Network Topologies, Communication Protocols, and Standards

  • First Online: 01 January 2014

Cite this chapter

Book cover

  • Javier Espina 2 ,
  • Thomas Falck 2 ,
  • Athanasia Panousopoulou 3 ,
  • Lars Schmitt 2 ,
  • Oliver Mülhens 2 &
  • Guang-Zhong Yang PhD 4  

4796 Accesses

7 Citations

40 Altmetric

Every network has a topology that determines the way in which different devices of the network are arranged and how they communicate with each other. Here we need to distinguish between physical and logical topologies. The former refers to the physical layout of the network, i.e., the way that devices are physically connected to the network, either through actual cables or direct wireless communication links. By contrast, the logical topology of a network refers to the manner that data flows through the network from one node to the other without worrying about the physical interconnection of the devices for transporting a packet from a source to a destination device. The two lower layers of the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) reference model (ISO/IEC international standard, Information technology – open systems interconnection – basic reference model: the basic model, 2nd edn, 1994) , the physical and data link layer, define the physical topology of a network, while the network layer is responsible for the logical topology.

  • Medium Access Control
  • Wireless Local Area Network
  • Medium Access Control Layer
  • Guarantee Time Slot
  • Logical Topology

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
  • Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

ISO/IEC 7498-1, ISO/IEC international standard, Information technology - open systems interconnection - basic reference model: the basic model, 2nd edition, http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/s020269_ISO_IEC_7498-1_1994(E).zip , 1994.

IEEE 11073-00101, Health Informatics—Point-of-Care Medical Device Communication—Technical Report—Guidelines for the Use of RF Wireless Technologies, Draft, October 2005.

Google Scholar  

Philips Medical Systems. Striving for cableless monitoring. In: Ragil C (eds), Philips Medical Perspective Magazine 2005, 8:24–25.

Falck T, Espina J, Ebert JP, Dietterle D. BASUMA-the sixth sense for chronically ill patients. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, Cambridge, USA, 2006.

The MobiHealth project, http://www.mobihealth.org/

The HealthService24 project, http://www.healthservice24.com/

Lo BPL, Yang GZ. Key technical challenges and current implementations of body sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, 2005, 1–5.

Anliker U, Ward JA, Lukowicz P, Tröster G, Dolveck F, Baer M, et al. AMON: a wearable multiparameter medical monitoring and alert system, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 2004, 8(4): 415–427.

Article   Google Scholar  

Malan D, Fulford-Jones T, Welsh M, Moulton S. Codeblue: an ad hoc sensor network infrastructure for emergency medical care. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, 2004, 55–58.

MyHeart project, http://www.hitech-projects.com/euprojects/myheart/

Jovanov E, Milenkovic A, Otto C, de Groen PC. A wireless body area network of intelligent motion sensors for computer assisted physical rehabilitation. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 2005, 2(1): 6.

Eklund JM, Hansen TR, Sprinkle J, Sastry S. Information technology for assisted living at home: building a wireless infrastructure for assisted living. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2005.

Stanford V. Using pervasive computing to deliver elder care. IEEE Pervasive Computing 2002, 1(1): 10–13.

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

The Wear-a-BAN project, www.wearaban.eu , 2012.

Kumar S. Nilsen W. Pavel M., Srivastava M. Mobile Health: Revolutionizing Healthcare Through Transdisciplinary Research. IEEE Computer Magazine 2013, 46(1): 28–35.

Ganti R. K., Jayachandran P., Abdelzaher T. F., Stankovic J. A. SATIRE: a software architecture for smart AtTIRE. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services, ACM, 2006, 110–123.

Lorincz K., Chen, B.-R., Challen G. W., Chowdhury A. R.; Patel S., Bonato P., Welsh M.. Mercury: a wearable sensor network platform for high-fidelity motion analysis. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, ACM, 2009, 183–196.

Espina J, Falck T, Mühlsteff J, Jin Y, Adán MA, Aubert X. Wearable body sensor network towards continuous cuff-less blood pressure monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Summer School and Symposium on Medical Devices and Biosensors, 2008.

Lorincz K., Malan D.J., Fulford-Jones T.R.F., Nawoj A., Clavel A., Shnayder V., Mainland G., Welsh M., Moulton S., Sensor networks for emergency response: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Pervasive Computing 2004, 3(4): 16–23.

Chen B. -R., Muniswamy-Reddy K. -K., Welsh M. Ad hoc multicast routing on resource-limited sensor nodes. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Multi-hop Ad Hoc Networks: from Theory to Reality, ACM, 2006, 87–94.

