmation that the countermeasures fix the issue
• Changes to standardized work to fix the issue permanently
• Share any changes within the company

Often these steps are broken down under the following headings on the A3 worksheet:

Current Situation

• Targets or Goals

Root Cause Analysis

Countermeasures.

• Implementation Plan

This is what should be considered and detailed within each section:

• What is the actual issue that you are looking to correct?
• How does it impact the business objectives? Why do we need to fix it?

It is always best to take your team to where the problem is occurring to see the problem firsthand. Talking about something in a remote location is never going to be as effective as actually observing at the Gemba (Workplace).

The team should carefully detail the problem. This should cover all relevant information such as how often something happens, when, where, etc. Depending on the complexity of the issue it may be necessary to collect data in the form of graphs and control charts or to conduct process mapping exercises to understand what is happening.

Targets / Goals

What does the team see as the ideal solution to the problem? What are we going to achieve? Your objectives should be clearly stated, and a time frame agreed so that all can agree on what you hope to do through your team.

There are of course many ways that you can arrive at the root cause of your problems depending on the complexity of the problem that you face. The right quality improvement tools should be selected and used from Pareto charts to fishbone diagrams or the 5 whys.

Ensure that your A3 root cause analysis comes up with agreed reasons for your problems. Remember, that there are often multiple causes that may need to be fixed.

Once you have your root cause(s) identified you can get to work to brainstorm the changes that you need to make to fix the problems. Remember that all fixes should aim to achieve the goals that you have identified earlier in the process.

Action Plan

This is your plan of action to fix the problem that you have identified. This plan should be detailed and include what is to be done, who is responsible, and of course when it will be done by. You should also consider the expected outcome from each action so that you will have a clear idea of whether the action has had any effect on your issue.

Once the plan has been detailed it should be implemented effectively by the team.

Too often teams will stop at the plan implementation stage. They make the changes that they have suggested and then fail to check if those actions have been effective. You must verify the effectiveness of your actions to confirm that they have fixed the root causes that you have identified. Otherwise the problems could easily return.

If the changes have not managed to fix the problem, then the process needs to be revisited. The team needs to work through the cycle once again to see what they have missed and to make alternative plans to fix the problems.

Changes should be made permanent if they are found to be effective through changes to standardized work and other procedural documentation.

Teams should also share what they have learned and implemented within the company. Often there is the opportunity to mirror the changes made to prevent issues occurring in other parts of your business.

Why Use A3 Reporting

The A3 reporting format does not have to limited to simply problem solving. Toyota use it for a number of things such as status reports, improvement suggestions and proposals. Other companies have developed similar reports for things such as coaching. Your imagination and business needs are your only limitation.

The A3 lean process is highly flexible and provides you with a highly visible way to communicate everything from your problem solving to continuous improvement initiatives. Used well with trained and dedicated teams it can really make a huge difference to your company.

Related posts:

• Top 50 Lean Tools | Comprehensive List for Lean Manufacturing and Service
• VSM Value Stream Mapping

Post navigation

Leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

CAPTCHA Code *

As I introduced A3 problem solving in my last column, I will now discuss in detail the steps involved with this problem solving approach. Background of A3 Problem Solving A3 problem solving is quite similar to other problem solving approaches which mirror Deming’s Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle. The comparison between A3 problem solving and PDCA is depicted in Table 1. Table 1

Become a PEX Network member and gain exclusive access to our upcoming digital events, industry reports and expert webinars

A3 Problem Solving Steps Using a very simple approach, A3 problem solving is composed of the following seven steps shown below. Step 1: Background In this step, you make the business case for selecting a particular problem for resolution. Upon your selection, clearly state how the problem impacts the strategic business objectives around customers, process, financials, new products, etc. Step 2: Problem Statement Detail the specifics of the problem. These may include the magnitude of the problem, where and when the problem occurred, and the problem’s impact on the business. By defining these specifics on a quantitative scale, you help to bring the problem to life for your organization. Step 3: Goal Statement In this step, state what you are trying to accomplish by initiating the A3 problem solving project. Map out what goals you are trying to achieve and set a timeframe for completing these goals. Step 4: Root Cause Analysis Having fully defined the problem, carry out a root cause analysis to determine the most basic reasons of your problem. Be as thorough as possible. Step 5: Countermeasures With the root causes in place, come up with the countermeasures that you will use to reach your objective in solving the problem. Draw up a detailed plan that outlines who will deploy the countermeasures and when this deployment will be completed. Following the 5WIH structure helps in this step. Step 6: Effect Confirmation Having implemented the countermeasures, look at the results. Determine whether the results indicate that your countermeasures were effective in meeting your objective. Step 7: Follow Up Action Having achieved your results, deploy the infrastructure for sustaining the gains (such as standardization, audits, dashboards and reviews). Make sure that you roll out your findings across the organization, which in Japanese is called yoko-narabi-tenkai , meaning "lateral deployment of findings to other groups." (Click on image to enlarge.) Conclusion A3 problem solving may appear to be a simple seven step approach which helps in solving business problems. However, it is not that simple. It requires the right context and conditions. In a subsequent column, I will share the Dos and Don’ts of A3 problem solving and will show how you can apply its tools to service processes.

