typescript return assignment

Home » Introduction and Basics » Type assignment in typescript

Type assignment in typescript

Type assignment in typescript.

TypeScript is a statically typed superset of JavaScript that adds optional type annotations to the language. This allows developers to catch errors and bugs at compile-time rather than runtime. One of the key features of TypeScript is its ability to assign types to variables, functions, and objects. In this article, we will explore the different ways to assign types in TypeScript and provide examples to illustrate their usage.

Basic Type Assignment

The most straightforward way to assign a type in TypeScript is by using the colon (:) syntax. This syntax is used to declare the type of a variable, function parameter, or function return value. Let’s take a look at some examples:

In the above examples, we have assigned the type “string” to the variable “name”, the type “string” to the function parameter “person”, and the type “number” to the function parameters “a” and “b” as well as the return value of the function “add”. This ensures that the assigned values or function arguments are of the specified type, and any type mismatches will result in a compile-time error.

Implicit Type Assignment

In addition to explicit type assignment, TypeScript also supports implicit type assignment. This means that TypeScript can infer the type of a variable based on its initial value. Let’s see an example:

In the above example, we have declared a variable “age” without explicitly assigning a type. TypeScript infers the type of “age” as “number” based on its initial value of 25. This allows us to write more concise code without sacrificing type safety.

Union Types

Another powerful feature of TypeScript is the ability to assign multiple types to a variable using union types. Union types are denoted by the pipe (|) symbol. Let’s consider an example:

In the above example, we have declared a variable “result” with a union type of “string” and “number”. This means that “result” can hold values of either type. We can assign a string value or a number value to “result” without any compile-time errors. This flexibility allows us to handle different types of data in a single variable.

Type Assertion

Sometimes, TypeScript may not be able to infer the correct type or we may want to override the inferred type. In such cases, we can use type assertion to explicitly specify the type of a value. Type assertion is done using the angle bracket (<>) syntax or the “as” keyword. Let’s see an example:

In the above example, we have a variable “message” with the type “any”. We want to access the “length” property of “message”, which is only available for strings. By using type assertion, we explicitly tell TypeScript that “message” is of type “string” and then access its “length” property. This allows us to perform type-specific operations on values with a broader type.

Type assignment is a fundamental aspect of TypeScript that enables developers to write safer and more maintainable code. By assigning types to variables, function parameters, and return values, we can catch errors at compile-time and improve the overall quality of our code. Additionally, TypeScript provides features like implicit type assignment, union types, and type assertion to enhance flexibility and expressiveness. Understanding and utilizing these type assignment techniques will greatly benefit TypeScript developers in their day-to-day programming tasks.

  • No Comments
  • assignment , typescript

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Table of Contents

Not stay with the doubts.

Typescript SOS

  • Privacy Overview
  • Strictly Necessary Cookies

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

Advisory boards aren’t only for executives. Join the LogRocket Content Advisory Board today →

LogRocket blog logo

  • Product Management
  • Solve User-Reported Issues
  • Find Issues Faster
  • Optimize Conversion and Adoption
  • Start Monitoring for Free

Assertion functions in TypeScript

typescript return assignment

Assertion functions in TypeScript are a very expressive type of function whose signature states that a given condition is verified if the function itself returns.

TypeScript Logo Purple Blue Background

In its basic form, a typical assert function just checks a given predicate and throws an error if such a predicate is false. For example, Node.js’s assert throws an AssertionError if the predicate is false.

TypeScript, since its version 3.7, has gone a little beyond that by implementing the support of assertions at the type system level.

In this article, we’re going to explore assertion functions in TypeScript and see how they can be used to express invariants on our variables.

Table of Contents

Javascript-like assertions, function declarations and expressions, assertion functions and type guards, assertion functions without a type predicate.

Node.js comes with a predefined assert function. As we mentioned in the introduction, it throws an AssertionError if a given predicate is false:

In JavaScript, this was useful to guard against improper types in a function:

Unfortunately, the code flow analysis does not take into account those assertions. In fact, they are simply evaluated at runtime and then forgotten.

With its assertion functions, TypeScript’s code flow analysis will be able to use the type of a function (in brief, its signature) to infer some properties of our code. We can use this new feature to make guarantees of our types throughout our code.

TypeScript-like assertion

An assertion function specifies, in its signature, the type predicate to evaluate. For instance, the following function ensures a given value be a string :

If we invoke the function above with a given parameter, and it returns correctly, TypeScript knows that value has type string . Hence, it will narrow down its type to string :

Of course, nothing prevents us from messing up the assertion. For example, we could have written a (wrong) function as follows:

Note that we’re now checking whether value's type is not number , instead of string . In this case, TypeScript’s code flow analysis will see a Value of type never , instead of string as above.