Baldus H, Klabunde K, Müsch G. Reliable set-up of medical body-sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks, Berlin, Germany, 2004; Springer LNCS 2920:353–363.

Falck T, Baldus H, Espina J, Klabunde K. Plug’n play simplicity for wireless medical body sensors. Mobile Networks and Applications 12(2–3), 143–153.

Lorincz K, Welsh M. MoteTrack: A robust, decentralized approach to RF-based location tracking. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Location- and Context-Awareness, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany, 2005; Springer LNCS 3479:63–82.

Philips Research. Philips demonstrates new personal healthcare techniques, Press release, http://www.research.philips.com/newscenter/archive/2005/050623-aachen-healthcare.html , June 2005.

The SAPHE project, http://ubimon.doc.ic.ac.uk/saphe/m338.html , 2008.

Wood A., Stankovic J., Virone G., Selavo L., Zhimin H., Qiuhua C., Thao D., Yafeng W., Lei F., Stoleru, R. Context-aware wireless sensor networks for assisted living and residential monitoring. IEEE Network 2008, 22(4): 26–33.

Tia G., Pesto C., Selavo L., Yin C., Jeong G. K.; Jong H. L., Terzis A., Watt A., Jeng J. Bor-rong C., Lorincz K., Welsh M. Wireless Medical Sensor Networks in Emergency Response: Implementation and Pilot Results. In: Proceedings of the 2008 I.E. Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security 2008,187–192.

Atallah L., Lo B., Yang G-Z., Siegemund F. Wirelessly accessible sensor populations (WASP) for elderly care monitoring. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, 2008 (Pervasive Health 2008), 2–7.

Chakravorty R. A programmable service architecture for mobile medical care. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2006. (PerCom2006), pp.5.–536.

Ko J, Lim J. H., Chen Y., Musvaloiu-E R., Terzis A., Masson G. M., Gao T., Destler W., Selavo L., Dutton, R. P. MEDiSN: Medical emergency detection in sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Embedded. Computing Systems 2010, 10(1): 11:1–11:29.

Gnawali O., Fonseca R., Jamieson K., Moss D., Levis P. Collection tree protocol. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, 2009, 1–14.

The AID-N Project, http://www.jhuapl.edu/aid-n/ (Final Report), 2007.

The Independent Regulator and Competition Authority for the UK Communications Industries (Ofcom), www.ofcom.org.uk .

Federal Communication Commission, http://www.fcc.gov/

International Telecommunication Union. 2012. Radio Regulations. http://www.itu.int/pub/R-REG-RR

ERC/REC 70-03, European Radiocommunications Office. ERC recommendation related to the use of short range devices (SRD): http://www.erodocdb.dk/docs/doc98/official/pdf/rec7003e.pdf , May 2013.

IEEE 802.11. 2012. IEEE Standard for Information technology - Telecommunications and information exchange between systems Local and metropolitan area networks - Specific requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications. IEEE, March 2012.

IEEE 802.15™. IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks--Part 15.4: Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs). IEEE Std 802.15.4-2011 (Revision of IEEE Std 802.15.4-2006), 1–314, 2011.

IEEE 802.11a. IEEE Standard for Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems - LAN/MAN Specific Requirements - Part 11: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications: High Speed Physical Layer in the 5 GHz band. IEEE, January 1999.

Takahashi D. Tzero Technologies shuts down; That’s the End of Ultra-Wide Band. 2009 http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/12/tzero-technologies-shuts-down-thats-the-end-of-ultrawideband/ .

ETSI EN 301 839. 2009. Electromagnetic compatibility and Radio spectrum Matters (ERM); Short Range Devices (SRD); Ultra Low Power Active Medical Implants (ULP-AMI) and Peripherals (ULP-AMI-P) operating in the frequency range 402 MHz to 405 MHz. ETSI. http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/301800_301899/30183901/01.03.01_60/en_30183901v010301p.pdf .

Federal Communication Commission (FCC). 1999. 47 CFR 95.601–95.673 Subpart E.: http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=operations&id=medical_implant .

Federal Communication Commission (FCC). 2012. Medical Device Radiocommunications Service (MedRadio). http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/medical-device-radiocommunications-service-medradio .