Upcoming Events

Embracing digital transformation and process automation in uncertain times.

21 March, 2024 Online

Business Transformation Exchange USA

March 26 - 27, 2024 Austin, Texas

Why digital adoption is pivotal for change management in 2024

27 March, 2024 Online

Implementing Agile in Automotive 2024

16 - 17 April, 2024 Berlin, Germany

All Access: Low Code 2024

April 16 - 17, 2024 Free PEX Network Webinar Series

Insights into action: Methodologies for data strategy success

25 April, 2024 Online

Subscribe to our Free Newsletter

Insights from the world’s foremost thought leaders delivered to your inbox.

Latest Webinars

2024-04-25 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM EDT

2024-03-27 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM EST

2024-03-21 12:00 PM - 01:00 PM EDT

RECOMMENDED

FIND CONTENT BY TYPE

• White Papers
• Press Releases

Process Excellence Network COMMUNITY

• Advertise With Us
• What is Process Excellence
• User Agreement
• Cookie Policy
• PEX Network App
• All Access from PEX Network
• Become a Member Today
• Media Partners

ADVERTISE WITH US

Reach Process Excellence professionals through cost-effective marketing opportunities to deliver your message, position yourself as a thought leader, and introduce new products, techniques and strategies to the market.

JOIN THE Process Excellence Network COMMUNITY

Join Process Excellence Network today and interact with a vibrant network of professionals, keeping up to date with the industry by accessing our wealth of articles, videos, live conferences and more.

Process Excellence Network, a division of IQPC

Careers With IQPC | Contact Us | About Us | Cookie Policy

Become a Member today!

PLEASE ENTER YOUR EMAIL TO JOIN FOR FREE

Already an IQPC Community Member? Sign in Here or Forgot Password Sign up now and get FREE access to our extensive library of reports, infographics, whitepapers, webinars and online events from the world’s foremost thought leaders.

We respect your privacy, by clicking 'Subscribe' you will receive our e-newsletter, including information on Podcasts, Webinars, event discounts, online learning opportunities and agree to our User Agreement. You have the right to object. For further information on how we process and monitor your personal data click here . You can unsubscribe at any time.

• Learn center
• Project management

How to use Toyota’s legendary A3 problem-solving technique

Georgina Guthrie

February 21, 2020

If you came home one day and found your kitchen taps on full-blast and your house full of water, what’s the first thing you’d do? Grab a bucket and start scooping — or turn off the tap?

When it comes to problem-solving, many of us take a rushed, reactionary approach rather than fixing the issue at the source. So in other words, we see the water, panic, and start scooping. If this sounds like something you’ve done recently, then don’t feel too bad: when the pressure’s high, we often jump towards the quickest fix, as opposed to the most effective one.

This is where the A3 technique comes in. It’s a problem-solving approach designed to efficiently address the root cause of issues.

What is the A3 technique?

The A3 technique is a structured way to solve problems. It’s part of the Lean methodology , developed by Toyota back in the mid-’40s. This doesn’t mean you need to implement a Lean way of working to take advantage of this process — it can work as a standalone exercise.

Granted, A3 isn’t an inspiring name, but the story of its origins is actually pretty interesting. Rumour has it that Taiichi Ohno, inventor of the Toyota Production System, refused to read past the first page of any report. In response, his team created A3 address and summarize problem-solving on one side of A3-sized paper. The A3 technique played a huge part in Toyota’s success and all kinds of industries have since adopted it. Here’s how to get started.