Assertion functions can be very useful with enums :

In the example above, we first defined a type whose value can only be either "r" , "w" , or "rw" . Let’s assume such a type simply defines the three types of access to a given resource. We then declare an assertion function throwing if its actual parameter does not allow a read operation.

As you can see, we’re narrowing down the type explicitly, stating that, if the function returns, the value must be either "r" or "rw" . If we call allowsReadAccess with writeOnly as the actual parameter, we’ll get an error as expected, stating that "Read access is not allowed" .

Another common use of assertion functions is expressing non-nullability. The following snippet of code shows a way to make sure a value is defined, that is it’s not either null or undefined :

Where NonNullable<T> is a TypeScript type that excludes null and undefined from the legit values of the type T.

typescript return assignment

Over 200k developers use LogRocket to create better digital experiences

typescript return assignment

At the time of writing, assertion functions may not be defined as plain function expressions. Generally speaking, function expressions can be seen as anonymous functions; that is, functions without a name:

The main advantage of function declarations is hoisting, which is the possibility of using the function anywhere in the file where it’s defined. On the other hand, function expressions can only be used after they are created.

There is actually a workaround to write assertion functions as function expressions. Instead of defining the function along with its implementation, we’ll have to define its signature as an isolated type:

Assertion functions in TypeScript are somewhat similar to type guards. Type guards were originally introduced to perform runtime checks to guarantee the type of a value in a given scope.

In particular, a type guard is a function that simply evaluates a type predicate, returning either true or false . This is slightly different from assertion functions, which, as we saw above, are supposed to throw an error instead of returning false if the predicate is not verified.

There is another big difference though. Assertion functions can also be used without a type predicate, as we’ll see in the following section.

The assertion functions we’ve seen so far were all checking whether a given value had a given type. Hence, they were all fairly tailored for the target type. Nonetheless, assertion functions give us much more power. In particular, we can write a completely general function asserting a condition that gets input as a parameter:

The assert function now inputs a condition , whose type is unknown , and, possibly, a message . Its body simply evaluates such a condition. If it is false , then assert throws an error, as expected.

Note, however, that the signature makes use of the condition parameter after asserts . This way, we’re telling TypeScript code flow analysis that, if the function returns correctly, it can assume that whatever predicate we passed in was, in fact, verified.

TypeScript’s Playground gives us a pretty good visual representation of what the code flow analysis does. Let’s consider the following snippet of code, where we generate a random number and then call assert to make sure the generated number is 10 :

If we inspect the inferred properties of randomValue before the call to assert , TypeScript just tells us the type (Figure 1).

RandomNumber

Then, as soon as we call assert , with the condition randomNumber == 10 , TypeScript knows that the value will be 10 for the rest of the execution (Figure 2).

RandomNumber set to 10

Lastly, if we attempt to check the equality of randomNumber and another number, TypeScript will be able to evaluate the property without even running the program. For example, the code flow analysis will complain about the following assignment, saying, “This condition will always return ‘false’ since the types ’10’ and ’20’ have no overlap.”:

In this article, we dove into what TypeScript assertion functions are and how we can use them to have the code flow analysis infer a set of properties about our values. They are a very nice feature that makes sense considering that TypeScript is transpiled to JavaScript, which gives programmers a lot more flexibility.

In particular, we took a look at a handful of usages, including narrowing types down and expressing conditions on the actual value of our variables. Lastly, we briefly mentioned the differences and similarities with type guards and grasped the syntactic limitations of assertions functions.

LogRocket : Full visibility into your web and mobile apps

LogRocket Dashboard Free Trial Banner

LogRocket is a frontend application monitoring solution that lets you replay problems as if they happened in your own browser. Instead of guessing why errors happen or asking users for screenshots and log dumps, LogRocket lets you replay the session to quickly understand what went wrong. It works perfectly with any app, regardless of framework, and has plugins to log additional context from Redux, Vuex, and @ngrx/store.

In addition to logging Redux actions and state, LogRocket records console logs, JavaScript errors, stacktraces, network requests/responses with headers + bodies, browser metadata, and custom logs. It also instruments the DOM to record the HTML and CSS on the page, recreating pixel-perfect videos of even the most complex single-page and mobile apps.

Try it for free .

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • #typescript

typescript return assignment

Stop guessing about your digital experience with LogRocket

Recent posts:.