Federal Communication Commission (FCC). 2012. FCC 12-54. Amendment of the Commission’s Rules to Provide Spectrum for the Operation of Medical Body Area Networks. First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-54A1.pdf

ETSI TR 101 557. 2012. System Reference document (SRdoc); Medical Body Area Network Systems (MBANSs). http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_tr/101500_101599/101557/01.01.01_60/tr_101557v010101p.pdf .

Federal Communication Commission (FCC). 2012. Wireless Medical Telemetry Service (WMTS). http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/wireless-medical-telemetry-service-wmts .

The IEEE 802.11™ Wireless Local Area Networks. The working group for WLAN Standards. http://www.ieee802.org/11/ .

The IEEE 802.15™ Wireless Local Area Networks. The working group for WPAN Standards. http://www.ieee802.org/15/ .

IEEE 802.15™. IEEE standard for information technology – Telecommunications and information exchange between systems – Local and metropolitan area networks – Specific requirements – Part 15.1: wireless medium access control and physical layer specifications for wireless personal area networks. 2002.

IEEE 802.15 ™. IEEE Standard for Information Technology - Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems - Local and Metropolitan Area Networks - Specific Requirements. - Part 15.1: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs). IEEE Std 802.15.1-2005 (Revision of IEEE Std 802.15.1-2002), 1–580, 2005.

Bluetooth SIG™. Bluetooth Core Version 4.0. 2010. https://www.bluetooth.org/Technical/Specifications/adopted.htm .

IEEE 802. 15 ™. IEEE Recommended Practice for Information Technology - Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems - Local and Metropolitan Area Networks - Specific Requirements Part 15.2: Coexistence of Wireless Personal Area Networks With Other Wireless Devices Operating in Unlicensed Frequency Bands. IEEE Std 802.15.2-2003, 1–115, 2003.

IEEE 802.15 ™. IEEE Standard for Information Technology - Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems – Local and Metropolitan Area Networks - Specific Requirements Part 15.3: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for High Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs). IEEE Std 802.15.3-2003, 1–315, 2003.

IEEE 802.15™. IEEE Standard for IEEE Amendment to Part 15.3: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for High Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPAN): Amendment to MAC sublayer. IEEE Std 802.15.3b-2005 (Amendment to IEEE Std 802.15.3-2003, 1–169, 2006.

IEEE 802.15™. IEEE Standard for Information technology - Telecommunications and information exchange between systems - Local and metropolitan area networks - Specific requirements. Part 15.3: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for High Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Amendment 2: Millimeter-wave-based Alternative Physical Layer Extension. IEEE Std 802.15.3c-2009 (Amendment to IEEE Std 802.15.3-2003), 1–187, 2009.

IEEE 802.15™. IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks—Part 15.4: Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs) Amendment 4: Alternative Physical Layer Extension to Support Medical Body Area Network (MBAN) Services Operating in the 2360 MHz – 2400 MHz Band, 2013.

IEEE 802.15™. IEEE Recommended Practice for Information technology-Telecommunications and information exchange between systems-Local and metropolitan area networks-Specific requirements Part 15.5: Mesh Topology Capability in Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs). IEEE Std 802.15.5-2009, 1–166, 2009.

IEEE 802.15™. IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks - Part 15.6: Wireless Body Area Networks. IEEE Std 802.15.6-2012, 1–271, 2012.

Dwola F. Handbook of RF and Wireless Technologies. Newens, 2003. ISBN-13 978-0-7506-7695-3.

Popovski P., Yomo H.; Prasad R. Strategies for adaptive frequency hopping in the unlicensed bands. IEEE Wireless Communications, 13(6): 60–67.

Bluegiga, www.bluegiga.com .

Nordic Semiconductors. Bluetooth Low Energy. http://www.nordicsemi.com .

Texas Instruments, Single-Chip 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4 Compliant and ZigBee™ Ready RF Transceiver, http://www.ti.com/product/cc2420 .

The ZigBee Alliance, http://www.zigbee.org/ .

The ZigBee 2012 Specification. http://www.zigbee.org/Specifications/ZigBee/Overview.aspx .

The ZigBee Healthcare Profile. http://www.zigbee.org/Standards/ZigBeeHealthCare/Overview.aspx .

Arora S., Barak B. Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach. Chap. 19. Cambridge University Press, 2009. ISBN-13 978-0521424264.

Golmie N, Cypher D, Rebala O. Performance analysis of low rate wireless technologies for medical applications. Computer Communications 2005; 28(10):1 255–1275.

Jennic Wireless Microcontrollers. Co-existence of IEEE 802.15.4 at 2.4 GHz. Application Note, 2009.