How to solve a problem with A3

The first thing to remember is this: A3 is collaborative and relies on good communication. It’s not something you should do by yourself.

There are three main roles involved:

• Owner (that’s you or someone under your charge)

As you’ve probably guessed, these aren’t roles that already exist in your company; you must create them for the purpose of this process. Here’s what they mean.

The owner is responsible for leading the exercise. They are the lynchpin between the two other roles, fostering good communication and keeping documents up to date. It’s tempting to think of the owner as the head of this trio, but that’s not true: everyone is equal here.

The mentor is someone with solid  problem-solving experience. It’s their job to coach the owner and steer them towards finding a solution. It’s not their job to find the answers themselves.

And finally, there are the  responders . This is someone (or a group of people) who have a vested interest in the outcome of the A3 project. Responders might include the client, stakeholders, or managers. A potential problem here is gaining access to them: if you work somewhere with a strict hierarchy — and you’re somewhere near the bottom of that structure — you may face challenges. There’s no easy way around this. Essentially, you need your organization to support this way of working and make it easy for you to access those at the top if needed.

How to create an A3 report

True to its origins, the A3 report is a one-page document. It typically contains 5-7 sections that systematically lead you towards a solution. These are the most commonly used steps, but feel free to modify them.

• Background:  Explain your project in a few sentences, including its context.
• Problem statement:  Explain the current problem. You can use process mapping to see the different tasks that surround the issue. This isn’t essential, but it will make it easier for you to locate the root cause.
• Goals:  Define your desired outcome, and include metrics for measuring success. You won’t know everything until you reach the end, so you may find you need to come back and refine stages 1-3.
• Root cause analysis:  This is a big stage of the process. You need to work out what you think the root problem is. You can use different methods to help you here, including 5 whys or a fault tree analysis .
• Countermeasures:  Once you’ve worked out your root cause, you can start proposing solutions.
• Implementation:  Work out how you’ll implement these solutions, including an action list with clearly defined roles and responsibilities. Project management software is a useful tool here because it can help everyone on the team track each other’s progress in real-time.
• Follow-up:  Using your metrics for success, decide whether the problem was solved. Report your results back to the team/organization. In the spirit of Lean (continuous improvement), you should go back and modify your plan if the results weren’t as expected. And if they were, you should make this process the new standard.

Final thoughts

A3 is an efficient, methodical way to solve problems at their source. When issues rear their head, rising stress can lead people to panic. Having a clearly designed system in place to guide you towards a solution minimizes the chances of people settling for a ‘quick fix’ or failing to act altogether.

Beyond being a guiding light in times of pressure, A3 is a great team-building exercise because it encourages individuals to work together towards a common goal — across all areas of the organization. Combine this with collaborative tools designed to help teams track progress and work together more effectively, and you’ll be unstoppable.

Solve problems like a pro with Root Cause Corrective Action

Lean to Six Sigma: process improvement methodologies explained

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Learn with Nulab to bring your best ideas to life

Effectively solve problems with the A3 problem-solving template

Reading time: about 5 min

• Organization and evaluation
• Strategic planning

To successfully create a culture of continuous improvement, people must:

• Identify problems and potential issues that could impact productivity and quality. 
• Determine the cause of problems so they develop and implement viable solutions.
• Document the solution and share knowledge to ensure the problem doesn’t reoccur.

In this article, we’ll discuss how an A3 template can help you accomplish all three of these goals.

What is the A3 problem-solving method?

Like most concepts and techniques associated with Lean management and Lean manufacturing, A3 problem-solving was developed in Japan as part of TPS. 

This problem-solving approach takes its name from the A3 paper size, which is part of the ISO 216 international standard for paper sizes. The closest paper size to A3 in the United States is 11x17, also called ledger or tabloid size.

The A3 method uses a structured, systematic approach to solving problems. The idea is to clearly and concisely document the problem, root cause, solution, implementation plan, and results on a single sheet of paper called an A3 report. The A3 report is shareable and gives everybody an easy-to-understand visual representation of the process for solving a specific problem.

Toyota believed that if a problem was too big to be explained and solved on one side of A3 paper, it should be broken down into smaller pieces. These pieces could then be explained, analyzed, and solved in their own A3 process.