Understanding Security In React Native Applications

Understanding security in React Native applications

Explore the various security threats facing React Native mobile applications and how to mitigate them.

typescript return assignment

warp adoption guide: Overview, examples, and alternatives

The warp web framework for Rust offers many enticing features. Let’s see when and why you should consider using warp in your projects.

typescript return assignment

Integrating Next.js and SignalR to build real-time web apps

In this tutorial, you’ll learn how to integrate Next.js and SignalR to build an enhanced real-time web application.

typescript return assignment

Exploring Tailwind Oxide

Tailwind Oxide was introduced to address common issues that exist with Tailwind CSS, such as the complex setup process.

typescript return assignment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Marius Schulz

Nullish Coalescing: The ?? Operator in TypeScript

TypeScript 3.7 added support for the ?? operator, which is known as the nullish coalescing operator . We can use this operator to provide a fallback value for a value that might be null or undefined .

# Truthy and Falsy Values in JavaScript

Before we dive into the ?? operator, let's recall that JavaScript values can either be truthy or falsy : when coerced to a Boolean, a value can either produce the value true or false . In JavaScript, the following values are considered to be falsy:

All other JavaScript values will produce the value true when coerced to a Boolean and are thus considered truthy.

# Providing Fallback Values with the ?? Operator

The ?? operator can be used to provide a fallback value in case another value is null or undefined . It takes two operands and is written like this:

If the left operand is null or undefined , the ?? expression evaluates to the right operand:

Otherwise, the ?? expression evaluates to the left operand:

Notice that all left operands above are falsy values. If we had used the || operator instead of the ?? operator, all of these expressions would've evaluated to their respective right operands:

This behavior is why you shouldn't use the || operator to provide a fallback value for a nullable value. For falsy values, the result might not be the one you wanted or expected. Consider this example:

The expression options.prettyPrint ?? true lets us provide the default value true in case that the prettyPrint property contains the value null or undefined . If prettyPrint contains the value false , the expression false ?? true still evaluates to false , which is exactly the behavior we want here.

Note that using the || operator here would lead to incorrect results. options.prettyPrint || true would evaluate to true for the values null and undefined , but also for the value false . This would clearly not be intended. I've seen this happen in practice a handful of times, so make sure to keep this case in mind and use towards the ?? operator instead.

# Compiled Output: ES2020 and Newer

The nullish coalescing operator has reached Stage 4 ("Finished") of the TC39 process and is now officially part of ES2020 . Therefore, the TypeScript compiler will emit the ?? operator as is without any downleveling when you're targeting "ES2020" (or a newer language version) or "ESNext" in your tsconfig.json file:

So, this simple expression will be emitted unchanged:

If you're planning on using the ?? operator while targeting "ES2020" or a newer language version, head over to caniuse.com and node.green and make sure that all the JavaScript engines you need to support have implemented the operator.

# Compiled JavaScript Output: ES2019 and Older

If you're targeting "ES2019" or an older language version in your tsconfig.json file, the TypeScript compiler will rewrite the nullish coalescing operator into a conditional expression. That way, we can start using the ?? operator in our code today and still have the compiled code successfully parse and execute in older JavaScript engines.

Let's look at the same simple ?? expression again:

Assuming we're targeting "ES2019" or a lower language version, the TypeScript compiler will emit the following JavaScript code:

The value variable is compared against both null and undefined (the result of the expression void 0 ). If both comparisons produce the value false , the entire expression evaluates to value ; otherwise, it evaluates to fallbackValue .

Now, let's look at a slightly more complex example. Instead of a simple value variable, we're going to use a getValue() call expression as the left operand of the ?? operator:

In this case, the compiler will emit the following JavaScript code (modulo whitespace differences):

You can see that the compiler generated an intermediate variable _a to store the return value of the getValue() call. The _a variable is then compared against null and void 0 and (potentially) used as the resulting value of the entire expression. This intermediate variable is necessary so that the getValue function is only called once.

# Compiled Output: Checking for null and undefined

You might be wondering why the compiler emits the following expression to check the value variable against null and undefined :

Couldn't the compiler emit the following shorter check instead?

Unfortunately, it can't do that without sacrificing correctness. For almost all values in JavaScript, the comparison value == null is equivalent to value === null || value === undefined . For those values, the negation value != null is equivalent to value !== null && value !== undefined . However, there is one value for which these two checks aren't equivalent, and that value is document.all :

The value document.all is not considered to be strictly equal to either null or undefined , but it is considered to be loosely equal to both null and undefined . Because of this anomaly, the TypeScript compiler can't emit value != null as a check because it would produce incorrect results for document.all .