Pollin S., Tan I., Hodge B., Chun C., Bahai A. Harmful Coexistence Between 802.15.4 and 802.11: A Measurement-based Study. In: Proceedings of the 3 rd International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications (CrownCom 2008) 2008, 1–6.

LaSorte N.J., Rajab S.A., Refai H.H. Experimental assessment of wireless coexistence for 802.15.4 in the presence of 802.11g/n. In: Proceedings of the 2012 I.E. International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC2012) 2012, 473–479.

IEEE 802.15™. Coexistence analysis of IEEE Std 802.15.4 with other IEEE standards and proposed standards. Technical Report, 2010. http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/19/pub/CA/15-10-0808-00-0000-802-15-4-2011-coexistence-analysis.pdf

IEEE 802.15™. TG6 Coexistence Assurance Document. Technical Report, 2011. https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/documents .

Hernandez M., Miura R., Coexistence of IEEE Std 802.15.6TM-2012 UWB-PHY with other UWB systems. In: Proceedings of 2012 I.E. International Conference on Ultra-Wideband (ICUWB2012) 2012, 46–50.

Garcia J.J., Falck T. Quality of Service for IEEE 802.15.4-based Wireless Body Sensor Networks. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, 2009.

HL7 – Health Level 7, http://www.hl7.org/ .

DICOM – Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine, http://medical.nema.org/

Schmitt L, Falck T, Wartena F, Simons D. Novel ISO/IEEE 11073 Standards for Personal Telehealth Systems Interoperability. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Workshop on High Confidence Medical Devices, Software, and Systems and Medical Device Plug-and-Play Interoperability. 2007; pp. 146–148.

ISO/IEEE 11073-20601. 2010. Health informatics—Personal health device communication—Application profile—Optimised Exchange Protocol.

ISO/IEEE 11073-10101. 2004. Health informatics – Point-of-care medical device communication – Part 10101: Nomenclature.

ISO/IEEE 11073-10404. 2008. Health informatics – Personal health device communication—Part 10404: Device specialization— Pulse oximeter.

Continua Health Alliance, http://www.continuaalliance.org/index.html .

Continua Health Alliance. Continua Design Guidelines, version 2012.

NFC Forum, http://nfc-forum.org/ .

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Philips Group Innovation, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Javier Espina, Thomas Falck, Lars Schmitt & Oliver Mülhens

The Hamlyn Centre, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK

Athanasia Panousopoulou

The Hamlyn Centre, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2BY, UK

Guang-Zhong Yang PhD

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Falck .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Director and Co-Founder,The Hamlyn Centre, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

Guang-Zhong Yang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Espina, J., Falck, T., Panousopoulou, A., Schmitt, L., Mülhens, O., Yang, GZ. (2014). Network Topologies, Communication Protocols, and Standards. In: Yang, GZ. (eds) Body Sensor Networks. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6374-9_5

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6374-9_5

Published : 12 March 2014

Publisher Name : Springer, London

Print ISBN : 978-1-4471-6373-2

Online ISBN : 978-1-4471-6374-9

eBook Packages : Computer Science Computer Science (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Publish with us

Policies and ethics

  • Find a journal
  • Track your research

IMAGES

  1. Topology

    case study on network topology pdf

  2. (PDF) IRJET-ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENT NETWORK TOPOLOGIES

    case study on network topology pdf

  3. What Is Network Topology

    case study on network topology pdf

  4. Lesson 3

    case study on network topology pdf

  5. Case study on network topology

    case study on network topology pdf

  6. Network Topology

    case study on network topology pdf

VIDEO

  1. 6-Building the LAB Topology

  2. 7.CS & AI

  3. 9th Physics Pairing scheme 2024, 9th Physics paper pattern in detail

  4. 9.Analysis of various network topologies in Cooja Simulator

  5. Part 41 : Computer Networking

  6. (10) network topology

COMMENTS

  1. Network Topology Scalability

    For scalability, a network topology should ideally have constant node degree. That is, the node degree of each node stays the same regardless of the number of times the network is scaled up. For example, a binary tree topology has low link complexity because of its constant node degree of 3, while a torus has relatively high link complexity ...

  2. 9 Network Topology

    Scribed by A. Santucci. 9 Network Topology. There are all kinds of ways that computers can be connected. Suppose each node a computer. The below is a su cient network x -- x -- x -- x | | x -- x -- x -- x Whats reasonable to assume about connectedness of network? Adding more connections may avoid bottlenecks, and we can make this a complete graph.