When to use the A3 problem-solving process

We often hear about a problem and try to fix it without considering its cause. We might assume we know what’s going on based on experience. But if we don’t accurately determine what is happening, we could miss important information to prevent its reoccurrence.

The A3 problem-solving process helps you better understand problems and create better solutions.

Consider using A3 to solve problems when:

• You need a framework for identifying, analyzing, understanding, and solving problems.
• You want to collaborate with team members, other managers, and key stakeholders to get feedback from multiple perspectives. Collaborating with others eliminates personal biases and provides a better understanding of problems and their root cause so you can make more informed decisions.
• You want to align your team with an easy-to-read document that breaks down important information.
• You are cultivating a culture of continuous improvement. The systematic A3 problem-solving approach helps the organization learn from past mistakes and perform more consistently.
• You want to standardize your process for working through problems in organizations of any size in any industry.

The basic steps of A3 problem-solving

The A3 problem-solving process typically uses the following basic steps:

Step 1: Define the problem

Provide context for the problem you need to solve. Clearly define the problem, its impact on the department or organization, and why it needs to be solved. To better understand the situation, consider observing the work. That way, you visualize the problem and get valuable input from team members about what might be causing it.

Step 2: Analyze the current situation

Gather data by sending surveys, interviewing team members, mapping the process, etc. The data will give you valuable information about the current state of a process or project. This can help you identify contributing factors to the problem and get closer to identifying potential root causes.

Step 3: Set targets and goals

Clearly state what you hope to achieve through this process. Setting specific and measurable targets helps you monitor progress as you find the right solutions.

Step 4: Root cause analysis

If you don’t identify the root cause of a problem, your solutions will only address the symptoms. Treating a symptom is generally temporary, and the problem will eventually return.

Use this 5 whys template to dig deeper, identify the root cause of a problem, and reach a solution faster.

Step 5: Propose potential solutions and countermeasures

Once you understand what the root causes of your problems are, use the collected data to propose solutions or countermeasures. By offering different solutions, you and your team can easily evaluate options to reach a consensus.

Step 6: Develop an implementation plan

After you have determined which solution to use, create an implementation plan . This should include clear steps, task ownership and responsibilities, timelines and target dates, and expected outcomes.

Step 7: Monitor and follow-up

Monitor how well the implementation of your solution is working. Determine if improvements need to be made and implement adjustments as necessary.

How Lucidspark can help with the A3 problem-solving process

Lucidspark brings together hybrid teams to collaborate in real time on a single document. Try our free A3 template to get started.

Each section of the A3 template includes resources to help you complete the document. For example, the “root causes” section includes an Ishikawa diagram (or fishbone diagram) that guides you inidentifying potential root causes.

A lot of the work in the A3 template has been done for you. All you need to do is edit and modify each section to match your use case.

The A3 problem-solving method encourages organizations to use a standardized, systematic, and collaborative problem-solving approach. 

As with most TPS and Lean management documents, the A3 report is not static. It is a living document that encourages teams to practice continuous improvement by frequently reviewing processes and refining methods. And its concise and easy-to-read format makes processes and progress more transparent, which helps keep the entire organization focused and aligned with the company vision.

Explore hundreds of free templates to simplify workflow and boost problem-solving skills.

About Lucidspark

Lucidspark, a cloud-based virtual whiteboard, is a core component of Lucid Software's Visual Collaboration Suite. This cutting-edge digital canvas brings teams together to brainstorm, collaborate, and consolidate collective thinking into actionable next steps—all in real time. Lucid is proud to serve top businesses around the world, including customers such as Google, GE, and NBC Universal, and 99% of the Fortune 500. Lucid partners with industry leaders, including Google, Atlassian, and Microsoft. Since its founding, Lucid has received numerous awards for its products, business, and workplace culture. For more information, visit lucidspark.com.

Related articles

Supercharge your team’s problem-solving skills by implementing visuals to find the most effective solutions faster.

Learn the components of the problem-solving process and techniques for problem-solving with your team (plus access free templates).  