You can read more about this curious behavior in an answer to the Why is document.all falsy? question on Stack Overflow. Oh, the things we do for web compatibility.

This article and 44 others are part of the TypeScript Evolution series. Have a look!

Was this page helpful?

Type Compatibility

Type compatibility in TypeScript is based on structural subtyping. Structural typing is a way of relating types based solely on their members. This is in contrast with nominal typing. Consider the following code:

In nominally-typed languages like C# or Java, the equivalent code would be an error because the Dog class does not explicitly describe itself as being an implementer of the Pet interface.

TypeScript’s structural type system was designed based on how JavaScript code is typically written. Because JavaScript widely uses anonymous objects like function expressions and object literals, it’s much more natural to represent the kinds of relationships found in JavaScript libraries with a structural type system instead of a nominal one.

A Note on Soundness

TypeScript’s type system allows certain operations that can’t be known at compile-time to be safe. When a type system has this property, it is said to not be “sound”. The places where TypeScript allows unsound behavior were carefully considered, and throughout this document we’ll explain where these happen and the motivating scenarios behind them.

Starting out

The basic rule for TypeScript’s structural type system is that x is compatible with y if y has at least the same members as x . For example consider the following code involving an interface named Pet which has a name property:

To check whether dog can be assigned to pet , the compiler checks each property of pet to find a corresponding compatible property in dog . In this case, dog must have a member called name that is a string. It does, so the assignment is allowed.

The same rule for assignment is used when checking function call arguments:

Note that dog has an extra owner property, but this does not create an error. Only members of the target type ( Pet in this case) are considered when checking for compatibility. This comparison process proceeds recursively, exploring the type of each member and sub-member.

Be aware, however, that object literals may only specify known properties . For example, because we have explicitly specified that dog is of type Pet , the following code is invalid:

Comparing two functions

While comparing primitive types and object types is relatively straightforward, the question of what kinds of functions should be considered compatible is a bit more involved. Let’s start with a basic example of two functions that differ only in their parameter lists:

To check if x is assignable to y , we first look at the parameter list. Each parameter in x must have a corresponding parameter in y with a compatible type. Note that the names of the parameters are not considered, only their types. In this case, every parameter of x has a corresponding compatible parameter in y , so the assignment is allowed.

The second assignment is an error, because y has a required second parameter that x does not have, so the assignment is disallowed.

You may be wondering why we allow ‘discarding’ parameters like in the example y = x . The reason for this assignment to be allowed is that ignoring extra function parameters is actually quite common in JavaScript. For example, Array#forEach provides three parameters to the callback function: the array element, its index, and the containing array. Nevertheless, it’s very useful to provide a callback that only uses the first parameter:

Now let’s look at how return types are treated, using two functions that differ only by their return type:

The type system enforces that the source function’s return type be a subtype of the target type’s return type.

Function Parameter Bivariance

When comparing the types of function parameters, assignment succeeds if either the source parameter is assignable to the target parameter, or vice versa. This is unsound because a caller might end up being given a function that takes a more specialized type, but invokes the function with a less specialized type. In practice, this sort of error is rare, and allowing this enables many common JavaScript patterns. A brief example:

You can have TypeScript raise errors when this happens via the compiler flag strictFunctionTypes .

Optional Parameters and Rest Parameters

When comparing functions for compatibility, optional and required parameters are interchangeable. Extra optional parameters of the source type are not an error, and optional parameters of the target type without corresponding parameters in the source type are not an error.

When a function has a rest parameter, it is treated as if it were an infinite series of optional parameters.

This is unsound from a type system perspective, but from a runtime point of view the idea of an optional parameter is generally not well-enforced since passing undefined in that position is equivalent for most functions.

The motivating example is the common pattern of a function that takes a callback and invokes it with some predictable (to the programmer) but unknown (to the type system) number of arguments:

Functions with overloads

When a function has overloads, each overload in the target type must be matched by a compatible signature on the source type. This ensures that the source function can be called in all the same cases as the target function.

Enums are compatible with numbers, and numbers are compatible with enums. Enum values from different enum types are considered incompatible. For example,

Classes work similarly to object literal types and interfaces with one exception: they have both a static and an instance type. When comparing two objects of a class type, only members of the instance are compared. Static members and constructors do not affect compatibility.

Private and protected members in classes

Private and protected members in a class affect their compatibility. When an instance of a class is checked for compatibility, if the target type contains a private member, then the source type must also contain a private member that originated from the same class. Likewise, the same applies for an instance with a protected member. This allows a class to be assignment compatible with its super class, but not with classes from a different inheritance hierarchy which otherwise have the same shape.