Bring your bright ideas to life.

or continue with

• Data, AI, & Machine Learning
• Managing Technology
• Social Responsibility
• Workplace, Teams, & Culture
• AI & Machine Learning
• Diversity & Inclusion
• Big ideas Research Projects
• Artificial Intelligence and Business Strategy
• Responsible AI
• Future of the Workforce
• Future of Leadership
• All Research Projects
• AI in Action
• Most Popular
• The Truth Behind the Nursing Crisis
• Work/23: The Big Shift
• Coaching for the Future-Forward Leader
• Measuring Culture

The spring 2024 issue’s special report looks at how to take advantage of market opportunities in the digital space, and provides advice on building culture and friendships at work; maximizing the benefits of LLMs, corporate venture capital initiatives, and innovation contests; and scaling automation and digital health platform.

• Past Issues
• Upcoming Events
• Video Archive
• Me, Myself, and AI
• Three Big Points

Toyota’s Secret: The A3 Report

How Toyota solves problems, creates plans, and gets new things done while developing an organization of thinking problem-solvers.

• Workplace, Teams, & Culture
• Innovation Strategy
• Quality & Service
• Organizational Behavior

While much has been written about Toyota Motor Corp.’s production system, little has captured the way the company manages people to achieve operational learning. At Toyota, there exists a way to solve problems that generates knowledge and helps people doing the work learn how to learn. Company managers use a tool called the A3 (named after the international paper size on which it fits) as a key tactic in sharing a deeper method of thinking that lies at the heart of Toyota’s sustained success.

A3s are deceptively simple. An A3 is composed of a sequence of boxes (seven in the example) arrayed in a template. Inside the boxes the A3’s “author” attempts, in the following order, to: (1) establish the business context and importance of a specific problem or issue; (2) describe the current conditions of the problem; (3) identify the desired outcome; (4) analyze the situation to establish causality; (5) propose countermeasures; (6) prescribe an action plan for getting it done; and (7) map out the follow-up process.

The leading question

Toyota has designed a two-page mechanism for attacking problems. What can we learn from it?

• The A3’s constraints (just 2 pages) and its structure (specific categories, ordered in steps, adding up to a “story”) are the keys to the A3’s power.
• Though the A3 process can be used effectively both to solve problems and to plan initiatives, its greatest payoff may be how it fosters learning. It presents ideal opportunities for mentoring.
• It becomes a basis for collaboration.

However, A3 reports — and more importantly the underlying thinking — play more than a purely practical role; they also embody a more critical core strength of a lean company. A3s serve as mechanisms for managers to mentor others in root-cause analysis and scientific thinking, while also aligning the interests of individuals and departments throughout the organization by encouraging productive dialogue and helping people learn from one another. A3 management is a system based on building structured opportunities for people to learn in the manner that comes most naturally to them: through experience, by learning from mistakes and through plan-based trial and error.

Get Updates on Transformative Leadership

Evidence-based resources that can help you lead your team more effectively, delivered to your inbox monthly.

Please enter a valid email address

Thank you for signing up

Privacy Policy

The A3s reproduced in this article represent just some of the stages in a typical development sequence — a process that may involve numerous iterations of the A3 before it is final. To illustrate how the A3 process works, we’ve imagined a young manager — call him Porter — who’s trying to solve a problem. The problem is that his Japan-based company is building a manufacturing plant in the United States, requiring many technical documents to be translated into English, and the translation project has been going badly. Porter uses the A3 process to attack the problem, which means that he gets coached through it by his boss and mentor — call him Sanderson. The A3s shown on these pages will give an idea of how one learning cycle might go, as Porter works on the problem under Sanderson’s tutelage. Porter’s first attempt at the A3 reveals, as early-stage A3s often do, his eagerness to get to a solution as quickly as possible.

(Editor’s note: The example is drawn from Managing to Learn , by John Shook, The Lean Enterprise Institute, 2008.)

Seeing this first version, Sanderson uses the A3 process as a mechanism to mentor Porter in root-cause analysis and scientific thinking. Through coaching Porter and others in this manner, Sanderson seeks to embed organizational habits and mind-sets that enable, encourage and teach people to think and take initiative.

The iterative process of producing progressive A3s generates practical problem-solving skills for the learner, while providing the manager with a practical mechanism to mentor others while achieving desired business results.

The last pages of this article show the final A3 in this iterative sequence. Author Porter uses the A3 process not only to figure out the best solutions to his problem, but to manufacture the authority he needs to proceed with his plan. Sanderson uses it to mentor his protégé, while getting the required results for the company (in this instance, the solution to a problem). Organizations use A3s to get decisions made, distribute authority to the level needed for good decisions, align people and teams on common goals and learn for constant improvement. The ultimate goal of A3s is not just to solve the problem at hand, but to make the process of problem solving transparent and teachable in a manner that creates an organization full of thinking, learning problem solvers. In this way, the A3 management process powerfully embodies the essence of operational learning.

About the Author

John Shook is an industrial anthropologist and senior advisor to the Lean Enterprise Institute, where he works with companies and individuals to help them understand and implement lean production. He is author of Managing to Learn: Using the A3 Management Process to Solve Problems, Gain Agreement, Mentor, and Lead (Lean Enterprise Institute), and coauthor of Learning to See (Lean Enterprise Institute). He worked with Toyota for 10 years, helping it transfer its production, engineering and management systems from Japan to its overseas affiliates and suppliers.

More Like This

Add a comment cancel reply.

You must sign in to post a comment. First time here? Sign up for a free account : Comment on articles and get access to many more articles.

Comments (22)

Sheila colinlak, patrick doyle, acta de constitución de proyecto ágil, un elemento diferenciador. | agilia, dave whaley, william harrod, howard s weinberg, systemental, khucxuanthinh.

The Lean Post / Articles / When should we do an A3 or use a different problem-solving tool?

Problem Solving

When should we do an A3 or use a different problem-solving tool?

By Michael Ballé

November 12, 2017

Dear Gemba Coach: I would really appreciate your perspective on the following: (1) When should we do an A3 for something vs. when would it be appropriate to just use an idea board? (2) What is the difference between a problem and an idea?

Dear Gemba Coach,

I would really appreciate your perspective on the following: (1) When should we do an A3 for something vs. when would it be appropriate to just use an idea board? (2) What is the difference between a problem and an idea?

I remember a while back endless debates about whether Toyota was abandoning pull because rather than using parts bins along the lines for operators to pick items, some plants were moving to kitting – preparing kits of parts for assembly. Then some lines weren’t. Then some were doing half-and-half.

Then Toyota’s French plant started running three shifts instead of the usual two (with maintenance done during the night shift), so Toyota was abandoning its TPM model. Then the plant went to 2 shifts. Then back to three shifts. Other Toyota plants still run on two, to my knowledge.

Yesterday a journalist asked me whether Toyota was abandoning kaizen because its head of a research institute in California said that kaizen wouldn’t cut it for disruptive innovation. Last time I visited Toyota plants, quality and flexibility targets were still as demanding as ever, and many of the tricks that helped operators achieve them could never have been thought up by engineers – only through kaizen.

Truth is in the eye of the beholder. These “is this lean or is this not” debates all hinge around our own fixation with solutions. We’re endlessly looking for good ideas that we can pinch and apply. We would call it a “best practice,” and try to apply it.

Lean thinking looks at this upside down. 

Lean thinking is about deeply understanding the problem and then explaining the local solution in its context.

For instance, if we go back to the lineside bins versus kitting problem, the question is one of variety’s impact on physical and mental ergonomic burdens for the team member. When variety increases because the line is more flexible and more products follow each other on the line, the operator now must both (1) pick the right parts for the right product and (2) handle some complex arrangement of parts. This creates the double burden of making the right picking decisions and then walking to and from the parts point of delivery.

If the problem is easing the team member’s mental burden by taking away parts choices, kitting is a good idea. The same with heavy or unwieldy part. On the other hand, if the problem is greater fluidity and flexibility of the parts flow to assembly, having shelves of small containers is the right idea. And then it all must fit within the station and a short walking distance so team members aren’t walking around without need.

Which all depends on the car’s design and process set-up. There is no one solution. These are ideas in a given context.

When an A3 Is Justified

Ideas, in lean, are usually the result of someone or a team solving a complex trade-off in a given context. This is also why having an idea that is not picked up by your team or your management doesn’t make you wrong, or doesn’t mean it was a bad idea. The team or management chose to solve the trade-off differently, but the idea remains valid – and might be taken up next time a similar problem arises.

Lean’s upside-down thinking is about understanding problems in-depth and then trying ideas as they come to see whether they work or not, and then looking for the next idea. The flow of ideas (the ultimate source of productivity for the company) depends on how deeply we understand the problem and how committed we are to solve it, every day – because really tricky problems rarely simply go away.

Having had an idea, and having shaped it into a workable solution, you now have a second problem: you’re not alone in the organization and colleagues from other functions need to understand what you have in mind.