Because TypeScript is a structural type system, type parameters only affect the resulting type when consumed as part of the type of a member. For example,

In the above, x and y are compatible because their structures do not use the type argument in a differentiating way. Changing this example by adding a member to Empty<T> shows how this works:

In this way, a generic type that has its type arguments specified acts just like a non-generic type.

For generic types that do not have their type arguments specified, compatibility is checked by specifying any in place of all unspecified type arguments. The resulting types are then checked for compatibility, just as in the non-generic case.

For example,

Advanced Topics

Subtype vs assignment.

So far, we’ve used “compatible”, which is not a term defined in the language spec. In TypeScript, there are two kinds of compatibility: subtype and assignment. These differ only in that assignment extends subtype compatibility with rules to allow assignment to and from any , and to and from enum with corresponding numeric values.

Different places in the language use one of the two compatibility mechanisms, depending on the situation. For practical purposes, type compatibility is dictated by assignment compatibility, even in the cases of the implements and extends clauses.

any , unknown , object , void , undefined , null , and never assignability

The following table summarizes assignability between some abstract types. Rows indicate what each is assignable to, columns indicate what is assignable to them. A ” ✓ ” indicates a combination that is compatible only when strictNullChecks is off.

Reiterating The Basics :

  • Everything is assignable to itself.
  • any and unknown are the same in terms of what is assignable to them, different in that unknown is not assignable to anything except any .
  • unknown and never are like inverses of each other. Everything is assignable to unknown , never is assignable to everything. Nothing is assignable to never , unknown is not assignable to anything (except any ).
  • void is not assignable to or from anything, with the following exceptions: any , unknown , never , undefined , and null (if strictNullChecks is off, see table for details).
  • When strictNullChecks is off, null and undefined are similar to never : assignable to most types, most types are not assignable to them. They are assignable to each other.
  • When strictNullChecks is on, null and undefined behave more like void : not assignable to or from anything, except for any , unknown , never , and void ( undefined is always assignable to void ).

The TypeScript docs are an open source project. Help us improve these pages by sending a Pull Request ❤

Ryan Cavanaugh  (51)

Last updated: Mar 27, 2024  

return-await

Enforce consistent returning of awaited values.

Some problems reported by this rule are automatically fixable by the --fix ESLint command line option .

Some problems reported by this rule are manually fixable by editor suggestions .

This rule requires type information to run.

Returning an awaited promise can make sense for better stack trace information as well as for consistent error handling (returned promises will not be caught in an async function try/catch).

This rule builds on top of the eslint/no-return-await rule. It expands upon the base rule to add support for optionally requiring return await in certain cases.

The extended rule is named return-await instead of no-return-await because the extended rule can enforce the positive or the negative. Additionally, while the core rule is now deprecated, the extended rule is still useful in many contexts.

How to Use ​

Try this rule in the playground ↗

See eslint/no-return-await options .

in-try-catch ​

Requires that a returned promise must be await ed in try-catch-finally blocks, and disallows it elsewhere. Specifically:

  • if you return a promise within a try , then it must be await ed.
  • if you return a promise within a catch , and there is no finally , then it must not be await ed.
  • if you return a promise within a catch , and there is a finally , then it must be await ed.
  • if you return a promise within a finally , then it must not be await ed.

Examples of code with in-try-catch :

  • ❌ Incorrect

Requires that all returned promises are await ed.

Examples of code with always :

Disallows all await ing any returned promises.

Examples of code with never :

When Not To Use It ​

Type checked lint rules are more powerful than traditional lint rules, but also require configuring type checked linting . See Performance Troubleshooting if you experience performance degredations after enabling type checked rules.

Resources ​

  • Rule source
  • Test source
  • in-try-catch
  • When Not To Use It

Set a default value if Null or Undefined in TypeScript

avatar

Last updated: Feb 28, 2024 Reading time · 3 min

banner

# Set a Variable's value if it's Null or Undefined in TypeScript

Use the logical nullish assignment operator to set a variable's value if it's equal to null or undefined .

The logical nullish assignment (??=) operator assigns the provided value to the variable if it's equal to null or undefined .

set variable value if its null or undefined

We used the logical nullish assignment (??=) operator to assign a value to the role variable if it stores a null or undefined value.

If the value of the role variable is not equal to null or undefined , the logical nullish assignment (??=) operator short-circuits and doesn't assign the value to the variable.