If the idea only concerns the team, it still needs to be explained to every other team member, as well as members from other shifts, but it can well stay on a local idea or kaizen board. If the idea has implications beyond the team, it can be presented as a QC story. Here’s a great example from Art Smalley and Durward Sobek .

Once a problem has been solved, the issue is to make sure that (1) everyone concerned understands the thinking that led to the solution so that (2) everyone understands the parameters of the solution – its scope, where it will work, and where it won’t.

If we return to the kitting issue, I remember when line activities at a Toyota forklift plant led it to start kitting. This immediately created a problem of flow for flexibility in logistics. Logistics then came up with a delivery train solution that moved smaller trolleys with kits within an awkward looking contraption that could handle both kitting and flow requirements. This local solution could only come together as a joint effort between line management and logistics.

Which brings us to A3s.

One obvious answer is there are easy problems (just look harder, ask why, and solve it).

Then there are harder problems, which require more structured thinking and might warrant an A3.

But we often completely miss yet another dimension of management. In today’s age, management is mostly about maintaining the processes and rituals of the company. But in earlier times of management theory, when “management” was still figuring out itself, people understood more clearly that management’s main role was not just having meetings and reporting and controlling, but also coordinating.

At some point, people across functions need to understand what each other does to figure out whether they help or hinder new solutions being applied: are they part of the solution, or part of the problem.

Lean companies attack this issue with formal interface presentations. Amazon uses APIs at a management level (present the parameters of your solution to the other functions so they can interface with it). Toyota uses A3s.

For instance, here’s an A3 I saw at Toyota.

Yes, without doubt, the A3 structure is useful to help the person conducting the problem-solving structure their thoughts.

But most importantly, the A3 helps explain (1) how this person understands the problem, (2) what other solutions were envisaged, (3) why this specific solution was picked, and (4) where it might be interesting to look at somewhere else (or what else needs to be solved to make the solution stick.

A3s are essential for management to communicate across functions and build more robust teamwork so that the company performs better together.

Here is another picture from Toyota Boshoku in Brazil where A3s are displayed in an obeya so that all functions can figure out what each is doing.

Don’t Just Solve Problems

Lean thinking very clearly hinges on three core intents: (1) improving customer satisfaction by (2) continuously improving how we work from (3) all people all the time developing their understanding of their jobs (and each other’s jobs). In this light, one person’s problem-solving skills are only one part of the problem. The second part is teaching this person to navigate the organization and deal with his or her colleagues, or stakeholders outside of the organization to make countermeasures work.

Mastery over one’s job is not simply getting better at solving problems .  It’s also getting better at having one’s solutions adopted by the organization, which means becoming more convincing and being more flexible in terms of finding countermeasures that also work for others. In this, the A3 is an invaluable tool because it allows one to present one’s deep thinking in a way that should be understood at one glance (okay, read in one minute) and where others can see how this countermeasure (or proposal in some cases) fits within their own issues and improvements.

In short, yes, A3s are reserved for harder problems (as opposed to go back, look harder, ask why), but they are also mainly used for problems that need to be shared across the board . Management’s real value added is not just to run things and solve problems, but to interface across functions by better defining these interface points. A3s are the core interface tool.

Written by:

About Michael Ballé

Michael Ballé is co-author of The Gold Mine, a best-selling business novel of lean turnaround, and recently The Lean Manager, a novel of lean transformation, both published by the Lean Enterprise Institute. For the past 25 years, he has studied lean transformation and helped companies develop a lean culture. He is…

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Revolutionizing Logistics: DHL eCommerce’s Journey Applying Lean Thinking to Automation  

Podcast by Matthew Savas

Transforming Corporate Culture: Bestbath’s Approach to Scaling Problem-Solving Capability

Building a Problem-Solving Culture: Insights from Barton Malow’s Lean University

Related books

The Power of Process – A Story of Innovative Lean Process Development

by Eric Ethington and Matt Zayko

Welcome Problems, Find Success – Creating Toyota Cultures Around the World

by Nate Furuta

Related events

March 19, 2024 | Optional Post-Summit Workshops March 21-22 Carlsbad, California

Lean Summit 2024

April 08, 2024 | Coach-Led Online Course

Managing to Learn

Explore topics.

Subscribe to get the very best of lean thinking delivered right to your inbox

Privacy overview.