An alternative approach is to use the nullish coalescing (??) operator.

# Set a default value if Null or Undefined in TypeScript

Use the nullish coalescing operator (??) to set a default value if null or undefined in TypeScript.

set default value if null or undefined

An easy way to think about the nullish coalescing operator (??) is that it allows us to provide a fallback value if the value to the left is equal to null or undefined .

If the value to the left isn't null or undefined , the operator returns the value as is.

Otherwise, the variable gets assigned a new value.

# Set a default value if Null or Undefined using the ternary operator

An alternative approach is to explicitly check whether the value is equal to null or undefined with the ternary operator.

set default value if null or undefined using ternary operator

The ternary operator is very similar to an if/else statement.

If the expression to the left of the question mark is truthy, the operator returns the value to the left of the colon, otherwise, the value to the right of the colon is returned.

You can imagine that the value before the colon is the if block and the value after the colon is the else block.

Notice that we used the loose (==) equality operator in the example.

The loose (==) equality operator checks for both null and undefined .

An easy way to visualize this is to use the operators to compare null and undefined .

The example shows that when using the loose equality operator (==), null is equal to undefined .

# Set default value to variable if it's Null or undefined using if

You can also set a default value to a variable if it's equal to null or undefined in a simple if statement.

set default value using if

We used the logical OR (||) operator to chain 2 conditions.

If either of the conditions returns a truthy value, the if block runs.

We check if the myVar variable is equal to null or undefined and if it is, we reassign the variable.

# Set a default value if Null or Undefined using logical OR (||)

You can also use the logical OR (||) operator to provide a default value if a variable is null or undefined .

The logical OR (||) operator returns the value to the right if the value to the left is falsy.

This is different from the nullish coalescing operator we used in the first example.

The logical OR (||) operator checks whether a value is falsy, whereas the nullish coalescing operator (??) checks whether a value is null or undefined .

The falsy values in JavaScript (and TypeScript) are undefined , null , 0 , false , "" (empty string), NaN (not a number).

This means that the logical OR (||) operator will return the value to the right if the value to the left is any of the aforementioned 6 falsy values.

On the other hand, the nullish coalescing operator will return the value to the right only if the value to the left is null or undefined .

book cover

Borislav Hadzhiev

Web Developer

buy me a coffee

Copyright © 2024 Borislav Hadzhiev

TypeScript Generic Function Return Type and Argument Assignment

TypeScript: Potential Issue with Generic Function Return Type and Argument Assignment

Abstract: In this article, we discuss an issue encountered while creating a function to update multiple entities of various types using TypeScript. The first version of the function does not produce TypeScript errors but does not behave as expected.

TypeScript: Potential Issue with Generic Function Return Type Argument Assignment

In TypeScript, developers often create functions that can handle multiple entities of various types. When updating these entities, it is essential to manage different versions of the function to avoid TypeScript errors.

Problem: TypeScript Errors with Generic Function Return Type Argument Assignment

Consider a scenario where you are trying to create a function to update multiple entities of different types. You might write two versions of the function:

  • 1st version: Doesn't produce TypeScript errors, but may not cover all use cases
  • 2nd version: Covers more use cases but may result in TypeScript errors

Here's an example of the first version of the function:

The above function works fine for simple use cases. However, it may not cover more complex scenarios where you need to access the index of the entity being updated.

To address this limitation, you might write a second version of the function:

However, this version of the function may result in TypeScript errors if the updateFunction is not properly typed.

Solution: Properly Typing the Return Type Argument

To avoid TypeScript errors when using the second version of the function, you need to properly type the return type argument. Here's an example:

In the above example, the return type argument is now typed as U, which extends T. This ensures that the return type of the function is compatible with the input type.

When working with generic functions in TypeScript, it's essential to properly type the return type argument to avoid errors. By properly typing the return type argument, you can ensure that your function is compatible with a wide range of input types, making it more versatile and reusable.

  • TypeScript Generics Handbook
  • TypeScript Function Return Types
  • TypeScript Function Signature with an Optional Parameter

Tags: :  TypeScript Software Development Bug

Latest news

  • Automating Email Responses with Google Apps Script: Handle Threads Starting to Different Recipients
  • Performing Multi-Modal Early Fusion with Two Models: Image Classification Example
  • Deploying a Flutter App to Azure App Services
  • Customizing Behavior of BrowseDlg in WiX: Use Custom Dialog (Invalid Directories)
  • How to Add PDF Functionality to Backend Node.js 14 with Angular
  • Automatically Sorting Google Sheets Table Based on Multiple Columns: A Solution
  • Unexpected Behavior when Checking Declared Properties in QML using C++ and JavaScript
  • macOS-iOS App Communication: Sending Commands via Core Bluetooth
  • Editing Values in a react-select Component: What's Different?
  • Solving Error: Array to String Conversion in Laravel Vue.js - A Multiselect Issue
  • Common Ways to Handle Duplicated Data in ADX: Options Explored
  • Fixing Appearance Bugs in a Long-Aged Laravel Application
  • SQLAlchemy ORM Error with Variables, Columns, and Values
  • Creating Similar Website Headers to The Ranges Estate: A JavaScript Newbie's Quest
  • Accessing WhatsApp Backups: Compliance and Privacy Considerations
  • Setting up C++: Handling User Input with Else Statement and Error Messages
  • Guards not Working with Middleware in Laravel 11: A Solution for Admin Login
  • Fixing an Image Error in Flutterflow: A Beginner's Guide
  • Scraping Glassdoor Reviews with Selenium: Moving to Large-Scale Scraping
  • Error in fetching data from TMDB API: parse undefined
  • Creating a Browser Extension: Navigating Windows for Data Extraction
  • Pytest and Mocking SQLAlchemy: Fixing OperationalErrors in Users Routes Tests
  • Developing Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) System on macOS 12.6.8 for Secure File Transfer
  • Debugger in Visual Studio Code Not Displaying Rust Enums
  • Fixing Scatterplot PCA in Python: A Troubleshooting Guide
  • Spring Boot Kafka: Custom Backoff for Specific Exceptions Not Working
  • Error Installing AdoptOpenJDK 11 with Homebrew: Cask Definition Invalid
  • Angular Application: Dynamically Generated Forms Reading JSON Responses
  • Managing Django Application's Unique API Key with Third-Party Service
  • Connecting Services Across Two Separate Containers on a Single EC2 Instance
  • Connecting Gemini Web Chat using Selenium Python: A Step-by-Step Guide
  • MAUI App Needs Double Clicks to Open in Taskbar on Windows 11: Single Click Solution
  • App Crashing Soon After Clicking Submit Button in Kotlin, Android Development using SQLite Backend
  • Livewire Issue: Bizarre Styles Injection on Page Design
  • Parallel Hint Delete Statement: Optimizing Large-Scale Database Deletions

IMAGES

  1. Creating a class using typescript with specific fields

    typescript return assignment

  2. What is Function in Typescript with Return Type

    typescript return assignment

  3. TypeScript Function Types: A Beginner's Guide

    typescript return assignment

  4. TypeScript function return type

    typescript return assignment

  5. TypeScript: How to write a function with conditional return type

    typescript return assignment

  6. How the TypeScript ReturnType Type works

    typescript return assignment

VIDEO

  1. typescript and Node Js Assignment Exercise no 4 & 5 I Governor IT Course

  2. Typescript class 4 oprator assignment oprator arithmetic oprator comparison oprator urinary

  3. typescript and Node Js Assignment Exercise no 3 I Governor IT Course

  4. Typescript Q no 8 solved

  5. Typescript exercise assignment 1,2 and 3 Governor Sindh IT course

  6. Q no 10 Typescript Assignment 45

COMMENTS

  1. TypeScript: Documentation

    var declarations. Declaring a variable in JavaScript has always traditionally been done with the var keyword. var a = 10; As you might've figured out, we just declared a variable named a with the value 10. We can also declare a variable inside of a function: function f() {.

  2. Typescript: Return a reference object that can be assigned to?

    It would be so easy in C++ or something to return an explicit reference, but in Typescript, the values are all going to be primitives, which are value types. I'm not seeing a way to return a reference to a primitive in Typescript, but maybe I'm missing something? Typescript = Javascript + type annotations. If you can't do it in Javascript then ...

  3. TypeScript: Handbook

    return x + y; } let myAdd = function ( x: number, y: number): number {. return x + y; }; We can add types to each of the parameters and then to the function itself to add a return type. TypeScript can figure the return type out by looking at the return statements, so we can also optionally leave this off in many cases.

  4. How to dynamically assign properties to an object in TypeScript

    Solution 1: Explicitly type the object at declaration time. This is the easiest solution to reason through. At the time you declare the object, go ahead and type it, and assign all the relevant values: type Org = { name: string } const organization: Org = { name: "Logrocket" } See this in the TypeScript Playground.

  5. Return Multiple values from a Function in TypeScript

    # Return Multiple values from a Function in TypeScript. To return multiple values from a function in TypeScript, group the values in an array and return the array, e.g. return [myValue1, myValue2] as const. ... Note that the order of assignment and the order of the values in the array is the same. If you don't want to use destructuring, you can ...

  6. Declare functions returning Object or Array in TypeScript

    Declare a function with a Readonly return type in TypeScript # Declare a function with an Object return type in TypeScript. To declare a function with an object return type, set the return type of the function to an object right after the function's parameter list. If the return type of the function is not set, TypeScript will infer it.

  7. TypeScript: Documentation

    In TypeScript, there are several places where type inference is used to provide type information when there is no explicit type annotation. For example, in this code. let x = 3; let x: number. The type of the x variable is inferred to be number . This kind of inference takes place when initializing variables and members, setting parameter ...

  8. Type assignment in typescript

    Type assignment is a fundamental aspect of TypeScript that enables developers to write safer and more maintainable code. By assigning types to variables, function parameters, and return values, we can catch errors at compile-time and improve the overall quality of our code.

  9. TypeScript: Documentation

    In our example, we knew that all uses of x would be initialized so it makes more sense to use definite assignment assertions than non-null assertions.. Fixed Length Tuples. In TypeScript 2.6 and earlier, [number, string, string] was considered a subtype of [number, string].This was motivated by TypeScript's structural nature; the first and second elements of a [number, string, string] are ...

  10. Assertion functions in TypeScript

    TypeScript, since its version 3.7, has gone a little beyond that by implementing the support of assertions at the type system level. In this article, we're going to explore assertion functions in TypeScript and see how they can be used to express invariants on our variables. Table of Contents. JavaScript-like assertions; TypeScript-like ...

  11. TypeScript ESLint: Unsafe assignment of an any value [Fix]

    Our function basically checks if the passed-in value is compatible with an object of type Employee.. Notice that in the if block in which we called the isAnEmployee() function, the parsed variable is typed as Employee and we can access the id and name properties without getting TypeScript or ESLint errors.. I've written a detailed guide on how to check if a value is an object.

  12. Nullish Coalescing: The ?? Operator in TypeScript

    fundamnetals ?. ??) operators, assertion functions, truly private class fields, conditional types, template literal types, more. TypeScript 3.7 added support for the ?? operator, which is known as the nullish coalescing operator. We can use this operator to provide a fallback value for a value that might be null or undefined.

  13. no-unsafe-return

    no-unsafe-return. Disallow returning a value with type any from a function. . Extending "plugin:@typescript-eslint/ recommended-type-checked " in an ESLint configuration enables this rule. 💭. This rule requires type information to run. The any type in TypeScript is a dangerous "escape hatch" from the type system.

  14. TypeScript: Documentation

    The type system enforces that the source function's return type be a subtype of the target type's return type. Function Parameter Bivariance When comparing the types of function parameters, assignment succeeds if either the source parameter is assignable to the target parameter, or vice versa.

  15. return-await

    in-try-catch . Requires that a returned promise must be awaited in try-catch-finally blocks, and disallows it elsewhere. Specifically: if you return a promise within a try, then it must be awaited.; if you return a promise within a catch, and there is no finally, then it must not be awaited.; if you return a promise within a catch, and there is a finally, then it must be awaited.

  16. How do you return multiple values from a typescript function

    foo.x = 'bar'; foo.y = 1; return foo; }) as Foo; let { x, y } = foo(); console.log(x); // bar. console.log(y); // 1. Playground Link. I don't recommend actually doing this, though; since it doesn't return a fresh object each time, it can lead to bugs if you retain a reference to the return value and expect its properties to stay the same.

  17. Set a default value if Null or Undefined in TypeScript

    You can also use the logical OR (||) operator to provide a default value if a variable is null or undefined. index.ts. const role: string | null = null; const result = role || 'designer'; console.log(result); The code for this article is available on GitHub. The logical OR (||) operator returns the value to the right if the value to the left is ...

  18. TypeScript: Potential Issue with Generic Function Return Type and

    TypeScript: Potential Issue with Generic Function Return Type Argument Assignment In TypeScript, developers often create functions that can handle multiple entities of various types. When updating these entities, it is essential to manage different versions of the function to avoid TypeScript errors.

  19. How to assign a variable in a switch statement in typescript?

    Here is the tslint doc regarding this rule and here is the complimentary eslint rule regarding this rule, which gives a slightly more complete explanation.The problem isn't with the assigning-- it's that you assign it but then do nothing with it, which is like writing your name on a nametag then throwing it in the garbage-- if you're not going to use it, why write your name?